• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Spatial distribution of aloricate ciliates in the stratified water of the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas in the Southern Ocean

    2022-02-07 07:05:44LIJingyuanLIHaiboWANGChaofengZHANGWuchangXIAOTian
    Advances in Polar Science 2022年4期

    LI Jingyuan, LI Haibo, WANG Chaofeng, ZHANG Wuchang& XIAO Tian

    Spatial distribution of aloricate ciliates in the stratified water of the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas in the Southern Ocean

    LI Jingyuan1,2,3,4, LI Haibo1,2,3*, WANG Chaofeng1,2,3, ZHANG Wuchang1,2,3*& XIAO Tian1,2,3

    1CAS Key Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China;2Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental Science, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China;3Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China;4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    Aloricate ciliates are the main component of microzooplankton. They play important roles in the circulation of materials and flow of energy in marine pelagic ecosystems. To determine the distribution pattern and structure of the aloricate ciliate community in vertically stratified waters of the Southern Ocean, we collected data on aloricate ciliates in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas during the 36th Chinese National Antarctic Research Expedition. The ranges of aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass were 5–3097 ind·L?1and 0.01–11.40 μg C·L?1, respectively. Vertically, the average abundance of aloricate ciliates decreased from the surface to 200 m, while biomass was highest in the 50-m layer. The importance of aloricate ciliates <20 μm increased along the depth gradient. Their contribution to total abundance increased from 13.04% in the surface layer to 73.71% in the 200-m layer. This is the first study to explore the distribution characteristics of the aloricate ciliate community in a stratified water column of the Southern Ocean. Our results will be helpful for understanding the variation in the pelagic community in waters of the Southern Ocean with intensified stratification.

    aloricate ciliates, spatial distribution, community structure, stratification, Southern Ocean

    1 Introduction

    Planktonic ciliates, which have a size range of 10–200 μm, are ubiquitous in all kinds of marine environments (Li et al., 2016, 2020, 2022; Yang et al., 2016; Monti-Birkenmeier et al., 2017; Liang et al., 2018). They are composed of aloricate ciliates and tintinnids, belonging to the subclasses Oligotrichia and Choreotrichia, respectively. Aloricate ciliates, the major component of planktonic ciliates, usually dominate the planktonic ciliate community and microzooplankton community in coastal waters (Zhang et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2016; Martínez-López et al., 2019), open seas (Gómez, 2007), and the polar regions (Ichinomiya et al., 2007; Garzio and Steinberg, 2013; Monti-Birkenmeier et al., 2017; Liang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2022). Aloricate ciliates are grazers of picoplankton and nanoplankton (Bernard and Rassoulzadegan, 1993) and prey of mesozooplankton (Stoecker and Capuzzo, 1990). Thus, aloricate ciliates are an important linkage between the microbial food web and the traditional food chain, and they play a crucial role in the functioning of marine ecosystems (Stoecker et al., 2017).

    Water-column stratification can result in distinct vertical, physical, and chemical properties and create distinct habitats for aloricate ciliates in the marine system (Basu and Mackey, 2018; Loick-Wilde et al., 2019; Romano et al., 2021). Compared with larger and more motile zooplankton, aloricate ciliates have a short life cycle and respond rapidly to environmental changes (Yang et al., 2021). Therefore, aloricate ciliates can form a stable community and quickly adapt to the surrounding seawaters in a stable marine environment, even if the stability only lasts for a short time (Sun et al., 2022).

    The upper water column of the Southern Ocean exhibits clear seasonal variation. During spring and summer time, surface water temperature increases, and the melting of sea ice induces water-column stratification (Rozema et al., 2017; Garcia et al., 2020). Global warming affects the polar regions more than other regions on the earth and causes the intense stratification of the Southern Ocean (Sarmiento et al., 2004). The intense stratification will influence the vertical distribution of the plankton community.

    The Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas are located in the Indian sector of the Southern Ocean (East Antarctica). In austral summer, the upper water column of this region is well stratified (Li et al., 2022). Many studies have reported on planktonic ciliates in different environments of the Southern Ocean (Liang et al., 2018; Li et al., 2022). Li et al. (2022) reported on variations in the planktonic ciliate community in different water masses in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas. However, the spatial distribution, especially the vertical variation of the aloricate ciliate community in the stratified Southern Ocean, has never been reported before. In this study, we investigated the aloricate ciliate community at depths of 0 m to 200 m in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas. Our aims were to: (1) determine the vertical variation of aloricate ciliate community in different sampling layers, and (2) describe the abundance and biomass variations of aloricate ciliates in different size classes.

    2 Material and methods

    Cruise sampling in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas was conducted at 59 stations in 9 transects (Figure 1) onboard the icebreaker R/V, during the 36th Chinese National Antarctic Research Expedition (CHINARE, from November 2019 to January 2020). Water samples were collected using 10-L Niskin bottles on a rosette CTD carousel. One liter of seawater was collected from each sampling point (0, 25, 50, 100, and 200 m at each station). The samples were fixed with Lugol’s solution (1% final concentration) in a plastic bottle and kept in a cool and dark place until the time of analysis. A total of 291 samples were collected. Data on temperature, salinity, and chlorophyll-concentration (Chl) were provided by the National Arctic and Antarctic Data Center (http://www. chinare.org.cn).

    In the laboratory, the supernatant of each water sample was gently siphoned out after being allowed to settle for at least 48 h. This process was repeated until each sample was concentrated to the final volume of 25 mL. Then, concentrated samples were sedimented in Uterm?hl counting chambers for at least 24 h, and aloricate ciliates were subsequently counted using an inverted microscope (Olympus IX 71, 100×, or 400×). If the high abundance of aloricate ciliates were found in the previous count, only a part of microscopy fields were counted, while aloricate ciliates with low abundances were counted completely to guarantee accuracy. The length and width of the aloricate ciliates were measured for at least (if possible) 20 individuals. The biovolume of each taxon was estimated from appropriate geometric shapes (e.g., cone, ball, and cylinder). The conversion factor of carbon biomass for aloricate ciliates used in this study was 0.19 pg C·μm?3(Putt and Stoecker, 1989). Aloricate ciliates were not classified into taxa, but into different size classes based on the equivalent spherical diameters. Aloricate ciliates were categorized into 10 size classes, with intervals of 10 μm (i.e., <20 μm, 20–30 μm, 30–40 μm, …, >100 μm). Univariate Spearman correlation analyses were carried out using the statistical program SPSS v16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

    Figure 1 Locations of sampling stations in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas.

    3 Results

    3.1 Hydrography

    Temperature and salinity were in the ranges of ?1.84–1.91°C and 33.27–34.69, respectively. Horizontally, the temperature decreased southward at each transect in each depth except for the 50-m depth, where the temperature was extremely low and relatively homogeneous. The temperature was lower in the middle region than in the eastern and western regions in the surface and 25-m layers, but higher in the 50-m, 100-m, and 200-m layers. The temperature was relatively low from 0 m to 200 m at several of the southeasternmost stations (Figure 2). The distribution pattern of salinity was opposite to that of temperature in the upper 50 m, but similar to the temperature distribution pattern at 100 m and 200 m (Figure 2). Chlwas in the range of 0–2.4 μg·L?1. In the upper 50 m, Chlwas high in the middle and northern stations of each transect. High values of Chlappeared in the offshore regions of Transects C4 and C9.

    Vertically, stratification in the water column was strong in the research area. Temperature and salinity exhibited obvious vertical gradients. Water temperature was lowest in the 50-m layer and increased both upward and downward. Meanwhile, salinity increased from the surface to 200 m at all stations. Chlwas high in the upper 50 m and decreased sharply from 50 m to 200 m (Figure 2).

    3.2 Aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass

    The ranges of aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass were 5–3097 ind·L?1and 0.01–11.40 μg C·L?1, respectively (Table 1). The highest abundance and biomass occurred in the 25-m depth of Station P1-07 and at 0 m of Station C9-01, respectively. Meanwhile, the lowest values of abundance and biomass occurred in 200 m of Station C9-10 and 0 m of Station C9-10, respectively (Figure 3, Table 1).

    Figure 2 Spatial distribution of temperature (a), salinity (b), and chlorophyll-concentration (Chl) (c) at each sampling layer.

    Figure 3 Spatial distribution of aloricate ciliate abundance (a) and biomass (b) at each sampling layer.

    Aloricate ciliates measuring 20–30 μm were the first contributor to total abundance, comprising 38.45% of the total abundance, followed by those measuring <20 μm (28.99%), 30–40 μm (16.78%), and 40–50 μm (8.35%). Aloricate ciliates in the 50–60-μm range only occupied 5.29% of total abundance. However, the biomass structure was clearly different from that of abundance: 50–60-μm aloricate ciliates were the main contributor (21.85%) to total biomass, followed by those measuring 40–50 μm (18.97%), 30–40 μm (17.98%), and 20–30 μm (16.27%). Aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm had a high abundance proportion, but extremely low biomass proportion (2.47%) (Table 2).

    Table 2 Abundance proportion and biomass proportion of different size-class aloricate ciliates at each depth

    Notes: AP=abundance proportion; BP=biomass proportion

    Horizontally, the distribution of aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass exhibited different patterns in different layers. In the surface and 25-m layers, aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass were higher at the low-temperature and salinity regions. In the 50-m layer, both abundance and biomass were high in low-temperature regions. In the 100-m and 200-m layers, aloricate ciliate distribution was homogeneous in most regions of the research area (Figure 3).

    Vertically, the abundance and biomass distributions of aloricate ciliates were clearly different in different regions of the research area. In Transects C2 and C3, aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass increased from the surface to the 50-m layer, then decreased with depth. In other transects, the highest values of abundance and biomass mainly appeared in 0 m and 25 m, except for the two northernmost stations in Transect C9 (Figure 3). The average abundance of aloricate ciliates was highest in the surface layer. It decreased from the surface to 200 m. However, the average biomass of aloricate ciliates increased from the surface to the 50-m layer, then decreased sharply at 200 m (Figure 4).

    Figure 4 Vertical variation of aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass. The blue dots indicate the average values of each sampling layer, and the blue lines indicate the variation trends of those average values.

    Both the abundance and biomass of aloricate ciliates decreased with increasing temperature. The same variation trends were found along the salinity gradient. Aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass increased with the increase in Chland reached a plateau when Chlwas higher than 0.75 μg·L?1(Figure 5).

    Correlation analysis showed that aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass exhibited significantly negative correlations with temperature, salinity, and depth, but a significantly positive correlation with Chl(Table 3).

    3.3 Vertical variation of aloricate ciliates in different size classes

    Aloricate ciliates measuring 20–30 μm were the most common size class. They appeared at all the sampling points, followed by aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm and 30–40 μm and appeared at 288 and 283 sampling points, respectively. The occurrence frequency of aloricate ciliates larger than 30 μm decreased with the increase in ciliate size (Table 1).

    The variation trends of different size class aloricate ciliates along the depth gradient were diverse, but the same vertical trend was seen in the abundance and biomass of aloricate ciliates of the same size class (Figures 5, 6 and 7). The average abundance and biomass of aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm increased from the surface to the 100-m layer with a very slight fluctuation at 50 m and then decreased until 200 m. Those of the 20–30-μm aloricate ciliates were the highest at the surface and decreased with depth. The vertical variation trend of aloricate ciliates measuring 30–40 μm was similar to those measuring 20–30 μm, but increased slightly at 50 m. Aloricate ciliates ranging from 40 μm to 70 μm had similar vertical distribution patterns. The highest values of aloricate ciliates sized 40–50 μm appeared in 25 m, while those of aloricate ciliates sized 50–60 μm and 60–70 μm appeared in 50 m (Figures 5, 6 and 7). The average abundance and biomass of <20-μm aloricate ciliates in 200 m were similar with those at the surface, while the values of other size classes of aloricate ciliates in 200 m were far less than those in the surface (Figures 5, 6, and 7). Aloricate ciliates in the 70–80-, 80–90-, and 90–100-μm size classes were restricted in the upper 50 m and disappeared in layers deeper than 50 m. Aloricate ciliates in the >100-μm size class occasionally appeared at 0, 25, 50, and 100 m and disappeared at 200 m (Figures 5, 6 and 7; Table 1).

    Correlation analysis revealed that the abundance and biomass of aloricate ciliates in most size classes had significantly negative correlations with temperature, salinity, and depth, and a significantly positive correlation with Chl. Aloricate ciliates in the <20-μm size class exhibited unique relationships with environmental factors. Their abundance and biomass were negatively correlated with temperature and significantly positively correlated with salinity and depth, but there was no significant correlation with Chl(Table 3).

    Figure 5 Variation of aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass along the temperature, salinity, and chlorophyll-concentration (Chl) gradient.

    Table 3 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient between environmental factors and aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass

    Notes:=temperature;=salinity; Chl=chlorophyll-concentration;=depth;*= Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2–tailed);**= Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2–tailed)

    Figure 6 Vertical variation of different size-class aloricate ciliate abundance. The blue dots indicate the average values of each sampling layer, and the lines indicate the variation trends of those average values.

    Figure 7 Vertical variation of different size-class aloricate ciliate biomass. The blue dots indicate the average values of each sampling layer, and the lines indicate the variation trends of those average values.

    3.4 Structure variation of aloricate ciliate community in different layers

    The abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm increased from the surface to 200 m. This was the most dominant size class at 100 m (49.28%) and 200 m (73.71%). Aloricate ciliates measuring 20–30 μm were dominant at the surface and in the 25-m layer, and their abundance proportion decreased from 54.34% at 0 m to 16.58% at 200 m. The abundance proportion of 30–40-μm aloricate ciliates was highest at 50 m (19.62%), followed by 0 m (17.87%), and the lowest value appeared at 200 m (5.74%). The variations in the vertical abundance proportions of aloricate ciliates measuring 40–70 μm were the same, increasing at first, then decreasing down to 200 m. However, the highest abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates sized 40–50 μm appeared at 25 m, while those of the other size class appeared at 50 m. The abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates measuring >70 μm were lower than 0.56% in all layers (Figure 8, Table 2).

    Figure 8 Average abundance (a), biomass (b), and proportion (c, d) of each size class of aloricate ciliates at each sampling layer.

    Although aloricate ciliates <20 μm had relatively higher abundance proportions in each layer, their biomass proportions were lower than 2.08% from the surface to 50 m and increased to 6.69% at 100 m and to 20.99% at 200 m. The biomass proportion of aloricate ciliates sized 20–30 μm decreased from the surface to 50 m and then increased down to 200 m. The biomass proportion of 30–40-μm aloricate ciliates was the lowest at 25 m (15.94%) and highest at 100 m (23.00%). The biomass proportions of aloricate ciliates measuring 40–50 μm were higher at 100 m and 200 m. With increased depth, the biomass proportions of aloricate ciliates measuring 50–60 μm and 60–70 μm increased at first and then decreased, with the highest values at 25 m and 50 m, respectively (Figure 8).

    4 Discussion

    4.1 Aloricate ciliate abundance and biomass

    Many studies have reported large ranges of aloricate ciliate abundance in the Southern Ocean. Aloricate ciliate abundance was in the range of 387–695 ind·L?1in the Atlantic sector (south of 60°S) of the Southern Ocean (Froneman and Perissinotto, 1996), 80–39969 ind·L?1in the Western Antarctic Peninsula (Garzio and Steinberg, 2013), 10–1900 ind·L?1in the Scotia Sea (Sushin et al., 1986; Garrison et al., 1993), 0–9000 ind·L?1in the Weddell Sea (Buck and Garrison, 1983; Garrison and Buck, 1989; Monti-Birkenmeier et al., 2017), 1262–2330 ind·L?1in the Ross Sea (Safi et al., 2012), and 1–2770 ind·L?1in the Prydz Bay (Liang et al., 2018). In our study, aloricate ciliate abundance (5–3097 ind·L?1) was in the lower end of previous data.

    Aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm were the main contributor to total abundance in neritic waters (Lynn et al., 1991), the equatorial Pacific Ocean (Yang et al., 2004), and the Southern Ocean (Liang et al., 2018). Yang et al. (2004) found that the abundance of <20-μm aloricate ciliates accounted for 49.9% of the total abundance in the northeast equatorial Pacific Ocean. Liang et al. (2018) reported that <20-μm aloricate ciliates represented approximately 40% of total abundance in the Prydz Bay. In our study, <20-μm aloricate ciliates only contributed 28.99% to the total abundance, and this value was less than those in previous studies. Although <20-μm aloricate ciliates contributed a large part to total abundance, it only accounted for a small portion of aloricate ciliates biomass (Yang et al., 2004; Christaki et al., 2008). Our results were consistent with the following: the <20-μm aloricate ciliate biomass proportion was <10% from the surface to 100 m and approximately 20% at 200 m.

    Aloricate ciliates <30 μm contributed to 75.5%, 54.6%, and 56.7% of aloricate ciliate abundance in the tropical West Pacific, the Bering Sea, and the Arctic Ocean, respectively (Wang et al., 2020). Our results indicate that <20-μm and 20–30-μm aloricate ciliates made up 67.44% of the total abundance; this value was lower than that of the tropical West Pacific but higher than those of the Bering Sea and the Arctic Ocean.

    In stratified Arctic and sub-Arctic waters, mixotrophic ciliates usually dominate the ciliate community (Putt, 1990; Suzuki and Taniguchi, 1998; Levinsen et al., 2000). Meanwhile, <30-μm mixotrophic ciliates were the main contributor to total ciliate abundance (Romano et al., 2021). In the present study, the water column was well stratified, which was beneficial to the development of small mixotrophic ciliates (Romano et al., 2021). Therefore, we speculate that the <20-μm and 20–30-μm aloricate ciliates in our study are mainly composed of mixotrophic ciliates.

    4.2 Vertical variation of aloricate ciliate community structure

    Several studies have reported on the vertical distribution of the aloricate ciliate community structure in different marine environments (Wang et al., 2020, 2021, 2022). The abundance variation trends differ extremely between those in our study and those in tropical waters. In our study, aloricate ciliate abundance decreased from the surface to the 200-m layer, while the abundance showed bimodal patterns (i.e., the peaks occurred in the surface and the deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM) layers) along the vertical profiles in the tropical seamount regions (Wang et al., 2021). In the open tropical Pacific Ocean, the abundance of aloricate ciliates was relatively homogeneous in the upper 100-m depth, with a higher abundance near the surface (Gómez, 2007).

    The abundance proportion of <20-μm aloricate ciliates increased from the surface to 200 m in tropical seamount regions (Wang et al., 2021). It first decreased, then increased to the 200-m layer, before reaching the lowest values in the 75-m layer in the tropical Pacific and the Bering Sea and the 50-m layer in the Arctic Ocean (Wang et al., 2020).The vertical variation of the <20-μm aloricate ciliate abundance proportion in our study showed a similar but much sharper trend compared with that in the tropical seamount regions. In the seamount regions, the abundance proportion varied from approximately 40% in the surface water to approximately 55% in the 200-m layer (Wang et al., 2021). In our study, it increased from 12.37% in the surface to 63.25% in the 200-m layer.

    The variation trend in the abundance proportion of 20–30-μm aloricate ciliates along the depth gradient in our study was clearly different from that of previous studies. In this study, it decreased from 47.99% in the surface to 22.91% in the 200-m layer with a slight increase in the 50-m layer. In the tropical Pacific Ocean, tropical seamount regions, the Bering Sea, and the Arctic Ocean, the 20–30-μm size-class contribution rate was relatively constant along the depth gradient (Wang et al., 2020, 2021, 2022).

    Aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm contributed to more than 40% of aloricate ciliate abundance and were the most abundant group from the surface to the 200-m depth in the tropical Pacific. However, in the Bering Sea and the Arctic Ocean, aloricate ciliates >30 μm were the dominant component in most layers except for the 200-m layer, where the aloricate ciliates <20 μm contributed to more than 40% aloricate ciliate abundance (Wang et al., 2020). In the tropical seamounts of Yap, Mariana, and Caroline, aloricate ciliates measuring <20 μm comprised more than 30% of aloricate ciliate abundance at each depth (Wang et al., 2021). In the present study, 20–30-μm aloricate ciliates were the most dominant group and <20-μm aloricate ciliates contributed to <30% of the total abundance from the surface to the 50-m layer.

    The abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates >30 μm in this study showed similar variation trends along the vertical profiles in the tropical West Pacific, the Bering Sea, and the Arctic Ocean (Wang et al., 2020). In both our study and Wang et al. (2020), the abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates >30 μm increased from the surface to the layers between 30–75 m, and then decreased to the 200-m layer.

    Aloricate ciliates measuring >50 μm were more abundant in the upper 85 m than below in the ice-edge zone of the Weddell and Scotia Seas during the austral winter, and they were not found in samples from 190 m and 200 m (Gowing and Garrison et al., 1992). In our study, aloricate ciliates measuring >50 μm were more abundant in the upper 50 m, accounting for more than 10% of total abundance, and only accounting for <5% and about 1% at 100 m and 200 m, respectively.

    4.3 Impact of water-column stratification on the distribution of aloricate ciliates

    In this study, the water column was well stratified. Water-column stratification is essential for phytoplankton development and governs phytoplankton succession (Rozema et al., 2017; Garcia et al., 2019). The stratification of the water column favors the development of small eukaryotic algae and thus affects the ciliate community (Garcia et al., 2019; Romano et al., 2021). In the Red Sea, the ciliate community was clearly affected by water-column stratification, as both abundance and biomass declined strongly along the vertical profile during summer stratification, with the highest average values in the surface layer (Claessens et al., 2008). The average abundance decreased along the depth gradient in this study, which was consistent with the results of Claessens et al. (2008). But the highest value of average biomass appeared in the 50-m layer in our study.

    During the stratification period in the oligotrophic Eastern Mediterranean, very small (<18 μm) and small (18–30 μm) ciliates were distributed throughout the water column, whereas the species measuring >50 μm were found only above the 50-m layer (Romano et al., 2021). In the seamount regions of the tropical Pacific Ocean, aloricate ciliates measuring >50 μm contributed less than 10% to the total abundance in the 200-m layer (Wang et al., 2020). In the present study, the abundance proportion of aloricate ciliates measuring >50 μm decreased sharply in the 100-m and 200-m layers, which is consistent with the results of Romano et al. (2021) and Wang et al. (2020).

    The stratification will hinder the exchange of nutrients between the upper and lower waters (Cerme?o et al., 2008), causing oligotrophic conditions in the deep waters of the euphotic layer. The oligotrophic conditions favor the small ciliates that feed on pico-bacterioplankton (Romano et al., 2021). Thus, the importance of small ciliates increases with the depth gradient in the euphotic layer. The aloricate ciliate community structure in our study is a universal phenomenon in the Antarctic and perhaps other stratified waters around the world. In the Southern Ocean, water-column stratification becomes more obvious with increased global warming. The input of fresh and iron-rich melting ice water will enhance vertical stratification (Sarmiento et al., 2004; Kim and Kim, 2021). Thus, we predict that the importance of small aloricate ciliates will increase with ongoing global warming.

    5 Conclusion

    The aloricate ciliate distribution and community structure were studied in the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas of the Southern Ocean. In a well-stratified water column, the aloricate ciliate community structure changed dramatically along the depth gradient, and the smaller aloricate ciliates became more important from the surface to the 200-m layer. We clarified the distribution pattern of the aloricate ciliate community in a well-stratified water column of the Southern Ocean. Our results are important for predicting trends in microzooplankton community variation, along with the intensified stratification of the Southern Ocean.

    Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National Polar Special Program “Impact and Response of Antarctic Seas to Climate Change” (Grant no. IRASCC 01-02-01D) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 41706192, 41806178). We are thankful to the 36th CHINARE for providing logistical support and environmental data. We thank the crew on the R/Vfor their support and assistance during sampling.We are deeply grateful to the Associate Editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions, which substantially improved the manuscript.

    Basu S, Mackey K. 2018. Phytoplankton as key mediators of the biological carbon pump: their responses to a changing climate. Sustainability, 10(3): 869, doi:10.3390/su10030869.

    Bernard C, Rassoulzadegan F. 1993. The role of picoplankton (cyanobacteria and plastidic picoflagellates) in the diet of tintinnids. J Plankton Res, 15(4): 361-373, doi:10.1093/plankt/15.4.361.

    Buck K R, Garrison D L. 1983. Protists from the ice-edge region of the Weddell Sea. Deep Sea Res A Oceanogr Res Pap, 30(12): 1261-1277, doi:10.1016/0198-0149(83)90084-5.

    Cerme?o P, Dutkiewicz S, Harris R P, et al. 2008. The role of nutricline depth in regulating the ocean carbon cycle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105(51): 20344-20349, doi:10.1073/pnas.0811302106.

    Christaki U, Obernosterer I, Van Wambeke F, et al. 2008. Microbial food web structure in a naturally iron-fertilized area in the Southern Ocean (Kerguelen Plateau). Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr, 55(5-7): 706-719, doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.12.009.

    Claessens M, Wickham S A, Post A F, et al. 2008. Ciliate community in the oligotrophic Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. Aquat Microb Ecol, 53: 181-190, doi:10.3354/ame01243.

    Froneman P, Perissinotto R. 1996. Microzooplankton grazing in the Southern Ocean: implications for the carbon cycle. Mar Ecol, 17(1/3): 99-115, doi:10.1111/j.1439-0485.1996.tb00493.x.

    Garcia M D, Dutto M S, Chazarreta C J, et al. 2020. Micro- and mesozooplankton successions in an Antarctic coastal environment during a warm year. PLoS One, 15(5): e0232614, doi:10.1371/journal. pone.0232614.

    Garcia M D, Severini M D, Spetter C, et al. 2019. Effects of glacier melting on the planktonic communities of two Antarctic coastal areas (Potter Cove and Hope Bay) in summer. Reg Stud Mar Sci, 30: 100731, doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100731.

    Garrison D L, Buck K R, Gowing M M. 1993. Winter plankton assemblage in the ice edge zone of the Weddell and Scotia Seas: composition, biomass and spatial distributions. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap, 40(2): 311-338, doi:10.1016/0967-0637(93) 90006-O.

    Garrison D L, Buck K R. 1989. Protozooplankton in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica: abundance and distribution in the ice-edge zone. Polar Biol, 9(6): 341-351, doi:10.1007/BF00442524.

    Garzio L M, Steinberg D K. 2013. Microzooplankton community composition along the Western Antarctic Peninsula. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap, 77: 36-49, doi:10.1016/j.dsr.2013.03.001.

    Gómez F. 2007. Trends on the distribution of ciliates in the open Pacific Ocean. Acta Oecologica, 32(2): 188-202, doi:10.1016/j.actao.2007.04. 002.

    Gowing M M, Garrison D L. 1992. Abundance and feeding ecology of larger protozooplankton in the ice edge zone of the Weddell and Scotia Seas during the austral winter. Deep Sea Res A Oceanogr Res Pap, 39(5): 893-919, doi:10.1016/0198-0149(92)90128-G.

    Ichinomiya M, Honda M, Shimoda H, et al. 2007. Structure of the summer under fast ice microbial community near Syowa Station, eastern Antarctica. Polar Biol, 30(10): 1285-1293, doi:10.1007/s00300-007- 0289-8.

    Kim S U, Kim K Y. 2021. Impact of climate change on the primary production and related biogeochemical cycles in the coastal and sea ice zone of the Southern Ocean. Sci Total Environ, 751: 141678, doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141678.

    Levinsen H, Turner J T, Nielsen T G, et al. 2000. On the trophic coupling between protists and copepods in Arctic marine ecosystems. Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 204: 65-77, doi:10.3354/meps204065.

    Li H B, Chen X, Denis M, et al. 2020. Seasonal and spatial variation of pelagic microbial food web structure in a semi-enclosed temperate bay. Front Mar Sci, 7: 589566, doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.589566.

    Li H B, Xu Z Q, Mou W X, et al. 2022. Planktonic ciliates in different water masses of Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas (Indian sector of the Southern Ocean) during austral summer. Polar Biol, 45(6): 1059-1076, doi:10.1007/s00300-022-03057-w.

    Li H B, Xu Z Q, Zhang W C, et al. 2016. Boreal tintinnid assemblage in the Northwest Pacific and its connection with the Japan Sea in summer 2014. PLoS One, 11(4): e0153379, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0153379.

    Liang C, Li H B, Dong Y, et al. 2018. Planktonic ciliates in different water masses in open waters near Prydz Bay (East Antarctica) during austral summer, with an emphasis on tintinnid assemblages. Polar Biol, 41(11): 2355-2371, doi:10.1007/s00300-018-2375-5.

    Loick-Wilde N, Fernández-Urruzola I, Eglite E, et al. 2019. Stratification, nitrogen fixation, and cyanobacterial bloom stage regulate the planktonic food web structure. Glob Chang Biol, 25(3): 794-810, doi:10.1111/gcb.14546.

    Lynn D H, Roff J C, Hopcroft R R. 1991. Annual abundance and biomass of aloricate ciliates in tropical neritic waters off Kingston, Jamaica. Mar Biol, 110(3): 437-448, doi:10.1007/BF01344362.

    Martínez-López A, Pérez-Morales A, Ayala-Rodríguez G A, et al. 2019. Abundance and seasonal variability of aloricate ciliates and tintinnids in a eutrophic coastal lagoon system of the Gulf of California, Mexico. Reg Stud Mar Sci, 32: 100814, doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2019.100814.

    Monti-Birkenmeier M, Diociaiuti T, Umani S F, et al. 2017. Microzooplankton composition in the winter sea ice of the Weddell Sea. Antarct Sci, 29(4): 299-310, doi:10.1017/s0954102016000717.

    Putt M. 1990. Abundance, chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rates of ciliates in the Nordic Seas during summer. Deep Sea Res A Oceanogr Res Pap, 37(11): 1713-1731, doi:10.1016/0198-0149(90)90073-5.

    Putt M, Stoecker D K. 1989. An experimentally determined carbon: volume ratio for marine “oligotrichous” ciliates from estuarine and coastal waters. Limnol Oceanogr, 34(6): 1097-1103, doi:10.4319/lo. 1989.34.6.1097.

    Romano F, Symiakaki K, Pitta P. 2021. Temporal variability of planktonic ciliates in a coastal oligotrophic environment: mixotrophy, size classes and vertical distribution. Front Mar Sci, 8: 641589, doi:10.3389/fmars. 2021.641589.

    Rozema P D, Biggs T, Sprong P A A, et al. 2017. Summer microbial community composition governed by upper-ocean stratification and nutrient availability in northern Marguerite Bay, Antarctica. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr, 139: 151-166, doi:10.1016/j.dsr2. 2016.11.016.

    Safi K A, Robinson K V, Hall J A, et al. 2012. Ross Sea deep-ocean and epipelagic microzooplankton during the summer-autumn transition period. Aquat Microb Ecol, 67(2): 123-137, doi:10.3354/ame01588.

    Sarmiento J L, Gruber N, Brzezinski M A, et al. 2004. High-latitude controls of thermocline nutrients and low latitude biological productivity. Nature, 427(6969): 56-60, doi:10.1038/nature02127.

    Stoecker D K, Capuzzo J M. 1990. Predation on protozoa: its importance to zooplankton. J Plankton Res, 12(5): 891-908, doi:10.1093/plankt/ 12.5.891.

    Stoecker D K, Hansen P J, Caron D A, et al. 2017. Mixotrophy in the marine plankton. Ann Rev Mar Sci, 9: 311-335, doi:10.1146/annurev- marine-010816-060617.

    Sun P, Liao Y Y, Wang Y, et al. 2022. Contrasting community composition and co-occurrence relationships of the active pico-sized haptophytes in the surface and subsurface chlorophyll maximum layers of the Arctic Ocean in summer. Microorganisms, 10(2): 248, doi:10.3390/microorganisms10020248.

    Sushin V A, Samyshev E Z, Gaydamak A I. 1986. The significance of infusoria in Antarctic plankton communities. Oceanology, 26(6): 982-988.

    Suzuki T, Taniguchi A. 1998. Standing crops and vertical distribution of four groups of marine planktonic ciliates in relation to phytoplankton chlorophyll. Mar Biol, 132(3): 375-382, doi:10. 1007/s00227005 0404.

    Wang C F, Li H B, Dong Y, et al. 2021. Planktonic ciliate trait structure variation over Yap, Mariana, and Caroline seamounts in the tropical western Pacific Ocean. J Ocean Limnol, 39(5): 1705-1717, doi:10. 1007/s00343-021-0476-4.

    Wang C F, Li H B, Xu Z Q, et al. 2020. Difference of planktonic ciliate communities of the tropical West Pacific, the Bering Sea and the Arctic Ocean. Acta Oceanol Sin, 39(4): 9-17, doi:10.1007/s13131- 020-1541-0.

    Wang C F, Yang M Y, He Y, et al. 2022. Hydrographic feature variation caused pronounced differences in planktonic ciliate community in the Pacific Arctic region in the summer of 2016 and 2019. Front Microbiol, 13: 881048, doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.881048.

    Yang E J, Choi J K, Hyun J H. 2004. Distribution and structure of heterotrophic protist communities in the northeast equatorial Pacific Ocean. Mar Biol, 146(1): 1-15, doi:10.1007/s00227-004-1412-9.

    Yang E J, Jiang Y, Lee S H. 2016. Microzooplankton herbivory and community structure in the Amundsen Sea, Antarctica. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr, 123: 58-68, doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2015. 06.001.

    Yang J P, Chen Z J, Chen D X, et al. 2021. Spatial distribution of the microzooplankton communities in the northern South China Sea: insights into their function in microbial food webs. Mar Pollut Bull, 162: 111898, doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2020.111898.

    Yu Y, Zhang W C, Feng M P, et al. 2016. Differences in the vertical distribution and response to freshwater discharge between aloricate ciliates and tintinnids in the East China Sea. J Mar Syst, 154: 103-109, doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.02.005.

    Zhang C X, Zhang W C, Ni X B, et al. 2015. Influence of different water masses on planktonic ciliate distribution on the East China Sea shelf. J Mar Syst, 141: 98-111, doi:10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.09.003.

    : Li J Y, Li H B, Wang C F, et al. Spatial distribution of aloricate ciliates in the stratified water of the Cosmonaut and Cooperation Seas in the Southern Ocean. Adv Polar Sci, 2022, 33(4): 313-325,

    10.13679/j.advps.2022.0017

    22 August 2022; accepted 28 December 2022; published online 30 December 2022

    10.13679/j.advps.2022.0017

    December 2022 Vol. 33 No. 4: 313-325

    Corresponding authors, Li Haibo, E-mail: haiboli@qdio.ac.cn; Zhang Wuchang, ORCID: 0000-0001-7534-8368, E-mail: wuchangzhang@qdio.ac.cn

    免费搜索国产男女视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| .国产精品久久| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 97在线视频观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 国产成人freesex在线| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久精品影院6| 午夜免费激情av| av线在线观看网站| 在线天堂最新版资源| av免费观看日本| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产精品野战在线观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 综合色av麻豆| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久久久久大精品| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 色综合色国产| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 欧美区成人在线视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 欧美色视频一区免费| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 久久精品影院6| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 免费观看精品视频网站| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 高清毛片免费看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 色播亚洲综合网| 高清毛片免费看| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 特级一级黄色大片| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产精品无大码| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 久久久精品大字幕| av播播在线观看一区| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 身体一侧抽搐| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 一本久久精品| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 99久国产av精品| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 日本五十路高清| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 欧美3d第一页| 色网站视频免费| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 人妻系列 视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产单亲对白刺激| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 中国国产av一级| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲18禁久久av| 三级毛片av免费| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o | 视频中文字幕在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲av男天堂| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 97在线视频观看| 免费看日本二区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 免费av观看视频| www日本黄色视频网| 日韩高清综合在线| 在线播放无遮挡| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 国产色婷婷99| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 亚洲av男天堂| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲色图av天堂| 黑人高潮一二区| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 一本一本综合久久| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产淫语在线视频| 午夜a级毛片| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 性色avwww在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 热99在线观看视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 免费av不卡在线播放| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 亚洲av.av天堂| 亚洲五月天丁香| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 日韩中字成人| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 日韩欧美三级三区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| av线在线观看网站| 色网站视频免费| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 一本久久精品| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 在线a可以看的网站| 99久久精品热视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 成人三级黄色视频| 一级黄片播放器| 日本免费在线观看一区| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产精品永久免费网站| 日韩中字成人| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久久久性生活片| 成年版毛片免费区| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久 | 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生 | 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 波野结衣二区三区在线| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看 | 麻豆成人av视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 欧美区成人在线视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 有码 亚洲区| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 日本午夜av视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产乱人视频| 成人av在线播放网站| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 91久久精品电影网| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产精品野战在线观看| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 简卡轻食公司| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产美女午夜福利| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产美女午夜福利| 男人舔奶头视频| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产成人精品一,二区| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 级片在线观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 久久精品夜色国产| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 毛片女人毛片| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久久色成人| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲国产色片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 简卡轻食公司| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 欧美成人a在线观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 大香蕉久久网| av卡一久久| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 岛国毛片在线播放| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 国产精品一区www在线观看| 日本黄大片高清| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| av.在线天堂| 国产在视频线精品| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 日日啪夜夜撸| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| h日本视频在线播放| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| av福利片在线观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| ponron亚洲| 国产成人aa在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 成人三级黄色视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 久久久成人免费电影| videos熟女内射| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 女人久久www免费人成看片 | 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲av熟女| 赤兔流量卡办理| 日本免费在线观看一区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 久久午夜福利片| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合 | 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 成人无遮挡网站| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| a级毛色黄片| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 床上黄色一级片| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 少妇丰满av| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 欧美人与善性xxx| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲图色成人| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看 | 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o | 免费观看精品视频网站| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 三级经典国产精品| 在现免费观看毛片| 日本五十路高清| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 一级毛片电影观看 | 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 日本熟妇午夜| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 精品国产三级普通话版| 直男gayav资源| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产在线一区二区三区精 | 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 在线免费十八禁| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 春色校园在线视频观看| 熟女电影av网| 日本一二三区视频观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 人人妻人人看人人澡| or卡值多少钱| av在线亚洲专区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | av在线观看视频网站免费| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品无大码| 极品教师在线视频| 国产不卡一卡二| 日本三级黄在线观看| 免费av毛片视频| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| av在线播放精品| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 精品久久久噜噜| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 久久草成人影院| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合 | 日韩欧美 国产精品| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产三级中文精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产成人精品一,二区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 性色avwww在线观看| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产成人aa在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 中文字幕制服av| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产单亲对白刺激| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产成人一区二区在线| 午夜福利在线在线| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 老女人水多毛片| 变态另类丝袜制服| 久久久欧美国产精品| 两个人视频免费观看高清| .国产精品久久| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 久久精品影院6| 日本熟妇午夜| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 欧美bdsm另类| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久久久久久久久成人| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 一级黄片播放器| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 草草在线视频免费看| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲,欧美,日韩|