• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparison of perioperative parameters in one-handed rotational phacoemulsification versus conventional phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

    2021-12-17 02:43:22SamueleGigliolaGiancarloSborgiaAlfredoNiroCarmelaPalmisanoPasqualePuzoGianluigiGiulianiLuigiSborgiaDarioSistoValentinaPastoreClaudioFurinoRossellaDonghiaAlessandraSborgiaFrancescoBosciaGiovanniAlessio
    International Journal of Ophthalmology 2021年12期

    Samuele Gigliola, Giancarlo Sborgia, Alfredo Niro, Carmela Palmisano, Pasquale Puzo,Gianluigi Giuliani, Luigi Sborgia, Dario Sisto, Valentina Pastore, Claudio Furino,Rossella Donghia, Alessandra Sborgia, Francesco Boscia, Giovanni Alessio

    1Eye Clinic, Department of Medical Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari, Bari 70124, Italy

    2Eye Clinic, Hospital “SS. Annunziata”, ASL Taranto, Taranto 74121, Italy

    3National Institute of Gastroenterology “S. de Bellis” Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte 70013, Italy

    Abstract

    ● KEYWORDS: cataract surgery; phaco-rolling; onehanded phacoemulsification; Divide et Conquer;femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery

    INTRODUCTION

    Since the 1960s when phacoemulsification was invented[1],several modifications of small-incision cataract surgical technique were designed[2]including the “Divide et Conquer”[3], which made surgery safer and more efficient.Güellet al[4]and Jardineet al[5]described innovative bimanual approaches called “phaco-rolling technique” and endocapsular carousel technique, respectively, to reduce phacoemulsification time and energy during cataract extraction.

    In the last years, the use of femtosecond laser has been expanding in cataract surgery with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) which has automated different steps of surgery[6]reducing the phacoemulsification time and the magnitude of ultrasound energy delivery[7-9]thus leading to a safer surgery with lower corneal endothelial cell loss (ECL)and corneal edema in the early postoperative period when compared to standard technique[10-12].

    However, some studies found comparable results in corneal ECL and corneal edema[13-15]macular thickness[16]and distance visual acuity[17-18]comparing conventional phacoemulsification technique with FLACS.

    On the basis of previous experiences on phaco-roll techniques[4-5], we designed a surgical approach called “onehanded rotational phacoemulsification technique” (one-handed phaco-roll)[19]that potentially can improve the efficiency and safety of manual procedure, reducing technical parameters including ultrasound time and phacoemulsification power, as risk factors of damage on intraocular structures[20-21].

    So, in this study we analyzed and compared safety and efficacy of one-handed phaco-roll with “Divide et Conquer”, as conventional approach, and FLACS.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS

    Ethical Approval The study followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institution’s Review Board of Eye Clinic, Department of Ophthalmology,University of Bari, Italy. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before all invasive procedures.

    We conducted a retrospective, comparative, cohort study on patients with uncomplicated cataract underwent cataract surgery between April 2019 and July 2019 in Eye Clinic,Department of Ophthalmology, University of Bari, Italy. All surgeries were performed by the same experienced surgeon(Alessio G). Inclusion criteria were: signed informed consent,age older than 50y, transparent cornea, cataract grade from 2-3 (nuclear opacity, NO2-NO3; nuclear color, NC2-NC3)according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III)[22]. Exclusion criteria were: a history of intraocular surgery or trauma; minimal and maximal K-values of the central 3 mm zone that differ by more than 5 D; a maximum K-value that exceeds 50 D; a minimum K-value of less than 37 D; corneal disease or pathology, such as corneal scaring or opacity;endothelial cell density (ECD) <1300 cells/mm2; poorly dilating pupils of less than 6 mm or any other defect of the pupil; manifest glaucoma and ocular hypertension; mature or complicated cataract (e.g., lens subluxation, traumatic cataract,pseudoexfoliation syndrome); any ocular comorbidities such as uveitis, severe non proliferative or proliferative diabetic retinopathy, macular degeneration, current infections.

    Patient data (age, gender, medical history) were reviewed.Each eligible patient underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA)assessed on standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) charts[23], slit-lamp biomicroscopy, cataract density objective evaluation using Scheimpflug imaging(The Pentacam HR, Type 70900, Oculus, Germany), ocular biometry determined using partial coherence interferometry IOL Master 500 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), specular microscopy performed using a noncontact specular microscope SP-1P (Topcon Europe Medical B.V., the Netherlands),Goldman applanation tonometry, dilated fundus evaluation and optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans using 6×6 radial scans protocol by OCT AVANTI RTVUE XR (OPTOVUE,Fremont, CA, USA).

    Patients were divided into three groups according to the surgical technique performed to treat cataract: one-handed phaco-roll technique (Group 1), “Divide et Conquer” technique(Group 2) or FLACS technique (Group 3).

    Intraoperative parameters recorded by the phacoemulsification machine and subsequently evaluated were: ultrasound time (USt, s), effective phaco time (EPt, s), aspiration time (s), surgical time (min), phacoemulsification (phaco-)power (%), balanced salt solution (BSS?) used (mL) and cumulative dissipated energy (CDE). CDE, as a value for phaco energy, was calculated as [total phacoemulsification time (min)×average phacoemulsification power]+[torsional time (s)×0.4×average torsional amplitude (%)]. Torsional time and torsional amplitude were recorded to allow us to calculate CDE but they were not included in the intraoperative parameters. The factor 0.4 represents approximate reduction of heat dissipated at the incision as compared with non-torsional phaco[24-25].

    Clinical outcomes including ECD (cell/mm2), ECL (%)calculated as (ECD preoperatively-ECD postoperatively/ECD preoperatively)×100, central corneal thickness (CCT, μm),and central macular thickness (CMT, μm) were assessed preand post-operatively at 1mo. ECD was analyzed using three photographs of each cornea taken and analysed automatically by the Image-Net imaging system (V.4.0; Topcon). A blinded observer chose the clearest photographs which was analyzed.The cell count was manually corrected according to the gold standard[26-27]. BCVA was measured at baseline and 1mo postoperatively. ETDRS values were converted into Snellen fraction and then in logMAR values for statistical analysis.Safety evaluation has also been performed as regards incidence of intra- and post-operative complications and intraocular pressure (IOP) changes.

    Surgical Technique Preoperatively, all patients were treated with topical ofloxacin and bromfenac four and three times a day, respectively, for the two days preceding the surgery.Mydriasert ophthalmic insert [combination of phenylephrine hydrochlorid (5.4 mg) and tropicamide (0.28 mg)] was preoperatively positioned in the fornix to reach pupil dilation.Topical anesthesia was realized in all cases. Topical 5%povidone-iodine solution was instilled before and after surgery.The same ocular viscoelastic device (OVD; IAL-F?, Bausch& Lomb, NY, USA) was used for all three groups. The same phacoemulsification machine (INFINITI?Vision System Alcon Laboratories, Inc, Fort Worth, Tex, USA) was used for all surgery.

    After the intraocular lens (IOL) implant into the capsular bag, the OVD was removed, a solution of 0.1 mL cefuroxime(Aprokam?) was introduced in the anterior chamber and finally a hydro-suture of the corneal incision was performed.Some parameters of phacoemulsification machine for different surgical phases were equally standardized for all groups: for cortical removal: vacuum, 350 mm Hg; aspiration, 30 mL/min; bottle height, 85 cm; for polish: vacuum, 20 mm Hg; aspiration,15 mL/min, bottle height, 80 cm; for OVD removal: vacuum,600 mm Hg; aspiration, 40 mL/min; bottle height, 80 cm. After surgery the therapy with corticosteroid-antibiotic combination eye drops and bromfenac eye drops with tapered frequency was administered to all patients.

    One-Handed Phaco-Roll Technique A clear corneal sutureless 2.4 mm temporal incision was performed with a precalibrated knife. The anterior chamber was filled with OVD. No paracentesis was performed. A continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC) of 5.5 mm was performed.Then hydrodissection and hydrodelineation with BSS?were performed. A complete rotation of the lens within the capsular bag was performed. Subsequently a 15-degree phaco-tip was placed on the lens equator beside the capsulorhexis edge and in contact with the nucleus-epinucleus surface, so the nucleus was turned on its horizontal axis within the capsular bag.

    Using high aspiration parameters including vacuum of 450 mm Hg and aspiration rate of 37 mL/min allowed to keep the probe tip occluded on the edge of the lens and to roll the nucleus as well as a spinning top. The tip was tilted to 45-degree toward the lens center. The nucleus aspiration moved from the periphery toward the center. The endo-nucleus was aspirated in the center of the bag and the epi-nucleus was aspirated. Then surgeon performed the irrigation/aspiration of residual cortex followed by the posterior capsule polishing[19].

    “Divide et Conquer” Technique A 2.4 mm single temporal incision was performed using a precalibrated knife. After the CCC was created, hydrodissection, lens segmentation and other phases were performed using the “Divide et Conquer”approach[3].

    FLACS Technique The Ziemer femtosecond laser (Ziemer Femto LVD Z8, Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems AG, Port,Switzerland) was used and the treatment was customized on each patient[28].

    A 2.4 mm clear corneal tunnel (distance to limbus 0.2 mm,width 2.4 mm, entrance angle 40°, bend angle 56°, position angle 180° and 140°, posterior safety distance 0.7 mm, anterior corneal offset 300 microns, posterior corneal offset 440 microns, corneal depth of bend point 45%, velocity 3 mm/s,lens power 150%, spot density HD-10), anterior capsulotomy(diameter 5.5 mm, laser power 90%, velocity 50 mm/s,resection heigh 0.9 mm, later safety distance 0.5 mm, spot density HD-10) and lens fragmentation (diameter 5.8 mm,laser power 120%, segments 16, velocity 8 mm/s, later safety distance 0.5 mm, anterior safety distance 0.6 mm posterior safety distance 0.8 mm, spot density HD-5) were created under OCT image control. Then, the surgeon completed the procedure with a gentle hydrodissection, phacoemulsification of fragmentated lens, automated irrigation/aspiration to remove the cortex and IOL implant.

    Statistical Analysis This study was designed to show the differences of intraoperative parameters and clinical outcomes between one-handed phaco-roll technique and each of the other two techniques, “Divide et Conquer” and FLACS. The calculation of the power (1-β) was post-hoc based on the observed value of the effect size. The most important technical parameter considering to calculate the power is the CDE.

    Mean and standard deviation (mean±SD) for continuous variables and frequency (%) for categorical were used as indices of centrality and dispersion. To test the difference between two categories of surgical interventions, Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney) test was used for continuous scale, when not normally distributed and Chi-square test for categorical variables. When testing the null hypothesis of no association, the probability level ofαerror, at two tailed, was 0.05. All the statistical computations were made using STATA 16.0, StataCorp software 2019. Stata Statistical Software:Release 16. CollegeStation, TX: StataCorp LLC.

    RESULTS

    A total of 69 patients (46 females and 23 males) were enrolled and equally divided into the study groups according to our inclusion/exclusion criteria. The overall mean age of patients was 74.5±5.8y (range 56-84y). The mean age was significantly different among the Groups 1 and 2 (P=0.004). No significant difference in cataract grade was found among the groups. Axial length was slightly higher in FLACS Group than one-handed rotational Group (P=0.04). All eyes underwent a successful surgery with IOL implantation in the capsular bag. Table 1 summarizes patients’ demographic data.

    Intraoperative Outcomes The USt in Group 1 (26.91±15.73s)was significantly shorter than Group 2 (41.25±25.72s,P=0.03)but significantly longer than Group 3 (17.99±9.41s,P=0.03).In Group 1 the EPt (0.66±0.70s) was significantly shorter than Group 2 (1.35±0.86s,P=0.004) and not significantlylonger than Group 3 (0.44±0.21s,P=0.44). In Group 1 the aspiration (1.37±0.56s) and surgical time (3.67±0.81min) were shorter (P≤0.001) than the same parameter in the other two groups. The phaco-power in Group 1 (75.86%±14.54%) was significantly lower than Group 2 (85.25%±3.77%,P=0.004).The CDE in Group 1 (9.75±6.85) was significantly lower compared to Group 2 (16.66±9.59,P=0.003). The quantitative of BSS?used in Group 1 (34.17±11.54 mL) was significantly lower (P≤0.01) than the other groups. Table 2 shows all intraoperative parameters recorded.

    Table 1 Comparison of demographic variables among one-handed phaco-roll, “Divide et Conquer”, and FLACS surgical technique mean±SD

    Table 2 Comparison of intraoperative variables among the groups mean±SD

    Clinical Outcomes At baseline there was no statistically significant difference between the groups according to BCVA.The 1-month BCVA was not different between Group 1 and each other group (P>0.05). At baseline, a significant difference only in CCT (P=0.01) between Groups 1 and 2 was observed.After 1mo from surgery a significant difference in ECD between the Group 1 and each other group was not reported.We observed the highest ECL (11.35%±8.48%) in Group 2 without significant difference comparing to Group 1 (P=0.31).A significant difference of 1-month CCT between Groups 1 and 2 (P=0.009) was reported, though their mean percentage changes were not significantly different (P=0.97). In FLACS Group the highest percentage change of CCT (-0.94%±1.18%)from baseline value was observed. There was not significant difference regarding absolute value and percentage change of CMT. Table 3 shows all intraoperative parameters recorded.

    Complications No adverse intraoperative events such as anterior capsule tear, posterior capsule tear, vitreous loss or Descemet membrane detachment occurred in either group. No postoperative complications occurred in either group.

    DISCUSSION

    In the present study, we compared intraoperative parameters and clinical outcomes over 1-month follow-up between one-handed phaco-roll, conventional “Divide et Conquer”technique, and FLACS to treat soft and medium-hard uncomplicated cataracts.Phaco-roll techniques were designed to reduce the surgical manipulations in the anterior chamber and the effects of ultrasound energy on endothelial corneal cells[4-5]. However,these techniques use a bimanual approach through a sideport incision[4-5]which could influence the value and the axis of post-surgical astigmatism[29-30], and increase the risk of endophthalmitis related to the potential leakage from the incision[31-33]. Furthermore, one of these techniques is dependent on a tip with a 3-port irrigation system[5].In a recent paper, we described a one-handed rotational phacoemulsification, as a modified phaco-roll technique, that uses a single corneal incision, high fluidics and low ultrasound power. The correct position and inclination of the tip, and the high aspiration allow to perform surgery with a single hand through a single incision. Performing phacosuction and emulsification with the continuous occlusion of the phaco-tip,and the rotational movement with the high vacuum and flow rate allow the aspiration of the nucleus in a short time[19].

    Table 3 Comparison of clinical outcomes among the groups mean±SD

    In this study, younger patients, having a potential lower risk for endothelium susceptibility to surgical injury[20], underwent conventional phacoemulsification technique as potentially less safe approach for corneal endothelium[34]. This aspect of study sample could increase the significance of the results.

    A Meta-analysis of 14 567 eyes from 15 randomized controlled trials and 22 observational studies comparing manual surgery and FLACS detected no statistically significant differences in terms of surgery time, revealing a considerable heterogeneity of data (manual surgery, ranged from 6 to 53.6min; FLACS ranged from 6.2 to 50.4min) probably due to the differences in surgical equipment, surgeon skill and patient selection[34].We recorded not only a shorter surgery time in conventional technique and FLACS than aforementioned data of Metaanalysis but also significantly lower parameters as total surgical time and aspiration time in one-handed phaco-roll than other surgical approaches. Indeed, if “Divide et Conquer”takes longer surgical time due to the deep central sculpting of the nucleus, manual cracking and subsequent fragmentation,FLACS technique involves a longer time since in addition to the purely surgical phase there is also the docking/suction phase which lengthens its overall timing. The same Metaanalysis, including longitudinal and torsional ultrasound machines, revealed that EPt was longer for conventional approach than FLACS without difference on CDE[34]. Recently,two prospective studies reported a significant lower EPt with FLACS than conventional surgery[35-36], while a retrospective case-control study including 506 consecutive eyes revealed that CDE was lower for FLACS than conventional approach[37].Our rotational technique takes shorter EPt and lower phacopower, and therefore lower CDE than conventional surgery,but seems not different to FLACS regarding EPt and CDE.It is also necessary to remember that we used for all groups a torsional ultrasound machine in which the formula for calculating CDE assigns only 40% of the torsional EPt to the sum, whereas the EPt for longitudinal ultrasound machine remains the same[38]. One-handed phaco-roll had shorter USt than conventional surgery but longer than FLACS. Güellet al[4]has already highlighted that phaco-roll technique allows to reduce phacoemulsification time by 30% to 50% and phacoemulsificaton energy by 20% to 40% compared with conventional technique. FLACS, for its part, has automated different steps of surgery[6]reducing the phacoemulsification time and the magnitude of ultrasound energy used[7-9]. Also the quantitative of BSS?used in rotational approach was the lowest. It is well known that the ultrasound time and power[39], the increased CDE, the aspiration time and the volume of BSS?[21], are important risk factors for ECL after phacoemulsification.

    In the large Meta-analysis by Popovicet al[34], no statistically significant difference between conventional surgery and FLACS regarding visual outcomes was reported. Another Meta-analysis of 989 eyes from 9 randomized controlled trials reported that the difference of visual improvement between FLACS and conventional surgery was not significant at postoperative 1-3mo[12]. Recently, a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial reported that FLACS is not inferior to manual phacoemulsification in terms of vision after 3mo follow-up, and there were no significant differences in patientreported health and safety outcomes after 12mo follow-up[18].We were unable to find any significant difference between surgical groups regarding visual outcome. Therefore, there is an evidence to support the hypothesis that one-handed phaco-roll is equally effective on early visual outcome when compared to other two techniques.

    The analysis of outcomes on corneal integrity revealed that post-surgical CCT was significant lower in Group 1 (onehanded phaco-roll) than Group 2 (“Divide et Conquer”).However, the significance of this results is limited because CCT was significantly different between Groups 1 and 2 also at baseline and the percentage changes of CCT in both groups were similar. Comparing CCT values between Groups 1 and 3 (FLACS) no difference in absolute value or percentage change was found. As previously observed, an early significant difference on CCT between conventional surgery and FLACS after 1wk disappeared after 1mo[36].

    The ECL in Groups 2 and 3 was in line with previuos papers on conventional phacoemulsification (4.01%-12.9%)[2,36,40-41]and FLACS (4.22%-13.7%), respectively[36,41-42]. Previous papers suggested that the “Divide et Conquer” technique provokes more corneal endothelial damage than other conventional techniques[2]and FLACS[10,25,34]because it uses more phaco energy to crack the nucleus. In one-hande phaco-roll group,ECL was lower than conventional phacoemulsification group but higher than FLACS group, though in a not significant way.This result could further confirm that one-handed rotational approach is equally safe for corneal integrity when compared to “Divide et Conqer” and FLACS. In all groups, an increase of 1-month macular thickness was recorded, although without difference among rotational approach and other techniques.

    The thickening of macular site may be due to the release of cytokines and growth factor from the blood-ocular barrier after cataract surgery[43]. In the only prospective randomized study on macular changes in eyes underwent different surgical techniques for cataract, authors concluded that FLACS does not increase the occurrence of macular edema when compared to standard phacoemulsification[16], as confirmed by recent studies[44-45]and by our results.

    Overall, no complications were reported, probably due to well standardized techniques used and surgeon experience in all surgical techniques performed.

    The small sample size and short follow-up may have limited the significance of the results. Furthermore, refractive parameters as surgically induced astigmatism, refractive spherical equivalent and higher-order aberrations were not analysed.

    As first in literature, we highlighted that one-handed rotational phacoemulsification technique seems to be less timeconsuming than “Divide et Conquer” and FLACS and less energy-consuming than “Divide et Conquer” in treating elected and uncomplicated cataracts. Furthermore, one-handed phacoroll seems to have an equal safety profile compared to the other two techniques. A randomized, controlled trial with a larger number of patients and a longer follow-up is needed to confirm the results obtained in this study.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    Authors’ contributions: Study design and concept (Gigliola S, Sborgia G, Niro A); Manuscript preparation (Niro A);Data collection (Gigliola S, Sborgia G, Palmisano C, Puzo P,Giuliani G, Sborgia L, Sisto D, Pastore V, Furino C, Sborgia A,Boscia F, Alessio G); Data evaluation (all the authors).

    Conflicts of Interest:Gigliola S, None; Sborgia G, None;Niro A, None; Palmisano C, None; Puzo P, None; Giuliani G, None; Sborgia L, None; Sisto D, None; Pastore V, None;Furino C, None; Donghia R, None; Sborgia A, None; Boscia F, None; Alessio G, None.

    人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 观看av在线不卡| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 天天影视国产精品| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 桃花免费在线播放| 超碰成人久久| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 9191精品国产免费久久| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 色播在线永久视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产在线视频一区二区| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产片内射在线| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 久久狼人影院| 1024视频免费在线观看| 成人影院久久| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 最黄视频免费看| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 国产成人av教育| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 女警被强在线播放| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 九草在线视频观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 午夜免费鲁丝| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 欧美另类一区| 脱女人内裤的视频| 咕卡用的链子| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | www.熟女人妻精品国产| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 1024香蕉在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产在线视频一区二区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 在线天堂中文资源库| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 丁香六月天网| 免费看十八禁软件| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 成人影院久久| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 悠悠久久av| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久久精品区二区三区| 嫩草影视91久久| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 超碰成人久久| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 中国美女看黄片| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 日本午夜av视频| 精品少妇内射三级| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 成人影院久久| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 久久99精品国语久久久| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产精品一国产av| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 超碰成人久久| 免费看av在线观看网站| 美女午夜性视频免费| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲精品自拍成人| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 9色porny在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 亚洲九九香蕉| 91老司机精品| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 一区在线观看完整版| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久av网站| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 一级毛片我不卡| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 免费看不卡的av| 男女免费视频国产| 操出白浆在线播放| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲伊人色综图| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产在线观看jvid| 久久性视频一级片| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| videosex国产| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 午夜影院在线不卡| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 成人国语在线视频| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| www日本在线高清视频| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲久久久国产精品| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 日韩电影二区| 久9热在线精品视频| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 在线看a的网站| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 精品一区二区三卡| 桃花免费在线播放| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 国产三级黄色录像| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 日本欧美视频一区| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | avwww免费| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久免费观看电影| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 青草久久国产| a 毛片基地| 国产在线视频一区二区| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 欧美97在线视频| 成人手机av| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美大码av| 天天影视国产精品| 视频区图区小说| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产精品一国产av| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 美女大奶头黄色视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲国产看品久久| 中文欧美无线码| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 成人影院久久| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| av在线老鸭窝| 青草久久国产| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲精品第二区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 五月开心婷婷网| 在线天堂中文资源库| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 看免费av毛片| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 精品高清国产在线一区| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 成人手机av| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 久久国产精品影院| 大香蕉久久成人网| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 乱人伦中国视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 免费看不卡的av| 在线观看国产h片| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美网| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 久9热在线精品视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 最黄视频免费看| 91字幕亚洲| 日本wwww免费看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| xxx大片免费视频| 亚洲国产看品久久| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 日日夜夜操网爽| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产在视频线精品| 精品福利永久在线观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 老司机靠b影院| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| av在线app专区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| av天堂在线播放| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| svipshipincom国产片| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 国产av国产精品国产| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 性色av一级| 99香蕉大伊视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 岛国毛片在线播放| kizo精华| 久久青草综合色| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 午夜av观看不卡| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 大香蕉久久网| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 久久精品成人免费网站| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 婷婷色综合www| 国产精品 国内视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产精品九九99| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 精品福利观看| 久9热在线精品视频| 精品人妻1区二区| av网站在线播放免费| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 亚洲成色77777| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲人成电影观看| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久久国产一区二区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产精品一二三区在线看| bbb黄色大片| 亚洲第一av免费看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 桃花免费在线播放| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 国产精品.久久久| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 捣出白浆h1v1| 超碰成人久久| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久精品成人免费网站| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 无限看片的www在线观看| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 午夜91福利影院| 久久中文字幕一级| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 超碰成人久久| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 曰老女人黄片| 电影成人av| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 老司机靠b影院| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲图色成人| e午夜精品久久久久久久| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 一级黄色大片毛片| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 免费看不卡的av| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 制服人妻中文乱码| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 亚洲黑人精品在线| 嫩草影视91久久| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产一级毛片在线| 国产男女内射视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 日韩伦理黄色片| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 欧美在线黄色| 99国产精品99久久久久| 18在线观看网站| 丝袜喷水一区| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 久久久精品94久久精品| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 999精品在线视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| bbb黄色大片| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 午夜免费观看性视频| 午夜91福利影院| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 亚洲国产av新网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 九草在线视频观看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 乱人伦中国视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站|