• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Modifying regeneration strategies classification to enhance the understanding of dominant species growth in fire-prone forest in Southwest China

    2022-03-08 02:18:54CifngLuoYueqingLiuZehoShenKngYngXinpeiWngYouxuJing
    Forest Ecosystems 2022年1期

    Cifng Luo ,Yueqing Liu ,Zeho Shen ,Kng Yng ,Xinpei Wng ,Youxu Jing,c

    aDepartment of Ecology,College of Urban and Environmental Science,The MOE Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes,Peking University,Beijing,100871,China

    bYunnan Appraisal Center for Ecological and Environmental Engineering,Kunming 650228,China

    cKey Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment of National Forestry and Grassland Administration,Research Institute of Forest Ecology,Environment and Protection,Chinese Academy of Forestry,Beijing,100091,China

    Keywords:Post-fire regeneration strategies Species coexistence Growth priority Subtropical forest Facultative seeder Obligate resprouter

    ABSTRACT Background: In fire-prone ecosystems,plant species having different post-fire regeneration strategies (PFRS)coexist at the local scale while showing different growth dynamics.To evaluate the effect of PFRS on species regeneration,we investigated the plant communities burned in different years in the central Yunnan Province,Southwest China.Several indicators describing plant growth and population importance were measured to compare the regeneration of four dominant tree species,including one facultative seeders(FS)and three obligate resprouters (OR).Partial correlation and mixed linear effect modeling were applied to disentangle the contribution of intrinsic and environmental factors to the interspecific variation in post-fire regeneration.Results:We identified two subtypes of plant growth strategy in the early post-fire stage for OR species;i.e.,number growth (OR+N) priority and height growth (OR+H) priority for sprouting stems.Generally,the FS and OR species varied in height growth rate with different temporal dynamics.The OR+N species occupied post-fire space horizontally with more resprouts and larger coverage than OR+H and FS species at the earlier stage.In contrast,the OR+H species generally had far less resprouts per clump,more variations in stem height and basal diameter.Factor analysis showed that the variation of post-fire plant regeneration was not effectively explained by environmental factors (R2 <20%);however,the linear mixed models with the modified PFRS as a random effect substantially increased the explanation.Conclusions: The differentiated regeneration dynamics and growth priorities in the four dominant tree species indicated a critical dichotomy of habitat occupation strategy for the resprouter species during the early stage of post-fire forest restoration.Our study uncovered a trade-off between height versus number growth priority in the post-fire tree growth strategy and provides a novel perspective in understanding the living space occupying(niche partitioning) process and species coexistence in post-fire forest community assembly.

    1.Background

    As an increasingly prominent feature of global climate changes,the extreme weathers have become more frequent and unpredictable,and caused record-breaking disasters in various regions,such as the catastrophic fire activities reported in Amazon basin,Australia and western of America in the recent years (Boer et al.,2020).According to the latest version of the Sixth Assessment Reports (AR6) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC,AR6),fire weather(compound hot,dry and windy events)have become more probable and fire weather seasons will be lengthened and intensified in some regions with global warming (Seneviratne et al.,2021).Therefore,the sustainability of fire-prone ecosystems and their post-fire restoration have also raised growing concerns,along with the perspective of increasing fire threats.

    Plant species of fire-prone ecosystem exhibit different regeneration strategies in responding to fire disturbance(Lamont and Markey,1995;Pausas et al.,2004;Keeley and Pausas,2011;Rogers et al.,2015;Zupo et al.,2020).Resprouting is considered to be an important trait of fire adaptation,particularly for lignotuberous plants (Canadell and Zedler,1995;Keeley et al.,2011;Pausas et al.,2018).Pausas et al.(2004)used the characteristics of resprouting and seed germination ability to propose a hierarchical classification of post-fire regeneration strategies(PFRS).In their study,the two regeneration syndromes (i.e.,seeding and resprouting) were combined to produce four PFRS:obligate resprouters (OR),obligate seeders (OS),facultative seeders (FS),and opportunists (OP).The FS were further classified into type I that recruits exclusively after fire and type II,which recruits after fire or during the fire-free period.The classification of PFRS has proved useful in the Mediterranean context,where the proportions of different PFRS are sensitive to different fire regimes and climates(Lamont and Markey,1995;Cowan,2010;Pausas and Keeley,2014;Rogers et al.,2015).The OR species are distributed widely and constitute more than 50%of the plant species in the area with frequent fires,such as the Mediterranean basin and California,whereas OS and FS species comprise more than 80% of the flora of Australia and South Africa (Cowan,2010).In the subtropical Southwest China,woody plant species in the semi-humid evergreen broadleaved forests were mostly (i.e.90.6%) comprise of resprouters (Su et al.,2015).

    Numerous existing studies have also explored the variation in growth dynamics of different PFRS and their mechanistic links with physiological traits,particularly in the environments with periodic drought (Pausas and Keeley,2014;Vilagrosa et al.,2014;Wüest et al.,2016;Parra and Moreno,2017;Cooper et al.,2018).Resprouters have higher root-shoot starch allocation,and their non-structural carbon assimilation enables the species to easily grow faster (Falster and Westoby,2005;Dietze and Clark,2008;Pausas and Keeley,2014).However,resprouter species are observed to have lower growth rates,and divert resources toward building below-ground structures (Bond and Midgley,2003;Clarke and Knox,2009;Nzunda et al.,2014).In other cases,no difference was found between the growth rates of resprouting stems and seeding stems(Zammit and Westoby,1987;Knox and Clarke,2005).These inconsistent results imply the effects of different regeneration strategies on growth rate.Moreover,a wide variability in resprouting ability and growth performance has been found among resprouter species in response to fire,while not well reflected in the current typologies(Vivian et al.,2010).Thus studies have attempted to modify the framework of PFRS.Vesk (2006) considered the growth strategy of plants during the developmental stage in PFRS classification.Clarke et al.(2013) developed an approach for classifying resprouter species with regard to differences in bud origin and resource location.To evaluate the heat shock tolerance of dormant seeds,Zupo et al.(2020) divided seeds of resprouter species according to their tolerance,stimulation,and sensitivity to heat.

    In the present study,we conducted a field investigation to measure the growth of tree species in forest communities that were burned at a series of time,and explored the post-fire growth dynamics of tree species with different PFRS.The studied forests are pervasively distributed in Southwest China,dominated by the mixed Yunnan pine -evergreen broadleaved forests,and intensively disturbed by a fire regime regulated by the subtropical monsoon climate(Tang et al.,2010;Han et al.,2015;Ying et al.,2018,2019).We tested the explanation of current PFRS framework in post-fire plant growth,and hypothesized that there is a dichotomy of regeneration strategies for OR species in the early post-fire forest restoration.With this differentiation we tried to improve the understanding of intrinsic and environmental factors in determining the post-fire regeneration and the partitioning of regeneration niche among resprouter species under the studied and similar environmental contexts.

    Abbreviations

    IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    AR6 the Sixth Assessment Reports

    PFRS post-fire regeneration strategies

    subPFRS subclassification of post-fire regeneration strategies

    BPR buds-protection-resources framework

    OR obligate resprouters

    OR+N OR placed the priority on occupying more horizontal space by regenerating more sprouts

    OR+H OR placed the priority on occupying more vertical space through more rapid stem height and diameter growth

    OS obligate seeders

    FS facultative seeders

    OP opportunists

    Envi environmental factors

    TSF time since last fire

    aspe slope aspects

    posi topographic positions

    elev elevation

    slop slope

    TN total nitrogen

    IOC inorganic carbon

    OC organic carbon

    P available phosphorus

    OC:N the ratio of organic carbon and total nitrogen

    IV importance values

    HGR height growth rate

    BDGR basal diameter growth rate

    BDmeanMean basal diameter

    HmaxMaximum height of clump

    Stems per clump Stems number of a clump

    OLS the ordinary least squares

    PCA principal component analysis

    LMMs linear mixed-effect models

    P.yunnanensis Pinus yunnanensisvar.Pygmaea

    L.mairei Lithocarpus mairei

    C.delavayi Cyclobalanopsis delavayi

    L.villosa Lyonia villosa

    2.Methods

    2.1.Study sites and species selection

    This study was conducted in Lufeng County (25°4′-25°10′N,102°12′-102°20′E) about 70 km west of Kunming,the capital city of Yunnan Province(Fig.1a).The regional climate is subtropical humid to semi-humid.According to the records of the nearest meteorological station (25°0′N,102°23′24′′E,1,888.1 m a.s.l),the mean annual temperature is 15.6°C,and the mean monthly temperature ranges from 7.3°C in January to 22.4°C in July.The annual mean precipitation is 912 mm,75% of which occurs in summer and autumn,as profoundly influenced by the Indian Ocean Monsoon(Han et al.,2015;Luo et al.,2021).The dominant vegetation type in this region is evergreen broadleaved forest and conifer forests dominated by Yunnan pine(Pinus yunnanensis).Accordingly,a warm and dry spring and early summer make the vegetation of this region vulnerable to ignitions caused mostly by intensive human activities,particularly those related to traditional agricultural practices and cultural activities during holidays and festivals (Su et al.,2015;Ying et al.,2018).The fire return interval of a natural secondary Yunnan pine forest is about 20-30 years;however,its historical fire frequency is not clear owing to the lack of ground records or fire scars on tree rings (Wu et al.,1987;Tang et al.,2010;Si,2019).Moreover,the spatial variability of fire severity is prominently shaped by topography(Han et al.,2015).

    Fig.1.(a) Location of the study region showing the sampling site,and (b) an elevation map of the region showing the four sampling sites.

    We studied the four dominant plant species of a fire-prone ecosystem in this region,as described below (Fig.1b).Pinus yunnanensisvar.Pygmaea(Pinaceae) grows as a shrub mainly in infertile soils and in areas frequently disturbed by fires.This species,which can both germinate from seeds and resprout from root crowns after fires,has a high proportion(74.7%)of serotinous cones(Su et al.,2015;Pausas et al.,2021).Lithocarpus mairei(Fagaceae)is an evergreen broadleaf tree species that produces abundant sprouts from shallow woody rhizomes after fires(Wang and He,1992).Cyclobalanopsis delavayi(Fagaceae),another evergreen broadleaf tree species,is one of the most common species dominating the forests of the study region.Lyonia villosa(Ericaceae)is a deciduous woody species that often dominates on sunny slopes.BothC.delavayiandL.villosacan resprout from basal burls after fires or clipping(Fig.2).

    2.2.Sampling design

    The field investigation was conducted in 2015 within various post-fire communities that were burned in 2005,2010,2013,or 2014 corresponding to 11,6,3,and 2 years since last fire(TSF),respectively,with the burned areas ranging from 235 to 1,240 ha (Luo et al.,2021).All four investigation sites were within a straight line distance of 7.5 km to each other.We used a stratified random sampling design to select 144 plots(10 m×10 m)on two slope aspects(aspe,including shady and sunny)at five topographic positions(posi,including valley bottom,lower slope,middle slope,upper slope,and summit) with four replicates on each specific sampling point.That is,the study included 4×[(2×4)+1]=36 plots in each of the four burned sites for a total of 144 plots.In addition,we recorded the elevation(elev)and slope(slop)of each plot using a portable Global Positioning System instrument and a compass.Surface soil samples were collected from each plot at depths of 0-10 cm below the litter layer.The pH value,total nitrogen (TN),inorganic carbon (IOC),and available phosphorus(P)of the soil were analyzed in the laboratory.The amount of organic carbon(OC)was determined by total carbon minus IOC.Details of the soil analysis are given in Luo et al.(2021).

    Fig.2.Photographs of the four studied woody species dominating the post-fire regeneration communities,including P.yunnanensis, L.mairei,L.villosa,and C.delavayi. Abbreviations are:R+,resprouters;P+,propagule persisters;P-,propagule non-persisters;FS,facultative seeders,OR,obligate seeders;OR+N,OR placed the priority on occupying more horizontal space by regenerating more sprouts;OR+H,OR placed the priority on occupying more vertical space through more rapid stem height and diameter growth.

    We investigated the post-fire plant community in each plot,identified woody species richness,and calculated importance values(IV)of the four dominant species in the post-fire community.In particular,we measured the plant regeneration traits and growth status of the four dominant woody species.Regeneration traits were classified into resprouting and seeding types (Pausas and Keeley,2014).The plant growth measurements included height and basal diameter of each sapling/tree,number of clumps,number of resprouting stems in each clump,and species seedlings/resprouts ratio.In addition,we measured the perimeter and thickness to determine the size of the basal burl for each clump.

    2.3.Data analysis

    We calculated the IV of the four studied species in each sample plot(Curtis and Mcintosh,1951) as:

    Moreover,we also calculated many growth variables for every clump.Hmaxis height of the tallest sprout stems,and BDmeanis the mean stem basal diameter of the clump.The height growth rate (HGR) was quantified asHmaxdivided by the TSF data,and the basal diameter growth rate(BDGR)was quantified as BDmeanalso divided by the TSF data.We then used the non-parametricWilcoxon rank sum testto determine the species differences as well as the temporal differences in plant growing states and IV in the post-fire community.Next,we applied the ordinary least squares (OLS) regression to examine the relationship of the sprout number and height with the burl size.Then we tested the correlation of the number and height of sprouts using partial correlation analysis by controlling environmental factors.Principal component analysis (PCA)was applied to determine the relationship among six variables of plant growth and IV (Table 1),using the“FactoMineR”and“factoextra”package(Sebastien et al.,2008;Alboukadel and Fabian,2020).Using the“l(fā)me4”package,we fitted linear mixed-effect models (LMMs) with species or PFRS as random factors (Douglas et al.,2015).The fixed factors including topographic(aspe,elev,posi,slop)and edaphic variables(pH,TN,P,OC,IOC,OC/N).The marginal and conditionalR2were used to indicate the variance accounted for by fixed factors alone and by fixed and random factors combined,to distinguish the effects of PFRS from that of the environment.

    Table 1 Plant growth variables measured for sampling plots of post-fire regeneration.

    All statistical analyses were conducted using R(R Development Core Team,2019),and its packages as mentioned.

    3.Results

    3.1.Species growth dynamics

    3.1.1.Growth temporal dynamics

    Among all sampling plots,speciesL.maireihad the most stem number per clump(65.1±18.9 stems/clump),the largest stem height(179.0±17.7 cm) and basal diameter (18.7 ± 2.0 cm) were observed forC.delavayi.In addition,P.yunnanensisandC.delavayihad obviously largerHmaxand BDmeanin the 6th or 11th year than the 2nd-3rd year after fires(Fig.3a,b).C.delavayishowed larger HGR and BDGR than theL.mairei,L.villosaandP.yunnanensis,especially at the early stages of post-fire regeneration (Fig.3c,d).The HGR and BDGR for theL.maireiandL.villosadecreased with an increase in the TSF,whereas the growth rates forP.yunnanensiswere stable through the study period.The stems per clump and IV in the community of theL.mairei,L.villosaandP.yunnanensiswere higher than those of theC.delavayi(Fig.3e,f).

    3.1.2.Relationships among tree regeneration variables

    The PCA1 and PCA2 axes loaded 55.7%and 23.5%of total variance in species growth,respectively (Fig.4).All six species performance variables were positively correlated with PCA1,but departed into two groups regarding their relationship with PCA2.Hmax,BDmean,HGR,and BDGR comprised a positively linked group,whereas IV and stem per clump comprised a group negatively linked with PCA2.As growth parameters,HGR and BDGR were closely correlated,and also positively linked withHmaxand BDmean,but were almost independent of stem number per clump.The four tree species revealed differentiated post-fire regeneration patterns,L.maireitended to have larger community IV,closely related with stems per clump.C.delavayishowed larger HGR and BDGR,whereasP.yunnanensisandL.villosashowed neutrality on both axes.

    3.2.Post-fire regeneration and growth strategies

    In the sampled post-fire plots across different topographical position and different time after fires (Fig.5),the populations ofL.mairei,L.villosa,andC.delavayiregenerated mostly by resprouting,which comprised 90.2%,95.6%,and 94.8% of the total post-fire regeneration for the three species,respectively.In contrast,the resprouts ofP.yunnanensiscomprised only 24.5%,with others contributed by seeding.This difference suggests that theP.yunnanensisis a FS species,and the other three are OR species.

    The burl size correlated significantly with the number of stems per clump and maximal stem height for the three OR species (P<0.001;Fig.6b) and for each specific species (Fig.6c,d).Moreover,controlling the effects of environmental factors and burl size resulted in a negative relationship between the stem number per clump and the maximal stem height,the partial correlation coefficientr=-0.261(P<0.001,Fig.6a).The stem number per clump was positively correlated with the burl size(P<0.001),and the slope was 0.27,0.19,0.07 forL.villosa,L.maireiandC.delavayi,respectively.Less effect of burl size on the maximal stem height was noted forL.mairei(R2=0.124)andC.delavayi(R2=0.046),but a significant effect on maximal stem height was observed inL.villosa(slope=1.26,R2=0.252;Fig.6d).At a given value of burl size,C.delavayiclumps had the lowest stem numbers and the highest stem,compared withL.villosaandL.mairei.

    Therefore,the OR species differentiated in their grow priority of regeneration and had different growth strategies.One subtype is the OR+N which placed the priority on occupying more horizontal space by regenerating more sprouts,such asL.villosaandL.mairei;alternatively,the OR+H type placed the priority on occupying more vertical space through more rapid stem height and diameter growth,such asC.delavayi.In addition,different height strategies appeared difference in variation and range of stem height and basal diameter in each clump(Fig.7).OR+H speciesC.delavayihad bigger range of height and basal diameter and showed higher variations,whereas the other two OR+N species exhibited more even and stable than OR+H species in different stems of a clump(P<0.001).

    3.3.Contributions of environment and PFRS to post-fire plant growth

    Fig.3.Growth dynamics of the four dominant species based on different regeneration indices:(a)Hmax,(b)BDmean,(c)HGR,(d)BDGR,(e)stems per clump,and(f)IV.The error bar indicates standard error.Different letters above the error bars denote statistical differences of multiple comparisons.Multiple comparisons were corrected using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and tested for significance at the 95% confidence level (α=0.05).

    Fig.4.Principal component analysis (PCA) diagram of the six growth variables,with plots and species represented by different symbols.The lengths of the arrows indicate the correlation of six variables with the PCA axes.

    Fig.5.Clump density of different regeneration traits including resprouting and seeding for four dominant species.

    The linear models with environmental factors alone accounted for only very limited percentages of variance in post-fire plant regeneration,especially for plant size (i.e.Hmaxand BDmean) and resprouting ability(i.e.stems number per clump) (Table 2).When the PFRS framework of FS_OR differentiation was included as a random factor,the variance accounted for by LMMs increased for all growth parameters,especially for HGR.Although replacing the FS_OR with species names further increased the explained variance,the modified PFRS framework including FS_OR+H_OR+N showed the optimal explaining power,except for stem number per clump.In particular,the LMMs with modified PFRS explained most variance of plant size and growth rate(i.e.HGR and BDGR),whereas resprouting ability (i.e.stems per clump) were poorly accounted for in all models.

    4.Discussion

    Habitat condition,time since of last fire,and regenerating traits have been found critical for regeneration dynamics and habitat selection of plant species in post-fire communities (Wüest et al.,2016;Minor et al.,2017;Han et al.,2018;Zupo et al.,2020).The PFRS plays a critical role in the interspecific variation of post-fire regeneration.Regarding post-fire regeneration growth priority and height strategies,our differentiation of OR species into OR+H and OR+N subtypes substantially improved the predictions of the post-fire tree growth (Table 2).Actually,the two OR subtypes show a trade-off in allocating plant productivity to the occupation of horizontal versus vertical dimensions of the post-fire regeneration niche (Fig.8a).Moreover,the FS species such asP.yunnanensischose to hedge its bets.Its serotiny is generally stopped by fire and the post-fire seed dispersal and seeding strategy is similar to the regeneration strategy of the OR+N species,focusing on horizontal space occupying,and its resprouting strategy is the same as that of the OR+H strategy,pursuing the rapid vertical space filling (Fig.8a).These regeneration strategies can be differentiated by analyzing their percentage investments on the single-stem versus total vegetative growth (Fig.8b).At the early post-fire stage,the OR+N species (L.maireiandL.villosahere) invested more on regenerating many stems to occupy the gaps horizontally,with less investment on each stems (Pausas and Keeley,2014;Tavsanoglu and Gurkan,2014).On the contrary,the OR+H species (C.delavayi) invested more on the height growth of one or few stems for light competition,and lent the species a more important role in the later stage of regenerating communities (Tang et al.,2013;Muscarella et al.,2016).

    Table 2 R2 of linear regression model and linear mixed models for plant size,growth rate and resprouting ability based on different random factors.Envi:linear models with 9 environmental explanatory variables including topography(i.e.elevation,position,slope,aspect),pH,soil nutrients(i.e.TN,OC/N,P)and TSF;PFRS:postfire regeneration strategy,including facultative seeder (FS) and obligate resprouter (OR);subPFRS:modified PFRS scheme including FS and the two subtypes of OR with number growth priority(OR+N)and height growth priority(OR +H).

    Fig.6.Different post-fire growth strategies of OR species according to the trade-off between the stem number and height.(a)The relationship of stem height and the residuals of stems number after regression with environmental factors.(b) Relationship among burl size,stem number,and stem height for three OR species.(c)Species specific relationship between burl size and stem number.(d)Species specific relationship between burl size and stem height.Solid lines indicate the ordinary least squares linear models;colored lines represent fitted lines of three OR species.The shaded areas surrounding the solid lines represent 95% confidence intervals.

    Fig.7.Coefficient of variation and range of stems height and basal diameter of each clump of OR species.Different letters above the boxes denote statistical differences of multiple comparisons.Multiple comparisons were corrected using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and tested for significance at the 95% confidence level (α=0.05).

    Clarke et al.(2013) developed a buds-protection-resources (BPR)framework,and reclassified resprouter species into basal resprouters,epicormics,and apical resprouters.It is suggested that basal resprouters are shorter,whereas epicormics and apical resprouters are generally as tall as non-resprouters,because there is no necessity resprouting from the base.In our study,all the OR species resprouted from the base.When the stem height or number priority of the resprouts growing was considered,a substantially higher percentage of interspecific variation in post-fire growth can be accounted for.According to earlier studies of PFRS,resprouters perform better in occupying gaps horizontally,whereas seeders grow upward quicker in gaps (Pausas et al.,2004;Dietze and Clark,2008;Pausas and Keeley,2014;Tavsanoglu and Gurkan,2014;Nzunda et al.,2014).In our post-fire sites,the population of OR+N species tended to be more abundant than those of the OR+H and FS species at the early stages of post-fire regeneration,but their height and diameter growth were slower than that of the FS and OR+H species.Other studies also mentioned about the height strategies of resprouters(Pausas et al.,2004;Falster and Westoby,2005;Dietze and Clark,2008).Midgley (1996) illuestated that resprouters of many genus were supposed to be taller than reseeders,whereas with some exception such asAcaciaandEucalyptus.Those exception could be involved into OR+H species.For instance,resproutersBanksia serratagrew much taller and faster than other seeders;resprouts ofEucalyptushad higher post-fire height growth than seedlings of the same species and other seeder species (Pausas et al.,2004;Falster and Westoby,2005).Moreover,environmental factors and burl size,besides regeneration strategies,also help to explain the variation of post-fire regeneration and plant growth.In our study,the relationship between growth rates and environment factors was in agreement with the results of previous studies,where the growth rates were negatively correlated with TSF (Falster and Westoby,2005;Dietze and Clark,2008) and positively correlated with soil nutrients(Wang et al.,1998;McDonald and Urban,2004).Meanwhile,the number of stems per clump and stem size were not explained well by environmental factors,but were influenced by intrinsic factors such as burl size(Fig.6;Canadell and López-Soria,1998;Walters et al.,2005;Moreira et al.,2012;Nzunda et al.,2014).Burl size also affects the maximum height of stems positively (Cirne and Scarano,2001;Cruz et al.,2002;Muscarella et al.,2016).

    According to Su et al.(2015),the resprouter species in this region are dominant or accompanying species in the middle to late stages of forest restoration,and thus play critical roles in the post-fire forest assembly.Species differences in regeneration strategies are an important part of species regeneration niche (Grubb,1977;Clark,1991),and contribute critically to their coexistence and community assembly (Takyu and Ohsawa,1997;Higgins et al.,2000;Aiba and Nakashizuka,2007;Klooster et al.,2007).In this study,the four dominant tree species filled the fire-released niche space with different growth priorities enabled their coexistence (and possibly of other species) in a heterogeneous post-fire landscape.By comparing the species composition of post-fire communities in the same region,Han et al.(2018) found that the repeated fires intensify the priority effect of speciation regeneration and stabilized the post-fire community assembly.According to our analyses,differentiating the number versus height growth priority in OR species represents a novel and useful improvement for the FS-OR framework of PFRS,and should help the understanding of niche partitioning and species coexistence in the fire-prone ecosystems.Although our PFRS classification was based only on the data of four species,they actually comprised over 75% of the post-fire regeneration in all sampled communities (Luo et al.,2021),thus have adequate data to reveal the interspecific difference.However,the applicability of this generalization requires evidence from more species and diverse life forms under various environmental contexts,and observations from longer temporal scales.Its usefulness and limitations for untangling the interaction between fire disturbance regime,regeneration strategies,and post-fire community dynamics deserve further works.

    Fig.8.Conceptual models differentiating the post-fire regeneration strategies in the forest of subtropical monsoon climate in Yunnan,Southwest China.(a) Differences of vertical and horizontal space occupancy for different strategies;(b)The change of total vegetative investment and single-stem investment with increasing TSF during the post-fire recovery.

    5.Conclusions

    The post-fire regeneration dynamics of different species are linked with species specific regeneration ability and strategies.The four dominant tree species in the post-fire plant communities of central Yunnan Plateau,represented typically different PFRS,and showed differed regeneration dynamics and growth features.There were difference between FS and OR especially in multiple traits dynamics,and OR species can be further classified into OR+N and OR+H species regarding priority in stem quantity or height growth.The OR+N species occupy space primarily through horizontal canopy expansion and were more dominant than OR+H and FS at the early post-fire regeneration stages.In contrast,the OR+H species exhibits higher growth rates and primarily pursue vertical space,and has more variations in stems height and basal diameter per clump.Environmental factors could not effectively explain the variation of post-fire plant regeneration (R2<20%);when the modified PFRS as a random effect in the linear mixed models substantially increased the explanation.The modification of PFRS framework showed a potential of generalization and the power of improving the prediction of species performance and niche partitioning in the fireprone ecosystems.

    Ethics approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Availability of data and materials

    Data are available from corresponding author on reasonable request.

    Declaration of competing interest

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Funding

    This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41971228) and the National Key R and D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China(2017YFC0505200).

    Authors’contributions

    CFL participated the field work,performed statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript.YQL,participated the field work,data collection and analyses.ZHS designed the study and participated the field investigation,reviewed and edited the manuscript.KY and XPW contributed to field work and manuscript editing.YXJ participated study design and manuscript review.All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are grateful for the collaboration of field investigation from Yiying Li,Jie Han,Lifang Chen,Mingzheng Yang,Jie Zhang and Yuyang Xie.We thank Dr.Juli G.Pausas for his helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.The suggestions and comments from the anonymous reviewers are appreciated.

    国产国语露脸激情在线看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 制服人妻中文乱码| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 自线自在国产av| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产 一区精品| 国产精品免费大片| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产成人一区二区在线| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 日日啪夜夜爽| 精品酒店卫生间| freevideosex欧美| 久久热在线av| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产毛片在线视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| a级毛色黄片| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲成色77777| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 免费大片18禁| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 捣出白浆h1v1| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产av国产精品国产| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 另类精品久久| www.av在线官网国产| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 午夜激情av网站| 美女中出高潮动态图| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 少妇的逼好多水| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 久久97久久精品| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 99香蕉大伊视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| videos熟女内射| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产麻豆69| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 18禁观看日本| 全区人妻精品视频| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 制服人妻中文乱码| 成年av动漫网址| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 18+在线观看网站| 18在线观看网站| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 岛国毛片在线播放| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 成人二区视频| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 国产精品免费大片| 少妇 在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 在线观看www视频免费| 欧美人与善性xxx| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久久久久久国产电影| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 观看av在线不卡| av在线播放精品| 内地一区二区视频在线| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 免费大片18禁| videos熟女内射| 满18在线观看网站| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 伦精品一区二区三区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 老熟女久久久| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产成人一区二区在线| 色吧在线观看| 久久人人爽人人片av| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 中国三级夫妇交换| a 毛片基地| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产精品一国产av| 热re99久久国产66热| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲图色成人| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产综合精华液| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 成人影院久久| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产精品 国内视频| 观看美女的网站| 内地一区二区视频在线| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲第一av免费看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产男女内射视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 男女边摸边吃奶| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 国产乱来视频区| www.av在线官网国产| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| av天堂久久9| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 午夜91福利影院| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 草草在线视频免费看| www日本在线高清视频| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久精品夜色国产| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 国产精品 国内视频| 久久97久久精品| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 日韩电影二区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 精品国产国语对白av| h视频一区二区三区| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 免费看不卡的av| 草草在线视频免费看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在 | 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲成人手机| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 熟女电影av网| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产 一区精品| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 有码 亚洲区| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 丰满乱子伦码专区| tube8黄色片| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产激情久久老熟女| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 久热这里只有精品99| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 97超碰精品成人国产| 成人国语在线视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 高清不卡的av网站| 免费少妇av软件| 男人操女人黄网站| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 精品福利永久在线观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 飞空精品影院首页| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 午夜91福利影院| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精 国产伦在线观看视频一区 | 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 熟女电影av网| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 国产精品成人在线| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 蜜桃在线观看..| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 99久久综合免费| 一个人免费看片子| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 久久久久精品性色| 老女人水多毛片| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 三级国产精品片| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 综合色丁香网| 日韩视频在线欧美| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 嫩草影院入口| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 国产极品天堂在线| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产视频首页在线观看| av不卡在线播放| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产麻豆69| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产片内射在线| videos熟女内射| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 午夜福利视频精品| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 久久久久国产网址| 一级毛片电影观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 看免费av毛片| 老女人水多毛片| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 午夜91福利影院| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 久久人人爽人人片av| 熟女电影av网| 久久97久久精品| 久久狼人影院| av免费观看日本| 精品国产国语对白av| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 99香蕉大伊视频| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲综合色惰| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 黄片播放在线免费| 欧美97在线视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲国产色片| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 一级毛片电影观看| 一个人免费看片子| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产亚洲最大av| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 免费观看av网站的网址| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产 一区精品| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 香蕉国产在线看| 午夜激情av网站| 精品亚洲成国产av| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 一个人免费看片子| 日本av免费视频播放| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日本免费在线观看一区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 老熟女久久久| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看 | 精品久久久久久电影网| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲成色77777| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 捣出白浆h1v1| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 一级黄片播放器| 色网站视频免费| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 午夜免费观看性视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 22中文网久久字幕| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 黑人高潮一二区| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| a级毛片在线看网站| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 宅男免费午夜| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产成人欧美| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 高清不卡的av网站| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 九草在线视频观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 99热全是精品| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 午夜免费鲁丝| 成年动漫av网址| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 香蕉国产在线看| 久久久久精品性色| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 精品午夜福利在线看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 一区二区三区精品91| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产在线免费精品| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区 | 大香蕉久久成人网| 婷婷色综合www| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 成人影院久久| 老女人水多毛片| 只有这里有精品99| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 久久久久久人妻| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 99久久人妻综合| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲在久久综合| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 美女主播在线视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 欧美另类一区| av在线老鸭窝| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产一级毛片在线| 只有这里有精品99| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 91成人精品电影| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 中文天堂在线官网| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 考比视频在线观看| 有码 亚洲区| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 成人国产麻豆网| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产在线免费精品| 久久青草综合色| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| av播播在线观看一区| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频 | 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| kizo精华| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | a级毛片在线看网站| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| xxx大片免费视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 免费看不卡的av| 中国国产av一级| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 丝袜喷水一区| av免费在线看不卡| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 欧美成人午夜精品| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 成人二区视频| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 成人免费观看视频高清| videossex国产| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日本与韩国留学比较| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲国产看品久久| 一级a做视频免费观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| av不卡在线播放| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 看免费成人av毛片| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 深夜精品福利| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 美女国产视频在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 曰老女人黄片| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲性久久影院| 久久久久精品性色| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲性久久影院| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 七月丁香在线播放| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 黄色一级大片看看| 一级黄片播放器| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www|