• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    The Variability of Air-sea O2 Flux in CMIP6: Implications for Estimating Terrestrial and Oceanic Carbon Sinks※

    2022-07-13 06:20:32ChangyuLIJianpingHUANGLeiDINGYuRENLinliANXiaoyueLIUandJipingHUANG
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2022年8期

    Changyu LI , Jianping HUANG , Lei DING , Yu REN , Linli AN , Xiaoyue LIU , and Jiping HUANG

    1College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

    2Collaborative Innovation Center for Western Ecological Safety, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China

    3Enlightening Bioscience Research Center, Mississauga, L4X 2X7, Canada

    ABSTRACT The measurement of atmospheric O2 concentrations and related oxygen budget have been used to estimate terrestrial and oceanic carbon uptake. However, a discrepancy remains in assessments of O2 exchange between ocean and atmosphere(i.e. air-sea O2 flux), which is one of the major contributors to uncertainties in the O2-based estimations of the carbon uptake. Here, we explore the variability of air-sea O2 flux with the use of outputs from Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6). The simulated air-sea O2 flux exhibits an obvious warming-induced upward trend (~1.49 Tmol yr-2)since the mid-1980s, accompanied by a strong decadal variability dominated by oceanic climate modes. We subsequently revise the O2-based carbon uptakes in response to this changing air-sea O2 flux. Our results show that, for the 1990-2000 period, the averaged net ocean and land sinks are 2.10±0.43 and 1.14±0.52 GtC yr-1 respectively, overall consistent with estimates derived by the Global Carbon Project (GCP). An enhanced carbon uptake is found in both land and ocean after year 2000, reflecting the modification of carbon cycle under human activities. Results derived from CMIP5 simulations also investigated in the study allow for comparisons from which we can see the vital importance of oxygen dataset on carbon uptake estimations.

    Key words: air-sea O2 flux,carbon budget,land and ocean carbon sinks,CMIP6

    1.Introduction

    Human beings are now faced with continuous growth of the climate risk in the warming world. The climate change, occurring mainly as a consequence of anthropogenic CO2emissions, is already wielding its influences on ecosystems, economic sectors and people's health (Bopp et al.,2013; Huang et al., 2016; Fr?licher et al., 2018; Wei et al.,2021). An increasing number of evidence warns us that actions should be taken urgently to minimize dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system, limiting global warming to 2 degrees - a threshold laid down by the Paris Agreement (Seneviratne et al., 2016; Huang et al.,2017b). Under this circumstance, the carbon neutrality,which refers to the balance of emissions of carbon dioxide with its removal, has become one of the most essential things human society needs to achieve in the mid-late 21st century (Dhanda and Hartman, 2011; Niu et al., 2021).

    The land and ocean play an important role in the storage of atmospheric CO2(Dai et al., 2013; DeVries et al., 2019).It has been reported that the land and ocean have sequestered approximately half of the anthropogenic CO2emitted to the atmosphere in the past decades, which helps greatly buffer climate change (Friedlingstein et al., 2019;Gao et al., 2019, 2020). Thus, for a reasonable design of global warming mitigation and carbon neutrality strategies,there is a pressing need to address the effectiveness of terrestrial and oceanic carbon uptake and their susceptibility to climate change. According to this view, the measurement of atmospheric O2concentrations and related oxygen budget could provide us a concise and effective method to estimate carbon-uptake capacity of land and ocean on the basis of the close relationship between oxygen and carbon (Huang et al.,2018, 2021; Han et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021).

    The accuracy of this O2-based carbon uptake estimation largely depends on how the oxygen data, especially the airsea O2exchange, is processed in the calculation. Early studies used to assume that there was no long-term oceanic effect of O2on the atmosphere (Keeling and Shertz, 1992; Battle et al., 2000). However, a number of indications have revealed the huge oceanic heat uptake under climate change(Willis et al., 2004; Cheng et al., 2018; Cheng and Zhu,2018; Li et al., 2019), which implies the air-sea O2exchange could vary as a consequence of warming-induced solubility and circulation changes (Bopp et al., 2002; Li et al., 2020). Later studies have thus taken air-sea O2flux into consideration (Manning and Keeling, 2006; Tohjima et al.,2019), where the oceanic O2outgassing to the atmosphere is approximately estimated by a linear regression with ocean heat content, assuming the relationship between gas flux and heat flux bears a proportional relationship at the air-sea interface. In fact, mechanisms that control the variability of air-sea O2flux are rather complicated. Its temporal and spatial variations could be affected by changes in ocean primary production, ventilation and stratification, as well as oceanic internal modes such as El Ni?o-Southern Oscillation(ENSO) (Resplandy et al., 2015; Yang et al., 2017). The intensified ocean heat uptake in the past few decades (Trenberth et al.,2014; Cheng et al., 2017) also wields its influences in the long-term period. How to accurately quantify the air-sea O2flux has therefore been one of the most important questions in the field of O2-based carbon uptake estimations.

    Here, based on recent CMIP6 model simulations, we systematically investigate the characteristics of air-sea O2flux and from it, we subsequently calculate the terrestrial and oceanic carbon sinks. We hope to provide a better understanding of air-sea O2flux under ongoing climate change. We also hope the applications of process-based air-sea O2flux from CMIP6 model simulations can provide a more comprehensive and reliable carbon sink estimation, compared with results from previous studies where the air-sea O2flux is not considered or simply approximated by a linear relationship between O2outgassing and heat content.

    The paper is arranged as follows. Section 2 describes the detailed method of O2-based carbon sink estimations and the datasets, especially air-sea O2flux, used in this study. The climatology characteristics of air-sea O2flux and its variability under climate change in CMIP6 are shown in section 3.1. Section 3.2 provides our estimations of terrestrial and oceanic carbon sinks with the use of this air-sea O2flux.Discussion and conclusion are presented in section 4.

    2.Data and methods

    2.1.O2-based estimations of terrestrial and oceanic carbon sinks

    2.1.1.Mass balanced equations for global oxygen and carbon budgets

    The assessments of land and ocean carbon sinks in this study are based on the strong relationship between oxygen and carbon, which can be written as follows (Keeling and Manning, 2014; Li et al., 2021):

    where ΔCO2and ΔO2represent changes in atmospheric CO2and O2; Ffossilis the industrial CO2emissions, which mainly comes from fossil fuel combustion; Fair-searepresents the air-sea O2flux;αFandαBare dimensionless parameters which represent the globally averaged O2: CO2mole exchange ratios for fossil fuel burning and biological process; Slandand Soceanrepresent the net land carbon sink and ocean carbon sink, respectively. These two equations briefly describe the human impacts on the oxygen and carbon cycles. All variables in the equations mentioned above use the units of mole.

    2.1.2.Observed atmospheric CO2and O2concentrations

    The concentrations of CO2in the atmosphere () are meas ured using the unit of “ppm” (parts per million). Its change can be expressed as

    where Mairrepresents the global total number of moles of dry air (Mair=1.769×1020). The change of atmospheric O2concentrations, however, is typically measured as the mole ratio changes of O2/N2rather than the mole fraction such as ppm, due to its high abundance in the atmosphere. Following Keeling and Shertz (1992), the O2content of an air sample can be defined as

    where (O2/N2)sampleis the mole ratio of O2to N2in the sample air and (O2/N2)refis the ratio in an arbitrary reference gas.Note thatδ(O2/N2) is typically multiplied by 106and expressed as “per meg” unit. The observed changes ofδ(O2/N2) in the atmosphere could thus be written as

    where ΔO2and ΔN2are changes in moles of atmospheric O2and N2;andare the standard mole fraction of O2and N2in the atmosphere (= 0.2094 and= 0.7808).

    According to Eqs. (1)-(5), the land and ocean carbon sink can be written as

    The observed timeseries of atmospheric CO2and O2concentrations [i.e.andδ(O2/N2)] can be downloaded from Scripps O2Program (https://scrippso2.ucsd.edu/),which provides records of both CO2and O2concentrations at 12 stations. In this study, we choose the longest three timeseries, at Alert (82.5°N, 62.3°W), La Jolla (32.9°N, 277.3°W), and Cape Grim (40.7°S, 144.7°E), respectively, and calculate the average with weights of 0.25, 0.25, 0.5 (given the equal weight in both hemispheres).

    2.1.3.Global fossil-fuel combustion and the oxidative ratio

    The global CO2emissions (Ffossil) are derived from Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC, Andres et al., 2016), which counts the consumptions of each type of fossil fuel. It should be noted that each fuel type has its own combustion ratio (αF), as shown in Table 1 (Liu et al., 2020).The global averaged αFtherefore slightly varies with time due to changes of global energy sources [Fig. S1 in the Electronic Supplementary Material, (ESM)]. The oxidative ratioαBalso exhibits temporal variations due to modifications to global vegetation cover by human activities, however, it is generally believed the decrease of αBis less than 0.01 over 100 years (Randerson et al., 2006). We thus set the typical value ofαBas 1.10 according to previous studies (Keeling and Manning, 2014; Battle et al., 2019).

    2.2.The air-sea O2 flux

    Due to the importance of O2flux (Fair-sea) in estimating the carbon uptake, here we discuss it in greater detail. The air-sea O2flux evaluated in this study builds on the processbased ocean physical and biochemical models developed as part of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6(CMIP6), which can be downloaded from https://esgf-node.llnl.gov/search/cmip6/. The detailed descriptions of these models are presented in Table 2. Here we choose the historical experiments of these models to match the timeseries of O2observations. Note that the air-sea O2flux is calculated by the model in mol m-2s-1, so we convert to mol of oxygen per year (mol m-2yr-1). For sake of comparisons and analysis, all the model results are gridded to 1°×1° resolution.

    Furthermore, it should be noted that, due to import of N2in the atmospheric O2observations, oceanic N2outgassing must be considered in the calculations. The total effect of the ocean on carbon sinks could thus be expressed as Eq.(8). Here we apply the tuning parameterβ=0.88 to represent the negative effect of N2outgassing (Keeling and Manning,2014); it can be shown that the equation can be written as

    The related ocean physics variables such as sea temperature, salinity, and mixed layer depth in CMIP6 are also used in this study to analyze mechanisms of O2flux change.

    2.3.The EEMD method

    We use the ensemble empirical mode decomposition(EEMD) method to separate the human-induced long-term signals from natural decadal variability in the time series of airsea O2flux. This noise-assisted method can separates scales naturally without any prior subjective criterion (Ji et al.,2014; Huang et al., 2017a). EEMD performs operations that partition a series into different “modes” (Intrinsic Mode Functions, IMFs), which are expressed by the following equation:

    Table 1. Typical oxidative ratio for each fuel type.

    Table 2. The CMIP6 models used in this study to obtain the air-sea O2 fluxa.

    where IMFi(t) is the ith IMF, and rn(t) is the residual of data X(t). The detailed descriptions of the steps on how to execute EEMD method can be found in Text S1 in the ESM. In this study, the noise added to the data has an amplitude that is 0.2 times the standard deviation of the raw data, and the ensemble number is 400. The number of IMFs is 6. A python version of EEMD is available at https://www.github.com/laszukdawid/PyEMD (Laszuk, 2017).

    3.Results

    3.1.The characteristics of air-sea O2 exchange in CMIP6

    3.1.1.Climatological status of air-sea O2flux in 1985-2014 and evaluation against available studies

    The transfer of gases across the air-sea interface is controlled by several physical, biological and chemical processes in the atmosphere and ocean, which could influence not only the partial pressure differences but also the efficiency of transfer processes (Wanninkhof, 1992; Liang et al., 2013).The air-sea O2flux thus varies considerably among the ocean regions. Figure 1a presents the model-ensemble-mean of annual air-sea O2flux averaged from 1985 to 2014 in CMIP6 historical experiments (positive means a flux to the atmosphere). Spatial distributions of O2flux in each individual model can be found in Fig. S2 in the ESM. The results show an overall net O2outgassing from ocean to the atmosphere at low latitudes, while a significant influx of O2occurs at high latitudes. The tropical and subtropical ocean(30°S-30°N) emits approximately 250.8±38.4 Tmol O2per year (1 Tmol = 1012mol), which is partly compensated by O2absorption in the high-latitude ocean, about -105.2±24.8 and -87.2±41.4 Tmol yr-1in the Northern (>30°N) and Southern Hemisphere (>30°S), respectively, eventually leading to a net O2outgassing of ~58.5±9.6 Tmol yr-1over the global ocean. This pattern highlights the solubility effect driven by meridional temperature gradients, as well as combinations of the dynamical and biological effects, which lead to a surplus of oceanic O2production in low latitudes (Bopp et al.,2002).

    Furthermore, the simulated O2flux is evaluated against results derived from previous studies (Gruber et al., 2001;Resplandy et al., 2015), which are found in Fig. 1b . The ocean is divided into 13 regions for sake of comparison (Fig.S3 in the ESM). The patterns presented by the ensemblemean of the suite of models in CMIP6 correspond well with estimations based on ocean inversions (Gruber et al., 2001),except for the Sothern Ocean. The results derived from Gruber et al. (2001) exhibit a much stronger O2outgassing in the subpolar South Atlantic [95.0 Tmol yr-1differences between this study and Gruber et al. (2001)]. However, this difference could roughly cancel out when we integrate the whole Southern Ocean regions, as it also exists a larger O2influx in subpolar Indian-Pacific Ocean and Oceans >58°S (differences of-58.1 and -26.2 Tmol yr-1, respectively). Besides, the spatial distribution shows a remarkable consistency with preindustrial experiments presented by Resplandy et al. (2015), indicating the robust of models in simulating O2flux.

    3.1.2.Modifications of air-sea O2flux under global warming

    Temporal evolution of the air-sea O2flux reveals that significant modifications have been occurring in response to ongoing climate change (Fig. 2). In Fig. 2a, we can see sizable oscillations of air-sea O2flux during the period 1950-85.Also obvious is the increase of oceanic O2outgassing found since the mid-1980s, with an upward trend of ~1.49 Tmol yr-2(significant at 0.01 level). Based on EEMD method,here we split the evolution of air-sea O2flux into decadal variability (i.e. sum of IMFs 2-5 from EEMD) and the longterm trend (i.e. IMF 6). As shown in Fig. 2b, the time series of air-sea O2flux from 1950 to 1985 is primarily dominated by natural decadal variability, while the human-induced long-term changes gradually wields its influence after 1985.The combination of the two terms eventually lead to an overall upward trend since the 1980s, with natural variability modulating the long-term trend.

    The EOF analysis was applied to the de-trended global air-sea O2flux over the 1985-2014 period to explore the spatio-temporal distributions of decadal variability (Fig. 3).The first two modes explain approximately 58% of the total variance. The highest decadal variability of O2flux is found in the North Pacific, the North Atlantic and the Southern Ocean (Figs. 3a, 3b). The most significant changes in the Atlantic are mainly in the high-latitude areas where the sinking branch of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation(AMOC) is located, the changes of which could significantly influence climate (Yang et al., 2016; Wen et al., 2018; Yang and Wen, 2020). In the Southern Ocean, the spatial pattern exhibits opposite phase between 40°S and 65°S, suggesting the potential relationship with the Southern Annular Mode(SAM). Time series associated with EOF modes reveal a cycle of ~15 years with different phases in PC1 and PC2(Fig. 3c). The standard deviation of the decadal variability derived from EEMD also shows a similar spatial distribution compared with the EOF analysis (Fig. S4 in the ESM).

    The long-term changes of air-sea O2flux, which are generally considered as modifications to anthropogenic forcing,is presented in Fig. 4. Positive values are mainly found in the high latitude areas (Fig. 4a), where strong O2uptake in the climatological state is seen (Fig. 1a), revealing the weakening of the oceanic O2absorption capacity from the atmosphere. The maximum increase of the flux occurs in the Southern Ocean (SO>58°S), where it reaches 5.39±0.34 Tmol yr-1. The next two highest increases occur in the North Pacific (Temp NPac) and North Atlantic (N NAtl), with an increase about 4.39±0.17 and 3.25±0.11 Tmol yr-1, respectively (Fig. 4b). This long-term change could be attributed to human-induced solubility and circulation changes. The solubility of dissolved O2has been decreasing in the warming ocean. This effect could be written as:

    Fig. 1 The spatial distributions of annual mean air-sea O2 flux (a) averaged from 1985 to 2014 in CMIP6 historical simulations, and (b) compared with two other studies. Positive flux in Fig. 1a means O2 outgassing from ocean to the atmosphere.For sake of comparisons, the ocean is partitioned into 13 regions as shown in Fig. S3 in the ESM. The results from Li et al (2020) are similar with Resplandy et al 2015,which are not shown here.

    where Q is the total sea-surface downward heat flux; Cprepresents the heat capacity of sea water; ?O2/?T is the temperature dependence of O2solubility which could be derived from Garcia and Gordon (1992). Our calculations reveal that roughly one quarter of the increase is directly associated with reduced solubility in the warming ocean, which is consistent with results found by Li et al. (2020) and Plattner et al. (2002). Warming-induced ocean stratification also plays an important role in the modifications of air-sea O2flux. Strong shoaling of the mixed layer is found in the North Atlantic and widespread areas in the Southern Ocean(Fig. S5 in the ESM), which prevents oxygen supplies from reaching the deeper layers and eventually result in a positive contribution to the air-sea O2flux.

    3.1.3.Comparisons with CMIP5: What’s new about the air-sea O2flux we can learn in CMIP6

    In Li et al. (2020), the air-sea O2flux derived from CMIP5 is applied to investigate the terrestrial and oceanic carbon sinks. It is therefore necessary to clarify the difference of the flux between the CMIP5 and CMIP6 as well as its influences on carbon sink estimations.

    Fig. 2 Time series in the historical period (1950-2014) of (a) air-sea O2 flux and (b)its EEMD decomposition. The red dashed line in (a) represents linear regression from 1980 to 2014, significant at the 0.01 level. Shaded area is the uncertainty of the flux represented by the standard deviation of these models. The decadal variability in (b)(the blue solid line) is the sum of IMF2-5 from the EEMD and the long-term trend(the red solid line) is the IMF6. Positive values in both panels indicate oceanic O2 outgassing to the atmosphere.

    For a simulated historical period from 1975 to 2005,the comparisons between CMIP6 (this study) and CMIP5[derived from Li et al. (2021)] reveal pronounced temporally varying differences of air-sea O2flux (Fig. 5). Except for a short period of time around year 1990, the ocean in CMIP6 exhibits an overall smaller oceanic O2outgassing, up to -22 Tmol yr-1, than in CMIP5. Spatial patterns shown in Fig. 5b reveal that this difference is mainly caused by the intensified high-latitude oceanic O2uptake in CMIP6, especially in the North Atlantic and Southern Ocean. Although there still exists relatively large uncertainties, this intensified uptake in CMIP6 is more consistent with the regional observations in the Southern Ocean (Bushinsky et al., 2017), reflecting the improvement of simulations in CMIP6. Furthermore,slight difference also exists in the long-term trend of air-sea O2flux. An upward linear trend of ~1.52 Tmol yr-2has been found in CMIP6 during the period 1985 to 2005, while the trend is approximately 1.12 Tmol yr-2in CMIP5. This indicates an accelerated oceanic O2outgassing in CMIP6,which is tightly associated with ocean deoxygenation (Bopp et al., 2013; Palter and Trossman, 2018; Li et al., 2020).

    According to Eqs. (6)-(8), this difference in O2flux could lead to a total fluctuation as large as 0.4 GtC yr-1in the estimated carbon sink. It should be noted that, besides the air-sea O2flux, the estimated carbon sink could also be influenced by the choice of other oxygen datasets in the study, which is therefore rather complicated. Comparisons of O2-based carbon sinks between this study and Li et al.(2021), as well as other previous studies, will be discussed in detail in the following section.

    3.2.Estimates of terrestrial and oceanic carbon sinks

    3.2.1.O2-CO2diagram from 1990 to 2014

    Simulations of the air-sea O2flux in CMIP6 provide a valuable complement for the O2-based carbon uptake estimations. With the use of air-sea O2flux as well as other O2-related variables, the global terrestrial and oceanic carbon sinks could be calculated based on Eqs. (1)-(9). The processes are briefly diagrammed in Fig. 6.

    Fig. 3 EOF analysis of de-trended global air-sea O2 flux over the 1985-2014 period.The spatial patterns of the first and second EOF mode are presented in panel (a) and(b), respectively. The black and blue lines in (a) represent the temporal coefficient of the two modes. Note that the original timeseries is pre-processed with a pentad running average to remove the influence of the high-frequency oscillations.

    The dots in Fig. 6 are the observed anomalies of global atmospheric CO2(horizontal axis) and O2/N2concentrations(vertical axis) from 1990 to 2014. Here we set the concentrations in year 1990 as the base point (0 ppm, 0 per meg).These dots show an increase of CO2concentration and a simultaneous decline in O2/N2concentration with time. For example, the concentrations in 2014 could be written as (44 ppm, -465 per meg) in this coordinate system, which means a 44 ppm increase of CO2concentration and a 465 per meg decrease of O2/N2concentration in the atmosphere since year 1990. The arrows in Fig. 6 reveal the effect of related processes on atmospheric CO2and O2/N2concentration changes. For example, the fossil fuel combustion is marked by the black arrow in Fig. 6, starting at (0, 0) and ending at(89.0, -584.7), meaning that the fossil fuel burning would have contributed to a total 89.0 ppm increase of CO2(that is,a release of 189.0 GtC CO2, 1 Gt = 1015g, 1 ppm = 2.12 GtC)and 584.7 per meg decrease of O2/N2concentration during 1990-2014, if no other processes were involved. This is to say, the observed decline of O2/N2(~465.1 per meg) is a bit smaller compared with the decline directly derived from fossil fuel combustion (584.7 per meg) during 1990-2014.More importantly, the observed atmospheric CO2concentration only increases by about half of the value derived from fossil fuel combustion (that is, ~44 ppm, as shown in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7), from which we can thus infer huge land and ocean carbon sinks, absorbing a total of 96.6 GtC carbon.The projections of these arrows on the x- axis are also drawn in Fig. 6, which reflect how the atmospheric CO2concentrations are influenced by the related processes. The land and ocean carbon sinks can be separated from the total carbon uptake according to Eq. (6) and Eq. (7), as 33.5 GtC and 63.2 GtC, respectively, during this period.

    Fig. 4 15-year changes in the long-term trend of air-sea O2 flux since 1985. The error bars in panel (b) represent the uncertainty of flux change.

    It should be especially noted that the air-sea O2flux plays an important role in the carbon uptake estimations.The ocean emits ~1.54 Pmol O2(1 Pmol = 1015mol) to the atmosphere (sum of the air-sea O2flux from 1990 to 2014 in Fig. 2a), making a positive contribution of about 36.7 per meg to the atmospheric O2/N2concentration (red vector in Fig. 6). Despite this air-sea O2flux being relatively small, it plays an important role in the estimation of land and ocean carbon sinks. Figure 8 describes the situation assuming that the air-sea O2flux is negligible on a multiannual-to-decadal timescale, as proposed in the early studies (Bender and Battle, 1999; Battle et al., 2000). If the air-sea O2flux is not considered in the O2budget, the ocean carbon sink would be apparently underestimated by approximately 14.8 GtC during 1990-2014, while the land carbon uptake would be largely overestimated (bar charts in the top right of Fig. 8).

    3.2.2.Averaged terrestrial and oceanic carbon sinks in different periods

    We subsequently calculated the averaged terrestrial and oceanic carbon uptake over several different periods and compared them with previous O2-based carbon uptake estimations(Table 3). Here, we use the linear trend of atmospheric O2/N2and CO2concentrations in the period to represent the O2/N2and CO2changes in Eqs. (6)-(7) (Δδ(O2/N2) and ΔCO2).For observed atmospheric concentration changes and fossil fuel consumption (Ffossil), our results are relatively consistent with Keeling et al. (2014) (differences less than 0.06 ppm yr-1in ΔCO2and 0.12 GtC yr-1in Ffossil). The effect of airsea flux in our study (which are derived from process-based CMIP6 model simulations, as described above) shows a relatively large discrepancy with that in Keeling et al. (2014)(which is calculated based on the linear regression between O2flux and net changes of ocean heat content). Our results show an averaged ocean and land carbon sink of 2.10±0.43 and 1.14±0.52 GtC yr-1, respectively, during 1990-2000.An increase is found in both ocean and land carbon sinks during 2000-10, while results from Keeling et al. (2014) show an increase in ocean sink but a decline in land sink. Furthermore, the averaged carbon sinks from 2004 to 2008 in our study (2.64±0.66 GtC yr-1for ocean and 1.84±0.79 GtC yr-1for land) are generally larger than that in Tohjima et al.(2019) (1.97±0.62 GtC yr-1for ocean and 2.17±0.82 GtC yr-1for land), which could also be partly attributed to the discrepancy in the air-sea flux (Table 3).

    Fig. 5 Differences of air-sea O2 flux between CMIP6 and CMIP5 during period 1975-2005 (i.e.FLUXCMIP6 minus FLUXCMIP5). The black line in (a) is the time series of the difference and (b)shows the spatial distribution of the difference averaged from 1975-2005.

    To further explore the temporal changes of ocean and land carbon sinks over the past two decades, the averaged ocean and land carbon sinks were calculated for several representative periods: 1991-97, 1994-2000 and 2004-10 were selected for the estimates of averaged ocean sinks; meanwhile, 1994-2000, 2002-08 and 2008-14 were selected for the estimates of averaged land sinks. These results are shown as the asterisks in Fig. 9, accompanied by time-continuous estimations from the Global Carbon Project (GCP,Friedlingstein et al., 2019), Landschützer et al 2016 and Carbon Tracker (CT, Jacobson et al., 2020). The estimates by GCP clearly show a quasi-monotonous increase of the oceanic carbon sink over the past few decades (Fig. 9a, red line). However, the oceanic uptake in our results show a decline from 2.04±0.47 GtC yr-1in 1991-97 to 1.85±0.45 GtC yr-1in 1994-2000. A significant upward trend is subsequently found in the 21st century, with ocean uptake increasing to 2.87±0.47 GtC yr-1in 2004-10. This temporal pattern is generally consistent with results derived from observed surface partial pressure of CO2in Landschützer et al. (2016)(Fig. 9a, green line), which may occur as consequences of the combined influence of anthropogenic forcing and oceanic internal modes. The net terrestrial carbon uptake estimated in this study corresponds well with the results derived from GCP. An increase of land carbon uptake (from 1.23±0.60 GtC yr-1to 1.91±0.50 GtC yr-1according to our estimations) could be found in the 2000s (Fig. 9b) which has been reported by several atmospheric inversion and model-based studies (Keenan et al., 2016; Ballantyne et al.,2017; Piao et al., 2018). Despite the fact that the mechanisms behind this increase are still under discussion, it is generally believed that the changes in land use, modifications of terrestrial productivity and respiration, as well as climatic variations of temperature and moisture are responsible for changes in terrestrial carbon uptake (Chen et al., 2020; Piao et al., 2020a, b; Yue et al., 2020).

    Fig. 6 Changes in observed atmospheric concentrations of O2/N2 and CO2 from 1990 to 2014. The blue dots represent the annual averaged O2 and CO2 anomaly (here we choose the concentrations in 1990 as the reference value). The vectors in the diagram schematically illustrate the contribution of each process related to the changes in O2 (vertical axis) and CO2(horizontal axis) during this period. The effect of air-sea O2 flux is highlighted in red.

    Fig. 7 The observed time series of atmospheric O2/N2 and CO2 concentrations. The blue, green and red lines represents observations in La Jolla (32.9°N, 277.3°W), Alert (82.5°N,62.3°W), and Cape Grim (40.7°S, 144.7°E), respectively. The black line is the annual mean concentrations averaged among the three stations with a weight of 0.25, 0.25 and 0.5.

    Fig. 8 Role of air-sea O2 flux in O2-based carbon sinks estimations. The diagram is same as Fig. 6, except for no airsea O2 flux considered in the calculation. The bar charts in the top right show the comparisons between estimated ocean/land carbon sink with and without O2 flux correction.

    3.2.3.Influence of oxygen datasets on estimated carbon uptake

    In this section, we specifically investigate the differences of the carbon sinks from that in Li et al. (2021). As mentioned in section 3.1.3, the air-sea O2flux used in Li et al. (2021) is derived from CMIP5, while CMIP6 simulation of the flux is used in this study. Meanwhile, the other O2-related variables(such as atmospheric O2decline) in Li et al. (2021) are derived from the oxygen budget proposed by Huang et al.(2018), which is also different from this study. Terrestrial and oceanic carbon uptakes estimated by Li et al. (2021) are depicted by the triangles in Fig. 9. From the comparisons between this study and Li et al. (2021), we can discern the role of oxygen data in carbon sink estimations.

    For the terrestrial carbon sink, both of the two studies corresponds well with GCP in the 21st century, which exhibit an enhanced uptake mentioned in section 3.2.2. However,the result from Li et al. (2021) seems to present an unrealistically high land carbon uptake (1.50 GtC yr-1) in the 1990s,while the current study behaves in good agreement with GCP during this period (1.06 GtC yr-1). The oceanic carbon uptake in both this study and Li et al. (2021) exhibits a similar variability with that in Landschützer et al. (2016) (that is, adownward trend in the 1990s subsequently followed by an upward trend in the 2000s). Despite this, discrepancy occurs around year 2010, as shown in Fig. 9a. The estimated oceanic carbon uptake in this study (2.87 GtC yr-1) is relatively larger than it in Li et al. (2021) (2.45 GtC yr-1) and GCP (2.36 GtC yr-1).

    Table 3. Estimations of O2-based carbon sinks in different periods.

    Fig. 9 Estimated ocean and land carbon sinks in different studies. The asterisks and triangles are seven-year averaged carbon sinks in this study and Li et al 2021, with error bars representing uncertainties of the estimations.The time series of carbon sinks derived from Global Carbon Project 2019, Landschützer et al 2016 and Carbon Tracker 2019 are colored in red, green and blue, respectively. The thin dashed lines and the thick solid lines are annual and seven-year running averaged carbon sinks, respectively.

    Overall, both of the two studies reveal an enhanced carbon uptake in the 21st century. This study provides a more reliable estimate of the terrestrial carbon uptake in the 1990s, while the oceanic carbon sink in Li et al. (2021) is more consistent with the Global Carbon Project after year 2010. Our calculations show that the differences in air-sea O2flux (Fair-sea) and atmospheric O2change (Δ O2) are the main contributors to the discrepancies. If the difference in O2flux is expressed as ΔFair-sea(the other variables remain unchanged), its influence on the terrestrial and oceanic carbon uptake could then be respectively expressed as ΔB=-β/αBΔFair-seaand ΔO=β/αBΔFair-sea,according to Equations 6-8. This implies that a weakened oceanic O2outgassing, approximately -22 Tmol O2yr-1, would lead to an increase of 0.21 GtC yr-1land carbon sink and a simultaneous opposite effect on ocean carbon sink. For the period 1990-95, Li et al. (2021) shows a smaller declining trend of atmospheric O2and oceanic outgassing in 1990-95, which could eventually lead to a larger land uptake in Li et al.(2021) during this period. These results highlight the vital importance of oxygen datasets on carbon sink estimations.

    4.Summary and discussion

    We use the coupled ocean biogeochemistry models in CMIP6 to investigate the modifications of air-sea O2flux under climate change and its influences on the estimations of global terrestrial and ocean carbon uptake. Our results show an enhanced global oceanic O2outgassing to the atmosphere since the 1980s, accompanied by a strong decadal variability dominated by oceanic internal modes. Consistent with Li et al. (2020), this study shows maximum changes of flux mainly occurring in the high latitudes, with roughly one quarter of the outgassing directly associated with reduced solubility in the warming ocean, and the rest mainly linked with circulation changes and ocean stratification. This modification of air-sea O2flux plays an important role in estimating carbon uptake, as described in section 3.2.

    The application of air-sea O2flux in CMIP6 provides a valuable complement for studies of O2-based global carbon sinks estimations under climate change. Our results reveal the significant increases of terrestrial and oceanic carbon sinks in the 21st century, reflecting the human impacts on the carbon cycle and Earth’s environments. The model biases of air-sea O2flux between CMIP5 and CMIP6 are also investigated in this study, which could lead to a total discrepancy up to 0.4 GtC yr-1in the estimations, indicating the importance of improvement of air-sea O2flux parameterizations in the model.

    Some limitations should also be acknowledged. Our estimation of carbon sinks still suffers from relatively large uncertainties (0.4-0.8 GtC yr-1) due to the accumulations of uncertainty of each term in the calculations. Furthermore, the earliest observations of O2/N2we could obtain are from the late 1980s, which greatly limits the lengths of estimated time series. The comparisons between this study and Li et al.(2021) also reveal the importance of the accuracy of oxygen datasets on the carbon uptake estimations. Presently, we are working on structuring the global oxygen budget (Huang et al., 2018) under the constrain of O2/N2observations, from which we hope to extend the time series of atmospheric O2changes back to the 1900s as well as provide a more reliable oxygen dataset. Further explorations and investigations of the O2-based carbon uptake estimations should be done in the future.

    Acknowledgements.The authors acknowledge the Scripps O2Program for providing the observations of atmospheric O2and CO2data. The authors also acknowledge the World Climate Recruitment Programme’s (WCRP) Working Group on Coupled Modelling(WGCM), and the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals (GO-ESSP) for producing outputs of CMIP6 model simulations. This work was jointly supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41991231, 91937302) and the China 111 project (Grant No. B13045). The data processes and analysis are supported by Supercomputing Center of Lanzhou University.

    Electronic supplementary material:Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1273-x.

    Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing,adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format,as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence,visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    国产黄色小视频在线观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产成人福利小说| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 国产不卡一卡二| 色哟哟·www| 国产成人影院久久av| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 91狼人影院| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 尾随美女入室| 日本熟妇午夜| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲无线在线观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产在视频线在精品| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产美女午夜福利| 久久午夜福利片| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 简卡轻食公司| 久久久久九九精品影院| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 老司机福利观看| netflix在线观看网站| 1000部很黄的大片| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产午夜精品论理片| 久久精品人妻少妇| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 日韩高清综合在线| 亚洲在线观看片| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 日本 av在线| 日本a在线网址| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| av国产免费在线观看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 伦精品一区二区三区| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产亚洲欧美98| netflix在线观看网站| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 久久久久性生活片| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 美女黄网站色视频| 春色校园在线视频观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久精品人妻少妇| 嫩草影院精品99| 韩国av在线不卡| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| av福利片在线观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 性色avwww在线观看| 级片在线观看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产成人av教育| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 在线播放无遮挡| 午夜影院日韩av| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 免费av毛片视频| 一本久久中文字幕| 在线播放无遮挡| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 中文资源天堂在线| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 一级黄色大片毛片| 在线免费观看的www视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产成人福利小说| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 美女黄网站色视频| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| av视频在线观看入口| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 天堂网av新在线| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| av专区在线播放| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 午夜福利18| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 在线免费十八禁| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 少妇丰满av| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 日本成人三级电影网站| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 亚洲无线在线观看| 国产综合懂色| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| h日本视频在线播放| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 成人二区视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲不卡免费看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 99热网站在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 免费观看在线日韩| 欧美zozozo另类| 99热精品在线国产| 日日撸夜夜添| 99久国产av精品| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 亚洲av美国av| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 级片在线观看| 美女免费视频网站| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 一夜夜www| 国产成人a区在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 伦精品一区二区三区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 日本三级黄在线观看| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 欧美zozozo另类| 精品日产1卡2卡| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 在线免费十八禁| 窝窝影院91人妻| 91久久精品电影网| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 精品日产1卡2卡| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 91精品国产九色| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 69人妻影院| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产 一区精品| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产高清三级在线| 久久久成人免费电影| 在线看三级毛片| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久亚洲真实| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 最好的美女福利视频网| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 免费看光身美女| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 色综合色国产| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久人妻av系列| 日韩中字成人| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 91在线观看av| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 级片在线观看| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 少妇丰满av| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日本成人三级电影网站| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 22中文网久久字幕| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| av在线老鸭窝| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 精品久久久久久久久av| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产成人福利小说| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产成人福利小说| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 嫩草影院精品99| 久久人妻av系列| 精品人妻视频免费看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 在线a可以看的网站| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美区成人在线视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 简卡轻食公司| 国产在线男女| 日本色播在线视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 窝窝影院91人妻| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产成人一区二区在线| 最好的美女福利视频网| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 丰满的人妻完整版| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | .国产精品久久| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产成人一区二区在线| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 亚洲美女黄片视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 香蕉av资源在线| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 亚洲av二区三区四区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 美女免费视频网站| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 窝窝影院91人妻| or卡值多少钱| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产成人aa在线观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 全区人妻精品视频| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 美女免费视频网站| 日本黄色片子视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 在线a可以看的网站| a级毛片a级免费在线| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 美女大奶头视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 国产成人av教育| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 欧美成人a在线观看| 搞女人的毛片| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 性色avwww在线观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产在线男女| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 午夜a级毛片| 99久国产av精品| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产真实乱freesex| 日本成人三级电影网站| 欧美zozozo另类| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 精品久久久久久,| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 88av欧美| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久这里只有精品中国| 窝窝影院91人妻| 观看美女的网站| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产美女午夜福利| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产色婷婷99| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 热99re8久久精品国产| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 少妇高潮的动态图| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产精品永久免费网站| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产av在哪里看| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国产 一区精品| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 草草在线视频免费看| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 热99在线观看视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 中国美女看黄片| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日本一本二区三区精品| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲av美国av| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 久久久久久久久大av| 老司机福利观看| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 日日夜夜操网爽| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 日本一本二区三区精品| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 欧美色视频一区免费| 嫩草影视91久久| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 色哟哟·www| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产精品伦人一区二区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 精品福利观看| 国产日本99.免费观看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲四区av| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 精品人妻1区二区| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产精品永久免费网站|