• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Basic mechanisms of peripheral nerve injury and treatment via electrical stimulation

    2022-03-09 07:33:32XiaoLeiChuXiZiSongQiLiYuRuLiFengHeXiaoSongGuDongMing

    Xiao-Lei Chu, Xi-Zi Song, Qi Li, Yu-Ru Li, Feng He, Xiao-Song Gu,Dong Ming

    Abstract Previous studies on the mechanisms of peripheral nerve injury (PNI) have mainly focused on the pathophysiological changes within a single injury site. However, recent studies have indicated that within the central nervous system, PNI can lead to changes in both injury sites and target organs at the cellular and molecular levels. Therefore, the basic mechanisms of PNI have not been comprehensively understood. Although electrical stimulation was found to promote axonal regeneration and functional rehabilitation after PNI, as well as to alleviate neuropathic pain, the specific mechanisms of successful PNI treatment are unclear. We summarize and discuss the basic mechanisms of PNI and of treatment via electrical stimulation. After PNI, activity in the central nervous system (spinal cord) is altered,which can limit regeneration of the damaged nerve. For example, cell apoptosis and synaptic stripping in the anterior horn of the spinal cord can reduce the speed of nerve regeneration. The pathological changes in the posterior horn of the spinal cord can modulate sensory abnormalities after PNI. This can be observed in cases of ectopic discharge of the dorsal root ganglion leading to increased pain signal transmission. The injured site of the peripheral nerve is also an important factor affecting post-PNI repair. After PNI, the proximal end of the injured site sends out axial buds to innervate both the skin and muscle at the injury site. A slow speed of axon regeneration leads to low nerve regeneration. Therefore, it can take a long time for the proximal nerve to reinnervate the skin and muscle at the injured site. From the perspective of target organs, long-term denervation can cause atrophy of the corresponding skeletal muscle, which leads to abnormal sensory perception and hyperalgesia, and finally, the loss of target organ function. The mechanisms underlying the use of electrical stimulation to treat PNI include the inhibition of synaptic stripping, addressing the excessive excitability of the dorsal root ganglion, alleviating neuropathic pain, improving neurological function,and accelerating nerve regeneration. Electrical stimulation of target organs can reduce the atrophy of denervated skeletal muscle and promote the recovery of sensory function. Findings from the included studies confirm that after PNI, a series of physiological and pathological changes occur in the spinal cord, injury site, and target organs, leading to dysfunction. Electrical stimulation may address the pathophysiological changes mentioned above, thus promoting nerve regeneration and ameliorating dysfunction.

    Key Words: axonal transport; brain-derived neurotrophic factor; dorsal horn stimulation; dorsal root ganglion stimulation; electrical stimulation; nerve regeneration; neuropathic pain; peripheral nerve injury; spinal cord dorsal stimulation

    Introduction

    Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) can lead to severe sensorimotor impairment and chronic neurogenic pain (Li et al., 2021; Xing et al., 2021), and is a prevalent cause of disability worldwide (Martínez-Marcos and Sa?udo, 2019).Sunderland (1951) classified PNI into five grades according to the extent of injury and loss of function. The first grade describes a conduction block, which is the physiological interruption of nerve conduction along the axon at the site of injury, with an intact nerve structure and no Wallerian degeneration. Selfrepair is expected in these cases. The second grade is characterized by axonal interruption, an intact endoneurium, and Wallerian degeneration. In these cases, nerve self-repair is observed with a speed of 1 mm/d. The third, fourth,and fifth grades involve injury to the endoneurial tubes, perineurium, and epineurium, respectively. Although self-repair is expected in the third grade,this is usually slow and incomplete. Thus, surgical intervention may eventually be required. Patients with grades four and five PNI are not expected to exhibit self-repair capacity, and surgical intervention is often necessary (Davis, 2020).The last decade has brought many surgical innovations in the treatment of PNI. However, there have been no significant improvements in the success of rehabilitation, as patients continue to experience somatosensory disorders.Moreover, 57% of patients with PNI are between 16 and 35 years of age, and 25% of patients with upper limb PNI are unable to return to work within 1.5 years post-operation (Kouyoumdjian et al., 2017). Therefore, PNI is associated with long-term disability and financial difficulties.

    Treatments for PNI range from conservative approaches to surgical interventions. Conservative approaches include pharmacological treatments,cell-based therapies, and physical therapy. Pharmacological treatments have been found to improve axonal regeneration. Commonly used neurotrophic drugs include B vitamins, methylcobalamin, and exogenous neurotrophic factors (Ehmedah et al., 2019; Karagyaur et al., 2020; Sawangjit et al., 2020).However, because local drug concentrations in the peripheral blood tend to be low, pharmacological treatments often fail to achieve sustained clinical benefits. Recent years have seen tremendous progress in cell-based therapies such as those employing Schwann cells (SCs), mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs),bone marrow stromal stem cells, and skin precursor cells (Kubiak et al.,2020). Among these, MSCs can secrete various growth factors and support both nerve cells and SCs. A recent study indicated that exosomes from MSCs may be useful in a novel therapeutic strategy for PNI, as they can promote neurite outgrowth in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and cortical neurons (Dong et al., 2019). However, difficulties associated with obtaining and sustaining such materials severely limit the clinical applications of cell therapy. Common physical therapies include phototherapy, magnetic therapy, acupuncture, and functional training. Despite the large variety of options, the treatment effects are not satisfactory. When spontaneous recovery is not observed in clinical practice, surgical interventions are often necessary. However, it is difficult to determine the optimal time for surgical intervention (Midha and Grochmal,2019).

    Compared with conservative approaches and surgical treatment, electrical stimulation (ES) is a safe and effective treatment option that can be applied in the vast majority of patients. Generally, patients without malignant tumors, high fever, coma, active bleeding, skin damage, or acute suppurative inflammation are eligible to receive ES. A previous study showed that ES can cause twisting of the axons and cytoarchitecture, leading to edema(Martellucci, 2015). However, recent studies reported that ES is efficacious in promoting axonal regeneration and functional rehabilitation in PNI patients(Gordon, 2016; Barber et al., 2018; Power et al., 2020). In addition, ES can be used to treat neuropathic pain after PNI. However, the physiological changes underlying PNI and the therapeutic effects of ES are complex. In this review,we summarize the physiological changes associated with PNI and the specific mechanisms of ES treatment at three levels: the cell body, the site of injury,and the target organ, to reflect a holistic view. Our goal was to generate theoretical guidance for further clinical ES applications.

    Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

    We used PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed) to collect relevant papers published from inception to 2021 for inclusion in this narrative review.Our search keywords were: “peripheral nerve injury”, “electrical stimulation”,“peripheral nerve regeneration”, “spinal cord dorsal stimulation”, “dorsal horn stimulation”, “dorsal root ganglion stimulation”, “neuropathic pain”, “brainderived neurotrophic factor”, “axonal transport”, “transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation”, and “skeletal muscle stimulation”. After eliminating duplicates from the retrieved studies, we read the titles and abstracts of each article as a preliminary screening process, and then read the full texts to eliminate studies that did not cover the mechanisms of peripheral nerve injury and stimulation. The literature search process was primarily completed by author XLC.

    The Mechanisms of Peripheral Nerve Injury

    PNI is a common neurological condition that may cause motor and sensory disturbances as well as neuropathic pain. Pathological changes occur not only at the site of direct injury, but also throughout the affected regions of the central nervous system. In addition, target organs can be affected due to prolonged denervation. Therefore, the pathological mechanisms are complex,necessitating a holistic view. Changes at different levels are discussed in the following sections (Table 1).

    Table 1 |Summary of the basic mechanism of peripheral nerve injury

    Neurophysiological changes associated with PNI-induced spinal cord injury Motor neuron apoptosis and synaptic stripping in the ventral horn of the

    spinal cord

    After PNI, motor neurons in the anterior horn of the spinal cord often undergo apoptosis. Current research suggests that there are two explanations for motor neurons apoptosis after PNI (Hart et al., 2008). The first is oxidative stress, and the second is significant upregulation of the expression of apoptosis-related genes Caspase-3, Caspase-8, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor, tumor necrosis factor receptor, and Fas after PNI. Consistent with the abovementioned mechanism, injection of a Bcl-12-expressing vector 1 week prior to root avulsion was found to increase the survival of lesioned motor neurons by 50% (Natsume et al., 2002).

    Synaptic stripping is another cause of functional loss after PNI. PNI usually causes activation and proliferation of microglia in the spinal cord. Upon activation, microglia proliferate and migrate toward the axotomized ventral horn, interposing themselves between ventral horn cell bodies and synapses undergoing detachment. The phenomenon in which microglia ‘lift’ these synapses has been termed “synaptic stripping” (Salvany et al., 2021). Synaptic stripping can induce Ia axons and synapses to withdraw from the ventral horn.Although motor and Ia axons can reinnervate muscles, Ia axons cannot return to the ventral horn. Consequently, individuals with this type of PNI show deficits during high force-related motor tasks due to the absence of Ia axons(Lyle et al., 2017).

    Given this information, we hypothesized that motor neuron apoptosis can cause the dendritic tree to shrink, thereby creating a need for reactive microglia to scavenge debris. After neuronal apoptosis, microglia aggregate around neuronal debris. Thus, immune surveillance appears to play an important role in the injured nervous system during neuronal cell death.

    Ectopic DRG activity in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord

    The DRG, also called the sensory ganglia, is a gathering place for the syncytium of most primary sensory neurons. Most DRG neurons are pseudounipolar, and are located in the intervertebral foramen between the vertebrae. Every cell body has two axons: one peripheral axon and one central axon that transmits electrical signals from the peripheral to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord(Esposito et al., 2019). Morphologically, DRG neurons can be divided into three types: large, medium, and small, according to diameter size. Large DRG neurons are associated with proprioceptive sensation, and play an important role in transmitting non-nociceptive sensation and inhibiting nociceptive sensation. Medium neurons relay tactile information, while small neurons are implicated in sensations of pain and touch, and often form unmyelinated C-fiber sensory nerves. Therefore, the DRG is closely associated with sensory abnormalities and pain (Esposito et al., 2019). Excessive neuronal firing is believed to be a critical factor in neuropathic pain (Moutal et al., 2019),and the inflammatory response induced by PNI commonly causes DRG neurons to fire excessively. A large number of inflammatory cells, including leucocytes, glial cells, T lymphocytes, SCs, and histocompatibility complex class II macrophages have been detected in the DRG following PNI. Even if the original peripheral nerve is restored, these inflammatory cells continue to deliver excitatory cytokines, and thus contribute to extended pain.

    The relationship between microglia and pain has received widespread attention. Animal studies have shown a number of spinal dorsal horn microglia and morphological changes following PNI, and these are considered to underlie the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain (Inoue and Tsuda, 2018).PNI rapidly activates NK-κB in the DRG, and colony stimulating factor 1 (CSF1)is transported anterogradely along axons to the spinal dorsal horn. A DAP12-dependent pathway via CSF1R contributes to the local expansion of resident microglia via proliferation in the spinal dorsal horn. These microglia convert from having normal morphology to over-reactive morphology in response to inflammatory factors. Cell morphological analyses have revealed that PNI induces microglia to change their phenotype to a reactive hypertrophic shape, for instance, that with a reduced process length and complexity, and an increased volume (Batti et al., 2016; Gu et al., 2016). Several studies have reported that activated microglia produce and release a variety of bioactive diffusible factors in response to extracellular ligands via their cognate receptors, and that these factors can influence spinal dorsal horn neuronal function. Furthermore, reciprocal microglia appear to play a causal role in spinal dorsal horn neuronal signaling related to neuropathic pain (Tsuda,2016; Inoue and Tsuda, 2018). Such signaling can lead to the secretion of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) by activated microglial cells, which can enhance excitatory synaptic transmission to excitatory neurons.

    A study conducted using a neuropathic pain model indicated that greater neuropathological damage may be correlated with changes in nerve growth factor (NGF), neurotrophin 3, and insulin-like growth factor, while vascular endothelial growth factor may attenuate pain behavior and prevent neuronal stress by influencing transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 activity (Hulse et al., 2015). These changes can increase the excitability of the DRG (Hilz et al.,2000; Simmons and Feldman, 2002; Generaal et al., 2016). The T-junction,which is located between the axon and cell soma, is also regarded as a key region in aberrant neuronal activity. The T-junction acts as a low-pass filter that limits the rate at which peripheral signals can be transported centrally.Previous studies have shown that the T-junction in DRG neurons permits an increased amount of high-frequency burst firing after PNI. This alteration in the filtering action of the T-junction may also cause hyperexcitability following PNI (Liem et al., 2016).

    The injury site

    After PNI, axons sprout from the broken ends of proximal axons. The speed of axon regeneration is affected by axonal transportation and neurotrophic growth factors, which are secreted by SCs in the reconstructed basement membrane tube.

    Staggered axonal regeneration

    Wallerian degeneration is initiated immediately after PNI in the distal nerve stumps, suggesting that these axons denature and disintegrate. Thus, one aim of therapeutic treatments is to create a microenvironment that is conducive to axonal regrowth and reinnervation (Conforti et al., 2014). During neuronal degeneration, macrophages play a main role in clearing the resulting myelin debris. Studies have suggested that non-neuronal cells and axotomized neuronal cell bodies express chemokines that are targeted at macrophages.In the early stage of injury, these signals appear to mainly recruit M1 macrophages, which secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines. This can thereby enhance inflammatory reactions and tissue necrosis (Zigmond and Echevarria,2019).

    SCs are activated and involved in the entire process of injury and regeneration.After Wallerian degeneration, the proximal section begins axonal regeneration by forming a growth cone. The proliferating SCs form Bungner bands, which guide the growth of newly sprouting axons. If a growth cone reaches the endoneurial tube, it has a better chance of reaching the target organ (Gordon,2020). NGF is upregulated in SCs during injury, which promotes the growth and proliferation of SCs and provides trophism to the outgrowing axon. In theory, the speed of axonal regeneration is 1-3 mm/d, but this speed is much slower through damaged regions. In reality, it takes 8-10 weeks for axons to regenerate by 25 mm, which is much longer than the theoretical time (Al-Majed et al., 2000b; Gordon, 2016).

    Unfortunately, exhausted nerve growth factors may limit the degree to which SCs can sustain regenerated axons. Liu et al. explored the factors associated with long nerve recovery durations, and found that SC atrophy and changes in the endoneurial microenvironment were responsible for delayed nerve recovery (Reinhold and Rittner, 2017; Liu et al., 2018). Ronchi et al.(2017) found that prolonged denervation led to the atrophy of SCs, which downregulated the expression of factors that sustain nerve regeneration(such as glial fibrillary acidic protein, a SC-specific cytoskeleton constituent expressed by nonmyelinating SCs) and upregulated the expression of molecules that inhibit axon regeneration [such as low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor (p75), a member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor family].These changes had an overall effect on nerve regeneration. Furthermore,endothelial cells form a physical barrier called the blood-nerve barrier. The inflammatory reactions induced by PNI can break this barrier and disrupt the stable internal microenvironment, which can also contribute to slow axonal regeneration (Yi et al., 2017).

    Growth factors and the inner tube of nerve fibers

    Progressive decreases in the levels of growth factors are another reason for postponed neuronal regeneration after PNI. The secretion and expression of growth factors by SCs peaks 15 days after nerve injury, and returns to normal levels 35 days later (McGregor and English, 2018). In cases of prolonged nerve injury, the ability of SCs to express growth factors in the distal region of injured axons gradually decreases. As it is difficult to maintain the proliferation of supporting axons for a long duration, the rate of axonal growth may gradually decrease.

    The state of the nerve fiber tube is an important factor affecting the recovery of peripheral nerve function. As macrophages engulf and clear away the fragments of the degenerated axon and myelin sheath, it may be a longtime before new axon buds enter the inner tube of nerve fibers (Cattin and Lloyd, 2016). This long absence of tube components can decrease the tube pressure, which can lead to collapse or a progressive decrease in the caliber of endoneurium tubes. In addition, the absence of tube components may enable the number of collagen fibers in the endoneurium to slowly increase,which can lead to thickening of the endoneurium tube and decreased ease of growth for new axial buds (Krarup et al., 2017).

    In summary, after axonal injury, axons near the injury site begin to produce new axon buds. However, staggered axonal growth may lead to a progressive prolongation of the amount of time required for the axons to pass through the injury site. This increase in time can weaken the proliferation-promoting ability of SCs at the far end of the injury. Cumulative narrowing of the inner neural membrane tube and nonspecific reinnervation can also exacerbate the passage of injured axons.

    Target organs

    Atrophy of skeletal muscles

    PNI often leads to impaired sensory motor function. Skeletal muscles,which control human movement, are innervated by the nervous system. All voluntary movements in daily life are made possible by muscle contractions.Compared with the atrophy of skeletal muscles, that of denervated muscle has received more attention from researchers. Once a nerve is transected,target muscles lose their ability to “pump” muscles due to the loss of nerve innervation. This leads to relatively reduced perfusion of the target muscle,which can result in skeletal muscle atrophy. A previous study indicated that PNI causes the cross-sectional width of skeletal muscles to decrease by 70%within 2 months (Willand et al., 2015).

    During skeletal muscle atrophy, a series of biochemical and physiological alterations occur in atrophic muscle, which trigger changes in gene expression.Shen et al. (2019) identified thousands of genes that were differentially expressed in the anterior tibial muscle at different times after sciatic nerve transection via cDNA microarray. They divided the period encompassing the 28 days after nerve injury into four transcriptional phases, and examined the activation of different functional genes and signaling pathways within each phase. PNI has been found to induce four transcriptional phases: the “oxidative stress stage” (0-12 hours), “inflammation stage” (12 hours-3 days), “atrophy stage” (3-14 days), and “atrophic fibrosis stage” (14-28 days) (Mancinelli et al., 2019). The oxidative stress stage is characterized by an increase in cytochrome P450 enzymes, which are responsible for the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). This can be interpreted to mean that a large number of ROS are produced due to oxidative stress in transcription phase 1 (He et al., 2017). Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) signaling pathways are activated to eliminate ROS, and thus avoid cellular damage (Eyrich et al.,2019). Then, in the inflammation stage, inflammation-related genes, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and transforming growth factor-beta, are triggered by ROS.

    Inflammatory proteins are activated by upstream signals and increases in the expression of cachexia-related genes. ROS and inflammatory proteins persistently damage skeletal muscles, causing the activation of proteasome signaling pathways. The proteasome signaling pathways promote protein degradation, leading to muscle atrophy. Inactivation of insulin can also activate the ubiquitin proteolytic system, causing skeletal muscle hypertrophy(O’Neill et al., 2016). Furthermore, the metabolic shift from glycolytic to oxidative processes can lead fast fibers to gradually transition to slow fibers.For example, a study by Ma et al. (2019) confirmed that the ratio of MyHC IIpositive fibers in the soleus rose significantly after denervation, suggesting that denervation leads to the slow transformation of skeletal muscle fibers into fast skeletal muscle fibers in the soleus muscle. Hence, oxidative stress and inflammatory reactions are both associated with denervated skeletal muscle atrophy. Accordingly, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory therapy may be an important strategy for preventing the initial atrophy of denervated skeletal muscle.

    Sensory perception degeneration and nociception overactivity

    Initially, changes in skeletal muscle strength are a primary concern for patients. However, their attention may shift to positive sensory symptoms as motor function is gradually regained. Sensory receptors can be divided into mechanoreceptors, thermoreceptors, and nociceptors. A mechanoreceptor is a sensory neuron that responds to mechanical pressure or distortion.PNI results in the loss of mechanical pressure because of the absence of mechanoreceptors. In clinical settings, neuropathic pain is measured in terms of cold intolerance. Aδ and C fibers transmit the sensation of temperature,and have free nerve endings that terminate in the skin. A main difference between the two fibers is that Aδ fibers are myelinated while the C fibers are not myelinated. Aδ fibers mainly convey sensitivity to cold and pain (rapid pain, “pinprick” sensations), and carry this information from the peripheral to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord. C fibers receive and transmit information primarily related to heat and pain (slow pain, “burning” sensations) (Sène,2018). Both fibers contain neurotransmitter receptors in the skin that are known as transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. TRP channels are important mediators of sensory signals, and have a strong impact on cellular function and signaling pathways. As “cellular sensors”, they respond to changes in temperature, pH, stretch/pressure, and chemicals in the cellular environment (Sakaguchi and Mori, 2020). Kambiz et al. (2014) found that thermosensitive TRP channels in the skin contribute to thermal intolerance via three mechanisms. Specifically, thermal intolerance can result from 1) an increase in the expression of TRP channels on nerve fibers and keratinocytes,2) a reduction in the threshold of TRP channels, leading the receptors to be activated by lower intensity stimuli, or 3) sprouting from non-injured nerve fibers. For example, Duraku et al. (2012) observed reinnervation that occurred in transected rat tibial and peroneal nerves due to sprouting of uninjured saphenous and sural nerves. Upon PNI, cell damage-related mediators increased nerve fiber excitation by activating TRP channels directly.This manifested as mechanical and cold hypersensitivity. This viewpoint was further confirmed by Mickle et al. (2016), who blocked TRP channels individually and found that peripheral fiber excitation was reduced.

    The nociceptive system modulates peripheral pain signal transduction.Peripheral nociceptive neurons are initially excited when free nerve endings(Aδ and C fibers) receive noxious stimuli or undergo injury. Over time, primary afferent Aδ- and C-nociceptors in the injured nerve area start to respond to noxious stimulation in an amplified way, leading to the development of hyperexcitability and spontaneous activity. This can be explained by the dramatically reduced firing thresholds of the Aδ fibers. Previous studies have explored the underlying mechanisms by which primary nociceptors are remodeled by the inflammatory effects of chemicals that infiltrate the injured site. Generally speaking, primary nociceptors are more likely to fire following an injury. Inflammatory factors can cause changes in the genetic and molecular composition of nociceptors, leading to an increase in primary nociceptor excitability (Bjorgen et al., 2018).

    The peripheral nerve contains sensory and motor fibers. Previous studies have suggested that injured sensory fibers are responsible for neuropathic pain.However, recent evidence has indicated that motor fiber injury is essential to neuropathic pain. The expression of voltage-gated sodium channels is altered in DRGs after PNI. This change forms the basis of ectopic discharges,and eventually leads to neuropathic pain. Chen et al. (2011) reported that the selective injury of motor fibers can lead to the upregulation of voltagegated sodium channels in DRGs, and that this process might be mediated by the over-production of TNF-α in bilateral DRGs. In their follow-up study, they showed that the overexpression of TNF-α induced hyperalgesia via calpain-2,which activated satellite glia to produce extra NGF. This, in turn, enhanced nociceptor excitability, resulting in apparent mirror-image pain. In addition,Liu et al. (2016) reported that injury to motor fibers may induce long-term potentiation at spinal C-fiber synapses, indicating that noxious inputs from muscle afferents induce long-lasting central sensitization. Hence, in contrast to sensations at the skin level, changes in muscle innervation should be investigated to fully understand neuropathic pain.

    Summary of the basic mechanisms of PNI

    The above-mentioned data indicate that regenerated axons cannot effectively reinnervate target-end organs. Therefore, a large number of patients with PNI fail to completely recover normal function. The reasons are listed as follows:Sensory changes affect the peripheral nerves, spinal cord organization,and plasticity of the brain, and all three can affect early regeneration and later neuropathic pain. The slow speed of regeneration delays the rate at which the proximal end crosses the surgical gap. Furthermore, nonspecific reinnervation reduces the chance of regeneration. Generally, SCs support axonal regeneration after injury in the peripheral nervous system. However,SCs gradually lose regeneration-supporting features and eventually die. The denervation of skeletal muscle cells and sensory abnormalities can lead to early loss of function. Furthermore, decreases in the activation threshold of thermoreceptors and nociceptors can gradually lead to neuropathic pain. The slow rate of nerve regeneration may account for negative sensory symptoms. However, the negative sensory symptoms that can recover the remaining positive sensory symptoms associated with PNI are difficult to treat. Nociceptor excitability can increase as the result of decreased firing thresholds. Furthermore, common noxious stimuli are still likely to cause hyperexcitability in nociceptors. Hence, treatments are needed for the positive symptoms of PNI.

    The Mechanisms of Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injury

    As stated above, PNI can trigger a series of pathophysiological changes at the level of the cell body, at the site of injury, and in the target organ,thus reflecting the overall structure of the nervous system. ES has received much attention from PNI researchers as an effective treatment for nerve regeneration. Several studies have examined the effects of ES on the cell body and target organ in models of PNI, including the stimulation of sites aside from the sites of injury, and most have reported a good outcome. In the sections that follow, we discuss the mechanisms of ES for the treatment of PNI in terms of changes in the cell body, local sites, and end organs (Table 2).

    Table 2 |Summary of the studies regarding neuron electrostimulation in PNI

    Cell body arrangement in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord

    Most previous studies have prioritized ES of the site of injury for treating PNI.However, we anticipate that proximal neuronal cell bodies will be important PNI therapeutic targets in the future. Previous studies have confirmed that activity of the wide-dynamic range neurons of the dorsal horn is decreased by spinal cord stimulation (SCS). However, even after SCS is switched off,the alleviating effects last for a long time (Jensen and Brownstone, 2019). A clinical trial indicated that SCS can produce coordinated spinal motor output and facilitate the restoration of the sensorimotor network of the spinal cord(Formento et al., 2018). Apoptosis and synaptic stripping are the reasons for the functional loss following PNI. Accordingly, a previous study investigated whether SCS can promote functional recovery by inhibiting apoptosis and synaptic stripping (Pei et al., 2015). The researchers found that SCS could reduce the Ca2+influx and stabilize the intracellular environment, which led to reduced motor neuron apoptosis in the ventral horn of the spinal cord (Pei et al., 2015).

    La et al. (2019) showed that an electric field targeting the spinal cord also increased the expression of anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 and decreased the expression of the apoptosis-related Bax gene after sciatic nerve transection. Glial cells are also involved in the effects of ES. Some studies have indicated that, if directly applied to the spinal cord, ES will have a robust effect on gene expression(Sun et al., 2017; Stephens et al., 2018). For instance, levels of glial cellrelated proteins glial fibrillary acidic protein and cFBJ osteosarcoma oncogene increased after ES in a PNI mouse model (Tilley et al., 2017; Shinoda et al.,2020). This suggests that glial cells may directly respond to ES and therefore contribute to motor recovery. As we discussed above, neuroglia can play an important role in PNI.

    Accordingly, we speculate that ES can accelerate the speed of functional recovery and reduce neuropathic pain in cases of PNI. However, complications from SCS have been reported to occur in 30% to 40% of patients, such as electrode migration, infection, and wound breakdown (Sakaguchi and Mori, 2020). For uninsured patients, typical out-of-pocket costs for SCS are $15,000-$50,000 or more. Thus, the potential complications and cost of SCS limit its use in PNI. Many studies have explored easy-to-perform and safe techniques for stimulating the spinal cord. For example, electrical acupuncture and interference electrotherapy may be alternatives to SCS in promoting functional recovery after PNI.

    Suppressing DRG excitability

    SCS relieves pain by retraining primary sensory neurons. However, DRG stimulation has a similar effect. ES can directly suppress the excitability of the DRG, which is also a site of pain pathogenesis, and can bring about changes in DRG neuronal activity by altering activity in the T-junction. DRG stimulation blocks nociceptive signals from the periphery and enhances the filtering properties of the T-junction (Schmidt, 2019).

    Koopmeiners et al. (2013) used neurophysiological techniques to measure the excitability parameters of uninjured cultured DRG cells after the application of ES. After ES, they found that fewer neurons could produce bursts of multiple action potentials, and that the conduction velocity was greatly reduced. This suggests that ES can lead to reduced neuronal excitability.

    Computational modeling analyses have revealed stimulation-induced failure of action potentials traveling from the periphery in nociceptive neurons after PNI. Low-pass filtering of afferent pain signals occurs at the T-junction, and takes place via hyperpolarization of the soma and the mismatch in impedance between the peripheral stem and central axons. When the filter is attenuated,pain signals can pass through the T-junction at a faster frequency. Elevated T-junction filtering can be explained by the subsequent enhancement of Ca2+-dependent K conductivity. The activated K channels produce a sustained somatic hyperpolarization offset in the stem axon and T-junction.Hyperpolarization of the T-junction increases the degree of change in the transmembrane potential, which is essential to the propagation of action potentials. When the pain signals are generated from the periphery, T-junction filtering is not amplified due to the absence of Ca2+and K channels.

    One study compared over 500 DRG stimulator and 2000 spinal cord stimulator implants over a 1-year period. The researchers reported that DRG stimulation had a remarkable safety profile, with fewer adverse events compared with SCS. A pooled analysis further verified the effectiveness and safety of DRG stimulators (Huygen et al., 2020).

    Local sites

    Staggered axonal regeneration

    Recent studies indicating that ES can enhance reinnervation after PNI have consistently focused on ES of a proximal nerve at the injury site. However, the exact cellular mechanisms by which ES accelerates nerve regeneration are still unclear. The intracellular Ca2+wave, which is initiated at the site of axotomy induced by ES, plays a key role in nerve regeneration. The intracellular Ca2+wave can travel along the axon to the neuronal body. In the neuronal soma,increased Ca2+induces upregulation of BDNF and its receptor tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB). The overexpression of BDNF can inhibit the phosphodiesterases that degrade cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP),leading to sustained elevated levels of cAMP (Al-Majed et al., 2000a).

    Raised cAMP levels can increase the expression of regeneration-associated genes such as Tα1 tubulin and growth-associated protein-43. Cytoskeletal assembly is enhanced through activation of the cAMP response element binding (CREB) protein, regulation of Tα1 tubulin, and the inhibition of Rho,which is a protein in the p75 NgR receptor (p75-NgR) pathway (McGregor and English, 2018). CREB activation is induced by the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. When a specific p38 MAPK inhibitor is implemented, CREB activation and neurite outgrowth are also suppressed.Hence, it is believed that ES-induced activation of the p38 MAPK pathway may play an important role in promoting neurite outgrowth (Kawamura and Kano, 2019). To further confirm that the potential effect of ES is produced by the neuron cell body, Al-Majed et al. (2000b) inhibited propagation from the injury site to the axon, and found no therapeutic effects on PNI. However, in addition to BDNF and TrkB, reports have examined other possible pathways.In PC12 mutant cells with injured NGF-induced neurite outgrowth, ES can also enhance neurite outgrowth through p38 mitogen activation (Huang et al., 2010). As explained earlier, ES of the proximal nerve at the injury site can produce substantial therapeutic effects via the cell body (Figure 1).

    In recent years, ES at the injury site has gradually attracted increased attention. The long and variable delays in the regeneration process can inhibit regenerating axons from successfully crossing the surgical gap and entering the distal nerve stumps. Axonal regeneration can be accelerated by 1 hour of ES (Gordon, 2000). Brushart et al. (2002) also found that 1 hour of 20-Hz stimulation could temporally compress staggered regeneration. Furthermore,they found that ES could synchronize distal sump reinnervation. The number of regenerated axons that cannot cross the transected nerve increases after ES. This is because ES facilitates the onset of motor axon regeneration without accelerating its speed. Moreover, continuous 20-Hz ES of the axons proximal to the repair site can remarkably accelerate referential reinnervation of the muscle nerve.

    Correct reinnervation is regarded as a reason for the therapeutic effects of ES.Al-Majed et al. (2000) found that 1 hour of stimulation not only accelerated the speed of neuroregeneration, but also reduced staggered regeneration in a mouse model of PNI. Further, the stimulation lead to a similar distribution of neurons in PNI mice and control mice. This occurs by redirecting neurons back to the tissue they served originally, rather than by redistributing them(Brushart et al., 2005). Selective motor axon regeneration can be promoted by guidance factors expressed by the regenerating axons and distal targets.Franz et al. (2008) found that brief periods of ES could increase polysialic acid expression in regenerating axons. This could promote increases in collateral sprouting and in the size of arborization fields, which improve the exactness of axon growth.SC activation

    SCs are also believed to be involved in proximal ES therapy. ES can stimulate SCs to secrete glutamate, which can increase SC-derived exosomes and intracellular Ca2+concentrations (Lopez-Leal and Court, 2016). Since cAMP and BDNF are Ca2+-dependent, increases in Ca2+-dependent protein may result from ES-induced glutamate secretion.

    The role of SCs in vesicular transfer has recently received increased attention.Indeed, crucial proregenerative molecules delivered by SCs might contribute to axonal extension. As mRNAs are deposited on the distal axon in a dormant state, the transfer of mRNA from SCs to axons may supply transcripts for translation induced by electrical stimulation (Rigoni and Negro, 2020). SCderived exosomes include mRNA, miRNA, and protein cargoes, which can promote damaged axonal regeneration, as verified viain vitroandin vivostudies. P75NTRis present in SC-derived exosomes, and is also found in abundance in the injury site. This protein can modulate growth from filopodia via the regulation of RhoA. SCs have previously been found to secrete exosomes that can be selectively internalized by axonsin vitroandin vivo. Furthermore, SC-secreted exosomes, but not fibroblast-derived exosomes, markedly increase axonal regeneration by acting locally on axons and decreasing RhoA GTPase activation in growth cones (Sohn et al., 2020).Wang et al. (2020) demonstratedin vivothat the regenerative capabilities of injured sciatic nerves can be greatly enhanced by delivering SC-derived exosomes to axons. In addition, Zhou et al. (2018) verified that while cyclic mechanical strain affected the proliferation of DRG cells, SC-derived exosomes could enhance the proliferation of injured DRG cells and decrease the rate of positive staining for SA-β-gal, which is a cytochemical biomarker for senescent cells. Hence, SC-derived exosomes inhibited apoptosis and the senescence of DGR cellsin vitro, providing support for a novel therapeutic strategy.

    A recent study reported that ES could shift the macrophage phenotype from a proinflammatory to a pro-repair phenotype (McLean and Verge,2016). In this way, ES could rapidly remove myelin debris. As SCs restore the nonreactive myelinating state, they maybe be useful in remyelinating nerves. Remyelination has a protective effect on nerves, and could enhance functional recovery after PNI. ES briefly decreases inflammatory reactions and increases neuronal activity, favorably altering the immune microenvironment in demyelinated nerves. Thus, ES may have beneficial therapeutic effects when applied to other pathologies.

    The major drawbacks of ES include the need for surgery and the risk of possible complications at the electrode implantation site, such as infection and wire movement. Most ES of the injury site for the treatment of PNI is based on animal experiments. However, there is a significant difference in nerve length and width between humans and animals. Power et al. (2020)applied ES in a clinical setting by placing two electrodes proximal to the site of the injured nerve. They observed that ES enhanced muscle reinnervation and promoted functional recovery after surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome.Wong et al. (2015) also affirmed that ES of a proximal nerve at the injury site promoted the recovery of sensory function in a randomized controlled trial. Although these clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of this method, the optimal electrode arrangement and treatment parameters are still unclear. In addition, according to the molecular mechanisms, the major therapeutic effects of ES are mediated by the cell body. Thus, SCS and DRG, which have direct effects on the cell body, may be more effective than stimulation at the injury site. However, spinal cord-related simulation does not facilitate the promotion of local SCs or correct regeneration across the gap. Hence, combined stimulation of the spinal cord and injury site may be the best treatment option. Given the complicated causes of PNI, it is difficult to determine whether implanted electrodes are ideal in terms of costs and benefits. Currently, some physicians have implanted electrodes under ultrasound guidance, which reduces the risk and cost of the procedure.However, further investigations are needed to identify the optimal treatment approach.

    The end organs

    The peripheral nerve is responsible for providing sensory and motor innervation to the skin, muscles, and subcutaneous tissue. ES can be divided into skeletal muscle stimulation, transcutaneous stimulation, and subcutaneous stimulation, according to the targeted layer. ES based on electrode position can be divided into three broad categories: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, skeletal muscle stimulation, and subcutaneous electrical stimulation. In transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, pads are attached directly to the skin. The method of placing electrodes within the subcutaneous space is called subcutaneous electrical stimulation.Electroacupuncture (EA) is the most common form of subcutaneous electrical stimulation. When an electrode is implanted into skeletal muscle, electricity is directly delivered to the nerves.

    Skeletal muscle electrical stimulation

    Many studies have shown that skeletal muscle ES is beneficial to motor function (Willand et al., 2016; Fu et al., 2020). Muscle stem cells, such as satellite cells, are responsible for the growth and repair of skeletal muscle.They can be activated by myogenic precursor cells (MPCs), and thereby promote skeletal muscle regeneration. To further investigate the underlying mechanisms of this process, a study examined whether skeletal muscle stimulation (SMS) could affect MPCs in healthy older adult subjects. Thein vitrostudy revealed that SMS could increase the fusion of adult stem cells with the existing myofibers by increasing cytoplasmic free Ca2+concentration and the gene expression of MYOD, as well as that of MYOG on MPCs. As the regenerative capacity of skeletal muscle was affected by myogenic precursor cell proliferation, the oxidative status of these MPCs was also evaluated. The researchers found that SMS greatly reduced O2-production, and tended to reduce super oxide dismutase activity. Thus, SMS promoted skeletal muscle regeneration through the reduction of oxidative status in the satellite cells of healthy older adult subjects (Di Filippo et al., 2017).

    Another study found that ES led to heightened myotube hypertrophy and elevated mTORC1 and ERK1/2 activity in a human skeletal muscle model(Khodabukus et al., 2019). Increased glucose consumption and reduced acetyl carnitine in myobundles observed after ES indicate that SMS can enhance changes in glycolytic and fatty acid metabolic processes. This is because ES increases the transport of glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT-4) to the plasma membrane.

    Muscle contractions are known to activate AMP-activated protein kinase(AMPK), which increases glucose uptake (Nedachi et al., 2008). Thus, ES may trigger the phosphorylation of AMPK, increasing GLUT-4 protein levels.However, when the AMPK kinase cascade is inhibited, the effects of SMS are not altered. One study found that ES releases ATP (Christensen et al., 2015),and ATP was observed to increase GLUT-4 transmission by activating P2γ purinergic receptors and AKT phosphorylation (Osorio-Fuentealba et al., 2013).Although ES increases the consumption of ATP, like exercise, it does not increase oxidative stress in muscle. However, the relationship between inflammation and ES is still unclear. Lambernd et al. (2012) found that ES decreased the protein levels of IKKβ/NF-κB, implying an anti-inflammatory effect. However, Scheler et al. (2013) reported increased activation of NFκB after ES. Time may be the major influential factor. Whitham et al. (2012)confirmed that ES in anin vitromodel activated the IKKβ/NF-kB signaling pathway within 4 hours. However, the activated signaling pathways returned to normal after 4 hours of ES. In addition, measurements of oxidative stress status and inflammation state have not been adapted for ES, especially in the short term. Mancinelli et al. (2019) demonstrated that oxidative stress and inflammation began immediately after PNI and ended after 3 days.

    When denervated skeletal muscle reaches the atrophy and atrophic fibrosis stage, ES increases insulin activation by inhibiting the ubiquitin proteolytic and lysosomal hydrolysis systems. Therefore, the application of ES may be optimal 3 days after PNI.

    Subcutaneous electrical stimulation

    Recent studies have confirmed that EA is effective for the treatment of PNI. Animal experiments have indicated that EA can improve facial muscle function by reducing inflammatory responses and neuronal apoptosis. In rabbits, increases in glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and N-cadherin expression in facial motoneurons are considered major cellular mechanisms of EA (Fei et al., 2019). The type 2 cannabinoid receptor-mediated activation of microglia induced by EA may also be involved in the repair of PNI (Wang et al., 2019).

    When a metal EA needle is inserted into the body, it usually penetrates skeletal muscle, passing the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Thus, EA combines the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), SMS, and subcutaneous electrical stimulation (SQS). While EA is proficient in terms of affecting tissue via depth, this is not the case for width. The selection of EA electrode targets usually depends on traditional Chinese medicine, and does not consider the properties of electrical transmission. Accordingly, EA does not usually have a large influence on the local area. Further work is needed to facilitate the selection of optimal parameters to form matrix arrangements that lead to enhanced treatment.

    Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation

    PNI-induced sensory function injury ranges from the early loss of cutaneous sensation to late hyperpathia. However, ES can dramatically increase tactile discrimination and pressure detection scale scores (Wong et al., 2015), and lead to cutaneous regeneration of DRG neurons (Koetsier et al., 2020). EA is not only a promising form of complementary medicine for PNI, but also for neuropathic pain. It can be used to activate Aβ and Aδ fibers, thus relieving pain by preventing nociceptive signals from entering the central nervous system and releasing analgesic opioid peptides (Huo et al., 2020).

    The nociceptive system controls pain modulation in the peripheral nervous system. When a noxious stimulus is encountered or tissue injury occurs,primary nociceptive neurons in the periphery with free nerve endings (Aδ and C fibers) respond. Nociceptive signals then travel into the spinal cord,where they synapse with second-order neurons in the gray matter of the dorsal horn. TENS only inhibits the transmission of the second-order neurons,because it only excites Aβ fibers, namely non-nociceptive afferent nerve fibers(Chakravarthy et al., 2016).

    The analgesic effect of TENS is produced by mediation of the suppression of the descending system. Nociception from the descending nerve is inhibited during heavy noxious stimulation when endogenous opioids are released and diffuse in the rostral ventral medulla. These analgesic effects have been termed “diffuse noxious inhibitory control phenomena” (Ploner et al.,2017; Wutz et al., 2018). TENS may directly reduce the regional number of biochemical mediators inducing pain reactions. Results from a study with human volunteers confirmed that TENS curbs pain neurotransmission by mediating decreased local inflammatory mediators and elevating pain thresholds (Chakravarthy et al., 2016). The electrical field induced by TENS might be able to reach more superficial Aδ fibers and release a greater amount of opioids than that induced by SQS because the electrodes are on the surface of the skin. It is also advantageous in treating superficial nerve injury because it is noninvasive.

    In contrast, SQS might activate a large number of Aβ fibers because the electrodes are positioned in the subcutaneous space. SQS electrodes are inserted percutaneously into the muscle to avoid impedance resistance from fat. Hence, SQS appears to be better than TENS for treating PNI, especially for damage of deep nerves in the underlying skeletal muscle. One study indicated that SQS and TENS might recruit different numbers of fibers (Vera-Portocarrero et al., 2013). Hence, SQS and TENS may be individually selected or combined according to the activated fibers and injured nerves.

    Limitations

    There are several limitations to this review. First, we did not consider PNIinduced changes in activity in the brain, which is the highest level of the nervous system. Moreover, although there are multiple causes of PNI and different degrees of nerve injury, we did not consider these variables. The parameters of electrical stimulation are an important consideration in the effects of electrical stimulation for PNI. Although most studies used a treatment strategy including 20 Hz of ES for 1 hour, identification of the optimal parameters will require further exploration. Finally, due to limited space, time, and energy, some relevant studies may have been excluded.

    Future Prospects and Conclusions

    Figure 2 | Following PNI, several molecular and cellular changes are observed at the local site of injury and the target organs.The effects of ES therapy on peripheral neurogenesis vary according to the position of stimulation. See the text for a detailed description. DRG: Dorsal root ganglion; ES:electrical stimulation; PNI: peripheral nerve injury; SCs: Schwann cells; SDH: spinal cord dorsal horn; SQS: subcutaneous electrical stimulation; SVH: spinal cord ventral horn.

    Many researchers have examined the basic mechanisms of PNI, as well as potential treatment via electrical stimulation. However, previous studies have focused primarily on cellular and molecular changes in single sites after PNI, especially those in the injury site. Recently, an increasing number of studies have observed cellular and molecular changes at the level of the central nervous system, including at the site of injury and in the target organs following PNI. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review of the existing literature to summarize and discuss changes after PNI and the mechanisms of ES from three different levels. As discussed, changes after PNI have been discovered at the level of the cell body (dorsal and ventral root),the site of injury, and in the target organs (Figure 2).PNI mainly involves the skin, skeletal muscles, spinal cord, and brain. It implicates a nervous system injury axis that includes the peripheral nerves,corticospinal tract, and spinothalamic tract. The effects of ES therapy on peripheral neurogenesis vary according to the position of stimulation (Table 3).SCS can block microglial activation and synaptic stripping-related excitability of the DRG, and subsequently dampen the pro-inflammatory cytokine response.This can delay the synaptic rearrangement of the dorsal horn. However, SCS treatment is expensive and challenging to implement, and many patients may find it difficult to cover the costs of medical care. ES of local sites is commonly applied to promote nerve regeneration after PNI, but the effects are mainly mediated by the cell body. TENS, which has a direct effect on the cell body, may be more effective in theory. However, its effects are less than those of SCS, especially for neuropathic pain. Currently, implanted electrodes are the main method of local ES, and this is associated with considerable risks for patients. End organ ES is usually conducted with exterior and needle electrodes. It is used to stimulate skeletal muscle, subcutaneous tissue, or skin to relieve neuropathic pain and skeletal muscle denervation. However,single-point electrical stimulation cannot restore PNI-induced changes in the peripheral nervous and central nervous system. Hence, a combination of ES and SCS may be better than ES alone in treating PNI. This consideration warrants further research.

    Although ES therapies are useful for treating PNI, they also have side effects.ES can lead to twisting of the axon and cytoarchitecture, leading to edema(Martellucci, 2015). In addition, extended periods of ES can lead to reduced skeletal muscle excitability and abnormalities in the neuromuscular junction.Furthermore, stimulation of innervated skeletal muscles can have adverse effects in surviving asynchronous nerves. If the stimulated nerves connect with the muscle in an asynchronous way, ES can compromise functional reinnervation (Hussain et al., 2018, 2020). Thus, more research is needed to address the side effects of ES and identify the optimal stimulation regimen.

    Author contributions:QL, YRL and DM conceived and designed this manuscript. XLC and XZS wrote the manuscript. FH and XSG critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of this manuscript for publication.

    Conflicts of interest:The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.Editor note: XSG is an Editorial Board member of Neural Regeneration Research. He was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal’s standard procedures, with peer review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and their research groups.

    Open access statement:This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

    Table 3 |Summary of trails about different electrical stimulation sites for PNI

    他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 制服人妻中文乱码| 中文资源天堂在线| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 日本免费a在线| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 精品第一国产精品| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 午夜福利在线观看吧| a在线观看视频网站| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产区一区二久久| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 99热6这里只有精品| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 白带黄色成豆腐渣| av欧美777| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 成年版毛片免费区| 美女黄网站色视频| 午夜免费激情av| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| a在线观看视频网站| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| av欧美777| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产精品 国内视频| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 午夜a级毛片| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产av在哪里看| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 香蕉av资源在线| 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 男人舔奶头视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 午夜免费激情av| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 我要搜黄色片| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产精品一及| 成人av在线播放网站| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| av中文乱码字幕在线| 免费观看人在逋| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| av在线播放免费不卡| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久热在线av| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 国产精华一区二区三区| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产精品永久免费网站| 日本黄大片高清| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产精品免费视频内射| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| av片东京热男人的天堂| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 不卡一级毛片| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 日本在线视频免费播放| 日本五十路高清| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 一夜夜www| 国产片内射在线| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产成人系列免费观看| av福利片在线| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 免费高清视频大片| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 午夜福利在线在线| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 丁香六月欧美| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 在线看三级毛片| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产在线观看jvid| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 亚洲精品色激情综合| aaaaa片日本免费| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 床上黄色一级片| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产精品免费视频内射| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 看片在线看免费视频| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 草草在线视频免费看| 在线观看日韩欧美| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| bbb黄色大片| 手机成人av网站| 99热只有精品国产| 老司机福利观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 成人手机av| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 午夜激情av网站| 波多野结衣高清作品| bbb黄色大片| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲av电影在线进入| svipshipincom国产片| 18禁观看日本| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 91在线观看av| 亚洲av成人av| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 欧美性长视频在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲成人久久性| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 99热只有精品国产| 久久伊人香网站| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 无限看片的www在线观看| 天堂动漫精品| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 欧美3d第一页| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 久久中文看片网| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 一区福利在线观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产三级中文精品| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲av美国av| 成人18禁在线播放| 在线观看一区二区三区| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 精品国产亚洲在线| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 三级毛片av免费| 手机成人av网站| 国产精品一及| 久久久国产成人免费| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 日本五十路高清| 午夜精品在线福利| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 欧美色视频一区免费| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩欧美免费精品| 级片在线观看| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 69av精品久久久久久| 高清在线国产一区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 三级毛片av免费| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 久久久久性生活片| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 三级毛片av免费| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲 国产 在线| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 黄片小视频在线播放| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 黄色成人免费大全| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产视频内射| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 成人手机av| 一本综合久久免费| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产av不卡久久| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产激情久久老熟女| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| cao死你这个sao货| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 99热只有精品国产| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| avwww免费| 久久九九热精品免费| 制服人妻中文乱码| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 午夜精品在线福利| 精品福利观看| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品 | 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| tocl精华| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 观看免费一级毛片| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 日韩欧美免费精品| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 一区福利在线观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 久久精品影院6| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 日本五十路高清| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 高清在线国产一区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| or卡值多少钱| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久国产精品影院| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 制服人妻中文乱码| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲九九香蕉| 级片在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产 | 日本一本二区三区精品| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产高清videossex| 不卡一级毛片| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 欧美3d第一页| 熟女电影av网| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 熟女电影av网| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 久久国产精品影院| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 久久精品影院6| 国产区一区二久久| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产亚洲欧美98| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产精品九九99| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 精品高清国产在线一区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 99久久国产精品久久久| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 波多野结衣高清作品| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 成人精品一区二区免费| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 日本一本二区三区精品| 丁香欧美五月| 久9热在线精品视频| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲九九香蕉| 看免费av毛片| 国产不卡一卡二| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 极品教师在线免费播放| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 亚洲国产看品久久| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲精品在线美女| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 午夜福利在线在线| 制服诱惑二区| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 我要搜黄色片| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 欧美大码av| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 国产高清videossex| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 日本三级黄在线观看| 色在线成人网| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 91麻豆av在线| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 精品福利观看| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| bbb黄色大片| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 两个人看的免费小视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| bbb黄色大片| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看 | 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲av美国av| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产三级在线视频| 又大又爽又粗| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 黄频高清免费视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 宅男免费午夜| 99热这里只有是精品50| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线|