• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Palaeogeographic reconstruction of a fluvio-marine transitional system in Narmada rift basin,India-Implications on Late Cretaceous global sea-level rise

    2021-03-19 08:00:48BiplabBhattacharyaSuparnaJhaandPrantikMondal
    Journal of Palaeogeography 2021年1期

    Biplab Bhattacharya,Suparna Jha and Prantik Mondal

    Abstract Rising sea-levels in tectonically active epicontinental basins often lead to varied depositional settings and palaeogeography, mostly influenced by the net accommodation resulting from mutual interference of the extent and nature of landward encroachment by the sea and the net sedimentation. The Cenomanian Nimar Sandstone Formation, Bagh Group, Narmada rift basin, uniquely portrays the effect of sea-level rise within an intra-cratonic setting and attributes to the corresponding palaeogeographic changes in west-central India. An integrated sedimentological-sequence-stratigraphic study of the broadly fining-upward Nimar Sandstone Formation (thickness~20-30 m) depicts the actual nature of changeover from a fluvial to a marine-dominated transitional depositional setting. Detailed sedimentological study reveals total seventeen facies, grouped in five facies associations, viz., the channel-fill facies association (FA-1), the overbank facies association (FA-2), the fluvial-dominated fluvio-tidal facies association (FA-3), the tide-dominated fluvio-tidal facies association (FA-4), and the shoreface facies association (FA-5). Overall facies architecture indicates a west-to-eastward marine encroachment, resulting in stacking of three distinct palaeo-depositional conditions: (i) an initial fluvial system with channel and overbank, changing into a tideinfluenced fluvial bay-head delta in the inner estuary, followed by (ii) marine encroachment leading to a tidedominated central estuary with inter- to sub-tidal settings, and finally, (iii) with further intense marine encroachments, a wave-reworked open shore condition in the outer estuary zone. The overall fining-up succession with a systematic change from fluvial to marine-dominated depositional systems points to a landward shift of the shoreline, signifying a major transgressive event correlated to the Cenomanian global sea-level rise. Characteristic stratal stacking patterns point to four coarsening- and fining-up hemicycles, embedded within the major transgressive succession. These high-frequency cycles attest to the varied interplay of sedimentation, tectonics and sea-level changes, and the resultant net accommodations. A palaeogeographic model is proposed based on the high-frequency transgressive-regressive hemicycles, which envisages the evolution of the depositional environments in relation to the Cenomanian eustatic rise in the intra-cratonic riftogenic fluvio-marine transitional basinal setup.

    Keywords: Late Cretaceous, Fluvial-estuary transition, Nimar Sandstone Formation, Bagh Group,Narmada rift basin,Transgressive-regressive cycles,Global sea-level

    1 Introduction

    The Late Cretaceous time interval is known for intense tectonic activities and significant changes in climatic conditions (Miller et al. 2005; Sames et al. 2016) accompanied by prolonged sea-level rises, leading to worldwide inundations of landmasses (Hancock and Kauffman 1979; F?rster et al. 1983; Hilbrecht et al. 1986; Haq et al.1987; Hallam 1992; R?per and Rothgaenger 1995; Miller et al. 2005; Haq 2014). Several parts of different continents were affected by transgressions during the Late Cretaceous time, including parts of Arctic Canada,Russia, western Europe, eastern Australia, parts of Africa, South America, India, Madagascar, and Borneo.Most of the subcontinents of the supercontinent Gondwanaland were fully or partially submerged at different time intervals during the Late Cretaceous, which led to the formation of shallow epicontinental seas in certain areas. Evidence of Cretaceous sea-level rise in the Indian subcontinent is recorded within thick sedimentary successions of the Cauvery Basin (Nagendra et al. 2011, 2013), Shillong Basin (Singh and Mishra 2000), Kutch Basin (Desai 2013), Bengal-Assam Basin,parts of the Himalayan fold belt, and the Narmada rift basin in west-central India (Acharya and Lahiri 1991;Banerjee et al. 2020).

    Such global eustatic changes generally manifest 1st-2ndorder sea-level cycles affecting most of the continents, which allow for their successful correlations.However, associated higher-frequency cycles (3rdorder,4thorder and beyond), included in the 2ndorder cycles,mostly depend on changes in relative sea-level and net accommodation caused by basin-scale tectonism, sedimentations and/or climatic/orbital forcings (Vail et al.1991; Gale et al. 2002; Haq 2014; Bhattacharya and Bhattacharya 2015). The Cenomanian Stage (98.9-93.5 Ma) provides a suitable window to study such changes,as high-resolution global correlations (100-400 kyr) in terms of sea-level changes and orbital cycles from marine successions revealed five major/minor eustatic events(KCe-1 to KCe-5 of Haq 2014). However, doubt persists regarding actual nature and effect of transgressions in shallow marine and continent-margin transitional depositional areas, and the role of climatic forcings, tectonism,and sedimentation in controlling palaeogeography and shaping resultant stratal stacking patterns (Bhattacharya et al. 2018). High-resolution sequence-stratigraphic study backed by detailed sedimentary facies analysis is useful to understand the appropriate transitional relationship between fluvial and marine processes in terms of major transgressive-regressive cycles in response to tectonoeustatic changes in such basins (Bhattacharya et al. 2018;Jaiswal et al.2018).

    History of sea-level fluctuations during the Cenomanian time in the southern part of the Indian subcontinent(Cauvery Basin) was documented by Sundaram et al.(2001), Skelton (2003), and Gale et al. (2002). However,the effects may vary significantly in fluvio-marine interactive systems depending on the prevalent tectonosedimentary equilibrium. Though attempts to understand the nature of the transition between fluvial and marine depositional systems are plenty in the literature (Dalrymple et al. 1992; Greb and Martino 2005; Dalrymple and Choi 2007; van den Berg et al. 2007; Bhattacharya et al. 2012;Bhattacharya and Banerjee 2015;Bhattacharya and Bhattacharya 2015; Bhattacharya et al. 2018; Richards and Bhattacharya 2018; Gugliotta et al. 2019; and references therein), gaps persist in the actual perception of basinscale facies architecture and stratal stacking pattern related to characteristic tectono-sedimentary attributes in shallow epicontinental basins.

    The Nimar Sandstone (Cenomanian) Formation, the lowermost litho-unit within the Bagh Group (Late Cretaceous), bears signatures of the contemporary global sea-level rise in west-central India (Jha et al. 2017). Signatures of the Late Cretaceous marine transgression in the Bagh Group are evident and agreed well in terms of different proxies such as sedimentary attributes, palaeontological data, ichnological data, micropalaeontological data and palaeobotanical data (Murty et al. 1963;Chiplonkar and Ghare 1975; Raiverman 1975; Badve and Ghare 1980; Singh and Srivastava 1981; Jafar 1982; Bose and Das 1986; Ganguly and Bardhan 1993; Sanganwar and Kundal 1997; Khosla et al. 2003; Smith 2010; Jaitly and Ajane 2013; Bhattacharya and Jha 2014; Jha et al.2017; Bansal et al. 2019; and many others). But, a comprehensive sequence stratigraphic model enumerating the actual nature of coastal onlap and the fluvial-marine interaction has not been attempted and is long overdue.The objective of the present paper is to document the palaeogeographic changes under the fluvio-marine interactive depositional system in the light of high-frequency transgressive-regressive (T-R) cycles. The proposed model will help to understand the effects of higherfrequency sea-level fluctuations in fluvio-marine transitional systems within a global eustatic rise condition.

    2 Geological setting

    The deposition of the Bagh Group (Late Cretaceous) was started within the Narmada rift basin during the Cenomanian time, directly overlying the Proterozoic Bijawar Group.The Bagh Group is constituted of three litho-units(formations), namely, the lowermost Cenomanian Nimar Sandstone Formation, followed by the Turonian Nodular Limestone Formation,and Coniacian Coralline Limestone Formation at the top(Table 1).In the Narmada rift basin,the Bagh Group is overlain by the Lameta Formation and the Deccan Traps,both of Late Cretaceous age.The presence of various sedimentary facies, ichnofabrics, andvaried palaeontological attributes within the Bagh Group manifests distinct changes in the depositional environment.The rocks are exposed along the northern flank of the Narmada rift basin and occur in patches (Fig. 1). Rocks of the Nimar Sandstone Formation are well exposed in several sections including the Man River near Awaldaman,Sitapuri,Bagh River,Rampura,Bagh Cave,Jobat,and other areas (detail of locations is given in Fig. 1). The Nimar Sandstone Formation is characterized by conglomerate,arenaceous to arkosic sandstone, sandstone-mudstone heteroliths, and mudstone. In the study area, the general strike of beds is N15°E-S15°W to N-S with a dip of 8°-10°. The depositional age of the Nimar Sandstone Formation is considered as Cenomanian (Jaitly and Ajane 2013),which has been determined mostly based on biostratigraphic records preserved in the upper part of the succession (Table 2). However,data depicting the absolute age of deposition of the Nimar Sandstone Formation is lacking till date.

    Table 1 Generalized lithostratigraphy of the study area (modified after Singh and Srivastava 1981; Jaitly and Ajane 2013)

    Fig. 1 a Map of India showing location of the Narmada rift basin; b Geological map of the study area (modified after Jaitly and Ajane 2013),showing distribution of the Bagh Group. Black points marked with numbers (1-15) indicate locations/areas of exposed rock sections from where respective vertical sedimentary lithologs were prepared: 1-Phata; 2-Ghoda; 3-Chikapoti; 4-Dhursal; 5-Akhara; 6-Rampura; 7-Baghini Temple; 8-Bagh;9-Neemkheda; 10-Dam;11-Raisinghpura; 12-Ratitalai;13-Baria; 14-Man River;15-Sitapuri

    Table 2 Inferred depositional age of the Nimar Sandstone Formation based on biostratigraphic studies

    3 Material and methods

    Unmetamorphosed, undeformed siliciclastic rocks of the Nimar Sandstone Formation are well exposed in and around the Bagh area (Fig. 1) in the western part of the state of Madhya Pradesh, central India. Well-exposed,long sections are available in the field for detailed sedimentological study. Altogether 15 sections were studied,distributed in three zones in the study area: (i) Awaldaman, Ratitalai, Sitapuri, Baria, etc. in the eastern part, (ii)Bagh, Rampura, Raisinghpura, etc. in the central part,and (iii) Chikapoti, Akhara, Phata, Ghoda, etc. in the western part.

    The sedimentological study is primarily based on (i)facies analysis, which includes descriptions andinterpretations of facies types and facies associations in the frame of prevalent process-response models and mechanisms of deposition, and (ii) preparation of lithologs from different parts and their correlation to understand the spatio-temporal distribution of different facies types and the depositional conditions.

    Table 3 Brief descriptions and interpretations of the facies types within the channel-fill facies association(FA-1)

    The sequence-stratigraphic study is primarily based on the identification and interpretation of different stratal stacking patterns, viz., coarsening-up (progradational)and fining-up (retrogradational), in the correlated sections, followed by the interpretation of sediment packages (cycles) of different frequencies.

    4 Results

    4.1 Sedimentological facies architecture

    Sedimentologically, the siliciclastic succession of the Nimar Sandstone Formation (average ~20-30 m thick)is represented by seventeen facies types grouped in five distinct facies associations (FA-1-FA-5). Brief descriptions and interpretations of the facies types in different facies associations are depicted in Tables 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7,respectively. Representative photographs of the facies types of different facies associations (FA-1-FA-5) are represented in Figs. 2, 3, 4,5 and 6, respectively.

    Facies association FA-1 (Fig. 2) consists of four facies types, viz., the clast-supported conglomerate (facies 1A),the matrix-supported conglomerate(facies 1B),the pebbly sandstone(facies 1C)and the trough cross-stratified sandstone (facies 1D) (see Table 3). All the facies types are characterized by a very coarse-grained immature nature with an abundance of pebbles. Facies types mostly conform to large channel geometries with occasional sharp erosional basal contacts. The sediment fill pattern in individual channel geometries depicts an abundance of pebbles near the basal part often associated with large trough cross-strata, changing to smaller trough cross-strata in coarse-grained sandstone in the upper part. Overall facies architecture of FA-1 indicates a channel-fill facies association where sedimentation took place as channel-filling basal lag to point bar in a low-sinuosity meandering stream of relatively high energy.

    The facies association FA-2 (Table 4; Fig. 3) is characterized by relatively fine-grained rocks. It is consisted of interbedded sandstone-mudstone (facies 2A) and planelaminated sandstone (facies 2B). The facies types are characterized by an overall sheet-like geometry with alternations of thin-bedded, plane-laminated to ripple cross-stratified sandstone grading to mudstone. Such geometry and the close association of this facies association with channel-fill facies association (FA-1) indicate deposition of FA-2 sediments in overbank areas of channels.

    The facies types in the facies association FA-3(Table 5; Fig. 4) include the large-scale trough crossstratified sandstone (facies 3A) and the planar crossstratified sandstone (facies 3B), which characteristically bear mud-draped foresets,and lateral accretion of ripple cross-sets with reactivation surfaces within channel-fill cross-stratified sandstone beds. Such signatures indicate tidal influence (Bhattacharya et al. 2015, 2018) within a fluvial-dominated fluvio-tidal depositional setting.

    The facies association FA-4 (Table 6; Fig. 5) consists of five different facies types, namely, the heterolithic sandstone-mudstone (facies 4A), the mud-clast-bearing conglomerate (facies 4B), the plane-laminated sandstone(facies 4C), the bioturbated sandstone (facies 4D) and the green sandstone (facies 4E). Abundant bi-directional ripple and climbing ripple cross-strata with mud-draped foresets, presence of glauconite in sandstone, trough cross-strata in sandstone with abundant mud, and an abundance of marine invertebrate trace fossils, etc. all indicate a strong tidal control within the fluvial system during the sedimentation of the tide-dominated fluviotidal facies association (FA-4).

    The facies association FA-5 (Table 7; Fig. 6) is represented by the fossil-bearing sandstone (facies 5A), the

    Thalassinoides-Ophiomorpha-bearing thinly-laminated sandstone-mudstone (facies 5B), the wave-ripplebearing sandstone (facies 5C) and the massive mudstone(facies 5D). The abundance of symmetrical wave ripples, presence of marine invertebrate fossils and trace fossils, and the prevalence of both sand and mud are the characteristics of this facies association, whichtogether indicate a significant amount of wave influence during deposition of the shoreface facies association (FA-5).

    Table 4 Brief descriptions and interpretations of facies types within the overbank facies association (FA-2)

    Table 5 Brief descriptions and interpretation of facies types within the fluvial-dominated fluvio-tidal facies association (FA-3)

    Table 6 Brief descriptions and interpretation of facies types under the tide-dominated fluvio-tidal facies association (FA-4)

    Table 7 Brief descriptions and interpretation of facies types under the shoreface facies association (FA-5)

    Fig. 2 Field photographs. a Clast-supported conglomerate (facies 1A) showing angular to sub-angular clasts of basement gneissic rock, exposed in the Rampura section. Length of pen is 14.5 cm. b Matrix-supported conglomerate (facies 1B), exposed in Bagh section. Arrows indicate occurrence of mud clasts. Diameter of coin is 2.5 cm. c Pebbly sandstone (facies 1C) showing alternate pebble-rich and pebble-free sandstone beds, exposed in the Neemkheda section. Length of pen is 15 cm. d Trough cross-stratified sandstone (facies 1D), exposed along the river bank of Baria section.Length of hammer is 30.5 cm

    Fig. 3 a Field photograph of interbedded sandstone-mudstone (facies 2A), near Raisinghpura. b Field photograph of the plane-laminated sandstone (facies 2B), Man River section. Length of pen is 14.5 cm. c Cross-section of the plane-laminated sandstone facies showing welldeveloped plane beds.Length of pen is 15 cm

    Detailed vertical sedimentary logs, showing the occurrence of facies types and facies associations in the 15 sections, from the western, central, and eastern parts of the study area are presented in Figs. 7, 8 and 9, respectively. These logs reveal that —

    i) the lower part of the succession is mostly comprised of immature sediments of FA-1and FA-2,and is overlain by

    ii) sediments of the fluvial-dominated fluvio-tidal facies association (FA-3), gradually changing vertically and laterally into sediments of the tide-dominated fluviotidal facies association (FA-4), commonly occupying the middle part of the succession and,finally,

    Fig. 4 a Field photographs of large-scale trough cross-stratified sandstone(facies 3A)along the western bank of the Man River section.Arrows show lateral accretion surfaces.b Field photograph of planar cross-stratified sandstone(facies 3B),Man River section.Length of hammer is 30.5 cm

    Fig. 5 Field photographs. a Heterolithic sandstone-mudstone (facies 4A) showing presence of mud drapes and poorly-developed bidirectional cross-strata, Man River section. The arrows indicate apparent orientation of the foresets in adjacent cross-strata sets. Diameter of coin is 2.5 cm. b Interference ripples with bifurcation of crest line (yellow arrows) on the sandstone bedding surface of facies 4A, Man River section. Length of pen (encircled) is 14.5 cm. c Lenticular and wavy bedding developed within facies 4A, preserved in Bagh Cave. d Inclined heterolithic strata developed within facies 4A, Man River section. e Mud-clast-bearing conglomerate (facies 4B) showing angular mud clasts (arrows), Man River section. Length of pen is 14.5 cm. f Plane-laminated sandstone (facies 4C), Ratitalai section. Length of the pen is 14.5 cm. g Bioturbated sandstone (facies 4D), Akhara section. Diameter of coin is 2.5 cm. h Green sandstone facies (4E), exposed in Ghoda area. Length of hammer is 30.5 cm

    iii) sediments of the shoreface facies association (FA-5)predominate along with tide-dominated facies associations(mostly FA-4)in the upper part of the succession.

    At different stratigraphic levels in the middle part of the studied succession, layers with various soft-sediment deformation structures (SSDS), e.g., convoluted laminae,pseudo-nodules, load and flame structures, synsedimentary faults, slumps, and sand dykes, have been recorded by Jha et al. (2017).

    Fig. 6 Field photographs. a Fossil-bearing sandstone (facies 5A) showing gastropod (G) and bivalve shells (B) on sandstone bedding plane, near Akhara.Length of pen is 14.5 cm. b Ostrea shells in facies 5A,occurring near the Bagh-Akhara road.Diameter of coin is 2.5 cm. c Symmetrical flattopped wave ripples with small-scale ladder-back ripples in facies 5A, preserved near Akhara. Length of pen is 14.5 cm. d Thalassinoides-Ophiomorpha-bearing thinly-laminated sandstone-mudstone (facies 5B) showing well-preserved vertical burrows (arrows). The section is exposed near Sitapuri. Length of hammer is 30.5 cm.e Wave-ripple-bearing sandstone (facies 5C) showing symmetrical wave ripples with bifurcating crests(arrows), exposed in the Dam section. Length of pen is 14.5 cm. f Massive mudstone (facies 5D) overlain by white-coloured Nodular Limestone Formation,north of Sitapuri.The contact is marked by dashed yellow line. Man for scale is 170 cm tall

    Alternate fluvial (FA-1 and FA-2) and fluvialdominated tidally-influenced sediments (FA-3)followed by tide-dominated wave-reworked sediments(FA-4 and FA-5) constitute distinct depositional cycles within a mixed fluvio-marine depositional setting.Cyclic occurrences of the tidally-influenced sediments of FA-4, overlain by the wave-dominated sediments of FA-5 in the middle-upper part of the succession indicate repeated changes in water-depth over short intervals under a tidal to wave interactive system as a product of periodic marine inundations and intercalations. Such repetitive fining-up cycles indicate the inundation of fluvio-tidal channels by marine waters within a typical estuarine setting (Nichols 2009). In the study area, overall dominance of tidal features over wave features points to a tide-dominated waveinfluenced estuary (Jha et al. 2017).

    The overall fining-up character, increasing marine dominance up-section, and prevalence of landward palaeocurrent directions indicate an estuarine setting.Within the fluvio-marine interactive setting, three major sub-environments are envisaged:

    i) A fluvial-dominated zone initially, with the transition from fluvial channels (FA-1) to floodplain(FA-2), with few tide-affected fluvial deposits(FA-3) in the basal part of the succession, mainly prevails in the eastern and central part of the study area.

    ii) A mixed-energy central estuary zone in the middle-upper part of the succession, which consists of transitional fluvio-tidal channels (FA-3) and tidal flats associated with tidal channels and bars(FA-4) overlying the fluvial systems in the study area.

    Fig. 7 Lithologs from the western part of the study area (sections 1-5) showing lateral and vertical distribution of various facies types and their associations.For section locations see Fig.1.Legend is the same for Figs.7, 8 and 9

    iii) A wave-dominated shore environment in the outer estuary zone (top part of FA-4 with FA-5), occupying the upper part of the succession, occurs dominantly in the west and central part and gradually diminishes towards the eastern part of the study area.

    Fig. 8 Lithologs from the central part of the study area (sections 6-11) showing lateral and vertical distribution of various facies types and their associations.For section locations see Fig.1;for legend see Fig.7

    The distinct layers with abundant SSDS have been interpreted as seismites by Jha et al. (2017). The seismite layers mark phases of a substantial shift in depositional conditions from fluvial-dominated to a transgressive tidal- and wave-influenced estuarine system related to basinal subsidence caused by reactivation of the Son-Narmada South Fault during sedimentation of the Nimar Sandstone Formation(Jha et al. 2017).

    4.2 Stratal stacking patterns and T-R cycles

    Vertical and lateral distributions of the litho-units depict an overall fining-upward retrogradational cycle for the entire Nimar Sandstone Formation. Four section correlations are made: (i) in the Akhara-Phata area, the westernmost of the basin, incorporating sections 1-5(Fig. 10); (ii) in the Bagh area, the central of the basin,incorporating sections 6-11 (Fig. 11); (iii) in the Man River-Ratitalai area, the easternmost of the study area,including sections 12-15 (Fig. 12); and (iv) along a nearly dip-parallel section over the whole study area(Fig. 13), incorporating, from west to east, logs of Chikapoti, Akhara, Bagh, Raisinghpura, and Sitapuri.The correlations provide clear evidence of stratal stacking patterns along the length (W-E) and width (NS) of the basin, and reflect the dominance of marineinfluenced facies types in the western logs in comparison to the easternmost ones. Similarly, a gradual diminishing abundance of channel-fill facies types (mostly FA-1) is observed from east to west in the study area. Within the overall fining-up trend, high-frequency alternate coarsening-up (progradational) and fining-up (retrogradational) hemicycles a are visible in almost all the lithologs (Figs. 10,11,12 and 13).

    The overall retrogradational pattern with the gradual changeover from dominant fluvial systems in the lower part, followed by mixed fluvial-tidal systems in the middle part and mixed tidal- and wave-dominated open marine systems in the upper part of the studied succession points to the overall transgressive nature of the succession. The transgressive succession is also evident from the systematic change in abundance of fluvial to marine facies from east to west, which signifies a westto eastward marine incursion controlling the sedimentation at different areas. The smaller coarsening- and fining-up hemicycles embedded within this major transgressive cycle manifest high-frequency changes in base level and accommodation.

    Fig. 9 Lithologs from the eastern part of the study area (sections 12-15) showing lateral and vertical distribution of various facies types and their associations.For section locations see Fig.1;for legend see Fig.7

    The Nimar Sandstone Formation is conformably overlain by the Nodular Limestone Formation without any visible break in sedimentation. The Nodular Limestone Formation has been interpreted as a restricted shallow marine platform-tidal flat deposit (Ruidas et al. 2018;Bansal et al. 2019). Thus, it remains inconclusive at this stage whether the major transgressive event that affected the entire Nimar Sandstone Formation succession also continued during the deposition of the overlying limestone units.

    4.3 High-frequency T-R cycles

    Four distinct high-frequency hemicycles (Figs. 10, 11, 12,13, 14 and 15) are observed within the major transgressive cycle: (i) the lowermost coarsening-up hemicycle(named as L-C), followed up by (ii) a fining-up hemicycle (named as L-F) in the lower-middle part of the succession, (iii) another coarsening-up hemicycle(named as U-C) in the middle-upper part of the succession, and (iv) an upper fining-up hemicycle (named as UF)occurring near the top of the entire succession.

    Fig. 10 Correlation of lithologs in the western part of the study area (see Fig. 1 for location), showing transgressive-regressive (T-R) cycles of different orders. U-C: Upper coarsening-up hemicycle; U-F: Upper fining-up hemicycle; L-C: Lowermost coarsening-up hemicycle; L-F: Lower finning-up hemicycle.Legends are the same for Figs.10, 11, 12 and 13

    The lowermost coarsening-up (progradational) hemicycle (L-C) is most prevalent in the central and eastern part of the area (Figs. 11, 12) and depict a stratal stacking pattern formed by the lateral and vertical amalgamation of channel-fill deposits (FA-1), intermittently separated by overbank deposits (FA-2). Overall, FA-1 sediments are much more abundant than FA-2 sediments.

    A fining-up (retrogradational) hemicycle (L-F) commonly overlies the L-C hemicycle and occupies the lower to middle part of the succession in the central and eastern parts of the study area (Figs. 11, 12 and 13). However, in the western part,the L-C hemicycle is absent and the succession starts with the L-F hemicycle (Fig. 10). This fining-up succession shows a stratal stacking pattern formed predominantly by overbank deposits (FA-2) with isolated, detached units of channel-fill sediments (FA-1).Overall, the overbank deposits are more abundant than the channel-fill sediments within this hemicycle.

    Both L-C and L-F are overlain by another coarsening-up (progradational) hemicycle (U-C),mostly occupying the middle to upper part of the succession. The stratal architecture within this hemicycle depicts a progradational stacking pattern with successively stacked fluvial-dominated fluvio-tidal deposits (FA-3) and intermittent finer-grained tidedominated fluvio-tidal deposits (FA-4) (Fig. 15). Both the channel and the overbank deposits are characterized by abundant tidal signatures. Preserved tidal signatures help to differentiate this hemicycle from earlier hemicycles apart from the change in stacking pattern from fining-up below to coarsening-up above.The coarsening-up stacking pattern is produced by the local amalgamation of tide-affected fluvial channels in the middle and upper part of the U-C hemicycle.

    Fig. 11 Correlation of lithologs in the central part of the study area (see Fig. 1 for location), showing different-order T-R cycles. For abbreviations see Fig.10

    The topmost fining-up hemicycle (U-F) caps the earlier hemicycles throughout the entire area. A fining-up,retrogradational stratal stacking pattern is observed with an abundance of FA-4 facies types accompanied by FA-5 facies types. Marine depositional signatures are most prevalent within this hemicycle in comparison to all other hemicycles, which include sheet sandstone bodies with abundant wave-produced features, heterolithic units with shallow-marine invertebrate fossils and trace fossils, and thick- to thin-bedded tidal heteroliths. Evidence of fluvial sedimentary processes in terms of facies types of FA-1, FA-2 or FA-3 are lacking or absent within this hemicycle. The thickness of the sediment package of U-F also varies significantly, with maximum thickness and sand-rich composition in the western part, and a gradually diminishing thickness and change to a mudrich composition towards the east. This hemicycle is directly overlain by the Nodular Limestone Formation.

    5 Discussion

    5.1 Interpretation of the high-frequency T-R cycles

    The lowermost coarsening-upward hemicycle (L-C),characterized by highly amalgamated channel-fill units and a high channel/overbank sediment ratio, signifies deposition in unconfined fluvial channels without any connection to marine processes. Lateral and vertical shifts in channel stacking pattern and amalgamation indicate frequent channel avulsion with a significantly low rate of aggradation of overbank deposits. The overall stratal stacking pattern points to a high-amalgamation systems tract (HAST) developed in a lowaccommodation, upstream-controlled fluvial depositional system (Catuneanu 2017).

    The overlying fining-up hemicycle (L-F), characterized by stacking pattern dominated by overbank deposits and a low channel/overbank sediment ratio, signifies deposition in confined isolated channels with a low rate of channel avulsion or migration and a high rate of overbank aggradation. Such a stratal stacking pattern is identified as a low-amalgamation systems tract (LAST)(Catuneanu 2017), indicating high accommodation due to basinal subsidence and raised river profile leading to flooding and deposition of finer overbank deposits over the earlier sand-depositing areas. This led to a fining-up retrogradational succession (FA-2 over FA-1) in most areas. The predominance of mud-rich floodplain deposits manifests rising base level conditions, leading to:(i) raising of the river profile, (ii) more deposition than the incision, and (iii) low channel avulsion and aggradation. Such rising of the base level can be considered as an indirect effect of the rising and encroaching sea,which was not far away. Close overlap of this hemicycle by the overlying tide-dominated facies association supports this interpretation.

    The stratal stacking pattern and the associated facies architecture in the overlying hemicycles (U-C and U-F)indicate clear signatures of marine influence. Thus, a shift in the depositional conditions from an upstreamcontrolled fluvial setting to a downstream-controlled,marine-influenced transitional setting can be envisaged at the boundary of the L-F hemicycle and the U-C hemicycle. Significant marine influence, in association with basinal tectonics and sediment supply controlled the creation of net accommodation and the resultant stratal stacking patterns. SSDS-bearing beds both above and below the said transition are interpreted as seismites(Jha et al. 2017), which signifies strong control of the basinal tectonism caused by reactivation of faults and basinal sagging in controlling the accommodation and sedimentation (Bhattacharya et al. 2016; Bhattacharya and Saha 2020).

    Fig. 13 Correlation of lithologs along a dip section from west to east of the study area (see Fig. 1 for location), showing different-order T-R cycles.For abbreviations see Fig.10

    Fig. 14 A representative field section beside the Baghini Temple, near Bagh, showing four transgressive-regressive hemicycles (marked by L-C, LF,U-C and U-F).The person(encircled)is 172 cm tall.For key of abbreviations, see Fig.10

    The overlying coarsening-up hemicycle (U-C) in the middle to upper part of the succession, characterized by low to high tidal influence, shows a stacking pattern dominated by tide-reworked channel and overbank deposits (FA-3 and FA-4). Additional accommodation was available, as evident from high-accumulation of the tideaffected overbank deposits (FA-4) and low to high amalgamation of tide-influenced channels (FA-3). This net accommodation creation was controlled by a rising base level and landward encroaching sea, which was overpaced by a high rate of sedimentation led by both fluvial and tidal systems. The overall progradational stratal stacking pattern with less aggradation indicates a regressive condition, equivalent to a lowstand systems tract(LST) in the fluvio-marine transitional setting. In some areas (e.g., Bagh, Rampura, etc., Figs. 11, 13), particularly in places where the fluvial channels were strongly affected by tidal currents during this marine encroachment, tidally reworked coarser-grained clastics led to stacked, amalgamated thick channel-fill sandstone units(of FA-3). Such progradational stacking pattern confirms a lowstand condition, where a significant amount of sediment supplied by river was reworked by the encroaching tidal currents and was deposited as bayhead deltas and tidal bars in river mouth areas.

    Fig. 15 Conceptual sequence stratigraphic model of the Nimar Sandstone Formation along a west-east transect through the study area,showing stratal stacking patterns with four high-frequency coarsening-up and fining-up hemicycles embedded in a major fining-up transgressive succession. Abbreviations see Fig. 10. HAST: High-amalgamation systems tract; LAST: Low-amalgamation systems tract; LST: Lowstand systems tract;TST:Transgressive systems tract

    Fig.16 Schematic 3D palaeogeographic model of the deposition of Nimar Sandstone Formation in the Narmada rift basin

    The lowstand stratal package is overlain by the topmost fining-up hemicycle (U-F) with a retrogradational stratal stacking pattern formed by predominantly tideand wave-produced sediments of FA-4 and FA-5(Figs. 10, 11, 12 and 13). The prevalence of wave- and tide-controlled sedimentation with a low or rare signature of fluvial deposition suggests a coastal onlapping,which covered the earlier fluvial (HAST and LAST) and the fluvio-tidal (LST) deposits. A clear shift from pure fluvial depositional processes to open coastal depositional systems in different parts of the basin (Figs. 10,11, 12 and 13) undoubtedly attests to a landward shift of the shoreline. Thus,the fining-up retrogradational stratal package in U-F represents a transgressive systems tract(TST). Minor variations in the stacking pattern within this TST in different areas are caused by varying water energy in different parts of the basin during the marine flooding event, which led to varied depositions from (i)wave-reworked shoreface sands with marine bivalves,gastropods, and trace fossils in the western part (more open marine), to (ii) finer-grained clastics with abundant Ostrea, Turritella and trace fossils (Thalassinoides) of marginal marine affinity, characteristic of brackish water conditions in the eastern part (landward, sheltered estuary-like). The contact with the overlying Nodular Limestone Formation (Fig. 14) is considered as the end of transgression documented by the Nimar Sandstone Formation succession;however,demarcating any definite surface (e.g., the maximum flooding surface) is not feasible due to the relatively poor preservation of features in outcrops and restricted lateral continuity of features.

    5.2 Sequence stratigraphic architecture

    In absence of absolute age data of the Nimar Sandstone Formation (as mentioned in Table 2), the chronological attributes of bounding surfaces and major events become problematic in the study area. The major transgressive cycle encompassing the entire Nimar Sandstone Formation succession definitely indicates a transgression.Since the lower contact of the Nimar Sandstone Formation is fault-bound, the actual starting age of the deposition is difficult to determine. The top boundary with the overlying Nodular Limestone Formation is conformable and indicates inland continuation of marine sedimentation. Thus, we may consider the major fining-up cycle in the Nimar Sandstone Formation as part of a major, continuous transgressive event. So, assigning the proper status of this major transgressive cycle in terms of sequence elements (sequence or systems tracts) is tricky and is avoided here.

    The high-frequency T-R cycles resemble different systems tracts, viz., L-C as HAST, L-F as LAST, U-C as LST,and U-F as TST,depending on characteristic stratal stacking patterns with assemblages of different facies associations (discussed earlier). Nature of the transition between the HAST and the LAST is gradual, rendering no definite bounding surface between them in field exposures. The changeover from the LAST and the overlying LST is commonly marked by initiation of tidal influence within the channel deposits and the progradation of these channel systems over the underlying overbank deposits. Sharp channel bases are locally identified in individual exposures, but poor preservation quality with lack of lateral continuity restricts the identification of a definite bounding surface between the LAST and the LST. Similarly, the changeover from LST to the topmost TST is not marked by any distinct surface such as the maximum regressive surface (MRS) and is mostly identified by the gradual change in the stratal stacking pattern from coarsening-up (U-C) to fining-up (U-F).The facies architecture near the upper boundary of the TST is not uniform throughout the sections and,in turn,makes it difficult to demarcate a definite terminating surface such as the maximum flooding surface (MFS).However,the Nodular Limestone Formation overlies this topmost TST throughout the study area, and definitely indicates the culmination of the transgressive event within the Nimar Sandstone Formation succession. Such variations in the facies architecture, causing difficulty in lateral correlation and identification of bounding surfaces of the sequence/systems tracts are due to the complex sedimentary facies distribution in the evolving fluvio-estuarine system within the riftogenic basin.

    5.3 Palaeogeography

    The Late Cretaceous global sea-level rise led to significant marine transgressions that affected part of western and central India (Acharya and Lahiri 1991; Singh and Mishra 2000; Desai 2013). This led to seawater inundation of large areas of central Indian land, resulting in a shift in depositional conditions from pure continental to marine/marginal marine. One such example of marine transgressions and change in depositional conditions is well recorded in the Upper Cretaceous Bagh Group, preserved within the Narmada rift basin.

    Analysis of the Nimar Sandstone Formation succession in the light of transgressive-regressive cycles reveals a major transgressive event affecting the upper part of the succession. The initial fluvial system depicts an amalgamation of channel and overbank deposits under lowto-high accommodation conditions, mostly controlled by changing river equilibrium profile due to tectonic subsidence and varied sediment supply. This caused thick accumulation of channel-fill and overbank deposits in the lower part of the Nimar Sandstone Formation. An east-west flowing river system is reconstructed, with coarse sediments dominating in the east and fine sediments in the west. In the western part of the basin, the fluvial system was affected by tidal intermixing, indicating a significant marine encroachment and fluvio-tidal interference (Fig. 16). The effect of tidal influence is more pronounced in the upper transgressive hemicycle(U-C), which records prevalent drowning of the underlying fluvial system. The effect of this drowning was more dominant in the western part and less in the eastern part, indicating that the marine encroachment took place from west to east with the development of a tideinfluenced estuarine system in the west changing to more fluvial-dominated bay-head delta systems in the east. Overall facies architecture indicates that an initial fluvial depositional setting was engulfed by the development of a tide-influenced estuarine system (Fig. 16),where three distinct depositional zones can be deciphered, namely,

    i) a fluvio-tidal interactive inner estuary zone, developed in the eastern part of the basin, characterized by the tide-reworked thick channel-fill and overbank deposits,

    ii) a tide-dominated central estuary zone, developed in the central part of the basin, characterized by development of tidal sand bars and sand- and mud-flats based on the extent of inundations, mutual strength of tidal and fluvial systems, and type of net accommodation created, and.

    iii) a tidal- and wave-dominated outer estuary part, developed in the western part of the basin, characterized by more open marine tide- and wave-reworked sediments of shore environments.

    Successive stacking of high-frequency transgressiveregressive cycles was caused by fluctuations in the base level in response to the Cenomanian sea-level rise along with net sedimentation controlled by the basinal subsidence caused by reactivation of basin marginal faults in the Narmada rift basin (Jha et al.2017). During the late stage of the transgression,outer estuarine open marine conditions encroached further landwards inundating the entire basin, which led to shallow, low-energy conditions with deposition of the Nodular Limestone Formation as an apron covering the underlying Nimar Sandstone Formation.Thus, the shift in depositional conditions from fluvialdominated to a transgressive tidal- to wave-influenced estuarine system attests to significant tectonosedimentary changes accompanied by prolonged events of marine transgressions in the Narmada rift basin during the Late Cretaceous.

    6 Conclusions

    The detailed facies analysis and sequence stratigraphic analysis of the Cenomanian Nimar Sandstone Formation helps to sort out the facies architecture in the fluviomarine interactive estuarine system. Based on the present study, we can frame the following conclusive remarks:

    1) Detailed facies analysis records deposition of the lower part of the succession in a fluvial setting,which changed up-section into a transgressive fluvio-marine estuarine setting with: (i) a fluvialdominated inner estuary zone, with the transition from fluvial to tide-affected fluvial deposits, (ii) a transitional central estuary zone consisting of transitional fluvio-tidal channels and tidal flats, associated with tidal channels and bars, and (iii) a wavedominated shallow-marine outer estuary zone. This evolution is time-transgressive with a gradual shift of different depositional conditions in space and time.

    2) Reactivation of basin-marginal faults during the Cenomanian time caused sequential subsidence of the land part within the Indian Plate, which enhanced the effective landward incursion of seawater due to the Cenomanian sea-level rise.

    3) The major transgression is attributed to the Cenomanian global eustatic rise, whereas the highfrequency T-R cycles indicate systematic variation in net sediment supply, change in accommodation space related to tectonic subsidence, and base level fluctuations, resulting in characteristic stratal stacking patterns.

    4) The proposed tectono-sedimentary model based on the integrated sedimentological-sequence-stratigraphic study helps to reconstruct the palaeogeography in central India during the Late Cretaceous.Such a palaeogeographic model can be applied to similar transgressive fluvio-marine sedimentary successions formed in passive margin rift basins, where transgression is controlled by both eustatic changes and tectonic subsidence.

    Abbreviations

    HAST: High-amalgamation systems tract; IHS: Inclined heterolithic strata;LAST: Low-amalgamation systems tract; LST: Lowstand systems tract;MFS: Maximum flooding surface; MRS: Maximum regressive surface;SSDS: Soft-sediment deformation structures; T-R cycles: Transgressiveregressive cycles;TST: Transgressive systems tract

    Acknowledgements

    The authors like to thank IIT Roorkee for providing the research facilities. The authors gratefully acknowledge the thorough and critical reviews by two anonymous reviewers and the constructive comments of the editors of JoP.

    Authors’contributions

    BB participated in the field work, identified and interpreted the primary sedimentary structures and the facies types, conceptualized the problem,completed the correlation of facies and facies associations in 2-D and 3-D,prepared the sequence stratigraphic models and drafted the manuscript. SJ has carried out the detailed descriptions of facies types, prepared the logs,participated in the field work and drafted the manuscript. PM has participated in the field, assisted in acquiring data and in lab analysis and drafted the manuscript. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    Authors are thankful to the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India,for financial support in the form of Extra-Mural Research Project (Ref. No.MoES/P.O.(Geo)/142/2017).

    Availability of data and materials

    The authors declare that the materials are available in open field area to be accessed by anyone. All data are collected by the authors themselves through fieldwork followed by laboratory analysis, and nothing has been supplied by any person or organization.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this article.

    Author details

    1Department of Earth Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee 247667, India.2Geological Survey of India, Jabalpur 482003, India.

    Received: 6 March 2020 Accepted: 16 October 2020

    亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| kizo精华| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 日本欧美视频一区| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 一级毛片 在线播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 久久久久久人人人人人| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 欧美大码av| kizo精华| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 黄色一级大片看看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 丁香六月欧美| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 午夜免费鲁丝| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 成年动漫av网址| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 欧美成人午夜精品| 精品少妇内射三级| xxx大片免费视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 少妇 在线观看| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 在线观看国产h片| 高清av免费在线| 欧美另类一区| 国产高清videossex| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美激情在线| 成人手机av| 日本a在线网址| 久久99一区二区三区| videosex国产| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 捣出白浆h1v1| 黄频高清免费视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 美女中出高潮动态图| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 日日夜夜操网爽| 色播在线永久视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美成人午夜精品| 热re99久久国产66热| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 又大又爽又粗| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 国产一区二区在线观看av| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 91精品国产国语对白视频| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 97在线人人人人妻| 国产在线观看jvid| 午夜福利,免费看| av有码第一页| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 满18在线观看网站| 麻豆av在线久日| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 九草在线视频观看| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 黄色视频不卡| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 只有这里有精品99| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 少妇人妻 视频| www.999成人在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 亚洲av美国av| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 深夜精品福利| 黄频高清免费视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产高清videossex| 丝袜美足系列| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 脱女人内裤的视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站 | 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 国产成人欧美| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 日本五十路高清| 乱人伦中国视频| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 久久久久久久国产电影| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 男人操女人黄网站| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 99热全是精品| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 精品久久久久久电影网| 精品一区在线观看国产| 高清不卡的av网站| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 国产在线观看jvid| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 高清av免费在线| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 制服诱惑二区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产激情久久老熟女| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 精品国产一区二区久久| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 久久中文字幕一级| 国产精品成人在线| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 桃花免费在线播放| 午夜久久久在线观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 色网站视频免费| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 两性夫妻黄色片| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 一级黄色大片毛片| 两个人免费观看高清视频| www.999成人在线观看| cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 青草久久国产| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 五月天丁香电影| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| xxx大片免费视频| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 久久国产精品影院| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲国产看品久久| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 无限看片的www在线观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产成人精品无人区| 精品福利永久在线观看| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| a级毛片黄视频| 飞空精品影院首页| 国产在线免费精品| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 性少妇av在线| 欧美黑人精品巨大| avwww免费| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 91精品三级在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 视频区图区小说| av天堂久久9| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 蜜桃在线观看..| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 伦理电影免费视频| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 黄频高清免费视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 五月天丁香电影| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 美国免费a级毛片| 精品人妻1区二区| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产在线视频一区二区| 观看av在线不卡| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 99热网站在线观看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 高清av免费在线| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| a 毛片基地| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 色94色欧美一区二区| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 女警被强在线播放| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 9热在线视频观看99| 乱人伦中国视频| kizo精华| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 69精品国产乱码久久久| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 一级毛片电影观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 久久影院123| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 桃花免费在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 男人操女人黄网站| av不卡在线播放| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产精品一国产av| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 色94色欧美一区二区| 搡老乐熟女国产| 91字幕亚洲| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 五月天丁香电影| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站 | 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 18在线观看网站| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 日本欧美视频一区| 香蕉国产在线看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久久欧美国产精品| av福利片在线| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 欧美人与善性xxx| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 午夜激情av网站| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲综合色网址| 成年av动漫网址| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 深夜精品福利| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 只有这里有精品99| 我的亚洲天堂| 性色av一级| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 99国产精品99久久久久| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 曰老女人黄片| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 一级毛片电影观看| 天天影视国产精品| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 久久99一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲第一av免费看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 一本久久精品| 搡老岳熟女国产| 1024视频免费在线观看| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 黄色视频不卡| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日本欧美视频一区| 最黄视频免费看| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 考比视频在线观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 婷婷成人精品国产| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 精品久久久精品久久久| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 大香蕉久久网| 久久影院123| 日韩视频在线欧美| 一级毛片 在线播放| 午夜视频精品福利| 只有这里有精品99| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 高清不卡的av网站| 久久av网站| 免费av中文字幕在线| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| av国产精品久久久久影院| tube8黄色片| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 蜜桃在线观看..| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 久久人人爽人人片av| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 日本wwww免费看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区 | 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 丝袜喷水一区| 国产麻豆69| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久久久网色| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 午夜91福利影院| 亚洲成色77777| 国产av国产精品国产| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 天堂8中文在线网| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 乱人伦中国视频| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 美女福利国产在线| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产男女内射视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 中文字幕色久视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 99热全是精品| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| av不卡在线播放| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 91老司机精品| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产野战对白在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 成年av动漫网址| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲精品在线美女| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 多毛熟女@视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 午夜影院在线不卡| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 久久狼人影院| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| avwww免费| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 午夜免费鲁丝| videosex国产| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 不卡av一区二区三区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日韩电影二区| 精品一区在线观看国产| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 大香蕉久久成人网| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 国产欧美亚洲国产| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 在线观看人妻少妇| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 超碰97精品在线观看|