• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Assessing the relationship between the rumen microbiota and feed efficiency in Nellore steers

    2021-12-17 11:51:38borahRomaskevisGomesLopesrciodeSouzaDuarteAlexLaReauIbrahimZunigaChavesTiagoAntniodeOliveiraMendesEdenioDetmannCludiaBragaPereiraBentoMariaEugniaZerlottiMercadanteSarahFigueiredoMartinsBonilhaGarretSuenandHilrioCuqu

    Déborah Romaskevis Gomes Lopes,Márcio de Souza Duarte,Alex J.La Reau,Ibrahim Zuniga Chaves,Tiago Ant?nio de Oliveira Mendes,Edenio Detmann,Cláudia Braga Pereira Bento,Maria Eugênia Zerlotti Mercadante,Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha,Garret Suenand Hilário Cuquetto Mantovani*

    Abstract

    Background:Ruminants rely upon a complex community of microbes in their rumen to convert host-indigestible feed into nutrients.However,little is known about the association between the rumen microbiota and feed efficiency traits in Nellore(Bos indicus)cattle,a breed of major economic importance to the global beef market.Here,we compare the composition of the bacterial,archaeal and fungal communities in the rumen of Nellore steers with high and low feed efficiency(FE)phenotypes,as measured by residual feed intake(RFI).

    Results:The Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio was significantly higher(P<0.05)in positive-RFI steers(p-RFI,low feed efficiency)than in negative-RFI(n-RFI,high feed efficiency)steers.The differences in bacterial composition from steers with high and low FE were mainly associated with members of the families Lachnospiraceae,Ruminococcaceae and Christensenellaceae,as well as the genus Prevotella.Archaeal community richness was lower(P<0.05)in p-RFI than in n-RFI steers and the genus Methanobrevibacter was either increased or exclusive of p-RFI steers.The fungal genus Buwchfawromyces was more abundant in the rumen solid fraction of n-RFI steers(P<0.05)and a highly abundant OTU belonging to the genus Piromyces was also increased in the rumen microbiota of highefficiency steers.However,analysis of rumen fermentation variables and functional predictions indicated similar metabolic outputs for the microbiota of distinct FE groups.

    Conclusions:Our results demonstrate that differences in the ruminal microbiota of high and low FE Nellore steers comprise specific taxa from the bacterial,archaeal and fungal communities.Biomarker OTUs belonging to the genus Piromyces were identified in animals showing high feed efficiency,whereas among archaea,Methanobrevibacter was associated with steers classified as p-RFI.The identification of specific RFI-associated microorganisms in Nellore steers could guide further studies targeting the isolation and functional characterization of rumen microbes potentially important for the energy-harvesting efficiency of ruminants.

    Keywords:Beef cattle,ITS1 region,Next-generation sequencing,RFI,Rumen microbiota,16S rRNA gene

    Background

    With the projected growth of the world’s population in the next decades,it is expected that meat production will have to double to meet the global demand for animal protein[1].Ruminants,which have a major role in ensuring sustainable food security,consume about 30% of the crops cultivated on Earth and occupy another 30% of the planet’s surface[2,3].Therefore,expanding herd size and land use to meet projected food demands is undesirable due to the environmental impacts associated with livestock production[3].In this context,there is an increasing interest in the use of feed efficiency(FE)indexes/markers in animal breeding programs to select for animals that produce more meat or milk while consuming less feed[4].In beef cattle,residual feed intake(RFI),which is the difference between observed dry matter intake(DMI)and expected DMI based on animal development metrics[5],has been widely used to calculate the FE of growing cattle.The expected DMI is determined from linear regression of measured feed intake versus developmental measures(such as mean daily weight gain)for a group of animals on the same diet.However,previous studies demonstrated that RFI has low to moderate heritability in cattle(h2=0.25,h2=0.39),which suggests that FE is also affected by non-genetic factors[6,7].

    The feed conversion in ruminants depends both on the ability of the rumen microbiota to ferment the components of their diet to produce volatile organic acids,and the ability of these animals to absorb and utilize these nutrients(genetic potential).Therefore,ruminal microorganisms play a fundamental role in providing energy to their hosts[8].Although feed efficiency is considered a multifactorial and complex trait in cattle involving multiple biological processes connected to the host[2,9],several published studies provide evidence for associations between the rumen microbiome and RFI phenotypes in both dairy cows[2,10–12]and beef cattle[13–19].It has been proposed that cows that are more efficient host a microbiome with lower richness and diversity,but produce higher abundances of important metabolites for the host[2].Most importantly,the functional analysis of the rumen microbiota indicates that differences in animals of high and low FE may be related to the genes involved in the digestion of fibrous and non-fibrous carbohydrates,synthesis of fatty acids and proteins,pathways for conservation of metabolic energy(e.g.,ATP production),and methane production[11].

    However,the ecological understanding of the rumen microbiome in Bos indicus cattle is still limited,especially the compositional dynamics of the rumen microbiome and its association with productivity traits of Nellore cattle[20,21],which accounts for more than 90% of Brazilian beef cattle herds and represents one of the most abundant sources of meat worldwide[1,22].Also,linear regression models predicting rumen bacterial features affecting feed efficiency indicated that the rumen microbiome likely explains approximately 20% of the variation in feed efficiency traits in beef steers[19].Therefore,research on the association between the rumen microbiota and feed efficiency traits(e.g.RFI)in Nellore(Bos indicus)cattle is needed to unveil the potential rumen microbial signatures in animals that are more efficient at feed utilization.

    To address this,we examined differences in the composition of the ruminal microbiota(Bacteria,Archaea,and Fungi)in the solid and liquid rumen contents of Nellore cattle showing high and low FE phenotypes(negative and positive RFI,respectively).This exploratory study aimed to determine if specific rumen microbes contribute to the feed efficiency phenotype in Nellore steers,a feature that could be relevant in evaluating the phenotypic variation of FE in Bos indicus cattle.The present study also provides the first systematic account of the bacterial,archaeal,and fungal communities colonizing the rumen of Nellore cattle showing distinct FE phenotypes.

    Materials and methods

    Animals,diets and sampling

    A cohort of 129 young Nellore bulls(7months of age,239±30.1 kg of initial body weight,BW)were fed a diet formulated to meet the requirements for 1 kg/d of BW gain during a growth period of 98 d[20,23,24].The diet was formulated without ionophore supplementation and the composition was:615 g/kg corn silage,33 g/kg Brachiaria hay,167 g/kg dry ground corn,163g/kg soybean meal,3.6g/kg urea,0.4g/kg ammonium sulfate,and 18 g/kg mineral mixture(on a dry matter basis).All animals had ad libitum access to water throughout the experiment.Before the beginning of the test period,all bulls were weighed,dewormed,vaccinated,and numbered with individual tags[20,23,24].

    Cattle were fed using a GrowSafe automated feeding system(GrowSafe Systems Ltd.,Airdrie,Canada).The RFI(kg/d)was calculated during the growth period as the error term of the following equation:DMI=β0+βP×BW0.75+βG×ADG+ε(RFI),where DMI is the dry matter intake observed during the test period,β0is the intercept of the equation,BW0.75is the mid-test metabolic live weight,ADG is the average daily gain in weight during the test,and βPand βGare the regression coefficients of BW0.75and ADG,respectively.ADG was estimated by the linear regression coefficient of live weight as a function of the number of days in the test.Mid-test metabolic live weight was calculated by the equation BW0.75=[α+β ×(DIT/2)]0.75,where α is the intercept of the regression equation corresponding to the initial live weight,β is the linear regression coefficient corresponding to the average daily gain,and DIT is the days in test[24].

    From the original group of 126 individuals,a cohort of 27 steers(12 with negative RFI and 15 with positive RFI)were selected based on a stratified sampling method for the finishing period to increase the statistical power[25].Individuals sampled in the first stage represented the 20% most efficient and the 20% least efficient steers of the cohort(P<0.0001,Supplementary Table S1),followed by random sampling of an equal number of individuals(n=9)belonging to the non-extreme RFI group.The RFI values were significantly different(P<0.05)between animals with negative(?0.93±0.17)or positive(0.87±0.14)RFI and the steers were separated into two FE groups:negative-RFI(n-RFI,more efficient steers)and positive-RFI(p-RFI,less efficient steers),respectively.The steers averaged 22.5±0.8 mo of age and 401±42kg of BW,were confined in individual pens(4m×2m)equipped with GrowSafe automated feeding systems(GrowSafe Systems Ltd.,Airdrie,Alberta,Canada)and had ad libitum access to the diet and water.The steers were adapted to the diets,facilities,and management for 22 d followed by a period of 103 d where they received the finishing diet,formulated to meet the requirements of 1.3 kg of daily gain with a target finishing weight of at least 550 kg[20,23,24].The finishing diet was composed of 333 g/kg corn silage,17 g/kg Brachiaria hay,465 g/kg dry ground corn,163 g/kg soybean meal,6 g/kg urea,4 g/kg ammonium sulfate,and 13 g/kg mineral mixture(dry matter basis).

    After slaughter,the ruminal contents were collected and filtered through four layers of cheese cloth to separate the liquid and solid fractions.Ruminal pH was measured in the liquid fraction using a portable pH meter(pH meter HI9124,Hanna Instruments,Woonsocket,Rhode Island,EUA).Aliquots from each fraction were stored in plastic containers at?20°C for further analysis.

    Ammonia and volatile fatty acids measurement

    Ammonia concentration was determined according to Chaney and Marbach[26].Absorbance was measured at 630nm in a Spectronic 20D spectrophotometer(Thermo Fisher Scientific,Madison,WI,USA)and ammonium chloride(NH4Cl)was used as the standard.

    Quantification of organic acids was performed using cell-free supernatants of the rumen fluid samples(2.0 mL)prepared as previously described[20].The VFAs were determined in a Dionex Ultimate 3000 Dual detector HPLC(Dionex Corporation,Sunnyvale,CA,USA)equipped with a Shodex RI-101 refractive index(RI)detector and a Phenomenex Rezex ROA column(300×7.8mm)(Phenomenex Inc.Torrance,CA,USA).Analyses were performed isocratically under the following conditions:mobile phase H2SO45mmol/L,flow rate 0.7 mL/min,column temperature 45°C and injection volume 20μL.Stock solutions of the external standards were prepared as previously described[20].

    DNA extraction and sequencing

    Total genomic DNA was extracted separately from the ruminal solids and liquids(n=54)of each animal following a mechanical disruption and phenol/chloroform extraction protocol as described by Stevenson and Weimer[27].Extracted genomic DNA was quantified using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer(Thermo Scientific,Wilmington,DE).The V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using universal primers(F-GTGCCAGCMG CCGCGGTAA;R-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT)as described by Kozich et al.[28].Furthermore,the archaeal 16S rRNA was amplified using primers for the V6-V8 hypervariable region(Ar915aF-AGGAATTGGCGGGGGAGC AC,Ar1386R-GCGGTGTGTGCAAGGAGC)and fungal sequences were amplified with primers for the internal transcribed spacer 1(ITS1)region(MN100F-TCCTACCCTT TGTGAATTTG,MNGM2-CTGCGTTCTTCATCGTTG CG)as described by Kittelmann et al.[29].For Bacteria,PCR reactions consisted of 50ng template DNA,0.4μmol/L of each primer,1×Kapa Hifi HotStart Ready Mix(KAPA Biosystems,Cape Town,South Africa),and water to 25μL.For Archaea and Fungi,DNA input was increased to 100ng and primers to 1.6 μmol/L each.PCR was performed at 95 °C for 3min,95 °C for 30 s,55 °C for 30 s,72 °C for 30 s(25cycles for Bacteria and 35cycles for Archaea and Fungi),and a final extension step at 72°C for 5min[20,30,31].PCR products were purified using a PureLink Pro 96 PCR Purification Kit(Invitrogen,Carlsbad,CA,EUA)and a second PCR was performed to attach both the Illumina sequencing adapters(F - AATGATACGGCGACCACCGAGATCTACAC;R-CAAGCAGAAGACGGCATACGAGAT)and unique barcodes to facilitate multiplexing.The second PCR reaction was similar to that for the bacterial V4 regions,except that 5 μL of non-quantified PCR product was used as template DNA and 8 cycles were performed[20,30,31].PCR products were recovered by gel extraction in AquaPōr low-melt agarose(National Diagnostics,Atlanta,GA)using a Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit(Zymo Research,Irvine,CA,USA).Purified DNA was quantified using a Qubit fluorometer(Invitrogen)and equimolarly pooled to create a single sample at 1 × 109ng per μL[20,30,31].Sequencing was performed using an Illumina MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 kit for Bacteria(2×250 bp)and an Illumina MiSeq Reagent Kit v3 for Achaea and Fungi(2×300 pb)on an Illumina MiSeq(Illumina,Inc.,San Diego,CA,USA)following manufacturer’s guidelines.All DNA sequences have been deposited into the NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive(SRA)under BioProject accession number PRJNA512996.

    Sequence analysis

    Bacterial,Archaeal and Fungal sequences were processed separately using mothur(v 1.43.0)[32].Any sequences shorter than 200 bp or longer than 500 bp for Bacteria and shorter than 200 bp or longer than 600 bp for Archaea and Fungi were removed.The V4 and V6-V8 sequences of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene,respectively,were aligned using the SILVA 16S rRNA gene reference database(release 138)[33].The fungal ITS1 sequences were aligned using the UNITE database version v8.2(2020-02-04)[34]and sequences that did not align to the correct location were removed[20].To reduce computational time and account for sequencing error, identical sequences were grouped using the unique.seqs command in mothur and sequences that were different by two or fewer base pairs were considered the same and grouped using pre.cluster command.Chimeric sequences[35]and singletons(sequences that occur once in the entire dataset)were removed as they provide little usable data and are often the result of sequencing error.All sequences were grouped into operational taxonomic units(OTUs)by uncorrected pairwise distance clustering using either the furthest neighbor(Bacteria and Archaea)or average neighbor(Fungi)method with a similarity cut-off of 97%.The bacterial and archaeal OTUs were classified using the SILVA database(release 138)and fungal OTUs were classified using the UNITE database v8.2(2020-02-04),with a bootstrap cut-off of 80.Sample coverage was assessed using Good’s coverage and the relative abundance(reads/total reads in a sample)of OTUs was determined.The OTU tables were normalized using the normalize.-shared command and method=totalgroup (relative abundance x lowest number of sequences per sample).Normalized OTU tables were used to determine alpha diversity indices(Chao1,Shannon’s and Simpson’s)and for beta diversity analyses.

    Statistical analysis

    Differences in the alpha diversity indices and the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio,as well as the concentration of ammonia and organic acids of rumen samples,according to each FE group,were assessed by t-test as performed in Minitab 17.1.0(Minitab,Inc.,Pennsylvania,USA)with P<0.05 being considered significant.

    Clustering of the steers according to the composition of rumen contents was visualized using Non-metric multidimensional scaling(NMDS)plots of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity metric(beta diversity index),and non-parametric analysis of similarities(ANOSIM,number of permutation=10,000)were performed using the Past software package[36],with P-values<0.001 being considered significant.Differences in the taxonomic composition according to FE group were assessed by White’s non-parametric t-test using the Statistical Analysis of Taxonomic and Functional Profiles–STAMP v 2.1.3 software[37],with P-values<0.05 being considered significant.

    For determining biomarkers,the Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size–LEfSe[38]at the OTU level was performed using Galaxy Version 1.0(https://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/).P-values<0.05 for the factorial Kruskal-Wallis test and the pairwise Wilcoxon test were considered significant.The threshold for the logarithmic linear discrimination analysis(LDA)scores of discriminative features was 2,and the strategy for multi-class analysis was “all-against-all”.

    Prediction of metabolic functions from the ruminal bacterial microbiota was performed using the CowPI/BeefPIE tool[39]that is used with an installation of the PICRUSt software package[40].This analysis was performed in the Galaxy platform Version 0.1)(https://sharegalaxy.ibers.aber.ac.uk/?tool_id=beefpie_rstep&version=0.1&__identifer=zb2ieybu7r) using normalized OTU tables of the bacterial composition for each steer and in addition to nucleotide sequence representatives of each OTU.Comparison of the relative abundances of the predicted metabolic categories according to FE group was assessed by White’s nonparametric t-test using STAMP v 2.1.3[37].

    The correlation network of liquid and solid bacterial OTUs and ruminal fermentation variables was determined based on sequences that were detected in at least 50% of the steers classified in each FE group(minimum of 7 steers to p-RFI group and 6 steers to n-RFI group)to avoid spurious findings due to between-animal variability.This criterion was based on previous observations indicating that different species of ruminal bacteria that exhibit a heritable component have a high presence(≥ 50%)across animals[41].Spearman’s rank correlation was calculated in R(v 3.4.1,corrr package)to assess the relationship of ammonia concentration,proportions of VFAs(acetic,succinic,propionic,valeric,isovaleric,isobutyric and butyric acid),total VFA concentration and acetate-to-propionate ratio against the relative abundance of bacterial OTUs.Significant correlations(P<0.05)were visualized as a network in Cytoscape v 3.2.1[42].The networks were built using sheets with shared and exclusives correlations of each FE group.

    Results

    Sequencing

    In total,3,201,058,1,202,160 and 2,415,859 raw sequences for Bacteria,Archaea and Fungi,respectively,were generated.After trimming,quality filtering and removal of chimeras,a total of 1,727,202 high-quality bacterial,251,013 archaeal,and 1,044,332 fungal sequences were obtained.The Good’s coverage before and after normalization was>95% for the bacterial community,>99% for the archaeal community and>94% for the fungal community,indicating sufficient coverage for comparisons of sequence abundance between samples and analysis of community shifts.The summary or sequence counts and OTUs that passed the quality filter,clean up and normalization are presented in Supplementary Table S2.

    Specific bacterial OTUs are associated with the p-RFI and n-RFI phenotypes

    Alpha diversity was measured using Chao1,Simpson’s,and Shannon’s diversity indices and demonstrated that the bacterial community of Nellore steers did not vary between RFI groups(t-test,P>0.05),regardless of the ruminal phase(Table 1).Beta diversity analysis showed that the Bray-Curtis dissimilarities of the bacterial communities differed according to the ruminal phase(solid or liquid fraction)(ANOSIM,P<0.001),whereas the dissimilarity in bacterial communities between p-RFI and n-RFI did not vary significantly in the ruminal contents(Fig.1a).These results demonstrate that microbial communities in the solid and liquid rumen phases are distinct and reinforce the need for separate analyses to evaluate the contributions of the feed-attached and planktonic ruminal microbiota to FE.

    Fig.1 Non-metric multidimensional scaling(NMDS)plots of the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index for bacterial(a)archaeal(b)and fungal(c)communities in the rumen of Nellore steers.Individual points represent a rumen sample and colors represent ruminal fractions and RFI groups

    Table 1 Alpha diversity of microbial communities in the rumen of steers according to RFI groupa

    Taxonomic analysis of the ruminal bacterial community of the liquids fraction revealed 3,672 unique OTUs(mean 1,073±SD 108 per sample after normalization)that were assigned to 20 phyla,38 classes,67 orders,110 families,and 237 genera.The rumen liquid(RL)bacterial community was dominated by the phyla Firmicutes(55.74±2.17%),Bacteroidetes(20.53±1.5%)(Supplementary Fig.S1).The most abundant families included the Ruminococcaceae(21.23±1.02%),Lachnospiraceae(15.87±1.6%),Prevotellaceae(10.16±1.26%),and Christensenellaceae(5.81±1.03%)(Supplementary Fig.S2).In the rumen solids(RS),3342 unique bacterial OTUs(mean of 962±132 OTUs per sample after normalization)were assigned to 18 phyla,32 classes,62 orders,97 families,and 209 genera.Members of the phyla Firmicutes(59.17±1.65%)and Bacteroidetes(20.58±1.60%)were also dominant in the RS bacterial community(Supplementary Fig.S1),while abundant families included the Ruminococcaceae(20.57±1.91%),Lachnospiraceae(20.18±1.30%),Prevotellaceae(10.17±1.20%)and Christensenellaceae(6.65±0.94%)(Supplementary Fig.S2).

    The bacterial taxonomic composition of the animals was similar,however,the abundance of some taxonomic categories varied according to the FE.More efficient animals(n-RFI)had higher abundances(White’s nonparametric t-test,P<0.05)of order Anaeroplasmatales and Lineage I(class Elusimicrobia),family ODP1230B8–23(order Halanaerobiales),and genera Lachnospiraceae NK3A20 group,Bacteroidales RF16 group,Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group and Bacteroidetes BD2–2 in the RL.Also,the genera Desulfovibrio,horsej-a03(family Oligosphaeraceae),and the Prevotellaceae UCG-001 were more abundant in the RS of n-RFI steers,when compared to the RS of p-RFI steers(Fig.2).

    Fig.2 Taxonomic groups showing significant differences(White’s nonparametric t-test,P<0.05)in relative abundance in liquid(a)and solid(b)ruminal fractions between p-RFI and n-RFI steers.The blue bars represent the p-RFI group and the red bars represent n-RFI group.Data are expressed as relative abundance mean and the standard error

    The Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes(F/B)ratio,an index previously reported as being associated with dysbiosis or differences in phenotypes in humans,rodents,and ruminants,was significantly higher(t-test,P<0.05)in p-RFI steers than in n-RFI steers(Fig.3).In the RL fraction,the average F/B ratio was 2.90±0.07 for the p-RFI steersand 2.67±0.04 for the n-RFI steers.In the RS fraction,the average ratio was 2.99±0.08 for the p-RFI and 2.75±0.05 for the n-RFI.

    Fig.3 The Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio in liquid(RL)and solid(RS)ruminal phase,according to the RFI group.White bars represent the p-RFI steers and grey bars represent the n-RFI steers.(*)Significantly different(P<0.05)by the t-test

    A Linear discriminant analysis of Effect Size(LEfSe)showed that 47 bacterial OTUs in the RL fraction of steers were associated with FE,of which 17 were increased or exclusive in the p-RFI steers(corresponding 0.37% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 0.042% to n-RFI),while 30 were increased or exclusive in the n-RFI steers(corresponding 1.32% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 3.54% to n-RFI)(Fig.4a and Table 2). Twenty-two biomarker OTUs were identified in the RS fraction,with 12 being enriched or unique of p-RFI steers(corresponding 2.43% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 1.65% to n-RFI),whereas 10 were enriched or unique of n-RFI steers(corresponding 0.43% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 1.24% to n-RFI)(Fig.4b and Table 2).Five bacterial OTU biomarkers (Otu00118, Otu00148,Otu00163,Otu00212,Otu00314)were common to both ruminal fractions(RL and RS)and all were increased in the most efficient animals(n-RFI)(Fig.4 and Table 2).Most of these biomarkers belonged to the order Bacteroidales,including the family Prevotellaceae and genus Prevotella,as well as members of the order Clostridiales order,including the families Lachnospiraceae,Ruminococcaceae and Christensenellaceae(Fig.4 and Table 2).

    Richness and specific OTUs of the Archaeal community are associated with the p-RFI and n-RFI phenotypes

    The alpha diversity analysis of RL and RS archaeal communities demonstrated that Simpson’s and Shannon’s diversity did not vary significantly in response to RFI group(t-test P>0.05),although the Chao1 richness of both rumen fractions from n-RFI steers(45.18±11.1)was significantly greater than that found in p-RFI steers(36.22±8.12)(Table 1).Beta diversity analysis,as summarized in NMDS plots of Bray-Curtis dissimilarities,showed differences between the RL and RS communities with both groups clustering separately(ANOSIM,P<0.001).However,no differences were observed in the RL and RS archaeal communities of p-RFI and n-RFI steers(Fig.1b).

    Table 2 Relative abundance of biomarker OTUs identified by LEfSe in the rumen of steers according to RFI(Continued)

    Table 2 Relative abundance of biomarker OTUs identified by LEfSe in the rumen of steers according to RFI(Continued)

    Table 2 Relative abundance of biomarker OTUs identified by LEfSe in the rumen of steers according to RFI

    Taxonomic composition analyses of the archaeal community revealed 78 unique OTUs in the rumen contents(liquid and solid phase)of Nellore steers.All OTUs were assigned to the phylum Euryarchaeota,with 82.26±0.47% of these classifying to the family Methanobacteriacea and 15.63±0.53% assigned to the family Thermoplasmatales Incertae Sedis.The less abundant groups of ruminal archaea accounted for 1.89±0.01% of thesequences and were classified to the family Methanosarcinaceae(Supplementary Fig.S3).

    We found that 17.43±5.82% and 16.27±4.41% of the OTUs in the RL and RS,respectively,could not be assigned at the genus level(Supplementary Fig.S4).The archaeal community in the ruminal contents were dominated by members of the genus Methanobrevibacter(77.23±6% in RS),followed by Methanosphaera(3.21±1.67%)and Methanimicrococcus(1.65±1.27%)(Supplementary Fig.S4).When considering FE groups,the relative abundance of Methanimicrococcus was,on average,two-fold higher in n-RFI steers than in p-RFI steers(White’s non-parametric t-test,P<0.05)(Fig.2).Archaeal biomarker OTUs in each FE group were identified only in the rumen liquid fraction by the LEfSe analysis.The three biomarker OTUs were classified as belonging to the genus Methanobrevibacter and were either increased or exclusive of p-RFI steers(2.82% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 0.24% to n-RFI)(Fig.5 and Table 2).

    Fig.5 Biomarker archaeal OTUs identified by Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size(LEfSe,P<0.05)in the liquid rumen fraction of Nellore steers showing low(p-RFI)or high(n-RFI)feed efficiency.Red bars represent enriched or exclusive OTUs in animals with low feed efficiency(p-RFI)

    Specific high abundance fungal OTU are associated with the p-RFI and n-RFI phenotypes

    The fungal intra-community diversity(alpha diversity)did not vary between RFI groups(t-test,P>0.05)(Table 1).Beta diversity analysis(Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index)represented on an NMDS plot showed that the fungal communities from the two efficiency groups(p-RFI and n-RFI)and ruminal fractions(RL and RS)were not significantly different(ANOSIM,P>0.001)(Fig.1c).

    Taxonomic composition analyses of the fungal community revealed 1,795 unique OTUs in the rumen contents(RL and RS).All OTUs classified were assigned to the family Neocallimastigaceae and nearly 25.46±10.35% and 16.21±4.55% of the OTUs in the RL and RS,respectively,could not be assigned to the genus level.In decreasing order of relative abundance,the assigned genera were Caecomyces,Piromyces,Orpinomyces,Cyllamyces,Neocallimastix,Anaeromyces,and Buwchfawromyces(Supplementary Table S3),with the Buwchfawromyces genus being almost five-fold higher in the RS fraction of n-RFI steers than in the p-RFI steers(White’s non-parametric ttest,P<0.05)(Fig.2).

    Our LEfSe showed that 14 fungal OTUs in the RL fraction of steers were associated with FE phenotype,of which 2 were increased in the p-RFI steers(corresponding to 1.50% of the relative abundance in p-RFI steers and 0.24% in n-RFI steers),while 12 were increased or exclusive to n-RFI steers(corresponding to 10.50% of the relative abundance in p-RFI steers and 20.94% in n-RFI steers)(Fig.6a and Table 2).In the RS phase,12 biomarker OTUs were identified,all enriched or unique to n-RFI steers(corresponding 8.08% of relative abundance to p-RFI and 22.11% to n-RFI)(Fig.6b and Table 2).Two biomarker fungal OTUs(Piromyces genus)were common to both ruminal fractions(RL and RS):Otu000004,which was among the most abundant OUT in the fungal community and was enriched in the n-RFI steers,and Otu000197,which was only detected in n-RFI steers(Fig.6 and Table 2).Among the 24 fungal biomarkers identified,7 belonged to the genus Piromyces,5 to unclassified Neocallimastigaceae,3 to Caecomyces communis,one to the Orpinomyces,and one to the Neocallimastix;7 OTUs could not be classified at any taxonomical level(Fungi unclassified)(Fig.6 and Table 2).

    Fig.6 Biomarker fungal OTUs identified by Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size(LEfSe,P<0.05)in the liquid(a)and solid(b)fractions of rumen contents from Nellore steers showing low(p-RFI)or high(n-RFI)feed efficiency.Red bars represent enriched or exclusive OTUs in animals with higher feed efficiency(n-RFI),while green bars represent enriched or exclusive OTUs in animals with lower feed efficiency(p-RFI)

    Functional prediction and correlations between the bacterial community and ruminal fermentation products

    To gain a better understanding of the functional role of the rumen bacterial community,as it relates to FE groups,we performed a prediction of metabolic functions for both solid and liquid phases and found 244 functional categories between the FE groups(Supplementary Table S4).No significant differences were detected for the predicted metabolic functions of Nellore steers with distinct FE phenotypes.These results are in agreement with the lack of differences in the quantification of rumen fermentation products between FE groups observed in this study.We also found that the molar proportion of acetic,propionic,succinic,butyric,isobutyric,valeric,and isovaleric acids,acetate-to-propionate ratio,total concentration of short-chain volatile fatty acids(VFA),ammonia concentration,and ruminal pH did not vary between the p-RFI and n-RFI steers(t-test,P>0.05)(Supplementary Table S5).

    However,our microbial-metabolite network analysis revealed significant associations(positive and negative)between the 638 bacterial OTUs in the RL fraction and the 544 OTUs in the RS fraction with ruminal fermentation products(e.g.,VFAs and ruminal NH3),which were represented by correlations(nodes connected by an edge)with specific fermentation products(Fig.7).In the RL phase,193 p-RFI steer OTUs,183 n-RFI steer OTUs,and 44 OTUs shared by both groups were positively associated with at least one ruminal fermentation product.The p-RFI steers had nearly two times more OTUs correlated to the concentration of acetic acid,isobutyric acid,and ruminal pH than the n-RFI steers.However,the opposite was observed for ammonia concentration and total VFA in the n-RFI steers,where the number of OTUs correlating with these parameters was higher compared to the OTUs in the RL phase of the p-RFI steers(Fig.7).In the RS phase 183 and 180 bacterial OTUs from the p-RFI and n-RFI steers,respectively,and 57 OTUs shared by both groups were positively associated with at least one ruminal variable.Isobutyric acid and ruminal pH were more correlated with OTUs from the p-RFI steers than the n-RFI steers,while ammonia concentration was more correlated with OTUs from n-RFI steers(Fig.7).

    Analysis of negative correlations between microbial taxa and ruminal fermentation products(e.g.,VFAs,NH3)revealed that 198 OTUs from p-RFI steers and 200 OTUs from n-RFI steers,as well as 39 OTUs shared by both groups,were negatively associated with at least one biochemical parameter.The concentration of propionic acid and total VFAs was more negatively correlated with OTUs in p-RFI steers,while a greater number of negative associations were observed for isovaleric acid and ruminal pH and taxa identified in n-RFI steers(Fig.7).In the solid fraction,there were 148 OTUs in p-RFI steers and 163 OTUs in n-RFI steers,in addition to 35 OTUs from both FE groups,associated with at least one ruminal fermentation parameter.Total VFA was negatively correlated with more OTUs in the p-RFI steers than in n-RFI steers,while ruminal pH was more negatively correlated with OTUs linked to the n-RFI steers(Fig.7).

    Fig.7 Correlation network between liquid and solid bacterial OTUs and ruminal fermentation variables according to each RFI group.The edges represent significant associations,as determined by Spearman’s rank correlation(P<0.05).These analyses were performed using OTUs that were shared by at least 50% of the steers in each feed efficiency group.Biochemical parameters:molar proportion of acetic,Ace;propionic,Prop;succinic,Suc;butyric,But;isobutyric,Isobut;valeric,Val;and isovaleric acids,Isoval;acetate-to-propionate ratio,Ace/Prop;total concentration of these volatile fatty acids,VFAt;ammonia concentration,NH3;and ruminal pH)

    Among the most abundant OTUs showing positive or negative correlations with fermentation parameters,we observed a predominance of OTUs from genera in the families Prevotellaceae,Ruminococcaceae,Rikenellaceae,Lachnospiraceae,and Christensenellaceae in the bacterial communities of both RL and RS phases(Supplementary Tables S6-S9).Taxonomic differences were also observed between the most abundant OTUs correlated with steers in the p-RFI or n-RFI groups.The most abundant OTUs that were positively correlated with total VFAs were classified to the genus Papillibacter,Treponema,and the families Bacteroidales, Ruminococcaceae, Prevotellaceae UCG-004,and unclassified Lachnospiraceae in the p-RFI steers,while in the n-RFI steers the most abundant OTUs were assigned to the order Bacteroidales BS1 and S24–7,the families Rikenellaceae RC9,Anaerolineaceae,Christensenellaceae R-7,Lachnospiraceae XPB1014,and the genera Prevotella,Phocaeicola,and Anaerotruncus(Supplementary Table S6).

    Discussion

    Here we investigated the composition of the ruminal microbial communities of high and low FE Nellore beef cattle raised under tropical conditions to identify if specific ruminal microbiota are correlated to FE.Although the steers in this study were classified into different FE groups based on their residual feed intake(RFI),a measure that has the advantage of being independent of animal growth and weight[43,44],we note that RFI has some limitations since it depends on the confinement of the herd for long periods(≥90d),requires daily recording of feed consumption and feed refusals,and weight assessments of the animals.In addition,if animals are housed in groups,individual feed intake can only be verified using specialized equipment(eg:GrowSafe).In tropical countries such as Brazil,limitations are accentuated by beef cattle that are raised predominantly on pasture and very few farmers have access to the infrastructure needed to measure RFI on a commercial scale.

    Our study demonstrates that Nellore steers with a lower FE harbor a ruminal microbiota with an increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes(F/B)ratio.Changes in the overall composition of the gut microbiota reflecting an increased F/B ratio have been implicated in certain animal phenotypes,including higher fat deposition in the blood and tissues of humans and mice[45]and increased milk fat in dairy cows[10].Nonetheless,differences in the F/B ratio can not be generalized across animal studies as relative abundances might be influenced by various factors,such as unbalanced sampling,sample processing methods,inter-individual variation,diet composition and feed additives,resulting in conflicting results[14,46,47].

    We also identified a higher relative abundance(0.13%)of bacteria within the family Peptostreptococcaceae(phylum Firmicutes)in the rumen of low efficient animals(p-RFI steers).Despite their low abundance in the rumen,members of this group have been associated with low nitrogen retention in Nellore steers[48].This family includes members of the hyper ammonia-producing bacteria(HAB)[49],which have exceptionally high deamination activity and are thought to contribute to ammonia overflow and inneficient nitrogen retention in ruminants[50].Although no differences in ruminal ammonia nitrogen were observed between the p-RFI and n-RFI steers in the current study,urinary N excretion and N retention deserve further investigation in future studies.

    Our results also revealed specific OTUs belonging to the families Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae and the genus Prevotella that are associated with both n-RFI(more efficient)and p-RFI(less efficient)steers(Table 2 and Supplementary Table S3).These taxa are among the most dominant bacteria in the rumen microbiome and show remarkable functional and genetic diversity,occupying various ecological niches in the rumen ecosystem[51,52].For example,the genus Prevotella is one of the most abundant taxa in the rumen of cattle and contains numerous metabolically versatile bacterial species that can grow on starch,protein,peptides,hemicellulose,and pectin[27].Our data support previous observations indicating that members of these microbial groups can be both positively and negatively correlated with FE in beef and dairy cattle[2,12,16,53].Importantly,bacteria in the family Lachnospiraceae appear to have greater relative abundance in Nellore steers with low nitrogen retention and in beef cattle showing p-RFI phenotype[48,54],and a significant negative correlation was also reported for the Ruminococcaceae in the microbiomes of inefficient Holstein cows[2].

    These findings indicate that some microbial taxa in the n-RFI animals may contribute more efficiently to the metabolism and energy utilization of dietary components.For example,Megasphaera elsdenii and Coprococcus catus were associated with greater production of butyrate and propionate in the rumen microbiome of efficient Holstein cows[2]and functional prediction of bacterial OTUs related to feed efficiency in beef steers indicated a higher abundance of transporters for the uptake of nutrients[19].In addition,studies that evaluated the rumen microbiota of Bos taurus reported that five Prevotella OTUs were more abundant in p-RFI cows and seven OTUs more abundant in n-RFI cows,suggesting that the effects on the host for these organisms are species/OTU-specific[12].Moreover,Chiquette et al.[55]demonstrated that inoculation of Prevotella into the rumen of dairy cows leads to decreased lactate production and increased milk fat yield.In contrast,Jami et al.[10]found a strong and significant negative correlation between the abundance of Prevotella and milk fat production in Israeli Holstein Friesian lactating cows.More recently,Brooke et al.[56]reported that Prevotella copri was the most highly enriched OTU in the fecal microbiota of high FE beef steers,accounting for 3.0% of the relative abundance in high-efficiency animals and only 0.14% relative abundance in low-efficiency steers.These results suggest that specific taxa might be positively correlated with rumen fermentation variables in highefficiency steers and could serve as potential biomarkers for FE in Nellore cattle,similar to the findings reported for Bos taurus cows.

    Although no differences were observed in the predicted functional profile of the rumen bacterial community,our analyses show that different bacterial OTUs are correlated with individual fermentation products for each FE group,and most of these OTUs belong to the same taxonomic groups.Previously,Guan and coworkers reported significantly higher concentrations of butyrate and valerate in the rumen of n-RFI steers,but these changes in VFA concentrations were not linked to specific rumen microbes[13].Taken together,these findings reinforce the idea that FE is a complex trait with specific ruminal bacteria potentially having different contributions to rumen metabolism and host physiology linked to the efficiency of feed utilization.Recent studies using culture-dependent and culture-independent(e.g.RNA-seq)methods have sought to improve the characterization of functional groups involved in ruminal fermentation,thus expanding our understanding of their role in this ecosystem[50,57,58].

    In addition to the complex bacterial community,which is responsible for hydrolyzing non-structural and structural carbohydrates,proteins,peptides,amino amides,and lipids into VFAs,ammonia,hydrogen,and CO2,the archaeal community also plays important a role in the energy retention balance in ruminants,serving as an electron sink that drives the direction of ruminal fermentation[59].Our results indicate that p-RFI Nellore steers exhibit a lower archaeal richness in their rumen,suggesting a more specialized archaeal community with different affinities for H2compared to the n-RFI steers.However,it is important to note that methane emissions were not measured in this study,and the alpha diversity indices(e.g.,Shannon,Simpson)did not differ between methanogenic communities in n-RFI and p-RFI steers.This is in contrast to published studies that report different outcomes for the compositional variation of methanogenic communities and the abundance of archaea in low and high FE cattle[9,14,15,59–61].The discrepancies among studies is likely because methane production is a complex process involving various members of the rumen microbial community(e.g.,bacteria,protozoa,fungi)that generate the main substrates for methanogenesis,such as H2and CO2[60].

    In agreement with results reported for Bos taurus[14,18],our findings reveal that Methanobrevibacter was the most abundant genus of archaea in the rumen of Nellore steers,followed by Methanosphaera and Methanimicrococcus.It is also significant that the genus Methanobrevibacter was increased in p-RFI steers.These methanogenic archaea use the hydrogenotrophic pathway for methane production and utilize H2or formic acid as electron donors[62].Although some ruminal archaea(e.g.members of the order Methanosarcinales and the genus Methanosphaera)that use the methylotrophic or the acetoclastic pathways were also found in our study,we are unable to speculate about the relationship between different methane production pathways and FE in the Nellore steers.

    The anaerobic fungi are long thought to play an important role in fiber degradation in the rumen and are recognized as one of the first colonizers of lignocellulosic substrates in ruminant diets[63].Because the fungal mycelia can penetrate and physically disrupt feed particles,more surface area is exposed for microbial colonization,thereby improving degradation of the plant biomass[64].Our analysis of the fungal community shows no differences in beta diversity between the solid and liquid fractions,indicating that the fungal populations attached to the feed particles are similar to those in the planktonic state.To our knowledge,this is the first work describing the structure and diversity of the anaerobic fungi community in the rumen solid and liquid fractions of Nellore cattle.

    Our fungal taxonomic analysis identified the genus Buwchfawromyces as being more highly distributed in the RS fraction of the more FE steers.Buwchfawromyces is a new genus of anaerobic fungi belonging to the order Neocallimastigales(phylum Neocallimastigomycota)that was isolated from fecal samples of buffalo,sheep,cattle,and horses[65].This fungus produces a monocentric thallus,spherical to ovoid sporangia,and shows an extensive rhizoidal system.However,little information is available about its physiology and further studies are warranted to investigate the metabolic potential of the isolated strains.

    A more detailed analysis of the fungal OTUs revealed that the Otu000004,classified to the Piromyces genus,was present in high proportions(varying on average from 4.42% to 18.73%)in the RL and RS fractions in both FE groups,and was significantly more abundant in the high efficient steers(n-RFI),relative to low efficient steers(p-RFI).Wang et al.[66]observed that inoculation of Piromyces sp.CN6 CGMC C 14449,isolated from the rumen of Xinong Saanen dairy goats,increased the in vitro digestibility of dry matter,neutral detergent fiber,and acid detergent fiber in maize silage.This emphasizes the need for continued efforts aiming at isolating and characterizing rumen anaerobic fungi that could be associated with FE in beef cattle,including in Nellore steers.These fungal populations could help improve the utilization of insoluble substrates,especially in ruminants fed forage-rich diets[63],such as the Nellore cattle that are raised mostly on grasses in the tropics.

    Conclusions

    The findings reported here provide insights into the specific differences in the bacterial,archaeal,and fungal ruminal communities of Nellore steers with high and low FE phenotypes.Individuals with a larger relative abundance of Bacteroidetes and lower relative abundance of Firmicutes and metanogenic archaea were more efficient at feed utilization.We have identified some candidate biomarkers representing important functional groups involved in the ruminal fermentation of dietary compounds.However,due to the intrinsic inter-and intraindividual variation in microbiota and the complexity of animal traits such as feed efficiency,follow-up validation using larger cohorts of cattle will be needed to corroborate these findings.Future studies,including analysis of the genetic and functional capabilities of rumen microorganisms using approaches such as metagenomics,metatranscriptomics,metaproteomics,and metabolomics can provide a greater understanding of the relationship between the ruminal microbiota and FE.In addition,efforts targeting the isolation,characterization,and quantification of ruminal strains that vary in abundance and diversity between n-RFI and p-RFI Nellore steers will be of value to understand the metabolic attributes and ecological functions of microorganisms with potential causal roles in the FE of beef cattle.

    Abbreviations

    ADG:Average daily gain;BW:Body weight;FE:Feed efficiency;CEUAP/UFV:Universidade Federal de Vi?osa Ethics Committee on Production Animal Use;CEUA-IZ:Instituto de Zootecnia Ethics Committee on Animal Use;DMI:Dry matter intake;F/B:Firmicutes to bacteroidetes;ITS1:Internal transcribed spacer 1;LDA:Logarithmic Linear Discrimination Analysis;LEfSe:Linear discriminant analysis effect size;NMDS:Non-metric multidimensional scaling;n-RFI:Negative-RFI;OTU:Operational taxonomic unit;PICRUSt:Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States;p-RFI:Positive-RFI;RFI:Residual feed intake;RL:Rumen liquid;RS:Rumen solids;SD:Standard deviation;SRA:Sequence Read Archive;STAMP:Statistical Analysis of Taxonomic and Functional Profiles;VFA:Volatile fatty acids

    Supplementary Information

    The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00599-7.

    Additional file 1.Supplementary Table S1.Residual feed intake(RFI)of the 129 Nellore steers evaluated in this study.Supplementary Table S2.Summary of sequencing data(Bacteria,Archaea and Fungi)derived from ruminal contents of Nellore steers according to ruminal phase and RFI group.Supplementary Fig.S1.Ruminal bacterial composition at the phyla level of rumen liquids and rumen solids samples.Supplementary Fig.S2.Ruminal bacterial composition at the family level of rumen liquids and rumen solids samples.Supplementary Fig.S3.Composition of the ruminal archaea at the class,order and family levels.Supplementary Fig.S4.Ruminal archaeal composition at the genus level of rumen liquids and rumen solids samples.Supplementary Table S3.Ruminal fungal composition at genus-level according to RFI group.Supplementary Table S4.Relative abundance(%)of the functional categories predicted for the bacterial microbiota in liquid and solid ruminal fractions of Nellore steers showing high(n-RFI)and low(p-RFI)feed efficiency.Supplementary Table S5.Fermentation profile of the ruminal liquid of Nellore steers according to RFI group.Supplementary Table S6.Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial OTUs showing positive correlation with ruminal fermentation parameters in p-RFI steers.Supplementary Table S7.Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial OTUs showing positive correlation with ruminal fermentation parameters in n-RFI steers.Supplementary Table S8.Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial OTUs showing negative correlation with ruminal fermentation parameters in p-RFI steers.Supplementary Table S9.Relative abundance of the most abundant bacterial OTUs showing negative correlation with ruminal fermentation parameters in n-RFI steers.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank the IZ staff for their support and help to handle the animals and Joseph Skarlupka(Suen laboratory)for his supporting laboratory/sequencing analysis.We also thank Sofia M.Moreira,Letícia Elisa Rossi and Helena Santiago Lima for technical assistance with data analysis and figure formatting.

    Authors’contributions

    DRGL,GS,ED,and HCM,conceived,and designed the experiments.GS,MEZM,SFMB,ED,MSD,and HCM provided experimental and laboratory resources.DRGL,MSD and HCM conducted sample collection and DNA extraction.DRGL,CBPB,and AJL performed library construction and sequencing.DRGL,TAOM,AJL,IZC,GS,and HCM conducted data analyses and interpretation of results.DRGL and HCM wrote the manuscript.AJL,GS,MSD,and ED reviewed and edited the manuscript.All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    This study was supported by Funda??o de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais–FAPEMIG[grant number APQ-02171-15],Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico –CNPq[grant number PVE 313792/2014–3],Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior–CAPES/Proex PPGMBA/UFV[grant number 0001]and the Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Ciência Animal– INCT-CA.This work was also supported by a traineeship from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health[grant number T32AI55397]to ALR.

    Availability of data and materials

    All DNA sequences have been deposited in the NCBI’s Sequence Read Archive(SRA-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra)under BioProject accession number PRJNA512996.

    Declarations

    Ethics approval

    All animal work was approved by the Universidade Federal de Vi?osa Ethics Committee on Production Animal Use(CEUAP/UFV),under protocol 026/15 and by the Instituto de Zootecnia Ethics Committee on Animal Use(CEUAIZ),under protocol 213–15.All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Author details

    1Departamento de Microbiologia,Universidade Federal de Vi?osa,Vi?osa,MG 36570-900,Brazil.2Departamento de Zootecnia,Universidade Federal de Vi?osa,Vi?osa,Minas Gerais,Brazil.3Department of Bacteriology,University of Wisconsin-Madison,Madison,WI,USA.4Departamento de Bioquímia e Biologia Molecular,Universidade Federal de Vi?osa,Vi?osa,Minas Gerais,Brazil.5Instituto de Zootecnia,Centro APTA Bovinos de Corte,Sert?ozinho,S?o Paulo,Brazil.

    Received:29 December 2020 Accepted:7 May 2021

    亚洲18禁久久av| 久久草成人影院| 99热这里只有精品一区| 亚洲无线观看免费| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 亚洲18禁久久av| 久久亚洲真实| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 少妇丰满av| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 黄色配什么色好看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 99热6这里只有精品| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 日本黄大片高清| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 老女人水多毛片| av福利片在线观看| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 内射极品少妇av片p| 日本五十路高清| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 91狼人影院| 精品人妻1区二区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 美女高潮的动态| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 丁香欧美五月| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 免费在线观看日本一区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 校园春色视频在线观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 97碰自拍视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 嫩草影院新地址| 性色avwww在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 日韩av在线大香蕉| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| av国产免费在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 欧美日韩黄片免| 免费高清视频大片| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产视频内射| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 悠悠久久av| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久中文看片网| 久久亚洲真实| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 69av精品久久久久久| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲av熟女| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 香蕉av资源在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 99热6这里只有精品| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产成人福利小说| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 免费高清视频大片| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 黄色配什么色好看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 少妇高潮的动态图| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 九色国产91popny在线| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产精品野战在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲成人久久性| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 高清在线国产一区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 免费观看精品视频网站| 少妇丰满av| 欧美色视频一区免费| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 99久国产av精品| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 亚洲不卡免费看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 直男gayav资源| ponron亚洲| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美日本视频| 波多野结衣高清作品| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 99久国产av精品| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 嫩草影院入口| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 久久中文看片网| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va | 很黄的视频免费| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国产乱人视频| 久久6这里有精品| 色av中文字幕| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 有码 亚洲区| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 如何舔出高潮| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲av美国av| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲美女黄片视频| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 在线a可以看的网站| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 免费看光身美女| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 精品久久久久久,| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 嫩草影院精品99| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| xxxwww97欧美| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美zozozo另类| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 天堂动漫精品| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲精品在线美女| 嫩草影院新地址| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 黄色一级大片看看| 热99在线观看视频| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 天堂网av新在线| 日韩中字成人| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 成人三级黄色视频| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 免费观看精品视频网站| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 久久午夜福利片| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产黄片美女视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| a在线观看视频网站| 99热这里只有是精品50| 永久网站在线| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 极品教师在线视频| 日本成人三级电影网站| 亚洲av成人av| 国产视频内射| 波野结衣二区三区在线| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 最新中文字幕久久久久| aaaaa片日本免费| 九九在线视频观看精品| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲无线在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 亚洲在线观看片| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 亚洲18禁久久av| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 精品久久久久久成人av| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 午夜影院日韩av| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 97热精品久久久久久| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 悠悠久久av| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 九色国产91popny在线| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| av中文乱码字幕在线| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产av不卡久久| 国产精品永久免费网站| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 久久久久国内视频| 久久久久久久久中文| 香蕉av资源在线| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 综合色av麻豆| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 免费看光身美女| 嫩草影视91久久| 日本免费a在线| 久久久精品大字幕| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 欧美3d第一页| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 黄色女人牲交| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 精品久久久久久久末码| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 免费看日本二区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 日本免费a在线| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 禁无遮挡网站| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 极品教师在线视频| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 91在线观看av| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| av中文乱码字幕在线| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲片人在线观看| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 午夜免费激情av| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 简卡轻食公司| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 日本三级黄在线观看| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | 亚洲黑人精品在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 午夜视频国产福利| 天堂动漫精品| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 亚洲激情在线av| 久久伊人香网站| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 综合色av麻豆| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 变态另类丝袜制服| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 色av中文字幕| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 18+在线观看网站| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产综合懂色| 综合色av麻豆| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 欧美在线黄色| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 黄色一级大片看看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲激情在线av| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 亚洲av一区综合| av福利片在线观看| 国产真实乱freesex| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲第一电影网av| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| www.色视频.com| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 黄色女人牲交| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| aaaaa片日本免费| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 在线看三级毛片| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 国产日本99.免费观看| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 一本一本综合久久| 美女免费视频网站| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 99国产精品一区二区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 97热精品久久久久久| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产熟女xx| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品人妻1区二区| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 午夜免费激情av| 丁香欧美五月| 丁香六月欧美| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 午夜福利18| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 日本五十路高清| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 极品教师在线免费播放| 国产精品国产高清国产av| www.www免费av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 1024手机看黄色片| 午夜福利在线在线| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 草草在线视频免费看| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 精品久久久久久,| 观看免费一级毛片| 舔av片在线| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久性视频一级片| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 免费看a级黄色片|