Tumor-specific lytic path “hyperploid progression mediated death”:Resolving side effects through targeting retinoblastoma or p53 mutant

Frank-Un Hong, Miguel Castro, Klaus Linse

Frank-Un Hong, Miguel Castro, Klaus Linse, Department of Research and Development, Bio-Synthesis, Lewisville, TX 75057, United States

Abstract A major advance was made to reduce the side effects of cancer therapy via the elucidation of the tumor-specific lytic path “hyperploid progression-mediated death” targeting retinoblastoma (Rb) or p53-mutants defective in G1 DNA damage checkpoint. The genetic basis of human cancers was uncovered through the cloning of the tumor suppressor Rb gene. It encodes a nuclear DNA-binding protein whose self-interaction is regulated by cyclin-dependent kinases. A 3Dstructure of Rb dimer is shown, confirming its multimeric status. Rb assumes a central role in cell cycle regulation and the “Rb pathway” is universally inactivated in human cancers. Hyperploidy refers to a state in which cells contain one or more extra chromosomes. Hyperploid progression occurs due to continued cell-cycling without cytokinesis in G1 checkpoint-defective cancer cells. The evidence for the triggering of hyperploid progression-mediated death in RBmutant human retinoblastoma cells is shown. Hence, the very genetic mutation that predisposes to cancer can be exploited to induce lethality. The discovery helped to establish the principle of targeted cytotoxic cancer therapy at the mechanistic level. By triggering the lytic path, targeted therapy with tumor specificity at the genetic level can be developed. It sets the stage for systematically eliminating side effects for cytotoxic cancer therapy.

Key Words: Retinoblastoma protein; P53 protein; Cancer; Checkpoint; Taxol; Tumorspecific lytic path

BIOGRAPHY

Frank-Un Hong (a.k.a. Frank Un, Frank D. Hong) is an established cancer researcher and research scientist at Bio-synthesis, Inc. While serving as a consultant in Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope National Medical Center, it became the top cancer center in the western half of the United States. He also served as a consultant in the highly regarded School of Pharmacy at the University of Southern California. As faculty at the top-ranked University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, he contributed editorially for research journals,e.g.Gene therapy and Molecular Biology,Mini-reviews in Medical Chemistry. His works have been presented at the University of California at Los Angeles Keystone conference, National Eye Institute conference,the American Association of Cancer Research symposium, esteemed Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology on several occasions, and covered by news media.

Of historic relevance, T. Svedberg, who invented ultracentrifuge (Nobel prize 1926),assisted A. Tiselius in developing electrophoresis (Nobel prize 1948) and supported the “Brownian motion” proposed by A. Einstein (Nobel prize 1921). At the University of Uppsala (Sweden), Svedberg was succeeded by S. Claesson (Nobel committee member for chemistry), who also taught at the Baylor University, under whom F.Hong studied physical chemistry in 1980. He also studied polymer chemistry under M.Dole in 1981, who discovered the “Dole effect”, which led to electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (Nobel prize 2002, J. Fenn, K. Tanaka). In 1979-1980, F. Hong worked on the organic synthesis of oligodeoxynucleotides using the phosphoramidite chemistry with W. Lunsford, a former colleague of W. Letsinger—a field to which H.Khorana (Nobel prize 1968, tRNAs encode amino acids) contributed. In 1983-1984, at the American Bio-Nuclear of F. Hoffmann-La Roche, F. Hong achieved the chemical synthesis of protected purine deoxynucleotide for oligonucleotide synthesis.

In 1981-1982, at the Johns Hopkins University, F. Hong worked on the cloning of phosphate transferase system-encoding genes with its discoverer S. Roseman, who uncovered that phosphate transferase system governs diauxie, whose prior interpretation by J. Monod led to the ‘‘operon'' concept (Nobel prize 1965). In 1982, F.Hong worked on “transdetermination” with A. Shearn, which is related to altered embryonic phenotype caused by the mutant homeotic gene (Nobel prize 1995, E.Lewis, C. Nusslein-Volhard, E. Wieschaus).

In 1985, at the Salk Institute founded by J. Salk (developed polio vaccine), F. Hong determined the genomic sequence of the avian infectious bronchitis virus strain M41-positive-sense single-stranded RNA coronavirus (belongs to the identical family as SARS or coronavirus disease 2019 coronavirus but distinct genus). This was done to identify the neutralizing antibody epitopes on spike protein with W. Spaan (University of Utrecht, The Netherlands), which was reported in Virus Research[1]. Vaccines prepared for the subsequent epidemic by “SARS coronavirus” likewise target the spike protein. In 1984-1985, F. Hong worked on the intracellular transport mechanism (of Vesicular stomatitis virus's G protein) with J. Rose, a former colleague of D. Baltimore(Nobel prize 1975, reverse transcriptase), which is implicated in diabetes or mental disorder (Nobel prize 2013, Scheckman, Sudhof, Rothman).

In 1985-1986, at the scripps research institute, F. Hong cloned/determined the first eukaryotic cDNA sequence of human muscle 6-phosphofructokinase gene with S.Vora of E. Beutler's group (parent of B. Beutler, Nobel prize 2011, Toll-like receptor),which was reported in Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm[2]. Phosphofructokinase-M is linked to Tarui disease, cancer metabolism, and represents one of the earliest susceptibility genes to be identified for human heart disease (cardiac hypertrophy).

In 1986-1987, at the University of California at San Diego, F. Hong identified/cloned human retinoblastoma susceptibility gene Rb, proving the genetic basis of human cancers, which was published in Science[3]. This work was done with W. Lee, a former colleague of P. Duesberg (discovered v-Src oncogene of Rous sarcoma virus, which led to c-Src discovery; Nobel prize 1989, M Bishop, H Varmus). Mutation in tumor suppressor geneRBwas also found in osteosarcoma, breast cancer, small cell lung cancer, colon cancer, and glioma. It inspired the cloning of other tumor suppressor genes: Example, p53, breast cancer 1, phosphatase and tensin homolog,neurofibromatosis type 1, Wilms' tumour 1.

In 1986-1987, F. Hong determined the cDNA sequence of human RB [the Nterminus that are GC-richviathe Maxam-Gilbert method[4]and the C-terminal regionviaSanger's chain termination method[3], which contained cyclin-dependent kinase(CDK) phosphorylation motifs. It led to the subsequent identification of CDK4/6 as the regulator of Rb, which governs cell cycle progression across “restriction point” at the G1 phase. This was followed by the development of the CDK4/6 inhibitor(example, palbociclib by Pfizer Inc.), which was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration to treat advanced-stage breast cancer.

In 1987, F. Hong discovered Rb's DNA binding property that revealed Rb's role in regulating transcription or DNA replication, which was reported in Nature[4]. It instilled the view that Rb may function as a transcription factor—example, by interacting with E2F or other associating proteins. Subsequently, he documented a stable complex formed by purified Rb protein and double-stranded DNA, which indicated that Rb interacts with DNA directly[5].

In 1987-1988, he observed that SV40 promoter-driven Rb overexpression causes cells to arrest as enlarged cells in cell culture (unpublished), which preceded the subsequent discovery of Rb's function in DNA damage checkpoint in G1 or S phase.

In 1988-1989, F. Hong identified/characterized theRbgene promoter and found its regulatory elements reminiscent of “housekeeping” genes, which was reported in Proc Natl. Acad. of Sci. United States[6]. In 1990, he reported the discovery of the firstRbmutation in human prostate cancer,i.e.defective promoter, which was published in Proc Natl. Acad. of Sci. United States[7]. It led to the finding that mutant Rb triples the mortality risk of prostate cancer patients and that Rb loss confers resistance to androgen receptor antagonizing therapy.

In 1989, he found a similarity between the Rb polypeptide sequence and the neurofilament subunit NF-L, indicating that Rb may function in the structural aspect of chromosomes, which was reported in Bioscience Report[8]. In 1990-1991, he discovered Rb's oligomerizing property, which was published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry[9]. It suggested that Rb may form a higher-ordered structure like nuclear matrix (“corral hypothesis” presented at Cold spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology in 1991[10]and 1994[11]with the latter organized by J. Watson;Nobel prize 1962, double helix) to assume its function—i.e.modulating chromatin to affect DNA condensation, histone modification, heterochromatin, DNA replication. It led to the finding that Rb's N-terminus interacts with its C-terminus, which was subsequently confirmed. Further, it revealed that CDKs negatively regulate the Rb-to-Rb self-interaction (presented at the 1994 Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology)[11].

In 1993, at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, F. Hong worked on the humanAPCgene, whose inactivation causes familial adenomatous polyposis with its discoverer G. Joslyn, a former colleague of R. White (University of Utah).

In 1993-1995, at the Salk Institute, F. Hong worked on growth factors, Alzheimer's disease, and aging disorders with D. Schubert, a former colleague of J. Monod (Pasteur Institute, France).

In 1996-1997, F. Hong discovered the tumor-specific lytic path “hyperploid progression mediated death” targeting Rb or p53 mutant cancers defective in G1 DNA damage checkpoint while investigating the mechanism through which Taxol induces chromosomal aneuploidy in human brain cancer cells, which was published in Carcinogenesis[12]. This work was done with P. Nisen, a former colleague of S. Cohen(Nobel prize 1986, epidermal growth factor) who worked on gene therapy of brain cancer. In 2010, the events that led to its discovery were chronicled in the book,“Multiple Drug Resistance”[13]. The lytic path has been confirmed globally.

In 2005-2006, at the City of Hope National Medical Center's Beckman Research Institute, F. Hong discovered the mechanism through which the sensitivity of resistant cancers to the antimetabolite drug hydroxyurea could be restored by modulating the Rb-associating transcription factor ICBP90 (UHRF1), which was reported in Anticancer Research[14]. In 2007, F. Hong reported the discovery that Rb protein mediates the cytotoxicity of the DNA crosslinking drug cisplatin in G1 DNA damage checkpointretaining human cancers in Anticancer Drugs[15].

In 2015-2018, at the University of Southern California, F. Hong worked on the role of monoamine oxidase (MAO), which degrades serotonin (5-HT) and other neurotransmitters, in human cancer with J. Shih (part of a delegation sponsored by the United States National Academy of Science to open diplomatic relation with China on the scientific front during the Nixon administration), who discovered MAO isoenzymes A and Bviacloning, the role of MAO in autism, and the genetic regulation of behavior.

INTRODUCTION

Advances in medicine come slowly. The discipline of cancer therapy is no exception as there has been little increase in survival within the last fifty years for certain human cancers despite extensive research. One of the key issues standing in the way of achieving a cure is side effects as it undermines dose escalation or prolonged treatment. The problem is well documented for chemotherapy, which nevertheless remains one of the major treatment modalities. This is because chemotherapeutics can induce cancer cell death (cytotoxic) rather than merely arrest cycling cells (cytostatic),which represents an important therapeutic asset. Here, a major advance made to solve the problem of side effects is described.

Chemoprevention

The basic tenet underlying chemoprevention is to reverse the course of cellular changes occurring during a normal to cancerous state transition through the pharmacological intervention. In several cases, the precise stages that a normal, welldifferentiated cell undergoes to become cancerous have been well documented. One such example is colon cancer, where the transition of a normal cell through the“polyp” stage in route to becoming cancerous has been clearly documented. In the case of an intestinal tumor, this scenario has been confirmed using an Apc(adenomatous polyposis coli)-gene inactivated murine model[16]. By understanding the molecular mechanism underlying this process, several targets can be identified for pharmacological intervention.

In the case of colon carcinogenesis, overexpression of the gene encoding cyclooxygenase (COX), which is responsible for the production of prostaglandin from arachidonic acid, is an early and central event. This has led to the development of COX-inhibiting nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as sulindac, or more selective COX-2-specific drugs.

In the case of breast carcinogenesis, the estrogen pathway has been targeted for chemoprevention given estrogen's role as a tumor promoter. Tamoxifen is an analog of estrogen used for suppressing mammary carcinogenesis. Raloxifene represents another agent with a similar potential. Development of selective estrogen receptor modulators, which function as estrogen agonists in tissues where estrogen is beneficial yet as antagonists in tissues where estrogen may promote carcinogenesis (breast,uterus, ovary) remains the goal.

For cancers of the head and neck as well as the lung, the retinoid pathway has been targeted for chemoprevention. Retinoids are essential for proper differentiation of lung and upper airway epithelium, and the loss of retinoic acid receptor (RAR) has been associated with premalignant lesions of the oral epithelium and the formation of lung cancer[17]. Consequently, (nuclear) receptors for retinoids represent critical molecular targets for chemoprevention. The nuclear receptors function as transcription factors for specific genes, whose promoters contain their responsive elements. Administration of 9-cis-retinoic acid, which represents an agonist for all 6 types of retinoid receptors, has been shown to restore the expression of RAR, and reverse the development of cancerous lesions[18]. Those binding to retinoid X receptors but not to RARs such as targretin may represent more selective chemopreventive agents for these cancers[19].

Chemotherapy

The majority of previously developed anti-cancer drugs were designed to interfere with various aspects of DNA metabolism. The underlying rationale is that interfering with the propagation of genetic material will undermine the continuous cell division necessary for tumor formation. The targeted areas of DNA metabolism include DNA replication, DNA repair, chromosome segregation, DNA mutagenesis,etc.

One class of such anti-cancer drugs includes agents that form noncovalent complexes with DNA. These include anthracyclines, mitoxantrone, dactinomycin,bleomycin, and plicamycin. Doxorubicin (adriamycin) and daunorubicin, isolated from different species ofstreptomyces, belong to the category of anthracyclines. In the case of doxorubicin, it intercalates with double-stranded DNA and causes local uncoiling. This happens due to the separation of the stacked bases by the intercalated doxorubicin molecule. Doxorubicin treatment of cells results in the cleavage of their DNA. Cleavage of the intracellular double-stranded DNA is thought to occur due to the inhibition of topoisomerase II. Cleavage of single-stranded DNA is thought to occur due to the formation of the drug-Fe-DNA complex, which induces the generation of hydroxyl radicals due to hydrogen peroxide[20].

In contrast, cisplatin belongs to a different class of anti-cancer drugs that interact directly with DNA, through forming crosslinks. The ability of cisplatin to form adducts with DNA has been exploited for the treatment of head and neck cancer.

Other types of anticancer drugs that do not interact with DNA directly, yet affect its metabolism indirectly, include methotrexate, which inhibits the synthesis of nucleotides necessary for DNA replication. They also include Taxol and vincristine,the antimicrotubule drugs that interfere with the DNA metabolism at the level of sister chromatid segregation (which occurs during metaphase-to-anaphase transition of mitosis) by blocking the formation of mitotic spindles.

Certain anticancer drugs such as etoposide function by inhibiting enzymes involved in the repair of DNA breaks, such as topoisomerase II.

The unresolved issue of side effects

The occurrence of side effects continues to pose a problem for chemoprevention and chemotherapy. Side effects associated with chemopreventive drugs include the following. In the case of the COX-inhibitors, their nonselective aspect can lead to serious side effects including gastrointestinal ulceration and bleeding. The side effects have mainly been attributed to the inhibition of the COX-1 enzyme, which is involved in generating prostaglandin. Prostaglandin functions to maintain stomach lining integrity, regulate blood flow within the kidneys, and balance platelet function. This has prompted the development of more selective drugs,i.e.inhibitors of COX-2 enzymes whose level increases in response to diet, stress, and injury. However,treatment with COX-2 inhibitors has been associated with an increased risk for heart attack and stroke[21].

The use of tamoxifen to treat breast cancer has been associated with the occurrence of endometrial cancer and thromboembolism. Raloxifene, an estrogenic agent that maintains bone mass in postmenopausal women to prevent osteoporosis, is used for breast cancer chemoprevention and has a similar degree of risk as tamoxifen for developing thromboembolism[22].

The use of retinoids has been associated with various toxicities including skin dryness, cheilitis, hypertriglyceridemia, and conjunctivitis.

For the majority of drugs used in chemotherapy, side effects remain a major problem. As most currently used drugs were designed to interfere with various aspects of DNA metabolism necessary for rapidly replicating cancer cells, it undoubtedly has a negative effect on normal cells that also divide frequently, ex. white blood cells. The lack of tumor-specificity may result in side effects including weight loss, infection (due to decreased immunity), fatigue, and pain.

Among various main-line therapies, chemotherapy utilizing Taxol has emerged as one of the most potent treatments for breast, ovarian, and lung cancers. But treatment with Taxol results in various side effects, including dyspnea with bronchospasm,urticaria, hypotension, neutropenia, and peripheral neuropathy[23].

For the crosslinking drug cisplatin, nephrotoxicity is its chief dose-limiting side effect[24]. For anthracyclines like doxorubicin, side effects include cardiac toxicity, bone marrow suppression, and gastrointestinal and hepatic effects[25]. The side effects,resulting from their lack of tumor-specificity, remain a major hurdle as it undermines the effort to attain the dose necessary for tumor destruction.

Another significant area of concern for DNA-targeting anticancer drugs is their mutagenic nature. Because drugs such as cisplatin or alkylating drugs interact directly with DNA, its mutagenic nature can contribute to the development of secondary malignancies.

Tumor-specific lytic path provides solution through genetic specificity

The problem facing current cancer therapy is not the lack of cytotoxic drugs per se but the lack of cytotoxic drugs that are tumor-specific. Indeed, the vast majority of drugs administered today as part of chemotherapy are capable of lysing cancer cells. Yet,upon administration, their propensity to cause side effects presents a major impediment as it incurs a debilitating effect and preempts dose-escalation necessary to eliminate recurrent cancers. The prevailing view is that the cytotoxicity results from their ability to interfere with cell cycle progression—hence, leading to the death of cancer cells as well as normal cells that divide.

Yet, this view may have oversimplified the scenario. First, pharmacologically, many of these drugs were isolated based on their ability to lyse cancer cells, not normal cells.The key amongst them is Taxol, which was isolated after screening various plant extracts for a tumor suppressing potential. Second, physiologically, many of these drugs represent a part of the host's defense repertoire against invading microorganisms—hence, were not designed to inflict damage on normal cells. Third,clinically, these drugs can achieve a cure in a minor subset of cancer patients despite that both the responders and nonresponders suffer side effects. These discrepancies have led to the speculation that the anti-tumor mechanism of these drugs may be distinct from the mechanism underlying their side effects, which ultimately led to the elucidation of a tumor-specific lytic path.

During 1996-1999, while working on the mechanism through which antimicrotubule drugs like taxol induce chromosomal aneuploidy, a tumor-specific lytic path targeting G1 checkpoint defective human cancers was discovered by serendipity (Figure 1). The tumor-specific lytic path ‘‘hyperploid progression mediated death'' is specific for RB or p53 genetic mutants that are defective in DNA damage checkpoint for the G1 phase[12]. Through its elucidation, the principle of tumor-specific cytotoxic therapy,which is based on the genetics of human cancer, was established. Previously, the lytic path was mentioned in a biological context[26]. Subsequently, the events that led to its discovery were chronicled in the book “Multiple Drug Resistance”[13]. More significantly, for cancer therapy, it provided a mechanistic framework for developing cytotoxic drugs devoid of side effects by conferring tumor specificity at the genetic level.

Universal inactivation of the Rb pathway in human cancers

The genetic basis of human cancers was elucidated through the identification of the prototypic tumor suppressor gene Rb, whose inactivation predisposes to the development of retinoblastoma[27]. The underlying genetic mechanism was proposed by A. Knudsen, who suggested that its dominant pattern of inheritance could be explained through the late inactivation of the remaining wild-type allele in a hereditary case harboring a mutant allele[28]. It also suggested that the sporadic cases may take a longer period to develop tumors due to the time it takes to acquire mutations in both wild-type alleles.

The retinoblastoma susceptibility gene was identified through molecular cloning,which was conducted in several laboratories[3,29,30]. The humanRbgene consists of 27 exons and the germline and somatic mutations may occur throughout its coding region as well as the promoter[6,31]. The delineation of the RB gene structure has significantly advanced our ability to manage retinoblastoma clinically through genetic diagnosis[32]. Subsequent investigations documented the occurrence ofRbgene mutation in various human cancer types including breast cancer, prostate cancer,osteosarcoma, non-small cell lung cancer (＞ 80%), and brain cancer[6,33-35].

Rb protein (also known as RB1) is a key component of mammalian DNA damage checkpoint that monitors the integrity of DNA and blocks cell cycle progression past the G1 (or S) phase in the event of DNA damage. The arrest at G1 is critical as it renders time to repair damaged DNA and avoid replicating mutated DNA. The step mediated by Rb represents a focal point where growth regulatory signals transduced through mitogen-activated protein kinase/ extracellular signal-regulated kinase or phosphatase and tensin homolog/AKT pathway as well as mitogenic signals initiated by epidermal growth factor receptor or ERBB2 (also known as Her2) converge to modulate cell proliferation--hence, giving rise to the concept that Rb represents the center of cell cycle control.

Nevertheless, the exact molecular mechanism through which Rb executes G1 arrest remains incompletely understood[36]. The binding of Rb to DNA-affinity columns suggested that Rb's intracellular function may be regulatory in nature, which was confirmed by its role in regulating gene transcription[4,37,38].

Figure 1 Side effects are distinct from the anticancer mechanism. An exemplary case concerning taxol is depicted. TSLP: Tumor-specific lytic path; >:Greater than microbutule-disruping dose; =: Equivalent to microtubule-disrupting dose; <: Lesser than microtubule-disrupting dose; NSP: Nonspecific.

Figure 2 Structural analysis of human retinoblastoma protein. A: 3D structure of the inactive retinoblastoma protein pocket domain of retinoblastoma-1(PDB ID: 4ELL). The model was generated using PyMol molecular graphics system, version 1.2r3pre, Schr?dinger, LLC. B: Structures (or structural model) of phosphorylated retinoblastoma. The model shows the protein dimer as observed in the asymmetric crystal unit for retinoblastomaPL-P. The structural coordinates for PDB ID 4ELL were downloaded from the NIH protein database. PyMol was used to re-enter the image of the model as shown. Rb: Retinoblastoma.

Critical insight into the Rb function was obtained upon uncovering its propensity to form oligomers through self-interaction[8,9]. The observation that cellular Rb exists as a dimer in the cell lysate confirmed its oligomerization potential[10]. A 3-dimensional model showing Rb protein dimer as observed in the asymmetric crystal unit for RbPL-Pis shown (Figure 2). The crystal structure (2.0 ?) of an Rb construct containing “pocket domain” with the phosphoserine-mimetic (S608E) and a shortened RbPL (large loop within the pocket domain) was solved by Burkeet al[39]viacrystallizing RbPL-P(representing Rb380-787Δ616-642/S608E/S612A/S780A) that binds E2FTD(transactivating domain of E2F) with a lesser affinity, suggesting that the glutamate substitution mimics phosphorylated S608. Rb's post-translational modificationviaphosphorylation, which was uncovered through the identification of cyclin-dependent kinase recognition motifs in the Rb polypeptide sequence, was shown to negatively regulate Rb self-interaction[11]. These findings suggested that Rb may form a higherordered structurein vivoto execute G1 arrest.

The central role of Rb in regulating cell cycling stems from the post-translational modification of Rb by various cyclin-dependent kinases, which occurs progressively as cells transit from the G1 to the M phase. These include Cdk4 and Cdk6 in the G1 phase and Cdk2 in the S phase whose activities require associating with distinct cyclins. The activities of specific Cdks are further modulated through complexing with other factors such as p14Artand p16, with the latter representing a distinct tumor suppressor.The activity of Cdk2 is inhibited by p21Cip1/Waf1, whose transcription is regulated by p53,which is mutated in nearly 50% of all human cancers. Additionally, the oncogenic proteins encoded by viruses such as papillomavirus and adenovirus target Rb to promote cell proliferation. As many as 200 cellular proteins may interact with Rb,including E2F regulating the transcription of genes involved in S phase activities that bind to the pocket domain. The above “Rb pathway” is inactivated in nearly all human cancers.

Triggering of hyperploid progression mediated death in Rb mutant human cancer cells

Hyperploid progression occurs due to continued cell cycle progression without cytokinesis. Briefly, disruption of the mitotic spindle by antimicrotubule drugs activates spindle checkpoint, a component of M phase DNA damage checkpoint, to induce M arrest. After a transient M-arrest, the treated cells re-enter the cell cycle (due to mitotic slippage) without cytokinesis to eventually become re-arrested at a “G1-like” phase in Rb-retaining cells. In cells lacking Rb, however, the treated cells continue with DNA replication, resulting in hyperploidy. Continued treatment with the antimicrotubule drug leads to the death of the hyperploid cells.

Experimental evidence for the triggering of hyperploid progression mediated death in RB-mutant human cancer cells is shown. WERI-1 is a human retinoblastoma cell line lacking both RB alleles[40]. Continued treatment of WERI-1 cells with the antimicrotubule drug nocodazole led to the death of hyperploid cells induced(Figure 3).

Triggering of hyperploid progression mediated death by antimicrotubule drugs

After the initial report by Honget al[12]in July of 1999, multiple other reports followed providing additional evidence for hyperploid progression mediated death. The first category of such reports used antimicrotubule drugs as the inducer.

In August of the same year, Casenghiet al[41]of the University of La Sapienza in Italy reported the propensity of K562 cells lacking p53 to undergo hyperploid progression before dying following the nocodazole treatment. In the report, polyploidization was confirmedviain situ hybridization using chromosome-specific pericentromeric probes.Their exit after a transient M arrest was confirmed by assessing the cyclin B1 or MPM-2 level and the re-initiation of DNA replication was detected by flow cytometric analysis of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd)-incorporated cells.

In September of the same year, Verdoodtet al[42]of Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium reported that a positive correlation exists between the extent of polyploidization induced by nocodazole and the level of apoptosis.

In 2001, Tsuikiet al[43]of Kumamoto University in Japan reported that U251MG cells containing mutant p53 undergo hyperploid progression (＞ 4N or 8N peak appeared)before dying (sub-2N or 0-1N peak detected) as monitored by flow cytometry. The authors also showed that enhancing hyperploid progression through the broad-range protein kinase inhibitor Staurosporine causes a greater extent of lethality in U251MG cells.

In the same year, Cassinelliet al[44]of instituto Nazionale per lo studio e la Cura dei tumori in Italy also reported that treatment of p53-mutant human ovarian cancer IGROV-1/Pt1 cells, p53-deficient human prostate carcinoma P3 cells, or Saos-2 with taxol or its analog integrated digital network 5109 led to hyperploid progression and death.

In a separate report by Lanziet al[45]of Instituto Nazionale per lo studio e la Cura dei tumori in Italy, the death of PC3 cells undergoing hyperploid progression following taxol treatment was directly shown using the TUNEL/PI double-staining method.

In 2002, Emory University reported that altering microtubule by noscapine caused murine melanoma B16S9 cells to undergo hyperploid progression before dying.

In 2012, Qiet al[46]of Showa Pharmaceutical University in Japan showed that pseudolaric acid B induces hyperploid progression, resulting in mitotic catastrophe before apoptosis in murine fibrosarcoma L929 cells. Pseudolaric acid B is a microtubule destabilizing agent found in the bark of pseudolarix kaempferi Gorden (pinaceae) tree in central China, which was used for treating fungal infection.

Triggering of hyperploid progression mediated death by alternate therapeutics

Figure 3 Nocodazole triggers hyperploid progression mediated death in retinoblastoma-mutant WERI-1 retinoblastoma cells. A DNA content flow cytometric histogram of WERI-1 cells continuously treated with nocodazole (Noc; 0.415 μmol/L) for the duration (1 d, 24 h; 4 d, 96 h) is shown. Cells (5 ×105) were treated as indicated, harvested using trypsin and fixed in 70% ethanol. To determine DNA content per cell, propidium (100 Kunitz units/mL) and RNase A(50 μg/mL) were added and assayed using Beckton Dickinson flow cytometry. Persistent treatment with nocodazole led to the death of hyperploid cells induced. RB:Retinoblastoma.

The second category of reports used antimitotic agents other than antimicrotubule drugs as the inducer of hyperploid progression mediated death. In 2003, Ditchfieldet al[47]of the University of Manchester and AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals in England reported that ZM447439-treated HeLa cells undergo hyperploid progression and die.ZM447439 is an inhibitor of Aurora B kinase.

In 2004, Harringtonet al[48]of Vertex Pharmaceuticals in England reported that treatment of HeLa cells or human breast cancer MCF-7 cells with VX-680 (tozasertib),which targets aurora kinase (see below) causes them to undergo hyperploid progression before dying. The exit from M phase of VX-680 treated cancer cells were monitored by assessing the cyclin B1 level. DNA replication occurring without the prior cytokinesis, leading to ＞ 4N cells, was also described.

In the same year, Gizatullinet al[49]of Dana Farber Cancer Institute at Harvard Medical School reported that VX-680 triggers hyperploid progression before death in human non-small cell lung cancer A549 cells with a deficient level of p53-induced p21cip1/waf1. They also were able to document that cells undergoing hyperploid progression were dyingviaapoptosis[49].

In 2005, Taoet al[50]of Merck Research Laboratories reported that treating human ovarian cancer A2780 cells with KSP-IA causes hyperploid progression and death.KSP-IA is an inhibitor of Eg5, a member of the kinesin-5 family that plays a critical role in chromosome segregation by maintaining spindle bipolarity. Eg5 functions as a molecular motor that slides along microtubule tracks within cells.

In 2006, Dijkhuiset al[51]of University Medical Center Gronigen in the Netherlands reported that treating with PDMP (D,L-threo-1-phenyl-2-decanoylamino-3-morpholino-1-propanol) sensitizes neuroblastoma cells to paclitaxel by triggering hyperploidy. PDMP is an inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase that suppresses sphingolipid biosynthesis.

In the same year, Chinet al[52]of the DNAX Research Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology Research Institute reported that treating M checkpoint-suppressed HeLa cells with monasterol causes hyperploid progression and death. Monasterol is an inhibitor of kinesin-5.

In 2007, New York Medical College reported that treatment of human prostate cancer PC-3, CWR22Rv1, or DU-145 cells with Reversine causes polyploidyviasuppressing cyclin B or Cdk1, resulting in growth arrest.

In 2008, D'Aliseet al[53]of the European Institute of Oncology in Italy reported that the synthetic purine reversine inhibits the aurora kinase and induces hyperploid progression and death in human colon cancer HCT116 cells.

In the same year, Haufet al[54]of Research Institute of Molecular Pathology in Austria reported that treating HeLa cells with hesperadin, which also targets aurora kinase, causes them to undergo hyperploid progression before dying. Flow cytometry showed the emergence of hyperploidy peak (8N and 16N) preceding the appearance of dead cells[54].

In 2018, Chenget al[55]of Peking University in China demonstrated that the treatment of human renal carcinoma cells with Reversine led to polyploidy formation and caspase-dependent cell death.

Current pharmacological approaches targeting RB or p53 mutants

In the case of p53, its mutant form may impart oncogenic properties to the affected cell. Nevertheless, various molecularly targeted approaches for treating p53-mutant cancers have been developed[56]. For RB, its loss is associated with enhanced efficacy for ionizing radiation therapy, chemotherapeutics such as cisplatin or adriamycin[57].

In 2018, Knudsenet al[57]of Thomas Jefferson University screened for therapeutic agents that may exhibit synthetic lethality with Rb loss. They found that drugs inhibiting checkpoint kinase1 (CHK1) or polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) kinase exhibit greater lethality inRbmutant tumors. The finding raises the potential of treating triple-negative breast cancers with dysfunctional Rb[58]. CHK1 encodes a serine/threonine kinase whose activation initiates cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage during S, G2, and M phases. PLK1 is a serine/threonine kinase that activates cdc25C, which in turn activates cyclin B/cdc2 complex through dephosphorylation, as well as anaphase-promoting complex to transit from G2 to M phase.

In 2019, Gomaaet al[59]of the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine showed that reconstituting the microRNA, miR-4715--3p, reduced aurora kinase A level in MKN45 gastric cancer cells, resulting in chromosome polyploidy and cell death. miR-4715--3p is an epigenetic regulator that downregulates aurora kinase A expression by binding to the 3'-untranslated region of its mRNA for degradation[59].

In the same year, Sunet al[60]of the National Cancer Institute demonstrated that genetically silencing INCENP (Inner centromere protein) in neuroblastoma cells induces polyploidy and apoptosis. TheINCENPgene encodes a key scaffolding component of chromosomal passenger complex consisting of survivin, aurora kinase B, borealin, and INCENP, which oversees proper alignment and segregation of chromosomes and cytokinesis during mitosis.

Additionally, Zhenget al[61]of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center showed that treating lung cancer cells with a highly selective tyrosine threonine kinase inhibitor, CFI-402257, causes aneuploidy and apoptosis. TTK (also called Mps1) or tyrosine threonine kinase is a component of mammalian spindle assembly checkpoint, which is integral to maintaining chromosome integrity.

In 2020, Simon Serranoet al[62]of the Lund University in Sweden reported that inhibiting Mps1 kinase (mitotic kinase monopolar spindle 1) induces hyperploid progression mediated death in neuroblastoma cells. The mechanism of death in Mps1 inhibited cells involves transiting through polyploidization/aneuploidization before the onset of mitotic catastrophe[62].

Combination therapy targeting RB or p53 mutants

In 2010, Charité-Universit?tsmedizin Berlin in Germany determined that combining the aurora kinase inhibitor ZM447439 significantly improves the antiproliferative effects of the chemotherapeutic drug cisplatin and streptozocin. For the study, the authors employed gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor cells.

In 2017, Czech Academy of Sciences in the Czech Republic examined the effect of combining CHK1 kinase inhibitor SCH900776 with the DNA crosslinking drug cisplatin or platinum (IV)-LA-12 complexes in treating colon cancer. In p53 or p21 deficient cells, the combination therapy increased mitotic slippage, leading to polyploidy. Further, the delayed death caused by the drug combination in p53 deficient cells was accelerated by p21 deficiency[63].

In the same year, Bressyet al[64]of Université Paris-Saclay in France assessed the therapeutic efficacy of combining oncolytic adenovirus containing delta-24 deletion in the E1A gene with valproic acid, a histone deacetylase inhibitor for colon carcinoma.Previously, it was shown that E1A interacts with Rb; thus, the recombinant virus may selectively replicate in Rb-deficient cancer cells but not in normal cells expressing wild-type Rb. The co-treatment led to polyploidy with increased H2AX phosphorylation indicative of DNA damage, as well as elevated cell death[64].

In 2018, Kawakamiet al[65]of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center reported that treating with CFI-400945, which inhibits polo-like kinase 4 regulating centriole duplication, causes polyploidy and mitotic defect, resulting in the death of lung cancer cells. Further, it was shown to cooperate with the Cdk2 inhibitor seliciclib[65].

In 2019, Gonget al[66]of Eli Lilly and Company showed that cell cycle inhibitors targeting aurora kinase B exhibit synthetic lethality withRbmutant. LY3295668 is an inhibitor of Aurora kinase but exhibits with ＞ 1000-fold selectivity against Aurora kinase B. Further, prolonged treatment was possible due to little toxicity against bone marrow[66].

A recent report in 2020 by Liuet al[67]of Kaohsiung Medical University in Taiwan showed that treating non-small-cell lung cancer cells with 4-HPPP [4-(4-(4-hydroxyphenoxy) phenoxy) phenol] caused polyploidy-specific cell death. The treatment resulted in cellular aneuploidization accompanied by the activation of double-strand DNA break markers such as Ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated and Rad3-related and gamma-H2AX. Previously, the phenoxyphenol derivatives have been suggested to sensitize the lung cancer cells to the topoisomerase inhibitor camptothecin by reducing the apoptosis-inducing threshold[68].

In the same year, Jemaàet al[69]of Lund University in Sweden described that treating tetraploid colon cancer cells with PLK1 inhibitor caused mitotic slippage, followed by apoptosis. Further, combining PLK1 inhibitor with vincristine or colchicine resulted in greater lethality, demonstrating a synergistic effect.

CONCLUSION

With the event of targeted therapy, an enormous capital has been spent by pharmaceutical industries on developing drugs that inhibit oncogenic signaling pathways. Equally staggering is the amount of federal funds allocated to assess their clinical efficacy. Yet, for the most part, benefits have been incremental. In the case of anti-ErbB2 drugs, only a modest gain in overall survival was achieved after combining with chemotherapy. With the PI3K inhibiting drugs, a similar outcome was observed upon combining with anti-hormone therapy for advanced-stage breast cancer. Besides,the cytostatic nature of these drugs may require perennial treatment, which may not be ideal as cancer cells could acquire genetic mutations to become resistant. Against this backdrop, the elucidation of “hyperploid progression mediated death” targetingRborp53mutants assumes greater significance as it provides an opportunity to develop cytotoxic drugs with tumor specificity at the genetic level, thereby eliminating side effects.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We are grateful to Tri Ngo for assistance with computer-based molecular modeling.Also acknowledged are the faculties at Johns Hopkins University, U. C. Berkeley,Baylor University, Davidson College (alma mater of United States president Woodrow Wilson, Nobel Prize 1919), Hollywood High School (alma mater of Hollywood classics actors, ex. Judy Garland in ‘‘The Wizard of Oz''), clinical staff (U. C. San Francisco),and actress in 'The Flying Nun' (Warner Bros. Pictures, Hollywood). City of Hope National Medical Center (National Comprehensive Cancer Network member) was established partly through the assistance of Hollywood's film industries (ex. Warner Bros. Pictures), supported by Hollywood's renown figures (Frank Sinatra, Bob Hope,Ella Fitzgerald,etc.), visited by United States First Lady Eleanor (Franklin D. Roosevelt presidency), United States presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Queen Elizabeth II (United Kingdom), graced by Pope John Paul II (Vatican, Italy), and supported by numerous distinguished individuals/industries. Its Beckman Research Institute was established by A. Beckman (California Institute of Technology; Beckman Instruments).