• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Influence of weight management on the prognosis of steatohepatitis in chronic hepatitis B patients during antiviral treatment

    2021-11-08 08:33:32XuJuHuLuZuZuYuHuGuLuYuHuHuYuZuVtSu

    Xu-Ju C ,,Y-W S ,,J W ,Hu-B Lu ,Y C ,X-N Zu ,Y-P C ,Zu-J Yu ,Q-Hu S ,L T ,Q L ,L J ,Gu-M X ,L C ,W Lu ,X-Yu Hu ,Q-Hu L ,L-J A ,Z-Yu Zu ,Vt W-Su W ,, Y-P Y ,, J-G F ,

    a Department of Liver Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, the Fif th Medical Center of Chinese PL A General Hospital, Beijing 10 0 039, China

    b Center for Fatty Liver, Department of Gastroenterology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Lab of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Shanghai 20 0 092, China

    c Department of Liver Disease, Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 61007 2, China

    d Department o f Liver Diseases, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 40 0 038, China

    e Department of Infectious and Liver Diseases, Liver Research Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 3250 0 0, China

    f Department of Infectious Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450 052, China

    g Center of Therapeutic Liver Disease, the 960th Hospital of Chinese PL A, Taian 2710 0 0, China

    h Liver Disease Department, Fuyang 2nd People’s Hospital, Fuyang 236015, China

    i Department of Liver Diseases, Fuzhou Infectious Diseases Hospital, Fuzhou 350025, China

    j Department of Infectious Diseases, Southwest Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 40 0 038, China

    k Department of Infectious Diseases, Guangzhou 8th People’s Hospital, Guangzhou 510060, China

    l Department of Hepatic Diseases, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai 201508, China

    m Department of Liver Diseases, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin Institute of Hepatology, Tianjin 300192, China

    n National Integrative Med icine Clinical Base for Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Di seases, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610 0 0 0, China,

    o Department of Infection and Liver Disease, Yichun People’s Hospital, Yichun 336028, China

    p Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Keywords: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Hepatitis B NASH resolution Antiviral treatment Weight management

    ABSTRACT Background: Although concomitant nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is common in chronic hepatitis B (CHB), the impact of viral factors on NASH and the outcome of CHB patients concomitant with NASH remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the outcomes of NASH in CHB patients receiving antiviral treat-ment. Methods: In the post-hoc analysis of a multicenter trial, na?ve CHB patients receiving 72-week entecavir treatment were enrolled. We evaluated the biochemical, viral and histopathological responses of these patients. The histopathological features of NASH were also evaluated, using paired liver biopsies at base-line and week 72. Results: A total of 10 0 0 CHB patients were finally enrolled for analysis, with 18.2% of whom fulfilling the criteria of NASH. A total of 727 patients completed entecavir antiviral treatment and received the second biopsy. Serum HBeAg loss, HBeAg seroconversion and HBV-DNA undetectable rates were similar between patients with or without NASH ( P > 0.05). Among patients with NASH, the hepatic steatosis, ballooning, lobular inflammation scores and fibrosis stages all improved during follow-up (all P < 0.001), 46% (63/136) achieved NASH resolution. Patients with baseline body mass index (BMI) ≥23 kg/m 2 (Asian criteria) [odds ratio (OR): 0.414; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.190-0.899; P = 0.012] and weight gain (OR: 0.187; 95% CI: 0.050-0.693; P = 0.026) were less likely to have NASH resolution. Among patients without NASH at baseline, 22 (3.7%) developed NASH. Baseline BMI ≥23 kg/m 2 (OR: 12.506; 95% CI: 2.813-55.606; P = 0.001) and weight gain (OR: 5.126; 95% CI: 1.674-15.694; P = 0.005) were predictors of incident NASH. Conclusions: Lower BMI and weight reduction but not virologic factors determine NASH resolution in CHB. The value of weight management in CHB patients during antiviral treatment deserves further eval-uation.

    Introduction

    Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects more than 292 mil-lion people (3.9%) worldwide. It significantly increases the risk of the development of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related mortality [1] . Although current potent antiviral ther-apies can maintain viral suppression and reduce the risk of liver-related complications, we could not completely eliminate the in-fection because of the persistent HBV minichromosome in infected cells [ 2,3 ]. With the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), concomitant NAFLD is common in treatment-na?ve CHB patients. It is estimated that the prevalence of hepatic steatosis in CHB patients ranges from 17% to 25% [ 4,5 ].

    As a more aggressive subtype of NAFLD, nonalcoholic steato-hepatitis (NASH) is characterized by the presence of steatosis, inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning, generally considered to have faster fibrosis progression than simple steatosis [6] . Dis-ease progression in NASH results in various liver-related outcomes. There have been no approved pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of NASH [7] . Although various studies on the interac-tion between NAFLD and CHB have been conducted, the interac-tion between the two diseases remains controversial [ 8–10 ]. Not only the impact of NASH on antiviral therapy but also the nat-ural history of NASH during antiviral therapy is unclear. In addi-tion, a recent study showed that CHB patients with superimposed NASH have poorer clinical outcomes [11] . Some studies have in-vestigated the effects of CHB and concomitant NAFLD on liver dis-ease [ 12–14 ], while few multicenter prospective studies have in-cluded biopsy-defined NASH. Many previous studies were cross-sectional designed, which cannot clearly define the relationship be-tween NASH and CHB [ 15,16 ].

    Considering the rapidly increasing incidence of NASH, concomi-tant CHB and NASH is expected to become more common in the near future. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of NASH on antiviral treatment response in CHB patients, and to investigate the outcomes of NASH in CHB patients receiving antiviral treat-ment.

    Methods

    Study design and participants

    This is a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective, ran-domized controlled trial on long-term HBV treatment outcomes (NCT01965418) [ 17,18 ]. Patients were prospectively recruited from 14 centers of China.

    Patients fulfilling the following criteria were enrolled in the study: aged ≥18 years and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive for ≥6 months; Ishak fibrosis staging of ≥3; and an-tiviral treatment-na?ve or no treatment for at least 6 months. The exclusion criteria included excessive alcohol consumption (>20 g/day for women or>30 g/day for men); history of malignancy including HCC; other causes of liver disease including co-infection with hepatitis C or D; receiving potential medical interventions for NAFLD; diabetes requiring hypoglycemic drugs; serious uncontrol-lable diseases, organ transplantation or HIV; pregnancy or lacta-tion.

    All patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive Biejia-Ruangan (BR) tablet or placebo tablets (2 g three times daily) af-ter enrollment. Patients in both groups also received entecavir 0.5 mg/day. BR tablet was a quintessence complex of traditional Chi-nese medicine, approved by the National Medical Products Admin-istration (NMPA) of China for the treatment of cirrhosis.

    Histopathological evaluation

    Liver biopsy at baseline and follow-up was performed with ul-trasound guidance using 16 G quick-cut needle or Menghini needle (Allegiance Corporation, Waukegan, IL, USA). At least two pieces of liver tissue with more than 11 portal tracts each were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), reticulin, and Masson’s trichrome. Two central liver pathologists blinded to clinical information as-sessed all biopsy samples independently.

    Necroinflammation activity of CHB was assessed by the Ishak modified histology activity index (HAI) grading system. Fibrosis of CHB was also scored by Ishak staging system, in which Ishak stage 5 to 6 was defined as cirrhosis [19] . Noninvasive fibrosis test in-cluding liver stiffness measurement (LSM), aspartate aminotrans-ferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4) were calculated. The histopathological features of NAFLD were evaluated according to the system developed by NASH Clinical Re-search Network (NASH-CRN) [14] . The NAFLD activity score (NAS) ranged from 0 to 8 including steatosis scores (0-3), lobular in-flammation scores (0-3) and hepatocellular ballooning scores (0-2). Liver fibrosis for NAFLD was staged 0-4 according to the Kleiner fi-brosis stage [20] .

    Treatment efficacy and working definitions

    The efficacy of antiviral treatment consists of virological re-sponse (including undetectable HBV-DNA), biochemical response [alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization] and histological re-sponse. HBeAg seroconversion is defined as the absence of HBeAg and the presence of antibody in HBeAg-positive patients. ALT nor-malization is defined as ≤upper limit of normal (40 U/L) of ALT at week 72. Fibrosis regression is defined as decrease in Ishak fi-brosis score by ≥1 stage. Histological improvement is defined as ≥2-point decrease in the modified HAI score and no worsening of fibrosis compared to baseline [21] .

    NAFLD is defined as the presence of ≥5% steatosis without sec-ondary causes according to the Chinese guidelines on NAFLD [22] . NASH is defined as the presence of ≥5% steatosis with lobular in-flammation and hepatocyte ballooning. Advanced fibrosis refers to stages 3 or 4 fibrosis in patients with NASH. NASH resolution is defined as absent or bland steatosis without steatohepatitis: 0-1 for inflammation score, 0 for ballooning score, and any score for steatosis [23] . NASH improvement is defined as a decrease in in-flammation score ≥1 point and a decrease in ballooning score ≥1 point, without worsening of fibrosis, defined by NMPA [24] .

    For Asian population, overweight is defined as body mass in-dex (BMI) higher than 23 kg/m2. Weight change is calculated as (weight at baseline-weight at week 72)/weight at baseline ×100%. Weight gain is defined as ≥1% increase compared to baseline.

    Statistical analysis

    Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean ±standard deviation, and analyzed by Student’st-test. Oth-erwise, median with interquartile range (IQR) was used in case of not normally distributed data, and analyzed by Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for comparison among three or more groups, when the data conformed to normal distribution and homogeneity of variance. Changes in the histological scores from baseline and week 72 were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank sum test for the paired data. Uni-variate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the associated factors for NASH resolution, NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis, NAS decrease more than 2 points, NASH improvement without progression of fibrosis, as well as incident NASH among CHB patients receiving antiviral therapy. Collinearity diagnostics among variables were estimated with generalized linear models. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, Version 25.0).

    Results

    Baseline characteristics of enrolled CHB patients

    From October 2013 to October 2014, a total of 1460 patients with CHB were screened for eligibility from 14 centers. Finally, 10 0 0 CHB patients were enrolled to receive antiviral treatment. Among the patients, 29.7% (297/10 0 0) had steatosis, and 18.2% (182/10 0 0) fulfilled the criteria of NASH at the first liver biopsy. During 72-week treatment, 46 patients were lost to follow up. Among 954 patients completing the antiviral treatment, 727 took the second liver biopsy and were included for the final analysis ( Fig. 1 ).

    Fig. 1. Flow chart of the study design and patient outcome. CHB: chronic hepatitis B; NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; LBx: liver biopsy.

    CHB patients with NASH had higher BMI, higher proportion of overweight and higher steatosis score compared to those without NASH (allP<0.001) ( Table 1 ). In virology, CHB patients with NASH had higher levels of serum HBV-DNA (6.46 log IU/mL vs. 6.09 log IU/mL,P= 0.005). CHB patients with NASH also had more severe degree of inflammation: they had higher proportion of elevated ALT (P= 0.015) and higher HAI scores (P<0.001) than those with-out NASH. Whereas, the two groups had similar fibrosis stages in terms of Ishak fibrosis score (P= 0.807) and LSM value (P= 0.224).

    Table 1 Baseline characteristics between chronic hepatitis B patients with and without NASH.

    Table 2 Treatment efficacy between CHB patients with vs. without NASH.

    Concomitant NASH did not af fect response to antiviral therapy in CHB

    Among CHB patients completing 72-week antiviral treatment, 136 with NASH and 591 without NASH received the second biopsy. The rates of undetectable HBV-DNA, HBeAg loss and HBeAg se-roconversion were similar between the two groups (P= 0.756,P= 0.264 andP= 0.651, respectively). Patients with NASH had lower ALT normalization rate than those without NASH (80% vs. 88%,P= 0.019). Although serum HBsAg loss was achieved in pa-tients without NASH only (n= 5, 1%), the difference between two groups did not reach statistical significance (P= 0.282).

    The patients in two groups also achieved significant histologi-cal improvements. About 85% patients with and 90% without NASH had a decreased HAI score at week 72 (P= 0.164). The fibrosis re-gression rates were similar between the two groups (51% vs. 54%,P= 0.516). The non-invasive tests of fibrosis including LSM, APRI and FIB-4 were also significantly decreased, and there was no sig-nificant difference between two groups (P= 0.504,P= 0.894 andP= 0.818, respectively). About 75% patients with and 67% without NASH achieved histological improvement (P= 0.082, Table 2 ).

    Improvements in the histology of patients with NASH

    The changes in the proportion of hepatic steatosis and steato-hepatitis were shown in Fig. 2 A. Among 136 patients with NASH completing 72-week antiviral therapy, 50% had moderate to se-vere steatosis (steatosis ≥2) at baseline, while only 20% still had moderate to severe steatosis at week 72 (P<0.001) after treat-ment. Similarly, scores of ballooning and lobular inflammation in patients with NASH were significantly decreased at week 72 (bothP<0.001). The NAS score of patients with NASH was also im-proved at week 72. The median NAS score decreased from 5 (5-7) points to 0 (0-4) points, with only 16/136 patients (12%) having NAS score>4 points at week 72. The proportion of significant fi-brosis (F ≥2) decreased from 100% to 76%, and the overall fibrosis stages were improved compared to baseline (P<0.001, Fig. 2 B-F).

    Fig. 2. Dynamic changes in the histological characteristics of NASH during antiviral treatment. A: Changes of the proportion of patients with NASH or bland steatosis at week 72. Changes in the histological characteristics in CHB patients with NASH: steatosis grade (B),ballooning score (C),lobular inflammation score ( D ), fibrosis stage by Kleiner stage (E),NAS score (F) .

    A total of 63 patients (46%) achieved NASH resolution, and 58 (43%) achieved NASH resolution without progression of fibrosis. A total of 74% (100/136) patients with NASH had a decrease in steato-sis grade, with a median from 2 (1-2) to 0 (0-1). Most of the patients (128/136, 94%) had a decrease in NAS score. A decrease of NAS ≥2 points was achieved in 115/136 (85%) patients with NASH. As defined by NMPA, NASH improvement without progres-sion of fibrosis was also achieved in 59% (80/136) of the patients. Up to 43% (59/136) patients also had fibrosis regression, with 40% (55/136) patients having no progression of NASH at the same time.

    Overweight and weight gain were negative factors for NASH resolution

    The ORs for key characteristics of main NASH outcomes includ-ing NASH resolution, NASH resolution without progression of fi-brosis, NAS decrease ≥2 points and NASH improvement with no progression of fibrosis were shown in Table 3 . After adjusting for sex, age, history of smoking and drinking, positive HBeAg, HBV-DNA level, quantitative HBsAg level at baseline, ALT normalization and HBV-DNA undetectable, baseline overweight (OR: 0.414; 95% CI: 0.190-0.899;P= 0.012) and weight gain (OR: 0.187; 95% CI: 0.050-0.693;P= 0.026) were independent negative factors associ-ated with NASH resolution ( Table 3,Table S1). In these logistic re-gression analyses, there was no interaction between baseline BMI and weight change (Pvalue interaction = 0.531, 0.564,>0.999, 0.149, respectively).

    Similarly, overweight at baseline and weight gain during follow-up were less likely to have NASH resolution without progression of fibrosis, NAS decrease ≥2 points and NASH improvement without progression of fibrosis ( Table 3,Table S2-4). In addition, the resolu-tion rates were similar between groups with and without BR treat-ment (Table S5). The combined BR tablet treatment had no effects on NASH resolution (OR: 0.934; 95% CI: 0.476-1.834), NASH reso-lution without progression of fibrosis (OR: 0.871; 95% CI: 0.441-1.720), NAS decrease ≥2 (OR: 0.664, 95% CI: 0.260-1.697), nor NASH improvement without progression of fibrosis (OR: 1.022, 95% CI: 0.516-2.023) in CHB patients with NASH (Table S1-4). The his-tological characteristics of patients never with NASH, newly onset NASH, NASH resolution and stable NASH were shown in Fig. 3 .

    Table 3 Risk factors associated with the outcomes of NASH.

    Fig. 3. Variety in histologic outcomes during treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Four different types of outcomes in CHB patients showed in liver biopsy samples: no NASH at baseline or 72-week follow-up (A) ; no NASH at baseline but developed NASH at week 72 (B) ; CHB patients had NASH resolution at week 72 (C) ; CHB patients had NASH at baseline and week 72 (D) . NASH: nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; BMI: body mass index; H&E: hematoxylin-eosin staining.

    Weight status and NASH outcomes during antiviral treatment of CHB

    Among CHB patients without steatosis at baseline, 7% (35/505) had newly onset steatosis during follow-up, with an incidence of 50.0 per 10 0 0 person-years. Among CHB patients who had no or bland steatosis at baseline, 22 (4%) developed NASH at the end of follow-up, with an incidence as 14.4 per 10 0 0 person-years. Patients with overweight had 12.5 times (95% CI: 2.813-55.606;P= 0.001) risk of developing NASH, while patients with weight gain during follow-up had 5.1 times (95% CI: 1.674-15.694;P= 0.005) risk of developing NASH ( Table 4 ).

    Overall, the proportions of patients with NASH resolution, sta-ble NASH, new-onset NASH and never NASH were 9%, 10%, 3% and 78%, respectively. Baseline BMI and weight change during follow-up were significantly associated with outcomes of NASH in CHB patients receiving antiviral treatment. The proportion of weight gain in these groups was 5%, 27%, 23% and 8%, respectively. Over-weight CHB patients with weight gain ≥1.5% during follow-up had the highest risk of developing new-onset steatosis, increasing de-gree of steatosis and incident NASH (allP<0.001, Table 5 ). These patients also had the lowest rate of NASH resolution (P= 0.018), NASH resolution with no progression of fibrosis (P= 0.041), and a tendency of lower rate of ≥2 points reduction in NAS with no progression of fibrosis (P= 0.069) and NASH improvement with no progression of fibrosis (P= 0.051, Table 5 ).

    Table 4 Risk factors of the incidence of NASH in CHB patients.

    Table 5 Baseline BMI and weight gain were associated with the outcomes of NASH in CHB patients.

    Discussion

    Numerous studies focused on the impact of hepatic steatosis on the virologic response of CHB, while few studies examined the outcomes of co-existing NASH in patients with CHB during an-tiviral treatment [ 25–27 ]. In this large-scale, multi-center, paired liver biopsy-proven antiviral treatment study, we observed that the outcome of patients with concomitant NASH was closely associ-ated with baseline BMI and subtle weight change rather than vi-ral response during treatment. These results call for the need of increased awareness in the weight management during antiviral treatment of CHB patients.

    To our knowledge, this is the first study using paired liver biop-sies to investigate the outcomes of CHB patients with NASH in a large cohort with antiviral therapy. Most of the previous stud-ies evaluated the grade of steatosis by ultrasonography [ 25,28,29 ], which is not sensitive enough to detect mild to moderate steatosis and its subtle changes. Furthermore, histopathological assessment remains indispensable in the diagnosis of NASH. In the present study, the scoring systems we used to assess the features of active inflammation and fibrosis in NAFLD and CHB were independent. The activity of hepatitis B (modified HAI) consists of the severity of four aspects including periportal interface hepatitis, confluent necrosis, focal lytic necrosis and portal inflammation [19] . While in NAFLD, the inflammation is determined by the numbers of lobular inflammation foci per field and ballooned hepatocytes [14] ; the lat-ter in particular is well recognized as a key feature of NASH. Recent evidence also showed that the histological activity of hepatitis B is not correlated with the severity of steatosis or NASH [30] . Thus, we could avoid the bias brought by the improvement of hepatitis B due to antiviral treatment when assessing the activity of NAFLD.

    Although a high proportion of na?ve CHB patients had concomi-tant NASH at baseline, we observed a high NASH resolution rate af-ter 72-week antiviral treatment. Compared to previous reports, the NASH resolution rate in our study was even higher than that in the control arm of novel agents clinical trials [ 31,32 ]. As demonstrated by previous studies, weight change played an important role in the resolution of NASH [ 33,34 ]. Overweight/obesity and weight gain in adulthood are closely associated with the development of NAFLD in the general population [ 35–37 ]. In non-obese patients, improve-ments in NAFLD or NASH can even be achieved by a small re-duction of weight [ 34,38 ]. A recent report in CHB patients also had similar findings [39] . We also reported the incidence of NASH in CHB patients during antiviral therapy for the first time. Our data (50.0/10 0 0 person-years) were similar with the recent report of incident ultrasound-based NAFLD in CHB patients (63.89/10 0 0 person-years) [39],and slightly higher than that in general popu-lation (28.6/10 0 0 person-years reported by Zelber-Sagi et al. [40],29.7/10 0 0 person-years reported by Chang et al. [41] ). Similar with the previous cohort study of metabolically normal patients, BMI of the patients was associated with the incidence of NAFLD [41] . Therefore, we should pay enough attention to body weight control and healthy lifestyle in CHB patients regardless of antiviral treat-ment.

    One previous study showed that HBV may have interactions with hepatic steatosis through multiple mechanisms [42] . HBV X protein (HBx) and HBV surface proteins play a role in the hepatic lipid deposition and lipogenesis [ 43,44 ]. Although antiviral agents including entecavir could down-regulate the expression of HBx [45],there is no evidence that entecavir had direct effect on the regulating lipid metabolism [46] . The combined BR tablet is a traditional Chinese medicine, consequently used for liver cirrhosis in China [47] . In the current study, BR tablet showed no effect on the resolution or improvement of steatohepatitis in fibrotic patients with CHB. The pathogenesis of HBV-associated hepatic steatosis still remains elusive, and more evidences from molecular pathways and experimental animal models are needed. In addition, novel antiviral agents such as tenofovir alafenamide and myrcludex B showed potential efficacy in improving metabolic dysfunctions including weight loss and decreased hepatic adiposity [ 4 8,4 9 ]. These new agents may be promising in the management of CHB patients concomitant with NASH or NAFLD.

    Another important question concerning the NASH in HBV in-fected patients is whether the steatosis had impact on the re-sponse to antiviral therapy. Most of previous studies investigat-ing this issue were retrospective and single-center, using indirect methods such as imaging to evaluate steatosis [ 50,51 ]. By avoiding these limitations, this study was based on histological evidence of NASH, a multicenter prospective cohort and therefore could specif-ically explore the impact of NASH on antiviral treatment response. In our study, concomitant NASH did not affect the antiviral effi-cacy of CHB. The HBV-DNA undetectable rates were similar be-tween CHB patients with and without NASH at week 72, in accor-dance with the recent study [52] . Compared with real-world study mentioned above, the present study was a clinical trial, and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria would reduce the effect of someconfounders. Based on the histologic evidence of NASH and a mul-ticenter prospective cohort, we believe that our findings could pro-vide a reliable inference that there is no significant impact of NASH on treatment response under antiviral therapy.

    Several limitations of the current study need to be consid-ered. First, there was no control group of CHB patients with NASH not receiving antiviral treatment, for it would be unethi-cal to leave patients with treatment indications untreated. Sec-ond, limited to previous design of the original study, the impact of metabolic characteristics including lipid profile, plasma glucose and insulin on the outcome of NASH was not analyzed. Fortu-nately, patients taking hypoglycemic agents or potential treatment for NAFLD were excluded in this study, which reduced confound-ing. Third, we did not observe any significant difference in fibro-sis improvement between patients with or without weight gain. A total of 72 weeks is still short for the significant changes of fibrosis attributed to NASH. In addition, this follow-up study is now going on. Future results of our current study, along with an-imal studies promise to further reveal the mechanism of resolu-tion and incident NASH in CHB patients receiving antiviral treat-ment. We hope that data in the near future would add more evidences.

    In conclusion, viral response is not associated with the outcome of NASH in na?ve CHB patients receiving 72-week entecavir ther-apy. BMI at baseline and subtle weight changes during follow-up are important either in the resolution or in the incidence of NASH in CHB patients during antiviral treatment. Therefore, we should pay attention to body weight control in CHB patients regardless of antiviral treatment.

    Acknowledgments

    None.

    Credit authorship contribution statement

    Xiu-Juan Chang:Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing -orig-inal draft.Yi-Wen Shi:Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writ-ing -original draft.Jing Wang:Data curation.Hua-Bao Liu:Data curation.Yan Chen:Data curation.Xiao-Ning Zhu:Data curation.Yong-Ping Chen:Data curation.Zu-Jiang Yu:Data curation.Qing-Hua Shang:Data curation. Lin Tan:Data curation.Qin Li:Data cu-ration.Li Jiang:Data curation.Guang-Ming Xiao:Data curation.Liang Chen:Data curation.Wei Lu:Data curation.Xiao-Yu Hu:Data curation.Qing-Hua Long:Data curation.Lin-Jing An:Data curation.Zi-Yuan Zou:Writing -original draft.Vincent Wai-Sun Wong:Conceptualization, Writing -original draft, Writing -review & editing.Yong-Ping Yang:Conceptualization, Data curation, Fund-ing acquisition, Writing -original draft, Writing -review & editing.Jian-Gao Fan:Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisi-tion, Writing -original draft, Writing -review & editing.

    Funding

    This study was supported by grants from the National Ma-jor Special Project for the Prevention and Treatment of Major Infectious Diseases: AIDS and viral hepatitis (2013ZX10 0 050 02, 2018ZX10725506) and the National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFC0908903).

    Ethical approval

    This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of each participating institution and written informed consents were obtained from all patients.

    Competing interest

    No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the sub-ject of this article.

    Supplementary materials

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.06.009 .

    国产成人精品久久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| av卡一久久| 97在线视频观看| 精品国产三级普通话版| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99 | 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产老妇女一区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| a级毛色黄片| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 免费av观看视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久久久精品性色| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 日日撸夜夜添| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 久久久久国产网址| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 一级黄片播放器| 在现免费观看毛片| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 成人无遮挡网站| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 色哟哟·www| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 国产黄片美女视频| 国产在线男女| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 精品久久久久久成人av| a级毛色黄片| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 内射极品少妇av片p| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| av专区在线播放| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 99热6这里只有精品| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 乱人视频在线观看| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 免费av不卡在线播放| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美另类一区| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 97在线视频观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 欧美bdsm另类| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 久久久久性生活片| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久久久性生活片| 免费看日本二区| 99久久人妻综合| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 成人二区视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 在线观看一区二区三区| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 男女国产视频网站| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 午夜激情欧美在线| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产不卡一卡二| 热99在线观看视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲综合色惰| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产综合懂色| 内地一区二区视频在线| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| av在线亚洲专区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 午夜免费观看性视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产在线男女| h日本视频在线播放| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 国产极品天堂在线| 日本色播在线视频| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 中文资源天堂在线| 岛国毛片在线播放| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 黄片wwwwww| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 在线观看一区二区三区| 七月丁香在线播放| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 69人妻影院| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲图色成人| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲精品一二三| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 九草在线视频观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 欧美区成人在线视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 日本熟妇午夜| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲成色77777| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 免费观看av网站的网址| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| av播播在线观看一区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 搡老乐熟女国产| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 久久97久久精品| 春色校园在线视频观看| 青春草国产在线视频| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 欧美bdsm另类| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 精品人妻视频免费看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 精品人妻视频免费看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 搞女人的毛片| 久久热精品热| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 91久久精品电影网| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 久久久久久久国产电影| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 在线观看一区二区三区| or卡值多少钱| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 美女高潮的动态| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 精品午夜福利在线看| 一级毛片电影观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产美女午夜福利| 中文字幕制服av| 赤兔流量卡办理| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产av不卡久久| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 黄色配什么色好看| 午夜福利在线在线| 中国国产av一级| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 在线免费十八禁| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲不卡免费看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 成人av在线播放网站| 老女人水多毛片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产永久视频网站| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 永久免费av网站大全| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 久久草成人影院| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲精品第二区| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 久久久久性生活片| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品视频女| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产极品天堂在线| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 免费看不卡的av| ponron亚洲| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 国产探花极品一区二区| 成人国产麻豆网| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 搞女人的毛片| 黄片wwwwww| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 丝袜喷水一区| 色综合色国产| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产综合精华液| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 午夜福利高清视频| 色哟哟·www| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 欧美97在线视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美日本视频| 国产av在哪里看| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 一级毛片我不卡| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 欧美人与善性xxx| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 午夜精品在线福利| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产成人福利小说| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 天堂网av新在线| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 天堂√8在线中文| 久久久久性生活片| 黄色日韩在线| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲成色77777| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 精品久久久噜噜| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 日本免费a在线| 直男gayav资源| 九九在线视频观看精品| 老司机影院毛片| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲国产色片| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| www.色视频.com| 春色校园在线视频观看| 午夜视频国产福利| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 99热这里只有精品一区| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 欧美日韩在线观看h| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 国内精品美女久久久久久| 精品国产三级普通话版| 欧美zozozo另类| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 内地一区二区视频在线| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 美女高潮的动态| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 人妻系列 视频| 色网站视频免费| 色哟哟·www| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 一级a做视频免费观看| 欧美另类一区| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 国产黄片美女视频| 色哟哟·www| 久久久久久久国产电影| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 五月天丁香电影| av福利片在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| videos熟女内射| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 久99久视频精品免费| 黄色日韩在线| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 色视频www国产| 九九在线视频观看精品| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲精品视频女| 高清欧美精品videossex| 岛国毛片在线播放| 舔av片在线| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 少妇高潮的动态图| 高清av免费在线| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩伦理黄色片| 欧美3d第一页| 男人舔奶头视频| 午夜免费激情av| 九草在线视频观看| 免费大片18禁| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂 | 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲精品视频女| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 久久久久国产网址| 欧美性感艳星| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲精品第二区| 1000部很黄的大片| 欧美zozozo另类| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 亚州av有码| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 麻豆成人av视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产91av在线免费观看| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 三级国产精品片| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 成年版毛片免费区| 一个人免费在线观看电影| av专区在线播放| 七月丁香在线播放| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 美女主播在线视频| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 午夜福利在线在线| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 日韩强制内射视频| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 99久久人妻综合| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产 一区精品| 久久久久精品性色| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 三级经典国产精品| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 免费看不卡的av| 中国国产av一级| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 91狼人影院| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 麻豆成人av视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 午夜免费激情av| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 日本午夜av视频| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久人人爽人人片av| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 久久久久性生活片| 日本午夜av视频| 直男gayav资源| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产成人a区在线观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新|