• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Understanding of the Effect of Climate Change on Tropical Cyclone Intensity: A Review※

    2022-01-20 07:04:38LiguangWUHaikunZHAOChaoWANGJianCAOandJiaLIANG
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2022年2期

    Liguang WU, Haikun ZHAO, Chao WANG, Jian CAO, and Jia LIANG

    1Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences and Institute of Atmospheric Sciences,Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China

    2Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster of Ministry of Education, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

    3Innovation Center of Ocean and Atmosphere System, Zhuhai Fudan Innovation Research Institute, Zhuhai 518057, China

    ABSTRACT The effect of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity has been an important scientific issue for a few decades.Although theory and modeling suggest the intensification of tropical cyclones in a warming climate, there are uncertainties in the assessed and projected responses of tropical cyclone intensity to climate change. While a few comprehensive reviews have already provided an assessment of the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone activity including tropical cyclone intensity, this review focuses mainly on the understanding of the effect of climate change on basin-wide tropical cyclone intensity, including indices for basin-wide tropical cyclone intensity, historical datasets used for intensity trend detection,environmental control of tropical cyclone intensity, detection and simulation of tropical cyclone intensity change, and some issues on the assessment of the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity. In addition to the uncertainty in the historical datasets, intertwined natural variabilities, the considerable model bias in the projected large-scale environment,and poorly simulated inner-core structures of tropical cyclones, it is suggested that factors controlling the basin-wide intensity can be different from individual tropical cyclones since the assessment of the effect of climate change treats tropical cyclones in a basin as a whole.

    Key words: tropical cyclone, climate change, intensity change

    1. Introduction

    Tropical cyclones are among the most catastrophic of high-impact weather events, causing substantial mortality and huge economic damage in many tropical and subtropical countries (Pielke and Landsea, 1998; Pielke et al.,2008; Zhang et al., 2009; Peduzzi et al., 2012). Currently, it is a matter of great public and scientific concern whether tropical cyclone activity has changed or will change in a warming climate, and this has been an important topic in the comprehensive scientific reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and a few review papers (IPCC,2007, 2014; Knutson et al., 2010; Walsh et al., 2015, 2016;Sobel et al., 2016; Knutson et al., 2019, 2020). Although theory and modeling consistently suggest the intensification of tropical cyclones on the basin-wide and global scales in a warming climate, there are uncertainties in the assessed and projected responses of tropical cyclone intensity to climate change (Knutson et al., 2019, 2020). One of the reasons is that the mechanisms controlling the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity have not yet been well understood.

    Among the metrics of tropical cyclone activity, the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity(mostly maximum sustained wind speed) was the first focus of scientific research, as signified by Emanuel (1987),which assessed the possible change in tropical cyclone intensity in a warming climate. Over the past decade, there have been some comprehensive review papers on the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone activity including tropical cyclone intensity (Knutson et al., 2010; Walsh et al., 2015,2016; Knutson et al., 2019, 2020). Lee et al. (2012), Ying et al. (2012), and Lee et al. (2020a, b) each provided a literature review on the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone activity in the western North Pacific basin. These reviews focused mainly on the assessment of the response of tropical cyclone activity to climate change. For example,Knutson et al. (2019, 2020) indicated that there is relatively low confidence in detecting the climate change of tropical cyclone activity from historical records, while there is mediumto-high confidence in projections including increased tropical cyclone rainfall, intensity, and proportion of tropical cyclones that reach category 4-5 intensity globally by the end of the century. In the technical summary of the IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5), confidence remains relatively low for long-term (centennial) changes in tropical cyclone activity, with a likely increase in global mean tropical cyclone maximum wind speed (Stocker et al., 2014). On the other hand, there has been relatively less attention paid to the physical mechanisms that control the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity, on both the basin-wide and global scales. Our review focuses on the understanding of the effect of climate change on the basin-wide tropical cyclone intensity.

    Our confidence in the assessment of the climate change of tropical cyclone intensity can be augmented only when the associated mechanisms are well understood. Although great progress has been made over the past 100 years to understand tropical cyclone intensity and structure change, as reviewed by Emanuel (2018), most studies on the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity were based on our knowledge derived from individual tropical cyclones, rather than on the basin-wide and global scales. More recently, studies have suggested that factors controlling the basin-wide intensity change can be different from those that affect individual tropical cyclones (e.g., Wu and Wang, 2008; Kossin and Camargo, 2009; Zhao et al., 2011, 2018a, b; Wu et al.,2018; Wang and Wu, 2019; Gao et al., 2020; Kossin et al.,2020). By focusing on the understanding of the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity, this review differs from previous ones in two aspects: 1) We focus on physical factors that control the climate change of tropical cyclone intensity, while previous reviews focused on how tropical cyclone activity has changed and will change; 2) We focus on the changes in basin-wide intensity of tropical cyclones, which can result from changes in formation location and prevailing tracks, even in the absence of changes in the environmental factors that are directly associated with intensity change. The following issues are reviewed: indices for basin-wide tropical cyclone intensity (section 2), historical datasets of tropical cyclone intensity (section 3), environmental parameters for tropical cyclone intensification (section 4), and progress in detecting tropical cyclone intensity change through observational analysis and numerical modeling (sections 5 and 6). In section 7, issues on the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity are discussed, followed by a summary and suggestions for future investigation (section 8).

    2. Indices for basin-wide tropical cyclone intensity

    Nearly all studies that explore the impact of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity focus on the intensity of tropical cyclones on the global or basin-wide scales,rather than an individual tropical cyclone. Thus, it is essential to quantify tropical cyclone intensity on the basin-wide scale. Two types of basin-wide intensity indices have been widely used in the literature. One is based only on the lifetime maximum wind speed. The other is a combination of tropical cyclone duration, frequency, and intensity.

    Webster et al. (2005) and Wu (2007) used the annual maximum intensity that is obtained by averaging the lifetime maximum intensity (LMI) of all tropical cyclones each year. The LMI can be in five categories based on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale in the North Atlantic and eastern Pacific basins. Tropical cyclones reaching category 3 (category 4) and higher are considered major (the most intense)hurricanes or tropical cyclones. Sometimes the most intense hurricanes or tropical cyclones are simply called intense hurricanes or intense tropical cyclones. In China, tropical cyclones are also classified into tropical storms, severe tropical storms, typhoons, strong typhoons, and super typhoons in the order of increasing intensity.

    Considering uncertainty in the historical records of tropical cyclone intensity (Landsea et al., 2006; Knutson et al.,2010; Kossin et al., 2013), the basin-wide intensity is also measured by the annual count of the major (the most intense) tropical cyclones. Since the annual counts of major and intense tropical cyclones depend on the annual tropical cyclogenesis frequency, the proportion of tropical cyclones with LMI reaching a certain category is used in many studies. For example, Webster et al. (2005) used the annual count and proportion of category 4-5 tropical cyclones to detect the trends in tropical cyclone intensity. The advantage of the proportion index is that the influence of the change in the annual tropical cyclone frequency is removed.For this reason, the proportion of the most intense tropical cyclones has been an important index in the study of climate change (Knutson et al., 2010, 2019).

    3. Datasets for tropical cyclone intensity

    Observational analysis is fundamental to the understanding of climate change of tropical cyclone intensity, which is defined by the maximum sustained surface wind in the eyewall or the minimum sea-level pressure in the eye. Recently Klotzbach et al. (2020) indicated that the minimum sealevel pressure is much more easily identified than the maximum sustained surface wind. In fact, the two intensity measures can be converted in the historical datasets (Emanuel,2005). According to the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) standard, the maximum sustained wind is a 10-min average wind speed at a 10-m height above the surface.However, the averaging period for the maximum sustained wind varies among different agencies. Harper et al. (2010)suggested conversions of the maximum wind speed between different averaging periods. It is suggested that a factor of 0.93 rather than the traditional value of 0.88 should be used to convert the 1-min maximum wind to 10-min maximum wind.

    Direct observations of the maximum sustained wind and minimum sea-level pressure are rarely available. Before the availability of aircraft reconnaissance, limited observations were from ships at sea and coastal weather stations(Landsea et al., 2006, 2008). After World War II, aircraft reconnaissance began in the North Atlantic and western North Pacific basins, but it was terminated in the western North Pacific basin in 1987 (Emanuel, 2008). Intensity estimates based on aircraft measurements are also prone to a variety of biases owing to changing instrumentation and means of inferring wind from central pressure and the flight level(Emanuel, 2005, 2008). Even in the basins with aircraft reconnaissance, aircraft can monitor only about half of the basin and are not available continuously (Landsea et al., 2004).

    A satellite-based pattern recognition scheme known as the Dvorak Technique is now the main method globally for estimating tropical cyclone intensity (Dvorak, 1975; Landsea et al., 2006; Emanuel, 2008). The Dvorak technique has evolved significantly (Velden et al., 2006). Application of this technique is mostly subjective, and it is common for different forecasters and agencies to estimate significantly different intensities based on identical information (Landsea et al., 2006). Considering the lack of homogeneity in both the data and techniques applied in the post-analyses, Kossin et al. (2007, 2013) constructed a relatively homogeneous data record of tropical cyclone intensity by creating a new consistently analyzed global satellite data archive (ADTHURSAT) from 1982 to 2009. Recently, the dataset was extended to the 39-year period 1979-2017 (Kossin et al.,2020).

    The International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS) provides location and intensity for global tropical cyclones (Knapp et al., 2010). Among the six basins, tropical cyclone records are dated back to 1851 in the North Atlantic and 1945 in the western North Pacific.In the other basins, the tropical cyclone records are relatively short in time. Considerable changes with time are included in the techniques and methods for estimating tropical cyclone intensity, leading to uncertainty and temporal inhomogeneities in the tropical cyclone intensity estimates.It is generally believed that the intensity records are considered relatively reliable after satellites started to routinely monitor tropical cyclones in the 1970s (Emanuel, 2008).

    In addition to the best track data from the Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC), there are several datasets available for the western North Pacific basin from the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center (RSMC) of Tokyo, the Shanghai Typhoon Institute (STI) of the China Meteorological Administration, and the Hong Kong Observatory (HKO). It has been found that the intensity trends are different in these datasets (Kamahori et al., 2006; Wu et al.,2006; Yu et al., 2007; Elsner et al., 2008; Song et al., 2010;and Ren et al., 2011). Using an intensity model adopted from Emanuel et al. (2008), Wu and Zhao (2012) simulated the basin-wide tropical cyclone intensity in the western North Pacific basin and compared it when forced with the datasets from JTWC, RSMC, and STI. They found that the evolution of the basin-wide tropical cyclone intensity in the JTWC best-track dataset can be generally reproduced with the observed tracks and large-scale environmental parameters over the period 1975-2007. Figure 1 shows an update of the comparisons of the frequency and proportion of intense tropical cyclones in the JTWC, RSMC, and STI best track datasets in Wu and Zhao (2012). Note that the simulation was conducted with the ocean-coupled intensity model (Wu et al., 2018). The differences among the three datasets are clear, and the intensity evolution after 1970 can be generally simulated in the JTWC dataset, but not in the RMSC or STI datasets.

    4. Environmental control of tropical cyclone intensity

    Fig. 1. Comparisons of the annual frequency (a) and proportion (b) of category 4 and 5 typhoons among the datasets from JTWC, RSMC, and STI during the period 1951-2019. The dashed lines indicate the simulation, and a 5-year running average is applied to the time series. This is an update of the comparisons of the frequency and proportion of intense tropical cyclones in Wu and Zhao (2012), and the simulation was conducted with the ocean-coupled intensity model (Wu and Wang, 2018).

    Observational, theoretical, and modeling studies have established the relationships between environmental parameters and tropical cyclone intensity. However, it should be noted that tropical cyclone intensity is controlled by both environmental parameters and internal dynamics (Wang and Wu, 2004; Montgomery and Smith, 2013; Emanuel, 2018).The environmental influences can be understood by first estimating an upper bound on tropical cyclone intensity, or maximum potential intensity (MPI), for given atmospheric and oceanic conditions (Miller, 1958; Malkus and Reihl,1960; Emanuel, 1986; Holland, 1997). Here we focus only on the MPI theory proposed by Emanuel (1986, 1987,1991), in which a mature tropical cyclone can be treated as a Carnot heat engine in terms of its energy cycle, deriving its primary energy from the underlying ocean. The MPI theory assumes that the mature tropical cyclone has an axisymmetric structure with flows that satisfy both hydrostatic and gradient wind balances and is in a state of slantwise moist neutral condition. The giant heat engine consists of four legs: isothermal expansion along with the low-level inflow,adiabatic expansion within the eyewall, isothermal compression along with the upper-level outflow, and adiabatic compression in the hypothesized environmental subsidence. In the Carnot heat engine, the MPI is achieved when the net energy input for mechanical work is balanced by the mechanical energy loss to the underlying ocean (Fig. 2, Wang,2012), which can be written as

    Fig. 2. Schematic of changes of dissipation and energy input with wind speed in a typical hurricane. WISHE, wind-induced surface heat exchange; MPI, maximum potential intensity.[Reproduced with permission from Wang (2012).].

    It is indicated that MPI (Vm) is a function of the thermodynamic efficiency [ε=(SST?Tout)/SST], the ratio of the surface exchange coefficient for enthalpy to the surface drag coefficient (Ck/CD), and the difference between the saturation enthalpy at the sea surface and the enthalpy of the air in the well-mixed boundary layer?ka). Equation (1) suggests that the underlying sea surface temperature (SST) and the outflow temperature (Tout) establish theoretically an upper limit for tropical cyclone intensity, or MPI.

    In reality, most tropical cyclones cannot achieve their MPI because of a variety of negative environmental influences, such as vertical wind shear (Gray, 1968; DeMaria and Kaplan, 1994; Frank and Ritchie, 2001; Wu and Braun,2004; Zeng et al., 2010), entrainment of dry air (Dunion and Velden, 2004; Wu, 2007; Shu and Wu, 2009), and SST cooling from air-sea interaction (Bender and Ginis, 2000; Shay et al., 2000; Wu et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2008, 2009; Pun et al., 2013). It should be mentioned that the mechanisms by which the environmental factors affect tropical cyclone intensity have not been fully understood and are still at the forefront of tropical cyclone research.

    Vertical wind shear is generally unfavorable for tropical cyclone intensification. Various mechanisms have been proposed to understand how vertical wind shear affects tropical cyclone intensity, including ventilation effects (Frank and Ritchie, 2001; Wong and Chan, 2004; Tang and Emanuel, 2010), increasing tropospheric stability (DeMaria,1996), and eddy momentum fluxes (Wu and Braun, 2004;Gu et al., 2015). The effect of vertical wind shear on tropical cyclone intensity also depends on tropical cyclone intensity, translation speed, and the shear depth (Zeng et al., 2007,2008, 2010; Wang et al., 2015; Fu et al., 2019). The shape of the shear profile also affects tropical cyclone intensity,and the deep-layer shear alone may not be sufficient for understanding the impact of vertical wind shear on tropical cyclones (Onderlinde and Nolan, 2014; Finocchio et al., 2016).On the other hand, recent studies have demonstrated that tropical cyclone rapid intensification (RI) can sometimes occur in an environment with vertical wind shear larger than 10 m s-1(Molinari et al., 2006; Molinari and Vollaro, 2010;Chen et al., 2018; Qiu et al., 2020). Lee et al. (2016) found that the vast majority (79%) of major storms are RI storms,suggesting that RI plays a crucial role in shaping tropical cyclone climatology.

    The entrainment of dry air can be induced by vertical wind shear. Such an effect of vertical wind shear is called midlevel ventilation (Simpson and Riehl, 1958; Tang and Emanuel, 2010). When a tropical cyclone moves along the western edge of the subtropical high over the western North Pacific, Shu et al. (2014) found that a strong westerly vertical shear promotes the intrusion of dry environmental air associated with the subtropical high from the north and northwest, inhibiting moisture supply and convection over the western half of the tropical cyclone. The dry air intrusions into the tropical cyclone circulation in the Atlantic basin can be from the Saharan air layer (SAL), which forms as air moves across the Sahara Desert with substantial amounts of mineral dust. Wu (2007) showed that the long-term trend in hurricane peak intensity generally follows the Sahel rainfall and SAL activity. Shu and Wu (2009) suggested that the SAL can affect tropical cyclone intensity when its dry air intrudes within 360 km from the tropical cyclone center.

    As a tropical cyclone intensifies, vertical mixing and upwelling of cooler subsurface ocean water reduce the SST.The SST reduction depends on the ocean subsurface thermal structure, as well as the tropical cyclone translation speed, size, and wind speed (Price, 1981; Bender and Ginis,2000; Wu et al., 2005). Lin et al. (2013) proposed a new MPI index by incorporating ocean coupling, which can more realistically characterize the pre-storm ocean contribution to tropical cyclone intensity. The ocean mixed layer depth (MLD) is important to the sea surface cooling induced by tropical cyclone circulation (Price, 1981). The shallower the MLD, the stronger the resulting sea surface cooling (Bender and Ginis, 2000; Shay et al., 2000; Wu et al., 2005; Lin et al., 2008, 2009; Pun et al., 2013). The influence of the ocean MLD on the climate change of tropical cyclone intensity has been recently confirmed (Emanuel, 2015;Mei et al., 2015). The MLD is closely associated with the ocean heat content, which has been identified as an important factor for tropical cyclone intensity change (Zhang et al., 2016).

    5. Observed trends in tropical cyclone intensity

    In many trend-detecting studies, the MPI theory has become the theoretical underpinning for assessment and understanding of how TC intensity may change with climate (e.g., Emanuel, 1987; Lighthill et al., 1994; Knutson et al., 1998; Webster et al., 2005; Emanuel, 2005). In other words, the detected tropical cyclone intensity trend was implicitly or explicitly linked to the tropical SST warming. Webster et al. (2005) were the first to report the global increasing trends in the number of the most intense tropical cyclones and their proportion during 1970-2004. They argued that the increasing trends were consistent with the SST warming (Webster et al., 2005; Hoyos et al., 2006; Mann and Emanuel, 2006). Emanuel (2005) found that the PDI, which increased markedly in the North Atlantic and western North Pacific basins during the period 1975-2003, was highly correlated with tropical SST.

    The relationship with the SST warming suggested by Webster et al. (2005) and Emanuel (2005) was further investigated. Holland and Webster (2007) found three relatively stable regimes in tropical cyclone and hurricane frequency over the past century in the North Atlantic Ocean. Each regime was associated with a distinct range of SSTs in the eastern Atlantic Ocean and experienced 50% more tropical cyclones and hurricanes than the previous one. Elsner et al.(2008) argued that upward trends in the estimated lifetimemaximum wind speeds of the strongest tropical cyclones(99th percentile) over each ocean basin are qualitatively consistent with the hypothesis that as the seas warm, the ocean has more energy to convert to tropical cyclone wind. Mei and Xie (2016) linked the intensified typhoons that strike East and Southeast Asia to locally enhanced ocean surface warming on the rim of East and Southeast Asia.

    However, these trend-detecting studies were questioned due to data quality and changes in observational capabilities over time (Landsea et al., 2006; Hagen and Landsea,2012; Zhao et al., 2014; Klotzbach and Landsea, 2015). Landsea et al. (2006) argued that subjective measurements and variable procedures made existing tropical cyclone datasets insufficiently reliable to detect trends in the frequency of category 4-5 tropical cyclones. Klotzbach (2006) suggested that most of the increase was likely due to improved observational technology. Klotzbach and Landsea (2015) extended the analysis of Webster et al. (2005) by including 10 additional years of data, indicating that the global frequency of category 4 and 5 hurricanes showed a small, insignificant downward trend. Kossin et al. (2013) found that the LMI trend is-2 m s-1(10 yr)-1in the western North Pacific, +1.7 m s-1(10 yr)-1in the south Indian Ocean, +2.5 m s-1(10 yr)-1in the south Pacific, and +8 m s-1(10 yr)-1in the North Atlantic during the period 1982-2009. The global trend in the LMI of the strongest storms is +1 m s-1(10 yr)-1with a p-value of 0.1. Recently, Kossin et al. (2020) extended their analysis to the 39-year period 1979-2017 and identified a global increasing trend in tropical cyclone intensity.

    The trends in tropical cyclone intensity have also been questioned due to the influence of natural variability (Chan,2006; Sobel et al., 2016). A portion of the detected intensity trend likely results from natural variability due to the limited time range of the historical records (Chan, 2006). Liu and Chan (2008) revealed strong multidecadal (16-32 years) variations in the frequency of intense typhoon occurrence over the western North Pacific. Over the western North Pacific, it has been found that tropical cyclone activity is affected by interdecadal variations such as the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), Interdecadal Pacific Oscillation(IPO), and Atlantic Multi-decadal Oscillation (AMO) (Chan and Shi, 1996; Yumoto and Matsuura, 2001; Matsuura et al., 2003; Ho et al., 2004; Liu and Chan, 2008; Wu et al.,2015; Hong et al., 2016; Zhao and Wang, 2016, 2019; Takahashi et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2018; Zhao et al., 2014).

    6. Projected future intensity change

    The response of tropical cyclone intensity to climate change has also been assessed by downscaling with regional models and statistical-dynamical frameworks in which the projected large-scale environment is from global climate models under different climate change scenarios. High-resolution global climate models are also used to project future intensity change (Knutson et al., 2020), and recently, a few coupled global climate models were able to explicitly simulate category 4 and 5 tropical cyclones (Small et al., 2014;Murakami et al., 2015; Scoccimarro et al., 2017). In this section, progress in the projection of tropical cyclone intensity change is reviewed based on these three approaches.

    6.1. Downscaling with regional models

    Knutson et al. (1998) were the first to assess the influence of the CO2-induced climate change on tropical cyclone intensity using the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL) Hurricane Prediction System with a grid size of about 18 km, while the environmental conditions and storm cases were from the GFDL global climate model in the control and high-CO2climate simulations. They found that CO2-induced warming led to more intense typhoons in the western North Pacific basin. Knutson and Tuleya (1999) further found a 5%-11% increase of intensity under high-CO2conditions with SSTs warmer by about 2.2°C in the western North Pacific basin.

    Downscaling with regional models can be further classified into two categories. The first includes regional models similar to one-way nesting within global climate system models, usually with relatively coarse resolutions (Walsh et al.,2004; Stowasser et al., 2007; Wu et al., 2014; Sun et al.,2017; Zhang and Wang, 2017). Regional models are run for one or more tropical cyclone seasons with the time-slice of the output from the climate change experiment, and the intensity metrics of the simulated tropical cyclone-like vortices are compared between the present-day and future experiments. For example, Walsh et al. (2004) conducted regional climate simulations over the eastern Australian region with a horizontal grid spacing of 30 km. Stowasser et al. (2007)used the International Pacific Research Center (IPRC)regional climate model with ~50-km grid spacing.

    The other category of regional models for downscaling tropical cyclone intensity change uses a relatively high resolution, even including cloud-resolving and non-hydrostatic models (Knutson et al., 1998, 2001, 2013; Knutson and Tuleya,2004; Bender et al., 2010; Hill and Lackmann, 2011; Tsuboki et al., 2015; Kanada and Wada, 2017). The intensity and inner-core structure simulated in these models can be comparable with observations (Bender et al., 2010; Knutson et al.,2015; Tsuboki et al., 2015). Using two different operational versions of the GFDL hurricane model with a grid spacing of 8 km, Bender et al. (2010) found a doubling of the frequency of category 4 and 5 Atlantic storms by the end of the 21st century. Knutson et al. (2015) used a two-stage downscaling procedure to derive global projections of intense tropical cyclones from the GFDL High-Resolution Atmospheric Model (HiRAM; 50-km grid) and the GFDL hurricane model. Tsuboki et al. (2015) performed very high resolution (2-km) downscaling for 30 category 4 and 5 typhoons from the 20-km mesh global simulation of a warmer climate. These studies indicated an increase of intense tropical cyclones.

    Recently, regional models have been used to investigate whether present-day climate change has affected specific tropical cyclones (Patricola and Wehner, 2018; Reed et al., 2020; Kawase et al., 2021). Using convection-permitting regional climate model simulations, Patricola and Wehner (2018) found that climate change to date enhanced average and extreme rainfall of Hurricanes Katrina, Irma,and Maria, but did not change tropical cyclone intensity. In addition, future anthropogenic warming robustly increases wind speed and rainfall of intense tropical cyclones among 15 events sampled globally. Kawase et al. (2021) investigated the impacts of historical warming on Typhoon Hagibis(2019) using the Japan Meteorological Agency Nonhydrostatic Model (JMA-NHM), indicating that historical warming intensified the strength of Typhoon Hagibis (2019) and enhanced the extremely heavy precipitation induced by the typhoon.

    The advantage of downscaling with regional models is that they are relatively cheap in computation so that it is possible to examine the sensitivity of the results to various model choices such as environmental conditions, model parameterizations, and the use of fixed SST or a coupled ocean model (Knutson et al., 2001). However, regional models for downscaling tropical cyclone activity share common issues with other regional simulations, such as model domain selection, lateral boundary condition technique, choice of physics schemes, and choice of initial conditions (Giorgi, 2019).Also, biases in the driving global climate model may lead to uncertainty in the projection (Camargo and Wing, 2016).Zhang and Wang (2017) used the so-called pseudo-global warming approach (the initial and boundary conditions in the regional model are from the projection in the warming climate) to avoid some climate drift of global climate models.

    6.2. Downscaling with statistical-dynamical frameworks

    Emanuel (2006) and Emanuel et al. (2008) developed a statistical-dynamical method for downscaling tropical cyclone activity. The synthetic tropical cyclones are generated with the formation, motion, and intensity models, respectively. One of the formation models simply generates track origin points by a random draw from the space-time probability density function of genesis location obtained from observations. An alternative way is to generate track origins by randomly distributing warm-core vortices in space and time,and the survival of the seeds depends on the large-scale environmental conditions when their tracks and intensities are produced in the track and intensity models. Tropical cyclone motion in the track model is determined by large-scale steering and β-drift. The intensity of the synthetic tropical cyclones is obtained by running a coupled intensity model along each tropical cyclone track. In addition to SST and outflow temperature, the influences of changes in the ocean mixed layer and vertical wind shear are included in the intensity model. Using this technique, Emanuel et al. (2008) and Emanuel et al. (2013) assessed the impact of climate change on tropical cyclones by downscaling IPCC AR4 and AR5 simulations, respectively. Based on historical and future climate states simulated by six Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 5 (CMIP5) global climate models, Emanuel et al. (2013) indicated that the frequency of downscaled tropical cyclones increases during the 21st century in most locations, and the tropical cyclone intensity also increases,although most numerical studies have projected a decrease in the frequency.

    Lee et al. (2018) developed a statistical-dynamical model for estimating the long-term hazard of rare, high impact tropical cyclone events globally, including an environmental index-based genesis model, a beta-advection track model, and an autoregressive intensity model. The model can simulate the observed number of rapidly intensifying storms. Jing and Lin (2020) developed the Princeton environment-dependent probabilistic tropical cyclone (PepC) model for generating synthetic tropical cyclones to support risk assessment. PepC consists of a hierarchical Poisson genesis model, an analog-wind track model, and a Markov intensity model. The model can simulate the statistics of TC genesis,movement, rapid intensification, and lifetime maximum intensity, as well as local landfall frequency and intensity.

    The relative contributions of various factors can be quantified with the statistical-dynamical framework. However,there are two issues regarding downscaling with the statistical-dynamical framework. One is that the tropical cyclone in the intensity model is axisymmetric and the influence of vertical wind shear is parameterized, which is based on the present-day observation. The other is that the initial track points were based on the present-day observation or randomly seeded without considering the possible frequency change of initial tropical disturbances (Vecchi et al., 2019).

    6.3. Simulating with global models

    Early studies are based mainly on global atmospheric models with no ocean coupling and other model components. By running 10-year simulations for the present-day and greenhouse-warmed climate with the 20 km-mesh global atmospheric model of the Meteorological Research Institute (MRI)/Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA), Oouchi et al. (2006) found that the maximum surface wind speed for the most intense tropical cyclones (>43 m s-1, the threshold used to diagnose category 4 intensity in the relatively coarse global model) increased. Using new versions of the high-resolution 20-, 60-, and 180-km-mesh MRI/JMA GCMs, Murakami and Sugi (2010) found that a significant increase in the frequency of intense tropical cyclones was projected as the 60-km and finer meshes were used. Yamada et al. (2010) and Yamada et al. (2017) investigated the response of tropical cyclone intensity to climate change with the global 14-km cloud-system-resolving model of Nonhydrostatic ICosahedral Atmospheric Model (NICAM). The model in Yamada et al. (2017) projected that the ratio of intense tropical cyclones will increase by 6.6% during the period 2075-2104. Manganello et al. (2014) conducted multidecadal Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project(AMIP)-style and time-slice simulations with the Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Integrated Forecast System (IFS) at 16-km and 125-km global resolution. The 16-km IFS projected about a 50% increase in the power dissipation index during 2070-2117, mainly due to significant increases in the frequency of the more intense storms.

    With advances in computational resources, coupled global climate models have started to be used to assess the impact of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity. Kim et al. (2014) simulated global tropical cyclone activity using the GFDL Climate Model, version 2.5 (CM2.5), which is a fully coupled global climate model with a horizontal resolution of about 50 km for the atmosphere and 25 km for the ocean. Murakami et al. (2015) used a new GFDL coupled model [the High-Resolution Forecast-Oriented Low Ocean Resolution (FLOR) model (HiFLOR)], which comprises high-resolution (~25-km mesh) atmosphere and land components and a moderate-resolution (~100-km mesh) sea ice and ocean component. Using a suite of high-resolution global coupled model experiments, Murakami et al. (2017) showed that anthropogenic forcing has likely increased the probability of late-season extremely severe cyclonic storms occurring in the Arabian Sea, suggesting that continued anthropogenic forcing will amplify the risk of cyclones. Murakami et al. (2018) found that the increase in Atlantic major hurricanes in 2017 was not primarily caused by La Ni?a conditions but rather triggered mainly by pronounced locally warm sea surface conditions in the tropical North Atlantic.Bhatia et al. (2018) conducted three 70-yr HiFLOR experiments to identify the effects of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity and intensification and found that the frequency, intensity, and intensification distribution of tropical cyclones all shift to higher values as the 21st century progresses.

    Characteristics of tropical cyclones in global climate models are influenced by details of the model configurations,including horizontal resolution and parameterization schemes. Wehner et al. (2014) presented an analysis of version 5.1 of the Community Atmospheric Model (CAM5.1)at a high horizontal resolution. In the absence of extensive model tuning at high resolution, they found that simulation of many of the mean fields was degraded compared to the tuned lower-resolution publicly released version of the model. Robert et al. (2020) suggested that enhanced resolution toward 25 km typically leads to more frequent and stronger tropical cyclones, together with improvements in spatial distribution and storm structure. Moon et al. (2020) performed a process-level examination of tropical cyclone structures in eight GCM simulations that span a range of horizontal resolutions from 1° to 0.25°, indicating that the structures of simulated tropical cyclone circulations become more realistic with smaller horizontal grid spacing, although even at 0.25 degree grid spacing, the radius of maximum winds is too large, especially at higher intensities, and rising motions occurring near the storm centers are inconsistent with observations. Wing et al. (2019) explored tropical cyclone intensification processes in six high-resolution climate models, revealing the contribution of radiative feedback and surface flux feedback. They suggested that the representation of the interaction between spatially varying surface fluxes and the developing tropical cyclone was responsible for at least part of the inter-model spread of moist static energy in tropical cyclone simulations. Recently, the variable resolution approach was used to investigate the impact of climate change on tropical cyclones by embedding highresolution domains in global models (e.g., Zarzycki and Jablonowski, 2014; Stansfield et al., 2020). Zarzycki and Jablonowski (2014) showed that the variable-resolution simulation produced significantly more TCs than the unrefined simulation, and Stansfield et al. (2020) projected an increase of tropical cyclone strength.

    Moreover, there is considerable model bias in the projected large-scale environment (Camargo, 2013; Murakami et al., 2014; Wang and Wu, 2018a, b; Vecchi et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2020a, b). Zhao et al. (2020) evaluated the possible impact of different SST warming patterns on the simulated TC activities. Using output from CMIP5 of 36 climate models in their study, Wang and Wu (2018a) investigated the zonal shift of the tropical upper-tropospheric trough(TUTT), whose strong westerly shear limits the eastward extension of tropical cyclone formation over the western North Pacific. A considerable spread was found in the zonal position, orientation, and intensity of the simulated-climatological TUTT in the historical runs, and the large spread is closely related to the diversity in the simulated SST biases over the North Pacific.

    7. Issues on climate change of tropical cyclone intensity

    While the influences of the environmental factors have been extensively used to understand the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity, relatively few studies have quantified their relative contributions. Moreover, since these climate change studies treat tropical cyclones in a basin as a whole, factors controlling the basin-wide intensity can be different from individual tropical cyclones.

    Following Wu and Zhao (2012), Wu et al. (2018) integrated an axisymmetric intensity model coupled with a simple one-dimensional ocean model along the observed tropical cyclone track in the western North Pacific during the period 1980-2015. They demonstrated that the increase in the proportion of intense typhoons was consistent with the corresponding changes in the ocean/atmosphere environment during 1980-2015. The attribution of individual environmental parameters indicated that changes in SST and vertical wind shear have little influence on the increase of the proportion of intense typhoons, while the temporal changes of the ocean mixed layer depth and outflow temperature show a moderate contribution. Although the results of Wu et al.(2018) are not necessarily related to the climate change of tropical cyclone intensity due to the short-period dataset,this study demonstrates the importance of quantifying the individual contributions of environmental factors.

    More importantly, Wu et al. (2018) demonstrated that changes in prevailing tropical cyclone tracks can account for more than half of the basin-wide intensity change since the distributions of the environmental parameters are not spatially uniform. The environmental parameters experienced by tropical cyclones can be systematically changed due to prevailing track change. The observed track changes in Wu et al. (2018) have been also shown in previous studies (Wu et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2011, 2015; Zhao and Wu, 2014;Zhao et al., 2020), and the track change has been projected under future climate change forcing experiments (Wu and Wang, 2004; Wang et al., 2011; Wang and Wu, 2015) (Fig.3). As shown in Fig. 3, relatively more tropical cyclones take a northward track in the western North Pacific basin in the projected future climate. Besides, the track change may also lead to changes in storm-ocean coupling and the duration in which tropical cyclones reach the lifetime maximum intensity, further changing the basin-wide tropical cyclone intensity.

    Fig. 3. Projected change in steering flow (black vectors) and the associated change in frequency of tropical cyclone occurrence (shading) compared to the historical run for (a)2010-39, (b) 2040-69, and (c) 2070-99 derived from the selected CMIP5 model ensemble. The thick arrowed lines schematically show the three prevailing tracks. Note the future change of tropical cyclone formation location was not considered in the projection. [Reproduced with permission from Wang and Wu (2015).].

    Recent studies have revealed a few other factors that may affect tropical cyclone intensity. Villarini and Vecchi(2013) used output from 17 state-of-the-art global climate models in three radiative forcing scenarios and found an intensification of North Atlantic tropical cyclones in response to both greenhouse gas (GHG) increases and aerosol changes over the current century. Using the theory of MPI, Sobel et al. (2016) suggested that aerosol cooling largely canceled the effect of greenhouse gas-driven warming over the historical record. Ting et al. (2015) suggested that the decrease in MPI due to aerosols and increase due to GHG largely cancel each other. Other than the local SST, it is suggested that the relative SST change (the SST change in the tropical main development region relative to the tropical mean SST) plays a more important role in causing MPI changes than local SST (Vecchi and Soden, 2007; Vecchi and Knutson, 2008; Murakami et al., 2018). In addition,Kang and Elsner (2015) statistically showed a trade-off between intensity and frequency and argued that an average increase in global tropical cyclone intensity of 1.3 m s-1over the past 30 years of ocean warming occurred at the expense of 6.1 TCs worldwide per year. The mechanisms for the influences of aerosol forcing, relative SST, and the trade-off between intensity and frequency remain inconclusive and need further research.

    8. Summary and suggestions

    The response of tropical cyclone activity to climate change has been an important research topic for more than three decades (Emanuel, 1987; Lighthill et al., 1994). Our understanding of the effect of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity has been remarkably improved. Studies have been conducted through analysis of the observed trends and numerical simulations of possible changes between the present and future climates with various complexities of regional, global, and statistical-dynamical models.Although theory and modeling consistently indicate an increasing trend in tropical cyclone intensity, uncertainty in the historical datasets of tropical cyclones, incomplete understanding of mechanisms for the basin-wide intensity change, intertwined natural variabilities, the considerable model bias in the projected large-scale environment, and poorly-simulated inner-core structures of tropical cyclones lead to relatively low confidence in the assessed and projected responses of tropical cyclone intensity to climate change. A similar situation also occurs for the assessed and projected responses of tropical cyclone formation and tracks. As a result, currently, it is unclear to what degree climate change has affected tropical cyclone intensity or when the impact of climate change on tropical cyclone intensity will be detectable in the future.

    Future research may be conducted to address the issues mentioned above, especially on the following topics:

    Fig. 4. Large-scale atmospheric systems associated with tropical cyclone activity in the western North Pacific basin. The blue dots indicate the formation location of tropical cyclones in the JTWC dataset and the shading shows the vertical shear of zonal wind (units:m s-1) between 200 hPa and 850 hPa during 1958-2018. SAH, TUTT, MT, and WNPSH stand for South Asia high, tropical upper tropospheric trough, monsoon trough, and western North Pacific subtropical high.

    1) Extending datasets by reconstructing past tropical cyclone activity. Various types of geological proxies have been tested for reconstructing past tropical cyclone activity (Walsh et al., 2016). The proxy data may be based on hurricane-induced overwash deposits of sediments of coastal lakes and marshes (Liu et al., 2001; Brandon et al., 2014; Donnelly et al., 2015), oxygen isotopic ratios of tropical cyclone precipitation in caves (stalagmites), tree rings, and corals (Frappier et al., 2007, 2014; Frappier, 2008). In China,local governments have usually recorded natural disasters,including the passages of tropical cyclones, at least since the Ming Dynasty in the 15th century (Pan et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2012), and great efforts have been made to compile and analyze the historical records (Chan and Shi, 2000; Pan et al., 2011; Chan et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2012). These extended records can advance our understanding of natural variations of tropical cyclone activity.

    2) Improving understanding of natural variability of tropical cyclone intensity. It is crucial to understand the natural variabilities of tropical cyclone intensity since most trend analyses have only focused on the historical records after the 1970s when satellite data began to be available for estimating tropical cyclone intensity. The detected trends involve some degree of natural variability on the interdecadal scale and longer (Chan, 2006; Zhao et al., 2020).For example, Murakami et al. (2017) examined the influence of the strong El Ni?o event on the extremely active hurricane season of 2015 in the eastern and central Pacific Ocean by running a suite of targeted high-resolution model experiments. They found that the extremely active hurricane season was not primarily induced by the 2015 El Ni?o tropical Pacific warming, but by warming in the subtropical Pacific Ocean, which is not typical of El Ni?o, but rather of the Pacific meridional mode (PMM) superimposed on long-term anthropogenic warming.

    3) Examining the simulated influences of climate change on the large-scale environment for tropical cyclone activity and the response of tropical cyclones to the simulated environmental changes. So far, most studies have focused on changes in environmental parameters. The changes are closely associated with changes in the largescale circulations. It is clear that bias in projected changes in the large-scale circulations can lead to considerable uncertainty in the projected tropical cyclone activity. For example(Fig. 4), tropical cyclone activity in the western North Pacific basin is largely controlled by the monsoon trough(MT), the western North Pacific subtropical high, the South Asia high (SAH), and the TUTT. It is important to understand how the large-scale circulations respond to climate change as the linkage of tropical cyclone intensity is pursued.

    Acknowledgements. This research was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.41730961, 41675051, 41675072, and 41922033).

    Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

    免费看日本二区| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 麻豆一二三区av精品| h日本视频在线播放| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 成人精品一区二区免费| ponron亚洲| 午夜免费观看网址| 久久久久国内视频| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| h日本视频在线播放| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 夜夜爽天天搞| 日本三级黄在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产综合懂色| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | aaaaa片日本免费| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲成人久久性| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲18禁久久av| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 国产老妇女一区| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 午夜福利18| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产美女午夜福利| 69人妻影院| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 99久久精品热视频| 国产老妇女一区| 丁香六月欧美| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 在线a可以看的网站| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 制服人妻中文乱码| 午夜激情欧美在线| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 香蕉av资源在线| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 日本 欧美在线| 九色成人免费人妻av| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| www日本在线高清视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲成人久久性| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 欧美日韩黄片免| 精品福利观看| 看免费av毛片| 日本一本二区三区精品| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产老妇女一区| 免费看光身美女| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久精品人妻少妇| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 丁香欧美五月| www日本黄色视频网| 88av欧美| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 国产精华一区二区三区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 亚洲片人在线观看| 久久精品影院6| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 性色avwww在线观看| 久9热在线精品视频| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产99白浆流出| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 亚洲国产色片| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 成人18禁在线播放| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 欧美区成人在线视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| av欧美777| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲在线观看片| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产精品一及| 日本与韩国留学比较| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲av成人av| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 日本黄色片子视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 欧美区成人在线视频| 丁香欧美五月| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| av天堂中文字幕网| 男人舔奶头视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 一本综合久久免费| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 久久伊人香网站| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产三级在线视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 免费看光身美女| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 天堂网av新在线| 黄色日韩在线| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 久久6这里有精品| 高清在线国产一区| 一本综合久久免费| 国产三级在线视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产毛片a区久久久久| avwww免费| 舔av片在线| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 精品电影一区二区在线| 黄片小视频在线播放| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 黄色丝袜av网址大全| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 久久这里只有精品中国| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| www国产在线视频色| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 午夜视频国产福利| 精品人妻1区二区| 天天添夜夜摸| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 床上黄色一级片| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 欧美三级亚洲精品| www.999成人在线观看| 青草久久国产| 午夜久久久久精精品| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 在线视频色国产色| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 色老头精品视频在线观看| www.色视频.com| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 脱女人内裤的视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产精品三级大全| 黄色女人牲交| 变态另类丝袜制服| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 草草在线视频免费看| 欧美区成人在线视频| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 成人三级黄色视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 无限看片的www在线观看| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| svipshipincom国产片| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产三级黄色录像| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看 | 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产美女午夜福利| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 日本与韩国留学比较| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| a在线观看视频网站| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 此物有八面人人有两片| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 一本久久中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲在线观看片| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 我要搜黄色片| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 69人妻影院| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 日韩免费av在线播放| 免费观看人在逋| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 免费大片18禁| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| ponron亚洲| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产三级中文精品| 免费观看人在逋| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| avwww免费| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区 | 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 美女免费视频网站| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月 | 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 毛片女人毛片| 国产免费男女视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产成人aa在线观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产日本99.免费观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 日本 av在线| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 丰满的人妻完整版| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 波野结衣二区三区在线 | 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲成人久久性| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| av片东京热男人的天堂| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲18禁久久av| 校园春色视频在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲内射少妇av| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 日本与韩国留学比较| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 内地一区二区视频在线| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲第一电影网av| 97碰自拍视频| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 男女午夜视频在线观看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 有码 亚洲区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产精华一区二区三区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 在线观看舔阴道视频| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 日本三级黄在线观看| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 久久草成人影院| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 天美传媒精品一区二区| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 国产在视频线在精品| 午夜福利欧美成人| 在线看三级毛片| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 午夜视频国产福利| 九色成人免费人妻av| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 黄色女人牲交| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产成人av教育| 国产乱人视频| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产精品野战在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | eeuss影院久久| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 免费看十八禁软件| av天堂中文字幕网| www.www免费av| 久久香蕉精品热| 日本一二三区视频观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 搞女人的毛片| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 日本熟妇午夜| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产黄片美女视频| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 色播亚洲综合网| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲国产色片| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 精品久久久久久,| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产综合懂色| 国产av不卡久久| 免费av观看视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 免费看光身美女| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| av天堂中文字幕网| 青草久久国产| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 嫩草影院入口| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产三级中文精品| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 午夜a级毛片| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 男女那种视频在线观看| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美日本视频| 欧美性感艳星| 内射极品少妇av片p| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久亚洲真实| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产乱人视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 高清在线国产一区| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产99白浆流出| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 成人欧美大片| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 日韩欧美精品免费久久 |