• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after open repair of rotator cuff tears: a prospective cohort study

    2018-06-20 03:33:44JoelGalindoAvalosOscarMedinaPontazaJuanpezValenciaJuanManuelmezmezAvelinoColinzquezRubTorresGonzlez

    Joel Galindo-Avalos , Oscar Medina-Pontaza Juan López-Valencia Juan Manuel Gómez-Gómez Avelino Colin-VázquezRubén Torres-González

    1 Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, UMAE “Dr. Victorio de la Fuente Narváez” IMSS-UNAM. Ciudad de México, México

    2 Health Education and Research Division, UMAE “Dr. Victorio de la Fuente Narváez” IMSS, Delegación Gustavo A. Madero, México

    INTRODUCTION

    Background

    The incidence of shoulder pain in the general population is at around 11.2/1,000 patients per year, with rotator cuff tears being the most common cause of shoulder pain. The estimated incidence of rotator cuff tears is 3.7/100,000 cases per year with a higher peak at thefifth decade of life in men and at the sixth in women.1Rotator cuff tears have an impact on patient impairment and quality of life that is comparable to that of diabetes,myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure or depression.2

    Surgical treatment should be directed to decompressing and repairing the torn rotator cuff as best as possible.3Symptomatic patients typically describe pain with overhead tasks and pain with daily activities.4The diagnosis must be both clinical and radiographic; radiographic studies include ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthro-MRI.5,6

    Coefield and DeOrio classified rotator cuff tears depending on the size of the tear, dividing them into small (less than 1 cm), medium (1–3 cm), large (3–5 cm) and massive (more than 5 cm).6-8In 2006, Burkhart classified rotator cuff tears depending on its patterns: crescent-shaped, U-shaped, and massive, contracted, immobile tears.9

    In the United States, about 300,000 rotator cuff repair surgeries are performed annually. Surgery can be performed using open or arthroscopic approaches, but there has recently been a dramatic increase in the number of patients treated arthroscopically. Purported advantages of arthroscopy include rapid recovery and decreased morbidity, however, in the developing countries, the high price of the instruments and devices used for an arthroscopic approach makes it necessary to continue the traditional open repair of rotator cuff tears.4,8Since originally described by Neer in 1972, acromioplasties have become one of the most commonly performed procedures in orthopedic surgery. The most common indication for subacromial decompression remains subacromial impingement with or without a concomitant rotator cuff tear.10

    Functional outcomes after rotator cuff surgery are evaluated using a variety of instruments; however, the overall health status,or quality of life, after rotator cuff repair cannot be adequately assessed by these instruments. Despite the recognized importance of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment, few studies on HRQoL after rotator cuff repair have been reported.11In 2002, the a shortened form (12 items) of the Short Form 36 Health Survey version 2 (SF12v2) was published, a shorter version of the SF-36 questionnaire, one of the most widely used tools for assessing quality of life. The main strategy for the interpretation of these questionnaires is based on the use of reference population norms. These norms indicate a standard value that facilitates the interpretation of the questionnaire scores over those expected for their age group and sex.12

    The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES)Research Committee developed in 1994, a standard method for evaluating shoulder function.13In 2002, a modification to this scale was validated, which must befilled only by the patient, and it consists of 2 dimensions: pain and activities of daily living. The pain score and function composite score are weighted equally (50 points each) and combined for a total score out of a possible 100 points.14

    The ultimate goal in rotator cuff surgery is to improve patient-reported results including HRQoL, shoulder function and to restore cuff integrity. Worldwide, orthopedic surgeons prefer to treat rotator cuff tears arthroscopically, despite it being more expensive and having a higher learning curve than open repair, arguing that open repair is not as effective as arthroscopic repair. The goal of this paper is to prove that open repair could yield good functional results and improve a patient’s quality of life by applying two questionnaires including ASES scores and SF12v2 surveys, which has certain guiding significance in clinical orthopedics.

    SUBJECTS AND METHODS

    Patients

    One hundred and twenty patients (35 males and 85 females)aged 40 to 65 years, who were diagnosed with subacromial impingement associated with a rotator cuff tear and who were treated by open surgical repair in the period from February 2016 to April 2016, were included.

    Patients who did not sign informed consent and fall into the age range, and had previous glenohumeral dislocation, a previous neurological lesion of the shoulder or a previous surgery on the affected shoulder were excluded from the study. Patients who had a massive rotator cuff tear and surgery-related complications during the time of the study were removed from the study.

    Patients admitted to the Reconstructive Joint Surgery Department at our hospital who had a diagnosis of a rotator cuff tear and were scheduled for open subacromial decompression and tear repair, and who met the inclusion criteria were identified.

    Surgery

    Patients were brought to the operating room and wereplaced under general anesthesia and positioned in the beach-chair position. The shoulder was examined underanesthesia and then it was properly draped.

    The rotator cuff was exposed through a modified Robert’s approach to the acromioclavicular (AC) joint. A Mumford clavicle osteotomy was performed if there was any AC osteoarthrosis. The deltoid was split and dissected off the acromion and an anterior acromioplasty was performed as described by Neer.3The cuff was mobilized byfirst releasing subacromial adhesions and then transecting the coracohumeral ligament andfinally intra-articular adhesions as required.

    Strengths and limitations

    The cuff was then repaired in a tendon-tendon fashion using No. 5 nonabsorbable sutures. If necessary, a bone trough was then made at the footprint of the rotator cuff. No. 5 nonabsorbable sutures were placed in the rotator cuff, using a locking suture pattern, and then passed through the trough and tied over a bone bridge on the lateral humeral cortex.The incision was irrigated with saline to ensure proper hemostasis. The deltoid was reattached to the acromion using No. 3 nonabsorbable sutures. The incision was then closed with a standard technique.

    Size and pattern of the rotator cuff tear were assessed in a standardized fashion for all patients and classified according to the Coefield and Burkhart classifications respectively.7,9

    Postoperative treatment and follow-up

    After surgery, all patients were placed in a shoulder sling for 2 weeks and were referred for physical therapy, commencing 2 weeks after surgery, using a standardized protocol.

    During thefirst 6 weeks, only self-assisted ROM (excluding abduction) and pendular exercises of the shoulder were permitted. In addition, exercises emphasizing theisometric recruitment of scapular stabilization musculature were initiated. Active ROM exercises of the elbow, wrist, and hand were also performed.

    From 6 to 10 weeks postoperatively, active shoulder ROM and self-assisted stretching toward end range were added to the program. Scapular stabilization exercises were progressed, and closed chain strengthening exercises were added to the program.

    Questionnaire survey and data collection

    The day before the surgery, informed consent was signed by the patients, and preoperative SF12v212and ASES13surveys were applied by one of the authors. Shoulder function was categorized as excellent (88–100), good (75–87), regular(62–74), or bad (61 or less) depending on the ASES score.Data collected in the SF12v2 survey was analyzed using the QualityMetric Health Outcomes? Scoring Software 4.5(QualityMetric Inc., Lincoln, RI, USA). Results were categorized as above the norm, at the norm or under the norm in the physical component summary (PCS) and in the mental component summary (MCS).

    When the patients were discharged from the hospital, three follow-up surveys were performed at 3, 6 and 12 months after their surgery through a phone call.

    Statistical analysis

    Descriptive and inferential analyses were performed usingIBM? SPSS? Statistics 23.0 software (IBM, Armonk, NY,USA). The differences in the categorical variables (affected side, tear size and tear pattern, functional category and HRQoL category) were analyzed using the chi-square test. The differences in ASES and SF12v2 scores between preoperative and postoperative 3, 6 and 12 months follow-up were analyzed using the Student's t-test for paired samples. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

    RESULTS

    Patient’s entry study and follow-up

    In the evaluated period from February 1stto April 28th, 2016, a total of 204 subacromial decompression and rotator cuff repair procedures by an open technique were performed in patients diagnosed with subacromial impingement and rotator cuff tear;of the 204 patients, 55 were older than 65 years and 13 of them were younger than 40 years, so they were left out of the study.

    Informed consent was obtained from 136 patients and the preoperative ASES and SF12v2 surveys were applied. Thirteen of these patients had massive rotator cuff tears as a surgicalfinding, and 3 developed adhesive capsulitis as a postoperative complication, so they were removed from the study.

    Demographics

    From thefinal sample of 120 patients, we observed a majority of women, representing 70.8% (85 patients); and men representing 29.2% (35 patients), with a mean age of 54 years. The most affected side was the right side, the most common tear size was the small one, and the most common tear pattern was the crescent-shaped one (Table 1).

    Table 1: Surgical characteristics of all patients

    Functional outcomes

    As for shoulder function, we found that nearly 100% of patients had a bad shoulder function preoperatively. At the 3 months follow-up, 65% of patients had a bad shoulder function, 34.25% a fair one, and only 0.8% a good one. At the 6 months follow-up, 53.3% of the patients had a good shoulder function, 45.8% an excellent one, and only 0.8% a fair one.At thefinal follow-up 97.5% of the patients had an excellent shoulder function and only 2.5% had a good shoulder function.

    SF12v2 survey results

    As for HRQoL, the results from the SF12v2 survey were divided by the software into the PCS and the MCS; furthermore,the PCS was divided into four categories, which are physical functioning (PF), role physical (RP), bodily pain (BP) and general health (GH); the MCS was also divided into four categories, which are Vitality (VT), Social Functioning (SF),Role Emotional (RE) and Mental Health (MH); the results of the surveys are shown in Figure 1.

    Secondary analysis results

    When secondary analysis was performed, we found a statistically significant difference between the preoperative ASES score with the 6 and 12 months follow-up results (Table 2);between preoperative PCS with the 6 and 12 months follow-up;and between preoperative MCS with the 12 months follow-up(Table 3) (P < 0.05). We found no correlation between the Functional category with the HRQoL PCS and MCS category in any of the evaluated periods; we found no correlation between sex, affected side, tear size, and tear pattern with the Functional category or the HRQoL PCS and MCS category in any of the evaluated periods (Table 4) (P > 0.05).

    DISCUSSION

    The goal of rotator cuff surgery is to improve patient’s quality of life through pain reduction and improvement in shoulder function. The primary goal of our study was to determine the effectiveness of the open surgical technique in the aforementioned clinical outcomes, and our results are mostly consistent with those reported by the international literature.

    Zhaeentan et al.15conducted a retrospective study in which 73 patients, with a mean age of 59 years, similar to our study;who had a rotator cuff tear that was surgically repaired by an open technique were evaluated,finding that 87% of thepatients reported to be very satisfied with their result, with a follow-up time that ranged from 14 to 149 months.

    Goutallier et al.16conducted a retrospective study with a total of 30 patients with a rotator cuff tear that was repaired by an open technique, who had a mean age of 67 years, with an average follow-up time of 8.9 years. Patients were evaluated using the Constant scale, showing an initial mean score of 51.9 points, and afinal score of 76.8. They found no correlation between the score with the degree of fatty degeneration.Unlike our study, this one showed a better initial score, and a worsefinal score.

    Clavert et al.17conducted a retrospective evaluation of 24 patients with rotator cuff tear, of whom 14 were treated by a subacromial decompression, acromioplasty and open repair of the tear. They had a mean follow-up time of 8.2 years, with a mean preoperative constant score of 63.5 and 81.63 postoperative, withoutfinding a correlation between the age and gender with the Constant scores. As in our study, there was no correlation between age and gender with the functional outcome;unlike our study, the range between the scores was lower, the follow-up period was longer, and the sample was smaller.

    Papadopoulos et al.18evaluated the functional outcome of 27 shoulders with rotator cuff tear repaired by an open technique with the UCLA and Constant scales, with a mean follow-up of 40.2 months, reporting excellent results in 71% of the patients, good in 22% and regular in 7% of them using the UCLA scale; with the Constant scale, 67% of the patients had excellent results, 26% good and 7% regular. As in our study,no correlation was found between tear size and functional outcomes; however, our study reported excellent results in 97.5% of patients at 12 months.

    Figure 1: Preoperative (A) and postoperative 3- (B), 6-month (C), and 1-year (D) health-related quality of life scores.

    Table 2: ASES scores measured over time a

    Hanusch et al.19conducted a prospective study with a sample of 24 patients with large or massive rotator cuff tears, with a mean age of 60 years. Patients were evaluated using the Constant scale,finding a preoperative mean score of 36 points,and postoperative mean score of 68 points. Unlike our study,this study showed a lower functional outcome, however, our study did not evaluate massive rotator cuff tears, which is already reported as a risk factor for poor functional outcome.20

    Vastam?ki et al.21conducted a retrospective study in which 416 patients with a rotator cuff tear repaired by an open technique were evaluated over a 16-year period,finding that 88 patients developed a postoperative frozen shoulder that required a new intervention; this incidence is much higher than in our study, however, our follow-up time and sample size are lower, which may explain these differences.

    Table 4: Relationship beetween categorical variables

    Mejía-Salazar et al.22conducted a study comparing the functional outcomes obtained between open and arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears with a focus on supraspinatus tear.A total of 32 patients underwent open repair, with a majority of women, with a mean age of 61 years and a mean follow-up time of 68 weeks, as in our study, the right shoulder was the most affected. They found a better functional outcome in the arthroscopic group; however, the total scores for each group are not reported, making it impossible to compare with our study.

    Connelly et al.23conducted a retrospective study evaluating the quality of life and functional outcomes of patients with massive rotator cuff tears. The total sample consisted of 22 patients, predominantly male, with a mean age of 62.6 years and a mean follow-up time of 14 months. The Constant and Oxford scales were used to assess shoulder function,finding good results in 68% of the patients. The SF12 was used to assess quality of life,finding that in the physical and emotional component the patients were below the norm, but vitality and mental health were above the norm. Unlike our study,these authors reported a predominance of males, with lower functional and quality of life scores, which can be explained by the fact that they only studied massive rotator cuff tears,which were excluded from our study.

    Baysal et al.24conducted a cohort study similar to ours, with a sample of 88 patients, with a follow-up time of up to 5 years,to assess the quality of life and functional outcomes after open rotator cuff repair. In this study they used the ASES scale for functional evaluation (as well as our study), in addition to the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC). The mean age of the patients was 54 years. They found 35% of small tears, 42%medium tears and 11% large tears. Regarding the ASES scale, they found a mean preoperative score of 55.4, and 90.6 at 12 months,similar to our study. Regarding quality of life, 96% of the patients reported to be very satisfied or satisfied, while 3% reported to be fairly satisfied and 1% not satisfied. As in our study, no correlation was found between tear size with functional outcomes and quality of life. Unlike our study, all patients were submitted to the same rehabilitation protocol after surgery.

    Saraswat et al.20conducted a 10-year follow-up study of Baysal's cohort,24finding that, at 10 years, the functional outcome and health related quality of life remained similar,although some of the patients were lost at follow-up.

    CONCLUSION

    Open repair of rotator cuff tears remains a valid and effective option, despite the current trend of arthroscopic repair,obtaining satisfactory results at around 6 months after surgery.

    To our knowledge, this is thefirst study that seeks the correlation of the tear pattern with the functionality and the quality of life, although no correlation was found. We consider that the improvement of pain is the most important part for obtaining the results reported in this study. Finally,we also consider that there is an opportunity to perform a better study, in which open and arthroscopic repairs are compared, in which the repair method used (tendon-tendon,bone-tendon, and anchor use) is taken into consideration,and in which all patients are submitted to the same rehabilitation protocol after surgery.

    There are some limitations in this study. First, even though this paper proves that open repair of rotator cuff tears is a safe an effective treatment method, it does not prove open repair is better than an arthroscopic repair, to do that, large multicenter randomized clinical trials need to be performed,as well as cost-effectiveness studies. Second, like the fact that massive rotator cuff tears were not evaluated, and the follow-up period is only of one year. The surveys used could be considered a limitation as well, given the fact that they are subjective in nature, and HRQoL surveys are generic instead of joint-specific, which could bias the results.

    Author contributions

    JGA was responsible for the study design, analysis, and writing of the paper. OMP was responsible for study implementation. JLV, JMGG,and ACV were responsible for study implementation and data collection. RTG conducted statistical analysis. All authors approved thefinal version of the paper for publication.

    Conflicts of interest

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    Financial support

    This study was funded by Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, No.FIS/IMSS/PROT/EXORT/11/002. The funding source had no role in study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of data, writing or deciding to submit this paper for publication.

    Research ethics

    All procedures involving human participants in studies were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This paper was registered in the Ethics Committee platform at our hospital with the number R-2011-3401-43 CLIS 3401, and authorization number AA45-CCM-SCA. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

    Declaration of patient consent

    The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patients have given their consent for their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

    Data sharing statement

    Individual participant data (including data dictionaries) that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables,fi gures, and appendices) are available. Study Protocol, Analytic Code and Clinical Study Report are shared. The data become available at www.figshare.com immediately following publication with no end date for researchers who wishes to access the data.

    Plagiarism check

    Checked twice by iThenticate.

    Peer review

    Externally peer reviewed.

    Open access statement

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Shar eAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially,as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under identical terms.

    REFERENCES

    1. Clayton RA, Court-Brown CM. The epidemiology of musculoskeletal tendinous and ligamentous injuries. Injury. 2008;39:1338-1344.

    2. Piitulainen K, Ylinen J, Kautiainen H, H?kkinen A. The relationship between functional disability and health-related quality of life in patients with a rotator cuff tear. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:2071-2075.

    3. Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;54:41-50.

    4. Khan M, Simunovic N, Provencher M. Cochrane in CORR?: surgery for rotator cuff disease (review). Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:3263-2069.

    5. Holmes RE, Barfield WR, Woolf SK. Clinical evaluation of nonarthritic shoulder pain: Diagnosis and treatment. Phys Sportsmed. 2015;43:262-268.

    6. Whittle S, Buchbinder R. In the clinic. Rotator cuff disease. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:ITC1-15.

    7. Cofield RH. Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982;154:667-672.

    8. Karas V, Hussey K, Romeo AR, Verma N, Cole BJ, Mather RC. Comparison of subjective and objective outcomes after rotator cuff repair.Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2013;29:1755-1761.

    9. Burkhart SS, Lo IK. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14:333-346.

    10. Chahal J, Mall N, MacDonald PB, et al. The role of subacromial decompression in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Arthroscopy. 2012;28:720-727.

    11. Kolk A, Wolterbeek N, Auw Yang KG, Zijl JA, Wessel RN. Predictors of disease-specific quality of life after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Int Orthop. 2016;40:323-329.

    12. Schmidt S, Vilagut G, Garin O, et al. Reference guidelines for the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 based on the Catalan general population. Med Clin (Barc). 2012;139:613-625.

    13. Richards RR, An KN, Bigliani LU, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994;3:347-352.

    14. Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient selfreport section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2002;11:587-594.

    15. Zhaeentan S, Von Heijne A, Stark A, Hagert E, Salomonsson B. Similar results comparing early and late surgery in open repair of traumatic rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:3899-3906.

    16. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Radier C, Bernageau J, Zilber S. Long-term functional and structural outcome in patients with intact repairs 1 year after open transosseous rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2009;18:521-528.

    17. Clavert P, Le Coniat Y, Kempf JF, Walch G. Intratendinous rupture of the supraspinatus: anatomical and functional results of 24 operative cases. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2016;26:133-138.

    18. Papadopoulos P, Karataglis D, Boutsiadis A, Fotiadou A, Christoforidis J, Christodoulou A. Functional outcome and structural integrity following mini-open repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears: A 3-5 year follow-up study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2011;20:131-137.

    19. Hanusch BC, Goodchild L, Finn P, Rangan A. Large and massive tears of the rotator cuff: functional outcome and integrity of the repair after a mini-open procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:201-205.

    20. Saraswat MK, Styles-Tripp F, Beaupre LA, et al. Functional outcomes and health-related quality of life after surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears using a mini-open technique: A concise 10-year follow-up of a previous report. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2794-2799.

    21. Vastam?ki H, Vastam?ki M. Postoperative stiff shoulder after open rotator cuff repair: a 3- to 20-year follow-up study. Scand J Surg 2014;103:263-270.

    22. Mejía-Salazar CR, Sierra-Pérez M, Ruiz-Suárez M. Functional evaluation of the supraspinatus tendon repair comparing mini-open and open techniques. Acta Ortop Mex. 2016;30:191-195.

    23. Connelly TM, Shaw A, O’Grady P. Outcome of open massive rotator cuff repairs with double-row suture knotless anchors: case series. Int Orthop. 2015;39:1109-1114.

    24. Baysal D, Balyk R, Otto D, Luciak-Corea C, Beaupre L. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life after surgical repair of fullthickness rotator cuff tear using a mini-open technique. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1346-1355.

    天美传媒精品一区二区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 国产探花在线观看一区二区| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 91精品国产九色| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 一级黄片播放器| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 免费看a级黄色片| 一级毛片电影观看 | 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 久久久精品94久久精品| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o | av视频在线观看入口| 日本黄色片子视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区 | 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产精品国产高清国产av| 午夜福利在线在线| av免费观看日本| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| eeuss影院久久| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 亚洲精品成人久久久久久| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲av一区综合| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产在线一区二区三区精 | 国产综合懂色| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 国产单亲对白刺激| 午夜久久久久精精品| 看片在线看免费视频| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 在线a可以看的网站| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 精品人妻视频免费看| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 久久精品夜色国产| 成年av动漫网址| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 日韩国内少妇激情av| 久久久久久大精品| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 国产91av在线免费观看| 最近最新中文字幕大全电影3| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产免费一级a男人的天堂| 国产一区二区三区av在线| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 成人无遮挡网站| 麻豆av噜噜一区二区三区| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产精品野战在线观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 日本五十路高清| 色吧在线观看| 中文字幕熟女人妻在线| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 99热这里只有是精品50| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 在线观看一区二区三区| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 国产又黄又爽又无遮挡在线| 国产高潮美女av| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 禁无遮挡网站| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 女人久久www免费人成看片 | 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 国产在线男女| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 久久热精品热| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 综合色av麻豆| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 日韩视频在线欧美| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产黄a三级三级三级人| 久久久久网色| 别揉我奶头 嗯啊视频| 综合色丁香网| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 久久久国产成人免费| 亚洲不卡免费看| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 搞女人的毛片| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 全区人妻精品视频| www日本黄色视频网| 97在线视频观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 超碰97精品在线观看| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 3wmmmm亚洲av在线观看| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久电影网 | 国产精品伦人一区二区| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 观看免费一级毛片| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜 | 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 日本午夜av视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲无线观看免费| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 成人av在线播放网站| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 看黄色毛片网站| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 美女高潮的动态| 小说图片视频综合网站| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 免费黄网站久久成人精品| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 免费观看性生交大片5| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 永久免费av网站大全| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 高清在线视频一区二区三区 | 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 禁无遮挡网站| 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 午夜免费男女啪啪视频观看| 日韩欧美三级三区| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 日本免费在线观看一区| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲在线自拍视频| 热99在线观看视频| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 全区人妻精品视频| 亚洲av熟女| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 日本与韩国留学比较| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 一级爰片在线观看| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 简卡轻食公司| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 午夜日本视频在线| 一本一本综合久久| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 男人舔奶头视频| 嫩草影院入口| 色5月婷婷丁香| 国产精品,欧美在线| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 亚洲欧美精品专区久久| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 超碰97精品在线观看| 特级一级黄色大片| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 日韩中字成人| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 中文字幕制服av| 黄色配什么色好看| 国产精品无大码| 久久99热这里只频精品6学生 | 高清视频免费观看一区二区 | 国产成人91sexporn| 插阴视频在线观看视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 中文字幕制服av| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 男女视频在线观看网站免费| 久久久久久久久久成人| 久久久精品94久久精品| 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产不卡一卡二| 国产成人aa在线观看| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| av在线天堂中文字幕| 日本一本二区三区精品| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 91狼人影院| 精品午夜福利在线看| 人妻系列 视频| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合 | 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 三级国产精品片| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲av熟女| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 成人无遮挡网站| 搞女人的毛片| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 天堂av国产一区二区熟女人妻| 亚洲av.av天堂| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 午夜免费激情av| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 美女高潮的动态| 中文天堂在线官网| 久久久久网色| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 三级经典国产精品| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产成人精品婷婷| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 亚洲色图av天堂| 超碰av人人做人人爽久久| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 国产精品,欧美在线| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 成人性生交大片免费视频hd| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 尾随美女入室| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区 | 一级毛片我不卡| 黄色一级大片看看| 国产成人福利小说| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 在线a可以看的网站| 有码 亚洲区| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 特级一级黄色大片| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 国产成人一区二区在线| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 毛片女人毛片| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 男人和女人高潮做爰伦理| 中文字幕av在线有码专区| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 69人妻影院| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 精品一区二区三区人妻视频| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 99热精品在线国产| 日本色播在线视频| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 成人美女网站在线观看视频| 国产精品福利在线免费观看| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 观看免费一级毛片| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 色哟哟·www| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 在线观看美女被高潮喷水网站| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 日本午夜av视频| 亚洲综合精品二区| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看 | 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 狂野欧美白嫩少妇大欣赏| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 欧美性猛交黑人性爽| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 国产乱人视频| 国产精品久久久久久av不卡| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 亚洲美女视频黄频| 简卡轻食公司| 国产精品.久久久| 国产亚洲91精品色在线| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 永久免费av网站大全| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 中文资源天堂在线| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 热99re8久久精品国产| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 国产极品天堂在线| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频 | 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 日本熟妇午夜| 麻豆国产97在线/欧美| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 欧美又色又爽又黄视频| 春色校园在线视频观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产精品一及| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 日本熟妇午夜| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 国产三级在线视频| 亚洲av免费高清在线观看| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 三级毛片av免费| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 国产精品,欧美在线| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区 | 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 日韩高清综合在线| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产高清视频在线观看网站| 热99re8久久精品国产| 久久精品91蜜桃| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 国产成人一区二区在线| 美女黄网站色视频| 成人鲁丝片一二三区免费| 两个人的视频大全免费| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 国内少妇人妻偷人精品xxx网站| 97热精品久久久久久| 国产精品电影一区二区三区| 亚洲乱码一区二区免费版| 久久久色成人| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说 | 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 亚洲人成网站在线观看播放| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久 | 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 一级毛片电影观看 | 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 久久久久九九精品影院| 99久久九九国产精品国产免费| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久 | 只有这里有精品99| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 色噜噜av男人的天堂激情| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 1024手机看黄色片| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 一区二区三区高清视频在线| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 成人综合一区亚洲| 美女黄网站色视频| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 久久这里只有精品中国| 晚上一个人看的免费电影| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 久久6这里有精品| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 观看美女的网站| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 美女黄网站色视频| 日本三级黄在线观看| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 成年免费大片在线观看| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲av.av天堂| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 亚洲av日韩在线播放| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 美女cb高潮喷水在线观看| 九九在线视频观看精品| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 国产精华一区二区三区| 永久网站在线| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | av播播在线观看一区| 午夜免费激情av| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 卡戴珊不雅视频在线播放| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 国产欧美另类精品又又久久亚洲欧美| 99久久成人亚洲精品观看| www.色视频.com| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 亚洲综合色惰| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 国产乱人视频| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 日本免费一区二区三区高清不卡| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 桃色一区二区三区在线观看| 精品人妻视频免费看| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 黄片wwwwww| 国产久久久一区二区三区| 日日撸夜夜添| 国产色婷婷99| 丰满乱子伦码专区| 色5月婷婷丁香| 日本免费a在线| 亚洲欧美日韩东京热| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 一个人看的www免费观看视频| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 久久精品91蜜桃| 久久久久网色| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲欧洲国产日韩| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 男女那种视频在线观看| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 成年版毛片免费区| 一级毛片我不卡| 国内精品美女久久久久久| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 99热6这里只有精品| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 极品教师在线视频| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 国产成人精品一,二区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 大香蕉久久网| 春色校园在线视频观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 日本黄色片子视频| 男人舔女人下体高潮全视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 床上黄色一级片| 日韩成人伦理影院| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 久久午夜福利片| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 亚洲欧美日韩高清专用| 又粗又爽又猛毛片免费看| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产不卡一卡二| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 国产一区二区亚洲精品在线观看| 国产午夜精品论理片| 久久韩国三级中文字幕| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 色尼玛亚洲综合影院| 亚洲国产欧洲综合997久久,| 日韩欧美在线乱码| 欧美激情在线99| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 99久久人妻综合| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 亚洲五月天丁香| 男的添女的下面高潮视频| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 七月丁香在线播放| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 免费观看性生交大片5| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 久久久久性生活片| 国产不卡一卡二| 又黄又爽又刺激的免费视频.| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲在久久综合|