• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Impact of Rice-Catfish/Shrimp Co-culture on Nutrients Fluxes Across Sediment-Water Interface in Intensive Aquaculture Ponds

    2019-11-12 13:26:30LiuYaobinQinLinLiFengboZhouXiyueXuChunchunJiLongChenZhongduFengJinfeiFangFuping
    Rice Science 2019年6期

    Liu Yaobin, Qin Lin, Li Fengbo, Zhou Xiyue, Xu Chunchun, Ji Long, Chen Zhongdu, Feng Jinfei, Fang Fuping

    Research Paper

    Impact of Rice-Catfish/Shrimp Co-culture on Nutrients Fluxes Across Sediment-Water Interface in Intensive Aquaculture Ponds

    Liu Yaobin1, #, Qin Lin3, #, Li Fengbo1, 2, Zhou Xiyue1, Xu Chunchun1, Ji Long1, Chen Zhongdu1, Feng Jinfei1, Fang Fuping1

    (China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 310006, China; Integrated and Urban Plant Pathology Laboratory, Université de Liège, Gembloux B-5030, Belgium; Analysis and Determination Center, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Chengdu 610000, China; These authors contributed equally to this work)

    Exchange of nitrogen and phosphorus across sediment-water interface plays an important role in the management of nutrient recycling in the aquaculture pond. In this study, a plot experiment was conducted to study the effect of rice-catfish/shrimp co-culture on the micro-profile of oxygen (O2), pH and nutrient exchange across sediment-water interface in the intensive culture ponds. The results showed that rice-catfish co-culture increased the concentration and penetrating depth of O2, but decreased the pH value across the sediment-water interface, compared with catfish monoculture. Additional rice cultivation significantly reduced the flux rates of ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-) across sediment-water interface in the catfish and shrimp ponds. The flux rates of NO2-and soluble phosphorus (PO43-) showed no significant difference between rice-catfish/shrimp co-culture ponds and catfish/shrimp monoculture ponds. Rice only affected the dissolved inorganic nitrogen and phosphorus fractions in the sediment. The concentrations of NH4+were significantly lower in the sediment of co-culture ponds than in the monoculture ponds. Additional rice cultivation also significantly reduced the content and percentage of dissolved inorganic phosphorus in the sediment of catfish ponds.

    sediment-water interface; rice-fish co-culture; eutrophication; nitrogen and phosphorus recycling; aquaculture

    Pond aquaculture plays an important role in the inland fish production. The area of pond aquaculture was estimated to be 16.7 × 106hm2in 2011 around the world (Jescovitch, 2014). As in China, the largest fishery nation, pond aquaculture accounted for 71.9% of the total production of freshwater fish. Intensive culture, characterized by high stocking density of fish with high input of pelleted feed, has been widely adopted in pond aquaculture to achieve high yield and benefit in the last three decades (Bosma and Verdegem, 2011; Li et al, 2011). However, intensive culture in ponds has induced serious environmental concerns, such as eutrophication and salinization (Martinezporchas and Martinezcordova, 2012; Sun et al, 2018). Nutrient budgets showed that only 23.0%–46.5% of the nitrogen and phosphorus in the feed is utilized by aquatic animals (Briggs and Fvnge-Smith, 1994; Jackson et al, 2003; Zhang et al, 2018). The remainder is retained in the pond or discharged to surrounding water bodies.

    A large portion (48.0%–86.3%) of un-utilized nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) and in residual feeds and fish excretes is deposited to the bottom soil (Hargreaves, 1998; Zhang et al, 2018). The amount of nutrients accumulated in surface bottom soil is usually several times higher than that in the water column (Avnimelech and Ritvo, 2003). The transformation and release of N and P in the bottom soil are key issues of nutrient recycling in pond aquaculture system (Avnimelech and Ritvo, 2003).

    Exchange of N and P across the sediment-water interface is a primary pathway regulating the nutrients fluxed from bottom soil to the water. Many previous studies have investigated the characteristics of nutrient fluxes across the sediment-water interface of lake, reservoir, river, estuarine and coastal systems (Nowlin et al, 2005; Helali et al, 2016; Qiu et al, 2016; Mu et al, 2017; Yang et al, 2017; Boynton et al, 2018). The nutrient flux rates are affected by many environmental factors, such as the pH and hypoxia of sediment, bioturbation and hydrodynamic condition, and show great spatial and temporal variations among different aquatic systems (Boynton et al, 2018; Lei et al, 2018). In recent years, increasing attentions have been paid to the impact of aquaculture on the nutrient exchange across sediment- water interface. For example, Petranich et al (2018) measured the seasonal changes of nutrient fluxes across the sediment-water interface in a coastal shrimp farm. Cheng et al (2014) monitored the nutrient release from the sediment at the floating cage aquaculture areas of Daya Bay. However, most of these studies focus on coastal or seawater culture areas. The study on inland freshwater aquaculture is still limited.

    Co-culturing with aquatic plants, including natural macrophytes, rice and vegetables, is a recommend measure to re-use the residual nutrients and to reduce the eutrophication in aquaculture ponds. Many previous studies have examined the effects of these aquatic plants on the restoration of water quality in the intensive aquaculture pond (Henry-Silva and Camargo, 2006; Ferdoushi et al, 2008; Akinbile and Yusoff, 2011; Lin et al, 2013; Feng et al, 2016). These studies primarily focused on the direct absorption of N and P in the water or bottom soil. The effect of aquatic plants on the nutrient exchange across sediment-water interface has rarely been studied. Rice is the only cereal crop that can be planted in aquaculture ponds and has the inherent advantage in the co-culture with aquatic animals. Therefore, in this study, we selected two rice-fish co-culture systems (yellow catfish-rice and freshwater shrimp-rice) to investigate the effect of rice-fish co-culture on the micro-profile of pH and dissolved oxygen (DO) across sediment-water interface in the intensive aquaculture ponds, the flux rates of inorganic N and P across sediment-water interface, and the fractions of N and P in the sediment.

    Materials and Methods

    Experiment design

    This experiment was carried out in the experimental farm of China National Rice Research Institute (30o05′ N, 119o95′ E) in Zhejiang Province, China. Four treatments, including yellow catfish monoculture (YC), yellow catfish-rice co-culture (YC-R), freshwater shrimp monoculture (FS), and freshwater shrimp-rice co-culture (FS-R), with three replications were arranged in 12 experiment plots. The size of each plot was 10 m long and 8 m wide. Rice was planted in the central region of the co-culture plots, accounting for about 60% of the total area. The images of monoculture and co-culture plots are showed in Fig. 1.

    A new high-stalk rice variety Yudao 1, specially developed for aquaculture pond, was used. The rice variety can grow up to 1.85 m,and can be planted into pond with the water depth below 1.5 m. Rice seeds were sown on a nursery bed on 29 May in 2015, and transplanted to co-culture plots at a spacing of 0.6 m × 0.6 m on 30 June in 2015. The water level was 0.1 m when rice seedlings were transplanted and rose gradually with the height of rice increasing. The maximum water level was 1.0 m for all the plots. The rice was harvested on 5 November in 2015. The rice yields were 457.7 and 392.9 g/m2for YC-R and FS-R, respectively. No fertilizer and pesticide were used for rice cultivation. The fingerlings of yellow catfish and freshwater shrimp were stocked into plots with a density of 15 and 45 fingerlings/m2on 12 August in 2015, respectively. Commercial pelleted feeds were fed two times per day for yellow catfish and one time per day for freshwater shrimp, respectively. The management practices for yellow catfish and freshwater shrimp were similar in the co-culture and monoculture ponds. The fish or shrimp yields were 344.9, 345.8, 29.1 and 35.9 g/m2for YC-R, YC, FS-R and FS, respectively.

    Fig. 1. Images of rice-catfish/shrimp co-culture (A) and monoculture (B) ponds.

    Sampling and chemical analysis methods

    Nutrient flux rates across the sediment-water interface were measuredusing benthic chambers (Niencheski and Jahnke, 2002), which was constructed from a cylindrical plastic pipe with an inside diameter of 40 cm and a height of 30 cm. The bottom water samples were collected before the chambers were deployed. The chambers were manually placed at the central region of each plot, and the total incubation time was 6 h. Water samples were taken from inside the chambers every 2 h using 100-mL plastic syringes through a silicone tube connected to the chambers. NH4+, NO3-, NO2-and PO43-in these water samples were analyzed. Nutrient flux rates were calculated by the following formula:

    =/× (/)

    Where,is the flux rates of nutrients [mmol/(m2·h)],/is the slope of nutrient content changing with time in the chamber [mmol/(L·h)],is the volume of incubated water (L), andis the bottom area of chamber (m2). The flux rates of inorganic N and P were measured every two weeks from the fish stocking to rice harvest. The surface water samples and bottom sediment samples were collected at the same day as benthic incubation.

    Micro-profile of pH and O2across sediment-water interface was measured using microelectrode (Unisense, pH-50, O2-50, Denmark) (Andersen et al, 2006). Sediment cores (inner diameter: 7 cm, height: 15 cm) were collected from YC-R and YC plots at the middle stage of rice-fish co-culture season. The height of the sediment in the cores was approximately 10 cm with a water column of 2 cm. O2and pH values were measured in the profiles from the water phase and down to a depth of 3 cm. The microelectrode was controlled by a micro manipulator and advanced in 1 mm steps from water phase down to sediment. Three replicated profiles were measured for each core.

    The concentrations of N and P in water samples, including total N (TN), total P (TP), NH4+, NO3-, NO2-and PO43-, and inorganic N and P in sediment (NH4+, NO3-and PO43-) were measured using an AA3 Auto Analyzer (Bran-lube, GmbH Co., Germany) according to the classical colorimetric methods. The contents of turbidity, total suspended solid (TSS), biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) of water samples were analyzed using standard methods (SEPA, 2002). The pH and DO in the water were measured by portable apparatus (Mettler Toledo, Seven2Go Pro S9; Mettler Toledo, SG2). The contents of TN and TP in the sediment were determined by the Kjeldahl and H2SO4-H2O2methods, respectively (Lu, 2000). P fractions [(residual P (Res-P), Fe- and Al-bound organic P (Fe/Al-OP), Fe- and Al-bound inorganic P (Fe/Al-IP), Ca-bound P (Ca-P) and dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP)] in the sediment were determined by the chemical sequential extraction method (Kapanen, 2008).

    Statistical analysis

    The statistical analysis was conducted using the software SPSS 19.0. The difference between rice-fish co-culture and fish monoculture was tested using the ANOVA procedure.

    Results

    Water properties

    Rice-fish/shrimp co-culture significantly affected the water parameters (Table 1). The pH value was significantly lower in the co-culture ponds than monoculture ponds. The contents of BOD, COD, turbidity and TSS in the water were significantly reduced by additional rice cultivation, especially in the catfish pond. Rice-fish co-culture also reduced the eutrophication in pond water. The concentrations of TN, NH4+-N, NO3--N, NO2--N, TP and PO43-were significantly mitigated by 39.2%, 48.3%, 15.3%, 46.0%, 30.8% and 24.1% in YC-R compared to YC, and mitigated by 23.4%, 38.9%, 15.9%, 64.8%, 46.7% and 38.5% in FS-R compared to FS, respectively.

    Micro-profiles of pH and O2 values across the sediment-water interface

    Fig. 2 illustrated the micro-profiles of O2and pH values across the sediment-water interface. The concentration of O2was decreased sharply across the sediment-water interface both in YC-R and YC. The concentration of O2were higher in YC-R than YC across the sediment-water interface (Fig. 2). Additionally, O2penetrated deeper in the sediment of YC-R than YC. The pH value across the sediment-water interface was lower in YC-R than YC. These results indicated that rice-catfish co-culture increased the concentration and penetrating depth of O2, but decreased the pH across the sediment-water interface, compared with catfish monoculture.

    Table 1. Water properties of monoculture and co-culture ponds.

    YC, Yellow catfish monoculture; YC-R, Yellow catfish-rice co-culture; FS, Freshwater shrimp monoculture; FS-R, Freshwater shrimp-rice co-culture; BOD, Biological oxygen demand; COD, Chemical oxygen demand; TP, Total phosphorus; OP, Organic phosphorus.

    Different letters indicate significant difference between different cultures for the same parameter at the 0.05 level.

    Flux rates of inorganic N and P across the sediment-water interface

    As shown in Fig. 3, the flux rate of NH4+across the sediment-water interface was negative on 21 August and 4 September in YC-R, indicating that NH4+in the water column was consumed by the sediment in YC-R in these two sampling days. NH4+fluxes were generally positive in YC, indicating the release of NH4+from sediment to water column. NO3-fluxes only showed significant difference on 19 September. It was negative in YC-R but positive in YC at this day. The seasonal mean flux rate of NH4+was -0.002 mmol/(m2·h) in YC-R, which was significantly reduced by 100.5% compared with that in YC. The mean flux rates of NO3-, NO2-and PO43-showed no significant difference between YC-R and YC.

    As in the shrimp ponds (Fig. 4), the flux rates of NH4+and NO3-across the sediment-water interface were negative in most sampling days in FS-R, while almost positive in FS. The seasonal mean flux rates of NH4+and NO3-were -0.107 and 0.0002 mmol/(m2·h)in FS-R, respectively, which were respectively reduced by 150.4% and 99.8%, compared with that in FS. The mean flux rates of NO2-and PO43-showed no significant difference between FS-R and FS.

    Fractions of N and P in the sediment

    The fractions of N in the sediment are shown in Fig. 5. The concentrations of NH4+were significantly lower in the sediment of co-culture ponds than monoculture ponds at most sampling days. The mean contents of NH4+were significantly reduced by 51.2% and 58.9% in the sediment of YC-R and FS-R than YC and FS, respectively. Additional rice cultivation did not affect the contents of NO3-and NO2-in the sediment. No significant difference was observed between co-culture and monoculture ponds.

    The fractions of P in the sediment were in the order of Res-P (47.0%–49.9%) > Fe/Al-OP (25.5%–28.9%) > Fe/Al-IP (20.3%–27.8%) > Ca-P (2.4%–3.6%) > DIP (0.21%–0.33%) (Fig. 6). Additional rice cultivation significantly reduced the content and percentage of DIP in the sediment of catfish ponds, but increased DIP in shrimp ponds (Table 2). Significantly reduction of Fe/Al-OP was observed in the sediment of YC-R compared to YC, but was not found in FS-R. The concentrations and ratios of Fe/Al-IP, Ca-P and Res-P showed no significant difference between the co-culture and monoculture ponds.

    Fig.2. Micro-profiles of oxygen (O2) and pH value across sediment-water interface in rice-catfish co-culture and catfish monoculture ponds.

    YC1 to YC3, Three profiles of yellow catfish monoculture; YC-R1 to YC-R3, Three profiles of yellow catfish-rice co-culture.

    Discussion

    Micro-profiles of O2 and pH across sediment-water interface

    Micro-environment is an important factor affecting the transformation of N and P across the sediment-water interface. Previous studies focused on investigating the micro-environment of sediment-water interface in natural water bodies (Bryant et al, 2011; Mügler et al, 2012; Wang et al, 2013b). Aquaculture ponds have rarely been studied. In this study, we measured the micro- profiles of O2and pH values across the sediment- water interface in the rice-catfish co-culture and catfish monoculture ponds. The O2penetration depth in this study is close to the results measured in Taihu Lake and Xiangxi River (Tian et al, 2013), but higher than in Carvins Cove Reservoir (Bryant et al, 2011), and lower than in Milling Lake (Koschorreck et al, 2003), Palaeochori Bay (Wenzh?fer et al, 2000), and Dazong Lake (Wang et al, 2013a). This is possibly attributed to the difference in the water depth, sediment texture and benthic bioturbation among different water bodies (Santschi et al, 1990; Li et al, 2019).

    Fig. 3. Flux rates of NH4+(A), NO3-(B), NO2-(C) and PO43-(D) across the sediment-water interface in the rice-catfish co-culture and catfish monoculture ponds.

    YC, Yellow catfish monoculture; YC-R, Yellow catfish-rice co-culture.

    Values are Mean ± SE (= 3). * indicates significant differences at the 0.05 level.

    Fig. 4. Flux rates of NH4+(A), NO3-(B), NO2-(C) and PO43-(D) across the sediment-water interface in the rice-shrimp co-culture and shrimp monoculture ponds.

    FS, Freshwater shrimp monoculture; FS-R, Freshwater shrimp-rice co-culture.

    Values are Mean ± SE (= 3). * indicates significant differences at the 0.05 level.

    Fig. 5. Fractions of N in the sediment of co-culture and monoculture ponds.

    YC, Yellow catfish monoculture; YC-R, Yellow catfish-rice co-culture; FS, Freshwater shrimp monoculture; FS-R, Freshwater shrimp-rice co-culture.

    Data are Mean ± SE (= 3).

    Table 2.Mean contents of differentphosphorus (P) fractions in the sediment of co-culture and monoculture ponds.

    YC, Yellow catfish monoculture; YC-R, Yellow catfish-rice co-culture; FS, Freshwater shrimp monoculture; FS-R, Freshwater shrimp-rice co-culture; DIP, Dissolved inorganic phosphorus; Fe/Al-IP, Fe- and Al-bound inorganic phosphorus; Fe/Al-OP, Fe- and Al-bound organic phosphorus; Res-P, Residual phosphorus; Ca-P, Ca-bound phosphorus.

    Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level among the treatments for the same phosphorus fraction.

    Rice-catfish co-culture increased the concentration and penetration depth across the sediment-water interface compared with catfish monoculture (Fig. 2). This can be explained by the root aeration of rice plants. Rice can transfer the O2from the atmosphere through its aerenchyma to roots and secrete to the rhizosphere in flooding water bodies (Colmer et al, 2006). Thus, additional rice cultivation improved the O2level across the sediment-water interface. Rice- catfish co-culture also decreased the pH of sediment- water interface (Fig. 2). This is because rice root can secret organic acids to the rhizosphere, thus reducing the pH in the sediment and water column in the aquaculture pond (Liu et al, 2007). The reduction of pH induced by rice in this study is higher than that induced by(Tian et al, 2013).

    Fluxes of N and P across water-sediment interface

    We measured the flux rates of N and P across the water-sediment interface in the co-culture and monoculture ponds (Figs. 3 and 4). The flux rates of inorganic N and P were in the order: NH4+> NO3-> NO2-> PO43-, which consists with the results measured in the cage aquaculture zone or aquaculture ponds in previous studies (Nicholaus and Zheng, 2014; Zhong et al, 2015). The N and P accumulated in the sediment surface primarily originated from the excretion of aquatic animals and residual feed, which contain more N than P due to the widely use of high-protein feed in intensive aquaculture to meet the requirement of aquatic animals (Dien et al, 2018; Zhang et al, 2018). The flux rates of N and P in this study are close to the results measured in the costal cage culture zone of fish and scallop (Jiang et al, 2007; Liao et al, 2016; Hu et al, 2017), but lower than that in the aquaculture pond of grass carp and(Guo et al, 2013; Zhong et al, 2015). The stocking density ofis higher than that of the yellow catfish and freshwater shrimp and the body size of grass carp is larger than that of yellow catfish and freshwater shrimp in this study. Higher stocking density and larger body size induced serve bioturbation in the sediment, which may stimulate the release of nutrients from the sediment to the water column (Adámek and Mar?álek, 2013).

    Fig. 6. Fractions of P in the sediment of co-culture and monoculture ponds.

    YC, Yellow catfish monoculture; YC-R, Yellow catfish-rice co-culture; FS, Freshwater shrimp monoculture; FS-R, Freshwater shrimp-rice co-culture; DIP, Dissolved inorganic phosphorus; Fe/Al-IP, Fe- and Al-bound inorganic phosphorus; Fe/Al-OP, Fe- and Al-bound organic phosphorus; Res-P, Residual phosphorus; Ca-P, Ca-bound phosphorus.

    Additional rice cultivation significantly reduced the flux rate of NH4+across the sediment-water interface both in the catfish and shrimp ponds (Figs. 3 and 4). This can be attributed to three possible reasons. Firstly, rice directly uptakes NH4+in the sediment, thus reduces the release of inorganic N from the sediment (Feng et al, 2016). Secondly, rice root can stabilize the sediment and weaken the bioturbation of aquatic animals on sediment surface, thus reduce the inorganic N release induced by bioturbation (Yahel et al, 2008). Thirdly, the shading of rice leaf reduced the water and sediment temperature, which may reduce the flux of nitrogen from sediment (Arandia-Gorostidi et al, 2016). Rice only significantly reduced the release of NO3-from sediment in shrimp ponds. The amount of feed applied in shrimp ponds was far lower than that in catfish ponds. The residual N accumulated in the sediment of shrimp ponds may not provide sufficient NH4+for rice. Thus, rice absorbed more NO3-in the sediment of shrimp ponds and significantly reduced the release of NO3-from the sediment.

    Rice did not affect the flux rate of PO43-across the sediment-water interface both in the catfish and shrimp ponds (Figs. 3 and 4). The effects of rice on PO43-exchange across sediment-water interface was complicated. Both positive and negative effects of rice on the release of PO43-from sediment may exist (Dai et al, 2015). Moreover, rice can absorb the PO43-in the sediment, thus reduced the release of PO43-from the sediment. Rice can increase the redox potential, cationic exchange capacity and exchangeable Ca, Fe and Al in the sediment through excreting oxygen and organic acids to the rhizosphere (Wang et al, 2007), which may increase the sorption of PO43-in the sediment. The excretion of organic acids by rice may also decrease the pH value of sediment and increase the chemical desorption of P in the sediment (Bolan, 1991). These effects may balance each other.

    Conclusions

    Rice-catfish/shrimp co-culture significantly reduced the contents of N and P in the water of intensive aquaculture ponds. Additional rice cultivation also affected the micro-environment and nutrient exchange across the sediment-water interface. Rice-catfish co-culture increased the concentration and penetrating depth of O2, but decreased the pH value across the sediment- water interface, compared with catfish monoculture. The flux rate of NH4+across sediment-water interface was significantly lower in the rice-catfish/shrimp co-culture ponds than catfish/shrimp monoculture ponds. The flux rates of NO2-and PO43-showed no significant difference between the co-culture and monoculture ponds. Rice only affected the dissolved inorganic N and P fractions in the sediment.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 41877548 and 31400379), Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (Grant No. LY15C030002) and Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.

    Adámek Z, Mar?álek B. 2013. Bioturbation of sediments by benthic macroinvertebrates and fish and its implication for pond ecosystems: A review., 21: 1–17.

    Akinbile C O, Yusoff M S. 2011. Assessing water hyacinth () and lettuce () effectivesness in aquaculture wasterwater treatment., 14(3): 201–211.

    Andersen T, Andersen F O, Pedersen O. 2006. Increased CO2in the water aroundraises the sediment O2concentration., 84: 294–300.

    Arandia-Gorostidi N, Weber P K, Alonso-Sáez L, Morán X A G, Mayali X. 2016. Elevated temperature increases carbon and nitrogen fluxes between phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria through physical attachment., 11: 641.

    Avnimelech Y, Ritvo G. 2003. Shrimp and fish pond soils: Processes and management., 220: 549–567.

    Bolan N S. 1991. A critical review on the role of mycorrhizal fungi in the uptake of phosphorus by plants., 134(2): 189–207.

    Bosma R H, Verdegem M C J. 2011. Sustainable aquaculture in ponds: Principles, practices and limits., 139: 58–68.

    Boynton W R, Ceballos M A C, Bailey E M, Hodgkins C L S, Humphrey J L, Testa J M. 2018. Oxygen and nutrient exchanges at the sediment-water interface: A global synthesis and critique of estuarine and coastal data., 41(2): 301–333.

    Briggs M R P, Fvnge-Smith S J. 1994. A nutrient budget of some intensive marine shrimp ponds in Thailand., 25: 789–811.

    Bryant L D, Gantzer P A, Little J C. 2011. Increased sediment oxygen uptake caused by oxygenation-induced hypolimnetic mixing., 45: 3692–3703.

    Cheng X J, Zeng Y X, Guo Z R, Zhu L S. 2014. Diffusion of nitrogen and phosphorus across the sediment-water interface and in seawater at aquaculture areas of Daya Bay, China., 11(2): 1557–1572.

    Colmer T D, Cox M C H, Voesenek L A C J. 2006. Root aeration in rice (): Evaluation of oxygen, carbon dioxide, and ethylene as possible regulators of root acclimatizations., 170: 767–778.

    Dai Y R, Cheng S P, Liang W, Wu Z B. 2015. Submerged macrophyteaffects phosphorus exchange at the sediment-water interface., 71(6): 913–921.

    Dien L D, Hiep L H, Hao N V, Sammut J, Burford M A. 2018. Comparing nutrient budgets in integrated rice-shrimp ponds and shrimp grow-out ponds., 484: 250–258.

    Feng J F, Li F B, Zhou X Y, Xu C C, Fang F P. 2016. Nutrient removal ability and economical benefit of a rice-fish co-culture system in aquaculture pond., 94: 315–319.

    Ferdoushi Z, Haque F, Khan S, Haque M M. 2008. The effects of two aquatic floating macrophytes (and) as biofilters of nitrogen and phosphate in fish ponds., 8: 253–258.

    Guo Y J, Shen Y P, Wang F, Zhang Z D. 2013. Nutrient fluxes across sediment-water interface in different grass carp polyculture enclosures., 37(4): 595–605. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Hargreaves J A. 1998. Nitrogen biogeochemistry of aquaculture ponds., 166: 181–212.

    Helali M A, Zaaboub N, Oueslati W, Added A, Aleya L. 2016. Nutrient exchange and oxygen demand at the sediment-water interface during dry and wet seasons off the Medjerda River Delta (Tunis Gulf, Tunisia)., 75: 25.

    Henry-Silva G G, Camargo A F M. 2006. Efficiency of aquatic macrophytes to treat Nile tilapia pond effluents., 63: 433–438.

    Hu B, Tan L J, Wang J T. 2017. Study on the diffusion fluxes of dissolved inorganic nitrogen phosphorus and urea across sediment-water interface in scallop culture area of Changli coastal waters., 36(6): 864–870. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Jackson C, Preston N, Thompson P J, Michele B. 2003. Nitrogen budget and effluent nitrogen components at an intensive shrimp farm., 218: 397–411.

    Jescovitch L N. 2014. Water Surface Area Ratio for Aquaculture Ponds. Alabama: Auburn University.

    Jiang Z J, Cui Y, Chen B J. 2007. Diffusive fluxes of dissolved inorganic nitrogen across sediment-water interface in net-cage culture area of Tangdao Bay., 28(5): 1001–1005. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Kapanen G. 2008. Phosphorus fractionation in lake sediments., 57(4): 244–255.

    Koschorreck M, Brookland I, Matthias A. 2003. Biogeochemistry of the sediment-water interface in the littoral of an acidic mining lake studied with microsensors and gel-probes., 285–286: 71–84.

    Lei P, Zhang H, Wang C, Pan K. 2018. Migration and diffusion for pollutants across the sediment-water interface in lakes: A review., 30(6): 1489–1508. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Li F B, Sun Z P, Qi H Y, Zhou X Y, Xu C C, Wu D X, Fang F P, Feng J F, Zhang N. 2019. Effects of rice-fish co-culture on oxygen consumption in intensive aquaculture pond., 26(1): 50–59.

    Li X P, Li J R, Wang Y B, Fu L L, Fu Y Y, Li B Q, Jiao B H. 2011. Aquaculture industry in China: Current state, challenges, and outlook., 19(3): 187–200.

    Liao H F, Zheng Z M, Regan N, Zhu J Y. 2016. Study on nutrient fluxes of sediment-water interface in cage culture zone of large yellow croakerin Xiangshan Bay., 34: 84–92. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Lin X B, Lin X, Yan Y Y, He S, Jiang L L, Zeng C S. 2013. Inorganic nitrogen exchange fluxes at the sediment-water interface in saline-fresh water wetland of Min River estuary., 27(5): 260–266. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Liu J G, Qian M, Cai G L, Zhu Q S, Wong M H. 2007. Variations between rice cultivars in root secretion of organic acids and the relationship with plant cadmium uptake., 29(3): 189–195.

    Lu R. 2000. Methods of nitrogen and phosphorus analysis.: Soil and Agro-chemical Analysis Methods. Agricultural Science and Beijing: Technology Press.

    Martinez-Porchas M, Martinez-Cordova L R. 2012. World aquaculture: Environmental impacts and troubleshooting alternatives., 2012: 389623.

    Mu D, Yuan D K, Feng H, Xing F W, Teo F Y, Li S Z. 2017. Nutrient fluxes across sediment-water interface in Bohai Bay Coastal Zone, China., 114(2): 705–714.

    Mügler C, Rabouille C, Bombled B, Montarnal P. 2012. Impact of spatial heterogeneities on oxygen consumption in sediments: Experimental observations and 2D numerical modeling., 112: 76–83.

    Nicholaus R, Zheng Z M. 2014. The effects of bioturbation by the Venus clamon the fluxes of nutrients across the sediment-water interface in aquaculture ponds., 22(2): 913–924.

    Niencheski L F, Jahnke R A. 2002. Benthic respiration and inorganic nutrient fluxes in the estuarine region of Patos Lagoon (Brazil)., 8(3): 135–152.

    Nowlin W H, Evarts J L, Vanni M J. 2005. Release rates and potential fates of nitrogen and phosphorus from sediments in a eutrophic reservoir., 50(2): 301–322.

    Petranich E, Covelli S, Acquavita A, de Vittor C, Faganeli J, Contin M. 2018. Benthic nutrient cycling at the sediment-water interface in a lagoon fish farming system (northern Adriatic Sea, Italy)., 644: 137–149.

    Qiu H M, Geng J J, Ren H Q, Xu Z Y. 2016. Phosphite flux at the sediment-water interface in northern Lake Taihu., 543: 67–74.

    Santschi P, H?hener P, Benoit G, Buchholtz-ten Brink M. 1990. Chemical processes at the sediment-water interface., 30: 269–315.

    SEPA. 2002. Monitor and Analysis Methods of Water and Wastewater. Beijing, China.

    Sun Z P, Qin L, Liu Y B, Li F B, Feng J F, Wu D X, Fang F P. 2018. Advances in restoration effects of rice growing on eutrophic water., 32(5): 509–518. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Tian C C, Wang C B, Li Q, Xiao B D. 2013. Effects ofon physical and chemical variables of the microprofiles at sediment-water interface., 25(5): 715–722. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Wang J F, Chen J A, Zeng Y, Yang Y Q, Yang H Q, Ji Y X. 2013b. Application of microelectrode measurement system in research on biogeochemical processed across the water-sediment Interface in Hongfeng Lake., 41(1): 65–71. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Wang L T, Liu L, Qian B, Xia Q, Chen L Y. 2013a. Changes in environmental chemistry at water-sediment interface before and after dredging of Dazong Lake in Yancheng City., 29(2): 33–38. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    Wang S R, Jin X C, Zhao H C, Zhou X N, Wu F C. 2007. Effects ofon phosphorus retention and release in sediments., 181: 329–339.

    Wenzh?fer F, Holby O, Glud R N, Nielsen H K, Gundersen J K. 2000.microsensor studies of a shallow water hydrothermal vent at Milos, Greece., 69: 43–54.

    Yahel G, Yahel R, Katz T, Lazar B, Herut B, Tunnicliffe V. 2008. Fish activity: A major mechanism for sediment resuspension and organic matter remineralization in coastal marine sediments., 372: 195–209.

    Yang P, Lai D Y F, Jin B, Bastviken D, Tan L S, Tong C. 2017. Dynamics of dissolved nutrients in the aquaculture shrimp ponds of the Min River estuary, China: Concentrations, fluxes and environmental loads., 603-604: 256–267.

    Zhang K, Xie J, Yu D G, Wang G J, Yu E M, Gong W B, Li Z F, Wang C C, Xia Y. 2018. A comparative study on the budget of nitrogen and phosphorus in polyculture systems of snakehead with bighead carp., 483: 69–75.

    Zhong D S, Wang F, Dong S L, Li L. 2015. Impact ofbioturbation on nitrogen dynamics and benthic fluxes at the sediment-water interface in pond aquaculture., 23(4): 967–980.

    3 April 2019;

    24 June 2019

    FENG Jinfei (fengjinfei@caas.cn); FANG Fuping (fangfuping@caas.cn)

    Copyright ? 2019, China National Rice Research Institute. Hosting by Elsevier B V

    This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

    Peer review under responsibility of China National Rice Research Institute

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2019.06.001

    (Managing Editor: Li Guan)

    在线 av 中文字幕| 亚洲第一青青草原| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 搡老乐熟女国产| 午夜福利视频精品| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 满18在线观看网站| 成人三级做爰电影| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 日本av免费视频播放| 9色porny在线观看| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 国产片内射在线| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 免费少妇av软件| 亚洲九九香蕉| 性少妇av在线| 午夜91福利影院| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 久久中文字幕一级| 在线av久久热| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 最新在线观看一区二区三区 | 亚洲,欧美精品.| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 亚洲综合色网址| av不卡在线播放| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 丝袜喷水一区| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 亚洲成人手机| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产麻豆69| 热re99久久国产66热| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 成在线人永久免费视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 老司机靠b影院| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| videos熟女内射| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产成人av教育| 国产av国产精品国产| 飞空精品影院首页| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 国产激情久久老熟女| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| av在线老鸭窝| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 老司机影院成人| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 久久中文字幕一级| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产 | 久久ye,这里只有精品| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 亚洲精品一二三| 久久免费观看电影| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 久久狼人影院| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 岛国毛片在线播放| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 97在线人人人人妻| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产男女内射视频| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| av福利片在线| 无限看片的www在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 国产成人av激情在线播放| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲成人手机| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 9色porny在线观看| av线在线观看网站| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 老司机影院成人| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 操出白浆在线播放| www日本在线高清视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 91国产中文字幕| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 久久久久久久精品精品| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 老熟女久久久| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 18在线观看网站| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 精品一区二区三卡| 国产精品一国产av| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 我的亚洲天堂| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 久久九九热精品免费| 精品少妇内射三级| 久久久欧美国产精品| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 91成人精品电影| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 亚洲国产看品久久| 69精品国产乱码久久久| a 毛片基地| 九草在线视频观看| 国产男女内射视频| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 1024香蕉在线观看| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 99香蕉大伊视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| av不卡在线播放| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 一区二区av电影网| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 中文欧美无线码| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产淫语在线视频| 中文欧美无线码| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| www.999成人在线观看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 久久久精品区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 亚洲自偷自拍图片 自拍| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 黄频高清免费视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 久久久欧美国产精品| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 在现免费观看毛片| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 成人影院久久| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 天天操日日干夜夜撸| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 午夜福利,免费看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| av视频免费观看在线观看| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 久9热在线精品视频| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 香蕉丝袜av| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 国产视频首页在线观看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲av男天堂| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 18在线观看网站| 在线 av 中文字幕| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 夫妻午夜视频| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 精品福利永久在线观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产成人精品在线电影| 精品少妇内射三级| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密 | 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 精品一区二区三卡| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 日本av免费视频播放| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 美女福利国产在线| www.av在线官网国产| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 99久久人妻综合| 别揉我奶头~嗯~啊~动态视频 | 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 9色porny在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 男女国产视频网站| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 成人国产一区最新在线观看 | 国产野战对白在线观看| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 18禁观看日本| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 性色av一级| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女精品中文字幕| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 一级黄片播放器| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| av在线老鸭窝| 久久久久视频综合| 欧美av亚洲av综合av国产av| 日韩中文字幕视频在线看片| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 久久这里只有精品19| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 日本午夜av视频| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 制服诱惑二区| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 另类精品久久| 日本午夜av视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 日本五十路高清| 午夜老司机福利片| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 国产激情久久老熟女| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 男女国产视频网站| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国产成人精品在线电影| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 国产男女内射视频| 1024香蕉在线观看| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲国产欧美网| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 9191精品国产免费久久| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 大型av网站在线播放| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 国产精品成人在线| 亚洲 国产 在线| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| av电影中文网址| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 亚洲免费av在线视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 成人手机av| 多毛熟女@视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| av国产精品久久久久影院| 午夜影院在线不卡| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 伊人亚洲综合成人网| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| av线在线观看网站| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 老司机影院成人| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 看免费av毛片| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 国产麻豆69| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 午夜影院在线不卡| 操出白浆在线播放| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 在线看a的网站| 国产1区2区3区精品| 熟女av电影| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 91成人精品电影| 久久这里只有精品19| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 老熟女久久久| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 国产成人精品无人区| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 美女中出高潮动态图| 国产视频首页在线观看| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 午夜av观看不卡| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 日韩伦理黄色片| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 色网站视频免费| 欧美日韩精品网址| 操出白浆在线播放| 成年动漫av网址| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 黄片播放在线免费| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲九九香蕉| 久久久精品区二区三区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 宅男免费午夜| 99九九在线精品视频| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 18禁观看日本| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 色94色欧美一区二区| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 9191精品国产免费久久| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 精品人妻1区二区| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 黄色一级大片看看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | av网站在线播放免费| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 女性被躁到高潮视频| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 伦理电影免费视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 在线观看www视频免费| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 丁香六月天网| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| videosex国产| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| av福利片在线| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 一级毛片我不卡| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 脱女人内裤的视频| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 大香蕉久久网| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 国产成人一区二区在线| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 精品国产一区二区久久| 尾随美女入室| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| kizo精华| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 制服诱惑二区| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 91成人精品电影| 免费在线观看日本一区| 在线看a的网站| 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 两个人看的免费小视频| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 99九九在线精品视频| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 一区在线观看完整版| 一区福利在线观看| 午夜福利视频精品| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| videos熟女内射| av在线播放精品| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕在线| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 麻豆av在线久日| 在线观看人妻少妇| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 丁香六月欧美| 大香蕉久久成人网| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉|