• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Comparative study of indocyanine green-R15, Child-Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease score for prediction of hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

    2021-02-05 03:36:18ZhongWangYiFanWuZhenDongYueHongWeiZhaoLeiWangZhenHuaFanYuZhangFuQuanLiu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2021年5期

    Zhong Wang, Yi-Fan Wu, Zhen-Dong Yue, Hong-Wei Zhao, Lei Wang, Zhen-Hua Fan, Yu Zhang, Fu-Quan Liu

    Abstract

    Key Words: Hepatic encephalopathy; Indocyanine green-R15; Child-Pugh score; Model for end-stage liver disease score; Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; Portal hypertention

    INTRODUCTION

    Portal hypertension (PHT) is a very common and serious complication of chronic liver disease that often causes variceal bleeding and refractory ascites[1]. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is an important treatment option that has been shown to be efficacious in the management of PHT[2]. This procedure can alleviate portal hypertension by creating a large channel between the portal vein and hepatic vein[3]. Unfortunately, TIPS can cause severe complications such as heart failure, liver failure, and hepatic encephalopathy (HE). HE has a high incidence rate and is one of the most debilitating complications, which has a serious effect on the prognosis and survival of patients[4-6]. Although some risk factors are known, the identification of patients at risk of HE needs additional research. It is important to predict post-TIPS HE so that prevention and treatment measures can be implemented in high-risk HE patients to avoid adverse outcomes.

    The indocyanine green retention rate at 15 min (ICG-R15), the Child-Pugh score (CPS), and the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score have been developed to assess liver function[7,8]. The ICG-R15 is a relatively non-invasive, quick, and inexpensive method that has been widely used in patients with end-stage liver disease[9]. Zipprichet al[10]reported that ICG is the most accurate predictor among quantitative liver function tests of the survival of patients with cirrhosis[10]. A recent retrospective study demonstrated that preoperative ICG clearance was predictive of the surgical prognosis in patients undergoing hepatectomy[11]. The CPS was developed to assess the severity of liver cirrhosis in the clinic. This scoring system includes the bilirubin level, the albumin level, the prothrombin time, HE, and ascites[12]. The MELD score is used to predict the survival of patients undergoing TIPS and to evaluate patients with severe liver disease prior to transplantation. It includes three objective variables: The total bilirubin level, the creatinine level, and the international normalized ratio (INR)[13]. However, there are limited data on the use of liver function tools, especially the ICG-R15, to predict post-TIPS HE. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the clinical value of the MELD score, CPS, and ICG-R15 for the prediction of post-TIPS HE in patients with PHT.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Shijitan Hospital of Capital Medical University. The need to obtain informed consent was waived due to its retrospective nature.

    Patients

    All patients who underwent TIPS between January 2018 and June 2019 in the interventional department of Beijing Shijitan Hospital were included in this study.

    The following inclusion criteria were set: (1) Patients between 18 and 70 years old; (2) Patients diagnosed with PHT; and (3) Patients who underwent TIPS using a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent. The following exclusion criteria were set: (1) Preoperative HE; (2) Liver cancer; (3) Liver transplantation; (4) TIPS retreatment; (5) Non-cirrhotic PHT; (6) Surgical splenectomy; (7) Portal vein thrombosis; and (8) Urgent TIPS.

    Definitions

    PHT was defined as the radiological presence of significant splenomegaly, umbilical vein recanalization, and/or portosystemic shunts as well as a preoperative platelet count < 100 × 109/L. Portal pressure gradient values greater than or equal to 10 mmHg indicated clinically significant PHT[14].

    HE was defined as neuropsychiatric abnormalities ranging from mild neuropsychological dysfunction to deep coma and abnormal ammonia levels, after the exclusion of other possible causes of altered mental status by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging[15].

    Preoperative ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score

    All patients included in this study underwent the ICG-R15 test with a dyedensitogram (DDG) analyser (Japan, NIHON KOHDEN, model DDG-3300K) and an ICG clearance rate test (Japan, NIHON KOHDEN, model A). Within 30 s after the injection of ICG (0.5 mg/kg) into the median cubital vein, plasma ICG concentrations were monitoredviaa sensor attached to the patients’ finger. The ICG-R15 was subsequently assessed by a computer. The CPS score can be divided into three grades depending on the total points: Grade A (5-6 points), B (7-9 points), and C (≥ 10 points). The MELD score was calculated based on the following formula: R = 3.8 × ln (bilirubin mg/dL) + 11.2 × ln (INR) + 9.6 ln (creatinine mg/dL) + 6.4 × aetiology (biliary and alcoholic 0, others 1)[8,16](Figure 1).

    TIPS

    Under fluoroscopic guidance, a standard TIPS procedure was performed by an experienced interventional radiologist. A pigtail catheter was inserted into the right internal jugular vein leading to the hepatic veins. After finding the portal vein through the superior mesenteric artery or splenic artery using indirect portal venography, a stent (7, 8, or 10 mm, Fluency, Bard, United States) was placed to create a channel between the hepatic vein and the portal vein. Afterward, the portal vein pressure was measured at least three times, and a pressure transducer system (Combitrans, Braun Melsungen, Germany) with a multichannel monitor (Sirecust, Siemens, Germany) was used to measure the haemodynamic parameters.

    Statistical analysis

    Clinical and laboratory characteristics were collected from the medical records. SPSS (version 20.0, SPSS Inc., United States) and MedCalc were used for the statistical analyses. Descriptive data are presented as the mean ± SD, and qualitative variables are presented as frequencies or percentages. Student'sttest or the Mann-WhitneyUtest was used to compare quantitative variables between groups, and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine HE-related risk factors after TIPS. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) for the ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score were evaluated. The non-parametric approach (Delong-Delong & Clarke-Pearson)[17]was used for pairwise comparison among AUCs of ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score. Statistical significance was established atP< 0.05.

    Figure 1 Receive operating characteristic curve analyses of indocyanine green-R15, Child-Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease score to predict post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt hepatic encephalopathy. ICG: Indocyanine green; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease.

    RESULTS

    Patients’ preoperative characteristics

    A total of 221 patients who underwent TIPS were included in this study. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study, data were collected from a total of 195 decompensated cirrhosis patients with PHT who underwent TIPS. The basic clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1. The study population comprised 140 men and 55 women, with a mean age of 51.2 ± 11.4 years. The indications included variceal bleeding in 118 (60.7%) patients, refractory ascites in 36 (18.5%), variceal bleeding combined with ascites in 27 (14.1%), and other (including pleural fluid and hepatorenal syndrome) in 14 (6.7%). The most common cause of cirrhosis was viral cirrhosis (60.7%), followed by alcoholic cirrhosis (15.9%), biliary cirrhosis (4.6%), and drug-induced and autoimmune hepatitis cirrhosis (4.6%). According to the CPS, 108 patients were classified as having grade A, 75 as having grade B and 12 as having grade C. The median MELD score and ICG-R15 were 7 (4.1, 10) and 38.4 (22, 50), respectively.

    Univariable and multivariable analyses of post-TIPS HE

    Of the 195 patients who underwent TIPS, 45 (23%) developed HE at the 12 mo followup. The factors associated with HE in univariable analysis included age, stent size, puncture site, ICG-R15, CPS, MELD score, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) level, and NH3level (P= 0.006, 0.019, 0.006, 0.027, 0.022, 0.020, 0.025, and 0.044, respectively). As shown in Table 2, multivariate regression analysis identified the following variables as independent risk factors for post-TIPS HE: Older age, 10 mm stent size, puncture site in the right branch of the portal vein, high ICG-R15, high BUN level, high NH3level, high CPS, and high MELD score.

    Discriminatory power of the CPS, MELD score, and ICG-R15

    The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the ICG-R15 (AUC = 0.664, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.557-0.743,P= 0.0046) for the prediction of post-TIPS HE was larger than those of the CPS (AUC = 0.596, 95%CI: 0.508-0.679,P= 0.087) and the MELD score (AUC = 0.641, 95%CI: 0.554-0.721,P= 0.021). The nonparametric approach (Delong-Delong & Clarke-Pearson)[17]showed that there was no statistical significance in pairwise comparison between AUCs of ICG-R15 and MELD score (P= 0.0229). The cut-off value for the ICG-R15, which was determined by the maximum of Youden index, was 30, with a sensitivity of 86.96% and specificity of 56.25% for the prediction of post-TIPS HE (Table 3). Of the 126 patients with an ICGR15 > 30, 36 (28.5%) developed post-TIPS HE, while 9 (13%) of 69 patients with an ICG ≤ 30 developed post-TIPS HE.

    Table 1 Patients’ preoperative characteristics

    WBC, × 109/L3 3.27 (2.1, 4.6)3.1 (2.1, 4.4)3.3 (2.5, 5.7)0.26 Platelet count, × 109/L3 80 (58.3, 120)85 (61.2, 127.7)83 (63, 107)0.49 Hb, g/L1 97.4 ± 27.1 95.3 ± 25.5 98.1 ± 27.9 0.9 BUN, mmoL/L3 5.7 (4.3, 7.7)5.4 (4.2, 7.0)7.6 (5.4, 8.8)0.07 NH3, μg/Dl1 49.5 ± 19.5 46.6 ± 15.4 54.9 ± 23.8 0.037a APTT, s3 33.4 ± 4.4 33.8 ± 4.5 33.5 ± 4.2 0.76 INR1 1.4 ± 0.3 1.37 ± 0.3 1.32 ± 0.19 0.50 FIB, g/L1 2.17 ± 0.8 2.2 ± 0.8 2.3 ± 0.7 0.39 PT, s1 14.8 ± 2.5 14.7 ± 2.6 14.4 ± 2.0 0.69 1Values are the mean ± SD.2Values are n.3Values are medians (P25, P75).aP < 0.05.bP < 0.01. TIPS: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt; HE: Hepatic encephalopathy; HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient; PPG: Portal pressure gradient; MELD: Model for end-stage liver disease; ICG: Indocyanine green; ALT: Alanine aminotransferase; AST: Aspartate transaminase; ALP: Alkaline phosphatase; Hb: Hemoglobin; BUN: Blood urea nitrogen; APTT: Active partial thromboplastin; INR: International normalized ratio; FIB: Fibrinogen; PT: Prothrombin time; WBC: White blood cells.

    Comparison of post-TIPS-HE incidence between patients with an ICG-R15 > 30% and < 30%

    The patients were divided into two groups according to the ICG-R15 cut-off value, 30%, determined by the maximal Youden index. Patients with an ICG-R15 > 30% had a higher incidence of HE than those with an ICG-R15 < 30% (13%vs28.5%;P= 0.014). There were significant differences in age, CPS, preoperative portal pressure gradient, NH3, albumin, aspartate transaminase, Cl, Na, white blood cells, active partial thromboplastin, or prothrombin time in patients with different ICG-R15 levels below and above 30% (Table 4).

    DISCUSSION

    TIPS has been widely used to treat complications of PHT, including varices and ascites, by creating a large channel between the hepatic vein and portal vein. This procedure changes the liver haemodynamics by shunting a fraction of the portal venous blood directly into the systemic circulation, which can lead to decreased liver blood supply and impaired liver function reserve. In addition, HE occurs because of an increase in the amount of natural toxins such as ammonia travelling to the brain as a result of the shunting of the blood directly from the portal vein to the hepatic vein[18]. HE can produce a spectrum of neurological/psychiatric syndromes ranging from subclinical alterations to coma. It remains one of the most common and worrisome complications of end-stage liver disease after TIPS[15].

    The ICG-R15 test is simple, fast, less invasive, and inexpensive, and can be performed in less than half an hour. The ICG-R15 retention trial was introduced as a relatively noninvasive tool for the classification of pediatric and adult patients with acute and chronic liver failure[19]. A particular advantage of the ICG-R15 test is that it is more suitable for pediatric patients. In addition, the trial appears to be an ideal way to assess the risks of surgical procedures such as liver resection. In addition to assessing the predictive value of varices and ascites, the results of some papers suggest that the ICG-R15 test may also predict mortality[20].

    In this study, univariate and multivariate logistic analyses showed that 10 mm stent size, puncture site in the right branch of the portal vein, age, ICG-R15, BUN level, NH3level, CPS, and MELD score were predictors of post-TIPS HE in patients with portal hypertension. Patients with puncture sites in the right portal vein had a high incidence of post-TIPS HE. This is related to the right branch of the portal vein contains more poisons mainly received from the superior mesenteric vein[21-23]. It was reported that choosing the left branch of the portal vein as the puncture site during the placement of TIPS may decrease the incidence of HE significantly[24,25]. HE occurs more often in patients with a stent diameter of 10 mm than in those with smaller-diameter stents. Alarger stent can effectively reduce portal vein pressure, but at the same time, more blood that has not been detoxified by the liver directly enters the systemic circulation, which can further impair liver function and lead to HE. However, some studies showed that the incidence of post-TIPS HE was unrelated to stent diameter[26]. Liet al[27]also found that age and Child-Pugh classification were independent risk factors for early post-TIPS HE[27], which was in accord with previous studies[28,29]. Fonioet al[4]demonstrated that the MELD grade was a risk factor for post-TIPS HE; the results of this study support this finding[4]. Normally, ammonia is detoxified by conversion to urea by Krebs-Henseleit buffer or the urea cycle in the liver. In total, 40% to 60% of the urea nitrogen in the primary urine is absorbed in the renal tubules and collecting tubes. A high incidence of HE was found in patients with high BUN levels, which is related to the aggravation of liver function involving the kidneys, renal decompensation, and azotaemia[30].

    Table 2 Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses of post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt hepatic encephalopathy

    Table 3 Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of indocyanine green rentention rate of 15 min, Child-Pugh score, and model for end-stage liver disease score

    Table 4 Characteristics of patients with an indocyanine green rentention rate at 15 min ≤ 30% and > 30%

    Hiwatashiet al[31]found that a higher ICG-R15 was significantly correlated with surgical complications and liver dysfunction after surgical resection and chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer[31]. Wanget al[32]demonstrated that the ICG-R15 could more accurately predict preoperative liver reserve function than the Child-Pugh and MELD scores in patients who suffered from liver cancer[32]. Another study showed that the ALICE scoring system (including serum albumin and ICG-R15) could simply and effectively predict the prognosis of liver cancer patients undergoing surgery[33]. In this study, we analysed and compared the areas under the ROC curves for the ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score. The results were as follows: AUCICG-R15> AUCMELD> AUCCPS, and there was statistical significance in pairwise comparison between AUCs of ICG-R15 and MELD score. This suggests that the ICG-R15 has clinical equivalent value to predict post-TIPS HE compared to MELD score. The CPS is relatively restricted because it includes two subjective variables (HE and severity of ascites)[12], and the limited values ranging from 5 to 15 make it imprecise. The boundary values for the five parameters were chosen empirically and have not been formally validated[34]. In some situations, the predictive value of MELD may be reduced. Malabsorption of vitamin K secondary to cholestasis can cause an increase in the INR; starvation and infection can increase the level of bilirubin; and the use of diuretics can increase the level of creatinine[35]. As a quantitative assessment, the ICGR15 is a simple and practical way to assess liver function and is widely used in patients undergoing liver surgery. The ICG-R15 may play a role in predicting post-TIPS HE; consequently, it may be useful for identifying high-risk patients.

    The optimal ICG-R15 cut-off value in our study was 30%, and it divided the patients into two groups with different risks of post-TIPS HE. This difference was highly significant (P= 0.014), which implies that TIPS patients with an ICG-R15 > 30% should be given special care during perioperative management. However, we did not compare the role of the CPS, MELD score, and ICG-R15 for predicting the survival of patients after TIPS, which needs further study. In addition, future studies should analyse the incidence of complications and survival between different ICG-R15 groups. A small number of patients with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis and the low median MELD score were limitations of this study. Since this may be related to the small sample size, we will increase the amount of the sample in the future.

    In summary, the ICG-R15 can be used for predicting post-TIPS HE in patients with PHT. We propose using the ICG-R15 to evaluate the risk of HE in PHT patients undergoing TIPS.

    CONCLUSION

    TIPS for PHT in patients with cirrhosis should be considered after careful selection based on patient characteristics and liver function. The ICG-R15 has appreciated clinical value for predicting the occurrence of post-TIPS HE and is a choice for evaluating the prognosis of patients undergoing TIPS.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research objectives

    The aim of this study was to explore whether ICG-R15 can be used as a predictor of post-TIPS HE and compared the clinical value of the ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score for the prediction of post-TIPS HE in decompensated cirrhosis patients with PHT. According to the ICG-R15 value, appropriate and timely intervention can be implemented in patients with high-risk HE patients.

    Research methods

    We conducted a prospective study of 195 patients with PHT who underwent elective TIPS. All patients underwent the ICG-R15 test, CPS evaluation, and MELD scoring. According to whether they developed HE or not, the patients were divided into two groups: HE group and non-HE group. Descriptive data are presented as the mean ± SD, and qualitative variables are presented as frequencies or percentages. Student'sttest or the Mann-WhitneyUtest was utilized to compare quantitative variables between groups, and the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine HE-related risk factors after TIPS. The prediction of one-year post-TIPS HE by ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score was evaluated by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs). Pairwise comparison of AUCs in three different function tools was analysed.

    Research results

    A total of 195 patients with PHT were included and 23% (45/195) of the patients developed post-TIPS HE. The ICG-R15 was identified as an independent predictor of post-TIPS HE. The AUCs for the ICG-R15, CPS, and MELD score for predicting post-TIPS HE were 0.664 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.557-0.743,P= 0.0046), 0.596 (95%CI: 0.508-0.679,P= 0.087), and 0.641 (95%CI: 0.554-0.721,P= 0.021), respectively. Molodianovitchet al[17]showed that there was statistical significance in pairwise comparison between AUCs of ICG-R15 and MELD score (P= 0.0229).

    Research conclusions

    TIPS for PHT in patients with cirrhosis should be considered after careful selection based on patient characteristics and liver function. The ICG-R15 has appreciated clinical value for predicting the occurrence of post-TIPS HE and is a choice for evaluating the prognosis of patients undergoing TIPS.

    Research perspectives

    We can learn from this study that monitoring patients who underwent TIPS with an ICG-R15 value above 30% can better prevent adverse outcomes. Future studies will focus on the incidence of complications and survival in terms of the value of ICG-R15 and randomized controlled trials are needed in order to verify our results.

    在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 在线国产一区二区在线| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 中文字幕制服av| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 亚州av有码| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 小说图片视频综合网站| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 观看免费一级毛片| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产单亲对白刺激| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 老司机影院成人| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 日韩高清综合在线| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 欧美zozozo另类| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 精品久久久久久久久av| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产成人福利小说| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| or卡值多少钱| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产精品一及| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 六月丁香七月| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久草成人影院| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 丝袜喷水一区| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产成人freesex在线| h日本视频在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| av黄色大香蕉| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| av在线观看视频网站免费| 少妇丰满av| 99热只有精品国产| 久久久久久大精品| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美3d第一页| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 99热全是精品| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产老妇女一区| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲无线观看免费| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 久久热精品热| 草草在线视频免费看| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 99久久人妻综合| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲成人久久性| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 有码 亚洲区| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 伦理电影大哥的女人| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 久久久久网色| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产成人a区在线观看| av在线亚洲专区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 免费看a级黄色片| 久久久久久久久大av| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 欧美区成人在线视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 久久6这里有精品| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 美女高潮的动态| 99热这里只有是精品50| 国产免费男女视频| 国产高潮美女av| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 久久这里只有精品中国| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 久久久久九九精品影院| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| av在线蜜桃| 99久久精品热视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 成人av在线播放网站| 中文字幕制服av| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 精品人妻视频免费看| 色哟哟·www| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 97超视频在线观看视频| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 丝袜喷水一区| ponron亚洲| 成人三级黄色视频| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 亚州av有码| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 天堂网av新在线| 欧美+日韩+精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 美女大奶头视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 久久久久国产网址| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 日本一二三区视频观看| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 日日啪夜夜撸| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 一本久久中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 99热网站在线观看| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 永久网站在线| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 免费看av在线观看网站| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | av黄色大香蕉| 免费观看在线日韩| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产免费男女视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 久久中文看片网| 国产精华一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 99久国产av精品| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| av国产免费在线观看| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 搞女人的毛片| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 日本熟妇午夜| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区 | 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 成人综合一区亚洲| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 中国国产av一级| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产免费男女视频| 国产精品无大码| 69av精品久久久久久| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 99热这里只有精品一区| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲成人久久性| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| av国产免费在线观看| 六月丁香七月| 日本在线视频免费播放| 国产老妇女一区| 精品午夜福利在线看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区 | 亚洲av一区综合| 国产一级毛片在线| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 一本久久精品| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 日本三级黄在线观看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 少妇丰满av| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| a级毛色黄片| 久久久久国产网址| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 舔av片在线| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 在线天堂最新版资源| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 一级av片app| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 久久精品影院6| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 成年版毛片免费区| 99热只有精品国产| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 性色avwww在线观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 日本黄大片高清| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 午夜福利在线在线| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产av在哪里看| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产色婷婷99| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 欧美3d第一页| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 久久精品影院6| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 黄色一级大片看看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 色视频www国产| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 97在线视频观看| 一级av片app| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 成人av在线播放网站| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 日本在线视频免费播放| 22中文网久久字幕| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 深夜精品福利| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 免费观看人在逋| 男女那种视频在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 春色校园在线视频观看| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 亚洲av熟女| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产美女午夜福利| .国产精品久久| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 床上黄色一级片| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产极品天堂在线| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 成人无遮挡网站| 色5月婷婷丁香| 黑人高潮一二区| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产成人影院久久av| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲最大成人中文| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 男女那种视频在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 51国产日韩欧美| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久6这里有精品| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 97超视频在线观看视频| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 麻豆成人av视频| 有码 亚洲区| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 日本色播在线视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 熟女电影av网| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 我要搜黄色片| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 久久热精品热| 毛片女人毛片| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 高清毛片免费看| av国产免费在线观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 永久网站在线| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 在线播放无遮挡| 综合色av麻豆| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 一级毛片我不卡| 免费av不卡在线播放| 69av精品久久久久久| 免费看光身美女| 免费观看人在逋| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 欧美潮喷喷水| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 少妇丰满av| 99久国产av精品| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 色视频www国产| 最好的美女福利视频网| 久久久久性生活片| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 深夜a级毛片| 极品教师在线视频| 午夜a级毛片| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 欧美bdsm另类| 直男gayav资源| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 国产综合懂色| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 免费观看人在逋| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 黄色配什么色好看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 在线观看66精品国产| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 中国美女看黄片| 熟女电影av网| 国产精品久久视频播放| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美色视频一区免费| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 午夜激情欧美在线| 国产极品天堂在线| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 免费看日本二区| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产视频首页在线观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 51国产日韩欧美| 深夜a级毛片| 日本三级黄在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| www.av在线官网国产| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 韩国av在线不卡| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 级片在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 日本黄大片高清| 国产日本99.免费观看| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 嫩草影院入口| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 日本与韩国留学比较|