• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Effects of variety and chemical regulators on cold tolerance during maize germination

    2018-12-11 08:38:20WANGLijunZHANGPingWANGRuonanWANGPuHUANGShoubing
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年12期

    WANG Li-jun, ZHANG Ping, WANG Ruo-nan, WANG Pu, HUANG Shou-bing

    College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, P.R.China

    Abstract Maize growth and development is affected by low temperature (LT) especially at the early stages of development. To describe the response of different varieties to LT stress and determine an effective method to cope with LT stress, maize hybrids Zhengdan 958 (ZD 958) and Danyu 39 (DY 39) were planted and grown at 10 and 25°C, respectively. Effects of the chemicals potassium chloride (KCl), gibberellin (GA3), 2-diethylaminoethyl-3,4-dichlorophenylether (DCPTA), and all three combined chemicals (KGD) on coping with LT stress were tested by seed priming. The varieties performed signiflcantly different at 10°C.Compared to leaf, root growth was more severely affected by LT stress. Root/leaf ratio is likely a more reliable parameter to evaluate cold tolerance based on its close correlation with leaf malondialdehyde (MDA) content (R=–0.8). GA3 advanced seed germination by about 2 days compared with control treatment of water. GA3 and DCPTA both resulted in lower leaf MDA content and higher leaf and root area, and root/leaf ratio. KCl resulted in the highest evenness of plant height. KGD performed the best in increasing cold tolerance of maize morphologically and physiologically. Strategies to increase maize tolerance of cold stress, such as variety breeding or chemical selection, would increase maize yield especially at high-latitude regions and have great implications for food security.

    Keywords: cold tolerance, maize, seedlings, root/shoot, chemical regulators

    1. lntroduction

    Despite the warming climate, low temperature (LT) stress remains one of the major abiotic factors severely affecting crop production worldwide, especially in the high-latitude regions (Sthapit and Witcombe 1998; Jhaet al. 2017).Maize (Zea maysL.) is one of the most important crops to ensure global food security (FAO 2012), but it is also a C4plant species that is sensitive to LT stress, particularly in the early growth stages (Maroccoet al. 2005; Presterlet al.2007). With rising temperatures, the maize growing area is expanding into some regions where the temperature is too low to grow maize before (Menget al. 2014), increasing the potential impacts of LT stress on maize production.

    LT stress in the early maize growth stages retards seed germination, seedling emergence, and vegetative growth, negatively affecting morphogenesis, photosynthetic characteristics, and yield (Miedema 1982; Allen and Ort 2001; Hundet al. 2008). Seedling growth at suboptimal temperatures is limited by leaf and root extension (Miedema 1982). The shoot apex is below the soil surface before the 6-leaf stage (Stoneet al. 1999), and as a consequence,both shoot and root can be directly influenced by LT at the seedling stage. Under cold stress, the appearance rate of leaves almost stops (Riva-Rovedaet al. 2016), and cooling of the shoot apex results in delayed leaf development (Sowińskiet al. 2005; Rymenet al. 2007). In addition, LT stress causes maize roots to become swollen behind the tip, grow thicker,and reduces branching (Farooqet al. 2009). LT-induced root length was about 20% less than control, and the delay in development of photosynthesis was related to insufflcient growth of roots (Sowińskiet al. 2005). The effect of cold stress on the primary and lateral roots may be indirectly reflected in shoot elongation and leaf formation (Hundet al.2004). Higher root area/shoot area ratio and root length/leaf area ratio were found when seedlings were grown at suboptimal temperatures (Richneret al. 1997; Hundet al.2007). However, there are few studies of the relationship between root and shoot of maize under LT stress.

    Inbred maize lines showed different responses to LT(Guanet al. 2009): LT-tolerant genotypes were highly resistant to LT stress and recovered faster from LT damage(Aguileraet al. 1999). In addition to innate cold tolerance,many chemicals have been used to reduce LT effects in maize (Waqaset al. 2017). Salicylic acid (SA, 0.5 mmol L–1) applied to the radicles increased LT tolerance of the aerial portion of maize (Kang and Saltveit 2002). Gibberellin(GA3, 0.1 mmol L–1) can increase seedling emergence and growth of maize at 10°C (Wanget al. 1996). Seed priming with calcium chloride (CaCl2) and potassium chloride (KCl)increased maize seedling tolerance to LT stress (Farooqet al. 2009). Exogenous application of compound plant growth regulators, such as PASP-KT-NAA, increased superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) activities under LT condition (Xuet al.2012). However, studies on compound regulators and comparative studies on the exogenous application of single and compound chemicals are limited in maize.

    The objectives of this study were to test the response of maize varieties to LT stress, investigate shoot and root meristem morphological changes under LT condition, and identify the effects of chemical regulators on alleviating LT damage. The widely adapted maize variety Zhengdan 958(ZD 958) and the regionally adapted variety Danyu 39 (DY 39)were tested for their responses to cold stress at germination stage. The former variety has adapted to environments in different regions of China, and the latter has adapted to environments in the Northeast China where cold stress is frequent before sowing maize (Liet al. 2009; Shiet al. 2010).

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Experimental design

    This experiment was conducted in plant growth champers at two temperature levels of 10 and 25°C. Two trials were varietal and chemical trials, and each trial had flve replications. The low temperature of 10°C was supposed to be the minimum temperature for seedling emergence of maize; at 25°C, both roots and seedlings grow fast (Sánchezet al. 2014). Prior to the trial, maize seeds were disinfected with 1% (v/v) NaClO solution for 10 min, and then were washed clean with distilled water. The varietal trial had a completely randomized design, in which 50 seeds of two maize varieties, DY 39 and ZD 958 were evenly placed in a transparent germination box equipped with fllter paper and containing 10 mL distilled water, with six replicates at each temperature. The germination box had a transparent cover to avoid water evaporation, and its dimensions were 19 cm long, 13 cm wide, and 7 cm high. After placing seeds in the germination boxes, all seeds were transferred to the plant growth champers with constant temperature levels of 10 and 25°C, respectively. At each temperature level, the same photosynthetic photon flux density of 350 μmol m–2s–1,12 h light/12 darkness, and a relative humidity of 60% were used. The seeds were transferred to the new germination boxes in 2-day intervals until the end of the trial to avoid drying and bacterial contamination.

    The chemical trial was also conducted using a completely randomized design with only the maize variety ZD 958 and four chemical regulators: 50 mg L–1potassium chloride (KCl),50 mg L–1gibberellin (GA3), 1 mg L–12-diethylaminoethyl-3,4-dichlorophenylether (DCPTA), and their combination(50 mg L–1KCl-50 mg L–1GA3-1 mg L–1DCPTA, KGD).ZD 958 has adapted widely to different regions of China,so study chemical effects on increasing cold tolerance of ZD 958 would be more valuable. Chemicals and their doses were determined by several prior experiments (data not shown) and previous relevant studies (Wanget al. 1996;Farooqet al. 2008a, b; Guet al. 2009, 2014). The disinfected seeds of ZD 958 were soaked for 12 h in aerated solutions of the four chemicals and distilled water was used as a control treatment (CK). The ratio of seed weight over solution volume was 1/5 g mL–1(Farooqet al. 2008a; Ahmadet al. 2016).After seed priming, the soaked seeds were dried under shade to a nearly constant weight, and then were incubated in germination boxes equipped with fllter paper and containing 10 mL H2O, under the same incubation conditions used in the varietal trial. Both trials lasted 11 days.

    2.2. Sampling and data collection

    In both trials, germination rate, evenness of plant height(Yanget al. 2006), leaf area (Montgomery 1991), root area, and leaf malondialdehyde (MDA) content (Heath and Packer 1968) were measured. The germinated seeds per germination box were counted daily. Germination rate was calculated as the proportion of germinated seeds over all the seeds used. Plant heights of flve randomly selected seedlings per germination box were measured at 10 days after sowing (DAS) to calculate the evenness of plant height as follows:

    At 10 DAS, flve seedlings were randomly separated to measure leaf length and width. Leaf area was calculated as follows:

    Leaf area=?(Leaf length×Maximum leaf width)×k(Montgomery 1991)

    Where, k is 0.75 for expanded leaf, and 0.5 for unexpanded leaf.

    After measuring the leaf area, MDA content of leaves was measured using the thiobarbituric acid (TBA) colorimetric technique (Heath and Packer 1968). Maize leaf segments(0.3 g) were ground in an ice-cold mortar fllled with 5.0 mL of 50 mmol L–1pH 7.8 phosphate buffer (including 2%polyvinylpyrrolidone) as an extraction buffer. The extracts were centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min at 10 000×g. The resulting supernatant (1 mL) was collected and mixed with 2 mL of 0.5% TBA in a centrifuge tube. The tubes were boiled in the water for 20 min, ice cooled, and then centrifuged for 10 min at 3 000×g. The supernatant was collected in a cuvette and its absorbance at 450, 532, and 600 nm was read with a spectrometer. The MDA content was calculated as:

    MDA (nmol g–1FW)=1 000×6.45(OD532–OD600)–0.56OD450

    Roots of flve plants per treatment were scanned with EPSON PREFCTION V700, and the root images were analyzed with WinRHIZO Pro Software (version 2009c,Regent Instruments Inc., Candan) to measure root area.

    2.3. Statistics

    One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) of plant height evenness, root area, leaf area, root area/leaf area (root/leaf) ratio, and MDA content were performed in SAS 9.3(SAS Institute, Carey, NC, USA). The differences were compared with the least signiflcant difference (LSD) test,and were considered statistically signiflcant whenP<0.05.The correlations of root area, leaf area, root /leaf ratio, and MDA content were calculated with procedure of correlation in SAS 9.3.

    3. Results

    3.1. Effects of variety on cold resistance

    The germination rate of ZD 958 was remarkably higher than that of DY 39 at 25°C, especially during the flrst half of the germination test (Fig. 1). It took 4 days for ZD 958 to reach its highest germination level of approximately 100% at 25°C,whereas DY 39 needed at least 1 wk to reach its highest germination level (approximately 90%). Compared to the treatment of 25°C, seeds started to germinate at 8 DAS for both varieties at 10°C, and germination rate of DY 39 was higher than that of ZD 958 in the following period.

    The evenness of plant height was higher in DY 39 than that in ZD 958 at both temperatures, and the difference was signiflcant at 10°C (Fig. 2).

    DY 39 was larger than ZD 958 in both root area and leaf area at both temperatures at 10 DAS (Fig. 3-A and B). The difference was not signiflcant in the root area at 25°C, but was signiflcant at 10°C. Leaf area was signiflcantly different between the varieties at both 10 and 25°C. ZD 958 had a slightly larger root/leaf ratio at 25°C than DY 39, but root/leaf ratio was signiflcantly smaller in ZD 958 at 10°C. Averaging the two varieties, root area was reduced from approximately 54 cm2at 25°C to 40 cm2at 10°C, leaf area was reduced from 24 to 21 cm2, and root/leaf ratio was reduced from 223 to 183% (Fig. 3-C).

    Fig. 1 Effects of variety and champer temperature on germination rate of maize seeds. DY 39, Danyu 39; ZD 958, Zhengdan 958.Bars mean SE.

    Leaf MDA content at 10 DAS was nearly at the same level between DY 39 and ZD 958 (3.7vs. 4.2 nmol g–1FW) at 25°C (Fig. 4). The MDA content of ZD 958 was signiflcantly higher than that of DY 39 at 10°C.

    3.2. Effects of chemicals on resistance to cold

    Chemicals used to soak seeds prior to the seed germination test had no signiflcant effect on the germination rate at 25°C, but dramatically increased seed germination at 10°C(Fig. 5). The germination rate reached 100% at 7 DAS in the treatment of KGD at the low temperature of 10°C, but was less than 20% in other treatments. At the end of the germination test, the germination rates of DCPTA, KCl, and water were approximately 60%.

    Plant height evenness of chemical-soaked seeds was higher than that of water-soaked seeds at both 10 and 25°C,except in the treatment of KCl at 25°C (Fig. 6). Treatment with KGD had the highest values of 27.7 at 25°C, and treatments of GA3and KCl had the highest values (28.6 and 28.2) at 10°C.

    Fig. 2 Effects of variety and champer temperature on evenness of maize plant height at 10 days after sowing. DY 39, Danyu 39;ZD 958, Zhengdan 958. Differences between values with the same letter are not signiflcant at P=0.05, comparisons are within the same temperature only. Bars mean SD.

    Averaged across chemical treatments, the root area,leaf area, and root/leaf ratio were signiflcantly larger in the treatment of 25°C than that in 10°C at 10 DAS (Table 1).Root area ranged from 53.6 cm2in the treatment of KGD to 50.4 cm2in the treatment of KCl at 25°C, and from 41.8 to 27.5 cm2at 10°C. The range of leaf area among chemical treatments was much smaller than that of root area.Difference in the root/leaf ratio among chemical treatments was not signiflcant at 25°C, but was signiflcant at 10°C. In the treatments of KGD, GA3, and DCPTA, the root/leaf ratio was signiflcantly larger than that in the control treatment.

    Leaf MDA content was signiflcantly lower in the chemical treatments than that in the control at both temperatures(Fig. 7). In particular, the MDA content was reduced from approximately 10 nmol g–1FW in the treatment of water to 2.5 nmol g–1FW in the treatment of KGD at 10°C. On average across treatments of chemicals, the MDA content at 10°C was 5.4 nmol g–1FW, about twice that at 25°C.

    The leaf MDA contents in the chemical trials were plotted against root area, leaf area, and root/leaf ratio (Fig. 8).Negative relationships were found, except between MDA and root/leaf ratio at 25°C. At 10°C, the correlation was weak between MDA and leaf area (R=–0.57), but was stronger between MDA and root area (R=–0.76), and was signiflcantly different between MDA and root/leaf ratio.

    4. Discussion

    4.1. Effects of maize variety on cold tolerance

    Fig. 3 Effects of variety and champer temperature on root area (A), leaf area (B), and root area/leaf area (root/leaf ratio, C) at 10 days after sowing. DY 39, Danyu 39; ZD 958, Zhengdan 958. Differences between values with the same letter are not signiflcant,comparisons are within the same temperature only. Bars mean SD.

    Fig. 4 Effects of variety and champer temperature on leaf malondialdehyde (MDA) content of maize seedling at 10 days after sowing. DY 39, Danyu 39; ZD 958, Zhengdan 958.Difference between values with the same letter are not signiflcant(P<0.05), comparisons are within the same temperature only.Bars mean SD.

    Fig. 5 Effects of champer temperature and chemical regulator on germination rate of maize seeds. KGD, the mixture of KCl,GA3, and DCPTA; GA3, gibberellin; DCPTA, 2-diethylaminoethyl-3,4-dichlorophenylether; KCl, potassium chloride. Bars mean SD.

    Fig. 6 Effect of chemicals on evenness of maize seedling plant height. KGD, the mixture of KCl, GA3, and DCPTA; GA3,gibberellin; DCPTA, 2-diethylaminoethyl-3,4-dichlorophenylether;KCl, potassium chloride. Differences between values with the same letter are not signiflcant at P<0.05, comparisons are within the same temperature only. Bars mean SD.

    This study further conflrmed that LT can greatly hinder seed germination and seedling growth of maize, consistent with flndings of Jhaet al. (2017). LT stress reduces leaf chlorophyll content, photosynthesis, activity of antioxidant enzymes, and stability of membranes in many crops (Nie and Baker 1991; Allenet al. 2001; Xuet al. 2012), reducing dry matter production and yield (Nayyaret al. 2007). The negative impacts of LT stress on maize is dependent on the variety (Richneret al. 1997; Leeet al. 2002). In the present study, the decreases in root area, leaf area, and root/leaf ratio by LT were greater in ZD 958 than that in DY 39.These results indicated that DY 39 was more resistant to low temperature than ZD 958 at early developmental stages, suggesting that effects of variety on coping with cold stress depend on the regions where the variety comes from. According to the present results, maize varieties adapted to cold regions likely have stronger resistance to cold stress at least during seedling emergence. Variety ZD 958 comes from the North China Plain, and can adapt to different regions of China (Liet al. 2009), but cold resistance is likely not the most important trait of this variety. Cold resistance of maize at seedling emergence is inheritable(Revillaet al. 2000). Our results indicated that selection of, or breeding for, an LT resistant maize variety is feasible(Fenzaet al. 2017).

    Compared to shoot growth, low temperature seems to affect root growth more severely (Hundet al. 2007). In the present study, the extent to which root area decreased under LT condition was much greater than that of leaf area(Fig. 3; Table 1), indicating that root growth can probably reflect LT resistance of maize more accurately than shoot growth (Hundet al. 2008).

    4.2. Effects of chemical regulator on cold tolerance

    MDA content is an indicator of biological activity that can be used to evaluate maize response to environmental stress(Heath and Packer 1968; Gill and Tuteja 2010). The more severely the crops are damaged by environmental stress,the higher the MDA content in the crops is. In the present study, LT resulted in more MDA contents in leaves of maize seedlings and in the CK treatment of water. MDA content reflected the capacity of maize variety and the effect of chemical regulators on coping with LT stress. With this in mind, the obvious correlation between MDA content and root/leaf ratio indicate that root/leaf ratio is likely a parameter that can better represent LT resistance in maize (Fig. 8).This hypothesis should be verifled in future research.

    Table 1 Effects of chemical regulators and temperature on leaf area and root area at the 3-leaf stage of maize seedlings1)

    Fig. 7 Effects of chemicals on malondialdehyde (MDA)content in leaves at 3-leaf stage of maize seedlings grown at 25 and 10°C. KGD, the mixture of KCl, GA3, and DCPTA; GA3,gibberellin; DCPTA, 2-diethylaminoethyl-3,4-dichlorophenylether;KCl, potassium chloride. Differences between values with the same letter are not signiflcant at P<0.05, comparisons are within the same temperature only. Bars mean SD.

    Fig. 8 Scatter plot of malondialdehyde (MDA) in leaves against root area, leaf area, and root area/leaf area ratio at 3-leaf stage of maize seedlings grown at 25 and 10°C. Values were derived from flve chemical treatments. *, signiflcant at P<0.05; ns, not signiflcant.

    The chemicals used in the present study increased shoot and root growth, and reduced leaf MDA content of maize at cold conditions through soaking seeds before sowing. Effects of GA3and KCl on coping with cold stress at the maize seedling stage were consistent with flndings of Wanget al. (1996) and Farooqet al. (2008b). These two chemicals increased the evenness of plant height(Fig. 6), but did not greatly accelerate seed germination(Fig. 5). GA3and KCl reduced leaf MDA content at the LT condition, but their positive effects were lower than that of KGD and DCPTA (Fig. 7). KCl even reduced root and leaf area under LT stress (Table 1). Previous studies indicated that DCPTA can enhance growth and development of many crops by foliar application (Hayman and Yokoyama 1990;Keithlyet al. 1990, 1991), but these studies did not focus on LT stress. Our results showed that, for the flrst time,seed priming with DCPTA increased leaf and root area and reduced leaf MDA content at the LT condition, suggesting that DCPTA can increase cold tolerance of maize at early stages of development. Previous studies indicated that seed priming with GA3can promote seed respiration and starch degradation under cold conditions due to increased amylase activities, which increase germination rate (Liet al.2013). Seed priming with the chemicals used in the present study was reported to increase activation of antioxidants and soluble sugar content in the crop leaves under cold stress (Farooqet al. 2008a; Guet al. 2009; Liet al. 2013).Compared to the single chemicals used, KGD (mixed compound of KCl, GA3, and DCPTA) accelerated seed germination fastest (Fig. 5), and resulted in the largest root and leaf area (Table 1) and the lowest MDA content (Fig. 7)at the LT condition. These results suggested that application of mixed speciflc chemicals likely enhanced cold tolerance of crops, providing a feasible strategy to cope with LT stress in crop production.

    5. Conclusion

    Low temperature (LT) stress decreased maize seed germination, inhibited shoot and root growth, and increased MDA content in the leaves, interrupting the function of the cell membrane system. Compared to the aboveground parts, LT stress had a larger effect on root extension. Root area/shoot area ratio represents cold tolerance of maize more accurately, and can be considered as a more reliable parameter for selecting or breeding cold-tolerance maize varieties. Strategies including application of cold-tolerance variety and mixed chemicals can increase maize yield or expand maize growing area where LT stress exists at the maize sowing stage around the world.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31701361, 31401331) and the earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System(CARS-02-26).

    久久久久国内视频| 激情在线观看视频在线高清| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产精品日韩av在线免费观看| 日本 欧美在线| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 欧美最黄视频在线播放免费| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲av熟女| 国产真实乱freesex| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 九色成人免费人妻av| 俺也久久电影网| 久久久久性生活片| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 深夜精品福利| 久久午夜亚洲精品久久| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆 | 亚洲精华国产精华精| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 97热精品久久久久久| 人妻久久中文字幕网| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 精品久久久久久久久av| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 午夜视频国产福利| 大型黄色视频在线免费观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 国产野战对白在线观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 老司机福利观看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 精品久久久久久,| 色哟哟·www| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 日韩免费av在线播放| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 日本在线视频免费播放| 精品国产亚洲在线| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va | 黄色配什么色好看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 久久久色成人| 天堂网av新在线| 久久精品91蜜桃| 国产精品一及| a在线观看视频网站| 国产精品永久免费网站| 不卡一级毛片| 国产成人福利小说| 美女 人体艺术 gogo| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 久久久久性生活片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 最近在线观看免费完整版| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 免费观看精品视频网站| 久久热精品热| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 国产老妇女一区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 搡老岳熟女国产| 嫩草影院新地址| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 757午夜福利合集在线观看| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 午夜福利高清视频| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 日韩欧美三级三区| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 日本黄色片子视频| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 一本综合久久免费| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 最好的美女福利视频网| av视频在线观看入口| 久久草成人影院| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 免费看a级黄色片| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 香蕉av资源在线| 一本久久中文字幕| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 69人妻影院| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 久久精品人妻少妇| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 极品教师在线视频| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 久久精品影院6| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 一本综合久久免费| 深夜精品福利| 国产精品久久久久久久久免 | 18禁在线播放成人免费| 91麻豆av在线| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 色哟哟·www| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 十八禁网站免费在线| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va | 国内精品美女久久久久久| 精品久久久久久久久av| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 色哟哟·www| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产成+人综合+亚洲专区| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 性插视频无遮挡在线免费观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 美女免费视频网站| 1024手机看黄色片| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 波多野结衣高清作品| 51国产日韩欧美| 91狼人影院| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 91av网一区二区| 国产亚洲欧美98| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 波多野结衣高清作品| 美女免费视频网站| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲av成人av| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| av在线观看视频网站免费| 欧美激情在线99| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 午夜影院日韩av| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 嫩草影院入口| 欧美日本视频| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 97热精品久久久久久| 亚洲18禁久久av| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| av视频在线观看入口| 午夜精品一区二区三区免费看| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 久久精品91蜜桃| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 看免费av毛片| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产美女午夜福利| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产成人av教育| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 宅男免费午夜| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 无人区码免费观看不卡| av视频在线观看入口| xxxwww97欧美| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 欧美日韩黄片免| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 免费看日本二区| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 一本综合久久免费| 国产三级黄色录像| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 亚洲av美国av| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 1024手机看黄色片| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 99国产极品粉嫩在线观看| 久久性视频一级片| av福利片在线观看| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 免费看光身美女| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美一区二区精品小视频在线| 色播亚洲综合网| 赤兔流量卡办理| www.色视频.com| xxxwww97欧美| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 久99久视频精品免费| 黄色日韩在线| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av香蕉五月| 一级黄片播放器| 不卡一级毛片| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看 | 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕 | 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 日本五十路高清| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 黄色日韩在线| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 搡老妇女老女人老熟妇| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 免费观看精品视频网站| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 内地一区二区视频在线| 午夜福利18| 久久九九热精品免费| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 精品一区二区免费观看| 久久伊人香网站| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产视频内射| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久9热在线精品视频| 久久国产精品影院| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲内射少妇av| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 亚洲美女黄片视频| 国产成人av教育| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 少妇高潮的动态图| 一夜夜www| 在线国产一区二区在线| 一个人免费在线观看的高清视频| 国产av麻豆久久久久久久| 国产精品一及| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 精品人妻1区二区| 简卡轻食公司| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 91狼人影院| 舔av片在线| 赤兔流量卡办理| 国产成人福利小说| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 天堂√8在线中文| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 精品午夜福利在线看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 毛片女人毛片| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 黄片小视频在线播放| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 美女高潮的动态| 日本黄大片高清| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久图片| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 黄色女人牲交| av视频在线观看入口| 免费看日本二区| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 免费在线观看亚洲国产| 成人精品一区二区免费| 不卡一级毛片| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 久久九九热精品免费| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 九九在线视频观看精品| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 美女黄网站色视频| 嫩草影院入口| 91麻豆av在线| 在线十欧美十亚洲十日本专区| 最好的美女福利视频网| 色综合站精品国产| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 欧美黑人巨大hd| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片 | 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 99久久无色码亚洲精品果冻| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 天堂网av新在线| 午夜福利高清视频| 舔av片在线| 亚洲第一欧美日韩一区二区三区| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 久久国产精品人妻蜜桃| av在线蜜桃| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 欧美3d第一页| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 一a级毛片在线观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| av黄色大香蕉| 亚洲人成网站在线播放欧美日韩| 88av欧美| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区 | 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 1000部很黄的大片| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 香蕉av资源在线| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 亚洲色图av天堂| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产日本99.免费观看| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 国产在线男女| www.999成人在线观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 成人av在线播放网站| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 观看美女的网站| 亚洲成av人片在线播放无| 国产av不卡久久| www.熟女人妻精品国产| 一a级毛片在线观看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| .国产精品久久| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产午夜精品论理片| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| www.色视频.com| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲精品在线观看二区| 最近在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 欧美激情在线99| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 一本精品99久久精品77| 日韩中字成人| 97超级碰碰碰精品色视频在线观看| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 日本 欧美在线| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 免费观看人在逋| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 乱人视频在线观看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 久久精品91蜜桃| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 一本精品99久久精品77| 两个人的视频大全免费| 国产成人aa在线观看| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看 | 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲18禁久久av| 9191精品国产免费久久| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件 | 最近在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产 | 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看 | 最近在线观看免费完整版| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱 | 丝袜美腿在线中文| 欧美+日韩+精品| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 日本 欧美在线| 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 亚洲av美国av| 一本综合久久免费| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 久99久视频精品免费| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 男女做爰动态图高潮gif福利片| 成熟少妇高潮喷水视频| 日韩中字成人| 性欧美人与动物交配| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 国产成人av教育| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 国产精华一区二区三区| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 国产精华一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 精品人妻视频免费看| av在线老鸭窝| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日本黄大片高清| 国产成人欧美在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 午夜精品在线福利| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 极品教师在线免费播放| 日韩中文字幕欧美一区二区| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 搡老熟女国产l中国老女人| a在线观看视频网站| 最好的美女福利视频网| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 欧美性感艳星| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 日本精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 日本熟妇午夜| 成人av在线播放网站| 一a级毛片在线观看| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 校园春色视频在线观看| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 少妇丰满av| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 免费搜索国产男女视频| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 最近在线观看免费完整版| av天堂在线播放| 色av中文字幕| 免费av毛片视频| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃 | 丝袜美腿在线中文| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 国产精品影院久久| 一级av片app| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲不卡免费看| 亚洲av美国av| 日韩大尺度精品在线看网址| 天堂√8在线中文| netflix在线观看网站| 国产精品女同一区二区软件 | 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 成人av在线播放网站| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| 国产成人av教育| 久久中文看片网| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 一级作爱视频免费观看| www.色视频.com| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 久久久国产成人免费| 午夜a级毛片| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区 | 嫩草影视91久久| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 欧美日韩国产亚洲二区| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久 | 成年女人永久免费观看视频| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 精品久久久久久久末码| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 性欧美人与动物交配| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 中文字幕久久专区| 舔av片在线| 国产精品1区2区在线观看.| 最新在线观看一区二区三区|