• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: state of the art

    2020-07-30 06:19:00MicheleDeRosaGregWynnFabioRondelliGrazianoCeccarelli
    Mini-invasive Surgery 2020年6期

    Michele De Rosa, Greg Wynn, Fabio Rondelli, Graziano Ceccarelli

    1Department of General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista Hospital", Foligno 06034, Italy.

    2Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, East Suffolk and North Essex Foundation NHS Trust, Colchester CO45JL,United Kingdom.

    3Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia 06100, Italy.

    Abstract Total mesorectal excision remains the gold standard for surgical treatment for rectal cancer to achieve excellent oncological outcomes. The transanal approach to the mesorectum was introduced to complement conventional surgery so that technical difficulties related to the distal rectal dissection could be overcome. Since its introduction,interest in transanal mesorectal excision has been growing and it appears that the benefits are maximal in patients with mid-low rectal cancer where anatomical and pathological factors present the greatest challenges. Current evidence demonstrates this approach is safe and feasible, with an acceptable morbidity profile, but with specific complications related to the technique. Oncological and functional data seem comparable to the conventional approaches, but most of the results come from small studies with short-term endpoints. Robotics, when available,might potentially overcome the difficulty of distal rectal dissection with a shorter learning curve compared to the transanal approach, but with higher costs. The aim of this review is to critically evaluate the available literature concerning transanal total mesorectal excision so that we can better define its role in the management of rectal cancer.

    Keywords: Rectal cancer, total mesorectal excision, transanal total mesorectal excision, transanal surgery,laparoscopy

    INTRODUCTION

    Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the gold standard approach to the surgical treatment of rectal cancer[1]. The application of this key technical principle has represented a revolution in rectal cancer surgery, demonstrating how the integrity of the mesorectal envelope is paramount in achieving excellent oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrence[2]. Minimally invasive techniques have shown major benefits in the treatment of colon cancer, but rectal surgery is technically more demanding and the associated steep learning curve has made the laparoscopic approach less appealing.

    Nevertheless, surgical techniques are constantly evolving and searching for less invasive approaches,particularly pursuing the principles of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) represents an exciting goal. A further reduction in postoperative pain, less wound infections and hernias, better cosmetic results and a shorter time off work are the key advantages of these super-minimally invasive approaches[3,4].

    It is suggested that bulky colorectal specimens can be effectively excised transanally[5]and several experimental studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of rectosigmoid transanal resection in animal and cadaveric models[6,7].

    Pure NOTES still requires significant improvement in instruments and technology to make the transition to the clinical arena and remains largely an experimental approach, while hybrid procedures such as natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) techniques combined with laparoscopy can reduce the impact of surgery further[5,7,8].

    As a result of these experiences, the fi rst transanal rectal resection with a hybrid approach was described by Sylla et al.[7]in a 76-year-old lady with a rectal cancer located at 8 cm from anal verge.

    This fi rst report, describing transanal TME (TaTME), aroused great interest because it demonstrated the feasibility of a hybrid NOTES procedure that could be applied to challenging real-life situations, such as the difficult TME for mid and distal rectal cancer.

    Indeed, even in the hands of experts, rectal cancer surgery in obese, male patients with bulky, distal tumors can be extremely difficult, where the ballooning of rectum into the sacral concavity creates a sharp angle with the anal canal[9]. In these cases, difficulty in staying in the correct dissection plane can easily result in an incomplete specimen with possible inadequate circumferential resection margin (CRM)[10].

    Despite the standardization of technique for TME, several studies have demonstrated that the quality of the fi nal specimen is important in predicting cancer-related outcomes[11,12]. Obese patients with low, anteriorlylocated tumors, those treated with neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or those with a narrow pelvis are at particular risk of incomplete mesorectal excision[13-15].

    Laparoscopy offers the advantage of improved visualization of deep pelvic structures, but the limitations imposed by long and straight instruments, particularly applying traction and counter-traction maneuvers in a narrow space, remain significant challenges. In addition, laparoscopic stapling technology has proved rather inadequate and difficult to use low in the pelvis, increasing the risk of poor outcomes[16,17].

    TaTME was conceived and developed with the aim of overcoming these specific limitations, particularly in mid and low cancers. The closer, more detailed view of the pelvic structures makes the dissections from below more accurate and effective, leading to a better specimen. Inserting the purse-string below the tumor allows the surgeon to accurately control the distal resection margin (DRM). In the case of anterior tumors,with a high risk of an involved circumferential margin, the transanal approach can facilitate the dissection of Denonvilliers fascia, thus minimizing the risk of injuries to prostate, seminal vesicles, and the nerves of the inferior hypogastric plexus and nervi erigentes.

    Because of these potential advantages, TaTME has gained wide interest in the colorectal community and represents an opportunity to improve patient outcomes; however, it remains a technically challenging operation and further research is required to prove its oncological efficacy when more widely adopted.

    DEVICE AND TECHNIQUE

    In 1983, Prof. Gerard Buess conceived transanal endoscopic microsurgey (TEM) and, in cooperation with Richard Wolf, created and developed the platform for endoscopic rectal surgery, with the aim to treat benign lesions of the upper and middle rectum not previously reached with conventional transanal approaches[18,19].

    Based on this model, the Transanal Endoscopic Operation (TEO; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was developed, which provides a rigid operative rectoscope, compatible with many standard laparoscopic instruments without the need for a dedicated platform.

    In 2009, in Orlando, Florida, Atallah and colleagues introduced the concept of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). This was inspired by devices already created for single-site surgery in the abdomen but were adapted for transanal access. This essentially created a fl exible, transanal multiport device that could be used with a conventional laparoscope and laparoscopic instruments[20].

    To date, two transanal platforms, GelPoint Path (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, Ca) and SILS Port (Covidien, Mansfield, Ma), have gained FDA approval for TAMIS. Clinical studies published thus far demonstrate that both these and rigid platforms such as TEM/TEO can be used for TaTME, but the review by Araujo et al.[21]shows that only the 24.7% (37/150) of the preliminary TaTME cases reported were performed with a platform TEM/TEO.

    TAMIS ports have now become the preferred option for surgeons dedicated to TaTME because, compared to rigid platforms, the soft, fl exible port offers more versatile access to the whole circumference of the rectal lumen without multiple position changes during surgery, the equipment is quicker and easier to set up, and there may also be economic advantages[22,23].

    With improving experience and the dissemination of this approach through research and training, many different technical modifications have been introduced, although the cardinal principles of this procedure remain the same: to provide a complete mobilization of the mesorectum from the pelvic floor upwards according to the eight steps described by Whiteford and colleagues in 2007[24].

    TaTME can be performed either with two different surgical teams working simultaneously with abdominal and transanal dissection or with a two-step approach, using the same surgical team for both operative phases in sequence.

    Abdominal phase: the abdominal phase is performed according to the standard approach and preference of the operating surgeon. It should be noted that either a planned open approach or a laparoscopic conversion does not preclude a transanal approach to the pelvis. If a sequential approach is used (usually due to the lack of two operating teams being available), then transabdominal dissection proceeds into the pelvis along the mesorectal fascia until it becomes technically challenging and the specimen or the surrounding key pelvic structures are at risk. Even in extremely challenging cases, the peritoneum will be divided anteriorly before changing to a transanal approach as this will facilitate entry into the abdominal cavity from below.Abdominal pneumoperitoneum is def l ated, the insufflator is turned off, and the ports are closed prior to the legs being positioned for the transanal phase.

    Transanal phase: the transanal phase commences with a digital rectal examination to ensure the rectum is empty and that the clinical findings correlate with the MRI scan. The placement of a self-fixing anal retractor (Lone Star CooperSurgical, Trumbull, CT, USA) may be useful to better expose the anal canal,particularly in male patients with a long anal canal. Insertion of the transanal platform should reveal distal rectal mucosa through the anal channel. Fixation of the TAMIS port to the anal margin, positioning of the ports in the gel-cap with attachment, and gentle insufflation will facilitate clear views and safe operating.Initial laparoscopic inspection will allow assessment of the height of the tumor from anal verge in order to plan the positioning of the purse-string and the rectotomy.

    A purse-string suture is placed at least 10 mm distal to the tumor to seal the rectal lumen, and then rectal irrigation eliminates debris and prevents the possible implantation of free cancer cells.

    Carbon dioxide is insufflated into the distal rectal lumen to obtain a stable pneumorectum with a pressure of 10-20 mmHg and the rectal mucosa is marked circumferentially with monopolar hook. A full thickness rectotomy is started, usually posteriorly where the plane between presacral fascia and mesorectum is more easily identified, but slightly laterally where the ano-coccygeal ligament is less easily encountered.

    The rectal transection is performed by opening the different layers of the rectal wall until the mesorectal plane is identified. Once the whole circumference of the distal rectal wall has been divided, the rectal specimen will retract upwards slightly, revealing the posterior mesorectal fascia. At this stage, the closed purse-string can be reinforced with a second V-LocTMsuture (Covidien, Mansfield, Ma) to reduce the risk of intraluminal leakage during the pelvic dissection. The posterior plane is developed fi rst, anterior to the pre-sacral fascia and along the angel hair of the mesorectal fascia which is kept intact. The anterior plane is approached afterward, keeping the dissection in front or behind Denonvillier’s fascia according to the rectal cancer position. The lateral dissection can then proceed, using the areas of correct dissection from the front and back to guide the dissection; this will minimize the risk of injuries to the neurovascular structures laterally and antero-laterally. Mesorectal dissection should proceed in a cylindrical fashion avoiding distortion of the specimen. Entry into the abdominal compartment should be delayed as late as possible, as accurate mesorectal dissection is impaired once a communication is established between the two cavities. When the dissection is complete, a careful assessment is made of whether the specimen can be safely extracted transanally or not, considering the size of both the specimen but also the stage of the cancer. The length of the remaining distal rectal cuff will determine whether a hand-sewn anastomosis will be required or whether there is adequate tissue for a distal purse-string to be inserted in preparation for a stapled anastomosis. Distal purse-strings can be inserted laparoscopically or as an open procedure with the TAMIS port still in-situ but drawn distally to stent the anorectal lumen or with the TAMIS port removed and the Lone Star retractor giving access. Various methods of stapled anastomosis techniques have been described[25].

    Techniques to assess the vascular supply to the anastomosis have been described[26], but one of the benefits of TaTME is direct inspection and palpation of the whole circumference of the anastomosis prior to the end of the operation. This may allow selective defunctioning stomas to be performed according to individual patient risk factors.

    INDICATIONS

    Ideal candidates for TaTME are patients with mid or low rectal cancer (within 10 cm from the anal verge),especially in male patients (because of the narrow pelvis or prostate hypertrophy/previous prostate surgery),obesity, bulky tumors, or after neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and, for these reasons, this approach may have the most to offer these patients. The San Gallen Consensus concurs that TaTME may be technically easier compared to abdominal techniques in this group of patients[27].

    Current practice suggests that selection of patients for TaTME includes a wider group of patients, particularly with regard with tumor location, as we can observe with the experience of Lacy or in the International Registry where tumors were proximally located in 20.7% and 38% of patients, respectively[28,29], however this remains primarily a technique for those requiring TME.

    Appropriate patient selection is of paramount importance, especially during the early learning curve and it is wise not to select very difficult cases before competence is reached. In this respect, expanding the indications for TaTME to include those patients who could easily be done laparoscopically may be required for training purposes.

    PERIOPERATIVE RESULTS

    Feasibility and safety of perioperative outcomes of TaTME have been extensively reported as well as limitations and shortcomings that need to be addressed.

    Reduced estimated blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and lower readmission rates were recently reported in a meta-analysis of 17 studies[30].

    Compared to laparoscopic TME, a lower rate of conversion to open surgery has been observed, ranging between 0% and 9.1%[22,31,32]. This correlated to the level of experience, as highlighted by Dejien and colleagues who compared low-volume centers performing TaTME (< 30 cases) to high-volume centers (> 30 cases)and reported conversion rates of 4.3% and 2.7%, respectively[33].

    Conversions during TME surgery are usually due to technical difficulties related to high body mass index(BMI) and the narrow male pelvis. Ma et al.[32]showed that this accounted for 25% of conversions in TaTME patients vs. 47% in those undergoing laparoscopic TME. In most reported series, the occurrence of intraoperative complications provoke conversion, with tumor or patient features not directly affecting the operation outcome.

    TaTME has also been shown to have a significantly shorter operation time, compared to laparoscopy[34],and this is even more pronounced if the operation is performed with a simultaneous two-team approach[35].Concerning morbidity, several retrospective series or cohort studies reported on safety of TaTME, showing postoperative complication rates comparable with conventional laparoscopic or open TME data[36].

    The international TaTME registry including 720 patients reported an overall morbidity of 32.5%[29], in line with several other monocentric series on TaTME[22,37].

    In a recent systematic review, TaTME and laparoscopic TME showed similar rates of intraoperative complications, although a lower rate of postoperative morbidity was reported in the transanal group[32].

    Several publications report a low incidence of anastomotic leak rate following TaTME, which in the largest meta-analyses available ranges between 5.7% and 6.1%[33,38]and is similar to the results reported after conventional TME[39].

    Recently updated data from the multi-institutional International TaTME registry on 1594 patients over 30 months show an overall 30-day anastomotic leak rate of 7.8%[40], not too far from the rate of 10%reported by Ma et al.[32]in their systematic review.Finally, the potential for major bacterial contamination as a consequence of the rectal transection, as shown by Velthuis with 39% of positivity of pelvic culture, suggests the risk for higher rates of pelvic sepsis, but this concern was not confirmed by subsequent studies[41].

    Indeed, the literature available reports an average rate of pelvic abscess of 2%-3%[29,42]and more up to date review data confirm an overall incidence of 2.2%[33].

    Despite these encouraging results, TaTME has some very specific complications. Rouanet reported urethral injury in 6.6% of cases; however, this was a series of 30 difficult high BMI male patients, most following radiotherapy[43]. However, urethral injury is a serious complication directly related to the transanal phase of the operation and is very uncommon during open or laparoscopic TME.

    In the largest multi-institutional registry reporting on 720 patients, the occurrence of urethral injuries was 0.7% and was associated with bladder injuries, vaginal and rectal perforations, and damage to hypogastric nerves[29].

    Another matter of concern specific of this technique is the possibility by pneumo-pelvis of creating a false dissection plan, misleading the surgeon and increasing the risk of inadvertent damages of sidewall autonomic nerves and vessels laterally and of sacral venous plexus posteriorly[29].

    Finally, carbon dioxide embolism during TaTME, a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, was reported by Ratcliffe et al.[44]and may occur in up to 0.4% of patients, mandating conversion to open and giving rise to postoperative morbidity[45].

    ONCOLOGICAL RESULTS

    TaTME was conceived to overcome some of the technical challenges in rectal cancer surgery, enabling dissection of a high quality mesorectal envelope. Soon after its introduction, several preliminary reports showed a good quality mesorectum in almost all cases, negative circumferential and distal margins, and a level of lymph node harvesting comparable with the conventional approach[37,46,47].

    These results are important since an incomplete TME represents an independent risk factor for local recurrence, regardless of the achievement of circumferential and distal negative margins[48].

    With an intact mesorectal fascia, the likelihood of local recurrence, even with involved lymph nodes, is significantly lower than with a threatened one and is around 7.5%[49].

    Negativity of circumferential margin is another indicator of the quality of the rectal resection and its involvement is reported in 8%-10% of cases[50].

    Fernández-Hevia et al.[22]confirmed this trend by comparing TaTME with laparoscopy in a matchcontrolled study showing similar numbers of lymph nodes harvested and negative circumferential margin in all cases.

    Velthuis obtained similar results demonstrating that with a transanal approach a significantly higher rate of complete mesorectal excision could be achieved, compared with laparoscopic patients[51].

    In an early meta-analysis reporting data on 510 patients, a complete TME specimen was reported in 88% of cases and near complete in 6%, while CRM was positive in 5% of cases and the DRM in 0.3% of cases[38].

    Hu et al.[52]showed that a complete mesorectal excision rate was 1.93 higher in the TaTME compared to laparoscopic TME, with a lower positive CRM rate, while positive DRM rate did not reach statistical difference.

    Recently, in 513 TaTME procedures performed in the UK, optimal pathology was observed in 295 patients(92.8%), with an involved resection margin (R1) in 13 patients (4.1%)[53].

    Can these preliminary short-term pathological advantages translate into the fi nal target of a lower recurrence rate?

    Lelong et al.[54]in a comparative series including 72 patients, with a median follow-up period of 31.9 months,demonstrated similar results following laparoscopic or TaTME (5.3% and 5.7% local recurrence rate,respectively), but, considering only patients with curative resections (no metastases at diagnosis), local recurrence rates were 5.7% and 0%, respectively.

    A two-center experience of 159 TaTMEs procedures showed the 3- and 5-year local recurrence rates were 2%and 4.0%, respectively, with a median time to local recurrence of 19.2 months (range 5.9-30.0 months)[55].

    On the other hand, the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Group expressed a warning against this technique,reporting a 9.5% rate of early local recurrence with rapid, multifocal growth in the pelvic cavity and sidewalls, and a median time to recurrence of 11 months. The observed local recurrence rate following laparoscopic TME was 3.4%[56].

    The small sample size of the experiences published thus far underline the need for a larger multicenter RCT for TaTME to better assess the long-term oncological results compared to conventional techniques.

    FUNCTIONAL RESULTS

    Bowel, sexual, and urinary dysfunction is common after rectal cancer surgery and is associated with social and psychological impairment. Anorectal disturbance can be caused by sphincter damage, reduced capacity of the neo-rectum, level of anastomosis, pelvic nerve damage, and the effects of radiotherapy. Up to one third of patients experience “anterior resection syndrome”, which is characterized by functional disorders such as urgency, increased bowel frequency, fragmentation, and incontinence. A similar proportion experiences genitourinary problems, including impotence and retrograde ejaculation in men and sexual dysfunction in both sexes.

    The relationship between these functional complaints and the quality of life perception is difficult to establish and poorly reported in the literature. In general, major bowel and urinary alterations affect social functioning, while incontinence and fecal urgency also impact on mental health.

    With acceptable perioperative and oncological results, functional outcome and quality of life measures after TaTME represent important outcomes for patients.

    The transanal approach for low rectal cancer has not been shown to significantly increase bowel and urologic dysfunction, compared to conventional laparoscopy, but may be associated with better erectile function with a significantly higher rate of sexual activity[57,58]. Quality of life and functional outcomes,assessed by validated questionnaires, showed acceptable outcomes after TaTME at 6 months after surgery[59].

    Rubinkiewicz et al.[60], in a comparative study concerning the occurrence and severity of low anterior resection syndrome, reported similar results between TaTME and LaTME, with a prevalence still high in both groups (87% and 91%, respectively).

    Assessment of patients after TaTME by transanal endoscopic ultrasound and physiological functional assessments concluded that TaTME has no impact on sphincter structure and evacuatory function, with about 10% of patients with major low anterior resection syndrome after 1 year[61].

    In conclusion, TaTME does not appear to increase the negative impact on functional and quality of life outcomes if compared to conventional laparoscopic transabdominal TME. Existing data concerning anorectal, urinary, and sexual function and quality of life following TaTME are still of low quality and further studies are needed in this area.

    ROBOTIC TaTME

    Robotic approaches can overcome several of the technical difficulties associated with traditional laparoscopic surgery and allow high-quality maneuvers to be performed in narrow spaces such as the pelvic cavity. Recent studies demonstrate similar clinical and oncological results between robotic and laparoscopic transabdominal surgical procedures[62], but, at present, no significant benefit of robotic over laparoscopic surgery seems to be detectable, except perhaps conversion rates.

    The application of robotic technology to TaTME (rTaTME) appears to be the next logical step in the evolution of minimal access surgery, allowing the benefits of improved dexterity, stability of the platform, and 3D-vision, while adhering to the principles of NOTES.

    Small rTaTME case series have been reported demonstrating feasibility. Kuo et al.[63]described a combined rTaTME and transabdominal single-site plus one port approach in 16 patients with low rectal lesions,showing good oncological results.

    More recently, Hu et al.[64]published a case series of 20 patients treated with r-TaTME with simultaneous laparoscopic-assisted abdominal phase performed with single-port placed at ileostomy site, demonstrating the applicability of this approach, but also highlighting some of the limitations of the Da Vinci Xi platform for transanal surgery.

    The introduction of the robotic platform based on the single-port access may represent the start of a new era for robot-assisted transanal surgery, but ultimately smaller, more fl exible robotic systems are required for true natural orifice procedures where scars are eliminated. If this can be combined with cost control,then a new era in surgery will be possible.

    CONCLUSION

    TaTME has demonstrated some tantalizing benefits for the surgeon and the patient, but remains controversial because of the lack of long-term oncological data and the technical operative challenges that make widespread dissemination difficult.

    Some consider TaTME as the culmination of 30 years of progress in colorectal cancer surgery[65]. Others,while applauding the results achieved to date, introduce a note of caution in their interpretation of the available data, as the majority of the published experience originates from highly trained surgeons in highvolume centers with great heterogeneity among studies[66]. It is important that we avoid the indiscriminate adoption by inadequately trained surgeons that could undermine the progress achieved thus far[67].The debate will continue as to whether this should be an operation that is used selectively for the most difficult cases - in which case, expect worse outcomes - or whether it is a panacea to improve all rectal cancer surgery and therefore outcomes more widely[43,46].

    The distal third of the rectum remains challenging even in highly experienced surgical hands[68]and could be difficult to reach transabdominally, sometimes at the price of an unavoidable derogation to principles of oncological radicality and nerve preservation. Even Bill Heald, the master of TME, in very challenging conditions used manual dissection to get out of otherwise impossible situations[69].

    For this reason, Heald himself has embraced and supported this conceptual revolution, considering the pneumodissection and the vision from below of great help in the challenging steps of the distal dissection,mainly on the anterior plane in the male pelvis, with a consequent better identification and preservation of nerves. Excited by Lacy’s message, he considered it as the future of rectal cancer surgery[70].

    With similar postoperative complications when compared to standard laparoscopic or open TME,remarkable short-term pathological and surgical results, and promising long-term oncologic outcomes, the available literature suggests that TaTME is safe and feasible in the hands of surgeons who have had proper training and been supported through the early learning curve. If this technique is to be widely adopted,then formal training programs with adequate resources will have to be available to facilitate wider adoption without the increase in complications[71].

    The multicentric randomized controlled trial COLOR III, designed to compare TaTME and Laparoscopic TME is currently underway and will produce more reliable evidence concerning the quality of this type of surgery.

    If the results already demonstrated are confirmed, TaTME should be considered among the gold standard approaches to be offered to selected high-risk patients with rectal cancer.

    DECLARATIONS

    Authors’ contributions

    Substantial contributions to conception and draft of the manuscript: De Rosa M, Wynn G, Rondelli F Critical revision: Ceccarelli G, Wynn G

    Availability of data and materials

    Not applicable.

    Financial support and sponsorship

    None.

    Conflicts of interest

    All authors declared that there are no conf l icts of interest.

    Ethical approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    ? The Author(s) 2020.

    久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 欧美zozozo另类| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| av天堂中文字幕网| 丁香六月欧美| 99久国产av精品| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 黄频高清免费视频| 99热只有精品国产| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 熟女电影av网| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 九色国产91popny在线| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 色播亚洲综合网| 国产成人福利小说| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 日本熟妇午夜| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 免费在线观看日本一区| 91麻豆av在线| 久久久国产成人免费| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 99re在线观看精品视频| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 1024香蕉在线观看| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 亚洲精品在线美女| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 亚洲国产色片| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 99久久精品热视频| 精品久久久久久,| ponron亚洲| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 身体一侧抽搐| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 一本综合久久免费| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 久久久久性生活片| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 亚洲国产欧美网| 窝窝影院91人妻| 亚洲在线观看片| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 人妻久久中文字幕网| aaaaa片日本免费| 1024手机看黄色片| 久久久久九九精品影院| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 天堂动漫精品| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 色在线成人网| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 999精品在线视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 欧美3d第一页| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 三级毛片av免费| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 亚洲av熟女| 日本免费a在线| 我要搜黄色片| 免费大片18禁| 综合色av麻豆| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 免费高清视频大片| 床上黄色一级片| 国产av不卡久久| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 深夜精品福利| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产视频内射| 久久久久国内视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 成人国产综合亚洲| 特级一级黄色大片| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产黄片美女视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 成人av在线播放网站| a在线观看视频网站| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 一进一出抽搐动态| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 特级一级黄色大片| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 国产黄片美女视频| 不卡一级毛片| 亚洲 国产 在线| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 综合色av麻豆| av视频在线观看入口| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲avbb在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 欧美日本视频| 岛国在线观看网站| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 在线观看66精品国产| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 日本五十路高清| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| av女优亚洲男人天堂 | 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 午夜福利18| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 丁香六月欧美| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 国产乱人伦免费视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 国产av在哪里看| 午夜影院日韩av| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲av美国av| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 色吧在线观看| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 性色avwww在线观看| 女警被强在线播放| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 中文字幕久久专区| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 亚洲中文av在线| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 91麻豆av在线| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 香蕉久久夜色| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 在线免费观看的www视频| 综合色av麻豆| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 成年免费大片在线观看| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产熟女xx| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久国产精品影院| 此物有八面人人有两片| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 校园春色视频在线观看| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产视频内射| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 日韩欧美 国产精品| av中文乱码字幕在线| 亚洲av美国av| 中国美女看黄片| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 97碰自拍视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 国产精品永久免费网站| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲av美国av| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 曰老女人黄片| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| 天堂√8在线中文| 久久久色成人| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 曰老女人黄片| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 精品久久久久久成人av| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 悠悠久久av| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| a级毛片a级免费在线| 国产精品久久视频播放| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| netflix在线观看网站| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 91av网站免费观看| www.www免费av| svipshipincom国产片| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| av在线蜜桃| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 全区人妻精品视频| 一区福利在线观看| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产三级在线视频| 色综合站精品国产| 日本一二三区视频观看| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 丁香欧美五月| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 日韩免费av在线播放| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 久久久久国内视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产1区2区3区精品| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产激情久久老熟女| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| a在线观看视频网站| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 91字幕亚洲| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 看片在线看免费视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 国产精品九九99| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 9191精品国产免费久久| www.自偷自拍.com| 免费观看人在逋| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 搞女人的毛片| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 国产高清三级在线| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 久久香蕉国产精品| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 在线观看一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 91av网一区二区| www.www免费av| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 91字幕亚洲| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 久久草成人影院| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 91麻豆av在线| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国产高清激情床上av| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 毛片女人毛片| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 香蕉国产在线看| 91在线观看av| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 黄片小视频在线播放| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 亚洲无线观看免费| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 嫩草影视91久久| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 男女那种视频在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂 | 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 在线播放国产精品三级| 成人三级黄色视频| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 91在线观看av| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 操出白浆在线播放| 黄色日韩在线| 亚洲九九香蕉| 中文字幕久久专区| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 丰满的人妻完整版| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产精品久久视频播放| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 午夜免费激情av| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 成在线人永久免费视频| 免费在线观看日本一区| 一区福利在线观看| 在线看三级毛片| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 欧美日本视频| 天堂动漫精品| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 日本成人三级电影网站| 免费观看人在逋| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 欧美色视频一区免费| 熟女电影av网| 国产精品 国内视频| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 精品国产三级普通话版| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 国产三级中文精品| 一本一本综合久久| av天堂中文字幕网| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 九色成人免费人妻av| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产精品影院久久| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 美女大奶头视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 午夜精品在线福利| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 两个人视频免费观看高清| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 美女免费视频网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 成人三级黄色视频| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 色在线成人网| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片 | 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 免费av不卡在线播放| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 小说图片视频综合网站| 久久久久国内视频| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 不卡一级毛片| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产亚洲欧美98| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 老司机福利观看| 99re在线观看精品视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 草草在线视频免费看| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 观看美女的网站|