• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Influence of weight management on the prognosis of steatohepatitis in chronic hepatitis B patients during antiviral treatment

    2021-11-08 08:33:32XuJuHuLuZuZuYuHuGuLuYuHuHuYuZuVtSu

    Xu-Ju C ,,Y-W S ,,J W ,Hu-B Lu ,Y C ,X-N Zu ,Y-P C ,Zu-J Yu ,Q-Hu S ,L T ,Q L ,L J ,Gu-M X ,L C ,W Lu ,X-Yu Hu ,Q-Hu L ,L-J A ,Z-Yu Zu ,Vt W-Su W ,, Y-P Y ,, J-G F ,

    a Department of Liver Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, the Fif th Medical Center of Chinese PL A General Hospital, Beijing 10 0 039, China

    b Center for Fatty Liver, Department of Gastroenterology, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Lab of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Shanghai 20 0 092, China

    c Department of Liver Disease, Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 61007 2, China

    d Department o f Liver Diseases, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Chongqing, Chongqing 40 0 038, China

    e Department of Infectious and Liver Diseases, Liver Research Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 3250 0 0, China

    f Department of Infectious Disease, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450 052, China

    g Center of Therapeutic Liver Disease, the 960th Hospital of Chinese PL A, Taian 2710 0 0, China

    h Liver Disease Department, Fuyang 2nd People’s Hospital, Fuyang 236015, China

    i Department of Liver Diseases, Fuzhou Infectious Diseases Hospital, Fuzhou 350025, China

    j Department of Infectious Diseases, Southwest Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing 40 0 038, China

    k Department of Infectious Diseases, Guangzhou 8th People’s Hospital, Guangzhou 510060, China

    l Department of Hepatic Diseases, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Shanghai 201508, China

    m Department of Liver Diseases, Tianjin Second People’s Hospital, Tianjin Institute of Hepatology, Tianjin 300192, China

    n National Integrative Med icine Clinical Base for Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Di seases, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610 0 0 0, China,

    o Department of Infection and Liver Disease, Yichun People’s Hospital, Yichun 336028, China

    p Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China

    Keywords: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis Hepatitis B NASH resolution Antiviral treatment Weight management

    ABSTRACT Background: Although concomitant nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is common in chronic hepatitis B (CHB), the impact of viral factors on NASH and the outcome of CHB patients concomitant with NASH remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the outcomes of NASH in CHB patients receiving antiviral treat-ment. Methods: In the post-hoc analysis of a multicenter trial, na?ve CHB patients receiving 72-week entecavir treatment were enrolled. We evaluated the biochemical, viral and histopathological responses of these patients. The histopathological features of NASH were also evaluated, using paired liver biopsies at base-line and week 72. Results: A total of 10 0 0 CHB patients were finally enrolled for analysis, with 18.2% of whom fulfilling the criteria of NASH. A total of 727 patients completed entecavir antiviral treatment and received the second biopsy. Serum HBeAg loss, HBeAg seroconversion and HBV-DNA undetectable rates were similar between patients with or without NASH ( P > 0.05). Among patients with NASH, the hepatic steatosis, ballooning, lobular inflammation scores and fibrosis stages all improved during follow-up (all P < 0.001), 46% (63/136) achieved NASH resolution. Patients with baseline body mass index (BMI) ≥23 kg/m 2 (Asian criteria) [odds ratio (OR): 0.414; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.190-0.899; P = 0.012] and weight gain (OR: 0.187; 95% CI: 0.050-0.693; P = 0.026) were less likely to have NASH resolution. Among patients without NASH at baseline, 22 (3.7%) developed NASH. Baseline BMI ≥23 kg/m 2 (OR: 12.506; 95% CI: 2.813-55.606; P = 0.001) and weight gain (OR: 5.126; 95% CI: 1.674-15.694; P = 0.005) were predictors of incident NASH. Conclusions: Lower BMI and weight reduction but not virologic factors determine NASH resolution in CHB. The value of weight management in CHB patients during antiviral treatment deserves further eval-uation.

    Introduction

    Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects more than 292 mil-lion people (3.9%) worldwide. It significantly increases the risk of the development of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related mortality [1] . Although current potent antiviral ther-apies can maintain viral suppression and reduce the risk of liver-related complications, we could not completely eliminate the in-fection because of the persistent HBV minichromosome in infected cells [ 2,3 ]. With the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), concomitant NAFLD is common in treatment-na?ve CHB patients. It is estimated that the prevalence of hepatic steatosis in CHB patients ranges from 17% to 25% [ 4,5 ].

    As a more aggressive subtype of NAFLD, nonalcoholic steato-hepatitis (NASH) is characterized by the presence of steatosis, inflammation and hepatocyte ballooning, generally considered to have faster fibrosis progression than simple steatosis [6] . Dis-ease progression in NASH results in various liver-related outcomes. There have been no approved pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of NASH [7] . Although various studies on the interac-tion between NAFLD and CHB have been conducted, the interac-tion between the two diseases remains controversial [ 8–10 ]. Not only the impact of NASH on antiviral therapy but also the nat-ural history of NASH during antiviral therapy is unclear. In addi-tion, a recent study showed that CHB patients with superimposed NASH have poorer clinical outcomes [11] . Some studies have in-vestigated the effects of CHB and concomitant NAFLD on liver dis-ease [ 12–14 ], while few multicenter prospective studies have in-cluded biopsy-defined NASH. Many previous studies were cross-sectional designed, which cannot clearly define the relationship be-tween NASH and CHB [ 15,16 ].

    Considering the rapidly increasing incidence of NASH, concomi-tant CHB and NASH is expected to become more common in the near future. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the impact of NASH on antiviral treatment response in CHB patients, and to investigate the outcomes of NASH in CHB patients receiving antiviral treat-ment.

    Methods

    Study design and participants

    This is a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter, prospective, ran-domized controlled trial on long-term HBV treatment outcomes (NCT01965418) [ 17,18 ]. Patients were prospectively recruited from 14 centers of China.

    Patients fulfilling the following criteria were enrolled in the study: aged ≥18 years and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive for ≥6 months; Ishak fibrosis staging of ≥3; and an-tiviral treatment-na?ve or no treatment for at least 6 months. The exclusion criteria included excessive alcohol consumption (>20 g/day for women or>30 g/day for men); history of malignancy including HCC; other causes of liver disease including co-infection with hepatitis C or D; receiving potential medical interventions for NAFLD; diabetes requiring hypoglycemic drugs; serious uncontrol-lable diseases, organ transplantation or HIV; pregnancy or lacta-tion.

    All patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive Biejia-Ruangan (BR) tablet or placebo tablets (2 g three times daily) af-ter enrollment. Patients in both groups also received entecavir 0.5 mg/day. BR tablet was a quintessence complex of traditional Chi-nese medicine, approved by the National Medical Products Admin-istration (NMPA) of China for the treatment of cirrhosis.

    Histopathological evaluation

    Liver biopsy at baseline and follow-up was performed with ul-trasound guidance using 16 G quick-cut needle or Menghini needle (Allegiance Corporation, Waukegan, IL, USA). At least two pieces of liver tissue with more than 11 portal tracts each were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), reticulin, and Masson’s trichrome. Two central liver pathologists blinded to clinical information as-sessed all biopsy samples independently.

    Necroinflammation activity of CHB was assessed by the Ishak modified histology activity index (HAI) grading system. Fibrosis of CHB was also scored by Ishak staging system, in which Ishak stage 5 to 6 was defined as cirrhosis [19] . Noninvasive fibrosis test in-cluding liver stiffness measurement (LSM), aspartate aminotrans-ferase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis 4 index (FIB-4) were calculated. The histopathological features of NAFLD were evaluated according to the system developed by NASH Clinical Re-search Network (NASH-CRN) [14] . The NAFLD activity score (NAS) ranged from 0 to 8 including steatosis scores (0-3), lobular in-flammation scores (0-3) and hepatocellular ballooning scores (0-2). Liver fibrosis for NAFLD was staged 0-4 according to the Kleiner fi-brosis stage [20] .

    Treatment efficacy and working definitions

    The efficacy of antiviral treatment consists of virological re-sponse (including undetectable HBV-DNA), biochemical response [alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization] and histological re-sponse. HBeAg seroconversion is defined as the absence of HBeAg and the presence of antibody in HBeAg-positive patients. ALT nor-malization is defined as ≤upper limit of normal (40 U/L) of ALT at week 72. Fibrosis regression is defined as decrease in Ishak fi-brosis score by ≥1 stage. Histological improvement is defined as ≥2-point decrease in the modified HAI score and no worsening of fibrosis compared to baseline [21] .

    NAFLD is defined as the presence of ≥5% steatosis without sec-ondary causes according to the Chinese guidelines on NAFLD [22] . NASH is defined as the presence of ≥5% steatosis with lobular in-flammation and hepatocyte ballooning. Advanced fibrosis refers to stages 3 or 4 fibrosis in patients with NASH. NASH resolution is defined as absent or bland steatosis without steatohepatitis: 0-1 for inflammation score, 0 for ballooning score, and any score for steatosis [23] . NASH improvement is defined as a decrease in in-flammation score ≥1 point and a decrease in ballooning score ≥1 point, without worsening of fibrosis, defined by NMPA [24] .

    For Asian population, overweight is defined as body mass in-dex (BMI) higher than 23 kg/m2. Weight change is calculated as (weight at baseline-weight at week 72)/weight at baseline ×100%. Weight gain is defined as ≥1% increase compared to baseline.

    Statistical analysis

    Normally distributed continuous variables were expressed as mean ±standard deviation, and analyzed by Student’st-test. Oth-erwise, median with interquartile range (IQR) was used in case of not normally distributed data, and analyzed by Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used for comparison among three or more groups, when the data conformed to normal distribution and homogeneity of variance. Changes in the histological scores from baseline and week 72 were evaluated using Wilcoxon rank sum test for the paired data. Uni-variate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the associated factors for NASH resolution, NASH resolution without worsening of fibrosis, NAS decrease more than 2 points, NASH improvement without progression of fibrosis, as well as incident NASH among CHB patients receiving antiviral therapy. Collinearity diagnostics among variables were estimated with generalized linear models. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 25.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, Version 25.0).

    Results

    Baseline characteristics of enrolled CHB patients

    From October 2013 to October 2014, a total of 1460 patients with CHB were screened for eligibility from 14 centers. Finally, 10 0 0 CHB patients were enrolled to receive antiviral treatment. Among the patients, 29.7% (297/10 0 0) had steatosis, and 18.2% (182/10 0 0) fulfilled the criteria of NASH at the first liver biopsy. During 72-week treatment, 46 patients were lost to follow up. Among 954 patients completing the antiviral treatment, 727 took the second liver biopsy and were included for the final analysis ( Fig. 1 ).

    Fig. 1. Flow chart of the study design and patient outcome. CHB: chronic hepatitis B; NASH: non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; LBx: liver biopsy.

    CHB patients with NASH had higher BMI, higher proportion of overweight and higher steatosis score compared to those without NASH (allP<0.001) ( Table 1 ). In virology, CHB patients with NASH had higher levels of serum HBV-DNA (6.46 log IU/mL vs. 6.09 log IU/mL,P= 0.005). CHB patients with NASH also had more severe degree of inflammation: they had higher proportion of elevated ALT (P= 0.015) and higher HAI scores (P<0.001) than those with-out NASH. Whereas, the two groups had similar fibrosis stages in terms of Ishak fibrosis score (P= 0.807) and LSM value (P= 0.224).

    Table 1 Baseline characteristics between chronic hepatitis B patients with and without NASH.

    Table 2 Treatment efficacy between CHB patients with vs. without NASH.

    Concomitant NASH did not af fect response to antiviral therapy in CHB

    Among CHB patients completing 72-week antiviral treatment, 136 with NASH and 591 without NASH received the second biopsy. The rates of undetectable HBV-DNA, HBeAg loss and HBeAg se-roconversion were similar between the two groups (P= 0.756,P= 0.264 andP= 0.651, respectively). Patients with NASH had lower ALT normalization rate than those without NASH (80% vs. 88%,P= 0.019). Although serum HBsAg loss was achieved in pa-tients without NASH only (n= 5, 1%), the difference between two groups did not reach statistical significance (P= 0.282).

    The patients in two groups also achieved significant histologi-cal improvements. About 85% patients with and 90% without NASH had a decreased HAI score at week 72 (P= 0.164). The fibrosis re-gression rates were similar between the two groups (51% vs. 54%,P= 0.516). The non-invasive tests of fibrosis including LSM, APRI and FIB-4 were also significantly decreased, and there was no sig-nificant difference between two groups (P= 0.504,P= 0.894 andP= 0.818, respectively). About 75% patients with and 67% without NASH achieved histological improvement (P= 0.082, Table 2 ).

    Improvements in the histology of patients with NASH

    The changes in the proportion of hepatic steatosis and steato-hepatitis were shown in Fig. 2 A. Among 136 patients with NASH completing 72-week antiviral therapy, 50% had moderate to se-vere steatosis (steatosis ≥2) at baseline, while only 20% still had moderate to severe steatosis at week 72 (P<0.001) after treat-ment. Similarly, scores of ballooning and lobular inflammation in patients with NASH were significantly decreased at week 72 (bothP<0.001). The NAS score of patients with NASH was also im-proved at week 72. The median NAS score decreased from 5 (5-7) points to 0 (0-4) points, with only 16/136 patients (12%) having NAS score>4 points at week 72. The proportion of significant fi-brosis (F ≥2) decreased from 100% to 76%, and the overall fibrosis stages were improved compared to baseline (P<0.001, Fig. 2 B-F).

    Fig. 2. Dynamic changes in the histological characteristics of NASH during antiviral treatment. A: Changes of the proportion of patients with NASH or bland steatosis at week 72. Changes in the histological characteristics in CHB patients with NASH: steatosis grade (B),ballooning score (C),lobular inflammation score ( D ), fibrosis stage by Kleiner stage (E),NAS score (F) .

    A total of 63 patients (46%) achieved NASH resolution, and 58 (43%) achieved NASH resolution without progression of fibrosis. A total of 74% (100/136) patients with NASH had a decrease in steato-sis grade, with a median from 2 (1-2) to 0 (0-1). Most of the patients (128/136, 94%) had a decrease in NAS score. A decrease of NAS ≥2 points was achieved in 115/136 (85%) patients with NASH. As defined by NMPA, NASH improvement without progres-sion of fibrosis was also achieved in 59% (80/136) of the patients. Up to 43% (59/136) patients also had fibrosis regression, with 40% (55/136) patients having no progression of NASH at the same time.

    Overweight and weight gain were negative factors for NASH resolution

    The ORs for key characteristics of main NASH outcomes includ-ing NASH resolution, NASH resolution without progression of fi-brosis, NAS decrease ≥2 points and NASH improvement with no progression of fibrosis were shown in Table 3 . After adjusting for sex, age, history of smoking and drinking, positive HBeAg, HBV-DNA level, quantitative HBsAg level at baseline, ALT normalization and HBV-DNA undetectable, baseline overweight (OR: 0.414; 95% CI: 0.190-0.899;P= 0.012) and weight gain (OR: 0.187; 95% CI: 0.050-0.693;P= 0.026) were independent negative factors associ-ated with NASH resolution ( Table 3,Table S1). In these logistic re-gression analyses, there was no interaction between baseline BMI and weight change (Pvalue interaction = 0.531, 0.564,>0.999, 0.149, respectively).

    Similarly, overweight at baseline and weight gain during follow-up were less likely to have NASH resolution without progression of fibrosis, NAS decrease ≥2 points and NASH improvement without progression of fibrosis ( Table 3,Table S2-4). In addition, the resolu-tion rates were similar between groups with and without BR treat-ment (Table S5). The combined BR tablet treatment had no effects on NASH resolution (OR: 0.934; 95% CI: 0.476-1.834), NASH reso-lution without progression of fibrosis (OR: 0.871; 95% CI: 0.441-1.720), NAS decrease ≥2 (OR: 0.664, 95% CI: 0.260-1.697), nor NASH improvement without progression of fibrosis (OR: 1.022, 95% CI: 0.516-2.023) in CHB patients with NASH (Table S1-4). The his-tological characteristics of patients never with NASH, newly onset NASH, NASH resolution and stable NASH were shown in Fig. 3 .

    Table 3 Risk factors associated with the outcomes of NASH.

    Fig. 3. Variety in histologic outcomes during treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients. Four different types of outcomes in CHB patients showed in liver biopsy samples: no NASH at baseline or 72-week follow-up (A) ; no NASH at baseline but developed NASH at week 72 (B) ; CHB patients had NASH resolution at week 72 (C) ; CHB patients had NASH at baseline and week 72 (D) . NASH: nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; BMI: body mass index; H&E: hematoxylin-eosin staining.

    Weight status and NASH outcomes during antiviral treatment of CHB

    Among CHB patients without steatosis at baseline, 7% (35/505) had newly onset steatosis during follow-up, with an incidence of 50.0 per 10 0 0 person-years. Among CHB patients who had no or bland steatosis at baseline, 22 (4%) developed NASH at the end of follow-up, with an incidence as 14.4 per 10 0 0 person-years. Patients with overweight had 12.5 times (95% CI: 2.813-55.606;P= 0.001) risk of developing NASH, while patients with weight gain during follow-up had 5.1 times (95% CI: 1.674-15.694;P= 0.005) risk of developing NASH ( Table 4 ).

    Overall, the proportions of patients with NASH resolution, sta-ble NASH, new-onset NASH and never NASH were 9%, 10%, 3% and 78%, respectively. Baseline BMI and weight change during follow-up were significantly associated with outcomes of NASH in CHB patients receiving antiviral treatment. The proportion of weight gain in these groups was 5%, 27%, 23% and 8%, respectively. Over-weight CHB patients with weight gain ≥1.5% during follow-up had the highest risk of developing new-onset steatosis, increasing de-gree of steatosis and incident NASH (allP<0.001, Table 5 ). These patients also had the lowest rate of NASH resolution (P= 0.018), NASH resolution with no progression of fibrosis (P= 0.041), and a tendency of lower rate of ≥2 points reduction in NAS with no progression of fibrosis (P= 0.069) and NASH improvement with no progression of fibrosis (P= 0.051, Table 5 ).

    Table 4 Risk factors of the incidence of NASH in CHB patients.

    Table 5 Baseline BMI and weight gain were associated with the outcomes of NASH in CHB patients.

    Discussion

    Numerous studies focused on the impact of hepatic steatosis on the virologic response of CHB, while few studies examined the outcomes of co-existing NASH in patients with CHB during an-tiviral treatment [ 25–27 ]. In this large-scale, multi-center, paired liver biopsy-proven antiviral treatment study, we observed that the outcome of patients with concomitant NASH was closely associ-ated with baseline BMI and subtle weight change rather than vi-ral response during treatment. These results call for the need of increased awareness in the weight management during antiviral treatment of CHB patients.

    To our knowledge, this is the first study using paired liver biop-sies to investigate the outcomes of CHB patients with NASH in a large cohort with antiviral therapy. Most of the previous stud-ies evaluated the grade of steatosis by ultrasonography [ 25,28,29 ], which is not sensitive enough to detect mild to moderate steatosis and its subtle changes. Furthermore, histopathological assessment remains indispensable in the diagnosis of NASH. In the present study, the scoring systems we used to assess the features of active inflammation and fibrosis in NAFLD and CHB were independent. The activity of hepatitis B (modified HAI) consists of the severity of four aspects including periportal interface hepatitis, confluent necrosis, focal lytic necrosis and portal inflammation [19] . While in NAFLD, the inflammation is determined by the numbers of lobular inflammation foci per field and ballooned hepatocytes [14] ; the lat-ter in particular is well recognized as a key feature of NASH. Recent evidence also showed that the histological activity of hepatitis B is not correlated with the severity of steatosis or NASH [30] . Thus, we could avoid the bias brought by the improvement of hepatitis B due to antiviral treatment when assessing the activity of NAFLD.

    Although a high proportion of na?ve CHB patients had concomi-tant NASH at baseline, we observed a high NASH resolution rate af-ter 72-week antiviral treatment. Compared to previous reports, the NASH resolution rate in our study was even higher than that in the control arm of novel agents clinical trials [ 31,32 ]. As demonstrated by previous studies, weight change played an important role in the resolution of NASH [ 33,34 ]. Overweight/obesity and weight gain in adulthood are closely associated with the development of NAFLD in the general population [ 35–37 ]. In non-obese patients, improve-ments in NAFLD or NASH can even be achieved by a small re-duction of weight [ 34,38 ]. A recent report in CHB patients also had similar findings [39] . We also reported the incidence of NASH in CHB patients during antiviral therapy for the first time. Our data (50.0/10 0 0 person-years) were similar with the recent report of incident ultrasound-based NAFLD in CHB patients (63.89/10 0 0 person-years) [39],and slightly higher than that in general popu-lation (28.6/10 0 0 person-years reported by Zelber-Sagi et al. [40],29.7/10 0 0 person-years reported by Chang et al. [41] ). Similar with the previous cohort study of metabolically normal patients, BMI of the patients was associated with the incidence of NAFLD [41] . Therefore, we should pay enough attention to body weight control and healthy lifestyle in CHB patients regardless of antiviral treat-ment.

    One previous study showed that HBV may have interactions with hepatic steatosis through multiple mechanisms [42] . HBV X protein (HBx) and HBV surface proteins play a role in the hepatic lipid deposition and lipogenesis [ 43,44 ]. Although antiviral agents including entecavir could down-regulate the expression of HBx [45],there is no evidence that entecavir had direct effect on the regulating lipid metabolism [46] . The combined BR tablet is a traditional Chinese medicine, consequently used for liver cirrhosis in China [47] . In the current study, BR tablet showed no effect on the resolution or improvement of steatohepatitis in fibrotic patients with CHB. The pathogenesis of HBV-associated hepatic steatosis still remains elusive, and more evidences from molecular pathways and experimental animal models are needed. In addition, novel antiviral agents such as tenofovir alafenamide and myrcludex B showed potential efficacy in improving metabolic dysfunctions including weight loss and decreased hepatic adiposity [ 4 8,4 9 ]. These new agents may be promising in the management of CHB patients concomitant with NASH or NAFLD.

    Another important question concerning the NASH in HBV in-fected patients is whether the steatosis had impact on the re-sponse to antiviral therapy. Most of previous studies investigat-ing this issue were retrospective and single-center, using indirect methods such as imaging to evaluate steatosis [ 50,51 ]. By avoiding these limitations, this study was based on histological evidence of NASH, a multicenter prospective cohort and therefore could specif-ically explore the impact of NASH on antiviral treatment response. In our study, concomitant NASH did not affect the antiviral effi-cacy of CHB. The HBV-DNA undetectable rates were similar be-tween CHB patients with and without NASH at week 72, in accor-dance with the recent study [52] . Compared with real-world study mentioned above, the present study was a clinical trial, and strict inclusion and exclusion criteria would reduce the effect of someconfounders. Based on the histologic evidence of NASH and a mul-ticenter prospective cohort, we believe that our findings could pro-vide a reliable inference that there is no significant impact of NASH on treatment response under antiviral therapy.

    Several limitations of the current study need to be consid-ered. First, there was no control group of CHB patients with NASH not receiving antiviral treatment, for it would be unethi-cal to leave patients with treatment indications untreated. Sec-ond, limited to previous design of the original study, the impact of metabolic characteristics including lipid profile, plasma glucose and insulin on the outcome of NASH was not analyzed. Fortu-nately, patients taking hypoglycemic agents or potential treatment for NAFLD were excluded in this study, which reduced confound-ing. Third, we did not observe any significant difference in fibro-sis improvement between patients with or without weight gain. A total of 72 weeks is still short for the significant changes of fibrosis attributed to NASH. In addition, this follow-up study is now going on. Future results of our current study, along with an-imal studies promise to further reveal the mechanism of resolu-tion and incident NASH in CHB patients receiving antiviral treat-ment. We hope that data in the near future would add more evidences.

    In conclusion, viral response is not associated with the outcome of NASH in na?ve CHB patients receiving 72-week entecavir ther-apy. BMI at baseline and subtle weight changes during follow-up are important either in the resolution or in the incidence of NASH in CHB patients during antiviral treatment. Therefore, we should pay attention to body weight control in CHB patients regardless of antiviral treatment.

    Acknowledgments

    None.

    Credit authorship contribution statement

    Xiu-Juan Chang:Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing -orig-inal draft.Yi-Wen Shi:Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writ-ing -original draft.Jing Wang:Data curation.Hua-Bao Liu:Data curation.Yan Chen:Data curation.Xiao-Ning Zhu:Data curation.Yong-Ping Chen:Data curation.Zu-Jiang Yu:Data curation.Qing-Hua Shang:Data curation. Lin Tan:Data curation.Qin Li:Data cu-ration.Li Jiang:Data curation.Guang-Ming Xiao:Data curation.Liang Chen:Data curation.Wei Lu:Data curation.Xiao-Yu Hu:Data curation.Qing-Hua Long:Data curation.Lin-Jing An:Data curation.Zi-Yuan Zou:Writing -original draft.Vincent Wai-Sun Wong:Conceptualization, Writing -original draft, Writing -review & editing.Yong-Ping Yang:Conceptualization, Data curation, Fund-ing acquisition, Writing -original draft, Writing -review & editing.Jian-Gao Fan:Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisi-tion, Writing -original draft, Writing -review & editing.

    Funding

    This study was supported by grants from the National Ma-jor Special Project for the Prevention and Treatment of Major Infectious Diseases: AIDS and viral hepatitis (2013ZX10 0 050 02, 2018ZX10725506) and the National Key Research and Development Program (2017YFC0908903).

    Ethical approval

    This study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of each participating institution and written informed consents were obtained from all patients.

    Competing interest

    No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the sub-ject of this article.

    Supplementary materials

    Supplementary material associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at doi:10.1016/j.hbpd.2021.06.009 .

    美女福利国产在线| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 久久久久久人人人人人| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 伦理电影免费视频| 在线国产一区二区在线| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 黄色女人牲交| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产色视频综合| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 香蕉久久夜色| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久中文看片网| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久性视频一级片| 免费不卡黄色视频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 中文欧美无线码| 国产成人av教育| 免费av中文字幕在线| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 亚洲片人在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 窝窝影院91人妻| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 91老司机精品| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 日韩欧美免费精品| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 精品福利永久在线观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产激情久久老熟女| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 露出奶头的视频| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 久久热在线av| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 高清av免费在线| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产精华一区二区三区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 黄片小视频在线播放| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 一级片免费观看大全| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 精品电影一区二区在线| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 夜夜爽天天搞| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 在线观看日韩欧美| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| av欧美777| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 午夜91福利影院| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 超碰成人久久| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 美女福利国产在线| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| videosex国产| 99久久国产精品久久久| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 在线永久观看黄色视频| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 精品国产国语对白av| 国产成人欧美| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲九九香蕉| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 老司机福利观看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 91国产中文字幕| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 大型av网站在线播放| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 91国产中文字幕| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 露出奶头的视频| 老司机影院毛片| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 在线观看www视频免费| 黄色成人免费大全| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片 | 一级毛片高清免费大全| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产片内射在线| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 国产高清国产精品国产三级| av天堂久久9| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产三级黄色录像| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 91av网站免费观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 国产成人免费观看mmmm| av天堂久久9| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 一区福利在线观看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 看片在线看免费视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 两个人看的免费小视频| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| www.999成人在线观看| 中国美女看黄片| 成人国语在线视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 久久中文字幕一级| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 天天添夜夜摸| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| a级毛片黄视频| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产野战对白在线观看| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 91国产中文字幕| 国产高清videossex| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 午夜视频精品福利| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| av网站在线播放免费| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| av天堂在线播放| 老司机影院毛片| 99热网站在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 国产在线观看jvid| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 精品人妻1区二区| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 久久久久国内视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 国产亚洲欧美98| 美女福利国产在线| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 91国产中文字幕| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久国产精品影院| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 久久精品成人免费网站| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 久久久久久人人人人人| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 亚洲五月天丁香| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 不卡一级毛片| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产麻豆69| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 日本a在线网址| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 国产精品二区激情视频| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| av网站在线播放免费| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产片内射在线| 黄色 视频免费看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产男女内射视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 999久久久国产精品视频| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 久99久视频精品免费| 高清欧美精品videossex| 午夜影院日韩av| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 窝窝影院91人妻| 天天影视国产精品| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 成人手机av| 看免费av毛片| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 亚洲av熟女| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 午夜视频精品福利| 黄频高清免费视频| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 自线自在国产av| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 精品亚洲成国产av| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 成年动漫av网址| 久9热在线精品视频| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲伊人色综图| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区 | 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 久久狼人影院| 操出白浆在线播放| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 自线自在国产av| 18在线观看网站| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久亚洲真实| 丝袜美足系列| 久热这里只有精品99| 99热网站在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 脱女人内裤的视频| 亚洲片人在线观看| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 天天影视国产精品| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 天堂动漫精品| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 91av网站免费观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 三级毛片av免费| 婷婷成人精品国产| 麻豆av在线久日| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 一级毛片女人18水好多| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 在线观看日韩欧美| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 满18在线观看网站| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 久久狼人影院| 国产区一区二久久| 精品电影一区二区在线| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 丁香欧美五月| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 久久久久视频综合| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 久久九九热精品免费| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产精品九九99| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲精品一二三| 高清在线国产一区| 国产高清激情床上av| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 男人操女人黄网站| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | av欧美777| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 身体一侧抽搐| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 精品福利永久在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 精品第一国产精品| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 久久影院123| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 久久久国产一区二区| avwww免费| 国产男女内射视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 青草久久国产| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| www日本在线高清视频| 男女免费视频国产| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| a级毛片黄视频| а√天堂www在线а√下载 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| www日本在线高清视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| a级毛片黄视频| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| avwww免费| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 曰老女人黄片| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 亚洲欧美激情在线| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 999精品在线视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 乱人伦中国视频| 国产亚洲欧美98| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 黄色女人牲交| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 亚洲av成人av| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲九九香蕉| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 欧美日韩精品网址| 超色免费av| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区 | 国产精品国产av在线观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲精品一二三| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 国产精品.久久久| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 大型av网站在线播放| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 国产色视频综合| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 大码成人一级视频| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 9色porny在线观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 一夜夜www| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| av天堂在线播放| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 久久青草综合色| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| a级毛片黄视频| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 老司机靠b影院| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 9色porny在线观看| 五月开心婷婷网| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件|