• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965

    2019-01-26 18:59:05
    中華海洋法學(xué)評(píng)論 2019年1期

    (Press Release, No. 2019/9, 25 February 2019)

    The Court finds that the process of decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed when that country acceded to independence and that the United Kingdom is under an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible

    THE HAGUE, 25 February 2019. The International Court of Justice (ICJ),the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, has today given its Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965. In that Opinion, the Court,

    (1) unanimously, finds that it has jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion requested;

    (2) by twelve votes to two, decides to comply with the request for an advisory opinion;

    (3) by thirteen votes to one, is of the opinion that, having regard to international law, the process of decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed when that country acceded to independence in 1968, following the separation of the Chagos Archipelago;

    (4) by thirteen votes to one, is of the opinion that the United Kingdom is under an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible;

    (5) by thirteen votes to one, is of the opinion that all Member States are under an obligation to co-operate with the United Nations in order to complete the decolonization of Mauritius.

    Reasoning of the Court

    I. HISTORY OF THE PROCEEDINGS

    The Court begins by recalling that the questions on which the advisory opinion of the Court has been requested are set forth in resolution 71/292 adopted by the General Assembly on 22 June 2017. It further recalls that those questions read as follows:

    (a) “Was the process of decolonization of Mauritius lawfully completed when Mauritius was granted independence in 1968, following the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius and having regard to international law,including obligations reflected in General Assembly resolutions 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960, 2066 (XX) of 16 December 1965, 2232 (XXI) of 20 December 1966 and 2357 (XXII) of 19 December 1967?”;

    (b) “What are the consequences under international law, including obligations reflected in the above-mentioned resolutions, arising from the continued administration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of the Chagos Archipelago, including with respect to the inability of Mauritius to implement a programme for the resettlement on the Chagos Archipelago of its nationals, in particular those of Chagossian origin?”

    II. JURISDICTION AND DISCRETION

    When the Court is seised of a request for an advisory opinion, it must first consider whether it has jurisdiction to give the opinion sought and, if so, whether there is any reason why the Court should, in the exercise of its discretion, decline to answer such a request.

    The Court notes that the General Assembly is competent, by virtue of Article 96, paragraph 1, of the Charter, to ask the Court for an advisory opinion on any legal question. It considers that a request for an advisory opinion to examine a situation by reference to international law, as is the case here, falls into this category. It concludes from this that the request has been made in accordance with the Charter and that the two questions submitted to it are legal in character. The Court accordingly has jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion requested by resolution 71/292 of the General Assembly.

    The fact that the Court has jurisdiction does not mean, however, that it is obliged to exercise it. The Court is, nevertheless, mindful of the fact that its answer to a request for an advisory opinion represents its participation in the activities of the Organization, and, in principle, should not be refused. Thus, the consistent jurisprudence of the Court is that only “compelling reasons” may lead it to refuse its opinion in response to a request. The Court notes in this regard that some participants in the present proceedings have argued that such reasons exist. Among the reasons raised are that, first, advisory proceedings are not suitable for determination of complex and disputed factual issues; secondly,the Court’s response would not assist the General Assembly in the performance of its functions; thirdly, it would be inappropriate for the Court to re-examine a question already settled by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the Arbitration regarding the Chagos Marine Protected Area; and fourthly, the questions asked in the present proceedings relate to a pending bilateral dispute between two States which have not consented to the settlement of that dispute by the Court. After examining these arguments, the Court reaches the conclusion that there are no compelling reasons for it to decline to give the opinion requested by the General Assembly.

    III. THE FACTUAL CONTEXT OF THE SEPARATION OF THE CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO FROM MAURITIUS

    Before addressing the questions submitted to it by the General Assembly,the Court deems it important to examine the factual circumstances surrounding the separation of the archipelago from Mauritius, as well as those relating to the removal of the Chagossians from this territory. It notes in this regard that, prior to the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius, there were formal discussions between the United Kingdom and the United States and between the Government of the United Kingdom and the representatives of the colony of Mauritius.

    During the talks between the United Kingdom and the United States, which were held from February 1964 onwards, the United States expressed an interest in establishing a military communication facility on Diego Garcia, the principal island of the Chagos Archipelago. The discussions held in 1965 between the Government of the United Kingdom and the representatives of the colony of Mauritius, for their part, concerned the question of the detachment of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius. They led to the conclusion, on 23 September 1965,of the Lancaster House agreement, by virtue of which the representatives of Mauritius agreed in principle to the detachment in exchange for, among other things, a sum of £3 million and the return of the archipelago to Mauritius when the need for the military facilities on the islands disappeared. On 8 November 1965,a colony, known as the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”), and consisting inter alia of the Chagos Archipelago, detached from Mauritius, was established by the United Kingdom. In 1966, an agreement was concluded between the United States and the United Kingdom for the establishment of a military base by the United States on the Chagos Archipelago.

    Between 1967 and 1973, the inhabitants of the Chagos Archipelago who had left the islands were prevented from returning. The other inhabitants were forcibly removed and prevented from returning. On 16 April 1971, the BIOT Commissioner enacted an Immigration Ordinance, which made it unlawful for any person to enter or remain in the Chagos Archipelago without a permit. By virtue of an agreement concluded between Mauritius and the United Kingdom on 4 September 1972, Mauritius accepted payment of the sum of £650,000 in full and final discharge of the United Kingdom’s undertaking given in 1965 to meet the cost of resettlement of persons displaced from the Chagos Archipelago.

    On 7 July 1982, an agreement was concluded between the Governments of Mauritius and the United Kingdom, for the payment by the United Kingdom of the sum of £4 million on an ex gratia basis, with no admission of liability on the part of the United Kingdom, in full and final settlement of all claims whatsoever of the kind referred to in the agreement against the United Kingdom by or on behalf of the Ilois. That agreement also required Mauritius to procure from each member of the Ilois community in Mauritius a signed renunciation of the claims.

    Two feasibility studies were conducted by the United Kingdom to determine whether a resettlement of the islanders was possible and, if so,under what terms. It was concluded that although resettlement was possible, it would pose significant challenges. To date, the Chagossians remain dispersed in several countries, including the United Kingdom, Mauritius and Seychelles. By virtue of United Kingdom law and judicial decisions of that country, they are not allowed to return to the Chagos Archipelago.

    IV. THE QUESTIONS PUT TO THE COURT BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

    The Court considers that there is no need for it to reformulate the questions submitted to it for an advisory opinion in these proceedings. Furthermore, there is no need for it to interpret those questions restrictively.

    1. Whether the process of decolonization of Mauritius was lawfully completed having regard to international law (Question (a))

    In order to pronounce on whether the process of decolonization of Mauritius was lawfully completed having regard to international law, the Court explains that it must determine, first, the relevant period of time for the purpose of identifying the applicable rules of international law and, secondly, the content of that law.

    In Question (a), the General Assembly situates the process of decolonization of Mauritius in the period between the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from its territory in 1965 and its independence in 1968. It is therefore by reference to this period that the Court is required to identify the rules of international law that are applicable to that process. However, this will not prevent it, particularly when customary rules are at issue, from considering the evolution of the law on self-determination since the adoption of the Charter of the United Nations and of resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 entitled“Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples”.Indeed, State practice and opinio juris are consolidated and confirmed gradually over time.

    The Court turns next to the nature, content and scope of the right to selfdetermination applicable to the process of decolonization of Mauritius. It begins by recalling that, having made respect for the principle of equal rights and selfdetermination of peoples one of the purposes of the United Nations, the Charter included provisions that would enable non-self-governing territories ultimately to govern themselves.

    The Court notes that the adoption of resolution 1514 (XV) represents a defining moment in the consolidation of State practice on decolonization. There is, in its view, a clear relationship between this resolution and the process of decolonization following its adoption. The Court adds that resolution 1514 (XV)has a declaratory character with regard to the right to self-determination as a customary norm, in view of its content and the conditions of its adoption.It also has a normative character, in so far as it affirms that “[a]ll peoples have the right to self-determination”. The Court further observes that the nature and scope of the right to self-determination of peoples, including respect for the national unity and territorial integrity of a State or country, were reiterated in the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. By recognizing the right to self-determination as one of the “basic principles of international law”, the Declaration confirmed its normative character under customary international law.

    The Court recalls that the right to self-determination of the people concerned is defined by reference to the entirety of a non-self-governing territory. Both State practice and opinio juris at the relevant time confirm the customary law character of the right to territorial integrity of a non-self-governing territory as a corollary of the right to self-determination. The Court considers that the peoples of nonself-governing territories are entitled to exercise their right to self-determination in relation to their territory as a whole, the integrity of which must be respected by the administering Power. It follows that any detachment by the administering Power of part of a non-self-governing territory, unless based on the freely expressed and genuine will of the people of the territory concerned, is contrary to the right to self-determination. In the Court’s view, the law on self-determination constitutes the applicable international law during the period under consideration, namely between 1965 and 1968.

    The Court then examines the functions of the General Assembly during the process of decolonization. It notes that the General Assembly has played a crucial role in the work of the United Nations on decolonization, in particular,since the adoption of resolution 1514 (XV). It observes that it is in this context that it is asked in Question (a) to consider, in its analysis of the international law applicable to the process of decolonization of Mauritius, the obligations reflected in General Assembly resolutions 2066 (XX) of 16 December 1965, 2232 (XXI)of 20 December 1966 and 2357 (XXII) of 19 December 1967. The Court points out in this regard that in resolution 2066 (XX) of 16 December 1965, entitled“Question of Mauritius”, the General Assembly invites the United Kingdom “to take no action which would dismember the Territory of Mauritius and violate its territorial integrity”. In resolutions 2232 (XXI) and 2357 (XXII), the General Assembly “[r]eiterates its declaration that any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of colonial Territories and the establishment of military bases and installations in these Territories is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and of General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV)”.

    In the Court’s view, by inviting the United Kingdom to comply with its international obligations in conducting the process of decolonization of Mauritius,the General Assembly acted within the framework of the Charter and within the scope of the functions assigned to it to oversee the application of the right to self-determination. The General Assembly assumed those functions in order to supervise the implementation of obligations incumbent upon administering Powers under the Charter. Moreover, it has been the Assembly’s consistent practice to call upon administering Powers to respect the territorial integrity of nonself-governing territories.

    The Court turns next to the question of whether the detachment of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius was carried out in accordance with international law. After recalling the circumstances in which the colony of Mauritius agreed in principle to such a detachment, the Court considers that this detachment was not based on the free and genuine expression of the will of the people concerned. It takes the view that the obligations arising under international law and reflected in the resolutions adopted by the General Assembly during the process of decolonization of Mauritius require the United Kingdom, as the administering Power, to respect the territorial integrity of that country, including the Chagos Archipelago. The Court concludes that, as a result of the Chagos Archipelago’s unlawful detachment and its incorporation into a new colony,known as the BIOT, the process of decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed when Mauritius acceded to independence in 1968.

    2. The consequences under international law arising from the continued administration by the United Kingdom of the Chagos Archipelago (Question(b))

    Having established that the process of decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed in 1968, the Court then examines the consequences, under international law, arising from the United Kingdom’s continued administration of the Chagos Archipelago (Question (b)). It is of the opinion that this continued administration constitutes a wrongful act entailing the international responsibility of that State. It concludes from this that the United Kingdom has an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible, and that all Member States must co-operate with the United Nations to complete the decolonization of Mauritius. Since respect for the right to selfdetermination is an obligation erga omnes, all States have a legal interest in protecting that right. The Court considers that, while it is for the General Assembly to pronounce on the modalities required to ensure the completion of the decolonization of Mauritius, all Member States must co-operate with the United Nations to put those modalities into effect. As regards the resettlement on the Chagos Archipelago of Mauritian nationals, including those of Chagossian origin,this is an issue relating to the protection of the human rights of those concerned,which should be addressed by the General Assembly during the completion of the decolonization of Mauritius.

    Composition of the Court

    The Court was composed as follows: President Yusuf; Vice-President Xue;Judges Tomka, Abraham, Bennouna, Can?ado Trindade, Donoghue, Gaja,Sebutinde, Bhandari, Robinson, Gevorgian, Salam, Iwasawa; Registrar Couvreur.

    Vice-President XUE appends a declaration to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judges TOMKA and ABRAHAM append declarations to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judge CAN?ADO TRINDADE appends a separate opinion to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judges CAN?ADO TRINDADE and ROBINSON append a joint declaration to the Advisory Opinion of the Court;Judge DONOGHUE appends a dissenting opinion to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judges GAJA, SEBUTINDE and ROBINSON append separate opinions to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judges GEVORGIAN, SALAM and IWASAWA append declarations to the Advisory Opinion of the Court.

    A summary of the Advisory Opinion appears in the document entitled“Summary No. 2019/2”, to which summaries of the declarations and opinions are annexed. This press release, the summary and the full text of the Advisory Opinion are available on the Court’s website (www.icj-cij.org), under the heading“Cases” (click on “Advisory proceedings”).

    Note: The Court’s press releases are prepared by its Registry for information purposes only and do not constitute official documents.

    在线观看免费高清a一片| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 欧美97在线视频| 精品酒店卫生间| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 免费看不卡的av| 1000部很黄的大片| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 性色avwww在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 伦精品一区二区三区| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 亚洲av福利一区| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 国产高清不卡午夜福利| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 久久影院123| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产成人freesex在线| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产大屁股一区二区在线视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 美女高潮的动态| 免费看日本二区| 简卡轻食公司| 简卡轻食公司| 久久久久性生活片| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 有码 亚洲区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 国产av精品麻豆| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 久久久欧美国产精品| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| xxx大片免费视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 少妇 在线观看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| av播播在线观看一区| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产永久视频网站| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 久久久久久伊人网av| 搡老乐熟女国产| 欧美zozozo另类| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产探花极品一区二区| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 永久网站在线| 男人舔奶头视频| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 高清毛片免费看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 22中文网久久字幕| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 嫩草影院新地址| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 色视频www国产| 精品一区二区三卡| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 国产亚洲最大av| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 一级毛片 在线播放| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 亚洲性久久影院| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久久色成人| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| freevideosex欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 九草在线视频观看| 两个人的视频大全免费| 成人国产麻豆网| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 国产 精品1| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产男人的电影天堂91| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 精品久久久久久久久av| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 精品久久久久久久久av| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 舔av片在线| 国产成人91sexporn| 精品人妻视频免费看| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 舔av片在线| 国产综合精华液| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 高清欧美精品videossex| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 大香蕉久久网| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 午夜免费鲁丝| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 高清视频免费观看一区二区| av国产免费在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产精品无大码| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| av.在线天堂| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲国产色片| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 春色校园在线视频观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 男女免费视频国产| xxx大片免费视频| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 全区人妻精品视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 亚洲综合精品二区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 免费看光身美女| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 观看免费一级毛片| 在线天堂最新版资源| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久久久久久精品精品| 人妻系列 视频| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 好男人视频免费观看在线| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 91久久精品电影网| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 久热久热在线精品观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国产精品成人在线| 天堂8中文在线网| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 日本免费在线观看一区| 在线观看三级黄色| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产av精品麻豆| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 日韩成人伦理影院| 日本与韩国留学比较| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 久久av网站| 日本黄大片高清| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 观看免费一级毛片| 蜜桃在线观看..| av网站免费在线观看视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 男女免费视频国产| 黄片wwwwww| 综合色丁香网| 性色av一级| 国产色婷婷99| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲成人手机| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 日本黄大片高清| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 久久久久久久国产电影| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 国产成人精品婷婷| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 少妇高潮的动态图| 777米奇影视久久| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 免费看光身美女| 美女国产视频在线观看| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 老熟女久久久| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产乱来视频区| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 国产av国产精品国产| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 亚洲精品一二三| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 简卡轻食公司| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 精品久久久久久久末码| 一级爰片在线观看| 国产极品天堂在线| 精品久久久久久久末码| 久久青草综合色| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 日本色播在线视频| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 日本wwww免费看| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 国产成人aa在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 中国国产av一级| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 国产淫语在线视频| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲国产精品999| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 精品久久久久久久末码| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产一区二区在线观看日韩| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 最近手机中文字幕大全| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 欧美97在线视频| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 成人国产av品久久久| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 黄片wwwwww| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 久久婷婷青草| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 日本午夜av视频| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 日本色播在线视频| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 午夜日本视频在线| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产成人91sexporn| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产视频内射| 亚洲色图av天堂| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 91精品国产九色| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 欧美97在线视频| 一级片'在线观看视频| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 少妇高潮的动态图| 97在线视频观看| 99久久人妻综合| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 春色校园在线视频观看| 久久av网站| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 99热全是精品| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 免费观看性生交大片5| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 97在线人人人人妻| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 99热全是精品| 免费观看在线日韩| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 高清不卡的av网站| 久热这里只有精品99| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 美女福利国产在线 | 国产av码专区亚洲av| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 黄片wwwwww| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 深爱激情五月婷婷| .国产精品久久| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频| 精品国产三级普通话版| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 亚洲无线观看免费| 一级毛片电影观看| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 一级爰片在线观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 欧美区成人在线视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 欧美区成人在线视频| 久久久精品94久久精品| 一级爰片在线观看| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| www.色视频.com| 高清毛片免费看| 深夜a级毛片| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 一区二区av电影网| 久久久久久久国产电影| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 午夜福利高清视频| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 男女免费视频国产| 毛片女人毛片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 午夜福利视频精品| 成人免费观看视频高清| 嫩草影院新地址| 国产成人freesex在线| 午夜免费鲁丝| 91狼人影院| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 免费观看在线日韩| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 内射极品少妇av片p| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 国产成人一区二区在线| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 久久久久久久久久成人| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 精品一区二区免费观看| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 一区二区av电影网| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 黄色日韩在线| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 亚洲av福利一区| www.av在线官网国产| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 亚洲av男天堂| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 嫩草影院入口| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 精品久久久久久电影网| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| av视频免费观看在线观看| 久久综合国产亚洲精品| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| av网站免费在线观看视频| 青春草国产在线视频| 久久久久久久久大av| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 成人国产av品久久久| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 日韩强制内射视频| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲色图av天堂|