• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Correlation between invasive microbiota in margin-surrounding mucosa and anastomotic healing in patients with colorectal cancer

    2019-09-19 06:45:30YanDongLiKangXinHeWeiFangZhu

    Yan-Dong Li,Kang-Xin He,Wei-Fang Zhu

    Abstract

    Key words: Intestinal microbiota;16s rRNA gene sequencing;Anastomotic healing;Predictive ability;Colorectal cancer;Radical resection

    INTRODUCTION

    Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide[1-3].Impaired anastomotic healing is defined as a breach in a surgical join between two hollow viscera,with a leak of luminal contents that may emerge either through the wound or at the drain site,or near the anastomoses[4].As one of the major complications after radical resection for CRC,impaired anastomotic healing may significantly increase hospital costs and prolong the length of hospital stay,and is also linked to cancer recurrence,metastasis,or even tumor-related death[5-11].Clinical symptoms of impaired anastomotic healing often include abdominal pain/distension with fever,pus or fecal excretion,pelvic abscess,peritonitis,and even septic shock[12,13].The International Study Group of Rectal Cancer[13]proposes the following system grading the severity of impaired anastomotic healing:A,no therapeutic intervention;B,active intervention is required but no re-laparotomy;and C,relaparotomy is required.Impaired anastomotic healing rate has been found to vary from 1% to 19% depending on the anatomic location of the anastomosis[9,14-17].Many risk factors have been identified to be associated with impaired anastomotic healing[10,18-20],for instance,a systematic review study[18]suggests that the main preoperative risk factors,which predict impaired anastomotic healing,are sex,age,tumor distal site,tumor size,advanced stage,renal disease,co-morbidity,and history of radiotherapy.Besides,blood loss/transfusion,duration of surgery,rectal contrast by computed tomography (CT),and C-reactive protein (CRP) level are considered as intraoperative risk factors or postoperative factors.The treatment strategies for impaired anastomotic healing after rectal cancer surgery can be divided into three stages according to the disease course as follows:Treatment strategies for the early stage (peritonitis stage,localized intra-abdominal abscess stage,and early stage fistula formation) mainly include identifying the necessity and opportunity of surgery,establishing patency drainage,controlling infection,correcting electrolyte and acidbase imbalance,and providing nutritional support;in addition to the above measures,treatment strategies for the middle stage (fistula formation stage) include fistula management and closure treatment;in the later stage,deterministic remedial surgery is performed for unrecovered patients[13].In terms of severity of specific symptoms,patients were treated either by systemic nutrition support,antibiotics,percutaneous drainage,and transanal revision or by re-laparotomy.Notably,antibiotic treatment should be implemented against Gram-negative bacteria and Gram-positive bacteria,and special attention is required for the anaerobic bacteria[21].

    In most cases,the clinical symptoms of impaired anastomotic healing remain insidious,vague,and uncharacteristic,which are typically not recognized until postoperative days 5-8,sometimes even until postoperative day 12[15,22].If not appropriately treated in time,impaired anastomotic healing in patients could easily evolve into severe postoperative complications and therefore affects morbidity,mortality,and functional and oncological outcomes[5-8].Thus,early diagnosis and prediction of impaired anastomotic healing are of great significance.A pilot study suggests that combined changes of interleukin (IL)-4,IL-6,and IL-10 could accurately predict impaired healing of anastomoses[23].Another study conducted on postoperative CRP in elective abdominal surgery shows that impaired anastomotic healing is unlikely to occur in patients with CRP < 135 mg/L on postoperative day 3[24].Daamset al[25]carried out a study,in which peritoneal lactate concentration was continuously monitored by peritoneal microdialysis to characterize the ischemia and inflammation around the anastomosis,and they found a significant change of peritoneal lactate concentration in patients with impaired anastomotic healing.The results suggest that peritoneal microdialysis is predictive of impaired anastomotic healing after colorectal surgery[25-27].However,these results need to be further confirmed by clinical trials.Intestinal microbes were first reported to be associated with impaired anastomotic healing over 60 years ago[28].It is shown that directly using antibiotics on anastomotic tissues could promote the healing process and prevent leak in dogs undergoing colon resection and anastomosis.Recently,the mechanism has been confirmed to be linked to the direct effect of bacterial collagenases[12,29].Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Serratia marcescens,andEnterococcus faecalis,which can express a collagenolytic phenotype,are reported to be associated with the impaired anastomotic healing[30-34].Besides,Shoganet al[12]proved thatEnterococcus faecalisis involved in the pathogenesis of impaired anastomotic healing by enhancing collagendegrading activity and activating intestinal tissue matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9).Preliminary evidence suggests that intestinal microbiota contributes to the occurrence and development of impaired anastomotic healing.Thus,it could be used as a potential predictor[12,20,29-34].Recently,researchers reported the role of intestinal microbiota in the development of impaired anastomotic healing in the “donuts’’,in which a stapled colorectal anastomosis was made.Their results showed that a high abundance ofLachnospiraceaeandBacteroidaceaeis strongly related to the impaired anastomotic healing,and the bacterial composition that consisted of 60% or more of these two families might be predictive of impaired anastomotic healing[35,36].It can be seen that intestinal microbiota is emerging as a potential predictive factor for anastomotic healing.Nonetheless,it still lacks extensive clinical data and strong statistical evidence on the effect of intestinal microbiota on postoperative anastomotic healing.In this study,margin-surrounding mucosa samples derived from seven CRC patients with impaired anastomotic healing and 30 well-healed CRC patients were collected and the bacterial community was characterized by using 16s rRNA gene sequencing,with an aim to identify the specific bacteria related to the impaired anastomotic healing and to evaluate the ability of the selected taxa in predicting the healing status of anastomoses.

    MATERIALS AND METHODS

    Participant recruitment and sample collection

    Thirty-seven patients with primary CRC who received surgical treatment from January 2017 to December 2018 at the First Affiliated Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine were recruited to the study,and informed consent was obtained from all participants.The exclusion criteria for all participants were as follows:(1)Aged above 90 years old;(2) History of using antibiotics (excluding prophylactic antibiotic usage through intravenous infusion during the preoperative period) within two months;and (3) History of receiving chemotherapy or radiation treatments prior to the study,or personal history of chronic bowel disorders or metabolic diseases such as cirrhosis and diabetes.Specimens of mucosa tissues adjacent to surgical margin derived from the participants were collected,immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen,and then stored at -80 °C for future DNA extraction and 16s rRNA gene sequencing.The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine.

    Anastomotic leak evaluation and confounders

    Clinical manifestations of impaired anastomotic healing after rectal cancer surgery are diverse but could be roughly divided into two categories according to whether the clinical manifestations are typical[13,22]:(1) Typical manifestations:fever,which is defined as decline or rise of body temperature or persistent high fever during postoperative day 3-5;signs of rectal stimulation and acute diffuse peritonitis;increased pelvic drainage and changes in characteristics (i.e.,drainage of gas,mucilage,or feces);leak detected by digital rectal examination;severe paralytic intestinal obstruction and infectious shock;elevated levels of white blood cells,neutrophils,and CRP detected by laboratory examination;impaired anastomotic healing and surrounding fluid found by CT and magnetic resonance imaging examination through the anus or abdominal drainage tube angiography;and impaired anastomotic healing found on colonoscopy;and (2) Atypical manifestations:irregularly low or medium fever,frequent bowel movements,tenesmus,and gradually appearing local peritonitis and (or) paralytic intestinal obstruction in the hypogastria,showing flocculent matter by pelvic drainage.In this study,the impaired healing of anastomoses was defined according to the following clinical manifestations in patients who received radical resection for CRC:Abdominal or pelvic pain,fever (>37.5 °C),discharge of feces,pus,or gas from pelvic drain,and discharge of pus from the rectum[13].It should be noted that fever was not considered as impaired anastomotic healing in this study,as it is difficult to distinguish the clinical symptoms between postoperative infections from impaired anastomotic healing[15].However,fever with abnormal drainage fluid (purulent,fecal,and long-term non-reduction) or with intestinal and abdominal abnormalities (such as abdominal pain without farting for a long time) was considered as impaired anastomotic healing.

    According to the above indexes,the 37 patients were divided into two groups,namely,well-healing group (n= 30) and impaired-healing group (n= 7).The clinical characteristics (including age,sex,body mass index,tumor location,tumor size,TNM stage,tumor morphology,differentiation degree,intestinal obstruction,transfusion,blood loss,operation time,CRP,hemoglobin,and albumin) of the patients were recorded.

    DNA extraction and characterization of bacterial community structure

    Total DNA from the mucosa tissue samples was extracted using SDS/CTAB method.The purity and concentration of DNA were monitored on 1% agar gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific,Waltham,United States).The DNA sample was diluted into 1 ng/μL with sterile water and amplified using primers targeting the V4 region of the 16s rRNA gene (515F:5’-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3’ and 806R:5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’)[37].Cycling conditions included preheating at 98°C for 1 min,followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 10 s,annealing at 50 °C for 30 s,elongation at 72 °C for 30 s,and final heating at 72 °C for 5 min.

    PCR products were cleaned up using a GeneJETTM Gel Extraction Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific,Waltham,United States).Sequencing libraries were constructed using an Ion Plus Fragment Library Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific,Waltham,United States) following the manufacturer's instructions.The library quality was assessed on the Qubit@ 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific,Waltham,United States).Finally,the library was sequenced on an Ion S5TM XL platform (Thermo Fisher Scientific,Waltham,United States).

    Single-end reads were assigned to samples according to their unique barcodes and truncated by cutting off the barcodes from primer sequences.Qualities filtering on the raw reads were performed under specific filtering conditions to obtain the highquality clean reads according to the Cut adapt quality controlled process (v1.9.1).The reads were compared with the Silva database (version 123) to detect the chimera sequences using UCHIME algorithm[38],and the chimera sequences were then removed to obtain the final clean reads[39].

    Sequences analysis was performed with Uparse software (v7.0.1001).Sequences with a similarity ≥ 97% were assigned to the same OTUs.Representative sequence for each OTU was screened.The Silva database (version 123)[40]was used based on the MOTHUR algorithm to annotate taxonomic information.In order to study the differences of the dominant species in different samples (groups),multiple sequence alignment was conducted using the MUSCLE software (version 3.8.31).OTUs abundance information was normalized using a standard of sequence number corresponding to the sample with the least sequences.Subsequent analyses of alpha diversity and beta diversity were all performed based on this output normalized sequencing data.Alpha and beta diversity analyses were calculated with QIIME software (version 1.7.0) and demonstrated with R software (version 2.15.3).

    Statistical analysis

    Statistical calculations were performed using SPSS (version 19.0).Wilcoxon test and chi-squared test were employed to analyze the correlation between the intestinal microbiota and anastomotic healing.The ability to discriminate impaired-healing and well healing was evaluated using the area under the receiver operator characteristic(ROC) curve (AUC).AP-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    Characteristics of patients in well-healing and impaired-healing groups

    A total of 37 CRC patients (age 67.97 ± 12.27 years old,51.35% of males) were included in this study,and seven (18.9%) patients developed impaired anastomotic healing.Although it seemed to be a high rate of patients with impaired anastomotic healing,this is mainly because the method we adopted was more sensitive in order to ensure the minimum loss of impaired healing cases.The clinical characteristics of the patients are presented in Table 1.The patients were significantly older in the impaired-healing group (P< 0.05),and most of the tumors were found in the right colon (57.1%),while tumors located in the left colon and rectum were more commonly found in the well-healing group (36.7% and 46.7%,respectively).Patients in the impaired-healing group largely had stages I and III CRC (42.9% and 42.9%,respectively),while those in the well-healing group mainly had stage II CRC (50%).The differentiation degree concentrated in the moderate degree and mainly polyp adenocarcinoma and ulcerative adenocarcinoma were diagnosed in both groups.Intestinal obstruction occurred in two (28.6%) patients in the impaired-healing group and three (10%) patients in the well-healing group.Besides,no significant differences in operative time,blood loss,transfusion,CRP level,hemoglobin level,or albumin level were identified in the two groups.

    Community structure shifts and correlation of intestinal microbiota with anastomotic healing

    The structure shifts of microbiota in mucosa tissue were analyzed by 16s rRNA gene sequencing.A total of 4527 OTUs in all samples were identified,of which 1874 were common in the two groups.Besides,the results found 2293 unique OTUs in the wellhealing group and 360 unique OTUs in the impaired healing group (Figure 1A).Rarefaction curve and species accumulation boxplot are shown in Figure 1B and C.The value of Good’s coverage for each group was higher than 99.6%.Alpha diversity analysis was conducted to examine the estimators of community richness,diversity,and evenness by observed species index,Shannon index,Simpson index,Chao1 index,Goods coverage index,and PD whole tree index between the two groups(Figure 1D),however,no significant difference was detected.For beta diversity analysis,microbial community and composition were analyzed by using weighted UniFrac distance matrix for each group,and a significant difference was found between the two groups (Figure 1E,P< 0.01),suggesting that the community compositions of the two groups were different.LEfSe analysis showed thatPorphyromonasgenus andPorphyromonadaceaefamily were highly abundant in the impaired healing group (Figure 1E).Ten highest dominant phyla of the two groups are shown in Figure 1F.The dominant phyla of the impaired-healing group wereProteobacteria(33%),Bacteroidetes(25%),andFirmicutes(17%),which were same as those in the well-healing group (31%,24%,and 21%,respectively).Figure 1G displays the ten highest dominant genera of the two groups.The dominant genera of the impaired-healing group wereIgnatzschineria(11%),Acinetobacter(11%),andBacteroides(11%),whileBacteroides(14%),Stenotrophomonas(9%),andIgnatzschineria(8%) were the dominant genera in the well-healing group.

    To determine the association between the intestinal microbiota and anastomotic healing,Wilcoxon test was performed to analyze the abundance of bacteria species and genera in the two groups.Species and genera with significantly different abundances between the two groups are shown in Table S1 (P< 0.05).Thirty-three species and forty-five genera were found to be associated with the healing of anastomoses.Besides,six species (Alistipes shahii,Dialister pneumosintes,Corynebacterium suicordis,Porphyromonas asaccharolytica,Vibrio diazotrophicus,andClostridium leptum) had a difference of carrier rate > 40%.As shown in Figure 2,Alistipes shahiiandDialister pneumosinteswere significantly enriched in the well-healing group (P< 0.05).However,the high abundance ofCorynebacterium suicordis,Porphyromonas asaccharolytica,Vibrio diazotrophicus,andClostridium leptumwas significantly correlated with the impaired anastomotic healing (P< 0.05).

    Table1 Clinicopathological characteristics

    Predictive ability of selected bacterial taxa assessment for healing status of anastomoses

    Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis showed that age was the only significant clinical variable for anastomotic healing (OR [odds ratio] = 1.223;95%confidence interval [CI]:1.032-1.449;P= 0.020),and age could be used as an independent factor predictive of the healing status of anastomoses (Figure 3,AUC =0.838;95%CI:0.697-0.979;P= 0.006;the optimum cut-off value was 69.5).Six species(Alistipes shahii,Dialister pneumosintes,Corynebacterium suicordis,Porphyromonas asaccharolytica,Vibrio diazotrophicus,andClostridium leptum) were selected as the potential predictive factors.Chi-squared analysis showed no correlation between these six bacteria and age.The 95%CIs of three bacteria (Porphyromonas asaccharolytica,Vibrio diazotrophicus,andClostridium leptum) ranged from 0 to 1 in the ROC curve and were therefore excluded.In predicting the healing status of anastomoses in the two groups,we found that usingAlistipes shahii,Dialister pneumosintes,andCorynebacterium suicordiswere less useful than age (Figure 3,AUC = 0.824;95%CI:0.691-0.957;P= 0.008).However,the predictive ability was significantly improved if age was in combination with the three bacteria species,compared with the predictive model containing age only (age andAlistipes shahii,AUC = 0.886;95%CI:0.774-0.998;age andDialister pneumosintes,AUC = 0.912;95%CI:0.807-1.000;age andCorynebacterium suicordis,AUC 0.874;95%CI:0.735-1.000) (Figure 3,P< 0.01).The predictive model combining age withDialister pneumosintesproved to have the highest discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.912;95%CI:0.807-1.000;P= 0.001,the optimum cut-off value was 0.143),which was even higher than the model combining two bacterial species with age (age,Alistipes shahii,andCorynebacterium suicordis,AUC= 0.886;95%CI:0.774-0.998) (Figure 3,P< 0.01).Besides,age in combination with three bacterial species had a relatively equal predictive ability to the model in which age was combined withDialister pneumosintes(Figure 3).

    DISCUSSION

    Figure1 Structural change of the intestinal microbiota between impaired-healing group (n = 7) and well-healing group (n = 30).

    Figure2 Correlation of intestinal microbiota with anastomotic healing.

    This study showed that the community structure was different between the impairedhealing group and the well-healing group.Six bacterial species were significantly correlated with anastomotic healing.Alistipes shahiiandDialister pneumosinteswere significantly enriched in the well-healing group,which were not identified in the impaired-healing group,indicating thatAlistipes shahiiandDialister pneumosintespossibly contribute to anastomotic healing.However,the high abundances ofCorynebacterium suicordis,Porphyromonas asaccharolytica,Vibrio diazotrophicus,andClostridium leptumwere strongly correlated with impaired anastomotic healing.Corynebacterium suicordiswas only detected in the impaired-healing group,suggesting that it might be positively associated with impaired anastomotic healing.Alistipes shahiiis a Gram-negative,strictly anaerobic,and rod-shaped bacterium[41].Dialister pneumosintesis an obligate anaerobic Gram-negative rod associated with periodontal diseases and other oral infections[42].Recently,it was reported thatDialister pneumosinteswas related to hepatic abscess and bacteremia[42,43].Corynebacterium suicordisis a Gram-positive,non-motile,non-spore-forming,catalase-positive,and rod-shaped bacterium[44].Porphyromonas asaccharolyticahas been previously reported to be associated with CRC and was correlated with lipopolysaccharide and energy biosynthetic pathways[45].Vibrio diazotrophicusis a Gram-negative,facultatively anaerobic,halophilic,motile,and slightly curved rod-shaped bacterium[46].Clostridium leptumis closely related to ulcerative colitis and significantly different in the ulcerated and the nonulcerated regions[47].However,only a few studies investigated the role of these bacteria in anastomotic healing.To the best of our knowledge,this is the first report that these bacteria species were studied with the anastomotic healing in CRC patients.Based on our research and literature data,we speculated that these bacteria affect anastomotic healing through invasive ability and inflammatory mechanisms.It was revealed thatEnterococcus faecaliscontributed to the pathogenesis of impaired anastomotic healing by enhancing collagen-degrading activity and activating intestinal tissue MMP9[12,34].Pseudomonas aeruginosa,Serratia marcescens,andEnterococcus faecalis,which express the collagenolytic phenotype,were reported to be associated with the impaired anastomotic healing[30-34].Although there is a lack of direct evidence of the effects of intestinal microbes on anastomotic healing,several previous studies suggested that a correlation might exist between microbes and MMP activation.Fusobacteria(especiallyFusobacterium variumandFusobacterium necrophorum) were found to stimulate the secretions of MMP-9,MMP-13,and IL-8 from epithelial cells[48],whilePorphyromonas endodontaliscould produce lipopolysaccharides to induce the expression of MMP-9 through NF-κB signaling[49].The mechanism by which these microbes affect anastomotic healing is worth further studying.

    Figure3 Microbial factors combined with clinical factor improve accuracy of predictive models for anastomotic healing.

    van Praaghet al[36]found that impaired anastomotic healing was linked to the intestinal microbiota,particularly to a higher abundance of mucin-degrading members of theBacteroidaceaeandLachnospiraceaefamilies.Besides,a lower microbial diversity was found to be related to the impaired healing of anastomoses.Researchers speculated that a disturbed microbial composition could affect the metabolic balance and weaken colonization resistance to pathogenic bacteria involved in the occurrence and development of impaired anastomotic healing.The result was obtained from 123“donuts” in which a stapled colorectal anastomosis was made.It was different from our sampling site (mucosa tissue adjacent to the surgical margin).Intestinal microbiota near the anastomotic site has been proved to interact with intestinal tissue and is likely to affect the healing[50].Our study found that fewer OTUs were identified in the impaired-healing group,and the microbial diversity was lower,although the result was not statistically significant (which could be explained by the small sample size in this study).Patients might have a higher risk of developing impaired anastomotic healing when their microbial diversity was low[36],thus a full awareness of the role of intestinal microbiota in anastomotic healing is helpful in identifying high-risk patients and contributes to mitigating the potential severe clinical outcome caused by impaired anastomotic healing.

    Sciutoet al[20]identified that older age (hazard ratio,2.42),male sex (hazard ratio,3.03),and lower anastomosis level (hazard ratio,2.68) were the risk factors for impaired anastomotic healing.Consistent with the findings from previous reports,we also found that age (OR = 1.223) was significantly associated with the impaired healing of anastomoses and could be used as an independent risk factor to predict the healing status of anastomoses.We found that patients older than 69.5 years were more prone to develop impaired anastomotic healing.Notably,our results suggested that three associated bacteria species,especiallyDialister pneumosintes,in combination with age significantly improved the predictive ability,compared with the model containing only age.van Praaghet al[36]suggested that samples were more likely to have impaired anastomotic healing if the total sum ofLachnospiraceaeandBacteroidaceaein them was higher than 60% and the Simpson diversity score was <0.75.Thus,the effect of the intestinal microbiota on the predictive value of anastomotic healing is positively useful in clinical nursing and postoperative surveillance.

    Technical factors such as the tension on the suture line,accurate suture placement,and blood supply were vitally important in ensuring the optimal healing of anastomoses[51].Unfortunately,it was difficult to be controlled precisely,and this is true to the most experienced and technically proficient surgeons.Besides the preventive measures implemented during the bowel resection,the early detection and diagnosis were equally important to prevent the patients from developing complications and severe clinical outcome caused by impaired healing of anastomoses.Our findings provided new clinical evidence for the theory that intestinal microbes are involved in the anastomotic healing and might contribute to the screening of the potential targets for the early diagnosis and treatment of impaired anastomotic healing.

    In conclusion,the mucosa-invasive microbiota is associated with the impaired anastomotic healing in the patients enrolled in this study.Alistipes shahii,Dialister pneumosintes,andCorynebacterium suicordis,which are not related to age,could be used as the supplementary factors in the prediction of the healing status of anastomoses in CRC patients after radical resection of CRC.

    ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS

    Research background

    The clinical symptoms of impaired anastomotic healing are typically not recognized.However,if not appropriately treated in time,impaired healing could easily evolve into severe postoperative complications.Thus,early diagnosis and prediction of impaired anastomotic healing are highly necessary.

    Research motivation

    A large number of studies reported that intestinal microbiota contributes to the development of impaired anastomotic healing.A full understanding of the role of intestinal microbiota in anastomotic healing can help identify high-risk patients and alleviate the potentially serious clinical outcomes caused by impaired anastomotic healing.

    Research objectives

    To identify the specific bacteria related to impaired anastomotic healing and to evaluate the predictive ability of the microbiota taxa for the healing status of anastomoses.

    Research methods

    Margin-surrounding mucosa samples derived from seven colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with impaired anastomotic healing and thirty well-healed CRC patients were respectively collected and the bacterial community was characterized by 16s rRNA gene sequencing.Wilcoxon test and chi-squared test were performed to analyze the statistic differences of bacterial taxa in the two groups.The predictive ability of the bacterial taxa for the healing status of anastomoses was evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve.

    Research results

    The community structure was different between the impaired-healing and the well-healing groups.Six bacteria species (Alistipes shahii,Dialister pneumosintes,Corynebacterium suicordis,Porphyromonas asaccharolytica,Vibrio diazotrophicus,and Clostridium leptum) were significantly correlated with anastomotic healing.Age was highly associated with the impaired healing of anastomoses.Three bacteria species (Alistipes shahii,Dialister pneumosintes,and Corynebacterium suicordis) in combination with age noticeably improved the accuracy for predicting the healing status of anastomoses.

    Research conclusions

    The mucosa-invasive microbiota was associated with the anastomotic healing in the research subjects.Alistipes shahii,Dialister pneumosintes,and Corynebacterium suicordis could be used as the supplementary factors in the prediction of the healing status of anastomoses in CRC patients after radical resection of CRC.

    Research perspectives

    Our findings provided new clinical evidence for the theory that intestinal microbiota is involved in the anastomotic healing,and it contributes to the screening of potential targets for the early diagnosis and treatment of impaired anastomotic healing.

    欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 成年版毛片免费区| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 亚洲国产色片| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚州av有码| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 91麻豆精品激情在线观看国产| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 波多野结衣高清作品| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6 | 久久精品91蜜桃| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 久久亚洲真实| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲最大成人中文| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 久久精品91蜜桃| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲av第一区精品v没综合| 能在线免费观看的黄片| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 18禁黄网站禁片免费观看直播| 在线观看一区二区三区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 精品福利观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 午夜福利高清视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 久久这里只有精品中国| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 尾随美女入室| 午夜福利18| a级毛片a级免费在线| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 特级一级黄色大片| 黄片wwwwww| 嫩草影院新地址| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 在线国产一区二区在线| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 看片在线看免费视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 国产欧美日韩精品亚洲av| 性色avwww在线观看| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 国产午夜精品论理片| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 99热精品在线国产| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 国产成人aa在线观看| 看片在线看免费视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| or卡值多少钱| 成人二区视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 免费看日本二区| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 成人国产一区最新在线观看| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 亚洲第一电影网av| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 欧美人与善性xxx| 精品人妻1区二区| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| bbb黄色大片| 窝窝影院91人妻| av在线蜜桃| 久久精品影院6| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 天堂√8在线中文| 成年人黄色毛片网站| 免费在线观看日本一区| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 欧美国产日韩亚洲一区| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 亚洲18禁久久av| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看 | 精品久久国产蜜桃| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| www.色视频.com| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 亚洲av一区综合| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲电影在线观看av| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 成人永久免费在线观看视频| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产精品一及| 亚洲成人久久爱视频| 免费av观看视频| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 久久精品影院6| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 国产高清激情床上av| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 久久精品91蜜桃| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 床上黄色一级片| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 亚洲无线观看免费| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 在线免费十八禁| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 性色avwww在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 午夜影院日韩av| 日本a在线网址| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 在线天堂最新版资源| 天堂√8在线中文| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 国产免费男女视频| 88av欧美| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 欧美一区二区国产精品久久精品| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 身体一侧抽搐| www日本黄色视频网| videossex国产| 99精品在免费线老司机午夜| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 97热精品久久久久久| 在线国产一区二区在线| 久久婷婷人人爽人人干人人爱| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 最好的美女福利视频网| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 午夜福利在线在线| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 91狼人影院| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产探花极品一区二区| 亚洲精品粉嫩美女一区| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 日日啪夜夜撸| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 天堂动漫精品| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 中国美女看黄片| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片 | 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美高清性xxxxhd video| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 99热精品在线国产| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 极品教师在线免费播放| 高清在线国产一区| 精品人妻视频免费看| 国产成人影院久久av| 色5月婷婷丁香| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办 | 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 舔av片在线| 在线播放国产精品三级| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 午夜精品久久久久久毛片777| 少妇高潮的动态图| 亚洲最大成人av| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 成人国产综合亚洲| 嫩草影院新地址| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 日韩欧美三级三区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 69人妻影院| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 国产精品一及| 高清在线国产一区| 国产高清激情床上av| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 露出奶头的视频| 男女那种视频在线观看| 国产精品,欧美在线| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 一级黄片播放器| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 夜夜爽天天搞| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 免费在线观看日本一区| 亚州av有码| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 97碰自拍视频| 三级毛片av免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 日本 欧美在线| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 国产高潮美女av| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 婷婷亚洲欧美| 亚洲av一区综合| 99热精品在线国产| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 观看免费一级毛片| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 精品久久久久久久末码| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 一区二区三区免费毛片| av福利片在线观看| 日本 欧美在线| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 亚洲av成人av| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 亚洲图色成人| 久久这里只有精品中国| 精品日产1卡2卡| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看 | 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国产成人福利小说| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 亚洲av成人av| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清| www.色视频.com| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 精品午夜福利视频在线观看一区| 国产一区二区三区av在线 | 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 免费av不卡在线播放| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 亚洲av五月六月丁香网| 一夜夜www| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲av一区综合| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产成人a区在线观看| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 少妇丰满av| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 色视频www国产| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 一进一出抽搐动态| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 国产真实乱freesex| .国产精品久久| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 在线免费十八禁| 此物有八面人人有两片| 成年免费大片在线观看| 午夜a级毛片| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频av| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 特级一级黄色大片| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 在线天堂最新版资源| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产视频内射| 日韩中字成人| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 在线国产一区二区在线| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 欧美日韩黄片免| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 久久热精品热| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精品久久久久久久末码| 亚洲成人久久性| 在线看三级毛片| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 老司机福利观看| 嫩草影视91久久| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 亚洲内射少妇av| aaaaa片日本免费| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 国产在线男女| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 黄色配什么色好看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 久久这里只有精品中国| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 欧美区成人在线视频| 嫩草影院精品99| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 日本成人三级电影网站| 久久久久久久久大av| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲 | 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 99久久精品热视频| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄 | 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲无线在线观看| 如何舔出高潮| avwww免费| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区 | 日韩欧美在线二视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| a级毛片a级免费在线| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 少妇的逼水好多| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 色在线成人网| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 久久精品91蜜桃| 97热精品久久久久久| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 日韩av在线大香蕉| av福利片在线观看| 热99re8久久精品国产| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 老司机福利观看| 国产黄片美女视频| 成人av在线播放网站| eeuss影院久久| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 91精品国产九色| 久久这里只有精品中国| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲av.av天堂| 十八禁国产超污无遮挡网站| 一个人免费在线观看电影| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 午夜激情欧美在线| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 午夜福利欧美成人| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 我要搜黄色片| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 哪里可以看免费的av片| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 亚洲av一区综合| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 在现免费观看毛片| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 综合色av麻豆| 小说图片视频综合网站| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 久久精品人妻少妇| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 特级一级黄色大片| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 午夜福利欧美成人| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 亚洲av一区综合| 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| www日本黄色视频网| 日本三级黄在线观看| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 小说图片视频综合网站| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区 | 一区福利在线观看| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 日韩高清综合在线| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 国产午夜精品论理片| a在线观看视频网站| 91av网一区二区| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 日本 欧美在线| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 欧美区成人在线视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| av.在线天堂| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久 | 嫩草影院新地址| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡|