• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Introduction to the Regional Coupled Model WRF4-LICOM: Performanceand Model Intercomparison over the Western North Pacific

    2020-08-06 12:07:36LiweiZOUTianjunZHOUJianpingTANGandHailongLIU
    Advances in Atmospheric Sciences 2020年8期

    Liwei ZOU, Tianjun ZHOU, Jianping TANG, and Hailong LIU

    1State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100029, China

    2Chinese Academy of Sciences Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China

    3School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China

    4College of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

    ABSTRACT Regional coupled modeling is one of the frontiers of regional climate modeling, but intercomparison has not been well coordinated. In this study, a community regional climate model, WRF4, with a resolution of 15 km, was coupled with a high-resolution (0.1°) North Pacific Ocean model (LICOM_np). The performance of the regional coupled model,WRF4_LICOM, was compared to that of another regional coupled model, RegCM4_LICOM, which was a coupling of version 4 of the Regional Climate Model (RegCM4) with LICOM_np. The analysis focused on the 2005 western North Pacific summer monsoon rainfall. The results showed that the regional coupled models with either RegCM4 or WRF4 as their atmospheric model component simulated the broad features over the WNP reasonably well. Quantitative intercomparison of the regional coupled simulations exhibited different biases for different climate variables.RegCM4_LICOM exhibited smaller biases in its simulation of the averaged June-July-August SST and rainfall, while WRF4_LICOM better captured the tropical cyclone (TC) intensity, the percentage contributions of rainfall induced by TCs to the total rainfall, and the diurnal cycle of rainfall and stratiform percentages, especially over land areas. The different behaviors in rainfall simulated by the two models were partly ascribed to the behaviors in the simulated western North Pacific subtropical high (WNPSH). The stronger (weaker) WNPSH in WRF4_LICOM (RegCM4_LICOM) was driven by overestimated (underestimated) diabatic heating, which peaked at approximately 450 hPa over the region around the Philippines in association with different condensation-radiation processes. Coupling of WRF4 with LIOCM is a crucial step towards the development of the next generation of regional earth system models at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

    Key words:regional coupled model,model intercomparison,western North Pacific summer monsoon,precipitation

    1.Introduction

    Regional climate models (RCMs) with high-resolution topography and surface characteristics have been widely used for a broad range of applications from process studies to paleoclimate and climate change simulations (Giorgi and Mearns, 1999; Leung et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004;Christensen et al., 2007; Giorgi, 2019). RCMs, as complementary tools to global climate models, have greatly improved our understanding of regional-scale climate and cli-mate change processes (Giorgi, 2019).

    Regional earth system modeling or regional coupled modeling is one of the frontiers of regional climate modeling(Gutowski et al., 2016). Coupling of the ocean component in RCMs was an important step towards the development of regional earth system models (RESMs) (Giorgi and Gao,2018). The Earth System Regional Climate Model, which includes the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ocean general circulation model, has been tested for many regions(Central America, South Atlantic, and the tropics) and has shown realistic simulations of coupled air-sea processes and interactions (Sitz et al., 2017). The Model of the Regional Coupled Earth system, whose ocean model is NEMO, has been tested for the Mediterranean and Indian Ocean domains and has shown reasonable performance in simulations of key elements (Drobinski et al., 2012).

    Intercomparison of regional earth system models/regional ocean-atmosphere-land coupled models has not been well coordinated. The Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX), an ongoing model intercomparison project within the regional climate modeling community, mainly focuses on traditional uncoupled RCMs(Giorgi et al., 2009; Jones et al., 2011; Gutowski et al.,2016). Two flagship pilot studies on regional ocean-atmosphere-land interactions have been endorsed by CORDEX,which focused on western-southern Africa and the Mediterranean region (http://www.cordex.org/endorsed-flagshippilot-studies/). However, little attention has been directed towards the East Asian-western North Pacific (WNP)region. Observational and modeling studies have demonstrated the importance of local air-sea interactions in simulations of the Asian summer monsoon rainfall for climatology, interannual variability (Wang et al., 2005; Zhou et al.,2009) and intraseasonal variability (Wu, 2019). Comparisons between coupled and uncoupled regional climate simulations with a focus on the Asian summer monsoon and its subcomponents have shown better results for summer monsoon rainfall and circulation in regional coupled simulations (e.g., Fang et al., 2010; Li and Zhou, 2010; Yao and Zhang, 2010; Zou and Zhou, 2013; Cha et al., 2016; Zou et al., 2016; Dai et al., 2018). Nevertheless, these studies lack comparability since the experimental designs (i.e., the model domain) were not identical.

    The Institute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) has put considerable effort into global ocean-atmosphere coupled model development [see Zhou et al. (2007, 2018) for a review]. One of the IAP’s global models is named the Flexible Global Ocean-Atmosphere-Land System Model (FGOALS) and has contributed to phases 3 and 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP), and is contributing to the ongoing sixth phase (Zhou et al., 2020). The horizontal resolution of FGOALS is relatively coarse (approximately 100-200 km), so the Flexible Regional Ocean-Atmosphere-Land System Model (FROALS), which has a resolution of approximately 50 km, was therefore developed (Zou and Zhou, 2013). FROALS consists of an RCM, version 3 of the Regional Climate Model (RegCM3), with some modifications in convection parameterizations (Zou and Zhou,2011; Zou et al., 2014), and a global ocean model,LASG/IAP Climate Ocean Model (LICOM), which is the same as in FGOALS. FROALS has been used to dynamically downscale the climate changes made by FGOALS and has shown the importance of regional air-sea coupling in the simulation and projection of the regional climate over the East Asian-WNP region (Zou et al., 2016; Zou and Zhou, 2016, 2017). The deficiencies of FROALS are the relatively low computational efficiency and some significant biases, i.e., cold biases of the sea surface temperature over the WNP and dry biases over the monsoon trough (Zou and Zhou, 2013).

    Another deficiency of FROALS is the ~50 km horizontal resolution, which is currently coarse for both regional atmospheric and oceanic components. Recent studies have indicated that for atmospheric models, a horizontal resolution of 10-20 km is essential to sufficiently represent the topographic effects on climate change (Giorgi et al., 2016) and has been shown to provide substantial added value for a variety of climate variables (Torma et al., 2015). Furthermore, a high resolution regional ocean-atmosphere coupled model study indicated that the interaction between ocean mesoscale eddies and the atmosphere plays a crucial role in controlling western boundary currents (Ma et al., 2016). Therefore, regional ocean-atmosphere coupled models with horizontal resolution ranging from approximately 10-20 km must be developed for climate studies.

    Given the deficiency of FROALS and the future direction of coupled RCMs, we aim to upgrade FROALS. We coupled the community Regional Climate Model, version 4(RegCM4) (Giorgi et al., 2012), with the high-resolution regional version of LICOM and investigated the sensitivity of the regional coupled model, RegCM4_LICOM, to the cumulus parameterizations over the WNP (Zou et al., 2019).The Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model,which is another community RCM, has been widely used for regional climate studies over Asia (i.e., Liang et al.,2019). In this study, we coupled the newly released WRF4.0 model with the high-resolution regional version of LICOM and compared the performance of WRF4_LICOM with that of RegCM4_LICOM over the WNP. The objectives of this study were as follows: (1) to introduce the regional coupled model WRF4_LICOM and evaluate both the strengths and weaknesses of the model in simulating the WNP summer monsoon rainfall; and (2) to conduct an intercomparison of regional coupled simulations over this region. The metrics employed in this study can serve as a reference for the future development of regional coupled models over this region. The intercomparison of different regional atmospheric model components will provide a basis for the development of the next generation of IAP/CAS regional earth system models.

    The rest of the paper is organized as follows: The developed regional coupled model, WRF4-LICOM, the experimental design, and the observational datasets are described in section 2. Section 3 describes the evaluation of the performance of the regional coupled model in simulations of SST,rainfall, circulations, tropical cyclones (TCs), and the diurnal cycle of rainfall. The impacts of different regional atmospheric models are also discussed. Section 4 summarizes the major results.

    2.Model, experimental design, and observational datasets

    2.1.Regional ocean-atmosphere coupled model

    2.1.1.Regional atmospheric models

    The WRF model (Skamarock et al., 2008) we used is the recently released WRF4.0. It has a nonhydrostatic dynamical core and a terrain-following sigma coordinate in the vertical direction. The vertical layers in WRF4 are set to 35,and the buffer zone of the WRF4 model is set to 20 grid layers. The following model physics are employed: the Noah multiphysics land surface model (Niu et al., 2011), the WRF Single-Moment 6-class (WSM6) microphysics scheme (Hong and Lim, 2006), the Rapid Radiative Transfer Model for GCMs for longwave and shortwave radiation parameterizations (Iacono et al., 2008), the Yonsei University (YSU) planetary boundary layer scheme (Hong et al., 2006), the COARE ocean-atmosphere flux algorithm(Fairall et al., 2003), and the cloud scheme proposed by Xu and Randall (1996). For the cumulus parameterization, we employed the Tiedtke scheme (Tiedtke, 1989; Nordeng,1994).

    Since our aim was to compare the performance of WRF4-LICOM and RegCM4-LICOM, the RegCM4 model and the physics configuration we used are briefly introduced here. RegCM4 (Giorgi et al., 2012) version 4.6,which is a limited area model, was developed at the Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics. The model has 23 levels in the vertical direction, with a terrain-following sigma vertical coordinate. The selected physics configuration is listed below. The land surface model was the Community Land Model (CLM), version 3.5 (Oleson et al.,2008). The grid-scale precipitation was parameterized using the subgrid explicit moisture scheme (Pal et al., 2000). The radiation package from the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate Model, version 3(Kiehl et al., 1996), was employed. The planetary boundary layer scheme was based on the nonlocal vertical diffusion scheme of Holtslag et al. (1990), with some modifications(Giorgi et al., 2012). The sea surface turbulence heat fluxes were calculated using the Zeng ocean-atmosphere flux algorithm (Zeng et al., 1998). Note that, as in WRF4, the Tiedtke scheme was used to parameterize the convection.The physics configuration of RegCM4 was the same as that in Zou et al. (2019). The physical configurations of the two models are summarized in Table 1.

    2.1.2.Oceanic model component

    A North Pacific Ocean model was employed as the oceanic model component. The regional ocean model was developed from a quasi-global eddy-resolving OGCM (Yu et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014), which was based on the LASG/IAP climate ocean model, version 2 (LICOM2) (Liu et al., 2012). Compared to LICOM2, the updates and improvements of the eddy-resolving OGCM include (Yu et al.,2012): (1) increased horizontal and vertical resolutions; (2)deactivation of mesoscale eddy parameterizations and improved barotropic and baroclinic split methods; and (3)the inclusion of a two-dimensional message passing interface, both zonal- and meridional-split. The North Pacific Ocean model employs a horizontal longitude-latitude grid of uniform 0.1° squares and verticalcoordinates with 55 levels and 36 uneven layers in the upper 300 m. In the following analysis, the regional ocean model is referred to as LICOM_np.

    LICOM_np covers the North Pacific (colored region of Fig. 1). In this kind of model configuration, only the southern boundary is open. During the simulation, the simulated ocean temperature and salinity in the southern boundary were relaxed to the Levitus climatological monthly data (Levitus et al., 2006), and the solid wall condition was used for the velocity. The spin-up process of LICOM_np has been described in Zou et al. (2019). First, with the initial conditions from World Ocean Atlas 2005 (Antonov et al., 2006;Locarnini et al., 2006), the LICOM_np model was driven for 10 years with the climatological daily atmospheric forcing from the Coordinated Ocean-Ice Reference Experiment (CORE) (Griffies et al., 2012). Then, the model was driven with the daily atmospheric forcing from COREphase II (CORE II) from 1990-2007. The CORE dataset was used since it has been widely used to perform global ocean-sea ice coupled simulations (i.e., Liu et al., 2012).The spin-up process has been shown to be reasonable in RegCM4_LICOM (Zou et al., 2019).

    Table 1. Summary of the physics configurations in RegCM4 and WRF4.

    Fig. 1. Experimental design. The ocean model and regional atmospheric model are fully coupled over the WNP (dark blue region), while the ocean model is driven by the CORE-II data outside the WNP (light blue region).

    2.1.3.Ocean-atmosphere coupling

    The Ocean Atmosphere Sea Ice Soil coupler, version 3(Valcke, 2006), was used to couple WRF4 with LICOM_np. During the coupling process, the heat flux(including solar and non-solar) and surface wind stress at the sea surface were transferred from WRF4 to the ocean model, while the ocean model provided the SST and ocean surface currents to WRF4. When calculating the sea surface sensible heat flux, latent heat flux and wind stresses, the relative motion of the atmospheric wind at the lowest level and the ocean surface current were taken into account.

    2.2.Experimental design

    To fairly compare the model performances, the experimental design for WRF4_LICOM was identical to that for RegCM4_LICOM (Zou et al., 2019). We briefly describe the experimental design here. The model domain of WRF4 covered the WNP (dark blue region in Fig. 1) with a horizontal resolution of 15 km. The European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) interim reanalysis (ERA-Interim) dataset (Dee et al., 2011), which has a horizontal resolution of 0.75°×0.75°, was employed to drive the regional atmospheric model as the initial and lateral boundary conditions, which were laterally updated every 6 h.

    The regional coupling started on 1 November 2004.WRF4 and the ocean model were coupled over the WNP.The coupling interval was 1 h. Outside the WNP region, the ocean model was driven by the CORE II daily atmospheric forcing. Note that in this study, LICOM_np outside of the WNP was forced by CORE II data but not ERA-Interim since the stand-alone LICOM_np model was tuned with the forcing from CORE-II. The regionally coupled simulation was conducted for one year, from 1 November 2004 through 30 November 2005. The year 2005 was selected because it was a normal WNP summer monsoon year. The simulation using RegCM4_LICOM with the Tiedtke scheme, which has been described in Zou et al. (2019), was used to compare to the results from WRF4_LICOM. To facilitate the discussion, the regionally coupled simulations using RegCM4 and WRF4 are referred to as RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM, respectively.

    2.3.Observational datasets

    The following datasets were used to validate the model performance: (1) the satellite-retrieved precipitation dataset of the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) 3B42 product with a resolution of 0.25° (Huffman et al., 2007);(2) the convective and stratiform rainfall derived from TRMM 3A12 (Kummerow et al., 2001); (3) the daily rainfall gridded dataset for the land area over Asia with a 0.25 ×0.25° grid derived from the Asian Precipitation-Highly Resolved Observational Data Integration toward the Evaluation of Water Resources (APHRO) project (Yatagai et al.,2012); (4) the daily mean circulation field derived from ERA-Interim with a 0.75° × 0.75° grid; (5) the daily Optimal Interpolation Sea Surface Temperature data with a resolution of 0.25° from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Reynolds et al., 2007); and (6) the observational dataset of TCs derived from the International Best Track Archive for Climate Stewardship (IBTrACS)best-track datasets (Knapp et al., 2010). To facilitate the following discussion, the satellite-retrieved precipitation and the reanalysis dataset are referred to as the “observation”.

    3.Results

    3.1.SST simulation

    Figure 2 shows the simulated SST biases averaged from June to August of 2005 over the WNP region derived from the WRF4_LICOM simulations. The corresponding biases of the RegCM4_LICOM simulation are already shown in Fig. 3c in Zou et al. (2019). Both RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM significantly reduced the cold biases of the simulated SST over the central WNP, as shown in the previous version of FROALS (RegCM3_LICOM) [Fig. 2c in Zou and Zhou (2013)]. These improvements can be ascribed to two factors. The first factor is the ocean mesoscale eddy-resolving resolution of LICOM,which improved simulations of the ocean current and the associated heat transport (Yu et al., 2012). The second factor is the Tiedtke cumulus parameterization scheme. A study using RegCM4_LICOM (Zou et al., 2019) showed that the simulated SST over the WNP is sensitive to the choice of cumulus parameterization scheme.

    Compared to that in RegCM4_LICOM, the simulated SST was colder in WRF4_LICOM. The average SST bias was 0.01°C (?0.21°C) in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM).Spatially, the cold biases north of 35°N in LICOM_np(Fig. 2 in Zou et al. 2019) have been inherited in the regionally coupled simulations, with a larger (weaker) magnitude in WRF4_LICOM (RegCM4_LICOM). The warm (cold)biases were evident along the coastline of Vietnam and mainland China in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM). The RMSE of the simulated SST was 0.89°C in RegCM4_LICOM, while it was slightly larger in WRF4_LICOM(1.05°C).

    Figure 3a shows the probability density function (PDF)distribution of the SST biases over the WNP derived from both RegCM4-LICOM and WRF4-LICOM. An overall normal-mode type of distribution was found in the coupled simulations, with a peak around 0.5°C. The frequencies of biases colder than ?0.75°C were larger in WRF4_LICOM. Quantitatively, 48.3% (38.9%) of the model grids had biases within±0.5°C in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM). These results indicate that RegCM4_LICOM performs slightly better than WRF4_LICOM in the simulation of SST over the WNP in the boreal summer of 2005.

    Fig. 2. Spatial pattern of the simulated biases of 2005 JJA mean SST (°C) over the WNP from WRF4_LICOM.

    3.2.Summer mean rainfall

    Fig. 3. The PDF distributions of the simulated biases of the 2005 JJA mean (a) SST (°C) and (b) rainfall (mm d?1) over the WNP from RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM.

    Rainfall is a rigorous test for RCMs. In the observations, four major rainbands, as indicated by the four boxes in Fig. 4a, were found over the east of the Philippines (monsoon trough), over the northern South China Sea, over the region extending northeast from South China to the east of Japan, and over the mei-yu front region. Both regionally coupled simulations exhibited comparable performances,with an SCC of 0.62 (0.56) for RegCM4_LICOM(WRF4_LICOM). The spatial distribution of the 2005 summer mean rainfall derived from APHRO (contours in Fig. 4a)was similar to that from the satellite-retrieved rainfall from TRMM 3B42 over the land area, with a spatial pattern correlation coefficient of 0.80. Since our aim was to provide an overview of the model performance of WRF4-LICOM over both land and ocean, the evaluation is mainly based on the TRMM data. The dry biases in RegCM3_LICOM over the monsoon trough [Fig. 5c in Zou and Zhou (2013)] have been significantly reduced in both RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM.

    Regionally, WRF4_LICOM tended to overestimate(underestimate) the rainfall amount over the monsoon trough and the mei-yu front region (over southern China)(Fig. 4d), while RegCM4_LICOM tended to underestimate the rainfall over the major rainy centers (Fig. 4c). The absolute biases and RMSEs of the rainfall simulated by WRF4_LICOM were larger than those simulated by RegCM4_LICOM, except for the absolute biases over the northern South China Sea (Table 2).

    Fig. 4. Spatial distributions of the 2005 JJA mean precipitation (mm d?1) over the WNP derived from (a)observations [TRMM (shading) and APHRO (contours)], and (b) WRF4_LICOM. The numbers 1-4 in (a) represent the locations of the observed major rainbands/centers. The simulated biases from RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM with respect to TRMM data (shading) and APHRO data (contours) are shown in (c) and (d),respectively.

    As the SST biases, the corresponding PDFs of the rainfall biases are shown in Fig. 3b. Normal mode-type distributions of the biases were found for the two simulations, with a peak of ?0.39 (1.44) mm d?1for RegCM4_LICOM(WRF4_LICOM). The percentages of the model grids with positive rainfall biases in WRF4_LICOM were higher than those in RegCM4_LICOM. Quantitatively, 51.9% (41.4%)of the model grids had rainfall biases within ±2 mm d?1in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM). These results suggest that the performance of RegCM4_LICOM is better overall than that of WRF4_LICOM in the simulation of the June-July-August (JJA) mean rainfall of 2005 over the WNP, while the major deficiency of RegCM4_LICOM is that the model tends to underestimate the rainfall amount.The results shown in Fig. 3 indicate that the rainfall biases and SST biases are physically consistent. The larger positive rainfall biases in WRF4_LICOM favor less solar radiation reaching the sea surface, thus leading to larger cold SST biases.

    To further understand the mean summer rainfall biases,Fig. 5 shows the PDF distribution of the daily rainfall rates derived from observations and the two regionally coupled simulations over four selected regions (shown in Fig. 4a) during JJA of 2005. Over the monsoon trough (Fig. 5a), both models tended to overestimate the frequencies of rain rates between 3 mm d?1and 25 mm d?1, with much higher frequencies in WRF4_LICOM, contributing to the overly wet biases in this region. Both models tended to overestimate(underestimate) the frequencies of rain rates lower than(greater than) 42 mm d?1over the northern South China Sea(Fig. 5b), indicating that reasonable estimation of the rainfall amount (Table 2) compensates for model errors. Underes-timation of the frequencies of rain rates greater than 12 mm d?1over southern China (Fig. 5c) contributed to the dry biases in both models. The overestimated rainfall over the mei-yu-front region in WRF4_LICOM could mainly be attributed to the overestimated frequencies of rain rates greater than 30 mm d?1(Fig. 5d).

    Fig. 5. The PDF distributions of the daily rain rate over the selected four regions shown in Fig. 4a from June to August of 2005.

    Table 2. JJA mean statistics of simulated precipitation (mm d?1)over the four selected regions (shown in Fig. 4a). Bias (mm d?1) is the regional averaged model bias, and RMSE (mm d?1) is rootmean-square error.

    3.3.Large-scale circulation associated with the rainfall

    The interplay between rainfall and monsoon circulations is important over the WNP. Figure 6 compares the performances of the two models in a simulation of geopotential height at 500 hPa and mid-level wind at 500 hPa averaged from June to August of 2005. In the observation (Fig. 6a),the western North Pacific subtropical high (WNPSH) is a dominant system over the WNP. The mid-level westerly wind from the Indian summer monsoon, the southerly flow across the Maritime Continent, and the mid-level easterly wind associated with the WNPSH converge over the northern South China Sea and east of the Philippines, producing a large amount of rainfall in these regions. Then, the southwesterly wind related to the Indian summer monsoon and the southeasterly wind in the southern flank of the WNPSH further converge over southern China, while the rainfall over the mei-yu front region corresponds well with the warm horizontal temperature advection at 500 hPa. The warm horizontal temperature advection by the mid-level westerly jet has been regarded as a crucial environmental forcing for the mei-yu rainband (Sampe and Xie, 2010). The general distributions of the WNPSH and the associated wind field were reasonably captured by each simulation, with SCCs larger than 0.95. However, some differences and biases existed. The simulated WNPSH by RegCM4_LICOM was weaker and shifted eastwards compared to the observation (Fig. 6b), which led to weaker moisture flux convergences over southern China and weaker mid-level warm horizontal temperature advection over the mei-yu front region, resulting in dry biases over East China (Fig. 5b). In contrast, the WNPSH simulated by WRF4_LICOM was too strong and shifted westwards (Fig. 6c), also favoring weaker convergences over southern China but stronger midlevel warm horizontal temperature advection over the meiyu front region. Subsequently, dry (wet) biases were found over southern China (the mei-yu front region) (Fig. 4c).

    But why do the two regional coupled models exhibit opposite biases in their simulations of the WNPSH despite both being driven by ERA-Interim reanalysis data? Figure 7 shows cross sections of the simulated biases of the 2005 JJA mean meridional overturning circulation averaged over 110°-160°E. Similar biases (ascending anomalies throughout the troposphere) were evident over the area north of 30°N and south of 10°N in both models, while almost opposite biases were found in between; that is, anomalous ascending(descending) motions in the middle to upper troposphere simulated by RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM) within 25°-30°N, which were indicative of a weakened (enhanced)WNPSH, were accompanied by descending (ascending) anomalies over the region around the Philippines (12°-16°N).

    The biases of the simulated WNPSH may have been induced by those of the simulated diabatic heating around the Philippines. The mechanism is very similar to that of the Pacific-Japan pattern in the observations, which suggests that the strong convective activities around the Philippines favor an enhanced and westward-shifted WNPSH through the Rossby wave response (e.g., Nitta, 1987; Huang and Sun, 1992). Figure 8a shows the vertical profile of the summer mean total heating, which is expressed as the apparent heat source, averaged over the region around the Philippines (12°-16°N, 110°-160°E). A peak of heating is located between 400 and 500 hPa in the reanalysis, but the peak was underestimated (overestimated) in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM).

    To further investigate the processes that contributes to the biases of simulated heating, the vertical profile of the regional averaged condensation heating, which is roughly expressed as the apparent moisture sink, and the cloud condensates over (12°-16°N, 110°-160°E) are also shown in Fig. 8. Clearly, the enhanced diabatic heating in WRF4_LICOM (Fig. 8a) is mainly derived from the stronger condensation heating (Fig. 8b). However, the weakened diabatic heating between 400 and 500 hPa in RegCM4_LICOM may be more due to the reduced longwave radiative warming associated with fewer high clouds (Fig. 8c). Note that compared to WRF4_LICOM, more low-level clouds were simulated in RegCM4_LICOM, which tended to stabilize the lowlevel troposphere and inhibit deep convection; as a result,less moisture was transported to be condensed in the upper troposphere.

    3.4.TC activities

    Fig. 7. Latitude-height cross sections of the biases of the simulated 2005 JJA mean vertical p velocity (ω, shading, ?100 hPa s?1) and the meridional overturning circulation (v and ?ω × 100)averaged over 110°-160°E derived from (a) RegCM4_LICOM and (b) WRF4_LICOM.

    The regionally coupled continuous simulations were initialized on 1 November 2004; thus, the models are not expected to represent specific TCs during the summer of 2005 because the initial condition of the atmosphere would be long forgotten by then, even when applying the observed atmospheric lateral boundary conditions, since the domain was not very small. Therefore, we assess the models’ abilities to simulate the TC statistics during the warm season of 2005.

    In this study, the TC track detection method (Murakami and Sugi, 2010) was applied, which has been effective for detecting TC tracks in reanalysis data and high-resolution climate models (Murakami et al., 2012; Murakami, 2014;etc.). The criteria for TC track detection include: (1) the maximum relative vorticity at 850 hPa exceeds 1.5 × 10?4s?1;(2) the sum of the temperature deviations at 850, 500, and 300 hPa exceeds 1.0 K over a 10° × 10° grid box (identification of the TC warm core aloft); (3) the wind speed at 850 hPa is greater than the wind speed at 300 hPa above the detected TC center (to eliminate extratropical cyclones); and (4)the duration of each detected TC center must last longer than 48 h. The criteria threshold is like that in Murakami et al. (2012) but with larger relative vorticity criteria, so that the detected TC number during April to October of 2005 was 19 (18) in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM), which was close to the 18 in the observation.

    Figure 9 shows the observed and simulated TC frequencies (TCFs) from April to October of 2005. The TCF is defined as the number of TCs passing at each 2.5° × 2.5°grid box. In the observation (Fig. 9a), TCs mainly generated over the central WNP and then moved westwards (northwards) to mainland China (Japan). The observed pattern was partly reproduced in RegCM4_LICOM, with an SCC of 0.25, but the genesis locations of the simulated TCs shifted southwards by approximately 5° (Fig. 9b). In WRF4_LICOM (Fig. 9c), the genesis locations of simulated TCs shifted too far westwards, probably due to the overly strong and westward-shifted WNPSH (Fig. 6c). The SCC of WRF4_LICOM was 0.13.

    Fig. 8. Vertical profiles of the 2005 JJA mean (a)apparent heat source (Q1/Cp, K d?1) and (b) the moisture sink (Q2/Cp, K d?1) averaged over (12°-16°N,110°-160°E) derived from observation, RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM. (c) Vertical profiles of the 2005 JJA mean simulated cloud condensates (cloud water in RegCM4_LICOM, but the total amount of five species along with the sum of cloud ice and cloud snow from WRF4_LICOM) averaged over (12°-16°N,110°-160°E).

    The observed and simulated TCs were further categorized into seven types [tropical depressions (TDs), tropical storms (TSs), and categories 1?5 (Cat 1-Cat 5)] based on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale (Fig. 9d). Clearly,both models tended to underestimate the observed TC intensity, i.e., they produced more TSs and fewer Cat 4 TCs. Compared to RegCM4_LICOM, WRF4_LICOM showed fewer TCs with Cat 1 intensity but more TCs with Cat 3 and Cat 4 intensity, thus exhibiting improved performance.

    The rainfall induced by a TC was defined as the rainfall within a 5° × 5° grid box around the TC center. Figure 10 shows the percentage contributions from the rainfall induced by TCs to the total rainfall amount. In the observation, TC-induced rainfall contributes more than 40% of the total rainfall over the northern South China Sea, the central WNP, the coastal region of mainland China, and east of Japan (Fig. 10a). Clearly, RegCM4_LICOM underestimated the contributions from TC-induced rainfall (Fig. 10b),with an SCC of 0.40. However, WRF4_LICOM reasonably captured the contributions from TC-induced rainfall over the northern South China Sea, the coastal region of mainland China, and east of Taiwan Island, but underestimated these contributions over the central WNP and east of Japan(Fig. 10c), with a higher SCC of 0.52.

    3.5.Diurnal cycle of rainfall

    The diurnal cycle of rainfall is a good test bed for weather and climate models (Dai and Trenberth, 2004). The TRMM3B42 data were used to assess the models’ performances in the simulation of diurnal cycle of rainfall. Previous studies have indicated that the diurnal cycle of rainfall from TRMM data is comparable to those seen in rain gauge data over East China (Zhou et al., 2008) and South Korea (Koo et al., 2009). The regionally coupled simulations with 15-km resolution were averaged onto 0.25° grids of TRMM3B42 data. Figure 11 shows the local solar time(LST) of the maximum in the composite diurnal cycle of rainfall amount, frequency, and intensity derived from the observation and regionally coupled simulations. In the observation, the land area is dominated by an afternoon peak in the rainfall amount, except for the regions between the Yangtze and Yellow rivers (Borneo Island), which also see an early morning peak (nocturnal peak) in the rainfall amount (Fig.11a). An early morning peak dominates over the monsoon trough, while the ocean area controlled by the WNPSH shows both an early morning peak and an afternoon peak in the rainfall amount (Fig. 11a). The observed features over the land area were partly reproduced in both models, while both models tended to produce a premature early morning peak in the rainfall amount over the ocean area (Figs. 11d and g). Compared to RegCM4_LICOM, WRF4_LICOM exhibited better performance, especially over the land area,as evidenced by a higher SCC (Fig. 12a). The weakness of RegCM4_LICOM was an earlier peak time of approximately three hours for the afternoon rainfall amount over the land area.

    Fig. 9. Spatial distributions of the TCF (tropical cyclone frequency) during April to October of 2005 derived from (a)IBTrACS, (b) RegCM4_LICOM, and (c) WRF4_LICOM. The TCF is defined as the number of TCs passing at each 2.5° ×2.5° grid box. (d) Intensity distributions of TCs categorized based on the Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale.

    An afternoon peak in rainfall frequency dominates over the WNP, with an early morning peak over some oceanic grids (Fig. 11b). The common bias of both models was a dominant nocturnal-early morning peak in rainfall frequency overall in the ocean area. Compared to WRF4_LICOM, the peak time of the rainfall frequency simulated by RegCM4_LICOM over the land area was three hours earlier than that in the observation. The performance of WRF4_LICOM was slightly better than that of RegCM4_LICOM (Fig. 12b). Rainfall intensity exhibits late afternoon and early morning peaks over both the land and ocean areas (Fig. 11c). These features were poorly simulated by both models, although the performance of WRF4_LICOM was better, especially over the land area(Fig. 12c).

    But why does WRF4_LICOM perform better in simulating the diurnal cycle of rainfall over land? Table 3 lists the observed and simulated stratiform percentages averaged over the land and oceanic grids of the region (5°S-40°N,105°-165°E). In the observation, the averaged stratiform percentages are approximately 50% over both land and oceanic grids of the WNP. Both models underestimated the observed stratiform percentage, which is a common bias of convection-parameterized climate models (Yuan, 2013).Both models showed comparable stratiform percentages over the oceanic grids, but RegCM4_LICOM produced higher percentages of convective rainfall than WRF4_LICOM over the land grids of the WNP, which may favor earlier peaks in the rainfall amount and intensity.

    4.Summary and concluding remarks

    4.1.Summary

    To upgrade the regional coupled model FROALS, in this study, the community RCM WRF4 was coupled with a regional high-resolution version of LICOM. The horizontalresolution of WRF4 was set to 15 km, while the horizontal resolution of the oceanic component was 0.1°. The performance of the regional coupled model WRF4_LICOM was compared to that of RegCM4_LICOM, with a focus on the 2005 WNP summer monsoon rainfall. The two regional coupled models shared the same regional ocean model component,horizontal resolution, cumulus parameterization scheme,and experimental design. The major conclusions are summarized below.

    Table 3. Observed and simulated stratiform percentages of the JJA mean precipitation averaged over the region (5°S-40°N,100°-165°E) and the corresponding percentages averaged over land and oceanic grids of the region.

    Fig. 10. Spatial distributions of the percentage contributions(%) from the rainfall induced by TCs to the total rainfall during May to October of 2005 derived from (a) TRMM, (b)RegCM4_LICOM, and (c) WRF4_LICOM. The rainfall induced by a TC is defined as the rainfall within the 5° × 5°grid box around the TC center.

    The upgraded regional ocean-atmosphere coupled model with either RegCM4 or WRF4 as the regional atmospheric model component exhibited improved performance over the WNP compared to that with RegCM3_LICOM.The evident cold biases of the simulated SST over the WNP, along with the dry biases of summer rainfall over the monsoon trough, were significantly reduced in the updated version.

    Intercomparison of regional coupled simulations with different regional atmospheric model components showed different skill levels for different climate variables, and no single model was found to systematically outperform the other.RegCM4_LICOM exhibited smaller biases in its simulation of the averaged SST and rainfall over the WNP in terms of RMSE. The spatial distribution of TCs was also partly reproduced in RegCM4_LICOM. However, RegCM4_LICOM tended to underestimate the rainfall over major rainy centers and TC intensity. WRF4_LICOM better captured TC intensity, the percentage contributions of TC-induced rainfall to the total rainfall, the diurnal cycle of rainfall and stratiform percentages, especially over the land area. However, the genesis locations of TCs were shifted too far westwards in WRF4_LICOM. The common biases of both models were also identified. Both models had large dry biases over southern China, underestimated TC intensity, and showed a premature morning peak of rainfall over the ocean area.

    The different performances of the two models for simulated rainfall can be partly ascribed to the opposite biases in the simulated WNPSH. The weakened and eastward-shifted (enhanced and westward-shifted) WNPSH in RegCM4_LICOM (WRF4_LICOM) led to dry biases over southern China and dry biases (wet biases) over the mei-yu front region. Further analysis indicated that the overestimated(underestimated) diabatic heating between 400 and 500 hPa over the region around the Philippines in WRF4_LICOM(RegCM4_LICOM) may have induced the stronger (weaker)WNPSH. The enhanced diabatic heating in WRF4_LICOM was mainly due to the stronger condensation heating, while the weakened diabatic heating in RegCM4_LICOM may be more due to the reduced longwave radiative warming associated with fewer high clouds.

    The overall reasonable performances of RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM indicate that the models can be used for a wide range of applications, i.e., dynamical downscaling of simulations and projections generated by the FGOALS, which will be reported in future studies.

    4.2.Concluding remarks

    In this study, it was challenging to identify which formulation differences listed in Table 1 were the root reasons to explain the different performances between RegCM4-LICOM and WRF4-LICOM over the WNP, since the two models only share the same cumulus scheme. In addition to the model physics, it is noted that the vertical resolution of WRF4 (35L) is higher than that of RegCM4 (23L), which may explain the higher TC intensity in WRF4-LICOM (Ma et al., 2012). The model intercomparison of the simulated mean rainfall biases (section 3.3) implies that the cloud microphysics-radiation interactions may play an essential role. It should be noted that we only compare the performances of RegCM4_LICOM and WRF4_LICOM with a typical physics configuration, which may not be the best configuration for each model over the target region. Currently, more than 100 combinations of different model physics can be configured in both RegCM4 and WRF4. A comprehensive comparison of RegCM4-LICOM and WRF4-LICOM with multiple physics configurations, which requires very large computational resources, is under consideration.

    Fig. 11. Spatial distributions of the local solar time of the maximum (LST) in the composite diurnal cycle of the rainfall amount (left panel), frequency (middle panel) and intensity (right panel) during June to August of 2005 derived from (a, b, c)TRMM, (d, e, f) RegCM4_LICOM, and (g, h, i) WRF4_LICOM.

    In this study, we compared the seasonal biases over the WNP region simulated by two regional ocean-atmosphere coupled models by conducting continuous 13-month simulations with the same initial condition and lateral boundary forcing. One member was used. This experimental design was similar to that of phase one of the Regional Model Intercomparison Project for Asia (Fu et al., 2005), which conducted continuous 18-month simulations. Some studies have argued that the internal variability of the RCMs does not significantly affect the domain-wide average but influences the day-to-day model variability (e.g., Giorgi and Bi, 2000). Nevertheless, the internal variability of regional ocean-atmosphere coupled models and the possible impacts on seasonal biases deserves further investigation.

    IAP/CAS intends to develop a next-generation high-resolution RESM with WRF4 as its regional atmospheric model.Coupling WRF4 with LIOCM is an important step towards the development of CAS RESM. Intercomparison of RegCM4-LICOM and WRF4-LICOM with the same cumulus scheme over the WNP region highlights the importance of cloud microphysics-radiation interactions. This implies that the tunable parameters in the cloud microphysics scheme should be given great attention for future tuning of CAS RESM over the East Asia-WNP region.

    Fig. 12. Spatial pattern correlation coefficients of the peak time of the 2005 JJA composite diurnal cycle of the (a) rainfall amount, (b) rainfall frequency, and (c) rainfall intensity between regionally coupled simulations and the observations over the WNP (5°S-44°N, 105°-165°E) and the land/oceanic area of the WNP.

    Acknowledgements.The comments from the reviewers,which significantly improved the manuscript, are greatly appreciated. All the observational datasets used in this study are listed in the references, and the model results used have been archived in figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.9917459.v1). This work was jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFA0606003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos.41875132 and 41575105), and the Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Climate Change.

    国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 咕卡用的链子| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 99国产精品99久久久久| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 一区在线观看完整版| av有码第一页| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 老司机靠b影院| 欧美另类一区| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 午夜福利,免费看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 99热全是精品| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 操美女的视频在线观看| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 丝袜喷水一区| a 毛片基地| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 国产成人一区二区在线| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 黄色视频不卡| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 香蕉国产在线看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲图色成人| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 99国产精品99久久久久| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 在线观看国产h片| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 男人操女人黄网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 又大又爽又粗| 在线天堂中文资源库| 9热在线视频观看99| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 日本五十路高清| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产av国产精品国产| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 丁香六月天网| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久99精品国语久久久| 午夜影院在线不卡| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 无限看片的www在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 亚洲成人手机| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 观看av在线不卡| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 国产一级毛片在线| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 国产成人系列免费观看| 五月天丁香电影| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 悠悠久久av| 99九九在线精品视频| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 男人舔女人的私密视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 精品福利观看| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 高清av免费在线| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 电影成人av| 国产精品成人在线| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 一级毛片电影观看| 日本色播在线视频| av有码第一页| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 9191精品国产免费久久| 两个人看的免费小视频| 中文欧美无线码| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 午夜激情av网站| 看免费成人av毛片| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 一级毛片我不卡| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 男女国产视频网站| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 婷婷色综合www| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 亚洲成人手机| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久久精品区二区三区| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 蜜桃在线观看..| 蜜桃在线观看..| 亚洲九九香蕉| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 搡老岳熟女国产| h视频一区二区三区| 美女中出高潮动态图| 午夜影院在线不卡| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 午夜福利视频精品| 婷婷成人精品国产| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 国产在线免费精品| 1024视频免费在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 欧美在线黄色| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 色网站视频免费| 1024视频免费在线观看| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 男女免费视频国产| 18在线观看网站| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 老司机影院成人| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 男人操女人黄网站| 一区在线观看完整版| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 午夜免费鲁丝| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 亚洲中文av在线| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 一区二区三区精品91| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| av在线播放精品| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| www.av在线官网国产| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 成年人黄色毛片网站| 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 9色porny在线观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 高清av免费在线| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 在线天堂中文资源库| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 夫妻午夜视频| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 大型av网站在线播放| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 日本欧美视频一区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 后天国语完整版免费观看| av不卡在线播放| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 操美女的视频在线观看| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产精品九九99| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 一区福利在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久中文字幕一级| 两个人看的免费小视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 天天添夜夜摸| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| videosex国产| 精品一区在线观看国产| 嫩草影视91久久| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 热re99久久国产66热| 午夜影院在线不卡| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 欧美另类一区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 婷婷成人精品国产| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 一级毛片女人18水好多 | 我的亚洲天堂| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 操出白浆在线播放| 男女免费视频国产| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 午夜久久久在线观看| 中文字幕色久视频| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 亚洲av男天堂| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 大香蕉久久成人网| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 丝袜美足系列| a 毛片基地| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 又大又爽又粗| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 91老司机精品| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 欧美另类一区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 久久久久网色| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 亚洲综合色网址| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 我的亚洲天堂| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 午夜福利视频精品| 日本五十路高清| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| h视频一区二区三区| 久久久欧美国产精品| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 91国产中文字幕| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 国产淫语在线视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 中国国产av一级| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 日韩电影二区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 色网站视频免费| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲综合色网址| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 午夜福利,免费看| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 久久99精品国语久久久| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产av国产精品国产| 久久久精品94久久精品| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 成人免费观看视频高清| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 免费av中文字幕在线| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 中文字幕制服av| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产在线观看jvid| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| a级毛片黄视频| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 国产av精品麻豆| 天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 日本wwww免费看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 久久性视频一级片| 高清欧美精品videossex| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 国产高清videossex| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 精品国产一区二区久久| a 毛片基地| 国产又爽黄色视频| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 最黄视频免费看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 国产精品二区激情视频| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | av视频免费观看在线观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 国产成人精品在线电影| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 成人影院久久| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 岛国毛片在线播放| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 精品福利观看| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲中文av在线| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 日本a在线网址| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产精品免费视频内射| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产精品二区激情视频| 欧美人与善性xxx| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产成人精品在线电影| 久久免费观看电影| 成人国语在线视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 亚洲第一青青草原| 久久性视频一级片| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 午夜久久久在线观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 国产麻豆69| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 999精品在线视频| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 满18在线观看网站| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 久久久久久人人人人人| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 欧美日韩精品网址| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 制服人妻中文乱码| 久久久精品94久久精品| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 久热这里只有精品99| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 9热在线视频观看99| 久热这里只有精品99| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 美女福利国产在线| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 国产成人精品无人区| 国产精品二区激情视频| 人妻一区二区av| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 中国国产av一级| 一级黄片播放器| 成人国产av品久久久|