• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Risk of malignancy in Caroli disease and syndrome: A systematic review

    2020-09-23 10:05:32RenFahrnerSandraGCDennlerDanielInderbitzin
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2020年31期

    René Fahrner, Sandra GC Dennler, Daniel Inderbitzin

    Abstract

    Key words: Malignancy; Caroli disease; Caroli syndrome; Tumor; Cholangiocarcinoma; Review

    INTRODUCTION

    Vachell first described Caroli disease (CD) in 1906[1]. The segmental dilatation of the intrahepatic biliary ducts in combination with renal cystic disease and liver fibrosis is named Caroli syndrome (CS)[2,3]. Due to focal inflammation, likely initiated by an intrauterine malformation of the bile ductal plate, the biliary tract is continuously destroyed over decades[4,5]. Consequently, the further progression of this destructive inflammatory state leads to recurrent episodes of cholangitis, the development of biliary stones and malignant transformation in some cases, and cholangiocarcinoma is described, but is rare overall with reports up to 14%[5-7]. However, the risk of developing intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma in CD or CS is increased 100-fold compared to healthy individuals[8]. The association between intrahepatic cystic lesions in CS or CD and cholangiocarcinoma was first published in 1968[9]. The distinct etiology of this association and malformation is not clear[8], but several theories are postulated: Carcinogenic component of the bile with prolonged effect during biliary stasis[8]; permanent stone irritation and formation of carcinogens[10]; and cellular predisposition for neoplastic change of the congenital cystic malformation of the biliary tract[8]. Unfortunately, the preoperative diagnosis of malignant transformation is difficult, and final diagnosis of the cholangiocarcinoma is typically made during pathological examination of the surgical specimen and less common in preoperative liver biopsies[6,11,12]. Furthermore, malignancy in CS or CD is suggested to be more likely in older patients[11], insufficient bile drainage[8]and long disease duration[8,10,12]. Therefore, the time span between the onset of first symptoms and definitive treatment is up to 60 mo in many cases[13,14]. The complaint symptoms may be unspecific and vary from pain, pruritus, fever, sepsis, recurrent cholangitis, abscesses, pancreatitis, weight loss, and adynamia[3,5,15-22]. Besides biliary drainage operations or interventions[7,22-24], liver resection[7,12,25]or orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT)[7]are performed. The decision to perform a specific intervention depends on the extent of biliary pathology and hepatic fibrosis and portal hypertension consecutively.

    The present systematic review (1) analyzed the existing literature on the current incidence of malignancy in CS or CD; (2) the potential risk factors for the development of malignancy in patients with CS or CD; (3) the postoperative outcome of CS or CD after liver resection or OLT; and (4) the best treatment options for patients with CS or CD and suspected malignancy.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    A systematic review of the literature until January 2019 was performed according the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement[26]to identify studies reporting the incidence of tumors in patients with CS and CD underwent resection or liver transplantation. Therefore, a literature search was performed using Medline (PubMed) from January 1993 to January 2019. During screening process, non-English articles were excluded. Reports with less than five patients and review articles were excluded. The search was performed using a combination of Medical Subject Headings terms “caroli disease”, “caroli syndrome”, “tumor”, “malignant”, and “cholangiocarcinoma”. Only human studies were used for this systematic review. The titles and abstracts of the articles were screened first for scientific relevance of this review. The full article was reviewed for potential eligibility and reported incidence of malignancy in the next step. The flow-chart show the process of identification, screening and final inclusion of articles in Figure 1.

    The following parameters were extracted from each article: Year of publication, type of study, number of patients with CD or CS, incidence of malignant tumor, duration of symptoms (months), age in years, sex (femalesvsmales), used diagnostics (ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), and percutaneous cholangiography), identification of tumor (preoperative biopsy or incidental finding), surgical therapy (liver resection, OLT), survival and tumor recurrence.

    RESULTS

    Included studies

    Twelve manuscripts were included in this systematic review (Table 1). All studies were of a retrospective nature. Most studies were single-center studies (n= 8), and four studies included data of an official registry (n= 2) or multicenter (n= 2) analysis. The study populations of each study were small, with only three studies including more than 100 patients and 75% of the studies included less than 45 patients, with a total of 561 patients. The reported incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in patients treated for CS or CD varied from 2.7% to 37.5%, depending on the size of the study population. The overall incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in all included patients was 6.6% (n= 37).

    Diagnostic preoperative work-up

    Only few studies reported a detailed preoperative diagnostic work-up for patients with CS and CD in general, and no study presented a work-up to identify cholangiocarcinoma within CS and CD (Table 2). Ultrasound of the liver, CT, MRI, and ERCP revealed the standard of preoperative diagnostics in most of the studies. Three studies reported percutaneous cholangiography to estimate the extent of biliary pathology.

    Patient demographics

    There was a slight predominance of female sex in all patients (53% females, Table 3).Patients suffering from CS or CD are younger than other populations undergoing liver resection, fore.g., liver cancer, the mean patient age ranged from 23 to 56 years old, with a total mean of 41.6 years old at the time point of surgery. Only five studies reported data on the duration of disease or symptoms. Patients reported at least 7 mo of mean duration of symptoms, but the most patients suffered from cholangitis, fever or abdominal pain for several years (Table 3). In most cases (89%), tumor identification was finally made in definitive histological assessment as an incidental finding. The diagnosis was suspected prior surgery or proven by preoperative biopsy only in less than five patients (14%).

    Table 1 Literature search results and analyzed manuscripts

    Table 2 Diagnostic work flow prior to surgery

    Tumor treatment and survival

    Patients with CS or CD were treated via liver resection or OLT (Table 4). The indication for the onco-surgical treatment (liver resection or OLT) was primarly basedon the extent of the biliary pathology and an additional alteration of the liver structure or function. Most of the tumors were incidental findings, and no exact proposal of liver resection or liver transplantation was possible on the basis of the data, but the proposed treatment of cholangiocarcinomas without CS or CD is likely applicable in these patients. In cases of tumor identification in histological assessment of the surgical specimen, no postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was reported. Chemotherapy was administered in selected cases of tumor recurrence. Unfortunately, few data were available on the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification or grading of the tumors. Most tumors were localized within in the liver (pT1 or pT2), but local lymph node involvement or peritoneal seeding was described (Table 4). However, overall survival rates after one year were low at 36% in total. It was impossible to distinguish the effect of liver resection or liver transplantation due to the retrospective reports of both different surgical treatments. The reported recurrence rate during the observation

    period in 7 studies was high, at up to 75%.

    Table 4 Surgical treatment, tumor characteristics and survival

    Figure 1 Flow-chart of the identification, screening and final inclusion of articles.

    DISCUSSION

    Only a few reports investigated CS and CD and the development of cancer, and there was no suitable explanation for this fact in most of the publications. The present review analyzed the data of 561 patients included in 12 studies who were treated either with liver resection or OLT. Unfortunately, most of the studies were reports of less than 45 patients, and retrospective single or multicenter experiences were reported over several years in all cases. In addition, various case reports were not included in this systematic review.

    The total incidence of cancerous transformation or simultaneous cancer in CS and CD is approximately 7%, but it ranged from approximately 3% to almost 40% in the beginning of the 2000s depending on the cohort[19,27]. Over time this incidence did not change, and the latest publications during the last six years reported incidences between 5% to 33%[12,20,25]. There were no new aspects reported on the development of cancerous transformation, and biliary stasis[8], stone irritation[10], a cellular predisposition of the cystic congenital malformation[8]and a combination of these factors are possible pathways[28]. Most cases of cancer are cholangiocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma, and the biliary epithelium is propagated as the origin of the cancerous transformation[6]. As one trigger for the malignant transformation, chronic inflammation of the biliary epithelium during cholangitis with consecutive dysplasia and carcinogenesis is postulated[29]. Unfortunately, due to little data, the hypothesis of an increased incidence for malignant transformation in large bile ducts rather than in small peripheral ducts could not be proven in this review[14].

    There are only few data on the structured preoperative work-up of patients with CS and CD regarding the used method. Ultrasound was used in most studies to identify cystic lesions within the liver and potential altered liver structure, such as liver cirrhosis[21,30]. To further evaluate the biliary tract, ERCP or percutaneous cholangiography was used in selected cases in some of the studies[3,13,19,27]. However, the use of invasive biliary diagnostics should be avoided and performed only in selected patients because they are often associated with an increased risk for infections[19]. If reported, CT or MRI scans were used to investigate the nature of the cysts, identify possible malignant transformation, and plan and assess the surgical resectability[20,21,27]. The tumor markers Ca-19-9 is often elevated in cases of benign biliary obstruction or cholangitis, and higher levels may mislead the correct diagnosis[7]. Overall, the diagnosis of malignancy in CS and CD is difficult, and the tumor identification was an incidental finding in most of the reports in this review, which was made during the final histological assessment of the surgical specimen, because the preoperative identification of a tumor within a dilated cystic bile tract is almost impossible[3,8,11,13,25]. Therefore, the value of screening patients with CS and CD for malignancy is quite inaccurate, and definite treatment should be sought, because delayed diagnosis and widespread tumor are associated with a poor prognosis[18]. In the future, a more aggressive diagnostic work-up including endoscopic ultrasound, puncture of suspected segments within the biliary tract, cholangioscopy (percutaneously) should be used, with the goal to detect more frequently patients with malignant transformation and therefore avoiding delay of definite surgical treatment.

    The initial treatment of CS and CD is often nonsurgical and supportive therapy using analgesia, antibiotics in case of biliary infections and ursodeoxycholic acid[31,32]. Surgical or interventional drainage procedures may be performed to remove biliary tract obstructions and improve biliary passage to decrease the risk and burden of cholangitis[33,34]. Beside this conservative treatment, the final diagnosis of CS or CD often takes months or years until the patient is referred for definite surgical treatment. During that time, patients suffer recurrent infections, sepsis, hepatic abscesses, portal hypertension, and the risk of malignant transformation without solving the problem of the dilated and cystic biliary tract[30,35-38]. There are reports that malignant transformation does not depend on the disease duration, because cancer occurred in patients with symptomatic CS or CD of two months to two decades. Therefore, it has been postulated that there are likely more aggressive subgroups in CS or CD with increased potential for malignancy[30]. Due to a lack of data, there is no explanation or postulated pathway for this fact.

    As a conclusion for this observation, surgical treatment with liver resection or OLT should be offered to patients with CS or CD as soon as possible to avoid recurrent sepsis and primarily malignant transformation[3,25,30]. In cases of conservative treatment, even asymptomatic patients should be regularly screened clinically and radiologically for malignancy[30]. To obtain the best treatment and surveillance, an interdisciplinary management team, including surgeons, gastroenterologists, hepatologists, radiologists, pediatrician and specialists in infectious diseases, is needed. Therefore, these patients are often treated in transplant centers. Overall, a high suspicion for potential malignant transformation is needed, and early treatment should be intended.

    After one year, the survival rate of all tumor patients was 35%, which is low and much lower than in hepatocellular carcinoma patients[39-41]or selected surgical treated cholangiocarcinoma patients[42-45]. At least 32% had tumor recurrence during the observation period, but five studies did not report any data about recurrence. Therefore, the incidence may be even higher, and some patients likely died before the detection of any tumor recurrence probably due to the high mortality rate. In some studies, a high morbidity and in-house mortality was reported after OLT due to infectious complications and therapy-resistant sepsis[17,21]. The general treatment suggestion is to perform liver resection in defined and localized cystic degeneration and evaluate OLT in diffuse cystic affection with structural hepatic changes[3,25,27,30].

    On the basis of the data, no adjuvant chemotherapy was administered in cases of cholangiocarcinoma or adenocarcinoma. There were only a few reports of chemotherapy in cases of recurrence when surgery was no longer an option. This result is comparable to patients with cholangiocarcinoma without CS or CD, where chemotherapy is used only in nonresectable and extended tumors or recurrence[46].

    The studies were not comparable. For example, TNM staging was available only in a few studies. The extent of cystic degeneration and underlying structural liver changes greatly influences the choice of treatment as mentioned previously. In cases of cancer in CS patients treated with OLT, the long-term survival rate was 0%[17,27], and recurrence rates were high, which are comparable to studies of OLT and cholangiocarcinoma without CS or CD[47]. Patients with localized and small cholangiocarcinoma likely benefit from OLT, although little current data exist[7].

    The following limitations of this systematic review must be addressed. Overall, there were predominantly small, retrospective cohort studies with nonhomogeneous patient collectives treated with liver resection or OLT. Therefore, it was not possible to identify specific risk factors indicating the risk for malignant transformation in CS or CD, because these two entities were not reported separately. Another aspect was that most of the tumors were incidental findings, so a specific work-up algorithm is likely not possible to define. Further prospective and multicenter studies or databases with the specific goal to identify risk factors for malignant transformation are needed.

    In conclusion, there were only few retrospective studies of patients treated with surgery in cases of CS and CD. Therefore, it was not possible to identify valuable risk factors for the malignant transformation in these patients. On the other hand, the previously postulated factors for the development of malignancy could neither be proven nor rebutted. Overall, the incidence of simultaneous malignancy in CS or CD is low, but high tumor rates to almost 40% were reported depending on the investigated cohort. Because a high proportion of malignant tumors were incidental findings, the definite surgical treatment should be offered as soon as possible to avoid septic complications and the development of carcinoma. Surgical treatment should include liver resection in localized affection (primarily CD) and OLT in diffuse affection and structural liver changes, such as liver fibrosis (CS). In proven malignant transformation, small tumors may be treated with OLT successfully, but extensive tumors are mostly associated with an inferior outcome,e.g., due to tumor recurrence. Overall, the postoperative results are associated with a high rate of mortality and tumor recurrence. Therefore, patient selection and the timing of surgery are of high importance. On the basis of the current literature, there are no optimal screening methods described to identify patients with malignant transformation early and safely. Therefore, a high suspicion of malignancy is needed to find the exact time point for surgery and avoid delay in definite surgical treatment. Finally, new screening tools are needed to increase the rate of tumor identification during long-term surveillance of patients with CS or CD.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    Congenital intrahepatic bile duct dilatation without fibrosis is called Caroli disease (CD), and is called Caroli syndrome (CS) when it has fibrotic and cirrhotic liver morphology. The development of intrahepatic carcinoma is described in both conditions, but the reported incidence varies extensively. Furthermore, there are no valid guidelines how to treat and diagnose malignant transformation in these patients.

    Research motivation

    So far no valid potential risk factors for the malignant transformation were described. Furthermore, conservative or surgical treatment is performed depending on the extent of cystic malformation, hepatic dysfunction and structural hepatic changes, but little is known about which treatment should be offered to patients with CD or CS and especially cancer.

    Research objectives

    We performed a systematic review of the current literature to investigate specific conditions for malignant transformation in patients with CD and CS and to identify potential risk factors and recommendations regarding diagnosis and surgical treatment.

    Research methods

    A systematic review of the current literature until January 2019 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. During screening process, non-English articles and reports with less than five patients were excluded. The search was performed using a combination of Medical Subject Headings terms “caroli disease”, “caroli syndrome”, “tumor”, “malignant”, and “cholangiocarcinoma”. Only human studies were used for this systematic review.

    Research results

    Twelve retrospective studies reporting the courses of 561 patients (53% females) were included in this systematic review. The patients’ mean age was 41.6 years old (range 23 to 56 years old), therefore patients were younger than other populations undergoing liver surgery. The incidence of cholangiocarcinoma varied from 2.7% to 37.5% with an overall incidence of 6.6%. There were only few detailed reports about preoperative diagnostic work-up. Disease duration was variable with up to several years. In most cases tumor detection was an incidental finding of the surgical specimen as tumor detection in preoperative diagnostics was often impossible. Surgical treatment depended on the extent of the biliary pathology and additional alterations of the liver structure or function. No adjuvant chemotherapy was reported. Overall survival rates after one year were low at 36% and a high recurrence rate of up to 75% during the observation period was seen.

    Research conclusions

    Only few retrospective studies are available and reported a low tumor incidence. On the basis of these studies distinct suggestions regarding diagnosis and treatment are impossible to define. Despite the high rate of mortality and tumor recurrence, definite surgical treatment should be offered as soon as possible.

    Research perspectives

    Further prospective multicenter investigations regarding patient surveillance, diagnostic tools, time point of surgery and risk factors of malignant transformation are needed.

    亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 伦理电影免费视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| a 毛片基地| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 熟女av电影| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 99香蕉大伊视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产成人一区二区在线| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站 | 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 免费观看在线日韩| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 男女免费视频国产| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| av在线app专区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| tube8黄色片| 老司机影院毛片| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 欧美日韩av久久| 日日啪夜夜爽| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 久久99一区二区三区| av片东京热男人的天堂| 一本久久精品| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 久久97久久精品| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 成人影院久久| 一区二区三区激情视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 色吧在线观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 国产色婷婷99| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 国产成人91sexporn| av电影中文网址| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 精品国产国语对白av| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 色94色欧美一区二区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 黄片播放在线免费| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 国产在线免费精品| 视频区图区小说| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 人人澡人人妻人| 如何舔出高潮| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 桃花免费在线播放| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产成人精品福利久久| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 不卡av一区二区三区| tube8黄色片| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区 | 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 三级国产精品片| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产片内射在线| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 日本wwww免费看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| av在线app专区| 满18在线观看网站| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 各种免费的搞黄视频| a级毛片黄视频| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 精品午夜福利在线看| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 美女福利国产在线| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| av有码第一页| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 蜜桃在线观看..| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 99久久综合免费| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 尾随美女入室| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 色网站视频免费| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| www日本在线高清视频| 老女人水多毛片| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产精品二区激情视频| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 成人二区视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 精品酒店卫生间| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 午夜福利视频精品| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 一区在线观看完整版| 99久久综合免费| 亚洲国产看品久久| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 国产乱人偷精品视频| 永久免费av网站大全| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 国产又爽黄色视频| av免费观看日本| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产色婷婷99| 日本午夜av视频| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 99久久人妻综合| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 婷婷色综合www| 深夜精品福利| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 18禁观看日本| 一区在线观看完整版| 欧美日韩精品网址| 亚洲成色77777| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 一区二区三区精品91| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 捣出白浆h1v1| 久久影院123| 一级爰片在线观看| 久久这里只有精品19| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产视频首页在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 中国三级夫妇交换| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产极品天堂在线| 在现免费观看毛片| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 久久这里只有精品19| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| videossex国产| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 国产又爽黄色视频| 亚洲av福利一区| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 中文欧美无线码| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 中文字幕色久视频| 久久久久网色| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 69精品国产乱码久久久| www日本在线高清视频| 考比视频在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 久久婷婷青草| 亚洲国产av新网站| 超碰成人久久| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 欧美日韩精品网址| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 久久97久久精品| av在线老鸭窝| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 青草久久国产| 99九九在线精品视频| 黄色配什么色好看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 电影成人av| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 捣出白浆h1v1| 久久久久久伊人网av| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影 | 最近的中文字幕免费完整| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 亚洲国产欧美网| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| av在线观看视频网站免费| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产精品二区激情视频| 777米奇影视久久| 99热全是精品| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 免费观看性生交大片5| av在线app专区| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲精品第二区| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| a级毛片在线看网站| 丝袜美足系列| 色网站视频免费| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 日日啪夜夜爽| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 青春草国产在线视频| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产av精品麻豆| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 精品少妇内射三级| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| av线在线观看网站| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 深夜精品福利| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| av福利片在线| 一级黄片播放器| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 热re99久久国产66热| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| av天堂久久9| 老女人水多毛片| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 成人二区视频| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 岛国毛片在线播放| 有码 亚洲区| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 99热网站在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区 | 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 美国免费a级毛片| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久久精品94久久精品| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 两个人看的免费小视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 欧美日韩精品网址| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 午夜av观看不卡| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 黄色一级大片看看| av不卡在线播放| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 在线 av 中文字幕| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 久久av网站| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 999久久久国产精品视频| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 免费看av在线观看网站| 日本av免费视频播放| 国产精品免费视频内射| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 午夜激情av网站| a级毛片在线看网站| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产乱来视频区| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 9191精品国产免费久久| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 男人操女人黄网站| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 一级片免费观看大全| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 免费观看av网站的网址| 久久午夜福利片| 老司机影院毛片| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 人人澡人人妻人| 久久av网站| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 99热全是精品| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| av在线播放精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 国产淫语在线视频| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 成人二区视频| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久久欧美国产精品| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 黄色 视频免费看| 一个人免费看片子| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 一个人免费看片子| 制服诱惑二区| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 丝袜喷水一区| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 久热久热在线精品观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 9热在线视频观看99| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 久久这里只有精品19| 欧美日韩av久久| 国产精品国产av在线观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 伦理电影免费视频| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 天美传媒精品一区二区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 91成人精品电影| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久影院123| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 超色免费av| xxx大片免费视频| av在线老鸭窝| 两性夫妻黄色片| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 欧美人与善性xxx| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 97在线视频观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 99九九在线精品视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 五月开心婷婷网| 精品国产国语对白av|