Functional Analysis of Three Rice Chloroplast Transit Peptides

He Lei, Chen Guang, Zhang Sen, Qiu Zhennan, Hu Jiang, Zeng Dali, Zhang Guangheng, Dong Guojun, Gao Zhenyu, Ren Deyong, Shen Lan, Guo Longbiao, Qian Qian, Zhu Li

?

Functional Analysis of Three Rice Chloroplast Transit Peptides

He Lei, Chen Guang, Zhang Sen, Qiu Zhennan, Hu Jiang, Zeng Dali, Zhang Guangheng, Dong Guojun, Gao Zhenyu, Ren Deyong, Shen Lan, Guo Longbiao, Qian Qian, Zhu Li

()

Chloroplast transit peptides (CTPs) can be used to transport non-chloroplastic proteins into the chloroplasts. Here, we studied the CTPs of three rice (L.) chloroplast-localized proteins and found that their CTPs could be used to transport non-chloroplast-localized proteins into the chloroplasts. Fusion proteins lacking the CTP remained located in the cytoplasm. Furthermore, we constructed green fluorescent protein fusion vectors with the three CTPs and three non-chloroplast-localized proteins, Ghd10, MULTI-FLORET SPIKELET1 (MFS1), and SHORTENED UPPERMOST INTERNODE 1 (SUI1). After transforming these constructs into rice protoplasts, the fusion proteins all localized in the chloroplasts. Collectively, our results showed that these CTPs can transport non-chloroplast-localized proteins into the chloroplasts, and more importantly, these CTPs can be applied to engineer chloroplast metabolism.

rice; chloroplast transit peptide; translocated function; subcellular location

In addition to their essential roles in photosynthesis and CO2fixation, chloroplasts participate in the synthesis of chlorophyll, carotenoids, fatty acids, some amino acids, starch and proteins (Hanke and Mulo, 2013). The chloroplast genome encodes only around 100 proteins (Martin et al, 2002; Timmis et al, 2004; Tu et al, 2017), and therefore, a large number of proteins that function in the chloroplasts are synthesized in the cytoplasm (Leister, 2003; Sun et al, 2009), then transported into the chloroplast and processed into mature proteins. This transport is usually mediated by the chloroplast transit peptide (CTP) in the precursor sequence of the protein, a sequence that is post-translationally cleaved by stromal processing peptidase in the chloroplast stroma (Keegstra and Bauerle, 1988; von Heijne et al, 1989). Many studies have shown that CTPs mediate the transportation of precursor proteins into chloroplasts via interaction with certain translocators, such as Hsp70 (heat shock proteins 70) (Ivey and Bruce, 2000), Hsp90 (heat shock proteins 90) (Qbadou et al, 2006), FKBP (FK506 binding protein) (Fellerer et al, 2011), TIC (translocon at the inner membrane of chloroplasts) and TOC (translocon at the outer membrane of chloroplasts) complexes (Sun et al, 2011), which are located at the inner and outer envelopes of chloroplasts.

CTPs mediate the transport of chloroplast proteins from the cytoplasm into the chloroplast and can be used to transport non-chloroplast proteins into the chloroplast. In 1985, van den Broeck et al (1985) successfully transported bacterial neomycin phosphor- transferase II (NPT-II) into tobacco chloroplasts by ligating a 58-amino acid transit peptide of the pea () Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase (Rubisco) small subunit to the N-terminal of NPT-II. Exogenous disease and insect résistance genes are transformed to chloroplast by using chloroplast transit peptide, which enhances the ability of transgenic plants to resist diseases and insects. Li (2016) transported yeast acyl-δ 9 dehydrogenase into tobacco () chloroplasts by using a CTP fromRibulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) small subunit and found that the effect of this enzyme on fatty acid composition in the chloroplasts is stronger than that in the cytoplasm.

The CTP of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) inis fused to the EPSPS ofand transformed into maize (), which showed that the CTP plays an important role in glyphosate resistance conferred by EPSPS. When the chloroplast transit peptide is absent, althoughis still highly expressed, the plant possess no glyphosate resistance (Zhao et al, 2013). Li et al (2013) fused the Rubisco CTP from rice with-glucuronidase (GUS) and transformed it into rice, and found that the rice plants with Rubisco CTP increases GUS protein expression levels for about 4.2-fold, compared to the plants without CTP.

Accumulating evidence showed that bioengineering technologies are important to solve the world food problem by improving the photosynthesis, stress resistance and yield traits of crop (Long et al, 2006; Zhang, 2007; Li et al, 2013; Zhao et al, 2013; Shen et al, 2017). For the biotechnology process, exogenous proteins often need to be effectively introduced into chloroplasts, so it is very important for CTP to work well (Shen et al, 2017). Although many studies have been done to research the function of chloroplast transit peptides in plants, most of the related studies in CTP use the Rubisco small subunit transit peptide for chloroplastic transportation (von Heijne et al, 1989; Wong et al, 1992; Leister, 2003; Kim et al, 2010; Fellerer et al, 2011; Sun et al, 2011; Li et al, 2013; Zhao et al, 2013). Therefore, more diverse transit peptides are required for genetic engineering, especiallyfor metabolic engineering (Wong et al, 1992; Kim et al, 2010; Li et al, 2013).

Recently, we isolated and identified a rice albino mutant,, which is sensitive to heat stress. The results of map-based cloning showed thatencodes a putative FLN2 (fructokinase-like protein 2) protein. Further protein homology analysis suggested that the rice genome contains genes encoding two FLN isoforms, FLN1 (LOC_Os01g63220) and FLN2/HSA1 (LOC_Os03g40550) (Qiu et al, 2018). Using yeast two-hybrid assays, we showed that OsFLN1 and HSA1/OsFLN2 interacted with OsTRXz (thioredoxin protein z), andandmutant alleles, created via Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9), were associated with a severe albino phenotype and seedling lethality. Our results showed that FLN1 and HSA1 interact with TRXz (LOC_Os08g29110) to regulate chloroplast biogenesis and plant growth (He et al, 2018). In this study, we used bioinformatics to predict the CTP sequence of TRXz, FLN1 and HSA1. To verify the accuracy of our predicted CTPs, we observed the subcellular localization of the three proteins without their CTPs. Then, we investigated the function of CTP from FLN1, HSA1 and TRXz, and demonstrated that this CTP could localize a non-chloroplast protein into the chloroplast. The discovery of the sequence and function of these CTPs provided insight into plant stress responses and a potentially useful tool for chloroplast metabolic engineering.

Materials and Methods

Materials

For protoplast isolation, Nipponbare (NPB,L.) seeds were sown on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) and cultured under 16 h light / 8 h dark photoperiods at 28 oC under illumination with 200 μmol/(m2?s). The p35S::GFP vector was obtained from our laboratory. The reagents for protoplast isolation and transformation were purchased from Sigma- Aldrich (Shanghai, China).

Protein sequence analysis

We selected three chloroplast proteins, FLN1, TRXz, and HSA1/FLN2 (He et al, 2018). To further clarify the function of the CTPs of these three proteins, we obtained their protein sequences from the Rice Genome Annotation Project Resource website (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/) and used the TargetP website (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/) to predict the sequence of their CTPs.

Construction of vectors

The p35S::GFP vector was digested withI(Takara Biotech, Dalian, China) at 37 oC for 2 h in a 50 μL reaction, consisting of 5 μL of 10× H buffer, 10 μL p35S::GFP vector, 2 μLI, and 33 μL sterile water. The digested products were analyzed on 1% agarose gels. We used the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega Biotech, USA) to extract and purify the target fragment.

To construct the p35S::CTPTRXz-GFP vector, we generated a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz by PCR using p35S:: CTPTRXz-GFP primer (Table 1) from the NPB cDNA. The PCR procedure was as follows: Denaturation at 94oC for 4 min, followed by 32 cycles of 98 oC for 10 s, annealing at 55 oC for 30 s, extension at 68 oC for 30 s, and a final extension step at 68 oC for 10 min. The PCR products were analyzed on 2% agarose gels. We used the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega Biotech, USA) to extract and purify the target DNA fragment. The purified DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz was fused with the purified p35S::GFP fragment using a ClonExpress II One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) by homologous recombination.The ligation reaction was conducted for 30 min at 37 oC in a 20 μL reaction, consisting of 2 μL PCR product, 2 μL purified p35S::GFP fragment, 4 μL of 5× CEII buffer, 2 μL Exnase II and 10 μL sterile water. After transformation into(DH5α), the positive clones were identified by PCR using the s65t-1F (GAGGACAGGCTTCTTGAG) and s65tR (GGTGGTGCAGATGAACTT) primers and sent to Hangzhou Tsingke Biotech Company (Hangzhou, China) for sequencing verification using the s65t-1F and s65tR primers. The other CTP and GFP fusion protein vectors (p35S::CTPHSA1-GFP and p35S:: 36CTPFLN1-GFP) were constructed and verified as described above using primers listed in Table 1.

To construct CTP-deleted proteins and GFP fusion vectors, we generated DNA fragments encoding deletion of CTP of TRXz and FLN1 by PCR using primers listed in Table 2 from NPB cDNA respectively. The PCR procedure, ligation reaction and positive clones verification was as above.

To construct the p35S::CTPTRXz-Ghd10-GFP vector, we generated a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz by PCR using p35S::CTPTRXz-Ghd10-GFP-1 primer (Table 3) from the NPB cDNA and generated the DNA fragment encoding Ghd10 by PCR using p35S::CTPTRXz-Ghd10- GFP-2 primer (Table 3) from the NPB cDNA. The PCR procedure was as above. The purified DNA fragments encoding the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz and Ghd10 were fused with the purified p35S::GFP fragment using a ClonExpress MultiS One Step Cloning Kit (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China) by homologous recombination. The ligation reaction was conducted for 30 min at 37 oC in a 20 μL reaction, consisting of 2 μL each PCR product, 4 μL purified p35S::GFP fragment, 4 μL of 5× CE MultiS buffer, 2 μL Exnase MultiS, and 6 μL sterile water. After transformation into(DH5α), the positive clones were identified by PCR and sequence verification using the s65t-1F and s65tR primers. The other vectors were constructed and verified as described above using primers listed in Table 3.

Protoplast preparation

Protoplasts were isolated from 2- to 3-week-old rice seedlings according to Wu et al (2016). Briefly, about 100 stems and sheaths of rice were cut into 0.5 mm pieces and digested in 15 mL enzyme solution (1.5% cellulase R-10, 0.75% macerozyme R-10, 0.6 mol/L mannitol, 10 mmol/L 2-(N-Morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid hydrate with pH 5.7, 10 mmol/L CaCl2, and 0.1% bovine serum albumin) for 6 h at 28 oC. After filtering through a piece of miracloth, protoplasts were pelleted by a 5-min centrifugation at 80 ×in a horizontal centrifuge and resuspended in 10 mL W5 solution (154 mmol/L NaCl, 125 mmol/L CaCl2, 5 mmol/L KCl, and 2 mmol/L MES with pH 5.7). After resting on ice for at least 30 min, protoplasts were spun down by another 1 min centrifugation at 100 ×and resuspendedinto 2 mL MMG solution (0.4 mol/L mannitol, 15 mmol/L MgCl2, and 4 mmol/L MES with pH 5.7). The protoplasts were counted using a hemocytometer under a microscope. The protoplasts were diluted into the optimal working concentration of 2 ×105cells/mL.

Table 1. Nucleotide sequences used in construction of fusion vector with chloroplast transit peptides and GFP (greenfluorescentprotein).

Table 2. Nucleotide sequences used in construction of GFP (greenfluorescentprotein) fusion vector for deletion of chloroplast transit peptide.

Table 3. Nucleotide sequences used in construction of GFP fusion vector with non-chloroplast-localized gene and chloroplast transit peptide.

GFP, Greenfluorescentprotein; CTP, Chloroplast transit peptide.

Polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated transfection

DNA transfection was carried out in a 2-mL round bottom microcentrifuge tube, in which 100 μL protoplasts (2 ×104cells) were mixed well with 20 μg (about 20 μL) constructs. Then, 120 μL PEG solution (40% PEG4000, 0.2 mol/L mannitol, and 0.1 mol/L CaCl2) was added to each tube, and transfection was initiated sequentially by a gentle tapping of the tube bottom 15 times. After a 15-min incubation at 28 oC, transfection was terminated in the same order by adding 1000 μL W5 solution and inverting the tube gently three times. The solution was centrifuged at 80 ×for 2 min, and the supernatant was discarded. Then, 2 mL W5 solution was added to gently resuspend the protoplast pellet, and protoplasts were cultured for 16–20 h in darkness to allow expression of the GFP fusion proteins. Before confocal microscopy, the transformed protoplasts were centrifuged at 80 ×for 2 min to remove most of the supernatant. GFP fluorescence was detected by a confocal laser- scanning microscopy (Olympus IX71, Tokyo, Japan).

Results

Prediction of CTP sequence of three rice proteins

FLN1, HSA1 and TRXz localize in the chloroplast. To clarify the function of the CTPs of these three proteins, we predicted their CTP sequences with TargetP (http:// www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/). Protein sequence analysis using TargetP suggested that the 36 amino acids of the FLN1 N-terminal region formed a CTP, whereas the 54 amino acids of the HSA1 N-terminal region, and the 56 amino acids of the TRXz N-terminal region formed a CTP, respectively (Fig. 1).

N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz functions as a CTP

In our previous study, we found that TRXz was located in the chloroplast (He et al, 2018). TargetP predicted that the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz is the CTP (CTPTRXz). To verify this, we constructed the p35S::CTPTRXz-GFP vector containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz (Fig. 2-A) and the p35S::ΔCTPTRXz-GFP vector containing a DNA fragment encoding 133 amino acids of TRXz that lacks the N-terminal 56 amino acids (ΔCTPTRXz) (Fig. 2-B). We transformed these two vectors into rice protoplasts and found that the ΔCTPTRXz-GFP fusion protein was located in the cytoplasm (Fig. 2-G), and the CTPTRXz-GFP fusion protein was located in the chloroplast (Fig. 2-H).

To further investigate whether the CTP can transport non-chloroplast-localized proteins into the chloroplast, we selected three proteins: Ghd10 (LOC_Os10g28330), MFS1 (LOC_Os05g41760) and SUI1 (LOC_Os01g02890). SUI1 is located in the nuclear membrane and cell membrane (Zhu et al, 2011; Zhao et al, 2015), whereas Ghd10 and MFS1 are located in the nucleus (Hu et al, 2013; Ren et al, 2013). We constructed the p35S::CTPTRXz-Ghd10-GFP vector containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz and a full-length DNA segment of Ghd10 (Fig. 2-C),p35S::CTPTRXz-MFS1- GFP containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz and a full-length DNA segment of MFS1 (Fig. 2-D), and p35S::CTPTRXz- SUI1-GFP containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz and a full-length DNA segment of SUI1 (Fig. 2-E). We introduced these vectors into rice protoplasts. Green fluorescence showed that all the three fusion proteins localized in the chloroplasts (Fig. 2-I to -K). These results suggested that the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz comprise its CTP, which functions to guide the protein into the chloroplasts.

Fig. 1.Structure and sequence of FLN1, HSA1 and TRXz.

A, Abbreviated diagram of TRXz, HSA1 and FLN1 protein sequences. B, Amino acids sequences of the three proteins. Sequences of thechloroplast transit peptide (CTP) are shown in red bold type. The arrows indicate the putative cleavage site during chloroplast import based on the TargetP website. C, cDNA sequences encoding the three genes. Sequences of the three CTPs are shown in blue bold type.

Fig. 2. Subcellular localization of TRXz and other proteins.

A–E, Diagrams of vector construction; F, The free green fluorescent protein (GFP) protein as a control. G, The ΔCTPTRXzprotein localized to the cytoplasm. H, The only N-terminal 56 amino acids of the TRXz and GFP fusion protein localized to chloroplast. I–K, The CTPTrxz-Ghd10, CTPTrxz-MFS1 and CTPTrxz-SUI1 fusion proteins localized to the chloroplasts. All of the GFP fusion proteins carried a C-terminal GFP tag. In F–K, GFP fluorescence, chlorophyll autofluorescence, merged GFP and chlorophyll fluorescence, and bright-field images are shown. Bar = 5 μm.

Fig. 3. Subcellular localization of HSA1 and other proteins.

A–D, Diagrams of vector construction. E, The free green fluorescent protein (GFP) protein as a control. F, The only N-terminal 54 amino acids of the HSA1 and GFP fusion protein localized to chloroplast. G–I, The CTPHSA1-Ghd10, CTPHSA1-MFS1 and CTPHSA1-SUI1 fusion proteins localized to the chloroplasts. All of the GFP fusion proteins carried a C-terminal GFP tag. In E–I, GFPfluorescence, chlorophyll auto fluorescence, merged GFP and chlorophyll fluorescence, and bright-field images are shown. Bar = 5 μm.

Fig. 4. Subcellular localization of FLN1 and other proteins.

A–E, Diagrams of vector construction. F, The free green fluorescent protein (GFP) protein as a control. G, The Δ36CTPFLN1protein localized to the cytoplasm. H, The only N-terminal 36 amino acids of the FLN1 and GFP fusion protein localized to chloroplast. I–K, The 36CTPFLN1-Ghd10, 36CTPFLN1-MFS1, and 36CTPFLN1-SUI1 fusion proteins localized to the chloroplasts. All of the GFP fusion proteins carried a C-terminal GFP tag. In F–K, GFP fluorescence, chlorophyll auto fluorescence, merged GFP and chlorophyll autofluorescence, and bright-field images are shown. Bar = 5 μm.

CTP of HSA1 can transport SUI1, Ghd10, and MSF1 into chloroplasts

HSA1 localized in the chloroplasts and the ΔCTPHSA1-GFP fusion protein localized in the cytoplasm (Qiu et al, 2018). To determine whether the N-terminal 54 amino acids comprise its CTP, we constructed the p35S::CTPHSA1-GFP vector containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 54 amino acids of HSA1 (CTPHSA1, Fig. 3-A). We transformed the vector into rice protoplasts and found that the CTPHSA1-GFP fusion protein localized in the chloroplasts (Fig. 3-F).

We constructed the p35S::CTPHSA1-Ghd10-GFP vector containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 54 amino acids of HSA1 and a full-length DNA segment of Ghd10 (Fig. 3-B), p35S::CTPHSA1- MFS1-GFP containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 54 amino acids of HSA1 and a full-length DNA segment of MFS1 (Fig. 3-C), and p35S::CTPHSA1- SUI1-GFP containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 54 amino acids of HSA1 and a full-length DNA segment of SUI1 (Fig. 3-D). We introduced these vectors into rice protoplasts. Green fluorescence showed that all the three fusion proteins localized in the chloroplasts (Fig. 3-G to -I). Taken together, these results indicated that the N-terminal 54 amino acids of HSA1 comprise its CTP, which can transport other non-chloroplast proteins into the chloroplasts.

N-terminal 36 amino acids of FLN1 are necessary for its transport into chloroplasts

The HSA1/FLN2 homologous protein FLN1 localizes in the chloroplasts (Qiu et al, 2018). TargetP predicted that the N-terminal 36 amino acids comprise its CTP (36CTPFLN1). To verify this, we constructed the p35S:: 36CTPFLN1-GFP vector containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 36 amino acids of FLN1 (Fig. 4-A) and the p35S::Δ36CTPFLN1-GFP vector containing a DNA fragment encoding 495 amino acids of FLN1 that lacks the N-terminal 36 amino acids (Δ36CTPFLN1, Fig. 4-B). We transformed these two vectors into rice protoplasts and found that the Δ36CTPFLN1-GFP fusion protein localized in the cytoplasm (Fig. 4-G) and 36CTPFLN1-GFP fusion protein localized in the chloroplasts (Fig. 4-H).

We constructed the p35S::36CTPFLN1-Ghd10-GFP vector containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 36 amino acids of FLN1 and a full-length DNA segment of Ghd10 (Fig. 4-C); p35S::36CTPFLN1- MFS1-GFP containing a DNA fragment encoding the N-terminal 36 amino acids of FLN1 and a full-length DNA segment of MFS1 (Fig. 4-D); and p35S:: 36CTPFLN1-SUI1-GFP containing a DNA fragment encoding the N terminal 36 amino acids of FLN1 and a full-length DNA segment of SUI1 (Fig. 4-E). We introduced these vectors into rice protoplasts. Green fluorescence showed that all the three fusion proteins localized in the chloroplasts (Fig. 4-I to -K). These results showed that the N terminal 36 amino acids of FLN1 are necessary for the transport of FLN1 into the chloroplasts and can also transport non-chloroplast proteins into the chloroplasts.

Discussion

Our results showed that the ΔCTPTRXz-GFP and Δ36CTPFLN1-GFP fusion proteins were not localized in the chloroplasts (Figs. 2-G and 4-G), whereas the GFP signals of CTPTRXz-GFP, CTPHSA1-GFP and 36CTPFLN1-GFP fusion proteins were observed to be concomitant with the chlorophyll autofluorescence (Figs. 2-H, 3-F and 4-H). These results suggested that the N-terminal 56 amino acids of TRXz, the N-terminal 54 amino acids of HSA1, and the N-terminal 36 amino acids of FLN1 are their respective CTPs. To further verify the function of these CTPs, we fused the CTPs with non-chloroplast proteins, SUI1, Ghd10 and MFS1, tagged with GFP. After transformation of these fusion proteins into rice protoplasts, the green fluorescence signal was found in the chloroplasts (Figs. 2-I to -K, 3-G to -I and 4-I to -K). These results indicated that these CTPs not only guide the chloroplast proteins to the chloroplasts, but also guide foreign proteins to the chloroplasts.

The prediction of CTP sequences is based on the existing sequence information, which may contain errors.In this study, we found that after removing the 36 amino acids from the N-terminal of FLN1, the green fluorescence signal was not observed throughout the cytoplasm and cell membrane, but only in a small area of the cytoplasm (Fig. 4-G).We constructed GFP fusion vectors containing a DNA fragment encoding 481 or 442 amino acids of FLN1 that lacks the N-terminal 50 or 89 amino acids of FLN1 (Δ50CTPFLN1and Δ89CTPFLN1) p35S:: Δ50CTPFLN1-GFP and p35S::Δ89CTPFLN1-GFP (Fig. 5-A and -B). After transformation into rice protoplasts, we found that p35S::Δ50CTPFLN1-GFP vector still existed in a small region of the cytoplasm, while the fluorescence signal of the transformed p35S:: Δ89CTPFLN1-GFP vector filled the cytoplasm and cell membrane (Fig. 5-F and -G). Furthermore, we constructed two fusion vectors p35S::50CTPFLN1- SUI1-GFP and p35S::89CTPFLN1-SUI1-GFP,containing a DNA fragment encoding the N terminal 50 or 89 amino acids of FLN1 (Fig. 5-C and -D), and a full-length segment of SUI1 tagged with GFP and transformed them into rice protoplasts. The fusion proteins, containing the N-terminal 50 or 89 amino acids and SUI1-GFP, localized in the chloroplasts (Fig. 5-H and -I). These results suggest that N-terminal 89 amino acids of FLN1 comprise its CTP.

Transferring foreign proteins into chloroplasts can change photosynthetic characteristics. Currently, the most commonly used approach is to guide the foreign protein into the chloroplasts by use of a CTP, which is typically fused to the N-terminus of the target protein. The Rubisco small subunit CTP is the most commonly used CTP for targeting foreign proteins into chloroplasts (Wong et al, 1992; Zhong et al, 2003; Kim et al, 2010). In this study, we reported three new CTPs in rice. Transient expression analysis in rice protoplasts demonstrated that these three CTPs can transport foreign proteins into the chloroplasts. These CTPs may be useful as targets for chloroplast metabolic engineering, particularly for crop plants.

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 31601284 and 31661143006), the Transgenic Plant Research and Commercialization Project of the Ministry of Agriculture of China (Grant No. 2016ZX08001003-002), Zhejiang Province Outstanding Youth Fund (Grant No. LR16C130001), and the Collaborative Innovation Project of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Grant No. Y2016XT05).

Fig. 5. Subcellular localization of other FLN1-related proteins.

A–D,Diagrams of vector construction. E, The free green fluorescent protein (GFP) protein as a control. F, The Δ50CTPFLN1protein localized to the cytoplasm. G, The Δ89CTPFLN1protein localized to the cytoplasm. H and I, The 50CTPFLN1-SUI1 and 89CTPFLN1-SUI1 fusion proteins localized to the chloroplasts. All of the GFP fusion proteins carried a C-terminal GFP tag. In E–I, GFP fluorescence, chlorophyll autofluorescence, merged GFP and chlorophyll fluorescence, and bright-field images are shown. Bar = 5 μm.

Fellerer C, Schweiger R, Sch?ngruber K, Soll J, Schwenkert S. 2011. Cytosolic HSP90 cochaperones HOP and FKBP interact with freshly synthesized chloroplast preproteins of., 4(6): 1133–1145.

Hanke G, Mulo P. 2013. Plant type ferredoxins and ferredoxin- dependent metabolism., 36(6): 1071–1084.

He L, Zhang S, Qiu Z N, Zhao J, Nie W D, Lin H Y, Zhu Z G, Zeng D L, Qian Q, Zhu L. 2018. FRUCTOKINASE-LIKE PROTEIN 1 interacts with TRXz to regulate chloroplast development in rice., 60(2): 94–111.

Hu S K, Dong G J, Xu J, Su Y, Shi Z Y, Ye W J, Li Y Y, Li G M, Zhang B, Hu J, Qian Q, Zeng D L, Guo L B. 2013. A point mutation in the zinc finger motif of RID1/EHD2/OsID1 protein leads to outstanding yield-related traits inrice variety Wuyunjing 7., 6(1): 24.

Ivey III R A, Bruce B D. 2000.andinteraction of DnaK and a chloroplast transit peptide., 5(1): 62–71.

Keegstra K, Bauerle C. 1988. Targeting of proteins into chloroplasts., 9(1): 15–19.

Kim S, Lee D S, Choi I S, Ahn S J, Kim Y H, Bae H J. 2010.Rubisco small subunit transit peptide increases the accumulation ofendoglucanase Cel5A in chloroplasts of transgenic tobacco plants., 19(3): 489–497.

Leister D. 2003. Chloroplast research in the genomic age., 19(1): 47–56.

Li F. 2016. Transit peptide-mediated location of yeast acyl-δ9 desaturase in plastid leads to biosynthesis and accumulation of palmitoleic acid in tobacco leaf tissue. [Master thesis]. Jinzhong, China: Shanxi Agriculture University. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Li X, Lin Z M, Chen Z J, Wang C H, Liu X, Wang F. 2013. Chloroplast targeting signal of a rice Rubisco activase gene enhances transgene expression., 28(2): 95–100. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Long S P, Zhu X G, Naidu S L, Ort D R. 2006. Can improvement in photosynthesis increase crop yields?, 29(3): 315–330.

Martin W, Rujan T, Richly E, Hansen A, Cornelsen S, Lins T, Leister D, Stoebe B, Hasegawa M, Penny D. 2002. Evolutionary analysis of, cyanobacterial, and chloroplast genomes reveals plastid phylogeny and thousands of cyanobacterial genes in the nucleus., 99(19): 12246–12251.

Murashige T, Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco cultures., 15(3): 473–497.

Qbadou S, Becker T, Mirus O, Ivo T, Soll J, Schleiff E. 2006. The molecular chaperone Hsp90 delivers precursor proteins to the chloroplast import receptor Toc64., 25(9): 1836–1847.

Qiu Z N, Kang S J, He L, Zhao J, Zhang S, Hu J, Zeng D L, Zhang G H, Dong G J, Gao Z Y, Ren D Y, Chen G, Guo L B, Qian Q, Zhu L. 2018. The newly identified heat-stress sensitive albino 1 gene affects chloroplast development in rice., 267: 168–179.

Ren D Y, Li Y F, Zhao F M, Sang X C, Shi J Q, Wang N, Guo S, Ling Y H, Zhang C W, Yang Z L, He G H. 2013., which encodes an AP2/ERF protein, determines spikelet meristem fate and sterile lemma identity in rice., 162(2): 872–884.

Shen B R, Zhu C H, Yao Z, Cui L L, Zhang J J, Yang C W, He Z H, Peng X X. 2017. An optimized transit peptide for effective targeting of diverse foreign proteins into chloroplasts in rice., 7: 46231.

Sun Q, Zybailov B, Majeran W, Friso G, Olinares P D B, van W K J. 2009. PPDB, the plant proteomics database at Cornell., 37: 969–974.

Sun X W, Feng P Q, Xu X M, Guo H L, Ma J F, Chi W, Lin R C, Lu C M, Zhang L X. 2011. A chloroplast envelope-bound PHD transcription factor mediates chloroplast signals to the nucleus., 2(2): 477.

Timmis J N, Ayliffe M A, Huang C Y, Martin W. 2004. Endosymbiotic gene transfer: Organelle genomes forge eukaryotic chromosomes., 5(2): 123–135.

Tu Z J, Zou G X, Huang L C, Chen L, Dai L P, Gao Y H, Leng Y J, Zhu L, Zhang G H, Hu J, Ren D Y, Gao Z Y, Dong G J, Chen G, Guo L B, Qian Q, Zeng D L. 2017. Identification and fine mapping of pale green leafin rice., 31(5): 489–499. (in Chinese with English abstract)

van den Broeck G, Timko M P, Kausch A P, Cashmore A R, van Montagu M, Herrera-Estrella L. 1985. Targeting of a foreign protein to chloroplasts by fusion to the transit peptide from the small subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase., 313: 358–363.

von Heijne G, Steppuhn J, Herrmann R G. 1989. Domain structure of mitochondrial and chloroplast targeting peptides., 180(3): 535–545.

Wong E Y, Hironaka C M, Fischhoff D A. 1992.small subunit leader and transit peptide enhance the expression ofproteins in transgenic plants., 20(1): 81–93.

Wu L W, Ren D Y, Hu S K, Li G M, Dong G J, Jiang L, Hu X M, Ye W J, Cui Y T, Zhu L, Hu J, Zhang G H, Gao Z Y, Zeng D L, Qian Q, Guo L B. 2016. Down-regulation of a nicotinate phosphoribosyltransferase gene,, leads to withered leaf tips., 171(2): 1085–1098.

Zhang Q F. 2007. Strategies for developing green super rice., 104(42): 16402–16409.

Zhao H M, Song W B, Lai J S. 2013. Cloning of sorghum bicolor chloroplast transit peptide (CTP) of 5-enolpyruvylshikimate- 3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) and its functional validation in transgenic maize ()., 21(9): 1009–1018. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Zhao J, Kang S J, Rao Y C, Qiu Z N, Jie X U, Jiang H U, Zhang G H, Zeng D L, Guo L B, Qian Q. 2015. Subcellular localization analysis of phosphatidylserine synthase () in tobacco mesophyll cells., 29(4): 343–349. (in Chinese with English abstract)

Zhong H, Teymouri F, Chapman B, Maqbool S B, Sabzikar R, El-Maghraby Y, Dale B, Sticklen M B. 2003. The pea (L.) rbcS transit peptide directs thepolyhydroxybutyrate enzymes into the maize (L.) chloroplasts., 165(3): 455–462.

Zhu L, Hu J, Zhu K M, Fang Y X, Gao Z Y, He Y H, Zhang G H, Guo L B, Zeng D L, Dong G J, Yan M X, Liu J, Qian Q. 2011. Identification and characterization of, a gene negatively regulating uppermost internode elongation in rice., 77: 475–487.

26 May 2018;

31 July 2018

Zhu Li (zhuli05@caas.cn); Qian Qian (qianqian188@hotmail.com)

Copyright ? 2019, China National Rice Research Institute. Hosting by Elsevier B V

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Peer review under responsibility of China National Rice Research Institute

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2018.12.001

(Managing Editor: Wang Caihong)