• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Impact of water and sediment discharges on subaqueous delta evolution in Yangtze Estuary from 1950 to 2010

    2014-03-15 05:06:56YunpingYANGYitianLIYongyangFANJunhongZHANG
    Water Science and Engineering 2014年3期

    Yun-ping YANG*, Yi-tian LI, Yong-yang FAN, Jun-hong ZHANG

    1. Key Laboratory of Engineering Sediment, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, Ministry of Transport, Tianjin 300456, P. R. China

    2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, P. R. China

    Impact of water and sediment discharges on subaqueous delta evolution in Yangtze Estuary from 1950 to 2010

    Yun-ping YANG*1,2, Yi-tian LI2, Yong-yang FAN2, Jun-hong ZHANG2

    1. Key Laboratory of Engineering Sediment, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, Ministry of Transport, Tianjin 300456, P. R. China

    2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, P. R. China

    In order to determine how the subaqueous delta evolution depends on the water and sediment processes in the Yangtze Estuary, the amounts of water and sediment discharged into the estuary were studied. The results show that, during the period from 1950 to 2010, there was no significant change in the annual water discharge, and the multi-annual mean water discharge increased in dry seasons and decreased in flood seasons. However, the annual sediment discharge and the multi-annual mean sediment discharge in flood and dry seasons took on a decreasing trend, and the intra-annual distribution of water and sediment discharges tended to be uniform. The evolution process from deposition to erosion occurred at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths of the subaqueous delta. The enhanced annual water and sediment discharges had a silting-up effect on the delta, and the effect of sediment was greater than that of water. Based on data analysis, empirical curves were built to present the relationships between the water and sediment discharges over a year or in dry and flood seasons and the erosion/deposition rates in typical regions of the subaqueous delta, whose evolution followed the pattern of silting in flood seasons and scouring in dry seasons. Notably, the Three Gorges Dam has changed the distribution processes of water and sediment discharges, and the dam’s regulating and reserving functions can benefit the subaqueous delta deposition when the annual water and sediment discharges are not affected.

    water discharge; sediment discharge; seasonal change; delta; Yangtze Estuary

    1 Introduction

    Over the past hundred years, sediment discharge of rivers all over the world has sharply declined because dams or water transfer projects have been implemented along rivers, resulting in erosion of subaqueous deltas, especially deltas in estuary regions (Trenhaile 1997). Changes of sediment discharge not only affect the deposition rate, but also alter the features of silting and scouring (Syvitski et al. 2005). Many submerged deltas have been deposited more slowly or eroded after a decrease of seaward sediment discharge all around the world, such as along the Nile River (Frihy et al. 2003), the Colorado River (Carriquiry et al. 2001), and theYellow River (Xu 2008). During the deltaic evolution, contradictions exist between rivers and oceans, and rivers usually dominate the process (Ren 1989). Chinese scholars (Yang et al. 2003a; Li et al. 2004; Li et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2010; Gao 2010; Yang et al. 2011) have investigated the relationship between the evolution of the Yangtze subaqueous delta and the sediment discharge, and established empirical curves of the relation between the sediment discharge and the evolution of typical regions of subaqueous deltas. However, the relation between delta evolution and seaward water discharge has not been analyzed. The water cycle mechanism in the delta region of the American Colorado River has changed due to the reduction of water discharge, resulting in a different mechanism of deposition in the estuary delta region (Fanos 1995). Meanwhile, the decreased sediment blocked the extension of the Colorado delta. In the Mississippi River Basin, the sediment transport was reduced by 40% from 1963 to 1989 due to the extremely high usage of river water, which was considered the major reason for the deltaic erosion in estuary areas (Qian et al. 1989). Yang et al. (2003b) showed that it was not rigorous in theory to use only water discharge, sediment discharge, or sediment concentration as a single index to determine the critical value of water or sediment discharge for maintaining the balance of deposition and erosion in delta regions.

    Generally, when the increase rateof water discharge is higher than that of the sediment discharge, the sediment concentration will decrease. Hence, the variations of basin water and sediment discharges may trigger significant delta changes. In the Yangtze Estuary, flooding plays a riverbed-rebuilding role. When the water discharge is larger than 60 000 m3/s, the water level in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River is significantly enhanced. Meanwhile, the silting and scouring variations in the river channel are significant. When the flood discharge exceeds 70 000 m3/s, new river branches and erosion appear frequently (Gong and Yun 2002). Especially in 1954 and 1998, two heavy floods greatly influenced the erosion and deposition of the subaqueous delta in the river mouth. Studies on the evolution of the Yellow River delta revealed that the water and sediment discharges not only drove the delta-rebuilding but also determined the deltaic evolution trend (Xu 2002). Thus, when studying the deltaic evolution, the sediment discharge should not be the only considered factor. Instead, the collective influence of both water and sediment discharges should receive full attention. In recent years, with gradually increasing human activities in the Yangtze River Basin, their effects on water discharge, sediment discharge, and the intra-annual distribution processes of water and sediment discharges have already appeared (Yang et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2005; Dai et al. 2008; Dai et al. 2009; Li et al. 2011), and the water discharge and sediment discharge, as well as their intra-annual distribution processes, have also had a direct effect on the subaqueous delta development. Overall, it is necessary to establish the relationship between the subaqueous delta evolution and the water and sediment discharges in the Yangtze Estuary, and, in particular, to determine how the distributions of water and sediment discharges over different seasons affects the subaqueous delta evolution.

    In this study, we investigated the variation trends of the annual water and sediment discharges, the amounts of water and sediment in dry and flood seasons, and the distribution processes of water and sediment discharges. Based on the results, the relationships between the areal erosion/deposition rates in typical regions of the subaqueous delta and the water and sediment discharges over a year or during dry and flood seasons were studied. This study demonstrated the relationship between the subaqueous delta evolution in the Yangtze Estuary and the decisive elements.

    2 Study area and methods

    2.1 Study area

    The Yangtze River Basin originates in the Tanggula Mountains, and has a full length of 6 300 km, covering an area of 1.84 × 106k m2. The Datong Hydrographic Station is the most downstream large-scale hydrological station along the main stream of the Yangtze River, where the amounts of water and sediment represent the water and sediment processes of the Yangtze River. The geomorphologic patterns of the Yangtze Estuary include three-order bifurcations and four outlets into the sea. The Yangtze Estuary is divided into the South Branch and the North Branch by the Chongming Island, and the South Branch is divided into the South Channel and the North Channel by the Changxing Island. The South Channel is again divided into the South Passage and the North Passage by the Jiuduansha Shoal. Fig. 1 shows the study area for this project, which is 68 km from the south to the north, covering the affected region of the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths of the subaqueous delta in the Yangtze Estuary.

    Fig. 1 Sketch of study area in Yangtze Estuary

    2.2 Sources of information and description

    Map information from 1958 to 1989 was obtained through a digitized electronic chart (ona scale of 1:15000). Map information from 2002 to 2009 came from the measured topographic data provided by the Yangtze River Waterway Bureau and Shanghai Estuarine and Coastal Science Research Center. All data from different departments and organizations using different measurement approaches were conformed to the same conditions through comparison and examination.

    According to the analysis of sediment diffusion effects in the Yangtze Estuary by Yun (2004), the outer boundary of diffusion range of muddy water is between the ?20 m isobath and ?30 m isobath. Both the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths are within the affected area of muddy water diffusion. Therefore, they are mainly controlled by the water and sediment discharges.

    For a subaqueous delta, the variations of the erosion/deposition rate include the change of the areal erosion/deposition rate and the change of the volumetric erosion/deposition rate (Gao 2010). In this study, the areal erosion/deposition rates at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths were investigated. In this way, delta evolution could be better reflected, and formulas were established to demonstrate the relation between the areal erosion/deposition rate and the water and sediment discharges over a year or during dry and flood seasons.

    3 Change processes of seaward water and sediment amounts in Yangtze River Basin

    3.1 Variation rules of annual water and sediment discharges

    The annual water and sediment discharges in the Yangtze River Basin are high. From 1950 to 2010, the multi-annual mean water discharge reached 8 970 × 108m3/year. From 1951 to 2010, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge was 3.88 × 108t/year, and the sediment concentration was 0.43 kg/m3. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the annual water discharge has not changed significantly from 1950 to 2010. In the 1990s, the annual water discharge slightly increased, while from 2000 to 2010, the annual water discharge decreased somewhat, whereas the annual sediment discharge was sharply reduced in general. The stepwise reduction occurred in years such as 1968, 1985, and 2002. Especially in recent years, the decrease of the annual sediment discharge presents a more dramatic trend. Compared with the multi-annual sediment discharge from 1951 to 1968, the multi-annual sediment discharge from 2003 to 2010 showed a reduction of 3.37 × 108t/year, with a reduction rate of 68.92%. Notably, the decrease of annual sediment discharge occurred along with the sharp sediment reduction at the Yichang and Hankou stations located in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River (Yang et al. 2011). As shown in Fig. 2(b), the suspended sediment concentration has declined since 1985. If the amount of water does not change too much, the flow is less capable of transporting sediment and the riverbed sediment is suspended to compensate for the deficiency, which triggers a scouring trend in the estuary subaqueous delta.

    Fig. 2 Variations of annual water and sediment discharges and suspended sediment concentration in Yangtze River Basin

    3.2 Variation characteristics of water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons

    The riverbed evolution in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River follows the basic pattern of silting in flood seasons, and scouring in dry seasons. Hence, it is critical to determine how the variations of annual water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons affect the evolution of the subaqueous delta.

    Fig. 3(a) shows the variation of multi-annual mean water discharge in flood and dry seasons. It can be seen that the multi-annual mean water discharge showed a reduction trend in flood seasons in most years except the 1990s, with the smallest amount in the 2000s. The multi-annual mean water discharge in dry seasons from 1950 to 1979 was smaller than that from 1980 to 2009, implicating the slight increase in dry seasons. Moreover, the percentage of multi-annual mean water discharge took on a downward reduction in flood seasons and an upward increase in dry seasons, which suggests that the amount of water distributed in flood and dry seasons tends to be uniform. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the maximum multi-annual mean sediment discharge in flood seasons was in the 1960s, and thereafter it gradually declined. In the 2000s, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge was only 1.57 × 108t/year in flood seasons. In particular, the annual sediment discharge was only 0.84 × 108t/year in 2006. Similarly, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge tended to decline in dry seasons, which means that the reduction of annual sediment discharge occurred along with the sediment decrease in both flood and dry seasons. The percentage of multi-annual mean sediment discharge tended to decrease in flood seasons, and increase in dry seasons. The intra-annual distributions of sediment and water discharges tended to be uniform.

    Overall, the multi-annual mean water and sediment discharges decreased in flood seasons, but in dry seasons the multi-annual mean water discharge showed a rising trend, and the multi-annual mean sediment discharge decreased. The percentages of multi-annual mean water and sediment discharges decreased in flood seasons, and increased in dry seasons.

    Fig. 3 Variation features of multi-annual mean water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons in Yangtze River Basin

    3.3 Variation characteristics of large and small water discharges in flood and dry seasons

    The riverbed-rebuilding discharge in the Yangtze Estuary is 60 400 m3/s. When the actual discharge is larger than that value, distinct erosion-deposition variations are observed in the estuary, which causes the replacement of main branches. For example, the flood in 1954 played a critical role in the development of the North Passage. It changed the top and shallow regions of mouth bars, and the erosion and deposition fluctuations were from 0.2 to 0.7 m, which resulted in changes in the shoal-cutting and split ratios, influencing the estuary waterway (Yun 2004). As shown in Fig. 4, the number of days with a discharge larger than 50 000 m3/s at the Datong Hydrographic Station has shown a decreasing trend since 1950, and the number of days with a discharge smaller than 15 000 m3/s has also tended to decrease. The results indicate that the medium amount of discharge increased in percentage, and the intra-annual distribution of water discharge was more uniform.

    Fig. 4 Variations of number of days with large and small discharges in Datong Hydrographic Station

    4 Relation between water and sediment processes in Yangtze River Basin and evolution of typical regions in subaqueous delta

    Variations of the areal erosion/deposition rates at typical isobaths of the subaqueous delta were examined. If the silting area between the same isobaths in different years is larger than the scouring area, the region near the isobath appears as deposition. In contrast, if the silting area is smaller than the scouring area, the region near the isobath appears as erosion. The areal erosion/deposition rate at an isobath in the subaqueous delta can be expressed as

    where V is the areal deposition/erosion rate at the deltaic isobath (km2/year), Adand Aeare the areas of deposition and erosion (km2), respectively, and T is the time interval (year).

    4.1 Evolution law of typical regions in subaqueous delta

    Fig. 5 shows variations of the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths in the Yangtze Estuary from 1958 to 2009, and the areal erosion/deposition rates at the two isobaths are listed in Table 1.

    Fig. 5 Evolution processes of ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths of subaqueous delta in Yangtze Estuary from 1958 to 2009

    During the period from 1958 to 1985, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge was 4.56 × 108t/year, and the regions near the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths showed a deposition trend. From 1985 to 1989, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge was 3.66 × 108t/year, the area above the ?10 m isobath slightly decreased, indicating that the region near the ?10 m isobath appear as erosion, but the region near the ?20 m isobath appeared as deposition. From 1989 to 2002, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge was 3.42 × 108t/year, and the area above the ?10 m isobath showed an increasing trend. As mentioned in section 3, the annual waterdischarge during this period was significantly larger than in other periods. Although the annual sediment discharge was smaller than that in previous periods, the annual water discharge increase caused a deposition trend in the subaqueous delta. From 1989 to 2004, the area above the ?20 m isobath maintained an upward trend and the region near the ?20 m isobath appeared as deposition, caused by the same factor as that mentioned above for the deposition in the region near the ?10 m isobath during this period. From 2002 to 2004, the area above the?10 m isobath tended to decrease, and an erosional retreat occurred. The area above the ?10 m isobath decreased continually from 2002 to 2009, and the erosional retreat was significant. Similarly, the area above the ?20 m isobath showed a reduction from 2004 to 2009, and the corresponding annual sediment discharge ranged from 0.84 × 108to 2.77 × 108t/year. Thus, the annual sediment discharge from the Yangtze River into the estuary subaqueous delta was significantly reduced compared with that in previous periods. In 2006, the sediment discharge was only 0.84 × 108t/year. Meanwhile, the areas above the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths decreased with the most serious observed retreat. The areal erosion rate from 2007 to 2009 increased compared with that from 2004 to 2007 because of the variations of seaward sediment and water discharges caused by the Three Gorges Dam.

    Table 1 Multi-annual mean sediment discharge and areal erosion/deposition rates at typical isobaths of subaqueous delta

    To sum up, a process from deposition to erosion occurred at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths of the subaqueous delta along with a reduction of sediment discharge. A continuous erosional retreat has occurred in the subaqueous delta of the Yangtze Estuary since 2002.

    In the future, if the sediment entering the estuary remains at a low level for a long time, it will cause serious erosion of the subaqueous delta. Hence, the estuarine wetland protection and the safety of ports and cities will be extremely threatened.

    4.2 Relationship between annual water and sediment discharges and erosion/deposition rate in typical regions

    As discussed above, when the sediment discharge decreased, the subaqueous delta would gradually shift from a stated of deposition to erosion. As Fig. 6 shows, there is a linear relation between the erosion/deposition rate at the isobath of the subaqueous delta and annual waterdischarge (Fig. 6(a)) and annual sediment discharge (Fig. 6(b)). When the annual water and sediment discharges decrease, the subaqueous delta in the Yangtze Estuary shifts from astate of deposition to reduced deposition or even to erosional retreat in the end. An analysis method of multiple regressions was used to establish the relation curves between the area erosion/deposition rates at typical isobaths of the subaqueous delta and the annual water and sediment discharges. The formulas are shown below:

    where V1and V2are the area deposition/erosion rates at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths (km2/year), respectively; Q is the annual water discharge (108m3/year); S is the annual sediment discharge (108t/year); R2is the coefficient of determination; and the coefficient 1 000 converts the units of water and sediment discharges to the same order of magnitude. Fitting curves are obtained under the confidence coefficient α=0.1.

    Fig. 6 Relation between subaqueous delta evolution and annual water and sediment discharges in Yangtze River Basin

    According to Eqs. (2) and (3), the deltaic evolution was jointly affected by the annual water and sediment discharges. Based on the coefficients of Q and S in Eqs. (2) and (3), the contributions of annual sediment discharge and annual water discharge to the areal erosion/deposition rate at the ?10 m isobath were 61.88% and 38.12%, respectively, while 61.01% of the sediment contribution and 38.99% of the water contribution were observed for the areal erosion/deposition rate at the ?20 m isobath. Hence, annual sediment discharge variations have a more significant effect than annual water discharge variations on the evolution of the subaqueous delta. However, the effect of annual water discharge variations on the deltaic evolution should not be ignored.

    4.3 Relationship between water or sediment variation process and evolution of typical deltaic regions

    The water and sediment discharges showed better correlation with the arealerosion/deposition rate at the deltaic isobaths in flood seasons than in dry seasons (Fig. 7). Whether or not the sediment discharge increased in flood seasons or in dry seasons, the delta always shift from a state of erosion to deposition. Based on the erosion/deposition rates at different subaqueous deltaic isobaths, and water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons, curves demonstrating the relationship between the water/sediment variation process and the evolution of the subaqueous delta were built, and the specific fitting formulas are shown in Table 2. Compared with the curves shown in Fig. 6, these curves are more accurate because the water and sediment discharges were examined in both flood seasons and dry seasons. The coefficients of QFand SFin the formulas in Table 2 were positive and the coefficients of QDand SDwere negative, suggesting that the water and sediment discharges promoted deposition of the subaqueous delta in flood seasons, and erosion in dry seasons. Accordingly, the delta showed a deposition trend in flood seasons and an erosion trend in dry seasons, which is consistent with the basic pattern for the evolution of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River: silting in flood seasons and scouring in dry seasons.

    Fig. 7 Relation between subaqueous delta evolution and variation processes of water and sediment discharges in different seasons

    Table 2 Relation curves of areal erosion/deposition rates at typical isobaths and water/sediment discharge in different seasons

    The Three Gorges Dam has been used for water storage since 2003, maintaining the water and sediment discharges in the Yangtze River Basin at a certain level. The dam showed a lesser effect on the annual water discharge, while the water distributions in flood and dry seasons were changed somewhat. Meanwhile, the annual sediment discharge showed adownward trend, and the distributions of sediment discharge in flood and dry seasons were also changed. According to the coefficients of QF, QD, SF, and SDin the formulas in Table 2, the absolute values of the coefficients of QDand SDwere larger than those of QFand SF, respectively, which suggests that if the reduced amount of water and sediment in flood seasons was emptied in dry seasons, the deltaic deposition area in a dry season would be larger than the erosion area caused by the water and sediment discharge reduction in a flood season. Because of the different distributions of the water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons throughout a year, the delta tended to show deposition development. Assuming that the water and sediment discharges reduced by the Three Gorges Dam in a flood season was all emptied in the dry season, the reduced deposition value of the subaqueous delta in the flood season should be smaller than the increased value in the dry season, indicating a deposition trend of the deltaic evolution. Therefore, the Three Gorges project has changed the distribution processes of water and sediment discharges, and its regulation function can benefit the subaqueous delta deposition, while the annual water and sediment discharges in the basin are not affected.

    4.4 Relationship between water and sediment variation processes and evolution of typical deltaic regions

    Comprehensively considering the effects of the water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons, we established curves to describe the relationships between the areal erosion/deposition rates at different isobaths and the water and sediment discharges. Fitting curves were obtained under the confidence coefficient α = 0.1. The formulas for the curves of?10 m and ?20 m isobaths are as follows:

    According to these formulas, it can be found that comprehensive consideration of the effects of the water and sediment variation processes on the deltaic evolution can reflect the variations of areal erosion/deposition rates at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths in the subaqueous delta much more accurately. Lou (2005) analyzed the subaqueous delta variations from 1997 to 2000, and the reported data wereused to test our fitting formulas. From 1997 to 2000, the water discharges in flood and dry seasons were 8 427 × 108m3/year and 2 989 × 108m3/year, respectively, and the sediment discharges were 3.20 × 108t/year and 0.39 × 108t/year, respectively. According to our calculation, the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths should have an areal erosion/deposition rate of 34.29 km2/year and 63.09 km2/year, respectively, consistent with the values obtained by Lou (2005) of 36.43 km2/year and 69.63 km2/year, respectively.

    5 Conclusions

    (1) The annual water discharge showed no obvious trend from 1950 to 2010, while the annual sediment discharge showed a stepwise decrease. The multi-annual mean water discharge decreased in flood seasons and increased in dry seasons. The multi-annual mean sediment discharge decreased in dry seasons and flood seasons. The percentages of multi-annual mean water and sediment discharges decreased in flood seasons, and increased in dry seasons.

    (2) An evolution process from deposition to erosion occurred at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths of the subaqueous delta, and empirical curves were established to present the relationships between the annual water and sediment discharges and the areal erosion/deposition rates in typical regions of the subaqueous delta. The annual sediment discharge variation had a greater effect on the evolution of the subaqueous delta than the annual water discharge variation.

    (3) Empirical curves were established to describe the relationships between the deltaic areal erosion/deposition rates in typical regions of the subaqueous delta and the water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons, and the evolution of the subaqueous delta was found to follow the pattern of silting in flood seasons and scouring in dry seasons. Although the Three Gorges Dam has changed the distribution processes of water and sediment discharges throughout a year, the regulation and reservation functions of the dam can benefit the deltaic deposition when the annual water and sediment discharges are not affected.

    The evolution of the estuary delta is controlled by the water and sediment factors in the basin. However, the ocean dynamics vary continuously, and their effects on the deltaic evolution are still unclear. In the future, we will pay more attention to the effect of ocean factors on the deltaic evolution and the corresponding empirical relationship.

    Carriquiry, J. D., Sanchez, A., and Camacho-lbar, V. F. 2001. Sedimentation in the northern Gulf of California after cessation of the Colorado River discharge. Sedimentary Geology, 144(1-2), 37-62. [doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(01)00134-8]

    Chen, X. Q., Zhang, E. F., Mu, H. Q., and Zong, Y. 2005. A preliminary analysis of human impacts on sediment discharges from the Yangtze, China, into the Sea. Journal of Coastal Research, 21(3), 515-521. [doi:10.2112/03-0034.1]

    Dai, S. B., Lu, X. X., Yang, S. L., and Cai, A. M. 2008. A preliminary estimate of human and natural contributions to the decline in sediment flux from the Yangtze River to the China Sea. Quaternary International, 186, 43-54. [doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2007.11.018]

    Dai, S. B., Yang, S. L., and Li, M. 2009. The sharp decrease in suspended sediment supply from China’s rivers to the sea: Anthropogenic and natural causes. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54(1), 135-146. [doi:10.1623/hysj.54.1.135]

    Fanos, A. M. 1995. The impact of human activities on the erosion and accretion of the Nile delta coast. Journal of Coastal Research, 11(3), 821-833.

    Frihy, O. E., Debes, E. A., and El Sayed, W. R. 2003. Processes reshaping the Nile delta promontories of Egypt: Pre- and post-protection. Geomorphology, 53(3-4), 263-279. [doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00318-5]

    Gao, S. 2010. Changjiang delta sedimentation in response to catchment discharge changes: Progress and problems. Advances in Earth Science, 25(3), 233-241. (in Chinese)

    Gong, C. L., and Yun, C. X. 2002. Floods rebuilding the riverbed of the Changjiang estuary. Ocean Engineering, 20(3), 94-97. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9865.2002.03.016]

    Li, C. X., Yang, S. Y., Fan, D. D., and Zhao, J. 2004. The change in Changjiang suspended load and its impact on the delta after completion of three gorges dam. Quaternary Sciences, 24(5), 495-500. (in Chinese)

    Li, P., Yang, S. L., Dai, S. B., and Zhang, W. X. 2007. Accretion/erosion of the subaqueous delta at the Yangtze Estuary in recent 10 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(7), 707-716. (in Chinese)

    Li, Q. F., Yu, M. X., Lu, G. B., Cai, T., Bai, X., and Xia, Z. Q. 2011. Impacts of the Gezhouba and Three Gorges reservoirs on the sediment regime in the Yangtze River, China. Journal of Hydrology, 403(3-4), 224-233. [doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.043]

    Lou, F. 2005. The Sedimentary and Accretion-erosion Environment of the Outer Navigation Channel in Changjiang Estuary. Ph. D. Dissertation. Shanghai: East China Normal University. (in Chinese)

    Qian, N., Zhang, R., and Zhou, Z. D. 1989. Riverbed Evolution. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Ren, M. E. 1989. Man’s impact on the coastal zone of the Mississippi River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 44(2), 221-229. (in Chinese)

    Syvitski, J. P. M., Vorosmarty, C. J., Kettner, A. J., and Green, P. 2005. Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science, 308(5720), 376-380. [doi: 10.1126/science.1109454]

    Trenhaile, A. S. 1997. Coastal Dynamics and Landforms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Wang, A. D., Pan, S. M., Zhang, Y. Z., and Liu, Z. Y. 2010. Modern sedimentation rate of the submarine delta of the Changjiang River. Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology, 30(3), 1-6. [doi:10.3724/SP.J. 1140.2010.03001]. (in Chinese)

    Xu, J. X. 2002. A study of thresholds of runoff and sediment for the land accretion of the Yellow River Delta. Geographical Research, 21(2), 163-170. (in Chinese) [doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2002.02.004]

    Xu, J. X. 2008. Response of land accretion of the Yellow River delta to global climate change and human activity. Quaternary International, 186(1), 4-11. [doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2007.08.032]

    Yang, S. L., Zhu, J., and Zhao, Q. Y. 2003a. A preliminary study on the influence of Changjiang River sediment supply on subaqueous delta-Evidences in late 20th century and an expectation for the coming decades. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 25(5), 83-91. (in Chinese)

    Yang, S. L., Belkin, I. M., Belkin, A. I., Zhao, Q. Y., Zhu, J., and Ding, P. 2003b. Delta response to decline in sediment supply from the Yangtze River: Evidence of the recent four decades and expectations for the next half-century. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 57(4), 689-699. [doi:10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00409-2]

    Yang, S. L., Shi, Z., Zhou, H. Y., Li, P., Dai, S. B., and Gao, A. 2004. Effects of human activities on the Yangtze River suspended sediment flux into the estuary in the last century. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 8(6), 1210-1216.

    Yang, S. L., Milliman, J. D., Li, P., and Xu, K. 2011. 50000 dams later: Erosion of the Yangtze River and its delta. Global and Planetary Change, 75(1-2), 14-20. [doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.09.006]

    Yun, C. X. 2004. The Recent Development Rules of the Changjiang Estuary. Beijing: Ocean Press. (in Chinese)

    (Edited by Yan LEI)

    This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (the 973 Program, Grant No. 2010CB429002).

    *Corresponding author (e-mail: yangsan520_521@163.com)

    Received Mar. 6, 2013; accepted Nov. 7, 2013

    性色av一级| 亚洲成人手机| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| videosex国产| 日韩伦理黄色片| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| videosex国产| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 男女无遮挡免费网站观看| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 成人国产麻豆网| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到 | 在线观看国产h片| 久久久久精品性色| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久久久久网色| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 国产在视频线精品| 赤兔流量卡办理| 九九在线视频观看精品| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 国产片特级美女逼逼视频| 91成人精品电影| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 少妇的逼水好多| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| a 毛片基地| 欧美97在线视频| 永久网站在线| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 在线播放无遮挡| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 日韩电影二区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 超碰97精品在线观看| 午夜福利,免费看| 国产极品天堂在线| 国产av国产精品国产| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 精品国产一区二区久久| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 日韩伦理黄色片| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| av免费观看日本| 高清不卡的av网站| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| av有码第一页| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 欧美变态另类bdsm刘玥| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 国产成人freesex在线| 麻豆成人av视频| av网站免费在线观看视频| 少妇人妻 视频| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 久久99精品国语久久久| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图 | 精品一区二区三卡| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 精品酒店卫生间| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 蜜桃久久精品国产亚洲av| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲伊人久久精品综合| 97在线视频观看| a级毛片黄视频| 日本欧美视频一区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 全区人妻精品视频| 少妇丰满av| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 中文天堂在线官网| 七月丁香在线播放| 日韩强制内射视频| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 国产色婷婷99| 欧美人与善性xxx| 亚洲国产精品一区二区三区在线| 22中文网久久字幕| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 欧美国产精品一级二级三级| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 久久国产精品男人的天堂亚洲 | 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 精品酒店卫生间| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 免费观看的影片在线观看| 久久久久久久大尺度免费视频| 午夜免费观看性视频| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | av卡一久久| 久久人人爽人人片av| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 国产黄片视频在线免费观看| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产日韩欧美视频二区| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 人体艺术视频欧美日本| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 国产成人精品福利久久| 一区在线观看完整版| 伦理电影免费视频| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲精品视频女| 九色成人免费人妻av| 性色avwww在线观看| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 亚洲性久久影院| 亚洲精品视频女| 有码 亚洲区| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 成年人免费黄色播放视频| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 少妇人妻精品综合一区二区| 五月天丁香电影| 日本91视频免费播放| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 日本色播在线视频| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 午夜福利在线观看免费完整高清在| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 成人二区视频| 99国产精品免费福利视频| av在线观看视频网站免费| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 免费观看av网站的网址| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 18禁观看日本| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕 | 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 777米奇影视久久| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 全区人妻精品视频| 久久久久久久久大av| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 香蕉精品网在线| 色94色欧美一区二区| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区 | 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 国产成人精品在线电影| 草草在线视频免费看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的| 考比视频在线观看| a级毛片在线看网站| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| h视频一区二区三区| 美女主播在线视频| 人妻系列 视频| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 久久ye,这里只有精品| 99久久人妻综合| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产在视频线精品| 亚洲经典国产精华液单| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 最黄视频免费看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 午夜激情av网站| 色94色欧美一区二区| 制服人妻中文乱码| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 日本wwww免费看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲精品一二三| 亚州av有码| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 婷婷色综合www| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 亚洲精品日韩av片在线观看| 精品少妇内射三级| 99热全是精品| 赤兔流量卡办理| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 免费观看性生交大片5| 欧美精品高潮呻吟av久久| 在线天堂最新版资源| 亚洲av福利一区| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 国产淫语在线视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 另类精品久久| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区 | 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 亚洲av.av天堂| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 男女免费视频国产| 高清欧美精品videossex| 伦理电影大哥的女人| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 午夜av观看不卡| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| a级毛片在线看网站| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 日韩熟女老妇一区二区性免费视频| 18禁在线播放成人免费| 熟女av电影| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 成人综合一区亚洲| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 日本欧美视频一区| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 国产一区二区在线观看av| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲精品日韩在线中文字幕| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 色网站视频免费| 国产av国产精品国产| 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| av专区在线播放| 黑人高潮一二区| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 男女免费视频国产| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 精品久久久久久久久av| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 亚洲四区av| 亚洲无线观看免费| 日韩制服骚丝袜av| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 一区二区av电影网| 久久久久精品性色| 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 欧美精品国产亚洲| 99热这里只有精品一区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 另类精品久久| 日本午夜av视频| 另类精品久久| av免费观看日本| 在线观看www视频免费| freevideosex欧美| 99热6这里只有精品| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| av电影中文网址| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产综合精华液| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| a级毛片免费高清观看在线播放| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 成人综合一区亚洲| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产男女内射视频| 久久这里有精品视频免费| 九色成人免费人妻av| 精品一区二区三卡| 多毛熟女@视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 另类亚洲欧美激情| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡 | 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 女人精品久久久久毛片| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| xxx大片免费视频| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 成人综合一区亚洲| 免费av中文字幕在线| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国产| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 美女福利国产在线| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| 99久久综合免费| 免费高清在线观看日韩| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 日本黄大片高清| 五月天丁香电影| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| a级毛片黄视频| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产乱来视频区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 十八禁高潮呻吟视频| 色吧在线观看| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 色哟哟·www| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院 | 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 国产乱人偷精品视频| 色吧在线观看| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 青春草视频在线免费观看| 国产国拍精品亚洲av在线观看| 99久久精品一区二区三区| av一本久久久久| 日韩成人伦理影院| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 老司机亚洲免费影院| av网站免费在线观看视频| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 日本色播在线视频| 亚洲图色成人| 亚洲综合色网址| 久久婷婷青草| 免费大片18禁| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 最后的刺客免费高清国语| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 亚洲五月色婷婷综合| 欧美日韩成人在线一区二区| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 国产成人一区二区在线| 精品少妇内射三级| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说 | 午夜视频国产福利| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 亚洲精品成人av观看孕妇| 日本色播在线视频| 精品亚洲成国产av| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 看免费成人av毛片| 久热久热在线精品观看| 69精品国产乱码久久久| 91成人精品电影| 国产精品免费大片| 亚洲性久久影院| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 99精国产麻豆久久婷婷| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡 | 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 亚洲综合色网址| kizo精华| 午夜福利视频精品| 成人毛片60女人毛片免费| 亚洲精品第二区| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 国产精品人妻久久久久久| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 久久女婷五月综合色啪小说| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产精品一国产av| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 精品久久久久久久久av| 国产在线视频一区二区| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 欧美xxxx性猛交bbbb| 欧美精品一区二区大全| 少妇 在线观看| 一区在线观看完整版| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 日本色播在线视频| 国产深夜福利视频在线观看| 午夜久久久在线观看| 久久久久久久久久成人| 午夜91福利影院| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲成人手机| 久久久久国产网址| 久久青草综合色| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 久久97久久精品| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 一级毛片电影观看| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕 | 99热国产这里只有精品6| 三上悠亚av全集在线观看| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产精品 国内视频| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 午夜激情av网站| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 曰老女人黄片| 国产精品 国内视频| 久久精品夜色国产| 美女主播在线视频| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 黄片播放在线免费| 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 日本wwww免费看| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 91久久精品电影网| 久久久久久久国产电影| 少妇的逼好多水| 国产欧美亚洲国产| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 国产av国产精品国产| 国产成人精品无人区| 国产精品蜜桃在线观看| 日韩av免费高清视频| 国产成人精品福利久久| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 亚洲av成人精品一二三区| 国产av一区二区精品久久| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 男女边摸边吃奶| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 免费av中文字幕在线| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲怡红院男人天堂| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲成人手机| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| videos熟女内射| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 大码成人一级视频| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 老司机影院成人| 精品久久久久久久久亚洲| 久久婷婷青草| 亚洲婷婷狠狠爱综合网| 超色免费av| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲国产成人一精品久久久| 九色成人免费人妻av| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 久久人人爽人人片av| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产精品嫩草影院av在线观看| 最黄视频免费看| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 亚洲国产最新在线播放| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 国产高清三级在线| xxxhd国产人妻xxx| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠久久av| 97在线人人人人妻| 青青草视频在线视频观看| 高清黄色对白视频在线免费看| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 亚洲欧洲精品一区二区精品久久久 | 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 中文字幕人妻熟人妻熟丝袜美| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 制服人妻中文乱码| 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 成年av动漫网址| 制服人妻中文乱码| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻丝袜制服| 国产一级毛片在线| 免费av中文字幕在线| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 国产视频内射| 精品午夜福利在线看| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 色哟哟·www| 在线天堂最新版资源| 中文字幕制服av| 久久久久人妻精品一区果冻| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃 | 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 多毛熟女@视频| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡|