• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Radiomics of rectal cancer for predicting distant metastasis and overall survival

    2020-10-29 02:04:54MouLiYuZhouZhuYongChangZhangYuFengYueHaoPengYuBinSong
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年33期
    關(guān)鍵詞:閃光哲理古詩(shī)文

    Mou Li, Yu-Zhou Zhu, Yong-Chang Zhang, Yu-Feng Yue, Hao-Peng Yu, Bin Song

    Abstract

    Key words: Radiomics; Rectal cancer; Overall survival; Distant metastasis; Computed tomography

    INTRODUCTION

    More than 1.8 million cases of colorectal cancer were diagnosed in 2018 worldwide, making it the third most prevalent malignancy around the world. In terms of morbidity, colorectal cancer accounts for approximately 9.2% of cancer-related deaths worldwide, similar to that of stomach and liver cancer[1]. In up to 70% of patients with rectal cancer (RC), surgical removal of the primary tumor is successful. However, local recurrence and distant metastases are commonly detected in approximately 30% of RC patients, often within 3 years after surgery[2-4]. The overall prognosis becomes poor once distant metastases have developed, thus demonstrating the importance of prompt diagnosis and treatment of RC[5]. Some patients may be at a higher risk of developing adverse outcomes post-surgery. In these patients, alternative and adjunctive therapies, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or other targeted therapies, may be needed to minimize the risk of developing distant metastases[6]. Hence, improved patient outcomes may be feasible by identifying unfavorable prognostic characteristics that could hinder the overall survival of patients. In return, personalized treatment strategies could be implemented to achieved improved outcomes in patients with RC[7]. Recently, the American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines outlined the need for newer surveillance technologies to better characterize and detect rectal tumors during the early stages of the disease, which could aid in risk stratification and subsequent surveillance[8].

    Currently, there is no universal list of clinicoradiologic prognostic factors used for the detection of RC patients more likely to benefit from treatment. While the TNM classification system is widely utilized for staging cancer in the clinic, it has certain pitfalls that limit its clinical utility in RC[9]. While TNM considers the degree of cancer invasion, the involvement of surrounding lymph nodes, and metastatic spread of the tumor[10], it does not consider the importance of spatial heterogeneity. Spatial heterogeneity is an important characteristic of RC, as it indicates high cell density, hemorrhage, and necrosis[11].

    Radiomics can provide a comprehensive overview of intratumor heterogeneity by extracting multiple quantitative features from medical images. A wide array of parameters can be utilized to assess and quantify the degree of heterogeneity at relevant scales, such as skewness, entropy, kurtosis, and uniformity. Radiomic analysis has been successfully utilized to predict survival outcomes in other diseases[12-14]. When integrated with the clinicopathologic features, the radiomics signature is superior to that of a single biomarker, in terms of prognostic value[15-17]. Hence, in the current study, the aim was to compare the predictive abilities, in terms of distant metastases and 3-year OS, of a radiomics signature and clinicoradiologic risk model in patients with RC.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Patients

    This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of our institution (No. 2019-1159; date: December 26, 2019). Patient approval or informed consent for the review of medical images was waived by the committee due to the retrospective nature of the study.

    The primary cohort of this study comprised an evaluation of the institutional database for medical records from October 2012 to December 2015 to identify patients with histologically-confirmed RC, who underwent curative surgery alone. A total of 148 patients (76 males and 72 females; mean age: 59.7 ± 11.7 years; age range: 27-94 years) were enrolled in our study according to the following inclusion criteria: (1) Patients with histologically-confirmed rectal adenocarcinoma who were treated with curative resection alone; (2) Preoperative enhanced computed tomography (CT) was performed within 1 mo before resection; (3) Follow-up was conducted for at least 3 years; and (4) T-stage, N-stage, and tumor grade were confirmed by pathology. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Patients who received neoadjuvant or postoperative chemoradiotherapy; (2) Patients who presented distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis; (3) Patients who failed to undergo follow-up; (4) Lack of preoperative CT images; and (5) Poor CT image quality. The patients were allocated to a training or validation set at a ratio of 7:3, based on the scanning date. The early data before the 70thpercentile scanning date were allocated to the training set, while the other data were allocated to the validation set. The patient recruitment pathway is shown in Figure 1.

    The baseline clinical characteristics and pathological data of each patient, including age, sex, tumor size on CT, pathological TNM stage, histological grade, antigen Ki-67, circumferential resection margin, number of distant metastasis, and follow-up time were all derived from medical records, as shown in Table 1.

    這一期,我們來(lái)學(xué)習(xí)古詩(shī)文的第九個(gè)字——理。說(shuō)起古詩(shī)文,人們大多感受明顯的是兒女情長(zhǎng),其實(shí),在古詩(shī)文中也有很多哲理的閃光。只是其中需要更高的思想素養(yǎng)才能發(fā)掘,讓我們一起來(lái)發(fā)掘一下古詩(shī)文中的哲理。

    CT examinations

    Enhanced CT was performed using a 128-channel multidetector CT scanner (Simens, SOMATOM Definition AS+) with the following scanning parameters: Tube voltage of 120 kV, tube current of 200-210 mA, and slice thickness of 2.0 mm. With the mass injection (dose: 1.2 mL/kg; injection rate: 3 mL/s) of iodine contrast agent (300 mg/mL), the portal venous phase images (30 s after the trigger) were obtained.

    Reference standard for pathology

    All 148 patients had histopathologically-verified RC, which was diagnosed with resected surgical specimens. The pathological confirmatory report was acquired from electronic medical records. Samples were processed using standard procedures, fixed in formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE).

    Follow-up

    All patients were followed for at least 3 years after surgery (3-mo intervals in the first year; every 6 mo in the following 2 years). The minimum postoperative follow-up period was 1 mo for metastasis (three cases had liver, lung, and bone metastases,respectively), and 11 mo for OS.

    Table 1 Patient and tumor characteristics in the training and validation sets

    Figure 1 Flow chart of the recruitment pathway for patients included in the study. CT: Computed tomography.

    The endpoint of this study was 3-year OS, defined as the time between the surgery and the date of the patient’s death. Local recurrence was defined as recurrence in the pelvis, and distant metastasis as recurrence at sites other than the pelvis. All distant metastatic cases were diagnosed by a multidisciplinary team based on clinical examinations, serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, chest and abdominopelvic CT, abdominopelvic magnetic resonance imaging, endoscopy, and biopsy. Follow-up information was recorded in the database.

    Texture feature extraction

    A radiologist with 7 years of experience in RC imaging used the ITK-SNAP software (open source, www.itk-snap.org) for the three-dimensional (3D) manual segmentation of the primary tumor, as shown in Figure 2. The region of interest was carefully placed in an area that avoided the intestinal lumen, calcification, blood vessels, and necrosis. In all, 396 quantitative radiomic features of three types (first-order, second-order, and higher-order) were calculated and extracted automatically using the in-house Artificial Intelligence Kit software (GE Healthcare). First-order features are calculated from the pixel intensity histogram to quantify tumor intensity characteristics. Second-order features based on the co-occurrence matrix or run-length matrix account for the location of the pixels and analyze texture in a specific direction. Higher-order features, such as contrast, compare differences and relationships between multiple pixels.

    Model building and evaluation

    Figure 2 A 58-year-old woman with rectal cancer. A-C: Representative manual segmentation of the whole lesion in the axial, sagittal, and coronal enhanced computed tomography images. Red lines represent the delineations of the regions of interest used to derive the radiomic features; D: Three-dimensional volumetric reconstruction of the segmented lesion.

    Before selecting features, the redundant features needed to be eliminated. When the Pearson correlation coefficient of any two features was higher than 0.6, one of them was selected at random, and the rest could be treated in the same manner. Then, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was performed to identify the most useful prognostic features. The LASSO regression is a variable selection method for linear regression models. The LASSO does this by imposing a constraint on the model parameter (λ) that causes regression coefficients for some variables to shrink toward zero. Variables with a regression coefficient equal to zero are excluded from the model. Variables with non-zero regression coefficients are selected by the LASSO. After that, z-score transformation was used to standardize all selected features. The CT images of 30 patients were segmented twice by the same radiologist to calculate intraclass correlation coefficients for assessing the stability of the features. Radiomic features with an intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.75 were included in the analysis. Each radiomic feature was assessed by univariate logistic regression, and statistical significance was assumed at a confidence level of 0.2 to avoid missing important features. Features withP< 0.2 in univariate logistic regression analysis were entered into the multivariate analysis. A nomogram was generated for model visualization. Receiver operating characteristic curves for each model were constructed to evaluate the performance for predicting distant metastasis of RC. The association of the predicting models with 3-year OS was investigated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

    Statistical analysis

    All statistical analyses were performed using R software (version 3.6.1, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), Statistic Package for Social Science version 21 (Statistic Package for Social Science Inc., Chicago, IL, United States), Stata 15.0 (Stata Corp LLC, Lakeway Drive College Station, United States), and Medcalc 15.2.2 (Medcalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). Differences between the training and validation sets were assessed by the chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test, andt-test. Survival curves were compared by the log-rank test.P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    A total of 148 patients were enrolled in our study, of whom 51 had distant metastases, 26 died, and 122 survived to the date of the last follow-up visit at 3 years post-surgery (Table 2).

    Table 2 Comparison of the models between the metastasis group and the non-metastasis group, and between the death group and the survival group

    Feature selection and model building

    A total of 17 radiomic features remained after removing the redundant features. Two features, “MaxIntensity” and “RelativeDeviation”, were selected by the LASSO method from the remaining features (Figure 3). To avoid missing important features, another feature “Inertia_AllDirection_offset7_SD” was selected by the univariate logistic regression (P= 0.192). These three features were presented in this calculation formula: Rad-score = 1/{1 + EXP [-(-0.649 - 0.786 × MaxIntensity - 0.868 × Inertia_AllDirection_offset7_SD - 2.743 × RelativeDeviation)]}. The radiomics signature (Rad-score), which consisted of three selected features, was statistically different between the metastasis and non-metastasis groups (Rad-score = 0.46 and 0.32, respectively;P< 0.001), as shown in Table 2.

    For clinical features, pathological T-stage and N-stage were selected by the univariate logistic regression analysis (P< 0.001 andP= 0.002, respectively). The clinicoradiologic risk model was built by the multivariate logistic regression analysis, using the formula 1/{1 + EXP [-(-6.199 + 1.368 × T-stage + 0.738 × N-stage + 4.673 × Rad-score)]}. The results of the combined model were significantly different between the metastasis and non-metastasis groups by 3 years after surgery (P< 0.001), as shown in Table 2. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded no statistical significance (P= 0.280 and 0.151 for the Rad-score and combined model, respectively), which suggested that there was no evidence of lack of fit.

    A nomogram to predict the distant metastasis of RC was generated for the combined model visualization (Figure 4). The nomogram could be used by locating the score for each variable on the corresponding axis, adding the points together for all of the variables, and drawing a line from the total number of points to the risk axis, which allows for the determination of distant metastasis risk. Higher total scores were associated with a greater risk of distant metastasis. The contributions of these variables to the Rad-score and the combined model were measured by the value of the standardized logistic regression coefficient (Figure 5). The contribution of “MaxIntensity” to the Rad-score, and that of “T-stage” to the combined model were greater than those of the others.

    Classification results

    Figure 3 Feature selection using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model. Dotted vertical lines were drawn at the optimal values (two features were selected) by using the minimum criteria and one standard error of the minimum criteria (i.e., the 1-SE criteria).

    Figure 4 Developed radiomics nomogram. The radiomics nomogram was developed in the training cohort, with the Rad-score, T-stage, and N-stage incorporated.

    In the case of only considering the Rad-score, the resulting area under the curve (AUC) was 0.709 (95%CI: 0.612-0.795). Improved prediction of distant metastases could be achieved by combining the radiomic features from preoperative CT images with the clinical features. The AUCs of the clinical model (T-stage combined with N-stage) and the combined model were 0.782 (95%CI: 0.689-0.857) and 0.842 (95%CI: 0.757-0.906), respectively (Table 3 and Figure 6). There was a significant difference in AUCs between the Rad-score and combined model in the training cohort (AUC = 0.709vs0.842,P= 0.005), which was confirmed using the validation cohort (AUC = 0.687vs0.802,P= 0.020). We found that the clinical variables had higher classification contributions than Rad-score to build the combined model. This finding was consistent with the higher standardized logistic regression coefficient of T-stage than that of the Rad-score (Figure 5). Moreover, the AUC value of the clinical model was also higherthan that of the Rad-score. Even so, the Rad-score greatly helped to increase the AUC value from 0.782 to 0.842 (Table 3 and Figure 6). In the subgroups of the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the AUC of the combined model decreased in the 1-year (distant metastasis occurred in the first year after surgery) and 2-year (distant metastasis occurred within 2 years after surgery) subgroups (Table 3).

    Table 3 Diagnostic performance of the three models in both training and validation cohorts

    Figure 5 Histogram showing the contribution of each variable to the models. A: the Rad-score; B: the combined model. The contributions of the variables were measured by the values of the standardized logistic regression coefficients.

    Assessment of the combined model for OS

    Using the clinicoradiologic risk model, stratified analyses were performed for the whole set, training set, and validation set to evaluate the association with OS. As shown in Figure 7, the grouping results of the combined model were significantly associated with OS in the whole, training, and validation groups (P< 0.0001,P= 0.0001, andP= 0.0137, respectively). Although there was a lack of statistical significance for stage III in the stratified subgroup analysis, according to the overall pathological stage, the low-risk group displayed a longer OS than the high-risk group (P< 0.001,P= 0.0194, andP= 0.1401 for stages I, II, and III, respectively), which was significant in terms of individualized treatment (Figure 8)[18].

    Figure 6 Receiver operating characteristic curves of the models in the training and validation cohorts. A: In the training set, the combined model [area under the curve under the curve (AUC) = 0.842] achieved a better performance than the Rad-score (AUC = 0.709) and the clinical model containing Tstage and N-stage (AUC = 0.782); B: In the validation set, the AUCs of the Rad-score, the clinical model, and the combined model were 0.687, 0.766, and 0.802, respectively.

    Figure 7 Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival stratified by risk group, as identified by the combined model. A: The whole set. P < 0.0001; B: The training set. P = 0.0001; C: The validation set. P = 0.0137.

    Figure 8 Overall survival curves for the low- and high-risk groups classified according to the combined model in the subgroups of the overall pathological stage. A: Stage I. P < 0.001; B: Stage II. P = 0.0194; C: Stage III. P = 0.1401.

    DISCUSSION

    In this study, we developed and validated a clinicoradiologic risk model that showed potential for predicting distant metastasis of RC within 3 years after surgery, which had a better prognostic performance than Rad-score (P= 0.005 and 0.020 for the training cohort and validation cohort, respectively). The combined model was used to stratify patients into low-risk and high-risk groups for the analysis of 3-year OS. The results showed that OS rates between low- and high-risk groups were significantly different in the training cohort, which was verified in the validation cohort.

    Compared with traditional image explanation, which is qualitative or subjective, radiomic analyses permit high-throughput extraction of radiomic features that can quantify differences between tissues invisible to human eyes. Recently, the use of radiomics has appeared as a potential technique for constructing decision-support models based on high-throughput quantificational characters extracted from medical images. Radiomics-based prognosis prediction models have been reported for advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma[19], early-stage non-small cell lung cancer[20], and RC[12-14]. In their pioneering retrospective studies about the prognosis of RC[12-14], robust models and strong independent prognostic factors have been developed for the prediction of OS in patients with RC. Our results were consistent with previous studies, suggesting that radiomics could help predict the prognosis of patients with RC. The building methods between our study and those of previous studies were similar (machine learning), and all these studies lacked external validation. However, there were still some differences that need to be explained. For the follow-up time, Wanget al[13]followed the patients for 5 years, and Lovinfosseet al[12]for 4 years, which were longer than the time in the current study. These authors[12-14]focused on predicting the prognosis in locally advanced RC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, which is different from our current study. Different chemoradiotherapy regimens might influence the prognostic evaluation of patients with RC. Moreover, the sample sizes of these two studies[12,14]were less than ours.

    In terms of feature selection, several relationships were uncovered between the specific features and their ability to predict distant metastasis. For the radiomic features included in this study, the first-order features show an excellent auxiliary classification effect, accounting for two of the three specified radiomic features. In the clinical features, we found that T-stage and N-stage had high standardized logistic regression coefficients, indicating the contribution to the combined model. This finding is consistent with the consensus that pathological T-stage and N-stage are very important for predicting the distant metastasis of RC. The histological grade, circumferential resection margin, Ki-67 score, and tumor diameter did not present enough predictive power for distant metastasis and prognosis. Subsequently, we integrated the Rad-score into a nomogram with clinical risk factors, and constructed a useful tool for individualized evaluation of distant metastasis and OS in patients with RC.

    In our study, only patients who did not receive chemoradiotherapy were selected for the analysis of prognosis. On the one hand, the variables caused by the different intensive chemoradiotherapy methods can be controlled. On the other hand, we could build a novel model to stratify the high-risk patients. This was in step with the current trends toward personalized medicine[21]. Considering individualized evaluation of patients with RC of different stages, the subgroup survival analysis was performed. The low-risk groups had longer OS than the high-risk groups, which was statically significant between stage I and II (P< 0.001 andP= 0.0194, respectively). However, there was no statistically significant difference for stage III (P= 0.1401). We speculate that this might be related to the small sample size of this study.

    There are several limitations to this study. The first limitation is the relatively small sample size. Second, even if we controlled therapeutic methods to surgery alone, inevitable bias may exist due to the retrospective design of this study. Therefore, prospective and external validation studies are required in future studies. Third, all of the CT images were obtained from a single institution. In the future, multicenter verification is necessary to extend the versatility of the experimental results.

    CONCLUSION

    In conclusion, this study describes a combined model that incorporates a radiomics signature and clinical risk factors. The model can aid in the individualized prediction of distant metastasis and prognosis in patients with RC.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research results

    A total of 51 (34.5%) patients had distant metastases, while 26 (17.6%) patients died, and 122 (82.4%) patients lived at least 3 years post-surgery. The values of both the Rad-score and the combined model were significantly different between the distant metastasis group and the non-metastasis group (0.46 ± 0.21vs0.32 ± 0.24 for the Radscore, 0.60 ± 0.23vs0.28 ± 0.26 for the combined model;P< 0.001 for both models). Predictors contained in the combined model included the Rad-score, pathological Nstage, and T-stage. The combined model showed good discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.842 and 0.802 for the training set and validation set, respectively. For the survival analysis, the combined model was associated with an improved OS in the whole cohort and the respective subgroups.

    Research conclusions

    This study presents a novel model, visualized in a nomogram, that can be used to facilitate individualized prediction of distant metastasis and 3-year OS in patients with RC.

    Research perspectives

    Radiomics may change the practice of medicine, particularly for patients with RC. However, there are challenges to be overcome before its routine implementation including challenges related to sample size, model design, and the lack of robust multicenter validation set. Therefore, prospective multicenter studies of a larger size are needed to externally validate our proposed model in the future.

    猜你喜歡
    閃光哲理古詩(shī)文
    閃光
    閃光的枝條
    古詩(shī)文閱讀備考指津
    哲理漫畫
    特別文摘(2016年18期)2016-09-26 18:02:20
    漫畫哲理
    雜文選刊(2016年9期)2016-09-14 19:52:43
    漫畫哲理
    雜文選刊(2016年5期)2016-05-12 20:10:00
    哲理漫畫
    特別文摘(2016年5期)2016-05-04 22:14:40
    引領(lǐng)小學(xué)生誦讀古詩(shī)文之妙招
    八月,紀(jì)念碑在閃光
    海峽姐妹(2015年8期)2015-02-27 15:12:54
    對(duì)古詩(shī)文默寫有效性的思考
    欧美性感艳星| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 天堂网av新在线| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 免费大片18禁| 十八禁网站免费在线| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 久久久久久伊人网av| 深夜精品福利| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| xxxwww97欧美| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 欧美3d第一页| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 欧美3d第一页| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| av在线天堂中文字幕| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 久久久国产成人免费| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| .国产精品久久| 国产不卡一卡二| 一夜夜www| 欧美3d第一页| 久久久久久久久久成人| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 欧美日本视频| www日本黄色视频网| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 91精品国产九色| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 免费高清视频大片| 国产美女午夜福利| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 午夜福利高清视频| 色吧在线观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 99热6这里只有精品| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 88av欧美| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产在线男女| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产老妇女一区| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 免费av观看视频| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 日本 欧美在线| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品 | 欧美zozozo另类| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 午夜a级毛片| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | av国产免费在线观看| 69人妻影院| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 热99在线观看视频| 午夜免费激情av| 中文字幕久久专区| 日本五十路高清| 免费观看人在逋| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久这里只有精品中国| 欧美色视频一区免费| 成人欧美大片| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲四区av| 欧美潮喷喷水| 成人三级黄色视频| www.www免费av| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 极品教师在线免费播放| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 春色校园在线视频观看| 韩国av在线不卡| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲av美国av| 一夜夜www| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产乱人视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 极品教师在线视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 乱人视频在线观看| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 永久网站在线| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 亚洲av一区综合| 直男gayav资源| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 九色成人免费人妻av| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 在线a可以看的网站| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 美女高潮的动态| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 久久久精品大字幕| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲18禁久久av| 成年免费大片在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| or卡值多少钱| 99热这里只有是精品50| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 亚洲 国产 在线| 日日撸夜夜添| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 51国产日韩欧美| 在线播放国产精品三级| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 22中文网久久字幕| 日日撸夜夜添| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国内精品宾馆在线| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲最大成人中文| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 三级国产精品片| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 22中文网久久字幕| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚洲av男天堂| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 一区在线观看完整版| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 夫妻午夜视频| 99久久人妻综合| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 亚洲最大成人中文| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲图色成人| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 一级a做视频免费观看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日韩成人伦理影院| 精品一区在线观看国产| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 美女高潮的动态| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| av在线播放精品| 国产淫语在线视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 一级av片app| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 精品久久久久久久末码| 久久久久国产网址| 国产亚洲最大av| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 成人国产av品久久久| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 岛国毛片在线播放| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 97热精品久久久久久| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 欧美日本视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 美女中出高潮动态图| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产视频内射| 亚洲无线观看免费| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产av精品麻豆| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 免费av中文字幕在线| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 国产色婷婷99| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 精品一区二区三卡| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 色视频www国产| 看免费成人av毛片| 一级爰片在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产精品一及| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 在线看a的网站| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 日本av免费视频播放| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 精品久久久噜噜| 中文欧美无线码| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 久久99精品国语久久久| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 精品人妻视频免费看| 亚洲精品第二区| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 欧美成人a在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 精品久久久久久久末码| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲色图av天堂| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲中文av在线| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 内射极品少妇av片p| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲在久久综合| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 色综合色国产| 一级毛片我不卡| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 久久久久网色| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 少妇 在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产视频内射| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 七月丁香在线播放| 老女人水多毛片| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 高清av免费在线| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 日韩视频在线欧美| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 免费看光身美女| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 少妇 在线观看| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 777米奇影视久久| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产探花极品一区二区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 久久久久久久国产电影| av在线观看视频网站免费| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日本一二三区视频观看| 久久av网站| 99久久精品热视频| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 久久av网站| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 97热精品久久久久久| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 六月丁香七月| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| av免费在线看不卡| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 日本av免费视频播放| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产精品无大码| 超碰97精品在线观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产 精品1| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 熟女电影av网| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 少妇 在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产精品成人在线| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 97热精品久久久久久| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 日韩电影二区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 国模一区二区三区四区视频| .国产精品久久| 嫩草影院入口| 老司机影院毛片| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 黄色日韩在线| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 黄色日韩在线| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| av一本久久久久| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 久久久久网色| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 99热这里只有是精品50| 午夜免费鲁丝| av在线蜜桃| 91精品国产九色| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久久久久伊人网av| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 美女内射精品一级片tv| freevideosex欧美| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 久久人人爽人人片av| www.色视频.com| 免费看不卡的av| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 免费看光身美女| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| av免费观看日本| 精品一区二区三卡| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 91久久精品电影网| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 一级a做视频免费观看| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 婷婷色综合www| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| tube8黄色片| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久av网站| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| av在线app专区| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产黄片美女视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲综合精品二区| av免费观看日本| 午夜免费观看性视频| videossex国产| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 大码成人一级视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| xxx大片免费视频| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 黄色一级大片看看| 韩国av在线不卡| 精品午夜福利在线看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 国产乱人视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| av国产精品久久久久影院| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 内地一区二区视频在线| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| av播播在线观看一区| 精品一区二区三卡| 97热精品久久久久久| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 女性被躁到高潮视频|