• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Efficacy of pancreatoscopy for pancreatic duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    2020-10-09 08:53:26SyedSaghirHarmeetMashianaBabuMohanBanreetDhindsaAmaninderDhaliwalSaurabhChandanNeilBhogalIshfaqBhatShailenderSinghDouglasAdler
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年34期
    關(guān)鍵詞:講武堂師資云南

    Syed M Saghir, Harmeet S Mashiana, Babu P Mohan, Banreet S Dhindsa, Amaninder Dhaliwal, Saurabh Chandan, Neil Bhogal, Ishfaq Bhat, Shailender Singh, Douglas G Adler

    Abstract

    Key Words: Electrohydraulic shockwave lithotripsy; Laser lithotripsy; Chronic pancreatitis; Calculi; Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Outcome

    INTRODUCTION

    Pancreatic duct (PD) stones are a common complication of chronic pancreatitis (CP), which can lead to obstruction of the PD and cause chronic abdominal pain and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency[1]. PD stones may be present in as many as 50%-90% of CP patients[1,2]. The cause of the pain is multifactorial, but is thought to be secondary to elevated pancreatic ductal pressures, elevated interstitial pancreatic pressure, ischemia, fibrosis, and inflammation-related injury to the nerves innervating the pancreas[1]. Relieving PD obstruction is an important aspect in treatment of patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.

    Current management of symptomatic PD stones includes medical therapy such as pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with or without endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), ERCP with pancreatic sphincterotomy and either balloon or basket retrieval with stent placement, peroral pancreatoscopy and/or surgery[1,2]. According to the 2018 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the 2017 United European Gastroenterology (UEG) guidelines, ESWL is the first line approach for patients with painful PD stones who have failed in medical therapy and who have stones greater than 5 mm[3,4]. ERCP is recommended for stones less than 5 mm[4]. The American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) 2020 guidelines recommend ERCP/interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for PD stone management[5]. If these modalities are unsuccessful, pancreatic surgery should be considered[6,7].

    Per oral pancreatoscopy (POP)-guided lithotripsy is being increasingly used for the management of main pancreatic duct calculi (PDC) in the setting of CP[2,8]. Previously two operators were required to do this procedure and imaging quality was poor, but with the advent of newer technology, POP by single operator is now widely available[9]. POP uses two techniques: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) and laser lithotripsy (LL). EHL technique uses a charge generator and bipolar probe to create a spark to produce a vapor plasma. The vapor plasma becomes a cavitation bubble that oscillates around the tip of the probe, which leads to stone fragmentation by absorption of rebounding shockwaves from the vapor. LL technique uses laser light at a specific wavelength to induce fragmentation[1]. Both techniques simply fragment stones into smaller pieces that still need to be removedviaballoon and basket retrieval devices.

    Information about the safety profile of POP and ESWL is limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on POP to assess the two techniques with regards to stone fragmentation, safety, and efficacy.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Literature search

    We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases (from 1999 to October 2019). We identified studies reporting on outcomes of POP-guided intracorporal lithotripsy and followed the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines[10]. The schematic diagram of study selection as per PRISMA guidelines is illustrated in Figure 1.

    Literature search keywords included a combination of “per-oral”, “pancreatoscopy”, “pancreatoscope”, “POP”, “electrohydraulic”, “EHL”, “l(fā)aser”, “l(fā)ithotripsy”, “LL”, “pancreas”, “calculi”, “stones”, “chronic” and “pancreatitis”. The literature retrieved was restricted to studies done on humans and published in English. Two authors (BD, HS) independently evaluated titles and abstracts obtained from the literature search and discarded any studies that were irrelevant to our topic, based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then reviewed the complete versions of the articles of interest to determine if they contained relevant context. Any article with discrepancies was reviewed by a third author (SS).

    這是一個(gè)很復(fù)雜的問(wèn)題,一方面云南那一段歷史,的確有待我們重新認(rèn)識(shí);另一方面,講武堂作為一所學(xué)校,的確在師資、管理和思想等方面,有獨(dú)到之處。

    Additional relevant articles were discovered from the bibliographic sections from the articles of interest.

    Study selection

    In this meta-analysis, studies that discussed the use of POP, EHL, and LL in patients with pancreatic duct stones were included. We included relevant studies for the data analysis regardless of their geographical location, inpatient/outpatient setting, or abstract/manuscript status.

    The exclusion criteria included the following: (1) Alternative therapies for management of pancreatic duct stones other than POP; (2) Use of POP for indications other than for pancreatic duct stones; (3) Studies of the pediatric population (age < 17 years); and (4) Studies published in languages other than English.

    In instances where there were multiple articles from the same cohort or overlapping cohorts, we used the ones that were the most relevant, comprehensive and/or recent.

    Figure 1 Study selection process in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis statement.

    Data extraction

    Information regarding study-related outcomes from the individual studies was extracted onto a standardized form by three authors (BD, HM, SMS).

    Risk of bias

    The collected data was evaluated akin to single group cohort studies and thus, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the quality of these studies[11]. Details of the scale is provided in Supplementary Table 1.

    Statistical analysis

    The pooled estimates were calculated with meta-analysis techniques as per DerSimonian and Laird using the random-effects model[12]. A continuity correction of 0.5 was added to the number of incident cases if incidence of an outcome was zero before statistical analysis[13]. Heterogeneity was evaluatedviaCochraneQstatistical test for heterogeneity and theI2statistics[14,15].I2values of < 30%, 30% to 60%, 61% to 75%, and > 75% were indicative of low, moderate, substantial, and significant heterogeneity, respectively[16]. Publication bias was determined quantitativelyviathe Egger test and qualitativelyviavisual inspection of the funnel plot[17]. With the presence of publication bias, we used the fail-safe N test and the Duval and Tweedie’s “Trim and Fill” test to determine the impact of the bias[18]. Impact was described in three levels based on similarities between the reported results and of those estimated as if there were no bias. Impact was classified as minimal if versions of both results were valued to be same, modest if there was substantial change in effect size, but the conclusion remained the same, or severe if the final conclusion of the analysis was subject to change by the bias[19].

    All of our analyses were executed using comprehensive meta-analysis software, version 3 (BioStat, Englewood, NJ, United States).

    Outcomes assessed

    Primary outcomes:(1) Pooled technical success rate of POP-guided lithotripsy; and (2) Pooled clinical success rate of POP-guided lithotripsy.

    Secondary outcomes:(1) Pooled technical success rate: EHL and LL; (2) Pooled clinical success rate: EHL and LL; (3) Pooled rate of adverse events (AE): POP, EHL and LL; and (4) Pooled rate of AE subtypes for POP: Hemorrhage, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), perforation, abdominal pain, fever and infections.

    Definition of outcomes

    Technical success rate was defined as the rate of clearing the pancreatic duct stones[2,7-9,20-31]. Clinical success was defined as improvement of the symptoms, primarily pain[2,7,20-26,28-31]. AE was defined as complications directly related to the procedure.

    RESULTS

    Search results and characteristics of the population

    Our initial search yielded 361 results. There was a total of 16 studies that reported on POP lithotripsy procedures. Ten of these studies reported outcomes on POP using EHL[2,7-9,20,21,23,25,29,30]and 8 studies reported outcomes on POP using LL[2,20,21,24,26-28,31].

    Ten of the 16 studies reported gender differences, with 65% of the population being male. The mean age reported in 9 of the 16 studies on POP was 54.4 years. The patient demographics are shown in Table 1.

    Characteristics and quality of included studies

    Nine studies were prospective, and the rest were retrospective. Eleven studies were from a single center and the remainder from multicenters. Twelve studies were in full text and 4 studies were in abstract form. There were no population-based studies. The clinical outcomes from all studies were adequately documented.

    Outcomes of the meta-analysis

    A total of 383 patients underwent 464 POP procedures. One hundred and forty-seven patients underwent 265 EHL procedures. One hundred and forty-two patients underwent 199 LL procedures.

    Primary outcomes

    The pooled technical success rate of POP was 76.4% (95%CI: 65.9-84.5;I2= 64%) and the pooled clinical success rate of POP was 76.8% (95%CI: 65.2-85.4;I2= 66%). Figure 2 shows the forest plots for technical and clinical success of POP, respectively.

    Secondary outcomes

    The pooled technical success rate of EHL was 70.3% (95%CI: 57.8-80.3;I2= 36%) and the pooled technical success rate for LL was 89.3% (95%CI: 70.5-96.7;I2= 70%). The pooled clinical success rate of EHL was 66.5% (95%CI: 55.2-76.2;I2= 19%) and of LL was 88.2% (95%CI: 66.4-96.6;I2= 77%). The pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, AE of POP, EHL and LL are presented in Table 2. The pooled POP AE rate was 14.9% (95%CI: 9.2-23.2;I2= 49%), the pooled POP EHL AE rate was 11.2% (95%CI: 5.9-20.3;I2= 15%) and the pooled POP LL AE rate was 13.1% (95%CI: 6.3-25.4;I2= 31%). The subgroup analysis for POP AE were as follows: post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), 7% (95%CI: 3.5-13.6;I2= 38%); fever, 3.7% (95%CI: 2-6.9;I2= 0); abdominal pain, 4.7% (95%CI: 2.7-7.8;I2= 0); perforation, 4.3% (95%CI: 2.1-8.4;I2= 0); hemorrhage, 3.4% (95%CI: 1.7-6.6;I2= 0) and no mortality. The AE in all procedures is shown in Table 3. Figure 3-5 show technical and clinical success of EHL, technical and clinical success of LL, and total adverse events, respectively.

    Validation of meta-analysis results

    Sensitivity analysis:We excluded one study at a time and explored its effect on the main summary evaluation to determine if any one study had a dominant effect on the meta-analysis. We concluded that there was no significant effect on the outcome or heterogeneity.

    The subgroup analysis of technical and clinical success by geographical location (United States, Japan and Europe), publication type (manuscript/abstract), study center (single/multicenter), and study type (retrospective/prospective) did not revealmajor differences.

    Table 1 Description of 16 studies included in the final analysis

    Table 2 Pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events of per oral pancreatoscopy, electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy

    Heterogeneity:Based on prediction interval andI2analysis for heterogeneity, we assessed dispersion of the calculated rates. WithI2we can determine what proportion in terms of dispersion is truevschance[32]. The technical success of POP, clinical success of POP and technical success of LL showed substantial heterogeneity. The technical success in EHL, POP AE, POP LL AE, and PEP showed moderate heterogeneity. Clinical success in EHL, POP EHL AE and remaining subgroup analysis of AE had low heterogeneity. Clinical success for LL had significant heterogeneity.

    Table 3 Adverse events in all procedures

    Publication bias

    Based on the results of the funnel plot and Eggers regression test, there was publication bias. Further assessment using the fail-safe N test and the Duval and Tweedie’s “Trim and Fill” test did not affect the final pooled outcomes. Figure 6 shows the funnel plot.

    DISCUSSION

    Our study demonstrates that the technical success rate of POP was 76.4% and the clinical success rate was 76.8%. Eight out of 16 studies performed ESWL[2,21-23,26,29,30]and all studies attempted standard ERCP prior to POP. This highlights that POP-guided lithotripsy can be utilized when patients fail in the first-line therapy.

    The overall technical success ranged from 37.5%-95% and this variability could be secondary to the type of POP procedure used and the experience of the individual operator. On indirect comparative analysis between EHL and LL, we found that LL had higher overall rates of technical and clinical success. This may be secondary to the ability of LL to fragment denser stones (i.e., Hounsfield index > 2000 HU) as compared to EHL[2]. Although EHL is more widely available as compared to LL, LL tends to be much more expensive and requires special precautions compared with EHL. On subgroup analysis, studies with more than 20 patients showed higher technical success as compared to studies with less than 20 patients. This indicates that operator expertise may have influence on technical success.

    Multiple stones, strictures, impacted stones, difficulty in cannulating PD due to angulation, poor visibility, equipment failure, or stones greater than 17 mm are other factors that may lead to lower technical success of POP[2,7,9,22-24,28-30]. Gutierrezet al[2]reported that presence of 3 or more stones was an independent risk factor for technical failure of POP (P< 0.04). Conversely, Hanet al[22]reported that increased stone burden lead to higher technical success as these patients had higher chances of having smaller stones as compared to larger stones, which led to easier clearance.

    Only Gergeset al[21]reported data regarding quality of lifeviaquestionnaires for pre- and post-procedure pain improvement based on a numeric rating scale decreased from mean of 5.4 ± 1.6 to 2.8 ± 1.8 (P< 0.01). Improvement in quality of life was reported by 89% of the patients in this study, which is comparable to ESWL[21,33].

    Figure 2 Per oral pancreatoscopy. A: Forest plot for the technical success of per oral pancreatoscopy; B: Forest plot for the clinical success of per oral pancreatoscopy.

    The overall pooled AE rate of POP was comparable to ESWL ranging from 7% to 15%[34-37]. On subgroup analysis, the pooled AE rate of EHL and LL was similar at 11.2% and 13.1%, respectively. PEP was the most common AE and was comparable to ESWL at 7%[4,33,35].

    Several limitations exist in our meta-analysis. Most of our studies were performed in tertiary care referral centers, so they may not be reflective of outcomes seen with less experienced operators. Also, POP does not reflect the skill of an average endoscopist. Our analysis contains studies that are retrospective in nature, which contribute to selection bias. No studies included data to compare POP as a first-line therapy with POP as a second-line therapy. Less than 5% of patients underwent POP as a first-line procedure and the individual outcomes were not mentioned in these studies. Nevertheless, this study contains the best available literature thus far with respect to POP. More studies are warranted to evaluate the technical and clinical success of EHL and LL. Clinical success is best defined universally with questionnaires, scores or scales to assess improvement of pain and quality of life, but not all studies provided this data.

    Figure 3 Electrohydraulic lithotripsy. A: Forest plots showing technical success of electrohydraulic lithotripsy; B: Forest plots showing clinical success of electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

    CONCLUSION

    In summary, POP-guided lithotripsy is a viable option for management of patients with chronic pancreatitis and symptomatic PD stones. We found LL technique to have a higher technical and clinical success rate with comparable AE rates. Optimal techniques for POP should be selected based on the clinical situation, device availability, and local center expertise. Further randomized controlled trials are needed for head to head comparison of the two techniques and evaluate if POP can be a potential first-line therapy in these cases.

    Figure 4 Laser lithotripsy. A: Forest plots showing technical success of laser lithotripsy; B: Forest plots showing clinical success of laser lithotripsy.

    Figure 5 Forest plots for adverse events.

    Figure 6 Funnel plots for publication bias.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research perspectives

    Further randomized controlled trials are needed for head to head comparison of the two techniques and evaluate if POP can be a potential first line therapy in these cases.

    猜你喜歡
    講武堂師資云南
    云南茶,1200年的發(fā)現(xiàn)
    馮庸畢業(yè)學(xué)??甲C
    云南邀您來(lái)“吸氧”
    云南是你避暑的最佳選擇
    一圖讀懂云南兩新黨建
    云南陸軍講武堂與中國(guó)近代革命
    文史春秋(2016年2期)2016-12-01 05:41:58
    中國(guó)和主要發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家學(xué)前教育師資職前培養(yǎng)體系比較
    幼教師資培訓(xùn)班在京開(kāi)班
    高職高專(zhuān)師資培訓(xùn)基地發(fā)展及創(chuàng)新思考
    不斷提高職教師資培養(yǎng)質(zhì)量
    精品福利永久在线观看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 一区在线观看完整版| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 色播在线永久视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 免费不卡黄色视频| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 亚洲国产看品久久| 久久中文字幕一级| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 久久 成人 亚洲| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 91国产中文字幕| 在线播放国产精品三级| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产在线视频一区二区| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 少妇 在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 超碰成人久久| av欧美777| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产区一区二久久| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 亚洲欧美激情在线| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 超碰97精品在线观看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 久久这里只有精品19| 久久久国产成人免费| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产色视频综合| 久9热在线精品视频| 中文字幕色久视频| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 男女免费视频国产| 久久九九热精品免费| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 久热这里只有精品99| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕 | 在线天堂中文资源库| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产高清videossex| av天堂久久9| 亚洲成人手机| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 丁香欧美五月| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 在线天堂中文资源库| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产区一区二久久| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 欧美成人午夜精品| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| av有码第一页| 一级片'在线观看视频| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲精品一二三| 一区在线观看完整版| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 18在线观看网站| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产在线视频一区二区| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲第一青青草原| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| av电影中文网址| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| tube8黄色片| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| av一本久久久久| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 久久影院123| 欧美日韩精品网址| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 香蕉丝袜av| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 热re99久久国产66热| av在线播放免费不卡| 久久九九热精品免费| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 男人操女人黄网站| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 成年版毛片免费区| 成年动漫av网址| 久久99一区二区三区| 一进一出抽搐动态| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 99久久国产精品久久久| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 午夜免费鲁丝| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 十八禁人妻一区二区| av一本久久久久| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 成年动漫av网址| 久久99一区二区三区| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 亚洲天堂av无毛| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| www.精华液| 自线自在国产av| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 制服人妻中文乱码| 天天影视国产精品| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 脱女人内裤的视频| avwww免费| 久9热在线精品视频| www日本在线高清视频| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| av在线播放免费不卡| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产精品1区2区在线观看. | 久久久国产一区二区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 午夜福利欧美成人| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| av片东京热男人的天堂| 一本综合久久免费| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 一夜夜www| 成人三级做爰电影| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 香蕉丝袜av| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 满18在线观看网站| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 午夜福利,免费看| 成人三级做爰电影| 免费看a级黄色片| 大香蕉久久成人网| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 天天添夜夜摸| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 在线av久久热| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产麻豆69| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久99一区二区三区| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产高清videossex| 搡老岳熟女国产| 热99re8久久精品国产| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 制服诱惑二区| 精品国产亚洲在线| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 久久中文看片网| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 丁香六月天网| 操美女的视频在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 久久久久久人人人人人| 99香蕉大伊视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 成人18禁在线播放| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 美国免费a级毛片| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 女警被强在线播放| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| av线在线观看网站| 免费不卡黄色视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 日本av免费视频播放| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 一级片免费观看大全| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 精品久久久久久电影网| 岛国在线观看网站| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| av不卡在线播放| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 黄频高清免费视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 成人三级做爰电影| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 香蕉久久夜色| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| www日本在线高清视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产成人精品无人区| 超碰成人久久| 电影成人av| www日本在线高清视频| 国产精品.久久久| 免费不卡黄色视频| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 人妻一区二区av| 女警被强在线播放| 精品福利观看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| a在线观看视频网站| 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 在线观看人妻少妇| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区 | cao死你这个sao货| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 香蕉国产在线看| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 亚洲美女黄片视频| www.精华液| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看 | 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 欧美大码av| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲中文av在线| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产成人影院久久av| a级毛片黄视频| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久 成人 亚洲| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 国产精品免费大片| 99久久人妻综合| 99香蕉大伊视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 久久av网站| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 日本五十路高清| 99香蕉大伊视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 麻豆av在线久日| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| av福利片在线| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 性少妇av在线| 在线观看人妻少妇| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 无限看片的www在线观看| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 精品国产亚洲在线| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 精品福利观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产成人欧美| 中文字幕色久视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 午夜福利视频精品| 大型av网站在线播放| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 久久久久视频综合| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 在线av久久热| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 老司机靠b影院| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 麻豆av在线久日| a级毛片黄视频| 男女免费视频国产| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| av不卡在线播放| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| av不卡在线播放| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 欧美黑人精品巨大| 国产1区2区3区精品| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 宅男免费午夜| av电影中文网址| a在线观看视频网站| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 免费av中文字幕在线| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 成人永久免费在线观看视频 | 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影 | 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 91成人精品电影| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 蜜桃国产av成人99| 美女主播在线视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 黄色 视频免费看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产在线视频一区二区| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 老熟女久久久| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| av福利片在线| 99久久人妻综合| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 成人国产av品久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲国产看品久久| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 18禁观看日本| 搡老乐熟女国产| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产男女内射视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 黄色视频不卡| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 一本综合久久免费| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 久久狼人影院| netflix在线观看网站| 久久九九热精品免费| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 久久性视频一级片| 成年动漫av网址| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久热这里只有精品99| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 蜜桃在线观看..| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 深夜精品福利| av免费在线观看网站| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 大香蕉久久网| 午夜两性在线视频| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢|