• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Introduction to the Regional Coupled Model WRF4-LICOM: Performanceand Model Intercomparison over the Western North Pacific

    2020-08-06 12:07:36LiweiZOUTianjunZHOUJianpingTANGandHailongLIU
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2020年8期

    Liwei ZOU, Tianjun ZHOU, Jianping TANG, and Hailong LIU

    1State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100029, China

    2Chinese Academy of Sciences Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    3School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China

    4College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    ABSTRACT Regional coupled modeling is one of the frontiers of regional climate modeling, but intercomparison has not been well coordinated. In this study, a community regional climate model, WRF4, with a resolution of 15 km, was coupled with a high-resolution (0.1°) North Pacific Ocean model (LICOM_np). The performance of the regional coupled model,WRF4_LICOM, was compared to that of another regional coupled model, RegCM4_LICOM, which was a coupling of version 4 of the Regional Climate Model (RegCM4) with LICOM_np. The analysis focused on the 2005 western North Pacific summer monsoon rainfall. The results showed that the regional coupled models with either RegCM4 or WRF4 as their atmospheric model component simulated the broad features over the WNP reasonably well. Quantitative intercomparison of the regional coupled simulations exhibited different biases for different climate variables.RegCM4_LICOM exhibited smaller biases in its simulation of the averaged June-July-August SST and rainfall, while WRF4_LICOM better captured the tropical cyclone (TC) intensity, the percentage contributions of rainfall induced by TCs to the total rainfall, and the diurnal cycle of rainfall and stratiform percentages, especially over land areas. The different behaviors in rainfall simulated by the two models were partly ascribed to the behaviors in the simulated western North Pacific subtropical high (WNPSH). The stronger (weaker) WNPSH in WRF4_LICOM (RegCM4_LICOM) was driven by overestimated (underestimated) diabatic heating, which peaked at approximately 450 hPa over the region around the Philippines in association with different condensation-radiation processes. Coupling of WRF4 with LIOCM is a crucial step towards the development of the next generation of regional earth system models at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

    Key words:regional coupled model,model intercomparison,western North Pacific summer monsoon,precipitation

    1.Introduction

    Regional climate models (RCMs) with high-resolution topography and surface characteristics have been widely used for a broad range of applications from process studies to paleoclimate and climate change simulations (Giorgi and Mearns, 1999; Leung et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004;Christensen et al., 2007; Giorgi, 2019). RCMs, as complementary tools to global climate models, have greatly improved our understanding of regional-scale climate and cli-mate change processes (Giorgi, 2019).

    Regional earth system modeling or regional coupled modeling is one of the frontiers of regional climate modeling(Gutowski et al., 2016). Coupling of the ocean component in RCMs was an important step towards the development of regional earth system models (RESMs) (Giorgi and Gao,2018). The Earth System Regional Climate Model, which includes the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ocean general circulation model, has been tested for many regions(Central America, South Atlantic, and the tropics) and has shown realistic simulations of coupled air-sea processes and interactions (Sitz et al., 2017). The Model of the Regional Coupled Earth system, whose ocean model is NEMO, has been tested for the Mediterranean and Indian Ocean domains and has shown reasonable performance in simulations of key elements (Drobinski et al., 2012).

    Intercomparison of regional earth system models/regional ocean-atmosphere-land coupled models has not been well coordinated. The Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX), an ongoing model intercomparison project within the regional climate modeling community, mainly focuses on traditional uncoupled RCMs(Giorgi et al., 2009; Jones et al., 2011; Gutowski et al.,2016). Two flagship pilot studies on regional ocean-atmosphere-land interactions have been endorsed by CORDEX,which focused on western-southern Africa and the Mediterranean region (http://www.cordex.org/endorsed-flagshippilot-studies/). However, little attention has been directed towards the East Asian-western North Pacific (WNP)region. Observational and modeling studies have demonstrated the importance of local air-sea interactions in simulations of the Asian summer monsoon rainfall for climatology, interannual variability (Wang et al., 2005; Zhou et al.,2009) and intraseasonal variability (Wu, 2019). Comparisons between coupled and uncoupled regional climate simulations with a focus on the Asian summer monsoon and its subcomponents have shown better results for summer monsoon rainfall and circulation in regional coupled simulations (e.g., Fang et al., 2010; Li and Zhou, 2010; Yao and Zhang, 2010; Zou and Zhou, 2013; Cha et al., 2016; Zou et al., 2016; Dai et al., 2018). Nevertheless, these studies lack comparability since the experimental designs (i.e., the model domain) were not identical.

    The Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has put considerable effort into global ocean-atmosphere coupled model development [see Zhou et al. (2007, 2018) for a review]. One of the IAP’s global models is named the Flexible Global Ocean-Atmosphere-Land System Model (FGOALS) and has contributed to phases 3 and 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), and is contributing to the ongoing sixth phase (Zhou et al., 2020). The horizontal resolution of FGOALS is relatively coarse (approximately 100-200 km), so the Flexible Regional Ocean-Atmosphere-Land System Model (FROALS), which has a resolution of approximately 50 km, was therefore developed (Zou and Zhou, 2013). FROALS consists of an RCM, version 3 of the Regional Climate Model (RegCM3), with some modifications in convection parameterizations (Zou and Zhou,2011; Zou et al., 2014), and a global ocean model,LASG/IAP Climate Ocean Model (LICOM), which is the same as in FGOALS. FROALS has been used to dynamically downscale the climate changes made by FGOALS and has shown the importance of regional air-sea coupling in the simulation and projection of the regional climate over the East Asian-WNP region (Zou et al., 2016; Zou and Zhou, 2016, 2017). The deficiencies of FROALS are the relatively low computational efficiency and some significant biases, i.e., cold biases of the sea surface temperature over the WNP and dry biases over the monsoon trough (Zou and Zhou, 2013).

    Another deficiency of FROALS is the ~50 km horizontal resolution, which is currently coarse for both regional atmospheric and oceanic components. Recent studies have indicated that for atmospheric models, a horizontal resolution of 10-20 km is essential to sufficiently represent the topographic effects on climate change (Giorgi et al., 2016) and has been shown to provide substantial added value for a variety of climate variables (Torma et al., 2015). Furthermore, a high resolution regional ocean-atmosphere coupled model study indicated that the interaction between ocean mesoscale eddies and the atmosphere plays a crucial role in controlling western boundary currents (Ma et al., 2016). Therefore, regional ocean-atmosphere coupled models with horizontal resolution ranging from approximately 10-20 km must be developed for climate studies.

    Given the deficiency of FROALS and the future direction of coupled RCMs, we aim to upgrade FROALS. We coupled the community Regional Climate Model, version 4(RegCM4) (Giorgi et al., 2012), with the high-resolution regional version of LICOM and investigated the sensitivity of the regional coupled model, RegCM4_LICOM, to the cumulus parameterizations over the WNP (Zou et al., 2019).The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model,which is another community RCM, has been widely used for regional climate studies over Asia (i.e., Liang et al.,2019). In this study, we coupled the newly released WRF4.0 model with the high-resolution regional version of LICOM and compared the performance of WRF4_LICOM with that of RegCM4_LICOM over the WNP. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to introduce the regional coupled model WRF4_LICOM and evaluate both the strengths and weaknesses of the model in simulating the WNP summer monsoon rainfall; and (2) to conduct an intercomparison of regional coupled simulations over this region. The metrics employed in this study can serve as a reference for the future development of regional coupled models over this region. The intercomparison of different regional atmospheric model components will provide a basis for the development of the next generation of IAP/CAS regional earth system models.

    The rest of the paper is organized as follows: The developed regional coupled model, WRF4-LICOM, the experimental design, and the observational datasets are described in section 2. Section 3 describes the evaluation of the performance of the regional coupled model in simulations of SST,rainfall, circulations, tropical cyclones (TCs), and the diurnal cycle of rainfall. The impacts of different regional atmospheric models are also discussed. Section 4 summarizes the major results.

    2.Model, experimental design, and observational datasets

    2.1.Regional ocean-atmosphere coupled model

    2.1.1.Regional atmospheric models

    The WRF model (Skamarock et al., 2008) we used is the recently released WRF4.0. It has a nonhydrostatic dynamical core and a terrain-following sigma coordinate in the vertical direction. The vertical layers in WRF4 are set to 35,and the buffer zone of the WRF4 model is set to 20 grid layers. The following model physics are employed: the Noah multiphysics land surface model (Niu et al., 2011), the WRF Single-Moment 6-class (WSM6) microphysics scheme (Hong and Lim, 2006), the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for GCMs for longwave and shortwave radiation parameterizations (Iacono et al., 2008), the Yonsei University (YSU) planetary boundary layer scheme (Hong et al., 2006), the COARE ocean-atmosphere flux algorithm(Fairall et al., 2003), and the cloud scheme proposed by Xu and Randall (1996). For the cumulus parameterization, we employed the Tiedtke scheme (Tiedtke, 1989; Nordeng,1994).

    Since our aim was to compare the performance of WRF4-LICOM and RegCM4-LICOM, the RegCM4 model and the physics configuration we used are briefly introduced here. RegCM4 (Giorgi et al., 2012) version 4.6,which is a limited area model, was developed at the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics. The model has 23 levels in the vertical direction, with a terrain-following sigma vertical coordinate. The selected physics configuration is listed below. The land surface model was the Community Land Model (CLM), version 3.5 (Oleson et al.,2008). The grid-scale precipitation was parameterized using the subgrid explicit moisture scheme (Pal et al., 2000). The radiation package from the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model, version 3(Kiehl et al., 1996), was employed. The planetary boundary layer scheme was based on the nonlocal vertical diffusion scheme of Holtslag et al. (1990), with some modifications(Giorgi et al., 2012). The sea surface turbulence heat fluxes were calculated using the Zeng ocean-atmosphere flux algorithm (Zeng et al., 1998). Note that, as in WRF4, the Tiedtke scheme was used to parameterize the convection.The physics configuration of RegCM4 was the same as that in Zou et al. (2019). The physical configurations of the two models are summarized in Table 1.

    2.1.2.Oceanic model component

    A North Pacific Ocean model was employed as the oceanic model component. The regional ocean model was developed from a quasi-global eddy-resolving OGCM (Yu et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014), which was based on the LASG/IAP climate ocean model, version 2 (LICOM2) (Liu et al., 2012). Compared to LICOM2, the updates and improvements of the eddy-resolving OGCM include (Yu et al.,2012): (1) increased horizontal and vertical resolutions; (2)deactivation of mesoscale eddy parameterizations and improved barotropic and baroclinic split methods; and (3)the inclusion of a two-dimensional message passing interface, both zonal- and meridional-split. The North Pacific Ocean model employs a horizontal longitude-latitude grid of uniform 0.1° squares and verticalcoordinates with 55 levels and 36 uneven layers in the upper 300 m. In the following analysis, the regional ocean model is referred to as LICOM_np.

    LICOM_np covers the North Pacific (colored region of Fig. 1). In this kind of model configuration, only the southern boundary is open. During the simulation, the simulated ocean temperature and salinity in the southern boundary were relaxed to the Levitus climatological monthly data (Levitus et al., 2006), and the solid wall condition was used for the velocity. The spin-up process of LICOM_np has been described in Zou et al. (2019). First, with the initial conditions from World Ocean Atlas 2005 (Antonov et al., 2006;Locarnini et al., 2006), the LICOM_np model was driven for 10 years with the climatological daily atmospheric forcing from the Coordinated Ocean-Ice Reference Experiment (CORE) (Griffies et al., 2012). Then, the model was driven with the daily atmospheric forcing from COREphase II (CORE II) from 1990-2007. The CORE dataset was used since it has been widely used to perform global ocean-sea ice coupled simulations (i.e., Liu et al., 2012).The spin-up process has been shown to be reasonable in RegCM4_LICOM (Zou et al., 2019).

    Table 1. Summary of the physics configurations in RegCM4 and WRF4.

    Fig. 1. Experimental design. The ocean model and regional atmospheric model are fully coupled over the WNP (dark blue region), while the ocean model is driven by the CORE-II data outside the WNP (light blue region).

    2.1.3.Ocean-atmosphere coupling

    The Ocean Atmosphere Sea Ice Soil coupler, version 3(Valcke, 2006), was used to couple WRF4 with LICOM_np. During the coupling process, the heat flux(including solar and non-solar) and surface wind stress at the sea surface were transferred from WRF4 to the ocean model, while the ocean model provided the SST and ocean surface currents to WRF4. When calculating the sea surface sensible heat flux, latent heat flux and wind stresses, the relative motion of the atmospheric wind at the lowest level and the ocean surface current were taken into account.

    2.2.Experimental design

    To fairly compare the model performances, the experimental design for WRF4_LICOM was identical to that for RegCM4_LICOM (Zou et al., 2019). We briefly describe the experimental design here. The model domain of WRF4 covered the WNP (dark blue region in Fig. 1) with a horizontal resolution of 15 km. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) interim reanalysis (ERA-Interim) dataset (Dee et al., 2011), which has a horizontal resolution of 0.75°×0.75°, was employed to drive the regional atmospheric model as the initial and lateral boundary conditions, which were laterally updated every 6 h.

    The regional coupling started on 1 November 2004.WRF4 and the ocean model were coupled over the WNP.The coupling interval was 1 h. Outside the WNP region, the ocean model was driven by the CORE II daily atmospheric forcing. Note that in this study, LICOM_np outside of the WNP was forced by CORE II data but not ERA-Interim since the stand-alone LICOM_np model was tuned with the forcing from CORE-II. The regionally coupled simulation was conducted for one year, from 1 November 2004 through 30 November 2005. The year 2005 was selected because it was a normal WNP summer monsoon year. The simulation using RegCM4_LICOM with the Tiedtke scheme, which has been described in Zou et al. (2019), was used to compare to the results from WRF4_LICOM. To facilitate the discussion, the regionally coupled simulations using RegCM4 and WRF4 are referred to as RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM, respectively.

    2.3.Observational datasets

    The following datasets were used to validate the model performance: (1) the satellite-retrieved precipitation dataset of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B42 product with a resolution of 0.25° (Huffman et al., 2007);(2) the convective and stratiform rainfall derived from TRMM 3A12 (Kummerow et al., 2001); (3) the daily rainfall gridded dataset for the land area over Asia with a 0.25 ×0.25° grid derived from the Asian Precipitation-Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration toward the Evaluation of Water Resources (APHRO) project (Yatagai et al.,2012); (4) the daily mean circulation field derived from ERA-Interim with a 0.75° × 0.75° grid; (5) the daily Optimal Interpolation Sea Surface Temperature data with a resolution of 0.25° from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Reynolds et al., 2007); and (6) the observational dataset of TCs derived from the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS)best-track datasets (Knapp et al., 2010). To facilitate the following discussion, the satellite-retrieved precipitation and the reanalysis dataset are referred to as the “observation”.

    3.Results

    3.1.SST simulation

    Figure 2 shows the simulated SST biases averaged from June to August of 2005 over the WNP region derived from the WRF4_LICOM simulations. The corresponding biases of the RegCM4_LICOM simulation are already shown in Fig. 3c in Zou et al. (2019). Both RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM significantly reduced the cold biases of the simulated SST over the central WNP, as shown in the previous version of FROALS (RegCM3_LICOM) [Fig. 2c in Zou and Zhou (2013)]. These improvements can be ascribed to two factors. The first factor is the ocean mesoscale eddy-resolving resolution of LICOM,which improved simulations of the ocean current and the associated heat transport (Yu et al., 2012). The second factor is the Tiedtke cumulus parameterization scheme. A study using RegCM4_LICOM (Zou et al., 2019) showed that the simulated SST over the WNP is sensitive to the choice of cumulus parameterization scheme.

    Compared to that in RegCM4_LICOM, the simulated SST was colder in WRF4_LICOM. The average SST bias was 0.01°C (?0.21°C) in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM).Spatially, the cold biases north of 35°N in LICOM_np(Fig. 2 in Zou et al. 2019) have been inherited in the regionally coupled simulations, with a larger (weaker) magnitude in WRF4_LICOM (RegCM4_LICOM). The warm (cold)biases were evident along the coastline of Vietnam and mainland China in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM). The RMSE of the simulated SST was 0.89°C in RegCM4_LICOM, while it was slightly larger in WRF4_LICOM(1.05°C).

    Figure 3a shows the probability density function (PDF)distribution of the SST biases over the WNP derived from both RegCM4-LICOM and WRF4-LICOM. An overall normal-mode type of distribution was found in the coupled simulations, with a peak around 0.5°C. The frequencies of biases colder than ?0.75°C were larger in WRF4_LICOM. Quantitatively, 48.3% (38.9%) of the model grids had biases within±0.5°C in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM). These results indicate that RegCM4_LICOM performs slightly better than WRF4_LICOM in the simulation of SST over the WNP in the boreal summer of 2005.

    Fig. 2. Spatial pattern of the simulated biases of 2005 JJA mean SST (°C) over the WNP from WRF4_LICOM.

    3.2.Summer mean rainfall

    Fig. 3. The PDF distributions of the simulated biases of the 2005 JJA mean (a) SST (°C) and (b) rainfall (mm d?1) over the WNP from RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM.

    Rainfall is a rigorous test for RCMs. In the observations, four major rainbands, as indicated by the four boxes in Fig. 4a, were found over the east of the Philippines (monsoon trough), over the northern South China Sea, over the region extending northeast from South China to the east of Japan, and over the mei-yu front region. Both regionally coupled simulations exhibited comparable performances,with an SCC of 0.62 (0.56) for RegCM4_LICOM(WRF4_LICOM). The spatial distribution of the 2005 summer mean rainfall derived from APHRO (contours in Fig. 4a)was similar to that from the satellite-retrieved rainfall from TRMM 3B42 over the land area, with a spatial pattern correlation coefficient of 0.80. Since our aim was to provide an overview of the model performance of WRF4-LICOM over both land and ocean, the evaluation is mainly based on the TRMM data. The dry biases in RegCM3_LICOM over the monsoon trough [Fig. 5c in Zou and Zhou (2013)] have been significantly reduced in both RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM.

    Regionally, WRF4_LICOM tended to overestimate(underestimate) the rainfall amount over the monsoon trough and the mei-yu front region (over southern China)(Fig. 4d), while RegCM4_LICOM tended to underestimate the rainfall over the major rainy centers (Fig. 4c). The absolute biases and RMSEs of the rainfall simulated by WRF4_LICOM were larger than those simulated by RegCM4_LICOM, except for the absolute biases over the northern South China Sea (Table 2).

    Fig. 4. Spatial distributions of the 2005 JJA mean precipitation (mm d?1) over the WNP derived from (a)observations [TRMM (shading) and APHRO (contours)], and (b) WRF4_LICOM. The numbers 1-4 in (a) represent the locations of the observed major rainbands/centers. The simulated biases from RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM with respect to TRMM data (shading) and APHRO data (contours) are shown in (c) and (d),respectively.

    As the SST biases, the corresponding PDFs of the rainfall biases are shown in Fig. 3b. Normal mode-type distributions of the biases were found for the two simulations, with a peak of ?0.39 (1.44) mm d?1for RegCM4_LICOM(WRF4_LICOM). The percentages of the model grids with positive rainfall biases in WRF4_LICOM were higher than those in RegCM4_LICOM. Quantitatively, 51.9% (41.4%)of the model grids had rainfall biases within ±2 mm d?1in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM). These results suggest that the performance of RegCM4_LICOM is better overall than that of WRF4_LICOM in the simulation of the June-July-August (JJA) mean rainfall of 2005 over the WNP, while the major deficiency of RegCM4_LICOM is that the model tends to underestimate the rainfall amount.The results shown in Fig. 3 indicate that the rainfall biases and SST biases are physically consistent. The larger positive rainfall biases in WRF4_LICOM favor less solar radiation reaching the sea surface, thus leading to larger cold SST biases.

    To further understand the mean summer rainfall biases,Fig. 5 shows the PDF distribution of the daily rainfall rates derived from observations and the two regionally coupled simulations over four selected regions (shown in Fig. 4a) during JJA of 2005. Over the monsoon trough (Fig. 5a), both models tended to overestimate the frequencies of rain rates between 3 mm d?1and 25 mm d?1, with much higher frequencies in WRF4_LICOM, contributing to the overly wet biases in this region. Both models tended to overestimate(underestimate) the frequencies of rain rates lower than(greater than) 42 mm d?1over the northern South China Sea(Fig. 5b), indicating that reasonable estimation of the rainfall amount (Table 2) compensates for model errors. Underes-timation of the frequencies of rain rates greater than 12 mm d?1over southern China (Fig. 5c) contributed to the dry biases in both models. The overestimated rainfall over the mei-yu-front region in WRF4_LICOM could mainly be attributed to the overestimated frequencies of rain rates greater than 30 mm d?1(Fig. 5d).

    Fig. 5. The PDF distributions of the daily rain rate over the selected four regions shown in Fig. 4a from June to August of 2005.

    Table 2. JJA mean statistics of simulated precipitation (mm d?1)over the four selected regions (shown in Fig. 4a). Bias (mm d?1) is the regional averaged model bias, and RMSE (mm d?1) is rootmean-square error.

    3.3.Large-scale circulation associated with the rainfall

    The interplay between rainfall and monsoon circulations is important over the WNP. Figure 6 compares the performances of the two models in a simulation of geopotential height at 500 hPa and mid-level wind at 500 hPa averaged from June to August of 2005. In the observation (Fig. 6a),the western North Pacific subtropical high (WNPSH) is a dominant system over the WNP. The mid-level westerly wind from the Indian summer monsoon, the southerly flow across the Maritime Continent, and the mid-level easterly wind associated with the WNPSH converge over the northern South China Sea and east of the Philippines, producing a large amount of rainfall in these regions. Then, the southwesterly wind related to the Indian summer monsoon and the southeasterly wind in the southern flank of the WNPSH further converge over southern China, while the rainfall over the mei-yu front region corresponds well with the warm horizontal temperature advection at 500 hPa. The warm horizontal temperature advection by the mid-level westerly jet has been regarded as a crucial environmental forcing for the mei-yu rainband (Sampe and Xie, 2010). The general distributions of the WNPSH and the associated wind field were reasonably captured by each simulation, with SCCs larger than 0.95. However, some differences and biases existed. The simulated WNPSH by RegCM4_LICOM was weaker and shifted eastwards compared to the observation (Fig. 6b), which led to weaker moisture flux convergences over southern China and weaker mid-level warm horizontal temperature advection over the mei-yu front region, resulting in dry biases over East China (Fig. 5b). In contrast, the WNPSH simulated by WRF4_LICOM was too strong and shifted westwards (Fig. 6c), also favoring weaker convergences over southern China but stronger midlevel warm horizontal temperature advection over the meiyu front region. Subsequently, dry (wet) biases were found over southern China (the mei-yu front region) (Fig. 4c).

    But why do the two regional coupled models exhibit opposite biases in their simulations of the WNPSH despite both being driven by ERA-Interim reanalysis data? Figure 7 shows cross sections of the simulated biases of the 2005 JJA mean meridional overturning circulation averaged over 110°-160°E. Similar biases (ascending anomalies throughout the troposphere) were evident over the area north of 30°N and south of 10°N in both models, while almost opposite biases were found in between; that is, anomalous ascending(descending) motions in the middle to upper troposphere simulated by RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM) within 25°-30°N, which were indicative of a weakened (enhanced)WNPSH, were accompanied by descending (ascending) anomalies over the region around the Philippines (12°-16°N).

    The biases of the simulated WNPSH may have been induced by those of the simulated diabatic heating around the Philippines. The mechanism is very similar to that of the Pacific-Japan pattern in the observations, which suggests that the strong convective activities around the Philippines favor an enhanced and westward-shifted WNPSH through the Rossby wave response (e.g., Nitta, 1987; Huang and Sun, 1992). Figure 8a shows the vertical profile of the summer mean total heating, which is expressed as the apparent heat source, averaged over the region around the Philippines (12°-16°N, 110°-160°E). A peak of heating is located between 400 and 500 hPa in the reanalysis, but the peak was underestimated (overestimated) in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM).

    To further investigate the processes that contributes to the biases of simulated heating, the vertical profile of the regional averaged condensation heating, which is roughly expressed as the apparent moisture sink, and the cloud condensates over (12°-16°N, 110°-160°E) are also shown in Fig. 8. Clearly, the enhanced diabatic heating in WRF4_LICOM (Fig. 8a) is mainly derived from the stronger condensation heating (Fig. 8b). However, the weakened diabatic heating between 400 and 500 hPa in RegCM4_LICOM may be more due to the reduced longwave radiative warming associated with fewer high clouds (Fig. 8c). Note that compared to WRF4_LICOM, more low-level clouds were simulated in RegCM4_LICOM, which tended to stabilize the lowlevel troposphere and inhibit deep convection; as a result,less moisture was transported to be condensed in the upper troposphere.

    3.4.TC activities

    Fig. 7. Latitude-height cross sections of the biases of the simulated 2005 JJA mean vertical p velocity (ω, shading, ?100 hPa s?1) and the meridional overturning circulation (v and ?ω × 100)averaged over 110°-160°E derived from (a) RegCM4_LICOM and (b) WRF4_LICOM.

    The regionally coupled continuous simulations were initialized on 1 November 2004; thus, the models are not expected to represent specific TCs during the summer of 2005 because the initial condition of the atmosphere would be long forgotten by then, even when applying the observed atmospheric lateral boundary conditions, since the domain was not very small. Therefore, we assess the models’ abilities to simulate the TC statistics during the warm season of 2005.

    In this study, the TC track detection method (Murakami and Sugi, 2010) was applied, which has been effective for detecting TC tracks in reanalysis data and high-resolution climate models (Murakami et al., 2012; Murakami, 2014;etc.). The criteria for TC track detection include: (1) the maximum relative vorticity at 850 hPa exceeds 1.5 × 10?4s?1;(2) the sum of the temperature deviations at 850, 500, and 300 hPa exceeds 1.0 K over a 10° × 10° grid box (identification of the TC warm core aloft); (3) the wind speed at 850 hPa is greater than the wind speed at 300 hPa above the detected TC center (to eliminate extratropical cyclones); and (4)the duration of each detected TC center must last longer than 48 h. The criteria threshold is like that in Murakami et al. (2012) but with larger relative vorticity criteria, so that the detected TC number during April to October of 2005 was 19 (18) in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM), which was close to the 18 in the observation.

    Figure 9 shows the observed and simulated TC frequencies (TCFs) from April to October of 2005. The TCF is defined as the number of TCs passing at each 2.5° × 2.5°grid box. In the observation (Fig. 9a), TCs mainly generated over the central WNP and then moved westwards (northwards) to mainland China (Japan). The observed pattern was partly reproduced in RegCM4_LICOM, with an SCC of 0.25, but the genesis locations of the simulated TCs shifted southwards by approximately 5° (Fig. 9b). In WRF4_LICOM (Fig. 9c), the genesis locations of simulated TCs shifted too far westwards, probably due to the overly strong and westward-shifted WNPSH (Fig. 6c). The SCC of WRF4_LICOM was 0.13.

    Fig. 8. Vertical profiles of the 2005 JJA mean (a)apparent heat source (Q1/Cp, K d?1) and (b) the moisture sink (Q2/Cp, K d?1) averaged over (12°-16°N,110°-160°E) derived from observation, RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM. (c) Vertical profiles of the 2005 JJA mean simulated cloud condensates (cloud water in RegCM4_LICOM, but the total amount of five species along with the sum of cloud ice and cloud snow from WRF4_LICOM) averaged over (12°-16°N,110°-160°E).

    The observed and simulated TCs were further categorized into seven types [tropical depressions (TDs), tropical storms (TSs), and categories 1?5 (Cat 1-Cat 5)] based on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale (Fig. 9d). Clearly,both models tended to underestimate the observed TC intensity, i.e., they produced more TSs and fewer Cat 4 TCs. Compared to RegCM4_LICOM, WRF4_LICOM showed fewer TCs with Cat 1 intensity but more TCs with Cat 3 and Cat 4 intensity, thus exhibiting improved performance.

    The rainfall induced by a TC was defined as the rainfall within a 5° × 5° grid box around the TC center. Figure 10 shows the percentage contributions from the rainfall induced by TCs to the total rainfall amount. In the observation, TC-induced rainfall contributes more than 40% of the total rainfall over the northern South China Sea, the central WNP, the coastal region of mainland China, and east of Japan (Fig. 10a). Clearly, RegCM4_LICOM underestimated the contributions from TC-induced rainfall (Fig. 10b),with an SCC of 0.40. However, WRF4_LICOM reasonably captured the contributions from TC-induced rainfall over the northern South China Sea, the coastal region of mainland China, and east of Taiwan Island, but underestimated these contributions over the central WNP and east of Japan(Fig. 10c), with a higher SCC of 0.52.

    3.5.Diurnal cycle of rainfall

    The diurnal cycle of rainfall is a good test bed for weather and climate models (Dai and Trenberth, 2004). The TRMM3B42 data were used to assess the models’ performances in the simulation of diurnal cycle of rainfall. Previous studies have indicated that the diurnal cycle of rainfall from TRMM data is comparable to those seen in rain gauge data over East China (Zhou et al., 2008) and South Korea (Koo et al., 2009). The regionally coupled simulations with 15-km resolution were averaged onto 0.25° grids of TRMM3B42 data. Figure 11 shows the local solar time(LST) of the maximum in the composite diurnal cycle of rainfall amount, frequency, and intensity derived from the observation and regionally coupled simulations. In the observation, the land area is dominated by an afternoon peak in the rainfall amount, except for the regions between the Yangtze and Yellow rivers (Borneo Island), which also see an early morning peak (nocturnal peak) in the rainfall amount (Fig.11a). An early morning peak dominates over the monsoon trough, while the ocean area controlled by the WNPSH shows both an early morning peak and an afternoon peak in the rainfall amount (Fig. 11a). The observed features over the land area were partly reproduced in both models, while both models tended to produce a premature early morning peak in the rainfall amount over the ocean area (Figs. 11d and g). Compared to RegCM4_LICOM, WRF4_LICOM exhibited better performance, especially over the land area,as evidenced by a higher SCC (Fig. 12a). The weakness of RegCM4_LICOM was an earlier peak time of approximately three hours for the afternoon rainfall amount over the land area.

    Fig. 9. Spatial distributions of the TCF (tropical cyclone frequency) during April to October of 2005 derived from (a)IBTrACS, (b) RegCM4_LICOM, and (c) WRF4_LICOM. The TCF is defined as the number of TCs passing at each 2.5° ×2.5° grid box. (d) Intensity distributions of TCs categorized based on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale.

    An afternoon peak in rainfall frequency dominates over the WNP, with an early morning peak over some oceanic grids (Fig. 11b). The common bias of both models was a dominant nocturnal-early morning peak in rainfall frequency overall in the ocean area. Compared to WRF4_LICOM, the peak time of the rainfall frequency simulated by RegCM4_LICOM over the land area was three hours earlier than that in the observation. The performance of WRF4_LICOM was slightly better than that of RegCM4_LICOM (Fig. 12b). Rainfall intensity exhibits late afternoon and early morning peaks over both the land and ocean areas (Fig. 11c). These features were poorly simulated by both models, although the performance of WRF4_LICOM was better, especially over the land area(Fig. 12c).

    But why does WRF4_LICOM perform better in simulating the diurnal cycle of rainfall over land? Table 3 lists the observed and simulated stratiform percentages averaged over the land and oceanic grids of the region (5°S-40°N,105°-165°E). In the observation, the averaged stratiform percentages are approximately 50% over both land and oceanic grids of the WNP. Both models underestimated the observed stratiform percentage, which is a common bias of convection-parameterized climate models (Yuan, 2013).Both models showed comparable stratiform percentages over the oceanic grids, but RegCM4_LICOM produced higher percentages of convective rainfall than WRF4_LICOM over the land grids of the WNP, which may favor earlier peaks in the rainfall amount and intensity.

    4.Summary and concluding remarks

    4.1.Summary

    To upgrade the regional coupled model FROALS, in this study, the community RCM WRF4 was coupled with a regional high-resolution version of LICOM. The horizontalresolution of WRF4 was set to 15 km, while the horizontal resolution of the oceanic component was 0.1°. The performance of the regional coupled model WRF4_LICOM was compared to that of RegCM4_LICOM, with a focus on the 2005 WNP summer monsoon rainfall. The two regional coupled models shared the same regional ocean model component,horizontal resolution, cumulus parameterization scheme,and experimental design. The major conclusions are summarized below.

    Table 3. Observed and simulated stratiform percentages of the JJA mean precipitation averaged over the region (5°S-40°N,100°-165°E) and the corresponding percentages averaged over land and oceanic grids of the region.

    Fig. 10. Spatial distributions of the percentage contributions(%) from the rainfall induced by TCs to the total rainfall during May to October of 2005 derived from (a) TRMM, (b)RegCM4_LICOM, and (c) WRF4_LICOM. The rainfall induced by a TC is defined as the rainfall within the 5° × 5°grid box around the TC center.

    The upgraded regional ocean-atmosphere coupled model with either RegCM4 or WRF4 as the regional atmospheric model component exhibited improved performance over the WNP compared to that with RegCM3_LICOM.The evident cold biases of the simulated SST over the WNP, along with the dry biases of summer rainfall over the monsoon trough, were significantly reduced in the updated version.

    Intercomparison of regional coupled simulations with different regional atmospheric model components showed different skill levels for different climate variables, and no single model was found to systematically outperform the other.RegCM4_LICOM exhibited smaller biases in its simulation of the averaged SST and rainfall over the WNP in terms of RMSE. The spatial distribution of TCs was also partly reproduced in RegCM4_LICOM. However, RegCM4_LICOM tended to underestimate the rainfall over major rainy centers and TC intensity. WRF4_LICOM better captured TC intensity, the percentage contributions of TC-induced rainfall to the total rainfall, the diurnal cycle of rainfall and stratiform percentages, especially over the land area. However, the genesis locations of TCs were shifted too far westwards in WRF4_LICOM. The common biases of both models were also identified. Both models had large dry biases over southern China, underestimated TC intensity, and showed a premature morning peak of rainfall over the ocean area.

    The different performances of the two models for simulated rainfall can be partly ascribed to the opposite biases in the simulated WNPSH. The weakened and eastward-shifted (enhanced and westward-shifted) WNPSH in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM) led to dry biases over southern China and dry biases (wet biases) over the mei-yu front region. Further analysis indicated that the overestimated(underestimated) diabatic heating between 400 and 500 hPa over the region around the Philippines in WRF4_LICOM(RegCM4_LICOM) may have induced the stronger (weaker)WNPSH. The enhanced diabatic heating in WRF4_LICOM was mainly due to the stronger condensation heating, while the weakened diabatic heating in RegCM4_LICOM may be more due to the reduced longwave radiative warming associated with fewer high clouds.

    The overall reasonable performances of RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM indicate that the models can be used for a wide range of applications, i.e., dynamical downscaling of simulations and projections generated by the FGOALS, which will be reported in future studies.

    4.2.Concluding remarks

    In this study, it was challenging to identify which formulation differences listed in Table 1 were the root reasons to explain the different performances between RegCM4-LICOM and WRF4-LICOM over the WNP, since the two models only share the same cumulus scheme. In addition to the model physics, it is noted that the vertical resolution of WRF4 (35L) is higher than that of RegCM4 (23L), which may explain the higher TC intensity in WRF4-LICOM (Ma et al., 2012). The model intercomparison of the simulated mean rainfall biases (section 3.3) implies that the cloud microphysics-radiation interactions may play an essential role. It should be noted that we only compare the performances of RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM with a typical physics configuration, which may not be the best configuration for each model over the target region. Currently, more than 100 combinations of different model physics can be configured in both RegCM4 and WRF4. A comprehensive comparison of RegCM4-LICOM and WRF4-LICOM with multiple physics configurations, which requires very large computational resources, is under consideration.

    Fig. 11. Spatial distributions of the local solar time of the maximum (LST) in the composite diurnal cycle of the rainfall amount (left panel), frequency (middle panel) and intensity (right panel) during June to August of 2005 derived from (a, b, c)TRMM, (d, e, f) RegCM4_LICOM, and (g, h, i) WRF4_LICOM.

    In this study, we compared the seasonal biases over the WNP region simulated by two regional ocean-atmosphere coupled models by conducting continuous 13-month simulations with the same initial condition and lateral boundary forcing. One member was used. This experimental design was similar to that of phase one of the Regional Model Intercomparison Project for Asia (Fu et al., 2005), which conducted continuous 18-month simulations. Some studies have argued that the internal variability of the RCMs does not significantly affect the domain-wide average but influences the day-to-day model variability (e.g., Giorgi and Bi, 2000). Nevertheless, the internal variability of regional ocean-atmosphere coupled models and the possible impacts on seasonal biases deserves further investigation.

    IAP/CAS intends to develop a next-generation high-resolution RESM with WRF4 as its regional atmospheric model.Coupling WRF4 with LIOCM is an important step towards the development of CAS RESM. Intercomparison of RegCM4-LICOM and WRF4-LICOM with the same cumulus scheme over the WNP region highlights the importance of cloud microphysics-radiation interactions. This implies that the tunable parameters in the cloud microphysics scheme should be given great attention for future tuning of CAS RESM over the East Asia-WNP region.

    Fig. 12. Spatial pattern correlation coefficients of the peak time of the 2005 JJA composite diurnal cycle of the (a) rainfall amount, (b) rainfall frequency, and (c) rainfall intensity between regionally coupled simulations and the observations over the WNP (5°S-44°N, 105°-165°E) and the land/oceanic area of the WNP.

    Acknowledgements.The comments from the reviewers,which significantly improved the manuscript, are greatly appreciated. All the observational datasets used in this study are listed in the references, and the model results used have been archived in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9917459.v1). This work was jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0606003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.41875132 and 41575105), and the Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change.

    成人免费观看视频高清| 国产三级黄色录像| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 成人精品一区二区免费| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产亚洲欧美98| 一本一本综合久久| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | av视频在线观看入口| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 美女午夜性视频免费| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 又大又爽又粗| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 自线自在国产av| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 久99久视频精品免费| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 美女大奶头视频| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 久久青草综合色| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 日本熟妇午夜| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 看免费av毛片| 午夜免费鲁丝| 在线播放国产精品三级| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 99久久国产精品久久久| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 欧美在线黄色| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 看免费av毛片| 制服诱惑二区| 国产精品久久视频播放| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 免费看日本二区| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 久久性视频一级片| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| www.www免费av| 精品久久久久久久末码| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 欧美在线黄色| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 精品福利观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 成人国产综合亚洲| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 精品国产国语对白av| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲 国产 在线| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 色在线成人网| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 黄色 视频免费看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| www.自偷自拍.com| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 日本五十路高清| 搡老岳熟女国产| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 午夜福利欧美成人| 午夜a级毛片| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲第一青青草原| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 嫩草影院精品99| 黄频高清免费视频| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| a在线观看视频网站| 一进一出抽搐动态| 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美大码av| 国产精品野战在线观看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产成人欧美| 日本五十路高清| av在线播放免费不卡| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 在线观看66精品国产| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲片人在线观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 成人午夜高清在线视频 | 国产视频一区二区在线看| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 美女大奶头视频| 精品久久久久久,| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 一a级毛片在线观看| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 午夜免费激情av| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| www.999成人在线观看| 精品人妻1区二区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产99白浆流出| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 精品第一国产精品| 国产片内射在线| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 午夜福利在线在线| 岛国在线观看网站| 丁香六月欧美| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 日日夜夜操网爽| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产日本99.免费观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 天天添夜夜摸| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 精品国产国语对白av| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 在线国产一区二区在线| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 91av网站免费观看| 免费观看人在逋| 色播亚洲综合网| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 大型av网站在线播放| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 制服诱惑二区| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 999久久久国产精品视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 男女那种视频在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 9191精品国产免费久久| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 中文资源天堂在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| ponron亚洲| 国产在线观看jvid| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 美国免费a级毛片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 国产熟女xx| 搞女人的毛片| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 美女大奶头视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 丁香欧美五月| 久久精品人妻少妇| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 熟女电影av网| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 色播在线永久视频| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 免费在线观看日本一区| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 精品久久久久久久久久久久久 | 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 天堂动漫精品| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆 | 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 看黄色毛片网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 日本熟妇午夜| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 在线免费观看的www视频| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲五月天丁香| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| av电影中文网址| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 亚洲无线在线观看| 青草久久国产| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久人妻av系列| 一本综合久久免费| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 深夜精品福利| 一本久久中文字幕| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站 | 日本五十路高清| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 三级毛片av免费| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 久久香蕉精品热| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 九色国产91popny在线| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 成人国产综合亚洲| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 1024香蕉在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产日本99.免费观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观 | 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 一级片免费观看大全| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 黄片播放在线免费| 黄色成人免费大全| av欧美777| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 久久久国产精品麻豆| tocl精华| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 操出白浆在线播放| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 日本一本二区三区精品| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 欧美日本视频| 91成人精品电影| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国产av在哪里看| 日本免费a在线| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 此物有八面人人有两片| 99精品欧美一区二区三区四区| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品二区激情视频| cao死你这个sao货| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 日本 av在线| cao死你这个sao货| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 日本在线视频免费播放| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 亚洲激情在线av| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| av视频在线观看入口| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 欧美色视频一区免费| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合 | 欧美黑人精品巨大| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 91老司机精品| 午夜视频精品福利| 天天添夜夜摸| 色av中文字幕| 不卡av一区二区三区| 在线天堂中文资源库| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 在线免费观看的www视频| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 热99re8久久精品国产| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 麻豆av在线久日| 一级毛片精品| 丁香欧美五月| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| av超薄肉色丝袜交足视频| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲激情在线av| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 成人国产综合亚洲| 午夜福利欧美成人| 99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 黄色视频不卡| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 一区二区三区激情视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 精品日产1卡2卡| av免费在线观看网站| 99热只有精品国产| 级片在线观看| 精品人妻1区二区| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 91成年电影在线观看| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 一级黄色大片毛片| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 午夜a级毛片| 久久这里只有精品19| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 中文在线观看免费www的网站 | 午夜久久久在线观看| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 两个人免费观看高清视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 成人三级做爰电影| 美女免费视频网站| 午夜久久久在线观看| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 在线免费观看的www视频| 91老司机精品| 久久香蕉国产精品| 91在线观看av| 一夜夜www| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 91在线观看av| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全|