• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965

    2019-01-26 18:59:05
    中華海洋法學(xué)評(píng)論 2019年1期

    (Press Release, No. 2019/9, 25 February 2019)

    The Court finds that the process of decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed when that country acceded to independence and that the United Kingdom is under an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible

    THE HAGUE, 25 February 2019. The International Court of Justice (ICJ),the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, has today given its Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965. In that Opinion, the Court,

    (1) unanimously, finds that it has jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion requested;

    (2) by twelve votes to two, decides to comply with the request for an advisory opinion;

    (3) by thirteen votes to one, is of the opinion that, having regard to international law, the process of decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed when that country acceded to independence in 1968, following the separation of the Chagos Archipelago;

    (4) by thirteen votes to one, is of the opinion that the United Kingdom is under an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible;

    (5) by thirteen votes to one, is of the opinion that all Member States are under an obligation to co-operate with the United Nations in order to complete the decolonization of Mauritius.

    Reasoning of the Court

    I. HISTORY OF THE PROCEEDINGS

    The Court begins by recalling that the questions on which the advisory opinion of the Court has been requested are set forth in resolution 71/292 adopted by the General Assembly on 22 June 2017. It further recalls that those questions read as follows:

    (a) “Was the process of decolonization of Mauritius lawfully completed when Mauritius was granted independence in 1968, following the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius and having regard to international law,including obligations reflected in General Assembly resolutions 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960, 2066 (XX) of 16 December 1965, 2232 (XXI) of 20 December 1966 and 2357 (XXII) of 19 December 1967?”;

    (b) “What are the consequences under international law, including obligations reflected in the above-mentioned resolutions, arising from the continued administration by the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland of the Chagos Archipelago, including with respect to the inability of Mauritius to implement a programme for the resettlement on the Chagos Archipelago of its nationals, in particular those of Chagossian origin?”

    II. JURISDICTION AND DISCRETION

    When the Court is seised of a request for an advisory opinion, it must first consider whether it has jurisdiction to give the opinion sought and, if so, whether there is any reason why the Court should, in the exercise of its discretion, decline to answer such a request.

    The Court notes that the General Assembly is competent, by virtue of Article 96, paragraph 1, of the Charter, to ask the Court for an advisory opinion on any legal question. It considers that a request for an advisory opinion to examine a situation by reference to international law, as is the case here, falls into this category. It concludes from this that the request has been made in accordance with the Charter and that the two questions submitted to it are legal in character. The Court accordingly has jurisdiction to give the advisory opinion requested by resolution 71/292 of the General Assembly.

    The fact that the Court has jurisdiction does not mean, however, that it is obliged to exercise it. The Court is, nevertheless, mindful of the fact that its answer to a request for an advisory opinion represents its participation in the activities of the Organization, and, in principle, should not be refused. Thus, the consistent jurisprudence of the Court is that only “compelling reasons” may lead it to refuse its opinion in response to a request. The Court notes in this regard that some participants in the present proceedings have argued that such reasons exist. Among the reasons raised are that, first, advisory proceedings are not suitable for determination of complex and disputed factual issues; secondly,the Court’s response would not assist the General Assembly in the performance of its functions; thirdly, it would be inappropriate for the Court to re-examine a question already settled by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted under Annex VII of United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea in the Arbitration regarding the Chagos Marine Protected Area; and fourthly, the questions asked in the present proceedings relate to a pending bilateral dispute between two States which have not consented to the settlement of that dispute by the Court. After examining these arguments, the Court reaches the conclusion that there are no compelling reasons for it to decline to give the opinion requested by the General Assembly.

    III. THE FACTUAL CONTEXT OF THE SEPARATION OF THE CHAGOS ARCHIPELAGO FROM MAURITIUS

    Before addressing the questions submitted to it by the General Assembly,the Court deems it important to examine the factual circumstances surrounding the separation of the archipelago from Mauritius, as well as those relating to the removal of the Chagossians from this territory. It notes in this regard that, prior to the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius, there were formal discussions between the United Kingdom and the United States and between the Government of the United Kingdom and the representatives of the colony of Mauritius.

    During the talks between the United Kingdom and the United States, which were held from February 1964 onwards, the United States expressed an interest in establishing a military communication facility on Diego Garcia, the principal island of the Chagos Archipelago. The discussions held in 1965 between the Government of the United Kingdom and the representatives of the colony of Mauritius, for their part, concerned the question of the detachment of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius. They led to the conclusion, on 23 September 1965,of the Lancaster House agreement, by virtue of which the representatives of Mauritius agreed in principle to the detachment in exchange for, among other things, a sum of £3 million and the return of the archipelago to Mauritius when the need for the military facilities on the islands disappeared. On 8 November 1965,a colony, known as the British Indian Ocean Territory (“BIOT”), and consisting inter alia of the Chagos Archipelago, detached from Mauritius, was established by the United Kingdom. In 1966, an agreement was concluded between the United States and the United Kingdom for the establishment of a military base by the United States on the Chagos Archipelago.

    Between 1967 and 1973, the inhabitants of the Chagos Archipelago who had left the islands were prevented from returning. The other inhabitants were forcibly removed and prevented from returning. On 16 April 1971, the BIOT Commissioner enacted an Immigration Ordinance, which made it unlawful for any person to enter or remain in the Chagos Archipelago without a permit. By virtue of an agreement concluded between Mauritius and the United Kingdom on 4 September 1972, Mauritius accepted payment of the sum of £650,000 in full and final discharge of the United Kingdom’s undertaking given in 1965 to meet the cost of resettlement of persons displaced from the Chagos Archipelago.

    On 7 July 1982, an agreement was concluded between the Governments of Mauritius and the United Kingdom, for the payment by the United Kingdom of the sum of £4 million on an ex gratia basis, with no admission of liability on the part of the United Kingdom, in full and final settlement of all claims whatsoever of the kind referred to in the agreement against the United Kingdom by or on behalf of the Ilois. That agreement also required Mauritius to procure from each member of the Ilois community in Mauritius a signed renunciation of the claims.

    Two feasibility studies were conducted by the United Kingdom to determine whether a resettlement of the islanders was possible and, if so,under what terms. It was concluded that although resettlement was possible, it would pose significant challenges. To date, the Chagossians remain dispersed in several countries, including the United Kingdom, Mauritius and Seychelles. By virtue of United Kingdom law and judicial decisions of that country, they are not allowed to return to the Chagos Archipelago.

    IV. THE QUESTIONS PUT TO THE COURT BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY

    The Court considers that there is no need for it to reformulate the questions submitted to it for an advisory opinion in these proceedings. Furthermore, there is no need for it to interpret those questions restrictively.

    1. Whether the process of decolonization of Mauritius was lawfully completed having regard to international law (Question (a))

    In order to pronounce on whether the process of decolonization of Mauritius was lawfully completed having regard to international law, the Court explains that it must determine, first, the relevant period of time for the purpose of identifying the applicable rules of international law and, secondly, the content of that law.

    In Question (a), the General Assembly situates the process of decolonization of Mauritius in the period between the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from its territory in 1965 and its independence in 1968. It is therefore by reference to this period that the Court is required to identify the rules of international law that are applicable to that process. However, this will not prevent it, particularly when customary rules are at issue, from considering the evolution of the law on self-determination since the adoption of the Charter of the United Nations and of resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 entitled“Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples”.Indeed, State practice and opinio juris are consolidated and confirmed gradually over time.

    The Court turns next to the nature, content and scope of the right to selfdetermination applicable to the process of decolonization of Mauritius. It begins by recalling that, having made respect for the principle of equal rights and selfdetermination of peoples one of the purposes of the United Nations, the Charter included provisions that would enable non-self-governing territories ultimately to govern themselves.

    The Court notes that the adoption of resolution 1514 (XV) represents a defining moment in the consolidation of State practice on decolonization. There is, in its view, a clear relationship between this resolution and the process of decolonization following its adoption. The Court adds that resolution 1514 (XV)has a declaratory character with regard to the right to self-determination as a customary norm, in view of its content and the conditions of its adoption.It also has a normative character, in so far as it affirms that “[a]ll peoples have the right to self-determination”. The Court further observes that the nature and scope of the right to self-determination of peoples, including respect for the national unity and territorial integrity of a State or country, were reiterated in the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations. By recognizing the right to self-determination as one of the “basic principles of international law”, the Declaration confirmed its normative character under customary international law.

    The Court recalls that the right to self-determination of the people concerned is defined by reference to the entirety of a non-self-governing territory. Both State practice and opinio juris at the relevant time confirm the customary law character of the right to territorial integrity of a non-self-governing territory as a corollary of the right to self-determination. The Court considers that the peoples of nonself-governing territories are entitled to exercise their right to self-determination in relation to their territory as a whole, the integrity of which must be respected by the administering Power. It follows that any detachment by the administering Power of part of a non-self-governing territory, unless based on the freely expressed and genuine will of the people of the territory concerned, is contrary to the right to self-determination. In the Court’s view, the law on self-determination constitutes the applicable international law during the period under consideration, namely between 1965 and 1968.

    The Court then examines the functions of the General Assembly during the process of decolonization. It notes that the General Assembly has played a crucial role in the work of the United Nations on decolonization, in particular,since the adoption of resolution 1514 (XV). It observes that it is in this context that it is asked in Question (a) to consider, in its analysis of the international law applicable to the process of decolonization of Mauritius, the obligations reflected in General Assembly resolutions 2066 (XX) of 16 December 1965, 2232 (XXI)of 20 December 1966 and 2357 (XXII) of 19 December 1967. The Court points out in this regard that in resolution 2066 (XX) of 16 December 1965, entitled“Question of Mauritius”, the General Assembly invites the United Kingdom “to take no action which would dismember the Territory of Mauritius and violate its territorial integrity”. In resolutions 2232 (XXI) and 2357 (XXII), the General Assembly “[r]eiterates its declaration that any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of colonial Territories and the establishment of military bases and installations in these Territories is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and of General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV)”.

    In the Court’s view, by inviting the United Kingdom to comply with its international obligations in conducting the process of decolonization of Mauritius,the General Assembly acted within the framework of the Charter and within the scope of the functions assigned to it to oversee the application of the right to self-determination. The General Assembly assumed those functions in order to supervise the implementation of obligations incumbent upon administering Powers under the Charter. Moreover, it has been the Assembly’s consistent practice to call upon administering Powers to respect the territorial integrity of nonself-governing territories.

    The Court turns next to the question of whether the detachment of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius was carried out in accordance with international law. After recalling the circumstances in which the colony of Mauritius agreed in principle to such a detachment, the Court considers that this detachment was not based on the free and genuine expression of the will of the people concerned. It takes the view that the obligations arising under international law and reflected in the resolutions adopted by the General Assembly during the process of decolonization of Mauritius require the United Kingdom, as the administering Power, to respect the territorial integrity of that country, including the Chagos Archipelago. The Court concludes that, as a result of the Chagos Archipelago’s unlawful detachment and its incorporation into a new colony,known as the BIOT, the process of decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed when Mauritius acceded to independence in 1968.

    2. The consequences under international law arising from the continued administration by the United Kingdom of the Chagos Archipelago (Question(b))

    Having established that the process of decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed in 1968, the Court then examines the consequences, under international law, arising from the United Kingdom’s continued administration of the Chagos Archipelago (Question (b)). It is of the opinion that this continued administration constitutes a wrongful act entailing the international responsibility of that State. It concludes from this that the United Kingdom has an obligation to bring to an end its administration of the Chagos Archipelago as rapidly as possible, and that all Member States must co-operate with the United Nations to complete the decolonization of Mauritius. Since respect for the right to selfdetermination is an obligation erga omnes, all States have a legal interest in protecting that right. The Court considers that, while it is for the General Assembly to pronounce on the modalities required to ensure the completion of the decolonization of Mauritius, all Member States must co-operate with the United Nations to put those modalities into effect. As regards the resettlement on the Chagos Archipelago of Mauritian nationals, including those of Chagossian origin,this is an issue relating to the protection of the human rights of those concerned,which should be addressed by the General Assembly during the completion of the decolonization of Mauritius.

    Composition of the Court

    The Court was composed as follows: President Yusuf; Vice-President Xue;Judges Tomka, Abraham, Bennouna, Can?ado Trindade, Donoghue, Gaja,Sebutinde, Bhandari, Robinson, Gevorgian, Salam, Iwasawa; Registrar Couvreur.

    Vice-President XUE appends a declaration to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judges TOMKA and ABRAHAM append declarations to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judge CAN?ADO TRINDADE appends a separate opinion to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judges CAN?ADO TRINDADE and ROBINSON append a joint declaration to the Advisory Opinion of the Court;Judge DONOGHUE appends a dissenting opinion to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judges GAJA, SEBUTINDE and ROBINSON append separate opinions to the Advisory Opinion of the Court; Judges GEVORGIAN, SALAM and IWASAWA append declarations to the Advisory Opinion of the Court.

    A summary of the Advisory Opinion appears in the document entitled“Summary No. 2019/2”, to which summaries of the declarations and opinions are annexed. This press release, the summary and the full text of the Advisory Opinion are available on the Court’s website (www.icj-cij.org), under the heading“Cases” (click on “Advisory proceedings”).

    Note: The Court’s press releases are prepared by its Registry for information purposes only and do not constitute official documents.

    大陆偷拍与自拍| 精品少妇内射三级| 免费看av在线观看网站| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 女警被强在线播放| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 午夜两性在线视频| 宅男免费午夜| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 中国国产av一级| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 搡老岳熟女国产| 国产在线免费精品| bbb黄色大片| 精品第一国产精品| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| av天堂在线播放| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区| 日本色播在线视频| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 丰满饥渴人妻一区二区三| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 777米奇影视久久| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| av天堂在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久久欧美国产精品| 男女免费视频国产| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 曰老女人黄片| 欧美97在线视频| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产精品 欧美亚洲| 精品高清国产在线一区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 1024视频免费在线观看| 电影成人av| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 午夜久久久在线观看| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 91老司机精品| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | av网站在线播放免费| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲国产精品一区三区| 不卡av一区二区三区| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| av在线app专区| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 欧美97在线视频| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 欧美日韩亚洲综合一区二区三区_| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 精品少妇内射三级| 成年动漫av网址| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 亚洲中文av在线| 视频区图区小说| 精品国产国语对白av| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 久久中文字幕一级| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码 | 国产xxxxx性猛交| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 亚洲伊人色综图| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 欧美日韩黄片免| 大香蕉久久网| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 极品人妻少妇av视频| 一本久久精品| kizo精华| 亚洲国产av新网站| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 九草在线视频观看| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 久久久久久久精品精品| 天天影视国产精品| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 观看av在线不卡| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 考比视频在线观看| 少妇人妻 视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲精品一二三| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 色播在线永久视频| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 看免费成人av毛片| 久久久国产一区二区| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| videosex国产| 国产精品三级大全| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 97在线人人人人妻| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 97在线人人人人妻| 两性夫妻黄色片| 精品少妇内射三级| 宅男免费午夜| 大码成人一级视频| 91字幕亚洲| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频 | 午夜福利免费观看在线| 多毛熟女@视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 9热在线视频观看99| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲 | 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 国产在线视频一区二区| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产精品三级大全| av在线app专区| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 精品国产国语对白av| 久热这里只有精品99| 波多野结衣一区麻豆| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 色94色欧美一区二区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 91成人精品电影| 免费看十八禁软件| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 免费看不卡的av| 国产麻豆69| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 亚洲中文av在线| 午夜久久久在线观看| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| avwww免费| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲国产精品999| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 天天添夜夜摸| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 国产精品三级大全| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 久久久久久人人人人人| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 午夜两性在线视频| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 飞空精品影院首页| 18在线观看网站| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 成人三级做爰电影| videos熟女内射| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 在线天堂中文资源库| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 欧美性长视频在线观看| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 50天的宝宝边吃奶边哭怎么回事| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| av在线播放精品| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 蜜桃国产av成人99| 又大又爽又粗| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产不卡av网站在线观看| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 久久久久久人人人人人| 日本色播在线视频| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品亚洲成国产av| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 90打野战视频偷拍视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 超色免费av| 手机成人av网站| 色网站视频免费| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美另类一区| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 91成人精品电影| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 欧美成人午夜精品| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 久久人人爽人人片av| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 丝袜美足系列| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 国产1区2区3区精品| 熟女av电影| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 麻豆av在线久日| 在线 av 中文字幕| 精品福利永久在线观看| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 精品少妇内射三级| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 久久热在线av| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看 | 五月开心婷婷网| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看 | 婷婷成人精品国产| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲欧美精品综合一区二区三区| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 老司机影院毛片| 成年美女黄网站色视频大全免费| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 天天影视国产精品| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 看免费av毛片| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 精品少妇内射三级| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 国产片内射在线| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 欧美大码av| 人妻一区二区av| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 精品人妻熟女毛片av久久网站| 免费在线观看日本一区| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 色播在线永久视频| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 久久国产精品影院| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 亚洲精品在线美女| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| xxx大片免费视频| 美女中出高潮动态图| www.精华液| 久久久欧美国产精品| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 深夜精品福利| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 看十八女毛片水多多多| av电影中文网址| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 一本综合久久免费| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久青草综合色| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索 | 久久99一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 亚洲国产看品久久| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 在线亚洲精品国产二区图片欧美| 永久免费av网站大全| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 黄色一级大片看看| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 黄频高清免费视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 天天影视国产精品| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡 | 在线 av 中文字幕| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 超碰成人久久| 深夜精品福利| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 亚洲图色成人| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 免费少妇av软件| www.精华液| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 97精品久久久久久久久久精品| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 亚洲图色成人| 午夜久久久在线观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 永久免费av网站大全| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲第一av免费看| av天堂久久9| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 国产精品久久久av美女十八| 在线观看国产h片| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 五月天丁香电影| 国产黄色免费在线视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 亚洲综合色网址| 久久av网站| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 大型av网站在线播放| 性色av一级| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| av一本久久久久| 19禁男女啪啪无遮挡网站| 欧美人与性动交α欧美软件| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 成在线人永久免费视频| 午夜激情av网站| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 国产野战对白在线观看| 中文字幕最新亚洲高清| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| kizo精华| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| h视频一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 女人精品久久久久毛片| kizo精华| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 夫妻午夜视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 手机成人av网站| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 日韩电影二区| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 在线观看www视频免费| 在线av久久热| 91精品三级在线观看| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 丁香六月天网| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 99久久综合免费| 国产精品 国内视频| www.自偷自拍.com| 男女国产视频网站| av有码第一页| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 日本wwww免费看| 免费看不卡的av| 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 亚洲人成电影观看| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 国产激情久久老熟女| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 久久国产精品影院| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 深夜精品福利| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 赤兔流量卡办理| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 国产色视频综合| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 久久 成人 亚洲| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产高清国产精品国产三级| 免费观看人在逋| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 夫妻午夜视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 中文精品一卡2卡3卡4更新| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 久久国产精品影院| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 捣出白浆h1v1| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 久久久精品国产亚洲av高清涩受| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 不卡av一区二区三区| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 成人手机av| 一区福利在线观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 午夜免费观看性视频| 精品久久久精品久久久| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 1024香蕉在线观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 国产主播在线观看一区二区 | 亚洲精品自拍成人| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 中文字幕av电影在线播放| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 丝袜美足系列| 午夜av观看不卡| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 午夜福利,免费看|