• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: state of the art

    2020-07-30 06:19:00MicheleDeRosaGregWynnFabioRondelliGrazianoCeccarelli
    Mini-invasive Surgery 2020年6期

    Michele De Rosa, Greg Wynn, Fabio Rondelli, Graziano Ceccarelli

    1Department of General Surgery, "San Giovanni Battista Hospital", Foligno 06034, Italy.

    2Department of General and Colorectal Surgery, East Suffolk and North Essex Foundation NHS Trust, Colchester CO45JL,United Kingdom.

    3Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Perugia, Perugia 06100, Italy.

    Abstract Total mesorectal excision remains the gold standard for surgical treatment for rectal cancer to achieve excellent oncological outcomes. The transanal approach to the mesorectum was introduced to complement conventional surgery so that technical difficulties related to the distal rectal dissection could be overcome. Since its introduction,interest in transanal mesorectal excision has been growing and it appears that the benefits are maximal in patients with mid-low rectal cancer where anatomical and pathological factors present the greatest challenges. Current evidence demonstrates this approach is safe and feasible, with an acceptable morbidity profile, but with specific complications related to the technique. Oncological and functional data seem comparable to the conventional approaches, but most of the results come from small studies with short-term endpoints. Robotics, when available,might potentially overcome the difficulty of distal rectal dissection with a shorter learning curve compared to the transanal approach, but with higher costs. The aim of this review is to critically evaluate the available literature concerning transanal total mesorectal excision so that we can better define its role in the management of rectal cancer.

    Keywords: Rectal cancer, total mesorectal excision, transanal total mesorectal excision, transanal surgery,laparoscopy

    INTRODUCTION

    Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the gold standard approach to the surgical treatment of rectal cancer[1]. The application of this key technical principle has represented a revolution in rectal cancer surgery, demonstrating how the integrity of the mesorectal envelope is paramount in achieving excellent oncological outcomes in terms of local recurrence[2]. Minimally invasive techniques have shown major benefits in the treatment of colon cancer, but rectal surgery is technically more demanding and the associated steep learning curve has made the laparoscopic approach less appealing.

    Nevertheless, surgical techniques are constantly evolving and searching for less invasive approaches,particularly pursuing the principles of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) represents an exciting goal. A further reduction in postoperative pain, less wound infections and hernias, better cosmetic results and a shorter time off work are the key advantages of these super-minimally invasive approaches[3,4].

    It is suggested that bulky colorectal specimens can be effectively excised transanally[5]and several experimental studies have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of rectosigmoid transanal resection in animal and cadaveric models[6,7].

    Pure NOTES still requires significant improvement in instruments and technology to make the transition to the clinical arena and remains largely an experimental approach, while hybrid procedures such as natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) techniques combined with laparoscopy can reduce the impact of surgery further[5,7,8].

    As a result of these experiences, the fi rst transanal rectal resection with a hybrid approach was described by Sylla et al.[7]in a 76-year-old lady with a rectal cancer located at 8 cm from anal verge.

    This fi rst report, describing transanal TME (TaTME), aroused great interest because it demonstrated the feasibility of a hybrid NOTES procedure that could be applied to challenging real-life situations, such as the difficult TME for mid and distal rectal cancer.

    Indeed, even in the hands of experts, rectal cancer surgery in obese, male patients with bulky, distal tumors can be extremely difficult, where the ballooning of rectum into the sacral concavity creates a sharp angle with the anal canal[9]. In these cases, difficulty in staying in the correct dissection plane can easily result in an incomplete specimen with possible inadequate circumferential resection margin (CRM)[10].

    Despite the standardization of technique for TME, several studies have demonstrated that the quality of the fi nal specimen is important in predicting cancer-related outcomes[11,12]. Obese patients with low, anteriorlylocated tumors, those treated with neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, or those with a narrow pelvis are at particular risk of incomplete mesorectal excision[13-15].

    Laparoscopy offers the advantage of improved visualization of deep pelvic structures, but the limitations imposed by long and straight instruments, particularly applying traction and counter-traction maneuvers in a narrow space, remain significant challenges. In addition, laparoscopic stapling technology has proved rather inadequate and difficult to use low in the pelvis, increasing the risk of poor outcomes[16,17].

    TaTME was conceived and developed with the aim of overcoming these specific limitations, particularly in mid and low cancers. The closer, more detailed view of the pelvic structures makes the dissections from below more accurate and effective, leading to a better specimen. Inserting the purse-string below the tumor allows the surgeon to accurately control the distal resection margin (DRM). In the case of anterior tumors,with a high risk of an involved circumferential margin, the transanal approach can facilitate the dissection of Denonvilliers fascia, thus minimizing the risk of injuries to prostate, seminal vesicles, and the nerves of the inferior hypogastric plexus and nervi erigentes.

    Because of these potential advantages, TaTME has gained wide interest in the colorectal community and represents an opportunity to improve patient outcomes; however, it remains a technically challenging operation and further research is required to prove its oncological efficacy when more widely adopted.

    DEVICE AND TECHNIQUE

    In 1983, Prof. Gerard Buess conceived transanal endoscopic microsurgey (TEM) and, in cooperation with Richard Wolf, created and developed the platform for endoscopic rectal surgery, with the aim to treat benign lesions of the upper and middle rectum not previously reached with conventional transanal approaches[18,19].

    Based on this model, the Transanal Endoscopic Operation (TEO; Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) was developed, which provides a rigid operative rectoscope, compatible with many standard laparoscopic instruments without the need for a dedicated platform.

    In 2009, in Orlando, Florida, Atallah and colleagues introduced the concept of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS). This was inspired by devices already created for single-site surgery in the abdomen but were adapted for transanal access. This essentially created a fl exible, transanal multiport device that could be used with a conventional laparoscope and laparoscopic instruments[20].

    To date, two transanal platforms, GelPoint Path (Applied Medical, Rancho Santa Margarita, Ca) and SILS Port (Covidien, Mansfield, Ma), have gained FDA approval for TAMIS. Clinical studies published thus far demonstrate that both these and rigid platforms such as TEM/TEO can be used for TaTME, but the review by Araujo et al.[21]shows that only the 24.7% (37/150) of the preliminary TaTME cases reported were performed with a platform TEM/TEO.

    TAMIS ports have now become the preferred option for surgeons dedicated to TaTME because, compared to rigid platforms, the soft, fl exible port offers more versatile access to the whole circumference of the rectal lumen without multiple position changes during surgery, the equipment is quicker and easier to set up, and there may also be economic advantages[22,23].

    With improving experience and the dissemination of this approach through research and training, many different technical modifications have been introduced, although the cardinal principles of this procedure remain the same: to provide a complete mobilization of the mesorectum from the pelvic floor upwards according to the eight steps described by Whiteford and colleagues in 2007[24].

    TaTME can be performed either with two different surgical teams working simultaneously with abdominal and transanal dissection or with a two-step approach, using the same surgical team for both operative phases in sequence.

    Abdominal phase: the abdominal phase is performed according to the standard approach and preference of the operating surgeon. It should be noted that either a planned open approach or a laparoscopic conversion does not preclude a transanal approach to the pelvis. If a sequential approach is used (usually due to the lack of two operating teams being available), then transabdominal dissection proceeds into the pelvis along the mesorectal fascia until it becomes technically challenging and the specimen or the surrounding key pelvic structures are at risk. Even in extremely challenging cases, the peritoneum will be divided anteriorly before changing to a transanal approach as this will facilitate entry into the abdominal cavity from below.Abdominal pneumoperitoneum is def l ated, the insufflator is turned off, and the ports are closed prior to the legs being positioned for the transanal phase.

    Transanal phase: the transanal phase commences with a digital rectal examination to ensure the rectum is empty and that the clinical findings correlate with the MRI scan. The placement of a self-fixing anal retractor (Lone Star CooperSurgical, Trumbull, CT, USA) may be useful to better expose the anal canal,particularly in male patients with a long anal canal. Insertion of the transanal platform should reveal distal rectal mucosa through the anal channel. Fixation of the TAMIS port to the anal margin, positioning of the ports in the gel-cap with attachment, and gentle insufflation will facilitate clear views and safe operating.Initial laparoscopic inspection will allow assessment of the height of the tumor from anal verge in order to plan the positioning of the purse-string and the rectotomy.

    A purse-string suture is placed at least 10 mm distal to the tumor to seal the rectal lumen, and then rectal irrigation eliminates debris and prevents the possible implantation of free cancer cells.

    Carbon dioxide is insufflated into the distal rectal lumen to obtain a stable pneumorectum with a pressure of 10-20 mmHg and the rectal mucosa is marked circumferentially with monopolar hook. A full thickness rectotomy is started, usually posteriorly where the plane between presacral fascia and mesorectum is more easily identified, but slightly laterally where the ano-coccygeal ligament is less easily encountered.

    The rectal transection is performed by opening the different layers of the rectal wall until the mesorectal plane is identified. Once the whole circumference of the distal rectal wall has been divided, the rectal specimen will retract upwards slightly, revealing the posterior mesorectal fascia. At this stage, the closed purse-string can be reinforced with a second V-LocTMsuture (Covidien, Mansfield, Ma) to reduce the risk of intraluminal leakage during the pelvic dissection. The posterior plane is developed fi rst, anterior to the pre-sacral fascia and along the angel hair of the mesorectal fascia which is kept intact. The anterior plane is approached afterward, keeping the dissection in front or behind Denonvillier’s fascia according to the rectal cancer position. The lateral dissection can then proceed, using the areas of correct dissection from the front and back to guide the dissection; this will minimize the risk of injuries to the neurovascular structures laterally and antero-laterally. Mesorectal dissection should proceed in a cylindrical fashion avoiding distortion of the specimen. Entry into the abdominal compartment should be delayed as late as possible, as accurate mesorectal dissection is impaired once a communication is established between the two cavities. When the dissection is complete, a careful assessment is made of whether the specimen can be safely extracted transanally or not, considering the size of both the specimen but also the stage of the cancer. The length of the remaining distal rectal cuff will determine whether a hand-sewn anastomosis will be required or whether there is adequate tissue for a distal purse-string to be inserted in preparation for a stapled anastomosis. Distal purse-strings can be inserted laparoscopically or as an open procedure with the TAMIS port still in-situ but drawn distally to stent the anorectal lumen or with the TAMIS port removed and the Lone Star retractor giving access. Various methods of stapled anastomosis techniques have been described[25].

    Techniques to assess the vascular supply to the anastomosis have been described[26], but one of the benefits of TaTME is direct inspection and palpation of the whole circumference of the anastomosis prior to the end of the operation. This may allow selective defunctioning stomas to be performed according to individual patient risk factors.

    INDICATIONS

    Ideal candidates for TaTME are patients with mid or low rectal cancer (within 10 cm from the anal verge),especially in male patients (because of the narrow pelvis or prostate hypertrophy/previous prostate surgery),obesity, bulky tumors, or after neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and, for these reasons, this approach may have the most to offer these patients. The San Gallen Consensus concurs that TaTME may be technically easier compared to abdominal techniques in this group of patients[27].

    Current practice suggests that selection of patients for TaTME includes a wider group of patients, particularly with regard with tumor location, as we can observe with the experience of Lacy or in the International Registry where tumors were proximally located in 20.7% and 38% of patients, respectively[28,29], however this remains primarily a technique for those requiring TME.

    Appropriate patient selection is of paramount importance, especially during the early learning curve and it is wise not to select very difficult cases before competence is reached. In this respect, expanding the indications for TaTME to include those patients who could easily be done laparoscopically may be required for training purposes.

    PERIOPERATIVE RESULTS

    Feasibility and safety of perioperative outcomes of TaTME have been extensively reported as well as limitations and shortcomings that need to be addressed.

    Reduced estimated blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and lower readmission rates were recently reported in a meta-analysis of 17 studies[30].

    Compared to laparoscopic TME, a lower rate of conversion to open surgery has been observed, ranging between 0% and 9.1%[22,31,32]. This correlated to the level of experience, as highlighted by Dejien and colleagues who compared low-volume centers performing TaTME (< 30 cases) to high-volume centers (> 30 cases)and reported conversion rates of 4.3% and 2.7%, respectively[33].

    Conversions during TME surgery are usually due to technical difficulties related to high body mass index(BMI) and the narrow male pelvis. Ma et al.[32]showed that this accounted for 25% of conversions in TaTME patients vs. 47% in those undergoing laparoscopic TME. In most reported series, the occurrence of intraoperative complications provoke conversion, with tumor or patient features not directly affecting the operation outcome.

    TaTME has also been shown to have a significantly shorter operation time, compared to laparoscopy[34],and this is even more pronounced if the operation is performed with a simultaneous two-team approach[35].Concerning morbidity, several retrospective series or cohort studies reported on safety of TaTME, showing postoperative complication rates comparable with conventional laparoscopic or open TME data[36].

    The international TaTME registry including 720 patients reported an overall morbidity of 32.5%[29], in line with several other monocentric series on TaTME[22,37].

    In a recent systematic review, TaTME and laparoscopic TME showed similar rates of intraoperative complications, although a lower rate of postoperative morbidity was reported in the transanal group[32].

    Several publications report a low incidence of anastomotic leak rate following TaTME, which in the largest meta-analyses available ranges between 5.7% and 6.1%[33,38]and is similar to the results reported after conventional TME[39].

    Recently updated data from the multi-institutional International TaTME registry on 1594 patients over 30 months show an overall 30-day anastomotic leak rate of 7.8%[40], not too far from the rate of 10%reported by Ma et al.[32]in their systematic review.Finally, the potential for major bacterial contamination as a consequence of the rectal transection, as shown by Velthuis with 39% of positivity of pelvic culture, suggests the risk for higher rates of pelvic sepsis, but this concern was not confirmed by subsequent studies[41].

    Indeed, the literature available reports an average rate of pelvic abscess of 2%-3%[29,42]and more up to date review data confirm an overall incidence of 2.2%[33].

    Despite these encouraging results, TaTME has some very specific complications. Rouanet reported urethral injury in 6.6% of cases; however, this was a series of 30 difficult high BMI male patients, most following radiotherapy[43]. However, urethral injury is a serious complication directly related to the transanal phase of the operation and is very uncommon during open or laparoscopic TME.

    In the largest multi-institutional registry reporting on 720 patients, the occurrence of urethral injuries was 0.7% and was associated with bladder injuries, vaginal and rectal perforations, and damage to hypogastric nerves[29].

    Another matter of concern specific of this technique is the possibility by pneumo-pelvis of creating a false dissection plan, misleading the surgeon and increasing the risk of inadvertent damages of sidewall autonomic nerves and vessels laterally and of sacral venous plexus posteriorly[29].

    Finally, carbon dioxide embolism during TaTME, a rare but potentially life-threatening complication, was reported by Ratcliffe et al.[44]and may occur in up to 0.4% of patients, mandating conversion to open and giving rise to postoperative morbidity[45].

    ONCOLOGICAL RESULTS

    TaTME was conceived to overcome some of the technical challenges in rectal cancer surgery, enabling dissection of a high quality mesorectal envelope. Soon after its introduction, several preliminary reports showed a good quality mesorectum in almost all cases, negative circumferential and distal margins, and a level of lymph node harvesting comparable with the conventional approach[37,46,47].

    These results are important since an incomplete TME represents an independent risk factor for local recurrence, regardless of the achievement of circumferential and distal negative margins[48].

    With an intact mesorectal fascia, the likelihood of local recurrence, even with involved lymph nodes, is significantly lower than with a threatened one and is around 7.5%[49].

    Negativity of circumferential margin is another indicator of the quality of the rectal resection and its involvement is reported in 8%-10% of cases[50].

    Fernández-Hevia et al.[22]confirmed this trend by comparing TaTME with laparoscopy in a matchcontrolled study showing similar numbers of lymph nodes harvested and negative circumferential margin in all cases.

    Velthuis obtained similar results demonstrating that with a transanal approach a significantly higher rate of complete mesorectal excision could be achieved, compared with laparoscopic patients[51].

    In an early meta-analysis reporting data on 510 patients, a complete TME specimen was reported in 88% of cases and near complete in 6%, while CRM was positive in 5% of cases and the DRM in 0.3% of cases[38].

    Hu et al.[52]showed that a complete mesorectal excision rate was 1.93 higher in the TaTME compared to laparoscopic TME, with a lower positive CRM rate, while positive DRM rate did not reach statistical difference.

    Recently, in 513 TaTME procedures performed in the UK, optimal pathology was observed in 295 patients(92.8%), with an involved resection margin (R1) in 13 patients (4.1%)[53].

    Can these preliminary short-term pathological advantages translate into the fi nal target of a lower recurrence rate?

    Lelong et al.[54]in a comparative series including 72 patients, with a median follow-up period of 31.9 months,demonstrated similar results following laparoscopic or TaTME (5.3% and 5.7% local recurrence rate,respectively), but, considering only patients with curative resections (no metastases at diagnosis), local recurrence rates were 5.7% and 0%, respectively.

    A two-center experience of 159 TaTMEs procedures showed the 3- and 5-year local recurrence rates were 2%and 4.0%, respectively, with a median time to local recurrence of 19.2 months (range 5.9-30.0 months)[55].

    On the other hand, the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Group expressed a warning against this technique,reporting a 9.5% rate of early local recurrence with rapid, multifocal growth in the pelvic cavity and sidewalls, and a median time to recurrence of 11 months. The observed local recurrence rate following laparoscopic TME was 3.4%[56].

    The small sample size of the experiences published thus far underline the need for a larger multicenter RCT for TaTME to better assess the long-term oncological results compared to conventional techniques.

    FUNCTIONAL RESULTS

    Bowel, sexual, and urinary dysfunction is common after rectal cancer surgery and is associated with social and psychological impairment. Anorectal disturbance can be caused by sphincter damage, reduced capacity of the neo-rectum, level of anastomosis, pelvic nerve damage, and the effects of radiotherapy. Up to one third of patients experience “anterior resection syndrome”, which is characterized by functional disorders such as urgency, increased bowel frequency, fragmentation, and incontinence. A similar proportion experiences genitourinary problems, including impotence and retrograde ejaculation in men and sexual dysfunction in both sexes.

    The relationship between these functional complaints and the quality of life perception is difficult to establish and poorly reported in the literature. In general, major bowel and urinary alterations affect social functioning, while incontinence and fecal urgency also impact on mental health.

    With acceptable perioperative and oncological results, functional outcome and quality of life measures after TaTME represent important outcomes for patients.

    The transanal approach for low rectal cancer has not been shown to significantly increase bowel and urologic dysfunction, compared to conventional laparoscopy, but may be associated with better erectile function with a significantly higher rate of sexual activity[57,58]. Quality of life and functional outcomes,assessed by validated questionnaires, showed acceptable outcomes after TaTME at 6 months after surgery[59].

    Rubinkiewicz et al.[60], in a comparative study concerning the occurrence and severity of low anterior resection syndrome, reported similar results between TaTME and LaTME, with a prevalence still high in both groups (87% and 91%, respectively).

    Assessment of patients after TaTME by transanal endoscopic ultrasound and physiological functional assessments concluded that TaTME has no impact on sphincter structure and evacuatory function, with about 10% of patients with major low anterior resection syndrome after 1 year[61].

    In conclusion, TaTME does not appear to increase the negative impact on functional and quality of life outcomes if compared to conventional laparoscopic transabdominal TME. Existing data concerning anorectal, urinary, and sexual function and quality of life following TaTME are still of low quality and further studies are needed in this area.

    ROBOTIC TaTME

    Robotic approaches can overcome several of the technical difficulties associated with traditional laparoscopic surgery and allow high-quality maneuvers to be performed in narrow spaces such as the pelvic cavity. Recent studies demonstrate similar clinical and oncological results between robotic and laparoscopic transabdominal surgical procedures[62], but, at present, no significant benefit of robotic over laparoscopic surgery seems to be detectable, except perhaps conversion rates.

    The application of robotic technology to TaTME (rTaTME) appears to be the next logical step in the evolution of minimal access surgery, allowing the benefits of improved dexterity, stability of the platform, and 3D-vision, while adhering to the principles of NOTES.

    Small rTaTME case series have been reported demonstrating feasibility. Kuo et al.[63]described a combined rTaTME and transabdominal single-site plus one port approach in 16 patients with low rectal lesions,showing good oncological results.

    More recently, Hu et al.[64]published a case series of 20 patients treated with r-TaTME with simultaneous laparoscopic-assisted abdominal phase performed with single-port placed at ileostomy site, demonstrating the applicability of this approach, but also highlighting some of the limitations of the Da Vinci Xi platform for transanal surgery.

    The introduction of the robotic platform based on the single-port access may represent the start of a new era for robot-assisted transanal surgery, but ultimately smaller, more fl exible robotic systems are required for true natural orifice procedures where scars are eliminated. If this can be combined with cost control,then a new era in surgery will be possible.

    CONCLUSION

    TaTME has demonstrated some tantalizing benefits for the surgeon and the patient, but remains controversial because of the lack of long-term oncological data and the technical operative challenges that make widespread dissemination difficult.

    Some consider TaTME as the culmination of 30 years of progress in colorectal cancer surgery[65]. Others,while applauding the results achieved to date, introduce a note of caution in their interpretation of the available data, as the majority of the published experience originates from highly trained surgeons in highvolume centers with great heterogeneity among studies[66]. It is important that we avoid the indiscriminate adoption by inadequately trained surgeons that could undermine the progress achieved thus far[67].The debate will continue as to whether this should be an operation that is used selectively for the most difficult cases - in which case, expect worse outcomes - or whether it is a panacea to improve all rectal cancer surgery and therefore outcomes more widely[43,46].

    The distal third of the rectum remains challenging even in highly experienced surgical hands[68]and could be difficult to reach transabdominally, sometimes at the price of an unavoidable derogation to principles of oncological radicality and nerve preservation. Even Bill Heald, the master of TME, in very challenging conditions used manual dissection to get out of otherwise impossible situations[69].

    For this reason, Heald himself has embraced and supported this conceptual revolution, considering the pneumodissection and the vision from below of great help in the challenging steps of the distal dissection,mainly on the anterior plane in the male pelvis, with a consequent better identification and preservation of nerves. Excited by Lacy’s message, he considered it as the future of rectal cancer surgery[70].

    With similar postoperative complications when compared to standard laparoscopic or open TME,remarkable short-term pathological and surgical results, and promising long-term oncologic outcomes, the available literature suggests that TaTME is safe and feasible in the hands of surgeons who have had proper training and been supported through the early learning curve. If this technique is to be widely adopted,then formal training programs with adequate resources will have to be available to facilitate wider adoption without the increase in complications[71].

    The multicentric randomized controlled trial COLOR III, designed to compare TaTME and Laparoscopic TME is currently underway and will produce more reliable evidence concerning the quality of this type of surgery.

    If the results already demonstrated are confirmed, TaTME should be considered among the gold standard approaches to be offered to selected high-risk patients with rectal cancer.

    DECLARATIONS

    Authors’ contributions

    Substantial contributions to conception and draft of the manuscript: De Rosa M, Wynn G, Rondelli F Critical revision: Ceccarelli G, Wynn G

    Availability of data and materials

    Not applicable.

    Financial support and sponsorship

    None.

    Conflicts of interest

    All authors declared that there are no conf l icts of interest.

    Ethical approval and consent to participate

    Not applicable.

    Consent for publication

    Not applicable.

    Copyright

    ? The Author(s) 2020.

    欧美一区二区亚洲| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 九色成人免费人妻av| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 热99在线观看视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 嫩草影视91久久| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 在线天堂最新版资源| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 69人妻影院| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 天堂网av新在线| xxxwww97欧美| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 久久香蕉精品热| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 免费看日本二区| 禁无遮挡网站| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| avwww免费| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲精品456在线播放app | 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 香蕉丝袜av| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 日本与韩国留学比较| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲第一电影网av| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 午夜精品在线福利| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 免费观看人在逋| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 91久久精品电影网| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 看黄色毛片网站| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲无线观看免费| 窝窝影院91人妻| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 午夜福利18| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 美女免费视频网站| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产精华一区二区三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 我要搜黄色片| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 宅男免费午夜| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 在线国产一区二区在线| 成人18禁在线播放| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 在线看三级毛片| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 欧美性感艳星| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国产乱人视频| 免费av不卡在线播放| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 一本综合久久免费| 中文字幕久久专区| 久久久精品大字幕| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产免费男女视频| h日本视频在线播放| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 怎么达到女性高潮| 久久久久久久久中文| 黄色成人免费大全| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产精品野战在线观看| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 高清在线国产一区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产高清三级在线| 国产精品永久免费网站| 校园春色视频在线观看| 99久国产av精品| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 99热6这里只有精品| 操出白浆在线播放| 久99久视频精品免费| 久99久视频精品免费| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 一本一本综合久久| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 午夜免费激情av| 日韩高清综合在线| 午夜免费激情av| 日本一二三区视频观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 久9热在线精品视频| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 成人av在线播放网站| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 免费在线观看日本一区| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 91在线观看av| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 久久久久久人人人人人| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲av美国av| 亚洲av一区综合| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 99久久综合精品五月天人人| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 脱女人内裤的视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 日本成人三级电影网站| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 长腿黑丝高跟| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 久久久久久大精品| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 欧美大码av| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| www日本黄色视频网| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 亚洲最大成人中文| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲成人久久性| 色在线成人网| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 久久6这里有精品| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 国产高清三级在线| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 国产精品 国内视频| 国产单亲对白刺激| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 日本成人三级电影网站| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 日韩高清综合在线| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 欧美大码av| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产视频内射| 老司机福利观看| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| av天堂在线播放| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产色婷婷99| 少妇高潮的动态图| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 久久久成人免费电影| 一夜夜www| 成年免费大片在线观看| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲国产色片| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 午夜视频国产福利| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 草草在线视频免费看| 嫩草影院入口| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产三级在线视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 一本一本综合久久| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产av在哪里看| 久久久久久久久大av| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 悠悠久久av| 88av欧美| 性色avwww在线观看| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 九色国产91popny在线| 内射极品少妇av片p| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲成人久久性| 黄片小视频在线播放| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 草草在线视频免费看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 午夜激情欧美在线| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 此物有八面人人有两片| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 九色国产91popny在线| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 在线观看日韩欧美| 91在线观看av| www日本黄色视频网| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 97碰自拍视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线 | 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 久久香蕉国产精品| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 在线免费观看的www视频| 日本 欧美在线| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 观看美女的网站| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 欧美日本视频| 国产精品影院久久| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产成人av教育| 窝窝影院91人妻| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 免费看十八禁软件| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 内射极品少妇av片p| 久久人人精品亚洲av| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 99久久精品一区二区三区| av在线蜜桃| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 日本 av在线| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 日本三级黄在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 十八禁网站免费在线| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产成人av教育| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 日韩欧美免费精品| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 舔av片在线| 制服人妻中文乱码| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久 | 人人妻人人看人人澡| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 国产精华一区二区三区| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 操出白浆在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 女警被强在线播放| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 日本熟妇午夜| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| www国产在线视频色| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 最新中文字幕久久久久| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 中文资源天堂在线| 丰满的人妻完整版| 1024手机看黄色片| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| av在线蜜桃| 日本免费a在线| 一本精品99久久精品77| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 此物有八面人人有两片| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产av不卡久久| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 亚洲av美国av| xxxwww97欧美| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 成人三级黄色视频| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲片人在线观看| xxxwww97欧美| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 青草久久国产| 成年版毛片免费区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 日韩免费av在线播放| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 国产精品野战在线观看| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 欧美+日韩+精品| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9 | 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 黄色成人免费大全| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 成人av在线播放网站| 国产精品久久久久久久电影 | 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| av福利片在线观看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看 | 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 午夜免费观看网址| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 色在线成人网| 久99久视频精品免费| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 一夜夜www| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 中文字幕久久专区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产精品永久免费网站| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| av专区在线播放| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 久久久久久人人人人人| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 日本成人三级电影网站| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 无限看片的www在线观看| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲国产欧美网| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 九色国产91popny在线| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 操出白浆在线播放| av在线蜜桃| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲最大成人中文| 免费观看人在逋| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美 | 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 国产淫片久久久久久久久 | 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 99热这里只有是精品50| 宅男免费午夜| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 免费av毛片视频| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 丁香欧美五月| 久久草成人影院| 91av网一区二区| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 色视频www国产| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产亚洲欧美98| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 色在线成人网| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 午夜免费观看网址| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| av专区在线播放| 亚洲无线在线观看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产一区在线观看成人免费| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 国产不卡一卡二| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频|