• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    effects of dietary supplementation of Ulva pertusa and nonstarch polysaccharide enzymes on gut microbiota of Siganus canaliculatus*

    2018-05-07 06:07:36ZHANGXinxu張新旭WUHuijuan吳惠娟LIZhongzhen李忠貞LIYuanyou李遠(yuǎn)友WANGShuqi王樹啟ZHUDashi朱大世WENXiaobo溫小波LIShengkang李升康
    Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 2018年2期
    關(guān)鍵詞:忠貞

    ZHANG Xinxu (張新旭) WU Huijuan (吳惠娟) LI Zhongzhen (李忠貞) LI Yuanyou (李遠(yuǎn)友) WANG Shuqi (王樹啟) ZHU Dashi (朱大世) WEN Xiaobo (溫小波) LI Shengkang (李升康)

    1 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China

    2 Marine Biology Institute, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China

    1 INTRODUCTION

    Siganuscanaliculatusis a commercially important aquaculture fish which mainly inhabits the coast of southeast China (Xu et al., 2011). Owing to its tender meat and rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids (Li et al.,2008), growing demands in aquaculture industry have encouraged wide cultivation ofS.canaliculatus. In general, the cost of feed constitutes >50% of the total cost in farming, in which animal-derived materials(e.g., fish meal) are often the most expensive. Despite the fact thatS.canaliculatusis herbivorous and mainly feed on algae and seagrasses in natural habitats(von Westernhagen, 1973), fish meal has a superior effect on fish growth due to its high protein content and favorable amino acid profile (Sinha et al., 2011).As some plant-derived materials (e.g., soybean meal,legume seeds, and seaweeds) contain high quality and energy rich nutrient sources, they are commonly used as important ingredients in aquaculture, which help reducing the cost significantly. Our previous studies have determined the basic nutritional requirements ofS.canaliculatus(Wang et al., 2010), and demonstrated that macroalgaeUlvapertusais a preferred food for this herbivorous species (You et al., 2014a, b). Dietary supplementation ofU.pertusapowder is thus a promising way to cut down the cost without influencing fish growth and quality (Tolentino-Pablico et al., 2008; Güroy et al., 2013).

    However, an important problem that hinders the application of plant-derived materials is the presence of abundant non-starch polysaccharides (NSPs, the major component of plant cell wall) that are indigestible for fish and other monogastric animals for lack of specific enzymes (Kuz’mina, 1996), and studies have suggested negative effects of NSPs on digestion and absorption of energy and nutrients in a few fish species (Refstie et al., 1999; Storebakken et al., 1999; Allan et al., 2000). The addition of exogenous NSP-degrading enzymes (e.g., cellulase,xylanase, and β-glucanase) in plant-derived sources is an economical approach to solve this problem, and numerous reports have revealed their effects on improving nutrient utilization in fish (Kumar et al.,2006; Ai et al., 2007), possibly through disrupting cell wall integrity, reducing digesta viscosity, and/or stimulating gastrointestinal microbiota (Sinha et al.,2011).

    Fishes represent the highest diversity of vertebrates,and the gastrointestinal tract of fish harbors diverse microbial communities (including adhesive microorganisms and non-adhesive ones) that are involved in digestion and immune responses, and contribute to host nutrition and health (Rawls et al.,2004; Gómez and Balcázar, 2008). A recent study showed that Proteobacteria and Fusobacteria dominated the microbial communities in the gut of zebrafish (Roeselers et al., 2011). Proteobacteria,Firmicutes and Actinobacteria prevailed in Grass carp intestine (Wu et al., 2012). Cyanobacteria,Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were predominant groups in Silver carp and Gizzard shad (Ye et al., 2014). Firmicutes were detected to be dominant species in the hindgut of three temperate marine herbivorous fishes (Clements et al., 2007).Notably, host diet is known to have a strong influence on indigenous microorganisms that inhabit the gastrointestinal tract (David et al., 2014; Ye et al.,2014), and the composition and diversity of microbial communities is partly determined by dietary preferences (Ley et al., 2008). For herbivorous fishes,diets with abundant NSPs may alter gut microbiota by enhancing volatile fatty acids, lowering pH of intestinal tract, or decreasing oxygen tension (Sinha et al., 2011). Some gut microorganisms, for example,convert indigestible algal components (e.g., cellulose and mannitol) to glucose and short-chain fatty acids that can be assimilated directly by herbivorous fishes(White et al., 2010; Wu et al., 2012). Microbial fermentation of high-starch foods such as cereal grains may also stimulate fatty acid uptake in the gut(Van Soest, 1994; Leenhouwers et al., 2007).

    Despite the importance ofS.canaliculatusin aquaculture industry, the microbial communities in its gut is still unknown. This study aims to characterize the gastrointestinal microbial community compositions ofS.canaliculatusthrough three culture-independent methods based on analysis of the bacterial 16S rRNA genes, including denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE), clone library construction, and high-throughput sequencing. This would facilitate an overview of the total gut microbiota inS.canaliculatus. The influence of dietary supplementation of macroalgaeU.pertusaand NSP enzymes on gut microbiota was further assayed to better understand its core gut microbiota, and to identify potential NSP-degrading microorganisms.

    2 MATERIAL AND METHOD

    2.1 Ethics statement

    Fish used in this study were captured from the coastal area near Nan’Ao Marine Biology Station(NAMBS) of Shantou University, Guangdong Province, China. No specific permits were required for the described field studies, as the sampling locations were not privately owned or protected in any way. Furthermore these field studies did not involve endangered or protected species. The animals were processed according to “the Regulations for the Administration of Affairs Concerning Experimental Animals” established by Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology on the Use and Care of Animals, and the experiments were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shantou University.

    2.2 Fish sampling and feeding conditions

    S.canaliculatusjuveniles (~15 g) were captured from the coastal area near NAMBS of Shantou University, and were acclimated for 3 weeks with self-prepared feeds. These fish were randomly reared in eighteen 200-L cylindrical tanks (13 fish per tank)equipped with a continuous recirculating seawater system. Group A was fed basal diet (Table S1); Group M was fed basal diet supplemented with 10 wt%U.pertusapowder (collected from the coastal waters near NAMBS) and 0.2 wt% NSP enzymes (90 U/g cellulase, 60 U/g xylanase and 120 U/g β-glucanase(Li et al., 2013)); Group Z was fed basal diet supplemented with 10 wt%U.pertusapowder only.Each treatment was conducted in triplicate tanks. The water temperature was maintained at 22±0.5°C with constant aeration and natural photoperiod. The water salinity was 32. Every day, the fish were fed to apparent satiation at 08:30 and 16:30, respectively;half of the aquarium water was replaced, and the faeces was removed. Detailed information had been described previously (You et al., 2014b). After 8 weeks, three healthy fish with a weight of ~43 g from each group were euthanized, and the whole intestinal tracts with gut contents were immediately removed with a sterile tweeze and clamped to prevent loss of samples. The gut contents were gently squeezed out into eppendorf tubes and stored at -80°C before DNA extraction.

    2.3 DNA extraction, 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing

    Nucleic acid of the gut contents was extracted using the FastDNA? SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Three parallel extractions were performed for each sample, and the DNA extracts were pooled for subsequent PCR amplification to minimize the biases and contamination. The DNA blank extraction was performed without a sample and processed with the same DNA extraction and PCR amplification kits as the experimental groups. DNA extraction and PCR amplification were considered free of contamination if no target PCR band was seen on an agarose gel from the blank DNA extraction and the PCR negative control.

    PCR-DGGE and clone library construction of the extracted DNA samples were performed as described previously (Li et al., 2012). Briefly, a ~180 bp (V3 region) and a ~1 500-bp (near full-length) of the 16S rRNA genes, were amplified for PCR-DGGE analysis and clone library construction, respectively. Three parallel PCR amplifications were performed for each sample and pooled for subsequent sequencing. For PCR-DGGE, the extracted DNA from the intestines of three fish in each group were analyzed separately.However, above DNA extracts were pooled for subsequent PCR amplification for clone library and Illumina sequencing due to limited availability.

    For Illumina sequencing, the V6 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the multi-tag primers 967F and 1046R, and ~60 bp amplicons were generated. The PCR program involved an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 2 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 57°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 5 min.Three parallel PCR amplifications were performed for each sample and pooled for subsequent sequencing.The 16S rRNA gene amplicons containing unique 8-mer barcodes used for each sample were pooled at equal concentrations, and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq2000 platform using 2×100 bp cycles according to manufacturer’s instructions. Raw reads were removed if they contained (1) a ≥ 10 bp poly sequence,(2) more than 2 bp with the quality score less than 20,and/or (3) any ambiguities. Filtered reads were merged together, and the merged sequences were removed if the sequence length was <50 bp. Clean sequences were demultiplexed using the QIIME software pipeline (Caporaso et al., 2010b; Version 1.9.0) with a mapping file containing the sample ID,barcode and primer sequence.

    The near full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences have been deposited to GenBank with the accession numbers from HG970977 to HG971024. The Illumina sequence data have been deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI)Sequence Read Archive under the accession number SRA148879 (A: SRR1203925, M: SRR1206016, Z:SRR1206017). The PCR primers are listed in Table S2.

    2.4 Bacterial community composition and phylogenetic analysis

    PCR-DGGE and clone library analysis were performed as described previously (Li et al., 2012).Statistical significance between groups in Table 1 were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test (SPSS 22.0). For Illumina sequencing data, the sequences were aligned with PyNAST (Caporaso et al., 2010a;Version 1.2.2) and clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) at 97% sequence similarity cutoff using usearch61 (Edgar, 2010) with the parameter --minlen=50 in the QIIME software pipeline (Caporaso et al., 2010b; Version 1.9.0).OTUs were assigned to taxa based on the Greengenes database (DeSantis et al., 2006; Version gg_13_5).Chimeric sequences were detected with the UCHIME program (Edgar et al., 2011; Version 4.2) using default parameters, and they were removed from further analysis. For the Venn diagram, sequences were rarefied to an even depth (5 785 029 reads) by random sampling using QIIME. The Venn diagram wascreated with a web tool provided by the Bioinformatics and Systems Biology of Gent (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/Venn/). The ternary plot was performed using the PAST software package (Hammeret al., 2001; Version 3.06). Cluster analysis of the microbial community structure was performed inRbased on a Bray-Curtis matrix using average linkage(R Core Team, 2015; Version 3.2.0). In this study,bacterial community composition analysis was mainly based on Illumina sequencing data. The phylogenetic tree was constructed in QIIME using the FastTree method, and the Shimodaira-Hasegawa test was used to estimate the reliability of each branch with 1 000 resamples (Price et al., 2010; Version 2.1.3).

    Table 1 Microbial diversity indices calculated from the DGGE banding patterns

    Fig.1 The denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles of the intestinal microbiota in S. canaliculatus from different groups

    Fig.2 Cluster analysis of the bacterial communities in the intestine of S. canaliculatus based on DGGE profiles

    Table 2 Comparison of coverage and diversity indices of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries

    3 RESULT

    3.1 Microbial diversity analysis based on DGGE and 16S rRNA gene clone library

    Approximately 23 DGGE bands with distinct patterns were observed in samples from different treatments (Fig.1; Table 1). Cluster analysis of the DGGE band patterns showed that samples from each dietary supplementation treatment grouped together(Fig.2), suggesting that bacterial community structures varied in the intestine ofS.canaliculatuswith different treatments.

    Fig.3 Bacterial community compositions of the three groups by two sequencing methods

    Fig.4 Alpha-diversity analysis of three samples with different treatments based on Illumina data

    To investigate the phylogenetic diversity of the intestinal microbial communities, three clone libraries of the 16S rRNA gene from Groups A, M and Z were constructed. In total, 190, 158 and 192 clones with the estimated overall coverage of 81.1%, 85.4% and 88.0% were retrieved from the colony libraries of A,M and Z, respectively (Table 2). Highest sequence population diversity occurred in A as calculated by Shannon diversity index (H), followed by M and Z(Table 2). Forty-three unique sequences were eventually obtained after a filtering procedure removing highly identical sequences with a criteria of 97% sequence similarity cutoff (Table S3). The identified taxa for each clone library generally grouped into six phyla, i.e., Proteobacteria, Firmicutes,Tenericutes, Bacteroidetes, Fusobacteria and Deferribacteres (Fig.3). Firmicutes and Tenericutes dominated the bacterial community across different treatments, constituting 33.5% to 43.7% of the total sequenced clones. Phylogenetic analysis of the near full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences from the three groups showed that highest species diversity occurred in Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria (Fig.S1). Blastn (Altschul et al., 1990) searches of the cloned sequences against GenBank database revealed that >80% of the clones had <97% sequence similarity with known type species (Table S3), indicating that unique bacterial communities inhabit the gut ofS.canaliculatus.

    3.2 Microbial community compositions based on Illumina sequencing

    The number of high quality bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained by high-throughput sequencing were between 5 785 029 and 5 881 813,resulting in more than 9 654 OTUs at 97% sequence similarity (Table 3). Alpha-diversity analysis showed that the rarefaction curves for all of the samples did not plateau at this sequencing depth (Fig.4a), but the Shannon Diversity indices were stable (Fig.4b). This indicated that major bacterial communities had largely been covered, although rare new phylotypes could still appear upon further sequencing.

    Fig.5 A Venn diagram showing the distribution of shared bacterial groups based on Illumina data

    Table 3 Number of high quality bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences obtained by Illumina sequencing

    Similar bacterial groups among the communities of Groups A, M and Z were observed as determined by Venn diagram (Fig.5). The number of overlapping groups were 29 at phylum level (89 at class level),and their relative abundances covered more than 99.9% of the total bacterial community in each sample(Table S4). Most of the bacterial groups were shared by A and M, and they almost had a complete coverage over those in Z (Fig.5). In general, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes dominated the bacterial community,although their relative abundances varied in different samples (Fig.3). For example, Proteobacteria-related sequences constituted more than 62.9% of the total communities in A and M, but their relative abundance was only 24.6% in Z.

    Fig.6 Ternary plot for bacterial groups (phylum level) of the three samples based on Illumina data

    Ternary plot further showed that bacterial groups including Proteobacteria, Tenericutes, Deinococcus-Thermus, Spirochaetes, WWE1 and NKB19 were evenly distributed in at least two of the samples(Fig.6), indicating their potential importance as an integral component of the gut inS.canaliculatus.Notably, major bacterial groups (relative abundance>1%) including Firmicutes (63.6%), Bacteroidetes(2.9%) and Fusobacteria (1.3%) were relatively enriched in Group Z. Cyanobacteria was enriched in Group M (5.9% in M, 0.6% in A, and 0.02% in Z).Various minor groups with relative abundance <1%(e.g., Actinobacteria, Acidobacteria and Planctomycetes) were enriched in A (Fig.6; Table S5).Cluster analysis revealed that Groups A and M grouped together based on a Bray-Curtis matrix(Fig.7), which was consistent with the DGGE profiles(Fig.2). Notably,RuminococcusandLactobacillusrelated sequences were relatively abundant in Groups M (6.7%, 0.07%) and Z (11.8%, 0.05%), compared to those in Group A (0.8%, 0.01%); Group A was enriched with Enterobacteriaceae,Actinomyces,Vibrio,StreptococcusandLeuconostoc.ClostridiumandBacillushad higher abundances in Group M(0.9%, 0.05%).Enterococcuswas highest in Group Z(0.007%).

    Fig.7 The relative abundances of potential NSP-degrading bacteria in the three samples based on Illumina data

    Table S6 showed relative abundances of some major OTUs observed in the three samples. In general,distinct distribution of some abundant OTUs was detected in Group Z as compared to Groups A and M.Notably, OTU0 (Vibrionaceae) was highly abundant in Groups A and M, constituting 48.4% and 36.1% of the total sequences, respectively; it was only 1.2% in Group Z. Group Z was enriched with OTU4(Coprobacillus), OTU10 (Caloramator), OTU14(Erysipelotrichaceae), OTU21 (Ruminococcus) and OTU26 (Arcobacter), indicating their importance as candidateU.pertusadegraders.

    4 DISCUSSION

    Investigations of the microbial community compositions inhabiting the gut of any host is an important step towards understanding the roles of microorganisms in digestion, immune responses, and host health (Flint et al., 2008; Pérez-Sánchez et al.,2014), and studies on fish gut microbiota have been reported recently (Roeselers et al., 2011; Sullam et al., 2012; Ye et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2016). Similar bacterial species were observed in the intestines of individualS.canaliculatusregardless of different diet ingredients, which were classified into the core microbiota of 86 OTUs with >93% relative abundance in each sample (Table S6). The reason for the high portions of the shared core gut microbiota is unknown due to the limit of this study. We speculate that early colonization events (e.g., live microorganisms from spawn surface, forage, and water) are key factors to determine the gut microbiota (Wong et al., 2013).Previous reports suggested that the intestinal microbial communities in fishes and mammals collected from different populations or habitats, had few shared sequences even though they were from the same host species (Roeselers et al., 2011; Durbán et al., 2012;Shade and Handelsman, 2012; Sullam et al., 2012).Fish performance and proximate composition showed that similar performance occurred for each diet,although the groups withU.pertusaamendment(Groups M and Z) had lower feed conversion ratios than that fed a basal diet (Group A) (Table S7; You et al., 2014b). This indicated that the shared core microbiota was functional resilient and could utilize these substrates through multiple pathways, which further support our previous findings thatU.pertusais an excellent economic alternative to soybean meal and wheat starch as carbon sources (Wang et al.,2010; Zhang, 2012; You et al., 2014a, b).

    Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were predominant bacterial groups in each sample based on the Illumina sequencing data (Fig.3). This result was consistent with previous reports about the gut microbial communities in grass carp (Wu et al., 2012), rainbow trout (Wong et al., 2013), zebrafish (Roeselers et al.,2011) and many other fishes (Nayak, 2010; Sullam et al., 2012), indicating that members of these bacterial groups are essential and well adapted to intestinal environments in fish. Higher abundances of Proteobacteria were observed in Groups A and M(72.3% and 62.9%, respectively) than those in Group Z (24.6%); Group Z was relatively enriched with Firmicutes (63.6%, compared to 17.0%–23.2% in Groups A and M). A possible explanation is that the Proteobacterial and Firmicutes groups identified in this study are sensitive to some nutrients from the untreatedU.pertusapowder. For example, macroalgaeU.pertusacontains significant amounts of NSPs that are indigestible for fish. The supplementation ofU.pertusaalone in Group Z resulted in obvious enrichment of Firmicutes, indicating that these bacterial groups are functional related to NSP degradation. Previous reports demonstrated that many species in Firmicutes are NSP-degrading bacteria(Pankratov et al., 2006; Flint et al., 2008). As discussed above, similar bacterial community compositions occurred in Groups A and M (Fig.3), which was also confirmed by cluster analysis (Fig.2). This is possibly because NSP-degrading enzymes in diet Group M were able to break up some indigestible NSPs into liable compounds, and the overall ingredients and compositions in Group M were similar with those in Group A. Notably, highest relative abundance of Cyanobacteria was observed in Group M (Fig.3),indicating that they were likely from theU.pertusaand were ingested as an important food source (Wu et al., 2012; Ye et al., 2014).

    We did not tend to determine the types, functions and activities of the potential NSP-degrading bacteria and probiotics in the gut ofS.canaliculatus, but we performed a comprehensive analysis of these bacterial lineages in the three diet groups. The NSP-degrading bacteria identified in the gut of fish and other vertebrates, includingClostridium,Actinomyces,Ruminococcusand Enterobacteriaceae, were reported to produce NSP-degrading enzymes such as cellulase,xylanase, pectinase and/or β-glucanase (Almirall et al., 1995; O’Connell et al., 2005; Saha et al., 2006; Ye et al., 2014). Various bacterial populations with the potential to degrade NSPs were identified in the three groups (Fig.7). The relative enrichment ofRuminococcus,Clostridiumand Lachnospiraceae in Group M and/or Z suggests that they likely participate in the degradation of the indigestible NSPs fromU.pertusa. For example, seven OTUs (OTU7, OTU21,OTU29, OTU36, OTU65, OTU66 and OTU94; Table S6) that assigned toRuminococcuswere the major NSP-degrading bacterial lineages, constituting up to 11.8% of the total bacterial community inU.pertusaamendment groups.Ruminococcusspp. have been reported to facilitate the host to degrade fibrous plant materials in the rumen (Sijpesteijn, 1951; Kong et al.,2010). SomeClostridiumspecies are known cellulosedegrading bacteria (Kato et al., 2004). An increased abundance of Lachnospiraceae-related species is reported in the human gut on a high NSPs diet (Salonen et al., 2014). Other potential NSP-degrading bacteria identified in this study includedActinomyces,Bacteroides,Anoxybacillus,Enterococcus,Leuconostoc,Anaerococcus,VibrioandBacillus. For the potential probiotics in the intestine ofS.canaliculatus, thirteen lineages were observed(Fig.7). For example, the lactic acid bacteria,includingLactobacillus,Streptococcus,LactococcusandBifidobacterium, could produce bacteriocins that inhibit the growth of certain pathogenic bacteria.Some species that belong toPseudomonas,Phaeobacter,MicrococcusandKocuriahave been reported to stimulate immune response and enhance resistance to some pathogenicAeromonasspp. andVibriospp. (as summarized by Pérez-Sánchez et al.,(2014)).Agrobacterium,Brevibacterium,MicrobacteriumandStaphylococcuscould contribute to nutritional process by improving the absorption efficiency of lipids (Ring? et al., 1995). Altogether,identification of these potential NSP-degrading bacteria and probiotics inhabiting the intestine ofS.canaliculatusprovides clues to study their functions and applications in aquaculture industry.

    In addition, OTU2 and OTU5 that assigned to Desulfovibrionaceae of Deltaproteobacteria were among the top-ten most abundant OTUs in Groups M and Z, which is approximately four-folds higher than that in Group A (Table S6). Many species in this family such asDesulfovibrioare known anaerobic sulfate reducers. A possible explanation for the enrichment of Desulfovibrionaceae in Groups M and Z is the indigestible NSPs fromU.pertusaincreased the residence time of digesta and decreased oxygen tension in the intestine, thus favoring the development of anaerobic microorganisms such as sulfate reducers(Choct, 1997; Sinha et al., 2011). These sulfate reducers have been reported to utilize short-chain fatty acids (e.g. lactate) to produce hydrogen sulfide(Heidelberg et al., 2004), which is generally a toxic product to the host (Attene-Ramos et al., 2006). This result indicated that supplementation ofU.pertusamight lead to growth of sulfate reducers that were harmful to the host.

    One thing should be noted is the Illumina sequencing data and clone library analysis resulted in varied intestinal bacterial diversity ofS.canaliculatusin each diet (Fig.3). We attribute this to the bias caused by PCR primers. different primers may occasionally amplify specific groups and lead to biased community compositions as has been reported previously (Teske and S?rensen, 2008; Pinto and Raskin, 2012; Cruaud et al., 2014). Another possibility is that varied number of 16S rRNA gene copies occur in different microbial cells (Větrovsky and Baldrian,2013), which would also influence the 16S rRNA gene abundance in the samples. In this study, the Illumina sequencing data (>5,785,029 reads; Table 3)had much higher overall coverage of the total 16S rRNA genes in the community than those using the clone library construction technique (<192 clones;Table 2), so description and comparison of the bacterial community compositions were only performed by using the Illumina sequencing data. The clone library data were mainly used for investigating the phylogenic diversity of the three samples due to the recovery of near full-length 16S rRNA genes.Nevertheless, our results showed consistent observation of some bacterial groups in each sample,including Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Tenericutes,Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria, indicating that they were “true” representation of the gut microbiota inS.canaliculatus.

    5 CONCLUSION

    In summary, this study provides the first insight into the bacterial community compositions in the intestine of theS.canaliculatus. A core gut microbiota dominated by Proteobacteria and Firmicutes was observed in fish fed three different diets with/without the supplementation ofU.pertusaand NSP enzymes.Higher abundances ofRuminococcus,Clostridiumand Lachnospiraceae-related sequences of Firmicutes were detected in fish fedU.pertusa, indicating that these microorganisms likely participate in the degradation of NSPs derived fromU.pertusa.Meanwhile, diverse potential NSP-degrading bacteria and probiotics were observed in the intestine of theS.canaliculatus. This study supports our previous conclusion thatU.pertusais an economic alternative to soybean meal and wheat starch as carbon sources.Future research on the gut microbiota ofS.canaliculatus, including isolation and characterization of NSP-degrading bacteria and probiotics, may help the production ofS.canaliculatuswith lower costs without compromising quality.

    6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

    We thank Prof. WEI Chiju of Shantou University for critical discussion and proof-reading of the manuscript.

    Ai Q H, Mai K S, Zhang W B, Xu W, Tan B P, Zhang C X, Li H T. 2007. effects of exogenous enzymes (phytase, nonstarch polysaccharide enzyme) in diets on growth, feed utilization, nitrogen and phosphorus excretion of Japanese seabass,Lateolabraxjaponicus.Comp.Biochem.Physiol.AMol.Integr.Physiol.,147(2): 502-508.

    Allan G L, Parkinson S, Booth M A, Stone D A J, Rowland S J, Frances J, Warner-Smith R. 2000. Replacement of fish meal in diets for Australian silver perch,Bidyanus bidyanus: I. Digestibility of alternative ingredients.Aquaculture,186(3-4): 293-310.

    Almirall M, Francesch M, Perez-Vendrell A M, Brufau J,Esteve-Garcia E. 1995. The differences in intestinal viscosity produced by barley and β-glucanase alter digesta enzyme activities and ileal nutrient digestibilities more in broiler chicks than in cocks.J.Nutr.,125(4): 947-955.

    Altschul S F, Gish W, Miller W, Myers E W, Lipman D J. 1990.Basic local alignment search tool.J.Mol.Biol.,215(3):403-410.

    Attene-Ramos M S, Wagner E D, Plewa M J, Gaskins H R.2006. Evidence that hydrogen sulfide is a genotoxic agent.Mol.CancerRes.,4(1): 9-14.

    Caporaso J G, Bittinger K, Bushman F D, DeSantis T Z,Andersen G L, Knight R. 2010a. PyNAST: a flexible tool for aligning sequences to a template alignment.Bioinformatics,26(2): 266-267.

    Caporaso J G, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K,Bushman F D, Costello E K, Fierer N, Pe?a A G, Goodrich J K, Gordon J I, Huttley G A, Kelley S T, Knights D,Koenig J E, Ley R E, Lozupone C A, McDonald D,Muegge B D, Pirrung M, Reeder J, Sevinsky J R,Turnbaugh P J, Walters W A, Widmann J, Yatsunenko T,Zaneveld J, Knight R. 2010b. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data.Nat.Methods,7(5): 335-336.

    Choct M. 1997. Feed non-starch polysaccharides: chemical structures and nutritional significance.FeedMillingInt.,(June): 13-26.

    Clements K D, Pasch I B Y, Moran D, Turner S J. 2007.Clostridia dominate 16S rRNA gene libraries prepared from the hindgut of temperate marine herbivorous fishes.Mar.Biol.,150(6): 1 431-1 440.

    Cruaud P, Vigneron A, Lucchetti-Miganeh C, Ciron P E,Godfroy A, Cambon-Bonavita M A. 2014. Influence of DNA extraction method, 16S rRNA targeted hypervariable regions, and sample origin on microbial diversity detected by 454 pyrosequencing in marine chemosynthetic ecosystems.Appl.Environ.Microbiol.,80(15): 4 626-4 639.

    David L A, Maurice C F, Carmody R N, Gootenberg D B,Button J E, Wolfe B E, Ling A V, Devlin A S, Varma Y,Fischbach M A, Biddinger S B, Dutton R J, Turnbaugh P J. 2014. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome.Nature,505(7484): 559-563.

    DeSantis T Z, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie E L,Keller K, Huber T, Dalevi D, Hu P, Andersen G L. 2006.Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB.Appl.Environ.Microbiol.,72(7): 5 069-5 072.

    Durbán A, Abellán J J, Jiménez-Hernández N, Latorre A,Moya A. 2012. Daily follow-up of bacterial communities in the human gut reveals stable composition and hostspecific patterns of interaction.FEMSMicrobiol.Ecol.,81(2): 427-437.

    Edgar R C, Haas B J, Clemente J C, Quince C, Knight R. 2011.UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection.Bioinformatics,27(16): 2 194-2 200.

    Edgar R C. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST.Bioinformatics,26(19): 2 460-2 461.

    Flint H J, Bayer E A, Rincon M T, Lamed R, White B A. 2008.Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis.Nat.Rev.Microbiol.,6(2): 121-131.

    Gómez G D, Balcázar J L. 2008. A review on the interactions between gut microbiota and innate immunity of fish.FEMSImmunol.Med.Microbiol.,52(2): 145-154.

    Güroy B, Ergün S, Merrifield D L, Güroy D. 2013. effect of autoclaved Ulva meal on growth performance, nutrient utilization and fatty acid profile of rainbow trout,Oncorhynchusmykiss.Aquacult.Int.,21(3): 605-615.

    Hammer O, Harper D A T, Ryan P. 2001. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis.PalaeontologiaElectronica,4(1): 1-9.

    Heidelberg J F, Seshadri R, Haveman S A, Hemme C L,Paulsen I T, Kolonay J F, Eisen J A, Ward N, Methe B,Brinkac L M, Daugherty S C, Deboy R T, Dodson R J,Durkin A S, Madupu R, Nelson W C, Sullivan S A, Fouts D, Haft D H, Selengut J, Peterson J D, Davidsen T M,Zafar N, Zhou L W, Radune D, Dimitrov G, Hance M,Tran K, Khouri H, Gill J, Utterback T R, Feldblyum T V,Wall J D, Voordouw G, Fraser C M. 2004. The genome sequence of the anaerobic, sulfate-reducing bacteriumDesulfovibriovulgarisHildenborough.Nat.Biotechnol.,22(5): 554-559.

    Kato S, Haruta S, Cui Z J, Ishii M, Yokota A, Igarashi Y. 2004.Clostridiumstraminisolvenssp. nov., a moderately thermophilic, aerotolerant and cellulolytic bacterium isolated from a cellulose-degrading bacterial community.Int.J.Syst.Evol.Microbiol.,54(6): 2 043-2 047.

    Kong Y H, Teather R, Forster R. 2010. Composition, spatial distribution, and diversity of the bacterial communities in the rumen of cows fed different forages.FEMSMicrobiol.Ecol.,74(3): 612-622.

    Kumar S, Sahu N P, Pal A K, Choudhury D, Mukherjee S C.2006. Studies on digestibility and digestive enzyme activities inLabeorohita(Hamilton) juveniles: effect of microbial α-amylase supplementation in non-gelatinized or gelatinized corn-based diet at two protein levels.Fish Physiol.Biochem.,32(3): 209-220.

    Kuz’mina V V. 1996. Influence of age on digestive enzyme activity in some freshwater teleosts.Aquaculture,148(1):25-37.

    Leenhouwers J I, Ortega R C, Verreth J A J, Schrama J W.2007. Digesta characteristics in relation to nutrient digestibility and mineral absorption in Nile tilapia(OreochromisniloticusL.) fed cereal grains of increasing viscosity.Aquaculture,273(4): 556-565.

    Ley R E, Lozupone C A, Hamady M, Knight R, Gordon J I.2008. Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota.Nat.Rev.Microbiol.,6(10): 776-788.

    Li Q, Wang S Q, You C H, Li Y Y. 2013. Comparison of three Non-starch polysaccharide enzymes on the in vitro digestibility of several kinds of marine algae.Siliao Gongye,34(22): 37-41. (in Chinese)

    Li S, Sun L, Wu H, Hu Z, Liu W, Li Y, Wen X. 2012. The intestinal microbial diversity in mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) as determined by PCR-DGGE and clone library analysis.J.Appl.Microbiol.,113(6): 1 341-1 351.

    Li Y Y, Hu C B, Zheng Y J, Xia X A, Xu W J, Wang S Q, Chen W Z, Sun Z W, Huang J H. 2008. The effects of dietary fatty acids on liver fatty acid composition and Δ6-desaturase expression differ with ambient salinities inSiganuscanaliculatus.Comp.Biochem.Physiol.B Biochem.Mol.Biol.,151(2): 183-190.

    Nayak S K. 2010. Role of gastrointestinal microbiota in fish.Aquacult.Res.,41(11): 1 553-1 573.

    O'Connell J M, Sweeney T, Callan J J, O'Doherty J V. 2005.The effect of cereal type and exogenous enzyme supplementation in pig diets on nutrient digestibility,intestinal microflora, volatile fatty acid concentration and manure ammonia emissions from finisher pigs.Animal Science,81(3): 357-364.

    Pankratov T A, Dedysh S N, Zavarzin G A. 2006. The leading role of actinobacteria in aerobic cellulose degradation inSphagnumpeat bogs.Dokl.Biol.Sci.,410(1): 428-430.

    Pérez-Sánchez T, Ruiz-Zarzuela I, de Blas I, Balcázar J L.2014. Probiotics in aquaculture: a current assessment.Rev.Aquacult.,6(3): 133-146.

    Pinto A J, Raskin L. 2012. PCR biases distort bacterial and archaeal community structure in pyrosequencing datasets.PLoSOne,7(8): e43093.

    Price M N, Dehal P S, Arkin A P. 2010. FastTree 2-approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments.PLoS One,5(3): e9490.

    R Core Team. 2015. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.r-project.org/.

    Rawls J F, Samuel B S, Gordon J I. 2004. Gnotobiotic zebrafish reveal evolutionarily conserved responses to the gut microbiota.Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.,101(13):4 596-4 601.

    Refstie S, Svihus B, Shearer K D, Storebakken T. 1999.Nutrient digestibility in Atlantic salmon and broiler chickens related to viscosity and non-starch polysaccharide content in different soyabean products.Anim.FeedSci.Technol.,79(4): 331-345.

    Ring? E, Str?m E, Tabachek J A. 1995. Intestinal microflora of salmonids: a review.Aquacult.Res.,26(10): 773-789.

    Roeselers G, Mittge E K, Stephens W Z, Parichy D M,Cavanaugh C M, Guillemin K, Rawls J F. 2011. Evidence for a core gut microbiota in the zebrafish.ISMEJ.,5(10):1 595-1 608.

    Saha S, Roy R N, Sen S K, Ray A K. 2006. Characterization of cellulase-producing bacteria from the digestive tract of tilapia,Oreochromismossambica(Peters) and grass carp,Ctenopharyngodonidella(Valenciennes).Aquacult.Res.,37(4): 380-388.

    Salonen A, Lahti L, Saloj?rvi J, Holtrop G, Korpela K, Duncan S H, Date P, Farquharson F, Johnstone A M, Lobley G E,Louis P, Flint H J, de Vos W M. 2014. Impact of diet and individual variation on intestinal microbiota composition and fermentation products in obese men.ISMEJ.,8(11):2 218-2 230.

    Shade A, Handelsman J. 2012. Beyond the Venn diagram: the hunt for a core microbiome.Environ.Microbiol.,14(1):4-12.

    Sijpesteijn A K. 1951. On ruminococcus flavefaciens, a cellulose-decomposing bacterium from the rumen of sheep and cattle.J.Gen.Microbiol.,5: 869-879.

    Sinha A K, Kumar V, Makkar H P S, De Boeck G, Becker K.2011. Non-starch polysaccharides and their role in fish nutrition-A review.FoodChem.,127(4): 1 409-1 426.

    Storebakken T, Kvien I S, Shearer K D, Grisdale-Helland B,Helland S J. 1999. Estimation of gastrointestinal evacuation rate in Atlantic salmon (Salmosalar) using inert markers and collection of faeces by sieving:evacuation of diets with fish meal, soybean meal or bacterial meal.Aquaculture,172(3-4): 291-299.

    Sullam K E, Essinger S D, Lozupone C A, O’Connor M P,Rosen G L, Knight R O B, Kilham S S, Russell J A. 2012.Environmental and ecological factors that shape the gut bacterial communities of fish: a meta-analysis.Mol.Ecol.,21(13): 3 363-3 378.

    Teske A, S?rensen K B. 2008. Uncultured archaea in deep marine subsurface sediments: have we caught them all?ISMEJ.,2(1): 3-18.

    Tolentino-Pablico G, Bailly N, Froese R, Elloran C. 2008.Seaweeds preferred by herbivorous fishes.J.Appl.Phycol.,20(5): 933-938.

    Van Soest P J. 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2ndedn. Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Větrovsky T, Baldrian P. 2013. The variability of the 16S rRNA gene in bacterial genomes and its consequences for bacterial community analyses.PLoSOne,8(2): e57923.von Westernhagen H. 1973. The natural food of the rabbitfishSiganusoraminand S. striolata.Mar.Biol.,22(4): 367-370.

    Wang S Q, Xu S D, Wu Q Y, Zhang L, Zhang T, You C H,Zheng H P, Li Y Y. 2010. Optimal levels of protein and lipid in diets for rabbitfishSiganuscanaliculatusjuvenile.MarineSciences,34(11): 18-22. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    White W L, Coveny A H, Robertson J, Clements K D. 2010.Utilisation of mannitol by temperate marine herbivorous fishes.J.Exp.Mar.Biol.Ecol.,391(1-2): 50-56.

    Wong S, Waldrop T, Summerfelt S, Davidson J, Barrows F,Kenney P B, Welch T, Wiens G D, Snekvik K, Rawls J F,Good C. 2013. Aquacultured rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) possess a large core intestinal microbiota that is resistant to variation in diet and rearing density.Appl.Environ.Microbiol.,79(16): 4 974-4 984.

    Wu S G, Wang G T, Angert E R, Wang W W, Li W X, Zou H.2012. Composition, diversity, and origin of the bacterial community in grass carp intestine.PLoSOne,7(2):e30440.

    Xu S D, Zhang L, Wu Q Y, Liu X B, Wang S Q, You C H, Li Y Y. 2011. Evaluation of dried seaweedGracilaria lemaneiformisas an ingredient in diets for teleost fishSiganuscanaliculatus.Aquacult.Int.,19(5): 1 007-1 018.

    Ye L, Amberg J, Chapman D, Gaikowski M, Liu W T. 2014.Fish gut microbiota analysis differentiates physiology and behavior of invasive Asian carp and indigenous American fish.ISMEJ.,8(3): 541-551.

    You C H, Zeng F G, Wang S Q, Li Y Y. 2014a. Preference of the herbivorous marine teleostSiganuscanaliculatusfor different macroalgae.J.OceanUniv.China,13(3): 516-522.

    You C H, Zhang W T, Wang S Q, Cheng C H K, Li Y Y. 2014b.Evaluation of green algaUlvapertusaas a dietary ingredient for rabbitfishSiganuscanaliculatusjuveniles.J.J.Aquacul.Res.,1(1): 005.

    Zhang M L, Sun Y H, Liu Y K, Qiao F, Chen L Q, Liu W T, Du Z Y, Li E C. 2016. Response of gut microbiota to salinity change in two euryhaline aquatic animals with reverse salinity preference.Aquaculture,454: 72-80.

    Zhang W. 2012. Primary Study on the Utilization of Macro-AlgaUlvaPertusaas Dietary Ingredient. Shantou University. (in Chinese with English abstract)

    猜你喜歡
    忠貞
    也談羅敷之好
    讀葉芝《當(dāng)你老了》有感
    卷宗(2019年18期)2019-07-11 11:06:38
    詠犬
    桃花命 巾幗魂
    多情蘇軾的情感世界
    《葉甫蓋尼奧涅金》中塔吉雅娜與奧爾嘉愛(ài)情觀的對(duì)比
    世界家苑(2018年6期)2018-07-23 04:06:48
    顏真卿
    《桃花扇》中李香君人物形象分析
    《飄》中白瑞德形象簡(jiǎn)析
    論朱有燉妓女戲?qū)Α柏憽钡捻灀P(yáng)
    戲劇之家(2017年7期)2017-05-12 23:25:08
    18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 极品教师在线免费播放| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产1区2区3区精品| svipshipincom国产片| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 俄罗斯特黄特色一大片| 制服诱惑二区| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 久久青草综合色| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 亚洲全国av大片| 色在线成人网| 国内毛片毛片毛片毛片毛片| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 欧美乱码精品一区二区三区| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 夜夜躁狠狠躁天天躁| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 午夜a级毛片| 成人免费观看视频高清| 国产av又大| 久久草成人影院| 免费观看精品视频网站| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | 日韩国内少妇激情av| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 韩国精品一区二区三区| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 一本久久中文字幕| 国产av一区在线观看免费| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲国产看品久久| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 国产精品影院久久| 88av欧美| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 亚洲成人国产一区在线观看| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 国产精品一区二区免费欧美| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 美女午夜性视频免费| 久久亚洲精品不卡| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 丰满的人妻完整版| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 日本黄色视频三级网站网址| 搞女人的毛片| 久久热在线av| 热99re8久久精品国产| a在线观看视频网站| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 国产麻豆69| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 两个人看的免费小视频| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 午夜久久久久精精品| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 看片在线看免费视频| 好看av亚洲va欧美ⅴa在| 亚洲国产精品合色在线| 成人特级黄色片久久久久久久| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产免费男女视频| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 午夜视频精品福利| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 巨乳人妻的诱惑在线观看| 婷婷六月久久综合丁香| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 宅男免费午夜| 国产一区二区激情短视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看 | 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 欧美乱妇无乱码| 欧美中文综合在线视频| av电影中文网址| 身体一侧抽搐| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 在线天堂中文资源库| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| www.www免费av| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 丰满的人妻完整版| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 日韩免费av在线播放| 99热只有精品国产| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 亚洲av成人av| 久久香蕉激情| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看 | 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 国产亚洲精品av在线| 日韩精品青青久久久久久| 变态另类丝袜制服| bbb黄色大片| 国内精品久久久久精免费| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 天天一区二区日本电影三级 | 变态另类丝袜制服| 黄色视频不卡| 国产亚洲欧美在线一区二区| 黄频高清免费视频| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 中文字幕人妻丝袜一区二区| 老汉色av国产亚洲站长工具| videosex国产| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 香蕉国产在线看| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 在线播放国产精品三级| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添小说| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 一进一出好大好爽视频| 久久久水蜜桃国产精品网| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 久久久久国内视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 精品一区二区三区av网在线观看| 日韩免费av在线播放| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产三级在线视频| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 国产主播在线观看一区二区| 一本久久中文字幕| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 亚洲专区国产一区二区| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 国产成人一区二区三区免费视频网站| www.自偷自拍.com| 精品一区二区三区视频在线观看免费| 久久婷婷成人综合色麻豆| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲视频免费观看视频| 国产成人精品在线电影| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 91国产中文字幕| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 丝袜美足系列| 女同久久另类99精品国产91| av中文乱码字幕在线| 午夜福利欧美成人| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 热re99久久国产66热| 久久久国产欧美日韩av| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 成人亚洲精品av一区二区| 成人国产综合亚洲| 国产成人系列免费观看| av视频免费观看在线观看| 一二三四社区在线视频社区8| av有码第一页| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 麻豆av在线久日| 99久久国产精品久久久| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 9热在线视频观看99| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区 | 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 午夜日韩欧美国产| 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 久久久久九九精品影院| 欧美日本视频| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 9色porny在线观看| 国产av在哪里看| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 久久伊人香网站| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 91字幕亚洲| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 淫妇啪啪啪对白视频| 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 精品国产国语对白av| 美女午夜性视频免费| 91国产中文字幕| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 人妻久久中文字幕网| 成人国产综合亚洲| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 日本撒尿小便嘘嘘汇集6| 欧美日韩黄片免| 成人免费观看视频高清| 黄色丝袜av网址大全| ponron亚洲| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 国产男靠女视频免费网站| 夜夜爽天天搞| 丝袜美足系列| 99re在线观看精品视频| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 亚洲av成人av| 精品久久久久久成人av| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 久久精品成人免费网站| 美国免费a级毛片| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o| 一级作爱视频免费观看| 在线免费观看的www视频| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 制服诱惑二区| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 91精品三级在线观看| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清 | 欧美日本亚洲视频在线播放| a级毛片在线看网站| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 欧美日韩精品网址| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 99re在线观看精品视频| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 法律面前人人平等表现在哪些方面| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| 夜夜爽天天搞| 亚洲精品国产一区二区精华液| 两性午夜刺激爽爽歪歪视频在线观看 | 日韩欧美一区视频在线观看| 日韩有码中文字幕| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 大码成人一级视频| 一进一出抽搐gif免费好疼| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 国产精品野战在线观看| 欧美午夜高清在线| 一本久久中文字幕| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 两性夫妻黄色片| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 午夜免费鲁丝| 黄网站色视频无遮挡免费观看| av欧美777| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 1024香蕉在线观看| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 色综合欧美亚洲国产小说| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲九九香蕉| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 中文字幕人成人乱码亚洲影| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 欧美国产精品va在线观看不卡| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 亚洲色图av天堂| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产成人啪精品午夜网站| 天天一区二区日本电影三级 | 免费高清在线观看日韩| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 黄片播放在线免费| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 给我免费播放毛片高清在线观看| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 久久中文看片网| 首页视频小说图片口味搜索| 午夜视频精品福利| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产成人av教育| 91字幕亚洲| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| ponron亚洲| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 最新在线观看一区二区三区| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| 国产单亲对白刺激| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 国产精品永久免费网站| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 国产精品永久免费网站| 午夜福利,免费看| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 国产高清激情床上av| 久久伊人香网站| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 午夜久久久久精精品| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 久久香蕉国产精品| 咕卡用的链子| 国产成人精品无人区| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一出视频| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲伊人色综图| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 色在线成人网| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 亚洲av美国av| 91精品国产国语对白视频| 亚洲av电影在线进入| netflix在线观看网站| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 一本综合久久免费| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产成人影院久久av| 亚洲国产高清在线一区二区三 | av片东京热男人的天堂| 成人三级黄色视频| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 1024香蕉在线观看| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 午夜激情av网站| 1024视频免费在线观看| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 99在线视频只有这里精品首页| 老司机靠b影院| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 搡老岳熟女国产| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 亚洲,欧美精品.| 久久草成人影院| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜 | 国产精品电影一区二区三区| av有码第一页| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 天堂√8在线中文| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看| 涩涩av久久男人的天堂| 国产精品美女特级片免费视频播放器 | 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产熟女xx| 变态另类丝袜制服| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 免费看美女性在线毛片视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 99香蕉大伊视频| 中文亚洲av片在线观看爽| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 亚洲午夜理论影院| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲激情在线av| 成人18禁在线播放| 啦啦啦免费观看视频1| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 久久久久久久久中文| 精品人妻1区二区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| svipshipincom国产片| 精品国产美女av久久久久小说| 三级毛片av免费| 黄色 视频免费看| 午夜免费激情av| 精品国产亚洲在线| 91国产中文字幕| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 久久久久国内视频| 黄色成人免费大全| 69av精品久久久久久| 一本大道久久a久久精品| 久久久久久国产a免费观看| 黄片播放在线免费| 久久精品国产清高在天天线| 欧洲精品卡2卡3卡4卡5卡区| 99re在线观看精品视频| 国产区一区二久久| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 日韩有码中文字幕| 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区mp4| 大型av网站在线播放| 熟妇人妻久久中文字幕3abv| 日韩欧美免费精品| netflix在线观看网站| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 成人精品一区二区免费| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产精品二区激情视频| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 男人的好看免费观看在线视频 | 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| av在线天堂中文字幕| 国产精品免费视频内射| 热99re8久久精品国产| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 看免费av毛片| 日本a在线网址| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国产私拍福利视频在线观看| 咕卡用的链子| 久久久久九九精品影院| 国产野战对白在线观看| 国产片内射在线| 欧美日韩中文字幕国产精品一区二区三区 | 成人av一区二区三区在线看| 老司机福利观看| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 韩国av一区二区三区四区| av在线播放免费不卡| 在线观看一区二区三区| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 久久久国产精品麻豆| netflix在线观看网站| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 亚洲av熟女| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 免费在线观看黄色视频的| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 欧美色欧美亚洲另类二区 | 精品无人区乱码1区二区| av在线播放免费不卡| 黄片播放在线免费| 日本a在线网址| 老司机靠b影院| 色av中文字幕| 国产一区二区在线av高清观看| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 日韩欧美免费精品| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 琪琪午夜伦伦电影理论片6080| 777久久人妻少妇嫩草av网站| 人人妻人人澡人人看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影 | 久久欧美精品欧美久久欧美| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 精品少妇一区二区三区视频日本电影| 一进一出抽搐动态| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 脱女人内裤的视频| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 9191精品国产免费久久| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 男女之事视频高清在线观看| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 久久香蕉激情| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 午夜福利欧美成人| svipshipincom国产片| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 级片在线观看| 99国产精品免费福利视频| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | av网站免费在线观看视频| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 久久人妻av系列| 色综合站精品国产| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产高清视频在线播放一区| 国产区一区二久久| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 我的亚洲天堂| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 少妇熟女aⅴ在线视频| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 美女大奶头视频| 最新美女视频免费是黄的| 亚洲中文av在线| netflix在线观看网站| 久久久久久久精品吃奶| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 在线观看日韩欧美| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 亚洲第一电影网av| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 久久久久久久久中文|