• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    A new early Visean coral assemblage from Azrou-Khenifra Basin,central Morocco and palaeobiogeographic implications

    2020-03-04 16:46:08SergioRodrguezIanSomervillePedrozarJavierSanzpezIsmaelCoronadoFelipeGonzlezIsmailSaidandMohamedElHouicha
    Journal of Palaeogeography 2020年1期

    Sergio Rodríguez,Ian D.Somerville,Pedro Cózar,Javier Sanz-López,Ismael Coronado,Felipe González,Ismail Said and Mohamed El Houicha

    Abstract A new early Visean coral assemblage has been recorded from turbidite facies in the southern part of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin, northwest of Khenifra, central Morocco. The newly discovered Ba Moussa West (BMW) coral fauna includes Siphonophyllia khenifrense sp. nov., Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi, Cravenia lamellata, Cravenia tela, Cravenia rhytoides, Turnacipora megastoma and Pleurosiphonella crustosa. The early Visean age of the coral assemblage is supported by foraminiferal and conodont data, with the recognition of the basal Visean MFZ9 Zone. This confirms that the first transgression in the Azrou-Khenifra Basin was during the earliest Visean. The allochthonous coral assemblage was recovered from coarse-grained proximal limestone debris flow and turbidite beds within a faultbounded unit, lying to the west of a thrust syncline containing upper Visean limestones. No evidence exists of the former early Visean shallow-water platform from which the corals were derived. All other in situ platform carbonate rocks around the southern margin of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin are probably of late Visean (Asbian–Brigantian) age.The early Visean Ba Moussa West coral fauna can be compared with that at Tafilalt in eastern Morocco, as well as in other Saharian basins of Algeria. Many of the genera and species in the Ba Moussa West assemblage are identical to those in NW Europe, with which it must have had marine connections. The new rugose species described,Siphonophyllia khenifrense, is probably endemic to North Africa. Its ecological niche in NW Europe was occupied by S.cylindrica or S.aff. garwoodi.

    Keywords: Mississippian,Visean, Corals, Foraminifers, Conodonts,Palaeobiogeography, Morocco

    1 Introduction

    Mississippian rocks are common in the Moroccan Meseta. They have been studied and described by French geologists since the beginning of the twentieth century(Lecointre 1926; Termier 1936; Termier and Termier 1950; Gigout 1951, etc.). The Mississippian stratigraphic successions are clearly different in the western and in the eastern parts of the Meseta. The stratigraphy in both areas, as well as in other regions from Morocco, has been summarized by Beauchamp and Izart (1987),Hoepffner et al. (2005) and Michard et al. (2010). The succession was considered quite continuous from the Devonian to the Serpukhovian (Michard et al. 2010).However, sedimentation in the eastern part of the central Meseta (Azrou-Khenifra Basin) is more complicated.It took place in both a shallow-water carbonate platform and a deeper water flysch basin, within a tectonically active setting, involving movements of blocks, and transgressions and regressions that produced some gaps and unconformities. Sedimentation during the Tournaisian,early and mid Visean in the basin is regarded as being absent by some authors (Huvelin 1969; Beauchamp and Izart 1987), whereas continuous or sporadic sedimentation during that time interval is suggested by others(Bouabdelli 1989; Huvelin and Mamet 1997; Michard et al. 2010).

    The purpose of this paper is to report the recent discovery of a relatively rich Mississippian (early Visean)coral fauna in the southern part of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin, to describe the corals in detail and their host limestone rocks, as well as to comment on their comparison and affinity with other coeval coral assemblages in North Africa, Europe and SW Asia. The microfossil content was also studied to enhance the biostratigraphic discussion and significance of the coral fauna.

    2 Geological setting

    The beginning of Carboniferous sedimentation in the Khenifra region, which lies in the southern part of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin and contains the largest Mississippian outcrops in the eastern central Meseta, is usually considered to occur within the widely known late Visean transgression(Huvelin 1969; Chanton-Güven? et al. 1971;Semenoff-Tian-Chansky 1985;Beauchamp and Izart 1987;Michard et al. 2010; Aretz and Herbig 2010; Rodríguez et al. 2012; Somerville et al. 2012; Said et al. 2013). However, Huvelin and Mamet (1997) cited two early Visean transgressions. The first one is imprecisely located as “to the north of Ba Moussa (point 1)”. The second one was equated with the base of V2b (= Cf5 Zone of Conil et al.1990;Livian or Holkerian)of mid Visean age.

    In the southwestern margin of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin at Sidi Lamine and Tabainout (Fig. 1b), a thick shallow-water carbonate succession with basal Mississippian conglomerate and sandy limestone can be seen to rest unconformably on older (Ordovician) tilted siltstones and sandstones (Aretz and Herbig 2010; Somerville et al. 2012; Said et al. 2013). A similar relationship is seen at the southeastern margin of the basin at Tiouinine (Fig. 1b) where shallow water sandy limestones rest unconformably on red Ordovician sandstones (Rodríguez et al. 2012).

    The eastern part of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin, northwest of Khenifra, is a region of mostly deep-water rythmic mudstones. However, recent field investigations at Ba Moussa West, northwest of a nappe folded as a N–Strending syncline, and approximately 3 km northwest of Khenifra city margins (Figs. 1 and 2a), have discovered two pale gray weathering limestone units within a thick dark gray siltstone and shale rhythmic succession. These limestones contain abundant corals that form the focus of this paper. The limestone units form two distinct parallel ridges, some 50 m apart, and traceable laterally for over 200 m (Fig. 1c). They form prominent features on the landscape, compared to the subdued topography of the more easily eroded mudstones which encase the limestones (Fig. 2a). The beds dip steeply to the east(70°) and in places can be vertical (Fig. 2 a). The two ridges expose respectively,4.90 m and 4.10 m thicknesses of well-bedded limestones (with beds ranging typically from 10 to 40 cm thick) with thin dark gray shale interbeds.

    The limestones are variable in composition and texture,comprising coarse-grained,bioclastic and lithoclastic calcirudites, rich in crinoids, thick-shelled brachiopods and relatively abundant corals. The limestone beds consist of numerous sedimentary events. Some have sharp, erosive bases and show grading with laminated tops.Large angular lithoclasts of sandstone and siltstone(up to 20 cm in diameter) occur in some beds (Fig. 2b–d). Other limestones are buff weathered, fine-grained, laminated calcarenites. Under the petrological microscope two microfacies are differentiated.The first microfacies,which is less common,is a laminated crinoidal wackestone-packstone containing small fragments of crinoidal plates, corals and bryozoans. The second one, which is dominant, is a polymictic rudstone with fragmented corals, crinoids, bryozoans, brachiopods,trilobites, gastropods, bivalves, foraminifers and angular to subangular grains of quartzite (Fig. 2b) sandstone and siltstone (Fig. 2e, f). The disposition of siliciclastic clasts and bioclasts is random in some beds(Fig.2e),suggesting rapid sedimentation, but in some beds, most clasts are disposed mainly parallel to the stratification(Fig.2c).The fragmentation of bioclasts is also variable.

    The limestones can be regarded as proximal debris flow and multistorey high-density turbidite bodies, with numerous event beds, deposited in a prevailing succession of distal turbidite beds. Thus, the coral assemblage is allochthonous and may have been transported far from its original depositional shelf setting.

    3 Methodology

    The two limestone horizons (BMW1 and BMW2) were sampled and corals were collected. Samples from BMW1 contain almost entire brachiopods and corals (Fig. 2d),whereas in BMW2 most bioclasts are completely broken and very few coral specimens are identifiable at generic or specific level. The coral assemblage is relatively rich, but their diversity is quite low (5 genera and 7 species). The assemblage comprises solitary rugose corals and tabulate colonies. Many corals are well preserved and nearly complete,missing only the apexes and showing sometimes compressed calices when they show few skeletal elements and are filled with muddy sediment. However, others are completely fragmented or crushed or have lost much of their dissepimentaria. Fifty specimens were collected, of which 38 have been definitively identified.

    Thin sections of samples were studied to describe the microfossil content. Owing to the brecciated character of many beds, including boulders of large size, only the fine-grained limestones yield foraminifers. Assemblages are relatively abundant in those fine-grained limestones,although specimens are commonly crushed, and diversity is limited to a few genera. Assemblages from BMW1 are slightly richer than BMW2, although this may be the result of more intense sampling and sectioning.

    Fig. 1 a Location of Khenifra in central Morocco; b Geological map of Azrou-Khenifra Basin with Ba Moussa West coral fauna locality and other coral localities mentioned in the text; c Simplified geological sketch map of Ba Moussa West area and the location of the studied limestone horizons BMW1 and BMW2.hV-Fm1=Lower Visean;hV-Fm2=Upper Visean

    A large sample from limestone BMW1(3.8 kg weight)was etched with 8%–10%buffered formic acid solution,following the standard technique to avoid damaging. The low abundance of conodont elements includes one complete P1 element and six broken elements with upper surface damaged and a few with surface dissolution,which could be in relation to significant transport and resedimentation of elements(Fig.3a–e).The colour of conodonts shows values of 4.5 to 5 for the alteration index(CAI).Reworking of conodonts may be causing a higher CAI value,but small recrystallized apatite surface is observed in conodonts (Fig. 3b). Some specimens preserve a smooth surface, but etched surfaces with pits are often discerned(Fig.3f,h).It suggests short heating on proximity to an igneous intrusion.

    Fig. 2 a View looking south of limestone ridge (BMW1) c. 5 m thick showing steeply dipping beds overlain and underlain by softer shales; b Limestone bed with large angular quartzite and sandstone lithoclasts (beside coin) succeeded by thin laminated sandy limestone and black shales, in turn overlain by bioclastic limestone rich in corals (solitary rugose coral Siphonophyllia (black arrows) and cerioid tabulate coral Turnacipora (white arrow)) (coin diameter=2.5 cm); c Close-up view of richly bioclastic limestone bed with sharp base, showing abundant transverse sections of Siphonophyllia and Sychnoelasma (black arrows) (hammer length=40 cm); d Coarse-grained crinoidal limestone with longitudinal and transverse sections of Siphonophyllia khenifrense; e Thin section of rudstone at BMW1 showing bioclasts and lithoclasts. br=brachiopod, bz=bryozoan, co=coral, cr=crinoid, gr=gastropod, st=sandstone; f Thin section of rudstone at BMW2 showing bioclasts and lithoclasts. br=brachiopod,co=coral, cr=crinoid, sl=siltstone,st=sandstone

    The allochthonous shales embedding the limestone horizons were sampled for palynomorphs. A total of 12 shale samples were crushed and dissolved following the classical extraction techniques described by Wood et al.(1996). After complete removal of carbonate and silicate minerals, the organic remains were oxidized with Fuming Schulze solution and mounted in slides for microscope analysis. Palynomorphs recovered from shales are dominated by phytoclasts and, in minor proportions, by spores, whereas organic-walled marine microphytoplankton and amorphous organic matter are virtually absent. The reduced number of spores and their irregular state of preservation precluded further taxonomic identification. The large proportion of equidimensional to lath-shaped phytoclasts and the absence of marine components may be explained by the intense reworking and effective dilution associated to low-density turbidity currents (Tyson 1993, 1995). The brownish-black to black colour of spores and phytoclasts points to a thermal alteration index (TAI) close to 5, which essentially agrees with the CAI values observed for conodonts from the limestone sample.

    Fig. 3 Conodonts from samples of BMW1. a–b Fragment of element of Kladognathus sp., DGO 15624, and detail of the face where breakage shows a lamellar inner structure and small apatite crystal 2–3 μm in size interpreted as recystallized and, later, slight dissolution; c–e Aboral and oral views of Mestognathus cf. beckmanni, DGO 15625, and detail of the margin of the platform with a strong dissolution located on the ornamentation of ridges and carina causing the inversion of surface relief; f Oral view of Polygnathus lobatus with pits due to dissolution of the conodont surface, DGO 15622; g Gnathodus pseudosemiglaber, DGO 15623; h–i Oral and aboral views of Polygnathus inornatus, DGO 15621.Conodonts are stored in the Museum of Geology of the Department of Geology at the University of Oviedo,Spain(abbreviated DGO)

    4 The coral assemblage and its biostratigraphic significance

    The coral assemblage from Ba Moussa West contains Siphonophyllia khenifrense sp. nov., with other solitary rugose corals, such as Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi (Stuckenberg 1895), Cravenia lamellata Howell 1938, C. tela Hudson 1928,C.rhytoides Hudson 1928.Colonial tabulate corals recorded include Turnacipora megastoma (Phillips 1836) and Pleurosiphonella crustosa Tchudinova 1970.The most abundant specimens collected belong to the genus Siphonophyllia(20)and Turnacipora(7).Most other species are represented only by three specimens or less.

    The assemblage is similar to that described from lower Visean (Arundian) Moel Hiraddug Formation in North Wales, UK (Somerville et al. 1986). In both regions the large siphonophylliid corals represent the dominant component in dark gray bioclastic limestone and shale lithofacies, in which colonial rugose corals are absent.However,the Ba Moussa succession has a lower diversity coral assemblage and the specimens are not as well preserved. This may be explained by the sedimentological setting at Ba Moussa,with the corals occurring in graded limestone beds containing large exotic clasts, interpreted as debris flow and proximal turbidite deposits.

    The stratigraphic range of Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi, and the three species of Cravenia (C. lamellata,C. tela,and C. rhytoides) is very restricted, typically diagnostic of the early Visean throughout Western Europe(Hudson 1928; Howell 1938; Poty 1981, 1983; Denayer et al. 2011). Turnacipora megastoma occurs also,typically in the early Visean (Lafuste and Plusquellec 1985; Somerville et al. 1986).

    The Ba Moussa West assemblage has similarities with Tafilalt in Eastern Morocco,where a richer early Visean solitary rugose assemblage is recorded (see Denayer 2015), including Cravenia, Siphonophyllia and Sychnoelasma, but where colonial rugose genera are also absent. Similar assemblages containing dominant cyathopsids plus Sychnoelasma,Pleurosiphonella and micheliniids have been reported in Canada and United States (Bamber and Sando 1985; Sando and Bamber 1985), and in Mid-Asia (Tchudinova 1986;Leleshus 1991).

    The Ba Moussa limestone beds are clearly older than other Mississippian sections in the Khenifra area, as confirmed by the associated foraminifers and conodonts.Coral assemblages from Tabainout and Sidi Lamine, 20 km and 30 km respectively,further west of Ba Moussa West,at the western margin of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin, contain fasciculate and massive colonial rugose coral genera (Siphonodendron and Lithostrotion) of late Visean (Asbian) age (Aretz and Herbig 2010;Rodríguez et al.2012;Somerville et al.2012;Said et al.2013).Both sections have basal transgressive deposits with in situ shallow-water limestones containing ooids and calcareous algae(Somerville et al.2012;Said et al.2013).At Tiouinine,8 km SE of Khenifra on the eastern margin of the basin, very rich and diverse late Visean (Brigantian) coral assemblages form a reefal tract (Rodríguez et al. 2012). The early Visean age of the Ba Moussa West limestone correlates with the early Visean age of the transgressive point 1 of Huvelin and Mamet(1997)located“to the north of Ba Moussa”(Table 1).

    Table 1 Foraminifer, conodont and coral zonations for Tournaisian and Visean in Western Palaeotethys related to the transgressions(TR1 to TR4) identified in the Azrou-Khenifra Basin by Huvelin and Mamet (1997). Note that TR1 is moved down into MFZ9 in accordance with results in this work

    5 Microfossils and age of limestones

    5.1 Foraminifers and Algospongia

    The assemblage in samples from BMW1 contains the foraminifers Earlandia vulgaris, E. elegans, Endothyra spp., E.similis, Endolaxina sp., Endothyranopsis (Eosinopsis) sp.,Eosparastaffella sp.,E.concinna,E.evoluta,E. interiecta,E.macdermoti, E. aff. macdermoti, E. ovalis, E. simplex, E.tumida subsp.1,E.vdovenkoae,Eotextularia diversa,Granuliferella sp., Globoendothyra sp., Lapparentidiscus sp.,?Lituotubella sp.,Mediocris mediocris,M.ovalis,M.aff.ovalis, Omphalotis sp., Pseudoplanoendothyra sp., Septabrunsiina sp., Septaglomospiranella sp., Spinobrunsiina sp.,Spinolaxina sp., Tetrataxis sp.and Urbanella(Brenckleites)fragilis. The Algospongia recorded are very common Kamaena delicata and Palaeoberesella lahoseni, as well as Stacheoides spissa and Exvotarisella sp.(Fig.4).

    The assemblage is characterized by a high diversity in Eoparastaffella species,and in particular,the first species with pointed periphery in the last whorl, E. tumida subsp. 1 and E. ex gr. simplex. Although the marker for the base of the MFZ9 of Poty et al. (2006), as well as the marker for the base of the Visean (Devuyst et al. 2003),E. tumida subsp. 1 is derived from E. simplex from the basal levels of the MFZ9 (Devuyst and Kalvoda 2007),and thus, the assemblages can be attributed to the base of the Visean. It is noteworthy for the occurrence of E.concinna and E. evoluta, also derived from E. simplex in more advances stages of the MFZ9.

    The foraminiferal assemblage recorded in BMW2 is composed of Earlandia minor,E.vulgaris,Endothyra spp.,E. ex gr. bowmani, E. prisca, E. similis, Eotextularia diversa, “Glomospira” sp., Eoparastaffella sp., E. concinna,E. interiecta, E. macdermoti, E. simplex, E. tumida subsp.1, E. vdovenkoae, Mediocris mediocris, Latiendothyranopsis sp., Omphalotis sp., Plectogyranopsis sp., and Pseudoplanoendothyra sp. This assemblage also contains the pointed and slender Eoparastaffella,including E.concinna,which is a more evolved form than the ancestral stock of pointed Eoparastaffella.In consequence,the assemblage is also assigned to an advanced stage in the MFZ9. The Algospongia recorded in those levels contain Palaeoberesella lahoseni, Kamaena delicata, Issinella sp., and Exvotarisella sp.(Fig.4).

    5.2 Conodonts

    Fig. 4 a Eotextularia diversa, BMW1, Pc4367; b Latiendothyranopsis sp., BMW2; c Omphalotis sp., BMW1, Pc4364; d Eoparastaffella tumida, BMW1,Pc4364. e Granuliferella sp., BMW1, Pc4364; f Mediocris aff. Ovalis, BMW1, Pc4366; g Eoparastaffella simplex, BMW1, Pc4366; h Eoparastaffella ex gr.simplex (E. tumida subsp. 1), BMW1, Pc4367; i Eoparastaffella aff. Concinna, BMW1, Pc4365; j Eoparastaffella evoluta, BMW2; k Eoparastaffella vdovenkoae, BMW1, Pc4366; l Eoparastaffella macdermoti, BMW1, Pc4364; m Eoparastaffella ovalis, BMW1, Pc4367; n Endolaxina sp., BMW1, Pc4367;o Pseudoplanoendothyra sp.,BMW1,Pc4364;p Endothyranopsis(Eosynopsis)sp., BMW1,Pc4364.Scale bar same for all figures

    The conodont fauna studied in samples from BMW1 includes Polygnathus inornatus Branson and Mehl 1934, P.lobatus Branson and Mehl 1938 (that is usually related with the first species), and a fragment of Polygnathus sp.(Fig. 3f, h–i). These taxa were usually described in the early to mid Tournaisian Siphonodella–Polygnathus inornatus Assemblage Zone of Rhodes et al. (1969) in the British Isles.However,Stewart(in Varker and Sevastopulo 1985) indicated that P. inornatus ranged up to the upper Tournaisian Gnathodus typicus Conodont Zone in Cornwall (UK). Polygnathus inornatus have been reported in the upper Tournaisian Scaliognathus anchoralis Zone of the Moravia-Silesia and the Dinant-Namur basins (Belka 1985; Belka and Groessens 1986), and in the earliest Visean, just at the first occurrence of Pseudognathodus homopunctatus (Ziegler 1960) in the Belgian area. A late Tournaisian to early Visean age is supported by the occurrences of one P1 element of Gnathodus pseudosemiglaber Thompson and Fellows 1970,one P1 fragment of Mestognathus sp.and one P2 element probably corresponding to Kladognathus sp. (Fig. 3a, c–d, g). The fragment of Mestognathus sp. shows dissolution of the carina and ornamentation of the platform,and the blade and the dorsal part of the platform are broken. The parapet area is close to that described in M. praebeckmanni Sandberg, Johnston, Orchard and von Bitter 1986. The secondary keel seems to be formed with a basal groove (Fig. 3d), as in Mestognathus beckmanni Bischoff 1958, but the specimen is broken. The first occurrence of Mestognathus beckmanni was indicated just below the lower boundary of the Visean Stage at the GSSP in the Pengchong section,South China and in a few localities of Western Europe,although it is often recorded in Visean beds (Groessens 1975; von Bitter et al. 1986; Devuyst et al. 2003; Somerville 2008).The early Visean Ps. homopunctatus species is lacking in the studied sample.

    6 Systematic palaeontology

    The terminology used for the description is that proposed by Hill (1981) with some observations of Poty (1981). The microstructural description is based on the terminology of Semenoff-Tian-Chansky (1974) and Rodríguez (1984). All specimens are stored in the Area de Paleontología,Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

    Phylum Coelenterata Frey and Leuckart 1847

    Class Anthozoa Ehrenberg 1834

    Subclass Rugosa Milne-Edwards and Haime 1850

    Order Stauriida Verrill 1865

    Suborder Caniniina Wang 1950

    Family Cyathopsidae Dybowski 1873

    Genus Siphonophyllia Scouler in McCoy 1844

    Type species:Siphonophyllia cylindrica Scouler in McCoy 1844, p. 187, pl. 27, Fig. 5, Lower Carboniferous,Ardsallagh, Drumquin, Ireland.

    Siphonophyllia khenifrense Rodríguez, Said and Somerville sp. nov.(Figs. 5 and 6).

    Derivatio nominis:The name of the species refers to the town of Khenifra within the Azrou-Khenifra Basin in Morocco.

    Holotype:Specimen DPM BMW1-1; other specimens collected in the same beds are regarded as paratypes.

    Type locality, horizon and age:Ba Moussa West, 3 km W of Khenifra, Azrou-Khenifra Basin, north central Morocco, early Visean.

    Material:17 specimens (DPM BMW1-1, 2, 3A, 5, 6,7A, 8, 9, 10, 11, 20A, 20B, 21, BMW2-1, 2, 3, 4B), 29 transverse sections, 15 longitudinal sections.

    Diagnosis:Siphonophyllia having 17–31 mm tabularium diameter and 42–61 major septa. Shorter cardinal septum in cardinal fossula. Strong thickening of major septa in tabularium. Narrow dissepimentarium, 4–5 rows of regular interseptal dissepiments with occasional lonsdaleoid type in the periphery. Microstructure of wall is lamellar. That of septa is granulofibrous in the mesoplasm,and lamellar in the stereoplasm.

    Description. (External characteristics):Cylindrical corallites between 20 mm and 40 mm in alar diameter and recorded fragments are up to 20 cm long, often without calice. The dissepimentarium is often abraded.The outer wall is thin.

    (Internal characteristics):The tabularium diameter varies from 17 mm in immature stage to 31 mm in adult stage.The tabularium is wide, 3/5 to >4/5 corallite diameter; the variation in tabularium width is a function of the age of the specimen(immature vs mature corallite)and variation in the width of the dissepimentarium,which although generally narrow, can also be variably preserved. The number of major septa ranges commonly between 42 and 61,but up to 68 may be present (Fig. 5a). The septa are long, almost reaching the axis in immature stage but withdrawn from the center in mature adult stage(Fig.6b,d,g,h).They are straight to slightly flexuous in the tabularium, thinning axially and straight to sinuous in the dissepimentarium(Fig.6a,b).Major septa are strongly thickened in the tabularium but are thin in the dissepimentarium; septa can be slightly thicker in cardinal quadrants and thinner in counter quadrants(Fig.6h).The minor septa are also thickened where they penetrate slightly into the tabularium, but not as thick as majors; in the dissepimentarium they are thin. They are variable in length, from 1/4 to 1/3 length of majors. The cardinal septum is slightly shorter in most mature corallites and located in a closed small cardinal fossula (Fig. 6b,d, h). It is often flanked by two major septa which are shorter than the others (Fig. 6b). Counter septum is inconspicuous, but shorter in late adult stages.

    Fig. 5 a Plot of corallite diameter (D) and tabularium diameter (Dt) versus number of septa (N) in Siphonophyllia khenifrense sp. nov.; b Plot of ranges of species of Siphonophyllia

    Fig. 6 a–i Siphonophyllia khenifrense sp. nov. a–c Holotype DPM BMW1-1: a DPM BMW1-1A, T.S., b DPM BMW1-1B, T.S., c L.S.; d–e DPM BMW1-6:d T.S., e L.S.; f–g DPM BMW1-20: f L.S., g T.S.; h DPM BMW2-16, T.S.; i DPM BMW2-4, T.S.; j Wall microstructure in Siphonophyllia khenifrense, DPM BMW1-1, L=Lamellae; k Septal microstructure in Siphonophyllia khenifrense, DPM BMW2-16, Gr=Granular axial septum, F=Fibronormal middle zone, L=Lamellar external zone. Black arrows indicate the position of the cardinal septum. Corals are housed in the Geodinamica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología Department of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid(abbreviated DPM)

    The dissepimentarium is narrow (typically 1/10 to 1/5 corallite diameter) and mainly composed of interseptal regular dissepiments. The dissepiments are more irregular in the external part of the dissepimentarium, with occasional lonsdaleoid dissepiments (Fig. 6b). Typically 3 to 6 rows of slightly angular concentric dissepiments are present in the dissepimentarium (Fig. 6b, d, g, h, i). In longitudinal section, the dissepiments are small and elongate. They are declined to the tabularium from 60°to 70° (Fig. 4c, e).

    The tabulae are mostly complete flat domes with some splitting; horizontal,medially sagging and convex tabulae can be present, sloping down peripherally to prominent gutters (Fig. 6c, e, f). They are relatively widely spaced numbering between 6 and 12 each centimeter.

    The wall microstructure is microlamellar (Fig. 6j),as well as the septal stereoplasm and thickenings of tabulae and dissepiments. The septal mesoplasm is granulofibrous (Fig. 6k) with incipient development of microtrabeculae. The tabulae and dissepiments are microgranular.

    Remarks:The main diagnostic features of the new species are the large tabularium diameter for corallites of moderate size, and fewer major septa than many species of the genus. The regular concentric interseptal dissepiments distinguish S. khenifrense from older Tournaisian species in Belgium (Poty 1989), such as S. cylindrica hastariense (Salée 1913) and S. rivagensis Poty and Boland 1996; Boland 1997, and other coeval early Visean species,such as S. cylindrica Scouler 1844 (Lewis 1927), S. caninoides (Sibly 1906) and S. garwoodi Mitchell 1980, from UK(Garwood 1916;Somerville et al.1986;Mitchell 1989),which have conspicuous lonsdaleoid dissepiments and minor septa often reduced to short pegs on the dissepiments and tabularium wall or absent. The early Visean species S. hettonensis (Wilmore 1910) and S. gigantea(Michelin 1843) show also low development of lonsdaleoid dissepiments, but much larger size and number of septa than S.khenifrense(Fig.5b).The late Visean and Serpukhovian species S. samsonensis (Salée 1913) (= S. benburbensis Lewis 1927) from Western Europe and North Africa (Smyth 1925; Hill 1938; Dixon 1970; Hubbard 1970;Semenoff-Tian-Chansky 1974,1985;Poty 1981;Poty and Hannay 1994; Somerville 1997; Said 2005; Rodríguez and Somerville 2007; Aretz 2010, 2011; Denayer et al.2011; Rodríguez et al. 2012, 2013, 2016b; Said et al. 2013)differs by its larger dimensions, greater number of major septa and short discontinuous minor septa.The only caninoid coral described in the early Visean from the High Atlas is Caninophyllum skouraense Poty in Izart et al.1989, which shows clear differences with Siphonophyllia by the presence of very thick and long septa and absence of lonsdaleoid dissepiments.

    Distribution:Only known from Azrou-Khenifra Basin,Morocco. The genus Siphonophyllia is almost cosmopolitan. It is widely distributed from North America (where it is present but scarce in the early Mississippian) to Japan. The only continent in low latitudes where it is not recorded is Australia.

    Family Zaphrentoididae Schindewolf 1938

    Genus Sychnoelasma Lang et al. 1940

    Diagnosis(Falces and Rodríguez 2002): Small solitary ceratoid coral, cardinal side convex; calice moderately deep, bell-shaped; septa numerous, long, radial, their axial ends fused to form thickened wall to long cardinal fossula, deepest at periphery and widest at axial end;containing a short cardinal septum, thinning and shortening in later stages of development; minor septa may be long, tabular floors convex, sagging deeply in fossula;tabulae complete or incomplete; absence of dissepiments; fibronormal septal microstructure.

    Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi (Stuckenberg 1895) (Figs. 7 and 8 a–d)

    Material:3 specimens (DPM BMW1-12, 15, 19), 4 transverse sections.

    Description:Corallites having 16–20 mm corallite diameter and 42 to 50 major septa (Figs. 7 and 8 a–c).The Ba Moussa West specimens exhibit typical features of the species with short cardinal septum in long parallel-sided cardinal fossula which reaches the axis where it expands slightly, and strong thickening of major septa and minor septa, the latter less so than the majors.The minor septa are typically 1/3 length of majors and similar in length with the cardinal septum. Major septa are usually more dilated in cardinal quadrants than counter quadrants. The wall microstructure is lamellar;the septal microstructure is fibronormal with a tendency to water-jet in the inner portions(Fig.8d).

    Remarks:It differs from the upper Tournaisian S.hawbankense Mitchell and Somerville 1988, which has longer minor septa and fewer major septa in corallites of smaller diameter and from S. konincki (Milne-Edwards and Haime 1850) by its larger dimensions and greater number of septa. Ba Moussa West specimens of Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi are smaller than the type material and show intermediate features with S. hawbankense,but the differences are by far larger than with the type material of the latter.

    Fig. 7 Plot of corallite diameter (D) versus number of septa (N) in species of Sychnoelasma

    Fig. 8 a–d Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi (Stuckenberg): a DPM BMW1-12, T.S., b DPM BMW1-15, T.S., c DPM BMW1-19, T.S., d Septal fibrous microstructure; e, i, j Cravenia lamellata Howell:e DPM BMW1-23,T.S., i Water-jet fibrous septum,j Fibrous inner border of septum; f Cravenia tela Hudson DPM BMW2-5, T.S.; g–h Cravenia rhytoides Hudson: g DPM BMW1-4, T.S., h DPM BMW1-4 lamellar microstructure at the wall. Black arrows indicate the position of the cardinal septum

    Distribution:The genus Sychnoelasma is typically Tournaisian and early Visean. It is distributed from China to North America, with its maximum abundance and diversity in the late Tournaisian from the western Palaeotethys. Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi is recorded from lower Visean strata in Western Europe (Germany,France, Belgium, UK and Ireland) (Fontaine 1980; Poty 1981; Vuillemin 1990; Somerville 1994; Weyer 2000;Denayer et al. 2011). Vassiljuk (1960), Sayutina (1976)and Fedorowski (1981) also record it from Eastern Europe (Ukraine and Urals) in the early Visean. Sychnoelasma sp. close to S. urbanowitschi is recorded in Serpukhovian rocks in Guadiato Valley, SW Spain(Falces and Rodríguez 2002),but the corals occur in olistoliths and are inferred to have been derived from older lower Visean strata no longer exposed.

    Family Verbeekiellidae Schouppé and Stacul 1955

    Genus Cravenia Hudson 1928

    Diagnosis(after Hill 1981): Small solitary cornute coral, fossula on convex side, axial structure, a welldefined column with median plate produced into a cusp on cardinal side and continuous in young stages with cardinal septum, which withdraws in late stages; numerous thin septal lamellae radiate with some curvature from median plate; tabellae within column more steeply declined than those between column and the wall; septa somewhat dilated in early stages, with their bases contiguous to form, narrow peripheral stereozone;no dissepiments; septal microstructure is composed of fibronormal to water-jet mesoplasm and lamellar stereoplasm.

    Distribution:The genus Cravenia has been recorded exclusively in the Palaeotethys. It is absent in North America,Australia and Japan. It has been mainly recorded in the Tournaisian–Visean transition from Western Europe (Poty 1985; Somerville et al. 1986; Vuillemin 1990), but there are records also in the Urals (Degtiarev 1972) and South China(Jia and Xu 1977).

    Cravenia rhytoides Hudson 1928 (Figs. 8g, h and 9)

    Material:1 specimen (DPM BMW1-4), 1 transverse section.

    Description:Cravenia rhytoides having 17 mm corallite diameter and 34 dilated major septa with long less dilated minor septa. The Ba Moussa West specimen exhibits typical features of the species, with dense and wide axial structure 2/5 of corallite diameter with a distinct medial lamella, absence of dissepiments and a thick inner wall separating the septa from the axial structure.The minor septa are typically 2/5 length of majors and dissepiments are absent. Wall is microlamellar (Fig. 8h)as well as the inner wall, thickenings on tabulae and dissepiments and the septal stereoplasm. The mesoplasm shows fibronormal microstructure.

    Fig.9 Plot of ranges of corallite diameter(D) versus number of septa(N)in species of Cravenia

    Remarks:The Ba Moussa West specimen differs from the holotype in slightly smaller diameter axial structure,thicker septa and inner wall and slightly longer minor septa. C. rhytoides differs from C. tela by its larger axial structure and larger corallite diameter, and from C.lamellata by having fewer major septa and smaller corallite diameter.

    Cravenia tela Hudson 1928 (Figs. 8f and 9)

    Material:1 specimen (DPM BMW1-23), 1 transverse section.

    Description:Cravenia tela having 13 mm corallite diameter and 33 major septa. Minor septa 1/2 length of majors. Both types of septa are not dilated. Narrow axial structure (3 mm in diameter, 1/4 of corallite diameter)composed of densely packed conical tabulae and radial lamellae, with well-marked median lamella and bounded by a middle thick inner wall. Dissepiments are absent.Wall is microlamellar as well as the inner wall, thickenings on tabulae and dissepiments and the septal stereoplasm. The mesoplasm shows fibronormal to water-jet microstructure.

    Remarks:The Ba Moussa West specimen exhibits typical features and dimensions of the holotype, but the axial structure is smaller and shows a thicker inner wall separating the axial structure from tabularium. Although it has similarity with C.rhytoides in the number of major septa, it can be distinguished by its smaller size, lacking dilation of major and minor septa, and having a narrower axial structure.

    Cravenia lamellata Howell 1938 (Figs. 8e, i, j and 9)

    Material:1 specimen (DPM BMW2-5), 1 transverse section.

    Description:Cravenia lamellata having 19 mm corallite diameter and 44 dilated major septa, with wide axial structure 1/3–2/5 of corallite diameter without a medial lamella, absence of dissepiments and a thick inner wall separating the septa from the axial structure. Wall is microlamellar as well as the inner wall, thickenings on tabulae and dissepiments and the septal stereoplasm.Septal mesoplasm shows a water-jet organization of fibers (Fig. 8i, j).

    Remarks:The Ba Moussa West specimen exhibits typical features of the species with a wide axial structure of 6×8 mm2, 1/3–2/5 corallite diameter, more complex than in C. tela, with 6–8 rows of tabellae and 12 septal lamellae and a prominent short thin median plate. The minor septa are typically 2/5 length of majors. The cardinal septum is short, as in the holotype. It can be distinguished from C. rhytoides by the much larger number of major septa, and wide axial structure without medial lamella.

    Subclass Tabulata Milne-Edwards and Haime 1850

    Order Favositida Wedekind 1937

    Family Michelinidae Waagen and Wentzel 1886

    Genus Turnacipora Lafuste and Plusquellec 1985

    Diagnosis(after Lafuste and Plusquellec 1985):Micheliniid genus with cerioid corallites, characterized by microlamellar wall. Without spines. Incomplete or vesiculous axial tabulae; globose peripheral tabulae, usually distinct. Pores on the faces or the vertices of the walls.Increase by basal buddings in the borders of the colonies; intercorallite budding very rare.

    Turnacipora megastoma (Phillips 1836) (Fig. 10a–e).

    Fig. 10 a–e Turnacipora megastoma (Phillips): a DPM BMW1-3b, T.S., b, d DPM BMW1-26, b L.S., d T.S., c, e DPM BMW1-27, c L.S., e T.S.; f–h Pleurosiphonella crustosa Tchudinova:f DPM BMW1-24,L.S.,g DPM BMW1-24,T.S.,h DPM BMW1-24,fibrous microstructure of the wall

    Material:6 specimens (BMW1-3, 1-25, 1-26, 1-27, 1-28, 1-29). Ten transverse and four longitudinal sections.

    Description:Massive cerioid colonies mostly fragmented.Maximum dimensions of colonies recorded are 15 cm in diameter and 8 cm in height. Single corallites are 4–7 sided, variable in size, 12 mm in maximum diameter, and having walls 0.5–2.2 mm thick (Fig. 10a–e). Mural pores scarce, both, at corners of corallites and on corallite wall sides, 0.2–0.4 mm in diameter and commonly obliterated by thickenings of the wall. Tabulae mostly incomplete,mostly concave upwards, locally convex upwards and densely packed(Fig.10b,c).All structures show conspicuous thickenings. Microstructure of the median dark line microgranular. Microstructure of wall and tabular thickenings microlamellar.

    Remarks:Lafuste and Plusquellec (1985) proposed the new genus Turnacipora as different from Michelinia by its microlamellar microstructure, and included in that genus the species M. favosa (type) and M. megastoma. Subsequently, Tourneur et al. (1989) included in Turnacipora only the type species and included the species T. megastoma in a general term of “Michelinia sensu lato” because of the absence of detailed microstructural studies on it. As the specimens from Ba Moussa West show identical microstructure to that described by Lafuste and Plusquellec(1985) in T. favosa, we follow their statement on the generic assignation of T. megastoma. The specimens from Ba Moussa West show microlamellar microstructure and identical dimensions as the specimens from the British Isles and Belgium.The only differences are a conspicuous thickening of most structures and less development of peripheral,steeply inclined vesicular tabulae.The species is typical for the late Tournaisian and early Visean from Europe and it has been also mentioned in an identical stratigraphical position in the Central Sahara (Lafuste 1983), but the Saharian specimen shows smaller corallites and includes fibrous layers in the microstructure.

    Distribution:T. megastoma is an index fossil from the late Tournaisian and early Visean. It is common in the British Isles (Vaughan 1905; Matley and Vaughan 1906;Mitchell 1973; Somerville et al. 1986), Iran (Ogar et al.2013), Kuznets Basin and Altai (Dobrolyubova et al.1966), and Himalaya (Wang et al. 2003) and less common in the same ages in Belgium (Tourneur et al. 1989).

    Order Auloporida Sokolov 1947

    Family Syringoporidae de Fromentel 1861

    Genus Pleurosiphonella Tchudinova 1970

    Diagnosis(after Tchudinova 1970): Colonies fasciculate, formed of cylindrical, slightly curved corallites usually arranged closely or at intervals equal to onehalf or less than one-half of corallite diameter. Corallites connected by very sparse, irregularly arranged tubules. Walls of corallites thick, with well-defined fibrous sclerenchyme, covered with concentrically rugose epitheca. Tabulae sparse, deeply infundibuliform, with distinct lateral hollow tubules. Septal spinules sparse or absent. Increase lateral.

    Pleurosiphonella crustosa Tchudinova 1970(Fig.10f–h).

    Material:1 specimen (BMW1-24). Two transverse and one longitudinal section.

    Description:Fasciculate colony, composed of parallel corallites. Rounded corallites from 1.3 mm to 1.5 mm in diameter. Corallites closely spaced (about 2 mm apart).Walls thick, 0.25–0.35 mm (Fig. 10f, g). Microstructure typically fibrous (Fig. 10h). Scarce connecting tubules.Tabulae infundibuliform, with laterally placed syrinx(Fig. 10f). Septal spines absent.

    Remarks:The presence of infundibuliform tabulae with laterally placed syrinx and the fibrous wall allow the identification of the studied specimen as Pleurosiphonella. Moreover, the diameter of corallites, diameter of the wall and absence of septal spines are identical to the type species P. crustosa. The only difference is the separation of corallites that is slightly higher in the specimen from Ba Moussa West than in the Caucasian species and might be due to ecological control. The type species is somewhat older than our specimen (late Tournaisian compared to early Visean).

    Distribution:The genus Pleurosiphonella occurs in North America from Tournaisian to Serpukhovian. In Western Palaeotethys, it has been cited from the lower Tournaisian from Belgium(Tourneur et al.1989),from the lower Visean Kohlenkalk (Chadian) in Germany (Weyer 1993, 2000) associated with Cyathoclisia modavensis (Salée 1913), with Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi and Siphonophyllia garwoodi in the succeeding Arundian strata. In the Middle Palaeotethys, it has been recorded in the upper Tournaisian and lower Visean from Moscow Basin, Urals(Tchudinova 1986), Transcaucasia (Tchudinova 1970),Tian-Shan (Ogar 2006) and Darwas (Leleshus 1991). In most cases, it is associated with Turnacipora and Siphonophyllia.

    7 Palaeobiogeographic significance of coral faunas (Table 2)

    At least four transgressive phases were differentiated in the Azrou-Kenifra Basin by Huvelin and Mamet (1997) which were related with fault activity and resedimentation on the margins of tectonic blocks (Table 1). The early Visean corals at Ba Moussa West are the oldest occurrence in this basin, and are an important fauna differentiated from the commonly described faunas in late Visean beds of the western margin of the basin at Sidi Lamine and Tabainout(Aretz and Herbig 2010; Somerville et al. 2012, 2013; Said et al. 2013), as well as in the northern part of the basin at Adarouch(Said et al.2007,2013)(Fig.1).

    The early Visean age in the MFZ9 is older than the previously considered age by Huvelin and Mamet (1997)for North Ba Moussa point 1 (Mamet’s Zone 11 or equivalent MFZ10), in spite of foraminifer species that was based on their zonal correlation, Earlandia vulgaris and Eotextularia diversa, are also occurring in samples from BMW1 and BMW2 (assigned here to the MFZ9).

    The Ba Moussa West succession is a resedimented body of shale, siltstone and limestone with early Visean microfossils and corals,indicating that the probable age of sedimentation was very close to that of skeletal growth of the components. The corals and microfossils correspond to shallow-water taxa dwelling on a neighbouring sedimentary relief. The coralline assemblage shows a distinctive dominance of solitary rugosans, the absence of colonial rugosans and occurrence of colonial tabulate corals.Moreover, the solitary forms are dominated by Siphonophyllia khenifrense and Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi, and the tabulate coral Turnacipora megastoma.A similar association of Siphonophyllia aff. garwoodi and Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi is known from the early Visean of the Laval syncline in Normandy (N. France), although with colonial rugosans there (Solenodendron spp.; Fontaine 1980;Vuillemin 1990). This colonial genus is not recorded in the Azrou-Khenifra Basin first until the late Visean (Said 2005;Somerville et al.2016).

    Table 2 Distribution of corals from the lower Visean in the main areas of Western Palaeotethys. The Taurides have been included as external near group. KH: Azrou-Khenifra, TA: Tafilalt,BR: Britain, FR: France, BE: Belgium, GE: Germany, PO: Poland,DO: Donetz, Tau: Taurides, X: Present. Data mainly taken from Vassiljuk (1960), Fedorowski (1981), Poty (1981), Somerville et al.(1986), Mitchell (1989), Vuillemin (1990), Weyer (2000), Denayer et al. (2011),Aretz et al. (2013), Denayer (2015) and unpublished

    The Ba Moussa West assemblage has ‘a(chǎn)ffinities’ with the early Visean RC4?2 subzone of Poty et al. (2006).However, none of the seven listed key taxa of this subzone are recorded in Morocco, although the genera

    Siphonophyllia, Cravenia and Sychnoelasma are present.Perhaps of greater significance though, is that whereas S.hawbankense is only recorded in the underlying upper Tournaisian RC4?1 subzone of Poty et al. (2006), a new taxon S. hawbankense subsp. A which starts in this subzone, extends into RC4?2 subzone (see Fig. 9 in Poty et al. 2006). Unfortunately, this subspecies is not described or figured in the 2006 paper. The strong possibility exists though, that this corresponds to the small S.urbanowitschi of Ba Moussa, which represents the transition to larger typical forms in RC5 Zone.

    The Ba Moussa West coral fauna, although quite restricted in its diversity, nevertheless, contains typical elements of the Western European coral province of Fedorowski (1981) and Sando (1990) (which includes North Africa and Nova Scotia) (Fig. 11). In particular,the dominance of solitary rugosa and tabulate corals is a feature of the early Visean assemblages which are recognised in NW Europe: Normandy (N France),southern Belgium, SW Province, North Wales, Craven Lowlands and South Cumbria (Great Britain), and Dublin Basin (Ireland) (Poty 1981; Mitchell 1989;Vuillemin 1990; Somerville 1994; Denayer et al. 2011).Similar early Visean faunas with solitary rugosans are known in the eastern part of the Anti-Atlas region at Tafilalt (Aretz et al. 2013; Denayer 2015) in eastern Morocco and in the Béchar Basin in Algeria (Semenoff-Tian-Chansky 1974, 1985). The late Tournaisian to early Visean rugose coral fauna from Tafilalt is richer than that from Ba Moussa. It is dominated by solitary genera, both undissepimented (Sychnoelasma,Cravenia) and dissepimented (Bifossularia, Cyathoclisia, Clisiophyllum, Siphonophyllia, Palaeosmilia,Amygdalophyllum), and is lacking colonial rugosans(Aretz et al. 2013; Denayer 2015).

    It was previously considered that since the Azrou-Khenifra Basin only had late Visean and younger coral assemblages (Aretz and Herbig 2010; Said et al. 2013;Rodríguez et al. 2016a), so too the Jerada Basin in NE Morocco (Aretz 2010), they were isolated from other marine basins in the early Visean. Connections among the Azrou-Khenifra Basin, NW Europe, Tafilalt, and other Saharian basins in Algeria (Béchar Basin) were open from the Asbian and Brigantian (late Visean). The Ba Moussa West corals,foraminifers and conodonts suggest that marine seaways were available for migrations between the Azrou-Khenifra Basin and other regions from the early Visean. Similar early Visean faunas with solitary rugosans are known in the eastern part of the Anti-Atlas region at Tafilalt (Aretz et al. 2013; Denayer 2015), in eastern Morocco and in the Béchar Basin in Algeria (Semenoff-Tian-Chansky 1974, 1985). The marine connections between NW Europe and the southern part of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin is supported by similar early Visean assemblages recognized in NW Europe with abundant solitary rugose and tabulate corals, but with colonial rugosans: Normandy (N France), southern Belgium, SW Province, North Wales, Craven Lowlands and South Cumbria (Great Britain), and Dublin Basin in Ireland (Poty 1981; Mitchell 1989; Vuillemin 1990; Somerville 1994; Denayer et al. 2011).

    Fig. 11 Palaeogeographic distribution of the coral taxa recorded in Ba Moussa West in the Palaeotethys region and around Laurentia and Baltica(modified after Webb 2002). s Siphonophyllia, u Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi, c Cravenia, t Turnacipora, p Pleurosiphonella. 1. Ba Moussa West, 2.Tafilalt, 3. Midcontinent, 4. Western Interior, 5. Canadian Rockies, 6. Carnic Alps, 7. Western Europe, 8. Eastern Europe, 9. Moscow Basin, 10. Ural Mountains, 11.Tian-Shan(Northwest China),12.Turkey, 13.Transcaucasia,14. Iran,15.Himalaya,16. South China

    In relation to the tabulate corals, the tabulate Turnacipora megastoma in the Ba Moussa West assemblage was also known from Central Saharian basins,but also from the Chadian-Arundian (early Visean)locations in NW Europe (UK, Ireland, France,Germany?) (Lafuste 1983). The occurrence of Pleurosiphonella crustosa is the first report in North Africa and suggests marine connection with the Urals. It was first described from the upper Tournaisian of Transcaucasia (Tchudinova 1970) and its age range extends here slightly into the early Visean. The dispersion between SW Asia (Armenia, Taurides and Alborz) and the Azrou-Khenifra Basin, via Tafilalt,Béchar and Sinai, is poorly established. Some solitary rugosans (Siphonophyllia) are common to all areas,but others, such as Kueichouphyllum and the colonial form Eokoninkocarinia, indicative of Asiatic affinity are clearly absent in Morocco (Denayer 2015).

    8 Conclusions

    A new early Visean coral assemblage has been discovered transported in the rhythmic facies deposits of the southern part of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin, northwest of Khenifra, Morroco. The Ba Moussa West coral fauna includes Siphonophyllia khenifrense sp. nov., Sychnoelasma urbanowitschi, Cravenia lamellata, Cravenia tela, Cravenia rhytoides, Turnacipora megastoma and Pleurosiphonella crustosa. The early Visean age of the coral assemblage is supported by microfossil data, which confirms a previous hypothesis that indicated a first transgression during the early Visean in the Carboniferous of the Meseta. The allochthonous coral assemblage was recovered from coarse-grained proximal limestone debris flow and turbidite beds within a fault-bounded rhythmic unit in the eastern part of the basin. No evidence remains of the former early Visean shallow-water platform from which the corals were derived. All other in situ platform carbonate rocks around the southern margin of the Azrou-Khenifra Basin are of late Visean (Asbian–Brigantian) age. The early Visean Ba Moussa West coral fauna can be compared with that from the Saharian basins of SE Morocco and Algeria. Most of the genera and species in the Ba Moussa West assemblage are identical to those in Western Europe, indicating possible marine connections. The new rugose species described,Siphonophyllia khenifrense, is probably endemic to North Africa.Its ecological niche in NW Europe was occupied by S.cylindrica or S. aff. garwoodi.

    The microfossil determinations provide greater precision in the age dating of the Ba Moussa West limestones. The foraminiferal assemblages from BMW1 can be attributed to the lowermost Visean (MFZ9). Similarly,the conodont fauna recovered from the same beds, although sparse, suggests a late Tournaisian to early Visean age.

    Abbreviations

    BMW: Ba Moussa West; CAI: Conodont alteration index; DPM: Geodinamica,Estratigrafía y Paleontología Department of the Universidad Complutense de Madrid; L.S.: Longitudinal section; MFZ: Mississippian Foraminiferal Zone;T.S.: Transverse section; TAI: Thermal alteration index; TR: Transgression

    Acknowledgements

    The authors thank the discussions on the regional geology and the location of the studied outcrops to Prof. M. El Houicha (Université Choua?b Doukkali).We thank the technicians of the Laboratory or the Area de Paleontología of the Complutense University and Instituto de Geociencias for the preparation of thin sections. JS-L would like to express their gratitude to A.J. Quintana García (Scientific-Technical Services, University of Oviedo) for their assistance with the scanning electron microscope. This study is a contribution to the IGCP 652.

    Authors’ contributions

    SR participated in the sampling and study of rugose corals and sedimentology.IDS collaborated in the sampling and study of rugose corals and sedimentology.PC carried out the sampling and study of foraminifera and algae and sedimentology. JS-L carried out the study of conodonts. IC participated in the study of the tabulate corals. FG carried out the sampling and study of palynomorphs.IS participated in field works and organization of expedition.MEH located the outcrops and provided information on the regional geology. All authors participated in the interpretation of results and writing the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

    Funding

    This study was funded by projects CGL2012–30922 and CGL2016–78738-P of the Spanish Government.

    Availability of data and materials

    Corals:Department of Geodinamics,Stratigraphy and Paleontology,Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Foraminifera: Institut of Geosciences of Madrid, CSIC.Conodonts: Department of Geology, Universidad de Oviedo. Palinomorphs:Department of Earth Sciences,Universidad de Huelva.

    Competing interests

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Author details

    1GEODESPAL, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, c/José Antonio Novais.12, 28040 Madrid, Spain.2Instituto de Geociencias (CSIC, UCM), c/ José Antonio Novais 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain.3UCD School of Earth Sciences,University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.4Departmento de Geología, Universidad de Oviedo, Arias de Velasco s/n, 33005 Oviedo, Spain.5Institute of Paleobiology, Warsaw, Poland.6Dpto. de Ciencias de la Tierra,Universidad de Huelva, Avda. Fuerzas Armadas s/n, Campus de El Carmen,21071 Huelva, Spain.7Laboratoire de Géodynamique et Géomatique, Faculté des Sciences, Université Choua?b Doukkali, BP.20, 24000 El Jadida, Morocco.

    Received: 16 April 2019 Accepted: 19 November 2019

    变态另类成人亚洲欧美熟女| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 日本与韩国留学比较| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| av在线播放精品| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 在线观看66精品国产| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 一级毛片电影观看 | 成年版毛片免费区| 午夜福利高清视频| 美女黄网站色视频| 嫩草影院新地址| 一本一本综合久久| aaaaa片日本免费| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久久久性生活片| 日本黄色片子视频| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产在视频线在精品| 国产色婷婷99| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| aaaaa片日本免费| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 在线免费观看的www视频| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| av免费在线看不卡| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 中文资源天堂在线| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲av成人av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 夜夜爽天天搞| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 99热全是精品| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 不卡一级毛片| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 热99re8久久精品国产| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 免费av毛片视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲四区av| 如何舔出高潮| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 久久热精品热| 99热网站在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 一本久久中文字幕| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 成人精品一区二区免费| 久久久久久久久久成人| 身体一侧抽搐| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 少妇的逼好多水| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 欧美色视频一区免费| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产高清三级在线| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 在线观看66精品国产| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 亚洲av一区综合| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 成年av动漫网址| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 免费av不卡在线播放| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 精品日产1卡2卡| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 少妇的逼好多水| 精品久久久久久久末码| 美女高潮的动态| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 在线播放无遮挡| 不卡一级毛片| 搡老岳熟女国产| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 嫩草影院精品99| 日韩高清综合在线| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 亚洲最大成人av| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 国产91av在线免费观看| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 悠悠久久av| 国产精品一及| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 六月丁香七月| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产精品野战在线观看| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 色吧在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 成人欧美大片| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 日韩欧美三级三区| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美潮喷喷水| 身体一侧抽搐| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 嫩草影院新地址| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区 | 精品一区二区免费观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 99久国产av精品| 欧美人与善性xxx| av天堂在线播放| 露出奶头的视频| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 搞女人的毛片| 日本与韩国留学比较| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 欧美+日韩+精品| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 综合色丁香网| 欧美激情在线99| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 在线播放国产精品三级| 又黄又爽又免费观看的视频| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产成人a区在线观看| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 久久久成人免费电影| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 日本色播在线视频| 久久6这里有精品| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 久久久久性生活片| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 嫩草影院新地址| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国语自产精品视频在线第100页| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲最大成人中文| eeuss影院久久| av卡一久久| 老女人水多毛片| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 长腿黑丝高跟| 久久久色成人| 在线国产一区二区在线| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 一进一出抽搐动态| 精品久久久噜噜| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 我要搜黄色片| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 国产成人91sexporn| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 在线观看一区二区三区| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 极品教师在线视频| 小说图片视频综合网站| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 99热精品在线国产| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 有码 亚洲区| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 91久久精品电影网| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 美女黄网站色视频| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 日韩中字成人| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 91久久精品电影网| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 国产91av在线免费观看| av.在线天堂| 一级毛片电影观看 | 免费看a级黄色片| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| av在线蜜桃| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 熟女电影av网| 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| aaaaa片日本免费| 国产成人freesex在线 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产日本99.免费观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产精品一及| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 国内精品宾馆在线| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产色婷婷99| 深夜a级毛片| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲av.av天堂| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 日本熟妇午夜| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| aaaaa片日本免费| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 九九在线视频观看精品| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 日本在线视频免费播放| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 久久久色成人| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 一级黄片播放器| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 黄色配什么色好看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 久久热精品热| 精品久久久久久久末码| 在线播放无遮挡| 在线免费观看的www视频| 简卡轻食公司| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 直男gayav资源| 久久热精品热| 中国美女看黄片| 少妇的逼水好多| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 女人被狂操c到高潮| av专区在线播放| 国产三级中文精品| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 高清毛片免费看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| av在线天堂中文字幕| 久久人妻av系列| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 一级黄色大片毛片| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 观看美女的网站| 老女人水多毛片| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 久久久久九九精品影院| 亚洲在线观看片| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 伦精品一区二区三区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 大香蕉久久网| 在线观看一区二区三区| 久久九九热精品免费| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 久99久视频精品免费| 色5月婷婷丁香| 亚洲综合色惰| a级毛色黄片| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 精品久久久噜噜| eeuss影院久久| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 少妇高潮的动态图| 国产精品三级大全| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 少妇丰满av| 国产美女午夜福利| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 亚洲第一电影网av| 午夜福利在线在线| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 日本 av在线| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 一本精品99久久精品77| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 久久久久国内视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 亚州av有码| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 在线播放无遮挡| 长腿黑丝高跟| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| videossex国产| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 日本免费a在线| av专区在线播放| 久久精品影院6| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 亚洲色图av天堂| 观看美女的网站| 91狼人影院| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲在线观看片| 97超视频在线观看视频| 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产成人91sexporn| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 三级毛片av免费| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 成人无遮挡网站| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 岛国在线免费视频观看| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 乱人视频在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| or卡值多少钱| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 成人三级黄色视频| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站 | 在线观看午夜福利视频| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲性久久影院| 日本免费a在线| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 在现免费观看毛片| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 国产三级中文精品| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国产 一区精品| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久这里只有精品中国| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产高清激情床上av| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 欧美bdsm另类| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 久久精品影院6| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲在线观看片| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 日本免费a在线| 国产成人freesex在线 | 国产亚洲精品av在线| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 看免费成人av毛片| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 99热6这里只有精品| 91av网一区二区| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产精品一及| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久久久国内视频| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 日本五十路高清| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 美女黄网站色视频| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 欧美性感艳星| 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 久久久久久大精品| 中文资源天堂在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| av在线蜜桃| 日本黄色片子视频| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验 | 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| av在线蜜桃| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 免费av毛片视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清|