• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Cryptococcosis in patients with liver cirrhosis: Death risk factors and predictive value of prognostic models

    2021-11-08 08:33:42QiHuiZhouCaiQinHuYuShiFengTianWuQinYangJunGuanAiChunLiZhiChen

    Qi-Hui Zhou ,Cai-Qin Hu ,Yu Shi, Feng-Tian Wu, Qin Yang, Jun Guan, Ai-Chun Li, Zhi Chen

    Department of Infectious Diseases, State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310 0 0 0, China

    Keywords: Cryptococcosis Cirrhosis Risk factors Prognosis

    ABSTRACT Background: Liver cirrhosis is associated with immune deficiency, which causes these patients to be sus-ceptible to various infections, including cryptococcus infection. Mortality in cirrhotic patients with cryp-tococcosis has increased. The present study was to explore the risk factors of mortality and the predictive ability of different prognostic models. Methods: Forty-seven cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis at a tertiary care hospital were included in this retrospective study. Data on demographics, clinical parameters, laboratory exams, diagnostic meth-ods, medication during hospitalization, severity scores and prognosis were collected and analyzed. Stu-dent’s t test and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare characteristics of survivors and non-survivors at a 90-day follow-up and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) manifestations of cryptococcal meningitis. Multivari-ate Cox regression analysis was used to identify the independent risk factors for mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze patient survival. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the different prognostic factors. Results: The 30-and 90-day survival rates were 93.6% and 80.9%, respectively, in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis. Cryptogenic liver diseases [hazard ratio (HR) = 7.567, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.616-35.428, P = 0.010], activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) (HR = 1.117, 95% CI: 1.016-1.229, P = 0.022) and Child-Pugh score (HR = 2.146, 95% CI: 1.314-3.504, P = 0.002) were risk factors for 90-day mortality in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis. Platelet count (HR = 0.965, 95% CI: 0.940-0.991, P = 0.008) was a protective factor. APTT (HR = 1.120, 95% CI: 1.044-1.202, P = 0.002) and Child-Pugh score (HR = 1.637, 95% CI: 1.086-2.469, P = 0.019) were risk factors for 90-day mortality in cirrhotic pa-tients with cryptococcal meningitis. There was significant difference in the percentage of lymphocytes in CSF between survivors and non-survivors [60.0 (35.0-75.0) vs. 95.0 (83.8-97.2), P < 0.001]. The model of end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) score was more accurate for predicting 30-day mortality both in patients with cryptococcosis [area under curve (AUC): 0.826, 95% CI: 0.618-1.0 0 0] and those with cryptococcal meningitis (AUC: 0.742, 95% CI: 0.560-0.924); Child-Pugh score was more useful for predict-ing 90-day mortality in patients with cryptococcosis (AUC: 0.823, 95% CI: 0.646-1.0 0 0) and those with cryptococcal meningitis (AUC: 0.815, 95% CI: 0.670-0.960). Conclusions: These results showed that cryptogenic liver diseases, APTT and Child-Pugh score were as-sociated with mortality in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis and cryptococcal meningitis. MELD-Na score was important for predicting 30-day mortality, and Child-Pugh score was critical for predicting 90-day mortality.

    Introduction

    Liver cirrhosis is an end-stage liver disease that results from different kinds of chronic liver diseases. The 1-year mortality of liver cirrhosis ranges from 1% to 57%. Cirrhosis is a dynamic pro-cess: stage 1 is compensated with no esophageal varices; stage 2 is compensated with varices; stage 3 is decompensated with ascites; stage 4 is decompensated with gastrointestinal bleeding; and stage 5 is characterized by infections and renal failure, with a 1-year mortality of 67% [1] . Liver cirrhosis is also associated with immune dysfunction, including decreased cellular and humoral immunity, reduced phagocytic activity of innate immune cells, and comple-ment deficiency [ 2,3 ]. A previous study found that infections in cirrhotic patients quadrupled mortality [4] .

    Cryptococcosis is an invasive fungal infection that primarily manifests as cryptococcal meningitis, pulmonary cryptococcosis, and disseminated cryptococcosis. Cryptococcosis generally occurs in individuals with compromised cellular immunity, including peo-ple with chronic renal diseases, rheumatic immune diseases, hu-man immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, diabetes, organ trans-plantation, and immunosuppressive drug administration [5] . How-ever, patients with cryptococcosis may also be immunocompe-tent [6] . Different manifestations are associated with varying co-morbidities. For example, HIV-positive patients primarily develop cryptococcal meningitis, but they also develop pulmonary crypto-coccosis.

    Few studies focused on risk factors for death due to cryptococ-cosis in liver cirrhotic patients. Recognition of these risk factors is of great importance to improve the survival rate. The current study aimed to: (1) investigate the epidemiology of liver cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis and cryptococcal meningitis, (2) iden-tify independent risk factors for mortality within 30 and 90 days, and (3) compare the value of prognostic models for liver cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis.

    Methods

    Study design and patients

    A total of 10 800 cirrhotic patients from the First Affiliated Hos-pital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Hangzhou, China) were screened between January 2010 and July 2020, and 47 cir-rhotic patients with cryptococcosis were included in this study (patients with cryptococcosis referred to those with cryptococcal meningitis, cryptococcal pneumonia, disseminated cryptococcosis and cryptococcosis in other organs). Of those, 31 (66.0%) had hep-atitis B virus infection, 3 (6.4%) had alcoholic liver diseases, 3 (6.4%) had autoimmune liver diseases, 2 (4.3%) had cholestatic liver disease, and the remaining 8 (17.0%) had cryptogenic liver diseases. Cirrhosis was diagnosed by (1) liver biopsy, (2) radiological evi-dence of lesions, and (3) clinical manifestations of decompensation, including ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, splenomegaly, and portal hypertension. Cryptococcosis was diagnosed by (1) positive culture of cryptococcus from biological samples, (2) a positive result of In-dia ink staining of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), (3) histological stain-ing of tissues, and (4) positive results from the cryptococcal cap-sular polysaccharide antigen test. The following exclusion criteria were used: (1) under 18 or over 80 years old; and (2) incomplete clinical data. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

    Data collection

    The following information was collected: age, sex, length of stay, etiologies and complications of liver cirrhosis, comorbid-ity, medication prior to admission, laboratory parameters, diag-nostic methods, medication during hospitalization, severity mod-els and prognosis. Complications including ascites, hepatic en-cephalopathy, hypersplenia, and variceal bleeding, were defined ac-cording to criteria from the European Association for the Study of the Liver and International Ascites Club [7] . The prognostic models used to predict 30-and 90-day mortality included the model of end-stage liver disease (MELD), MELD-Na, and Child-Pugh scores. The formula for MELD score is 3.78 × ln(total bilirubin, mg/dL) + 11.2 × ln(INR) + 9.57 × ln(creatinine, mg/dL) + 6.43 × etiology (0 for cholestatic and alcoholic cirrhosis; 1 for others). The formula for MELD-Na score is MELD + 1.59 ×(135-Na). Child-Pugh score is determined based on hepatic encephalopathy, ascites, total bilirubin, albumin and pro-thrombin time.

    Statistical analysis

    Continuous variables were presented as the means ±standard deviation (SD) or the median (interquartile rang, IQR). Student’sttest and Mann-Whitney test were used to compare continuous variables between survivors and non-survivors. Nominal variables were presented as frequency and percentage and were compared using Fisher’s Exact test. A difference was considered significant when theP<0.05. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to examine risk factors for time-dependent death. The factors re-lated to mortality were included in the univariate Cox regression analysis. After univariate Cox regression analysis, the factors with significant differences were included in the multivariate Cox re-gression analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to analyze pa-tient survival. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the different prognostic models. Statistical analy-ses were performed using SPSS software version 20 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

    Results

    Patient characteristics

    A total of 10 800 patients were diagnosed with liver cirrho-sis. Forty-seven liver cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis were enrolled in this study, of them, 38 patients (80.9%) survived, and 9 (19.1%) died by the end of the 90-day follow-up. The median length of stay among survivors was 17 days, while the median length of stay among non-survivors was 25 days. Baseline char-acteristics, severity models, pathogen tests and treatments of the 90-day follow-up of the study were depicted in Table 1 . Of these patients, 9 (19.1%) had rheumatic immune diseases, 6 (12.8%) had chronic kidney diseases, 6 (12.8%) had diabetes mellitus, 2 (4.3%) had hematological malignancies, 2 (4.3%) had HIV infection, and 1 (2.1%) had cardiovascular diseases. There were no significant differ-ences in age, sex, co-morbidity, or medication prior to admission between survivors and non-survivors. Survivors differed from non-survivors in cryptogenic liver diseases (10.5% vs. 44.4%,P= 0.015). Non-survivors showed a higher frequency of certain complications, including hepatic encephalopathy (33.3% vs. 7.9%,P= 0.040), hep-atorenal syndrome (11.1% vs. 0,P= 0.038), and hepatopulmonary syndrome (11.1% vs. 0,P= 0.038). Regarding laboratory parame-ters, there were also significant differences in platelet count [109.5 (70.5-146.0) vs. 47.0 (33.5-89.0) ×109/L,P= 0.009], fibrinogen [2.5 (1.8-3.5) vs. 1.2 (1.0-2.0) g/L,P= 0.013], activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) [30.6 (26.1-38.3) vs. 43.7 (37.4-62.9) s,P= 0.003], prothrombin time (PT) [13.3 (11.8-15.7) vs. 17.6 (15.2-19.7) s,P= 0.007], total bilirubin (TBIL) [14.5 (9.0-26.3) vs. 34.2 (26.0-82.0)μmol/L,P= 0.002], direct bilirubin (DBIL) [6.0 (4.0-10.3) vs. 16.0 (10.6-50.5)μmol/L,P= 0.001] and indirect biliru-bin (IBIL) [8.1 (5.0-15.0) vs. 23.0 (11.0-31.5)μmol/L,P= 0.003] be-tween survivors and non-survivors.

    There were no significant differences in the positive rates of serum cryptococcal antigen and blood culture of cryptooccus be-tween survivors and non-survivors (39.5% vs. 22.2%,P= 0.333;5.3% vs. 22.2%,P= 0.101). Forty-two patients underwent lumbar puncture. There was a significant difference in cryptococcal smear between survivors and non-survivors (48.6% vs. 100%,P= 0.012), and the rates of CSF cryptococcal antigen, CSF culture, and CSF ink staining showed no significant differences ( Table 1 ).

    Table 1 Comparison of clinical characteristics between survivors and non-survivors for 90-day follow-up.

    Thirty-three cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis had crypto-coccal meningitis (70.2%); of these, twenty-five patients survived (75.8%), and eight died (24.2%). Baseline characteristics, severity models, pathogen tests and treatments of 90-day follow-up of the study were shown in Table 2 . Platelet counts [107.0 (58.5-148.0) ×109/L vs. 41.0 (33.3-97.8) ×109/L,P= 0.006], INR [1.2 (1.0-1.4) vs. 1.5 (1.2-1.7),P= 0.003], fibrinogen [2.5 (1.7-3.4) vs. 1.2 (1.0-2.3) g/L,P= 0.013], APTT [28.8 (26.1-37.5) vs. 39.9 (37.4-48.3) s,P= 0.001], PT [13.0 (11.7-15.5) vs. 17.5 (14.6-18.6) s,P= 0.003],TBIL [17.0 (8.7-27.5) vs. 33.1 (26.0-58.0)μmol/L,P= 0.001], creati-nine [62.0 (56.5-71.5) vs. 55.5 (43.0-63.0)μmol/L,P= 0.045], DBIL [6.0 (4.0-10.0) vs. 15.5 (10.3-28.8)μmol/L,P= 0.001], IBIL [10.0 (5.0-15.9) vs. 19.5 (11.0-29.3)μmol/L,P= 0.004] and Child-Pugh score (8.9 ±1.2 vs. 11.0 ±1.9,P= 0.001) were significantly differ-ent between survivors and non-survivors.

    Table 2 Comparison of clinical characteristics between survivors and non-survivors of patients with cryptococcal meningitis for 90-day follow-up.

    Clinical manifestations of cirrhotic patients with cryptococcal meningitis

    Patients with isolated cryptococcal meningitis accounted for most cryptococcosis cases (n= 33), and we analyzed the clinicalmanifestations of these patients ( Table 3 ). Cirrhotic patients with cryptococcal meningitis exhibited various clinical signs, including fever, headache, vomiting, disturbance of consciousness, and coma.Fever and headache were the main complications and developed in 78.8% and 81.8% of the patients, respectively. In contrast, vomiting, unconsciousness, and coma were observed in fewer patients.

    Table 3 Clinical manifestations of cryptococcal meningitis ( n = 33)

    Table 4 Manifestations of CSF and the treatment of cryptococcal meningitis for 90-day follow-up.

    Table 5 Risk factors correlated with 90-day mortality in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis.

    CSF manifestations in cirrhotic patients with cryptoc occal meningitis

    We also analyzed the manifestations of CSF at admission be-tween survivors and non-survivors in cirrhotic patients with cryp-tococcal meningitis at the 90-day follow-up ( Table 4 ). The per-centage of lymphocyte was higher in non-survivors than in sur-vivors [95.0% (83.8-97.2)% vs. 60.0% (35.0-75.0)%,P<0.001), and the protein level was higher in survivors than in non-survivors [1.2 (0.8-1.7) vs. 0.6 (0.5-1.1) g/L,P= 0.011). However, the intracranial pressure, nucleated cell count, glucose and chloride assessments showed no significant differences.

    Treatments

    Induction therapy is the most essential step of treatment for cryptococcal patients. As for non-HIV-infected patients with cryptococcosis, the combination of amphotericin B (AmB) and 5-flucytosine for at least 4 weeks is the preferred treat-ment. Apart from the abovementioned regimen, AmB monother-apy, AmB + fluconazole, fluconazole ±5-flucytosine, itraconazole ±5-flucytosine and voriconazole ±5-flucytosine are also considered when the preferred treatment is unavailable or impracticable. Ini-tial induction therapy is generally followed by consolidation and maintenance therapy with longer courses for suppression. In the present study, approximately 18 patients (18/47, 38.3%) received an AmB-based regimen ( Table 1 ). Fourteen cirrhotic patients with cryptococcal meningitis received an AmB-based regimen (14/33, 42.4%) ( Table 2 ). Patients also received flucytosine + fluconazole, flucytosine + voriconazole, fluconazole monotherapy and voricona-zole monotherapy as induction therapy. There were no significant differences in the percentages of patients who received AmB-based regimens or duration of AmB less than 14 days between survivors and non-survivors among all the patients and patients with cryp-tococcal meningitis (36.8% vs. 44.4%,P= 0.673; 28.6% vs. 50%,P= 0.423; 44% vs. 37.5%,P= 0.746; 45.6% vs. 50%,P= 0.876; Tables 1 and 2 ).

    Factors associated with 30- and 90-day mortality

    Liver cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis in the present co-hort had 30-and 90-day survival rates of 93.6% and 80.9%, re-spectively ( Fig. 1 ). Age was an important factor in the progno-sis of cryptococcosis, and was included in the multivariate anal-ysis. As shown in Table 5,cryptogenic liver diseases were critical in predicting 90-day mortality (HR = 7.567, 95% CI: 1.616-35.428,P= 0.010) in multivariate Cox regression analysis. The laboratory exam results in model 2 showed that platelet count (HR = 0.965, 95% CI: 0.940-0.991,P= 0.008) and APTT (HR = 1.117, 95% CI: 1.016-1.229,P= 0.022) were associated with 90-day mortality. The severity models for liver cirrhotic patients with cryptococco-sis were shown in model 3. Child-Pugh score (HR = 2.146, 95% CI: 1.314-3.504,P= 0.002) was important in the prognosis of cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis. As described above, platelet count was a protective factor, and cryptogenic liver diseases, APTT and Child-Pugh score were risk factors for predicting 90-day mortality. However, none of the factors affected 30-day mortality.

    Fig. 1. Kaplan-Meier curve depicting 30-day ( A ) and 90-day ( B ) survival rates.

    Table 6 Risk factors correlated with 90-day mortality in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcal meningitis.

    Table 7 Performance of three prognostic scores for predicting mortality of liver cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis.

    For the cirrhotic patients with cryptococcal meningitis, vari-ables with significantPvalues were included in the 90-day multivariate Cox regression ( Table 6 ). The results showed that platelet counts (HR = 0.969, 95% CI: 0.941-0.997,P= 0.033), APTT (HR = 1.120, 95% CI: 1.044-1.202,P= 0.002) and Child-Pugh score (HR = 1.637, 95% CI: 1.086-2.469,P= 0.019) were related with 90-day mortality. As described above, platelet count was also a protec-tive factor, APTT and Child-Pugh score were risk factors. However, these factors did not affect 30-day mortality.

    Value of three prognostic scores in liver cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis and cryptococcal meningitis

    We evaluated the abilities of the three prognostic scores MELD, MELD-Na and Child-Pugh to predict 30-and 90-day mortality in liver cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis ( Fig. 2 and Table 7 ). The area under curve (AUC) of MELD-Na score for predicting 30-day (AUC: 0.826, 95% CI: 0.618-1.0 0 0) mortality and the AUROC of Child-Pugh score for predicting 90-day (AUC: 0.823, 95% CI: 0.646-1.0 0 0) mortality at the onset of cryptococcosis were higher than those of the other two prediction scores.

    For cirrhotic patients with cryptococcal meningitis, the AUC of MELD-Na score for predicting 30-day mortality (AUC: 0.742, 95% CI: 0.560-0.924) and the AUROC of Child-Pugh score for predicting 90-day mortality (AUC: 0.815, 95% CI: 0.670-0.960) at the onset of cryptococcal meningitis were higher than those of the other two scores. The Youden index revealed the best cutoff point for MELD-Na score was 10.725 for 30-day mortality (sensitivity: 1.0 0 0 and specificity: 0.613). The best cutoff point for the Child-Pugh score was 10.5 for 90-day mortality (sensitivity: 0.625 and specificity: 0.960) ( Fig. 3 and Table 8 ).

    Table 8 Performance of three prognostic models for predicting mortality of liver cirrhotic patients with cryptococcal meningitis.

    Fig. 2. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of prognostic models in predicting 30-day ( A ) and 90-day ( B ) mortality in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis. MELD: the model of end-stage liver disease; MELD-Na: the model of end-stage liver disease-sodium.

    Fig. 3. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of prognostic models in predicting 30-day ( A ) and 90-day ( B ) mortality in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcal menin-gitis. MELD: the model of end-stage liver disease; MELD-Na: the model of end-stage liver disease-sodium.

    Discussion

    Cryptococcosis is observed in immunocompetent patients, but it primarily occurs in immunosuppressed patients, including HIV-positive patients and patients with organ transplantation, rheumatic immune diseases, diabetes mellitus, and malignancies. According to a study performed before 1983, the underlying dis-eases and the concurrent infections were more critical in deter-mining the survival rates of patients with cryptococcosis. The most common underlying disease in the present study was rheumatic immune diseases (9 patients, 19.1%), but another study reported HIV infection, HBV carrier status and malignancies as the main co-morbidities [8] . Steroid therapy, chronic lung and kidney diseases, malignancies and organ transplantation were associated with cryp-tococcal meningitis in a US cohort of cryptococcal infection [9] . Vi-ral hepatitis (31 patients, 66.0%) was the most common liver dis-ease that led to liver cirrhosis in the present study, which was con-sistent with the results of another study [3] .

    Thompson et al. [10] found that serotypes A and D were more common in immunosuppressed patients, and serotypes B and C were prone to comprise immunocompetent patients. Liver cirrhotic patients had a higher risk than patients with other primary dis-eases. The immune dysfunction, including decreased cellular and humoral immunity, reduced phagocytosis by innate immune cells and promoted complement deficiency and portal-systemic shunt-ing of blood flow, which promotes the entry of intestinal micro-biota into the peripheral circulation, all led to cryptococcosis in cirrhotic patients [ 2,3,11 ]. Low complement levels were associated with increased mortality in laboratory animals with cryptococcosis and patient with cirrhosis.

    Cryptococcosis is acquired via the respiratory system and begins in the lung. Fungal particles may also be ingested through contaminated food. Then cryptococci disseminate in the peripheral blood and localize in other organs, including the central nervous system (CNS), abdominal organs, and lymph nodes [3] . Therefore, disseminated cryptococcosis is diagnosed from a positive culture from two sites, or a positive blood culture. Cryptococcal meningitis often manifests as fever, headache, vomiting, seizure, confusion and unconsciousness. The median duration is approximately 6-12 weeks in non-HIV-infected patients and 2 weeks in HIV-infected patients [9] . Fever and headache were the two main signs in the current study, followed by vomiting, disturbance of consciousness and coma. These manifestations were consistent with a study in immunocompetent children [12] . Visual and hearing impair-ments, hemiplegia and altered mental status were not observed in our study but were common in a study of 94 non-HIV-infected patients with cryptococcal meningitis [13] . Lumbar puncture is indispensable in establishing the diagnosis. The CSF results indicate elevated intracranial pressure, increased lymphocytes and protein levels, and low glucose level [9],and the increased intracranial pressure and cerebral herniation are predictors of mortality. Cryptococcal antigen in CSF is always positive when CNS infection is established [14] . Williamson et al. [9] demon-strated that elevated cytokines in CSF, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferon -γ(IFN-γ), IL-17 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α), were associated with a high CD4 + T cell count, high CSF white cell counts, quick clearance rates of infection and high survival rates. They also showed that survivors had a higher proportion of TNF-αand IFN-γ-producing CD4 + T cells than non-survivors. However, Shih et al. [13] reported that immunocompromised pa-tients who had lower CSF cell and lymphocyte counts showed less severe symptoms of meningitis than immunocompetent patients. Meningeal involvement in the prognosis may be underestimated. Therefore, it is urgent to diagnose cryptococcal meningitis early and manage intracranial pressure aggressively. The CSF lympho-cyte percentage in our study was higher in non-survivors than in survivors at the 90-day follow-up. Okurut et al. [15] showed no significant difference in CSF protein level between HIV patients with and without cryptococcal meningitis. Another study showed that increased CSF protein level was related to an increased like-lihood of cryptococcal meningitis compared to controls [16] . The manifestations of cryptococcal meningitis in CSF include increased protein level, elevated white cell counts and low glucose. High protein level may be the indicator of a poor prognosis. However, the level of CSF protein in our cohort was lower in non-survivors than in survivors. This significant difference between survivors and non-survivors was found at admission, and it may be due to the small size of the cohort. Another possibility is that high protein level in CSF may increase the opsonic effect which help to kill cryptococci. Cryptococcal antigen testing is more sensitive than blood culture in disseminated cryptococcosis. The titers of serum cryptococcal antigens in patients with cryptococcosis range from 1:2 to 1:32 678 or from 1:32 to 1:1024. However, a Korean study showed that positive rate of cryptococcal antigen testing in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis was low, and that screening for cryptococcal antigens may not be helpful [17] . Moreover, cryptococcal antigen testing had only 57% sensitivity in pulmonary cryptococcosis [5] . Cryptococcal smear positivity in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis was lower in survivors than in non-survivors in this study (48.6% vs. 100%). However, there were no significant differences in the results of cultivation of cryptococcus in CSF and blood or the measurement of cryptococcal capsular polysaccharide antigen in CSF and blood. An accurate and prompt diagnosis is indispensable regardless of the method used to confirm cryptococcal infection because the failure to diagnose may cause a poor outcome, especially neurological damage.

    Our results showed that the survival rates were as high as 93.6% and 80.9% at the 30-and 90-day follow-ups, respectively. These percentages were similar to previous reports (0-47%) [13] . Because of the high mortality in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis and cryptococcal meningitis, the risk factors for mortality were ana-lyzed and discussed in our study. Cryptogenic liver diseases, APTT and Child-Pugh score were associated with 90-day mortality for cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis. APTT and Child-Pugh score were also related with 90-day mortality for cirrhotic patients with cryptococcal meningitis. Notably, age did not influence 30-or 90-day mortality. The Child-Pugh scoring system was pivotal in pre-dicting the 90-day outcome. The Child-Pugh scoring system con-siders the complications of liver cirrhosis, liver function and blood clotting index, and is more comprehensive than the MELD and MELD-Na scoring systems.

    The standard treatment course consists of induction, consol-idation and maintenance. AmB is the fastest acting drug against severe cryptococcal infection, especially meningitis, but it has several side effects. Renal injury and anemia are more commonly seen in the second week of AmB-based regimens than in the first week [18] . The combination of AmB and flucytosine is the first-line therapy because of its most potent fungicidal ability. Yan et al. [19] found that a low dose of AmB (0.4 mg/kg) in this combination reduced side effects without affecting effectiveness. Therefore, the combination of low-dose AmB and flucytosine was recommended for use in patients. The combination of AmB and fluconazole is recommended when flucytosine is not available because of the safety and low cost of fluconazole [ 20,21 ]. A study of HIV-infected patients advised two alternative options because of the short course of induction therapy: administration of AmB plus flucytosine for 1 week and flucytosine plus fluconazole for 2 weeks [18] . Day et al. [21] demonstrated that the use of AmB and flucytosine resulted in a higher survival rate without disability than AmB monotherapy, but AmB and fluconazole did not offer any benefit. The treatment regimens in this research followed the “Practice Guidelines for the Management of Cryptococcal Disease”and its 2010 updated version by Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) [ 22,23 ]. However, the optimal treatment varies between patients according to individual differences. The admin-istration of AmB-based regimens did not improve the survival rate for cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis and cryptococcal meningitis in the present study. There was no significant differ-ence in treatment with AmB-based regimens for less than 14 days between survivors and non-survivors at the 90-day follow-up. This result is not consistent with Xu et al. [24] . One explanation is that Xu’s study included the cryptococcal meningitis infec-tions underlying variety of diseases, whereas our cohort only included the patients underlying liver cirrhosis. Liver cirrhosis played an essential role in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis and cryptococcal meningitis. Another study also showed cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis were older and the manifestations may not be obvious [25] . Therefore, these patients did not receive antifungal treatments promptly, which was not beneficial to their outcomes.

    Our study also had some limitations. First, the study was a single-center cohort, the data need to be validated in multicenter studies. Second, the unavailability of cryptococcal capsular polysac-charide antigen measurements in earlier time was a big obstacle to acquire complete data for further analyses.

    In conclusion, our study investigated the risk factors for mor-tality and the predictive value of prognostic scores in cirrhotic patients with cryptococcosis and cryptococcal meningitis. Cryp-togenic liver diseases, APTT and Child-Pugh score were indepen-dently associated with mortality in these patients. The MELD-Na score was important for predicting 30-day mortality, and the Child-Pugh score was critical for predicting 90-day mortality.

    Acknowledgements

    None.

    CRediT authorship contribution statement

    Qi-Hui Zhou:Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing -original draft.Cai-Qin Hu:Writing -original draft.Yu Shi:Conceptualiza-tion.Feng-Tian Wu:Investigation, Formal analysis.Qin Yang:In-vestigation, Formal analysis.Jun Guan:Investigation, Formal anal-ysis.Ai-Chun Li:Methodology.Zhi Chen:Funding acquisition, Su-pervision, Writing -review & editing.

    Funding

    The study was supported by grants from the National Sci-ence and Technology Major Project of China ( 2018ZX10302206 and 2017ZX10202203 ).

    Ethical approval

    This study was approved by Ethics Committee of the First Affil-iated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

    Competing interestNo benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the sub-ject of this article.

    男女边吃奶边做爰视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 韩国av在线不卡| 日韩电影二区| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 久久 成人 亚洲| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 久久久久视频综合| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 熟女av电影| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久久久国产网址| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 一级黄片播放器| 久热这里只有精品99| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 高清av免费在线| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 极品教师在线视频| www.av在线官网国产| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 久久久久视频综合| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 在线看a的网站| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 人妻 亚洲 视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产91av在线免费观看| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 丁香六月天网| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产av精品麻豆| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 一级毛片我不卡| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 午夜福利,免费看| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 观看av在线不卡| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产黄色免费在线视频| www.色视频.com| 多毛熟女@视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 成人影院久久| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 免费av不卡在线播放| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 国产成人精品无人区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 天堂8中文在线网| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产精品.久久久| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 99久久精品热视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| www.色视频.com| av卡一久久| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产综合精华液| 在线 av 中文字幕| 免费看av在线观看网站| 秋霞伦理黄片| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲综合精品二区| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 尾随美女入室| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区久久| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产乱来视频区| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 大香蕉久久网| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 深夜a级毛片| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 久久狼人影院| 三级经典国产精品| 国产 一区精品| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 国产永久视频网站| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 91久久精品电影网| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲av男天堂| 六月丁香七月| 国产视频内射| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲av男天堂| 午夜福利视频精品| 另类精品久久| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 久久久精品94久久精品| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 日日撸夜夜添| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产精品成人在线| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 久久av网站| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 赤兔流量卡办理| 中文天堂在线官网| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产精品一区www在线观看| tube8黄色片| av天堂中文字幕网| 99久久精品热视频| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 欧美另类一区| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 欧美3d第一页| 在线天堂最新版资源| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 中文天堂在线官网| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲国产精品999| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 97在线视频观看| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产综合精华液| 一级黄片播放器| 成人免费观看视频高清| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产乱来视频区| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 男女免费视频国产| 精品久久久久久电影网| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 亚洲国产精品999| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| av在线老鸭窝| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 大码成人一级视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 91成人精品电影| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 曰老女人黄片| 久久狼人影院| 国产永久视频网站| 男女国产视频网站| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 九草在线视频观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 一级爰片在线观看| 久久久久视频综合| 国产高清三级在线| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 自线自在国产av| 国产精品无大码| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 麻豆成人av视频| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 香蕉精品网在线| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 中文欧美无线码| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲精品色激情综合| av黄色大香蕉| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 老司机影院成人| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产毛片在线视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 国产一区二区三区av在线| 一级黄片播放器| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 老司机影院成人| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 久久久久国产网址| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 午夜福利,免费看| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 在线观看人妻少妇| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 久久热精品热| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 成人免费观看视频高清| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| kizo精华| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| av免费在线看不卡| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频 | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 一级片'在线观看视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 高清av免费在线| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 少妇的逼好多水| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久久久视频综合| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 精品久久久噜噜| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 人妻系列 视频| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产 精品1| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 在现免费观看毛片| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| av线在线观看网站| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| a 毛片基地| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| av播播在线观看一区| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 香蕉精品网在线| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 国产 一区精品| 中文字幕制服av| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 亚洲av男天堂| 日本欧美视频一区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 中国国产av一级| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频 | 亚洲国产色片| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 精品一区在线观看国产| tube8黄色片| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 日韩强制内射视频| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 全区人妻精品视频| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| av免费在线看不卡| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 91精品国产九色| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 美女福利国产在线| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 国产成人91sexporn| 如何舔出高潮| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 亚洲成色77777| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 美女大奶头黄色视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 一级片'在线观看视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 亚洲在久久综合| 成人无遮挡网站| 插逼视频在线观看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 老司机影院成人| av播播在线观看一区| 91成人精品电影| 精品一区在线观看国产| www.av在线官网国产| 成人影院久久| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 中文欧美无线码| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 熟女电影av网| 三级国产精品片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线 | 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| av卡一久久| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 久久久国产一区二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 国产成人aa在线观看| 日韩伦理黄色片| 美女中出高潮动态图| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 久久99一区二区三区| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产av国产精品国产| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| av免费在线看不卡| 伦精品一区二区三区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 另类精品久久| xxx大片免费视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 51国产日韩欧美| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产视频内射| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| av在线app专区| 有码 亚洲区| 尾随美女入室| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 精品午夜福利在线看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 在线观看国产h片| 成人免费观看视频高清| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区 | 青春草视频在线免费观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费 | 韩国av在线不卡| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 国产一级毛片在线| 中国三级夫妇交换| 两个人免费观看高清视频 | 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久 成人 亚洲| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看|