• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Seismic performance of diagonally braced cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls

    2021-03-07 12:14:42,,,,,

    , , , , ,

    1. School of Civil Engineering; Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P.R. China; 2. Shandong Laigang Constuction Co. Ltd, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, P.R. China; 3. Management Committee of Dafosi Scenic Area, Chongqing 402660, P.R. China; 4. BNBM House Co. Ltd, Beijing 100070, P.R. China)

    Abstract: Through an experimental investigation of the seismic performance of diagonally braced cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls subjected to vertical loads, the mechanical properties, failure modes, and hysteresis properties of the walls were elucidated. In addition, the influence of a sheathing panel on the hysteresis performance, ductility, and energy dissipation of the composite walls was analyzed. The experimental results show that the shear bearing capacity of the single-sided oriented strand board (OSB) panel wall was increased by 38.79% compared with the non-panel wall under the same vertical load. The shear bearing capacity, ductility coefficient, μ, and energy dissipation factor, E, of the single-sided OSB panel composite wall with an axial compression ratio of 0.24 were increased by 7.5%, 4.5%, and 4.1%, respectively, compared to the wall with an axial compression ratio of 0.16; however, the yield displacement was reduced by 8.1%. The cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall with diagonal bracing exhibited good seismic performance. After verifying the reliability of the finite element model, the influence of the axial compression ratio of the wall stud and the yield strength of the steel components on the mechanical performance of the wall was investigated through a variable parameter analysis. The results showed that with the increasing axial compression ratio, the shear bearing capacity of the wall was improved. In addition, reducing the yield strength of the steel components significantly reduced the shear capacity of the composite wall. Finally, according to the Technical Specification for Low-rise Cold-formed Thin-walled Steel Buildings (JGJ 227-2011) and AISI S400-15, the resistance partial coefficient of the wall was derived, which determines the design value for the shear bearing capacity under a horizontal earthquake.

    Keywords:cold-formed thin-walled steel; composite wall; diagonal support; seismic performance; experimental research; finite element analysis

    1 Introduction

    In recent years, green prefabricated buildings have been vigorously promoted in China, and cold-formed thin-walled steel structure residential systems have rapidly emerged as representative prefabricated building structures. The composite wall, which consists of a panel material and steel keel, is the main bearing member of cold-formed thin-walled steel structure residential systems.

    Blum et al.[1]studied the bending support of cold-formed thin-walled steel walls. Through tests and analysis, design expressions for support stiffness and strength were proposed, and the concepts of minimum support stiffness and corresponding imperfections were introduced. Hikita et al.[2]carried out an investigation of the shear bearing capacity of a light steel frame shear wall subjected to an extra gravity load under monotonic and low-cycle reverse loads. The results showed that the existence of an additional gravity load had no obvious effect on the shear bearing capacity of a steel frame shear wall with a plate. Tian et al.[3]carried out a theoretical analysis of a cross flat steel-braced cold-formed steel frame wall. Based on the angle-displacement method, a first-order elastic analysis was used to predict the shear bearing capacity of the cross flat steel braced cold-formed steel frame wall. Gad et al.[4]studied the interaction between the components of a cold-formed steel composite wall and the shear bearing capacity of the whole wall. Horizontal low-cycle reverse loading tests were carried out on a cold-formed steel wall with cross-bracing and a panel, revealing that the yield strength of the x-cross bracing controlled the bearing capacity of the wall.

    Liu[5]studied the hysteresis properties of a steel plate shear wall and an anti-buckling steel plate shear wall subjected to vertical loads. The results indicated that the shear bearing capacity and energy dissipation capacity of the steel plate shear wall and anti-buckling steel plate shear wall were reduced as a result of the vertical load, but the lateral stiffness of the anti-buckling steel plate shear wall was not affected by the vertical load. Hao et al.[6]studied the shear bearing capacity of a cross steel strip braced composite wall consisting of a cold-formed thin-walled steel frame and light weight mortar. A joint plate was added to the specimens to strengthen the screw connection between the brace and the steel skeleton in the experiments. The results showed that the shear bearing capacity of the composite wall was greatly improved by the joint plate. Dong[7]studied the shear bearing capacity of a cold-formed thin-walled composite wall with a sandwich steel plate. The results showed that the cross steel strip controlled the shear bearing capacity of the wall; reducing the screw spacing could improve the lateral stiffness and shear bearing capacity of the wall. Chen[8]carried out an investigation of the shear bearing capacity of a cold-formed thin-walled composite wall with cross bracing. It was noted that the buckling of the side column of the cross-braced wall under monotonic loading was caused by the eccentric tension, while the damage to the wall under a low-cycle reverse load was due to the extrusion deformation of the lower guide beam. Wang et al.[9]studied the seismic behavior of cold-formed thin-walled walls with diagonal braces. The results showed that the arrangement of the diagonal bracings resulted in improvement of the load bearing capacity, stiffness and energy dissipation of the walls. However, the diagonal brace increased the lateral performance to a limited extent, because the connection between the diagonal brace and the transverse brace was weak and buckling of the transverse brace occurred early. The integrity of the wall panel has a significant influence on the lateral performance of the wall. Reducing the screw spacing around the wall panel can improve the bearing capacity, stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity of the wall markedly; however, the ductility will decrease.

    Although there have been many experimental studies and theoretical analyses of the seismic performance of cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls, studies on the mechanical behavior of cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls are uncommon; systemic studies on the seismic performance of such walls under vertical loading are still lacking. In this study, an experimental investigation and theoretical analysis of a diagonally braced cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall under vertical loading were carried out to investigate the mechanical properties, failure modes, and hysteresis properties of the wall. In addition, the influence of the axial compression ratio of the wall studs and the yield strength of the steel components on the seismic performance of the wall were also investigated. Based on the results of the experiments and finite element parameter analysis, a design method and suggestions for these walls in seismic design are proposed.

    2 Wall Design

    2.1 Wall Structure

    In these experiments, six full-sale cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls with diagonal bracing were designed and divided into three groups based on the inclusion of a panel and the value of the vertical force,each group of walls was identical in material, size, and loading method. The configurations are detailed in Table 1. The first group of walls was placed under a vertical load of 80 kN without a panel. The second group was placed under a vertical load of 80 kN and included a single-sided oriented-strand board (OSB) panel. The third group was placed under a vertical load of 120 kN and included a single-sided OSB panel. The first and second groups were compared to analyze the effect of the panel on the shear bearing capacity of the wall. The second and third groups were compared to analyze the effect of different vertical loads (i.e., the axial compression ratio of the wall stud) on the shear bearing capacity of the wall with a single-sided OSB panel. The wall numbers and test parameters are listed in Table 1.

    The columns of the composite wall were composed of C-section cold-formed thin-walled steel member (C140 mm×40 mm×11 mm×1.2 mm) spaced at 400 mm; the upper guide beam, lower guide beam, and diagonal bracing of the wall were composed of U-section cold-formed thin-walled steel member (U143 mm×40 mm×1.2 mm). The columns on both sides of the wall and the middle column were composed of two C-shaped cold-formed thin-walled steel members and connected to the I-section by a double row of self-tapping screws. In addition, the side columns were covered by U-section cold-formed thin-walled steel members to avoid premature buckling, and the self-tapping screws were spaced at 100 mm. The diagonal bracing was composed of two C-section cold-formed thin-walled steel members, which were connected to the I-section by a double row of self-tapping screws. The openings at the middle of the diagonal bracing were used to keep the column continuous. To strengthen the screw connection between the diagonal bracing and the column, the inter-section of the diagonal bracing and the column was strengthened locally by a 3-mm-thick gusset plate. The thickness of the OSB panel of the wall was 12 mm, and the size of a single panel was 2.4 mm× 1.2 mm (height × width). On the inside and outside of the wall, self-tapping screws were spaced at intervals of 150 mm between the panel and the steel frame. The steel frames were assembled using ST4800 self-tapping screws, the OSB panel and the steel frame were assembled using ST4835 self-tapping screws, and the connection between the anti-drawing component and the steel frame was made with ST5330 self-tapping screws. The anti-drawing components at the four corners of the wall were connected to the upper guide beam and the lower guide beam by M16 bolts, while the upper guide beam and the upper guide were connected to the loading device with M12 bolts. Detailed dimensions of the wall are depicted in Fig.1.

    2.2 Material properties

    The material properties of the Q345 steel and the OSB panel were measured as set out in standard GB/T228.1-2010[10]by making plate specimens. The measurement results for the Q345 steel and the material properties of the OSB panel are listed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

    Table 2 Material property test results of steel

    Table 3 Physical properties of 12-mm-thick OSB panel

    Fig.1 Dimension of walls(mm)

    2.3 Loading device and testing procedure

    The test loading device is shown in Fig.2. At the four corners of the top and bottom of the wall, the wall and the top and bottom beams of the loading device were connected with M16 bolts, in which 150 mm×150 mm×20 mm (length×width×thickness) rectangular cushion blocks were arranged, to allow the vertical load to be accurately transferred to each wall stud. In addition, the wall was fastened to the slots in the top and bottom beams of the loading device by M12 bolts spaced at a distance of 400 mm. The horizontal actuator was connected to the web of the top guide beam through the top loading beam. On the lateral side of the top loading beam, sliding bracings were arranged to provide a lateral restraint force and prevent loss of out-of-plane stability.

    Fig.2 Test loading device

    In accordance with the requirements for shear tests of cold-formed thin-walled steel walls set out in standard JGJ 227-2011[11], the measurement points were arranged as shown in Fig.3. Eight displacement sensors were arranged to measure the displacements of the wall specimens and the loading device (Fig.3). Sensor D1 was used to measure the displacement of the horizontal actuator connected to the top beam, sensor D2 measured the horizontal relative displacement between the wall specimen and the top loading beam, and sensors D3 and D4 measured the relative slipping displacements between the wall and the bottom loading beam. Sensors D5 and D6 were used to measure the vertical relative displacement between the wall and the bottom loading beam; sensors D7 and D8 measured the vertical relative displacement between the bottom loading beam and the ground. In Fig.3, “A” represents the vertical distance from sensor D2 to the bottom surface of the top loading beam, which was set as 600 mm; “B” and “C” represent the horizontal distances from sensors D5 and D6 to the lateral surface of the side column of the wall, which were set as 100 mm.

    Fig.3 Displacement meter arrangement(mm)

    2.4 Loading process

    The previous finite element simulation predicted a yield displacement of the wall of 12 mm. The tests were conducted using the displacement control method under a horizontal low-cycle reverse load. A preload was applied at a rate of 0.4 mm/s with a displacement increment per stage of 0.125Δyuntil 3 mm and cycled once. Then, the formal loading stage was applied, with a displacement increment per stage of 4 mm until 12 mm (yield displacement), and cycled once per stage. After yielding, the wall was loaded with a displacement increment per stage of 0.5Δyand cycled three times until the wall was destroyed.

    In these tests, the vertical force was loaded to the specified value once through the vertical actuator. The vertical force was initially kept constant and readings from all sensors were recorded simultaneously. The vertical force was applied using the load-control method at a rate of 0.2 kN/s. During the horizontal loading process, the displacement data for each sensor and the actuator load were collected and recorded by a ZI-160 data collection instrument.

    3 Test results and analysis

    3.1 Test observations

    3.1.1 Wall A1

    For wall A1, the experimental phenomenon was basically the same, so only wall A1-1 is described. Owing to the low in-plane stiffness of the wall without a panel, the force increased slowly with increasing horizontal displacement; thus the change was not obvious in the early stage of the test. When the horizontal displacement reached 12 mm, obvious wrinkles appeared in the flange of the diagonal bracing close to the upper guide beam, and the thrust of the horizontal actuator reached 24.03 kN. With further increase in the horizontal displacement, the wrinkles in the left and right diagonal bracings occurring at the area of the gusset plate became more obvious. When the horizontal displacement reached 18 mm, the local buckling of the diagonal bracing subjected to pressure was obvious, and the deformation was larger, as shown in Fig.4(a).

    Fig.4 Failure of wall A1-1

    When the horizontal displacement reached 24 mm, the self-tapping screws of the gusset plate in the middle bottom of the wall exhibited sliding and then shear failure as the test was carried out. At the inter-section with the middle gusset plate, the diagonal bracing exhibited severe bending, and some of the self-tapping screws were torn out, as shown in Fig.4(b) and (c). Meanwhile, the gusset plate and the wall frame connection exhibited obvious dislocation. As the horizontal displacement continued to increase, the deformation of the wall also continued to increase, but the load began to decrease. When the horizontal displacement reached 42 mm, the left bracing was pulled to breaking, as shown in Fig.4(d). With increasing horizontal displacement, the deformation of the wall was accelerated, and the load decreased. When the load reached 85% of the ultimate load, the test was stopped.

    3.1.2 Wall A2

    For wall A2, the experimental phenomenon was basically the same, so only wall A2-1 is described. Owing to the effect of the OSB panel on the lateral stiffness of the wall, the force increased rapidly with increasing horizontal displacement. At the elastic stage of the wall, the flange of the diagonal bracing close to the upper and lower guide beam exhibited obvious wrinkles in the tension and compression process, as shown in Fig.5(a). When the horizontal displacement reached 18 mm, the bending of the left and right diagonal bracing at the gusset plate became more obvious, and the screws connecting the OSB panel to the steel skeleton at the corners became cut into the panel, as shown in Fig.5(b). When the horizontal displacement reached 30 mm, the bearing capacity reached 50.12 kN. The compression diagonal bracing at the gusset plate in the middle bottom of the wall exhibited intense bending, while the lower guide beam and the stud exhibited different levels of buckling, as shown in Fig.5(c). At the joint area on the back of the OSB panel, the screws became embedded into the panel, causing minor shedding of the OSB panel, as shown in Fig.5(d). When the horizontal displacement reached 36 mm, the screws on the gusset plate at the intersection of the V-shaped diagonal bracing were torn out, the diagonal bracing and upper and lower guide beams were severely deformed, and sliding occurred between the gusset plate and the guide beam, as shown in Fig.5(e).

    When the horizontal displacement reached 48 mm, the screws connecting the middle gusset plate and the lower guide beam were torn out, the joint area was severely deformed, and the screws at the bottom corner on the back of the OSB panel were torn out. This resulted in different levels of shedding of the OSB panel, as shown in Fig.5(f). With increasing horizontal displacement, the deformation of the wall accelerated and the load decreased. When the load reached 85% of the ultimate load, the test was stopped. The global failure mode is shown in Fig.5(g).

    Fig.5 Failure of wall A2-1

    3.1.3 Wall A3

    For wall A3, the experimental phenomenon was basically the same, so only wall A3-2 is described. In the elastic stage, the test behavior of wall A3-1 and A3-2 was similar to that of wall A2-1 and A2-2. In the reverse loading process, the flange of the diagonal bracing subjected to pressure at the gusset plate exhibited obvious local buckling, as shown in Fig.6(a). When the horizontal displacement reached 12 mm, the screws in the bottom corner of the OSB panel became embedded into the panel, the wrinkles of the compressive diagonal bracing at the gusset plate became more obvious, and a noticeable relative angle occurred between the gusset plate and lower guide beam, as shown in Fig.6(b). When the horizontal displacement increased from 12 mm to 18 mm, the upper parts of the left and right studs exhibited obvious buckling; the deformation of the flange and crimping of the studs is shown in Fig.6(c). With further increase in the horizontal displacement, the force applied to the wall increased. When the displacement reached 24 mm, the bearing capacity reached 55.99 kN. The buckling of the middle stud near the lower guide beam at this point is shown in Fig.6(d). As the horizontal displacement continued to increase, the bearing capacity began to decrease, and the screws in the middle part of the gusset plate were torn out, as shown in Fig.6(e).

    At the joint area on the bottom of the OSB panel, the screws were cut into the panel and caused minor shedding of the panel. As the horizontal displacement continued to increase, the screws connecting the lower guide beam and the middle part of the gusset plate were torn out, and the diagonal bracing subjected to pressure became severely wrinkled and deformed. When the horizontal displacement reached 48 mm, the bearing capacity decreased to 39.62 kN. Meanwhile, the screws connecting the panel and the steel skeleton were cut into the panel, and different degrees of separation occurred between the corner of the panel and the steel skeleton, as shown in Fig.6(f). With increasing horizontal displacement, the deformation of the wall accelerated and the load decreased. When the load reached 85% of the ultimate load, the test was stopped. The global failure mode is shown in Fig.6(g).

    Fig.6 Failure of wall A3-2

    The observed test behaviors reveal that without the constraint from the panel, the shear bearing capacity of wall A1 was small, but the lateral stiffness of the wall was improved owing to the effect of the V-shaped diagonal bracing and the gusset plate. Most of the damage occurred in the area of the gusset plate, and the shear fracture of the screws and breaking of the diagonal bracing represented failure of the wall. Compared with wall A1, the lateral stiffness and shear bearing capacity of wall A2 were improved by the constraint from the panel. The shear failure of the screws in the gusset plate and panel represented failure of the wall. Comparing wall A3 with wall A2, as a result of the increased vertical load, the side studs of wall A3 exhibited buckling earlier, but both wall A3 and A2 were destroyed when the screws on the gusset plate and panel underwent shear fracture and the middle studs and guide beams yielded.

    3.2 Test data processing

    The whole lateraldisplacement,0, at the top of the wall measured during the tests consists of three parts:is the lateral displacement of the top of the wall when the wall undergoes rotation caused by the extension of the anchor bolts,lis the relative sliding displacement between the wall and the pedestal, andis the actual shear deformation of the wall (Fig.7).

    Fig.7 Shear-displacement model of composite

    Thus, the actual lateral displacement at the top of the wall, which is the shear deformation (), can be expressed with Eq.(1).

    Δ=δ=δ0-δl-δφ

    (1)

    The actual shear deformation of the wall is as follows

    (2)

    The hysteretic loops of the horizontal load versus the displacement response for the wall under cyclic loading are presented in Fig.8(a)-(f). The skeleton curve for the wall is the envelope formed by connecting all of the peak points of the hysteretic curve (connecting the peak points of the hysteretic curve in the first cycle of the three cyclic groups). The maximum load on the skeleton curve and the corresponding lateral displacement are defined as the peak load,Pmax, and the corresponding deformation,Δmax,of the wall, respectively. After the peak load is reached, the load on the skeleton curve and the corresponding lateral displacement when the load decreases to 85% of the maximum load is defined as the ultimate load,Pu,and corresponding deformation,Δu,of the wall, respectively. The yield load and yield displacement were determined using the area reciprocal method on the skeleton curve according to JGJ 101-2015[12]. The ductility coefficient is the ratio of the peak displacement and yield displacement, i.e.,μ=Δu/Δy. The energy dissipation factor,E, is used to measure the energy dissipation capacity of the specimen; the calculation is given in Eq. (3) and Fig.9.

    (3)

    Fig.8 Hysteresis curve of

    Fig.9 Calculation method of energy dissipation coefficient

    3.3 Analysis of the test results

    The test data for the six composite walls are summarized in Table 4. From Fig.8(a)-(f) and Table 4, the following can be observed:

    All six composite walls had similar hysteresis curves. Owing to the improvement in the lateral stiffness of the wall caused by the diagonal bracing and the gusset plate, the hysteresis curves were full and fusiform at the beginning of the test, and almost no wall slipping occurred. When the horizontal displacement reached a certain degree, the wall entered the plastic stage, the hysteresis curve became arched, the area of the hysteresis loop increased, and the hysteresis curve exhibited a "pinch" phenomenon. At the same horizontal displacement, the area of the hysteresis curve decreased with the increasing number of cycles, and the bearing capacity decreased. In the process of horizontal pushing and pulling, the wall exhibited some "no-load slipping" behavior. However, the unloading stiffness was relatively large, the curve of the unloading phase had an obvious slope, and the wall had a little restoring force. Thus the residual deformation of unloading was relatively small. As the horizontal displacement continued to increase, the stiffness of the wall gradually decreased, and the hysteresis curve transformed from a bow-shape to an inverse S-shape. At the end of the test, the stiffness degradation of the wall was intensified, the bearing capacity was significantly reduced, the slip of the wall increased, and the horizontal segment of the hysteresis loop became longer. At this time, the energy dissipation capacity of the wall was low, and the "pinching" phenomenon in the middle of the hysteresis loop was more obvious. The energy dissipation capacity of wall A1 was better than that of walls A2 or A3.

    Table 4 Data processing results of wall shear test

    The shear bearing capacity of wall specimen A2 was 38.79% higher than that of wall specimen A1, but the difference in the ductility coefficient,, of the two was not significant, indicating that the restraint effect of the panel on the wall was strong and the shear bearing capacity of the wall was improved markedly. The shear bearing capacity of wall specimen A3 was 7.5% higher than that of wall specimen A2 However, the difference in the ductility coefficient,, was not significant, indicating that the shear bearing capacity and ductility coefficient of the wall were improved by the action of the large axial compression ratio but not significantly.

    4 Finite element analysis

    4.1 Finite element verification

    Finite element (FE) models of the tested composite walls were constructed using the FE software ABAQUS 6.14. S4R shell elements with linear reduced integration were used to simulate the wall skeleton, gusset plate, and OSB panel. The FE model of wall A2 is shown in Fig.10.

    Fig.10 Finite element model of wall

    The grid size of the wall steel skeleton and OSB panel was 20 mm, while the grid size of the gusset plate was 10 mm. The following values were used: for the steel, a yield strengthfy=358 MPa, modulus of elasticityE=178 820 MPa, and Poisson’s ratiov=0.3; for the OSB panel, which was simplified as an isotropic material, a tensile strengthfu= 7.86 MPa, modulus of elasticityE=3 500 MPa, and Poisson’s ratiov=0.3. The self-tapping screw connection was created from the joint section in the interaction module and the translation type of the self-tapping screw connection was defined as a sliding plane. The rotation type was defined such that the U1 of each connection in the local coordinate system (perpendicular to the plane of the panel) was constrained, while U2 (the direction of the vertical actuator) and U3 (the direction of the horizontal actuator) had editable degrees of freedom. Based on shear tests of the self-tapping screw connection, the load-displacement curves for the connection between the OSB panel and steel plate and the steel plate-steel plate were obtained as the parameter options for this connection section[13]. The six degrees of freedom were constrained in the global coordinate system of the web of the bottom beam to simulate the fixed boundary conditions at the bottom of the wall. Reference point RP-1 was established for coupling the connection with the web of the top beam of the wall.

    Besides the degrees of freedom in the movement direction of the top beam represented by U2 and U3, the other four degrees of freedom were constrained. Meanwhile, for reference point RP-1, the displacement-loading amplitude was set to be the same as the displacement of the hysteretic loading to simulate the loading process of the tests.

    A comparison between the hysteresis curve obtained with the FE analysis and the hysteresis curve obtained in the experiments is shown in Fig.11. A similar comparison of the skeleton curves is shown in Fig.12, and comparisons of the FE and experimental yield load, peak load, and shear bearing capacity is given in Table 5.

    Fig.11, 12, and Table 5 indicate that the hysteresis curve and skeleton curve obtained with the FE analysis were roughly consistent with the experimental curves. However, the hysteresis loop from the FE results is fuller than that from the experimental results.

    Table 5 Comparison between the average of the experimental results and the finite element analysis results

    The error of the yield load and yield displacement, peak load and peak displacement, and shear bearing capacity of the wall between the FE analysis and the experimental results was generally less than 15%, which indicates that the FE model can effectively simulate the mechanical performance of the wall under hysteresis loading, and the finite element model is reliable.

    Fig.11 Comparison of the hysteresis curve between the finite element and

    Fig.12 Comparison of the skeleton curve between the finite element and

    4.2 Influence of the yield strength of steel on the seismic performance of the wall

    Based on the FE model of the cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall with a single-sided OSB panel and diagonal bracing (wall A2), the influence of steel strength grades Q235 (fy=245 N/mm2) and Q345 (fy=358 N/mm2) on the mechanical properties of the wall was investigated. The FE modeling method was the same as in Section 4.1, and the vertical load was 80 kN. Comparisons of the obtained hysteresis curves and skeleton curves are shown in Fig.13.

    As shown in Fig.13, compared with the Q235 steel wall, the yield load of the Q345 steel wall was increased by 39.68%, the yield displacement was increased by 37.08%, the peak load was increased by 38.25%, the peak displacement was increased by 25.61%, and the shear bearing capacity was increased by 35.31%. The shear bearing capacity of the composite wall was thus significantly improved by increasing the yield strength of the steel skeleton. This is because the failure of the wall was mainly caused by the yielding of the studs and guide rails, the yielding or fracture of the diagonal bracing at the area of the gusset plate during the process of tension and compression, the shear failure of the screws at the area of joint plate and the corner of the wall plate, and the shear failure of the wall panel. Therefore, the yield strength of the steel is an important factor affecting the shear bearing capacity of walls with diagonal bracing.

    Fig.13 The hysteresis and skeleton curves of finite element

    4.3 Influence of the vertical load on the seismic performance of the wall

    Based on the FE model of the cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall with a single-sided OSB panel and diagonal bracing (wall A2), the influence of varying the vertical load (0, 80, 120, 160, 200, 240, 280, and 320 kN) on the mechanical properties of the wall was investigated. The FE modeling method was the same as in Section 4.1. The specimen numbering scheme is summarized in Table 6. A comparison of the skeleton curves for the eight models is shown in Fig.14. The relationship between the peak load and the axial compression ratio of the wall is shown in Fig.15, and the results of the FE analysis of the wall specimens are presented in Table 6.

    Table 6 The finite element analysis results of the walls

    Fig.14 The comparison of skeleton

    Fig.15 The relationship between peak load and axial

    As indicated in Table 6, Fig.14, and Fig.15, the load-displacement curves of the walls under a vertical load exhibited roughly the same trend, and there was little variation in the peak load. With the increasing axial compression ratio, the peak load of the wall gradually increased, and the content of this increase varied from high to low. When the axial compression ratio reached approximately 0.6, the peak load of the wall tended to be stable. The yield displacement of the wall increased with the increasing axial compression ratio, which indicates that the lateral stiffness of the wall also increased with the increasing vertical load.

    For the ordinary steel plate shear wall, the steel plate was confined only by the steel frame and the middle area of the steel plate was unconstrained. The vertical load would lead to the increase of the out-of-plane deformation of the steel plate shear wall, and the reduction of lateral stiffness and shear bearing capacity[5]. But for the cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall, the application of a vertical load was likely to strengthen the constraint effect of the panel on the steel skeleton. The shear bearing capacity under a vertical load of 320 kN (axial compression ratio of 0.64) was 5.9% higher than that under no vertical load. The increase was not obvious, and the specific reasons need to be studied in further research.

    In conclusion, the application of a vertical load was likely to strengthen the constraint effect of the panel on the steel skeleton. The bearing capacity and lateral stiffness of the wall both slightly increased with the increasing axial compression ratio. When the axial compression ratio reached approximately 0.6, the peak load of the wall tended to be stable.

    5 Design suggestions for cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls with diagonal bracing

    Based on the safety factor for the allowable stress design in American code AISI-15[14], the "equal safety factor" principle is used to approximate the "equivalent resistance partial factor" according to the probability limit-state design method in China. This is then combined with the yield bearing capacity to obtain the design value for the shear bearing capacity of composite walls. This method ensures that the calculation results are basically the same as the reliability in the American code.

    Allowable stress design (ASD) for horizontal earthquake action can be described as follows

    (4)

    whereSEhkis the standard value of the horizontal shear force of the wall under horizontal earthquake action;Pnominalis the "nominal shear strength" of the wall, which is taken as the unit peak load of the wall,Pmax; andKis the safety factor, which is defined as 2.5 under horizontal earthquake action.

    The expression for the probability limit state design method in China for horizontal earthquake action is as follows

    (5)

    where,γ0is the coefficient for the importance of a structure, which is generally taken as 1.0;γEhis the partial factor of the horizontal earthquake action, taken as 1.3;Pkis the standard value of the shear bearing capacity of the wall, taken as the unit yield load of the wall,Py[11]; andγRis the partial factor for the resistance of the wall.

    The monomials on the right sides of Eqs. (4) and (5) were equated and simplified to obtain the partial factor for the resistance of the wall under the action of a horizontal earthquake.

    (6)

    At present, structural design in China employs the probability limit state design method. The determination of the design value for the shear bearing capacity of the wall,P, mainly involves the standard value of the shear bearing capacity,Pk,and the resistance partial factor,γR, of the structure, as follows[15]

    (7)

    By substituting Eq.(6) into Eq.(7), the design value for the shear bearing capacity of the wall under horizontal earthquake action can be obtained as follows

    P=0.52Pmax

    (8)

    According to the above method, the recommended design values for the shear bearing capacity per unit length of the composite walls obtained through the experiments and FE analysis are listed in Table 7.

    Table 7 Shear capacity design values under horizontal earthquake action

    Based on the results in Table 7, test behavior observations, and the wall structure and influencing factors for the shear bearing capacity of the wall, the following design suggestions for cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls with diagonal bracing are proposed:

    1)In the tests, the failure of the composite wall with a single-sided OSB panel mostly occurred in the gusset plate area and the corner of the panel. This was shown by the shear fracture of the screws in the gusset plate area, the breakage of the diagonal bracing caused by the reciprocating deformation of the flange in the process of tension and compression, the yielding of the studs and the lower guide rail, and the shear fracture at the corner of the panel. Finally, shear fracture of the screws on the gusset plate represented the failure of the wall. Therefore, it is recommended to include a gusset plate at the intersection of the diagonal bracing and the steel skeleton in the design of these walls.

    2)The yield strength of steel is an important factor affecting the shear bearing capacity of walls with diagonal bracing. Thus, it is suggested that in the design of cold-formed thin-walled composite walls with diagonal bracing, steel with a higher yield strength should be selected.

    3)For the cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall, the application of a vertical load was likely to strengthen the constraint effect of the panel on the steel skeleton, and the shear bearing capacity under a vertical load of 320 kN (axial compression ratio of 0.64) was 5.9% higher than that under no vertical load. But the increase was not obvious, therefore, it is suggested that the influence of the vertical load on the shear bearing capacity of the wall should not be the focus of too much attention in the design of cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls with diagonal bracing.

    6 Conclusions

    In this study, through an experimental investigation and FE analysis of the seismic performance of diagonally braced cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls subjected to a vertical load, the following conclusions could be drawn:

    1)The failure of walls with no panel mostly occurred in the joint area. This manifested as inclined slippage and shear fracture of the screws in the gusset plate area, breakage of the diagonal bracing caused by the reciprocating deformation of the flange in the process of tension and compression, and yielding of the flange of the lower guide rail and the bottom of the middle studs. The failure mode observed in the composite wall with a single-sided OSB panel was mostly oblique slipping and shear fracture of the screws in the gusset plate area, severe deformation and yielding of the studs and the lower guide rail, and shear fracture of the screws at the corner of the panel and the joint area. The studs in composite walls with a higher axial pressure yielded earlier and exhibited more deformation when destroyed.

    2)The panel had a strong restraint effect on the composite wall and made a significant contribution to improving the shear bearing capacity of the diagonally braced wall. The yield strength of the steel was an important factor affecting the shear bearing capacity of walls with diagonal bracing. However, the axial compression ratio had little influence on the shear bearing capacity of the wall, and when the axial compression ratio reached a certain level, the shear bearing capacity fluctuated minimally and became stable.

    3)Based on the experiments and FE analysis and according to the design norms and theoretical background of JGJ 227-2011 and American code AISI-15, "the partial coefficient of resistance" of the wall was derived, and the design value for the shear bearing capacity of the wall under the action of a horizontal earthquake was determined, providing a reference to guide the structural design of these walls.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0700905) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51678060). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

    日韩中字成人| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 少妇 在线观看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久热在线av| 有码 亚洲区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲在久久综合| 蜜桃在线观看..| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 自线自在国产av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 嫩草影院入口| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 欧美另类一区| 午夜激情久久久久久久| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 日韩伦理黄色片| 精品一区二区免费观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 韩国精品一区二区三区 | 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 日本午夜av视频| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 在线天堂最新版资源| 国产成人精品在线电影| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 国产 一区精品| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 久久久精品区二区三区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 超碰97精品在线观看| 内地一区二区视频在线| 韩国精品一区二区三区 | 草草在线视频免费看| 久久这里只有精品19| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 国产成人91sexporn| 黑人高潮一二区| 色哟哟·www| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 国产成人精品福利久久| 另类精品久久| 国产精品免费大片| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 久久久精品94久久精品| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 全区人妻精品视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 插逼视频在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 午夜av观看不卡| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 一级毛片电影观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| av卡一久久| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 国产在线视频一区二区| 免费观看av网站的网址| 免费观看在线日韩| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 看免费av毛片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 大香蕉久久成人网| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 香蕉丝袜av| 满18在线观看网站| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 熟女电影av网| 精品福利永久在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 性色av一级| 国产高清三级在线| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 老司机影院成人| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 精品福利永久在线观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 欧美成人午夜精品| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 777米奇影视久久| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 在线观看人妻少妇| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产麻豆69| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| av在线app专区| videosex国产| 久久这里只有精品19| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 在线 av 中文字幕| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 9色porny在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 另类精品久久| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 高清毛片免费看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 狠狠婷婷综合久久久久久88av| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 中文字幕制服av| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产激情久久老熟女| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 黄色一级大片看看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 成人影院久久| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 精品福利永久在线观看| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| a 毛片基地| 日本91视频免费播放| 免费av不卡在线播放| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 最新中文字幕久久久久| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| freevideosex欧美| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| av免费在线看不卡| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 两性夫妻黄色片 | 韩国av在线不卡| 欧美97在线视频| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 日本91视频免费播放| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产永久视频网站| 有码 亚洲区| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| h视频一区二区三区| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 久久婷婷青草| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| xxx大片免费视频| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产成人精品一,二区| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 午夜日本视频在线| 一级片'在线观看视频| 美国免费a级毛片| 老女人水多毛片| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产av新网站| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 伊人久久国产一区二区| av卡一久久| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲性久久影院| 一区二区三区精品91| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 99热全是精品| 日韩成人伦理影院| 日韩中字成人| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看 | 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 中文欧美无线码| 免费观看性生交大片5| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 岛国毛片在线播放| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 欧美3d第一页| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 日本av免费视频播放| 精品第一国产精品| 超碰97精品在线观看| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 亚洲精品自拍成人| www.熟女人妻精品国产 | 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美性感艳星| 久热久热在线精品观看| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 精品一区二区免费观看| www日本在线高清视频| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 9191精品国产免费久久| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 久久青草综合色| 老熟女久久久| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 97在线视频观看| 飞空精品影院首页| 色94色欧美一区二区| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 99久久人妻综合| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 色哟哟·www| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 国产 精品1| 熟女av电影| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| kizo精华| 久久这里只有精品19| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 国产在视频线精品| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 尾随美女入室| 国产精品 国内视频| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 欧美人与善性xxx| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 只有这里有精品99| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| av免费观看日本| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产成人一区二区在线| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 伦精品一区二区三区| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 伦精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 欧美成人午夜精品| 岛国毛片在线播放| 桃花免费在线播放| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 高清av免费在线| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 人人澡人人妻人| 精品亚洲成国产av| 大香蕉久久网| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| www日本在线高清视频| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| av黄色大香蕉| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 久久午夜福利片| 赤兔流量卡办理| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产成人一区二区在线| 精品一区二区免费观看| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 熟女av电影| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产色婷婷99| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产精品无大码| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 欧美bdsm另类| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 黄片播放在线免费| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 少妇的逼水好多| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 久久人人爽人人片av| 熟女电影av网| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产 一区精品| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 久久av网站| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 一级爰片在线观看| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲成人手机| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 永久网站在线| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 在线天堂中文资源库| 天堂8中文在线网| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 美国免费a级毛片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| av在线播放精品| 国产探花极品一区二区| 在线观看国产h片| 18+在线观看网站| 国产精品免费大片| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 乱人伦中国视频| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 人妻系列 视频| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 午夜激情av网站| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产av国产精品国产| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 久久影院123| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久婷婷青草| 久久久精品94久久精品| 少妇的逼水好多| 精品第一国产精品| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 欧美性感艳星| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 久久久久网色| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 香蕉精品网在线| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 久久久久久人妻| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| videos熟女内射| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲第一av免费看| 高清av免费在线| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 久久影院123| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 午夜91福利影院| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 成人手机av| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产男女内射视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| av天堂久久9| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 最黄视频免费看| av在线app专区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 综合色丁香网| 亚洲成色77777| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 亚洲第一av免费看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 国产探花极品一区二区| 热re99久久国产66热| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| av.在线天堂| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 观看美女的网站| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三|