• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Efficacy of pancreatoscopy for pancreatic duct stones: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    2020-10-09 08:53:26SyedSaghirHarmeetMashianaBabuMohanBanreetDhindsaAmaninderDhaliwalSaurabhChandanNeilBhogalIshfaqBhatShailenderSinghDouglasAdler
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年34期
    關(guān)鍵詞:講武堂師資云南

    Syed M Saghir, Harmeet S Mashiana, Babu P Mohan, Banreet S Dhindsa, Amaninder Dhaliwal, Saurabh Chandan, Neil Bhogal, Ishfaq Bhat, Shailender Singh, Douglas G Adler

    Abstract

    Key Words: Electrohydraulic shockwave lithotripsy; Laser lithotripsy; Chronic pancreatitis; Calculi; Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Outcome

    INTRODUCTION

    Pancreatic duct (PD) stones are a common complication of chronic pancreatitis (CP), which can lead to obstruction of the PD and cause chronic abdominal pain and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency[1]. PD stones may be present in as many as 50%-90% of CP patients[1,2]. The cause of the pain is multifactorial, but is thought to be secondary to elevated pancreatic ductal pressures, elevated interstitial pancreatic pressure, ischemia, fibrosis, and inflammation-related injury to the nerves innervating the pancreas[1]. Relieving PD obstruction is an important aspect in treatment of patients with painful chronic pancreatitis.

    Current management of symptomatic PD stones includes medical therapy such as pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT), extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) with or without endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), ERCP with pancreatic sphincterotomy and either balloon or basket retrieval with stent placement, peroral pancreatoscopy and/or surgery[1,2]. According to the 2018 European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and the 2017 United European Gastroenterology (UEG) guidelines, ESWL is the first line approach for patients with painful PD stones who have failed in medical therapy and who have stones greater than 5 mm[3,4]. ERCP is recommended for stones less than 5 mm[4]. The American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) 2020 guidelines recommend ERCP/interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) for PD stone management[5]. If these modalities are unsuccessful, pancreatic surgery should be considered[6,7].

    Per oral pancreatoscopy (POP)-guided lithotripsy is being increasingly used for the management of main pancreatic duct calculi (PDC) in the setting of CP[2,8]. Previously two operators were required to do this procedure and imaging quality was poor, but with the advent of newer technology, POP by single operator is now widely available[9]. POP uses two techniques: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) and laser lithotripsy (LL). EHL technique uses a charge generator and bipolar probe to create a spark to produce a vapor plasma. The vapor plasma becomes a cavitation bubble that oscillates around the tip of the probe, which leads to stone fragmentation by absorption of rebounding shockwaves from the vapor. LL technique uses laser light at a specific wavelength to induce fragmentation[1]. Both techniques simply fragment stones into smaller pieces that still need to be removedviaballoon and basket retrieval devices.

    Information about the safety profile of POP and ESWL is limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on POP to assess the two techniques with regards to stone fragmentation, safety, and efficacy.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Literature search

    We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases and conference proceedings including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases (from 1999 to October 2019). We identified studies reporting on outcomes of POP-guided intracorporal lithotripsy and followed the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines[10]. The schematic diagram of study selection as per PRISMA guidelines is illustrated in Figure 1.

    Literature search keywords included a combination of “per-oral”, “pancreatoscopy”, “pancreatoscope”, “POP”, “electrohydraulic”, “EHL”, “l(fā)aser”, “l(fā)ithotripsy”, “LL”, “pancreas”, “calculi”, “stones”, “chronic” and “pancreatitis”. The literature retrieved was restricted to studies done on humans and published in English. Two authors (BD, HS) independently evaluated titles and abstracts obtained from the literature search and discarded any studies that were irrelevant to our topic, based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then reviewed the complete versions of the articles of interest to determine if they contained relevant context. Any article with discrepancies was reviewed by a third author (SS).

    這是一個(gè)很復(fù)雜的問(wèn)題,一方面云南那一段歷史,的確有待我們重新認(rèn)識(shí);另一方面,講武堂作為一所學(xué)校,的確在師資、管理和思想等方面,有獨(dú)到之處。

    Additional relevant articles were discovered from the bibliographic sections from the articles of interest.

    Study selection

    In this meta-analysis, studies that discussed the use of POP, EHL, and LL in patients with pancreatic duct stones were included. We included relevant studies for the data analysis regardless of their geographical location, inpatient/outpatient setting, or abstract/manuscript status.

    The exclusion criteria included the following: (1) Alternative therapies for management of pancreatic duct stones other than POP; (2) Use of POP for indications other than for pancreatic duct stones; (3) Studies of the pediatric population (age < 17 years); and (4) Studies published in languages other than English.

    In instances where there were multiple articles from the same cohort or overlapping cohorts, we used the ones that were the most relevant, comprehensive and/or recent.

    Figure 1 Study selection process in accordance with preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis statement.

    Data extraction

    Information regarding study-related outcomes from the individual studies was extracted onto a standardized form by three authors (BD, HM, SMS).

    Risk of bias

    The collected data was evaluated akin to single group cohort studies and thus, we used the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the quality of these studies[11]. Details of the scale is provided in Supplementary Table 1.

    Statistical analysis

    The pooled estimates were calculated with meta-analysis techniques as per DerSimonian and Laird using the random-effects model[12]. A continuity correction of 0.5 was added to the number of incident cases if incidence of an outcome was zero before statistical analysis[13]. Heterogeneity was evaluatedviaCochraneQstatistical test for heterogeneity and theI2statistics[14,15].I2values of < 30%, 30% to 60%, 61% to 75%, and > 75% were indicative of low, moderate, substantial, and significant heterogeneity, respectively[16]. Publication bias was determined quantitativelyviathe Egger test and qualitativelyviavisual inspection of the funnel plot[17]. With the presence of publication bias, we used the fail-safe N test and the Duval and Tweedie’s “Trim and Fill” test to determine the impact of the bias[18]. Impact was described in three levels based on similarities between the reported results and of those estimated as if there were no bias. Impact was classified as minimal if versions of both results were valued to be same, modest if there was substantial change in effect size, but the conclusion remained the same, or severe if the final conclusion of the analysis was subject to change by the bias[19].

    All of our analyses were executed using comprehensive meta-analysis software, version 3 (BioStat, Englewood, NJ, United States).

    Outcomes assessed

    Primary outcomes:(1) Pooled technical success rate of POP-guided lithotripsy; and (2) Pooled clinical success rate of POP-guided lithotripsy.

    Secondary outcomes:(1) Pooled technical success rate: EHL and LL; (2) Pooled clinical success rate: EHL and LL; (3) Pooled rate of adverse events (AE): POP, EHL and LL; and (4) Pooled rate of AE subtypes for POP: Hemorrhage, post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), perforation, abdominal pain, fever and infections.

    Definition of outcomes

    Technical success rate was defined as the rate of clearing the pancreatic duct stones[2,7-9,20-31]. Clinical success was defined as improvement of the symptoms, primarily pain[2,7,20-26,28-31]. AE was defined as complications directly related to the procedure.

    RESULTS

    Search results and characteristics of the population

    Our initial search yielded 361 results. There was a total of 16 studies that reported on POP lithotripsy procedures. Ten of these studies reported outcomes on POP using EHL[2,7-9,20,21,23,25,29,30]and 8 studies reported outcomes on POP using LL[2,20,21,24,26-28,31].

    Ten of the 16 studies reported gender differences, with 65% of the population being male. The mean age reported in 9 of the 16 studies on POP was 54.4 years. The patient demographics are shown in Table 1.

    Characteristics and quality of included studies

    Nine studies were prospective, and the rest were retrospective. Eleven studies were from a single center and the remainder from multicenters. Twelve studies were in full text and 4 studies were in abstract form. There were no population-based studies. The clinical outcomes from all studies were adequately documented.

    Outcomes of the meta-analysis

    A total of 383 patients underwent 464 POP procedures. One hundred and forty-seven patients underwent 265 EHL procedures. One hundred and forty-two patients underwent 199 LL procedures.

    Primary outcomes

    The pooled technical success rate of POP was 76.4% (95%CI: 65.9-84.5;I2= 64%) and the pooled clinical success rate of POP was 76.8% (95%CI: 65.2-85.4;I2= 66%). Figure 2 shows the forest plots for technical and clinical success of POP, respectively.

    Secondary outcomes

    The pooled technical success rate of EHL was 70.3% (95%CI: 57.8-80.3;I2= 36%) and the pooled technical success rate for LL was 89.3% (95%CI: 70.5-96.7;I2= 70%). The pooled clinical success rate of EHL was 66.5% (95%CI: 55.2-76.2;I2= 19%) and of LL was 88.2% (95%CI: 66.4-96.6;I2= 77%). The pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, AE of POP, EHL and LL are presented in Table 2. The pooled POP AE rate was 14.9% (95%CI: 9.2-23.2;I2= 49%), the pooled POP EHL AE rate was 11.2% (95%CI: 5.9-20.3;I2= 15%) and the pooled POP LL AE rate was 13.1% (95%CI: 6.3-25.4;I2= 31%). The subgroup analysis for POP AE were as follows: post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), 7% (95%CI: 3.5-13.6;I2= 38%); fever, 3.7% (95%CI: 2-6.9;I2= 0); abdominal pain, 4.7% (95%CI: 2.7-7.8;I2= 0); perforation, 4.3% (95%CI: 2.1-8.4;I2= 0); hemorrhage, 3.4% (95%CI: 1.7-6.6;I2= 0) and no mortality. The AE in all procedures is shown in Table 3. Figure 3-5 show technical and clinical success of EHL, technical and clinical success of LL, and total adverse events, respectively.

    Validation of meta-analysis results

    Sensitivity analysis:We excluded one study at a time and explored its effect on the main summary evaluation to determine if any one study had a dominant effect on the meta-analysis. We concluded that there was no significant effect on the outcome or heterogeneity.

    The subgroup analysis of technical and clinical success by geographical location (United States, Japan and Europe), publication type (manuscript/abstract), study center (single/multicenter), and study type (retrospective/prospective) did not revealmajor differences.

    Table 1 Description of 16 studies included in the final analysis

    Table 2 Pooled rates of technical success, clinical success, and adverse events of per oral pancreatoscopy, electrohydraulic lithotripsy and laser lithotripsy

    Heterogeneity:Based on prediction interval andI2analysis for heterogeneity, we assessed dispersion of the calculated rates. WithI2we can determine what proportion in terms of dispersion is truevschance[32]. The technical success of POP, clinical success of POP and technical success of LL showed substantial heterogeneity. The technical success in EHL, POP AE, POP LL AE, and PEP showed moderate heterogeneity. Clinical success in EHL, POP EHL AE and remaining subgroup analysis of AE had low heterogeneity. Clinical success for LL had significant heterogeneity.

    Table 3 Adverse events in all procedures

    Publication bias

    Based on the results of the funnel plot and Eggers regression test, there was publication bias. Further assessment using the fail-safe N test and the Duval and Tweedie’s “Trim and Fill” test did not affect the final pooled outcomes. Figure 6 shows the funnel plot.

    DISCUSSION

    Our study demonstrates that the technical success rate of POP was 76.4% and the clinical success rate was 76.8%. Eight out of 16 studies performed ESWL[2,21-23,26,29,30]and all studies attempted standard ERCP prior to POP. This highlights that POP-guided lithotripsy can be utilized when patients fail in the first-line therapy.

    The overall technical success ranged from 37.5%-95% and this variability could be secondary to the type of POP procedure used and the experience of the individual operator. On indirect comparative analysis between EHL and LL, we found that LL had higher overall rates of technical and clinical success. This may be secondary to the ability of LL to fragment denser stones (i.e., Hounsfield index > 2000 HU) as compared to EHL[2]. Although EHL is more widely available as compared to LL, LL tends to be much more expensive and requires special precautions compared with EHL. On subgroup analysis, studies with more than 20 patients showed higher technical success as compared to studies with less than 20 patients. This indicates that operator expertise may have influence on technical success.

    Multiple stones, strictures, impacted stones, difficulty in cannulating PD due to angulation, poor visibility, equipment failure, or stones greater than 17 mm are other factors that may lead to lower technical success of POP[2,7,9,22-24,28-30]. Gutierrezet al[2]reported that presence of 3 or more stones was an independent risk factor for technical failure of POP (P< 0.04). Conversely, Hanet al[22]reported that increased stone burden lead to higher technical success as these patients had higher chances of having smaller stones as compared to larger stones, which led to easier clearance.

    Only Gergeset al[21]reported data regarding quality of lifeviaquestionnaires for pre- and post-procedure pain improvement based on a numeric rating scale decreased from mean of 5.4 ± 1.6 to 2.8 ± 1.8 (P< 0.01). Improvement in quality of life was reported by 89% of the patients in this study, which is comparable to ESWL[21,33].

    Figure 2 Per oral pancreatoscopy. A: Forest plot for the technical success of per oral pancreatoscopy; B: Forest plot for the clinical success of per oral pancreatoscopy.

    The overall pooled AE rate of POP was comparable to ESWL ranging from 7% to 15%[34-37]. On subgroup analysis, the pooled AE rate of EHL and LL was similar at 11.2% and 13.1%, respectively. PEP was the most common AE and was comparable to ESWL at 7%[4,33,35].

    Several limitations exist in our meta-analysis. Most of our studies were performed in tertiary care referral centers, so they may not be reflective of outcomes seen with less experienced operators. Also, POP does not reflect the skill of an average endoscopist. Our analysis contains studies that are retrospective in nature, which contribute to selection bias. No studies included data to compare POP as a first-line therapy with POP as a second-line therapy. Less than 5% of patients underwent POP as a first-line procedure and the individual outcomes were not mentioned in these studies. Nevertheless, this study contains the best available literature thus far with respect to POP. More studies are warranted to evaluate the technical and clinical success of EHL and LL. Clinical success is best defined universally with questionnaires, scores or scales to assess improvement of pain and quality of life, but not all studies provided this data.

    Figure 3 Electrohydraulic lithotripsy. A: Forest plots showing technical success of electrohydraulic lithotripsy; B: Forest plots showing clinical success of electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

    CONCLUSION

    In summary, POP-guided lithotripsy is a viable option for management of patients with chronic pancreatitis and symptomatic PD stones. We found LL technique to have a higher technical and clinical success rate with comparable AE rates. Optimal techniques for POP should be selected based on the clinical situation, device availability, and local center expertise. Further randomized controlled trials are needed for head to head comparison of the two techniques and evaluate if POP can be a potential first-line therapy in these cases.

    Figure 4 Laser lithotripsy. A: Forest plots showing technical success of laser lithotripsy; B: Forest plots showing clinical success of laser lithotripsy.

    Figure 5 Forest plots for adverse events.

    Figure 6 Funnel plots for publication bias.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research perspectives

    Further randomized controlled trials are needed for head to head comparison of the two techniques and evaluate if POP can be a potential first line therapy in these cases.

    猜你喜歡
    講武堂師資云南
    云南茶,1200年的發(fā)現(xiàn)
    馮庸畢業(yè)學(xué)??甲C
    云南邀您來(lái)“吸氧”
    云南是你避暑的最佳選擇
    一圖讀懂云南兩新黨建
    云南陸軍講武堂與中國(guó)近代革命
    文史春秋(2016年2期)2016-12-01 05:41:58
    中國(guó)和主要發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家學(xué)前教育師資職前培養(yǎng)體系比較
    幼教師資培訓(xùn)班在京開(kāi)班
    高職高專(zhuān)師資培訓(xùn)基地發(fā)展及創(chuàng)新思考
    不斷提高職教師資培養(yǎng)質(zhì)量
    久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 黄色视频不卡| av网站在线播放免费| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 色播在线永久视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲美女黄片视频| av在线播放免费不卡| 精品国产亚洲在线| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| videosex国产| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 美女午夜性视频免费| 在线观看66精品国产| 成人三级做爰电影| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久亚洲真实| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| av网站免费在线观看视频| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 国产精品久久视频播放| 1024香蕉在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 精品一区二区三卡| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 午夜激情av网站| 免费看a级黄色片| www.自偷自拍.com| www日本在线高清视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 成人国语在线视频| 午夜影院日韩av| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 女警被强在线播放| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 一区在线观看完整版| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 久久精品成人免费网站| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 久久久久视频综合| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 无限看片的www在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 日韩欧美三级三区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 国产淫语在线视频| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 久久99一区二区三区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 在线av久久热| 99久久国产精品久久久| 又大又爽又粗| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 1024香蕉在线观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 一本综合久久免费| 国产精品国产高清国产av | 极品教师在线免费播放| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 男人操女人黄网站| 精品国产一区二区久久| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 国产av精品麻豆| av不卡在线播放| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 黄色视频不卡| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 久久香蕉国产精品| av有码第一页| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 久久狼人影院| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产男女内射视频| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲成人手机| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 9热在线视频观看99| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| www日本在线高清视频| 一级片免费观看大全| 欧美成人午夜精品| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 中文字幕制服av| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 男人操女人黄网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 三级毛片av免费| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 午夜精品在线福利| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕 | 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲色图av天堂| 黄色成人免费大全| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 乱人伦中国视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 午夜福利,免费看| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 露出奶头的视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 色在线成人网| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 欧美午夜高清在线| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 99re在线观看精品视频| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 在线观看www视频免费| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 久久久国产成人精品二区 | 久久久久视频综合| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 99国产综合亚洲精品| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 一区二区三区精品91| 大型av网站在线播放| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 在线观看日韩欧美| 一级片'在线观看视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国产区一区二久久| 久久香蕉激情| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 91大片在线观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 欧美日韩黄片免| a级毛片黄视频| 欧美大码av| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产99白浆流出| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 大香蕉久久网| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 超色免费av| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说 | 妹子高潮喷水视频| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 久久99一区二区三区| 很黄的视频免费| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 99久久人妻综合| 天堂√8在线中文| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久久久国内视频| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 少妇 在线观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 在线看a的网站| 超色免费av| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 精品国产国语对白av| 精品国产亚洲在线| 亚洲片人在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 成人三级做爰电影| 看片在线看免费视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 久久精品成人免费网站| 搡老乐熟女国产| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 日韩有码中文字幕| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产成人精品在线电影| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 午夜91福利影院| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 亚洲精华国产精华精| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| av免费在线观看网站| 嫩草影视91久久| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 久久这里只有精品19| 日韩欧美在线二视频 | 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 久久久久国内视频| 777米奇影视久久| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区 | 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| bbb黄色大片| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 色老头精品视频在线观看| www.自偷自拍.com| 岛国毛片在线播放| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 精品第一国产精品| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| tocl精华| 国产高清videossex| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 不卡av一区二区三区| 日本欧美视频一区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| av一本久久久久| 一级黄色大片毛片| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费 | 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线 | 91老司机精品| 婷婷成人精品国产| www.999成人在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 怎么达到女性高潮| 老司机靠b影院| 岛国毛片在线播放| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看 | 在线视频色国产色| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 热re99久久国产66热| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 大型av网站在线播放| 成人18禁在线播放| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 久久久国产成人免费| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 脱女人内裤的视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女 | 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 老司机福利观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 五月开心婷婷网| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 午夜老司机福利片| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 超碰97精品在线观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 91字幕亚洲| 麻豆av在线久日| 91在线观看av| 午夜福利,免费看| 在线av久久热| 黄色 视频免费看| a级毛片在线看网站| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 精品高清国产在线一区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 久久九九热精品免费| 91老司机精品| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 久久香蕉精品热| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲人成电影观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产精品免费视频内射| 露出奶头的视频| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲第一av免费看| 久99久视频精品免费| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 91成人精品电影| 两性夫妻黄色片| 激情在线观看视频在线高清 | 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址 | 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 一a级毛片在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| xxx96com| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影 | 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 两性夫妻黄色片| 精品福利观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| av欧美777| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 欧美成人午夜精品| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 国产免费现黄频在线看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 国产av又大| 午夜激情av网站| 69av精品久久久久久| 高清欧美精品videossex| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 无人区码免费观看不卡| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产1区2区3区精品| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 国产亚洲欧美98| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 成人三级做爰电影| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 1024视频免费在线观看| 美国免费a级毛片| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 咕卡用的链子| 久久香蕉国产精品| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 无限看片的www在线观看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频 | 热re99久久国产66热| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 精品久久久久久电影网| 99久久人妻综合| 国产麻豆69| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 久久久久久人人人人人| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 超碰成人久久| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 日本五十路高清| 午夜老司机福利片| 久久久久久久国产电影| 操出白浆在线播放| 18禁观看日本| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 在线观看午夜福利视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 成在线人永久免费视频| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 天天添夜夜摸| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 99久久人妻综合| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产精品电影一区二区三区 | 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 香蕉久久夜色| 91av网站免费观看| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 中国美女看黄片| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 男人操女人黄网站| 久久久久久久国产电影| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 99久久人妻综合|