• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Computational Screening of Phase-separating Proteins

    2021-12-03 09:03:24BoyanShenZhaomingChenChunyuYuTaoyuChenMingleiShiTingtingLi
    Genomics,Proteomics & Bioinformatics 2021年1期

    Boyan Shen, Zhaoming Chen, Chunyu Yu, Taoyu Chen, Minglei Shi Tingting Li,*

    1 Department of Biomedical Informatics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China

    2 Institute of Systems Biomedicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100191, China

    3 MOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, Bioinformatics Division and Center for Synthetic & Systems Biology, BNRist, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China

    KEYWORDS

    Abstract Phase separation is an important mechanism that mediates the compartmentalization of proteins in cells. Proteins that can undergo phase separation in cells share certain typical sequence features, like intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) and multiple modular domains. Sequencebased analysis tools are commonly used in the screening of these proteins. However,current phase separation predictors are mostly designed for IDR-containing proteins,thus inevitably overlook the phase-separating proteins with relatively low IDR content. Features other than amino acid sequence could provide crucial information for identifying possible phase-separating proteins: protein–protein interaction(PPI)networks show multivalent interactions that underlie phase separation process; post-translational modifications (PTMs) are crucial in the regulation of phase separation behavior; spherical structures revealed in immunofluorescence (IF) images indicate condensed droplets formed by phase-separating proteins, distinguishing these proteins from non-phaseseparating proteins. Here, we summarize the sequence-based tools for predicting phaseseparating proteins and highlight the importance of incorporating PPIs,PTMs,and IF images into phase separation prediction in future studies.

    Introduction

    Cellular organelles can be categorized into two classes,membrane-bound organelles and membraneless organelles.Membrane-bound organelles include classic organelles such as the Golgi apparatus, mitochondrion, and lysosome. These cellular compartments enclosed by lipid bilayers have been well studied in the last century. However, in living cells, many biochemical reactions take place in membraneless organelles[1,2].The formation mechanisms and functions of membraneless organelles had remained perplexing until ten years ago. In 2009, Brangwynne et al. reported liquid-like behaviors of P granules, which are protein-rich membraneless organelles in the cytoplasm of cells from Caenorhabditis elegans [3]. These granules can flow,deform,and undergo fission freely,just like liquid droplets. Proteins within P granules are also highly mobile and can exchange rapidly with the surrounding cytoplasm. These findings suggest that liquid–liquid phase separation(LLPS,also called liquid–liquid demixing)could be one of the mechanisms underlying membraneless organelle formation.

    In a phase separation process,a set of macromolecules such as proteins and nucleic acids are separated from their surrounding environments and form an independent phase. The separated phase shares a similar molecular composition with the surrounding environment, yet at different concentrations[4]. In cells, proteins or nucleic acids form separated phases via intra- or intermolecular interactions [1,4,5], thereby allowing the formation of phase-separated compartments,which are also named membraneless organelles or biomolecular condensates.Besides P granules[3],the nucleoli[1,2],centrosomes[6],stress granules [7,8],and processing bodies (P-bodies) [8,9] are also membraneless organelles formed through phase separation. In addition, phase separation underlies many biological processes such as translation regulation [10,11], mRNA deadenylation [10,12], heterochromatin formation [13,14], and the control of signal transduction [15–17].

    Phase separation is a complex biophysical process.Changes to any property of the system, e.g., molecular composition,temperature, electrostatic property, and viscoelasticity of the solution, may affect the phase separation process [1,5,18].Being able to undergo phase separation under specific conditions may be a universal property of proteins. However, only a few proteins with specific sequence-dependent features have the potential to undergo phase separation in living cells [19].In this review, we name these proteins phase-separating proteins. Scientists have found that certain sequence features may correlate with phase separation behaviors, which brings out a range of useful bioinformatics tools to predict phaseseparating proteins. Herein, we summarize the sequencebased predicting tools for phase-separating proteins and integrate the available phase-separating protein data to evaluate their performances. Furthermore, we propose protein–protein interaction (PPI) networks, post-translational modifications(PTMs),and immunofluorescence(IF)images as three promising features to be incorporated into phase separation prediction in future studies.

    Driving force of phase separation

    Phase separation is a conditional process. Proteins indispensable to the formation of one condensate can be alternative in another or do not participate in phase separation under some conditions [19]. Multivalent interactions between condensate components are the driving force of phase separation[17,20,21].

    Proteins able to form multivalent interactions that promote phase separation can be classified into two types: one characterized by multiple modular domains and the other characterized by intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). The first type of proteins often carry several folded interaction domains.The driving force of phase separation of these proteins is the multivalent interactions between their interaction domains[4]. An example is the interaction between small ubiquitinlike modifier (SUMO) and SUMO-interacting motif (SIM),which plays an essential role in the overall architecture of promyelocytic leukemia (PML) body. The PML protein contains a SUMO-interacting motif and multiple SUMOylation sites [22]. As the scaffold protein of the PML body, PML can not only self-assemble via interactions between its tripartite motifs(TRIMs)but also interact with itself and other proteins via SUMO–SIM interactions [23,24] (Figure 1A).Another example is the multivalent interactions of the nephrin–non-catalytic region of tyrosine kinase (NCK)–neuronal Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein (N-WASP) system in the actin regulatory signaling pathway. Nephrin is a transmembrane protein,the cytoplasmic tail of which harbors three tyrosine phosphorylation(pTyr)sites.Each of these three pTyr sites can bind to a Src homology 2(SH2)domain on NCK.NWASP contains six proline-rich motifs(PRMs),which can also bind to three of the SH3 domains on NCK.These interactions further stimulate actin assembly and phase separation [17](Figure 1B).

    The other type of phase-separating proteins are characterized by the presence of IDRs[25,26].Instead of having a fixed three-dimensional structure, IDRs can interconvert between a range of slightly different low-energy states with discrepant conformations [27–29]. Proteins with high proportions of IDRs are hot targets in phase separation studies,e.g.,the neurodegenerative disorder-related protein fused in sarcoma(FUS)[30–33](Figure 1C),the BUB3-interacting and GLEBS motif-containing protein BuGZ [34,35] (Figure 1D), and the microtubule-associated protein Tau [36–38]. However, not all IDRs facilitate phase separation.Phase-separating IDRs often share some sequence features. One type of IDRs that often undergo phase separation is the IDRs encompassing lowcomplexity regions (LCRs), which are regions with biased amino acid composition, often containing repeated segments.Moreover, phase-separating IDRs are often enriched with specific amino acid residues, e.g., arginine and glycine for the RGG/RG domains [39,40] or polar amino acid residues like serine, tyrosine, glutamine, and asparagine for the prion-like domains [41]. These amino acids do not appear randomly,but are often found as functional sites like short/eukaryotic linear motifs and alternating charge blocks [25,42].

    IDR content analysis in the prediction of phaseseparating proteins

    Figure 1 Schematic view of multivalent interactions that promote phase separationA. PML protein can not only self-assemble via interactions between its TRIMs but also interact via its SIM with SUMOs of itself and other proteins,such as DAXX and SP100.B.Schematic view of nephrin–NCK–N-WASP system.The cytoplasmic tail of nephrin contains three pTyr sites,each of which can bind to an SH2 domain on NCK.The three SH3 domains on NCK can also bind to PRMs within NWASP. C.Residue-wise plot of scaffold protein FUS. Information of PTM sites was collected from the PhosphoSitePlus database;IDR scores were predicted by IUPred for long disorder; the prion-like domain was identified with PLAAC score greater than zero; the picontact was identified with PScore greater than four, as indicated by dashed line. D. Residue-wise plot of scaffold protein BuGZ. PML,promyelocytic leukemia; TRIM, tripartite motif; SIM, SUMO-interacting motif; SUMO, small ubiquitin-like modifier; DAXX, death domain-associated protein; SP100, nuclear autoantigen Sp-100; NCK, non-catalytic region of tyrosine kinase; N-WASP, neuronal Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome protein;pTyr,tyrosine phosphorylation;SH,Src homology;PRM,proline-rich motif;FUS,fused in sarcoma;PTM, post-translational modification; IDR, intrinsically disordered region; BuGZ, BUB3-interacting and GLEBS motif-containing protein ZNF207; Phos, phosphorylation; Ub, ubiquitination; Ac, acetylation; Me, methylation; AA, amino acid.

    Table 1 IDR content analysis tools

    IDR-containing proteins account for a large proportion of phase-separating proteins, although our understanding of how IDRs are involved in the phase separation process and what features these IDRs share is still limited [43]. Therefore,IDR content analysis is often utilized in bioinformatics screening of potential phase-separating proteins(Table 1).DisProt is one of the earliest and most influential disorder databases[44,45]. Two long-tested IDR predictors, ESpritz [46] and IUPred[47,48],are frequently used in the IDR content analysis of potential phase-separating proteins. In recent years, meta-IDR predictors like D2P2 [49] and MobiDB [50,51], which integrate predictions from several predictors currently available and provide comprehensive results, are widely used as well.For example,in a previous study on how intrinsically disordered linkers influence the interplay between phase separation and gelation, researchers used the meta-IDR predictor D2P2 to identify proteins containing disordered regions from the human proteome [52].

    Phase separation predictors

    Although multivalent, transient interactions that drive phase separation are often facilitated by IDRs [21], only proteins with certain types of IDRs facilitate phase separation. Non-IDR interacting elements like the coiled-coil domain can also promote these interactions [6]. Bioinformaticians thus aim to develop prediction tools that are based explicitly on phase separation-specific sequence features.

    By studying the sequences of several well-known phaseseparating proteins, e.g., FUS, DEAD box protein 4(DDX4), TATA-binding protein-associated factor 15(TAF15), Ewing sarcoma protein (EWS), TAR DNAbinding protein 43 (TDP43), and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (HNRNPA1), two common types of LCRs, prion-like domains (PLDs) and RGG domains, were found to promote weak interactions and thereby promote phase separation [33,39,53,54]. Furthermore, low-complexity aromatic-rich kinked segments (LARKSs) and steric zipper motifs have been found to promote the transition between different physical properties of biomolecular condensates[55,56].Such features have inspired bioinformaticians to design algorithms to predict the phase separation propensities of proteins[57]. These include PScore [58], prion-like amino acid composition (PLAAC) [59], PSPer [60], catGRANULE [61], R + Y[41], LARKS [55], and ZipperDB [56] (Table 2).

    PScore

    Pi–pi interactions can occur between protein sequences enriched in pi-orbital-containing residues. In contrast to the conventional view, pi–pi interaction involves not only amino acids with an aromatic ring (tyrosine, phenylalanine, tryptophan, and histidine) [62], but also non-aromatic amino acids with pi bonds on their side chains(glutamine,asparagine,glutamic acid, aspartic acid, and arginine) and small amino acids with exposed backbone peptide bonds (glycine, serine, threonine, and proline). Face-to-face interactions formed by these pi-containing groups are called planar pi–pi contacts.In 2018,the Forman-Kay group reported that planar pi–pi contact represents a predominant interaction type and is highly relevant to self-association and phase separation of proteins [58]. Then a planar pi–pi contact predictor named PScore was developed for screening potential phase-separating proteins.

    PLAAC

    PLAAC is an application initially designed to screen PLDs[59], which utilizes a hidden Markov model (HMM) for thediscrimination of PLDs and non-PLDs based on amino acid composition. PLAAC was originally trained on yeast proteome but later extended to screen human proteins [63,64]. It supports both single-protein and proteome scanning.

    Table 2 Phase separation analysis tools

    PSPer

    PSPer is a rule-based model developed for screening prion-like RNA-binding phase-separating proteins. Expected properties of the FUS-like phase-separating regions are used to build an HMM-like model [41], which identifies PLDs, RNArecognition motifs, and disordered, arginine-rich regions within a protein [60].

    catGRANULE

    catGRANULE is a phase separation prediction algorithm with good performance for predicting dosage-sensitive proteins[61].This tool is based on the discovery that cellular toxicity mechanisms of some dosage-sensitive proteins in yeast are well-explained by LLPS theory, as these proteins take part in the formation of cytoplasmic foci in a concentration-related manner. Further studies reveal that these proteins have an increased nucleic acid binding propensity. catGRANULE was therefore developed to screen these proteins by combining nucleic acid binding propensities,structural disorder,sequence length, and content of arginine, glycine, and phenylalanine.Although initially trained against the yeast proteome, cat-GRANULE has been successfully applied to mammalian and even human proteomes [37].

    R + Y

    R + Y is a predictor built upon the analysis of the molecular grammar of FET family proteins, including FUS, EWS, and TAF15 [65]. In 2018, the Hyman, Alberti, and Pappu groups reported that phase separation behaviors of FET family proteins are determined by interactions between the tyrosine-rich PLDs and the arginine-rich RNA-binding domains[41].Further analyses indicate that the numbers of tyrosine and arginine residues are inversely correlated with the measured saturation concentrations for phase separation. Extrapolating these findings to the prediction of non-FET proteins, researchers developed the R + Y predictor and utilized it for a human proteome-wide analysis, which has remarkable prediction performance on DNA-and RNA-binding proteins(RBPs).

    ZipperDB

    ZipperDB is a database that includes predicted fibril-forming segments from more than 20,000 putative amyloid-forming protein sequences [56]. Fibrils are highly ordered aggregates characterized by a ‘‘steric zipper” structure, whose formation is an essential step in amyloidosis.Amyloid deposition is occasionally observed in cells. Recent evidence indicates that the formation of such deposits could be attributed to a liquid-tosolid phase transition or an atypical phase separation process that forms solid-state compartments. ZipperDB utilizes an algorithm named 3D profiling to analyze the probability of forming a steric zipper structure for every hexapeptide segment.

    LARKS

    LARKSs share similar structural characteristics with steric zippers yet have lower binding energy, as aromatic residues predominate the kinks and affect LARKS stability through weak interactions. LARKSs are characterized by the stacking kinked β sheet pairs,which promote the formation of amyloid fibrils and hydrogels during phase transition. Similar to ZipperDB,3D profiling was utilized to identify potential LARKSs from inquiry protein sequences. After querying the human proteome of 20,120 proteins, a list of 400 proteins with the most enriched LARKS was provided [55].

    In summary, all current phase separation prediction tools are developed based on sequence-dependent features. PScore calculates the pi-contact propensities of each residue in a given protein sequence.PLAAC and PSPer identify specific domains like PLDs based on HMM. catGRANULE calculates the granule propensity of each residue in a given sequence.R+Y calculates the number of tyrosine and arginine residues within disordered regions of a given sequence. LARKS and ZipperDB adopt an algorithm named 3D profiling to measure the probability of a given sequence to fold into a LARKS or a steric zipper.

    Performance evaluation of phase separation predictors

    Vernon et al. have recently reviewed several phase separation predictors and compared their prediction performance comprehensively [57]. They find that since each algorithm predicts different kinds of interactions and sequence features, very different protein categories are covered by these predictors. The only exceptions are RBPs, as high prediction confidence is obtained from all predictors for RBPs. However, due to the insufficient phase-separating protein data available, evaluations could only be made on a set of 30 human proteins [57].

    At least four LLPS protein databases were released until 2020, including LLPSDB [66], PhaSePro [67], PhaSepDB[68],and DrLLPS[69](Table 3).LLPSDB collects in vitro data on LLPS-related proteins. The current version of LLPSDB includes 295 independent proteins, which are integrated into 1192 entries with corresponding experimental phase separation conditions. PhaSePro provides the experimental data on 121 proteins driving phase separation in living cells, which is less focused on in vitro phase separation conditions and contains a broader array of information than LLPSDB. PhaSepDB contains less detailed information than either LLPSDB or Pha-SePro, but provides a larger set of data with 2914 nonredundant proteins localized in more than 30 different organelles, which comprise PubMed-reviewed data, UniProtreviewed data, and high-throughput data. DrLLPS contains 9285 curated proteins that are known to be associated with LLPS, including 150 scaffold proteins, 987 regulator proteins,and 8148 potential client proteins. All four databases extensively reference the original literature,allowing the user to verify information or conduct further scrutinization.

    With the availability of high-quality data provided by the four databases mentioned above, a more comprehensive comparison of phase separation predictors is possible. We constructed a non-redundant positive set (set P) of 278 human proteins involving 90,59,233,and 86 proteins from LLPSDB,PhaSePro, the PubMed-reviewed part of PhaSepDB, and the scaffold part of DrLLPS,respectively(Table S1).The remaining majority of human proteome was collected from UniProt and defined as the negative set (set N), which includes 20,227 proteins (Table S1).

    To compare the prediction performance of available phase separation predictors,we scored the proteins in both set P and set N using PScore, PLAAC, catGRANULE, and PSPer,which provide online/offline batch prediction (Table S2). For R + Y and LARKS without prediction tools, R + Y scores of 2657 human proteins and 400 human proteins enriched with LARKSs were downloaded from the resepctive websites(Table S2). ZipperDB provides neither batch prediction tools nor bulk download.As a result,we collected prediction scores from six phase separation predictors (Table S2).

    Firstly, we adopted a comparison between those six tools on human proteome by plotting the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). As shown in Figure 2A, catGRANULE,PScore, PLAAC, and PSPer have nearly the same values for area under the curve (AUC), which are > 0.7, while the performance of R + Y and LARKS is not as good as that of the other four tools.

    To test the influence of IDR contents on the scores of these phase separation predictors,we scored the proteins in set P by IUPred with default setting(Table S3).As shown in the scatter plots,phase separation scores of the first five predictors are significantly correlated with IDR scores(Figure 2B).In R+Y,a lower score means a higher phase separation potential, and therefore its prediction scores are significantly negativelycorrelated with IDR scores. For LARKS that did not provide prediction scores, proteins in set P were divided into LARKS High and LARKS Low groups,according to whether the protein is in the list of LARKS enriched proteins.The IDR scores of proteins in the LARKS High group were significantly higher than those in the LARKS Low group (Figure 2C).The aforementioned comparison processes were also performed for all human proteins, scores of all phase separation predictors are significantly correlated with IDR scores (Figure S1). These results demonstrate that all phase separation predictors prefer proteins with high IDR contents.

    Discriminating the scaffold proteins from the client proteins remains challenging. Therefore, it is possible that some low IDR proteins in set P are client proteins.However,taking the 12 phase-separating proteins for example,heterochromatin protein 1 homolog alpha (HP1A), nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1),PML,and NCK1,which are all scaffold proteins,were rankedoutside of the top 10% of the human proteome by all the six predictors, while PML was ranked outside of the top 20%(Figure 2D).

    Table 3 Information of four LLPS databases

    Figure 2 Comparison of phase separation predictors on human proteomeA. ROC curve for each predictor. Since PScore, PLAAC, and PSPer have restrictions on the length of protein sequence, only catGRANULE returned scores for all human proteins.Except for catGRANULE,the AUC scores of the remaining tools were calculated on the subsets of P and N sets.Prediction of LARKS was shown as a point since it did not provide scores for each protein.B.Scatter plots of predicted values for proteins in set P,with one axis being the IDR score and the other axis being the phase separation score.Spearman correlation coefficient with P < 0.05 indicates significant correlation. C. Proteins in set P were divided into LARKS High and LARKS Low groups, according to whether the protein is in the list of LARKS-enriched proteins. P value is calculated through the two-sided Mann–Whitney U test. D. Ranking scores of 12 specific LLPS proteins by six phase separation predictors. ROC, receiver operating characteristic;AUC,area under the curve;LARKS,low-complexity aromatic-rich kinked segment;LLPS,liquid–liquid phase separation.

    In summary, a range of useful bioinformatics tools have been developed to predict phase-separating proteins,however,most of which are designed for screening IDR-containing proteins. Proteins with modular domains account for a considerable part of phase-separating proteins as well, yet a corresponding computational tool to identify such proteins is not available.It may not be so challenging to identify proteins with multiple modular interaction domains. However, some proteins with few modular domains can also participate in phase separation via assembly, like HP1A [13]. More comprehensive features besides sequence composition might be required for phase separation predictors.

    Other features potentially used to predict phaseseparating proteins

    Features other than sequence composition could provide crucial information for identifying possible phase-separating proteins.This section will discuss three new features that could be utilized in phase separation prediction: PPI networks, PTMs,and IF images.

    PPI networks

    As described in the preceding section, the driving force of phase separation is the multivalent interactions between molecules. In some cases, especially for those with low IDR contents, proteins cannot undergo phase separation alone. Take the nephrin–NCK–N-WASP system in Figure 1B for example.The pTyr–SH2 and SH3–PRM interactions among cooperated proteins are the driving force of the phase separation process,and NCK cannot phase separate under the conditions with nephrin or N-WASP abscent[17].Another example is the clustering of T cell receptor (TCR) signaling pathway molecules.Upon TCR activation, the tyrosine kinase ZAP70 phosphorylates the transmembrane protein LAT, and phospho-tyrosines on LAT can bind to the SH2 domain on Grb2. Two SH3 domains within Grb2 further interact with Sos1,and the phosphorylated LAT,Grb2,and Sos1 together form the LAT complex, which can coalesce into T cell microclusters that show phase separation behaviors[15].Similar to the aforementioned example, components in this TCR pathway cannot phase separate without interactions among cooperated proteins.

    One issue of the available phase separation predictors is that they are based on sequence-dependent features of individual proteins.These features may not be sufficient,as phase separation driven by complex modular interaction domains or motifs and other multivalent interactions might be missed. A more comprehensive approach that also considers PPI network information could be helpful. It is hard to integrate PPI networks into phase separation predictors directly. One possible approach is network embedding method such as node2vec[70].Taking the adjacency matrix of the PPI network as input,node2vec encodes each node in the network as a vector,which can be used for various downstream machine learning tasks.The distance between vectors reflects the similarity of interaction networks of corresponding proteins. However, it should be noted that PPI networks based on experimental evidence usually bias to well-studied proteins. BioPlex database that provides an unbiased mapping of the human PPIs by affinity-purification mass spectrometry might be more appropriate to be incorporated into phase separation prediction[71,72].

    PTMs

    The interactions required for phase separation can be weak interactions or strong interactions reversible on a short timescale [21]. The reversibility can often be regulated by PTMs,like the interaction between the SH2 domain and the pTyr residue in nephrin–NCK–N-WASP and TCR pathways[15,17].In these examples, PTMs can regulate the reversibility of a binding event by generating/degenerating a modular interaction domain recognition site [21].

    PTMs can also regulate phase separation processes by changing protein physical properties, like the charge state,bulkiness, solubility, hydrophobicity, or binding affinity[10,73–75]. Citrullination of RG/RGG motifs has been reported to increase the solubility of proteins like FUS,EWS, and TAF15, inhibiting the arginine methylation, aggregation, and stress granule formation of these proteins [76].Another example is the PTMs of fragile X mental retardation protein (FMRP) and cytoplasmic activation- and proliferation-associated protein 1 (CAPRIN1). The two proteins do not co-phase separate without phosphorylation.However, co-phase separation occurs when Tyr of CAPRIN1 aromatic-rich regions is phosphorylated, or the C-terminal LCR of FMRP is phosphorylated [10,74].

    Figure 3 Comparison of PTM frequencies between different groups on human proteomeA.Venn diagram displaying the overlap of phase-separating proteins with different PTM types.The PTM datasets were collected from the PhosphoSitePlus database.B.For all PTM types,frequencies for proteins in set P are significantly higher than those for set N.P values are calculated through the two-sided Mann–Whitney U test.C.Distribution of IDR contents of proteins in set P and set N.Most proteins in set N have low proportions of IDRs. D. Set N was resampled into a subset according to IDR content distribution of set P. P value indicates that IDR contents of proteins in sampled set N have a similar distribution with that in set P.E.PTM frequencies of proteins in set P are still higher than those in resampled set N.

    Given the widespread regulatory roles of PTMs in phase separation,we tested whether PTM levels could be used as features to discriminate phase-separating proteins. We collected PTM datasets from the PhosphoSitePlus database[77],including phosphorylation,ubiquitination,acetylation,and methylation (Table S4). As shown in Figure 3A, the Venn diagram displays the overlap of phase-separating proteins with different PTM types.For 278 phase-separating proteins in set P,221 of them contain more than three types of PTMs,and 158 of them possess all four types of PTMs considered. The overlap demonstrates that most phase-separating proteins are modified by multiple types of PTMs. Then we defined the PTM frequency of a protein as the number of modification sites on a sequence divided by the length of the sequence,and calculated PTM frequencies of proteins in set P and set N.For each protein,frequency of all PTM types and frequencies of each specific PTM types with more than 10,000 recorded sites in the database were calculated (Table S5). For all PTM types, frequencies for proteins in set P were significantly higher than those in set N(Figure 3B).However,it is well established that PTM sites are enriched in IDRs, and proteins with high proportions of IDRs tend to have higher PTM frequencies(Figure 3C), which might cause bias. To control the impact of different IDR contents, the set N was resampled into a subset,whose distribution of IDR contents was similar to that of the set P(Figure 3D;see details of the resampling process in Table S6). The PTM frequencies of the set P were still significantly higher than those of the resampled set N (Figure 3E),which indicates that PTM frequency can be regarded as a feature to discriminate phase-separating proteins. Previous studies reported that an increased number of PTMs was correlated with an increased LLPS propensity in predicted phase-separating proteins [10,58], and our results show the similar observations using the actual LLPS proteins from more datasets.

    It should be noted that although a considerable number of PTM sites have been collected into the database,most of them are phosphorylation sites.Poor data quality and low coverage of the PTM dataset might affect the performance of incorporating PTM frequency as a feature.A high-confidence dataset,including 119,809 phosphorylation sites, has been reported recently [78], which could provide a high-quality PTM feature for identifying possible phase-separating proteins.

    IF images

    Identification of spherical droplet structures through IF images represents the most common approach for validation of phase-separating proteins. Phase-separating proteins usually appear as spherical droplet-like structures in IF images,which allows them to be distinguished from non-phaseseparating proteins. Thus phase-separating proteins can be identified if we screen out the proteins which appear as spherical structures in IF images.The Cell Atlas(part of the Human Protein Atlas) database provides antibody-based profiling by IF confocal microscopy for 12,073 proteins [79], allowing the screening of phase-separating proteins based on IF images.

    It should be noted that the formation of phase separation is condition-dependent. Phase separation proteins that do not appear as droplets in the inquiry IF images cannot be identified. In addition, some phase-separated condensates are too small to be detected in IF images, such as the ‘‘transcription hubs” in transcriptional activation [80], and some membrane-bound organelles like vesicles have similar spherical appearance in IF images.Therefore,IF images alone are insufficient to determine whether a specific protein can undergo phase separation or not. However, IF images with dropletlike structures could provide evidence that the labeled proteins aggregate in cells, which allows us to screen out the potential phase-separating proteins.In a previous study,we built a convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier to identify IF images with droplet-like structures and found that the aggregation evidence extracted from IF images is useful in screening phase-separating proteins with low IDR contents [81]. Besides deep learning methods, CellProfiler[82] that can segment droplets and cells in the IF images should also be useful in extracting aggregation evidence from IF images.The outputs of both the CNN classifier and the CellProfiler can measure the aggregation state of the labeled proteins in IF images,and these outputs can be used as features for various downstream machine learning tasks.

    Conclusion and perspectives

    Experimental studies have enabled significant progress in improving our understanding of phase separation.Researchers have also noticed that some sequence features are closely related to the phase separation behavior, and several sequence-based computational tools have been developed accordingly. These computational methods facilitate studies on the phase separation phenomenon by providing predictions and proteome-scale screening of phase separation candidates.Furthermore, to examine the roles of different domains of specific proteins in phase separation, truncation mutants are usually constructed to detect segments crucial in forming liquid-like droplets. Computational methods that provide residue-specific predictions also assist phase separation studies in screening critical fragments.However,a meta-predictor that integrates predictions from existing phase separation predictors is in need to reduce the complexity of sequence analysis,like D2P2 and MobiDB in IDR analysis.

    Furthermore, current phase separation predictors are mostly designed for IDR-containing proteins and are based on sequence-dependent features of individual proteins. More comprehensive features should be incorporated into phase separation predictors. As multivalent interactions are critical to phase separation,PPI networks can be useful in phase separation computational analysis. PTMs and IF images are also available features that can be utilized in the prediction of phase-separating proteins. PTMs are predominant regulators of phase separation behavior. Accordingly, in this review, we also find that phase-separating proteins tend to have high PTM frequencies. Components of phase-separating condensates usually appear as spherical droplets in IF images, allowing the screening of phase-separating proteins. We expect that incorporating PPI networks,PTMs,and IF images into prediction algorithms will lead to more effective and unbiased phase separation analytic tools.

    CRediT author statement

    Boyan Shen: Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Zhaoming Chen: Methodology,Formal analysis,Writing-original draft,Writing-review& editing. Chunyu Yu: Methodology. Taoyu Chen: Writing -review & editing. Minglei Shi: Writing - review & editing.Tingting Li: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision,Writing - review & editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Competing interests

    The authors have declared no competing interests.

    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0507504) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61773025 and 32070666).

    Supplementary material

    Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2020.11.003.

    ORCID

    0000-0002-1574-1958 (Boyan Shen)

    0000-0002-6810-5445 (Zhaoming Chen)

    0000-0002-3519-1332 (Chunyu Yu)

    0000-0002-8966-1264 (Taoyu Chen)

    0000-0002-1108-4233 (Minglei Shi)

    0000-0003-4266-0317 (Tingting Li)

    91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产视频首页在线观看| 一区二区三区精品91| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 成年版毛片免费区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲在线观看片| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产综合精华液| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 97热精品久久久久久| 美女主播在线视频| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 99热这里只有是精品50| 青春草国产在线视频| videossex国产| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲国产精品999| av在线老鸭窝| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产极品天堂在线| 亚洲国产精品999| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 中文欧美无线码| 大香蕉久久网| 熟女av电影| 免费av观看视频| 丝袜喷水一区| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 一级片'在线观看视频| 有码 亚洲区| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| xxx大片免费视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| tube8黄色片| 97在线人人人人妻| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 欧美97在线视频| 99久久人妻综合| 观看美女的网站| 高清av免费在线| 久久久成人免费电影| 日本与韩国留学比较| 免费看a级黄色片| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一区二区三区精品91| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 久久热精品热| 一区二区三区精品91| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 久久久色成人| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 日本免费在线观看一区| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 日本一本二区三区精品| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 国产视频内射| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 美女高潮的动态| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 在线看a的网站| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产精品.久久久| www.av在线官网国产| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日韩伦理黄色片| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 日韩伦理黄色片| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| netflix在线观看网站| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产毛片在线视频| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 麻豆av在线久日| 久久性视频一级片| 成人手机av| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 成人国语在线视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产成人精品在线电影| 五月开心婷婷网| 精品酒店卫生间| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 桃花免费在线播放| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 成人影院久久| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 高清不卡的av网站| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 视频区图区小说| 一级毛片电影观看| 超碰成人久久| av在线app专区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久久久视频综合| av天堂久久9| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 尾随美女入室| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 不卡av一区二区三区| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产av码专区亚洲av| bbb黄色大片| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲伊人色综图| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| av免费观看日本| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| av有码第一页| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 七月丁香在线播放| 亚洲国产欧美网| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 久久狼人影院| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 国产精品 国内视频| 只有这里有精品99| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 满18在线观看网站| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 99热网站在线观看| 国产亚洲最大av| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 午夜91福利影院| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久久久久人妻| videosex国产| 久久这里只有精品19| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产一级毛片在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲精品在线美女| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产极品天堂在线| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 五月天丁香电影| 日韩电影二区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲av福利一区| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 如何舔出高潮| 国产探花极品一区二区| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 午夜免费鲁丝| 黄色 视频免费看| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 在线天堂最新版资源| 成人国语在线视频| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| kizo精华| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 在线观看国产h片| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美在线黄色| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久99一区二区三区| 一级毛片 在线播放| 丝袜美足系列| 一个人免费看片子| 大陆偷拍与自拍| bbb黄色大片| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 亚洲中文av在线| 中文欧美无线码| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 老司机影院成人| av在线老鸭窝| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 久久久精品区二区三区| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 中文天堂在线官网| 免费av中文字幕在线| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 一区二区av电影网| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 五月天丁香电影| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产在线视频一区二区| 国产男女内射视频| 黄色 视频免费看| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 超碰成人久久| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 久久免费观看电影| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲国产看品久久| 99香蕉大伊视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 亚洲国产av新网站| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 免费少妇av软件| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 午夜91福利影院| 91成人精品电影| 亚洲人成电影观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 又大又爽又粗| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲国产精品999| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 亚洲精品第二区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 国产在线视频一区二区| 大香蕉久久成人网| 两个人看的免费小视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 成年动漫av网址| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产又爽黄色视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 国产成人91sexporn| av卡一久久| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线 | xxx大片免费视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 只有这里有精品99| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 久久这里只有精品19| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 日本午夜av视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 成人三级做爰电影| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲四区av| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 超碰成人久久| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 亚洲精品视频女| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 国产男女内射视频| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 满18在线观看网站| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产精品免费大片| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久久国产一区二区| 欧美在线黄色| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 天堂8中文在线网| 亚洲精品一二三| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 只有这里有精品99| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 一级片免费观看大全| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| kizo精华| 七月丁香在线播放| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产探花极品一区二区| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 一本久久精品| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 一区二区三区激情视频| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| av视频免费观看在线观看| 免费不卡黄色视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 黄片播放在线免费| 国产成人系列免费观看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| av在线播放精品| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 久久久国产一区二区| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 男人操女人黄网站| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 久久性视频一级片| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 免费不卡黄色视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 国产免费现黄频在线看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产在线视频一区二区| 久久青草综合色| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 91老司机精品| 九草在线视频观看| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 成人免费观看视频高清| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 成人影院久久| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 看免费av毛片| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产在线免费精品| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区 | 捣出白浆h1v1| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码|