• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of delayed post-traumatic vertebral body collapse (Kümmell’s disease) in Chinese patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis?

    2020-01-10 02:15:16PengFeiHanChengLongChenTaoYuChenZhiLiangZhangXiaoDongLiPengCuiLiXiaoChunWei
    Frontiers of Nursing 2019年4期

    Peng-Fei Han, Cheng-Long Chen, Tao-Yu Chen, Zhi-Liang Zhang, Xiao-Dong Li, Peng-Cui Li, Xiao-Chun Wei,*

    a Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second People's Hospital of Changzhi, Changzhi, Shanxi 046000, China

    bDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030009, China

    Abstract: Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy between percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in the treatment of Kümmell's disease in Chinese patients.Methods: The studies using randomized controlled trials to compare clinical efficacy between PVP and PKP in the treatment of Kümmell's disease in Chinese patients were retrieved from Embase, Pubmed, Central, Cinahl, PQDT, CNKI, CQVIP, Wanfang Data, and CBM (from September 2008 to September 2018). Keywords for both Chinese and English search were: percutaneous vertebroplasty, PVP, percutaneous kyphoplasty, PKP, and Kümmell's disease. A total of 132 articles were retrieved based on the search strategy through online database searching and manual searching. Finally, one foreign report and seven Chinese reports were included. After extracting the data, statistical software Review Manager 5.3 was used for data analysis.Results: Through comparison, Cobb angle (95% CI [0.54, 4.42), P = 0.01] and Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI) (95% CI [0.21, 2.15], P= 0.02) of PKP group was smaller than that of PVP group. Postoperative anterior vertebral body height of the PKP group was better than PVP group (95% CI [-1.27, -0.66], P < 0.001]. However, the PVP group had shorter operation time than PKP group (95% CI [-13.48, -7.43), P = 0.001]. In the other outcome measures, including Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (95% CI [-0.04, 0.27), P = 0.15), cement volume (95% CI [-0.82, 0.32], P = 0.39) and cement leakage (95% CI [0.90, 2.76], P = 0.11), there was no significant differences between the two procedures.Conclusions: At this stage, there is sufficient evidence to support that PKP is better than PVP in the treatment of Kümmell's disease in Chinese patients. Although PVP surgery requires much less operation time, PKP has better postoperative radiological results and lower ODI. Moreover, both of them had similar clinical results (e.g., analgesic effects, cement dosage, and leakage rate). Further evidence is dependent on the emergence of randomized controlled trials with higher quality and larger sample sizes in the future.

    Keywords: Kümmell's disease · percutaneous vertebroplasty · percutaneous kyphoplasty · post-trauma · vertebral body collapse · meta-analysis · systematic review

    1. Introduction

    Kümmell's disease, otherwise known as delayed posttraumatic vertebral collapse and avascular necrosis of the vertebral body, after a mild traumatic experience in an asymptomatic period, was first described by the German surgeon Kümmell in 1895.1,2Due to the rare and complicated conditions, Kümmell's disease has so far been reported few times. Kümmell's disease causes only mild symptoms at an early stage, and the duration of the disease varies, which can delay diagnosis and treatment.3In the late stage, vertebral body collapse and kyphotic deformity are caused, which often leads to severe intractable back pain.4Some patients even have symptoms of spinal cord compression, which severely impacts the quality of life. Kümmell's disease treatment includes conservative and surgical methods, which includes PVP, PKP minimally invasive surgery, and open surgery. As the vertebral body of Kümmell's patients is destroyed and does not heal itself, conservative treatment is often ineffective for Kümmell's disease and requires surgical intervention.5Surgical treatment of patients with Kümmell's disease results in better clinical outcomes such as good pain relief, functional improvement, and kyphosis correction. Both the PVP and PKP are minimally invasive surgery, which percutaneously injected cement into the vertebral body under local anesthesia and X-ray to enhance the strength and stability of the vertebral body.6Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and kyphoplasty can effectively relieve fracture pain and even partially restore the height of vertebral body. At the same time, the thermal effect generated by polymerization of bone cement can further alleviate the pain of nerve degeneration and necrosis in and around vertebral body. Therefore, the operation has the advantages of simple operation, exact curative effect, small trauma, and early activity of the patient.7,8

    Currently, it is generally believed that PVP surgery is more economical than PKP surgery because there are no consumables such as balloons. Clinical application has confirmed that PVP is a safe and effective surgical procedure;9,10PKP is a better choice for patients with significant vertebral height loss and old fractures with pseudo articular formation. PKP can better restore vertebral height and correct kyphosis.11,12On the other hand, due to the injection of bone cement into the compressed vertebral body under a large pressure, both types of minimally invasive surgery may cause complications such as leakage of bone cement. Reportedly, both procedures can be used for the treatment of Kümmell's disease, but the optimal choice between these two procedures remains controversial.13,14This metaanalysis intends to systematically compare the efficacy between the two procedures in order to provide some theoretical guidance for clinical practice.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Search strategy

    The retrieval was conducted in the online databases include Embase, Pubmed, Central, Cinahl, PQDT, CNKI, CQVIP, Wanfang Data, Cochrane Library, and CBM. We also manually searched some journals' catalog and references, and strive to find gray literature, such as unpublished academic papers and chapters in monographs. Searching all relevant papers without restricting the language and translating if necessary. Keywords searched for both Chinese and English were: Percutaneous Vertebroplasty, PVP, Percutaneous Kyphoplasty, PKP, and Kümmell's disease. Search strategy was: Kümmell's disease AND “Percutaneous Vertebroplasty OR PVP” AND “Percutaneous Kyphoplasty OR PKP.”

    2.2. Inclusion criteria

    Inclusion criteria for the analysis were (1) Chinese adults with phase I and II Kümmell's disease; (2) randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective studies, retrospective studies, and cohort studies; (3) Patients received minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of Kümmell's disease; (4) study compared results of PVP and PKP, (5) The outcome being measured by Cobb angle, anterior vertebral body height, Oswestry Dysfunction Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, cement volume, cement leakage, and operation time.

    2.3. Exclusion criteria

    The exclusion criteria were: (1) letters, comments, editorials, case reports, proceedings, personal communications, or reviews; (2) study objective or intervention measures failed to meet the inclusion criteria; (3) the original documents of experimental design being not precise; and (4) studied with incomplete data.

    2.4. Data extraction and quality assessment

    Inclusion decisions were made independently by two reviewers participated in according to the pre-stated eligiblity criteria. Disagreement between the two reviewers was resolved by discussion or consulting to a third reviewer when necessary. The risk-of-bias assessment tool outlined in Cochrane Handbook was used to measure the methodological quality of case-controlled trials (CCTs). Six domains are evaluated: random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of patients and personal, blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, and selective reporting risk. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of cohort studies, the full score is 9 points. Trials with a score of more than 6 points are considered high-quality study. Relevant data were recorded in this analysis, including: first author's name, published year, sample size of PVP and PKP in the treatment of Kümmell's disease, and so on.

    2.5. Statistical analysis

    Data were independently entered into RevMan 5.3 software by two reviewers. Dichotomous outcomes were expressed in terms of Odds ratio (OR) and the weighted mean difference (WMD) or the standard mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous outcomes, both with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Heterogeneity was tested using both the chi-square test and I2test. A fixed-effects model was chosen when there was no statistical evidence of heterogeneity (I2< 50%) and random-effects model was adopted if significant heterogeneity was found. If the heterogeneity was found, we checked the study population, treatment, outcome, and methodologies to determine the source of heterogeneity. If it could not be quantitatively synthesized or the event rate was too low to measure, we used qualitative evaluation. By eliminating some of the studies for sensitivity analysis and making funnel plots to assess the bias. The difference was considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05.

    3. Results

    Based on the above mentioned search strategy, a total of 132 related articles were retrieved. By reading the titles and abstracts, we excluded 55 noncontrolled studies, repeated publications, and 40 articles that are not related to the research purpose. Thirty-seven related studies were screened out preliminarily; further reading the full texts and the screening criteria were strictly followed according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, one English article and seven Chinese articles were included. Patient's characteristics and conditions in included study were compared such as age, gender, and so on. The differences were not significant (P > 0.05). The literature screening process and the results are shown in Figure 1. Basic characteristics of included literature are indicated in Table 1.

    3.1. Cobb angle

    To compare preoperative and postoperative Cobb angle changes in PVP and PKP groups of Chinese Kümmell patients, five clinical studies were included. These studies were divided into three subgroups based on preoperative, postoperative 1-2 days and last follow-up. Random effect model was employed in meta- analysis because the heterogeneity between the studies and subgroups was significant (I2> 50%). The results showed that PKP group had less Cobb angle than PVP group 1-2 days after operation (95% CI [0.91, 8.36], P = 0.01), but preoperative Cobb angle (95% CI [-1.25, 1.05], P = 0.86) and the last follow-up Cobb angle (95% CI [-0.76, 6.41], P = 0.12) was similar, and the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 2).

    3.2. Anterior vertebral body height

    According to the preoperative, 1-2 days after operation, and the last follow-up, data were divided into three subgroups. A total of six trials were included, and preoperative and postoperative vertebral body height of Chinese Kümmell's patients between PVP and PKP groups were compared. Random effect model was employed in metaanalysis because the heterogeneity between the studies and subgroups was significant (I2> 50%). The results showed that the height of anterior vertebral body in the PKP group was better than PVP group on 1-2 days postoperative (95% CI [-5.49, -0.26], P = 0.03) and the last follow-up (95% CI [-4.7, -0.29], P = 0.03), and the difference was statistically significant (Figure 3).

    3.3. Oswestry Dysfunction Index

    According to the preoperative, 1-2 days after operation, and the last follow-up, data were divided into three subgroups. A total of six trials were included, and preoperative and postoperative ODI of Chinese Kümmell's patients in PVP and PKP groups were compared. Random effect model was employed in meta- analysis because the heterogeneity between the studies and subgroups was significant (I2> 50%). The results showed that PKP group had less ODI score than PVP group 1-2 days after operation (95% CI [0.00, 1.81], P = 0.05), but preoperative ODI score (95% CI [-0.41, 3.84], P = 0.11) and the last follow-up ODI score (95% CI [-0.60, 3.46], P = 0.17] was similar, and the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 4).

    3.4. VAS score

    According to the preoperative, 1-2 days after operation, and the last follow-up, data were divided into three subgroups. A total of eight trials were included, and preoperative and postoperative VAS score of Chinese Kümmell's patients between PVP and PKP groups was compared. Random effect model was employed in meta-analysis because the heterogeneity between the studies and subgroups was significant (I2> 50%). The results showed that in PVP group and PKP group, preoperative VAS score (95% CI [-0.09, 0.45], P = 0.19), VAS score at 1-2 days after operation (95% CI [-0.20, 0.15], P = 0.79) and the last follow-up VAS score (95% CI [-0.18, 0.52], P = 0.35) was similar, and the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 5).

    Figure 1. Flow diagram of search strategy.

    3.5. Cement volume

    For 6 studies included we compared the amounts of cement injected between PVP and PKP procedures. Random effect model was employed in meta-analysis because the heterogeneity between the studies was significant (I2> 50%). The meta-analysis showed that amounts of cement injected in PVP and PKP procedures were similar (95% CI [-0.82, 0.32), P = 0.39), there was no significant difference between the two groups (Figure 6).

    3.6. Cement leakage

    Seven studies included have compared the cases of cement leakage of PVP and PKP procedures. Fixed effect model was employed in meta-analysis with the absence of heterogeneity (I2< 50%) among the seven study results. The meta-analysis showed that the occurrence of cement was similar between the two groups (95% CI [0.90, 2.76], P = 0.11), and the difference was not statistically significant (Figure 7).

    3.7. Operation time

    Five trials included have compared the operation time between PVP and PKP procedures. Random effect model was employed in meta-analysis because the heterogeneity between the studies was significant (I2> 50%). The meta-analysis showed that the operation time required for PVP group was less than that in PKP group (95% CI [-13.48, -7.43], P < 0.001; Figure 8).

    Table 1. General characteristics of included studies.

    Figure 2. Forest plot to assess Cobb angle between two procedures.

    Figure 3. Forest plot to assess anterior vertebral body height between two procedures.

    Figure 4. Forest plot to assess ODI between the two procedures.

    Figure 5. Forest plot to assess VAS score between the two procedures.

    Figure 6. Forest plot to assess cement volume between two procedures.

    Figure 7. Forest plot to assess cases of cement leakage between the two procedures.

    3.8. Publication bias

    All the eight studies included in this meta-analysis had gone through a strict quality assessment. All of them were CCTs and the possibility of a bias was low. But the funnel figure showed that there was a small bias, which may be associated with the incomplete collection of relevant literature, insufficient sample size, and the different level of clinical physicians. Sensitivity analysis showed a good overall result (Figures 9 and 10).

    Each risk of bias item is presented as a percentage across all included studies and indicates the proportional level for each risk of bias item.

    Methodological quality of the included studies. This risk of bias tool incorporates assessment of randomization (sequence generation and allocation concealment), blinding (participants, personnel, and outcome assessors), completeness of outcome data, selection of outcomes reported, and other sources of bias. The items were scored with “yes,” “no,” or “unclear.”

    4. Discussion

    Kümmell's disease is a special type of osteoporosis vertebra compressed fracture (OVCF),23which accounts for about 10% of OVCF.24It is reported few times due to the rare incidence and difficult diagnosis. However, as China enters an aging society with the explosion of the elderly population and advancement of imaging diagnostic technology, particularly the popularity of MRI has increased the reports of Kümmell's disease.25The main symptoms of Kümmell's disease are back pain with or without spinal cord injury.26,27The disease progresses progressively, and due to the obvious vertebral body necrosis and collapse, it can lead to severe kyphotic deformity in the late stage, which has a higher incidence of nerve injury than common OVCF.28,29Li et al. divided Kümmell's disease into three stages: in Stage I, vertebral body height reduction was < 20% without adjacent disc degeneration; in Stage II, vertebral body height reduction was > 20%, often with adjacent disc degeneration; in Stage III, the posterior cortex of vertebrae ruptured with spinal cord compression.19For stages I and II, PVP and PKP procedures are often used for vertebral bone cement treatment.30-32But the vertebral body in stage III is incomplete due to posterior cortex collapse, and greater risk of cement leakage in vertebral canal exists during surgery, therefore open surgery is recommended.33,34At present, PVP and PKP have become one of the most effective methods to treat vertebral tumors and OVCF35,36(including Kümmell's disease).

    Figure 8. Forest plot to assess the operation time between the two procedures.

    Figure 9. Risk of bias graph.

    Figure 10. Risk of bias summary.

    The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of PVP and PKP in the treatment of Kümmell's disease in Chinese patients. We selected seven outcomes including Cobb angle, vertebral body height, ODI, VAS score, amounts of cement injected, cement leakage, and operation time and strive to fully compare the efficacy between the two procedures. By comparison, Cobb angle (95% CI [0.54, 4.42], P = 0.01), ODI (95% CI [0.21, 2.15], P = 0.02] and postoperative anterior vertebral body height (95% CI [-1.27, -0.66], P < 0.001) of the PKP group was better than PVP group and the difference was statistically significant. It indicates that there is no significant difference between the two groups in pain relief (VAS score), bone cement volume for injection and rate of leakage, but PKP is superior to PVP in terms of better functional improvement (ODI index), vertebral height recovery, and correction of kyphosis. However, the PVP group had less operation time than PKP group (95% CI [-13.48, -7.43], P < 0.001). PKP technology is an improved technology for PVP. By correcting kyphosis deformity through balloon dilation, bone cement can be injected at a lower pressure, but the operation time is longer than that of PVP due to the increase of operation steps. In summary, at this stage PKP has a clear edge over PVP in the treatment of Chinese Kümmell's disease at I and II stage. Although there is no evidence to support that PVP is invalid, in some hospitals with limited technical conditions, PVP is still an effective treatment for Kümmell's disease.

    5. Conclusions

    This systematic review included seven Chinese articles and one English article, and the methodological quality evaluation results were all high. Most studies were case-control studies. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of two cement augmentation procedures in Kümmell's disease treatment at I and II stages in Chinese patients. Therefore, the patient's informed consent, the choice of a specific treatment plan, the medical ethical issues, and the other inevitable bias also impact the reliability of the meta-analysis. In the same outcome measurements system, we include into the maximum of eight articles least of five and the heterogeneity between groups will increase. Therefore, the above conclusions still need to further verify depending on the emergence of RCTs with higher quality and larger sample sizes in the future.

    Ethical approval

    This study was approved by the ethics committee of Shanxi Medical University (IRB approval number: 201622083).

    Conflicts of interest

    All contributing authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 搡老岳熟女国产| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 在线国产一区二区在线| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| av天堂中文字幕网| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 色综合站精品国产| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲av.av天堂| av国产免费在线观看| 日本与韩国留学比较| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕 | 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| av黄色大香蕉| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 成人欧美大片| 色视频www国产| 欧美zozozo另类| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 一本久久中文字幕| 春色校园在线视频观看| 国产精品久久视频播放| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 国内精品宾馆在线| av在线播放精品| 综合色丁香网| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| a级毛色黄片| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 校园春色视频在线观看| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 99热这里只有是精品50| 日韩成人伦理影院| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 一级av片app| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 在线观看66精品国产| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产在线男女| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 欧美日本视频| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 亚洲无线观看免费| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 国产乱人偷精品视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 在线看三级毛片| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 内射极品少妇av片p| 久久久久久久久中文| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 在线播放国产精品三级| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 99热精品在线国产| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 99热网站在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 精品人妻视频免费看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 久久久久久久久久黄片| av免费在线看不卡| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久 | 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 三级毛片av免费| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 中国美女看黄片| 97热精品久久久久久| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| av卡一久久| 春色校园在线视频观看| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说 | 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 99热6这里只有精品| 成人二区视频| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| av黄色大香蕉| 午夜视频国产福利| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 三级经典国产精品| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久精品影院6| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 午夜久久久久精精品| 99热精品在线国产| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 日日啪夜夜撸| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 综合色丁香网| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看 | 波野结衣二区三区在线| 午夜福利在线在线| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 变态另类丝袜制服| av在线天堂中文字幕| 成人无遮挡网站| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| av黄色大香蕉| 在线播放国产精品三级| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 久久人妻av系列| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 搞女人的毛片| 在线天堂最新版资源| 97碰自拍视频| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| av在线蜜桃| 久久精品人妻少妇| av天堂在线播放| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 美女大奶头视频| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 久久精品影院6| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 中国美女看黄片| 性色avwww在线观看| 日本一二三区视频观看| 久久精品夜色国产| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 日本三级黄在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 亚洲av美国av| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 中国国产av一级| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 欧美色视频一区免费| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| av专区在线播放| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 免费大片18禁| 久久精品夜色国产| 亚洲在线观看片| 在线观看66精品国产| 深夜a级毛片| 床上黄色一级片| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 久久久色成人| av黄色大香蕉| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| av天堂中文字幕网| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 一级毛片电影观看 | 欧美潮喷喷水| 男人舔奶头视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 22中文网久久字幕| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 中文字幕久久专区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 亚洲在线观看片| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 免费高清视频大片| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 不卡一级毛片| 精品午夜福利在线看| 久久久久国内视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 尾随美女入室| 日韩中字成人| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 亚洲18禁久久av| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | av在线亚洲专区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 精品午夜福利在线看| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 国产单亲对白刺激| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看| 午夜福利在线在线| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 看片在线看免费视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 免费看av在线观看网站| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 午夜福利高清视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 久久久久国产网址| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 哪里可以看免费的av片| 一级毛片我不卡| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 午夜精品在线福利| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| av天堂在线播放| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放 | 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 国产精品久久视频播放| 内地一区二区视频在线| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| av福利片在线观看| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 色哟哟·www| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 身体一侧抽搐| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 国产极品精品免费视频能看的| 美女黄网站色视频| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 亚洲图色成人| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 韩国av在线不卡| 看黄色毛片网站| 久久热精品热| 久久久精品94久久精品| 成人av在线播放网站| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 免费观看在线日韩| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 99热6这里只有精品| 三级经典国产精品| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 97热精品久久久久久| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 久久久久久久久大av| 日本一二三区视频观看| 一本精品99久久精品77| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 在线播放国产精品三级| av中文乱码字幕在线| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 露出奶头的视频| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 一a级毛片在线观看| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 在线播放无遮挡| 国产精品,欧美在线| 一级av片app| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 色在线成人网| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| a级毛片a级免费在线| av黄色大香蕉| 黄片wwwwww| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产黄片美女视频| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲在线观看片| www日本黄色视频网| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品 | 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 91久久精品电影网| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| av.在线天堂| 乱人视频在线观看| 成年av动漫网址| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 亚洲无线在线观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 99热这里只有是精品50| av中文乱码字幕在线| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 在线播放国产精品三级| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 一夜夜www| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| .国产精品久久| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 老女人水多毛片| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 国产老妇女一区| 国产精品三级大全| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 日韩强制内射视频| 级片在线观看| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 成人国产麻豆网| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 一级黄色大片毛片| 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 日本五十路高清| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久久久久久久久成人| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 一区福利在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 天堂√8在线中文| 直男gayav资源| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 91av网一区二区| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 性色avwww在线观看| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| eeuss影院久久| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 99热精品在线国产| 免费av毛片视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 欧美性感艳星| 欧美日本视频| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 国产亚洲欧美98| av在线观看视频网站免费| 99热全是精品| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 深夜a级毛片| 校园春色视频在线观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 搡老岳熟女国产| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久精品夜色国产| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日本五十路高清| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 成年免费大片在线观看| 97人妻精品一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 亚洲av.av天堂| 天堂网av新在线| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 国产精品三级大全| 在线播放无遮挡| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产成人影院久久av| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看 | 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| 在线天堂最新版资源| 欧美色视频一区免费| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 欧美中文日本在线观看视频| 国产 一区精品| 美女高潮的动态| avwww免费| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 成人欧美大片| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 免费av观看视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 免费大片18禁| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 在现免费观看毛片| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 嫩草影视91久久| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 日韩强制内射视频| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 69av精品久久久久久| 熟女电影av网| 午夜精品在线福利| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡|