• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Genome Editing in the Olive Flounder (Paralichthys olivaceus) Using CRISPR/Cas9 and a Simple Microinjection System

    2021-12-22 11:30:40TANXungangWANGLingWUZhihaoJIAOShuangWANGLijuanZOUYuxiaJIANGJingtengandYOUFeng
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2021年6期

    TAN Xungang, WANG Ling, WU Zhihao, JIAO Shuang,WANG Lijuan, ZOU Yuxia, JIANG Jingteng, and YOU Feng, *

    Genome Editing in the Olive Flounder () Using CRISPR/Cas9 and a Simple Microinjection System

    TAN Xungang1), 2), #, *, WANG Ling1), 2), 3), #, WU Zhihao1), 2), JIAO Shuang1), 2),WANG Lijuan1), 2), ZOU Yuxia1), 2), JIANG Jingteng4), 5), and YOU Feng1), 2), *

    1),,,,266071,2),,266071,3),100049,4),264200,5),.,264200,

    The whole-genome sequence of the olive flounder () provides a basis for gene functional analyses, which is important for the aquaculture industry. Understanding gene function will help us to select better economic traits such as fast growth and better culture conditions, which further will increase the aquaculture output. Gene knockout is an important reverse genetics approach forstudies of gene function. In this study, the CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing method with a microinjection sys- tem using a simple braked needle was employed in olive flounder. After injection in embryos, green fluorescent protein expression was detected in 40% of larvae. The proportion of normal-hatched larvae was approximately 50%. Different mutations, including short indels and fragment deletions, were found in our test genesand. Additionally, we detected more than one mutation in a single larva. In summary, our microinjection technique and CRISPR/Cas9 can be applied to study gene functions in olive flounder.

    CRISPR/Cas9;; microinjection;; needle with brake; olive flounder

    1 Introduction

    Overexpression and knockdown/knockout are important approaches forstudies of gene function in many organisms. The key step in these methods is the deliveryof a small number of macromolecules, such as DNA, RNA,or protein, into cells or embryos. Many techniques have been applied to this step, such as microinjection, electro- poration, and transfection.

    Microinjection can directly transfer macromolecules into individual eggs or embryos, so it is widely used in many species, such as mouse (Palmiter and Brinster, 1986),(Kobayashi and Satou, 2018), chicken, and(Moody, 2018).With genetic modification by generation of transgenics or gene knockouts, the gene function can be studied in these species (Du., 1992; Davis., 2000; Jao., 2013).

    However, microinjection into fish eggs faces various chal-lenges, including its inability to optically locate the nucleus in fertilized eggs, the hard chorion of some fish species, and internal pressure in the egg. To overcome these difficulties, special methods and tools have been developed formicroinjection into fish eggs (Zhu., 1985, 1986; Cho- urrout., 1986; Ozato., 1986; Brem., 1988; Fletchr., 1988; McEvoy., 1988; Stuart., 1988; Goto., 2015, 2019; Kim., 2019). In marine flat- fish that spawn pelagic eggs, the hard and elastic chorion of marine pelagic egg, and the high internal osmotic pres- sure should be considered, as they can bring more chal- lenges to the microinjection. Microinjection can damage the eggs, which will reduce the larval survival rate. The status of the injected larvae is closely related to the survival rate during the metamorphosis of the larvae. During metamorphosis, culture conditions must be tightly control- led to achieve a high survival rate. Microinjection condi- tions should be carefully controlled too.Microinjection has been applied in marine flatfish with pelagic eggs, such as Chinese tongue sole () (Cui., 2017) and olive flounder () (Kim., 2019). For marine pelagic eggs, such as those of Nibe croaker () and red sea bream ()(Yamamoto., 2011; Kishimoto., 2018), microinjection was performed with an oil-driven micro- injector and a specialized needle equipped with a brake. For the Chinese tongue sole, microinjection was accom- plished with a simple needle and an air pressure-driven microinjector (Cui., 2017). For olive flounder (Kim., 2019), microinjection was performed with an air pres- sure-driven microinjector and specialized brake needle,which has also been used in sea bream (Kishimoto., 2018) and barfin flounder () (Goto., 2015, 2019). When using an oil-driven microinjector, re- searchers require much time to become familiar with the technique (Yamamoto., 2011; Kishimoto., 2018). For the preparation of a needle with a brake, specialized equipment, technique, and additional time are needed (Ki- shimoto., 2018; Goto., 2019). Therefore, a me- thod involving simple needle preparation and easy hand- ling of the microinjector should be developed for pelagic eggs.

    The development of new technologies, including zinc- finger nucleases, TALEN (transcription activator-like effec- tor nuclease), and CRISPR/Cas9 (clustered regularly in- terspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated proteins 9), has extended the application of genome edit- ing from the mouse model (Doetschman., 1987; Tho-mas., 1987; Thompson., 1989) to non-rodent mo- dels, including fish species, and promoted efficient genefunctional research (Gaj., 2013). In recent years, CRSIPR/Cas9 has been used more and more extensively in many fishes, such as zebrafish () (Hwang., 2013), Atlantic salmon (L)(Edvardsen., 2014), tilapia () (Zhang., 2014), Atlantic killifish ()(Aluru., 2015), medaka ()(Inoue., 2017),rainbow trout ()(Cleveland., 2018), pufferfish () (Kato-Unoki., 2018), fathead minnow ()(Maki., 2020), and Arabian Killifish ()(Hamied., 2020). However, genome editing has been success- ful only in three marine fish species: Chinese tongue sole using TALEN technology (Cui., 2017), red sea bream using CRISPR/Cas9 (Kishimoto., 2018), and olive flounder (Kim., 2019) using CRISPR/Cas9.

    Growth of fish is important in aquaculture. For oliveflounder, fast growth might be achieved by improving mu- scle development,or by culturing more female fishas the female flounders grow faster than the males. However, mu- scle development and gonadal differentiation mechanisms are not very clear in olive flounder., a muscle- specific gene, is essential for myoblast fusion and muscle hypertrophy (Landemaine., 2014). Gonadal soma-de- rived factor (gsdf), a gonad-specific growth factor, plays an important role during early germ cell and testicular dif- ferentiation (Jiang., 2016). The functions of these two genes in olive flounder have not yet been characterized.

    The olive flounder () is an economically im-portant fish in East Asia. A comprehensive characterization of gene function in this species will provide insight into its unique characters, such as the morphological change from bilaterally symmetrical to asymmetric after metamorpho- sis (Shao., 2017) and the behavior change from pe- lagic to benthic (Fuiman., 1997; Jiao., 2019). It will also improve the flounder industry by providing a ba- sis for genetic improvements, such as genome editing, trans- genesis, selection for critical alleles, and so on. Though genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 has been successful in olive flounder, the microinjection system is too complex with a special technique (Kim., 2019). In this study, a new microinjection method using a simple needle was developed to introduce exogenous Cas9 and gRNA into fer- tilized eggs of olive flounder, which can be employed to edit the gene with a high larval survival rate.

    2 Materials and Methods

    2.1 Ethics Statement

    Experiments with olive flounder (adult and larvae) were performed according to the regulations of local and cen- tral governments and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Ocea- nology, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

    2.2 Fish and Embryo Culture

    Adult flounders were cultured at Shenghang fish farm in Rongcheng city, Shandong province, China. They were more than three years old and weighed more than 1.5kg per fish.They were kept at a stocking density of appro- ximately 50–60 fish/pond (16m2) (female:male=2:1), and were fed with fresh fish twice per day. Fertilized eggs were collected from the flounder spawning pond. Eggs were cultured in boiled seawater without aeration at 15℃±1℃ in a glass or plastic beaker.

    2.3 Microinjection

    The micropipette (Figs.1A, B) was prepared from glass capillaries (GD-1 or G-1; Narishige, Tokyo, Japan) using the HEKA pipette puller PIP5 and a micro grinder (EG- 400; Narishige). The micropipette was pulled in two steps. Firstly, the needle was pulled without breakage at a high temperature (from 1000 to 1200℃, depending on the room temperature and glass capillaries). Then, it was broken after pulling at low temperatures (from 700 to 900℃, depend- ing on the room temperature and glass capillaries). For the needle with a modified brake, the second heated site was moved a little apart from the first. Two different needles were pulled, and one of them was prepared with a brake. Both types of needles could be used for microinjection. If the sites for the first and second heating were the same, two of the same needles without brakes were prepared. The first three pairs of pulled needles were checked to ensure that they met the requirements under a dissecting micro- scope each time. Then, a batch of needles could be prepared all at once. Eggs were injected using a microinjector (Pli- 100; Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA).

    Fig.1 Microinjection of fertilized flounder eggs. A, normal needle for injection; B, needle with a brake for injection; Scale bar: 50μm; C, un-injected embryo; D, inject- ed embryo; Scale bar: 1mm.

    Fertilized eggs (=10–20) were aligned in a groove of a 1.5% agar plate (filled with 1/3 seawater) (Goto., 2015,2019). The plasmid myod-green fluorescence protein (GFP) (Zhang., 2006) was dissolved in distilled H2O to a final concentration of 50μgmL?1with 0.01% phenol red.Approximately 1–2nL of myod-GFP plasmid with 0.0125%dextran rhodamine B (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA,USA) or CRISPR/mRNA (250ngmL?1) and gRNA(100ngmL?1) was injected into each embryo. Injectionswere performed at the protoplasmic-streaming-formation stage to one-cell stage (one-cell was not included, stage I), one-cell to two-cell stage (two-cell not included, stage II), and two-cell to four-cell stage (four-cell not included, stage III). Injected or un-injected (control) embryos were cultured in boiled seawater with 0.0002% methylene blue and 1ppm florfenicol without aeration at 15℃±1℃ in a 1-L glass or plastic beaker. Before hatching, newboiled seawater with florfenicol was added every day afterdead embryos were removed and counted. After they hatched, all larvae were anesthetized with 0.02% MS222, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, and observed under a Nikon fluores- cence microscope for analysis of GFP expression in- GFP-injected embryos. Moreover, immunohistochemistry was performed to confirm GFP expression. Normal and ab-normal larvae were counted. All injected embryos were reared in a secured land-based hatchery to prevent the es- cape of genetically modified organisms into the natural en- vironment after CRISPR/Cas9 or plasmid injection.

    2.4 Cas9-Capped mRNA and gRNA Synthesis

    Olive flounder(GeneBank Accession: NW_ 017861210.1) exon 1 and(GeneBank Accession No. KY703432) exon 1 were cloned using gene-specific pri- mers (YPMM-E1-F and YPMM-E1-R for; YPgsdf-E-F and YPgsdf-E-R for) and sequenced to confirm the gRNA target sequence. Detection primers were designed using the online tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/tools/primer-blast/index.cgi?LINK_LOC=BlastHome). Cas9-capped mRNAs were synthesized using the ZCas9 plasmid (Liu., 2014) and MESSAGE mMACHINE T7 (Thermo, Foster City, CA, USA) and purified using MEGA clear (Thermo, USA). gRNA was predicted using online tools (http://zifit.partners.org/ZiFiT/CSquare9Nu- clease.aspxs), synthesized using the MAXIscript T7 Kit (Thermo, USA), and purified using the mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Thermo, USA).

    Two gRNAs targeting distinct sites in exon 1 of the floun- der myomaker gene were synthesized (Fig.2). The two tar- get sites were named YPMMgRNA-1 (5’-GGCGATGAA CGCTCCCATGGTGG-3’), and YPMMgRNA-2 (5’-GGCGGCGACGCTGGCTGCAGGGAGG-3’). The first GG arerequired for correct T7 RNA polymerase transcription. ThePAM sequences (NGG) are underlined. For gRNA synthe- sis, a DNA template was generated by PCR on the pMD- 18T plasmid containing the gRNA scaffold (Chang., 2013), thatwas the template,-specific forward primers (YPMMgRNA1, YPMMgRNA2), and gRNA re- verse primer (Table 1).

    Two gRNAs targeting distinct sites of the flounderwere on the reverse strand of exon 1, which were named YPgsdfgRNA-1 and YPgsdfgRNA-2 (Fig.2). The-spe-cific forward primers (YPgsdfgRNA1, YPgsdfgRNA2) were used for gRNA synthesis (Table 1).

    2.5 DNA Isolation from Fish Embryos, Mutation Detection, and Genotyping

    Larvae at the hatching and swimming stages were an- esthetized with 100mgL?1MS222 (Tricaine methanesul- fonate). Five larvae were collected per tube as a group. The larvae were treated as described by Wang. (2014). PCR was performed in a total reaction volume of 25μL with 2μL of template, using gene-specific primers (YPMM- E1-F and YPMM-E1-R for; YPgsdf-E-F and YPgsdf-E-R for; Table 1). PCR products were sub- jected to direct sequencing for mutation detection.

    Fig.2 Design of the target site of gRNAs in myomaker and gsdf. A, genome structure of myomaker; B, genome structureof gsdf. The gRNAs were designed in exon 1. The gRNA-1 site was targeted to the start codon.The gRNA sequence is underlined. Red letters represent the NGG site. ATG in boldface represents the start codon.

    Table 1 Primers for gRNA synthesis and PCR products analyses

    For larval genotyping, genomic DNA was isolated fromrandomly selected groups, which contained five larvae. The PCR products were purified and ligated into the Peasy-T3 vector (Transgene, China). After the ligated products weretransformedinto.and identified with blue-white screening, single white colonies were selected, and their plasmid inserts were purified and sequenced. For each band obtained in the original PCR amplification, at least 10 se- quences that matched the target sequence were obtained. These sequences were compared with the wild-type se- quence using the online software ClustalW (https://embnet. vital-it.ch/software/ClustalW.html.).

    2.6 Immunohistochemistry

    The larvae injected with-GFP were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and whole-mount immunohisto- chemistry was performed to confirm GFP expression us- ing GFP antibody according to the method of Tan and Du (2002) with some modifications. After treatment in cold acetone, embryos were washed in PBST (1× PBS with 0.1%Tween 20). Then, the larvae were incubated with 10% goat serum in PBST for 30min at room temperature. After wash-ed with PBST, the larvae were incubated with anti-GFP antibody (Molecular Probe, 1:1000) in PBST containing 1% goat serum at 4℃overnight. Then, the larvae were wash- ed with PBST, followed by incubation with HRP-labeled anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Molecular Probe, 1:1000 in PBST) for 1h. After washed with PBST, the larvae were incubated in DAB staining solution (Tiangen, China) at room temperature. The staining was monitored and stop- ped by washing with PBST. Embryos were photographed in 50% glycerol under a Leica DM LB2 microscope (Lei- ca, Germany).

    3 Results

    3.1 Test of the Microinjection Method with a Modified Needle

    To test whether the injections had been successful in flounder eggs using our simply prepared needle (Fig.1), dextran rhodamine B and flounderpromoter-driven GFP (-GFP) plasmid (Zhang., 2006) were injected together into the eggs, and the injected eggs were cultured to the swimming stage. Among the hatched larvae, more than 80% (18/22) were normal and showed red fluorescence (Fig.3B), while about 40% (8/22) show GFP expression (Fig.3D). Immunohistochemistry analysis con- firmed the identity of the expressed protein as GFP (Fig.3F).

    Fig.3 Rhodamine dye and GFP expression in hatched and free-swimming larvae after injection.A and C, Control; B, Rhodamine dye in injected larvae; D, GFP expression; E, Immunohistochemistry analysis of GFP expression in control larvae; F, Immunohistochemistry analysis of GFP expression in myod-GFP injected larvae. Scale bar: 100μm.

    There was no obvious difference in the effect of the two different needles on the injected embryos. However, the needle without the modified brake was not easily blocked during microinjection, and usually one needle with a mo- dified brake could replace three needles without brakes in terms of the degree of clogging. Therefore, the use of a needle with a modified brake could increase the injection speed.

    3.2 Transient Expression of GFP in Injected Olive Flounder Larvae

    Usually microinjection is performed at the one-cell to two-cell stage. To determine the optimal stage for injection, the plasmid-GFP was injected at three stages,., protoplasmic streaming to one-cell (not included, stage I), one-cell to two-cell (visible cleavage furrow, cell has not divided, stage II), and two-cell to four-cell (visible cleavage furrow, cell has not divided, stage III) stages. The nor- mal, hatched with GFP expression larvae accounted for about 40% (44.4%, 41.2%, and 38.2%, respectively) of thetotal hatched and free-swimming larvae (Table 2) for all three stages. However, the percentages of normal hatched larvae for stage I and stage II were higher (57.1% and 56.8%) than that for stage III (42.0%). Abnormal, hatched, and liv- ing larvae accounted for approximately 11.1% (7/63), 9.8% (5/51), and 27.6% (21/76) (Table 2), and GFP expression was detected in 3.2%, 11.8%, and 25.0% (Table 2) of the to- tal hatched larvae, respectively.

    3.3 Gene Modification in Olive Flounder Larvae

    To determine whether CRISPR/Cas9 could be applied to olive flounder embryos, two different genes,and, were selected. Two gRNAs were designed (Table 2) to test site mutations and fragment deletions. One month after injection, the survival rate was approximately 2%,while it was about more than 80% for un-injected embryos.For each gene, the PCR products were first direct sequenced to identify mutations (Fig.4). Then, one tube containing five larvae was randomly selected for single-clone sequencing and genotype analyses for each gene. The single-clone mu- tation rate was approximately 45% (14/31 forand 5/11 for) (Table 3). There were 10 distinctgenotypes (Fig.5, Table 3) and fourgenotypes (Fig.6, Table 3). For, most mutations were frag-ment deletions from 30bp to 170bp, which was between the gRNA-1 and gRNA-2 sites. The other mutations were at the gRNA1 site, which also contained one insertion mu- tation. For, the mutations were found only at the site around gRNA-1. For themutations, 4 of 10 wereinducedmicrohomology-mediated joining (Ansai.,2014), whereas for themutations, this propor- tion was three of four (Fig.5 and Fig.6).

    Table 2 Stage effect on hatch and GFP expression after microinjection

    Note: The normal hatching rates in control (without injection) were >90%.

    Fig.4 Direct sequencing chromatogram of PCR products.A, myomaker control embryos; B, Cas9 mRNA and myomaker gRNA injected embryos; C, gsdf control embryos; D, Cas9 mRNA, and gsdf gRNA injectedembryos. Red box indicated the gRNA site.

    Table 3 Type and frequency of myomaker and gsdf mutations in larvae

    Note: ?/+, deletion/insertion number.

    Fig.5 Different flounder myomaker mutation types.A, Large fragment deletion (≥90bp) of myomaker; B, Fragment deletion (<90bp) of myomaker; C, Deletion at the first gRNA site of myomaker. Red letter, gRNA site; WT, wild-type sequence; M?/+XX. Deletion/insertion sequence length; lower-case letters, insertion; Underlined text indicates microhomology.

    Fig.6 Different flounder gsdf mutation types.Red letter, gRNA site; WT, wild-type sequence; M?/+XX. Deletion/inser- tion sequence length; lower-case letters, insertion; Underlined text indicates microhomology.

    4 Discussion

    In this study, we successfully established a microinjec- tion and CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing method for olive flounder. Some noteworthy aspects of this process are dis- cussed below.

    The needle was an important factor for successful micro- injection. Olive flounder embryos have osmotic pressure as well as hard and elastic chorion. To penetrate the cho- rion and block suck-back, a needle with a brake has been used in pelagic eggs, such as the eggs of barfin flounder (Goto., 2015, 2019) and olive flounder (Kim., 2019). However, the preparation of such a needle requires special equipment and is complex and time-consuming (Goto., 2019). It requires approximately five minutes to prepare a needle with a brake using special equipment for a skilled person. Also, the needle is easily blocked du- ring injection, as the brake region is too narrow (appro- ximately 3–5μm) (Goto., 2019). To resolve the issues of osmotic pressure and complex needle preparation, we designed two different methods. First, we prepared a needle with a modified brake through a puller. Two-step pul- ling was performed at different temperatures, first at a high temperature, then at a low temperature, which hasbeen described in detail inMaterial and Methods. The time needed to prepare such a needle was only one minute, and no special instrument was required. Our experiment show- ed that the needle with a modified brake was more effi- cient and less often blocked. In the second method, to ad- dress the high osmotic pressure, we used a needle without a brake and adjusted the in/out air balance. The balance in the injector was adjusted to a position that could induce slight leakage of the inner solution when the needle was in the water in the injection plate. There was no leakage when the needle was out. The balance pressure was usu- ally 1.5–2 psi, and the injection pressure was about 2–3psi.Using these two different strategies, the plasmid could be successfully injected into the flounder eggs with a high survival rate of the hatched larvae.

    From egg to adult, all fishes of Pleuronectiformes had to overcome the important stage metamorphosis, a high-death- rate stage (Thorisson, 1994). Therefore, a larger number of hatched larvae would increase the quantity of adult fish. In tongue sole (Cui., 2017), the hatch rate was only 0.1%, while in barfin flounder (Goto., 2015), a high hatch rate was achieved using special needles (Goto., 2019). In our method, the hatch rate was approximately 50% for plasmid, which is higher than that achieved intongue sole and lower than that attained in barfin flounder. However, in our method, the needle preparation required only the incorporation of a puller, whereas the method used in barfin flounder required not only a puller but also other specialized instruments (Goto., 2019). Specialized ins- truments require special skills for their operation, which brings more difficulties to the application. Thus, our nee- dle preparation method can increase the efficiency and suc- cess of the experimnt.

    The injection stage was also important for the efficien- cy of exogenous macromolecules. Most injections are conducted at the blastodisc to two-cell stage, such as injections in zebrafish, medaka, Nibe croaker (Yamamoto., 2011), red sea bream (Kishimoto., 2018), and olive flounder (Kim., 2019). In olive flounder, the in- jection efficiency was lower than that inzebrafish due to differences in chorion strength and cell penetration ability. In our experiments, GFP was expressed after injection at all three stages, with substantial differences in its expres- sion levels. The embryos injected at the earlier two stages showed low GFP expression levels with high percentages of normally developed larvae, whereas embryos of the later stage showed high GFP expression with a low percentage of normally developed larvae. It is possible that methyla- tion levels differed among these stages (Goll and Halpern, 2011). These results suggest that plasmid injections to test gene function should be performed at the two-cell to four- cell stage.

    Our CRISPR/Cas9 experiments successfully induced mu- tations in two different genes in olive flounder. Four dif- ferent mutations were found in thegene, and 10 dif- ferent mutations were found in. Interestingly, these 10 mutations were detected in only five larvae in a single tube. In red sea bream and tongue sole, different mu- tations have also been detected within a single fish (Cui., 2017; Kishimoto., 2018; Kim., 2019). This may be attributed to the injection stage (two-cell) and va- riation in genome editing efficiency among cells. It is also possible that mutations occurred at the one-cell stage but underwent homologous repair in different cells during cell proliferation.

    The mutation rates differed between the gRNA-1 and gRNA-2 sites. Two gRNAs targetingandwere designed to delete a fragment. For, the probabilities of being digested by Cas9 were equal for the DNA sequences at the two gRNA sites. Thus, most mutations were fragment deletions between the two gRNA sites. In addition to the fragment deletion, some nucleotides were also deleted at one gRNA site, mostly at the gRNA-1site for. It is possible that the mutation ratewas higher at the 5’ end of the gene than at the 3’ end. For, all of the mutations were near the gRNA-1 site. It is possible that the gRNA-2 ofhas no function at theearly developmental stages. Another possible reason is thatthe sequence was correctly repaired although it was digest- ed by Cas9. Hence, two gRNAs for each gene will increase the probability of obtaining a mutant.

    5 Conclusions

    In conclusion, a microinjection system with a simple needle preparation method was developed in this research. It has been successfully applied in olive flounder with a high survival rate. Short sequence mutations and fragment deletions in olive flounder can be obtained by employing the CRISPR/Cas9 methodology. This system can be used for other pelagic eggs. In the future, the function ofandin flounder can be analyzed using the knock-out fish developed in this study. The functions of other genes can be studied with the similar strategy.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the National Natural Sci- ence Foundation of China (Nos. 31672636, 31772834, and 31972774), the National Key R&D Program of China (Nos. 2018YFD0901202 and 2018YFD0900202), and the Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Pro- vince, China (No. 2019GHY1120070). The authors declare no financial or commercial conflict of interest.

    Aluru, N., Karchner, S. I., Franks, D. G., Nacci, D., Champlin, D., and Hahn, M. E., 2015. Targeted mutagenesis of aryl hydro- carbon receptor 2a and 2b genes in Atlantic killifish ()., 158: 192-201.

    Ansai, S., Inohaya, K., Yoshiura, Y., Schartl, M., Uemura, N., Ta-kahashi, R.,., 2014. Design, evaluation, and screening me- thods for efficient targeted mutagenesis with transcription ac- tivator-like effector nucleases in medaka., 56: 98-107.

    Brem, G., Brenig, B., H?rstgen-Schwark, G., and Winnacker, E. L., 1988. Gene transfer in tilapia ()., 68: 209-219.

    Chang, N., Sun, C., Gao, L., Zhu, D., Xu, X., Zhu, X.,., 2013. Genome editing with RNA-guided Cas9 nuclease in zebrafish embryos., 23 (4): 465-472.

    Chourrout, D., Guyomard, R., and Houdebine, L. M., 1986. High efficiency gene transfer in rainbow trout () by microinjection into egg cytoplasm., 51: 143-150.

    Cleveland, B. M., Yamaguchi, G., Radler, L. M., and Shimizu, M., 2018. Editing the duplicated insulin-like growth factor bind- ing protein-2b gene in rainbow trout ()., 8 (1): 16054.

    Cui, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, W., Wang, Q., Zhang, N., Lin, F.,., 2017. Genome editing reveals dmrt1 as an essential male sex- determining gene in Chinese tongue sole ()., 7: 42213.

    Davis, B. R., Brown, D. B., Prokopishyn, N. L., and Yannariel- lo-Brown, J., 2000. Micro-injection-mediated hematopoietic stemcell gene therapy., 2 (4): 412-419.

    Doetschman, T., Gregg, R. G., Maeda, N., Hooper, M. L., Melton,D. W., Thompson, S.,., 1987. Targetted correction of a mu-tant HPRT gene in mouse embryonic stem cells., 330: 576-578.

    Du, S. J., Gong, Z. Y., Fletcher, G. L., Shears, M. A., King, M. J., Idler, D. R.,., 1992. Growth enhancement in transgenic At- lantic salmon by the use of an ‘a(chǎn)ll fish’ chimeric growth hor- mone gene construct., 10 (2): 176-181.

    Edvardsen, R. B., Leininger, S., Kleppe, L., Skaftnesmo, K. O., and Wargelius, A., 2014.Targeted mutagenesis in Atlantic sal- mon (L.) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system induces complete knockout individuals in the F0 generation., 9 (9): e108622.

    Fletcher, G. L., Shears, M. A., King, M. J., Davies, P. L., and Hew, C. L., 1988. Evidence for antifreeze protein gene trans- fer in Atlantic salmon ()., 45 (2): 352-357.

    Fuiman, L. A., 1997. What can flatfish ontogenies tell us about pelagic and benthic lifestyles?,37(3-4): 257-267.

    Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A., and Barbas III, C. F., 2103. ZFN, TALEN,and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering., 31: 397-405.

    Goll, M. G., and Halpern, M. E., 2011. DNA methylation in ze- brafish., 101: 193-218.

    Goto, R., Saito, T., Kawakami, Y., Kitauchi, T., Takagi, M., Todo,T.,., 2015. Visualization of primordial germ cells in the fer- tilized pelagic eggs of the barfin flounder., 59 (10-12): 465-470.

    Goto, R., Saito, T., Matsubara, T., and Yamaha, E., 2019. Micro- injection of marine fish eggs: Methods and protocols. In:. Liu, C. Y., ed., Huma- na Press, New York, 475-487.

    Hamied, A., Alnedawy, Q., Correia, A., Hacker, C., Ramsdale, M., Hashimoto, H.,., 2020. Identification and characteriza- tion of highly fluorescent pigment cells in embryos of the Ara- bian killifish ()., 23 (11): 101674.

    Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S, Q., Sander, J. D.,., 2013. Efficient genome editing in zebra- fish using a CRISPR-Cas system., 31 (3): 227-229.

    Inoue, D., Stemmer, M., Thumberger, T., Ruppert, T., B?renz, F., Wittbrodt, J.,., 2017. Expression of the novel maternal centrosome assembly factor Wdr8 is required for vertebrate em-bryonic mitoses., 8: 14090.

    Jao, L. E., Wente, S. R., and Chen, W., 2013. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system., 110 (34): 13904-13909.

    Jiang, D. N., Yang, H. H., Li, M. H., Shi, H. J., Zhang, X. B., and Wang, D. S., 2016.is a downstream gene ofthat functions in the male sex determination pathway of the Nile tilapia., 83 (6): 497-508.

    Jiao, S., Tan, X., Sui, Y., and You, F., 2019. Muscle fibre type com- position in the lateral muscle of olive flounder., 121 (1): 1-6.

    Kato-Unoki, Y., Takai, Y., Kinoshita, M., Mochizuki, T., Tatsu- no, R., Shimasaki, Y.,., 2018. Genome editing of puffer- fish saxitoxin- and tetrodotoxin-binding protein type 2 in., 153: 58-61.

    Kim, J., Cho, J. Y., Kim, J. W., Kim, H. C., Noh, J. K., Kim, Y. O.,., 2019. CRISPR/Cas9-mediateddisruption en- hances muscle mass in the olive flounder., 512: 734336.

    Kishimoto, K., Washio, Y., Yoshiura, Y., Toyoda, A., Ueno, T., Fukuyama, H.,., 2018. Production of a breed of red sea breamwith an increase of skeletal muscle mass and reduced body length by genome editing with CRISPR/ Cas9., 495: 415-427.

    Kobayashi, K., and Satou, Y., 2018. Microinjection of exogenous nucleic acids into eggs,species., 1029: 5-13.

    Landemaine, A., Rescan, P. Y., and Gabillard, J. C., 2014. Myo- maker mediates fusion of fast myocytes in zebrafish embryos., 451 (4): 480-484.

    Liu, D., Wang, Z., Xiao, A., Zhang, Y., Li, W., Zu, Y.,., 2014. Efficient gene targeting in zebrafish mediated by a zebrafish- codon-optimized cas9 and evaluation of off-targeting effect., 41 (1): 43-46.

    Maki, J. A., Cavallin, J. E., Lott, K. G., Saari, T. W., Ankley, G. T., and Villeneuve, D. L., 2020. A method for CRISPR/Cas9 mu- tation of genes in fathead minnow ()., 222: 105464.

    McEvoy, T., Stack, M., Keane, B., Barry, T., Sreenan, J., and Gan- non, F., 1988. The expression of a foreign gene in salmon em- bryos., 68: 27-37.

    Moody, S. A., 2018. Microinjection of mRNAs and oligonucleo- tides., 2018 (12): pdb.prot097261.

    Ozato, K., Kondoh, H., Inohara, H., Iwamatsu, T., Wakamatsu, Y.,and Okada, T. S., 1986. Production of transgenic fish: Introduc-tion and expression of chicken d-crystallin gene in medaka em- bryos., 19 (4): 237-244.

    Palmiter, R. D., and Brinster, R. L., 1986. Germ-line transforma- tion of mice., 20: 465-499.

    Shao, C., Bao, B., Xie, Z., Chen, X., Li, B., Jia, X.,., 2017. The genome and transcriptome of Japanese flounder provide insights into flatfish asymmetry., 49 (1): 119- 124.

    Stuart, G. W., McMurray, J. V., and Westerfield, M., 1988. Repli- cation, integration and stable transmission of foreign sequences injected into early zebrafish embryos., 103 (2): 403-412.

    Tan, X., and Du, S. J., 2002. Differential expression of twogenes in fast and slow muscles of gilthead seabream ()., 212 (5): 207-217.

    Thomas, K. R., and Capecchi, M. R., 1987. Site-directed muta- genesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells., 51 (3):503-512.

    Thompson, S., Clarke, A. R., Pow, A. M., Hooper, M. L., and Melton, D. W., 1989. Germ line transmission and expression of a corrected HPRT gene produced by gene targeting in em- bryonic stem cells., 56 (2): 313-321.

    Thorisson, K., 1994. Is metamorphosis a critical interval in the early life of marine fishes?, 40: 23-36.

    Wang, Q., Tan, X., Jiao, S., You, F., and Zhang, P. J., 2014. Ana- lyzing cold tolerance mechanism in transgenic zebrafish ()., 9 (7): e102492.

    Yamamoto, Y., Kabeya, N., Takeuchi, Y., Higuchi, K., Yatabe, T., Tsunemoto, K.,., 2011. Establishment of a stable trans- genic strain in a pelagic egg spawning marine teleost, Nibe croaker., 313: 42-49.

    Zhang, X., Wang, H., Li, M., Cheng, Y., Jiang, D., Sun, L.,., 2014. Isolation of doublesex- and mab-3-related transcription factor 6 and its involvement in spermatogenesis in tilapia., 91 (6): 136.

    Zhang, Y., Tan, X., Zhang, P. J., and Xu, Y., 2006. Characteriza- tion of muscle-regulatory gene,, from flounder () and analysis of its expression patterns du- ring embryogenesis., 8 (2): 139- 148.

    Zhu, Z., Li, G., He, L., and Chen, S., 1985. Novel gene transfer into the fertilized eggs of goldfish (L1758)., 1 (1): 31-34.

    Zhu, Z., Xu, K., Li, G., Xie, Y., and He, L., 1986. Biological effects of human growth hormone gene microinjected into the fertilized eggs of loach(Cantor)., 31 (14): 988-990.

    September 19, 2020;

    November 10, 2020;

    March 16, 2021

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021

    #The two authors contributed equally to this paper.

    E-mail: tanx@qdio.ac.cn

    E-mail: youfeng@qdio.ac.cn

    (Edited by Qiu Yantao)

    精品久久久久久久久久久久久| av在线天堂中文字幕| av在线蜜桃| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 99国产精品99久久久久| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 制服人妻中文乱码| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 日本在线视频免费播放| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| www.精华液| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产综合懂色| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 午夜激情欧美在线| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 一本一本综合久久| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产视频内射| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 日本a在线网址| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 综合色av麻豆| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 小说图片视频综合网站| 999精品在线视频| 国产av在哪里看| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 久久草成人影院| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产三级在线视频| 日本黄大片高清| 国产高潮美女av| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 国产99白浆流出| 黄色 视频免费看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 欧美3d第一页| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 久久久成人免费电影| 精品国产三级普通话版| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产免费男女视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 日本 av在线| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 亚洲激情在线av| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| av中文乱码字幕在线| 少妇丰满av| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 成在线人永久免费视频| 免费观看人在逋| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 精品电影一区二区在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 免费看a级黄色片| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| www.999成人在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 色吧在线观看| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 91av网站免费观看| 黄频高清免费视频| a在线观看视频网站| 久99久视频精品免费| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 91麻豆av在线| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 久久伊人香网站| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产高清三级在线| 色综合婷婷激情| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 在线a可以看的网站| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站 | 一级作爱视频免费观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 三级毛片av免费| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 日本成人三级电影网站| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 色在线成人网| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲国产看品久久| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 免费大片18禁| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产真实乱freesex| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产乱人视频| 91在线观看av| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产高清videossex| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 99热6这里只有精品| 观看美女的网站| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 舔av片在线| 欧美在线一区亚洲| tocl精华| 色av中文字幕| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 欧美日本视频| 熟女电影av网| 男人舔奶头视频| 黄色女人牲交| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 黄频高清免费视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产黄片美女视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 在线观看一区二区三区| 99久久精品热视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 亚洲国产色片| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲国产欧美网| 全区人妻精品视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 日本a在线网址| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲成人久久性| 美女免费视频网站| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产野战对白在线观看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 毛片女人毛片| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产视频内射| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 1024手机看黄色片| 99热6这里只有精品| xxx96com| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 美女高潮的动态| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 久久性视频一级片| 国产单亲对白刺激| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 小说图片视频综合网站| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 精品电影一区二区在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 我要搜黄色片| 无人区码免费观看不卡| xxx96com| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲美女黄片视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| www.自偷自拍.com| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 精品久久久久久,| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 青草久久国产| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 国内精品美女久久久久久| 一区福利在线观看| 欧美激情在线99| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲 国产 在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 成人三级做爰电影| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 露出奶头的视频| 久久久色成人| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 色在线成人网| 99国产综合亚洲精品| xxxwww97欧美| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久久久久大精品| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 午夜精品在线福利| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 国产不卡一卡二| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 欧美中文综合在线视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 91av网站免费观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 精品国产亚洲在线| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 亚洲无线观看免费| 午夜福利欧美成人| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 美女大奶头视频| 久久久久国内视频| 国产综合懂色| 午夜福利高清视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 在线观看日韩欧美| 免费看光身美女| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 天堂网av新在线| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 一本综合久久免费| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| h日本视频在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 99久国产av精品| 久久香蕉精品热| 舔av片在线| 成人18禁在线播放| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产精品野战在线观看| www日本黄色视频网| 亚洲中文av在线| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 黄色女人牲交| 搡老岳熟女国产| 色在线成人网| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 在线国产一区二区在线| 九色国产91popny在线| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 日本 欧美在线| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| www日本在线高清视频| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产成人aa在线观看| 超碰成人久久| 日韩欧美三级三区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 欧美三级亚洲精品| or卡值多少钱| 一本精品99久久精品77| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日韩高清综合在线| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产真实乱freesex| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 一区二区三区激情视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产精品一及| 国产日本99.免费观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产黄片美女视频| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产免费男女视频| 九色成人免费人妻av| 亚洲第一电影网av| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 1024手机看黄色片| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 久久香蕉国产精品| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产真实乱freesex| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲 国产 在线| 俺也久久电影网| 黄色成人免费大全| 免费观看人在逋| 99热精品在线国产| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲第一电影网av| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 哪里可以看免费的av片| 九色国产91popny在线| 热99在线观看视频| 美女高潮的动态| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| tocl精华| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 天堂动漫精品| 在线播放国产精品三级| 欧美在线黄色| 在线看三级毛片| 91字幕亚洲| 香蕉国产在线看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 69av精品久久久久久| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 午夜久久久久精精品| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 久久久久性生活片| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 成人av在线播放网站| 国内精品美女久久久久久| a在线观看视频网站| 精品福利观看| 久久亚洲真实| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 级片在线观看| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 久久久久性生活片| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产真实乱freesex| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 久久精品影院6| 国产1区2区3区精品| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 99热精品在线国产| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 九色成人免费人妻av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 看黄色毛片网站| 免费观看人在逋| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产精品 国内视频| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 免费观看人在逋| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 一级黄色大片毛片| av片东京热男人的天堂| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 成人欧美大片| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 午夜久久久久精精品| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 9191精品国产免费久久| 一夜夜www| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的|