• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Genetic Relationship and Structure Analysis of Root Growth Angle for Improvement of Drought Avoidance in Early and Mid-Early Maturing Rice Genotypes

    2020-04-01 16:24:20ElssaPANDITRajendraKumarPANDAAuromeeraSAHOODiptiRanjanPANISharatKumarPRADHAN
    Rice Science 2020年2期

    Elssa PANDIT , Rajendra Kumar PANDA , Auromeera SAHOO Dipti Ranjan PANI,Sharat Kumar PRADHAN

    (1Crop Improvement Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha 753006, India; 2Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India; 3ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resource Base Center, National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha 753006, India; #These authors contributed equally to this work)

    Abstract: Deeper rooting 1 (Dro1) and Deeper rooting 2 (Dro2) are the QTLs that contribute considerably to root growth angle assisting in deeper rooting of rice plant. In the present study, a set of 348 genotypes were shortlisted from rice germplasm based on root angle study. Screening results of the germplasm lines under drought stress identified 25 drought tolerant donor lines based on leaf rolling, leaf drying,spikelet fertility and single plant yield. A panel containing 101 genotypes was constituted based on screening results and genotyped using Dro1 and Dro2 markers. Structure software categorized the genotypes into four sub-populations with different fixation index values for root growth angle. The clustering analysis and principal coordinate analysis could differentiate the genotypes with or without deeper rooting trait. The dendrogram constructed based on the molecular screening for deep rooting QTLs showed clear distinction between the rainfed upland cultivars and irrigated genotypes. Eleven genotypes, namely Dular, Tepiboro, Surjamukhi, Bamawpyan, N22, Dinorado, Karni, Kusuma, Bowdel,Lalsankari and Laxmikajal, possessed both the QTLs, whereas 67 genotypes possessed only Dro1. The average angle of Dro positive genotypes ranged from 82.7° to 89.7°. These genotypes possessing the deeper rooting QTLs can be taken as donor lines to be used in marker-assisted breeding programs.

    Key words: root growth angle; Dro1; Dro2; deeper rooting; upland rice; drought avoidance

    Rice is the most important food crop for more than half of the world population. The global population is increasing and expected to reach 9 billion by the middle of the twenty-first century. The targeted food production needs to be increased even from the droughtprone areas with a hike of 40% from this crippled ecosystem by 2025 (Pennisi, 2008). Drought is a major limitation in obtaining higher productivity from rainfed rice cultivation (Bernier et al, 2009; Panda et al, 2016; Barik et al, 2018). It affects the crop at vegetative and reproductive growth stages. Under water stress, genotypes showing delay in leaf rolling and faster recovery from the stress are required for drought breeding (Singh and Mackill, 1991). During vegetative stage, leaf rolling and leaf drying are good criteria of screening drought tolerance (Chang et al,1974; Farooq et al, 2010; Singh et al, 2012). Drought stress during reproductive stage is most critical as it causes low yield due to higher proportion of unfilled grains in the panicles (Hsiao et al, 1976; Kumar et al,2006; Davatgar et al, 2009; Singh et al, 2012; Kumar et al, 2015; Torres and Henry, 2018; Barik et al, 2019).

    Rice plant is a shallow rooting type relative to other cereal crops and hence is sensitive to moisture stress in the soil. Deep rooting may assist plants to avoid drought-induced stress by extracting water from deep soil layers (Yoshida and Hasegawa, 1982; Fukai and Cooper, 1995). Kondo et al (2000) showed low moisture stress to rice plants under vertical root distribution in upland condition. The genetic control of deep rooting in rice was confirmed by Uga et al (2011). To improve drought avoidance in rice, introducing the deeprooting characteristic into shallow-rooting cultivars is considered one of the most promising breeding strategies. To date, only one quantitative trait locus(QTL) responsible for deep rooting namely Dro1 on chromosome 9 has been cloned in rice (Uga et al,2011, 2013a). qSOR1, a QTL for soil surface rooting on chromosome 7 (Uga et al, 2012), Dro2 on chromosome 4 (Uga et al, 2013b) and Dro3 on chromosome 7 (Kitomi et al, 2015) have been mapped.Genotypic variation contributes considerably to root growth angle in rice cultivars with functional Dro1 allele along with other major QTLs such as Dro2,Dro4 and Dro5, and with several additional minor QTLs (Kitomi et al, 2015). Hence, screening of germplasm lines with deep rooting and subsequent utilization as donor in the superior background is essential for upland rice improvement program.

    The effects of climate change are considerably harse to rice crop particularly on soil moisture stress. As per earlier estimate, about 50% of global rice production is affected by drought (Bouman et al, 2005). The intensity and distribution of rainfall is erratic, and as a result, rice crop faces drastic soil moisture stress in the course of production (Kang et al, 2009; McKersie,2015; Yang et al, 2018). Deployment of identified donors and molecular markers in marker-assisted breeding for deeper rooting trait will be benificial in avoiding soil moisture stress. In addition, irrigated rice consumes a lot of water for rice production. Deep rooted high yielding varieties will require less water compared to shallow rooted irrigated rice varieties.

    Dro1 gene was cloned and identified by comparing the putative region (LOC_Os09g26840) of Kinadong Patong with that of IR64 revealing a single 1-bp deletion within exon 4 in IR64 leading to introduction of premature stop codon (Uga et al, 2013a). Therefore,this gene loses its phenotypic expression for root growth angle in IR64. Dro1 gene is an early-auxin response gene regulated by auxin response factors and is negatively regulated by auxin. It expresses around the root meristem tissues enhancing the cell elongation at the root tip, causing asymmetric root growth and downward root bending in response to gravity controlling the root angle. Over-expression of Dro1 increases deeper rooting. Dro1 explains around 66%of phenotypic variance for ratio of deep rooting(RDR). In addition to Dro1, another QTL Dro2 contributes around 32% to 56% of the total variance in different populations (Uga et al, 2013a, b). Incorporating these two QTLs into swallow rooting cultivar can be useful for increasing the deeper rooting trait. Although Dro3, Dro4 and Dro5 were reported for root growth angle, extensive study has not been done for their consistency in different populations. However, Dro1 and Dro2 are reported to be consistent among populations conferring effect towards root growth angle and gravitropic curvature. Hence, the present investigation aimed to characterize 348 diverse rice germplasm lines for selection of drought avoidance donors through root growth angle study using Dro1 and Dro2 QTLs and further for classifying of the panel population into different sub-populations using various population genetic analyses for the trait.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Seed materials and field screening

    A set of 348 genotypes from rice germplasm were shortlisted based on early and mid-early maturing genotypes, which were acquired from eight rice growing countries of the world (Supplemental Table 1). Traits namely leaf rolling and leaf drying during vegetative stage as well as spikelet fertility and single plant yield at reproductive stage were investigated.The 348 germplasm lines were direct seeded in an augmented block design with 8 blocks and 4 check varieties (N22, Dular, IR64 and IR20) with three rows of 4.5 m length each at spacing of 20 cm × 15 cm between hills during dry season of 2015. The experimental materials were exposed to a minimum of 15 and 7 d rainless during vegetative and reproductive stages, respectively for drought scoring. IRRI standard evaluation system (IRRI, 2013) was followed to score the genotypes. From the 348 genotypes again, a panel for genotyping and precise phenotyping for root growth angle was prepared based on leaf rolling and leaf drying during vegetative stage, and spikelet fertility and single plant yield during reproductive stage of the germplasm lines.

    Genomic DNA extraction

    Genomic DNA was extracted after crushing young leaves in liquid nitrogen using CTAB extraction buffer(100 mmol/L Tris-HCl with pH of 8.0, 20 mmol/L EDTA with pH of 8.0, 2% CTAB and 1.3 mol/L NaCl)and chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction, followed by RNAase treatment and ethanol precipitation. DNA concentration was estimated by agarose gel electrophoresis taking lambda DNA as standard. Each sample was diluted to approximately 25 ng/μL.

    Polymerase chain reaction for amplification of Dro markers

    DNA amplification was performed in a Gradient Thermal Cycler (Verity, Applied BioSciences, USA)with a reaction volume of 20 μL, containing 1.5 mmol/L Tris-HCL (pH 8.75), 50 mmol/L KCl, 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.1% TrotonX-100, 200 μmol/L each of dATP, dCTP, dTTP, dGTP, 4 pmol of each forward and reverse primers, 1 unit of Taq polymerase and 30 ng of genomic DNA. The reaction mixture was first denatured for 4 min at 94 °C and then subjected to 35 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 94 °C, 1 min annealing at 57 °C-62 °C, and 1 min extension at 72 °C; and then a final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. A set of nine specific and flanking markers for Dro QTLs were used (Supplemental Table 2). Four flanking markers,ID07_14 and RM24393 on upstream and ID7_17 and RM7424 on downstream of the Dro1 QTL, were deployed for the locus. In addition to these flanking markers, four specific markers for Dro1 gene, viz.Dro1-CAPS5, Dro1-INDEL, SNP02-KP and SNP02-IR64, were used.

    Visualization of PCR product

    DNA products from PCR amplification were loaded in 2.5%-3.0% gel containing 0.8 g/mL ethidium bromide for electrophoresis in 1× TBE (pH 8.0). One lane was loaded with 50 bp DNA ladder. The gel was run at 2.5 V/cm for 4 h and photographed using a Gel Documentation System (SynGene, UK).

    Data analysis

    Data were scored for computer analysis on the basis of the presence or absence of the amplified products for each genotype-primer combination. The data entry was done into a binary data matrix as discrete variables.Dendrogram was constructed with unweighted pair group method arithmatic average (UPGMA) algorithm using DARwin5 software (Perrier and Jacquemoud-Collet, 2006). STRUCTURE 2.3.4 software was used for data analysis to obtain possible population structure(Pritchard et al, 2000). The model choice criterion to detect the most probable value of K was ΔK, an ad-hoc quantity related to the second-order change of the log probability of data with respect to the number of clusters inferred by STRUCTURE (Evanno et al,2005). Structure Harvester was used for estimation of the ΔK value (Earl and Von, 2012). The principal coordinate analysis was performed following Pandit et al(2016) and Pradhan et al (2016).

    Phenotyping for root angle in rice

    The primary root angle was measured by using agarose-glass box method following Uga et al (2013a)with minor modifications. The de-husked seeds were pre-soaked for 3-4 h. These seeds were carefully transferred to 0.4% agarose in semi solid state in a glass box and then the agarose was allowed to solidify,after which the boxes were kept in dark at 30 °C. The root angle was measured at 24 and 48 h. The glass boxes were rotated at 60° angle for 4-6 h to check the gravitropic effect.

    RESULTS

    Field screening of germplasm lines for drought avoidance and tolerance under moderate drought stress condition

    The susceptible checks showed a score of ≥ 7 for leaf rolling and leaf drying during vegetative stage, and spikelet fertility (< 20%) and single plant yield (< 5 g)were considered for primary screening. Field screening results indicated that 29 germplasm lines were with score 1, 121 with score 3 and 114 with score 5 for leaf rolling (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Table 1). For leaf drying, 45 were with score 1, 161 with score 3 and 92 with score 5 (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Table 1). It was observed that spikelet fertility varied from 6.12% to 83.22% under moderate drought stress condition.Genotypes N22, Ac10914, Ac39973, Ac39890,Ac11261, Ac10984, CR2340-2, Ac39790, IR10C-167 and CR143-2-2 were with score 1 under the stress.Single plant yield varied from 1.26 g (IR20) to 14.42 g (Sahabhagi Dhan) under the stress, and 86 lines showed single plant yield more than 10 g (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Table 2). Screening results showed that 25 genotypes namely CR143-2-2, Dular, Satyabhama,Sahabhagi Dhan, IR83141-B-32-B, IR10C-161, Dinorado,IR64197-3B-15-2, N22, CR Dhan 202, Surjamukhi,Kutiarasi, Ac39973, Ac10976, Ac10925, Bowdel,Serety, Ac11261, Habigonj Boro 6, Anjali, IR10G-103, Ac39843, Ac10914, IR10C-103 and Karni are drought tolerant based on leaf rolling, leaf drying,spikelet fertility and single plant yield.

    Phenotyping for root angle trait in rice

    The gravitropic responses of the primary roots of the Dro positive genotypes along with the negative check were evaluated by using agarose-glass box method.The primary root angle in glass box containing 0.4%agarose indicated that genotypes Bowdel, Lalsankari,N22, Dular, Tepiboro and Surjamukhi had almost vertical roots while the angle was much less in susceptible variety, IR64 (Fig. 2). The average primary root angle in the Dro positive genotypes varied from 65° to 90°.However, the negative check IR64 exhibited an average root angle of 54°, whereas IR20 showed root angle of 56°. These results revealed that our candidate genotypes may contain Dro1 QTL(s). After the trays were rotated 60°, the majority of the Dro positive genotypes continued to extend and bend in the direction of gravity within 4-6 h. The gravitropic response of the genotypes is presented in Fig. 3-A.The mean root angle of the genotypes having both Dro1 and Dro2 ranged from 82.7° to 89.7° (Fig. 3-B).The Dro positive genotypes showed similar root angle in response to gravitropic effect as observed in case of primary root angle. However, sometimes the seminal roots of the Dro negative genotypes were irregular before and after rotation. These results suggested that the primary roots of the Dro positive genotypes showed normal gravitropic response.

    Genotyping of panel population using deeper rooting markers

    Nine markers (Supplemental Table 2) were used to amplify Dro1 and Dro2 loci in the panel containing 101 genotypes including negative checks. The popular variety IR64 was taken as the negative check for both Dro loci (Uga et al, 2011). Four flanking markers and four specific markers for Dro1 gene were used for amplification of 67 genotypes to be positive for the QTL (Supplemental Table 3). The marker ID07-14 showed the target band of 174 bp in 84 genotypes(Supplemental Fig. 1), whereas ID7-17 showed 220 bp band in 59 genotypes (Supplemental Table 3). A 557-bp amplicon for Dro1 was obtained with an SSR marker RM24393 in 70 genotypes, whereas RM7424 amplified the expected band of 82 bp in 83 genotypes.The marker SNP02-KP which is specific for Kinadong Patong Dro1 could be observed in 76 genotypes and these genotypes were negative for SNP02-IR64 confirming the presence of Dro1 gene. These genotypes were also observed to be positive for Dro1-INDEL and Dro1-CAPS5 markers (Supplemental Table 3). Considering all these marker data, a total of 67 genotypes were found to possess Dro1 QTL(Supplemental Table 3).

    The major QTL Dro2, reported for deeper rooting,was used for screening the panel population using a closely linked marker RM6089. The expected size of the amplicon i.e. 170 bp was obtained in 12 genotypes(Supplemental Table 3 and Supplemental Fig. 2). The IR64 allele of 165 bp was obtained in 89 genotypes.Eleven genotypes viz., Dular, Tepiboro, Surjamukhi,Bamawpyan, N22, Dinorado, Karni, Kusuma, Bowdel,Lalsankari and Laxmikajal, were positive for both Dro1 and Dro2 loci (Supplemental Table 3).

    Population structure, principal coordinate and clustering analyses

    The population structure of the genotypes was estimated by using STRUCTURE 2.3.4 software following Bayesian clustering approach (Pritchard et al, 2000).By taking higher ΔK-value, four sub-populations were observed (Fig. 4). The four sub-populations were obtained at ΔK value of 43.3 with K = 4 (Fig. 4-A).Maximum allele frequency divergence between the two sub-populations (net nucleotide distance) was 0.1425, 0.843, 0.1425 and 0.9838 for clusters 1 and 3,clusters 1 and 4, clusters 2 and 3, and clusters 3 and 4,respectively. The average distances (expected heterozygosity) between individuals in clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 0.0004, 0.0004, 0.0013 and 0.0148, respectively.The four sub-populations showed fixation index values (Fst) of 0.966, 0.965, 0.962 and 0.957,respectively. A lower value of α (0.0271) was detected in the studied panel population. The distribution pattern of α-value in the panel population showed a leptokurtic symmetry while distribution of Fst values in the sub-populations were in symmetric shape with almost identical to the left and right from the centre.

    Principal coordinate analysis (PCA) was performed to determine the genetic relatedness among the genotypes with respect to the Dro loci (Fig. 5-A). The first two components (PC1 and PC2) accounted for 29.11% and 13.49% of total inertia, respectively. The 101 genotypes were distributed in all the four quadrants showing two major groups (Fig. 5-A). The 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quadrants consisted 37, 31, 18 and 15 genotypes, respectively. The genotypes having Dro1 or Dro2 locus or both were placed in the 1st (top right) and 2nd (bottom right) quadrants, whereas the negative genotypes were placed in the rest two quadrants, i.e. 3rd and 4th quadrants (Fig. 5-A).However, Hongzui El was placed along with the negative ones in the 4th quadrant, whereas Dhobosankari and Basaramatia were placed in the 2nd quadrant along with the positive genotypes. These three genotypes showed inconsistent response for Dro1 specific markers.

    The clustering analysis of the genotypes based on the molecular screening for Dro1 and Dro2 could separate out the tolerant rainfed upland cultivars and the irrigated ecosystem genotypes. The irrigated genotypes IR64 and IR20 that had been taken as negative check together formed a distinct branch in dendrogram (Fig. 5-B). Eight genotypes namely Tepiboro, Bamawpyan, Surjamukhi, N22, Karni,Bowdel, Lalsankri and Laxmikajal, positive for both Dro1 and Dro2, formed distinct cluster (green),whereas Dular, Dinorado and Kusuma having both the QTLs were placed along with the other genotypes.The genotypes having Dro1 gene only formed two distinct clusters (red) accommodating 49 genotypes(Fig. 5-B). Seven genotypes namely Khaodaw,Vanaprabha, Menkasala, Hazaridhan, Khandagiri,Blackgora and Tawadhan were placed separately from the aforesaid 49 genotypes having Dro1 gene.

    DISCUSSION

    This study provides a novel survey for presences of Dro1 and Dro2 among diverse rice varieties and landraces. Better donor lines having deeper rooting system were identified for drought stress tolerance.The markers employed showed that eleven genotypes possessed both the QTLs. These genotypes were drought tolerant at both vegetative and reproductive stages based on our field screening trial (Supplemental Table 1). All these eleven landraces are very good donors for upland rice breeding program. Besides,these donor lines are also being cultivated in some areas of the country.

    Deep rooting is a beneficial strategy against drought stress in rice (Yoshida and Hasegawa, 1982; Fukai and Cooper, 1995). Under drought stress, rice plant shows leaf rolling, leaf senescence, reduced plant height, stomatal closure, lower dry matter production and decreased leaf elongation (Farooq et al, 2010;Kumar et al, 2015). Previous study on root angle reveals the existence of genetic variation and its genetic control in rice (Uga et al, 2011). In our study,a majority (71.88%) of the genotypes were with Dro1 QTL on chromosome 9. Another major QTL Dro2 had been reported on chromosome 4 from Kinandang Patong, from which Dro1 was reported (Uga et al,2013a). Dro2 is reported to account for up to 56% of phenotypic variance for ratio of deep rooting in rice.RM6089 showed better linkage to Dro2 locus and consistency in different populations according to Uga et al (2013b). Hence, the present study used RM6089 for screening the genotypes. Only 12 genotypes,namely Laxmikajal, Tepiboro, Surjamukhi, Bamawpyan,Hongzui El, N22, Dular, Dinorado, Karni, Kusuma,Bowdel and Lalsankari, showed Kinandang Patong allele. This result revealed that Dro2 is not well distributed throughout the upland genotypes as the QTL Dro1. Dular was reported for deep rooting character with high drought tolerance (Kato et al,2006; Henry et al, 2011). The present study confirmed the presence of both Dro1 and Dro2 in Dular. Dro1 is present in genotypes like Sahabhagidhan, Pyari,Sadabahar, RR20, RR51-1, Habigonj boro 6 and RR354-1, indicating that deeper rooting trait can be incorporated in high yielding rice backgrounds.

    The dendrogram constructed based on the molecular screening for deep rooting QTLs showed clear distinction between the rainfed upland cultivars and irrigated genotypes. Although there is no such previous reports on classification of genotypes on the basis of Dro markers, similar study was conducted by Chin et al (2011) and Pandit et al (2018) where they had classified the upland, irrigated and lowland genotypes based on the phosphorous uptake 1 (Pup1)QTL specific markers. A few irrigated or aerobic genotypes like Kalinga-III, CR Dhan 204 and CR Dhan 202 were grouped separately whereas genotypes Pyari, CR Dhan 201 and Sahabhagidhan were grouped along with the upland genotypes. As dendrogram was constructed based on the presence of the Dro specific markers, it can be inferred that the aerobic ecosystem and some irrigated ecosystem genotypes may also possess these QTLs. The genotypes RR347-466, CR Dhan 204 and CR Dhan 202 were of negative inconsistency for most of the markers whereas IR64 and IR20 were negative for all.

    The panel population showed four sub-populations by structure analysis where the negative checks IR64 and IR20 formed a sub-group (SP4) (Fig. 4). The genotypes in sub-population 3 (SP3) included all the genotypes having Dro1 and Dro2 QTLs. SP1 and SP2 inferred ancestry values were almost equally distributed among the rest of the genotypes, which may be due to the presence of inconsistent positive/negative genotypes for Dro1 markers. However, the PCA analysis clearly distinguished the Dro positive and Dro negative/inconsistent genotypes. These analyses were able to identify the potential donor lines into separate groups.The genotypes possessing the two deeper rooting QTLs Dro1 and Dro2, grouped under SP3 in structure analysis, can be used as donor lines in breeding programs. More specifically, genotypes amplified by all the studied markers should be characterized and utilized in future. The α-value obtained for the panel population by structure analysis also revealed the domestication of Dro QTLs from common ancestor for adaption in rainfed ecosystem. Similar trend of evolution for high and low temperature stress are reported in rice (Pradhan et al, 2016; Pandit et al,2017).

    The gravitropic responses of the primary roots of the Dro positive genotypes along with the negative check indicated that genotypes Bowdel, Lalsankari,N22, Dular, Tepiboro and Surjamukhi had almost vertical roots, and their average angle ranged from 82.7° to 89.7°, while the angle was much less (54°) in the negative check IR64. These results suggested that our candidate genotypes may contain Dro QTL(s).IR64 NILs containing Dro1 QTL show almost vertical roots as compared to the normal one (Uga et al, 2013a;Kitomi et al, 2015), which is in agreement with our results. This indicated the potential of these genotypes to be used as donors in breeding programs.

    Upland rice ecosystem is generally deficient in phosphorus content. Dular, Tepiboro, Surjamukhi,Bamawpyan, N22, Dinorado, Karni, Bowdel and Lalsankari contain QTL Pup1 (Pandit et al, 2015,2018). The three QTLs Dro1, Dro2 and Pup1 are important for upland rice breeding and they need to be incorporated into a single high yielding genetic background. Kasalath is reported to contain Pup1 locus (Wissuwa, 2001; Chin et al, 2010; Pandit et al,2018). Moreover, in this study, we detected Deeper rooting1 locus, too. Bowdel, Lalsankari, Karni, Dinorado,N22, Bamawpyan, Tepiboro, Dular and Surjamukhi,can be used as common donor for upland breeding programs for improving both deeper rooting (Dro1 and Dro2) and phosphorous uptake (Pup1) in rice.

    Deep rooting may assist rice plants to avoid drought-induced stress by utilizing water from deeper soil. Dro1 and Dro2 are the QTLs that contribute considerably to the root growth angle assisting in deeper rooting of rice plant. Screening of 348 early and mid-early maturing germplasm lines for drought stress identified 25 drought tolerant germplasm lines.The representative panel containing 101 genotypes showed four sub-populations with different Fst values for root growth angle. The clustering analysis and principal coordinate analysis could differentiate the genotypes with or without deeper rooting trait. The dendrogram constructed based on the molecular screening for deep rooting QTLs showed clear distinction between the rainfed upland cultivars and irrigated genotypes. Eleven genotypes namely Dular,Tepiboro, Surjamukhi, Bamawpyan, N22, Dinorado,Karni, Kusuma, Bowdel, Lalsankari and Laxmikajal possessed both the QTLs, whereas 67 genotypes possessed only Dro1 QTL. The average angle of Dro positive genotypes ranged from 82.7° to 89.7°. These genotypes possessing the deeper rooting QTLs can be taken as donor lines to be used in marker-assisted breeding programs for incorporation of these QTLs into high yielding popular rainfed rice varieties.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The authors are highly grateful to the Director,ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, and Head,Crop Improvement Division, National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, India, for providing all the necessary facilities, and Department of Science and Technology,Govt. of India for providing financial support.

    SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

    The following materials are available in the online version of this article at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/16726308; http://www.ricescience.org.

    Supplemental Table 1. Leaf rolling, leaf drying, spikelet fertility and single plant yield of 348 early and mid-early duration germplasm lines under moderate drought stress.

    Supplemental Table 2. List of markers used in the study.

    Supplemental Table 3. Response of panel genotypes to Dro1 and Dro2 QTL/gene(s) using gene specific and flanking markers.

    Supplemental Fig. 1. Representative electrophoregram obtained with ID07_14 showing target band of 174 bp.

    Supplemental Fig. 2. Amplicons obtained with RM6089.

    99精品久久久久人妻精品| avwww免费| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av | av欧美777| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 成人手机av| 91麻豆av在线| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 看片在线看免费视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 国产又爽黄色视频| 97碰自拍视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 亚洲九九香蕉| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 午夜免费激情av| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 又大又爽又粗| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 成在线人永久免费视频| 99久久国产精品久久久| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 一级作爱视频免费观看| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 成年版毛片免费区| 天天影视国产精品| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 视频区图区小说| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3 | 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 久久亚洲真实| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 久久 成人 亚洲| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸 | 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久久久久久午夜电影 | 正在播放国产对白刺激| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影 | 91老司机精品| 不卡一级毛片| 日本黄色日本黄色录像| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 88av欧美| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产高清激情床上av| 美女午夜性视频免费| 国产成人精品在线电影| 性少妇av在线| 午夜91福利影院| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 午夜免费观看网址| 黄片大片在线免费观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 国产三级黄色录像| 性少妇av在线| 不卡av一区二区三区| 日本五十路高清| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产精品九九99| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 丁香六月欧美| 不卡av一区二区三区| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 不卡av一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产三级在线视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 成在线人永久免费视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 色在线成人网| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 久久人妻av系列| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 99国产精品99久久久久| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 国产三级黄色录像| 91成年电影在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| a级毛片黄视频| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 中文欧美无线码| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| avwww免费| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类 | 亚洲精品在线美女| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 电影成人av| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 久久久久久人人人人人| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 99热只有精品国产| 满18在线观看网站| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 国产亚洲欧美98| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 香蕉国产在线看| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲av美国av| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 天堂√8在线中文| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费 | 亚洲九九香蕉| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 精品国产一区二区久久| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 看免费av毛片| 丁香欧美五月| tocl精华| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 在线国产一区二区在线| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 日韩有码中文字幕| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 国产成人精品在线电影| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 国产成人精品在线电影| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 自线自在国产av| 免费高清在线观看日韩| www国产在线视频色| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 国产成人影院久久av| 怎么达到女性高潮| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 丁香欧美五月| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美日韩精品网址| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出 | 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 91成年电影在线观看| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| av有码第一页| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 丰满的人妻完整版| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| av福利片在线| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 欧美日韩av久久| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 夫妻午夜视频| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲全国av大片| 1024香蕉在线观看| 精品福利永久在线观看| av片东京热男人的天堂| 看免费av毛片| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 免费不卡黄色视频| 色综合婷婷激情| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 天天影视国产精品| av在线天堂中文字幕 | 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 91成年电影在线观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产熟女xx| 最好的美女福利视频网| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 中文欧美无线码| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产精品九九99| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 午夜激情av网站| 久久狼人影院| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 国产成人精品无人区| 成人国语在线视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 午夜91福利影院| www.自偷自拍.com| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 色综合站精品国产| av福利片在线| 丁香六月欧美| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼 | 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| av免费在线观看网站| 一a级毛片在线观看| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| av视频免费观看在线观看| 在线看a的网站| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 日韩欧美免费精品| 在线av久久热| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 国产在线观看jvid| 日韩欧美免费精品| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 午夜91福利影院| 在线视频色国产色| 嫩草影院精品99| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 色播在线永久视频| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产亚洲欧美98| 超碰成人久久| 国产在线观看jvid| 国产成人精品无人区| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 国产av又大| 色综合婷婷激情| 国产三级在线视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 久久伊人香网站| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 免费av中文字幕在线| 午夜两性在线视频| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 999久久久国产精品视频| 国产成人精品在线电影| www国产在线视频色| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲成人久久性| 香蕉丝袜av| 高清av免费在线| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲激情在线av| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 精品高清国产在线一区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 欧美成人午夜精品| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 脱女人内裤的视频| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 超碰成人久久| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 成人影院久久| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 黄色女人牲交| av福利片在线| 丝袜美足系列| 国产不卡一卡二| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站 | 亚洲全国av大片| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 国产一区二区激情短视频| www国产在线视频色| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 天堂动漫精品| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 咕卡用的链子| 一a级毛片在线观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 国产精品野战在线观看 | 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 9191精品国产免费久久| 在线视频色国产色| cao死你这个sao货| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 亚洲成人久久性| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 天天添夜夜摸| 高清在线国产一区| 国产成人欧美| 91成年电影在线观看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区 | 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 亚洲中文av在线| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 黄色视频不卡| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 午夜激情av网站| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 久久国产精品影院| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 校园春色视频在线观看| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 国产成人精品在线电影| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 久久久国产一区二区| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 久久久久九九精品影院| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 精品日产1卡2卡| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| www.999成人在线观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 午夜免费观看网址| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 天天影视国产精品| 国产av又大| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 日本三级黄在线观看| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 国产三级在线视频| 久久精品成人免费网站| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 久久中文看片网| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 高清av免费在线| 18禁观看日本| 精品福利永久在线观看| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 人人澡人人妻人| avwww免费| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 脱女人内裤的视频| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久电影网| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 丁香六月欧美| 亚洲第一青青草原| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 亚洲全国av大片| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 9191精品国产免费久久| 日本 av在线| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 国产成人欧美| 1024视频免费在线观看| 国产免费男女视频| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久影院123| 国产xxxxx性猛交| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 大陆偷拍与自拍| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 久久伊人香网站| 国产又爽黄色视频| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲专区字幕在线| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看 | 怎么达到女性高潮| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| www.自偷自拍.com| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产av精品麻豆| 9191精品国产免费久久| 色综合站精品国产| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 1024香蕉在线观看| 成人影院久久| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 91大片在线观看| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 视频区图区小说| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 午夜免费激情av| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 丝袜美足系列| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 美女大奶头视频| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 岛国在线观看网站| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 欧美大码av| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 岛国在线观看网站| 五月开心婷婷网| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产精品久久视频播放| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 超色免费av| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| a级毛片在线看网站| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 咕卡用的链子| 91av网站免费观看| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| av视频免费观看在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 日本 av在线| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 成人三级黄色视频| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频|