Chest CT features of children infected by B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of COVID-19

Qi-Rui Cheng · Ming-Xing Fan · Jing Hao · Xiao-Chen Hu · Xu-Hua Ge · Zhi-Liang Hu 2 · Zhuo Li

Abstract

Keywords B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant · Children · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) · Chest computed tomography(CT)

Introduction

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) reported in 2019 is a severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by the coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The disease has spread rapidly around the world and has become a global health emergency announced by the World Health Organization [ 1]. At present, research on COVID-19 shows that patients of all ages are susceptible to the disease, and individuals with comorbidities are more susceptible to infection and often have a poor prognosis [ 2].Previous reports on children pointed out that COVID-19 infection in children was relatively mild and that their prognosis was better and their mortality rate was extremely low[ 3]. However, for some children with underlying diseases,the COVID-19 infection may progress quickly to severe or critically severe types of disease requiring intensive care unit(ICU) admission and prolonged ventilation time [ 4].

The B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of SARS-CoV-2 was discovered in India at the end of 2020 and subsequently was found in more than 90 countries/regions [ 5]. Compared with the original strain, the Delta-variant strain carries "triple mutation": L452R, P681R and T478K mutations. These three mutations act on different steps of the coronavirus infection and have allowed the Delta strain to become a very threatening variant in the pandemic, increasing the virus'infectivity [ 6, 7].

Owing to the effective epidemic control in China, there are few clinical studies on Delta variant of COVID-19. Furthermore, radiological findings, which are crucial in diagnosis of COVID-19, currently are focused mainly on adults[ 8, 9]. Chest tomography (CT) is a simple and fast imaging tool that can accurately detect and evaluate lung lesions in children with COVID-19 pneumonia. The typical CT image manifestation is multifocal bilateral ground glass opacity(GGO), accompanied by patchy consolidation, which often occurs in the outer area of the lung, especially the subpleural area [ 10]. In the present study, we aim to conduct a retrospective study to investigate imaging characteristics of children infected with Delta variant.

Methods

Study population

We collected case data from 66 children with Delta-variant COVID-19 who were admitted to Nanjing Infectious Disease Center from 22 July 2021 to 20 August 2021 (hereinafter referred to as 2021 cases). We also collected case data from 23 children with original COVID-19 who were admitted to Nanjing Infectious Disease Center from 25 January 2020 to 21 February 2020 (hereinafter referred to as 2020 cases).We conducted a retrospective analysis and a comparison of the above data. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was based on the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (8th Trial Edition) proposed by the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China [ 11]. This study was approved by the local ethics committee of the hospital (protocol no: 2020-LS-ky003).

Collection of chest CT images

CT examination

All children underwent high-resolution chest CT examinations using a 64-CT scanner (Toshiba and Philips Healthcare) with exposure parameters of 110 kv scanning tube voltage, reference tube current 100 mAs, layer thickness 2.5 mm, maximum scanning layer thickness 10 mm, interval 2.5 mm. pitch 0.9,thin layer reconstruction layer thickness after scanning was 1.5 mm. Scanning range covered from the thorax entrance to the lung bottom. The technician used level 2 protection, and the scanning room was disinfected regularly. Children under 4 years old were examined after sedation to reduce artifacts.Children and escorts wore masks and applied radiation protection. The possible effects of radiation exposure on the children were explained in detail, and written consent was obtained from their legal guardians.

All the 2020 cases completed their chest CT scans within 5 days after their first symptoms (the ten symptoms of COVID-19 such as fever/cough, or asymptomatic children tested nCoV positive). Among the children in 2021, three patients did not receive a CT examination due to personal reasons. The remaining 63 cases completed their first chest CT examination within 1 week (47 cases, within 3 days)after the first symptoms or asymptomatic children tested nCoV positive. Follow-up chest CT examinations were carried out until recovery or no dynamic change was observed.

Chest CT image analysis

Distribution and morphology of lung lesions in the CT scan were examined by two senior radiologists, respectively, in the medical imaging information system. If there was any disagreement, senior radiologists were consulted.

Chest CT score

Each of the five lung lobes was assessed for degree of involvement and was classified as none (0%), minimal(1-25%), mild (26-50%), moderate (51-75%), or severe(76-100%). No involvement corresponded to a lobe score of 0, minimal involvement to a lobe score of 1, mild involvement to a lobe score of 2, moderate involvement to a lobe score of 3, and severe involvement to a lobe score of 4. An overall lung “total severity score” was reached by summing the five lobe scores (range of possible scores, 0-20) [ 12].According to the CT scores of the two lung, COVID-19 was classified by 4 stages: ≤5 is mild stage, 6-10 is moderate stage, 11-15 is severe stage, and ≥ 16 is critical stage.

Statistical analysis

Prism GraphPad 9.0.0 was used for statistical analysis and mapping. Continuous variables were expressed as the medians and standard deviation (± SD). Categorical variables were summarized as the counts and percentages in each category.

Chest CT score distribution of children in 2021 and 2020 by the first-time examination

CT score 2021 (63 patients)2020 (23 patients)n (%) n (%)0 (normal) 29 46.0 9 39.1 1-2 (mild) 25 39.7 6 26.1 3-5 (mild) 8 12.7 5 21.7 6-10 (moderate) 1 1.6 2 8.6 11-20 (severe) 0 0 1 4.3

Fig. 1 Average chest CT score of children in 2021 and 2020 by the first-time examination ( n = 63 in year 2021 and n = 23 in year 2020,respectively, P = 0.007)

Results

The chest CT score of children in 2021 was significantly lower than those in 2020 (1.10 ± 1.41 vs. 2.56 ± 3.5,

P

= 0.007) (Table 1, Fig. 1).

Among 66 children (30 boys and 36 girls) in 2021, the mean age was 10.37 ± 5.85 years. Three children did not perform chest CT because they were uncooperative; 29 showed no abnormal appearances in the first chest CT. A total of 34 cases (51.5%) showed positive findings. Lung lesions mainly appeared in the two lower lungs; twenty(58.9) % located in the right lower lobe and 18 (52.9%) in the left lower lobe, 7 (20.6%) in the right middle lobe, 5(14.7%) in the right upper lobe, and 3 (8.9%) in the upper left lobe. Most patients involved a single lobe (18 cases,52.9%), followed by two or more lobes. Lung lesions were in the simple right lung in 14 (41.2%), in both lungs in 14(41.2%), and only in the left lung in 6 (17.6%). Most of the patients’ lesions were ground glass (23, 67.6%) and nodular shadows (13, 38.2%), with patchy high density in 2, fibrous streak shadow in 1, and pulmonary consolidation. No bronchial inflation was found only in one patient.Enlargement of hilar lymphatic nodules in 2, pericardial effusion in 1, and no extrapulmonary manifestations such as pleural effusion were seen (Table 2).

Among the 23 children in 2020, the age distribution was 6.2 ± 4.1 years, including 14 boys and 9 girls (Table 2).Thirteen cases showed no abnormalities in the first chest CT. Ten cases (51.5%) showed abnormal imaging results.Among the positive children, consolidation involved both lungs in 9 cases, multi-lobe and multi-pulmonary segments in 7, bilateral lower lungs in 5, upper lobe lesions in 1, right middle lobe lesions in 1, and right lower lung lesions in 1.Subpleural patchy GGO were seen in 8 cases, patchy consolidation was seen in 6. Both GGO and patchy consolidation were seen in four cases, air bronchogram sign in 1,localized emphysema and interlobular pleural thickening in 1, no lymph nodes involvement or pleural effusion were observed (Table 2).

Discussion

This study investigated the children infected with B.1.617.2(Delta) variant COVID-19 during summer 2021 and compared them with the imaging data of children infected with the original strain in 2020. Based on imaging characteristics, this study showed that Delta-variant pediatric cases displayed less lung consolidation, more frosted glass sign with unclear edges (67.6%) or nodules (38.2%), and mostly distributed under the pleura. However, children with original strain in 2020 mostly showed serious high-density patch shadows (80%) and small-scale lung consolidation (60%).From the perspective of CT scores, the imaging-based severity of children with Delta variant was significantly milder than that in cases in 2020. The latest findings on original COVID-19 children indicated that [ 13, 14] the early-stage imaging features from preschool children were atypical,pleomorphic, mainly manifested as small patches with unclear edges, and the scale of pulmonary consolidations was smaller. In addition, children’s imaging rarely showed multifocal bilateral GGO, “paving stone sign” and other lung consolidation [ 15, 16] which were remarkable characteristics in COVID-19 adult patients on early stage. The GGO is defined as a CT imaging distributed along the bronchial vascular bundle or dorsolateral and subpleural parts.

The results of this study showed that for children with abnormal chest CT in the initial examination, the imaging indicated an aggravation of the condition from day 4 to day 7 and then showed a recovery trend from the secondweek (Table 3, Fig. 2). No radiographic exacerbations were observed in the other 29 children with normal chest CT.The outcomes of the 29 cases were as follows: 13 displayed small nodules or focal small flocculation (CT score 1-2), or subpleural small sacs appeared; 7 cases had normal chest CT during the follow-up; and the other did not undertaken CT examinations during the follow-up because of personal requirements. Delta children presented better outcomes than their original peers and the CT imaging dynamic follow-up remained normal, distinguished from adults whose imaging often showed pulmonary interstitial fibrosis changes after treatment [ 12].

Chest CT imaging performance of patients with COVID-19 by the first-time examination

CT image 2021 ( n = 34)2020( n = 10)n (%) n (%)Distribution in lobes Right upper lobe 5 14.7 1 10 Right middle lung 7 20.6 1 10 Right lower lung 20 58.9 8 80 Left Upper lung 3 8.9 0 0 Left lower lung 18 52.9 7 70 Lobes involved One lobe 18 52.9 1 10 Two lobes 11 32.3 5 50 Three lobes 3 8.8 2 20 Four lobes 1 2.9 0 0 Five lobes 0 0 0 0 Only the right lung 14 41.2 1 10 Only the left lung 6 17.6 0 0 Both lungs 14 41.7 9 90 Distribution in the lungs Peripheral 21 61.7 3 30 Central 5 14.7 1 10 Peripheral and central 7 20.6 1 10 Imaging presentations Ground glass shadows 23 67.6 5 50 Patchy high-density shadow 2 5.9 8 80 Consolidation 1 2.9 6 60 Nodules 13 38.2 0 0 Fiber streaks 2 5.9 0 0 Bronchial inflation sign 0 0 1 10 Imaging presentations outside the lung Hilar lymph nodes 2 5.9 0 0 Pleural effusion 0 0 0 0 Pericardial effusion 1 2.9 0 0 Emphysema 0 0 1 10

Imaging outcomes of the children’s cases in our study of 2020 (who were infected with original virus) were similar to those reported in other studies. Their lesions were mostly confined to both lower lungs and multiple lobes were involved [ 17]. However, Delta-variant pneumonia cases were distributed over both lower lobes similarly, but confined in a single lobe differently. The prognostic analysis of COVID-19 showed that [ 18] GGO lesions, multifocal involvement, lung parenchyma, and the degree of pleural effusion maybe used independently to predict adverse outcomes. Delta-variant peers, however, rarely had the above characteristics, and indicated a better prognosis.

Based on the imaging findings and prognosis, these Delta-variant-infected children’s features were mostly mild or moderate. This phenomenon may be related to the viral infection mechanism. Novel Coronavirus mainly mediates virus invasion through Spike protein (S protein) binding to host cell receptor and determines virus tissue or host phototropism. Shi et al. [ 19] proposed angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) as a receptor to provide a pathway for the virus to enter cells. SARS-CoV-2 virus can down-regulate the expression of ACE-2 and can affect its metabolism after infecting lung cells. In children’s lung cells, the lung receptors that bind to the SARS-CoV-2 virus S protein are structurally underdeveloped, which may reduce the inflammation and relieve disease caused by the virus [ 20- 22].Meanwhile, the CT findings of the lungs in Delta-variant cases indicate that its lung consolidation and extrapulmonary manifestation are milder than original virus-infected children. It may be explained by the following points: from the view of virus transmission, the mutated virus with highly virulence may be recognized and eliminated by the immune system due to the pressure of immune surveillance. From anevolutionary standpoint, low-viral infections maybe more likely to establish a transmission cycle in human than viruses with higher mortality [ 23]; however, there are different perspectives from researches based on adults. A recent study in Scotland found that the hospitalization rate for adults infected with the Delta variant is approximately twice than that with Alpha variant [ 24]. In the reports of other types of virus mutations [ 25], the virulence of the virus decreased for a period of time, and then increased which leading to more severe clinical symptoms.

Chest CT variation after symptoms onset measured by CT score in patients of 2021

all children, children with abnormal CT in first time, children with normal CT in first time, not significant. *There was a significant difference between the 0-3 day group and the 4-7 day group ( = 0.039); the 4-7 day group and the group over 8 days had a significant difference ( ＜ 0.001)

Grouping Total CT times 0-3 days 4-7 days More than 8 days n x ± SD n x ± SD n x ± SD A 143 49 0.98 ± 1.43 39 1.67 ± 2.29 55 1.09 ± 1.69 NS B 92 23 1.69 ± 0.82 25 2.88 ± 2.45 44 1.21 ± 1.39 *C 51 24 0 13 0.86 ± 0.62 14 0.25 ± 1.17 NS

Fig. 2 For children with abnormal chest CT findings, CT score variation during follow-up with the days after symptoms onset( n = 34 in 0-3 days, n = 25 in 4-7 days, n = 44 after 8 days, * P = 0.039,? P ＜ 0.001,). NS no significant

COVID-19 infected children tend to be misdiagnosed as ordinary bronchial pneumonia because their imaging showed patchy GGO which is indistinguishable from other diseases included mycoplasma pneumonia, H1N1 influenza pneumonia, and adenovirus pneumonia. It is necessary to distinguish the CT features of COVID-19 pneumonia from others. Adenovirus pneumonia mostly occurs in children, mainly involving the middle and inner areas of bilateral lungs, manifested as hilar enlargement, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, subcutaneous emphysema,mediastinal emphysema and the subpleural lesions are rare[ 26]. The most common CT manifestation of mycoplasma pneumonia is bilateral peribranchial perivascular interstitial infiltrations in central and middle lung zones [ 27].Unlike SARS-CoV-2, RSV pneumonia is known to cause an airway-centric pattern of disease, leading to moderate bronchial enlargement and bronchial wall thickening [ 28].The most common imaging features of H1N1 pneumonia are unilateral or bilateral GGO, with or without related focal or multifocal areas of consolidation. GGO and consolidation areas are mainly distributed around bronchial vessels and subpleural [ 29]. Deeper understanding the above image characteristics facilitates the identification.

This article summarizes the chest CT characteristics of children infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and Delta-variant strains. However, clinicians should not base opinions on CT only. Pathogenic examination should be put into practice as soon as possible. Furthermore, there are some limitations in this study, including its retrospective nature, only including Chinese ethnicity and relatively low sample size.

In conclusion, the chest CT images of Delta-variant COVID-19 children turned out to be diverse: single lobe involved mainly, ground glass sign and high-density nodular shadows frequently, and generally milder than original strain COVID-19 children. Taking into consideration the radiation damage on children's thymus and potential risk, such as radiation pneumonitis caused by frequent CT examination, the reexamination frequency should be appropriately reduced according to the initial CT manifestation, personalized clinical feature, and laboratory examinations. Deeper understanding of lung CT images can be conducted to diagnose COVID-19 timely and to maintain quarantine, and take intervention early.

Author contributions

ZLH, ZL, XHG, QRC, MXF conceptualized and designed the study, carried out the analyses, drafted the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript. MXF collected data,coordinated, and supervised data collection. MXF, XCH, JH designed the data collection instruments, collected data. QRC and MXF contributed equally to this paper. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This study was supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2020M681674 (to Xuhua Ge) and The Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation (No.YKK20130) (to Zhuo Li).

Data availability statement

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The datasets are also available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Declarations

Ethical approval

This work was reviewed and approved by the Medical Ethical Committee of Second Hospital of Nanjing (approval number 2020-LS-ky003).

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Author Xuhua Ge is a member of the Editorial Board for

World Journal of Pediatrics

. The paper was handled by the other Editor and has undergone rigorous peer review process. Author Xuhua Ge was not involved in the journal's review of, or decisions related to, this manuscript.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from each enrolled patient.