• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Diagnostic performance of endoscopic classifications for neoplastic lesions in patients with ulcerative colitis: A retrospective case-control study

    2022-03-31 08:10:54YuichiKidaTakeshiYamamuraKeikoMaedaTsunakiSawadaEriIshikawaYasuyukiMizutaniNaomiKakushimaKazuhiroFurukawaTakuyaIshikawaEizaburoOhnoHirokiKawashimaMasanaoNakamuraMasatoshiIshigamiMitsuhiroFujishiro
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2022年10期

    Yuichi Kida,Takeshi Yamamura, Keiko Maeda,Tsunaki Sawada,Eri Ishikawa,Yasuyuki Mizutani,NaomiKakushima, Kazuhiro Furukawa,Takuya Ishikawa,Eizaburo Ohno, Hiroki Kawashima,Masanao Nakamura,Masatoshi Ishigami,Mitsuhiro Fujishiro

    Abstract

    Key Words: Diagnostic performance; Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification; Pit pattern classification; Sporadic neoplasms; Ulcerative colitis; Ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasms

    lNTRODUCTlON

    Patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC) are at risk for colorectal tumors due to chronic inflammation. The cumulative risk of colorectal cancer at 10 , 20 , and 30 years after UC onset are reportedly 1 .6 %, 8 .3 %, and 18 .4 %, respectively[1 ]. Consequent to improvements in UC treatment, longstanding UC cases have gradually increased, and surveillance colonoscopy has become more important.UC patients are exposed to the risk of not only UC-associated neoplasms (UCAN) but also sporadic neoplasms (SN). As the treatment strategy for UCAN greatly differs from that for SN, distinguishing UCAN from SN is important[2 ]. In line with the Surveillance for Colorectal Endoscopic Neoplasia Detection and Management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: International Consensus Recommendations (SCENIC) consensus statement, endoscopic resection now tends to be accepted as a treatment for endoscopically visible dysplasia[3 ]. With the support from the SCENIC consensus statement, endoscopic treatments for visible dysplasia have gradually increased and have attracted attention recently[4 -6 ].

    UCAN differentiation by endoscopic findings had been described previously. Prior studies revealed that features of surface structure and vascular pattern obtained by magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging(NBI) and chromoendoscopy are useful in diagnosing UCAN[7 -11 ]. Additionally, multimodal endo-scopic classification without the use of magnifying endoscopy has been reported[12 ]. Most of these studies focused on differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions or on detecting these lesions,not on qualitatively diagnosing neoplastic lesions in UC patients. While several studies have focused on differentiating UCAN from non-neoplastic lesions, few reports have explored the differentiation of UCAN from SN[2 ].

    Table 1 Clinical characteristics of ulcerative colitis patients with neoplastic lesions (mean ± SD)

    The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) and pit pattern classifications are useful for determining the pathology and invasion depth of colorectal tumors[13 ,14 ]. Both classifications have high reproducibility and good diagnostic accuracy in terms of pathology and invasion depth[15 -19 ], as well as good intraand inter-observer agreement rates for diagnosing colorectal tumors[18 ,20 ]. Dysplastic pit patterns are sometimes observed even in non-dysplastic lesions due to inflammation and regenerative changes in UC patients[21 ]. Surface and vascular patterns are modified by inflammation in UCAN[22 ]. These patterns are likely to be modified by inflammation not only in UCAN but also in SN located in the inflamed mucosa. Therefore, whether these endoscopic classifications apply to the diagnosis of neoplastic lesions in UC patients remains unclear. Only a few reports have described the usefulness of both classifications in diagnosing UCAN[22 ], and there have been no reports on their use for classifying SN in UC patients. Hence, the present retrospective case-control study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the JNET and pit pattern classifications for neoplastic lesions in UC patients.

    MATERlALS AND METHODS

    Patients

    A total of 89 UC patients who had neoplastic lesions that could be pathologically evaluated by biopsy,endoscopic resection, or surgery and who underwent colonoscopy at Nagoya University Hospital fromAugust 2005 to April 2020 were consecutively registered. Neoplastic lesions located in the colonic mucosa outside the previously or currently inflamed mucosa were excluded. Additionally, lesions magnified using both NBI or Blue LASER imaging (BLI) and chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine or crystal violet were included. The present study ultimately enrolled 41 UC patients with 44 lesions that could be assessed using both the JNET and pit pattern classifications. According to pathological findings, these patients were divided into two groups—namely, the UCAN group, which comprised 19 patients with 21 lesions, and the SN group, which consisted of 22 UC patients with 23 lesions.

    Endoscopic evaluation

    Endoscopists conducted routine white-light imaging observation. When neoplastic lesions were identified, magnifying NBI or BLI and magnifying chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine or crystal violet were performed. All lesions were endoscopically detectable, visually identified, and subsequently diagnosed using target biopsy. The morphological type of neoplasms was categorized in accordance with the SCENIC consensus statement[3 ]. The severity of inflammation in the mucosa surrounding neoplasms was assessed using the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS)[23 ]. The JNET and pit pattern classifications were employed to evaluate the pathology and invasion depth of neoplasms by endoscopy. With the JNET classification, lesions were categorized based on surface and vascular patterns into types 1 , 2 A, 2 B, and 3 . The pit pattern classification was used under indigo carmine or crystal violet observation; lesions were categorized based on form of crypt orifices into types I, II, III, IV, VIlow irregularity, VIhigh irregularity, and VN. This study used JNET type 2 A and pit pattern type III/IV as indicators of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), based on previous reports[22 ].Furthermore, in the same manner, as LGD, JNET type 2 B and pit pattern type VIlow irregularity were utilized as indicators of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) to shallow submucosal invasive carcinoma (sSM),whereas JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VIhigh irregularity/VNwere used as indicators of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma (dSM). Endoscopic images corresponding to the part that could be evaluated pathologically were extracted, and six endoscopists (three experts, three non-experts) each evaluated the endoscopic findings. Experts were defined as those with ≥ 5 -year experience in magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy and who had managed more than 1000 cases[18 ]. Endoscopists independently evaluated the images obtained from 44 lesions; when individual diagnostic interpretations differed, they discussed the case until a consensus was reached. Diagnostic performance was assessed by consensus of the first diagnosis of three endoscopists. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated for the diagnostic results of each endoscopist. The second diagnosis was performed by randomly switching the order of images at ≥ 1 mo after the first round of diagnosis to calculate for intraobserver agreement.

    Pathological assessment

    Two pathologists specializing in the gastrointestinal tract conducted pathological diagnosis of UCAN and SN according to the Riddellet al[24 ]’s pathological system. UCAN and SN were differentiated based on pathological results. If necessary, p53 and Ki-67 immunostaining were performed. UCAN was diagnosed for cases with diffuse and strong expression or complete absence of p53 immunostaining[25 ]. Differentiation of Ki-67 -positive cells from the basal mucosal side toward the superficial mucosal side[25 ,26 ], called “bottom-up,” was also useful in diagnosing UCAN. Contrary to the UCAN,expression of p53 is low in SN. Moreover, Ki-67 -positive cells are mainly distributed at the superficial zone of the mucosal layer, and tumor cells differentiate towards the basal side of the mucosa in the SN[26 ], also known as “top-down”. Dysplasia was classified into LGD and HGD according to the degree of cellular and nuclear dysplastic change. Submucosal invasive carcinoma was divided into dSM and sSM depending on whether the vertical invasion depth exceeded 1000 μm. When two pathologists had different diagnoses, they discussed the case until a conclusion was reached.

    Data collection

    Clinical data, including age at UC onset, disease duration, sex, disease distribution (total colitis, leftsided colitis, proctitis), clinical type (relapse and remission, chronic persistent, first attack), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and family history of colorectal cancer, were retrospectively collected from medical records and investigated. Endoscopic findings, including location, color, lesion border,morphology, and UCEIS, were obtained from medical reports and evaluated.

    Statistical analysis

    Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD or as median with range and were compared using Student’st-test or Mann-WhitneyUtest, depending on the normality of data distribution, as determined by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Categorial variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test or chi-square test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV),and accuracy were calculated for both the JNET and pit pattern classifications. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated using κ coefficient and arbitrarily interpreted as follows: 0 -0 .20 , poor;0 .21 -0 .40 , fair; 0 .41 -0 .60 , moderate; 0 .61 -0 .80 , substantial; and 0 .81 -1 .00 , excellent. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States) and R3 .6 .3 (CRAN, freeware, https://personal.hs. hirosaki-u.ac.jp/pteiki/reserch/stat/R/), withP< 0 .05 being indicative of statistical significance.

    RESULTS

    Clinical characteristics

    All patients were divided into two groups according to pathological findings. Inter-observer agreement in the diagnosis between UCAN and SN by the two pathologists was 0 .531 . The clinical characteristics of both groups are summarized in Table 1 . The UCAN group had a significantly lower mean age at UC onset than the SN group (35 .7 vs 48 .8 years, P = 0 .003 ). Pathological findings indicated 2 LGD lesions, 11 HGD lesions, 3 sSM lesions, and 5 dSM lesions in the UCAN group and 16 LGD lesions, 5 HGD lesions,and 2 dSM lesions in the SN group. No significant differences in the disease duration, sex, extent of disease, disease distribution, presence of PSC, and family history of colorectal cancer were identified between the two groups.

    Endoscopic and clinical findings

    The endoscopic findings for both groups are presented in Table 2 . A total of 17 (81 .0 %) and 12 (52 .2 %)lesions were detected in the proctosigmoid colon in the UCAN and SN groups, respectively (P= 0 .044 ).The UCAN group had a higher percentage of reddish lesions than the SN group (71 .4 % vs 39 .1 %,P=0 .032 ). All lesions in the SN group exhibited a clear border, whereas 16 lesions (76 .2 %) in the UCAN group showed an unclear border (P< 0 .001 ). The UCAN group had a higher proportion of flat or depressed lesions than the SN group (28 .6 % vs 8 .7 %, P = 0 .094 ). Inflammation in the mucosa surrounding neoplasms was more severe in the UCAN group than in the SN group [UCEIS (median): 2vs0 , P < 0 .001 ].

    Diagnostic performance of the JNET and pit pattern classifications

    Diagnostic performance for each type in the JNET and pit pattern classifications is shown in Tables 3 and 4 , respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were calculated for experts and non-experts separately.

    Table 3 Diagnostic performance (95 % confidence interval) for each type in the Japan Narrow-Band lmaging Expert Team classification

    In the UCAN group, JNET type 2 A had a low PPV [experts vs non-experts: 50 .0 % (10 .2 -85 .6 ) vs 33 .3 %(12 .3 -33 .3 )] and a high NPV [experts vs non-experts: 94 .7 % (90 .5 -98 .5 ) vs 100 % (91 .6 -100 )] for both experts and non-experts. Conversely, in the SN group, JNET type 2 A had a high PPV [expertsvsnonexperts: 100 % (83 .4 -100 ) vs 93 .3 % (79 .6 -98 .7 )] and a low NPV [experts vs non-experts: 63 .6 % (45 .5 -63 .6 )vs75 .0 % (49 .3 -85 .0 )]. In the UCAN group, the accuracy of diagnosis for JNET types 2 A, 2 B, and 3 by experts was 90 .5 %, 71 .4 %, and 85 .7 %, respectively, and that by non-experts was 81 .0 %, 76 .2 %, and 85 .7 %, respectively.

    In the UCAN group, pit pattern type III/IV had a low PPV [expertsvsnon-experts: 40 .0 % (14 .9 -40 .0 )vs20 .0 % (7 .3 -20 .0 )] and a high NPV [experts vs non-experts: 100 % (92 .2 -100 ) vs 100 % (88 .4 -100 )] for both experts and non-experts. Conversely, in the SN group, pit pattern type III/IV had a high PPV[expertsvsnon-experts: 100 % (86 .4 -100 ) vs 92 .9 % (77 .8 -98 .6 )] and a low NPV [77 .8 % (56 .6 -77 .8 ) vs 66 .7 %(43 .3 -75 .6 )]. In the UCAN group, the accuracy of diagnosis for pit pattern type III/IV, type VIlow irregularity, and type VIhigh irregularity/VNby experts was 85 .7 %, 57 .1 %, and 76 .2 %, respectively, and that by non-experts was 61 .9 %, 57 .1 %, and 85 .7 %, respectively. The accuracy of diagnosis for JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VIhigh irregularity/VNby both experts and non-experts was higher in the SN group than in the UCAN group. Figure 1 shows a representative case of UCAN misdiagnosed by all endoscopists.

    Intra-observer and inter-observer agreements for the JNET and pit pattern classifications

    Intra-observer agreement was separately calculated for experts and non-experts (Table 5 ). The intraobserver agreement among experts for the JNET classification of UCAN, pit pattern classification of UCAN, JNET classification of SN, and pit pattern classification of SN was 0 .387 , 0 .454 , 0 .803 , and 0 .567 ,respectively. The corresponding values for non-experts were 0 .640 , 0 .569 , 0 .828 , and 0 .628 , respectively.The intra-observer agreement for SN was higher than that for UCAN. Among non-experts, the intraobserver agreement for both UCAN and SN was higher with the JNET classification than with the pit pattern classification.

    Inter-observer agreement was calculated similarly (Table 6 ). The inter-observer agreement among experts for the JNET classification of UCAN, pit pattern classification of UCAN, JNET classification of SN, and pit pattern classification of SN was 0 .401 , 0 .364 , 0 .666 , and 0 .597 , respectively. The corresponding values for non-experts were 0 .237 , 0 .378 , 0 .503 , and 0 .437 , respectively. Overall, the inter-observer agreement for SN was higher than that for UCAN among both experts and non-experts,irrespective of the classification system used.

    Table 4 Diagnostic performance (95 % confidence interval) for each type in the pit pattern classification

    Table 5 lntra-observer agreement

    DlSCUSSlON

    In the present study, we evaluated the performance of the JNET and pit pattern classifications in patients with UC. The JNET classification evaluates the tumors’ surface and vascular patterns, whereas the pit pattern classification assesses the form of pits on the tumor surface. Colonic mucosal inflammation in UC patients modifies the tumors’ surface and vascular patterns and is considered to reduce the diagnostic accuracy of both classifications. Here, we revealed that the accuracy of diagnosing colorectal tumors using JNET and pit pattern classifications was lower in UC patients, particularly those with UCAN, than in non-UC patients[15 -18 ]. The agreement rates were lower for both UCAN and SNpatients than for non-UC patients. The diagnostic performance of both classifications in UC patients is substantially lower than their previously reported diagnostic performance in non-UC patients[15 -18 ].

    Table 6 lnter-observer agreement

    Figure 1 Endoscopic features of ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasms misdiagnosed by all endoscopists. A: White-light imaging reveals a flat elevated lesion in the rectum; B: Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine shows a clear lesion border; C: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging of box in (B) shows regular surface and vascular patterns, which were classified by all endoscopists as Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification type 2 A; D:Magnifying endoscopy with crystal violet chromoendoscopy of box in (B) reveals relatively uniform villous structures, which were classified by all endoscopists as pit pattern type IV; E: Pathological examination of the resected specimen by endoscopic submucosal dissection shows architectural atypia. This lesion was pathologically diagnosed as high-grade dysplasia (hematoxylin and eosin staining, original magnification × 50 ); F: Immunohistochemistry for p53 on serial section of(E).

    Previous reports revealed that, compared to SN, UCAN is more common in the proctosigmoid colon and features more redness, unclear border, flat and depressed lesions, and a higher degree of surrounding inflammation[2 ]. On magnifying chromoendoscopy, pit pattern types III, IV, and V, which are also caused by regenerative changes, are useful in diagnosing UCAN[9 ,21 ]. In the present study, the UCAN group had a significantly higher proportion of lesions with endoscopically unclear border and severe inflammation in the mucosa surrounding neoplasms than the SN group. As colorectal tumors can considerably impact the quality of life of UC patients, it is essential for endoscopists to understand these endoscopic features of UCAN.

    In the UCAN group, JNET type 2 A and pit pattern type III/IV had a low PPV but with a high NPV in LGD diagnosis, and JNET type 2 B and pit pattern type VIlow irregularity had a low NPV in the diagnosis of HGD to sSM. This was because several lesions in UCAN were diagnosed as JNET type 2 A or pit pattern type III/IV, even though they were actually HGD to sSM. Additional detailed analysis revealed that most endoscopists diagnosed about one-quarter of HGD to sSM lesions as JNET type 2 A and one-third of HGD to sSM lesions as pit pattern type III/IV. Furthermore, a small number of dSM lesions were diagnosed as JNET type 2 A or pit pattern type III/IV (Table 7 ).

    In the SN group, JNET type 2 A and pit pattern type III/IV had a high PPV but with a low NPV in LGD diagnosis, and JNET type 2 B and pit pattern type VIlow irregularity had a low PPV in the diagnosis of HGD to sSM. Because JNET type 2 B and pit pattern type VIlow irregularity include lesions from LGD to dSM, these types have low PPV even in non-UC patients[17 ,19 ,27 ]. Several LGD and dSM lesions in the SN group were diagnosed as JNET type 2 B and pit pattern type VIlow irregularity. JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VIhigh irregularity/VNin both UCAN and SN groups showed low sensitivity but with high specificity and accuracy. Previous studies showed that JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VIhigh irregularity/VNhave high specificity for dSM diagnosis in both UC and non-UC patients[17 -19 ,22 ]. Regardless of whether the surface and vascular patterns are modified by inflammation, JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VIhigh irregularity/VNhave been confirmed to be useful in diagnosing dSM among UC patients. In UCAN, the tumors’ surface structure sometimes could not represent the dysplastic change due to the bottom-up growth pattern; hence, it is considered that several lesions are underestimated by endoscopic classifications. Additionally, SN located in the inflamed mucosa, especially SN in the severely inflamed mucosa, tends to be misdiagnosed due to the influence of inflammation.

    Intra-observer agreement was higher among non-experts than among experts; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Inter-observer agreement did not also significantly differ but was higher in experts than in non-experts. Irrespective of the endoscopists’ experience, a consistent endoscopic diagnosis of neoplastic lesions in UC patients was difficult to achieve. In particular, the intra- and inter-observer agreements were lower for UCAN than for SN.

    The present study has some limitations. First, our study was conducted on a small number of cases;however, given its retrospective nature, the same size could not be set a priori. We believe that the small number of typical LGDs in this study was responsible for the unsatisfactory diagnostic accuracy.Second, only neoplastic lesions evaluated using both the JNET and pit pattern classifications were included. While inflammation and regenerative changes might be evaluated as neoplastic patterns by both JNET and pit pattern classifications, our study could not include non-neoplastic lesions. Nonneoplastic lesions should be included in future studies. Third, differentiation between UCAN and SN was based on pathology; nevertheless, even in pathology, distinguishing UCAN from SN can be difficult.

    CONCLUSlON

    The JNET and pit pattern classifications did not show high accuracy in diagnosing the pathology and invasion depth of neoplastic lesions in UC patients. Overall, the endoscopic diagnosis of UCAN tended to be underestimated as compared to the pathological results. Endoscopic diagnosis of neoplastic lesions in UC patients is still difficult, and treatment strategies need to be carefully determined.

    ARTlCLE HlGHLlGHTS

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We would like to thank Go Kajikawa, Masaya Esaki, Issei Hasegawa, Kentaro Yamada, and Shuji Ikegami for evaluating the endoscopic data.

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Kida Y and Yamamura T contributed to the conception and design; Kida Y, Yamamura T,Kawashima H, Ishikawa E, and Kakushima N contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data; Kida Y drafted the article; Nakamura M, Ohno E, Sawada T, Maeda K, Ishikawa T, Ishigami M, and Furukawa K contributed to the critical revision of the article for important intellectual content; Mizutani Y, Yamamura T and Nakamura M contributed to statistical analysis; Fujishiro M made the final approval of the article; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    lnstitutional review board statement:The use of patient data for this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nagoya University Hospital, No. 2015 -0485 .

    lnformed consent statement:The need for patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:The authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.

    Data sharing statement:No additional data are available.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4 .0 ) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4 .0 /

    Country/Territory of origin:Japan

    ORClD number:Yuichi Kida 0000 -0002 -1345 -1922 ; Takeshi Yamamura 0000 -0003 -4994 -016 X; Keiko Maeda 0000 -0001 -7615 -0476 ; Tsunaki Sawada 0000 -0002 -4779 -9708 ; Eri Ishikawa 0000 -0003 -1623 -7996 ; Yasuyuki Mizutani 0000 -0002 -4363 -3161 ; Naomi Kakushima 0000 -0002 -9635 -2099 ; Kazuhiro Furukawa 0000 -0003 -0980 -9095 ; Takuya Ishikawa 0000 -0001 -5814 -3555 ; Eizaburo Ohno 0000 -0002 -7730 -4630 ; Hiroki Kawashima 0000 -0002 -3720 -781 X; Masanao Nakamura 0000 -0002 -5444 -143 X; Masatoshi Ishigami 0000 -0003 -0938 -631 X; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro 0000 -0002 -4074 -1140 .

    S-Editor:Fan JR

    L-Editor:A

    P-Editor:Fan JR

    99热网站在线观看| 婷婷成人精品国产| 亚洲精品一二三| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 51国产日韩欧美| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 久久精品久久久久久久性| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 一区在线观看完整版| 777米奇影视久久| 色吧在线观看| 伦理电影免费视频| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 91精品国产九色| 性色av一级| 一级爰片在线观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 免费观看性生交大片5| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久97久久精品| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 久久av网站| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 久久热精品热| 日日撸夜夜添| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 日韩av免费高清视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 伦精品一区二区三区| 免费av不卡在线播放| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产精品免费大片| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 一级毛片电影观看| 如何舔出高潮| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产精品 国内视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 欧美另类一区| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 全区人妻精品视频| 男女国产视频网站| 99热这里只有精品一区| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 老熟女久久久| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 欧美另类一区| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 日韩成人伦理影院| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 一级黄片播放器| 国产成人一区二区在线| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久99精品国语久久久| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 中文字幕制服av| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 一级片'在线观看视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| .国产精品久久| 老司机影院毛片| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 五月天丁香电影| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 99热网站在线观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产一级毛片在线| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 日本色播在线视频| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产av精品麻豆| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲第一av免费看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国产极品天堂在线| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 有码 亚洲区| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 999精品在线视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 18在线观看网站| av一本久久久久| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 一本久久精品| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久热久热在线精品观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 成人综合一区亚洲| 免费观看av网站的网址| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 简卡轻食公司| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 91精品三级在线观看| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 观看av在线不卡| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 欧美性感艳星| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 赤兔流量卡办理| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| av一本久久久久| 美女福利国产在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 午夜福利,免费看| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 日韩伦理黄色片| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 精品一区在线观看国产| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 久久久久久久久久成人| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产亚洲最大av| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 久久av网站| av在线观看视频网站免费| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 中文欧美无线码| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 岛国毛片在线播放| 色吧在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 考比视频在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 日本色播在线视频| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 51国产日韩欧美| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产片内射在线| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| av不卡在线播放| www.av在线官网国产| 成人影院久久| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | av不卡在线播放| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 久久久久久伊人网av| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久99一区二区三区| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区 | 亚洲美女视频黄频| 如何舔出高潮| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 18在线观看网站| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 99国产精品免费福利视频| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 一区在线观看完整版| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚州av有码| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡 | 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产av精品麻豆| 丝袜美足系列| 国产成人精品在线电影| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产在线免费精品| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 久久久欧美国产精品| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 少妇的逼水好多| 精品久久久久久久久av| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产在线视频一区二区| 免费观看性生交大片5| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 久久av网站| 9色porny在线观看| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 精品少妇内射三级| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 丝袜美足系列| 免费观看av网站的网址| a级毛片黄视频| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国产成人aa在线观看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| a级毛片在线看网站| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| www.色视频.com| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲av.av天堂| av在线老鸭窝| 一级片'在线观看视频| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 成人影院久久| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| av在线播放精品| 色94色欧美一区二区| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| a 毛片基地| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲综合色惰| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 在线天堂最新版资源| 久久97久久精品| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 男女免费视频国产| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 少妇的逼好多水| 久久久久久久国产电影| 在线天堂最新版资源| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 免费看av在线观看网站| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| av免费观看日本| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 成人国产av品久久久| 视频区图区小说| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲综合色网址| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 午夜日本视频在线| 婷婷色综合www| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 一区二区av电影网| 日韩电影二区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 伦精品一区二区三区| 精品少妇内射三级| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产乱来视频区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 少妇人妻 视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| av在线观看视频网站免费| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产成人精品福利久久| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 大香蕉久久成人网| 丁香六月天网| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| .国产精品久久| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 少妇丰满av| 久久狼人影院| av在线播放精品| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 精品久久久久久电影网| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 考比视频在线观看| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 久久久精品区二区三区| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 成人无遮挡网站| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 曰老女人黄片| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 自线自在国产av| 欧美另类一区| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 午夜91福利影院| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产成人av激情在线播放 | 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| av在线app专区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 日本黄大片高清| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 五月天丁香电影| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| tube8黄色片| 综合色丁香网| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 免费观看在线日韩| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 制服人妻中文乱码| www.av在线官网国产| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 日日啪夜夜爽| 精品久久久久久久久av| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 青春草国产在线视频| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 日本91视频免费播放| xxx大片免费视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 观看av在线不卡| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 欧美另类一区| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 精品一区二区三卡| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站|