不同分娩方式對產(chǎn)后早期盆底肌電值及肌力的影響

聶偉 劉學(xué)云 張琳琳 黑國真

[摘要] 目的 探討不同分娩方式對產(chǎn)后早期盆底肌電值及肌力的影響。 方法 選取2015年6月～2018年10月于山東省聊城市東昌府區(qū)婦幼保健院產(chǎn)檢并分娩的200例產(chǎn)婦為研究對象，按照分娩方式的不同將其分為剖宮產(chǎn)組（n = 98）和陰道分娩組（n = 102），陰道分娩組根據(jù)有無側(cè)切分為側(cè)切組（n = 53）和無側(cè)切組（n = 49）。分別于分娩前、產(chǎn)后6周、產(chǎn)后12周、產(chǎn)后20周，比較剖宮產(chǎn)組與陰道分娩組、側(cè)切組和無側(cè)切組組間的盆底肌電值和肌力下降情況。 結(jié)果 產(chǎn)后6、12、20周，兩組盆底肌電位峰值、活力值、速度值均呈先降低后升高趨勢（P < 0.05）;產(chǎn)后6周，剖宮產(chǎn)組除盆底肌電位活力值與陰道分娩組比較差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P > 0.05）外，其余各時(shí)間點(diǎn)的盆底肌電位峰值、活力值、速度值均高于陰道分娩組（P < 0.05）。分娩前及產(chǎn)后6、12、20周，側(cè)切組與無側(cè)切組盆底肌電位峰值、活力值、速度值等比較，差異無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P > 0.05），產(chǎn)后6周兩組電位峰值、活力值、速度值均低于分娩前（P < 0.05）。分娩前及產(chǎn)后6、12、20周，剖宮產(chǎn)組、陰道分娩組以及側(cè)切組、無側(cè)切組Ⅰ類肌、Ⅱ類肌肌力下降患者占比比較，差異均無統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P > 0.05）。 結(jié)論 剖宮產(chǎn)、陰道分娩對盆底肌力下降的影響區(qū)別不大，且陰道分娩中側(cè)切不能減輕對產(chǎn)后盆底肌力的影響。剖宮產(chǎn)對產(chǎn)后早期盆底肌電值的影響較陰道分娩小。

[關(guān)鍵詞] 剖宮產(chǎn)術(shù);自然分娩;會陰切開術(shù);產(chǎn)后;盆肌電值;肌力

[中圖分類號] R714.254? ? ? ? ? [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識碼] A? ? ? ? ? [文章編號] 1673-7210（2019）07（b）-0095-05

Effect of different delivery modes on pelvic floor electromyography and muscle strength in early postpartum period

NIE Wei1? ?LIU Xueyun2? ?ZHANG Linlin3? ?HEI Guozhen3

1.Research Department， Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences， Shandong Province， Ji′nan? ?250000， China; 2.Department of Obstetrics， Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital， Shandong Province， Ji′nan? ?250000， China; 3.Department of Obstetrics， Liaocheng Dongchangfu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital， Shandong Province， Liaocheng? ?252000， China

[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of different delivery methods on pelvic floor electromyography and muscle strength in early postpartum period. Methods Total of 200 parturients who were examined and delivered in Liaocheng Dongchangfu District Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Shandong Province from June 2015 to October 2018 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into cesarean section group （n = 98） and vaginal delivery group （n = 102）， vaginal delivery group was divided into lateral section group （n = 53） and non-lateral section group （n = 49） according to the different modes of delivery. The pelvic floor myoelectricity and muscle strength were compared between cesarean section group and vaginal delivery group， lateral incision group and the non-lateral incision group before delivery， 6， 12 and 20 weeks postpartum. Results The peak value， activity value and velocity value of pelvic floor potential in cesarean section group and vaginal delivery group decreased first and then increased at 6，12 and 20 weeks postpartum （P < 0.05）. There was no significant difference in pelvic floor potential activity between cesarean section group and vaginal delivery group at 6 weeks postpartum （P > 0.05）. The peak value of pelvic floor muscle potential， pelvic floor muscle activity and pelvic floor velocity at other time points were higher than those in vaginal delivery group （P < 0.05）. There was no statistical difference in peak pelvic floor potential， pelvic floor activity and pelvic floor velocity between the two groups （P > 0.05）， and the peak pelvic floor potential， pelvic floor activity and pelvic floor velocity of the two groups was lower 6 weeks postpartum than those before delivery （P < 0.05）. There was no statistical difference in the decrease rate of muscular strength of type Ⅰ and Ⅱ muscles between cesarean section group， vaginal delivery group and lateral section group and non-lateral section group （P > 0.05）. Conclusion The influence of cesarean section and vaginal delivery on the decrease of pelvic floor muscle strength is not different， and lateral incision during vaginal delivery can not reduce the influence of pelvic floor muscle strength after delivery. The effect of cesarean section on pelvic floor EMG in early postpartum period is slight.