• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Morphological diversity and correlation analysis of phenotypes and quality traits of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) core collections

    2019-05-10 06:13:32ZHANGDazhongRabiaBegumPanhwarLlUJiajiaGONGXiangweiLlANGJibaoLlUMinxuanLUPingGAOXiaoliFENGBaili
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2019年5期

    ZHANG Da-zhong , Rabia Begum Panhwar, LlU Jia-jia, GONG Xiang-wei, LlANG Ji-bao , LlU Minxuan, LU Ping , GAO Xiao-li, FENG Bai-li

    1 College of Agronomy, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, P.R.China

    2 Agricultural Technology Promotion Center of Shenmu City, Shenmu 719000, P.R.China

    3 Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, P.R.China

    Abstract Genetic diversity and comprehensive performance are the basis for the discovery and eff icient use of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) core collections. In this study, 386 proso millet core collections were used as materials to observe inf lorescence color, leaf phase, inf lorescence density, axis shape, branched spike length, panicle type, trichome, measured area of the top3 leaves, and chlorophyll content of the top3 leaves at f illing stage. These core collections were also used to record growth period, plant height, diameter of main stem, plant tiller number, branch number, panicle length, panicle number per plant, and panicle weight per plant at the maturation stage. Starch, fat, protein, and yellow pigment contents in the grain and 1 000-seed weight were also measured after harvest. Then, quantitative traits were used for diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of each collection. Correlations between all traits were also analyzed. Results showed that among the 8 quality traits, the Shannon index (H′) of hull color was the highest (1.588) followed by the H′ of inf lorescence density (0.984). However, inf lorescence color and axis shape were lower. The H′ of 16 quantitative traits were signif icantly higher than the quality traits with the following traits having the highest indices: fat content (2.092), 1 000-seed weight (2.073), top3 leaves area (2.070), main stem diameter (2.056), and plant height (2.052). Furthermore, all other traits had a diversity higher than 1.900. After a comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits, plant height, diameter of main stem, plant tiller number, leaf area of top3 leaves, and 1 000-seed weight were the biggest contributors to the principal components. Six high-fat and high-protein cultivars, including Nuoshu, A75-2, Zhiduoaosizhi, Panlonghuangmi, Xiaobaishu, and Xiaohongshu were also screened. Correlations between the quantitative traits were signif icant, including the correlation between quality traits and quantitative traits. In conclusion, the core collections can be used as basis for discriminating among proso millet cultivars based on related traits and for further studies on millet with rich genetic diversity, good representation, and signif icant collection between traits.

    Keywords: proso millet, phenotypic traits, quality, diversity, correlation, evaluation

    1. lntroduction

    Proso millet is one of the earliest cultivated crops in China with a short seed-to-seed cycle, and low requirements for water and fertilizer. It plays an important role in the Chinese diet and culture (Magness et al. 1971; Chen 1986). The cultivated acreage of proso millet is about 600 000 ha in China and is mainly distributed in the area along the Great Wall (Lin et al. 2002), indicating that proso millet is an important crop in arid and semiarid areas. Extensive geographical distribution and long-term domestication have led to a rich and varied germplasm resource of proso millet (Wang R Y et al. 2016). Currently, China, Russia, Ukraine, and other countries have collected and conserved more than 24 000 copies of proso millet germplasms with more than 8 700 copies being collected and preserved by China (Chai and Feng 2012). Research and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic and quality traits, richness, and diversity of genes, and correlations between these traits of the germplasms are not only conducive to conservation and further research of high quality germplasms but are also important for its genetic improvement. In the process of core collection and diversity assessment, Hu et al. (2012) evaluated rice core germplasms with genetic diversity index, standard deviation, frequency distribution, and variation coeff icient of phenotype. Liu et al. (2006) analyzed the diversity of mungbean (Vigna radiata) resources by calculating the distribution frequency of quality traits and the maximum, minimum, and mean values, standard deviation, and variation coeff icient of the quantitative traits. Hu et al. (2008) also used a similar method in proso millet.

    In recent years, the study of proso millet core collections has gradually increased, with studies mainly focused on phenotypic traits (Upadhyaya et al. 2011; Dikshit and Sivaraj 2013), quality traits (Wen et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2017), drought and salt resistance (Wang et al. 2007, 2015; Liu et al. 2015; He et al. 2016), and lodging, disease, and insect resistance (Wang et al. 2008; Wang L 2016). Studies at the molecular level increased rapidly (Hu et al. 2009; Hunt et al. 2011). Wang L et al. (2005), Upadhyaya et al. (2011), and Dikshit and Sivaraj (2013) analyzed the phenotypic and quality traits of core collections including 7-8 agronomic traits, such as growth period and plant height, which contribute greatly to variation, and then screened a number of high-quality resources. Wen et al. (2014) and Wang et al. (2017) measured protein, fat, and lysine contents in grains and other quality traits of more than 6 000 resources. Afterwards, they screened out 342 high-quality copies. Wang (2015) and He (2016) identif ied drought resistance of more than 500 resources and screened out 11 Grade I drought-resistant copies. Wang et al. (2007) and Liu et al. (2015) identif ied salt tolerance of over 6 000 proso millet resources and screened 22 salt-tolerant and 3 phosphite salt-tolerant copies. Wang L et al. (2016) screened out 71 resources with lodging-resistance from 1 192 varieties. Wang et al. (2008) identif ied resistance to head smut of more than 6 000 copies by investigating incidence and determining activity of defensive enzymes. Hu et al. (2009), Harriet et al. (2011), and Rajput and Santra (2016) analyzed the genetic diversity of proso millet using SSR markers.

    In summary, there are many reports on phenotypic diversity of proso millet core collections, but few studies on quality traits, especially on the relationships among the traits. In this study, 386 core germplasms were used to analyze the genetic diversity and the correlations between the traits by analyzing diversity of phenotypic traits, principal component analysis, and comprehensive evaluation of phenotypes, which is of great importance for the innovation, use, and genetic improvement of the core germplasms.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Germplasms and experimental condition

    A total of 386 core collections (Appendix A) were used as materials, including landraces and cultivars, of which 377 germplasms came from China and 9 germplasms came from foreign countries. All germplasms were provided by the Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences who constructed a primary core germplasm using the morphological indicator data recorded in the proso millet database and then used SSR molecular markers to analyze and construct the proso millet core collection. The study was conducted in Zhaojiagou Dryland Agricultural Demonstration Garden (110.53°E, 38.76°N), Shenmu City, Shaanxi Province, China. The plot size was 12 m2(4 m×3 m) and all plants were sown on June 8, 2016.

    2.2. Determination of phenotypic traits

    During each growth stage, the growing period, inf lorescence color, leaf phase, inf lorescence density, axis shape, branched spike length, panicle type, and trichome were recorded. At the f illing stage, the top3 leaves area (leaf length×leaf width×0.75) was measured with a ruler, and the chlorophyll contents were measured with a chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502Plus, Japan). Five plants were randomly selected from each variety to measure plant height, diameter of the main stem, plant tiller number, branch number, panicle length, panicle number per plant, and panicle weight per plant at maturity stage. After harvesting, seed color was observed, and 1 000-seed weight was measured. The quality traits were described according to the Descriptors and Data Standards for Broomcorn Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) (Wang and Wang 2006).

    2.3. Determination of quality traits

    Fat content determination was conducted based on GB/T 5512-2008 (2008). Starch content was determined using the dual wavelength method with a UV-visible spectrophotometer (Blue Star B, LabTech, China). Protein content was assayed by the Kjeldahl method with an automatic Kjeldahl apparatus (K9860, Hanon, China). Flavochrome content determination was conducted based on the ApproVed Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemists (AACC) (Hentschel et al. 2002).

    2.4. Data analysis

    Excel 2007 and SPSS 22.0 were used to analyze data and cartography.

    3. Results

    3.1. Analysis of genetic diversity

    Core germplasm resources of proso millet showed abundant genetic diversity in phenotypic (Fig. 1) and grain traits (Fig. 2). From the perspective of ear type, the f irst 6 of the 16 genotypes shown in Fig. 1 are the scattered type, the 5 in the middle are the compact type, and the last 5 are the lateral type. The resources have numerous, clear differences in plant height, spike type, stem diameter, tiller number, and branch number. The grains also show rich diversity in terms of color, size, and shape (Fig. 2).

    Table 1 lists the Shannon indices (H′) of 24 major traits of proso millet resources, including 8 quality traits and 16 quantitative traits. The highest H′ of quality traits was for hull color (1.588), followed by inf lorescence density (0.984); those of inf lorescence color (0.590) and axis shape (0.580) were lower. H′ of 16 quantitative traits were signif icantly higher than quality traits, of which the highest were fat content (2.092), 1 000-seed weight (2.073), top3 leaves area (2.070), main stem diameter (2.056), plant height (2.052), and starch content (2.053).

    Diversity of quality traitsThere are signif icant differences in the frequency distribution of different phenotypic and quality traits (Fig. 3). For the 386 genotypes, hull color is mostly yellow (30.3%) and red (24.9%). In terms of inf lorescence density, the osculant type amounts to 62.2% of the total amounts, while the compact type is only 1.8%. As for the leaf phase, the proportion of drooping type, osculant type, and up turned type is 68.4, 24.9, and 6.7%, respectively. Majority of the corn collections have a bent spike principal axis (78.2%) and few are erect (1.6%). The branched spike length is mainly long type (51.6%) and osculant type (40.7%), while the short type was only 7.8%. Osculant type (48.7%) and dense type (47.7%) are main types of trichome. The lateral panicle accounts for a vast majority (76.9%), but the scattered and compact type has a proportion of only 19.4 and 3.6%, respectively. About 3/4 of the corn collections are green inf lorescence, thus 1/4 are purple ones.

    Diversity of quantitative traitsAs shown in Table 2,variation amplitude of growing period was 51 to 107 days with an average of 85.7 days; variation coeff icient was 13.51%, and the shortest was only 47% of the longest growing period. Variation amplitude of plant height was 63.6 to 174.9 cm, and 80% of the height among the corn collection was between 102.5 to 154.8 cm. Variation coeff icient of stem diameter was 14.62%, and the variation amplitude was 2.5 to 8.8 mm with an average of 6.3 mm. Stem node numbers were 3.7 to 9.1 with an average of 7.5, and most germplasms are 6-8 knots. As the variation amplitude was from 0 to 6.8, variation coeff icient of tiller number is higher (43.35%) with an average of 2.33. Variation coeff icient of branch number is the highest (69.23%) with an average of 16.3, while some corn collections had no branch. The variation coeff icient of panicle number per plant was also high (46.12%), where the spike length range was from 12.8 to 48.5 cm with an average of 34.78 cm. Thus, the longest ones are nearly 4 times the shortest ones. The variation coeff icient of panicle weight per plant was 45.97%, and the variation amplitude was 4.43 to 96.38 g with a difference of nearly 22 times between the extremums. 1 000-seed weight was between 3.96 to 9.71 g, and the most was between 5.7 and 8.6 g. In terms of the top3 leaf area, the biggest (317.76 cm2) was nearly 8 times the smallest (39.94 cm2). The top3 leaf chlorophyll content variation was only 7.41%. As for quality traits, variation coeff icient of starch content was the smallest (only 1.83%), but the variation coeff icient was relatively high (24.28%). Content of fat ranged from 1.10 to 4.70%, and the variation amplitude was between 10.20 to 16.10%. Flavochrome content ranged from 5.05 to 18.86 mg kg-1with an average of 13.78 mg kg-1.

    Fig. 1 The rich agronomic characters of proso millet germplasm resources. Scattered type: (1) Maimizi, (2) Huami, (3) Bendimizi, (4) Minlehongmizi, (5) 6, (6) Guanghehuangmi. Compact type: (7) Bamenghuangshuzi, (8) 2048, (9) Gaoliangshu, (10) 2096, (11) Mi. Lateral type: (12) Bairuanshu, (13) Xiaomaimizi, (14) Heiruanmi, (15) 790051 (India), (16) Yumi 2.

    Fig. 2 The rich grain color of proso millet germplasm resources.

    Table 1 The Shannon index (H′) of proso millet germplasm resources

    Fig. 3 The distribution frequency of each phenotype in quality traits. Hull color: a, gray; b, multiple; c, white; d, brown; e, red; f, yellow. Inf lorescence density: a, dense; b, sparse; c, slightly dense; d, osculant. Leaf phase: a, upturned; b, osculant; c, drooping. Axis shape: a, erect; b, slightly curved; c, bent. Panicle branch length: a, short; b, osculant; c, long. Trichome: a, sparse; b, dense; c, osculant. Panicle type: a, compact type; b, scattered type; c, lateral type. Inf lorescence color: a, purple; b, green.

    3.2. Phenotype evaluation

    Princ ip al c omp onent analysis and evaluation of phenotypic traitsPrincipal component analysis was used to evaluate the genotypes of phenotypic traits. Results (Table 3) show that the cumulative contribution rate of the f irst 4 principal components is 81.26%, indicating that these principal components contain the most genetic information of the phenotypic traits and can be used for comprehensive evaluation of core collections. The contribution rate of the f irst principal component was 37.52%, and the power vector of plant height, top3 leaf area, and stem diameter were greater than for other characters, indicating that the f irst principal component consisted of these 3 characters. Contribution rate of the second principal component was 18.81%, and the power vectors of stem node number and 1 000-grain weight were the largest. Moreover, the power vector of the panicle number per plant was the highest in the third principal component, showing that the third principal component was a comprehensive response of panicle number. Contribution of the 4th principal component was 10.69%, of which the panicle length was signif icantly higher than the other coeff icients. This means that panicle length had the largest contribution to the 4th principal component.The composite score (F) was calculated for each germplasm based on standardized values of 10 phenotypic traits, normalized scores of the 4 principal components, and the calculated principal component weighting coeff icients (0.461, 0.232, 0.175, 0.132). Higher F values indicate more comprehensive phenotypes. Among the 386 germplasms, the best 10 germplasms came from Shaanxi Province, including Hongruanmi, Bairuanmi, Hongyingmi, Hongmizi, Huangmizi (shu), Huangmizi, Dahongpao, Zigaitouhuangmi, Heiruanmi (shu), and Baiyingmi. The worst 10 were from Heilongjiang and Inner Mongolia, including Balinzuogedashu, Xiaobaishu, Huangmizi, 2096, Anchunwei, Yimengliang 56-2, Baimizi, Jan-55, Eheitou, and Maimizi.

    Evaluation of quality traitsAmong 386 germplasms,217 were non-waxy germplasms and 169 were waxy germplasms. The content of amylose was between 1.57 and 45.61%, of which Neimi 5 was the highest and Zhengninghongnian was the lowest. The average content of grain protein was 12.3%, and amplitude was 10.2 to 16.1%, of which 19 germplasms are above 14%, including Noushu, Helanerhuang, 2048, Maimizi, Heimizi, Bamenghuangshuzi, 6, A75-2, Anchunwei, Aoduoaosizhi, Dahuangmi, Linghehongnianmi, 15, Panlonghuangmi, Xiaobaishu, Yemizi, Xiaohongshu, Hongmizi, and Nianfeng 5. The amplitude of fat content was 1.1 to 4.7% with an average content of 3.1%, and 61 genotypes were higher than 4%. Above all, there were 6 germplasms with both high protein (more than 14%) and high fat content (more than 4%), including Nuoshu, A75-2, Aoduoaosizhi, Panlonghuangmi, Xiaobaishu, and Xiaohongshu. Average of f lavochrome content was 13.78 mg kg-1, and the amplitude was 5.05 to 18.68 mg kg-1. Hejianbaishuzi, Liaomi 56, Gumi 21, Hongruanmi, Bairuanmi, and Xiaotoumi had a content of f lavochrome above 18 mg kg-1.

    Table 2 The variation distribution of quantitative traits

    Table 3 Power vector (PV), eigenvalues (E), contribution rate (CR), and cumulative contribution rate (CCR) of the f irst 4 principal components based on 10 phenotypic traits

    3.3. Correlations between traits

    Table 4 shows the correlations between the 5 major and 13 representative quantitative traits. The ways to describe the correlation of quality and quantitative traits are different, so 3 categories were created: correlation between quantitative traits, correlation between quality traits, and correlation between quality and quantitative traits. Correlation between the quality traits was not signif icant, except that leaf phase and spike branch length were signif icantly correlated. Therefore, the following sections only describe the correlations between quantitative traits and correlations between quality and quantitative traits.

    Correlation between quantitative traitsAs seen in Table 4, growing period and plant height, stem node number, panicle length, panicle weight per plant, 1 000-seed weight, top3 leaves area, grain protein, and starch content had highly signif icant correlations. Plant height, stem node number, panicle length, branch length, panicle weight, 1 000-seed weight, and top3 leaves area were all positively correlated with growing period, while grain protein content and number of panicle per plant were negatively correlated with growing period. Correlations between top3 leaves chlorophyll, fat, and f lavochrome contents were not signif icant. Plant height had signif icantly positive correlations with stem node number, panicle length, panicle weight, top3 leaves area, and 1 000-seed weight. Remarkably, plant height had a negative correlation with panicle number and grain protein content, and no signif icant correlation with top3 leaves chlorophyll, fat, starch, or f lavochrome contents. There were clear, negative correlations between stem node and panicle number per plant and top3 leaves chlorophyll and protein content. A signif icant positive correlation between panicle weight and top3 leaves area was also seen. There was a positive correlation between 1 000-seed weight and starch content, but it was not signif icant. Spike length had signif icantly positive correlations with panicle weight, top3 leaves area, and 1 000-seed weight but was not correlated with panicle number, top3 leaves chlorophyll content, or quality traits. In terms of panicle number per plant, remarkable positive correlations were seen with panicle weight, top3 leaves chlorophyll, and protein content, all of which were signif icant, and there was a clear and negative correlation with top3 leaves area and 1 000-seed weight. Panicle weight per plant was signif icantly and positively correlated with top3 leaves chlorophyll content, top3 leaves area, starch content, and 1 000-seed weight, but negatively correlated with grain protein content. Chlorophyll content was signif icantly and positively correlated with top3 leaves area and grain protein content, and signif icantly negatively correlated with starch content. Compared to protein content, starch content and 1 000-seed weight were signif icantly positively correlated with top3 leaves area. A signif icant positive correlation between grain fat and protein content was also seen, and both had obvious negative correlations with other quality traits. Starch content was signif icantly and positively correlated with 1 000-seed weight and f lavochrome content. Flavochrome content and 1 000-seed weight also had a signif icant positive correlation.

    Correlation between quality traits and quantitative traitsAs shown in Table 4, 4 quality traits, including leaf phase, hull color, inf lorescence color, and panicle type, had highly signif icant correlations with many quantitative traits. The following is the detailed analysis of correlations between the quality and quantitative traits.

    Different frequency distributions of the quantitative traits were seen for 3 leaf phase genotypes (Fig. 4). As shown in Fig. 4-A, the growth period of the drooping type was longer than that of the osculant and upturned types with the upturned type having the shortest growth period with an average of 76.5 days, shorter than the dropping type by 12.2 days. Top3 leaves area of the dropping type was 30% higher than that of the upturned type with an average of 205 cm2(Fig. 4-B). Grain protein and top3 leaves chlorophyll content of drooping and osculant genotypes were higher than that of the upturned type (Fig. 4-C and D). The dropping germplasms have the highest 1 000-seed weight and f lavochrome content with 1 000-seed weight being 20% higher than in the upturned type (Fig. 4-E and F).

    The red genotypes had the highest 1 000-seed weight (Fig. 5) with an average of 7.61 g and amplitude of 4.64 to 9.50 g, followed by the gray type between 4.75 and 8.83 g with an average of 7.42 g. Other genotypes are as follows: brown (amplitude of 4.80 to 8.94 g with an average of 7.11 g), yellow, and multi colored (amplitude of 4.31 to 9.52 g with an average of 6.88 g). As shown in Fig. 5-B, f lavochrome content was also the highest in red seeds with an average of 14.5 mg kg-1, followed by gray, brown, yellow, and multi colored seed, while in white seed the f lavochrome content was the lowest (13.1 mg kg-1).

    Fig. 6 shows that inf lorescence color was signif icantly correlated with the growing period and f lavochrome content. The purple germplasms had a long growing period with an average of 89.1 days and the green germplasms had an average of 84.4 days. The green germplasms had an average f lavochrome content of 13.95 mg kg-1, which was higher than the purple germplasms (13.34 mg kg-1).

    As shown in Fig. 7-A, lateral germplasms had a longer growth period with an average of 87 days and amplitude of 60 to 107 days. Compact and scattered types had the same average growing period of 81 days but with different amplitudes, ranging from 68 to 100 days and 51 to 101 days, respectively. The lateral type had the largest top3 leaves area (Fig. 7-B) with an average of 200 and amplitude of 102 to 317 cm2, followed by the compact and scattered types with average values of 175 and 167 cm2and amplitudes of 40 to 295 cm2and 118 to 236 cm2, respectively. The 1 000-seed weight of lateral type germplasms had an amplitude range of 3.96 to 9.71 g with an average of 7.28 g, that was 14.3 and 30.7% higher than scattered and compact germplasms, respectively (Fig. 7-D). Grain protein content of compact and scattered germplasms were both about 12.7%, which was signif icantly higher than that of lateral germplasms at 12.2% (Fig. 7-D).

    Table 4 Correlation coefficients of traits

    Fig. 4 Frequency distribution of quantitative traits with different leaf phase genotypes. a, drooping type; b, osculant type; c, upturned type.

    4. Discussion

    4.1. Diversity and evaluation of proso millet core collections

    Fig. 5 1 000-seed weight and f lavochrome content in different hull color genotypes. a, red; b, yellow; c, white; d, brown; e, gray; f, multiple.

    Fig. 6 Growing period and f lavochrome content of different inf lorescence color genotypes. a, green; b, purple.

    Results suggest that H′ of hull color in quality traits was the highest (1.588), and the predominant color was yellow and red (55.2%), which is similar to the statistical results of 8 515 genotypes of proso millet resources (52.6%). Moreover, the distributions of each type of panicle and inf lorescence color are also similar to a previous study (Wang et al. 2005). H′ of the quantitative traits of core collections were generally higher compared to the study of Hu et al. (2008). The H′ of 1 000-seed weight and panicle weight per plant were 2.073 and 1.978 with variation coeff icients of 17.90 and 45.97, respectively. H′ of grain protein and fat content were 2.028 and 2.092 with ranges of 10.2 to 16.1% and 1.1 to 4.7%, respectively. Variation coeff icients and amplitudes of other traits were also high, indicating that the core collections had abundant variation and can accurately represent the genetic diversity of the proso millet resources as required by core germplasm construction (Upadhyaya et al. 2011) and genetic improvement of proso millet. At present, F-value analysis based on normalization of phenotypic data and principal component scores are mostly applied to the comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits of core collections (Dong et al. 2015). This method was also used in this study, and the 10 germplasms with the highest F-values came from Shaanxi Province, including Hongruanmi, Bairuanmi, Hongyingmi, Hongmizi, Huangmizi (shu), Huangmizi, Dahongpao, Zigaitouhuangmi, Heiruanmi (shu), and Baiyingmi. In addition, other resources with high F should also be attractive, for example, Zhiduoaosizhi from Russia that had good phenotypic and quality traits. Although the protein content of Hongruanmi and Hongyingmi is generally normal, fat content and comprehensive phenotypic traits were ranked in the top3. Nuoshu, A75-2, Panlonghuangmi, Xiaobaishu, and Xiaohongshu have excellent quality characteristics, which can be applied to the breeding of high quality varieties.

    4.2. Proso millet genetic improvement

    Fig. 7 Growing period, top3 leaves area, 1 000-seed weight, and protein content of different panicle genotypes. a, scattered type; b, lateral type; c, compact type.

    The analysis of more than 40 proso millet cultivars bred in recent years showed that the growing period is between 93.9 and 111.0 days, which is basically consistent with the growth period of high-yield genotypes in this study. The slight difference may be due to the differences of planting date and environment (Yang et al. 2017). The reason why plant height of these variants (120.4 to 175.1 cm) was generally higher than core collections (63.6 to 174.9 cm) may be because higher plant height was selected indirectly at high yield selections. However, if plant height of cultivars was higher than the range of 118 to 150 cm, it would be bad for resistance to lodging (Wang L et al. 2016), which may lead to diff iculties in mechanized harvesting. Spike length of varieties was 24.3 to 40.3 cm, and most of them were lateral type, which was consistent with this study. The average grain weight of cultivated varieties was 6.2 to 9.9 g, which was lower than that of high yield core collections (7.4 to 9.7 g). Fat and protein contents of these cultivars ranged from 1.7 to 5.6% and 9.64 to 15.72%, respectively, and content of some collections was high, but the average value was low. Compared with amylose content of landraces (1.6 to 45.6%), amylose content of the varieties was 2.24 to 38.67%, indicating that the selection of strong non-waxy and waxy varieties was not prominent. From the above results, we knew that though trait amplitudes of the varieties were small, the diversity within the cultivars was still high. Therefore, rich variations can still be seen. Thus, the selection pressure of proso millet breeding was not enough to reduce variation (Wang H G et al. 2016), and there still is great potential for optimizing plant shape traits and yield, and for improving quality.

    4.3. Correlation between the traits

    The correlation analysis of traits in this study was based on large samples. Although some correlation coeff icients were small, correlations were still signif icant or highly signif icant. The correlation between most quantitative traits was either signif icant or very signif icant. The growing period is clearly and positively correlated with plant height, diameter of main stem, top3 leaves area, and 1 000-seed weight, indicating that the genotypes with long growing periods are strong and have high yields. However, the yield will decrease because of the extremely long growing period, for example, the average 1 000-seed weight of genotypes with a growth period of more than 100 days is 6.5 g, which is lower than the 7.4 g of 80 to 90 days. The result is consistent with results of Lang et al. (2012) on rice and Yuan et al. (2016) on foxtail millet. A possible reason for this is the matter accumulation of the germplasms with short growing periods is less than medium germplasms. Also, germplasms with a long growth period are not conducive to grain f illing and maturity due to environmental factors, such as lower light and decreasing temperature during the latter growth period, which results in decreased yield (Yuan et al. 2016). Therefore, breeders can increase yields by modestly extending the growing days.

    Effects of growth period on quality traits were different. The content of grain fat and protein f irst decreased and then increased with the extension of the growing period. On the other hand, the content of starch and f lavochrome had an opposite trend, which may be related to the characteristics of germplasm accumulation in proso millet (Han 2017). There was a signif icant and positive correlation between characteristics of vegetative organs such as plant height, stem diameter, stem node number, panicle length, and top3 leaves area. Results of this study are consistent with the f inding of Upadhyaya et al. (2011) showing that in vegetative organs, growing period is consistently correlated with yield and quality traits. There is a marked positive correlation between grain fat and protein content, and they both have signif icantly negative correlations with 1 000-seed weight, indicating that high protein and fat are not contradictory and could be achieved in some varieties. In contrast, obtaining both high yield and high quality is diff icult. These f indings are consistent with Hou et al. (2001).

    The correlation between leaf phase and quantitative traits was the highest among quality traits. The correlation coeff icients between leaf phase and plant height, growing days, and 1 000-grain weight were -0.476, -0.378, and -0.318, respectively. Since leaf phase also is the key to optimizing plant shape (Jiao 2010), it is necessary to study further. Other quality traits and quantitative traits are also signif icantly related, but the correlation coeff icient was low, and the relationships need to be further studied.

    5. Conclusion

    The core collections had abundant variation. Therefore, they can accurately represent the genetic diversity of the proso millet resources as required by germplasm construction and can be used as basis for discriminating among proso millet cultivars based on related traits and for further studies on millet with rich genetic diversity, good representation, and signif icant correlation between traits.

    Acknowledgements

    Work in my lab was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31371529), the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-06-A26), and the National Key Technologies R&D Program of China during the 12th Five-Year Plan period (2014BAD07B03).

    Appendixassociated with this paper can be available on http://www.ChinaAgriSci.com/V2/En/appendix.htm

    亚洲精品自拍成人| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 日日夜夜操网爽| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 五月天丁香电影| av线在线观看网站| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 午夜久久久在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 在线观看www视频免费| 国产成人系列免费观看| 免费女性裸体啪啪无遮挡网站| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产精品免费视频内射| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产激情久久老熟女| 一本综合久久免费| 一个人免费看片子| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区 | 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 免费看十八禁软件| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产av国产精品国产| 秋霞在线观看毛片| kizo精华| 欧美精品一区二区免费开放| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 夫妻午夜视频| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久 | 久久中文看片网| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 午夜影院在线不卡| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 国产片内射在线| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 老熟女久久久| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 午夜两性在线视频| 悠悠久久av| 18禁观看日本| 亚洲第一av免费看| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 免费观看人在逋| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 香蕉国产在线看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 免费av中文字幕在线| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 日日夜夜操网爽| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 后天国语完整版免费观看| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 一级黄色大片毛片| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 91大片在线观看| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 在线观看www视频免费| 深夜精品福利| 国产麻豆69| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 午夜福利,免费看| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 高清av免费在线| 无限看片的www在线观看| 精品亚洲成国产av| 国产成人精品无人区| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 曰老女人黄片| 久久中文看片网| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 亚洲国产欧美网| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 一区二区av电影网| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产淫语在线视频| 永久免费av网站大全| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 制服诱惑二区| 精品国产国语对白av| 99久久人妻综合| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产av又大| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 不卡一级毛片| 男女免费视频国产| 热99re8久久精品国产| 操美女的视频在线观看| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www | 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 日日夜夜操网爽| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 1024香蕉在线观看| 久久99一区二区三区| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| netflix在线观看网站| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频 | 久久免费观看电影| 99久久国产精品久久久| 成人影院久久| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 又大又爽又粗| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 999精品在线视频| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 搡老岳熟女国产| 两性夫妻黄色片| 9191精品国产免费久久| 十八禁网站免费在线| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 午夜免费鲁丝| 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 一进一出抽搐动态| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频 | 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 久久久久国内视频| netflix在线观看网站| 亚洲精品一二三| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 亚洲综合色网址| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 欧美97在线视频| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 电影成人av| 国产精品成人在线| 免费不卡黄色视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久这里只有精品19| 亚洲av男天堂| 久久人人爽人人片av| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 我的亚洲天堂| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 午夜久久久在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产xxxxx性猛交| cao死你这个sao货| 99热网站在线观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| 黄频高清免费视频| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女 | 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 老熟妇乱子伦视频在线观看 | 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 十八禁网站免费在线| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产av又大| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲 | 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 悠悠久久av| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 午夜视频精品福利| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 男女国产视频网站| 午夜影院在线不卡| 中文欧美无线码| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| tocl精华| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 欧美在线黄色| 国产av又大| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 色播在线永久视频| 亚洲成av片中文字幕在线观看| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 香蕉丝袜av| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 99久久综合免费| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 青草久久国产| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| av国产精品久久久久影院| 免费日韩欧美在线观看| 女人被躁到高潮嗷嗷叫费观| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| a级毛片在线看网站| 一级片'在线观看视频| 欧美大码av| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 最新的欧美精品一区二区| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 悠悠久久av| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 免费观看人在逋| 午夜91福利影院| 一区福利在线观看| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 又大又爽又粗| 成人影院久久| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频 | 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 免费av中文字幕在线| 999久久久国产精品视频| 日韩三级视频一区二区三区| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 五月天丁香电影| 天天影视国产精品| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 国产精品影院久久| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 黄片播放在线免费| www日本在线高清视频| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 日韩人妻精品一区2区三区| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 久久久久国内视频| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| av欧美777| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 亚洲精品一二三| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| h视频一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 性色av一级| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | a级毛片黄视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 日韩视频一区二区在线观看| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 手机成人av网站| av在线app专区| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 高清av免费在线| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区 | 日日夜夜操网爽| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 9色porny在线观看| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 午夜福利免费观看在线| av福利片在线| 国产av又大| 多毛熟女@视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| av有码第一页| 搡老乐熟女国产| 五月天丁香电影| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 成人三级做爰电影| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 高清av免费在线| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 一本久久精品| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 久热这里只有精品99| 久久免费观看电影| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 日韩电影二区| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 一级毛片电影观看| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 中文字幕制服av| 免费少妇av软件| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 国产在线免费精品| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 国产精品九九99| 国产激情久久老熟女| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 宅男免费午夜| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美日韩黄片免| av有码第一页| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 黄片小视频在线播放| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| a在线观看视频网站| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 大香蕉久久成人网| 精品少妇内射三级| av线在线观看网站| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区 | 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面 | 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产在线视频一区二区| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 一级毛片女人18水好多| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 777米奇影视久久| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 中国国产av一级| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 日本91视频免费播放| 久久这里只有精品19| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 久久久久久久精品精品| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 午夜91福利影院| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲伊人色综图| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产淫语在线视频| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产色视频综合| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 三级毛片av免费| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 色94色欧美一区二区| 视频区图区小说| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 亚洲va日本ⅴa欧美va伊人久久 | 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| av在线播放精品| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产精品免费大片| av线在线观看网站| 91麻豆av在线| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产精品九九99| 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 在线看a的网站| 婷婷成人精品国产| 成人三级做爰电影| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月 | 国产成人影院久久av| 自线自在国产av| 久久性视频一级片| 丝袜喷水一区| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲人成电影观看| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 777米奇影视久久| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美 | 欧美一级毛片孕妇| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| av天堂在线播放| 中国国产av一级| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 一级片免费观看大全| 中文字幕制服av| 国产极品粉嫩免费观看在线| 免费少妇av软件| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 成年av动漫网址| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 超碰97精品在线观看| 国产精品免费大片| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 99国产综合亚洲精品| 欧美日韩av久久| 亚洲av男天堂| 日韩 欧美 亚洲 中文字幕| 热re99久久国产66热| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 窝窝影院91人妻| 18在线观看网站| 丝袜喷水一区| 夫妻午夜视频| 日韩欧美免费精品| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| av福利片在线| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 一区福利在线观看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| av线在线观看网站| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看|