• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Compressive behavior of hybrid steel-polyvinyl alcohol fiber-reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag powder: experiments and an artificial neural network model*#

    2021-09-21 05:28:10FangyuLIUWenqiDINGYafeiQIAOLinbingWANGQiyangCHEN

    Fang-yu LIU, Wen-qi DING, Ya-fei QIAO, Lin-bing WANG, Qi-yang CHEN

    Compressive behavior of hybrid steel-polyvinyl alcohol fiber-reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag powder: experiments and an artificial neural network model*#

    Fang-yu LIU1, Wen-qi DING2,3, Ya-fei QIAO??2,3, Lin-bing WANG??1, Qi-yang CHEN4

    2, Shanghai 200092, China Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Ministry of Education, Shanghai 200092, China ?E-mail: yafei.qiao@#edu.cn; wangl@vt.edu

    Understanding the mechanical behavior of hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete (HFRC), a composite material, is crucial for the design of HFRC and HFRC structures. In this study, a series of compression experiments were performed on hybrid steel- polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fiber-reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag powder, with a focus on the fiber content/ratio effect on its compressive behavior; a new approach was built to model the compression behavior of HFRC by using an artificial neural network (ANN) method. The proposed ANN model incorporated two new developments: the prediction of the compressive stress-strain curve and consideration of 23 features of components of HFRC. To build a database for the ANN model, relevant published data were also collected. Three indices were used to train and evaluate the ANN model. To highlight the performance of the ANN model, it was compared with a traditional equation-based model. The results revealed that the relative errors of the predicted compressive strength and strain corresponding to compressive strength of the ANN model were close to 0, while the corresponding values from the equation-based model were higher. Therefore, the ANN model is better able to consider the effect of different components on the compressive behavior of HFRC in terms of compressive strength, the strain corresponding to compressive strength, and the compressive stress-strain curve. Such an ANN model could also be a good tool to predict the mechanical behavior of other composite materials.

    Experiments; Artificial neural network (ANN); Hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete (HFRC); Compressive behavior; Stress-strain curve

    1 Introduction

    Fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC), a typical composite material, has been successfully and widely used in civil infrastructure, such as tunnels (de la Fuente et al., 2012; Liao et al., 2015; Gong et al., 2017), bridges (Stoll et al., 2000), concrete structures (Sim et al., 2005), and pavements (Belletti et al., 2008). This is because FRC greatly improves tensile behavior (Xu et al., 2011), flexural behavior (Nguyen et al., 2013), and durability (Liu et al., 2019a) compared with concrete. The compression behavior and basic mechanical characteristics of concrete can also be significantly affected by the addition of fibers (Zhou et al., 2018, 2019). Such enhanced compression behavior is important for many concrete structures, especially in the joints of precast structures where stress is concentrated (Ding et al., 2020). To design a suitable FRC, different types of fibers can be used, including steel, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polypropylene (PP), basalt, and synthetic fibers (Sim et al., 2005; Soutsos et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2019a, 2020a). The mechanical behavior of FRC is related to the type of fiber, the geometry of fiber, and the total fiber content (Lawler et al., 2003, 2005; Liu et al., 2020b).

    According to the number of fiber types combined, FRC can be categorized as single fiber- reinforced concrete or hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete (HFRC), which includes two or more types of fibers. HFRC generally has better mechanical properties than single fiber-reinforced concrete. This is because the hybridization of different fibers can maximize their contribution to the improvement in the mechanical properties of the concrete mixture (Lawler et al., 2005). These improvements are strongly dependent on the fiber type, fiber volume content, hybrid ratio, fiber aspect ratio, and mechanical properties of the fibers (Lawler et al., 2003, 2005; Blanco et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2019b; Zhou et al., 2019). For instance, steel fibers, a type of macrofiber, could create a bridge effect to prevent the development of a major crack because of their greater length, leading to improvements in tensile strength, crack resistance, toughness, and flexural post-cracking creep behavior (Zhao et al., 2015; Serna Ros et al., 2016; Pujadas et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2020b); PVA fibers, a type of microfiber, could introduce many noticeable microcracks and delay the propagation of macrocracks, thereby improving the toughness of concrete (Lawler et al., 2005; Pujadas et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2019b). Therefore, understanding the effects of these fiber features is important for the design and modeling of HFRC.

    To describe the compression behavior of HFRC, many researchers have built models based on the constitutive models of plain concrete (Chi et al., 2014a, 2014b; Zhou et al., 2019). The effects of many features of fibers, such as their length, diameter, and volume, can be introduced into constitutive models via statistical analysis. However, as HFRC exhibits complex responses in terms of strain-softening/hardening, volumetric dilatancy, and pressure sensitivity, these constitutive models are difficult to develop from a purely mathematical perspective (Chi et al., 2014a). They also have limitations for describing the complex compressive behavior of HFRC, especially in capturing the effects of different components.

    To overcome these limitations, deep learning methods have recently been applied to predicting the mechanical properties of concrete (Mashhadban et al., 2016) and designing the mix compositions of civil materials (A?ikgen? et al., 2015). Artificial neural network (ANN), as one of the basic deep learning methods, has shown its strong application ability in civil engineering. It can be used to analyze the relationship between different types of data, produce a correct or nearly correct response to a large database, and make a good prediction for new data. The ANN method has been successfully used to model the compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths of FRC (Karahan et al., 2008; Mashhadban et al., 2016), predict the mix composition of steel fiber-reinforced concrete (A?ikgen? et al., 2015), describe the stress-strain model for fiber reinforced polymer (FRP)-confined concrete (Jiang et al., 2020), and predict the workability of concrete incorporating metakaolin and fly ash (Bai et al., 2003). Since more factors can be considered in an ANN model, it can make more accurate predictions. Moreover, an ANN model is implicit and does not need an experimental data-based formula. However, all the above studies focused on the key characteristics of the mechanical behavior of FRC. Few studies have been carried out to predict the whole stress-strain curve of HFRC using the ANN method. The authors have developed an ANN model to capture the tensile stress-strain relationship of HFRC (Liu et al., 2020a) and attempted to extend it to describe the compressive behavior in this work.

    In summary, the compression behavior of HFRC, especially the stress-strain relationship, is important for many types of concrete structures and their modeling. Conventional constitutive models have limitations in describing such complex compression behaviors. Therefore, this study aimed to reveal the compressive behavior of HFRC containing fly ash and slag powder and develop a new approach to model its compressive stress-strain curve by using the ANN method, and to highlight the capability of the ANN model by investigating the effect of different HFRC components on the compressive behavior of HFRC. To accurately represent the effect of different components of HFRC, the proposed ANN model was used to consider many important factors, including the fiber characteristics (volume, weight, length, diameter, aspect ratio, and reinforcement index), the mechanical properties of plain concrete (elastic modulus, compressive strength, and strain corresponding to compressive strength), and the composition of the concrete mixture (water binder ratio, cement, fly ash, slag powder, water, coarse aggregate, and fine aggregate).

    In the following sections, a series of compression tests on HFRC containing fly ash and slag powder were first introduced to reveal its compressive behavior. Then relevant published data were collected to extend the size and diversity of the database. After that, the ANN model was built and trained based on the database and an equation-based model was also proposed. Finally, a comparison between these two models was carried out via the description of the experimental data, followed by the sensitivity analysis of ANN model.

    2 Compressive experiments

    2.1 Materials

    The selected cement was Class 42.5R ordinary Portland cement, which had a specific surface area of 368 m2/kg. The specific surface area of fly ash was 242 m2/kg compared with 436 m2/kg for slag powder. The fly ash had a SiO2mass fraction of 54.2% compared with 36.9% for the slag powder. The maximum particle size of the fine aggregate was 5 mm, and the coarse aggregate had a continuous size of 5–20 mm. Other properties of the cement, fly ash, and slag powder can be found in (Liu et al., 2019a). The mass proportions of the concrete mixture were cement:fly ash:slag powder:fine aggregate:coarse aggregate:water:superplasticizer=225:75:75:785:1024:165:3.2, and the water-to-binder ratio was set to 0.44.These were designed according to the Chinese Codes (CAECS, 2010; MHURD, 2011a, 2011b).

    As a component of HFRC, fibers significantly affect its mechanical properties, which warrant detailed investigation. In this study, steel fiber and PVA fiber were used, and the detailed properties of these two fibers can be found in (Liu et al., 2019a). To highlight the effects of hybridization and fiber content on the compressive behavior of HFRC, various volume-based hybrid ratios of steel fiber to PVA fiber, ranging from 1:3 to 3:1, were tested, and the total fiber volume content ranged from 1% to 3%. Steel and PVA fiber combinations with fiber volume contents of 0.5%, 1.0%, and 1.5% were tested, based on published values shown to improve the mechanical properties of HFRC (Hai et al., 2016; Feng et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019b, 2020b). Concrete reinforced with either steel or PVA fiber alone was also tested simultaneously, as well as plain concrete, collectively acting as the control group. Therefore, there are 12 groups of specimens in total and they are named as SP, wheremeans the volume content of steel fibers andmeans the volume content of PVA fibers. For example, S1.0P1.5means the specimen that consists of 1.0% steel fibers and 1.5% PVA fibers. C means the plain concrete.

    2.2 Specimen and experiment program

    All concrete specimens were mixed according to the literature, to ensure the uniform dispersion of the fibers (CAECS, 2010; MHURD, 2011a; Li and Liu, 2016; Liu et al., 2019b, 2020b). During mixing of the HFRC samples, more steel fibers had little effect on the workability of HFRC, but increasing the PVA fibers could worsen the workability due to their high-water absorption properties when the proportions of the concrete mix remained constant, as observed in other studies (Hossain et al., 2013; Tabatabaeian et al., 2017). The geometry of the specimen was 150 mm×150 mm×300 mm. A high stiffness testing machine (Fig. 1) with a capacity of 3000 kN was used to carry out the compressive tests. To obtain a better descent part of the compressive stress-strain curve, the test was controlled by a displacement control, loading at a rate of 0.1 mm/min before reaching the peak value, and at a rate of 0.06 mm/min during the post-peak stage. The loading force was recorded by a force sensor. The strain in the middle part of the specimen was measured by an extensometer (Fig. 1) with a gauge length of 100 mm, attached to the side of the specimen.

    2.3 Experimental results

    Fig. 2 presents typical measured compressive stress-strain curves. The compressive stress increased quickly and almost linearly before reaching the compressive strength at a strain of about 0.002. The compressive stress then dropped nonlinearly as the strain increased. According to Figs. 2a–2c, the peak value of the curve increased as the content of steel fibers increased, but it appeared to decrease when the volume of steel fibers was too high. In comparison, with an increase in PVA fibers, the peak value reduced slightly, and the gap between the different curves widened during the post-peak stage.

    Fig. 1 Compressive test instrument and sensors

    Fig.2 Compressive stress-strain curves: (a) S0.5P0.5, S1.0P0.5, and S1.5P0.5; (b) S0.5P1.0, S1.0P1.0, and S1.5P1.0; (c) S0.5P1.5, S1.0P1.5, and S1.5P1.5; (d) S0.5P0.5, S0.5P1.0, and S0.5P1.5; (e) S1.0P0.5, S1.0P1.0, and S1.0P1.5; (f) S1.5P0.5, S1.5P1.0, and S1.5P1.5

    Table 1 summarizes the average compressive strength and its corresponding strain for all test specimens. The compressive strength and strain corresponding to compressive strength (SCCS) depended on the fiber volume and the hybrid ratio. The single fiber-reinforced concrete (S1.0, P1.0) had a higher compressive strength than the plain concrete (C). For the same fiber volume of 1.0%, the compressive strength of the steel fiber-reinforced concrete (32.97 MPa) was similar to that of the PVA fiber-reinforced concrete (33.05 MPa). Compared with the single steel fiber-reinforced concrete, HFRC had a higher compressive strength owing to the fiber hybridization effect. However, when the total fiber volume was too high, the compressive strength appeared to decrease. Among all test specimens, the sample with a steel fiber volume of 1.0% and PVA fiber volume of 0.5% had the highest compressive strength, which was 22.3% higher than that of the plain concrete, as the strain corresponding to compressive strength decreased.

    Table 1 Compressive test results

    *tis the ratio of the compressive strength of FRC to that of plain concrete (C)

    When the steel fiber volume was constant (e.g. at 0.5%, 1.0%, or 1.5%), the compressive strength decreased with increasing PVA fiber volume (Fig. 3b). Taking the samples with a steel fiber volume of 1.0% as an example, the measured compressive strength decreased from 38.33 MPa to 34.32 MPa as the PVA fiber volume increased from 0.5% to 1.5%. In comparison, increasing the steel fiber volume increased the compressive strength when the PVA fiber volume was fixed as a constant value (Fig. 3a). However, when the steel fiber volume was too high (such as above 1.0%), the compressive strength tended to decrease when the steel fiber volume increased. For instance, when the PVA fiber volume was 0.5%, the compressive strength increased by 2.64 MPa as the steel fiber volume increased from 0.5% to 1.0%, but its value decreased by 3.66 MPa when the steel fiber volume continued to increase to 1.5%. We conclude that steel fiber plays a more important role in increasing the compressive strength of HFRC. Zhou et al. (2019) reported a similar phenomenon.

    Fig. 3 Effect of fiber type on the compressive strength of HFRC: (a) steel fiber effect; (b) PVA fiber effect

    Fig. 4 Failure images of HFRC, single fiber-reinforced concrete, and plain concrete: (a) S0.5P0.5, S0.5P1.0, and S0.5P1.5; (b) S1.0P0.5, S1.0P1.0, and S1.0P1.5; (c) S1.5P0.5, S1.5P1.0, and S1.5P1.5; (d) S1.0, P1.0, and C

    3 Relevant data from the literature

    The 36 concrete samples tested in this study were insufficient to represent the diversity of HFRC. Therefore, more HFRC data from the literature were collected (Table 2). Although these samples had different cementitious materials, this seems to have had no clear influence on the hybridization of steel and PVA fibers (Liu et al., 2020b). Therefore, all these data, along with those obtained from the above tests were used to prepare the database in this study. Table 3 summarizes the mean, median, and standard deviation of each feature for this database. The size of the whole dataset is 44 135. Compared with the compressive stress and the compressive strength, these three indices of the strain corresponding to compressive strength are much lower.

    4 Performance of the ANN model

    The ANN model that described the compressive behavior was built based on the previous work (Liu et al., 2020a) and its performance was investigated in this section. The details about the ANN model can be found in theelectronic supplementary materials. Moreover, a traditional equation-based model was also introduced for comparison with the ANN model. Finally, the performance of the ANN model was discussed.

    4.1 Indices for evaluating the model

    Apart from the loss function, several different comprehensive indices were used to examine the performance of the ANN model. They included the root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the coefficient of determination (2), which were identified and calculated by Eqs. (1)–(3). The closer2is to 1 and the smaller the values of the other errors, the better the performance of the ANN model.

    Table 2 Steel-PVA fiber hybridization of HFRC from the literature

    Table 3 Summary of the dataset for the ANN model (size=44 135)

    4.2 ANN model training and evaluation

    The database in Section 3 was used to train and evaluate the ANN model. The loss curves of the training dataset and test dataset are shown in Fig. 5a. Before 480 epochs, the loss values of the training dataset and test dataset varied greatly and showed an obvious decrease. After 480 epochs, the loss values declined gently and tended to converge.This is because the learning parameter was set as 0.01 before 480 epochs and then changed to 0.001.The lowest flat part of the curves can be observed after 960 epochs when the learning rate was changed to 0.0001. The higher learning rate could enable the model to quickly move towards a minimum of the loss function, but would also cause the loss value to oscillate easily, which is suitable for use in the initial stage. By comparison, although a smaller learning rate would slow the forward speed of the model, it could enable the model to converge faster, which is often useful after several epochs.

    The RMSE, MAE, and2values of the training and test datasets are shown in Fig. 5b. With the increase in epochs, both the RMSE and MAE of the training and test datasets decreased linearly in the initial stage, then gradually reduced until they converged after 480 epochs. The2of the training and test datasets increased quickly then remained stable after 480 epochs, with both sets having final values above 0.998. All these indices reveal the good performance of the ANN model.

    4.3 Equation-based model

    For comparison with the ANN model, an equation-based model was also designed based on the constitutive model of MHURD (2011a). The compressive stress-strain curve of HFRC can be described by

    whereis the compressive stress;is the strain;cis the elastic modulus;c,ris the compressive strength;c,ris the strain corresponding to compressive strength (SCCS);cis the damage evolution parameter, which is dependent mainly on the degree of plasticity, defined as the ratio oftoc,r;cis the descending shape parameter, which determines the slope of the descending branch during the post-peak stage;c,andare internal variables. Based on Zhou et al. (2019), thecof HFRC was assumed to be identical to that of the corresponding plain concrete in this study.

    c,r,c,r, andcare the main three parameters, and can be determined by back-fitting the experimental data.c,randc,rcan be easily obtained from the peak value of each compressive stress-strain curve;cneeds to be calculated by fitting each compressive stress-strain curve using Eq. (5). To describe the effects of steel fiber and PVA fiber, the relationship between these three parameters and the characteristic parameters of steel fiber or PVA fiber need to be formulated. In this study, a polynomial regression was used as a first approximation, as indicated in Eqs. (6)–(8).

    Fig. 5 Training and evaluation results of the ANN model: (a) loss curves; (b) RMSE, MAE, and R2

    wherecHis the compressive strength of HFRC;cHis the SCCS of HFRC;cHis the descending shape parameter of HFRC;cpis the compressive strength of plain concrete;cpis the SCCS of plain concrete;Sis the reinforcement index of steel fibers;Pis the reinforcement index of PVA fibers.S,S, andSare the length, diameter, and volume, respectively, of the steel fibers;P,P, andPare the length, diameter, and volume, respectively, of the PVA fibers.

    SandPwere introduced into Eqs. (6)–(8) to consider the hybridization of steel and PVA fibers because the hybridization effect in HFRC appeared obvious in the above experiments. The back-fitting results are illustrated in Fig. 6. Eqs. (6)–(8) reproduced the trend well, although the value of2was not big.

    As indicated in Eq. (6), the addition of PVA fibers decreased the compressive strength of HFRC, while adding a lower volume of steel fibers increased the compressive strength. However, when the fiber volume content of the steel fibers is too high (such as 1.0%), more steel fibers may result in a decrease in the compressive strength. This phenomenon is consistent with the test results in Section 2. Eq. (7) shows that adding both steel and PVA fibers increased the SCCS, and the hybridization of steel and PVA fibers had a positive influence on the SCCS, which is similar to the test results. According to Eq. (8), PVA fibers could significantly influencec, reducing the decreasing speed of stress during the post-peak stage.

    To describe the compressive stress-strain curve of HFRC,cp,cp, andcof the plain concrete were firstly obtained and used as the reference values in Eqs. (6)–(8). Secondly,cH,cH, andcHwere calculated with the fiber information using Eqs. (6)–(8). Then, the compressive stress-strain curve of HFRC was obtained using Eqs. (4) and (5) by replacingc,r,c,r, andcwith these parameters.

    Fig. 6 Back-fitting results of key parameters in the equation-based model: (a) compressive strength, fcH; (b) SCCS, εcH; (c) descending shape parameter, αcH

    4.4 Model performance analysis

    Fig. 7 presents the simulation results from the ANN model and the equation-based model, as well as the experimental results of the compressive stress-strain curve of several HFRC samples. Both the ANN model and the equation-based model reproduced the experimental data well, but the ANN model showed a better capacity. For instance, in Fig. 7a, the equation-based model could predict accurately the stress-strain curve before the peak value, but the difference during the post-peak value increased with the strain. This may be caused by the error of the descending shape parameter induced by Eq. (8); in Fig. 7d, the equation-based predicted compressive stress-strain curve is parallel with the tested curve, owing to the underestimation of the compressive strength by Eq. (6). However, for these two cases, the ANN model reproduced the stress-strain curve well, and almost overlapped the tested curves.

    Table 4 summarizes the RMSE, MAE, and2values of the ANN model and the equation-based model. The ANN model had lower errors and a higher2than the equation-based model. Therefore, we conclude that the ANN model can perform better than the equation-based model to reproduce the compressive stress-strain curve.

    In this paper, we also introduce the relative error (Zhou et al., 2019) to evaluate the performance of the ANN model and equation-based model in terms of predicting the compressive strength and SCCS. The relative error is calculated by

    4.5 Sensitivity analysis

    Since the ANN model is implicit, it is difficult to understand the relationship between input features and output features. Hence, a sensitivity analysis has been proposed to illustrate how input features affect output features for an ANN model (Saltelli, 2002; Shojaeefard et al., 2013). Among several sensitivity analysis methods, the use of the “PaD” method (partial derivatives) makes it easy to calculate the

    Table 4 RMSE, MAE, and R2 of the ANN model and the equation-based model

    Fig. 8 Relative errors of the ANN model and the equation-based model in terms of the compressive strength (a) and SCCS (b)

    Fig. 9 Contributions of each input feature to the compressive strength (a) and the strain corresponding to compressive strength of HFRC (b)

    Fig. 9 shows the contribution of each input feature to the compressive strength and the SCCS for HFRC samples. The redder the color, the higher the contribution of the specified input feature. The highest contribution appears to be the compressive strength and the SCCS of plain concrete. There are four main influence parts, including steel fibers, PVA fibers, mechanical properties of plain concrete, and components of HFRC. Fig. 10 reveals the contribution of these four main parts to the compressive strength and the SCCS, which is the sum of their sub-input features. According to Figs. 9 and 10, the mechanical properties of plain concrete make the main contribution to the compressive strength and the SCCS for all HFRC samples. The contribution of steel fibers is higher than that of PVA fibers in terms of the compressive strength and the SCCS for all HFRC samples. This is similar to the experimental results.

    Fig. 10 Contribution of steel fibers, PVA fibers, mechanical properties of plain concrete, and components of HFRC to the compressive strength (a) and the SCCS (b)

    4.6 Discussion

    According to the analysis above, it is clear that the ANN model developed in this study is better able to describe the compressive behavior of HFRC than the equation-based model. The performance of the equation-based model depends on the determination of key parameters, including the compressive strength, SCCS, and descending shape parameter, calculated using Eqs. (6)–(8). If one of these parameters is not well determined, the predicted compressive stress-strain curve would not fit well with the experimental results. Also, only limited factors are considered in Eqs. (6)–(8), and many other components, such as the cementitious material, that could significantly influence the mechanical properties of concrete, are not directly considered in these equations. The2value of Eqs. (6)–(8) seems relatively low, indicating that the equation-based model could reproduce well the stress-strain curve for some HFRC samples while having obvious error for others, as shown in Figs. 6 and 7. However, the equation-based model is simple and can be easily used in the calculation of the structural components and structures, resulting in the wide application of such types of models. In summary, the equation-based model needs further development, especially the methodology to consider the effects of different compositions.

    By comparison, the ANN model can consider more factors. Thus, it is able to extract more important features and has more powerful nonlinear fitting abilities, resulting in a better capacity to predict the compressive stress-strain curve of HFRC. Moreover, the ANN model could be applied not only to HFRC, but also to other composite materials (such as ultra-high-performance concrete) and even material that contains different composite components, which are difficult to model by an equation-based model. On the other hand, the ANN model needs a large database to improve its performance, especially when it is used to predict the stress-strain curve. To consider these factors, more and credible databases are necessary, and this work is being carried out by our group. Furthermore, the geometry of steel fibers and PVA fibers may also affect the compressive behavior, but cannot be considered by the current ANN model. However, the influence of these factors could be clarified via the ANN model when the diversity of the database is big enough. Also, the training of the ANN model needs time. For example, about 1 h was necessary for training the ANN model in this study based on GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GPU. When adding more datasets, the model needs a longer time for training to improve its performance. However, these problems may be solved by developments in computer science. As a first approximation, the presented work demonstrates the suitability of the ANN model for describing the compressive behavior of HFRC.

    In summary, the choice of an equation-based model or an ANN model should be related to actual needs. The ANN model is more suitable for the accurate design of composite material, such as HFRC, while the equation-based model can be easily used in structural analysis.

    5 Conclusions

    This paper presents a comprehensive investigation on the compressive behavior of HRFC containing fly ash and slag powder via experiments and modelling. A series of experiments were carried out to investigate the hybrid effect of steel and PVA fiber on the compressive behavior of HFRC containing fly ash and slag powder. Meanwhile, an ANN model to describe the compressive behavior was also built and trained with the experimental data and relevant data from the literature. The performance of the ANN model was compared to an equation-based model. Based on the above work, the following conclusions can be drawn:

    1. The proposed ANN model has a better capacity than the equation-based model to reproduce the compressive behavior of hybrid steel-PVA fiber concrete containing fly ash and slag powder in terms of the compressive stress-strain curve, the compressive strength, and the SCCS. The ANN model can consider many factors affecting the mechanical behavior of HFRC. In this study, 23 factors were considered, including features of fibers, concrete composition, and mechanical behavior of plain concrete. Note that more factors may be included when the database is large enough. Therefore, the ANN model is a good tool for designing composite materials, and is not limited to HFRC.

    2. Both the experimental results and the ANN model simulation results revealed that steel fibers play a more important role in increasing the compressive strength of HFRC than PVA fibers, while both contribute to the deformation. Increasing the steel fiber volume could increase the compressive strength, while increasing the PVA fiber volume could reduce it. However, when the steel fiber volume is too high (such as above 1.0%), the compressive strength tends to decrease with increasing steel fiber volume. The hybridization effect of steel and PVA fibers could enable HFRC to shift from a brittle break to a ductile break.

    Contributors

    Fang-yu LIU, Wen-qi DING, and Ya-fei QIAO designed the research. Fang-yu LIU,Ya-fei QIAO, and Qi-yang CHEN processed the corresponding data. Fang-yu LIU and Ya-fei QIAO wrote the first draft of the manuscript. Wen-qi DING and Lin-bing WANG helped to organize the manuscript. Fang-yu LIU, Wen-qi DING, Ya-fei QIAO, and Lin-bing WANG revised and edited the final version.

    Conflict of interest

    Fang-yu LIU, Wen-qi DING, Ya-fei QIAO, Lin-bing WANG, and Qi-yang CHEN declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    List of electronic supplementary materials

    Data S1 Framework of the ANN model

    A?ikgen? M, Ula? M, Alyama? KE, 2015. Using an artificial neural network to predict mix compositions of steel fiber-reinforced concrete., 40(2):407-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-014-1549-x

    Arulmurugan P, 2018. Evaluation of FRC beams using steel and pva fibres in concrete., 6(1):121-124.

    Bai J, Wild S, Ware JA, et al., 2003. Using neural networks to predict workability of concrete incorporating metakaolin and fly ash., 34(11-12): 663-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(03)00102-9

    Belletti B, Cerioni R, Meda A, et al., 2008. Design aspects on steel fiber-reinforced concrete pavements., 20(9):599-607. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2008)20:9(599)

    Blanco A, Pujadas P, de la Fuente A, et al., 2016. Influence of the type of fiber on the structural response and design of FRC slabs., 142(9): 04016054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001515

    CAECS (China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization), 2010. Standard Test Methods for Fiber Reinforced Concrete, CECS 13:2009. National Standards of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese).

    Chi Y, Xu LH, Yu HS, 2014a. Constitutive modeling of steel-polypropylene hybrid fiber reinforced concrete using a non-associated plasticity and its numerical implementation., 111:497-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.01.025

    Chi Y, Xu LH, Zhang YY, 2014b. Experimental study on hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete subjected to uniaxial compression., 26(2):211-218. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000764

    de la Fuente A, Pujadas P, Blanco A, et al., 2012. Experiences in Barcelona with the use of fibres in segmental linings., 27(1): 60-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2011.07.001

    Ding WQ, Gong YF, Qiao YF, et al., 2020. Experimental investigation on mechanical behavior of segmental joint under combined loading of compression-bending-shear., 98: 103346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2020.103346

    Feng J, Sun WW, Zhai HZ, et al., 2018. Experimental study on hybrid effect evaluation of fiber reinforced concrete subjected to drop weight impacts., 11(12): 2563. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11122563

    Gong CJ, Ding WQ, Mosalam KM, et al., 2017. Comparison of the structural behavior of reinforced concrete and steel fiber reinforced concrete tunnel segmental joints., 68: 38-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2017.05.010

    Hai R, Liu JX, Zhang ML, et al., 2016. Performance of hybrid steel-polyvinyl alcohol fiber reinforced ultra high performance concrete., (5):95-97 (in Chinese). https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-3550.2016.05.025

    Hossain KMA, Lachemi M, Sammour M, et al., 2013. Strength and fracture energy characteristics of self-consolidating concrete incorporating polyvinyl alcohol, steel and hybrid fibres., 45:20-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.054

    Jiang KJ, Han Q, Bai YL, et al., 2020. Data-driven ultimate conditions prediction and stress-strain model for FRP-confined concrete., 242:112094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112094

    Karahan O, Tanyildizi H, Atis CD, 2008. An artificial neural network approach for prediction of long-term strength properties of steel fiber reinforced concrete containing fly ash., 9:1514- 1523.https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A0720136

    Lawler JS, Wilhelm T, Zampini D, et al., 2003. Fracture processes of hybrid fiber-reinforced mortar., 36(3):197-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02479558

    Lawler JS, Zampini D, Shah SP, 2005. Microfiber and macrofiber hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete., 17(5):595-604. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2005)17:5(595)

    Li HY, Liu G, 2016. Tensile properties of hybrid fiber-reinforced reactive powder concrete after exposure to elevated temperatures., 10(1):29-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40069-016-0125-z

    Liao L, de la Fuente A, Cavalaro S, et al., 2015. Experimental and analytical study of concrete blocks subjected to concentrated loads with an application to TBM-constructed tunnels., 49:295-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.04.020

    Liu FY, Ding WQ, Qiao YF, 2019a. An experimental investigation on the integral waterproofing capacity of polypropylene fiber concrete with fly ash and slag powder., 212:675-686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.027

    Liu FY, Ding WQ, Qiao YF, 2019b. Experimental investigation on the flexural behavior of hybrid steel-PVA fiber reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag powder., 228:116706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116706

    Liu FY, Ding WQ, Qiao YF, et al., 2020a. An artificial neural network model on tensile behavior of hybrid steel-PVA fiber reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag power., 14: 1299-1315.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0712-6

    Liu FY, Ding WQ, Qiao YF, 2020b. Experimental investigation on the tensile behavior of hybrid steel-PVA fiber reinforced concrete containing fly ash and slag powder., 241:118000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118000

    Mashhadban H, Kutanaei SS, Sayarinejad MA, 2016. Prediction and modeling of mechanical properties in fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete using particle swarm optimization algorithm and artificial neural network., 119:277-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.034

    MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China), 2011a. Code for Design of Concrete Structure, GB 50010-2010. National Standards of People’s Republic of China (in Chinese).

    MHURD (Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s the Republic of China), 2011b. Specification for Mix Proportion Design of Ordinary Concrete, JGJ 55-2011. National Standards of the People’s Republic of China (in Chinese).

    Nguyen DL, Kim DJ, Ryu GS, et al., 2013. Size effect on flexural behavior of ultra-high-performance hybrid fiber-reinforced concrete., 45(1):1104-1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.012

    Pizarroso J, Portela J, Mu?oz A, 2020. NeuralSens: sensitivity analysis of neural networks. arXiv: 2002.11423.https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.11423

    Pujadas P, Blanco A, Cavalaro S, et al., 2014. Plastic fibres as the only reinforcement for flat suspended slabs: experimental investigation and numerical simulation., 57:92-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.01.082

    Pujadas P, Blanco A, Cavalaro S, et al., 2017. The need to consider flexural post-cracking creep behavior of macro- synthetic fiber reinforced concrete., 149:790-800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.166

    Saltelli A, 2002. Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment., 22(3):579-590. https://doi.org/10.1111/0272-4332.00040

    Serna Ros P, Martí-Vargas JR, Bossio ME, et al., 2016. Creep and residual properties of cracked macro-synthetic fibre reinforced concretes., 68(4):197-207. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.15.00111

    Shen QZ, 2013. Mechanical Properties Research for Steel-PVA Hybrid Fibers Reinforced Concrete. MS Thesis, Chang’an University, Xi’an, China (in Chinese).

    Shojaeefard MH, Akbari M, Tahani M, et al., 2013. Sensitivity analysis of the artificial neural network outputs in friction stir lap joining of aluminum to brass., 2013:574914. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/574914

    Sim JS, Park C, Moon DY, 2005. Characteristics of basalt fiber as a strengthening material for concrete structures., 36(6-7):504-512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2005.02.002

    Soutsos MN, Le TT, Lampropoulos AP, 2012. Flexural performance of fibre reinforced concrete made with steel and synthetic fibres., 36:704-710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.042

    Stoll F, Saliba JE, Casper LE, 2000. Experimental study of CFRP-prestressed high-strength concrete bridge beams., 49(2):191-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(99)00134-8

    Tabatabaeian M, Khaloo A, Joshaghani A, et al., 2017. Experimental investigation on effects of hybrid fibers on rheological, mechanical, and durability properties of high-strength SCC., 147:497-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.181

    Xu LH, Xu HR, Chi Y, et al., 2011. Experimental study on tensile strength of steel-polypropylene hybrid fiber reinforced concrete., 4(3):911- 916. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2011.1740

    Yang KH, 2011. Tests on concrete reinforced with hybrid or monolithic steel and polyvinyl alcohol fibers., 108(6):664-672.

    Zhao GY, di Prisco M, Vandewalle L, 2015. Experimental investigation on uniaxial tensile creep behavior of cracked steel fiber reinforced concrete., 48(10):3173-3185. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0389-1

    Zhou Y, Xiao Y, Gu AQ, et al., 2018. Dispersion, workability and mechanical properties of different steel-microfiber-reinforced concretes with low fiber content., 10(7):2335. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072335

    Zhou Y, Xiao Y, Gu AQ, et al., 2019. Orthogonal experimental investigation of steel-PVA fiber-reinforced concrete and its uniaxial constitutive model., 197:615-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.203

    Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A (Applied Physics & Engineering)

    ISSN 1673-565X (Print); ISSN 1862-1775 (Online)

    www.jzus.zju.edu.cn; link.springer.com

    E-mail: jzus_a@zju.edu.cn

    https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2000379

    # Electronic supplementary materials: The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.A2000379) contains supplementary materials, which are available to authorized users

    ? Zhejiang University Press 2021

    TU528.572

    Aug. 23, 2020;

    Revision accepted Nov. 11, 2020;

    Crosschecked Sept. 3, 2021

    *Project supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51978515 and 52090083), the Shanghai Sailing Program (No. 19YF1451400), and the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2017SHZDZX02), China

    成人精品一区二区免费| 久久免费观看电影| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 色在线成人网| 天天添夜夜摸| 三级毛片av免费| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 99久久人妻综合| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产麻豆69| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| cao死你这个sao货| 中文欧美无线码| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产在线视频一区二区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 国产一区二区 视频在线| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 一区二区三区激情视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久狼人影院| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 日韩欧美三级三区| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 大香蕉久久网| 日本a在线网址| 国产成人影院久久av| 99热网站在线观看| 久久热在线av| 一级毛片精品| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 操出白浆在线播放| www.999成人在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 91老司机精品| 老司机福利观看| 久久性视频一级片| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久国产精品影院| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| www.999成人在线观看| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 五月开心婷婷网| 最黄视频免费看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 在线天堂中文资源库| 最黄视频免费看| 一级毛片精品| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 夜夜爽天天搞| 怎么达到女性高潮| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 亚洲成人手机| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 成年版毛片免费区| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| cao死你这个sao货| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 久久久精品区二区三区| 欧美日韩精品网址| av网站在线播放免费| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 久久久久视频综合| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 宅男免费午夜| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 久久影院123| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 大香蕉久久网| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产1区2区3区精品| 超碰97精品在线观看| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲免费av在线视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 亚洲成人手机| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲国产av新网站| 91老司机精品| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 欧美成人午夜精品| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 老司机靠b影院| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 蜜桃在线观看..| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 亚洲avbb在线观看| av不卡在线播放| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲第一av免费看| 大香蕉久久网| 成人手机av| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产精品免费视频内射| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 宅男免费午夜| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 成人国语在线视频| 91老司机精品| 五月天丁香电影| 999久久久国产精品视频| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 午夜激情av网站| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 国产成人av教育| 搡老乐熟女国产| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 飞空精品影院首页| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲综合色网址| svipshipincom国产片| 久久热在线av| 超碰成人久久| 老熟女久久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| www日本在线高清视频| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产又爽黄色视频| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 国产色视频综合| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 男女免费视频国产| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 精品国产亚洲在线| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 中文字幕色久视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| a级毛片黄视频| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产在线观看jvid| 香蕉丝袜av| 久久久久视频综合| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久免费观看电影| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲国产av新网站| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 夜夜爽天天搞| 国产激情久久老熟女| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久久国产成人免费| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 91国产中文字幕| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 黄频高清免费视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区 | 天天影视国产精品| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 超色免费av| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| av天堂久久9| 国产精品影院久久| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 美女午夜性视频免费| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 欧美精品av麻豆av| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 最黄视频免费看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 满18在线观看网站| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 大码成人一级视频| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 999久久久国产精品视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久亚洲真实| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人 | 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 久久久久视频综合| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 99国产精品99久久久久| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| netflix在线观看网站| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 高清av免费在线| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 捣出白浆h1v1| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 制服人妻中文乱码| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 一级毛片电影观看| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 高清在线国产一区| av线在线观看网站| 国产精品二区激情视频| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 91字幕亚洲| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 午夜视频精品福利| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 制服诱惑二区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 国产野战对白在线观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 免费不卡黄色视频| 国产高清videossex| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲成人手机| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 人妻一区二区av| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 久久久国产成人免费| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久9热在线精品视频| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| cao死你这个sao货| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 久久久久网色| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 成年动漫av网址| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 美国免费a级毛片| 日韩欧美三级三区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| www.自偷自拍.com| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 午夜91福利影院| 国产成人欧美| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | h视频一区二区三区| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产在线视频一区二区| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 日本av免费视频播放| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 超碰97精品在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产成人系列免费观看| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 伦理电影免费视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 天天添夜夜摸| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线 | 看免费av毛片| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 视频区图区小说| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 色在线成人网| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 高清在线国产一区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 视频区图区小说| 中文字幕制服av| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 曰老女人黄片| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 咕卡用的链子| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 日本欧美视频一区| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 91av网站免费观看| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久这里只有精品19| www.自偷自拍.com| 99久久国产精品久久久| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久 | 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产不卡一卡二| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 满18在线观看网站| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 少妇 在线观看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| bbb黄色大片| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 老司机影院毛片| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 天天影视国产精品| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 岛国毛片在线播放| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 免费观看人在逋| 午夜久久久在线观看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产三级黄色录像| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 黄色视频不卡| 精品高清国产在线一区| 极品教师在线免费播放| 黑人操中国人逼视频| videosex国产| 成人精品一区二区免费| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲久久久国产精品| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 久久中文看片网| 国产av国产精品国产| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 中文欧美无线码| 悠悠久久av| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av|