• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Bilateral vs unilateral placement of metal stents for inoperable highgrade hilar biliary strictures: A systemic review and meta-analysis

    2019-09-25 08:12:42MunishAshatSumantAroraJagpalKlairChristopherChildsArvindMuraliFrederickJohlin
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 2019年34期

    Munish Ashat, Sumant Arora, Jagpal S Klair, Christopher A Childs, Arvind R Murali, Frederick C Johlin

    Abstract BACKGROUND Bilateral vs unilateral biliary stenting is used for palliation in malignant biliary obstruction. No clear data is available to compare the efficacy and safety of bilateral biliary stenting over unilateral stenting.AIM To assess the efficacy and safety of bilateral vs unilateral biliary drainage in inoperable malignant hilar obstruction.METHODS PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, as well as secondary sources(bibliographic review of selected articles and major GI proceedings), were searched through January 2019. The primary outcome was the re-intervention rate. Secondary outcomes were a technical success, early and late complications,and stent malfunction rate. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval(CI) were calculated for each outcome.RESULTS A total of 9 studies were included (2 prospective Randomized Controlled Study,5 retrospective studies, and 2 abstracts), involving 782 patients with malignant hilar obstruction. Bilateral stenting had significantly lower re-intervention rate compared with unilateral drainage (OR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.40-0.87, P = 0.009). There was no difference in the technical success rate (OR = 0.7, CI: 0.42-1.17, P = 0.17),early complication rate (OR = 1.56, CI: 0.31-7.75, P = 0.59), late complication rate(OR = 0.91, CI: 0.58-1.41, P = 0.56) and stent malfunction (OR = 0.69, CI: 0.42-1.12,P = 0.14) between bilateral and unilateral stenting for malignant hilar biliary strictures.CONCLUSION Bilateral biliary drainage had a lower re-intervention rate as compared to unilateral drainage for high grade inoperable malignant biliary strictures, with no significant difference in technical success, and early or late complication rates.

    Key words: Metal stent; Hilar biliary stricture; Re-intervention rate; Technical success rate

    INTRODUCTION

    Unresectable malignant hilar obstruction (UMHO) is associated with very poor prognosis. Five-year survival is < 10% with most patients dying within 1 year of diagnosis[1,2]. Compared to plastic stents, self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) have shown to be more cost effective and provides advantage with longer stent patency and less re-intervention rate in patients with non-operable malignancy with score of II to IV on Bismuth-Corlette classification and Hilar cholangiocarcinoma who have a predicted the life expectancy of > 3 mo[3-5]. Biliary stenting also plays a role in the management of obstructive jaundice and cholangitis and is important in enhancing the quality of life of patients with UMHO.

    Although endoscopic stenting is widely favored in cases of UMHO, there is currently no consensus on whether the placement of bilateral biliary stents has any advantage for these patients over unilateral stenting. Although some experts believe in measuring the volume of the liver to be drained to determine the type of stent to be used, quantification of the liver volume is clinically challenging. Furthermore, there have been conflicting data regarding the technical success and outcomes of bilateral and unilateral stenting. While some authors believe that unilateral stenting renders increased technical success rate with concomitant lower complications[6-8]; bilateral stenting, on the other hand, will drain higher liver volume, may have longer stent patency, and hence may require less re-intervention[9-11].

    The aim of the meta-analysis was to systematically review the current literature and compare the efficacy of unilateralvsbilateral stenting in achieving successful stent placement, comparing re-intervention rate, technical success, and early and late procedure-related complications for unresectable malignant hilar strictures.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Data sources and searches

    Search strategies were developed with the assistance of a health sciences librarian with expertise in searching for systematic reviews. Comprehensive search strategies using index and keywords were constructed for PubMed, Embase (Elsevier), and Cinhal (EBSCO). No database filters were used at any time during the searching process. All searches were conducted during January 2019 and the number of citations found in each database can be found in the flow diagram (Figure 1). The searches combined the following concepts: Unilateral SEMS and bilateral SEMS with biliary stents. Within the results for those combined concepts, additional filters, publication types, and keyword strategies were used to identify and exclude the most common articles types that do not report trial results (reviews and case studies). An exhaustive forward search tool was used for the Web of Science database to capture all possible studies of interest. The databases were searched for publications dates 1995 to present.Language limits were applied to search for articles in English only. To identify further articles, references were hand searched. All results were downloaded into EndNote(Thompson ISI Research Soft, Philadelphia, PA, United States), a bibliographic database manager, and duplicate citations were identified and removed. In addition,abstracts from Digestive Disease Week, annual meetings of American College of Gastroenterology, and United European Gastroenterology Week from the last 5 years were also searched.

    Inclusion criteria

    Prospective studies, retrospective studies, and abstracts published in the English language were included if they compared unilateralvsbilateral SEMS biliary stent placement, for one or more of the clinical outcomes: Re-intervention rate, technical success, complication rate, and stent malfunction.

    Exclusion criteria

    Studies were excluded when there was no comparison between unilateral and bilateral stents. We also excluded studies that did not evaluate the required predefined endpoints. Furthermore, duplicate studies, case reports, animal studies, and letters to editors were excluded.

    Data extraction

    Two authors (Ashat M and Arora S) independently extracted the data according to a pre-specified protocol from all the included studies. All discrepancies were resolved after discussion with a third reviewer.

    Quality assessment and risk of bias

    Cohort studies were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and for randomized control trials, Cochrane tool was used to assess for risk of bias[12,13]. Risk of publication bias for each end-point was assessed using the funnel plots.

    Outcome

    The data collected from eligible studies included following data points-publication year, authors, country of publication, study design, mean age of study participants, a total number of patients in each unilateral stenting and bilateral stenting category and type of malignancy, complications rates, and type of complications Supplemental(Table 1).

    Primary end-point of the study was the re-intervention rate. This was defined as an endoscopic or percutaneous intervention that was done for stent failure and to increase biliary drainage or for recurrent jaundice, or for management of dilated intrahepatic bile duct revealed by imaging or management of immediate adverse event of successfully inserted SEMS. Secondary outcomes were (1) Technical success was defined by the successful placement of bilateral or unilateral SEMS across stricture site, confirmed by the flow of contrast or bile through SEMS; (2) Early adverse event rate- defined as early stent-related complications within 4 wk. Early complications included cholangitis, cholecystitis, pancreatitis, bleeding, and liver abscess; (3) Late adverse events were defined as any stent-related complication that occurred after 4 wk of stent insertion. Late complication included cholangitis, cholecystitis, liver abscess; and (4) Stent malfunction defined as stent obstruction due to sludge or stone formation, cholangitis, tumor in-growth, or development of a liver abscess, or biloma.

    Statistical analysis

    Review Manager 5.3 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, United Kingdom) was used to analyze the data for the meta-analysis. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95%confidence interval (CI) of study end-points were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. In order to access of heterogeneity, we usedX2test (Cochran Q statistic). In case there was significant heterogeneity, a random-effect model was used.Funnel plots were obtained to assess the risk of bias.

    RESULTS

    Using pre-defined parameters and removing duplicate publications our search strategy identified 281 articles. Another 2 articles were identified by manual search. A total of 262 articles were excluded based on our exclusion criterion. Based on our inclusion criterions, 9 studies were selected (Figure 1). Of these 9 studies, 7 were published manuscripts and 2 were published as abstracts. All the baseline characteristics of each individual studies are highlighted in Supplemental Table 1.

    Figure 1 PRISMA diagram of the literature search.

    Study characteristics

    The characteristics of the studies, and of the patients in the selected studies are shown in Supplemental Table 1. A total of 9 studies were enrolled in the current study of which 2 were randomized control trial’s (RCT), and 7 were retrospective trials (5 complete manuscripts and 2 abstracts). Although the study by Mukaiet al[14]was an RCT, for our analysis we used only bilateral stents subgroup of the study which was not randomized. A total of 782 patients were included in the analysis of bilateralvsunilateral biliary stenting.

    Results of meta-analysis

    Primary end-point:Re-intervention rate: A total of 7 studies involving 513 patients was included in this analysis[7,10,14-18]. Bilateral stenting required significantly lower reintervention as compared to unilateral stenting (OR = 0.59, 95%CI: 0.40-0.87,P=0.009) (Figure 2). The funnel plot showed no asymmetry (Figure 3).

    Secondary end-points:(1) Technical success: A total of 8 studies involving 745 patients was included in this analysis[7,10,14,15,17-20]. There was no significant difference in the technical success rate with bilateral stenting as compared to unilateral stenting(OR = 0.7, 95%CI: 0.42-1.17,P= 0.17) (Figure 4). There was mild heterogeneity; (2)Early complications: A total of 5 studies involving 530 patients were included in this analysis[7,10,18-20]. There was no difference between early complications (OR = 1.56,95%CI: 0.31-7.75,P= 0.0001) (Figure 5); (3) Late complications: A total of 5 studies involving 430 patients were included in this analysis[7,10,15,18,20]. There was no difference in late complication rate (OR = 0.91, 95%CI: 0.58-1.41,P= 0.56) (Figure 6); and (4)Stent malfunction: A total of 4 studies involving 324 patients was included in this analysis[7,10,15,18]. There was no difference in stent malfunction rates (OR = 0.69, 95%CI:0.42-1.12,P= 0.14) (Figure 7).

    Quality assessment and funnel plots

    The Newcastle Ottawa Scale score has been provided for all retrospective studies in Supplemental Table 1. The Cochrane collaboration tool assessment of bias for the RCT has been provided in Figure 8. Funnel plots to estimate bias revealed no asymmetry(Figure 3).

    DISCUSSION

    Endoscopic biliary drainage is the intervention of choice in patients with UMHO.Besides providing symptomatic relief to patients with pruritis it also has therapeutic implications with a reduction in total bilirubin which permits the use of subsequent chemotherapy, radiotherapy or photodynamic therapy. This may be important in prolonging the life of patients with unresectable malignant biliary strictures. Over the past decade, multiple studies have found using metallic stents over plastic stents as more cost-effective in hilar cholangiocarcinoma[4,14,21,22]. However, the data comparing bilateralvsunilateral stenting in UMHO is sparse. There has been conflicting data in regards to the outcomes of placement of bilateralvsunilateral SEMS stents[7,8,10,18,23,24].Therefore, we designed this meta-analysis to review the data, thus-far available,comparing bilateralvsunilateral SEMS placement for UMHO. Our meta-analysis shows that bilateral stenting as compared to unilateral stenting is associated with a lower re-intervention rate, but has a comparable technical success rate, early and late complication rates.

    Figure 2 Forest plot of re-intervention rates with bilateral self expanding metal stents vs unilateral stent. SEMS: Self expanding metal stents; OR: Odds ratio;CI: Confidence interval.

    Bilateral stenting was associated with a statistically significant 41% reduction in reintervention rate. There has been marked variability in results among published literature. A prospective trial by Mukaiet al[14]demonstrated 50% re-intervention rate in bilateral SEMS group compared to 29% in unilateral SEMS group. However, the study groups were not treated similarly in their study, as patients who received bilateral stent received sphincterotomy while patients receiving unilateral stent did not. In the prospective RCT by Leeet al[10], the authors showed a statistically significant lower re-intervention rate at 3 mo for bilateral SEMS groupvsunilateral SEMS group (10.9%vs33.3%). The ability to reduce the number of interventions is of paramount importance in patients with non-operable malignant hilar strictures and an average life expectancy < 12 mo, thus avoiding multiple hospitalizations, which inreturn could mean an overall more cost-effective approach and also will have an impact on improving the quality of life for patients[18,25]. Further, restoration of bile flow with bilateral stenting is physiologically more superior to unilateral stenting.Approximately 25%-30% liver needs to be drained in order to satisfactorily reduce jaundice[8,26]. Though unilateral stent should be able to drain at-least 25% of the liver,clinical evidence suggests that up to 30% cases of hilar cholangiocarcinoma are associated with hepatic lobar atrophy[27], and thus in such a situation, unilateral stenting may not provide an appropriate therapeutic response and may increase primary re-intervention rates. Furthermore, a study by Vienneet al[28]suggested that draining more than 50% of the liver volume is an important predictor of the effectiveness of biliary drainage especially in malignant hilar strictures.

    The conflicting data is further complicated by the technical difficulties associated with the placement of bilateral stents. Thus, multiple newer stent delivery systems have been developed to overcome this technical challenge. In our study, there was no significant difference in the technical success between bilateral biliary stenting and unilateral biliary stenting. A meta-analysis by Hong Wet al[24]concluded higher success with unilateral stenting. However, their meta-analysis included studies involving plastic biliary stents which may have affected the results. Our results are similar to results by Naitohet al[18]and Iwanoet al[7]who had similar technical success for bilateral and unilateral stents. Bilateral stents could be placed by either stent-instent technique (SIS) or side-by-side technique (SBS). Naitohet aluse stent in stent technique and Iwanoet alused SIS technique respectively in their patients Although,this meta-analysis did not specifically compare the two techniques of bilateral stenting, a meta-analysis by Naitohet al[18]showed longer stent patency time with SBS group when compared to SIS group. Provider expertise could also account for the variability in the technical success rate among the studies. Thus, based on our results,we believe that bilateral stenting may be preferable for providers who are technically adept at placing both bilateral and unilateral stent.

    Figure 3 Cochrane collaboration tool. Risk assessment.

    Stent malfunction could be driving our primary outcome of stent re-intervention rates. The rate of reintervention was influenced by stent malfunction, however, not all studies defined the cause of stent malfunction clearly (Supplemental Table 2) and hence we only included stent malfunction as a secondary outcome. There was a trend towards decreased stent malfunction with bilateral drainage as compared to unilateral drainage though this was not statistically different. Earlier studies seemed to suggest that bilateral stents could lead to increased stent-related early complications. SBS was associated with increased cholangitis rates and portal vein occlusion because of excessive expansion of the bile duct by parallel stents[18]. SIS deployment could lead to increased sludge formation at the site of stent overlap as a result of a reduction in bile inflow and increase the incidence of tumor ingrowth if the stent mesh is expanded in the area of overlap[17]. In contrast, most recent RCT by Leeet al[10]has shown no difference in rates of cholangitis and liver abscess after bilateral stent placement.Similarly, in our meta-analysis, there was no difference with stent-related early or late complication rates between the two groups.

    There are several limitations to this meta-analysis. The main limitation is that only two studies included in our meta-analysis are RCT’s. Most studies are retrospective studies which could have led to selection bias. Nevertheless, the retrospective studies are reasonable quality cohort studies, as determined by the Modified Newcastle Ottawa quality assessment scale of cohort studies. Another limitation is the presence of significant heterogeneity in some of the analysis. This is likely due to the significant clinical heterogeneity among the studies the differences in the study population, the location of malignant strictures, technical expertise of the providers, and the difference in the duration. However, importantly, there was only mild heterogeneity in the analysis of our primary end-point analysis of re-intervention rate and in the analysis for technical success. For analysis with significant heterogeneity, we used a random effects model to partly account for the clinical heterogeneity. This highlights the need for further research on this topic and the importance of our meta-analysis based on available data.

    In conclusion, bilateral biliary stenting for UMHO may decrease the re-intervention rate in patients with malignant hilar strictures, without increasing early or late complication rate. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis so far comparing the outcomes of SEMS bilateralvsunilateral stenting. Further RCT’s are needed to confirm our findings.

    Figure 4 Forest plot of technical success rates with bilateral self expanding metal stents vs unilateral stent. SEMS: Self expanding metal stents; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

    Figure 5 Forest plot of early complication rates with bilateral self expanding metal stents vs unilateral stent. SEMS: Self expanding metal stents; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

    Figure 6 Forest plot of late complication rates with bilateral self expanding metal stents vs unilateral stent. SEMS: Self expanding metal stents; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

    Figure 7 Forest plot of stent malfunction rates with bilateral self expanding metal stents vs unilateral stent. SEMS: Self expanding metal stents; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.

    Figure 8 Risk of bias summary: Review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    The background, present status, and significance of the study should be described in detail.

    Research motivation

    Over the past few years, newer randomized control trials (RCTs have been published showing the overall advantage of bilateral biliary stenting over unilateral stenting in a subset of patients with inoperable hilar malignant strictures. No meta-analysis was done on this topic with newer study data points.

    Research objectives

    We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to compare the role of bilateral stentingvsunilateral stenting in inoperable malignant hilar strictures.

    Research methods

    A detailed literature search was conducted to find all the relevant articles. Two reviewers independently analyzed all the selected studies. All discrepancies were discussed independently with the third reviewer and consensus was achieved. We used Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95%confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome.

    Research results

    A total of 782 patients form nine studies were included for analysis. Bilateral stenting had significantly lower re-intervention rate compared with unilateral drainage (OR = 0.59, 95%CI:0.40-0.87, P = 0.009). There was no difference in the technical success rate (OR = 0.7, CI: 0.42-1.17,P = 0.17), early complication rate (OR = 1.56, CI: 0.31-7.75,P= 0.59), late complication rate (OR =0.91, CI: 0.58-1.41, P = 0.56) and stent malfunction (OR = 0.69, CI: 0.42-1.12,P= 0.14) between bilateral and unilateral stenting for malignant hilar biliary strictures.

    Research conclusions

    Older studies that have shown the ease of putting unilateral stenting with fewer complications over bilateral stenting in inoperable malignant hilar strictures. However, with new RCTs showing the higher success of bilateral biliary stenting with lower re-intervention rates, bilateral stenting could offer an overall advantage over unilateral stenting. Our study highlights the overall advantage of bilateral stenting over unilateral stenting.

    Research perspectives

    Biliary stenting is very important modality in the overall management of inoperable malignant hilar strictures. Bilateral stenting offers an advantage over unilateral stenting, however more RCT is required to further support this conclusion.

    亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 久久亚洲真实| 久久久久久久久久黄片| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久精品人妻少妇| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 1000部很黄的大片| 久久香蕉精品热| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 久久国产精品影院| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 99re在线观看精品视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产精品影院久久| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 午夜视频精品福利| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产乱人伦免费视频| 欧美日韩精品网址| 黄色成人免费大全| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 超碰成人久久| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 久久精品亚洲精品国产色婷小说| 男女那种视频在线观看| 91老司机精品| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 两个人看的免费小视频| 久久久精品大字幕| 亚洲在线观看片| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 丁香六月欧美| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 很黄的视频免费| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 久久久久性生活片| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 999精品在线视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 在线a可以看的网站| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 日本在线视频免费播放| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 日本 欧美在线| 久9热在线精品视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 在线播放国产精品三级| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 国产高清videossex| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 波多野结衣巨乳人妻| 怎么达到女性高潮| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 99热精品在线国产| 久久精品人妻少妇| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 久久久久性生活片| 亚洲无线观看免费| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 国产成人精品无人区| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 小说图片视频综合网站| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 黄色女人牲交| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产高清三级在线| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 国产视频内射| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 国产精品一及| 毛片女人毛片| 看黄色毛片网站| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久,| 天天添夜夜摸| www国产在线视频色| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 日韩免费av在线播放| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 床上黄色一级片| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国产午夜精品论理片| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 99久久国产精品久久久| 特级一级黄色大片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人 | 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆 | 91九色精品人成在线观看| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产精品,欧美在线| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 不卡av一区二区三区| 一a级毛片在线观看| 久久久久国内视频| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 宅男免费午夜| 一进一出抽搐动态| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 午夜a级毛片| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产1区2区3区精品| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 天堂网av新在线| 亚洲精品在线美女| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国产成人aa在线观看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| 午夜a级毛片| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 亚洲av成人一区二区三| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 成人三级做爰电影| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产三级在线视频| 黄片小视频在线播放| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 免费看日本二区| 成人三级做爰电影| 脱女人内裤的视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 亚洲片人在线观看| 黄频高清免费视频| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 欧美日韩黄片免| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 欧美黑人巨大hd| 99热这里只有精品一区 | 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 综合色av麻豆| av片东京热男人的天堂| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av | 久久久国产成人精品二区| 在线a可以看的网站| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 色av中文字幕| 国产精品影院久久| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 国产1区2区3区精品| 在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美色视频一区免费| 99国产精品一区二区三区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| ponron亚洲| cao死你这个sao货| 欧美日本视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 香蕉久久夜色| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 国产单亲对白刺激| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 国模一区二区三区四区视频 | 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 中文字幕久久专区| av欧美777| 一进一出抽搐动态| 精品国产亚洲在线| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 色播亚洲综合网| 成人精品一区二区免费| 天堂动漫精品| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 午夜视频精品福利| 禁无遮挡网站| 在线观看66精品国产| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| www日本黄色视频网| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 国产av在哪里看| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 丰满的人妻完整版| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 亚洲av熟女| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 国产激情久久老熟女| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看 | 黄片大片在线免费观看| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 12—13女人毛片做爰片一| 黄色日韩在线| 国产精品一及| 中国美女看黄片| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 成人精品一区二区免费| 免费看a级黄色片| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| a级毛片在线看网站| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 亚洲 国产 在线| 成在线人永久免费视频| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费 | 深夜精品福利| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 色视频www国产| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲片人在线观看| 亚洲九九香蕉| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 免费av不卡在线播放| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 日日夜夜操网爽| 国产高潮美女av| av在线天堂中文字幕| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 国产毛片a区久久久久| 黄片小视频在线播放| 在线观看日韩欧美| 国产精品亚洲美女久久久| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 午夜精品在线福利| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 成人18禁在线播放| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 日本五十路高清| 欧美激情在线99| 国产高清三级在线| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 级片在线观看| 精品电影一区二区在线| 一个人免费在线观看电影 | 亚洲激情在线av| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 99热6这里只有精品| av福利片在线观看| 成在线人永久免费视频| 在线播放国产精品三级| 最好的美女福利视频网| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲美女黄片视频| av片东京热男人的天堂| 国产成人系列免费观看| 亚洲avbb在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| www.精华液| 精品国产三级普通话版| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 色吧在线观看| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 91老司机精品| 亚洲av成人av| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 国产av不卡久久| 怎么达到女性高潮| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 综合色av麻豆| 特级一级黄色大片| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 真人一进一出gif抽搐免费| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 窝窝影院91人妻| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 我要搜黄色片| 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产精华一区二区三区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 不卡一级毛片| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 国产av在哪里看| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 床上黄色一级片| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 超碰成人久久| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 最好的美女福利视频网| 校园春色视频在线观看| 宅男免费午夜| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 日本a在线网址| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 老司机福利观看| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产精品九九99| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 女警被强在线播放| 日本五十路高清| 99久国产av精品| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 中文资源天堂在线| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 精品久久久久久,| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产精品九九99| 特级一级黄色大片| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 久久热在线av| 亚洲无线在线观看| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 午夜福利在线在线| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 久久久久久久久中文| 亚洲av熟女| 一区二区三区激情视频| 久久久久性生活片| 99久久精品热视频| 脱女人内裤的视频| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 欧美色视频一区免费| 午夜影院日韩av| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 久久香蕉国产精品| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 久久这里只有精品中国| 窝窝影院91人妻| а√天堂www在线а√下载| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 久久这里只有精品19| 午夜a级毛片| 日本在线视频免费播放| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| www.精华液| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 999精品在线视频| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 天天添夜夜摸| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 97超视频在线观看视频| 精品久久久久久成人av| 最好的美女福利视频网| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| ponron亚洲| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| av在线蜜桃| www.www免费av| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 嫩草影院入口| 97碰自拍视频| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 国产高清三级在线| 日本免费a在线| 国产99白浆流出| 免费看日本二区| 波多野结衣高清作品| 日本熟妇午夜| 午夜精品在线福利| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 18禁观看日本| 成人18禁在线播放| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 黄色成人免费大全| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 午夜免费观看网址| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 毛片女人毛片| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看 | 欧美黄色片欧美黄色片| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 九九热线精品视视频播放| 在线观看66精品国产| 国产日本99.免费观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点| 国产真实乱freesex| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 级片在线观看| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲成人久久性| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 天天添夜夜摸| 国产99白浆流出| 校园春色视频在线观看| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 色视频www国产| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| av女优亚洲男人天堂 | 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 嫩草影视91久久| 九色国产91popny在线| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 综合色av麻豆| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产三级黄色录像|