• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Genetic Relationship and Structure Analysis of Root Growth Angle for Improvement of Drought Avoidance in Early and Mid-Early Maturing Rice Genotypes

    2020-04-01 16:24:20ElssaPANDITRajendraKumarPANDAAuromeeraSAHOODiptiRanjanPANISharatKumarPRADHAN
    Rice Science 2020年2期

    Elssa PANDIT , Rajendra Kumar PANDA , Auromeera SAHOO Dipti Ranjan PANI,Sharat Kumar PRADHAN

    (1Crop Improvement Division, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha 753006, India; 2Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar 751003, India; 3ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resource Base Center, National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha 753006, India; #These authors contributed equally to this work)

    Abstract: Deeper rooting 1 (Dro1) and Deeper rooting 2 (Dro2) are the QTLs that contribute considerably to root growth angle assisting in deeper rooting of rice plant. In the present study, a set of 348 genotypes were shortlisted from rice germplasm based on root angle study. Screening results of the germplasm lines under drought stress identified 25 drought tolerant donor lines based on leaf rolling, leaf drying,spikelet fertility and single plant yield. A panel containing 101 genotypes was constituted based on screening results and genotyped using Dro1 and Dro2 markers. Structure software categorized the genotypes into four sub-populations with different fixation index values for root growth angle. The clustering analysis and principal coordinate analysis could differentiate the genotypes with or without deeper rooting trait. The dendrogram constructed based on the molecular screening for deep rooting QTLs showed clear distinction between the rainfed upland cultivars and irrigated genotypes. Eleven genotypes, namely Dular, Tepiboro, Surjamukhi, Bamawpyan, N22, Dinorado, Karni, Kusuma, Bowdel,Lalsankari and Laxmikajal, possessed both the QTLs, whereas 67 genotypes possessed only Dro1. The average angle of Dro positive genotypes ranged from 82.7° to 89.7°. These genotypes possessing the deeper rooting QTLs can be taken as donor lines to be used in marker-assisted breeding programs.

    Key words: root growth angle; Dro1; Dro2; deeper rooting; upland rice; drought avoidance

    Rice is the most important food crop for more than half of the world population. The global population is increasing and expected to reach 9 billion by the middle of the twenty-first century. The targeted food production needs to be increased even from the droughtprone areas with a hike of 40% from this crippled ecosystem by 2025 (Pennisi, 2008). Drought is a major limitation in obtaining higher productivity from rainfed rice cultivation (Bernier et al, 2009; Panda et al, 2016; Barik et al, 2018). It affects the crop at vegetative and reproductive growth stages. Under water stress, genotypes showing delay in leaf rolling and faster recovery from the stress are required for drought breeding (Singh and Mackill, 1991). During vegetative stage, leaf rolling and leaf drying are good criteria of screening drought tolerance (Chang et al,1974; Farooq et al, 2010; Singh et al, 2012). Drought stress during reproductive stage is most critical as it causes low yield due to higher proportion of unfilled grains in the panicles (Hsiao et al, 1976; Kumar et al,2006; Davatgar et al, 2009; Singh et al, 2012; Kumar et al, 2015; Torres and Henry, 2018; Barik et al, 2019).

    Rice plant is a shallow rooting type relative to other cereal crops and hence is sensitive to moisture stress in the soil. Deep rooting may assist plants to avoid drought-induced stress by extracting water from deep soil layers (Yoshida and Hasegawa, 1982; Fukai and Cooper, 1995). Kondo et al (2000) showed low moisture stress to rice plants under vertical root distribution in upland condition. The genetic control of deep rooting in rice was confirmed by Uga et al (2011). To improve drought avoidance in rice, introducing the deeprooting characteristic into shallow-rooting cultivars is considered one of the most promising breeding strategies. To date, only one quantitative trait locus(QTL) responsible for deep rooting namely Dro1 on chromosome 9 has been cloned in rice (Uga et al,2011, 2013a). qSOR1, a QTL for soil surface rooting on chromosome 7 (Uga et al, 2012), Dro2 on chromosome 4 (Uga et al, 2013b) and Dro3 on chromosome 7 (Kitomi et al, 2015) have been mapped.Genotypic variation contributes considerably to root growth angle in rice cultivars with functional Dro1 allele along with other major QTLs such as Dro2,Dro4 and Dro5, and with several additional minor QTLs (Kitomi et al, 2015). Hence, screening of germplasm lines with deep rooting and subsequent utilization as donor in the superior background is essential for upland rice improvement program.

    The effects of climate change are considerably harse to rice crop particularly on soil moisture stress. As per earlier estimate, about 50% of global rice production is affected by drought (Bouman et al, 2005). The intensity and distribution of rainfall is erratic, and as a result, rice crop faces drastic soil moisture stress in the course of production (Kang et al, 2009; McKersie,2015; Yang et al, 2018). Deployment of identified donors and molecular markers in marker-assisted breeding for deeper rooting trait will be benificial in avoiding soil moisture stress. In addition, irrigated rice consumes a lot of water for rice production. Deep rooted high yielding varieties will require less water compared to shallow rooted irrigated rice varieties.

    Dro1 gene was cloned and identified by comparing the putative region (LOC_Os09g26840) of Kinadong Patong with that of IR64 revealing a single 1-bp deletion within exon 4 in IR64 leading to introduction of premature stop codon (Uga et al, 2013a). Therefore,this gene loses its phenotypic expression for root growth angle in IR64. Dro1 gene is an early-auxin response gene regulated by auxin response factors and is negatively regulated by auxin. It expresses around the root meristem tissues enhancing the cell elongation at the root tip, causing asymmetric root growth and downward root bending in response to gravity controlling the root angle. Over-expression of Dro1 increases deeper rooting. Dro1 explains around 66%of phenotypic variance for ratio of deep rooting(RDR). In addition to Dro1, another QTL Dro2 contributes around 32% to 56% of the total variance in different populations (Uga et al, 2013a, b). Incorporating these two QTLs into swallow rooting cultivar can be useful for increasing the deeper rooting trait. Although Dro3, Dro4 and Dro5 were reported for root growth angle, extensive study has not been done for their consistency in different populations. However, Dro1 and Dro2 are reported to be consistent among populations conferring effect towards root growth angle and gravitropic curvature. Hence, the present investigation aimed to characterize 348 diverse rice germplasm lines for selection of drought avoidance donors through root growth angle study using Dro1 and Dro2 QTLs and further for classifying of the panel population into different sub-populations using various population genetic analyses for the trait.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Seed materials and field screening

    A set of 348 genotypes from rice germplasm were shortlisted based on early and mid-early maturing genotypes, which were acquired from eight rice growing countries of the world (Supplemental Table 1). Traits namely leaf rolling and leaf drying during vegetative stage as well as spikelet fertility and single plant yield at reproductive stage were investigated.The 348 germplasm lines were direct seeded in an augmented block design with 8 blocks and 4 check varieties (N22, Dular, IR64 and IR20) with three rows of 4.5 m length each at spacing of 20 cm × 15 cm between hills during dry season of 2015. The experimental materials were exposed to a minimum of 15 and 7 d rainless during vegetative and reproductive stages, respectively for drought scoring. IRRI standard evaluation system (IRRI, 2013) was followed to score the genotypes. From the 348 genotypes again, a panel for genotyping and precise phenotyping for root growth angle was prepared based on leaf rolling and leaf drying during vegetative stage, and spikelet fertility and single plant yield during reproductive stage of the germplasm lines.

    Genomic DNA extraction

    Genomic DNA was extracted after crushing young leaves in liquid nitrogen using CTAB extraction buffer(100 mmol/L Tris-HCl with pH of 8.0, 20 mmol/L EDTA with pH of 8.0, 2% CTAB and 1.3 mol/L NaCl)and chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction, followed by RNAase treatment and ethanol precipitation. DNA concentration was estimated by agarose gel electrophoresis taking lambda DNA as standard. Each sample was diluted to approximately 25 ng/μL.

    Polymerase chain reaction for amplification of Dro markers

    DNA amplification was performed in a Gradient Thermal Cycler (Verity, Applied BioSciences, USA)with a reaction volume of 20 μL, containing 1.5 mmol/L Tris-HCL (pH 8.75), 50 mmol/L KCl, 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.1% TrotonX-100, 200 μmol/L each of dATP, dCTP, dTTP, dGTP, 4 pmol of each forward and reverse primers, 1 unit of Taq polymerase and 30 ng of genomic DNA. The reaction mixture was first denatured for 4 min at 94 °C and then subjected to 35 cycles of 1 min denaturation at 94 °C, 1 min annealing at 57 °C-62 °C, and 1 min extension at 72 °C; and then a final extension for 10 min at 72 °C. A set of nine specific and flanking markers for Dro QTLs were used (Supplemental Table 2). Four flanking markers,ID07_14 and RM24393 on upstream and ID7_17 and RM7424 on downstream of the Dro1 QTL, were deployed for the locus. In addition to these flanking markers, four specific markers for Dro1 gene, viz.Dro1-CAPS5, Dro1-INDEL, SNP02-KP and SNP02-IR64, were used.

    Visualization of PCR product

    DNA products from PCR amplification were loaded in 2.5%-3.0% gel containing 0.8 g/mL ethidium bromide for electrophoresis in 1× TBE (pH 8.0). One lane was loaded with 50 bp DNA ladder. The gel was run at 2.5 V/cm for 4 h and photographed using a Gel Documentation System (SynGene, UK).

    Data analysis

    Data were scored for computer analysis on the basis of the presence or absence of the amplified products for each genotype-primer combination. The data entry was done into a binary data matrix as discrete variables.Dendrogram was constructed with unweighted pair group method arithmatic average (UPGMA) algorithm using DARwin5 software (Perrier and Jacquemoud-Collet, 2006). STRUCTURE 2.3.4 software was used for data analysis to obtain possible population structure(Pritchard et al, 2000). The model choice criterion to detect the most probable value of K was ΔK, an ad-hoc quantity related to the second-order change of the log probability of data with respect to the number of clusters inferred by STRUCTURE (Evanno et al,2005). Structure Harvester was used for estimation of the ΔK value (Earl and Von, 2012). The principal coordinate analysis was performed following Pandit et al(2016) and Pradhan et al (2016).

    Phenotyping for root angle in rice

    The primary root angle was measured by using agarose-glass box method following Uga et al (2013a)with minor modifications. The de-husked seeds were pre-soaked for 3-4 h. These seeds were carefully transferred to 0.4% agarose in semi solid state in a glass box and then the agarose was allowed to solidify,after which the boxes were kept in dark at 30 °C. The root angle was measured at 24 and 48 h. The glass boxes were rotated at 60° angle for 4-6 h to check the gravitropic effect.

    RESULTS

    Field screening of germplasm lines for drought avoidance and tolerance under moderate drought stress condition

    The susceptible checks showed a score of ≥ 7 for leaf rolling and leaf drying during vegetative stage, and spikelet fertility (< 20%) and single plant yield (< 5 g)were considered for primary screening. Field screening results indicated that 29 germplasm lines were with score 1, 121 with score 3 and 114 with score 5 for leaf rolling (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Table 1). For leaf drying, 45 were with score 1, 161 with score 3 and 92 with score 5 (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Table 1). It was observed that spikelet fertility varied from 6.12% to 83.22% under moderate drought stress condition.Genotypes N22, Ac10914, Ac39973, Ac39890,Ac11261, Ac10984, CR2340-2, Ac39790, IR10C-167 and CR143-2-2 were with score 1 under the stress.Single plant yield varied from 1.26 g (IR20) to 14.42 g (Sahabhagi Dhan) under the stress, and 86 lines showed single plant yield more than 10 g (Fig. 1 and Supplemental Table 2). Screening results showed that 25 genotypes namely CR143-2-2, Dular, Satyabhama,Sahabhagi Dhan, IR83141-B-32-B, IR10C-161, Dinorado,IR64197-3B-15-2, N22, CR Dhan 202, Surjamukhi,Kutiarasi, Ac39973, Ac10976, Ac10925, Bowdel,Serety, Ac11261, Habigonj Boro 6, Anjali, IR10G-103, Ac39843, Ac10914, IR10C-103 and Karni are drought tolerant based on leaf rolling, leaf drying,spikelet fertility and single plant yield.

    Phenotyping for root angle trait in rice

    The gravitropic responses of the primary roots of the Dro positive genotypes along with the negative check were evaluated by using agarose-glass box method.The primary root angle in glass box containing 0.4%agarose indicated that genotypes Bowdel, Lalsankari,N22, Dular, Tepiboro and Surjamukhi had almost vertical roots while the angle was much less in susceptible variety, IR64 (Fig. 2). The average primary root angle in the Dro positive genotypes varied from 65° to 90°.However, the negative check IR64 exhibited an average root angle of 54°, whereas IR20 showed root angle of 56°. These results revealed that our candidate genotypes may contain Dro1 QTL(s). After the trays were rotated 60°, the majority of the Dro positive genotypes continued to extend and bend in the direction of gravity within 4-6 h. The gravitropic response of the genotypes is presented in Fig. 3-A.The mean root angle of the genotypes having both Dro1 and Dro2 ranged from 82.7° to 89.7° (Fig. 3-B).The Dro positive genotypes showed similar root angle in response to gravitropic effect as observed in case of primary root angle. However, sometimes the seminal roots of the Dro negative genotypes were irregular before and after rotation. These results suggested that the primary roots of the Dro positive genotypes showed normal gravitropic response.

    Genotyping of panel population using deeper rooting markers

    Nine markers (Supplemental Table 2) were used to amplify Dro1 and Dro2 loci in the panel containing 101 genotypes including negative checks. The popular variety IR64 was taken as the negative check for both Dro loci (Uga et al, 2011). Four flanking markers and four specific markers for Dro1 gene were used for amplification of 67 genotypes to be positive for the QTL (Supplemental Table 3). The marker ID07-14 showed the target band of 174 bp in 84 genotypes(Supplemental Fig. 1), whereas ID7-17 showed 220 bp band in 59 genotypes (Supplemental Table 3). A 557-bp amplicon for Dro1 was obtained with an SSR marker RM24393 in 70 genotypes, whereas RM7424 amplified the expected band of 82 bp in 83 genotypes.The marker SNP02-KP which is specific for Kinadong Patong Dro1 could be observed in 76 genotypes and these genotypes were negative for SNP02-IR64 confirming the presence of Dro1 gene. These genotypes were also observed to be positive for Dro1-INDEL and Dro1-CAPS5 markers (Supplemental Table 3). Considering all these marker data, a total of 67 genotypes were found to possess Dro1 QTL(Supplemental Table 3).

    The major QTL Dro2, reported for deeper rooting,was used for screening the panel population using a closely linked marker RM6089. The expected size of the amplicon i.e. 170 bp was obtained in 12 genotypes(Supplemental Table 3 and Supplemental Fig. 2). The IR64 allele of 165 bp was obtained in 89 genotypes.Eleven genotypes viz., Dular, Tepiboro, Surjamukhi,Bamawpyan, N22, Dinorado, Karni, Kusuma, Bowdel,Lalsankari and Laxmikajal, were positive for both Dro1 and Dro2 loci (Supplemental Table 3).

    Population structure, principal coordinate and clustering analyses

    The population structure of the genotypes was estimated by using STRUCTURE 2.3.4 software following Bayesian clustering approach (Pritchard et al, 2000).By taking higher ΔK-value, four sub-populations were observed (Fig. 4). The four sub-populations were obtained at ΔK value of 43.3 with K = 4 (Fig. 4-A).Maximum allele frequency divergence between the two sub-populations (net nucleotide distance) was 0.1425, 0.843, 0.1425 and 0.9838 for clusters 1 and 3,clusters 1 and 4, clusters 2 and 3, and clusters 3 and 4,respectively. The average distances (expected heterozygosity) between individuals in clusters 1, 2, 3 and 4 were 0.0004, 0.0004, 0.0013 and 0.0148, respectively.The four sub-populations showed fixation index values (Fst) of 0.966, 0.965, 0.962 and 0.957,respectively. A lower value of α (0.0271) was detected in the studied panel population. The distribution pattern of α-value in the panel population showed a leptokurtic symmetry while distribution of Fst values in the sub-populations were in symmetric shape with almost identical to the left and right from the centre.

    Principal coordinate analysis (PCA) was performed to determine the genetic relatedness among the genotypes with respect to the Dro loci (Fig. 5-A). The first two components (PC1 and PC2) accounted for 29.11% and 13.49% of total inertia, respectively. The 101 genotypes were distributed in all the four quadrants showing two major groups (Fig. 5-A). The 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th quadrants consisted 37, 31, 18 and 15 genotypes, respectively. The genotypes having Dro1 or Dro2 locus or both were placed in the 1st (top right) and 2nd (bottom right) quadrants, whereas the negative genotypes were placed in the rest two quadrants, i.e. 3rd and 4th quadrants (Fig. 5-A).However, Hongzui El was placed along with the negative ones in the 4th quadrant, whereas Dhobosankari and Basaramatia were placed in the 2nd quadrant along with the positive genotypes. These three genotypes showed inconsistent response for Dro1 specific markers.

    The clustering analysis of the genotypes based on the molecular screening for Dro1 and Dro2 could separate out the tolerant rainfed upland cultivars and the irrigated ecosystem genotypes. The irrigated genotypes IR64 and IR20 that had been taken as negative check together formed a distinct branch in dendrogram (Fig. 5-B). Eight genotypes namely Tepiboro, Bamawpyan, Surjamukhi, N22, Karni,Bowdel, Lalsankri and Laxmikajal, positive for both Dro1 and Dro2, formed distinct cluster (green),whereas Dular, Dinorado and Kusuma having both the QTLs were placed along with the other genotypes.The genotypes having Dro1 gene only formed two distinct clusters (red) accommodating 49 genotypes(Fig. 5-B). Seven genotypes namely Khaodaw,Vanaprabha, Menkasala, Hazaridhan, Khandagiri,Blackgora and Tawadhan were placed separately from the aforesaid 49 genotypes having Dro1 gene.

    DISCUSSION

    This study provides a novel survey for presences of Dro1 and Dro2 among diverse rice varieties and landraces. Better donor lines having deeper rooting system were identified for drought stress tolerance.The markers employed showed that eleven genotypes possessed both the QTLs. These genotypes were drought tolerant at both vegetative and reproductive stages based on our field screening trial (Supplemental Table 1). All these eleven landraces are very good donors for upland rice breeding program. Besides,these donor lines are also being cultivated in some areas of the country.

    Deep rooting is a beneficial strategy against drought stress in rice (Yoshida and Hasegawa, 1982; Fukai and Cooper, 1995). Under drought stress, rice plant shows leaf rolling, leaf senescence, reduced plant height, stomatal closure, lower dry matter production and decreased leaf elongation (Farooq et al, 2010;Kumar et al, 2015). Previous study on root angle reveals the existence of genetic variation and its genetic control in rice (Uga et al, 2011). In our study,a majority (71.88%) of the genotypes were with Dro1 QTL on chromosome 9. Another major QTL Dro2 had been reported on chromosome 4 from Kinandang Patong, from which Dro1 was reported (Uga et al,2013a). Dro2 is reported to account for up to 56% of phenotypic variance for ratio of deep rooting in rice.RM6089 showed better linkage to Dro2 locus and consistency in different populations according to Uga et al (2013b). Hence, the present study used RM6089 for screening the genotypes. Only 12 genotypes,namely Laxmikajal, Tepiboro, Surjamukhi, Bamawpyan,Hongzui El, N22, Dular, Dinorado, Karni, Kusuma,Bowdel and Lalsankari, showed Kinandang Patong allele. This result revealed that Dro2 is not well distributed throughout the upland genotypes as the QTL Dro1. Dular was reported for deep rooting character with high drought tolerance (Kato et al,2006; Henry et al, 2011). The present study confirmed the presence of both Dro1 and Dro2 in Dular. Dro1 is present in genotypes like Sahabhagidhan, Pyari,Sadabahar, RR20, RR51-1, Habigonj boro 6 and RR354-1, indicating that deeper rooting trait can be incorporated in high yielding rice backgrounds.

    The dendrogram constructed based on the molecular screening for deep rooting QTLs showed clear distinction between the rainfed upland cultivars and irrigated genotypes. Although there is no such previous reports on classification of genotypes on the basis of Dro markers, similar study was conducted by Chin et al (2011) and Pandit et al (2018) where they had classified the upland, irrigated and lowland genotypes based on the phosphorous uptake 1 (Pup1)QTL specific markers. A few irrigated or aerobic genotypes like Kalinga-III, CR Dhan 204 and CR Dhan 202 were grouped separately whereas genotypes Pyari, CR Dhan 201 and Sahabhagidhan were grouped along with the upland genotypes. As dendrogram was constructed based on the presence of the Dro specific markers, it can be inferred that the aerobic ecosystem and some irrigated ecosystem genotypes may also possess these QTLs. The genotypes RR347-466, CR Dhan 204 and CR Dhan 202 were of negative inconsistency for most of the markers whereas IR64 and IR20 were negative for all.

    The panel population showed four sub-populations by structure analysis where the negative checks IR64 and IR20 formed a sub-group (SP4) (Fig. 4). The genotypes in sub-population 3 (SP3) included all the genotypes having Dro1 and Dro2 QTLs. SP1 and SP2 inferred ancestry values were almost equally distributed among the rest of the genotypes, which may be due to the presence of inconsistent positive/negative genotypes for Dro1 markers. However, the PCA analysis clearly distinguished the Dro positive and Dro negative/inconsistent genotypes. These analyses were able to identify the potential donor lines into separate groups.The genotypes possessing the two deeper rooting QTLs Dro1 and Dro2, grouped under SP3 in structure analysis, can be used as donor lines in breeding programs. More specifically, genotypes amplified by all the studied markers should be characterized and utilized in future. The α-value obtained for the panel population by structure analysis also revealed the domestication of Dro QTLs from common ancestor for adaption in rainfed ecosystem. Similar trend of evolution for high and low temperature stress are reported in rice (Pradhan et al, 2016; Pandit et al,2017).

    The gravitropic responses of the primary roots of the Dro positive genotypes along with the negative check indicated that genotypes Bowdel, Lalsankari,N22, Dular, Tepiboro and Surjamukhi had almost vertical roots, and their average angle ranged from 82.7° to 89.7°, while the angle was much less (54°) in the negative check IR64. These results suggested that our candidate genotypes may contain Dro QTL(s).IR64 NILs containing Dro1 QTL show almost vertical roots as compared to the normal one (Uga et al, 2013a;Kitomi et al, 2015), which is in agreement with our results. This indicated the potential of these genotypes to be used as donors in breeding programs.

    Upland rice ecosystem is generally deficient in phosphorus content. Dular, Tepiboro, Surjamukhi,Bamawpyan, N22, Dinorado, Karni, Bowdel and Lalsankari contain QTL Pup1 (Pandit et al, 2015,2018). The three QTLs Dro1, Dro2 and Pup1 are important for upland rice breeding and they need to be incorporated into a single high yielding genetic background. Kasalath is reported to contain Pup1 locus (Wissuwa, 2001; Chin et al, 2010; Pandit et al,2018). Moreover, in this study, we detected Deeper rooting1 locus, too. Bowdel, Lalsankari, Karni, Dinorado,N22, Bamawpyan, Tepiboro, Dular and Surjamukhi,can be used as common donor for upland breeding programs for improving both deeper rooting (Dro1 and Dro2) and phosphorous uptake (Pup1) in rice.

    Deep rooting may assist rice plants to avoid drought-induced stress by utilizing water from deeper soil. Dro1 and Dro2 are the QTLs that contribute considerably to the root growth angle assisting in deeper rooting of rice plant. Screening of 348 early and mid-early maturing germplasm lines for drought stress identified 25 drought tolerant germplasm lines.The representative panel containing 101 genotypes showed four sub-populations with different Fst values for root growth angle. The clustering analysis and principal coordinate analysis could differentiate the genotypes with or without deeper rooting trait. The dendrogram constructed based on the molecular screening for deep rooting QTLs showed clear distinction between the rainfed upland cultivars and irrigated genotypes. Eleven genotypes namely Dular,Tepiboro, Surjamukhi, Bamawpyan, N22, Dinorado,Karni, Kusuma, Bowdel, Lalsankari and Laxmikajal possessed both the QTLs, whereas 67 genotypes possessed only Dro1 QTL. The average angle of Dro positive genotypes ranged from 82.7° to 89.7°. These genotypes possessing the deeper rooting QTLs can be taken as donor lines to be used in marker-assisted breeding programs for incorporation of these QTLs into high yielding popular rainfed rice varieties.

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

    The authors are highly grateful to the Director,ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, and Head,Crop Improvement Division, National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, India, for providing all the necessary facilities, and Department of Science and Technology,Govt. of India for providing financial support.

    SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

    The following materials are available in the online version of this article at http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/16726308; http://www.ricescience.org.

    Supplemental Table 1. Leaf rolling, leaf drying, spikelet fertility and single plant yield of 348 early and mid-early duration germplasm lines under moderate drought stress.

    Supplemental Table 2. List of markers used in the study.

    Supplemental Table 3. Response of panel genotypes to Dro1 and Dro2 QTL/gene(s) using gene specific and flanking markers.

    Supplemental Fig. 1. Representative electrophoregram obtained with ID07_14 showing target band of 174 bp.

    Supplemental Fig. 2. Amplicons obtained with RM6089.

    国内精品久久久久精免费| 色5月婷婷丁香| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 夜夜爽天天搞| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 三级毛片av免费| 日本黄色片子视频| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 赤兔流量卡办理| 日本黄大片高清| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| .国产精品久久| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 此物有八面人人有两片| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 香蕉av资源在线| 悠悠久久av| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 日本成人三级电影网站| ponron亚洲| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 看黄色毛片网站| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| av在线蜜桃| 天堂动漫精品| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 丰满的人妻完整版| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 黄片小视频在线播放| a在线观看视频网站| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 波多野结衣高清作品| 一本一本综合久久| 看黄色毛片网站| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久香蕉精品热| 午夜a级毛片| 精品久久久久久久末码| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 国产老妇女一区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲最大成人av| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 欧美3d第一页| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 内射极品少妇av片p| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 性欧美人与动物交配| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 免费看光身美女| 悠悠久久av| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲最大成人av| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 中国美女看黄片| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 老女人水多毛片| 内射极品少妇av片p| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 草草在线视频免费看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| www日本黄色视频网| 天堂√8在线中文| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 少妇的逼好多水| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 赤兔流量卡办理| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 97超视频在线观看视频| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 久久久久久大精品| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲最大成人av| 亚洲av熟女| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 久久精品91蜜桃| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产精华一区二区三区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产高清三级在线| 小说图片视频综合网站| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 一级黄片播放器| 少妇的逼水好多| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 深夜精品福利| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 国产精品影院久久| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 在线免费观看的www视频| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 国产亚洲欧美98| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 直男gayav资源| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 欧美日本视频| av天堂在线播放| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲成人久久性| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 久久久久久久久久成人| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 长腿黑丝高跟| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 99热精品在线国产| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 变态另类丝袜制服| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 97碰自拍视频| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图 | 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 深夜精品福利| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 国产精品野战在线观看| 91字幕亚洲| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美3d第一页| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 午夜a级毛片| 成人无遮挡网站| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 一级作爱视频免费观看| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| av天堂在线播放| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | bbb黄色大片| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 看免费av毛片| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站 | 国产一区二区三区视频了| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 久久性视频一级片| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 不卡一级毛片| 色综合站精品国产| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲激情在线av| 久久久色成人| 成人精品一区二区免费| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 极品教师在线视频| 成人三级黄色视频| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 两个人的视频大全免费| 久久久色成人| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 午夜福利欧美成人| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 久久九九热精品免费| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 老女人水多毛片| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 国产成人av教育| 身体一侧抽搐| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 在线a可以看的网站| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 综合色av麻豆| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 国产成人福利小说| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 直男gayav资源| 国产不卡一卡二| 美女高潮的动态| 国产精品永久免费网站| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 51国产日韩欧美| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 久久国产精品影院| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产精品久久视频播放| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 亚洲无线观看免费| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 观看美女的网站| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲无线在线观看| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| 精品久久久久久久久av| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 国产高清三级在线| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 脱女人内裤的视频| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 9191精品国产免费久久| 我要搜黄色片| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 久久久色成人| 成人国产综合亚洲| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲av.av天堂| 国产视频内射| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 日韩欧美免费精品| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 日韩有码中文字幕| 亚洲经典国产精华液单 | netflix在线观看网站| 97超视频在线观看视频| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 老司机福利观看| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在 | 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 午夜免费激情av| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 亚洲 国产 在线| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 色5月婷婷丁香| 天堂√8在线中文| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 1000部很黄的大片| 三级毛片av免费| 最好的美女福利视频网| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 午夜a级毛片| 级片在线观看| 天堂√8在线中文| 成人精品一区二区免费| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 国产黄片美女视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲 国产 在线| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 欧美一区二区亚洲| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 91麻豆av在线| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 乱人视频在线观看| 看免费av毛片| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 亚洲国产色片| 久久香蕉精品热| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 看免费av毛片| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产成人av教育| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 欧美成人a在线观看| 免费看光身美女| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 亚洲av美国av| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 少妇的逼水好多| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 性欧美人与动物交配| 热99在线观看视频| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 禁无遮挡网站| av在线观看视频网站免费| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| www.色视频.com| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 午夜两性在线视频| 一级黄片播放器| 午夜福利欧美成人| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 全区人妻精品视频| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产真实乱freesex| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 午夜激情欧美在线| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲无线观看免费| 日韩高清综合在线| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 亚洲男人的天堂狠狠| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 内射极品少妇av片p| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 此物有八面人人有两片| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 一a级毛片在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产单亲对白刺激| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 国产av在哪里看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 在线a可以看的网站| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 草草在线视频免费看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 69av精品久久久久久| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 有码 亚洲区| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 欧美激情在线99| 悠悠久久av| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 国产成人福利小说| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 永久网站在线| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 在线看三级毛片| 色在线成人网| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 亚洲av成人av| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 亚州av有码| 少妇的逼水好多| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲最大成人中文| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 午夜影院日韩av| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 我要搜黄色片| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 午夜精品在线福利| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 免费av毛片视频| 国产精品野战在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 简卡轻食公司| 色在线成人网| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 9191精品国产免费久久| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 51国产日韩欧美| 欧美bdsm另类| 日本一本二区三区精品| or卡值多少钱| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区 | 久久人人精品亚洲av| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 欧美zozozo另类| 免费看a级黄色片| 欧美潮喷喷水|