• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after open repair of rotator cuff tears: a prospective cohort study

    2018-06-20 03:33:44JoelGalindoAvalosOscarMedinaPontazaJuanpezValenciaJuanManuelmezmezAvelinoColinzquezRubTorresGonzlez

    Joel Galindo-Avalos , Oscar Medina-Pontaza Juan López-Valencia Juan Manuel Gómez-Gómez Avelino Colin-VázquezRubén Torres-González

    1 Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, UMAE “Dr. Victorio de la Fuente Narváez” IMSS-UNAM. Ciudad de México, México

    2 Health Education and Research Division, UMAE “Dr. Victorio de la Fuente Narváez” IMSS, Delegación Gustavo A. Madero, México

    INTRODUCTION

    Background

    The incidence of shoulder pain in the general population is at around 11.2/1,000 patients per year, with rotator cuff tears being the most common cause of shoulder pain. The estimated incidence of rotator cuff tears is 3.7/100,000 cases per year with a higher peak at thefifth decade of life in men and at the sixth in women.1Rotator cuff tears have an impact on patient impairment and quality of life that is comparable to that of diabetes,myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure or depression.2

    Surgical treatment should be directed to decompressing and repairing the torn rotator cuff as best as possible.3Symptomatic patients typically describe pain with overhead tasks and pain with daily activities.4The diagnosis must be both clinical and radiographic; radiographic studies include ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthro-MRI.5,6

    Coefield and DeOrio classified rotator cuff tears depending on the size of the tear, dividing them into small (less than 1 cm), medium (1–3 cm), large (3–5 cm) and massive (more than 5 cm).6-8In 2006, Burkhart classified rotator cuff tears depending on its patterns: crescent-shaped, U-shaped, and massive, contracted, immobile tears.9

    In the United States, about 300,000 rotator cuff repair surgeries are performed annually. Surgery can be performed using open or arthroscopic approaches, but there has recently been a dramatic increase in the number of patients treated arthroscopically. Purported advantages of arthroscopy include rapid recovery and decreased morbidity, however, in the developing countries, the high price of the instruments and devices used for an arthroscopic approach makes it necessary to continue the traditional open repair of rotator cuff tears.4,8Since originally described by Neer in 1972, acromioplasties have become one of the most commonly performed procedures in orthopedic surgery. The most common indication for subacromial decompression remains subacromial impingement with or without a concomitant rotator cuff tear.10

    Functional outcomes after rotator cuff surgery are evaluated using a variety of instruments; however, the overall health status,or quality of life, after rotator cuff repair cannot be adequately assessed by these instruments. Despite the recognized importance of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment, few studies on HRQoL after rotator cuff repair have been reported.11In 2002, the a shortened form (12 items) of the Short Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF12v2) was published, a shorter version of the SF-36 questionnaire, one of the most widely used tools for assessing quality of life. The main strategy for the interpretation of these questionnaires is based on the use of reference population norms. These norms indicate a standard value that facilitates the interpretation of the questionnaire scores over those expected for their age group and sex.12

    The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES)Research Committee developed in 1994, a standard method for evaluating shoulder function.13In 2002, a modification to this scale was validated, which must befilled only by the patient, and it consists of 2 dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. The pain score and function composite score are weighted equally (50 points each) and combined for a total score out of a possible 100 points.14

    The ultimate goal in rotator cuff surgery is to improve patient-reported results including HRQoL, shoulder function and to restore cuff integrity. Worldwide, orthopedic surgeons prefer to treat rotator cuff tears arthroscopically, despite it being more expensive and having a higher learning curve than open repair, arguing that open repair is not as effective as arthroscopic repair. The goal of this paper is to prove that open repair could yield good functional results and improve a patient’s quality of life by applying two questionnaires including ASES scores and SF12v2 surveys, which has certain guiding significance in clinical orthopedics.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS

    Patients

    One hundred and twenty patients (35 males and 85 females)aged 40 to 65 years, who were diagnosed with subacromial impingement associated with a rotator cuff tear and who were treated by open surgical repair in the period from February 2016 to April 2016, were included.

    Patients who did not sign informed consent and fall into the age range, and had previous glenohumeral dislocation, a previous neurological lesion of the shoulder or a previous surgery on the affected shoulder were excluded from the study. Patients who had a massive rotator cuff tear and surgery-related complications during the time of the study were removed from the study.

    Patients admitted to the Reconstructive Joint Surgery Department at our hospital who had a diagnosis of a rotator cuff tear and were scheduled for open subacromial decompression and tear repair, and who met the inclusion criteria were identified.

    Surgery

    Patients were brought to the operating room and wereplaced under general anesthesia and positioned in the beach-chair position. The shoulder was examined underanesthesia and then it was properly draped.

    The rotator cuff was exposed through a modified Robert’s approach to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. A Mumford clavicle osteotomy was performed if there was any AC osteoarthrosis. The deltoid was split and dissected off the acromion and an anterior acromioplasty was performed as described by Neer.3The cuff was mobilized byfirst releasing subacromial adhesions and then transecting the coracohumeral ligament andfinally intra-articular adhesions as required.

    Strengths and limitations

    The cuff was then repaired in a tendon-tendon fashion using No. 5 nonabsorbable sutures. If necessary, a bone trough was then made at the footprint of the rotator cuff. No. 5 nonabsorbable sutures were placed in the rotator cuff, using a locking suture pattern, and then passed through the trough and tied over a bone bridge on the lateral humeral cortex.The incision was irrigated with saline to ensure proper hemostasis. The deltoid was reattached to the acromion using No. 3 nonabsorbable sutures. The incision was then closed with a standard technique.

    Size and pattern of the rotator cuff tear were assessed in a standardized fashion for all patients and classified according to the Coefield and Burkhart classifications respectively.7,9

    Postoperative treatment and follow-up

    After surgery, all patients were placed in a shoulder sling for 2 weeks and were referred for physical therapy, commencing 2 weeks after surgery, using a standardized protocol.

    During thefirst 6 weeks, only self-assisted ROM (excluding abduction) and pendular exercises of the shoulder were permitted. In addition, exercises emphasizing theisometric recruitment of scapular stabilization musculature were initiated. Active ROM exercises of the elbow, wrist, and hand were also performed.

    From 6 to 10 weeks postoperatively, active shoulder ROM and self-assisted stretching toward end range were added to the program. Scapular stabilization exercises were progressed, and closed chain strengthening exercises were added to the program.

    Questionnaire survey and data collection

    The day before the surgery, informed consent was signed by the patients, and preoperative SF12v212and ASES13surveys were applied by one of the authors. Shoulder function was categorized as excellent (88–100), good (75–87), regular(62–74), or bad (61 or less) depending on the ASES score.Data collected in the SF12v2 survey was analyzed using the QualityMetric Health Outcomes? Scoring Software 4.5(QualityMetric Inc., Lincoln, RI, USA). Results were categorized as above the norm, at the norm or under the norm in the physical component summary (PCS) and in the mental component summary (MCS).

    When the patients were discharged from the hospital, three follow-up surveys were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after their surgery through a phone call.

    Statistical analysis

    Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed usingIBM? SPSS? Statistics 23.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY,USA). The differences in the categorical variables (affected side, tear size and tear pattern, functional category and HRQoL category) were analyzed using the chi-square test. The differences in ASES and SF12v2 scores between preoperative and postoperative 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up were analyzed using the Student's t-test for paired samples. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    Patient’s entry study and follow-up

    In the evaluated period from February 1stto April 28th, 2016, a total of 204 subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair procedures by an open technique were performed in patients diagnosed with subacromial impingement and rotator cuff tear;of the 204 patients, 55 were older than 65 years and 13 of them were younger than 40 years, so they were left out of the study.

    Informed consent was obtained from 136 patients and the preoperative ASES and SF12v2 surveys were applied. Thirteen of these patients had massive rotator cuff tears as a surgicalfinding, and 3 developed adhesive capsulitis as a postoperative complication, so they were removed from the study.

    Demographics

    From thefinal sample of 120 patients, we observed a majority of women, representing 70.8% (85 patients); and men representing 29.2% (35 patients), with a mean age of 54 years. The most affected side was the right side, the most common tear size was the small one, and the most common tear pattern was the crescent-shaped one (Table 1).

    Table 1: Surgical characteristics of all patients

    Functional outcomes

    As for shoulder function, we found that nearly 100% of patients had a bad shoulder function preoperatively. At the 3 months follow-up, 65% of patients had a bad shoulder function, 34.25% a fair one, and only 0.8% a good one. At the 6 months follow-up, 53.3% of the patients had a good shoulder function, 45.8% an excellent one, and only 0.8% a fair one.At thefinal follow-up 97.5% of the patients had an excellent shoulder function and only 2.5% had a good shoulder function.

    SF12v2 survey results

    As for HRQoL, the results from the SF12v2 survey were divided by the software into the PCS and the MCS; furthermore,the PCS was divided into four categories, which are physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP) and general health (GH); the MCS was also divided into four categories, which are Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF),Role Emotional (RE) and Mental Health (MH); the results of the surveys are shown in Figure 1.

    Secondary analysis results

    When secondary analysis was performed, we found a statistically significant difference between the preoperative ASES score with the 6 and 12 months follow-up results (Table 2);between preoperative PCS with the 6 and 12 months follow-up;and between preoperative MCS with the 12 months follow-up(Table 3) (P < 0.05). We found no correlation between the Functional category with the HRQoL PCS and MCS category in any of the evaluated periods; we found no correlation between sex, affected side, tear size, and tear pattern with the Functional category or the HRQoL PCS and MCS category in any of the evaluated periods (Table 4) (P > 0.05).

    DISCUSSION

    The goal of rotator cuff surgery is to improve patient’s quality of life through pain reduction and improvement in shoulder function. The primary goal of our study was to determine the effectiveness of the open surgical technique in the aforementioned clinical outcomes, and our results are mostly consistent with those reported by the international literature.

    Zhaeentan et al.15conducted a retrospective study in which 73 patients, with a mean age of 59 years, similar to our study;who had a rotator cuff tear that was surgically repaired by an open technique were evaluated,finding that 87% of thepatients reported to be very satisfied with their result, with a follow-up time that ranged from 14 to 149 months.

    Goutallier et al.16conducted a retrospective study with a total of 30 patients with a rotator cuff tear that was repaired by an open technique, who had a mean age of 67 years, with an average follow-up time of 8.9 years. Patients were evaluated using the Constant scale, showing an initial mean score of 51.9 points, and afinal score of 76.8. They found no correlation between the score with the degree of fatty degeneration.Unlike our study, this one showed a better initial score, and a worsefinal score.

    Clavert et al.17conducted a retrospective evaluation of 24 patients with rotator cuff tear, of whom 14 were treated by a subacromial decompression, acromioplasty and open repair of the tear. They had a mean follow-up time of 8.2 years, with a mean preoperative constant score of 63.5 and 81.63 postoperative, withoutfinding a correlation between the age and gender with the Constant scores. As in our study, there was no correlation between age and gender with the functional outcome;unlike our study, the range between the scores was lower, the follow-up period was longer, and the sample was smaller.

    Papadopoulos et al.18evaluated the functional outcome of 27 shoulders with rotator cuff tear repaired by an open technique with the UCLA and Constant scales, with a mean follow-up of 40.2 months, reporting excellent results in 71% of the patients, good in 22% and regular in 7% of them using the UCLA scale; with the Constant scale, 67% of the patients had excellent results, 26% good and 7% regular. As in our study,no correlation was found between tear size and functional outcomes; however, our study reported excellent results in 97.5% of patients at 12 months.

    Figure 1: Preoperative (A) and postoperative 3- (B), 6-month (C), and 1-year (D) health-related quality of life scores.

    Table 2: ASES scores measured over time a

    Hanusch et al.19conducted a prospective study with a sample of 24 patients with large or massive rotator cuff tears, with a mean age of 60 years. Patients were evaluated using the Constant scale,finding a preoperative mean score of 36 points,and postoperative mean score of 68 points. Unlike our study,this study showed a lower functional outcome, however, our study did not evaluate massive rotator cuff tears, which is already reported as a risk factor for poor functional outcome.20

    Vastam?ki et al.21conducted a retrospective study in which 416 patients with a rotator cuff tear repaired by an open technique were evaluated over a 16-year period,finding that 88 patients developed a postoperative frozen shoulder that required a new intervention; this incidence is much higher than in our study, however, our follow-up time and sample size are lower, which may explain these differences.

    Table 4: Relationship beetween categorical variables

    Mejía-Salazar et al.22conducted a study comparing the functional outcomes obtained between open and arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears with a focus on supraspinatus tear.A total of 32 patients underwent open repair, with a majority of women, with a mean age of 61 years and a mean follow-up time of 68 weeks, as in our study, the right shoulder was the most affected. They found a better functional outcome in the arthroscopic group; however, the total scores for each group are not reported, making it impossible to compare with our study.

    Connelly et al.23conducted a retrospective study evaluating the quality of life and functional outcomes of patients with massive rotator cuff tears. The total sample consisted of 22 patients, predominantly male, with a mean age of 62.6 years and a mean follow-up time of 14 months. The Constant and Oxford scales were used to assess shoulder function,finding good results in 68% of the patients. The SF12 was used to assess quality of life,finding that in the physical and emotional component the patients were below the norm, but vitality and mental health were above the norm. Unlike our study,these authors reported a predominance of males, with lower functional and quality of life scores, which can be explained by the fact that they only studied massive rotator cuff tears,which were excluded from our study.

    Baysal et al.24conducted a cohort study similar to ours, with a sample of 88 patients, with a follow-up time of up to 5 years,to assess the quality of life and functional outcomes after open rotator cuff repair. In this study they used the ASES scale for functional evaluation (as well as our study), in addition to the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC). The mean age of the patients was 54 years. They found 35% of small tears, 42%medium tears and 11% large tears. Regarding the ASES scale, they found a mean preoperative score of 55.4, and 90.6 at 12 months,similar to our study. Regarding quality of life, 96% of the patients reported to be very satisfied or satisfied, while 3% reported to be fairly satisfied and 1% not satisfied. As in our study, no correlation was found between tear size with functional outcomes and quality of life. Unlike our study, all patients were submitted to the same rehabilitation protocol after surgery.

    Saraswat et al.20conducted a 10-year follow-up study of Baysal's cohort,24finding that, at 10 years, the functional outcome and health related quality of life remained similar,although some of the patients were lost at follow-up.

    CONCLUSION

    Open repair of rotator cuff tears remains a valid and effective option, despite the current trend of arthroscopic repair,obtaining satisfactory results at around 6 months after surgery.

    To our knowledge, this is thefirst study that seeks the correlation of the tear pattern with the functionality and the quality of life, although no correlation was found. We consider that the improvement of pain is the most important part for obtaining the results reported in this study. Finally,we also consider that there is an opportunity to perform a better study, in which open and arthroscopic repairs are compared, in which the repair method used (tendon-tendon,bone-tendon, and anchor use) is taken into consideration,and in which all patients are submitted to the same rehabilitation protocol after surgery.

    There are some limitations in this study. First, even though this paper proves that open repair of rotator cuff tears is a safe an effective treatment method, it does not prove open repair is better than an arthroscopic repair, to do that, large multicenter randomized clinical trials need to be performed,as well as cost-effectiveness studies. Second, like the fact that massive rotator cuff tears were not evaluated, and the follow-up period is only of one year. The surveys used could be considered a limitation as well, given the fact that they are subjective in nature, and HRQoL surveys are generic instead of joint-specific, which could bias the results.

    Author contributions

    JGA was responsible for the study design, analysis, and writing of the paper. OMP was responsible for study implementation. JLV, JMGG,and ACV were responsible for study implementation and data collection. RTG conducted statistical analysis. All authors approved thefinal version of the paper for publication.

    Conflicts of interest

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Financial support

    This study was funded by Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, No.FIS/IMSS/PROT/EXORT/11/002. The funding source had no role in study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, writing or deciding to submit this paper for publication.

    Research ethics

    All procedures involving human participants in studies were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This paper was registered in the Ethics Committee platform at our hospital with the number R-2011-3401-43 CLIS 3401, and authorization number AA45-CCM-SCA. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

    Declaration of patient consent

    The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

    Data sharing statement

    Individual participant data (including data dictionaries) that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables,fi gures, and appendices) are available. Study Protocol, Analytic Code and Clinical Study Report are shared. The data become available at www.figshare.com immediately following publication with no end date for researchers who wishes to access the data.

    Plagiarism check

    Checked twice by iThenticate.

    Peer review

    Externally peer reviewed.

    Open access statement

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Shar eAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially,as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under identical terms.

    REFERENCES

    1. Clayton RA, Court-Brown CM. The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury. 2008;39:1338-1344.

    2. Piitulainen K, Ylinen J, Kautiainen H, H?kkinen A. The relationship between functional disability and health-related quality of life in patients with a rotator cuff tear. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:2071-2075.

    3. Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54:41-50.

    4. Khan M, Simunovic N, Provencher M. Cochrane in CORR?: surgery for rotator cuff disease (review). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:3263-2069.

    5. Holmes RE, Barfield WR, Woolf SK. Clinical evaluation of nonarthritic shoulder pain: Diagnosis and treatment. Phys Sportsmed. 2015;43:262-268.

    6. Whittle S, Buchbinder R. In the clinic. Rotator cuff disease. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:ITC1-15.

    7. Cofield RH. Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;154:667-672.

    8. Karas V, Hussey K, Romeo AR, Verma N, Cole BJ, Mather RC. Comparison of subjective and objective outcomes after rotator cuff repair.Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2013;29:1755-1761.

    9. Burkhart SS, Lo IK. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:333-346.

    10. Chahal J, Mall N, MacDonald PB, et al. The role of subacromial decompression in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arthroscopy. 2012;28:720-727.

    11. Kolk A, Wolterbeek N, Auw Yang KG, Zijl JA, Wessel RN. Predictors of disease-specific quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Int Orthop. 2016;40:323-329.

    12. Schmidt S, Vilagut G, Garin O, et al. Reference guidelines for the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 based on the Catalan general population. Med Clin (Barc). 2012;139:613-625.

    13. Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3:347-352.

    14. Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient selfreport section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2002;11:587-594.

    15. Zhaeentan S, Von Heijne A, Stark A, Hagert E, Salomonsson B. Similar results comparing early and late surgery in open repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:3899-3906.

    16. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Radier C, Bernageau J, Zilber S. Long-term functional and structural outcome in patients with intact repairs 1 year after open transosseous rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2009;18:521-528.

    17. Clavert P, Le Coniat Y, Kempf JF, Walch G. Intratendinous rupture of the supraspinatus: anatomical and functional results of 24 operative cases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26:133-138.

    18. Papadopoulos P, Karataglis D, Boutsiadis A, Fotiadou A, Christoforidis J, Christodoulou A. Functional outcome and structural integrity following mini-open repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears: A 3-5 year follow-up study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20:131-137.

    19. Hanusch BC, Goodchild L, Finn P, Rangan A. Large and massive tears of the rotator cuff: functional outcome and integrity of the repair after a mini-open procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:201-205.

    20. Saraswat MK, Styles-Tripp F, Beaupre LA, et al. Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears using a mini-open technique: A concise 10-year follow-up of a previous report. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2794-2799.

    21. Vastam?ki H, Vastam?ki M. Postoperative stiff shoulder after open rotator cuff repair: a 3- to 20-year follow-up study. Scand J Surg 2014;103:263-270.

    22. Mejía-Salazar CR, Sierra-Pérez M, Ruiz-Suárez M. Functional evaluation of the supraspinatus tendon repair comparing mini-open and open techniques. Acta Ortop Mex. 2016;30:191-195.

    23. Connelly TM, Shaw A, O’Grady P. Outcome of open massive rotator cuff repairs with double-row suture knotless anchors: case series. Int Orthop. 2015;39:1109-1114.

    24. Baysal D, Balyk R, Otto D, Luciak-Corea C, Beaupre L. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life after surgical repair of fullthickness rotator cuff tear using a mini-open technique. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1346-1355.

    国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 国产毛片在线视频| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 在线观看一区二区三区| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 精品人妻熟女av久视频| 观看免费一级毛片| 欧美最新免费一区二区三区| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 搡老乐熟女国产| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| av在线亚洲专区| 亚洲精品视频女| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 青春草国产在线视频| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 永久免费av网站大全| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 久久久久性生活片| 国产在线男女| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 久久久国产一区二区| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| av线在线观看网站| 色综合色国产| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| av国产精品久久久久影院| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 国产69精品久久久久777片| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 日韩欧美 国产精品| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| www.av在线官网国产| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 久久久久精品久久久久真实原创| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 久久久色成人| 成年免费大片在线观看| 一级黄片播放器| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 内地一区二区视频在线| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 欧美性感艳星| 亚洲在线观看片| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 国产成人精品一,二区| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 欧美亚洲 丝袜 人妻 在线| 少妇被粗大猛烈的视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 大码成人一级视频| 少妇的逼好多水| 丰满乱子伦码专区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 一级毛片我不卡| 少妇 在线观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 五月开心婷婷网| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 亚洲图色成人| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 欧美性感艳星| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 岛国毛片在线播放| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲国产色片| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 九九在线视频观看精品| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产 精品1| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 97在线人人人人妻| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 美女高潮的动态| 看免费成人av毛片| 99热网站在线观看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| a级一级毛片免费在线观看| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| 久久久久久久精品精品| 精品一区在线观看国产| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 亚洲色图av天堂| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| av专区在线播放| 久久99精品国语久久久| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 又爽又黄a免费视频| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 欧美另类一区| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 特级一级黄色大片| 国产永久视频网站| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 直男gayav资源| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| kizo精华| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 欧美激情在线99| 国内精品宾馆在线| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 国产高清三级在线| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 免费看光身美女| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 久久99精品国语久久久| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产极品天堂在线| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 一级爰片在线观看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 日韩中字成人| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| 18+在线观看网站| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 精品午夜福利在线看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 夫妻午夜视频| 久久久久久久国产电影| 午夜福利高清视频| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 在线观看一区二区三区激情| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 国产美女午夜福利| 精品酒店卫生间| 一级a做视频免费观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 69人妻影院| 亚洲在线观看片| 深夜a级毛片| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 99久久精品热视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 99九九线精品视频在线观看视频| 男女那种视频在线观看| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 久久久久久伊人网av| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 午夜免费观看性视频| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 黄色一级大片看看| 精品一区在线观看国产| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 精品久久久精品久久久| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产永久视频网站| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 精品久久久久久电影网| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 97热精品久久久久久| 97超碰精品成人国产| 最近最新中文字幕免费大全7| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 99热网站在线观看| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 日本黄大片高清| 丝袜美腿在线中文| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 少妇丰满av| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 国产综合懂色| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| freevideosex欧美| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 内射极品少妇av片p| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 特大巨黑吊av在线直播| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 婷婷色综合www| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 人妻一区二区av| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 直男gayav资源| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 舔av片在线| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 内地一区二区视频在线| 日本色播在线视频| 韩国av在线不卡| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 精品久久久久久久末码| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产精品三级大全| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| eeuss影院久久| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 日韩欧美精品v在线| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 身体一侧抽搐| 日本一二三区视频观看| 国产老妇女一区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 久久久久久久久久成人| 欧美性猛交╳xxx乱大交人| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 99热这里只有是精品50| 中国三级夫妇交换| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 欧美bdsm另类| 久热久热在线精品观看| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 久久精品夜色国产| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 婷婷色综合www| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 免费看不卡的av| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| av国产免费在线观看| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 久久久久精品性色| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 春色校园在线视频观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| av免费在线看不卡| 三级国产精品片| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 亚洲内射少妇av| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 久久久久久久国产电影| 少妇高潮的动态图| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 黄色日韩在线| 国产亚洲最大av| 少妇的逼水好多| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 黑人高潮一二区| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| av线在线观看网站| av免费在线看不卡| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 成人国产av品久久久| 草草在线视频免费看| 亚洲久久久久久中文字幕| 少妇丰满av| 国产91av在线免费观看| 久久久成人免费电影| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 精品国产三级普通话版| av黄色大香蕉| 久久久久久久久大av| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| tube8黄色片| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 七月丁香在线播放| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日本一本二区三区精品| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 中国国产av一级| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| 亚洲最大成人av| 18+在线观看网站| 国产视频首页在线观看| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 欧美另类一区| 看黄色毛片网站| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 天天躁日日操中文字幕| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| videossex国产| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 久久久久九九精品影院| av在线蜜桃| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 中文欧美无线码| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 天堂网av新在线| 高清av免费在线| 成年女人在线观看亚洲视频 | 五月开心婷婷网| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 天堂中文最新版在线下载 | 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 国产男女超爽视频在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 男人舔奶头视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 久久久久久久国产电影| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频 | 天美传媒精品一区二区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 三级男女做爰猛烈吃奶摸视频| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 69人妻影院| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 欧美日本视频| av卡一久久| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 午夜爱爱视频在线播放| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 免费看不卡的av| 欧美激情在线99| 免费观看在线日韩| 日韩一区二区三区影片| 一区二区av电影网| 精品一区二区三卡| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 日本色播在线视频| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 在线观看三级黄色| 久久久欧美国产精品| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 成人国产麻豆网| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 久久久色成人| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 99久久人妻综合| 国产成人精品婷婷| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 国产精品成人在线| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 听说在线观看完整版免费高清| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 少妇 在线观看| 视频区图区小说| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 免费观看性生交大片5| av.在线天堂| 99热6这里只有精品| 26uuu在线亚洲综合色| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 亚洲成人一二三区av| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 欧美人与善性xxx| 婷婷色综合www| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 久久久久性生活片| 成人国产av品久久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 啦啦啦在线观看免费高清www| 高清视频免费观看一区二区| 毛片女人毛片| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 永久免费av网站大全| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 色哟哟·www| 黄色一级大片看看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 日本wwww免费看| 免费av观看视频| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 免费看a级黄色片| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 免费观看av网站的网址| 香蕉精品网在线| 国产成人福利小说| 黄色日韩在线| 青春草国产在线视频| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | av免费在线看不卡| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频 | 一级a做视频免费观看| 三级经典国产精品| 99热全是精品| 亚州av有码| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 视频区图区小说| 18+在线观看网站| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 日日啪夜夜撸| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 22中文网久久字幕| av在线app专区| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 1000部很黄的大片| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 成人特级av手机在线观看| 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 夫妻午夜视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产男女内射视频| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说 | 久久精品人妻少妇| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 99久久人妻综合| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 永久免费av网站大全| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 精品久久久久久久久av| .国产精品久久| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 97在线视频观看| av.在线天堂| 亚洲av不卡在线观看| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 色吧在线观看| 少妇高潮的动态图| 性色av一级| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级 |