• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Stress-Activated Protein Kinase OsSAPK7 Regulates Salt- Stress Tolerance by Modulating Diverse Stress-Defensive Responses in Rice

    2021-10-18 08:31:02ZengDanWangChunchaoXieJunpinZhangFanLuJialingShiXiaorongShiYingyaoZhouYongli
    Rice Science 2021年6期

    Zeng Dan, Wang Chunchao, Xie Junpin, Zhang Fan, Lu Jialing, Shi Xiaorong, Shi Yingyao, Zhou Yongli

    Research Paper

    Stress-Activated Protein Kinase OsSAPK7 Regulates Salt- Stress Tolerance by Modulating Diverse Stress-Defensive Responses in Rice

    Zeng Dan1, Wang Chunchao1, Xie Junpin2, Zhang Fan1, Lu Jialing1, Shi Xiaorong2, Shi Yingyao2, Zhou Yongli1

    (Institute of Crop Sciences / National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China)

    Soil salinity is an environmental threat limiting rice productivity. Identification of salinity tolerance genes and exploitation of their mechanisms in plants are vital for crop breeding. In this study, the function of stress-activated protein kinase 7 (OsSAPK7), a SnRK2 family member, was characterized in response to salt stress in rice. Compared with variety 9804,-overexpression plants had a greater survival rate, increased chlorophyll and proline contents, and superoxide dismutase and catalase activities at the seedling stage under salt-stress conditions, as well as decreasedsodium potassium ratio (Na+/K+)and malondialdehyde contents. After salt stress, theknockout plants had lower survival rates, increased Na+/K+ratios and malomdiadehyde contents, and decreased physiological parameters compared with 9804. These changes in transgenic lines suggested thatincreased the salt tolerance of rice by modulating ion homeostasis, redox reactions and photosynthesis. The results of RNA-Seq indicated that genes involved in redox-dependent signaling pathway, photosynthesis and zeatin synthesis pathways were significantly down-regulated in theknockout line compared with 9804 under salt-stress condition, which confirmed thatpositively regulated salt tolerance by modulating diverse stress-defensive responses in rice. These findings provided novel insights for the genetic improvement of rice and for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of salt-stress tolerance.

    rice;; salt stress tolerance; survival rate

    High salinity is major abiotic stress that affects plant growth, resulting in great yield loss in rice, which is a highly salt-sensitive crop compared with other cereals (Munns and Tester, 2008). Plants have evolved a series of sophisticated mechanisms during growth and development in response to external environmental stress (Bhatt et al, 2020). To combat salinity-dependent damage using breeding or biotechnological strategies, it is essential to identify salt-tolerance genes and understand their response mechanisms to salt stress.

    Sucrose non-fermentation 1 (SNF1)-associated protein kinase 2s (SnRK2s), which form a family of plant- specific Ser/Thr kinases, play important roles in regulating plant responses to environmental and biotic stress (Kulik et al, 2011). The first SnRK2 cDNA () was isolated from the ABA-treated wheat endosperm cDNA library (Anderberg and Walker- Simmons, 1992), and SnRK2 functions have been widely elucidated. In, there are 10 known SnRK2 genes that have been studied (Boudsocq et al, 2004). AtSnRK2s not only play roles in many developmental processes, but also in responses to salinity and drought (Zheng et al, 2010).- mediated phosphorylation and salicylic acid (SA) signaling act synergistically to activate nonexpressor of pathogenesis-related 1 (NPR1), which initiates immune responses and increases disease resistance (Lee et al, 2015). In maize, 11 ZmSAPK genes have been cloned and most are induced by one or more biotic stresses. For example, the expression ofis significantly increased after high salt and drought stresses (Ying et al, 2011).

    Ten homologous genes have been identified in the rice SnRK2 family and designated asto, respectively (Kobayashi et al, 2004). In recent years, expressions and functions of several OsSAPKs in response to biotic and abiotic stresses in ricehave been characterized. For example,is up-regulated after drought treatment and itsoverexpression can increase rice yields (Dey et al, 2016).can respond to salt stress, and its overexpression results in lower Na+and Cl–accumulations and increased photosynthesis (Diédhiou et al, 2008).,,andare up-regulated in a transgenic rice line carrying the non-host resistance genewhen plants have been inoculated withpv.(Xu M R et al, 2013).andmay function collaboratively as positive regulators of salt-stress tolerance at the germination and seedling stages (Lou et al, 2018).

    In this study, we demonstrated thatwas involved in response to salt stress usingoverexpressing and knockouttransgenic rice lines. Furthermore, to elucidate the response mechanisms to salt stress mediated by, physiological changes and transcriptome profiling in transgenic line and wild type (WT, 9804) were investigated.

    Results

    Subcellular localization and salt-stress-responsive expression patterns of OsSAPK7 in rice

    OsSAPK7 was first identified as a SNF1-associated protein kinase consisting of 359 amino acid residues with a 257-amino acid kinase region at the N-terminal and a 25-amino acid Glu-rich region at the C-terminal (Fig. 1-A). To determine the subcellular localization of OsSAPK7, the OsSAPK7-GFP fusion protein was transiently expressed inleaves.OsSAPK7-GFP was localized in the cytoplasm and nucleus as assessed by merged GFP signals and auto fluorescence (Fig. 1-B).

    To analyze the stress-responsive expression patterns ofin rice,expression levels at the seedling stage after being treated with 100 mmol/L NaCl were measured by qRT-PCR.was rapidly expressed in rice seedlings after the salt-stress treatment, and the transcription level was increased by greater than 7-fold from 4 h to 36 h after the stress treatment (Fig. 2). Thus,may be involved in the response to salt stress in rice.

    Fig. 1. Domain structure and subcellular localization of OsSAPK7.

    A, Schematic representation of the domain structure of OsSAPK7. The highly conserved kinase region at the N-terminal and the Glu-rich motif at the C-terminal are shown.

    B, Green fluorescence protein (GFP) signals arising from the OsSAPK7- GFP fusion proteins expressed in tobacco leaves were detected using a confocal microscope. Red signals represent chloroplast auto-fluorescence.

    The only GFP signal expressed by pCAMBIA-1300 in tobacco leaves served as a negative control.

    OsSAPK7 positively regulates salt-stress tolerance at seedling stage in rice

    To completely investigate the function of,overexpression transgenic lines (and)andknockout lines (and) were generated (Fig. S1). Without the NaCl treatment, no obvious differences were observed between the WT and the transgenic plants (Fig. 3-A). After 10 d of 100 mmol/L NaCl treatment, the-over- expression plants were obviously more robust than 9804, and conversely, theknockout plants were more wilted than 9804 (Fig. 3-A). After treatment with 100 mmol/L NaCl for 10 d and recovered in Hoagland’s nutrient solution for 7 d, the survival rates of the-overexpression plants ranged from 45%–50% (Fig. 3-B), which was significantly greater than 9804. However, the survival rates of theknockout plants were only 20%–25%, which were significantly lower than that of the WT (Fig. 3-B). Thus,may increase the tolerance to salt stress at the rice seedling stage.

    Fig. 2. Expression ofin rice under salt-stress conditions.After 20-day-old rice seedlings were subjected to 100 mmol/L NaCl treatment,expression levels were assessed by qRT-PCR. Means and standard errors were obtained from three biological replicates. ** and *** indicate statistically significant differences at the 0.01 and 0.001 levels, respectively.

    To investigate whetheraffectsroot growth and seed germination under salt-stress conditions,-overexpression and knockout lines, as well as WT 9804, were grown in distilled water or 100 mmol/L NaCl. There were no significant differences in the root lengths of the-overexpression and knockout lines compared with 9804 under both salt-stress and normal conditions (Fig. S2-A to -D). In addition, there were no significant differences among the seed germination rates of-overexpression,knockout and WT lines grown in either distilled water or 100 mmol/L NaCl (Fig. S2-E to -H). Thus,did not affect root growth or seed germination under salt-stress.

    OsSAPK7 modulates diverse physiological traits associated with stress

    The capability to eliminate Na+and maintain a lower Na+/K+ratio can reflect the salt tolerance of the plants (Zhu, 2003).-overexpression transgenic plants selectively reduced Na+uptake and maintained lower Na+/K+ratios in the roots and shoots after 6 d of salt stress (Fig. 4-A, -B and Fig. S3). In contrast, theknockout plants accumulated more Na+, leading to greater Na+/K+ratios in the roots and shoots compared with 9804.

    To elucidate the physiological changes that occurred in transgenic plants under salt-stress conditions, the chlorophyll contents were determined in the 20-day- old seedlings ofoverexpression,knockout and WT plants grown in Hoagland’s solution supplemented with 100 mmol/L NaCl for 6 d. There were no significant differences in the chlorophyll contents between WT and the transgenic plants under normal conditions (Fig. 4-C). Compared with 9804, the chlorophyll contents were significantly higher inoverexpression plants, but markedly lower inknockout lines under salt-stress conditions (Fig. 4-C).

    Fig. 3. Phenotypic reactions of-overexpression,knockout and wild type (WT) 9804 lines under salt-stress conditions.

    A, Phenotypic comparison of seedings grown under salt stress at the seedling stage.-overexpression lines (and),knockout lines (and) and 9804 plants under normal conditions for 20-day-old seedlings were transferred to Hoagland’s nutrient solution supplemented with 100 mmol/L NaCl for 10 d and then recovered for 7 d.

    B, Survival rates of,,,and 9804 plants after recovered for 7 d. Values are Mean ± SE (= 3). **,< 0.05 according to the Student’s-test.

    Additionally, several physiological parameters were measured in transgenic and WT plants under salt- stress conditions. Compared with 9804, superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was significantly greater in theoverexpression plants but markedly lower inknockout plants under salt-stress conditions (Fig. 4-D). Similarly, catalase (CAT) activity was significantly greater inoverexpression plants but lower inknockout plants than in 9804(Fig. 4-E). Salt stress resulted in a significantly decreased malomdiadehyde (MDA) accumulation in-overexpression plants, while MDA accumulation was significantly increased inknockout plants, compared with WT (Fig. 4-F).

    Fig. 4. Responses of 20-day-old transgenic lines and wild type 9804 at 6 d after exposure to 100 mmol/L NaCl treatment.

    A, Na+/K+ratio in roots. B, Na+/K+ratio in shoots. C, Chlorophyll content in the leaves under control and salt-stress conditions for 6 d. D, Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity in leaves. E, Catalase (CAT) activity in leaves. F, Malomdiadehyde (MDA) content of leaves. G, Proline content of leaves.

    andare the-overexpression lines.andare theknockout lines. Values are Mean ± SE (= 3). * and ** indicate significant differences at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels according to the Student’s-test compared with 9804, respectively.

    Proline accumulation is also a common response to salt stress in many plants (Vives-Peris et al, 2017). Compared with 9804, free proline content in- overexpressionplants was significantly increased under salt stress, while it was decreased significantly inknockout plants (Fig. 4-G). Thus, positive regulation of salt-stress tolerance was associated with a decreasing Na+/K+ratio and an increasing free proline content in plants.

    Comparative transcriptome profiling of OsSAPK7 knockout and WT

    To elucidate the molecular mechanisms ofin salt-stress responses, a comparative transcriptome profiling of theknockout lineand WT 9804 was globally characterized using RNA-Seq. Compared with WT, 247 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified inunder normal conditions (at 0 h) (Fig. 5-A and Table S1). There were 650 DEGs incompared with WT under salt-stress conditions, including 297 and 416 DEGs at 12 and 36 h after the salt-stress treatment (Fig. 5-A and Table S2), respectively. Among these DEGs, 63 were found at both 12 and 36 h. Cluster analysis of DEGs with R studio showed that they were divided into two clusters. The samples after salt stress (12 and 36 h) were clustered together, and the WT (0 h) clustered in another cluster, indicating thatcan respond to rice salt stress (Fig. 5-B).

    Some Gene Ontology (GO) categories associated with basic biological processes, such as metabolic process (GO:0008152), transporter activity (GO:0005215), enzyme regulator activity (GO:0030234) and localization (GO:0051179), were common betweenand WT at 0, 12 and 36 h after salt stress (Fig. 5-C, Fig. S4 and Table S3). Strikingly, several significant GO terms, including electron carrier activity (GO:0009055), structural molecule activity (GO:0005198) and protein binding transcription factor activity (GO:0000988), were characterized inbut not in WT at 12 h after salt stress (Fig. 5-C and Table S3). Notably, the DEGs betweenand WT at 36 h after salt stress were more significantly enriched in electron carrier activity, structural molecule activity, protein binding transcription factor activity, membrane-enclosed lumen (GO:0031974) and organelle part (GO:0044422) (Fig. 5-C and Table S3).

    Fig. 5. Transcriptome profiling analysis ofknockout lineand wild type (WT, 9804) under salt stress conditions.

    A, Venn diagram of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in WT vsat 0, 12 and 36 h under salt-stress conditions.

    B, Hierarchical clustering of DEGs between WT andat 12 and 36 h under salt stress. The color scale represents log2 of the fragment per kilo base of exon model per million mapped fragments (FPKM).

    C, Gene Ontology analysis of DEGs in WT vsat 12 and 36 h under salt-stress conditions.

    D, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis of DEGs in WT vs.

    In addition, significant Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways including phenylalanine metabolic pathway and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathway were common incompared with WT at 0, 12 and 36 h after salt stress (Fig. 5-D and Table S4). Compared with the sample at 0 h, photosynthesis was significantly enriched in KEGG pathway inat 12 h after salt stress, and zeatin biosynthesis and ribosome pathways were enriched at 36 h after salt stress (Fig. 5-D and Table S4).

    DEGs involved in redox signaling and photosynthetic pathways in response to salt stress

    The electron carrier activity is important in the redox process, with electrons being transported through a series of reactions from the reductant (electron donor) to the oxidant (electron acceptor), with concomitant energy conversion (Garg et al, 2010). In this study, four genes,,,and,associated with electron carrier activity,exhibited the same expression patterns after salt stress (Fig. 6-A and Table S5). Among them,was down-regulated incompared with 9804 at 12 h, and,andwere down-regulated incompared with 9804 at 36 h (Fig. 6-A and Table S5).

    Fig. 6. Expression patterns of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) inknockout linecompared with wild type 9804.

    A, Hierarchical clustering of DEGs associated with electron carrier activity, photosynthesis and zeatin synthesis pathway regulated byafter salt-stress treatment. Color scale represents the log2 of the fragment per kilo base of exon model per million mapped fragments (FPKM).

    B, Expression patterns of key genes in 9804 andassessed by qRT-PCR and FPKM. Values are Mean ± SE (= 3).

    Moreover,,and, which wereinvolved in photosynthesis, were down-regulated incompared with 9804 at 12 h after salt stress (Fig. 6-A and Table S5). Compared with 9804 at 36 h after salt stress,,and, which have roles in the zeatin synthesis pathway, were also down-regulated in(Fig. 6-A and Table S5). The relative expression levels of the five tested DEGs as assessed by qRT-PCR were consistent with their fragment per kilo base of exon model per million mapped fragments (FPKM) values (Fig. 6-B).

    Discussion

    Ten members of the OsSAPKs family in rice might be activated by hyperosmotic stress in the cellular protoplasts (Anderberg and Walker-Simmons, 1992).,andcan function as positive regulators of salt-stress tolerance in rice (Diédhiou et al, 2008; Lou et al, 2018). However, the mechanism of salt tolerance mediated by this kinase family remains to be elucidated to date. In this study,positively regulated salt tolerance at the rice seedling stage and revealed physiological and molecular mechanisms underlying salt tolerance.

    Salt stress generally impairs the metabolic processes of plants through both osmotic and ionic effects (Munns and Tester, 2008). Osmotic effects result in a reduction in the water absorption capability. Ionic stress causes Na+toxicity, which disrupts photosynthesis, protein synthesis and enzyme activities (Horie et al, 2015). Na+absorption increases in cell and the change in the Na+/K+ratio may cause the degradation or failure of essential enzymes, leading to cell death (Passricha et al, 2019). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulate during abiotic-stress exposure. ROS accumulation acts as a signal in the mediation of stress, but excessive ROS at later stages injures plant cells by damaging lipids, DNA and proteins (Zhang et al, 2016; Li et al, 2020). Plants have evolved efficient enzymatic and nonenzymatic detoxification mechanisms to scavenge ROS (Xu J et al, 2013). SOD and CAT play important roles in reducing ROS to resist stress. In this study,overexpression plants displayedalower Na+/K+ratio compared with 9804under salt-stress conditions, whileknockout plants had a greater Na+/K+ratio (Fig. 4-A and -B). Furthermore,overexpression plants displayed greater SOD and CAT activities compared with 9804under salt-stress conditions, whileknockout plants had decreased SOD and CAT activities (Fig. 4-D and -E). Notably, MDA content, which is an important intermediate in ion leakage and reflects membrane injuryand ROS scavenging (Zhou et al, 2018), was also significantly reduced in- overexpression plants compared with 9804 (Fig. 4-F). Conversely, it was dramatically increased inknockout plants. These physiological changes in thetransgenic plants suggested thatcan improve salt tolerance by regulating ion homeostasis and scavenging ROS through redox reactions.

    Plants can synthesize some small molecules, such as sugars, amino acids and other substances, to regulate the osmotic pressure and resist external stress through photosynthesis. In particular, proline has beneficial roles in ROS scavenging and osmotic pressure regulation to protect plants under abiotic stress conditions (Vives-Peris et al, 2017).overexpression plants had increased chlorophyll and proline contents compared with 9804after salt treatments, whileknockout plants had decreased chlorophylland prolinecontents, suggesting that the salt tolerance mediated bymight be related tophotosynthesis in rice.

    Comparative transcriptome profiling ofknockoutand WT lines corroborated thatregulated salt-stress tolerance by modulating diverse stress-defensive responses. DEGs associated with the electron carrier activity, photosynthetic pathway and zeatin biosynthesis pathway, which prevent chlorophyll degradation (Rodo et al, 2008), were significantly enriched in WT compared with transgenic plants under salt-stress conditions, which was in accordance with the change trends of investigated physiological parameters. Thus, the salt tolerance mediated byin rice was involved in diverse stress-defensive responses, including modulating ion homeostasis, scavenging ROS and improving photosynthesis. The results of this study provided novel insights that can be used in the genetic improvement in rice.The further characterization of downstream components and signal transduction cascades triggered byand determination of the DEG functions identified in this study will help elucidate the complex molecular networks involved in salt-stress responses in rice.

    methods

    Plant materials, strain and vectors

    Seeds ofL. variety 9804 and transgenic lines were maintained at the experimental fields of Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China. The plasmid pYLCRISPR/Cas9Pubi-H was obtained from Prof. Liu Yaoguang from South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China. pMDC43 vector (Curtis and Grossniklaus, 2003) andEHA105 were maintained in our laboratory.

    Subcellular localization and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis

    To localize the SAPK7 protein, the coding sequence ofwas cloned into the pMDC43 vector, in which it was fused to GFP coding sequence. The plasmid construct was transformed intoleaves. The leaves ofwere observed 48–72 h after infiltration using an LSM 700 laser confocal scanning microscope (ZEISS Microsystems, Jena, Germany). Because the pMDC43 empty vector contains CcdB (Controller of cell division or death B) toxic protein, and it is lethal when transformed into tobacco alone, we supplemented pCAMBIA-1300 as a negative control for only GFP. The excitation and detection wavelengths used for GFP were 488 and 509 nm, respectively.

    Plant materials were collected from wild type (WT) 9804 and transgenic plants that were cultured in Hoagland’s nutrient solution (Yoshida et al, 1976). Tissue samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen at -80 oC. The total RNA was extracted using a TRIzol reagent kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA). First-strand cDNA was extracted using TransScript?RT/RI Enzyme Mix reverse transcriptase (Trans, Beijing, China). The real-time quantification of transcript levels was performed in 20 μL reactions using the SYBR?Green PCR Master Mix kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol on an ABI Prism 7500 Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA). Primers used in qRT-PCR are shown in Table S6.gene was used as a reference. Independent biological repetitions of each time point for each sample were performed in triplicate.

    Vector construction and transgenic line generation

    To generate the-overexpression plants, a 1080-bpcDNA sequence was inserted downstream of the35S promoter of pMDC43 using the Gateway system (Curtis and Grossuiklaus, 2003). The full-lengthsequence was downloaded from the NCBI database (https://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov/). Using cDNA of 9804 as the template, the target fragment was amplified by PCR using the primer pair SAPK7-CDS-F and SAPK7-CDS-R. The purified product was cloned into the entry vector pGWC using TA cloning to obtain pGWC-. The correctly sequenced pGWC-plasmid was exchanged with the destination vector pMDC43 to obtain pMDC43-.

    To generate theknockout lines, the first exon of thegenomic sequence from 38 to 57 bp was used as a single guide RNA (Table S6). pYLCRISPR/Cas9Pubi-H plasmid and-Cas9 vector were constructed using the method described by Ma et al (2005).

    The above constructs were introduced intostrain EHA105 and incorporated into the genome of 9804 using an-mediated transformation method. The positiveoverexpression plants were identified using PCR and qRT-PCR. Two positive T1overexpression lines,and, which exhibited greaterexpression levels, were further confirmed using a western blot assay as described by Kim et al (2017). The positiveknockout T0and T1plants were screened by sequencing with primers Cas9-SAPK7-Test-F and Cas9-SAPK7-Test-F (Table S6). The two homozygousknockout linesandwere obtained (Fig. S1). All the primers are listed in Table S6.

    Assaying transgenic line phenotypes under salt-stress

    overexpression linesand,knockout linesand, and WT 9804 plants were cultured in Hoagland’s nutrient solution (Yoshida et al, 1976) for 20 d and then treated with 100 mmol/L NaCl. For each line, 40 seedlings were planted in three biological replicates. At 10 d after the salt-stress treatment, the seedlings were transferred to normal Hoagland’s nutrient solution to recover for 7 d, and then the survival rates were measured.

    To observe the effect ofon seed germination, the seeds of transgenic lines and WT 9804 were treated with 75% alcohol for 5 min, washed with water for three times, and then-overexpression,knockout and WT seeds were sown in distilled water (control) or distilled water supplemented with 100 mmol/L NaCl solution. Each plate contained 30 seeds with three replications. The plates were incubated at 25 oC under 16 h/8 h (light/dark) cycles.

    To evaluate the effect ofon root growth, 3-day-old seedlings that were fully germinated were transferred to germination bags (Phytotc, Beijing, China) containing distilled water or 100 mmol/L NaCl solution. To measure root length, the germination bags were incubated vertically, and the root lengths were measured after 7 d.

    Assaying physiological parameters under salt-stress

    SOD and CATactivity levels, and the chlorophyll, proline, MDA, Na+and K+contents in transgenic lines,,andas well as WT 9804 were detected under salt-stress conditions. The leaves of 20-day-old seedlings cultured in Hoagland’s nutrient solution supplemented with 100 mmol/L NaCl for 6 d were collected, with leaves of the same lines cultured in Hoagland’s nutrient solution serving as controls. The collected samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 oC. The total chlorophyll content, and SOD and CAT activity levels, were measured according to Civello et al (1995). The proline content of the leaves was measured according to Tezvergil-Mutluay et al (2010). MDA content was measured according to Ashraf et al (2010). The relative Na+and K+ion accumulations in the roots and shoots were measured according to Schmidt et al (2013). Three replicates were used for each measurement.

    High-throughput transcriptome analyses and DEG identification

    To determine the expression profiles of genes modulated by, high-throughput transcriptome analyses were performed for the salt stress-challengedknockoutand WT lines. Briefly, 20-day-old seedlings ofand WT were grown in Hoagland’s nutrient solution supplemented with 100 mmol/L NaCl, and the plant leaves were harvested at 0, 12 and 36 h after salt stress. The total RNA of each sample was extracted using a TRIzol extraction kit (Invitrogen, CA, USA). Two replicated RNA samples for each plant were mixed equally and used to construct the library. The produced libraries underwent cluster generation on cBot were sequenced on a HiSeq 2000 platform (Illumina) with paired-end 100-bp reads by CapitalBio Corporation, Beijing, China. The raw sequence data reported in this study have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive (Wang et al, 2017) in the BIG Data Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics (BIG), Chinese Academy of Sciences, under accession number PRJCA001237 and are publicly accessible at http://bigd.big.ac.cn/gsa.

    The raw reads were first filtered by removing adaptor sequences and low-quality sequences using an in-house perl script. The retained high-quality reads in each sample were mapped to the Rice Genome Note Project (RGAP) of Michigan State University (MSURGAP7, ftp://ftp.plantbiology.msu.edu/ pub/data/Eukaryotic_Projects/o_sativa/annotation_dbs/pseudomo lecules/version_7.0) using Bowtie (Trapnell et al, 2010). The DEGs were usually identified using a Chi-square test when there was a statistically significant difference in the relative abundance between the two samples (using IDEG6 software, based on a-value threshold ≤ 0.001). Cuffdiff was used to identify DEGs. GO (www.geneontology.org/) and KEGG enrichment (http://bioinfo.sibs.ac.cn/carmo/Gene_Annotation. php) analyses of the DEGs were performed using an online website. The Venn diagram was built using software available online (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html), and the heat map was created by R studio. According to the GO and KEGG enrichment analyses, candidate genes were selected and verified by qRT-PCR.

    Acknowledgements

    This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFD0100101), the National High-Tech Program of China (Grant No. 2014AA10A603), the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant No. OPP1130530). We thank Professor Liu Yaoguang from South China Agricultural University for providing plasmid pYLCRISPR/Cas9Pubi-H. We thank Lesley Benyon from Liwen Bianji Edanz Group China (www.liwenbianji.cn/ac) for editing the English text.

    Supplemental data

    The following materials are available in the online version of this article at http://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/rice-science; http://www.ricescience.org.

    Fig. S1. Graphic representation of vector constructs and expression analysis ofin transgenic plants.

    Fig. S2. Root growth and germination rates oftransgenic lines and wild type 9804 under salt-stress conditions.

    Fig. S3. Potassium and sodium ion concentrations in plant tissues of transgenic and wild type 9804 plants.

    Fig. S4. Gene Ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes in theknockout linecompared with wild type 9804 at 0 h.

    Table S1. Differentially expressed genes incompared with wild type at 0 h after exposure to salt stress.

    Table S2. Differentially expressed genes incompared with wild type at 12 and 36 h after exposure to salt stress.

    Table S3. Gene ontology analysis of differentially expressed genes inat 0, 12 and 36 h after exposure to salt stress.

    Table S4. KEGG analysis of differentially expressed genes inat 0, 12 and 36 h after exposure to salt stress.

    Table S5. Differentially expressed genes in electron carrier activity, photosynthesis and zeatin biosynthesis processes under salt-stress condition.

    Table S6. Primers used in this study.

    Anderberg R J, Walker-Simmons M K. 1992. Isolation of a wheat cDNA clone for an abscisic acid-inducible transcript with homology to protein kinases., 89(21): 10183?10187.

    Ashraf M A, Ashraf M, Ali Q. 2010. Response of two genetically diverse wheat cultivars to salt stress at different growth stages: Leaf lipid peroxidation and phenolic contents., 42(1): 559?565.

    Bhatt T, Sharma A, Puri S, Minhas A P. 2020. Salt tolerance mechanisms and approaches: Future scope of halotolerant genes and rice landraces., 27(5): 368?383.

    Boudsocq M, Barbier-Brygoo H, Lauriere C. 2004. Identification of nine sucrose nonfermenting 1-related protein kinases 2 activated by hyperosmotic and saline stresses in., 279: 41758?41766.

    Civello P M, Martinez G A, Chaves A R, Anon M C. 1995. Peroxidase from strawberry fruit (Duch): Partial purification and determination of some properties., 43(10): 2596?2601.

    Curtis M D, Grossniklaus U. 2003. A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta., 133(2): 462?469.

    Dey A, Samanta M K, Gayen S, Maiti M K. 2016. The sucrose non-fermenting 1-related kinase 2 geneimproves drought tolerance and grain yield in rice by modulating cellular osmotic potential, stomatal closure and stress-responsive gene expression., 16: 158.

    Diédhiou C J, Popova O V, Dietz K J, Golldack D. 2008. The SNF1-type serine-threonine protein kinase SAPK4 regulates stress-responsive gene expression in rice., 8: 49.

    Garg R, Jhanwar S, Tyagi A K, Jain M. 2010. Genome-wide survey and expression analysis suggest diverse roles of glutaredoxin gene family members during development and sesponse to various stimuli in rice., 17(6): 353?367.

    Horie T, Karahara I, Katsuhara M. 2015. Salinity tolerance mechanisms in glycophytes: An overview with the central focus on rice plants., 5(1): 11.

    Kim B. 2017. Western blot techniques.: Espina V. Molecular Profiling: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology. Springer Science and Business Media LLC: 1606: 133?139.

    Kobayashi Y, Yamamoto S, Minami H, Kagaya Y, Hattori T. 2004. Differential activation of the rice sucrose nonfermenting1-related protein kinase2 family by hyperosmotic stress and abscisic acid., 16(5): 1163?1677.

    Kulik A, Wawer I, Krzywińska E, Bucholc M, Dobrowolska G. 2011. SnRK2 protein kinases: Key regulators of plant response to abiotic stresses., 15(12): 859?872.

    Lee H J, Park Y J, Seo P J, Kim J H, Sim H J, Kim S G, Park C M. 2015. Systemic immunity requires SnRK28-mediated nuclear import of NPR1 in., 27(12): 3425?3438.

    Li B, Huang J, Wang L, Li J, Liang Y Y, Chen J. 2020. A review on how plant hormones and environment factors are involved in rice root hair development., 34(4): 287?299. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Lou D J, Wang H P, Yu D Q. 2018. The sucrose non-fermenting-1- related protein kinases SAPK1 and SAPK2 function collaboratively as positive regulators of salt stress tolerance in rice., 18: 203?219.

    Ma X L, Zhang Q Y, Zhu Q L, Liu W, Chen Y, Qiu R, Wang B, Yang Z F, Li H Y, Lin Y R, Xie Y Y, Shen R X, Chen S F, Wang Z, Chen Y L, Guo J X, Chen L T, Zhao X C, Dong Z C, Liu Y G. 2005. A robust CRISPR/Cas9 system for convenient, high-efficiency multiplex genome editing in monocot and dicot., 8(8): 1274?1284.

    Munns R, Tester M. 2008. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance., 59: 651?681.

    Passricha N, Saifi S K, Kharb P, Tuteja N. 2019. Marker-free transgenic rice plant overexpressing pea LecRLK imparts salinity tolerance by inhibiting sodium accumulation., 99(3): 265?281.

    Rodo A P, Brugière N, Vankova R, Malbeck J, Olson J M, Haines S C, Martin R C, Habben J E, Mok D W S, Mok M C. 2008. Over-expression of a zeatin-glucosylation gene in maize leads to growth retardation and tasselseed formation., 59(10): 2673?2686.

    Schmidt R, Mieulet D, Hubberten H M, Obata T, Hoefgen R, Fernie A R, Fisahn J, San B S, Guiderdoni E, Schippers J H M, Mueller-Roeber B. 2013. Salt-responsive ERF1 regulates reactive oxygen species-dependent signaling during the initial response to salt stress in rice., 25(6): 2115?2131.

    Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Agee K A, Hoshika T, Carrilho M, Breschi L, Tj?derhane L, Nishitani Y, Carvalho R M, Looney S, Tay F R, Pashley D H. 2010. The requirement of zinc and calcium ions for functional MMP activity in demineralized dentin matrices., 26(11): 1059?1067.

    Trapnell C, Williams B A, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren M J, Salzberg S L, Word B J, Pachter L. 2010. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation., 28(5): 511?515.

    Vives-Peris V, Gómez-Cadenas A, Pérez-Clemente R M. 2017. Citrus plants exude proline and phytohormones under abiotic stress conditions., 36(6): 1971?1984.

    Wang Y Q, Song F H, Zhu J W, Zhang S S, Yang Y D, Chen T T, Tang B X, Dong L L, Ding N, Zhang Q, Bai Z X, Dong X N, Chen H X, Sun M Y, Zhai S, Sun Y B, Yu L, Lan L, Xiao J F, Fang X D, Lei H X, Zhang Z, Zhao W M. 2017. GSA: Genome sequence archive., 15(1): 14?18.

    Xu J, Duan X G, Yang J, Beeching J R, Zhang P. 2013. Reactive oxygen species scavenging by overproduction of superoxide dismutase and catalase delays postharvest physiological deterioration of cassava storage roots., 161(3): 1517–1528.

    Xu M R, Huang L Y, Zhang F, Zhu L H, Zhou Y L, Li Z K. 2013. Genome-wide phylogenetic analysis of stress-activated protein kinase genes in rice () and expression profiling in response topvinfection., 31(4): 877?885.

    Ying S, Zhang D F, Li H Y, Liu Y H, Shi Y S, Song Y C, Wang T Y, Li Y. 2011. Cloning and characterization of a maize SnRK2 protein kinase gene confers enhanced salt tolerance in transgenic., 30(9): 1683?1699.

    Yoshida S, Forno D A, Cock J H, Gomez K A. 1976. Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. Manila, the Philippines: International Rice Research Institute: 61?64.

    Zhang M, Smith J A, Harberd N P, Jiang C F. 2016. The regulatory roles of ethylene and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plant salt stress responses., 91(6): 651?659.

    Zheng Z F, Xu X P, Crosley R A, Greenwalt S A, Sun Y J, Blakeslee B, Wang L Z, Ni W T, Sopko M S, Yao C L, Yau K, Burton S, Zhuang M B, McCaskill D G, Gachotte D, Thompson M, Greene T W. 2010. The protein kinase SnRK2.6 mediates the regulation of sucrose metabolism and plant growth in., 153(1): 99?113.

    Zhou Y B, Liu C, Tang D Y, Yan L, Wang D, Yang Y Z, Gui J S, Zhao X Y, Li L G, Tang X D, Yu F, Li J L, Liu L L, Zhu Y H, Lin J Z, Liu X M. 2018. The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase STRK1 phosphorylates and activates CatC, thereby regulating H2O2homeostasis and improving salt tolerance in rice., 30(5): 1100?1118.

    Zhu J K. 2003. Regulation of ion homeostasis under salt stress., 6(5): 441?445.

    Zhou Yongli (zhouyongli@caas.cn)

    1 July 2020;

    12 October 2020

    Copyright ? 2021, China National Rice Research Institute. Hosting by Elsevier B V

    This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

    Peer review under responsibility of China National Rice Research Institute

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2021.09.003

    (Managing Editor: Li Guan)

    欧美高清成人免费视频www| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| www日本黄色视频网| 男人舔奶头视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| www日本在线高清视频| 国产午夜精品论理片| 国产在视频线在精品| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 精品福利观看| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 一级毛片高清免费大全| netflix在线观看网站| netflix在线观看网站| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产黄片美女视频| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 黄色日韩在线| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 黄色女人牲交| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 极品教师在线免费播放| 日本a在线网址| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 两个人的视频大全免费| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 亚洲片人在线观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 18+在线观看网站| ponron亚洲| 亚洲av成人av| 国产成人av教育| 两个人看的免费小视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国产高清三级在线| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 99久久精品热视频| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产高清激情床上av| 69av精品久久久久久| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| www.色视频.com| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 手机成人av网站| 亚洲片人在线观看| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧美激情在线99| 久久草成人影院| 日本熟妇午夜| 黄色女人牲交| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 国产av在哪里看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| h日本视频在线播放| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久国产精品影院| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 51国产日韩欧美| 看片在线看免费视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 久久久久久大精品| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 毛片女人毛片| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 69av精品久久久久久| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 嫩草影院入口| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 免费大片18禁| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 免费看日本二区| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 怎么达到女性高潮| 午夜影院日韩av| 色播亚洲综合网| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 一级黄片播放器| 日韩国内少妇激情av| eeuss影院久久| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 国产美女午夜福利| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 少妇的逼水好多| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 女警被强在线播放| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 在线免费观看的www视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 一本精品99久久精品77| 欧美日韩精品网址| av中文乱码字幕在线| 九色成人免费人妻av| 久久性视频一级片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产三级在线视频| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产高清三级在线| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩欧美免费精品| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月 | 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 久久久久国内视频| www国产在线视频色| 少妇的逼水好多| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 日韩免费av在线播放| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产精品一及| xxx96com| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产真实乱freesex| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 男人舔奶头视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产日本99.免费观看| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 天天添夜夜摸| xxxwww97欧美| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 嫩草影院入口| 高清在线国产一区| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 日本 av在线| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| svipshipincom国产片| 岛国在线观看网站| 少妇丰满av| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 色综合站精品国产| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 色在线成人网| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 精品久久久久久成人av| 一级黄色大片毛片| 舔av片在线| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 我要搜黄色片| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产精品一及| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| eeuss影院久久| 午夜免费激情av| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 精品人妻1区二区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 日本 av在线| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 十八禁网站免费在线| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 午夜a级毛片| 欧美成人a在线观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| av福利片在线观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av熟女| 香蕉久久夜色| 久久久久久大精品| av专区在线播放| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| svipshipincom国产片| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| netflix在线观看网站| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 中国美女看黄片| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 丁香欧美五月| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 脱女人内裤的视频| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产乱人视频| xxx96com| 免费看a级黄色片| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 99久久精品热视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 免费av毛片视频| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 69人妻影院| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 日本黄大片高清| www.www免费av| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| www.999成人在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 午夜福利在线在线| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美性感艳星| 中文字幕久久专区| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 国产三级黄色录像| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | h日本视频在线播放| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 91久久精品电影网| xxxwww97欧美| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 老司机福利观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲无线在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 波多野结衣高清作品| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 级片在线观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| xxxwww97欧美| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产亚洲欧美98| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 精品国产亚洲在线| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 嫩草影视91久久| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲激情在线av| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 少妇丰满av| av片东京热男人的天堂| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 免费av毛片视频| 怎么达到女性高潮| 黄片小视频在线播放| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 香蕉av资源在线| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 国产高清激情床上av| 日本黄色片子视频| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 观看美女的网站| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 乱人视频在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产在视频线在精品| 在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 熟女电影av网| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 久久久成人免费电影| 性欧美人与动物交配| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| av欧美777| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 综合色av麻豆| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 看片在线看免费视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产成人av教育| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 日本免费a在线| 成人欧美大片| 波多野结衣高清作品| 国产高清videossex| 99久久精品热视频| 久久伊人香网站| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产日本99.免费观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲av成人av| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 免费av不卡在线播放| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲内射少妇av| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲最大成人中文| 一本一本综合久久| 免费av不卡在线播放| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 91av网一区二区| 俺也久久电影网| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 国产三级中文精品| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 色视频www国产| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 69人妻影院| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| tocl精华| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 午夜免费激情av| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 69av精品久久久久久| 91字幕亚洲| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 精品电影一区二区在线| 日韩欧美免费精品| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 欧美成人a在线观看| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产熟女xx| 88av欧美| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美bdsm另类| 午夜久久久久精精品| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久人妻av系列| 波多野结衣高清作品| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 精品久久久久久,| 91麻豆av在线| avwww免费| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 天天添夜夜摸| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 1024手机看黄色片| 久久亚洲精品不卡|