• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Stress-Activated Protein Kinase OsSAPK7 Regulates Salt- Stress Tolerance by Modulating Diverse Stress-Defensive Responses in Rice

    2021-10-18 08:31:02ZengDanWangChunchaoXieJunpinZhangFanLuJialingShiXiaorongShiYingyaoZhouYongli
    Rice Science 2021年6期

    Zeng Dan, Wang Chunchao, Xie Junpin, Zhang Fan, Lu Jialing, Shi Xiaorong, Shi Yingyao, Zhou Yongli

    Research Paper

    Stress-Activated Protein Kinase OsSAPK7 Regulates Salt- Stress Tolerance by Modulating Diverse Stress-Defensive Responses in Rice

    Zeng Dan1, Wang Chunchao1, Xie Junpin2, Zhang Fan1, Lu Jialing1, Shi Xiaorong2, Shi Yingyao2, Zhou Yongli1

    (Institute of Crop Sciences / National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

    Soil salinity is an environmental threat limiting rice productivity. Identification of salinity tolerance genes and exploitation of their mechanisms in plants are vital for crop breeding. In this study, the function of stress-activated protein kinase 7 (OsSAPK7), a SnRK2 family member, was characterized in response to salt stress in rice. Compared with variety 9804,-overexpression plants had a greater survival rate, increased chlorophyll and proline contents, and superoxide dismutase and catalase activities at the seedling stage under salt-stress conditions, as well as decreasedsodium potassium ratio (Na+/K+)and malondialdehyde contents. After salt stress, theknockout plants had lower survival rates, increased Na+/K+ratios and malomdiadehyde contents, and decreased physiological parameters compared with 9804. These changes in transgenic lines suggested thatincreased the salt tolerance of rice by modulating ion homeostasis, redox reactions and photosynthesis. The results of RNA-Seq indicated that genes involved in redox-dependent signaling pathway, photosynthesis and zeatin synthesis pathways were significantly down-regulated in theknockout line compared with 9804 under salt-stress condition, which confirmed thatpositively regulated salt tolerance by modulating diverse stress-defensive responses in rice. These findings provided novel insights for the genetic improvement of rice and for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of salt-stress tolerance.

    rice;; salt stress tolerance; survival rate

    High salinity is major abiotic stress that affects plant growth, resulting in great yield loss in rice, which is a highly salt-sensitive crop compared with other cereals (Munns and Tester, 2008). Plants have evolved a series of sophisticated mechanisms during growth and development in response to external environmental stress (Bhatt et al, 2020). To combat salinity-dependent damage using breeding or biotechnological strategies, it is essential to identify salt-tolerance genes and understand their response mechanisms to salt stress.

    Sucrose non-fermentation 1 (SNF1)-associated protein kinase 2s (SnRK2s), which form a family of plant- specific Ser/Thr kinases, play important roles in regulating plant responses to environmental and biotic stress (Kulik et al, 2011). The first SnRK2 cDNA () was isolated from the ABA-treated wheat endosperm cDNA library (Anderberg and Walker- Simmons, 1992), and SnRK2 functions have been widely elucidated. In, there are 10 known SnRK2 genes that have been studied (Boudsocq et al, 2004). AtSnRK2s not only play roles in many developmental processes, but also in responses to salinity and drought (Zheng et al, 2010).- mediated phosphorylation and salicylic acid (SA) signaling act synergistically to activate nonexpressor of pathogenesis-related 1 (NPR1), which initiates immune responses and increases disease resistance (Lee et al, 2015). In maize, 11 ZmSAPK genes have been cloned and most are induced by one or more biotic stresses. For example, the expression ofis significantly increased after high salt and drought stresses (Ying et al, 2011).

    Ten homologous genes have been identified in the rice SnRK2 family and designated asto, respectively (Kobayashi et al, 2004). In recent years, expressions and functions of several OsSAPKs in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in ricehave been characterized. For example,is up-regulated after drought treatment and itsoverexpression can increase rice yields (Dey et al, 2016).can respond to salt stress, and its overexpression results in lower Na+and Cl–accumulations and increased photosynthesis (Diédhiou et al, 2008).,,andare up-regulated in a transgenic rice line carrying the non-host resistance genewhen plants have been inoculated withpv.(Xu M R et al, 2013).andmay function collaboratively as positive regulators of salt-stress tolerance at the germination and seedling stages (Lou et al, 2018).

    In this study, we demonstrated thatwas involved in response to salt stress usingoverexpressing and knockouttransgenic rice lines. Furthermore, to elucidate the response mechanisms to salt stress mediated by, physiological changes and transcriptome profiling in transgenic line and wild type (WT, 9804) were investigated.

    Results

    Subcellular localization and salt-stress-responsive expression patterns of OsSAPK7 in rice

    OsSAPK7 was first identified as a SNF1-associated protein kinase consisting of 359 amino acid residues with a 257-amino acid kinase region at the N-terminal and a 25-amino acid Glu-rich region at the C-terminal (Fig. 1-A). To determine the subcellular localization of OsSAPK7, the OsSAPK7-GFP fusion protein was transiently expressed inleaves.OsSAPK7-GFP was localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus as assessed by merged GFP signals and auto fluorescence (Fig. 1-B).

    To analyze the stress-responsive expression patterns ofin rice,expression levels at the seedling stage after being treated with 100 mmol/L NaCl were measured by qRT-PCR.was rapidly expressed in rice seedlings after the salt-stress treatment, and the transcription level was increased by greater than 7-fold from 4 h to 36 h after the stress treatment (Fig. 2). Thus,may be involved in the response to salt stress in rice.

    Fig. 1. Domain structure and subcellular localization of OsSAPK7.

    A, Schematic representation of the domain structure of OsSAPK7. The highly conserved kinase region at the N-terminal and the Glu-rich motif at the C-terminal are shown.

    B, Green fluorescence protein (GFP) signals arising from the OsSAPK7- GFP fusion proteins expressed in tobacco leaves were detected using a confocal microscope. Red signals represent chloroplast auto-fluorescence.

    The only GFP signal expressed by pCAMBIA-1300 in tobacco leaves served as a negative control.

    OsSAPK7 positively regulates salt-stress tolerance at seedling stage in rice

    To completely investigate the function of,overexpression transgenic lines (and)andknockout lines (and) were generated (Fig. S1). Without the NaCl treatment, no obvious differences were observed between the WT and the transgenic plants (Fig. 3-A). After 10 d of 100 mmol/L NaCl treatment, the-over- expression plants were obviously more robust than 9804, and conversely, theknockout plants were more wilted than 9804 (Fig. 3-A). After treatment with 100 mmol/L NaCl for 10 d and recovered in Hoagland’s nutrient solution for 7 d, the survival rates of the-overexpression plants ranged from 45%–50% (Fig. 3-B), which was significantly greater than 9804. However, the survival rates of theknockout plants were only 20%–25%, which were significantly lower than that of the WT (Fig. 3-B). Thus,may increase the tolerance to salt stress at the rice seedling stage.

    Fig. 2. Expression ofin rice under salt-stress conditions.After 20-day-old rice seedlings were subjected to 100 mmol/L NaCl treatment,expression levels were assessed by qRT-PCR. Means and standard errors were obtained from three biological replicates. ** and *** indicate statistically significant differences at the 0.01 and 0.001 levels, respectively.

    To investigate whetheraffectsroot growth and seed germination under salt-stress conditions,-overexpression and knockout lines, as well as WT 9804, were grown in distilled water or 100 mmol/L NaCl. There were no significant differences in the root lengths of the-overexpression and knockout lines compared with 9804 under both salt-stress and normal conditions (Fig. S2-A to -D). In addition, there were no significant differences among the seed germination rates of-overexpression,knockout and WT lines grown in either distilled water or 100 mmol/L NaCl (Fig. S2-E to -H). Thus,did not affect root growth or seed germination under salt-stress.

    OsSAPK7 modulates diverse physiological traits associated with stress

    The capability to eliminate Na+and maintain a lower Na+/K+ratio can reflect the salt tolerance of the plants (Zhu, 2003).-overexpression transgenic plants selectively reduced Na+uptake and maintained lower Na+/K+ratios in the roots and shoots after 6 d of salt stress (Fig. 4-A, -B and Fig. S3). In contrast, theknockout plants accumulated more Na+, leading to greater Na+/K+ratios in the roots and shoots compared with 9804.

    To elucidate the physiological changes that occurred in transgenic plants under salt-stress conditions, the chlorophyll contents were determined in the 20-day- old seedlings ofoverexpression,knockout and WT plants grown in Hoagland’s solution supplemented with 100 mmol/L NaCl for 6 d. There were no significant differences in the chlorophyll contents between WT and the transgenic plants under normal conditions (Fig. 4-C). Compared with 9804, the chlorophyll contents were significantly higher inoverexpression plants, but markedly lower inknockout lines under salt-stress conditions (Fig. 4-C).

    Fig. 3. Phenotypic reactions of-overexpression,knockout and wild type (WT) 9804 lines under salt-stress conditions.

    A, Phenotypic comparison of seedings grown under salt stress at the seedling stage.-overexpression lines (and),knockout lines (and) and 9804 plants under normal conditions for 20-day-old seedlings were transferred to Hoagland’s nutrient solution supplemented with 100 mmol/L NaCl for 10 d and then recovered for 7 d.

    B, Survival rates of,,,and 9804 plants after recovered for 7 d. Values are Mean ± SE (= 3). **,< 0.05 according to the Student’s-test.

    Additionally, several physiological parameters were measured in transgenic and WT plants under salt- stress conditions. Compared with 9804, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was significantly greater in theoverexpression plants but markedly lower inknockout plants under salt-stress conditions (Fig. 4-D). Similarly, catalase (CAT) activity was significantly greater inoverexpression plants but lower inknockout plants than in 9804(Fig. 4-E). Salt stress resulted in a significantly decreased malomdiadehyde (MDA) accumulation in-overexpression plants, while MDA accumulation was significantly increased inknockout plants, compared with WT (Fig. 4-F).

    Fig. 4. Responses of 20-day-old transgenic lines and wild type 9804 at 6 d after exposure to 100 mmol/L NaCl treatment.

    A, Na+/K+ratio in roots. B, Na+/K+ratio in shoots. C, Chlorophyll content in the leaves under control and salt-stress conditions for 6 d. D, Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in leaves. E, Catalase (CAT) activity in leaves. F, Malomdiadehyde (MDA) content of leaves. G, Proline content of leaves.

    andare the-overexpression lines.andare theknockout lines. Values are Mean ± SE (= 3). * and ** indicate significant differences at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels according to the Student’s-test compared with 9804, respectively.

    Proline accumulation is also a common response to salt stress in many plants (Vives-Peris et al, 2017). Compared with 9804, free proline content in- overexpressionplants was significantly increased under salt stress, while it was decreased significantly inknockout plants (Fig. 4-G). Thus, positive regulation of salt-stress tolerance was associated with a decreasing Na+/K+ratio and an increasing free proline content in plants.

    Comparative transcriptome profiling of OsSAPK7 knockout and WT

    To elucidate the molecular mechanisms ofin salt-stress responses, a comparative transcriptome profiling of theknockout lineand WT 9804 was globally characterized using RNA-Seq. Compared with WT, 247 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified inunder normal conditions (at 0 h) (Fig. 5-A and Table S1). There were 650 DEGs incompared with WT under salt-stress conditions, including 297 and 416 DEGs at 12 and 36 h after the salt-stress treatment (Fig. 5-A and Table S2), respectively. Among these DEGs, 63 were found at both 12 and 36 h. Cluster analysis of DEGs with R studio showed that they were divided into two clusters. The samples after salt stress (12 and 36 h) were clustered together, and the WT (0 h) clustered in another cluster, indicating thatcan respond to rice salt stress (Fig. 5-B).

    Some Gene Ontology (GO) categories associated with basic biological processes, such as metabolic process (GO:0008152), transporter activity (GO:0005215), enzyme regulator activity (GO:0030234) and localization (GO:0051179), were common betweenand WT at 0, 12 and 36 h after salt stress (Fig. 5-C, Fig. S4 and Table S3). Strikingly, several significant GO terms, including electron carrier activity (GO:0009055), structural molecule activity (GO:0005198) and protein binding transcription factor activity (GO:0000988), were characterized inbut not in WT at 12 h after salt stress (Fig. 5-C and Table S3). Notably, the DEGs betweenand WT at 36 h after salt stress were more significantly enriched in electron carrier activity, structural molecule activity, protein binding transcription factor activity, membrane-enclosed lumen (GO:0031974) and organelle part (GO:0044422) (Fig. 5-C and Table S3).

    Fig. 5. Transcriptome profiling analysis ofknockout lineand wild type (WT, 9804) under salt stress conditions.

    A, Venn diagram of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in WT vsat 0, 12 and 36 h under salt-stress conditions.

    B, Hierarchical clustering of DEGs between WT andat 12 and 36 h under salt stress. The color scale represents log2 of the fragment per kilo base of exon model per million mapped fragments (FPKM).

    C, Gene Ontology analysis of DEGs in WT vsat 12 and 36 h under salt-stress conditions.

    D, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis of DEGs in WT vs.

    In addition, significant Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways including phenylalanine metabolic pathway and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway were common incompared with WT at 0, 12 and 36 h after salt stress (Fig. 5-D and Table S4). Compared with the sample at 0 h, photosynthesis was significantly enriched in KEGG pathway inat 12 h after salt stress, and zeatin biosynthesis and ribosome pathways were enriched at 36 h after salt stress (Fig. 5-D and Table S4).

    DEGs involved in redox signaling and photosynthetic pathways in response to salt stress

    The electron carrier activity is important in the redox process, with electrons being transported through a series of reactions from the reductant (electron donor) to the oxidant (electron acceptor), with concomitant energy conversion (Garg et al, 2010). In this study, four genes,,,and,associated with electron carrier activity,exhibited the same expression patterns after salt stress (Fig. 6-A and Table S5). Among them,was down-regulated incompared with 9804 at 12 h, and,andwere down-regulated incompared with 9804 at 36 h (Fig. 6-A and Table S5).

    Fig. 6. Expression patterns of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) inknockout linecompared with wild type 9804.

    A, Hierarchical clustering of DEGs associated with electron carrier activity, photosynthesis and zeatin synthesis pathway regulated byafter salt-stress treatment. Color scale represents the log2 of the fragment per kilo base of exon model per million mapped fragments (FPKM).

    B, Expression patterns of key genes in 9804 andassessed by qRT-PCR and FPKM. Values are Mean ± SE (= 3).

    Moreover,,and, which wereinvolved in photosynthesis, were down-regulated incompared with 9804 at 12 h after salt stress (Fig. 6-A and Table S5). Compared with 9804 at 36 h after salt stress,,and, which have roles in the zeatin synthesis pathway, were also down-regulated in(Fig. 6-A and Table S5). The relative expression levels of the five tested DEGs as assessed by qRT-PCR were consistent with their fragment per kilo base of exon model per million mapped fragments (FPKM) values (Fig. 6-B).

    Discussion

    Ten members of the OsSAPKs family in rice might be activated by hyperosmotic stress in the cellular protoplasts (Anderberg and Walker-Simmons, 1992).,andcan function as positive regulators of salt-stress tolerance in rice (Diédhiou et al, 2008; Lou et al, 2018). However, the mechanism of salt tolerance mediated by this kinase family remains to be elucidated to date. In this study,positively regulated salt tolerance at the rice seedling stage and revealed physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying salt tolerance.

    Salt stress generally impairs the metabolic processes of plants through both osmotic and ionic effects (Munns and Tester, 2008). Osmotic effects result in a reduction in the water absorption capability. Ionic stress causes Na+toxicity, which disrupts photosynthesis, protein synthesis and enzyme activities (Horie et al, 2015). Na+absorption increases in cell and the change in the Na+/K+ratio may cause the degradation or failure of essential enzymes, leading to cell death (Passricha et al, 2019). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulate during abiotic-stress exposure. ROS accumulation acts as a signal in the mediation of stress, but excessive ROS at later stages injures plant cells by damaging lipids, DNA and proteins (Zhang et al, 2016; Li et al, 2020). Plants have evolved efficient enzymatic and nonenzymatic detoxification mechanisms to scavenge ROS (Xu J et al, 2013). SOD and CAT play important roles in reducing ROS to resist stress. In this study,overexpression plants displayedalower Na+/K+ratio compared with 9804under salt-stress conditions, whileknockout plants had a greater Na+/K+ratio (Fig. 4-A and -B). Furthermore,overexpression plants displayed greater SOD and CAT activities compared with 9804under salt-stress conditions, whileknockout plants had decreased SOD and CAT activities (Fig. 4-D and -E). Notably, MDA content, which is an important intermediate in ion leakage and reflects membrane injuryand ROS scavenging (Zhou et al, 2018), was also significantly reduced in- overexpression plants compared with 9804 (Fig. 4-F). Conversely, it was dramatically increased inknockout plants. These physiological changes in thetransgenic plants suggested thatcan improve salt tolerance by regulating ion homeostasis and scavenging ROS through redox reactions.

    Plants can synthesize some small molecules, such as sugars, amino acids and other substances, to regulate the osmotic pressure and resist external stress through photosynthesis. In particular, proline has beneficial roles in ROS scavenging and osmotic pressure regulation to protect plants under abiotic stress conditions (Vives-Peris et al, 2017).overexpression plants had increased chlorophyll and proline contents compared with 9804after salt treatments, whileknockout plants had decreased chlorophylland prolinecontents, suggesting that the salt tolerance mediated bymight be related tophotosynthesis in rice.

    Comparative transcriptome profiling ofknockoutand WT lines corroborated thatregulated salt-stress tolerance by modulating diverse stress-defensive responses. DEGs associated with the electron carrier activity, photosynthetic pathway and zeatin biosynthesis pathway, which prevent chlorophyll degradation (Rodo et al, 2008), were significantly enriched in WT compared with transgenic plants under salt-stress conditions, which was in accordance with the change trends of investigated physiological parameters. Thus, the salt tolerance mediated byin rice was involved in diverse stress-defensive responses, including modulating ion homeostasis, scavenging ROS and improving photosynthesis. The results of this study provided novel insights that can be used in the genetic improvement in rice.The further characterization of downstream components and signal transduction cascades triggered byand determination of the DEG functions identified in this study will help elucidate the complex molecular networks involved in salt-stress responses in rice.

    methods

    Plant materials, strain and vectors

    Seeds ofL. variety 9804 and transgenic lines were maintained at the experimental fields of Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. The plasmid pYLCRISPR/Cas9Pubi-H was obtained from Prof. Liu Yaoguang from South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. pMDC43 vector (Curtis and Grossniklaus, 2003) andEHA105 were maintained in our laboratory.

    Subcellular localization and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis

    To localize the SAPK7 protein, the coding sequence ofwas cloned into the pMDC43 vector, in which it was fused to GFP coding sequence. The plasmid construct was transformed intoleaves. The leaves ofwere observed 48–72 h after infiltration using an LSM 700 laser confocal scanning microscope (ZEISS Microsystems, Jena, Germany). Because the pMDC43 empty vector contains CcdB (Controller of cell division or death B) toxic protein, and it is lethal when transformed into tobacco alone, we supplemented pCAMBIA-1300 as a negative control for only GFP. The excitation and detection wavelengths used for GFP were 488 and 509 nm, respectively.

    Plant materials were collected from wild type (WT) 9804 and transgenic plants that were cultured in Hoagland’s nutrient solution (Yoshida et al, 1976). Tissue samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen at -80 oC. The total RNA was extracted using a TRIzol reagent kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA). First-strand cDNA was extracted using TransScript?RT/RI Enzyme Mix reverse transcriptase (Trans, Beijing, China). The real-time quantification of transcript levels was performed in 20 μL reactions using the SYBR?Green PCR Master Mix kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol on an ABI Prism 7500 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Primers used in qRT-PCR are shown in Table S6.gene was used as a reference. Independent biological repetitions of each time point for each sample were performed in triplicate.

    Vector construction and transgenic line generation

    To generate the-overexpression plants, a 1080-bpcDNA sequence was inserted downstream of the35S promoter of pMDC43 using the Gateway system (Curtis and Grossuiklaus, 2003). The full-lengthsequence was downloaded from the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/). Using cDNA of 9804 as the template, the target fragment was amplified by PCR using the primer pair SAPK7-CDS-F and SAPK7-CDS-R. The purified product was cloned into the entry vector pGWC using TA cloning to obtain pGWC-. The correctly sequenced pGWC-plasmid was exchanged with the destination vector pMDC43 to obtain pMDC43-.

    To generate theknockout lines, the first exon of thegenomic sequence from 38 to 57 bp was used as a single guide RNA (Table S6). pYLCRISPR/Cas9Pubi-H plasmid and-Cas9 vector were constructed using the method described by Ma et al (2005).

    The above constructs were introduced intostrain EHA105 and incorporated into the genome of 9804 using an-mediated transformation method. The positiveoverexpression plants were identified using PCR and qRT-PCR. Two positive T1overexpression lines,and, which exhibited greaterexpression levels, were further confirmed using a western blot assay as described by Kim et al (2017). The positiveknockout T0and T1plants were screened by sequencing with primers Cas9-SAPK7-Test-F and Cas9-SAPK7-Test-F (Table S6). The two homozygousknockout linesandwere obtained (Fig. S1). All the primers are listed in Table S6.

    Assaying transgenic line phenotypes under salt-stress

    overexpression linesand,knockout linesand, and WT 9804 plants were cultured in Hoagland’s nutrient solution (Yoshida et al, 1976) for 20 d and then treated with 100 mmol/L NaCl. For each line, 40 seedlings were planted in three biological replicates. At 10 d after the salt-stress treatment, the seedlings were transferred to normal Hoagland’s nutrient solution to recover for 7 d, and then the survival rates were measured.

    To observe the effect ofon seed germination, the seeds of transgenic lines and WT 9804 were treated with 75% alcohol for 5 min, washed with water for three times, and then-overexpression,knockout and WT seeds were sown in distilled water (control) or distilled water supplemented with 100 mmol/L NaCl solution. Each plate contained 30 seeds with three replications. The plates were incubated at 25 oC under 16 h/8 h (light/dark) cycles.

    To evaluate the effect ofon root growth, 3-day-old seedlings that were fully germinated were transferred to germination bags (Phytotc, Beijing, China) containing distilled water or 100 mmol/L NaCl solution. To measure root length, the germination bags were incubated vertically, and the root lengths were measured after 7 d.

    Assaying physiological parameters under salt-stress

    SOD and CATactivity levels, and the chlorophyll, proline, MDA, Na+and K+contents in transgenic lines,,andas well as WT 9804 were detected under salt-stress conditions. The leaves of 20-day-old seedlings cultured in Hoagland’s nutrient solution supplemented with 100 mmol/L NaCl for 6 d were collected, with leaves of the same lines cultured in Hoagland’s nutrient solution serving as controls. The collected samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 oC. The total chlorophyll content, and SOD and CAT activity levels, were measured according to Civello et al (1995). The proline content of the leaves was measured according to Tezvergil-Mutluay et al (2010). MDA content was measured according to Ashraf et al (2010). The relative Na+and K+ion accumulations in the roots and shoots were measured according to Schmidt et al (2013). Three replicates were used for each measurement.

    High-throughput transcriptome analyses and DEG identification

    To determine the expression profiles of genes modulated by, high-throughput transcriptome analyses were performed for the salt stress-challengedknockoutand WT lines. Briefly, 20-day-old seedlings ofand WT were grown in Hoagland’s nutrient solution supplemented with 100 mmol/L NaCl, and the plant leaves were harvested at 0, 12 and 36 h after salt stress. The total RNA of each sample was extracted using a TRIzol extraction kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Two replicated RNA samples for each plant were mixed equally and used to construct the library. The produced libraries underwent cluster generation on cBot were sequenced on a HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina) with paired-end 100-bp reads by CapitalBio Corporation, Beijing, China. The raw sequence data reported in this study have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (Wang et al, 2017) in the BIG Data Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics (BIG), Chinese Academy of Sciences, under accession number PRJCA001237 and are publicly accessible at http://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa.

    The raw reads were first filtered by removing adaptor sequences and low-quality sequences using an in-house perl script. The retained high-quality reads in each sample were mapped to the Rice Genome Note Project (RGAP) of Michigan State University (MSURGAP7, ftp://ftp.plantbiology.msu.edu/ pub/data/Eukaryotic_Projects/o_sativa/annotation_dbs/pseudomo lecules/version_7.0) using Bowtie (Trapnell et al, 2010). The DEGs were usually identified using a Chi-square test when there was a statistically significant difference in the relative abundance between the two samples (using IDEG6 software, based on a-value threshold ≤ 0.001). Cuffdiff was used to identify DEGs. GO (www.geneontology.org/) and KEGG enrichment (http://bioinfo.sibs.ac.cn/carmo/Gene_Annotation. php) analyses of the DEGs were performed using an online website. The Venn diagram was built using software available online (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html), and the heat map was created by R studio. According to the GO and KEGG enrichment analyses, candidate genes were selected and verified by qRT-PCR.

    Acknowledgements

    This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFD0100101), the National High-Tech Program of China (Grant No. 2014AA10A603), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant No. OPP1130530). We thank Professor Liu Yaoguang from South China Agricultural University for providing plasmid pYLCRISPR/Cas9Pubi-H. We thank Lesley Benyon from Liwen Bianji Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac) for editing the English text.

    Supplemental data

    The following materials are available in the online version of this article at http://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/rice-science; http://www.ricescience.org.

    Fig. S1. Graphic representation of vector constructs and expression analysis ofin transgenic plants.

    Fig. S2. Root growth and germination rates oftransgenic lines and wild type 9804 under salt-stress conditions.

    Fig. S3. Potassium and sodium ion concentrations in plant tissues of transgenic and wild type 9804 plants.

    Fig. S4. Gene Ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes in theknockout linecompared with wild type 9804 at 0 h.

    Table S1. Differentially expressed genes incompared with wild type at 0 h after exposure to salt stress.

    Table S2. Differentially expressed genes incompared with wild type at 12 and 36 h after exposure to salt stress.

    Table S3. Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes inat 0, 12 and 36 h after exposure to salt stress.

    Table S4. KEGG analysis of differentially expressed genes inat 0, 12 and 36 h after exposure to salt stress.

    Table S5. Differentially expressed genes in electron carrier activity, photosynthesis and zeatin biosynthesis processes under salt-stress condition.

    Table S6. Primers used in this study.

    Anderberg R J, Walker-Simmons M K. 1992. Isolation of a wheat cDNA clone for an abscisic acid-inducible transcript with homology to protein kinases., 89(21): 10183?10187.

    Ashraf M A, Ashraf M, Ali Q. 2010. Response of two genetically diverse wheat cultivars to salt stress at different growth stages: Leaf lipid peroxidation and phenolic contents., 42(1): 559?565.

    Bhatt T, Sharma A, Puri S, Minhas A P. 2020. Salt tolerance mechanisms and approaches: Future scope of halotolerant genes and rice landraces., 27(5): 368?383.

    Boudsocq M, Barbier-Brygoo H, Lauriere C. 2004. Identification of nine sucrose nonfermenting 1-related protein kinases 2 activated by hyperosmotic and saline stresses in., 279: 41758?41766.

    Civello P M, Martinez G A, Chaves A R, Anon M C. 1995. Peroxidase from strawberry fruit (Duch): Partial purification and determination of some properties., 43(10): 2596?2601.

    Curtis M D, Grossniklaus U. 2003. A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta., 133(2): 462?469.

    Dey A, Samanta M K, Gayen S, Maiti M K. 2016. The sucrose non-fermenting 1-related kinase 2 geneimproves drought tolerance and grain yield in rice by modulating cellular osmotic potential, stomatal closure and stress-responsive gene expression., 16: 158.

    Diédhiou C J, Popova O V, Dietz K J, Golldack D. 2008. The SNF1-type serine-threonine protein kinase SAPK4 regulates stress-responsive gene expression in rice., 8: 49.

    Garg R, Jhanwar S, Tyagi A K, Jain M. 2010. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis suggest diverse roles of glutaredoxin gene family members during development and sesponse to various stimuli in rice., 17(6): 353?367.

    Horie T, Karahara I, Katsuhara M. 2015. Salinity tolerance mechanisms in glycophytes: An overview with the central focus on rice plants., 5(1): 11.

    Kim B. 2017. Western blot techniques.: Espina V. Molecular Profiling: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 1606: 133?139.

    Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Minami H, Kagaya Y, Hattori T. 2004. Differential activation of the rice sucrose nonfermenting1-related protein kinase2 family by hyperosmotic stress and abscisic acid., 16(5): 1163?1677.

    Kulik A, Wawer I, Krzywińska E, Bucholc M, Dobrowolska G. 2011. SnRK2 protein kinases: Key regulators of plant response to abiotic stresses., 15(12): 859?872.

    Lee H J, Park Y J, Seo P J, Kim J H, Sim H J, Kim S G, Park C M. 2015. Systemic immunity requires SnRK28-mediated nuclear import of NPR1 in., 27(12): 3425?3438.

    Li B, Huang J, Wang L, Li J, Liang Y Y, Chen J. 2020. A review on how plant hormones and environment factors are involved in rice root hair development., 34(4): 287?299. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Lou D J, Wang H P, Yu D Q. 2018. The sucrose non-fermenting-1- related protein kinases SAPK1 and SAPK2 function collaboratively as positive regulators of salt stress tolerance in rice., 18: 203?219.

    Ma X L, Zhang Q Y, Zhu Q L, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, Wang B, Yang Z F, Li H Y, Lin Y R, Xie Y Y, Shen R X, Chen S F, Wang Z, Chen Y L, Guo J X, Chen L T, Zhao X C, Dong Z C, Liu Y G. 2005. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot., 8(8): 1274?1284.

    Munns R, Tester M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance., 59: 651?681.

    Passricha N, Saifi S K, Kharb P, Tuteja N. 2019. Marker-free transgenic rice plant overexpressing pea LecRLK imparts salinity tolerance by inhibiting sodium accumulation., 99(3): 265?281.

    Rodo A P, Brugière N, Vankova R, Malbeck J, Olson J M, Haines S C, Martin R C, Habben J E, Mok D W S, Mok M C. 2008. Over-expression of a zeatin-glucosylation gene in maize leads to growth retardation and tasselseed formation., 59(10): 2673?2686.

    Schmidt R, Mieulet D, Hubberten H M, Obata T, Hoefgen R, Fernie A R, Fisahn J, San B S, Guiderdoni E, Schippers J H M, Mueller-Roeber B. 2013. Salt-responsive ERF1 regulates reactive oxygen species-dependent signaling during the initial response to salt stress in rice., 25(6): 2115?2131.

    Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Agee K A, Hoshika T, Carrilho M, Breschi L, Tj?derhane L, Nishitani Y, Carvalho R M, Looney S, Tay F R, Pashley D H. 2010. The requirement of zinc and calcium ions for functional MMP activity in demineralized dentin matrices., 26(11): 1059?1067.

    Trapnell C, Williams B A, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren M J, Salzberg S L, Word B J, Pachter L. 2010. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation., 28(5): 511?515.

    Vives-Peris V, Gómez-Cadenas A, Pérez-Clemente R M. 2017. Citrus plants exude proline and phytohormones under abiotic stress conditions., 36(6): 1971?1984.

    Wang Y Q, Song F H, Zhu J W, Zhang S S, Yang Y D, Chen T T, Tang B X, Dong L L, Ding N, Zhang Q, Bai Z X, Dong X N, Chen H X, Sun M Y, Zhai S, Sun Y B, Yu L, Lan L, Xiao J F, Fang X D, Lei H X, Zhang Z, Zhao W M. 2017. GSA: Genome sequence archive., 15(1): 14?18.

    Xu J, Duan X G, Yang J, Beeching J R, Zhang P. 2013. Reactive oxygen species scavenging by overproduction of superoxide dismutase and catalase delays postharvest physiological deterioration of cassava storage roots., 161(3): 1517–1528.

    Xu M R, Huang L Y, Zhang F, Zhu L H, Zhou Y L, Li Z K. 2013. Genome-wide phylogenetic analysis of stress-activated protein kinase genes in rice () and expression profiling in response topvinfection., 31(4): 877?885.

    Ying S, Zhang D F, Li H Y, Liu Y H, Shi Y S, Song Y C, Wang T Y, Li Y. 2011. Cloning and characterization of a maize SnRK2 protein kinase gene confers enhanced salt tolerance in transgenic., 30(9): 1683?1699.

    Yoshida S, Forno D A, Cock J H, Gomez K A. 1976. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. Manila, the Philippines: International Rice Research Institute: 61?64.

    Zhang M, Smith J A, Harberd N P, Jiang C F. 2016. The regulatory roles of ethylene and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plant salt stress responses., 91(6): 651?659.

    Zheng Z F, Xu X P, Crosley R A, Greenwalt S A, Sun Y J, Blakeslee B, Wang L Z, Ni W T, Sopko M S, Yao C L, Yau K, Burton S, Zhuang M B, McCaskill D G, Gachotte D, Thompson M, Greene T W. 2010. The protein kinase SnRK2.6 mediates the regulation of sucrose metabolism and plant growth in., 153(1): 99?113.

    Zhou Y B, Liu C, Tang D Y, Yan L, Wang D, Yang Y Z, Gui J S, Zhao X Y, Li L G, Tang X D, Yu F, Li J L, Liu L L, Zhu Y H, Lin J Z, Liu X M. 2018. The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase STRK1 phosphorylates and activates CatC, thereby regulating H2O2homeostasis and improving salt tolerance in rice., 30(5): 1100?1118.

    Zhu J K. 2003. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress., 6(5): 441?445.

    Zhou Yongli (zhouyongli@caas.cn)

    1 July 2020;

    12 October 2020

    Copyright ? 2021, China National Rice Research Institute. Hosting by Elsevier B V

    This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

    Peer review under responsibility of China National Rice Research Institute

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2021.09.003

    (Managing Editor: Li Guan)

    免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 波多野结衣高清作品| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 国产精品永久免费网站| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 在线免费观看的www视频| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产在线男女| 嫩草影视91久久| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| bbb黄色大片| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 欧美+日韩+精品| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 亚洲国产色片| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 久久中文看片网| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 老女人水多毛片| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 97热精品久久久久久| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国产精品三级大全| 三级毛片av免费| av专区在线播放| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 在线免费观看的www视频| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久久久成人免费电影| 久久亚洲真实| 99热这里只有是精品50| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| xxxwww97欧美| 成人国产综合亚洲| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 日本五十路高清| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 日韩中字成人| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 黄色日韩在线| 亚州av有码| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| av在线老鸭窝| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲最大成人av| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 高清在线国产一区| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 天堂动漫精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 日韩中字成人| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 免费大片18禁| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 免费大片18禁| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| av在线亚洲专区| 91av网一区二区| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲五月天丁香| 很黄的视频免费| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| av在线蜜桃| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产在线男女| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 热99在线观看视频| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 少妇高潮的动态图| 日韩欧美三级三区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 18+在线观看网站| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 国产午夜精品论理片| 热99在线观看视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产视频内射| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 舔av片在线| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 舔av片在线| 高清在线国产一区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 国产视频内射| 成人国产综合亚洲| 舔av片在线| 久久久久久久久久久丰满 | 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 黄色一级大片看看| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国产成人影院久久av| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 不卡一级毛片| 欧美黑人巨大hd| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产精品一及| 91麻豆av在线| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 免费在线观看日本一区| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚州av有码| 91精品国产九色| av在线蜜桃| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| eeuss影院久久| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 综合色av麻豆| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 日本色播在线视频| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 亚洲av一区综合| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 三级毛片av免费| 一级黄色大片毛片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 在线免费十八禁| 少妇高潮的动态图| 嫩草影院精品99| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 中国美女看黄片| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区 | 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲av中文av极速乱 | 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| a级毛片a级免费在线| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 午夜a级毛片| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 欧美成人a在线观看| 色综合婷婷激情| 88av欧美| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国产精品无大码| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| aaaaa片日本免费| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 午夜影院日韩av| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 日本免费a在线| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 丰满的人妻完整版| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 十八禁网站免费在线| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 91在线观看av| a级毛片a级免费在线| 成人综合一区亚洲| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 一本久久中文字幕| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚州av有码| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 日本三级黄在线观看| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 黄色配什么色好看| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 天堂√8在线中文| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 舔av片在线| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 午夜福利在线在线| 一本一本综合久久| 成年版毛片免费区| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产乱人视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频 | 性色avwww在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 热99re8久久精品国产| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 内地一区二区视频在线| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美日本视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产美女午夜福利| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲不卡免费看| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 99热这里只有是精品50| 九色成人免费人妻av| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 看片在线看免费视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 黄色配什么色好看| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 91av网一区二区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 一级av片app| 久久人妻av系列| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 色av中文字幕| 欧美bdsm另类| 午夜久久久久精精品| 香蕉av资源在线| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 舔av片在线| 搞女人的毛片| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 午夜精品在线福利| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 99热只有精品国产| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 国产午夜精品论理片| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 日韩中字成人| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产色婷婷99| a级毛片a级免费在线| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 在线免费十八禁| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 我要搜黄色片| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 久久精品人妻少妇| 性欧美人与动物交配| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 天堂网av新在线| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 亚洲午夜理论影院| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 波野结衣二区三区在线| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 在线观看一区二区三区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 久久中文看片网| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 毛片女人毛片| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 国产综合懂色| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 色播亚洲综合网| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 亚洲无线在线观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 美女黄网站色视频| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 免费看日本二区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 成年版毛片免费区| 欧美激情在线99| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 久久中文看片网| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 全区人妻精品视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| av在线亚洲专区| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久久久久大精品| 精品福利观看| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 久久这里只有精品中国| av专区在线播放| 欧美zozozo另类| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 极品教师在线视频| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 黄片wwwwww| 精品久久久噜噜| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产亚洲欧美98| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 色5月婷婷丁香| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 熟女电影av网| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 久久久久久伊人网av| netflix在线观看网站| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 亚洲图色成人| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 22中文网久久字幕| 直男gayav资源| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 乱系列少妇在线播放| eeuss影院久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 床上黄色一级片| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久久久性生活片| 色吧在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| bbb黄色大片| 亚洲av.av天堂| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 久久九九热精品免费| 日韩中字成人| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 老女人水多毛片| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 赤兔流量卡办理| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 不卡一级毛片| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产 一区精品| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 99热网站在线观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国内精品宾馆在线| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 亚洲av美国av| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产精品一区www在线观看 | 亚洲在线自拍视频| 久久亚洲真实| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| eeuss影院久久| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区|