熊富英
[摘要] 目的 分析助產(chǎn)人性化體貼式護(hù)理對高齡產(chǎn)婦產(chǎn)程進(jìn)展和新生兒結(jié)局影響。方法 方便選取2018年2月—2019年2月間在該院分娩高齡產(chǎn)婦132例,隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分成對照組(66例)行常規(guī)護(hù)理,觀察組(66例)在對照組基礎(chǔ)上行助產(chǎn)人性化體貼式護(hù)理。觀察兩組產(chǎn)婦的產(chǎn)程時間、產(chǎn)后2 h出血量、分娩結(jié)局、護(hù)理滿意度與新生兒結(jié)局情況。結(jié)果 觀察組產(chǎn)婦第一、第二、第三產(chǎn)程及總產(chǎn)程時間均低于對照組,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(P<0.05); 觀察組宮產(chǎn)率為27.27%低于對照組43.94%,自然分娩率對比,觀察組為66.67%高于對照組46.97%,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(χ2=3.998、5.218,P=0.034、0.017);觀察組新生兒胎兒窘迫率為3.03%低于對照組12.12%,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(χ2=3.895,P=0.048);觀察組正常新生兒率為93.94%顯著高于對照組78.79%,數(shù)據(jù)對比,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(χ2=6.433,P=0.010);觀察組產(chǎn)婦的護(hù)理滿意度評分為(8.93±1.06)分,顯著高于對照組(6.78±1.25)分,差異有統(tǒng)計學(xué)意義(t=10.657,P=0.001)。結(jié)論 助產(chǎn)人性化體貼式護(hù)理有有效縮短高齡產(chǎn)婦產(chǎn)程,降低剖宮產(chǎn)率和新生兒不良結(jié)局。
[關(guān)鍵詞] 高齡產(chǎn)婦;人性化體貼式護(hù)理;產(chǎn)程;新生兒結(jié)局
[Abstract] Objective To analyze the impact of midwifery and humanized nursing on the maternity progress and neonatal outcomes of elderly women. Methods A total of 132 elderly women who delivered in the hospital from February 2018 to February 2019 were conveniently selected. The random number table method was used to divide the control group (66 cases)into routine care, and the observation group (66 cases)went to midwifery on the basis of the control group. Humanized and thoughtful care. Observe the time of delivery, 2h postpartum hemorrhage, delivery outcome, nursing satisfaction and neonatal outcome in the two groups. Results The maternal first, second, third labor and total labor time in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05); Compared with the natural delivery rate, the observation group was 66.67% higher than the control group 46.97%, the difference was statistically significant(χ2=3.998,5.218,P=0.034; 0.017); the neonatal fetal distress rate in the observation group was 3.03% lower than the control group 12.12%, the difference was statistically significant (χ2=3.895, P=0.048); the normal newborn rate in the observation group was 93.94% significantly higher than that in the control group 78.79%. The data comparison showed a statistically significant difference(χ2=6.433, P=0.010); the maternal nursing satisfaction score of the observation group was (8.93±1.06)points, which was significantly higher than the control group (6.78±1.25)points. The data pairs were statistically significantly different (t= 10.657, P=0.001). Conclusion The humanized and thoughtful nursing of midwifery can effectively shorten the delivery process of elderly women, reduce the cesarean delivery rate and adverse neonatal outcomes.
[Key words] Elderly women; Humanized and thoughtful nursing; Labor process; Newborn outcome
通常產(chǎn)科的常規(guī)護(hù)理一般由生物學(xué)角度出發(fā),對產(chǎn)婦提供相關(guān)的護(hù)理服務(wù),往往忽略了護(hù)理的社會性和整體性等特征。目前,隨著醫(yī)學(xué)技術(shù)不斷發(fā)展,臨床醫(yī)學(xué)模式已由單一生物醫(yī)學(xué)模式逐步轉(zhuǎn)變成生物-心理-社會醫(yī)學(xué)模式,對產(chǎn)婦的助產(chǎn)護(hù)理工作也不在是配合治療單一內(nèi)容,而是實現(xiàn)“以產(chǎn)物為中心”綜合護(hù)理模式。
在該次研究中,觀察組產(chǎn)婦第一、第二、第三產(chǎn)程及總產(chǎn)程時間均低于對照組(P<0.05)。分析原因大致為該研究所采用的人性化體貼式護(hù)理模式起源于美國,以人為本是其核心理念,充分尊重生命個體,并為產(chǎn)婦提供舒適、安逸的分娩環(huán)境,減緩了患者的生產(chǎn)時間。這與李容芳等人[13]的研究中的結(jié)果基本一致,在其研究中表示,采取的新助產(chǎn)方式后產(chǎn)婦的總產(chǎn)程時間與該次研究的總產(chǎn)程時間接近。該次研究中,觀察組宮產(chǎn)率為27.27%低于對照組43.94%,自然分娩率對比,觀察組為66.67%高于對照組46.97%(P<0.05)。觀察組新生兒胎兒窘迫率為3.03%低于對照組12.12%(P<0.05);觀察組正常新生兒率為93.94%顯著高于對照組78.79%(P<0.05)表明觀察組產(chǎn)婦剖宮產(chǎn)率及新生兒不良結(jié)局概率低于對照組。這與游麗[14]的研究結(jié)果近似,在其研究中自然分娩率為76.34%,剖宮產(chǎn)率23.64%,正常新生兒為97.81%,上述研究結(jié)果與該文中結(jié)果基本一致。
該次研究還對比了護(hù)理滿意度,研究中的觀察組產(chǎn)婦的護(hù)理滿意度評分為(8.93±1.06)分,顯著高于對照組(6.78±1.25)分(P<0.05)。在吳琪等人[15]的研究中,產(chǎn)婦的護(hù)理滿意度為98.19%,與該次研究中取得護(hù)理滿意度評分(8.93±1.06)分具有一致性。表明采用有效的護(hù)理可減少既往護(hù)理模式易使產(chǎn)婦發(fā)生較大的恐懼感是因為分娩的疼痛感和其他一些生活壓力,而人性化體貼式護(hù)理模式經(jīng)對產(chǎn)婦健康宣教,使其充分認(rèn)識到剖宮產(chǎn)和順產(chǎn)的差異及不同結(jié)果,增大了產(chǎn)婦和醫(yī)生間的配合度,也取得了產(chǎn)婦的信任。通過搭建溝通平臺是產(chǎn)婦進(jìn)行后期工作的關(guān)鍵。首先可經(jīng)語言交流來卸下產(chǎn)婦的心理防備,使其緊張情緒等消除,在通過產(chǎn)前的健康宣教等,不但可消除產(chǎn)婦顧慮,使其思想上有所準(zhǔn)備,還可建立良好護(hù)患關(guān)系,得到產(chǎn)婦的信賴與親近。另外,助產(chǎn)護(hù)士應(yīng)積極幫助產(chǎn)婦做好分娩相關(guān)準(zhǔn)備,加強(qiáng)對產(chǎn)婦精神慰藉,指導(dǎo)其分娩中的用力方式與呼吸等,消失產(chǎn)婦對順產(chǎn)的恐懼等心理。
綜上所述,助產(chǎn)人性化體貼式護(hù)理有有效縮短高齡產(chǎn)婦產(chǎn)程,降低剖宮產(chǎn)率和新生兒不良結(jié)局。
[參考文獻(xiàn)]
[1]? 楊凡. 自我效能干預(yù)對高齡產(chǎn)婦妊娠結(jié)局及心理狀況的影響[J]. 中華現(xiàn)代護(hù)理雜志, 2017, 23(31):4024-4027.
[2]? 王智慧, 陳文殊, 李宇, 等. 硬膜外阻滯分娩鎮(zhèn)痛下第二產(chǎn)程時長對新生兒結(jié)局的影響[J].現(xiàn)代婦產(chǎn)科進(jìn)展, 2017, 26(3):219-221.
[3]? 孫芳珍. 責(zé)任制陪產(chǎn)對初產(chǎn)婦產(chǎn)程進(jìn)展及分娩結(jié)局的影響[J]. 中國婦幼保健, 2017, 32(23):5887-5889.
[4]? 馮群, 韓慶. 孕晚期綜合干預(yù)對產(chǎn)時認(rèn)知行為、產(chǎn)程及分娩結(jié)局的影響[J]. 重慶醫(yī)學(xué), 2017, 46(9):120-122.
[5]? 戴燕紅, 崇凱芳, 鐵鑫. 國際認(rèn)證在國內(nèi)醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)管理中的應(yīng)用[J]. 中國病案, 2018, 19(7):15-17.
[6]? 楊洪萍. 穴位按摩聯(lián)合導(dǎo)樂分娩對初產(chǎn)婦心理狀態(tài)、分娩情況及母嬰結(jié)局的影響[J].長春中醫(yī)藥大學(xué)學(xué)報,2017, 33(1):108-111.
[7]? Araínga M,Edagwa B, Mosley RL,et al.A mature macrophage is a principal HIV-1 cellular reservoir in humanized mice after treatment with long acting antiretroviral therapy[J]. Retrovirology, 2017, 14(1):17-21.
[8]? 許玉鳳,侯燕,尹莉,等.激勵式心理干預(yù)對高齡產(chǎn)婦自我管理能力及分娩結(jié)局的影響[J].國際精神病學(xué)雜志, 2017,11(6):1122-1124.
[9]? 吉訓(xùn)玲,童碧芳,周翠怡.助產(chǎn)責(zé)任制聯(lián)合體位系統(tǒng)化管理對初產(chǎn)婦女分娩的影響[J].醫(yī)學(xué)臨床研究;2017;34(9):1753-1755.
[10]? 郭路,張菁,葉朝.孕期實施聯(lián)想分娩與Kegel運動對孕婦分娩結(jié)局的影響[J].護(hù)士進(jìn)修雜志,2018,9(6):540-543.
[11]? Schmid P,Cruz C,Braiteh FS,et al.Abstract 2986: Atezoliz umab in metastatic TNBC(mTNBC): Long-term clinical outcomes and biomarker analyses[J].Cancer Research,2017, 77(13):2986.
[12]? 章艷.助產(chǎn)護(hù)理干預(yù)對高齡產(chǎn)婦分娩方式及產(chǎn)程的影響[J].中國婦幼健康研究,2017,28(1):547-551.
[13]? 李容芳,徐燕媚,鄧瓊.新產(chǎn)程標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與助產(chǎn)措施對產(chǎn)鉗助產(chǎn)、中轉(zhuǎn)剖宮產(chǎn)和新生兒窒息發(fā)生率的影響[J].海南醫(yī)學(xué),2017,28(19):137-139.
[14]? 游麗.助產(chǎn)護(hù)理干預(yù)對產(chǎn)婦分娩方式及母嬰結(jié)局的影響[J].世界中醫(yī)藥,2017,3(1):264-268.
[15]? 吳琪,馬令,龔妤.產(chǎn)婦專人全程陪伴分娩護(hù)理模式對其分娩情況的影響[J].中國婦幼健康研究,2017,28(2):505-509.
(收稿日期:2020-02-03)