• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Fast Quantification of the Mixture of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spec-troscopy Combined with PLS-GA-BP Network

    2021-12-22 11:24:14YanXiashixiaofengandmajun
    Journal of Ocean University of China 2021年6期

    Yan Xia, shi xiaofeng, and ma jun

    Fast Quantification of the Mixture of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Using Surface-Enhanced Raman Spec-troscopy Combined with PLS-GA-BP Network

    Yan Xia, shi xiaofeng*, and ma jun

    Optics and Optoelectronics Laboratory of Qingdao, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

    To realize the fast and accurate quantitative analysis of the mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) coupled with multivariate calibrations were employed. In this study, three kinds of calibration algorithms were used to quantitative analysis of the mixture of naphthalene (Nap), phenanthrene (Phe), and pyrene (Pyr). Firstly, partial least squares (PLS) algorithm was used to select characteristic variables, then the global search capability of genetic algorithm (GA) was used for the determining of the initial weights and thresholds of back propagation (BP) neural network so that local minima was avoided. The PLS-GA-BP model exhibited superiority to quantify PAHs mixture, which achieved2=0.9975, 0.9710, 0.9643, ARE=10.07%, 19.28%, 16.72% and RMSE=13.10, 5.40, 5.10nmolL?1for Nap, Phe, Pyr (in the PAHs mixture) concentration prediction respectively. The forecast error, ARE and RMSE have been reduced more than 50% and 60% respectively compared with the whole spectral BP model. The study indicates that accurate quantitative spectroscopic analysis of the mixture of PAHs samples can be achieved through the combination of SERS technique and PLS-GA-BP algorithm.

    polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs); surface enhanced Raman spectral (SERS); back propagation (BP) algorithm; multi-component quantitative analysis

    1 Introduction

    Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are one of the persistent organic pollutants, which attract the atten- tion of regulators duo to their highly carcinogenic, tera- togenic, mutagenic and lipophilic (Menzie., 1992). PAHs can do harm to human health seriously even with low concentration in environment. Moreover, since any incomplete combustion of carbohydrates may produce PAHs, they are widespread in the environment (Simcik., 1999; Zhang., 2009, Akdoan., 2020). There- fore, detection and monitoring of these hazardous compounds are imminent.

    Several spectral measurements such as high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Joe., 1982; Wenclawiak., 1992), gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Orecchio., 2009), fluorescence spectrometry (Zhang., 2009; Han., 2018), and so on, have been applied to PAHs detection and identification. However, these analytical techniques either need very laborious sample handling process (GC-MS, LC) or have difficult in mixture distinguish (fluorescence spectroscopy), which hinder their field application and quantitative analysis of PAHs.

    As a high precision trace detection technique, SERS is regarded as the fingerprint spectrum of substances (Qian., 2008; Dasary., 2009; Langer., 2019), and it has great potential for application in various fields due to its unique advantages, such as excellent molecular specificity, simple sample pretreatment and ultra-high sensitivity as well, especially in organic pollutants field detection such as PAHs (Shi., 2015). However, SERS is more frequently used as a qualitative tool rather than quantitative one because the SERS signals of analyte not only depend on the analyte concentration, but also the physical properties of enhanced substrate, such as the particle size and shape of colloids, the degree of aggregation, the intensity and focusing of laser excitation source (Chen., 2015).

    Over the years, lots of efforts have been addressed to the issue of SERS detection, and most concerning is to improve the sensitivity of SERS substrates (Tripp., 2008; Gu., 2013; Yin., 2019), but fewer studies focus on the accuracy of rapid quantitative analysis of organic pollutant mixtures. Moreover, due to the influence of the collection efficiency, changes in the detection conditions and competitive adsorption between various substances, it is difficult to obtain a repeatable SERS signal (Lin., 2018). In general, the SERS technique is full of challenges for rapid quantitative analysis (Zhao., 2015), especially for multi-component organic substances. Nevertheless, for on-site real-time detection, ra- pidly analysis of the data is necessary. Therefore, to reduce the influence of human factors and improve the efficiency and accuracy of data analysis, using advanced data mining techniques to provide support for scientific decision-making has attracted increasing research attention. For most study, there is nonlinear relationship between concentration and spectrum intensity. To improve the quantitative accurate under in this situation, many methods are adopted, such as optimized artificial neural network (ANN) (Li., 2019; Wang., 2019), optimized partial least squares (PLS) (Chen., 2019) and support vector regression (SVR) (Fan., 2015),.

    BP neural network is one of the most popular ANN methods (Ma., 2005; Liu., 2017),which shows a great promise in the quantitative analysis of spectral data (Jun., 2019). However, the existing BP neural network has some drawbacks, such as low convergence rate (Chun., 2018; Jia., 2019)and being difficult to devise suitable network structure (Xie., 2007). In addition, for actual SERS regression analysis, high precision is the prerequisite for quantitative analysis, and the characteristic variables of model input data play an important role for quantitative accuracy.Therefore, to obtain high precision prediction, some optimization algorithms such as PLS, GA are needed to select the input parameter and optimize the algorithm.The original data can be compressed according to the output variables by PLS, which can improve the prediction accuracy of the nonlinear model compared with principal component analysis (PCA) (Li., 2007). And the precision and prediction robustness of a model can be improved by combining GA and BP algorithm (Li., 2015).

    In this study, SERS spectra of 31 mixed solutions of three PAHs at different concentrations were obtained using a portable Raman system. An advanced high-preci- sion algorithms were established and used in the concentration prediction of the mixture. In which,according to the value of average relative error (ARE), root-mean-squa- re error (RMSE) and correlation coefficient (2), PLS was used to select the number of principal components of each substance with one hidden layer and one neuron BP network, and many experiments were conducted to determine the deep structure of BP neural network. And to accelerate the convergence speed and improve the accuracy for multicomponent PAHs SERS spectra quantitative analysis, GA was introduced into the PLS-BP algorithm, with full use of its global search capability and the local search capability of BP algorithm. The experiments demonstrated that the PLS-GA-BP algorithm performed well in the regression analysis of PAHs mixture.

    2 Materials and Methods

    2.1 Chemicals and Instrumentation

    Nap (C10H8, 97%), Phe (C14H10, 97%), Pyr (C16H10, 97%) were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich Co. (USA). Hydrogen tetrachloroauric (III) trihydrate (HAuCl4, 99.9%), trisodium citrate (Na3C6H5O7·2H2O, 99.5%), methanol (CH3OH, 99.7%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 99%), hydrochloric acid (HCl, 99%) and sulfuric acid (H2SO4, 98%) were from Sinopharm Group Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (China).

    The portable spectrometer (QE65000) was purchased from Ocean Optics (USA). The excitation light source, 785nm semiconductor laser (FC-785-500-MM) was ma- nufactured by Xilong Optoelectronics Technology Co., Ltd. (China).

    2.2 Preparation of Gold Colloid

    The gold colloid was synthesized by reducing chloroauric acid with sodium citrate as a reductant using the method of Frens (1973). The specific process can refer to the reference(Shi., 2012).

    2.3 Sample Preparation and SERS Measurement

    2.3.1 Sample preparation

    The analytes used in this study, Nap, Phe, and Pyr are three main PAHs in the surface seawater of Qingdao coastal area (Li., 2012). Stock solutions of them were prepared at a concentration of 40μmolL?1(Nap), 50 μmolL?1(Phe) and 40μmolL?1(Pyr) respectively with methanol as the solvent. Subsequently, a series of PAHs solutions at different concentrations (500, 100, 50nmol L?1for Nap; 100, 50, 20, 10, 4nmolL?1for Phe; 100, 50, 20, 10, 4, 1nmolL?1for Pyr) were obtained by diluting with deionized water. Thirty- one PAHs mixed solutions with different concentrations were prepared by mixing the prepared three PAH solutions with different concentrations of Nap, Phe and Pyr in equal volumes. Considering in the human error of the prepared solution, two mixed solution of each concentration was prepared. Thus, sixty- four samples were obtained.

    2.3.2 SERS measurement

    Existing studies have shown that the aggregation degree of gold nanoparticles (Au-NPs) in the colloids solution can be increased by adjusting the pH value of the gold (Au) colloids, which could obtain more high-sensitivity SERS detection. With Au-NPs adjusted by NaOH as enhanced substrate, SERS technology coupled with chemometric algorithms such as full spectrum BP algorithm, PLS-BP, PLS-GA-BP was endeavored to quantify multi-component PAHs.

    The quantitative strategy of the proposed method for PAHs mixture is schematically depicted in Fig.1. Briefly, PAHs molecules were combined with Au-NPs to form Au-NPs-PAHs by adding PAHs (Nap, Phe and Pyr) molecules to the uniformly distributed Au NPs colloid. When NaOH was added to adjust the pH of the solution, the aggregation of Au-NPs and PAHs molecules was formed. Thus the number of SERS hot spots was increased, and the detection sensitivity was improved.

    SERS detection was performed as follows: PAHs mixture and Au-NPs (size about 57nm, pH=6) were mixed with themixture:Au-NPs=3:1. Then, adjust the pH of the mixed solution to 13 with NaOH. Finally, the average SERS spectra of three replicated spectra with an integration time of 10 s and the laser power of 180mW (on sample) were recorded.

    Fig.1 Schematic illustration of fast quantification of PAHs mixture by SERS coupled GA-PLS-BP algorithm.

    2.4 Algorithms

    PLS is a multivariate statistical analysis method, which combines the advantages of the three algorithms: principal component analysis (PCA), canonical correlation analysis (CCA), and multiple linear regression (MLR), and it focuses on the effect of the principal component factor and spectral treatment (Chen., 2015; Kutsanedzie., 2017).

    ANN is an algorithm which offers an alternativeway to simulate complex and ill-defined problems. BP neural network is a typical ANN algorithm that has been widely used in many fields, such as medical signal analysis and quantitative analysis of spectra. With proper parameters, BP network can approximate any nonlinear function (Yu., 2014).

    GA is a simple, fault-tolerant and fast simulated evolutionary process algorithm, which follows the principle of evolution and takes the good individual evolution as the optimal solution. It can achieve the optimal initial weight and threshold for the BP network.

    3 Results and Discussion

    3.1 Characterization of Analytes

    The typical SERS spectra of Nap, Phe, Pyr and their mixture in the same concentration are shown in the Fig.2. As the picture shows, the SERS peaks intensity and location for the mixture has changed compared with the peaks of single product, although their concentration are same. The changed ratio of each signal was different even for one constituent. Compared with the Nap solution, the Raman intensities of the mixture at 753cm?1and 1374 cm?1(for Nap) reduced 58.70% and 69.21% respectively. And since different solubilities and adsorption properties between different kinds of PAHs, this reduction is even more different among different issues. The Raman shifts at 1374cm?1(for Nap), 702cm?1(for Phe) and 588cm?1(for Pyr) reduced 69.21%, 41.34% and 27.73% correspondently, which testified that tetracyclic Pyr (with poorer water solubility) had better combination with Au-NPs compared with Nap and Phe (consisted of two and three benzene rings respectively). Therefore, the peaks intensity of Pyr reduced least in the mixture compared with the pure solution. Furthermore, the peaks at 1598cm?1(for Phe), 1606cm?1(for Pyr) overlapped to 1600cm?1 in the mixture.All these differences make the quantitative analysis of mixture more difficult.

    Fig.2 Typical SERS spectra of 100nM Nap, Phe, Pyr and their mixture. (a), Nap; (b), Phe; (c), Pyr; (d), mixture.

    Due to the competitive adsorption between substances, the changes of one other substance in the solution will cause the spectrum change of the fixed substance. SERS spectra of PAHs mixture (Nap, Phe, Pyr) are shown in Fig. 3(A), where the concentration of Pyr changes while the concentration of Nap and Phe does not change. The dependences of the intensities at 588, 1054, 1230 and 1498 cm?1bands on the concentration of Nap are plotted in Fig. 3(B). As can be seen, the SERS intensities of Pyr increased with the increasing concentration. However, the relationship between concentration and peak intensities was no longer linear. The regression equations and correlation coefficients are presented in Table 1. The non-linear correlation between Raman intensity and concentration was noted.

    Fig.3 (A) SERS spectra of different concentrations of Pyr with the same concentrations of Nap (167nmolL?1) and Phe (33 nmolL?1). (B) Dependence of the Raman intensities at 588, 1054, 1230, 1498cm?1 bands on the Pyr concentration.

    Table 1 Regression equations between Raman intensity and concentration (2, 3, 7, 17, 33nmolL?1) of Nap and their correlation coefficients with the same concentrations of Nap (167nmolL?1) and Phe (33nmolL?1)

    Fig.4 Raman intensity of Nap (167nmolL?1), Phe (33nmolL?1) in five parallel experiments with different concentrations of Pyr.

    With the different concentration of Pyr, the Raman intensity at 542, 707 (for Phe), 753, 1374cm?1(for Nap) are shown in the Fig.4. It can be seen that the spectral characteristics of Nap and Phe were affected by the changing of Pyr. The relative error (RE) of 542, 707, 753 and 1374 cm?1bands intensity are 27.95%, 27.67%, 31.32%, 27.67% respectively, which increase the difficulty of quantitative analysis. In this study, the quantitative me- thod of the SERS spectrum of three-component PAHs solution was studied, and to get the optimized accuracy, three kinds of multivariate calibration models were used.

    3.2 Data and PLS-GA-BP Algorithm

    In this paper, SERS signals from 352 to 1800cm?1were selected for the subsequent quantitative analysis. Sixty- four mixture samples of PAHs (Nap with the concentration of 167, 33, 17nmolL?1; Phe with 33, 17, 7, 3, 2nmolL?1; and Pyr with 33, 17, 7, 3, 2, 0.3nmolL?1) were selected. The sixty-four PAHs mixture samples were selected and divided into two sets, fifty-four for the calibration set and ten for the test set.

    The robustness and prediction precision of the established models are often influenced, by some useless issues of the full spectral data. For the quantitative study of SERS spectroscopy, the selection of wave band is one of the keys for the accuracy of network prediction. In this study, PLS was used to choose the input variables.

    The initial weights and thresholds of traditional neural network are randomly generated. However, network connection weights and thresholds of the whole distribution will affect the prediction accuracy. Improper initial parameters will lead to no convergence or fall into local extremum which will worsen the accuracy of the final prediction. To improve the accuracy of SERS spectra quantitative analysis of PAHs mixture, GA was adopted to optimize the initial weights and threshold values. GA algorithm can effectively reduce the randomness of the initial parameters, overcome the local optimization defects of the BP algorithm and make the prediction effect more stable. Fig.5 shows the PLS-GA-BP neural network algorithm flow.

    Fig.5 Flow chart of PLS-GA-BP.

    The input variables of the network were obtained through PLS dimensionality reduction, and as the fitness function of GA algorithm, the prediction error of BP algorithm was provided by MATLAB neural network toolbox using the gradient descent algorithm as the training function. Gradient descent algorithm for medium-sized BP neural network is the default training function of the toolbox, and it also has the fastest convergence speed. The initialization parameter which are the thresholds and weights, can be obtained after the GA process.

    3.3 Number of Principal Components

    For regression model, the input data will seriously affect the prediction accuracy of network. To improve the operation efficiency and rate, PLS method was used for data compression. To determine the number of principal component, the BP network with one hidden layer and one neuron was selected. The number of network training, learning rate, minimum error, additional momentum factor were set as 1×104, 0.01, 1×10?3, 0.95, respectively.

    Table 2 Estimation of precision for PAHs samples by PLS- BP model with different number of principal components

    For simplicity, only some typical results are shown in the Table 2. Three principal components were selected as optimum number for the regression of Nap according the lowest value of ARE, RMSE and the largest value of2. Similarly, the optimal number of PLS components were six and nine in the calibration set of Phe and Pyr. The PLS-BP model was recorded2=0.9955, ARE=15.04%, RMSE=24.79nmolL?1for Nap,2=0.9652, ARE=31.67%, RMSE=7.99nmolL?1for Phe,2=0.9565, ARE=19.03%, RMSE=8.08nmolL?1for Pyr.

    3.4 Hidden Layer Structure

    Choosing appropriate number of hidden layer and nodes is particularly significant to improve the prediction accuracy of BP network. In this study, the structure of BP network was selected according2, ARE and RMSE. With the compressed points in 3.1, different hidden layer structures of BP network were studied and the results are shown in Table 3.

    Table 3 Quantification of PAHs samples by PLS-BP model with the compressed points

    The result clarified that the different topologies of BP network had significance influence on the prediction accuracy. For most study, a three layer BP network with one hidden layer can be satisfied, but in order to obtain higher accuracy, the structure of network could be deepened. According to2, ARE and RMSE, the optimum hidden layer for the quantitative analysis of Nap, Phe, Pyr in the PAHs mixture samples were 2, 2, 1 respectively. Take Nap for example, network structure of 2 hidden layers reduced ARE from 15.04% to 13.51% compared with 1 hidden layer, which expounded the necessity to regulate the structure. With the optimum BP network structure for each PAH in mixture, the model was recorded2=0.9967, ARE=13.51%, RMSE=19.12nmolL?1for Nap,2=0.9495, ARE=26.99%, RMSE=9.2507nmolL?1for Phe,2=0.9565, ARE=19.03%, RMSE=8.08nmolL?1for Pyr.

    3.5 Results of Quantitation

    In this study, three different multivariate calibrations models including BP, PLS and GA were employed systematically and comparatively in order to obtain an optimum model for rapid quantification of multicomponent PAHs (Nap, Phe and Pyr) in water. The establishment process of the model is shown in Fig.5. The quantitative analysis results of multicomponent PAHs (Nap, Phe, Pyr) with three different multivariate calibrations models are shown in Fig.6.

    Fig.6 A linear regression plot of the reference values versus SERS predicted values of the validation data set of PAHs mixture in three different multivariate calibrations models.

    Table 4 Comparison of different analysis methods in the pre- diction of concentration of PAHs mixture (Nap, Phe, Pyr)

    Table 4 exhibits the quantitative analysis results of three models (BP, PLS-BP, PLS-GA-BP) for Nap, Phe, Pyr in the multicomponent PAHs samples.

    The optimum number of hidden layer and neurons are important for BP model performance. In this study, one hidden layer and four neurons were selected as the optimum structure according to the value of2, ARE and RMSEfor each tissue in the three components mixture. For the concentration prediction of PAHs mixture,the BP model was recorded with2=0.9505, ARE=29.32%, RMSE=55.65nmolL?1for Nap,2=0.9597%, ARE=37.84%, RMSE=12.85nmolL?1for Phe,2=0.9517, ARE=37.26%, RMSE=17.00nmolL?1for Pyr. In the PLS-BP model, the characteristic variables were selected using PLS by studying the regression modeling of dependent variables on independent variables, thus the effective spectral variables were achieved. The model was recorded with2=0.9961, ARE=16.82%, RMSE=23.31 nmolL?1,2=0.9007, ARE=28.38%, RMSE=8.40nmolL?1, and2=0.9606, ARE=19.06%, RMSE=8.57nmolL?1for Nap, Phe and Pyr, respectively. Compared with the whole spectral BP model, the ARE for PLS-BP model had been reduced 42.63%, 25.00%, 48.85%, and the RMSE had been reduced 49.00%, 34.63%, 49.59%. GA is a global probability search algorithm, which was used to optimize solutions in an uncertain space and search for optimal variables in the whole combined space meanwhile avoid falling into local minimum. Understandably the PLS-GA-BP model provided the best result with the finest predictive ability, stability and the smallest variables. The method was based on individuals, genetic iterations, generation gap crossover and mutation probabilities set to 40, 50, 0.95, 0.7, 0.01 respectively, and was recorded with2=0.9975, ARE=10.07%, RMSE=13.10nmolL?1for Nap,2=0.9710, ARE=19.28%, RMSE=5.40 for Phe,2=0.9643, ARE=16.72% and RMSE=5.10nmolL?1for Pyr. Compared with PLS-BP model, the ARE for PLS-GA-BP model had been reduced 40.13%, 32.06%, 12.27%, respectively, and the RMSE had been reduced 53.84%, 35.71%, 40.49% successively. And compared with the BP model, the ARE had been reduced 65.65%, 49.05%, 55.13% and the RMSE had been reduced 76.46%, 57.98%, 70.00%, respectively.

    According to the three model results, the PLS-GA-BP model offers a simple, convenient and highly precision method for rapid quantification of multicomponent PAHs in water.

    4 Conclusions

    The present work established a high-precision quantitative method for SERS spectrum of PAHs mixture. The result showed that with the poorest water solubility, Pyr coupled with Au-NPs optimally, and the SERS peaks of Pyr were affected least by other substances. Conversely, the peaks of Nap were affected mostly. These phenomena laid a foundation for the quantitative analysis of SERS spectroscopy of multi-component PAHs. And to obtain a best model for rapid and accurate quantification of PAHs mixture in water, three different multivariate calibrations models including BP, PLS-BP, PLS-GA-BP were studied. In which, with three principal components and two hidden layers for Nap, six principal components and two hidden layers for Phe, nine principal components and one hidden layer for Pyr, the PLS-GA-BP performed best, and was recorded with2=0.9975, 0.9710, 0.9643, ARE= 10.07%, 19.28%, 16.72% and RMSE=13.10, 5.40, 5.10 n molL?1for Nap, Phe, Pyr, respectively. It indicated that the PLS-GA-BP showed high potential in quantitative analysis of multicomponent PAHs in water, and it might be used for fast, high precision, field quantitative analysis of PAHs in environmental water where has been severely contaminated by PAHs.

    Acknowledgements

    This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41476081), the Major Research and Development Project in Shandong Province (No. 2019GHY112027), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (No. ZR2020MF121).

    Akdoan, A., and Gursoy, O., 2020. Determination of four priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (4PAHs) by GC-MS in traditional Turkish yoghurts., 37 (3): 391-400.

    Chen, Q. S., Hassan, M. M., Xu, J., and Zareef, M., 2019. Fast sensing of imidacloprid residue in tea using surface-enhanced Raman scattering by comparative multivariate calibration., 211: 86-93.

    Chen, X. J., Liu, K., Cai, J. B., Zhu, D. H., and Chen, H. L., 2015. Identification of heavy metal-contaminatedusing infrared spectroscopy., 7 (5): 2172-2181.

    Chen, Y., Chen, Z. P., Jin, J. W., and Yu, R. Q., 2015. Quantitative determination of ametryn in river water using surface- enhanced Raman spectroscopy coupled with an advanced chemometric model., 142 (15): 166-171.

    Chun, L., and Zhou, J. J., 2018. An improved algorithm of BP neural network and its application., 11: 60-64.

    Dasary, S. S. R., Singh, A. K., Senapati, D., Yu, H. T., and Ray, P. C., 2009. Gold nanoparticle based label-free SERS probe for ultrasensitive and selective detection of trinitrotoluene., 131 (38): 13806- 13812.

    Fan, Y. X., Lai, K. Q., Rasco, B. A., and Huang, Y. Q., 2015. Determination of carbaryl pesticide in Fuji apples using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy coupled with multivariate analysis., 60 (1): 352-357.

    Frens, G., 1973. Controlled nucleation for the regulation of the particle size in monodisperse gold suspensions., 241 (105): 20-22.

    Gu, X. F., Tian, S., Zhou, Q., Adikins, J., Gu, Z. M., Li, X. W.,., 2013. SERS detection of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on a bowl-shaped silver cavity substrate., 3 (48): 25989-25996.

    Han, T. T., and Zhang, H. R., 2018. Determination of total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Buddha incense smoke by fluorescence spectrometry., 46 (6): 75-77.

    Jia, K., Ni, Z. W., Li, J. M., and Zhu, X. H., 2019. Research on IBABC-BP parallel integration learning algorithm and its application., 39 (3): 477-494.

    Joe, F. L., Jean, S., and Thomas, F., 1982. High performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence and ultraviolet detection of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons in Barley Malt., 65 (6): 395-402.

    Jun, T., Xiang, L., and Han, K. L., 2019. Rapid analysis of main components in lavender essential oil by near infrared spectroscopy combined with bp neural network., 47 (3): 189-192, 195.

    Kutsanedzie, F. Y. H., Chen, Q., Hassan, M. M., Yang, M. X., Sun, H., and Rahman, M. H., 2017. Near infrared system coupled chemometric algorithms for enumeration of total fungi count in cocoa beans neat solution., 240 (1): 231- 238.

    Langer, J., Aberasturi, D. J. D., Aizpurua, J., 2019. Present and future of surface enhanced raman scattering., 14 (1): 86-87.

    Li, B. P., Qin, H. J., Luo, X., Cao, S. W., and Wang, J. D., 2007. Determination of four contents of feedstuff powder using near infrared spectroscopy by PLS-BP model., 27 (10): 2005-2009.

    Li, H. H., Liu, S. S., Hassan, M. M., Ali, S., Ouyang, Q., Chen, Q. S.,., 2019. Rapid quantitative analysis of Hg2+residue in dairy products using SERS coupled with ACO-BP- AdaBoost algorithm., 223: 117281-117290.

    Li, H. S., Lai, L., Chen, L., Lu, C., and Cai, Q., 2015. The prediction in computer color matching of dentistry based on GA+BP neural network., 2015 (2): 1-7.

    Li, X. G., Deng, W., Zhou, X., Tang, X. L., Guo, X. Y., and Wang, Y., 2012. Distribution of PAHs in surface seawater of Qingdao coast area and their preliminary apportionment., 33 (3): 741-745.

    Lin, S., Lin, X., Liu, Y. L., Zhao, H. L., Hasi, W., and Li, W., 2018. Self-assembly of Au@Ag core-shell nanocubes embedded with internal standard for reliable quantitative SERS measurements., 10: 4201-4208.

    Liu, J., and Li, H. L., 2017. PID control algorithm of BP neural network of dynamic quantitative weighing packaging system., 38 (5): 78-81.

    Ma, F. M., and Li, G. J., 2005. Application of BP neural net work in quantitative recognizing pipeline defect., 7 (4): 16-18.

    Menzie, C. A., Potocki, B. B., and Santodonato, J., 1992. Exposure to carcinogenic PAHs in the environment., 26 (7): 1278-1284.

    Orecchio, S., Ciotti, V. P., and Culotta, L., 2009. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in coffee brew samples: Analytical method by GC–MS, profile, levels and sources., 47 (4): 819-826.

    Qian, X. M., and Nie, S. M., 2008. Single-molecule and single- nanoparticle SERS: From fundamental mechanisms to biomedical applications., 37 (5): 912-920.

    Shi, X. F., Liu, S., Han, X. H., Ma, J., Jiang, Y. C., and Yu, G. F., 2015. High-sensitivity surface-enhanced raman scattering (SERS) substrate based on a gold colloid solution with a PH change for detection of trace-level polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous solution., 69 (5): 574-579.

    Shi, X. F., Ma, J., Zheng, R. E., Wang, C. Y., and Kronfeldt, H. D., 2012. An improved self-assembly gold colloid film as surface-enhanced Raman substrate for detection of trace-level polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in aqueous solution., 43: 1354-1359.

    Simcik, M. F., Eisenreich, S. J., and Lioy, P. J., 1999. Source apportionment and source/sink relationships of PAHs in the coastal atmosphere of Chicago and Lake Michigan., 33 (30): 5071-5079.

    Tripp, R. A., Dluhy, R. A., and Zhao, Y., 2008. Novel nanostructures for SERS biosensing., 3 (3-4): 31-37.

    Wang, Y. T., Zhang, Y., Shang, F. K., Zhang, J. Z., Zhang, H., Sun, Y. Y.,., 2019. Measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water by bp neural network combined with ATLD and three-dimensional fluorescence spectrometry., 39 (11): 3420-3425.

    Wenclawiak, B., Rathmann, C., and Teuber, A., 1992. Supercritical-fluid extraction of soil samples and determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) by HPLC., 344 (10-11): 497-500.

    Xie, Y. T., 2007. The determination of the number of the hidden cells and the variable selection of the neural network., 22 (6): 9-15.

    Yin, X. P., Dong, H., Wang, S. Q., Liang, Y., Gao, N., Zhang, W. L.,., 2019. A multiple coupling approach to produce high-performance SERS substrates., 30 (01): 199-202.

    Yu, F., and Xu, X. Z., 2014. A short-term load forecasting model of natural gas based on optimized genetic algorithm and improved BP neural network., 134 (1): 102-113.

    Zhang, W., Zhou, N., Li, N., Xie, Y. S., Luo, H. D., and Li, Y. Q., 2009. Simultaneous determination of pahs in food by low- temperature constant-energy synchronous fluorescence spectrometry., 29 (10): 2806- 2809.

    Zhang, Y., and Tao, S., 2009. Global atmospheric emission inventory of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) for 2004., 43 (4): 812-819.

    Zhao, Y., Tian, Y., Ma, P. Y., Yu, A. M., Zhang, H. Q., and Chen, Y. H., 2015. Determination of melamine and malachite green by surface-enhanced raman scattering spectroscopy using starch-coated silver nanoparticles as substrate., 7: 8116-8122.

    November 12, 2020;

    April 14, 2021;

    June 3, 2021

    ? Ocean University of China, Science Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2021

    . Tel: 0086-532-66781201

    E-mail: shixiaofeng@ouc.edu.cn

    (Edited by Ji Dechun)

    色视频www国产| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲成色77777| 熟女电影av网| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产乱人视频| 熟女电影av网| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产永久视频网站| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| h日本视频在线播放| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产色婷婷99| 色5月婷婷丁香| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产成人精品福利久久| av.在线天堂| 男人舔奶头视频| 少妇丰满av| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 一本一本综合久久| 成年免费大片在线观看| 直男gayav资源| 欧美潮喷喷水| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲国产精品999| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 亚洲最大成人av| 亚洲最大成人av| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 免费看不卡的av| 日韩成人伦理影院| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 精品人妻视频免费看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲精品第二区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久精品人妻少妇| av.在线天堂| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日日啪夜夜爽| 97在线人人人人妻| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久人人爽人人片av| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 内地一区二区视频在线| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲色图av天堂| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 色播亚洲综合网| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 日日啪夜夜撸| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲图色成人| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| a级毛色黄片| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 在线看a的网站| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 在线 av 中文字幕| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 男女国产视频网站| 日本一二三区视频观看| 欧美3d第一页| av专区在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 男人舔奶头视频| www.色视频.com| 一级a做视频免费观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 亚洲色图av天堂| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 黄色一级大片看看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久久成人免费电影| 久久久精品94久久精品| 精品一区在线观看国产| 嫩草影院新地址| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 国产美女午夜福利| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产男女内射视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 日本三级黄在线观看| 免费看光身美女| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 久久97久久精品| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 一本一本综合久久| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产在线男女| 五月开心婷婷网| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲av一区综合| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 黄片wwwwww| h日本视频在线播放| 免费观看在线日韩| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久久精品94久久精品| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 在线观看人妻少妇| av国产免费在线观看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 内射极品少妇av片p| 日日撸夜夜添| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 一级毛片我不卡| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 精品久久久久久电影网| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| av卡一久久| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 精品午夜福利在线看| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| av福利片在线观看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 亚洲精品视频女| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| av专区在线播放| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产男女内射视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| www.色视频.com| a级毛色黄片| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 亚洲成色77777| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产精品无大码| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 老女人水多毛片| 精品人妻视频免费看| 久久久久精品性色| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 久久6这里有精品| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久久久久久久大av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 身体一侧抽搐| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产成人福利小说| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 黄片wwwwww| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 青春草国产在线视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | tube8黄色片| 亚洲精品视频女| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| videossex国产| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日本色播在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 国产在线男女| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 日韩视频在线欧美| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| av网站免费在线观看视频| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| av.在线天堂| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 日本黄大片高清| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 久久精品人妻少妇| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 内射极品少妇av片p| 舔av片在线| 久热这里只有精品99| 九色成人免费人妻av| av在线老鸭窝| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 美女国产视频在线观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 一级av片app| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 五月天丁香电影| 日本黄大片高清| 在现免费观看毛片| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲国产色片| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久热久热在线精品观看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 直男gayav资源| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 亚洲图色成人| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品999| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 免费大片18禁| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲精品第二区| 一区二区三区精品91| a级毛色黄片| 国产在线男女| 国产精品三级大全| 日韩成人伦理影院| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲国产色片| 久久99精品国语久久久| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 人妻系列 视频| 久久99精品国语久久久| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 国产色婷婷99| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 91狼人影院| 69人妻影院| 大香蕉久久网| 日本一二三区视频观看| 久久热精品热| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 欧美激情在线99| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 一区二区三区精品91| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 天堂网av新在线| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 国产极品天堂在线| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲av男天堂| 51国产日韩欧美| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 成人欧美大片| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 亚洲av一区综合| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲四区av| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 久久久成人免费电影| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 日韩国内少妇激情av| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 久久久欧美国产精品| 中国国产av一级| 日韩电影二区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 日本wwww免费看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲四区av| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产亚洲最大av| 日韩电影二区| 亚州av有码| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲综合色惰| 内地一区二区视频在线| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产精品三级大全| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 丝袜脚勾引网站| eeuss影院久久| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 日本黄色片子视频| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产在视频线精品| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 国产av不卡久久| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 免费观看在线日韩| 久久久久性生活片| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 一级毛片我不卡| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 日本黄色片子视频| 大码成人一级视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 国产男女内射视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 免费av毛片视频| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| eeuss影院久久| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 身体一侧抽搐| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 插逼视频在线观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 色哟哟·www| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 久久久久国产网址| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久久久久伊人网av| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 九九在线视频观看精品| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 中国三级夫妇交换| 97超碰精品成人国产| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 中国三级夫妇交换| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产极品天堂在线| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合|