• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Seismic performance of diagonally braced cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls

    2021-03-07 12:14:42,,,,,

    , , , , ,

    1. School of Civil Engineering; Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, P.R. China; 2. Shandong Laigang Constuction Co. Ltd, Qingdao 266000, Shandong, P.R. China; 3. Management Committee of Dafosi Scenic Area, Chongqing 402660, P.R. China; 4. BNBM House Co. Ltd, Beijing 100070, P.R. China)

    Abstract: Through an experimental investigation of the seismic performance of diagonally braced cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls subjected to vertical loads, the mechanical properties, failure modes, and hysteresis properties of the walls were elucidated. In addition, the influence of a sheathing panel on the hysteresis performance, ductility, and energy dissipation of the composite walls was analyzed. The experimental results show that the shear bearing capacity of the single-sided oriented strand board (OSB) panel wall was increased by 38.79% compared with the non-panel wall under the same vertical load. The shear bearing capacity, ductility coefficient, μ, and energy dissipation factor, E, of the single-sided OSB panel composite wall with an axial compression ratio of 0.24 were increased by 7.5%, 4.5%, and 4.1%, respectively, compared to the wall with an axial compression ratio of 0.16; however, the yield displacement was reduced by 8.1%. The cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall with diagonal bracing exhibited good seismic performance. After verifying the reliability of the finite element model, the influence of the axial compression ratio of the wall stud and the yield strength of the steel components on the mechanical performance of the wall was investigated through a variable parameter analysis. The results showed that with the increasing axial compression ratio, the shear bearing capacity of the wall was improved. In addition, reducing the yield strength of the steel components significantly reduced the shear capacity of the composite wall. Finally, according to the Technical Specification for Low-rise Cold-formed Thin-walled Steel Buildings (JGJ 227-2011) and AISI S400-15, the resistance partial coefficient of the wall was derived, which determines the design value for the shear bearing capacity under a horizontal earthquake.

    Keywords:cold-formed thin-walled steel; composite wall; diagonal support; seismic performance; experimental research; finite element analysis

    1 Introduction

    In recent years, green prefabricated buildings have been vigorously promoted in China, and cold-formed thin-walled steel structure residential systems have rapidly emerged as representative prefabricated building structures. The composite wall, which consists of a panel material and steel keel, is the main bearing member of cold-formed thin-walled steel structure residential systems.

    Blum et al.[1]studied the bending support of cold-formed thin-walled steel walls. Through tests and analysis, design expressions for support stiffness and strength were proposed, and the concepts of minimum support stiffness and corresponding imperfections were introduced. Hikita et al.[2]carried out an investigation of the shear bearing capacity of a light steel frame shear wall subjected to an extra gravity load under monotonic and low-cycle reverse loads. The results showed that the existence of an additional gravity load had no obvious effect on the shear bearing capacity of a steel frame shear wall with a plate. Tian et al.[3]carried out a theoretical analysis of a cross flat steel-braced cold-formed steel frame wall. Based on the angle-displacement method, a first-order elastic analysis was used to predict the shear bearing capacity of the cross flat steel braced cold-formed steel frame wall. Gad et al.[4]studied the interaction between the components of a cold-formed steel composite wall and the shear bearing capacity of the whole wall. Horizontal low-cycle reverse loading tests were carried out on a cold-formed steel wall with cross-bracing and a panel, revealing that the yield strength of the x-cross bracing controlled the bearing capacity of the wall.

    Liu[5]studied the hysteresis properties of a steel plate shear wall and an anti-buckling steel plate shear wall subjected to vertical loads. The results indicated that the shear bearing capacity and energy dissipation capacity of the steel plate shear wall and anti-buckling steel plate shear wall were reduced as a result of the vertical load, but the lateral stiffness of the anti-buckling steel plate shear wall was not affected by the vertical load. Hao et al.[6]studied the shear bearing capacity of a cross steel strip braced composite wall consisting of a cold-formed thin-walled steel frame and light weight mortar. A joint plate was added to the specimens to strengthen the screw connection between the brace and the steel skeleton in the experiments. The results showed that the shear bearing capacity of the composite wall was greatly improved by the joint plate. Dong[7]studied the shear bearing capacity of a cold-formed thin-walled composite wall with a sandwich steel plate. The results showed that the cross steel strip controlled the shear bearing capacity of the wall; reducing the screw spacing could improve the lateral stiffness and shear bearing capacity of the wall. Chen[8]carried out an investigation of the shear bearing capacity of a cold-formed thin-walled composite wall with cross bracing. It was noted that the buckling of the side column of the cross-braced wall under monotonic loading was caused by the eccentric tension, while the damage to the wall under a low-cycle reverse load was due to the extrusion deformation of the lower guide beam. Wang et al.[9]studied the seismic behavior of cold-formed thin-walled walls with diagonal braces. The results showed that the arrangement of the diagonal bracings resulted in improvement of the load bearing capacity, stiffness and energy dissipation of the walls. However, the diagonal brace increased the lateral performance to a limited extent, because the connection between the diagonal brace and the transverse brace was weak and buckling of the transverse brace occurred early. The integrity of the wall panel has a significant influence on the lateral performance of the wall. Reducing the screw spacing around the wall panel can improve the bearing capacity, stiffness, and energy dissipation capacity of the wall markedly; however, the ductility will decrease.

    Although there have been many experimental studies and theoretical analyses of the seismic performance of cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls, studies on the mechanical behavior of cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls are uncommon; systemic studies on the seismic performance of such walls under vertical loading are still lacking. In this study, an experimental investigation and theoretical analysis of a diagonally braced cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall under vertical loading were carried out to investigate the mechanical properties, failure modes, and hysteresis properties of the wall. In addition, the influence of the axial compression ratio of the wall studs and the yield strength of the steel components on the seismic performance of the wall were also investigated. Based on the results of the experiments and finite element parameter analysis, a design method and suggestions for these walls in seismic design are proposed.

    2 Wall Design

    2.1 Wall Structure

    In these experiments, six full-sale cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls with diagonal bracing were designed and divided into three groups based on the inclusion of a panel and the value of the vertical force,each group of walls was identical in material, size, and loading method. The configurations are detailed in Table 1. The first group of walls was placed under a vertical load of 80 kN without a panel. The second group was placed under a vertical load of 80 kN and included a single-sided oriented-strand board (OSB) panel. The third group was placed under a vertical load of 120 kN and included a single-sided OSB panel. The first and second groups were compared to analyze the effect of the panel on the shear bearing capacity of the wall. The second and third groups were compared to analyze the effect of different vertical loads (i.e., the axial compression ratio of the wall stud) on the shear bearing capacity of the wall with a single-sided OSB panel. The wall numbers and test parameters are listed in Table 1.

    The columns of the composite wall were composed of C-section cold-formed thin-walled steel member (C140 mm×40 mm×11 mm×1.2 mm) spaced at 400 mm; the upper guide beam, lower guide beam, and diagonal bracing of the wall were composed of U-section cold-formed thin-walled steel member (U143 mm×40 mm×1.2 mm). The columns on both sides of the wall and the middle column were composed of two C-shaped cold-formed thin-walled steel members and connected to the I-section by a double row of self-tapping screws. In addition, the side columns were covered by U-section cold-formed thin-walled steel members to avoid premature buckling, and the self-tapping screws were spaced at 100 mm. The diagonal bracing was composed of two C-section cold-formed thin-walled steel members, which were connected to the I-section by a double row of self-tapping screws. The openings at the middle of the diagonal bracing were used to keep the column continuous. To strengthen the screw connection between the diagonal bracing and the column, the inter-section of the diagonal bracing and the column was strengthened locally by a 3-mm-thick gusset plate. The thickness of the OSB panel of the wall was 12 mm, and the size of a single panel was 2.4 mm× 1.2 mm (height × width). On the inside and outside of the wall, self-tapping screws were spaced at intervals of 150 mm between the panel and the steel frame. The steel frames were assembled using ST4800 self-tapping screws, the OSB panel and the steel frame were assembled using ST4835 self-tapping screws, and the connection between the anti-drawing component and the steel frame was made with ST5330 self-tapping screws. The anti-drawing components at the four corners of the wall were connected to the upper guide beam and the lower guide beam by M16 bolts, while the upper guide beam and the upper guide were connected to the loading device with M12 bolts. Detailed dimensions of the wall are depicted in Fig.1.

    2.2 Material properties

    The material properties of the Q345 steel and the OSB panel were measured as set out in standard GB/T228.1-2010[10]by making plate specimens. The measurement results for the Q345 steel and the material properties of the OSB panel are listed in Tables 2 and 3, respectively.

    Table 2 Material property test results of steel

    Table 3 Physical properties of 12-mm-thick OSB panel

    Fig.1 Dimension of walls(mm)

    2.3 Loading device and testing procedure

    The test loading device is shown in Fig.2. At the four corners of the top and bottom of the wall, the wall and the top and bottom beams of the loading device were connected with M16 bolts, in which 150 mm×150 mm×20 mm (length×width×thickness) rectangular cushion blocks were arranged, to allow the vertical load to be accurately transferred to each wall stud. In addition, the wall was fastened to the slots in the top and bottom beams of the loading device by M12 bolts spaced at a distance of 400 mm. The horizontal actuator was connected to the web of the top guide beam through the top loading beam. On the lateral side of the top loading beam, sliding bracings were arranged to provide a lateral restraint force and prevent loss of out-of-plane stability.

    Fig.2 Test loading device

    In accordance with the requirements for shear tests of cold-formed thin-walled steel walls set out in standard JGJ 227-2011[11], the measurement points were arranged as shown in Fig.3. Eight displacement sensors were arranged to measure the displacements of the wall specimens and the loading device (Fig.3). Sensor D1 was used to measure the displacement of the horizontal actuator connected to the top beam, sensor D2 measured the horizontal relative displacement between the wall specimen and the top loading beam, and sensors D3 and D4 measured the relative slipping displacements between the wall and the bottom loading beam. Sensors D5 and D6 were used to measure the vertical relative displacement between the wall and the bottom loading beam; sensors D7 and D8 measured the vertical relative displacement between the bottom loading beam and the ground. In Fig.3, “A” represents the vertical distance from sensor D2 to the bottom surface of the top loading beam, which was set as 600 mm; “B” and “C” represent the horizontal distances from sensors D5 and D6 to the lateral surface of the side column of the wall, which were set as 100 mm.

    Fig.3 Displacement meter arrangement(mm)

    2.4 Loading process

    The previous finite element simulation predicted a yield displacement of the wall of 12 mm. The tests were conducted using the displacement control method under a horizontal low-cycle reverse load. A preload was applied at a rate of 0.4 mm/s with a displacement increment per stage of 0.125Δyuntil 3 mm and cycled once. Then, the formal loading stage was applied, with a displacement increment per stage of 4 mm until 12 mm (yield displacement), and cycled once per stage. After yielding, the wall was loaded with a displacement increment per stage of 0.5Δyand cycled three times until the wall was destroyed.

    In these tests, the vertical force was loaded to the specified value once through the vertical actuator. The vertical force was initially kept constant and readings from all sensors were recorded simultaneously. The vertical force was applied using the load-control method at a rate of 0.2 kN/s. During the horizontal loading process, the displacement data for each sensor and the actuator load were collected and recorded by a ZI-160 data collection instrument.

    3 Test results and analysis

    3.1 Test observations

    3.1.1 Wall A1

    For wall A1, the experimental phenomenon was basically the same, so only wall A1-1 is described. Owing to the low in-plane stiffness of the wall without a panel, the force increased slowly with increasing horizontal displacement; thus the change was not obvious in the early stage of the test. When the horizontal displacement reached 12 mm, obvious wrinkles appeared in the flange of the diagonal bracing close to the upper guide beam, and the thrust of the horizontal actuator reached 24.03 kN. With further increase in the horizontal displacement, the wrinkles in the left and right diagonal bracings occurring at the area of the gusset plate became more obvious. When the horizontal displacement reached 18 mm, the local buckling of the diagonal bracing subjected to pressure was obvious, and the deformation was larger, as shown in Fig.4(a).

    Fig.4 Failure of wall A1-1

    When the horizontal displacement reached 24 mm, the self-tapping screws of the gusset plate in the middle bottom of the wall exhibited sliding and then shear failure as the test was carried out. At the inter-section with the middle gusset plate, the diagonal bracing exhibited severe bending, and some of the self-tapping screws were torn out, as shown in Fig.4(b) and (c). Meanwhile, the gusset plate and the wall frame connection exhibited obvious dislocation. As the horizontal displacement continued to increase, the deformation of the wall also continued to increase, but the load began to decrease. When the horizontal displacement reached 42 mm, the left bracing was pulled to breaking, as shown in Fig.4(d). With increasing horizontal displacement, the deformation of the wall was accelerated, and the load decreased. When the load reached 85% of the ultimate load, the test was stopped.

    3.1.2 Wall A2

    For wall A2, the experimental phenomenon was basically the same, so only wall A2-1 is described. Owing to the effect of the OSB panel on the lateral stiffness of the wall, the force increased rapidly with increasing horizontal displacement. At the elastic stage of the wall, the flange of the diagonal bracing close to the upper and lower guide beam exhibited obvious wrinkles in the tension and compression process, as shown in Fig.5(a). When the horizontal displacement reached 18 mm, the bending of the left and right diagonal bracing at the gusset plate became more obvious, and the screws connecting the OSB panel to the steel skeleton at the corners became cut into the panel, as shown in Fig.5(b). When the horizontal displacement reached 30 mm, the bearing capacity reached 50.12 kN. The compression diagonal bracing at the gusset plate in the middle bottom of the wall exhibited intense bending, while the lower guide beam and the stud exhibited different levels of buckling, as shown in Fig.5(c). At the joint area on the back of the OSB panel, the screws became embedded into the panel, causing minor shedding of the OSB panel, as shown in Fig.5(d). When the horizontal displacement reached 36 mm, the screws on the gusset plate at the intersection of the V-shaped diagonal bracing were torn out, the diagonal bracing and upper and lower guide beams were severely deformed, and sliding occurred between the gusset plate and the guide beam, as shown in Fig.5(e).

    When the horizontal displacement reached 48 mm, the screws connecting the middle gusset plate and the lower guide beam were torn out, the joint area was severely deformed, and the screws at the bottom corner on the back of the OSB panel were torn out. This resulted in different levels of shedding of the OSB panel, as shown in Fig.5(f). With increasing horizontal displacement, the deformation of the wall accelerated and the load decreased. When the load reached 85% of the ultimate load, the test was stopped. The global failure mode is shown in Fig.5(g).

    Fig.5 Failure of wall A2-1

    3.1.3 Wall A3

    For wall A3, the experimental phenomenon was basically the same, so only wall A3-2 is described. In the elastic stage, the test behavior of wall A3-1 and A3-2 was similar to that of wall A2-1 and A2-2. In the reverse loading process, the flange of the diagonal bracing subjected to pressure at the gusset plate exhibited obvious local buckling, as shown in Fig.6(a). When the horizontal displacement reached 12 mm, the screws in the bottom corner of the OSB panel became embedded into the panel, the wrinkles of the compressive diagonal bracing at the gusset plate became more obvious, and a noticeable relative angle occurred between the gusset plate and lower guide beam, as shown in Fig.6(b). When the horizontal displacement increased from 12 mm to 18 mm, the upper parts of the left and right studs exhibited obvious buckling; the deformation of the flange and crimping of the studs is shown in Fig.6(c). With further increase in the horizontal displacement, the force applied to the wall increased. When the displacement reached 24 mm, the bearing capacity reached 55.99 kN. The buckling of the middle stud near the lower guide beam at this point is shown in Fig.6(d). As the horizontal displacement continued to increase, the bearing capacity began to decrease, and the screws in the middle part of the gusset plate were torn out, as shown in Fig.6(e).

    At the joint area on the bottom of the OSB panel, the screws were cut into the panel and caused minor shedding of the panel. As the horizontal displacement continued to increase, the screws connecting the lower guide beam and the middle part of the gusset plate were torn out, and the diagonal bracing subjected to pressure became severely wrinkled and deformed. When the horizontal displacement reached 48 mm, the bearing capacity decreased to 39.62 kN. Meanwhile, the screws connecting the panel and the steel skeleton were cut into the panel, and different degrees of separation occurred between the corner of the panel and the steel skeleton, as shown in Fig.6(f). With increasing horizontal displacement, the deformation of the wall accelerated and the load decreased. When the load reached 85% of the ultimate load, the test was stopped. The global failure mode is shown in Fig.6(g).

    Fig.6 Failure of wall A3-2

    The observed test behaviors reveal that without the constraint from the panel, the shear bearing capacity of wall A1 was small, but the lateral stiffness of the wall was improved owing to the effect of the V-shaped diagonal bracing and the gusset plate. Most of the damage occurred in the area of the gusset plate, and the shear fracture of the screws and breaking of the diagonal bracing represented failure of the wall. Compared with wall A1, the lateral stiffness and shear bearing capacity of wall A2 were improved by the constraint from the panel. The shear failure of the screws in the gusset plate and panel represented failure of the wall. Comparing wall A3 with wall A2, as a result of the increased vertical load, the side studs of wall A3 exhibited buckling earlier, but both wall A3 and A2 were destroyed when the screws on the gusset plate and panel underwent shear fracture and the middle studs and guide beams yielded.

    3.2 Test data processing

    The whole lateraldisplacement,0, at the top of the wall measured during the tests consists of three parts:is the lateral displacement of the top of the wall when the wall undergoes rotation caused by the extension of the anchor bolts,lis the relative sliding displacement between the wall and the pedestal, andis the actual shear deformation of the wall (Fig.7).

    Fig.7 Shear-displacement model of composite

    Thus, the actual lateral displacement at the top of the wall, which is the shear deformation (), can be expressed with Eq.(1).

    Δ=δ=δ0-δl-δφ

    (1)

    The actual shear deformation of the wall is as follows

    (2)

    The hysteretic loops of the horizontal load versus the displacement response for the wall under cyclic loading are presented in Fig.8(a)-(f). The skeleton curve for the wall is the envelope formed by connecting all of the peak points of the hysteretic curve (connecting the peak points of the hysteretic curve in the first cycle of the three cyclic groups). The maximum load on the skeleton curve and the corresponding lateral displacement are defined as the peak load,Pmax, and the corresponding deformation,Δmax,of the wall, respectively. After the peak load is reached, the load on the skeleton curve and the corresponding lateral displacement when the load decreases to 85% of the maximum load is defined as the ultimate load,Pu,and corresponding deformation,Δu,of the wall, respectively. The yield load and yield displacement were determined using the area reciprocal method on the skeleton curve according to JGJ 101-2015[12]. The ductility coefficient is the ratio of the peak displacement and yield displacement, i.e.,μ=Δu/Δy. The energy dissipation factor,E, is used to measure the energy dissipation capacity of the specimen; the calculation is given in Eq. (3) and Fig.9.

    (3)

    Fig.8 Hysteresis curve of

    Fig.9 Calculation method of energy dissipation coefficient

    3.3 Analysis of the test results

    The test data for the six composite walls are summarized in Table 4. From Fig.8(a)-(f) and Table 4, the following can be observed:

    All six composite walls had similar hysteresis curves. Owing to the improvement in the lateral stiffness of the wall caused by the diagonal bracing and the gusset plate, the hysteresis curves were full and fusiform at the beginning of the test, and almost no wall slipping occurred. When the horizontal displacement reached a certain degree, the wall entered the plastic stage, the hysteresis curve became arched, the area of the hysteresis loop increased, and the hysteresis curve exhibited a "pinch" phenomenon. At the same horizontal displacement, the area of the hysteresis curve decreased with the increasing number of cycles, and the bearing capacity decreased. In the process of horizontal pushing and pulling, the wall exhibited some "no-load slipping" behavior. However, the unloading stiffness was relatively large, the curve of the unloading phase had an obvious slope, and the wall had a little restoring force. Thus the residual deformation of unloading was relatively small. As the horizontal displacement continued to increase, the stiffness of the wall gradually decreased, and the hysteresis curve transformed from a bow-shape to an inverse S-shape. At the end of the test, the stiffness degradation of the wall was intensified, the bearing capacity was significantly reduced, the slip of the wall increased, and the horizontal segment of the hysteresis loop became longer. At this time, the energy dissipation capacity of the wall was low, and the "pinching" phenomenon in the middle of the hysteresis loop was more obvious. The energy dissipation capacity of wall A1 was better than that of walls A2 or A3.

    Table 4 Data processing results of wall shear test

    The shear bearing capacity of wall specimen A2 was 38.79% higher than that of wall specimen A1, but the difference in the ductility coefficient,, of the two was not significant, indicating that the restraint effect of the panel on the wall was strong and the shear bearing capacity of the wall was improved markedly. The shear bearing capacity of wall specimen A3 was 7.5% higher than that of wall specimen A2 However, the difference in the ductility coefficient,, was not significant, indicating that the shear bearing capacity and ductility coefficient of the wall were improved by the action of the large axial compression ratio but not significantly.

    4 Finite element analysis

    4.1 Finite element verification

    Finite element (FE) models of the tested composite walls were constructed using the FE software ABAQUS 6.14. S4R shell elements with linear reduced integration were used to simulate the wall skeleton, gusset plate, and OSB panel. The FE model of wall A2 is shown in Fig.10.

    Fig.10 Finite element model of wall

    The grid size of the wall steel skeleton and OSB panel was 20 mm, while the grid size of the gusset plate was 10 mm. The following values were used: for the steel, a yield strengthfy=358 MPa, modulus of elasticityE=178 820 MPa, and Poisson’s ratiov=0.3; for the OSB panel, which was simplified as an isotropic material, a tensile strengthfu= 7.86 MPa, modulus of elasticityE=3 500 MPa, and Poisson’s ratiov=0.3. The self-tapping screw connection was created from the joint section in the interaction module and the translation type of the self-tapping screw connection was defined as a sliding plane. The rotation type was defined such that the U1 of each connection in the local coordinate system (perpendicular to the plane of the panel) was constrained, while U2 (the direction of the vertical actuator) and U3 (the direction of the horizontal actuator) had editable degrees of freedom. Based on shear tests of the self-tapping screw connection, the load-displacement curves for the connection between the OSB panel and steel plate and the steel plate-steel plate were obtained as the parameter options for this connection section[13]. The six degrees of freedom were constrained in the global coordinate system of the web of the bottom beam to simulate the fixed boundary conditions at the bottom of the wall. Reference point RP-1 was established for coupling the connection with the web of the top beam of the wall.

    Besides the degrees of freedom in the movement direction of the top beam represented by U2 and U3, the other four degrees of freedom were constrained. Meanwhile, for reference point RP-1, the displacement-loading amplitude was set to be the same as the displacement of the hysteretic loading to simulate the loading process of the tests.

    A comparison between the hysteresis curve obtained with the FE analysis and the hysteresis curve obtained in the experiments is shown in Fig.11. A similar comparison of the skeleton curves is shown in Fig.12, and comparisons of the FE and experimental yield load, peak load, and shear bearing capacity is given in Table 5.

    Fig.11, 12, and Table 5 indicate that the hysteresis curve and skeleton curve obtained with the FE analysis were roughly consistent with the experimental curves. However, the hysteresis loop from the FE results is fuller than that from the experimental results.

    Table 5 Comparison between the average of the experimental results and the finite element analysis results

    The error of the yield load and yield displacement, peak load and peak displacement, and shear bearing capacity of the wall between the FE analysis and the experimental results was generally less than 15%, which indicates that the FE model can effectively simulate the mechanical performance of the wall under hysteresis loading, and the finite element model is reliable.

    Fig.11 Comparison of the hysteresis curve between the finite element and

    Fig.12 Comparison of the skeleton curve between the finite element and

    4.2 Influence of the yield strength of steel on the seismic performance of the wall

    Based on the FE model of the cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall with a single-sided OSB panel and diagonal bracing (wall A2), the influence of steel strength grades Q235 (fy=245 N/mm2) and Q345 (fy=358 N/mm2) on the mechanical properties of the wall was investigated. The FE modeling method was the same as in Section 4.1, and the vertical load was 80 kN. Comparisons of the obtained hysteresis curves and skeleton curves are shown in Fig.13.

    As shown in Fig.13, compared with the Q235 steel wall, the yield load of the Q345 steel wall was increased by 39.68%, the yield displacement was increased by 37.08%, the peak load was increased by 38.25%, the peak displacement was increased by 25.61%, and the shear bearing capacity was increased by 35.31%. The shear bearing capacity of the composite wall was thus significantly improved by increasing the yield strength of the steel skeleton. This is because the failure of the wall was mainly caused by the yielding of the studs and guide rails, the yielding or fracture of the diagonal bracing at the area of the gusset plate during the process of tension and compression, the shear failure of the screws at the area of joint plate and the corner of the wall plate, and the shear failure of the wall panel. Therefore, the yield strength of the steel is an important factor affecting the shear bearing capacity of walls with diagonal bracing.

    Fig.13 The hysteresis and skeleton curves of finite element

    4.3 Influence of the vertical load on the seismic performance of the wall

    Based on the FE model of the cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall with a single-sided OSB panel and diagonal bracing (wall A2), the influence of varying the vertical load (0, 80, 120, 160, 200, 240, 280, and 320 kN) on the mechanical properties of the wall was investigated. The FE modeling method was the same as in Section 4.1. The specimen numbering scheme is summarized in Table 6. A comparison of the skeleton curves for the eight models is shown in Fig.14. The relationship between the peak load and the axial compression ratio of the wall is shown in Fig.15, and the results of the FE analysis of the wall specimens are presented in Table 6.

    Table 6 The finite element analysis results of the walls

    Fig.14 The comparison of skeleton

    Fig.15 The relationship between peak load and axial

    As indicated in Table 6, Fig.14, and Fig.15, the load-displacement curves of the walls under a vertical load exhibited roughly the same trend, and there was little variation in the peak load. With the increasing axial compression ratio, the peak load of the wall gradually increased, and the content of this increase varied from high to low. When the axial compression ratio reached approximately 0.6, the peak load of the wall tended to be stable. The yield displacement of the wall increased with the increasing axial compression ratio, which indicates that the lateral stiffness of the wall also increased with the increasing vertical load.

    For the ordinary steel plate shear wall, the steel plate was confined only by the steel frame and the middle area of the steel plate was unconstrained. The vertical load would lead to the increase of the out-of-plane deformation of the steel plate shear wall, and the reduction of lateral stiffness and shear bearing capacity[5]. But for the cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall, the application of a vertical load was likely to strengthen the constraint effect of the panel on the steel skeleton. The shear bearing capacity under a vertical load of 320 kN (axial compression ratio of 0.64) was 5.9% higher than that under no vertical load. The increase was not obvious, and the specific reasons need to be studied in further research.

    In conclusion, the application of a vertical load was likely to strengthen the constraint effect of the panel on the steel skeleton. The bearing capacity and lateral stiffness of the wall both slightly increased with the increasing axial compression ratio. When the axial compression ratio reached approximately 0.6, the peak load of the wall tended to be stable.

    5 Design suggestions for cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls with diagonal bracing

    Based on the safety factor for the allowable stress design in American code AISI-15[14], the "equal safety factor" principle is used to approximate the "equivalent resistance partial factor" according to the probability limit-state design method in China. This is then combined with the yield bearing capacity to obtain the design value for the shear bearing capacity of composite walls. This method ensures that the calculation results are basically the same as the reliability in the American code.

    Allowable stress design (ASD) for horizontal earthquake action can be described as follows

    (4)

    whereSEhkis the standard value of the horizontal shear force of the wall under horizontal earthquake action;Pnominalis the "nominal shear strength" of the wall, which is taken as the unit peak load of the wall,Pmax; andKis the safety factor, which is defined as 2.5 under horizontal earthquake action.

    The expression for the probability limit state design method in China for horizontal earthquake action is as follows

    (5)

    where,γ0is the coefficient for the importance of a structure, which is generally taken as 1.0;γEhis the partial factor of the horizontal earthquake action, taken as 1.3;Pkis the standard value of the shear bearing capacity of the wall, taken as the unit yield load of the wall,Py[11]; andγRis the partial factor for the resistance of the wall.

    The monomials on the right sides of Eqs. (4) and (5) were equated and simplified to obtain the partial factor for the resistance of the wall under the action of a horizontal earthquake.

    (6)

    At present, structural design in China employs the probability limit state design method. The determination of the design value for the shear bearing capacity of the wall,P, mainly involves the standard value of the shear bearing capacity,Pk,and the resistance partial factor,γR, of the structure, as follows[15]

    (7)

    By substituting Eq.(6) into Eq.(7), the design value for the shear bearing capacity of the wall under horizontal earthquake action can be obtained as follows

    P=0.52Pmax

    (8)

    According to the above method, the recommended design values for the shear bearing capacity per unit length of the composite walls obtained through the experiments and FE analysis are listed in Table 7.

    Table 7 Shear capacity design values under horizontal earthquake action

    Based on the results in Table 7, test behavior observations, and the wall structure and influencing factors for the shear bearing capacity of the wall, the following design suggestions for cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls with diagonal bracing are proposed:

    1)In the tests, the failure of the composite wall with a single-sided OSB panel mostly occurred in the gusset plate area and the corner of the panel. This was shown by the shear fracture of the screws in the gusset plate area, the breakage of the diagonal bracing caused by the reciprocating deformation of the flange in the process of tension and compression, the yielding of the studs and the lower guide rail, and the shear fracture at the corner of the panel. Finally, shear fracture of the screws on the gusset plate represented the failure of the wall. Therefore, it is recommended to include a gusset plate at the intersection of the diagonal bracing and the steel skeleton in the design of these walls.

    2)The yield strength of steel is an important factor affecting the shear bearing capacity of walls with diagonal bracing. Thus, it is suggested that in the design of cold-formed thin-walled composite walls with diagonal bracing, steel with a higher yield strength should be selected.

    3)For the cold-formed thin-walled steel composite wall, the application of a vertical load was likely to strengthen the constraint effect of the panel on the steel skeleton, and the shear bearing capacity under a vertical load of 320 kN (axial compression ratio of 0.64) was 5.9% higher than that under no vertical load. But the increase was not obvious, therefore, it is suggested that the influence of the vertical load on the shear bearing capacity of the wall should not be the focus of too much attention in the design of cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls with diagonal bracing.

    6 Conclusions

    In this study, through an experimental investigation and FE analysis of the seismic performance of diagonally braced cold-formed thin-walled steel composite walls subjected to a vertical load, the following conclusions could be drawn:

    1)The failure of walls with no panel mostly occurred in the joint area. This manifested as inclined slippage and shear fracture of the screws in the gusset plate area, breakage of the diagonal bracing caused by the reciprocating deformation of the flange in the process of tension and compression, and yielding of the flange of the lower guide rail and the bottom of the middle studs. The failure mode observed in the composite wall with a single-sided OSB panel was mostly oblique slipping and shear fracture of the screws in the gusset plate area, severe deformation and yielding of the studs and the lower guide rail, and shear fracture of the screws at the corner of the panel and the joint area. The studs in composite walls with a higher axial pressure yielded earlier and exhibited more deformation when destroyed.

    2)The panel had a strong restraint effect on the composite wall and made a significant contribution to improving the shear bearing capacity of the diagonally braced wall. The yield strength of the steel was an important factor affecting the shear bearing capacity of walls with diagonal bracing. However, the axial compression ratio had little influence on the shear bearing capacity of the wall, and when the axial compression ratio reached a certain level, the shear bearing capacity fluctuated minimally and became stable.

    3)Based on the experiments and FE analysis and according to the design norms and theoretical background of JGJ 227-2011 and American code AISI-15, "the partial coefficient of resistance" of the wall was derived, and the design value for the shear bearing capacity of the wall under the action of a horizontal earthquake was determined, providing a reference to guide the structural design of these walls.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors wish to acknowledge the support of the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFC0700905) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51678060). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sponsors.

    婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 久久伊人香网站| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| xxx96com| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩 | 美女大奶头视频| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 国产99白浆流出| 美女免费视频网站| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 黄色成人免费大全| 久久亚洲精品不卡| av视频在线观看入口| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 午夜福利欧美成人| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 99热这里只有是精品50| 欧美日韩黄片免| 久久久成人免费电影| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 免费看十八禁软件| 一本精品99久久精品77| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 热99在线观看视频| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久亚洲真实| xxx96com| ponron亚洲| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | bbb黄色大片| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 操出白浆在线播放| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 香蕉丝袜av| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 超碰成人久久| 黄色女人牲交| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 在线观看一区二区三区| 一本综合久久免费| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 级片在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产野战对白在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| 高清在线国产一区| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 老司机福利观看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 久久久色成人| 中文资源天堂在线| 热99在线观看视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 宅男免费午夜| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 午夜免费激情av| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 日本五十路高清| 免费大片18禁| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 成人欧美大片| 一a级毛片在线观看| 性色avwww在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| www.自偷自拍.com| 长腿黑丝高跟| 麻豆av在线久日| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| a在线观看视频网站| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 免费av不卡在线播放| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 18禁观看日本| 99热只有精品国产| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 欧美三级亚洲精品| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 色在线成人网| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 我要搜黄色片| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美日本视频| 国产精品影院久久| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 两个人看的免费小视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产高清三级在线| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| av中文乱码字幕在线| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 日韩有码中文字幕| 小说图片视频综合网站| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 免费观看人在逋| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美3d第一页| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产成人av教育| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 久久久久久人人人人人| 嫩草影院入口| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 1024香蕉在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 超碰成人久久| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 亚洲第一电影网av| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 精品国产亚洲在线| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 十八禁网站免费在线| 久久草成人影院| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 91字幕亚洲| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 久久香蕉国产精品| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 久久久久性生活片| 999久久久国产精品视频| 中国美女看黄片| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久中文看片网| 成人三级做爰电影| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 午夜精品在线福利| 一区二区三区激情视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 我要搜黄色片| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产野战对白在线观看| 在线看三级毛片| 不卡一级毛片| 禁无遮挡网站| av天堂中文字幕网| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| a级毛片a级免费在线| 99re在线观看精品视频| cao死你这个sao货| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产黄片美女视频| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 久久这里只有精品19| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 97超视频在线观看视频| 午夜激情欧美在线| 岛国在线观看网站| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| av天堂中文字幕网| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| www国产在线视频色| 一级黄色大片毛片| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 三级毛片av免费| 1000部很黄的大片| 操出白浆在线播放| 男人舔奶头视频| bbb黄色大片| 午夜福利高清视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 午夜免费成人在线视频| xxxwww97欧美| 成人三级黄色视频| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产高清激情床上av| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 色视频www国产| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| www日本黄色视频网| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲片人在线观看| 国产高清videossex| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式 | 99riav亚洲国产免费| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 91av网一区二区| 国产日本99.免费观看| 一级黄色大片毛片| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产综合懂色| 男人舔奶头视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 九九在线视频观看精品| av在线天堂中文字幕| 午夜久久久久精精品| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 十八禁人妻一区二区| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 日韩有码中文字幕| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 色av中文字幕| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 欧美大码av| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 国产三级在线视频| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 成人18禁在线播放| www.999成人在线观看| 免费在线观看日本一区| 天天添夜夜摸| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 禁无遮挡网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 99re在线观看精品视频| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲中文av在线| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 在线a可以看的网站| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 99热6这里只有精品| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| www.精华液| 宅男免费午夜| 香蕉久久夜色| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 特级一级黄色大片| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 91老司机精品| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 超碰成人久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 三级毛片av免费| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 午夜a级毛片| 99热6这里只有精品| 午夜视频精品福利| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| www.自偷自拍.com| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 免费高清视频大片| 香蕉久久夜色| 性色avwww在线观看| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 最新中文字幕久久久久 | 美女免费视频网站| 日本一本二区三区精品| 天天添夜夜摸| 小说图片视频综合网站| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| av欧美777| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲国产看品久久| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 草草在线视频免费看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 丁香六月欧美| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产av在哪里看| 日本黄色片子视频| 91字幕亚洲| 国产美女午夜福利| 午夜福利高清视频| 操出白浆在线播放| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久性视频一级片| av在线蜜桃| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| avwww免费| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产日本99.免费观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久国产精品影院| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 中文字幕久久专区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 一本精品99久久精品77| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产高潮美女av| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 嫩草影院精品99| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 毛片女人毛片| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 欧美zozozo另类| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 观看美女的网站| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 日本在线视频免费播放| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| av在线蜜桃| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | www.www免费av| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 免费看十八禁软件| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久久久国内视频| 搡老岳熟女国产| 99国产精品99久久久久| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲国产看品久久| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 一本一本综合久久| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 午夜精品在线福利| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产午夜精品论理片| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 免费av毛片视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 日本黄大片高清|