Similarities and differences between multiple inflammatory syndrome in children associated with COVID-19 and Kawasaki disease: clinical presentations, diagnosis, and treatment

Qing-You Zhang · Bo-Wen Xu · Jun-Bao Du

Abstract

Keywords Kawasaki disease · Multisystem inflammatory syndrome · Children

Introduction

A new syndrome in children and juveniles was first described in the global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), termed as “multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children” (MIS-C), which is closely associated with COVID-19 infection [ 1- 3]. So far, a series of cases with such a syndrome have been reported in children from Italy [ 3], the UK [ 4], Spain [ 5], France [ 6, 7], the United States [ 8], India [ 9], Brazil [ 10] and many other countries including South Korea [ 11]. No reports of MIS-C have been observed in China and Singapore. This syndrome has clinical manifestations similar to Kawasaki disease (KD) and Kawasaki disease shock syndrome (KDSS) [ 12], or KD with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) [ 13]. Patients may present with high fever, lymphadenopathy, pleomorphic rash, conjunctivitis, mucosal pathology changes, and coronary artery dilation. Severe cases may present in cardiovascular shock, encephalitis, and multiple organ failure[ 8, 14- 16]. However, obvious differences have also been found between the two syndromes in clinical presentations,diagnosis, and treatment.

The differences between MIS-C and KD might be associated with different pathogenesis of the two diseases. Unfortunately, the pathogenesis of two diseases is still under research and is not yet clear. There are differences between MIS-C and KD in hyper-inflammatory states. For example,interleukin (IL)-17A, the main contributor in the cytokine storm, is significantly higher in KD than that in MIS-C.Apart from IL-17A, a plasma protein called endothelial and smooth muscle cell-derived neuropilin-like protein (ESDN)was obviously elevated in KD as compared with that in MISC, which is related to arterial damage [ 17]. Other studies have reported that interferon-γ (IFN-γ)-associated cytokines,IL-1 associated cytokines, and inflammatory monocytes are major contributors to acute inflammation in MIS-C and KD patients, and most of these studies overlap. However,compared with KD patients, a subgroup of MIS-C patients showed a significant increase in circulating levels of IFN- γ which is the hallmark of MAS [ 18]. These studies suggest that immune-modulating factors for MIS-C and KD may contribute differently to each condition.

In this review, we discussed the similarities and differences between MIS-C associated with COVID-19 and KD based on clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment(Fig. 1).

Clinical presentations of MIS-C and KD: similarities and differences

Although the first case of MIS-C was reported in early April 2020 [ 19], the real concern was raised on April 26, 2020.On that day, National Health Service in the United Kingdom(NHS, UK) issued a warning that severely ill children may have similar features as that of the toxic shock syndrome,severe COVID-19 infection, and atypical KD [ 20]. On May 14, 2020, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) issued a health advisory to report the cases that matched the criteria for MIS-C [ 21], which was also emphasized by others, including the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH), the World Health Organization(WHO), and the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [ 22]. All three institutions developed their definitions, namely, pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome temporally associated with SARS-CoV-2 (PIMS-TS), MIS-C by CDC, US and the WHO [ 21, 22]. All these definitions include the age of the disease onset, clinical characteristics,laboratory examination of inflammation, and laboratory or epidemiologic proof of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However,there are other excluded conditions, such as toxic shock syndrome, hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis, etc. As per the definition of MIS-C by CDC of the United States [ 22], there are six criteria as follows: the illness is severe enough to require hospitalization; patients are below 21 years; the body temperature of patients is over 38.0 °C or self-conscious fever that lasts for at least 24 h; inflammation found through a laboratory clue; at least two organ systems showing signs of involvement; laboratory evidence that confirms SARSCoV-2 infection (SARS-CoV-2 DNA being positive for real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction,RT-PCR or the presence of a positive antibody) or a positive epidemiological history. However, SARS-CoV-2 infection is not an essential factor in the UK guideline.

Fig. 1 Similarities and differences between multiple inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) associated with COVID-19 and Kawasaki disease (KD): the clinical presentations, diagnosis, and treatment. ECMO extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, MAS macrophagic activation syndrome, CAA coronary artery aneurysm, IVIG intravenous immunoglobulin

Data on the characteristics of children and adolescents with MIS-C remain limited and are updated daily. The median age of the affected children in MIS-C ranges from 6 to 10 years, which is different from the classical KD because MIS-C affects older children and teenagers [ 23]. 76% of the cases of KD are under 5 years old [ 24]. However, the older patients of KD are known to be more severe than younger patients. Also, MIS-C seems to be more common in males than in females. A majority of papers have reported that more than 60% of patients were found to be males [ 2- 10,23]. MIS-C and KD are similar in many clinical manifestations; for example, both exhibits persistent high fever,25-65.5% of the patients with symptoms of MIS-C are also consistent with the classic or incomplete KD, including rashes, mucous membrane involvement, conjunctivitis,hands and feet erythema/edema, and cervical lymphadenopathy [ 2- 10]. However, the differences in clinical manifestations between the two diseases are also obvious. Gastrointestinal symptoms, such as vomiting, abdominal pain, and/or diarrhea, are more pronounced in children with MIS-C than the ones with KD [ 2- 10, 23, 25, 26]. According to the report of Abdel-Haqet et al. the abdominal imaging findings of their MIS-C patients were lymphadenopathy, hepatosplenomegaly, mesenteric adenitis, calculous cholecystitis, pancreatitis, ascites, intestinal wall thickening, and inflammation [ 26]. Because some KD cases did not have abdominal ultrasound examination, the abovementioned gastrointestinal findings seem not common in KD [ 27]. Also, the patients with MIS-C are more serious than the children with KD.33-87% of MIS-C patients experienced hypotension that required inotropic support. However, only 2-7% of children with KD developed shock [ 2- 10, 21, 22, 25, 28]. According to previous reports, 1.1-1.9% of children with KD could be associated with macrophage activation syndrome (MAS)[ 28, 29]. However, MAS is more frequently seen in children with MIS-C, with an incidence of 3-50%. MAS can lead to multi-organ system dysfunction and is associated with high morbidity and mortality [ 2, 13, 14]. Respiratory distress is rarely seen in KD patients, whereas, in MIS-C, 12-46% of the patients receive oxygen or mechanical ventilation [ 2- 10].

Cardiac manifestations of these two diseases are also different, although both can have myocarditis and coronary artery dilation and aneurysm (CAA). After being treated with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), CAA can be seen in only about 4% of the patients with KD [ 28],while in MIS-C, 14-36% of patients exhibit CAA, which is higher than those seen in patients with KD [ 15, 16].Some researchers found that CAA observed in patients with MIS-C is generally reversible [ 16]. Also, the left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LV ejection fraction ＜ 50%)is rarely seen in KD, but in MIS-C, 18-87% of children display ventricular dysfunction [ 15, 16, 23] (Table 1).Nevertheless, the long-term prognosis of CAA caused by MIS-C is unclear.

Laboratory features of MIS-C and KD: similarities and differences

Elevated inflammatory indexes occur in both MIS-C and KD cases. However, the elevation observed in KD cases was moderate [ 28] compared to the MIS-C, where an obvious increase was observed in the levels of CRP, PCT,and IL-6 [ 2- 10, 23, 25], with the values being more than 350 times, 16 times, and 3 times higher, respectively [ 25].Lymphopenia was present in 37-81% of MIS-C patients[ 2- 10, 23], whereas in patients with KD, it was rare. However, thrombocytopenia and the ratio of neutrophils are common risk factors of refractory KD in the acute phase[ 28]. In addition, the laboratory characteristics were different according to age [ 30]. Thrombocytosis is a characteristic feature of the convalescent KD. The majority of patients with MIS-C presented with thrombocytopenia ＜ 150 × 10 9 /L [ 2- 10]. Another characteristic of patients with MIS-C is a marked increase in the biochemical markers of cardiac injury, including troponin T and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) [ 2- 10, 15, 16, 23], whereas these indexes increase only slightly in children with KD, which indicates that children with MIS-C may have more serious cardiac involvement [ 15, 16]. Highly elevated ferritin and D-dimer were widely reported in children with MISC, which was also similar to that of the MAS [ 2- 10, 23,25]. These findings are uncommon in classic KD and may help to differentiate these two diseases. However, some researchers reported that risk factors for coronary artery disease in patients with KD include elevated D-dimer levels [ 31, 32]. The most characteristic laboratory test of MIS-C is the one that confirms the SARS-CoV-2 infection,including a positive SARS-CoV-2 DNA RT-PCR or a positive antibody test. Most patients with MIS-C (75-100%)have IgG antibodies for SARS-CoV-2, but only a few tested positive for RT-PCR with nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab sampling [ 2- 10, 23]. These results suggest that MIS-C is not the result of acute viral infection, but the virus is the inducing agent for the uncontrolled immune response in susceptible children [ 17, 33]. Compared to the peak of SARS-CoV-2 infection, the cases of MIS-C appeared late in some countries. This clinical phenomenon also supports the above hypothesis [ 34] (Table 1).

Table 1 Differences of multiple inflammatory syndrome in children associated with COVID-19 and Kawasaki disease

Treatment of MIS-C and KD: similarities and differences

The standard recommended treatment for KD is a high dose of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), i.e., 2 g/kg as a single infusion, along with a moderately high dose of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). The infusion time is recommended to be over 10-12 h [ 26]. Nearly 10-20% of the KD cases are refractory. Generally, fever develops or persists for 36 h after IVIG infusion. Administration of the second dose of IVIG, high-dose pulse steroids, or infliximab may be considered in patients having refractory KD as per the AHA guidelines [ 28]. However, current treatment strategies of MIS-C are empirical and do not have enough evidence.Treatment strategies include symptomatic and supportive therapy, along with immunomodulatory treatment. Because the patients with MIS-C were more serious than those with KD, most of them were hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU), where 25-100% needed inotropic support or vasopressors [ 2- 10, 23, 25]. Currently, it is suggested that immune-mediated damage triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection, other than the virus itself, leads to MIS-C. 13-57% of patients with MIS-C receive invasive mechanical ventilator support. Also, ECMO support was used in 3-28% of patients with MIS-C [ 2- 10]. However, all the above-mentioned life support therapies were rarely required in patients with KD. Because children with MIS-C showed KD-like symptoms, a majority (ranging from 54 to 100%) of them received IVIG. Also, the response to IVIG was worse in patients with MIS-C than with the KD. Most of the children with MIS-C (about 20-83%) needed a second dose of IVIG or steroids [ 2- 10, 15, 16, 23, 25]. Also, the efficacy of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), the traditional drug used to treat KD, in MIS-C was uncertain. Some studies reported that 75% of the patients with MIS-C received ASA [ 2- 10,23]. It is rational to provide antiplatelet treatment along with a low dose of ASA for MIS-C patients who have evidence of coronary involvement [ 14- 16]. For the patients with KD who are refractory to first-line of IVIG therapy, a combination or steroid-free treatment with biological drugs, such as infliximab, should be considered [ 28]. The release of excessive pro-inflammatory cytokines occurs in both MIS-C and KD cases, and the “cytokine storm” is found in adults with SARS-CoV-2, too. Frequently, about 7-80% of biological drugs are added as a supplemental therapy for MIS-C patients, especially for those with clinical features consistent with those of the MAS [ 2- 10, 13, 14, 23, 35] (Table 1).

Outcomes of MIS-C and KD: similarities and differences

Most children with KD have a good prognosis, where the in-hospital mortality rate is about 0.17%, and 0.015% in Japan [ 28]. The long-term clinical outcomes of MIS-C are not clear because it is a new syndrome that is relevant to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. The in-hospital mortality rate of MIS-C varied greatly with different centers. Although some studies reported no deaths in the series of cases with MIS-C, other studies reported a mortality rate of up to 18%[ 10] (Table 1).

Conclusions

A new syndrome in children known as MIS-C, related to the infection with SARS-CoV-2, has recently been reported in many countries and regions with a global COVID-19 pandemic. MIS-C shares many clinical features with KD.However, there are still great differences between both the syndromes, and it is controversial to say whether MIS-C is a new entity or a “severe type” of KD [ 35, 36]. The characteristics of COVID-19 infection in children and the possible mechanistic links between COVID-19 and KD require further studies from a global perspective.

However, at present, it is difficult to identify clearly between “severe type” of KD and MIS-C because the “severe type” KD is very rare in patients with KD. Only 2-7% of children with KD developed shock [ 28], and 1.1-1.9% of children are associated with MAS [ 29], which is the limitation of the present review. However, accumulated experiences in the management of severe cases of KD will make it probable to differentiate “severe type” of KD from MIS-C.

Author contributionsQZ had primary responsiblity for the design and execution of the study, data collection, preliminary data analysis and writing the manuscript. BX participated in data collection, preliminary data analysis and the writing of the manuscript.JD supervised the design and execution of the study, performed the final data analyses and contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

FundingThis research was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (7171010).

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approvalThe ethics committee of Peking University First Hospital granted an exemption from requiring ethics approval.

Conflict of interestProfessor Junbao Du serves as an associate editor for this journal. The paper was handled by the other Editor and has undergone rigrous peer review process. None of the authors participated in the journal’s review of, or decisions related to this manuscript.All authors declared no finanacial or non-financial conflict of interests related to this paper.