• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Enhanced recovery after surgery program in the patients undergoing hepatectomy for benign liver lesions

    2020-05-10 06:55:40JiMinZhouXiGnHeMioWngYiMingZhoLinShuLongRongWngLuWngAnRongMo

    Ji-Min Zhou , Xi-Gn He , Mio Wng , Yi-Ming Zho , Lin Shu , Long-Rong Wng ,Lu Wng , An-Rong Mo , *

    a Department of Hepatic Surgery, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China

    b Education Department, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China

    ABSTRACT

    Keywords:

    Enhanced recovery after surgery

    Hepatectomy

    Benign liver lesions

    Laparoscopy

    Liver function

    Introduction

    Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) aims to reduce postoperative morbidity and improve recovery through reducing the postoperative undesirable sequelae caused by surgical stress response. It was first raised by Kehlet in the 1990s [1 , 2] . After more than two decades of clinical practice and development, the effectiveness of ERAS program has been widely proven in colorectal surgery [3] , urology surgery [4] , orthopedic surgery [5] , gynecology [6] , and many other surgical fields, in some of which guidelines and consensus have been established. The concept of ERAS was gradually introduced to China from Europe and America since the 21st century and was gradually spread in domestic. In the hepatic surgery, the practice and clinical application of ERAS were relatively lagging due to the high risk of hepatectomy [7] . The earliest clinical study exploring the application of ERAS in hepatic surgery can be traced back to 2008 [8] . Then, ERAS has gradually attracted attention in the clinical practice of hepatic surgery over the past decade. A large number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) [9-11] and meta-analyses [12-16] have emerged domestic and overseas. On that basis, the guidelines and consensus special for hepatectomy were also established [17 , 18] . However, until now, almost all the ERAS studies focused on the ERAS perioperative management process and content of hepatectomy for liver tumors,in which the types of tumors were often mixed. Very few studies have specifically discussed the application characteristics and clinical outcomes of ERAS for a certain type of liver tumor and most of them were focusing on the malignant lesions including hepatocellular carcinoma, peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma, colorectal cancer liver metastasis [19-21] and parasitic diseases [22] . So far,there has been no study to summarize the characteristics of ERAS in patients with benign liver lesions.

    Benefit from the development of radiological technology,the early detection rate of benign liver lesions has been increasing [23] . Benign liver lesions mainly include hemangioma,focal nodular hyperplasia, hepatic adenoma, solitary necrotic nodules. Currently, hepatectomy is the main treatment for these diseases [24] . Liver benign lesions have the following clinical characteristics: follow-up observation is one of the treatment options as well; patients with benign liver lesions are usually without background of liver disease, which make the postoperative recovery easier; patients with benign liver lesions have relatively low acceptance threshold for perioperative adverse events. Higher surgical safety, better perioperative experience, fewer postoperative complications, and shorter hospital stay may show greater significance for patients with benign lesions who choose to receive hepatectomy compared with patients with malignant tumors. Therefore, it is important to explore if ERAS can achieve the expected results in such patient population.

    Methods

    From September 2016 to June 2019, 233 consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed benign liver lesions who underwent hepatectomy in our center were enrolled retrospectively. Benign liver tumor was defined as follows: hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia, solitary necrotic nodules, hepatic adenoma, and others, including angioleiomyolipoma, peliosishepatitis, hepatolithiasis, and inflammatory lesions, such as inflammatory pseudotumor and hepatic abscesses. The criteria of hepatectomy for benign liver diseases in our center are following: (1) tumor volume was larger than 5 cm, or tumor grew rapidly within a short period of time;(2) tumor compression or other conditions caused symptoms; (3)the patient required tumor removal with a strong desire; (4) tumor was suspected malignant from the examinations.

    ERAS was implemented in our center since March 1st, 2018.Therefore, 109 patients from September 2016 to February 2018 were enrolled into the control group, and the subsequent 124 patients were enrolled in the ERAS group. ERAS management measures were introduced in Table 1 . The underlying diseases of patients were divided into three subgroups: no other morbidity;cardiovascular disease, hypertension or diabetes; others, included anemia, asthma, and history of other tumors and tuberculosis and so on. The last subgroup also included six patients in each of the two groups with a history of hepatitis B infection, hepatitis C infection, and schistosomiasis. The liver functions of all patients enrolled in the study were Child-Pugh classification A. All data were collected during hospital stay and within 30 days after surgery.Postoperative complications were defined and classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification criteria. The pain score was classified according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) and score ≥4 was defined as severe pain requiring analgesic treatment. Postoperative recovery of liver function was evaluated by liver function related indicators, such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT),total bilirubin (TBil), prothrombin time (PT), and D -dimer. These indicators were recorded on postoperative day 3. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our center.

    Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 for Windows(SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Graphpad Prism 5 for Windows(Graphpad Software, Inc. San Diego, USA). Quantitative data were presented with mean ±standard error or median (interquartile range) and compared using two-sample Student’st-test or Mann-WhitneyUtest where appropriate. Qualitative data were compared using Pearson Chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. APvalue of<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    Results

    A total of 233 patients with benign liver lesions were recruited in this study. Among these, 109 patients (46.78%) who received traditional perioperative care were in the control group and 124 patients (53.22%) who received ERAS program were in the ERAS group. The clinicopathologic characteristics of the cohort were summarized in Table 2 . The age, sex, underlying diseases, ASA physical status, and BMI of patients in these two groups were similar. In terms of pathologic diagnosis and type of hepatectomy,there was also no significant difference between these two groups.However, a significantly higher proportion of patients underwent laparoscopic surgery in the ERAS group (79.84% vs. 58.72%,P<0.001).

    The operative results and postoperative outcomes of these two groups in the whole patient population were listed in the Table 3 .As for the operation related indicators, both intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion rate were significantly less in the ERAS group than those in the control group [10 0.0 0 (50.0 0-20 0.0 0) mL vs. 20 0.0 0 (10 0.0 0-487.50) mL,P<0.0 01 and 3.23% vs. 10.09%,P= 0.033]. The ERAS group had also shown shorter operative duration in spite of no significant difference [120.00 (90.00-150.00)min vs. 140.00 (95.00-179.75) min,P= 0.056]. As the indicators of postoperative liver function recovery, TBil was significantly lower in the ERAS group [17.10 (13.43-23.85) μmol/L vs. 21.00 (14.83-29.55) μmol/L,P= 0.041]. In terms of coagulation function, D -dimer was dramatically reduced in the ERAS group [2.08 (1.49-2.94) μg/mL vs. 2.57 (1.77-3.49) μg/mL,P= 0.031], while PT was similar in these two groups. For ERAS study common indicators,including days that semiliquid diet was allowed after surgery, abdominal drainage tube indwelling duration, and hospital stay after surgery, all these indicators were significantly shorter in the ERAS group (allP<0.05). In terms of pain score, the proportion of patients with pain score ≥4 was significantly lower than that in the control group within postoperative five days except the first two days after surgery (6.45% vs. 13.76%,P= 0.062 and 16.13% vs.24.77%,P= 0.101; Fig. 1 (A)). The hospital costs between these two groups were similar (P= 0.784). The postoperative complications in the study were also analyzed. In both groups, 30-day mortality was 0. According to the Clavien-Dindo classification criteria, the incidence of complications in the control group was significantly higher than that in the ERAS group (32.11% vs. 16.13%,P= 0.008).

    Due to the uneven distribution of the patients underwent open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in these two groups, stratification analysis was further performed to evaluate the role of ERAS program in different operative methods. The clinicopathologic baselines of ERAS group and control group were comparable in patients underwent these two operative methods (Data not shown). The operative results and postoperative outcomes were shown in Tables 4 and 5 . For postoperative outcomes, ERAS group showed signi ficantly fewer days that semiliquid diet was allowed and hospital stay after surgery than the control group in both operative methods (allP<0.001). In patients underwent laparoscopic surgery,among other postoperative indicators, a significant difference was shown in the pain score on postoperative day 4 after surgery between ERAS and control group (P= 0.008; Fig. 1 (B)). Impressively,ALT level in the ERAS group was significantly higher than that in the control group [124.20 (67.60-215.10) U/L vs. 83.35 (51.13-158.18) U/L,P= 0.027] in patients underwent laparoscopic surgery.In patients underwent open surgery, the ERAS group demonstrated a significantly shorter operative duration (131.76 ±8.75 min vs.160.73 ±7.23 min,P= 0.016), less blood loss [20 0.0 0 (10 0.0 0-325.0 0) mL vs.450.0 0 (20 0.0 0-625.0 0) mL,P= 0.0 08], lower post-operative morbidity (16.00% vs. 4 4.4 4%,P= 0.040), and significantly different pain score on postoperative day 3 (P= 0.013;Fig. 1 (C)). There were different patterns of postoperative pain and analgesic effect between patients underwent laparoscopic and open surgery. In addition, ALT level in the ERAS group was lower than that in the control group, although with no significant difference [147.65 (62.05-179.08) U/L vs.220.90 (119.50-350.63) U/L,P= 0.060].

    Discussion

    This study explored the role of ERAS in patients underwent hepatectomy for benign liver lesions. Compared with traditional perioperative care, ERAS had shorter hospital stay, fewer postoperative complications, less intraoperative blood loss, and better postoperative liver function.

    The demographic baseline between the two groups of this study was comparable. A significantly higher proportion of patients underwent laparoscopic surgery in the ERAS group (79.84% vs.58.72%). Ratti et al. [21] reported that laparoscopic approaches may be associated with reduced blood loss and postoperative morbidity,which was similar to the open surgery group treated with ERAS program. Laparoscopic hepatectomy itself may be an approach of ERAS and recommended by the consensus [18] .

    The anesthesia strategy of our ERAS program specifically emphasized the low central venous pressure (CVP) technique(CVP<5 mmHg, systolic blood pressure>90 mmHg), which was extremely critical to the hepatectomy. Hughes et al. [25] verified that low CVP could significantly reduce the intraoperative blood loss and transfusion rates in hepatectomy. The low CVP strategy may provide a safer hepatectomy, a cleaner surgical field and an easier operation. A trend of shorter operative duration in the ERAS group with more laparoscopic surgeries in this study should also partially owe to low CVP. Another major objective of our study was to observe the change of liver function impairment after ERAS implement. In clinical practice, it has been shown that the peak liver damage occurs 3-4 days after surgery. All patients in our study showed normal preoperative liver function. Thus, we compared the results of liver and coagulation function tests in the third day after hepatectomy, and found that the TBil and D -dimer levels in the ERAS group were significantly lower which suggests that liver function impairment caused by hepatectomy may be milder in the ERAS group. The minor surgical trauma due to ERAS was the critical reason.

    Table 2The clinicopathologic characteristics of patients.

    Table 3Operative results and postoperative outcomes in the whole patient population.

    Mitigated postoperative pain, nausea and vomiting for the implement of ERAS may alleviate postoperative stress and improve the recovery of liver function. We have to mention that the patients in the ERAS group were routinely treated with lowmolecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for anticoagulation postoperatively. LMWH has been shown not to increase the risk of postoperative hemorrhage [18] . The PT level was not longer after the application of LMWH and impressively, the level of D -dimer wassignificantly reduced in the study and therefore, LMWH was safe and effective to be applied to relieve hypercoagulability and prevent thrombotic complications after operation without deteriorating coagulation function, although LMWH was not recommended by the consensus [18] . The reduced surgical trauma and accelerated postoperative recovery of liver function reflect the merit of ERAS in hepatectomy of patients with benign liver lesions.

    Table 4Operative results and postoperative outcomes in patients underwent open surgery.

    Table 5Operative results and postoperative outcomes of patients underwent laparoscopic surgery.

    Patients with ERAS significantly shortened postoperative hospital stay, abdominal drainage tube removal, and semiliquid diet intake. Postoperative complications were reduced by almost half,with an incidence of 32.11% in the control group to 16.13% in the ERAS group. Our results were the same as the previous studies [12-16] . Most of these studies focused on malignancies such as hepatocellular carcinoma, and these results were similar to what we reported in the benign liver lesion populations.

    Management of postoperative pain is a major component of ERAS. Our analgesia strategy was close to what Liang et al. [26] reported: routine analgesic pump one day + intravenous parecoxib sodium (Dynastat) twice a day. In the whole patient population,the proportion of patients requiring pharmaceutical intervention was reduced by 50% in the ERAS group compared with the control group for postoperative five consecutive days. Actually, a trend of difference had been shown at day one postoperatively. The reason why there was no difference at day two may be that this is the routine day withdrawal of analgesic pump. The analgesic function of intravenous parecoxib sodium was still not completely effective in part of insensitive patients. The pain could be controlled better in the following days. Further stratified analysis showed that the analgesic effect in patients underwent laparoscopic surgery was earlier than that in patients underwent open surgery. The results indicated the effectiveness of postoperative analgesia strategies in our ERAS program, which made the patients with benign diseases experience a better postoperative recovery.

    For hospital costs, no difference was shown between the two groups. It might be due to a higher proportion of laparoscopic surgery in the ERAS group which is higher than that of open surgery. The total cost in our center was much lower than those reported in other centers [26-28] . Actually, the costs associated with treatment of benign liver diseases should be less than those with malignant tumors. Therefore, the hospital costs were relatively lower in our study.

    Fig. 1. The proportion of patients with the score ≥4 in the control group and ERAS group within 5 days after operation. ( A) Whole patient population, the proportion of patients with severe pain was much lower in the ERAS group. ( B) Patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, a significant difference was shown at day 4 after surgery. ( C ) Patients underwent open surgery, the ERAS group demonstrated significantly less proportion of patients with severe pain at day 3 after surgery.*P < 0.05.

    Due to the different proportion of laparoscopic surgeries, stratified analysis was further performed to explore the different roles of ERAS in patients underwent laparoscopic or open surgery for benign liver lesions. As expected, ERAS showed a more significant effect in the open surgery group. In addition to the shorter semifl uid diet intake day and postoperative hospital stay in both open and laparoscopic surgery group with ERAS implement, shorter operative duration, less blood loss, and less incidences of postoperative complications were revealed in the open surgery group as well. The results suggested that the effect of ERAS implement in the laparoscopic surgery and open surgery may be different. A previous meta-analysis [13] has revealed that the implement of ERAS in the patients underwent laparoscopic surgery could reduce the postoperative hospital stay and overall complications, but not the operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, nor blood transfusion.Recently, only Liang’s study confirmed the above conclusion [26] .In several other studies, ERAS implement in laparoscopic surgery could only reduce the hospital stay, not the postoperative complications, or neither [28 , 29] . Compared with laparoscopic surgery, although ERAS implement in open surgery was not superior to traditional perioperative care in the operative time and blood loss,ERAS implement shortened hospital stay and decreased complications [30] . As mentioned above, laparoscopic hepatectomy itself may be an approach of ERAS [21] and the postoperative surgical stress response was much lower than that of open surgery. Therefore, although parts of patients were not suitable for laparoscopic surgery, perioperative ERAS implement during open surgery could improve the patient outcomes.

    In summary, ERAS program significantly improved the postoperative recovery and did not affect the hospital costs. Stratifi ed analysis unveiled that ERAS showed more advantages in the open surgery than the laparoscopic surgery. Therefore, ERAS program was suitable for the patients underwent hepatectomy, especially open surgery, for benign liver lesions. The limitation of this study is the retrospective nature which may lead to bias of results.Prospective large sample studies are necessary to further validate our data.

    CRediT authorship contribution statement

    Jia-Min Zhou:Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft.Xi-Gan He:Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft.Miao Wang:Data curation, Methodology.Yi-Ming Zhao:Methodology.Lian Shu:Data curation, Validation.Long-Rong Wang:Validation.Lu Wang:Conceptualization, Writing - review& editing.An-Rong Mao:Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing -review & editing.

    Funding

    None.

    Ethical approval

    This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

    Competing interest

    No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

    av在线天堂中文字幕| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产精品一及| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 免费av观看视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 天美传媒精品一区二区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| av卡一久久| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 永久网站在线| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 久久久成人免费电影| 老女人水多毛片| 99久国产av精品| 99久国产av精品| 91精品国产九色| 99热6这里只有精品| 观看美女的网站| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 尾随美女入室| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 少妇的逼水好多| 尾随美女入室| 国产91av在线免费观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 1000部很黄的大片| 内射极品少妇av片p| 免费看不卡的av| 老女人水多毛片| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 直男gayav资源| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 成人二区视频| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 一本一本综合久久| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 搡老乐熟女国产| 日韩av免费高清视频| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 日日啪夜夜撸| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 精品久久久久久久末码| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 舔av片在线| 精品久久久久久久久av| 亚洲内射少妇av| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 草草在线视频免费看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产三级在线视频| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| av播播在线观看一区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 免费观看a级毛片全部| eeuss影院久久| 国产精品一及| 69人妻影院| 色视频www国产| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 天堂√8在线中文| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲av一区综合| 男女国产视频网站| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 一级毛片我不卡| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 午夜免费激情av| 午夜激情欧美在线| 看黄色毛片网站| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 日日啪夜夜撸| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 91久久精品电影网| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 简卡轻食公司| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 日韩强制内射视频| 99热6这里只有精品| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 日日啪夜夜撸| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 欧美成人a在线观看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 黄色一级大片看看| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看 | 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | av女优亚洲男人天堂| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 国产成人aa在线观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 日韩电影二区| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 七月丁香在线播放| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 1000部很黄的大片| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产视频首页在线观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 亚洲综合精品二区| 久久久久网色| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 免费看av在线观看网站| 国产单亲对白刺激| 精品久久久久久成人av| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲精品一二三| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 在线免费十八禁| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日韩视频在线欧美| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久久久久久久中文| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 一级av片app| 如何舔出高潮| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| ponron亚洲| 亚洲精品视频女| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产成人福利小说| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 看免费成人av毛片| 插逼视频在线观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产色婷婷99| 国产高清三级在线| 国产在视频线在精品| 97超碰精品成人国产| 99热这里只有精品一区| 日本一本二区三区精品| av在线亚洲专区| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产单亲对白刺激| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品 | 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲av福利一区| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 老司机影院毛片| 一级片'在线观看视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 午夜福利在线在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 我的老师免费观看完整版| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 一夜夜www| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 一夜夜www| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 五月天丁香电影| 麻豆成人av视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 亚州av有码| 日本黄色片子视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 97热精品久久久久久| 赤兔流量卡办理| 成人国产麻豆网| 成人av在线播放网站| 日本熟妇午夜| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 午夜视频国产福利| 亚洲av男天堂| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| av在线播放精品| 中文字幕久久专区| 亚洲国产av新网站| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 69人妻影院| 成人欧美大片| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 色综合色国产| 亚洲图色成人| kizo精华| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲综合精品二区| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲av.av天堂| 美女高潮的动态| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 午夜福利高清视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 高清av免费在线| 久久久久性生活片| 午夜福利在线在线| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 国产精品.久久久| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产在线男女| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 成人二区视频| 日本色播在线视频| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 精品久久久噜噜| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 黄色配什么色好看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 国产成人精品一,二区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 一本久久精品| 黄色日韩在线| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 色综合色国产| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 18+在线观看网站| 乱人视频在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 少妇的逼好多水| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 99久久精品热视频| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 极品教师在线视频| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 久久久久网色| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲成色77777| 免费观看性生交大片5| 久久久欧美国产精品| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| av黄色大香蕉| 一级毛片 在线播放| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 久久这里只有精品中国| 成年av动漫网址| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 国产乱来视频区| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 在线免费十八禁| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲四区av| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 成人无遮挡网站| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 大陆偷拍与自拍| 69av精品久久久久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 欧美激情在线99| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 色网站视频免费| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 成年免费大片在线观看| 只有这里有精品99| 精品久久久久久成人av| 国产成人91sexporn| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 老女人水多毛片| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 免费av毛片视频| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 日本wwww免费看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| xxx大片免费视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 日本色播在线视频| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| or卡值多少钱| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 麻豆成人av视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产视频内射| 草草在线视频免费看| 日韩电影二区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 一本一本综合久久| ponron亚洲| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| av黄色大香蕉| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 熟女电影av网| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产在视频线精品| 永久网站在线| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 99久国产av精品| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 欧美性感艳星| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 毛片女人毛片| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 人妻一区二区av| 国产av不卡久久| 99久国产av精品| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产老妇女一区| 七月丁香在线播放| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产av不卡久久| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 国产成人精品婷婷| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 搞女人的毛片| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 成人国产麻豆网| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 在线天堂最新版资源| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲内射少妇av| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 18+在线观看网站| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 综合色丁香网| 久久久欧美国产精品| 舔av片在线| 精品酒店卫生间| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品无大码| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 韩国av在线不卡| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 婷婷色综合www| 国产老妇女一区| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产老妇女一区| 嫩草影院入口| 国产探花极品一区二区| 男女国产视频网站| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 国产成人福利小说| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 日本wwww免费看| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 国产乱人视频| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 午夜福利在线在线| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精品久久久精品久久久| 两个人的视频大全免费| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 91av网一区二区| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 99久久精品国产国产毛片| eeuss影院久久| 免费少妇av软件| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 日韩欧美三级三区|