• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Diagnostic performance of endoscopic classifications for neoplastic lesions in patients with ulcerative colitis: A retrospective case-control study

    2022-03-31 08:10:54YuichiKidaTakeshiYamamuraKeikoMaedaTsunakiSawadaEriIshikawaYasuyukiMizutaniNaomiKakushimaKazuhiroFurukawaTakuyaIshikawaEizaburoOhnoHirokiKawashimaMasanaoNakamuraMasatoshiIshigamiMitsuhiroFujishiro
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2022年10期

    Yuichi Kida,Takeshi Yamamura, Keiko Maeda,Tsunaki Sawada,Eri Ishikawa,Yasuyuki Mizutani,NaomiKakushima, Kazuhiro Furukawa,Takuya Ishikawa,Eizaburo Ohno, Hiroki Kawashima,Masanao Nakamura,Masatoshi Ishigami,Mitsuhiro Fujishiro

    Abstract

    Key Words: Diagnostic performance; Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification; Pit pattern classification; Sporadic neoplasms; Ulcerative colitis; Ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasms

    lNTRODUCTlON

    Patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis (UC) are at risk for colorectal tumors due to chronic inflammation. The cumulative risk of colorectal cancer at 10 , 20 , and 30 years after UC onset are reportedly 1 .6 %, 8 .3 %, and 18 .4 %, respectively[1 ]. Consequent to improvements in UC treatment, longstanding UC cases have gradually increased, and surveillance colonoscopy has become more important.UC patients are exposed to the risk of not only UC-associated neoplasms (UCAN) but also sporadic neoplasms (SN). As the treatment strategy for UCAN greatly differs from that for SN, distinguishing UCAN from SN is important[2 ]. In line with the Surveillance for Colorectal Endoscopic Neoplasia Detection and Management in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: International Consensus Recommendations (SCENIC) consensus statement, endoscopic resection now tends to be accepted as a treatment for endoscopically visible dysplasia[3 ]. With the support from the SCENIC consensus statement, endoscopic treatments for visible dysplasia have gradually increased and have attracted attention recently[4 -6 ].

    UCAN differentiation by endoscopic findings had been described previously. Prior studies revealed that features of surface structure and vascular pattern obtained by magnifying Narrow-Band Imaging(NBI) and chromoendoscopy are useful in diagnosing UCAN[7 -11 ]. Additionally, multimodal endo-scopic classification without the use of magnifying endoscopy has been reported[12 ]. Most of these studies focused on differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions or on detecting these lesions,not on qualitatively diagnosing neoplastic lesions in UC patients. While several studies have focused on differentiating UCAN from non-neoplastic lesions, few reports have explored the differentiation of UCAN from SN[2 ].

    Table 1 Clinical characteristics of ulcerative colitis patients with neoplastic lesions (mean ± SD)

    The Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET) and pit pattern classifications are useful for determining the pathology and invasion depth of colorectal tumors[13 ,14 ]. Both classifications have high reproducibility and good diagnostic accuracy in terms of pathology and invasion depth[15 -19 ], as well as good intraand inter-observer agreement rates for diagnosing colorectal tumors[18 ,20 ]. Dysplastic pit patterns are sometimes observed even in non-dysplastic lesions due to inflammation and regenerative changes in UC patients[21 ]. Surface and vascular patterns are modified by inflammation in UCAN[22 ]. These patterns are likely to be modified by inflammation not only in UCAN but also in SN located in the inflamed mucosa. Therefore, whether these endoscopic classifications apply to the diagnosis of neoplastic lesions in UC patients remains unclear. Only a few reports have described the usefulness of both classifications in diagnosing UCAN[22 ], and there have been no reports on their use for classifying SN in UC patients. Hence, the present retrospective case-control study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the JNET and pit pattern classifications for neoplastic lesions in UC patients.

    MATERlALS AND METHODS

    Patients

    A total of 89 UC patients who had neoplastic lesions that could be pathologically evaluated by biopsy,endoscopic resection, or surgery and who underwent colonoscopy at Nagoya University Hospital fromAugust 2005 to April 2020 were consecutively registered. Neoplastic lesions located in the colonic mucosa outside the previously or currently inflamed mucosa were excluded. Additionally, lesions magnified using both NBI or Blue LASER imaging (BLI) and chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine or crystal violet were included. The present study ultimately enrolled 41 UC patients with 44 lesions that could be assessed using both the JNET and pit pattern classifications. According to pathological findings, these patients were divided into two groups—namely, the UCAN group, which comprised 19 patients with 21 lesions, and the SN group, which consisted of 22 UC patients with 23 lesions.

    Endoscopic evaluation

    Endoscopists conducted routine white-light imaging observation. When neoplastic lesions were identified, magnifying NBI or BLI and magnifying chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine or crystal violet were performed. All lesions were endoscopically detectable, visually identified, and subsequently diagnosed using target biopsy. The morphological type of neoplasms was categorized in accordance with the SCENIC consensus statement[3 ]. The severity of inflammation in the mucosa surrounding neoplasms was assessed using the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS)[23 ]. The JNET and pit pattern classifications were employed to evaluate the pathology and invasion depth of neoplasms by endoscopy. With the JNET classification, lesions were categorized based on surface and vascular patterns into types 1 , 2 A, 2 B, and 3 . The pit pattern classification was used under indigo carmine or crystal violet observation; lesions were categorized based on form of crypt orifices into types I, II, III, IV, VIlow irregularity, VIhigh irregularity, and VN. This study used JNET type 2 A and pit pattern type III/IV as indicators of low-grade dysplasia (LGD), based on previous reports[22 ].Furthermore, in the same manner, as LGD, JNET type 2 B and pit pattern type VIlow irregularity were utilized as indicators of high-grade dysplasia (HGD) to shallow submucosal invasive carcinoma (sSM),whereas JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VIhigh irregularity/VNwere used as indicators of deep submucosal invasive carcinoma (dSM). Endoscopic images corresponding to the part that could be evaluated pathologically were extracted, and six endoscopists (three experts, three non-experts) each evaluated the endoscopic findings. Experts were defined as those with ≥ 5 -year experience in magnifying image-enhanced endoscopy and who had managed more than 1000 cases[18 ]. Endoscopists independently evaluated the images obtained from 44 lesions; when individual diagnostic interpretations differed, they discussed the case until a consensus was reached. Diagnostic performance was assessed by consensus of the first diagnosis of three endoscopists. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated for the diagnostic results of each endoscopist. The second diagnosis was performed by randomly switching the order of images at ≥ 1 mo after the first round of diagnosis to calculate for intraobserver agreement.

    Pathological assessment

    Two pathologists specializing in the gastrointestinal tract conducted pathological diagnosis of UCAN and SN according to the Riddellet al[24 ]’s pathological system. UCAN and SN were differentiated based on pathological results. If necessary, p53 and Ki-67 immunostaining were performed. UCAN was diagnosed for cases with diffuse and strong expression or complete absence of p53 immunostaining[25 ]. Differentiation of Ki-67 -positive cells from the basal mucosal side toward the superficial mucosal side[25 ,26 ], called “bottom-up,” was also useful in diagnosing UCAN. Contrary to the UCAN,expression of p53 is low in SN. Moreover, Ki-67 -positive cells are mainly distributed at the superficial zone of the mucosal layer, and tumor cells differentiate towards the basal side of the mucosa in the SN[26 ], also known as “top-down”. Dysplasia was classified into LGD and HGD according to the degree of cellular and nuclear dysplastic change. Submucosal invasive carcinoma was divided into dSM and sSM depending on whether the vertical invasion depth exceeded 1000 μm. When two pathologists had different diagnoses, they discussed the case until a conclusion was reached.

    Data collection

    Clinical data, including age at UC onset, disease duration, sex, disease distribution (total colitis, leftsided colitis, proctitis), clinical type (relapse and remission, chronic persistent, first attack), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and family history of colorectal cancer, were retrospectively collected from medical records and investigated. Endoscopic findings, including location, color, lesion border,morphology, and UCEIS, were obtained from medical reports and evaluated.

    Statistical analysis

    Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± SD or as median with range and were compared using Student’st-test or Mann-WhitneyUtest, depending on the normality of data distribution, as determined by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Categorial variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test or chi-square test. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV),and accuracy were calculated for both the JNET and pit pattern classifications. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were calculated using κ coefficient and arbitrarily interpreted as follows: 0 -0 .20 , poor;0 .21 -0 .40 , fair; 0 .41 -0 .60 , moderate; 0 .61 -0 .80 , substantial; and 0 .81 -1 .00 , excellent. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics version 27 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States) and R3 .6 .3 (CRAN, freeware, https://personal.hs. hirosaki-u.ac.jp/pteiki/reserch/stat/R/), withP< 0 .05 being indicative of statistical significance.

    RESULTS

    Clinical characteristics

    All patients were divided into two groups according to pathological findings. Inter-observer agreement in the diagnosis between UCAN and SN by the two pathologists was 0 .531 . The clinical characteristics of both groups are summarized in Table 1 . The UCAN group had a significantly lower mean age at UC onset than the SN group (35 .7 vs 48 .8 years, P = 0 .003 ). Pathological findings indicated 2 LGD lesions, 11 HGD lesions, 3 sSM lesions, and 5 dSM lesions in the UCAN group and 16 LGD lesions, 5 HGD lesions,and 2 dSM lesions in the SN group. No significant differences in the disease duration, sex, extent of disease, disease distribution, presence of PSC, and family history of colorectal cancer were identified between the two groups.

    Endoscopic and clinical findings

    The endoscopic findings for both groups are presented in Table 2 . A total of 17 (81 .0 %) and 12 (52 .2 %)lesions were detected in the proctosigmoid colon in the UCAN and SN groups, respectively (P= 0 .044 ).The UCAN group had a higher percentage of reddish lesions than the SN group (71 .4 % vs 39 .1 %,P=0 .032 ). All lesions in the SN group exhibited a clear border, whereas 16 lesions (76 .2 %) in the UCAN group showed an unclear border (P< 0 .001 ). The UCAN group had a higher proportion of flat or depressed lesions than the SN group (28 .6 % vs 8 .7 %, P = 0 .094 ). Inflammation in the mucosa surrounding neoplasms was more severe in the UCAN group than in the SN group [UCEIS (median): 2vs0 , P < 0 .001 ].

    Diagnostic performance of the JNET and pit pattern classifications

    Diagnostic performance for each type in the JNET and pit pattern classifications is shown in Tables 3 and 4 , respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were calculated for experts and non-experts separately.

    Table 3 Diagnostic performance (95 % confidence interval) for each type in the Japan Narrow-Band lmaging Expert Team classification

    In the UCAN group, JNET type 2 A had a low PPV [experts vs non-experts: 50 .0 % (10 .2 -85 .6 ) vs 33 .3 %(12 .3 -33 .3 )] and a high NPV [experts vs non-experts: 94 .7 % (90 .5 -98 .5 ) vs 100 % (91 .6 -100 )] for both experts and non-experts. Conversely, in the SN group, JNET type 2 A had a high PPV [expertsvsnonexperts: 100 % (83 .4 -100 ) vs 93 .3 % (79 .6 -98 .7 )] and a low NPV [experts vs non-experts: 63 .6 % (45 .5 -63 .6 )vs75 .0 % (49 .3 -85 .0 )]. In the UCAN group, the accuracy of diagnosis for JNET types 2 A, 2 B, and 3 by experts was 90 .5 %, 71 .4 %, and 85 .7 %, respectively, and that by non-experts was 81 .0 %, 76 .2 %, and 85 .7 %, respectively.

    In the UCAN group, pit pattern type III/IV had a low PPV [expertsvsnon-experts: 40 .0 % (14 .9 -40 .0 )vs20 .0 % (7 .3 -20 .0 )] and a high NPV [experts vs non-experts: 100 % (92 .2 -100 ) vs 100 % (88 .4 -100 )] for both experts and non-experts. Conversely, in the SN group, pit pattern type III/IV had a high PPV[expertsvsnon-experts: 100 % (86 .4 -100 ) vs 92 .9 % (77 .8 -98 .6 )] and a low NPV [77 .8 % (56 .6 -77 .8 ) vs 66 .7 %(43 .3 -75 .6 )]. In the UCAN group, the accuracy of diagnosis for pit pattern type III/IV, type VIlow irregularity, and type VIhigh irregularity/VNby experts was 85 .7 %, 57 .1 %, and 76 .2 %, respectively, and that by non-experts was 61 .9 %, 57 .1 %, and 85 .7 %, respectively. The accuracy of diagnosis for JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VIhigh irregularity/VNby both experts and non-experts was higher in the SN group than in the UCAN group. Figure 1 shows a representative case of UCAN misdiagnosed by all endoscopists.

    Intra-observer and inter-observer agreements for the JNET and pit pattern classifications

    Intra-observer agreement was separately calculated for experts and non-experts (Table 5 ). The intraobserver agreement among experts for the JNET classification of UCAN, pit pattern classification of UCAN, JNET classification of SN, and pit pattern classification of SN was 0 .387 , 0 .454 , 0 .803 , and 0 .567 ,respectively. The corresponding values for non-experts were 0 .640 , 0 .569 , 0 .828 , and 0 .628 , respectively.The intra-observer agreement for SN was higher than that for UCAN. Among non-experts, the intraobserver agreement for both UCAN and SN was higher with the JNET classification than with the pit pattern classification.

    Inter-observer agreement was calculated similarly (Table 6 ). The inter-observer agreement among experts for the JNET classification of UCAN, pit pattern classification of UCAN, JNET classification of SN, and pit pattern classification of SN was 0 .401 , 0 .364 , 0 .666 , and 0 .597 , respectively. The corresponding values for non-experts were 0 .237 , 0 .378 , 0 .503 , and 0 .437 , respectively. Overall, the inter-observer agreement for SN was higher than that for UCAN among both experts and non-experts,irrespective of the classification system used.

    Table 4 Diagnostic performance (95 % confidence interval) for each type in the pit pattern classification

    Table 5 lntra-observer agreement

    DlSCUSSlON

    In the present study, we evaluated the performance of the JNET and pit pattern classifications in patients with UC. The JNET classification evaluates the tumors’ surface and vascular patterns, whereas the pit pattern classification assesses the form of pits on the tumor surface. Colonic mucosal inflammation in UC patients modifies the tumors’ surface and vascular patterns and is considered to reduce the diagnostic accuracy of both classifications. Here, we revealed that the accuracy of diagnosing colorectal tumors using JNET and pit pattern classifications was lower in UC patients, particularly those with UCAN, than in non-UC patients[15 -18 ]. The agreement rates were lower for both UCAN and SNpatients than for non-UC patients. The diagnostic performance of both classifications in UC patients is substantially lower than their previously reported diagnostic performance in non-UC patients[15 -18 ].

    Table 6 lnter-observer agreement

    Figure 1 Endoscopic features of ulcerative colitis-associated neoplasms misdiagnosed by all endoscopists. A: White-light imaging reveals a flat elevated lesion in the rectum; B: Chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine shows a clear lesion border; C: Magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging of box in (B) shows regular surface and vascular patterns, which were classified by all endoscopists as Japan Narrow-Band Imaging Expert Team classification type 2 A; D:Magnifying endoscopy with crystal violet chromoendoscopy of box in (B) reveals relatively uniform villous structures, which were classified by all endoscopists as pit pattern type IV; E: Pathological examination of the resected specimen by endoscopic submucosal dissection shows architectural atypia. This lesion was pathologically diagnosed as high-grade dysplasia (hematoxylin and eosin staining, original magnification × 50 ); F: Immunohistochemistry for p53 on serial section of(E).

    Previous reports revealed that, compared to SN, UCAN is more common in the proctosigmoid colon and features more redness, unclear border, flat and depressed lesions, and a higher degree of surrounding inflammation[2 ]. On magnifying chromoendoscopy, pit pattern types III, IV, and V, which are also caused by regenerative changes, are useful in diagnosing UCAN[9 ,21 ]. In the present study, the UCAN group had a significantly higher proportion of lesions with endoscopically unclear border and severe inflammation in the mucosa surrounding neoplasms than the SN group. As colorectal tumors can considerably impact the quality of life of UC patients, it is essential for endoscopists to understand these endoscopic features of UCAN.

    In the UCAN group, JNET type 2 A and pit pattern type III/IV had a low PPV but with a high NPV in LGD diagnosis, and JNET type 2 B and pit pattern type VIlow irregularity had a low NPV in the diagnosis of HGD to sSM. This was because several lesions in UCAN were diagnosed as JNET type 2 A or pit pattern type III/IV, even though they were actually HGD to sSM. Additional detailed analysis revealed that most endoscopists diagnosed about one-quarter of HGD to sSM lesions as JNET type 2 A and one-third of HGD to sSM lesions as pit pattern type III/IV. Furthermore, a small number of dSM lesions were diagnosed as JNET type 2 A or pit pattern type III/IV (Table 7 ).

    In the SN group, JNET type 2 A and pit pattern type III/IV had a high PPV but with a low NPV in LGD diagnosis, and JNET type 2 B and pit pattern type VIlow irregularity had a low PPV in the diagnosis of HGD to sSM. Because JNET type 2 B and pit pattern type VIlow irregularity include lesions from LGD to dSM, these types have low PPV even in non-UC patients[17 ,19 ,27 ]. Several LGD and dSM lesions in the SN group were diagnosed as JNET type 2 B and pit pattern type VIlow irregularity. JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VIhigh irregularity/VNin both UCAN and SN groups showed low sensitivity but with high specificity and accuracy. Previous studies showed that JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VIhigh irregularity/VNhave high specificity for dSM diagnosis in both UC and non-UC patients[17 -19 ,22 ]. Regardless of whether the surface and vascular patterns are modified by inflammation, JNET type 3 and pit pattern type VIhigh irregularity/VNhave been confirmed to be useful in diagnosing dSM among UC patients. In UCAN, the tumors’ surface structure sometimes could not represent the dysplastic change due to the bottom-up growth pattern; hence, it is considered that several lesions are underestimated by endoscopic classifications. Additionally, SN located in the inflamed mucosa, especially SN in the severely inflamed mucosa, tends to be misdiagnosed due to the influence of inflammation.

    Intra-observer agreement was higher among non-experts than among experts; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Inter-observer agreement did not also significantly differ but was higher in experts than in non-experts. Irrespective of the endoscopists’ experience, a consistent endoscopic diagnosis of neoplastic lesions in UC patients was difficult to achieve. In particular, the intra- and inter-observer agreements were lower for UCAN than for SN.

    The present study has some limitations. First, our study was conducted on a small number of cases;however, given its retrospective nature, the same size could not be set a priori. We believe that the small number of typical LGDs in this study was responsible for the unsatisfactory diagnostic accuracy.Second, only neoplastic lesions evaluated using both the JNET and pit pattern classifications were included. While inflammation and regenerative changes might be evaluated as neoplastic patterns by both JNET and pit pattern classifications, our study could not include non-neoplastic lesions. Nonneoplastic lesions should be included in future studies. Third, differentiation between UCAN and SN was based on pathology; nevertheless, even in pathology, distinguishing UCAN from SN can be difficult.

    CONCLUSlON

    The JNET and pit pattern classifications did not show high accuracy in diagnosing the pathology and invasion depth of neoplastic lesions in UC patients. Overall, the endoscopic diagnosis of UCAN tended to be underestimated as compared to the pathological results. Endoscopic diagnosis of neoplastic lesions in UC patients is still difficult, and treatment strategies need to be carefully determined.

    ARTlCLE HlGHLlGHTS

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    We would like to thank Go Kajikawa, Masaya Esaki, Issei Hasegawa, Kentaro Yamada, and Shuji Ikegami for evaluating the endoscopic data.

    FOOTNOTES

    Author contributions:Kida Y and Yamamura T contributed to the conception and design; Kida Y, Yamamura T,Kawashima H, Ishikawa E, and Kakushima N contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the data; Kida Y drafted the article; Nakamura M, Ohno E, Sawada T, Maeda K, Ishikawa T, Ishigami M, and Furukawa K contributed to the critical revision of the article for important intellectual content; Mizutani Y, Yamamura T and Nakamura M contributed to statistical analysis; Fujishiro M made the final approval of the article; all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    lnstitutional review board statement:The use of patient data for this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Nagoya University Hospital, No. 2015 -0485 .

    lnformed consent statement:The need for patient consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

    Conflict-of-interest statement:The authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.

    Data sharing statement:No additional data are available.

    Open-Access:This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BYNC 4 .0 ) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is noncommercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4 .0 /

    Country/Territory of origin:Japan

    ORClD number:Yuichi Kida 0000 -0002 -1345 -1922 ; Takeshi Yamamura 0000 -0003 -4994 -016 X; Keiko Maeda 0000 -0001 -7615 -0476 ; Tsunaki Sawada 0000 -0002 -4779 -9708 ; Eri Ishikawa 0000 -0003 -1623 -7996 ; Yasuyuki Mizutani 0000 -0002 -4363 -3161 ; Naomi Kakushima 0000 -0002 -9635 -2099 ; Kazuhiro Furukawa 0000 -0003 -0980 -9095 ; Takuya Ishikawa 0000 -0001 -5814 -3555 ; Eizaburo Ohno 0000 -0002 -7730 -4630 ; Hiroki Kawashima 0000 -0002 -3720 -781 X; Masanao Nakamura 0000 -0002 -5444 -143 X; Masatoshi Ishigami 0000 -0003 -0938 -631 X; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro 0000 -0002 -4074 -1140 .

    S-Editor:Fan JR

    L-Editor:A

    P-Editor:Fan JR

    亚洲美女黄片视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 久久久久久久久中文| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品永久免费网站| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 一本精品99久久精品77| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产熟女xx| 亚洲色图av天堂| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 性色avwww在线观看| 在线看三级毛片| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| svipshipincom国产片| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 内地一区二区视频在线| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 免费高清视频大片| 日本 av在线| 国产高清激情床上av| 黄色日韩在线| 手机成人av网站| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 黄色成人免费大全| 久久中文看片网| a在线观看视频网站| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 精品日产1卡2卡| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 在线国产一区二区在线| 小说图片视频综合网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 精品久久久久久,| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 变态另类丝袜制服| 综合色av麻豆| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 丰满的人妻完整版| 免费看a级黄色片| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 丁香六月欧美| 免费av观看视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产综合懂色| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 美女大奶头视频| 免费大片18禁| 国产单亲对白刺激| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 久久6这里有精品| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲18禁久久av| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 脱女人内裤的视频| 精品久久久久久,| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲不卡免费看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产成人av教育| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲激情在线av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 午夜久久久久精精品| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 免费在线观看日本一区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| avwww免费| 国产成人影院久久av| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看 | 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| eeuss影院久久| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 18+在线观看网站| 91av网一区二区| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 此物有八面人人有两片| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲成人久久性| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| www.999成人在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 国产精华一区二区三区| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲18禁久久av| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 宅男免费午夜| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 黄片小视频在线播放| 久9热在线精品视频| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 香蕉久久夜色| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 极品教师在线免费播放| 俺也久久电影网| 欧美激情在线99| 性欧美人与动物交配| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 久久久久久大精品| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 最好的美女福利视频网| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 国产精品,欧美在线| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 黄色成人免费大全| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 免费av观看视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产综合懂色| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲内射少妇av| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国内精品美女久久久久久| or卡值多少钱| 欧美在线黄色| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 搞女人的毛片| 热99在线观看视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 免费av观看视频| 国产高潮美女av| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 人妻久久中文字幕网| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产熟女xx| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产不卡一卡二| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 嫩草影院入口| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 免费av观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 一进一出抽搐动态| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久久色成人| 欧美区成人在线视频| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 久久人妻av系列| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 成人精品一区二区免费| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 欧美午夜高清在线| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 在线a可以看的网站| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 性欧美人与动物交配| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 手机成人av网站| 97超视频在线观看视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久 | 女警被强在线播放| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 一夜夜www| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 97碰自拍视频| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产成人aa在线观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 身体一侧抽搐| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| tocl精华| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 丁香六月欧美| 国产老妇女一区| 在线视频色国产色| 观看美女的网站| 国产综合懂色| 国产午夜精品论理片| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲无线观看免费| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 美女免费视频网站| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 中文资源天堂在线| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 色吧在线观看| 一进一出抽搐动态| 少妇的逼水好多| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 三级毛片av免费| 国产黄片美女视频| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产熟女xx| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 男女那种视频在线观看| 欧美在线黄色| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 91麻豆av在线| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久9热在线精品视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 99热这里只有精品一区| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 欧美色视频一区免费| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 男人舔奶头视频| 成年免费大片在线观看| www日本黄色视频网| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 88av欧美| 日日夜夜操网爽| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| a在线观看视频网站| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 九色成人免费人妻av| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 操出白浆在线播放| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 日韩欧美免费精品| 免费在线观看日本一区| 在线观看一区二区三区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 内射极品少妇av片p| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| av专区在线播放| 国产成人系列免费观看| tocl精华| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产高潮美女av| 久久九九热精品免费| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 免费看十八禁软件| 成年版毛片免费区| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 色综合站精品国产| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 看免费av毛片| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 在线观看66精品国产| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 色av中文字幕| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 在线国产一区二区在线| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 一夜夜www| 丁香六月欧美| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 1024手机看黄色片| av天堂中文字幕网| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲av美国av| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 欧美午夜高清在线| 亚洲第一电影网av| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| avwww免费| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产不卡一卡二| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久,| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 在线看三级毛片| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 日韩免费av在线播放| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 一区福利在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 一本综合久久免费| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产免费男女视频| 青草久久国产| 国产野战对白在线观看| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 日本成人三级电影网站| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 香蕉av资源在线| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 久久香蕉国产精品| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 女警被强在线播放| 黄色女人牲交| 欧美日本视频| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 亚洲午夜理论影院| 日韩高清综合在线| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 香蕉丝袜av| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 特级一级黄色大片| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| xxxwww97欧美| 在线免费观看的www视频| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 免费看十八禁软件| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产色婷婷99| 色播亚洲综合网| 男人舔奶头视频| 日本在线视频免费播放| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 国产精品一及| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 97超视频在线观看视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 | 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 午夜a级毛片| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久草成人影院| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 亚洲国产色片| 国产三级在线视频| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| eeuss影院久久| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 搞女人的毛片| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 成年免费大片在线观看| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 丁香欧美五月| 亚洲第一电影网av| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 一夜夜www| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 热99re8久久精品国产|