• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    lnfluence of protein characteristics and the proportion of gluten on end-use quality in Korean wheat cultivars

    2018-08-06 12:08:14SeongWooChoChonSikKangHyeonSeokKoByungKeeBaikKwangMinChoChulSooPark
    Journal of Integrative Agriculture 2018年8期

    Seong-Woo Cho, Chon-Sik Kang, Hyeon Seok Ko, Byung-Kee Baik, Kwang-Min Cho, Chul Soo Park

    1 Department of Crop Science & Biotechnology, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea

    2 National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Republic of Korea

    3 Farm & Agribusiness Management Division, Rural Development Administration, Jeonju 54875, Republic of Korea

    4 USDA-ARS CSWQRU, Soft Wheat Quality Laboratory, Wooster, OH 44691, USA

    5 Research Center of Bioactive Materials, Chonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Republic of Korea

    Abstract The effects of protein characteristics and the proportion of gluten on end-use quality in 13 Korean wheat cultivars for three years were verified in this study. Year, cultivar, and the interaction between the year and the cultivar influenced protein characteristics, the proportion of gluten except for γ- and ω-gliadin using RP-HPLC (reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography), and end-use quality. Protein characteristics and the proportion of gluten in Korean wheat cultivars were between those of Australian standard white (ASW) and hard wheat (AH). Korean wheat cultivars exhibited a higher average α+β gliadin proportion than imported wheat, a γ-gliadin proportion similar to that of dark northern spring wheat,and the same ω-gliadin proportion as AH. They showed a bread-loaf volume intermediate between those of ASW and AH and a texture of cooked noodles similar to that of soft white wheat, but less springiness than imported wheat. The cookie diameter of Korean wheat cultivars was similar to that of hard red winter wheat. There was a correlation between bread-loaf volume and protein characteristics, except for the protein content in Korean wheat cultivars. Springiness and cohesiveness of cooked noodles were not correlated with protein characteristics, while hardness was correlated with the protein content and water absorption of a mixograph. Cookie diameter was negatively correlated with the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)sedimentation volume and water absorption of a mixograph. The end-use quality was not correlated with any proportion of gluten composition. Principal component analysis (PCA) showed that the proportion of gluten was not related to the quality of the bread (both PCs, 81.3%), noodle (77.7%), and cookie (82.4%). PCA explained that Keumkang is suitable for superior bread, while Uri is good for cooked noodles and cookies.

    Keywords: wheat quality, flour quality, storage proteins

    1. lntroduction

    Wheat gluten is the primary factor that determines the enduse quality because of protein content and composition influence dough rheology and baking properties (Carson and Edwards 2009). Glutenins, mainly related to gluten quality in wheat, are divided into two groups, high-molecularweight glutenin subunits (HMW-GSs) and low-molecularweight glutenin subunits (LMW-GSs) (Gianibelliet al.2001). HMW-GSs are the key factors in bread baking, as the major determinants of dough elasticity, and LMW-GSs play significant roles in determining dough resistance and extensibility (D’Ovidio and Masci 2004). LMW-GSs and HMW-GSs can be linkedviaboth inter- and intra-molecular disulfide bonds, forming very large polymeric proteins(Gianibelliet al. 2001; D’Ovidio and Masci 2004). The cohesiveness and extensibility of the gluten are attributed to the monomeric gliadins (Carson and Edwards 2009).These gluten properties, such as the amount of gluten,ratio of glutenin to gliadin, gluten composition, and ratio of HMW-GSs to LMW-GSs, have been closely related to enduse quality (Song and Zheng 2007).

    Bread-loaf volume generally increases with increasing protein content and is significantly influenced by the content and composition of protein in wheat grains (Branlardet al. 2001). The bread-loaf volume, as well as gluten properties, depends principally on both the genotype and the environment (Grayboschet al.1996; Panozzo and Eagles 2000; Zhu and Khan 2001). Wheat flour of about 10% protein content is acceptable for the preparation of soft-bite white salted noodles (Huo 2001). The protein content and its related parameters, such as sedimentation volume and the mixing time of mixograph, are known to affect the texture of cooked noodles (Baiket al. 1994;Yunet al. 1996; Parket al. 2003). Cookie diameter is an excellent indicator of general soft-wheat baking quality(Finneyet al. 1987; Hoseneyet al. 1988). Cookie diameter was more affected by protein content than by composition,which fundamentally is genetically controlled, but protein content is largely influenced by environmental conditions(Hoseneyet al. 1988; Slade and Levine 1994; Souzaet al. 1994). The principal environmental factors, such as fertilization and weather, affect the quantitative variations,like the amount and fraction of gluten. Such quantitative characteristics are equally important for the end-use quality.Understanding these effects on gluten properties and enduse quality is important for wheat breeders, growers, and end-use processors.

    Korean wheat cultivars have a short maturation period because of temperature and rice transplantation. The temperature rapidly rises after mid-May, so the wheat harvest has to be completed in mid-June, because of overlapping rainy seasons. The Korean wheat-breeding program has long focused on improving grain yield and early maturation. Korean wheat cultivars also had narrow genetic diversity and the bread produced has been inferior to that from foreign wheat cultivars, despite the similar protein content (Parket al. 2012). Thus, quality improvement is receiving more attention from Korean wheat breeders. The objectives of this study are to find out how gluten properties affect end-use quality, including that of pan bread, white slated noodles, and sugar-snap cookies, of 13 Korean wheat cultivars during three growing seasons, and to provide useful information for improving end-use quality in wheat-breeding programs.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Plant materials

    Thirteen Korean representative wheat cultivars, which originated in the 1990s, were sown in randomized complete blocks with three replications in the Upland Crop Experimental Farm of the National Institute of Crop Science,Rural Development Administration (Korea) in 2013/2014,2014/2015, and 2015/2016 on 50% clay/loam soil. The seeds were sown in late October, and each plot consisted of three 4-m rows spaced 25 cm apart. These plots were combine-harvested in mid-June for three years. Prior to sowing, fertilizer in the ratio of 5:7:5 kg 10 yr–1(N:P:K) was applied, while weeds, insects, and disease were stringently controlled. No supplemental irrigation was applied. The means of temperature and precipitation for the three seasons were 10.4°C and 586.0 mm. During the three seasons, the temperature and precipitation of 2015/2016 season were higher (10.8°C, 702.1 mm) than those of 2013/2014 (10.4°C, 481.8 mm) and 2014/2015 (10.0°C,574.1 mm). Grains from each plot were dried using forcedair dryers and bulked from replications to provide grains for milling. The five imported wheat flours used in this study,including Australian hard (AH), Australian standard white(ASW), soft white (SW), dark northern spring (DNS), and hard red winter (HRW), were obtained from Dong-A-One(Dangjin, Korea).

    2.2. Analytical methods

    Wheat was milled using a Bühler Experimental Mill, based on the American Association of Cereal Chemists International Approved Method 26-31.01 (AACCI 2010). Two kilograms of wheat under 15% moisture content were milled with a feed rate of 100 g min–1and with roll settings of 8 and 5 in break rolls and 4 and 2 in reduction rolls. Protein content(%) of wheat flour was measured according to AACCI Approved Methods 46-30.01 (AACCI 2010). An sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sedimentation test was performed according to AACCI Approved Method 56-70.01 (AACCI 2010). Optimum water absorption and mixing time of wheat flour were measured using a 10-g mixograph (National Mfg.Co., USA) according to AACCI Approved Method 54-40.02(AACCI 2010). Dry gluten content was measured using a Glutomatic 2200 (Perten Instruments AB, Sweden) with a constant volume of Glutomatic wash solution (4.8 mL) based on AACCI Approved Method 38-12.02 (AACCI 2010).

    2.3. RP-HPLC

    Reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography(RP-HPLC) was performed to measure the proportion of glutenin components, including HMW-GSs and LMW-GSs,x- and y-type glutenin subunits, and gliadin components,such as ω, α+β, and γ-gliadin.

    Gliadin was extracted from 100 mg of wheat flour, which was incubated in 400 μL of 70% ethanol at root temperature(RT) for 1 h under vortexing and then centrifuged at 13 000 r min–1for 15 min (Zhouet al. 2013). The supernatant was used to analyze gliadins. After extraction of gliadin, the pellet was used to extract glutenin according to the protocol of Yanet al. (2014). It was washed three times with 500 μL of 55%isopropanol (v/v) for 30 min at 65°C and then centrifuged at 1 300 r min–1for 10 min. After centrifuging, the pellet was incubated with 100 μL extraction buffer containing 50% isopropanol (v/v), 80 mmol L–1Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), and 1% dithiothreitol for 30 min at 65°C, and then centrifuged at 13 000 r min–1for 10 min. For alkylation, the pellet was incubated with 100 μL extraction buffer for 30 min at 65°C, wherein 1% dithiothreitol was replaced with 1.4%4-vinylpyridine (v/v). After centrifuging, the supernatant was collected and added to cold acetone at –20°C to a final concentration of 80%, and then stored overnight at –20°C.Precipitated glutenins were obtained by centrifuging at 13 000 r min–1for 10 min, followed by removal of acetone in a fume hood. The pellet was eluted in 200 μL of 20%acetonitrile with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Extracted gliadins and glutenins were cleaned with a 0.2-μm polyvinylidene difluoride membrane filter (Pall Life Sciences, USA). The injection volume for RP-HPLC analysis was 20 μL. RPHPLC analysis was carried out on an Agilent 1100 instrument with a ZORBAX 300StableBond C18 as a reverse-phase column (300? 5 μm, 4.6 mm×250 mm, Agilent Technologies,USA) at the column temperature of 65°C, and the flow rates of 0.8 mL min–1for glutenin or 1.0 mL min–1for gliadin.For separation of glutenin, the initial solvent contained 25% acetonitrile and 75% water, each comprising 0.1%trifluoroacetic acid. The acetonitrile ratio gradually increased to 33% within 13 min, 43% within 54 min, and 50% within 62 min, and then returned to the initial condition within 64 min.For separation of gliadin, the initial solvent contained 25%acetonitrile and 75% water, each with 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. The acetonitrile ratio gradually increased to 50% within 60 min, 25% within 62 min, and then returned to the initial condition within 70 min. The proteins were detected using UV analysis at a wavelength of 210 nm. Glutenin properties were measured according to the percentage of the area of total gluten or gliadin content.

    2.4. End-use quality

    Bread was baked according to the optimized straightdough bread-making method according to AACCI Approved Method 10-10.03 (AACCI 2010). The ingredients of the baking formula consisted of 100 g (14% moisture basis)flour, 6 g sugar, 3 g shortening, 1.5 g salt, 5.0 g fresh yeast,50 mg ascorbic acid, and 0.25 g barley malt (about 50 DU g–1,20°C). The optimum water absorption and mixing time were judged by the feel and appearance of the dough during the mixing. The dough was fermented in a cabinet at 30°C and 85% relative humidity for 70 min with two punches and a proof period of 60 min, and then baked at 210°C for 18 min. After cooling for 2 h at room temperature, a slice 2.0 cm thick was cut from the center portion of the bread. Bread-loaf volume was measured immediately by rapeseed displacement and weighed after taking the bread out of the oven.

    White salted noodles were prepared as in our previous study (Park and Baik 2002). Flour (100 g, 14% moisture basis) was mixed with a predetermined amount of sodium chloride (NaCl) solution in a pin mixer (National Mfg. Co.,USA) for 4 min, with a head speed of 86 r min–1. The concentration of NaCl solution for making noodles with 34% absorption was adjusted to have 2.0% NaCl in the noodle dough. The crumbly dough was passed through the rollers of a noodle machine (Ohtake Noodle Machine Manufacturing Co., Tokyo, Japan) running at 65 r min–1with a 3-mm gap to form a dough sheet, which was further folded and put through the sheeting rollers. The folding and sheeting were repeated twice. The dough sheet was rested for 1 h and then put through the sheeting rollers thrice at progressively decreasing gaps of 2.40, 1.85, and 1.30 mm.The dough sheet was cut through number 12 cutting rolls to produce noodle strands with a cross section of 3 mm×2 mm, each about 30 cm in length. Raw noodles (20 g)were cooked for 18 min in boiling distilled water (500 mL)and then rinsed with cold water. Two replicates of cooked noodles were evaluated by texture profile analysis (TPA)with a TA.XT2 texture analyzer (Stable Micro Systems,Godalming, UK) within 5 min after cooking. A set of five strands of cooked noodles was placed parallel on a flat metal plate and compressed crosswise twice to 70% of their original height with a 3.175-mm metal blade at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm s–1. From TPA force-time curves, hardness,springiness, and cohesiveness were measured as described by Parket al. (2003).

    Sugar-snap cookies were baked to measure their diameter following the AACCI Approved Method 10-52.01 (AACCI 2010). The ingredients for cookie baking were 40 g flour with 14.0% moisture, 24.0 g sugar, 12.0 g shortening, 1.2 g nonfat dry milk solids, 0.4 g sodium bicarbonate, 4 mL solution with 0.32 g sodium bicarbonate, 2 mL solution with 0.2 g ammonium chloride, 0.18 g sodium chloride, and 2.7 mL of deionized water. The sifted sugar, nonfat dry milk solids,and sodium bicarbonate were combined with the shortening and then creamed by Kitchen Aid Professional KPM5 Mixer(Kitchen Aid, MI, USA) equipped with a flat beater mixing arm (type K45AB) for 4 min. Of the creamed mass, 37.6 g were blended with a water solution of sodium bicarbonate and ammonium chloride. The mixture was remixed again with flour by a National cookie dough micromixer (National Mfg. Co., Lincoln, NE) at 172 r min–1for 3 min. The cookie dough, 7 mm thick, was divided into a scrap using a cookie dough cutter (60 mm inside diameter). The scrap was baked at (205±2)°C for 10 min. Cookie diameter was measured after the cookies were cooled at room temperature for 20 min.Four cookies were baked for each flour.

    2.5. Statistical analysis

    Statistical analysis of the data was performed by SAS software (SAS Institute, NC, USA) using ANOVA (analysis of variance) with LSD (Fisher’s least significant difference test)and a pairwiset-test. Analysis of variance was conducted using the general linear model, and the cultivar×year component was used as the error term. Sources of variation in the model were considered to be fixed effects.Correlation of end-use quality with the measured traits was analyzed by Pearson’s correlation coefficients, with aP-value of less than 0.05 being considered significant.PCA (principal component analysis) was carried out using the Proc Princomp procedure in SAS to load the measured traits under visualization. All measurements were performed at least in triplicate and all were averaged.

    3. Results

    3.1. Analysis of variance

    Year, cultivar, and their interaction were significant for the protein characteristics, the proportion of gluten, and the end-use quality of the 13 Korean wheat cultivars (Table 1).Cultivar accounted for the largest proportion of the variation in protein characteristics, including protein content (57.4%),SDS-sedimentation volume (75.5%), dry gluten (50.0%), and water absorption and mixing time of the mixograph (82.0 and 97.3%, respectively). The variation in the proportions of HMW-GSs and LMW-GSs, the ratio of HMW-GSs to LMW-GSs, and the proportion of gliadin were significantly influenced by the cultivar rather than the year. The variation of the proportion of x- and y-type and the ratio of x-type to y-type in HMW-GSs were mainly affected by the year.The proportion of γ-gliadin was largely influenced by the cultivars, while the proportion of ω-gliadin was influenced by the cultivar and the interaction between the year and the cultivar. The variation of the bread-loaf volume was mainly affected by the cultivar, while the hardness, springiness, and cohesiveness of cooked noodles as well as cookie diameter were influenced by the year.

    3.2. Protein characteristics

    The protein characteristics of the 13 Korean wheat cultivars and the five imported wheat flours are summarized in Table 2. The protein content of Korean wheat cultivars was 9.6–14.5%, which was the range of protein content in the imported wheat flours (9.6–14.4%). SDS sedimentation volume was 19.0–73.8 mL in the Korean wheat cultivars,but the imported wheat flour exhibited SDS sedimentation volumes of 23.0–69.0 mL. Dry gluten was 5.7–14.0% in the Korean wheat cultivars and 7.7–13.9% in the imported wheat flours. Among the Korean wheat, Joongmo 2008 showed superior protein content, SDS sedimentation volume, and dry gluten content, while these characteristics were inferior in Goso, Joa, and Uri wheat. These values of Joongmo 2008 were similar to those of DNS, while Goso, Joa, and Uri showed properties similar to those of soft white flours.Water absorption and mixing time of the mixograph were 55.5–66.1% and 1.4–4.1 min, respectively, for the Korean wheat cultivars, and were 58.0–66.0% and 3.9–5.6 min,respectively, for the imported wheat flours.

    Table 1 Analysis of variance for protein properties, proportion of gluten composition, and end-use quality of 13 Korean wheat cultivars

    Table 2 Protein characteristics of 13 Korean wheat cultivars and five imported wheat flours1)

    3.3. Proportion of gluten

    The proportions of glutenin composition in the 13 Korean wheat cultivars and five imported wheat flours are summarized in Table 3. The proportions of gluten composition were measured by reversed-phase highperformance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC); Fig. 1 shows the chromatogram of the Korean wheat cultivars.The proportions of HMW-GSs and LMW-GSs in the 13 Korean wheat cultivars were 42.1–47.3% and 52.7–57.9%,respectively. Younbaek showed the highest proportion of HMW-GSs and the lowest proportion of LMW-GSs, whereas a precisely contrasting tendency was seen in Joongmo 2008(i.e., the lowest proportion of HMW-GSs and the highest proportion of LMW-GSs). Younbaek and DNS showed similar proportions, while those proportions were similar in Joongmo 2008 and HRW wheat. The proportions of x-type, y-type, and the ratio of x- to y-type in HMW-GSs in the Korean wheat cultivars were 60.8–76.6%, 23.4–39.2%,and 1.77–3.31, respectively. The x- and y-type in the HMWGSs of the imported wheat flours could not be measured because different x- and y-types coexisted in each flour,which blended flour from several cultivars. The ratio of HMW-GSs to LMW-GSs in the Korean wheat cultivars was 0.73–0.90. Younbaek showed the highest ratio of HMWGSs to LMW-GSs, while Joongmo 2008 showed the lowest value. Imported wheat flours showed 0.72–1.09 in the ratio of HMW-GSs to LMW-GSs. Younbaek exhibited a ratio similar to that of DNS. Joongmo 2008 was similar to SW or HRW in the ratio of HMW-GSs to LMW-GSs.

    The proportions of gliadin compositions in the 13 Korean wheat cultivars and five imported wheat flours are summarized in Table 4. The proportion of α+β gliadin,γ-gliadin, and ω-gliadin in the Korean wheat cultivars was 48.2–60.7%, 27.7–35.1%, and 11.6–21.0%, respectively,while those of the imported wheat flours was 33.3–53.6%,29.9–36.1%, and 14.1–33.3%, respectively. Jojoong showed the highest proportion of α+β gliadin, and the lowest proportions of γ-gliadin and ω-gliadin among all the wheat,including the imported wheat flours. Younbaek showed the lowest proportion of α+β gliadin and the highest proportion of ω-gliadin, while Suan showed a higher proportion of γ-gliadin than other Korean wheat cultivars. Younbaek was similar to AH in the proportion of α+β gliadin and had a higher proportion of ω-gliadin than all the imported wheat flours except for SW. Suan was intermediate between ASW and AH. The ratios of α+β to γ, α+β to ω, and γ to ω in the Korean wheat cultivars were 1.50–2.19, 2.85–5.28,and 1.68–2.73, respectively, which are higher values than those of the imported wheat flours, 1.00–1.79, 1.00–3.60,and 1.00–2.57, respectively. Jojoong showed higher α+β to γ and α+β to ω ratios, while Younbaek showed lower α+β to ω and γ to ω ratios than the other Korean wheat cultivars. These ratios in Jojoong were also higher than in the imported wheat flours, and lower in Younbaek, except for SW. Suan showed a lower α+β to γ ratio than the other Korean wheat cultivars; it was similar to that of Australian standard white wheat. Keumkang exhibited the highest γ to ω ratio among all the Korean wheat cultivars and imported wheat flours.

    Table 3 Proportion and ratio of glutenin in 13 Korean wheat cultivars and five imported wheat flours

    Fig. 1 The proportion of glutenin composition of Jojoong (A) and Goso (B), and gliadin composition of Younbaek (C) and Goso(D) using RP-HPLC (reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography). HMW, amount of high molecular weight glutenin subunits; x-type, amount of x-type in HMW; y-type, amount of y-type in HMW; LMW, low molecular weight glutenin subunits; α+β,proportion of α+β gliadin; γ, proportion of γ-gliadin; ω, proportion of ω-gliadin.

    Table 4 Proportion and ratio of gliadin composition of 13 Korean wheat cultivars and imported five wheat flours1)

    3.4. End-use quality

    Bread-loaf volume, texture of cooked noodles, and cookie diameter of the 13 Korean wheat cultivars and five imported wheat flours are summarized in Table 5. In the Korean wheat cultivars, the bread-loaf volume ranged from 609.7–913.9 mL. Keumkang (913.9 mL), Jokyung (870.8 mL), and Joongmo 2008 (884.7 mL) had a bread-loaf volume similar to that of DNS and HRW (916.7 and 833.3 mL, respectively).Bread-loaf volume in the Korean wheat cultivars was significantly correlated with SDS sedimentation volume(r=0.87,P<0.001) and dry gluten content (r=0.68,P<0.05),as well as with the water absorption (r=0.57,P<0.05) and mixing time of the mixograph (r=0.58,P<0.05) (Table 6).

    For the texture of cooked noodles, the hardness for Korean wheat cultivars was 3.21–4.22 N compared to 3.43–5.36 N in the imported wheat flours. Further, the springiness was 0.90–0.93 in Korean wheat cultivars, 0.93–0.95 in the imported wheat flours. The cohesiveness for Korean wheat cultivars was 0.64–0.67, which was similar to the range of cohesiveness in imported wheat flours, 0.63–0.67. Jojoong and Joa were harder, springier and more cohesive than the other cultivars. Jojoong and HRW were about as hard, and Joa was about as springy as AH and about as cohesive as ASW. Korean wheat cultivars exhibited significant correlations between the hardness of cooked noodles and protein content (r=0.67,P<0.05) and with mixograph water absorption (r=0.75,P<0.01), but there were no significant correlations between springiness, cohesiveness, and protein properties. The texture properties of cooked noodles for Korean wheat cultivars were not significantly correlated with any proportion of gluten composition.

    The cookie diameters for Korean wheat cultivars were 78.40–93.11 mm, which is a narrower range than for the imported wheat flours (70.78 to 96.49 mm). Uri exhibited the largest cookie diameter among Korean wheat and imported wheat flours and was similar in size to SW. The cookie diameter from Korean wheat cultivars was negatively correlated with SDS sedimentation volume (r=–0.70,P<0.01) and mixograph water absorption (r=–0.71,P<0.01),but was not significantly correlated with protein content despite a negative relationship (r=–0.53) (Table 6).

    3.5. Classification of Korean wheat cultivars

    The PCA was loaded to verify multivariate correlations between protein properties, gluten composition, and enduse quality (Fig. 2). For bread (Fig. 2-A), both principal components (PCs) explained 81.4% (PC1, 43.5% and PC2,37.8%). The PC1 was positively associated with protein content, SDS sedimentation, dry gluten, mixograph water absorption, and mixograph mixing time to a lesser extent.Bread-loaf volume was a critical component for good bread quality. PC1 explained the close relationship of breadloaf volume with protein content, SDS sedimentation, dry gluten, and mixograph water absorption and mixing time.However, PC2 explained the vector of bread-loaf volume in positive direction, but the vectors of protein content, SDS sedimentation, dry gluten, and mixograph water absorption and mixing time in negative direction. Both PCs showed no relationship between bread-loaf volume and gluten composition. Keumkang and Joongmo 2008 were suitable for good bread-loaf volume, like DNS or HRW.

    Table 5 Bread-loaf volume, texture of cooked noodles, and cookie diameter from 13 Korean wheat cultivars and five imported wheat flours

    Table 6 Correlation coefficients between protein and gluten and end-use quality parameters in 13 Korean wheat cultivars

    For the texture of cooked noodles (Fig. 2-B), the PCs together explained 77.7% (PC1, 41.9% and PC2,35.8%). PC1 was strongly and negatively correlated with cohesiveness and positively correlated with protein properties, while PC2 was strongly and positively correlated with the proportion of α+β, the ratios of α+β to ω and α+β to γ, and negatively correlated with the proportion of γ- and ω-gliadin. Epsteinet al. (2002) reported that the hardness of cooked noodles was negatively correlated with their springiness, and cohesiveness was correlated with springiness in recombinant inbred lines with various waxy genotypes. Ross (2006) said that hardness was not significantly correlated with springiness, which was not significantly correlated with cohesiveness. Also, hardness was negatively or positively correlated with cohesiveness,depending on different cooking times. Cohesiveness was negatively related to springiness and hardness, and hardness was closely related to springiness for the Korean wheat cultivars. Joa, Suan, and Uri were clustered on the direction of the cohesiveness vector, and most Korean wheat cultivars were very close to them. HRW and AH were on the direction of the springiness vector, and DNS was strongly related to springiness and hardness, which can explain the difference between Korean wheat cultivars and HRW, AH,and DNS for hardness and springiness. PCA explained that Joa, Suan, and Uri were similar to SW in cohesiveness and were better than ASW. Also, both PCs showed that gluten composition was not related to the texture of cooked noodles for Korean wheat cultivars.

    For cookies (Fig. 2-C), the PCs together explained 82.4% (PC1, 44.6% and PC2, 37.8%). PC1 was positively correlated with protein properties and negatively correlated with cookie diameter, so cookie diameter was negatively related to protein properties; i.e., cookie diameter decreases as protein content increase. Both PCs explained that cookie diameter was not close with gluten composition. PCA explained that Uri was suitable for large cookie diameter as a cookie quality among Korean wheat cultivars. Uri was clustered with SW; that is, Uri showed cookie quality similar to that of SW, whereas, Keumkang was not suitable for superior cookie quality like HRW and DNS.

    Fig. 2 Principal component analysis (PCA) loading of the measured traits and values of components 1 and 2 with clustering corresponding to bread-loaf volume (A), texture of cooked noodles (B), and cookie diameter (C). SDSS, sodium dodecyl sulfate sedimentation volume; Abs, mixograph water absorption; time, mixograph mixing time; HMW, amount of high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits; x-type, amount of x-type in HMW; y-type, amount of y-type in HMW; LMW, low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits;HMW/LMW, ratio of HMW to LMW; α+β, proportion of (α+β)-gliadin; γ, proportion of γ-gliadin; ω, proportion of ω-gliadin; (α+β)/γ,ratio of (α+β)- to γ-gliadin; (α+β)/ω, ratio of (α+β)- to ω-gliadin; γ/ω, ratio of γ- to ω-gliadin; BLV, bread-loaf volume; HD, hardness of cooked noodles; SP, springiness of cooked noodles; CO, cohesiveness of cooked noodles; DIA, cookie diameter; AH, Australian hard; ASW, Australian standard white; SW, soft white; DNS, dark northern spring; HRW, hard red winter. Each number indicates a Korean wheat cultivar, in the following order: 1, Baekjoong; 2, Goso; 3, Hojoong; 4, Joa; 5, Jojoong; 6, Jokyung; 7, Joongmo 2008;8, Joongmo 2012; 9, Jopoom; 10, Keumkang; 11, Suan; 12, Uri; 13, Younbaek.

    4. Discussion

    4.1. Major effect on variation of protein characteristic and end-use qualities

    The protein characteristics and end-use qualities were influenced by the year as well as the cultivar, as reported previously (Rozbickiet al. 2015). The proportion of gluten was also influenced by the year and cultivar (Triboiet al.2000). In this study, the cultivar influenced the protein characteristics, proportion of gluten composition, and end-use quality in Korean wheat cultivars while the year influenced them except for the γ- and ω-gliadin. The interaction between year and cultivar also influenced them except for the γ-gliadin.

    4.2. Profiling of protein characteristics and proportion of gluten

    Generally, wheat flours with high protein content exhibited high SDS sedimentation volumes and gluten content,because SDS sedimentation volume and dry gluten are influenced by protein content and quality. Protein content was correlated with SDS sedimentation volume(r=0.79,P<0.01) and dry gluten content (r=0.93,P<0.001).Mixograph parameters were used to compare wheat flours for their differences in protein quality, because dough-mixing properties of flours are mainly controlled by the quantity and quality of protein (Finney and Shogren 1972). The Korean wheat cultivars had a shorter mixing time in the mixograph than the imported wheat flours with similar water absorption by the mixograph. Protein content was correlated with the water absorption of the mixograph (r=0.95,P<0.001),but was not significantly correlated with the mixing time of the mixograph, because of the narrow variation in Korean wheat cultivars.

    For the correlation between the proportions of glutenin composition and protein characteristics, the proportions of HMW-GSs (r=–0.61,P<0.05) and LMW-GSs (r=0.61,P<0.05), and the ratio of HMW-GSs to LMW-GSs (r=–0.59,P<0.05) were correlated with only SDS sedimentation volume. In contrast, the proportions of glutenin composition were not correlated with protein content, because the variation of protein content was not a linear regression with the variation of the proportions of HMW and LMW, and of xand y-type between the Korean wheat cultivars. Al-Khawani(1989) reported the variation of glutenin content according to class of wheat cultivars. However, Korean wheat cultivars showed similar proportions of glutenin composition, because of the narrow allelic background, almost all of which have a similar allelic composition, such as theGlu-D1fallele,which is composed of Dx2.2 and Dy12 glutenin subunits like Japanese wheat (Parket al. 2006; Leeet al. 2013).Because of the narrow genetic stock of glutenin, there was no correlation between protein content and the proportion of glutenin. Hence, the Korean wheat-breeding program should focus on the diversity of the genetic stock of glutenin.

    The gliadin content differed considerably, depending on the class of wheat (Bietzet al. 1984; Al-Khawani 1989).However, Korean wheat cultivars showed similarity of the proportion of gliadin composition like the case of glutenin.It can be explained as a narrow variation of the proportion of gliadin composition similar to glutenin composition, e.g.,five cultivars with the same level as the proportion of α+β gliadin. In Korean wheat cultivars, the allelic composition of gliadin is limited; that is, there is no variation of ω5-gliadin between Korean wheat cultivars (Kimet al. 2016). Endoet al. (1993) reported different fragment areas of gliadin between Australian standard wheat and Japanese wheat cultivars during the same elution time. Most Korean wheat cultivars showed differences of the proportion of gliadin composition compared to that of the imported wheat flours,e.g., a higher proportion of α+β gliadin than in AH and ASW,but a lower proportion of γ-gliadin than in them. For the correlations between the proportions of gliadin composition and protein characteristics, there was a correlation only between the proportion of α+β gliadin and the dry gluten content (r=0.56,P<0.05). Huebneret al. (1997) discussed correlations of γ-gliadin peak areas, such as the increase in the proportion of bread-loaf volume in HRW, and of γ-gliadin with the increase in total protein, whereas the other gliadins do not increase directly. The proportion of gliadin in the Korean wheat cultivars was not correlated with protein content. Furthermore, some Korean cultivars that had a higher protein content then the other cultivars did not show a higher proportion of γ-gliadin.

    4.3. Evaluation of end-use quality

    Bread-loaf volume is generally known to have a positive correlation with protein content and quality (Hussain 2009).In HMW and LMW, glutenin was positively correlated with bread-loaf volume (He and Hoseney 1992; Zhanget al.2007). The role of gliadin on bread-making quality is still debated, but many researchers found that gliadins are correlated directly to mixing time and bread-loaf volume(Parket al. 2006; Wanget al. 2007; Ohmet al. 2010).However, the proportion of gluten compositions as well as protein content was not significantly correlated with breadloaf volume, whereas the imported wheat flours with higher protein content showed a larger bread-loaf volume than all the other flours (Tables 2 and 5). For example, DNS showed the largest bread-loaf volume (916.70 mL), corresponding to the highest protein content (14.4%), while SW showed the smallest bread-loaf volume (662.50 mL), corresponding to the lowest protein content (9.6%). That is, the variation of bread-loaf volume is larger than the variation of protein content in Korean wheat cultivars. Glutenin and gliadin composition using RP-HPLC was used to identify suitable wheat cultivars for baking quality (Al-Khawani 1988). The composition and levels of protein expression are also related to dough properties and bread-making quality (Payne 1987;Shewry and Halford 2002). Keumkang, Jokyung, and Joongmo 2008 have theGlu-D1dallele, which is associated with better quality in bread baking than other alleles atGlu-1loci (Shewryet al. 1992), whereas most of the Korean wheat cultivars containing theGlu-D1fallele exhibited poor rheological properties and low bread-loaf volume (Parket al.2006; Leeet al. 2013). Wanget al. (2016) reported that the wheat line with theGlu-B3hallele shows a larger breadloaf volume than the other wheat lines without theGlu-B3hallele given the same level of protein content. Both Jokyung and Keumkang possess theGlu-B3hallele, but most other Korean wheat cultivars for noodles possess theGlu-B3dallele, which is rarely inherited in Argentinean, Australian,French, Japanese, and USA wheat cultivars (Eagleset al.2002; Branlardet al. 2003; Tanakaet al. 2005; Shanet al.2007; Lerneret al. 2009; Parket al. 2011).

    The protein content of wheat is positively correlated with the texture of cooked noodles, especially hardness (Yunet al. 1996; Rosset al. 1997). Houet al. (2013) found that the proportions of protein composition as polymeric glutenin,monomeric gliadin, and other proteins using SE-HPLC (size exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography) are not significantly related to hardness, cohesiveness, and springiness of cooked Chinese white salted noodles made from flours from hard and soft wheat of the USA and hard white wheat of Australia. Epsteinet al. (2002) concluded that the texture of cooked noodles mainly depends on starch properties rather than protein contents and qualities.

    Ohmet al. (2009) concluded that the correlation between SDS sedimentation volume and cookie characteristics means that the qualitative variation in protein significantly influences cookie characteristics more than quantitative variation under a narrow range of protein content. Huebneret al. (1999) reported that cookie diameter is negatively or not significantly correlated with each protein fraction using SE-HPLC in soft red winter wheat and soft white winter wheat. The cookie diameter for Korean wheat cultivars was also not significantly correlated with any proportion of gluten composition. Cookie diameter is negatively correlated with the particle size of flour and damaged starch content(Kanget al. 2014). Monsalve-Gonzalez and Pomeranz(1993) demonstrated that cookie diameter is negatively correlated with grain hardness because of the increase of water absorption and viscosity by damaged starch. Also,soft wheat show a higher ratio of spreading and longer expansion time than, and are thus superior to, hard wheat(Abboudet al. 1985). Hence, in the Korean wheat-breeding program, grain hardness might be important for the quality of a cookie.

    5. Conclusion

    The protein characteristics were somewhat correlated with bread-loaf volume, cookie diameter, and the texture of cooked noodles for the Korean wheat cultivars. Furthermore,the proportion of gluten using RP-HPLC was not correlated with them, because Korean wheat had a narrow variation of the protein content and proportion of gluten composition,given the narrow allelic diversity of Korean wheat. Hence,the Korean wheat-breeding program should focus more on enlarging the genetic stock of gluten composition to improve the end-use quality of Korean wheat cultivars.

    Acknowledgements

    This work was carried out with the support of Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project title: Establishment of quality criteria for high uniformity in end-use of Korean wheat cultivars,PJ011009), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

    国产亚洲最大av| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 中文资源天堂在线| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| av在线蜜桃| 亚洲综合色惰| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 高清欧美精品videossex| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 人妻系列 视频| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 伦精品一区二区三区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 国产高潮美女av| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| av免费在线看不卡| av播播在线观看一区| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 最黄视频免费看| 黄片wwwwww| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲av男天堂| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 搡老乐熟女国产| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 国产av精品麻豆| 黄片wwwwww| 观看美女的网站| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 成人综合一区亚洲| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 午夜视频国产福利| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 极品教师在线视频| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 少妇丰满av| 久久6这里有精品| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 在线观看一区二区三区| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 身体一侧抽搐| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 只有这里有精品99| 我要看日韩黄色一级片| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 内射极品少妇av片p| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 欧美另类一区| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 男女边摸边吃奶| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲不卡免费看| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 黄片wwwwww| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 成人国产麻豆网| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产黄片美女视频| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片va| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 观看免费一级毛片| 中文天堂在线官网| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 国产精品.久久久| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 色视频www国产| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 黄色日韩在线| 国产精品三级大全| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 色5月婷婷丁香| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 国模一区二区三区四区视频| 日韩电影二区| 久久99精品国语久久久| 嫩草影院入口| 精品一区二区三卡| 日本与韩国留学比较| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 成人无遮挡网站| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲av福利一区| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 国产成人精品福利久久| 一级片'在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| www.av在线官网国产| 全区人妻精品视频| 一区二区三区精品91| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 午夜福利视频精品| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| a级毛色黄片| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 欧美人与善性xxx| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看 | 草草在线视频免费看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 免费大片18禁| 99久久人妻综合| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 内地一区二区视频在线| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 久久久久久久精品精品| videos熟女内射| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 久久久精品94久久精品| 直男gayav资源| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 综合色丁香网| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| av卡一久久| 观看免费一级毛片| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 国产极品天堂在线| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产精品.久久久| 久久久久视频综合| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 极品教师在线视频| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 欧美成人a在线观看| 国产色婷婷99| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 内地一区二区视频在线| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| kizo精华| 亚洲精品色激情综合| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 亚洲色图av天堂| 久久久国产一区二区| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 夫妻午夜视频| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 九九在线视频观看精品| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 国产 一区精品| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 久久午夜福利片| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲av.av天堂| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 久久久久网色| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 欧美另类一区| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 91狼人影院| 大码成人一级视频| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| av播播在线观看一区| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产成人精品一,二区| 日本av免费视频播放| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美另类一区| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久人人爽人人片av| 九九在线视频观看精品| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 日韩欧美 国产精品| av卡一久久| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 免费大片黄手机在线观看| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 亚洲图色成人| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 97超视频在线观看视频| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 91精品国产九色| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产男女内射视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 午夜视频国产福利| 日本与韩国留学比较| 精品一区在线观看国产| av不卡在线播放| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 午夜免费观看性视频| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 狂野欧美激情性bbbbbb| 久久av网站| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 老女人水多毛片| 日本黄大片高清| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲性久久影院| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 国产无遮挡羞羞视频在线观看| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 高清欧美精品videossex| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 亚洲成色77777| 一级片'在线观看视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 黄色日韩在线| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产一级毛片在线| av.在线天堂| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚州av有码| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久久性生活片| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美精品| 一级黄片播放器| 午夜福利高清视频| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲国产色片| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 婷婷色综合www| 最近中文字幕2019免费版| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 国产探花极品一区二区| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 精品久久久精品久久久| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 亚洲成人手机| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 亚洲综合精品二区| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 久久久色成人| 22中文网久久字幕| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 22中文网久久字幕| 99热全是精品| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 精品国产三级普通话版| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 久久久久久久久大av| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| av国产免费在线观看| 极品教师在线视频| av免费观看日本| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 国产乱人视频| a级毛色黄片| 久久99精品国语久久久| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 欧美bdsm另类| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 一级毛片 在线播放| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产淫语在线视频| 搡老乐熟女国产| 国产毛片在线视频| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 国产在线免费精品| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 永久免费av网站大全| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 久久99精品国语久久久| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 一区二区av电影网| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 日日撸夜夜添| 免费少妇av软件| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 亚洲精品一二三| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 欧美成人a在线观看| 在线观看人妻少妇| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 在线播放无遮挡| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产色婷婷99| 99热网站在线观看| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 日日撸夜夜添| 美女高潮的动态| 1000部很黄的大片| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲最大成人中文| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产91av在线免费观看| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲不卡免费看| 99久久精品热视频| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 精品一区二区免费观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| xxx大片免费视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 一级黄片播放器| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 免费少妇av软件| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 熟女电影av网| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲国产av新网站| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 永久网站在线| 一级av片app| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 18+在线观看网站| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 热re99久久精品国产66热6| 亚洲国产av新网站| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 网址你懂的国产日韩在线| a 毛片基地| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 精品一区二区三卡| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 亚洲最大成人中文| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 简卡轻食公司| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 久热久热在线精品观看| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 日本色播在线视频| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 色综合色国产| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| av国产精品久久久久影院| 国产av码专区亚洲av| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 少妇人妻 视频| 直男gayav资源| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 97在线人人人人妻| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂 | 亚洲av福利一区| 国产探花极品一区二区| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 搡老乐熟女国产| 伦精品一区二区三区| 在线 av 中文字幕| 午夜福利高清视频| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 色婷婷av一区二区三区视频| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 少妇人妻一区二区三区视频| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 美女中出高潮动态图| 有码 亚洲区| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 在线观看免费高清a一片| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡 | 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 欧美97在线视频| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 黄色一级大片看看| 久久精品久久精品一区二区三区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 一级片'在线观看视频| 国产av一区二区精品久久 | 91精品国产九色| 亚洲内射少妇av| 赤兔流量卡办理| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 插逼视频在线观看| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 深夜a级毛片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产视频内射| av免费观看日本| 美女中出高潮动态图| 久久久成人免费电影| 内射极品少妇av片p| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 视频区图区小说| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码|