業(yè)余時(shí)光：非職業(yè)樂(lè)團(tuán)在新加坡與曼谷的成功表現(xiàn)

文：司馬勤（Ken Smith） 編譯：李正欣

幾個(gè)月前，我在這個(gè)專欄里談及了兩種樂(lè)團(tuán)：交響樂(lè)團(tuán)和坐在樂(lè)池中的樂(lè)團(tuán)。當(dāng)時(shí)的邏輯顯得很合理，但后來(lái)我發(fā)現(xiàn)了幾個(gè)漏洞。

我所指的，跟卡內(nèi)基音樂(lè)廳前任藝術(shù)策劃總監(jiān)杰里米·格芬（Jeremy Geffen）有一次告訴我的漏洞不一樣。他曾告訴我，自己遵循所有的猶太教規(guī)中的飲食規(guī)則，“培根除外”。那不是個(gè)小“漏洞”，簡(jiǎn)直就是模式上的轉(zhuǎn)變。而我所指的漏洞是一個(gè)更簡(jiǎn)單的例子，即強(qiáng)調(diào)某些概括性或模糊不清的界定因素，故意避開(kāi)其他的關(guān)鍵要點(diǎn)。

維吉爾·湯姆森（Virgil Thomson）是最先提出“兩種樂(lè)團(tuán)”概念的人，他最喜歡在遣詞造句方面一概而論，目的是故意挑戰(zhàn)某些讀者，引起他們的反感。他這樣做也是經(jīng)過(guò)深思熟慮的：他所歸納的兩個(gè)門(mén)類——“龐大的樂(lè)團(tuán)和直接功能性的樂(lè)團(tuán)”之中，將非職業(yè)與學(xué)生樂(lè)團(tuán)放在了第二類的最低層次中。

自我從有記憶以來(lái)，朋友圈里有不少非職業(yè)的音樂(lè)家與學(xué)生音樂(lè)家。要是他們知悉湯姆森的見(jiàn)解，我能猜得到他們的反應(yīng)——也就是，反感——因此，我故意完全回避了這個(gè)話題。不過(guò)，上個(gè)月我遇上一些非職業(yè)音樂(lè)家和學(xué)生音樂(lè)團(tuán)體。說(shuō)真的，我要為他們平反，讓他們可以走出“最低層次”的境地。

＊＊＊

1月初，我人在新加坡，觀看當(dāng)?shù)刂谱鞯摹杜渖瘛肥籽荨@不僅是新加坡罕有的瓦格納制作，也很有可能為東南亞地區(qū)首套全舞臺(tái)版制作的《指環(huán)》打響頭炮。讓我在這里正式聲明，這并不是新加坡歌劇團(tuán)（Singapore Lyric Opera）出品，也不是新加坡交響樂(lè)團(tuán)（Singapore Symphony Orchestra）的制作。把《女武神》搬上舞臺(tái)的，是一群非職業(yè)的音樂(lè)家，他們組織了自己經(jīng)營(yíng)的創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)（Orchestra of Music Makers）。

我們?cè)龠M(jìn)一步探討：西方歌劇經(jīng)典中最具挑戰(zhàn)性的作品之一在新加坡上演，而把這部作品付諸實(shí)踐卻是一群由醫(yī)生、律師與商人組成的團(tuán)隊(duì)。創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)成立于2008年，當(dāng)時(shí)，一群鐘愛(ài)音樂(lè)的中學(xué)生遵從父母的意愿，填報(bào)了 “真材實(shí)料”的大學(xué)專業(yè)志愿，畢業(yè)后在社會(huì)上也紛紛找到“實(shí)在的工作崗位”，但他們十分堅(jiān)決地不放棄音樂(lè)。

新加坡創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)制作的《女武神》劇照（攝影：許智勇）

起初，他們甚至不確定自己是否想要舉辦公開(kāi)演出，可是這些疑慮很快就被打消了。你可以想象，拿到商科與法律學(xué)位的人，在求學(xué)時(shí)期就已經(jīng)被灌輸了大量的自信，在管理技能方面同樣熟練有加。過(guò)了不久，創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)（他們找來(lái)了科班出身的專業(yè)指揮，還有一位職業(yè)樂(lè)手當(dāng)樂(lè)團(tuán)首席）開(kāi)始在新加坡最顯赫的表演場(chǎng)地——濱海藝術(shù)中心，舉行定期音樂(lè)會(huì)。樂(lè)團(tuán)于2011年錄制了馬勒《第二交響曲（復(fù)活）》，音頻被納入新加坡航空公司的機(jī)上娛樂(lè)系統(tǒng)，更贏得英國(guó)《留聲機(jī)》（

Gramophone

）雜志的贊許。一年后的夏天，樂(lè)團(tuán)獲邀于英國(guó)切爾滕納姆（Cheltenham）與利奇菲爾德（Lichfield ）音樂(lè)節(jié)亮相。然后是2015年，樂(lè)團(tuán)搬演了馬勒《第八交響曲》——聲名遠(yuǎn)播的“千人交響曲”（雖然舞臺(tái)上大約只有350人）。兩年后，樂(lè)團(tuán)搬演了英格伯特·洪佩爾丁克（Englebert Humperdinck）的《漢澤爾與格蕾泰爾》（

Hansel and Gretel

）半舞臺(tái)版制作。到了2018年，搬演了倫納德·伯恩斯坦（Leonard Bernstein）的《彌撒》（

Mass

）。這種無(wú)所畏懼的精神贏得當(dāng)?shù)孛襟w激賞，與樂(lè)季編排平平無(wú)奇的新加坡交響樂(lè)團(tuán)（尤其是領(lǐng)導(dǎo)該團(tuán)多年的音樂(lè)總監(jiān)水藍(lán)去年卸任后相比），形成很大的反差。

我們回顧一下此次創(chuàng)樂(lè)者樂(lè)團(tuán)制作的瓦格納龐大樂(lè)隊(duì)編制的《女武神》以及近30萬(wàn)歐元的制作費(fèi)用吧。這個(gè)制作不算“徹底”的本土化——只有兩位演員（飾演九名女武神中的成員）來(lái)自新加坡，其他演員從美國(guó)、英國(guó)與澳大利亞遠(yuǎn)道而來(lái)——但導(dǎo)演與制作團(tuán)隊(duì)都來(lái)自新加坡，皆為當(dāng)?shù)貞騽〗绲闹袌?jiān)人物。

在導(dǎo)演伊蒂絲·普德斯塔（Edith Podesta）的構(gòu)思里，樂(lè)團(tuán)坐在舞臺(tái)中央，穿上戲服的演員則位于樂(lè)團(tuán)前下方（升高了的樂(lè)池區(qū)）以及樂(lè)團(tuán)后上方（舞臺(tái)后建造了代表瓦爾哈拉的山峰，演員得經(jīng)常上上下下）。大型的投影除提供英語(yǔ)字幕之外，更展示出一些由瓦格納的主導(dǎo)動(dòng)機(jī)（leitmotif）所衍生出的視覺(jué)設(shè)計(jì)，也有現(xiàn)場(chǎng)演出的即時(shí)視像特寫(xiě)（讓大家看得清演員的面部表情）。于是，多層次的細(xì)膩感情與瓦格納龐大的音樂(lè)編制相得益彰，特別是當(dāng)演員們分隔在舞臺(tái)兩邊的時(shí)候。

所有這些設(shè)計(jì)讓我們意識(shí)到這個(gè)制作實(shí)際上是圍繞著樂(lè)團(tuán)展開(kāi)的。創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)在陳子樂(lè)——他是樂(lè)團(tuán)創(chuàng)辦人之一，同時(shí)擔(dān)任音樂(lè)總監(jiān)——指揮下，這群非職業(yè)樂(lè)手大致上成功地應(yīng)對(duì)了這次挑戰(zhàn)。弦樂(lè)像是一堵精亮的音墻，聽(tīng)起來(lái)統(tǒng)一、準(zhǔn)確、遼闊。個(gè)別木管與銅管樂(lè)手也許不習(xí)慣從樂(lè)隊(duì)中突顯出來(lái)——也可能是耐力不夠——所以偶爾的出現(xiàn)了錯(cuò)失。最重要的是，陳子樂(lè)對(duì)于瓦格納風(fēng)格把握得很好，樂(lè)手們堅(jiān)定而頑強(qiáng)地奏完等同于兩套交響樂(lè)音樂(lè)會(huì)時(shí)長(zhǎng)的曲目。總的來(lái)說(shuō)，這場(chǎng)演出與眾多歐洲歌劇院的水平不相上下。

＊＊＊

下一站是曼谷。在那里，我遇上一群學(xué)生。2001年，曼谷歌劇院（Bangkok Opera）（后來(lái)改名暹羅歌劇院，Opera Siam）由桑姆托·蘇恰里故（Somtow Sucharitkul）創(chuàng)辦。這位泰國(guó)出生但在英國(guó)接受過(guò)教育的作家與作曲家，創(chuàng)辦歌劇院的初衷，跟新加坡創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)開(kāi)頭一樣，都是小型院團(tuán)?？墒歉鑴≡旱乃囆g(shù)宗旨隨著創(chuàng)辦人善變的思維而有所變動(dòng)。暹羅歌劇院也是東南亞首家開(kāi)拓《指環(huán)》制作的表演團(tuán)體，雖然至今已兩度推遲《齊格弗里德》的制作。在過(guò)去幾年里，歌劇院制作了自己出品的史詩(shī)式歌?。荷Ｄ吠凶珜?xiě)的《佛陀本生十世》（

Ten Lives of the Buddha

），至今已經(jīng)演了六部。

新加坡創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)制作的《女武神》劇照（攝影：許智勇）

今年1月中旬，桑姆托的最新歌劇作品《海琳娜·茨特羅諾娃》（

Helena Citrónová

）搶先公演，歌劇《佛陀》的第七部也因而被推遲。從各個(gè)層次來(lái)看，《海琳娜》代表了嶄新的出發(fā)點(diǎn)。劇本根據(jù)真人真事改編，描述了被困在奧斯威辛集中營(yíng)的猶太女子與一名納粹侍衛(wèi)墜入愛(ài)河的故事，劇情發(fā)展所利用的音樂(lè)混合了無(wú)調(diào)性旋律及當(dāng)時(shí)的流行音樂(lè)曲風(fēng)，樂(lè)團(tuán)襯托的音樂(lè)令人聯(lián)想起伯納德·赫爾曼（Bernard Herrmann）的管弦樂(lè)配器；臺(tái)上更設(shè)有猶太克萊茲默（klezmer）小樂(lè)隊(duì)，在適當(dāng)?shù)臅r(shí)候加入演奏，讓我們?cè)诟S故事的發(fā)展的同時(shí)，時(shí)不時(shí)還能耳目一新。就像創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)的模式，暹羅歌劇院只聘用了幾位本地歌唱家擔(dān)任配角，其他主演來(lái)自世界各地。整場(chǎng)演出的情感迂回路轉(zhuǎn)，故事的兩位主角——美國(guó)女高音卡桑德拉·布萊克（Cassandra Black）飾演海琳娜、德國(guó)男中音法爾克·赫尼茨（Falko H?nisch）飾演納粹侍衛(wèi)法蘭茨·弗恩舒（Franz Wunsch）——合演多段二重唱，有時(shí)候富有戲劇張力，有時(shí)候抒情至極。

這部歌劇的原動(dòng)力來(lái)自樂(lè)池中的管弦樂(lè)團(tuán)。指揮特里斯蒂·納·帕塔楞（Trisdee na Patalung）融匯了總譜中包含的多種風(fēng)格，把它們糅合成為一體，負(fù)責(zé)演奏的暹羅小交響樂(lè)團(tuán)（Siam Sinfonietta）在帕塔楞的引領(lǐng)下，充滿激情，信心堅(jiān)定。演出結(jié)束后，我才知道暹羅小交響樂(lè)團(tuán)的團(tuán)員年齡從12歲到25歲不等，樂(lè)團(tuán)中有幾位年輕的職業(yè)樂(lè)手，由他們帶領(lǐng)著曼谷各中學(xué)的學(xué)生樂(lè)手一起演奏。

上、左頁(yè)：暹羅歌劇院制作的《海琳娜·茨特羅諾娃》 劇照

不知何故，我聽(tīng)聞這個(gè)消息后，并不感到驚訝。新加坡創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)對(duì)所謂“業(yè)余”（amateur）的界定，其實(shí)是根據(jù)這個(gè)英文詞匯的拉丁詞根：他們愛(ài)好音樂(lè)，所以彈奏音樂(lè)。很多不依靠音樂(lè)賺錢(qián)的音樂(lè)家寧愿用“非職業(yè)”（avocational）這個(gè)詞語(yǔ)，因?yàn)椤皹I(yè)余”隱喻著馬虎與非內(nèi)行的貶義。在我印象中最難忘的演出，有不少是名副其實(shí)“愛(ài)好者”的演出，而不是那些按時(shí)鐘計(jì)算薪水的音樂(lè)家。反過(guò)來(lái)，我經(jīng)歷過(guò)不少“職業(yè)樂(lè)手”無(wú)精打采的音樂(lè)會(huì)：他們排練充分，演奏出來(lái)的表面音色十全十美，可是內(nèi)心的激情火花完全熄滅了。有一次，在聽(tīng)過(guò)一場(chǎng)死氣沉沉的音樂(lè)會(huì)后，我描述那場(chǎng)演出是“音樂(lè)停尸間”：那里的音樂(lè)已經(jīng)“死去”了，可它比還“活著”的時(shí)候更悅耳。

創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)可以為觀眾獻(xiàn)上專業(yè)水準(zhǔn)的演出，是因?yàn)?.從他們的角度來(lái)看，判斷演出的成功與否的根據(jù)，是演奏的效果，而不是薪酬多少；2.每年只演幾場(chǎng)音樂(lè)會(huì)，可以為每一場(chǎng)音樂(lè)會(huì)的曲目投入更多的時(shí)間。同樣地，暹羅小交響樂(lè)團(tuán)的學(xué)生們可能永遠(yuǎn)都達(dá)不到職業(yè)樂(lè)團(tuán)那種打磨得非常光滑的音效，但年輕人帶來(lái)的，是剛剛發(fā)現(xiàn)音樂(lè)美妙之處時(shí)那毫無(wú)保留的興奮和純粹。我可以保證，很多膩煩的職業(yè)音樂(lè)家一看到桑姆托的樂(lè)譜就會(huì)貶低這部歌劇，因?yàn)槭紫人切伦髌?，其次它不是瓦格納作品。

完全漠視職業(yè)音樂(lè)家當(dāng)然也不公平?？瓢喑錾淼穆殬I(yè)音樂(lè)家不但能展示卓越的演奏技藝，而且無(wú)論演出多少場(chǎng)次還能確保同樣的高水平。創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)此番只安排了一場(chǎng)《女武神》演出，倘若他們加演第二場(chǎng)——或者暹羅歌劇院連續(xù)三晚搬演《海琳娜·茨特羅諾娃》——樂(lè)團(tuán)團(tuán)員由腎上腺素激發(fā)的動(dòng)力，能與首場(chǎng)演出時(shí)保持一致嗎？大概不行。因?yàn)槲矣^看的都是首演場(chǎng)次，所以我真的不在乎。

上、左頁(yè)：暹羅歌劇院制作的《海琳娜·茨特羅諾娃》 劇照

A couple of months ago I wrote that there were two types of orchestras: symphonic ensembles and pit bands.It made sense at the time, but since then I’ve found a couple of loopholes.

I don’t mean a loophole like Jeremy Geffen, the former Carnegie Hall director of artistic planning,telling me he follows all the Jewish dietary rules“except for bacon.” That’s more of a paradigm shift.This is a simple case of choosing different generalizations and ambiguities to emphasize.

Virgil Thomson, who started the whole “two types of orchestras” thing, loved sweeping generalizations, mostly because they annoy all the right people.But he didn’t do it recklessly: His own two orchestral categories—“the monumental and the directly functional”—included amateur and student groups as the bottom rung of the second.

Having been around amateur and student musicians my whole conscious life, I knew just how well they would respond to that—i.e., not favorably—so I avoided the subject altogether.After last month, though, I’m back to amateurs and students.In fact, I’m arguing for their promotion.

＊＊＊

In early January, I was in Singapore for the local premiere of

Die Walküre

—not just a rare Wagner production in the region but actually the launch of what might well end up as the first completed Ring Cycle in Southeast Asia.And let the record state, this was not produced by the Singapore Lyric Opera, or even the Singapore Symphony Orchestra, but rather a group of amateur musicians called the Orchestra of Music Makers.

Let’s look at this again: the most challenging corner in the Western operatic canon appeared in Singapore through the efforts of a group of doctors,attorneys and businessmen.OMM first began playing together in 2008 when a group of secondary school music students essentially agreed to their parents’ demands to “get real jobs,” but still refused to give up music.

At first, they weren’t even sure they wanted to play in public, but those doubts ended quickly.Business and law degrees usually instill a certain amount of self-assurance, as well as a few administrative skills,and soon OMM (with a grown-up conductor and a professional concertmaster) was playing regularly at the Esplanade, Singapore’s preeminent performing arts center.The orchestra’s 2011 recording of Mahler’s “Resurrection” Symphony, featured on Singapore Airlines’ in-flight playlist and favourably reviewed in England’s

Gramophone

magazine,resulted in invitations to the Cheltenham and Lichfield music festivals the following year.Then there was their 2015 performance of Mahler’s Eighth—the famous “Symphony of a Thousand” (albeit with only about 350 on stage)—then two years later, a semi-staged production of Humperdinck’s opera

Hansel and Gretel

, then a 2018 staging of Leonard Bernstein’s

Mass

.Such fearlessness has been heavily lauded in the local press, in contrast with the lack of interesting programming coming from the Singapore Symphony Orchestra ever since their longtime music director Lan Shui stepped down a year ago.But back to

Walküre

, with its full Wagnerian orchestra and nearly €300,000 production budget.This was not an

entirely

local effort—only two cast members, both playing Valkyries, were from Singapore, the rest of the singers coming from the US, UK and Australia—but the director and production team were all recruited from Singapore’s active theatre community.

Director Edith Podesta’s conception kept the orchestra center stage, while a fully costumed cast moved both in front and below (occupying what would usually be the orchestra pit) and behind and above (scaling a makeshift mountain to represent Valhalla at the rear of the stage).Large-scale projections offered not only English translations but also recurring visualisations of Wagner’s leitmotifs and frequent close-ups of the singers, bringing layers of emotional intimacy to the score’s epic scope, particularly when the singers themselves were placed on opposite sides of the stage.

All of this meant that the story literally revolved around the orchestra, and with OMM music director and co-founder Chan Tze Law on the podium the amateurs mostly rose to the occasion.String playing was a polished sonic wall, uniformly precise and expansive, a few occasional cracks coming from individual wind and brass players not used to the exposure—or, perhaps the endurance—required.Above all, Chan commanded a sure sense of idiom, the musicians powering through the equivalent of two backto-back symphonic programs.And ultimately, the evening was indistinguishable from many provincial European opera houses.

＊＊＊

Next stop, Bangkok, where we turn to students.Opera Siam, which was originally formed as the Bangkok Opera in 2001 by the Thai-born,British-educated author and composer Somtow Sucharitkul, was a start-up much like Singapore’s OMM, though the company was largely molded specifically in its founder’s mercurial interests.They were also the first company in Southeast Asia to begin a Ring Cycle, though they’ve now postponed

Siegfried

twice.In the meantime, they’ve launched their own homegrown epic, namely Somtow’s

Ten Lives of the Buddha

, which is currently up to episode six.

新加坡創(chuàng)樂(lè)者交響樂(lè)團(tuán)制作的《女武神》劇照（攝影：許智勇）

Buddha, too, got pre-empted in mid-January by Somtow’s latest opera,

Helena Citrónová

, which was a departure on every level.The libretto,inspired by a true story of a Jewish prisoner in Auschwitz and her relationship with a Nazi guard,unfolded in an eclectic mix of atonal musical themes and epochal popular tunes, all held together by a Bernard Herrmann-like orchestral backdrop with an onstage klezmer band to cleanse the aural palate as needed.Like OMM’s

Walküre

,Opera Siam’s Helena had a handful of local singers in secondary roles amidst a largely international cast.Emotionally, the evening took its cues directly from the American soprano Cassandra Black (as Helena) and German baritone Falko H?nisch (as the Nazi guard), in a series of duets that ranged from dramatic to lyrical.

The musical momentum, though, came from the orchestra pit, where conductor Trisdee na Patalung fused the score’s diverse musical influences into a seamless whole, coaxing passionate commitment from the Siam Sinfonietta.Only later did I find out that the players ranged in age from 12 to 25, a few young professional musicians helming students from Bangkok’s secondary schools.

Somehow, though, I was not surprised.OMM was“amateur” only in the original Latin roots of the word,doing things for the love of it.Many non-professionals call themselves “avocational” to avoid the taint of their sloppier, inexpert colleagues.And yet, some of the most memorable performances I’ve attended have hailed from true

amateurs

rather mercenaries playing music with one eye on the clock.Conversely,some of the most lifeless performances I’ve ever encountered have been by “professionals,” rehearsed to the point of surface perfection with the inner spark completely extinguished.I once compared a particular lifeless performance to a musical mortuary where the music was dead but sounded better than it did when it was alive.

The OMM can deliver a professional quality product specifically because (a) they’re more invested in the musical results than the paycheck,and (b) they play fewer concerts and can devote more time to each one.Likewise, student groups like the Siam Sinfonietta will never achieve a professional’s sonic polish, but they bring to the table the sheer excitement of discovering something for the first time.I could list plenty of jaded professionals who would’ve discounted Somtow’s score simply because (a) it was new, and (b) it wasn’t Wagner.

Let’s not disregard the professionals entirely.The true mark of grown-up playing is not simply high quality, but rather delivering it consistently night after night.OMM presented only one performance.Would a second

Walküre

—or the third night of Opera Siam’s

Helena Citrónová

—be as adrenaline-fueled as the first? Probably not.But since I was there for both on opening night, I really don’t care.