陜西鄂爾多斯盆地中三疊統(tǒng)一離片椎類牙齒化石

武 瑞 涂 黎 韓鳳祿

(1 中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(武漢)地球科學(xué)學(xué)院 武漢 430074)

(2 中國石化河南油田分公司勘探開發(fā)研究院 南陽 473132)

An isolated large temnospondyl tooth (CUGW VH100) was collected from the 7th member of the Yanchang Formation in the 5th Well of Weibei Oilfield, Ordos Basin, Shaanxi Province, China, which corresponds to the Member II of the Tongchuan Formation (Li et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2018; Tong et al., 2019).The Tongchuan Formation was deposited during the late Middle Triassic and abundant vertebrate fossils have been collected there, including the fishesHybodus,TriassodusandBoreosomus(Liu, 1962; Su, 1984; Yang et al., 2016; Deng et al., 2018) and the ArchosauriformesYonghesuchus sangbiensis(Liu et al., 2001; Wu et al., 2001).TheSinokannemeyeria-Fauna also extends to the Member I of the Tongchuan Formation in the Ordos Basin (Liu et al., 2018).The tooth is referred to Temnospondyli based on the following features: slender, conical tooth with a circular cross-section, slightly recurved crown, no denticles or carinae on the crown, and well-marked apicobasal grooves on the surface.It represents the youngest fossil record of temnospondyls in the North China Block.

Institutional abbreviationsCUGW, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan), Wuhan, China; IVPP, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China; SMNS, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

DescriptionThe tooth crown of CUGW VH100 is slender and recurved, with a nearly circular cross-section.The crown tip is cone-like, and slightly worn, with several homocentric dark growth lines.The maximum preserved length and crown height (CH) are 44 mm and 35 mm, respectively (Fig.1A).Only a small part of the root is preserved (9 mm) on the lingual side (Fig.1C).

Both the anterior and posterior carinae are not shown, and there are no serrations.Numerous grooves are clearly shown on the crown surface and are nearly parallel to each other (Fig.1F).There are two types of grooves.The long grooves extend up two-thirds of the crown’s height, whereas the short grooves only extend to the mid-region (Fig.1A).Between these grooves, some weak wrinkles are mainly longitudinally arranged on the convex surface.Generally, these wrinkles are short compared to the grooves and are closely arranged but not parallel to each other (Fig.1G).

Fig.1 Photographs of the tooth fossil from the Tongchuan Formation, Ordos Basin (CUGW VH100)A.anterior (or posterior) view; enamel surface showing two types of grooves: short grooves extending to the mid-region of the crown (white arrow), and long grooves extending two-thirds up the crown (black arrow); B.posterior (or anterior) view; C.lingual view; D.labial view; E.CT image of the cross-section at the base (white line in A); F.enlargement of white square in A, showing longitudinal parallel grooves (arrow); G.enlargement of white square in F, showing radial tiny wrinkles between grooves (arrows)Abbreviations: CBL.crown base length; CBW.crown base width; CH.crown height; RH.root height

In CT images, several longitudinal channels with regular distribution can be observed around the transverse section of the crown base (Fig.1E).Some radial channels are shown in the inner region, and these radial channels vary longitudinally along the long axis of the crown.

Comparison and discussionThe conical shape of the tooth and the longitudinal ornamentations along the crown are widespread in different tetrapod groups from the Triassic to the Late Cretaceous, including some crurotarsal archosaurs, crocodylomorphs, temnospondyls, pistosauroids and plesiosaurs; however, the teeth of the different groups differ in the morphology of ornamentations, their arrangements on the crown surface, the development of the carinae, and the distributions of serrations on the anterior and posterior edges (Cheng et al., 2006; Moser and Schoch, 2007; Baczko and Ezcurra, 2016).The absence of serrations differs from most crurotarsal archosaurs and crocodylomorphs (Hungerbühler, 1998; Clark and Sues, 2002; Sulej, 2010).The crown shape and surface ornamentations of CUGW VH100 differ from those of plesiosaurs and pistosauroids in which the crown is more slender with numerous longitudinal ridges rather than grooves (Yang, 1965; Rieppel, 1999; Cheng et al., 2006; Kear et al., 2006; Vecchia, 2006; Sato et al., 2007).

Combined with morphological characteristics and geological age, CUGW VH100 is most similar to a fossil tooth (SMNS 55911) ofMastodonsaurus(Temnospondyli, Capitosauroidea), which is conical in shape and has no carinae or serrations, with obvious groove-like ornamentations that do not extend to the tip (Moser and Schoch, 2007).However, SMNS 55911 has an irregular “l(fā)abyrinthine structure” on the cross-section, which is an external expression of the dentine folding inside the tooth (Romer, 1956).Dentine folding is common in the amniote, especially in some basal groups, including the sarcopterygians (Latimeria chalumnae), the actinopterygians (Lepisosteus), some basal tetrapods and some ichthyosaurs (Maxwell and Lamoureux, 2011; Meunier et al., 2015), and the shape of dentine folding varies greatly longitudinally along with the crown (Moser and Schoch, 2007).CUGW VH100 lacks any apparent “l(fā)abyrinthine structure” in the CT image.This may be affected by the preservation and small density discrepancy between enamel and dentine.This tooth is here identified as a temnospondyl tooth.

Although the temnospondyls survived to the Jurassic in Sichuan, the youngest record in the North China Block was from the Ermaying Formation (Li et al., 2008).CUGW VH100 represents the youngest fossil record of temnospondyl from the North China Block.The tooth crown with conical shape and circular cross-section is highly adapted to fishing (Damiani et al., 2000; Dias and Schultz, 2003; Moser and Schoch, 2007), and the coexistenceHybodusyoungifish fauna can provide enough food for it.

AcknowledgementsThe authors thank Lin Qixiang and Ruan Xiaoyan (CUG, Wuhan) for providing information, Zhang Muhui (CUG, Wuhan) for CT photographing, and Liu Jun (IVPP) for fossil identification and their very helpful comments on the manuscript.This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41688103).