• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Time-lapse videography reveals different morphokinetic profiles of human embryos displaying direct or reverse cleavage at different stages of development: A retrospective sibling embryo study

    2020-11-03 01:43:42ChloBritsKatieFeenanVinceChapplePhillipMatsonYanheLiu
    Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction 2020年6期

    Chloé Brits, Katie Feenan, Vince Chapple, Phillip L. Matson, Yan-he Liu,4,5

    1School of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia

    2Fertility Specialists of Western Australia, Claremont, Western Australia, Australia

    3Fertility North, Joondalup Private Hospital, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia

    4School of Human Sciences, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia

    5Monash IVF Group, Southport, Queensland, Australia

    ABSTRACT

    KEYWORDS: Time-lapse; Direct cleavage; Reverse cleavage;Morphokinetics; Cleavage abnormality

    1. Introduction

    The novel clinical application of time-lapse videography has enabled embryologists to observe in detail the preimplantation development of human embryos without disruption to culture conditions[1]. Whilst the reported embryo selection models employing time-lapse videography were mostly formulated by using quantitative morphokinetic parameters[2], time-lapse videography may also assist with qualitative embryo deselection via identification of cleavage abnormalities, which has recently been shown to have increased reproducibility between different laboratories[3]. Two of the most studied abnormal cleavage patterns are direct cleavage where one blastomere divides into three or more daughter cells[4] and reverse cleavage where cells fuse following division or blastomeres display failed cytokinesis (fail to separate post karyokinesis)[5]. This latter description of reverse cleavage did see the abnormal cleavage at the three cell cycles up to 8-cell,but the specific morphokinetic timings before or after reverse cleavage were not defined. Although clinical and biological causes of such abnormalities remain unclear, alterations in the embryo’s subsequent morphokinetic profile can be expected[6]. Nevertheless,data demonstrating such morphokinetic differences in a wellcontrolled setting are lacking in the literature.

    Whilst the reduced implantation potential of embryos displaying direct cleavage or reverse cleavage is well recognised, a systematic analysis of the morphokinetic dynamics of embryos with cleavage abnormalities at different stages is absent in the literature. The present study therefore aims to investigate the morphokinetic profile of embryos identified with direct cleavage or reverse cleavage during the first, second or third cleavage cycle as observed directly via timelapse videography. Using a self-controlled sibling-embryo design,cleavage behaviours both before and after the onset of such events are evaluated up to three days post oocyte collection and compared with embryos showing normal cleavage patterns.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Cycle inclusion criteria

    Initial dataset included a total of 595 (Figure 1) consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)cycles using the women’s own fresh oocytes undertaken at Fertility North between January 2017 and December 2018. Cycle records were downloaded and de-identified. Cycles resulting in only one zygote, or cycles with no embryos showing direct cleavage or reverse cleavage were excluded. Cycles with both direct cleavage and reverse cleavage embryos were included but the reverse cleavage embryos were removed when comparing direct cleavage embryos and unaffected sibling embryos, and vice-versa when direct cleavage embryos were excluded when comparing reverse cleavage embryos with unaffected sibling embryos. A total of 167 IVF and/or ICSI treatment cycles [167 women, aged (35.0±4.6) years at oocyte pick up] were included for reverse cleavage analysis (241 affected vs 657 control embryos), and a total of 167 IVF and/or ICSI treatment cycles [167 women, aged (33.8±4.3) years at oocyte pick up, using their own fresh oocytes] were included for direct cleavage analysis(244 affected vs 630 control embryos) in the current study (Figure 1,Table 1). This was a day three transfer program with EmbryoscopeTM(Vitrolife, Sweden) annotations being used to select and deselect embryos for transfer or subsequent cryopreservation[5]. All embryos contained two pronuclei, with one and multiple pronuclei embryos being excluded from analysis. Cycles were included if sibling embryos (within the same cycle) displayed both (i) direct cleavage or reverse cleavage and (ii) no cleavage abnormality embryos (control).Embryos demonstrating mixed or multiple direct cleavage or reverse cleavage events were excluded from the analysis, whereas cycles that contained both direct cleavage and reverse cleavage embryos were included. Embryos with poor conventional morphology as previously described[5], and those that were not cultured to day 3 in the timelapse videography incubator were removed from the analysis.

    Figure 1. Cell cycle number from the original data set and after the exclusion criteria is applied. The total cycle number for reverse cleavage and direct cleavage is shown, demonstrating the commonality of cycles.The conditions for exclusion: Cycles resulting in only one zygote, or cycles with no embryos showing direct cleavage or reverse cleavage are excluded.

    2.2. Consent and ethical considerations

    Identifiable patient details were removed prior to data analysis, and the patient’s treatment was not impacted due to the retrospective nature of this study. Every patient, both male and female, had signed a Fertility North consent number 1 form for the use of stored data to be used for practice management and quality assurance.Since morphokinetic data were de-identified and transferred to a spreadsheet for subsequent analysis, the Australian National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (National Health and Medical Research Council, 2015) deemed such projects using de-identified data were classified as negligible risk and were exempted from ethical review[7].

    2.3. Gamete preparation and embryo culture

    Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, gamete preparation and insemination via either conventional IVF or ICSI were performed as previously described[5]. Media from the G-series? (Vitrolife,Sweden) were used to culture the gametes and embryos. G-IVF?PLUS was used to co-incubate the gametes overnight in routine IVF,or to perform the injection procedure for ICSI. Oocytes fertilised in IVF were moved to the EmbryoscopeTMthe following day at the pronuclear stage for culture in the G-1? PLUS media until three days post oocyte collection, whereas oocytes after the injection in ICSI were transferred directly into G-1? PLUS until day 3.Embryo transfers were done on day 3 and supernumerary embryos not transferred underwent further culture to day 5 or 6 in G-2?PLUS media prior to cryopreservation. Culture conditions in the EmbryoscopeTMwere set at 6% CO2, 5% O2and balance N2at 37 ℃, with images acquired across seven focal planes of each embryo every ten minutes.

    2.4. Time-lapse annotation of embryos

    Annotation of embryos was performed by a number of experienced embryologists using the Embryosviewer?(Vitrolife, Sweden)software. Inter-operator consistency of time-lapse videography annotation was monitored via the External Quality Assurance Scheme for Reproductive Medicine (EQASRM, Northlands, Australia) as well as an internal quality control program. Developmental milestones of embryos were expressed in reference to pronuclear fading to remove timing variations arising from insemination method[8]. Milestone timing parameters analysed included two cell (t2), three cell (t3),four cell (t4), five cell (t5), six cell (t6), seven cell (t7) and eight cell(t8). Relative timing parameters considered included CC2 (duration of the two cell stage or t3-t2), CC3 (duration of the four cell stage or t5-t4) and synchrony of cell division at the two cell (S2=t4-t3) and four cell stages (S3=t8-t5).

    Reverse cleavage was categorized as cell fusion following division(typeⅠ) or failed cytokinesis after karyokinesis (type Ⅱ) as previously described[5]. Direct cleavage was categorized as multipolar cell division resulting in three or more daughter cells[4]. The nucleus inside the blastomeres were tracked and confirmed throughout all cleavage cycles in all embryos and used to differentiate blastomeres from large anucleated fragments, which was essential to accurately identify both direct cleavage and reverse cleavage. Developmental stages at which either direct cleavage or reverse cleavage occurred were classified into three categories; namely the first cleavage cycle where the event occurred at the one cell stage blastomere, the second cleavage cycle where the event occurred at the two to three cell stage blastomere, and the third cleavage cycle where the event occurred at the four to seven cell stage blastomere. Skipped cell stages in direct cleavage embryos were timed the same as the subsequent cell stage,e.g., embryos with direct cleavage from one to three cell stages were annotated to have the same t2 and t3. Temporary cell stage in reverse cleavage embryos was not annotated with only the subsequent stable cell stage recorded, e.g., embryos with a temporary cell stage of four cells were only annotated with the subsequently three cell stage.

    2.5. Statistical analysis

    All timing parameters were tested for normal distribution, and if normality was confirmed, expressed in the form of mean±standard deviation (mean±SD), with comparisons analyzed by using the Student t-test. If the distribution was found not to be normal, the comparisons were analyzed using the Mann Whitney U Test. The median, 1st and 3rd interquartile values were also calculated. The nonparametric values were expressed as median (interquartile range), namely, median (Q1-Q3). Statistical analysis was performed by using the IBM?SPSS?Statistics software platform, and a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    3. Results

    3.1. Cycle characteristics

    Details on the cycles included in the study were shown in Table 1. There was no difference between cycles that had one or more embryos showing reverse or direct cleavage when considering the proportion of cycles using various ovarian stimulation protocols or insemination methods. The number of affected and control embryos per cycle was similar for both types of cleavage abnormalities.

    3.2. Reverse cleavage

    Comparisons between reverse cleavage affected and unaffected(normal cleavage pattern) sibling embryos showed significantly delayed subsequent development (t2, t3, t4 and CC2; P<0.001 P<0.001, P<0.001 and P<0.001 respectively) when reverse cleavage occurred in the first cleavage cycle (Table 2). A similar delay was also detected in embryos post reverse cleavage in the second cleavage cycle (t4, t7, t8, CC3, S2, and S3; P<0.001, P<0.001,P=0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively) (t5 and t6,P=0.050 and P=0.040, respectively), and in embryos when reverse cleavage occurred in the third cleavage cycle (t7, P=0.030; t8 and S3, P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively) (Table 2). No difference was observed in cleavage rates prior to embryos showing reverse cleavage as compared with their siblings (P>0.05), regardless of the developmental stages (the first cleavage cycle, the second cleavage cycle or the third cleavage cycle) at which reverse cleavage occurred (Table 2).

    3.3. Direct cleavage

    Altered cleavage kinetics were also evident in embryos displaying direct cleavage when compared to their unaffected siblings. Firstly,direct cleavage embryos reached subsequent developmental milestones earlier than their unaffected siblings in the first cleavage cycle and the second cleavage cycle (Table 3); this can be attributed to the additional daughter cell(s) generated during the division. Direct cleavage occurring in the first cleavage cycle led to significantly reduced (faster) time to reach the three cell through to eight cell stages (t2, t3, t4, t5, t6, and t7; P<0.001,P<0.001, P=0.001, P<0.001, P<0.001, and P=0.005, respectively)(t8, P=0.038) in comparison to their unaffected siblings. Similarly,embryos reached the five cell through to seven cell stages (t5 and t6,P<0.001 respectively; t7, P=0.026) significantly earlier following direct cleavage in the second cleavage cycle. However, there was no detectable increase in development when direct cleavage occurred in the third cleavage cycle. Secondly, CC2 and CC3 were significantly shortened at either the first cleavage cycle (CC2 and CC3, P<0.001,respectively) and the second cleavage cycle (CC3, P<0.001). Thirdly,S2 and S3 were prolonged in the first cleavage cycle (S2 and S3,P<0.001, respectively) and the second cleavage cycle (S3, P<0.001).Compared to reverse cleavage embryos, direct cleavage embryos seemed to slow down in their developmental progression prior to the onset of this abnormal cleavage event. This can be seen by the significantly delayed t2 (direct cleavage in the first cleavage cycle,P<0.001; and direct cleavage in the second cleavage cycle, P=0.008),t3 (direct cleavage in the second cleavage cycle, P<0.001; and direct cleavage in the third cleavage cycle, P=0.022), and t4 (direct cleavage in the second cleavage cycle, P=0.002).

    Table 1. Characteristics of cycles including at least one reverse cleavage or direct cleavage embryo.

    Table 2. The morphokinetic and cleavage cycle parameters of embryos displaying reverse cleavage at different cleavage cycles.

    Table 3. The morphokinetic and cleavage cycle parameters of embryos displaying direct cleavage at different cleavage cycles.

    4. Discussion

    It is considered as a novel finding that direct cleavage embryos tend to slow down before its occurrence, which is previously unobserved in the literature. The cause of direct cleavage is largely unknown,however, a range of theories have been proposed. Previously, tripolar cell division in the first cleavage cycle was mostly observed in the trinucleated zygotes due to the additional pair of centrioles following polyspermic fertilization[4]. This however is unlikely in the current study as all zygotes were confirmed as binuclear at fertilization check. Another popular theory points to centrosomal dysfunction in direct cleavage embryos as an inherited defect from the sperm[4,9].In addition, a further potential cause is the application of mitosis spindle toxins (such as paclitaxel, a cancer treatment) used to artificially induce tripolar mitosis[10]. Another group, Kalatova et al, illustrated that the immediate cellular mechanism of tripolar mitosis may originate from excessive duplication of centrosome before mitotic spindle formation[11]. This last theory may explain the observed delay prior to the onset of direct cleavage in the present study, where embryos with impaired centrosomal function may require extra time regulating associated replication activities before the occurrence of direct cleavage.

    The present study also presents novel comparisons in embryo morphokinetic profile prior to the display of their reverse cleavage phenotype, showing no difference to sibling counterparts. By using sibling embryos as control, statistical analysis of the reverse cleavage embryo morphokinetic profile is considered reliable. At this stage, the cause of reverse cleavage also remains unknown,although previous reports have shown potential association with sperm motility and ovarian stimulation regime, but not female age[5].Another group postulated that cell fusion could be linked with a defect in the cell membrane[12]. Results in the present study suggest that embryos displaying reverse cleavage may have an underlying intrinsic defect, which may not be evident in the cleavage kinetic prior to the event occurring. Studies at the ultrastructural and molecular level may offer further insights.

    The observed similar morphokinetic profiles between embryos showing direct cleavage in the third cleavage cycle and siblings are not expected since direct cleavage in one of the four cell stage blastomeres would have led to shorter t6 and onwards. Considering embryos in the present study were only cultured and observed for three days post oocyte collection, the opportunity to detect later stage (e.g., nine cell or beyond) acceleration of embryo growth is lost. For example, direct cleavage in the last dividing four cell stage blastomere may not result in detectable differences in t8 and prior.Furthermore, the capability of “self-correction” is believed to arise in later stage human embryos, where “normal” cells tend to exclude genetically abnormal cells (as a result of direct cleavage in this case)which subsequently end up with developmental arrest[9].

    The present study further expanded the annotation of direct cleavage events from the first mitotic division as was originally described in the first documented report[4] to the second and third round of mitotic divisions. Identification of later stage direct cleavage events is thought to require additional efforts by the annotating operator, which involves careful tracking of karyokinesis activities as well as cytokinesis with more cells in the field of view. A recent study made an attempt at identifying direct cleavage embryos and other irregularly dividing embryos using timing-parameter-based mathematical equations, however, it did not seem to outperform a qualitative-parameter-based model where abnormal biological events were manually annotated[13]. As such full automation in annotation for abnormal cleavage patterns such as direct cleavage and reverse cleavage seems to be a long way off, considering the commercially available time-lapse videography devices are currently incapable of automatically evaluating blastomere nuclei[2].

    In previous studies the incidences of direct cleavage and reverse cleavage have been reported at various rates, probably due to different patient population. As such, the sibling-embryo design in the present study has avoided the risk of “comparing oranges to apples” by eliminating patient related confounding factors.

    Furthermore, it is widely acknowledged that embryo morphokinetics alter between laboratories due to diverse laboratory[14] and patient[15]characteristics, even for those with known implantation outcomes[16].It is therefore crucial, when comparing embryo cleavage timings, that not only laboratory/patient related confounding factors are taken into consideration but also that direct cleavage/ reverse cleavage embryos are removed from comparisons. For example, studies comparing morphokinetic features between different patient populations (such as smoker versus non-smokers) may consider removing direct cleavage and reverse cleavage embryos before performing statistical analysis on timing parameters[15]. Nevertheless, the full description of the behaviour and morphokinetic profiles of affected embryos in each of the three cell cycles is crucial as a first step in understanding these cleavage abnormalities. Further end-points will also reveal the impact of such cleavage abnormalities in the different cell cycles on the functional capacity of affected embryos, such as blastocyst formation rates, implantation rates and pregnancy viability, but these are outside the remit of the present study.

    In conclusion, results in the present study indicate the significantly changed morphokinetic profiles by direct cleavage embryos both before and after their occurrence and reverse cleavage embryos after the occurrence. It is therefore proposed that such embryos are removed from morphokinetic comparisons to avoid biased and erroneous interpretation of data.

    Conflict of interest statement

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    Authors’ contributions

    All authors have contributed positively to this manuscript. Phillip L. Matson and Yan-he Liu conceived and designed this study. Chloé Brits carried out data collection, statistical analysis and manuscript writing. Katie Feenan and Vince Chapple facilitated data collection and patient management. All authors contributed significantly to the proofreading, revision and final approval of the manuscript.

    av专区在线播放| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 色视频www国产| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 中文字幕制服av| av专区在线播放| 看免费成人av毛片| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产 精品1| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 在线a可以看的网站| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 免费大片18禁| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 亚洲av.av天堂| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 成人无遮挡网站| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| av卡一久久| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 日本一本二区三区精品| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久久久久久久大av| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 高清毛片免费看| 国产成人精品福利久久| 美女国产视频在线观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲电影在线观看av| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 亚洲四区av| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 黄色日韩在线| 亚州av有码| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 成人国产av品久久久| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 久久久国产一区二区| av女优亚洲男人天堂| av专区在线播放| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 老司机影院毛片| 国产精品一及| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 1000部很黄的大片| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 中文字幕制服av| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 精品久久久精品久久久| 成人综合一区亚洲| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美 | 国产成人aa在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 日韩中字成人| 在线免费十八禁| 少妇的逼水好多| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 亚洲国产色片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 一级毛片我不卡| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 性色avwww在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 色视频www国产| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 免费看光身美女| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 一级毛片电影观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 尾随美女入室| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 伦精品一区二区三区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| av专区在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 中文字幕久久专区| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 91狼人影院| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产精品成人在线| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 国产成人精品一,二区| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产色婷婷99| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| av在线蜜桃| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 久久这里有精品视频免费| av免费观看日本| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 嫩草影院精品99| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 永久免费av网站大全| 色哟哟·www| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 少妇丰满av| 在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲成色77777| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 人妻一区二区av| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 日本色播在线视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产成人福利小说| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 性色avwww在线观看| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲av.av天堂| 成年免费大片在线观看| 国产永久视频网站| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 久久久久久伊人网av| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 熟女电影av网| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 免费av毛片视频| 久久久久性生活片| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 1000部很黄的大片| 春色校园在线视频观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 | 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 国产精品三级大全| 99热这里只有是精品50| 免费av毛片视频| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲精品视频女| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 老司机影院毛片| 亚洲av一区综合| 成人综合一区亚洲| 久久久久久伊人网av| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日本wwww免费看| 韩国av在线不卡| kizo精华| 亚洲综合色惰| 日本三级黄在线观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| av在线观看视频网站免费| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 久久97久久精品| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产男女内射视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲av男天堂| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 永久免费av网站大全| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 免费看不卡的av| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| eeuss影院久久| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 在线观看国产h片| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 免费av毛片视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| av网站免费在线观看视频| 春色校园在线视频观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 五月开心婷婷网| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 免费av观看视频| 色哟哟·www| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 美女国产视频在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久久av| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| xxx大片免费视频| tube8黄色片| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 直男gayav资源| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 欧美3d第一页| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久热久热在线精品观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 91精品国产九色| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久热久热在线精品观看| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 黄片wwwwww| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 久久久成人免费电影| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 成人国产av品久久久| 97超视频在线观看视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 在线观看三级黄色| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 一级a做视频免费观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 欧美性感艳星| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美成人a在线观看| 三级经典国产精品| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 亚洲成色77777| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 视频区图区小说| 内地一区二区视频在线| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲内射少妇av| 久久久欧美国产精品| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美人与善性xxx| 久久6这里有精品| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲av一区综合| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产 一区精品| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲av福利一区| 少妇的逼水好多| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产精品成人在线| 直男gayav资源| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 免费看光身美女| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 国产成人一区二区在线| 欧美zozozo另类| 全区人妻精品视频| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲无线观看免费| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久 | 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 熟女电影av网| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 欧美zozozo另类| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 久久久精品94久久精品| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 久久这里有精品视频免费| 综合色丁香网| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲精品第二区| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲在线观看片| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产色婷婷99| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 永久网站在线| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 色吧在线观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 精品久久久久久久末码| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲综合精品二区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 精品久久久久久久久av| 色综合色国产| 在线免费十八禁| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| av在线蜜桃| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 亚洲在久久综合| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产精品无大码| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 免费看a级黄色片| 观看免费一级毛片| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 亚洲内射少妇av| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产成人91sexporn| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 黄色日韩在线| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲四区av| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 身体一侧抽搐| 成年av动漫网址| 国产亚洲最大av| 在线a可以看的网站| 成年免费大片在线观看| 777米奇影视久久| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 国产在视频线精品| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| av在线app专区| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产成人福利小说| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 成年免费大片在线观看| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久人人爽人人片av| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 美女主播在线视频| 少妇的逼水好多| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 精品一区二区三卡| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 在线a可以看的网站| 一级av片app| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产老妇女一区| 如何舔出高潮| 国产视频首页在线观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 国产91av在线免费观看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 熟女电影av网| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| av在线app专区| 国精品久久久久久国模美|