• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    Impact of water and sediment discharges on subaqueous delta evolution in Yangtze Estuary from 1950 to 2010

    2014-03-15 05:06:56YunpingYANGYitianLIYongyangFANJunhongZHANG
    Water Science and Engineering 2014年3期

    Yun-ping YANG*, Yi-tian LI, Yong-yang FAN, Jun-hong ZHANG

    1. Key Laboratory of Engineering Sediment, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, Ministry of Transport, Tianjin 300456, P. R. China

    2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, P. R. China

    Impact of water and sediment discharges on subaqueous delta evolution in Yangtze Estuary from 1950 to 2010

    Yun-ping YANG*1,2, Yi-tian LI2, Yong-yang FAN2, Jun-hong ZHANG2

    1. Key Laboratory of Engineering Sediment, Tianjin Research Institute for Water Transport Engineering, Ministry of Transport, Tianjin 300456, P. R. China

    2. State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, P. R. China

    In order to determine how the subaqueous delta evolution depends on the water and sediment processes in the Yangtze Estuary, the amounts of water and sediment discharged into the estuary were studied. The results show that, during the period from 1950 to 2010, there was no significant change in the annual water discharge, and the multi-annual mean water discharge increased in dry seasons and decreased in flood seasons. However, the annual sediment discharge and the multi-annual mean sediment discharge in flood and dry seasons took on a decreasing trend, and the intra-annual distribution of water and sediment discharges tended to be uniform. The evolution process from deposition to erosion occurred at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths of the subaqueous delta. The enhanced annual water and sediment discharges had a silting-up effect on the delta, and the effect of sediment was greater than that of water. Based on data analysis, empirical curves were built to present the relationships between the water and sediment discharges over a year or in dry and flood seasons and the erosion/deposition rates in typical regions of the subaqueous delta, whose evolution followed the pattern of silting in flood seasons and scouring in dry seasons. Notably, the Three Gorges Dam has changed the distribution processes of water and sediment discharges, and the dam’s regulating and reserving functions can benefit the subaqueous delta deposition when the annual water and sediment discharges are not affected.

    water discharge; sediment discharge; seasonal change; delta; Yangtze Estuary

    1 Introduction

    Over the past hundred years, sediment discharge of rivers all over the world has sharply declined because dams or water transfer projects have been implemented along rivers, resulting in erosion of subaqueous deltas, especially deltas in estuary regions (Trenhaile 1997). Changes of sediment discharge not only affect the deposition rate, but also alter the features of silting and scouring (Syvitski et al. 2005). Many submerged deltas have been deposited more slowly or eroded after a decrease of seaward sediment discharge all around the world, such as along the Nile River (Frihy et al. 2003), the Colorado River (Carriquiry et al. 2001), and theYellow River (Xu 2008). During the deltaic evolution, contradictions exist between rivers and oceans, and rivers usually dominate the process (Ren 1989). Chinese scholars (Yang et al. 2003a; Li et al. 2004; Li et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2010; Gao 2010; Yang et al. 2011) have investigated the relationship between the evolution of the Yangtze subaqueous delta and the sediment discharge, and established empirical curves of the relation between the sediment discharge and the evolution of typical regions of subaqueous deltas. However, the relation between delta evolution and seaward water discharge has not been analyzed. The water cycle mechanism in the delta region of the American Colorado River has changed due to the reduction of water discharge, resulting in a different mechanism of deposition in the estuary delta region (Fanos 1995). Meanwhile, the decreased sediment blocked the extension of the Colorado delta. In the Mississippi River Basin, the sediment transport was reduced by 40% from 1963 to 1989 due to the extremely high usage of river water, which was considered the major reason for the deltaic erosion in estuary areas (Qian et al. 1989). Yang et al. (2003b) showed that it was not rigorous in theory to use only water discharge, sediment discharge, or sediment concentration as a single index to determine the critical value of water or sediment discharge for maintaining the balance of deposition and erosion in delta regions.

    Generally, when the increase rateof water discharge is higher than that of the sediment discharge, the sediment concentration will decrease. Hence, the variations of basin water and sediment discharges may trigger significant delta changes. In the Yangtze Estuary, flooding plays a riverbed-rebuilding role. When the water discharge is larger than 60 000 m3/s, the water level in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River is significantly enhanced. Meanwhile, the silting and scouring variations in the river channel are significant. When the flood discharge exceeds 70 000 m3/s, new river branches and erosion appear frequently (Gong and Yun 2002). Especially in 1954 and 1998, two heavy floods greatly influenced the erosion and deposition of the subaqueous delta in the river mouth. Studies on the evolution of the Yellow River delta revealed that the water and sediment discharges not only drove the delta-rebuilding but also determined the deltaic evolution trend (Xu 2002). Thus, when studying the deltaic evolution, the sediment discharge should not be the only considered factor. Instead, the collective influence of both water and sediment discharges should receive full attention. In recent years, with gradually increasing human activities in the Yangtze River Basin, their effects on water discharge, sediment discharge, and the intra-annual distribution processes of water and sediment discharges have already appeared (Yang et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2005; Dai et al. 2008; Dai et al. 2009; Li et al. 2011), and the water discharge and sediment discharge, as well as their intra-annual distribution processes, have also had a direct effect on the subaqueous delta development. Overall, it is necessary to establish the relationship between the subaqueous delta evolution and the water and sediment discharges in the Yangtze Estuary, and, in particular, to determine how the distributions of water and sediment discharges over different seasons affects the subaqueous delta evolution.

    In this study, we investigated the variation trends of the annual water and sediment discharges, the amounts of water and sediment in dry and flood seasons, and the distribution processes of water and sediment discharges. Based on the results, the relationships between the areal erosion/deposition rates in typical regions of the subaqueous delta and the water and sediment discharges over a year or during dry and flood seasons were studied. This study demonstrated the relationship between the subaqueous delta evolution in the Yangtze Estuary and the decisive elements.

    2 Study area and methods

    2.1 Study area

    The Yangtze River Basin originates in the Tanggula Mountains, and has a full length of 6 300 km, covering an area of 1.84 × 106k m2. The Datong Hydrographic Station is the most downstream large-scale hydrological station along the main stream of the Yangtze River, where the amounts of water and sediment represent the water and sediment processes of the Yangtze River. The geomorphologic patterns of the Yangtze Estuary include three-order bifurcations and four outlets into the sea. The Yangtze Estuary is divided into the South Branch and the North Branch by the Chongming Island, and the South Branch is divided into the South Channel and the North Channel by the Changxing Island. The South Channel is again divided into the South Passage and the North Passage by the Jiuduansha Shoal. Fig. 1 shows the study area for this project, which is 68 km from the south to the north, covering the affected region of the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths of the subaqueous delta in the Yangtze Estuary.

    Fig. 1 Sketch of study area in Yangtze Estuary

    2.2 Sources of information and description

    Map information from 1958 to 1989 was obtained through a digitized electronic chart (ona scale of 1:15000). Map information from 2002 to 2009 came from the measured topographic data provided by the Yangtze River Waterway Bureau and Shanghai Estuarine and Coastal Science Research Center. All data from different departments and organizations using different measurement approaches were conformed to the same conditions through comparison and examination.

    According to the analysis of sediment diffusion effects in the Yangtze Estuary by Yun (2004), the outer boundary of diffusion range of muddy water is between the ?20 m isobath and ?30 m isobath. Both the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths are within the affected area of muddy water diffusion. Therefore, they are mainly controlled by the water and sediment discharges.

    For a subaqueous delta, the variations of the erosion/deposition rate include the change of the areal erosion/deposition rate and the change of the volumetric erosion/deposition rate (Gao 2010). In this study, the areal erosion/deposition rates at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths were investigated. In this way, delta evolution could be better reflected, and formulas were established to demonstrate the relation between the areal erosion/deposition rate and the water and sediment discharges over a year or during dry and flood seasons.

    3 Change processes of seaward water and sediment amounts in Yangtze River Basin

    3.1 Variation rules of annual water and sediment discharges

    The annual water and sediment discharges in the Yangtze River Basin are high. From 1950 to 2010, the multi-annual mean water discharge reached 8 970 × 108m3/year. From 1951 to 2010, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge was 3.88 × 108t/year, and the sediment concentration was 0.43 kg/m3. As shown in Fig. 2(a), the annual water discharge has not changed significantly from 1950 to 2010. In the 1990s, the annual water discharge slightly increased, while from 2000 to 2010, the annual water discharge decreased somewhat, whereas the annual sediment discharge was sharply reduced in general. The stepwise reduction occurred in years such as 1968, 1985, and 2002. Especially in recent years, the decrease of the annual sediment discharge presents a more dramatic trend. Compared with the multi-annual sediment discharge from 1951 to 1968, the multi-annual sediment discharge from 2003 to 2010 showed a reduction of 3.37 × 108t/year, with a reduction rate of 68.92%. Notably, the decrease of annual sediment discharge occurred along with the sharp sediment reduction at the Yichang and Hankou stations located in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River (Yang et al. 2011). As shown in Fig. 2(b), the suspended sediment concentration has declined since 1985. If the amount of water does not change too much, the flow is less capable of transporting sediment and the riverbed sediment is suspended to compensate for the deficiency, which triggers a scouring trend in the estuary subaqueous delta.

    Fig. 2 Variations of annual water and sediment discharges and suspended sediment concentration in Yangtze River Basin

    3.2 Variation characteristics of water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons

    The riverbed evolution in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River follows the basic pattern of silting in flood seasons, and scouring in dry seasons. Hence, it is critical to determine how the variations of annual water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons affect the evolution of the subaqueous delta.

    Fig. 3(a) shows the variation of multi-annual mean water discharge in flood and dry seasons. It can be seen that the multi-annual mean water discharge showed a reduction trend in flood seasons in most years except the 1990s, with the smallest amount in the 2000s. The multi-annual mean water discharge in dry seasons from 1950 to 1979 was smaller than that from 1980 to 2009, implicating the slight increase in dry seasons. Moreover, the percentage of multi-annual mean water discharge took on a downward reduction in flood seasons and an upward increase in dry seasons, which suggests that the amount of water distributed in flood and dry seasons tends to be uniform. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the maximum multi-annual mean sediment discharge in flood seasons was in the 1960s, and thereafter it gradually declined. In the 2000s, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge was only 1.57 × 108t/year in flood seasons. In particular, the annual sediment discharge was only 0.84 × 108t/year in 2006. Similarly, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge tended to decline in dry seasons, which means that the reduction of annual sediment discharge occurred along with the sediment decrease in both flood and dry seasons. The percentage of multi-annual mean sediment discharge tended to decrease in flood seasons, and increase in dry seasons. The intra-annual distributions of sediment and water discharges tended to be uniform.

    Overall, the multi-annual mean water and sediment discharges decreased in flood seasons, but in dry seasons the multi-annual mean water discharge showed a rising trend, and the multi-annual mean sediment discharge decreased. The percentages of multi-annual mean water and sediment discharges decreased in flood seasons, and increased in dry seasons.

    Fig. 3 Variation features of multi-annual mean water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons in Yangtze River Basin

    3.3 Variation characteristics of large and small water discharges in flood and dry seasons

    The riverbed-rebuilding discharge in the Yangtze Estuary is 60 400 m3/s. When the actual discharge is larger than that value, distinct erosion-deposition variations are observed in the estuary, which causes the replacement of main branches. For example, the flood in 1954 played a critical role in the development of the North Passage. It changed the top and shallow regions of mouth bars, and the erosion and deposition fluctuations were from 0.2 to 0.7 m, which resulted in changes in the shoal-cutting and split ratios, influencing the estuary waterway (Yun 2004). As shown in Fig. 4, the number of days with a discharge larger than 50 000 m3/s at the Datong Hydrographic Station has shown a decreasing trend since 1950, and the number of days with a discharge smaller than 15 000 m3/s has also tended to decrease. The results indicate that the medium amount of discharge increased in percentage, and the intra-annual distribution of water discharge was more uniform.

    Fig. 4 Variations of number of days with large and small discharges in Datong Hydrographic Station

    4 Relation between water and sediment processes in Yangtze River Basin and evolution of typical regions in subaqueous delta

    Variations of the areal erosion/deposition rates at typical isobaths of the subaqueous delta were examined. If the silting area between the same isobaths in different years is larger than the scouring area, the region near the isobath appears as deposition. In contrast, if the silting area is smaller than the scouring area, the region near the isobath appears as erosion. The areal erosion/deposition rate at an isobath in the subaqueous delta can be expressed as

    where V is the areal deposition/erosion rate at the deltaic isobath (km2/year), Adand Aeare the areas of deposition and erosion (km2), respectively, and T is the time interval (year).

    4.1 Evolution law of typical regions in subaqueous delta

    Fig. 5 shows variations of the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths in the Yangtze Estuary from 1958 to 2009, and the areal erosion/deposition rates at the two isobaths are listed in Table 1.

    Fig. 5 Evolution processes of ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths of subaqueous delta in Yangtze Estuary from 1958 to 2009

    During the period from 1958 to 1985, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge was 4.56 × 108t/year, and the regions near the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths showed a deposition trend. From 1985 to 1989, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge was 3.66 × 108t/year, the area above the ?10 m isobath slightly decreased, indicating that the region near the ?10 m isobath appear as erosion, but the region near the ?20 m isobath appeared as deposition. From 1989 to 2002, the multi-annual mean sediment discharge was 3.42 × 108t/year, and the area above the ?10 m isobath showed an increasing trend. As mentioned in section 3, the annual waterdischarge during this period was significantly larger than in other periods. Although the annual sediment discharge was smaller than that in previous periods, the annual water discharge increase caused a deposition trend in the subaqueous delta. From 1989 to 2004, the area above the ?20 m isobath maintained an upward trend and the region near the ?20 m isobath appeared as deposition, caused by the same factor as that mentioned above for the deposition in the region near the ?10 m isobath during this period. From 2002 to 2004, the area above the?10 m isobath tended to decrease, and an erosional retreat occurred. The area above the ?10 m isobath decreased continually from 2002 to 2009, and the erosional retreat was significant. Similarly, the area above the ?20 m isobath showed a reduction from 2004 to 2009, and the corresponding annual sediment discharge ranged from 0.84 × 108to 2.77 × 108t/year. Thus, the annual sediment discharge from the Yangtze River into the estuary subaqueous delta was significantly reduced compared with that in previous periods. In 2006, the sediment discharge was only 0.84 × 108t/year. Meanwhile, the areas above the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths decreased with the most serious observed retreat. The areal erosion rate from 2007 to 2009 increased compared with that from 2004 to 2007 because of the variations of seaward sediment and water discharges caused by the Three Gorges Dam.

    Table 1 Multi-annual mean sediment discharge and areal erosion/deposition rates at typical isobaths of subaqueous delta

    To sum up, a process from deposition to erosion occurred at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths of the subaqueous delta along with a reduction of sediment discharge. A continuous erosional retreat has occurred in the subaqueous delta of the Yangtze Estuary since 2002.

    In the future, if the sediment entering the estuary remains at a low level for a long time, it will cause serious erosion of the subaqueous delta. Hence, the estuarine wetland protection and the safety of ports and cities will be extremely threatened.

    4.2 Relationship between annual water and sediment discharges and erosion/deposition rate in typical regions

    As discussed above, when the sediment discharge decreased, the subaqueous delta would gradually shift from a stated of deposition to erosion. As Fig. 6 shows, there is a linear relation between the erosion/deposition rate at the isobath of the subaqueous delta and annual waterdischarge (Fig. 6(a)) and annual sediment discharge (Fig. 6(b)). When the annual water and sediment discharges decrease, the subaqueous delta in the Yangtze Estuary shifts from astate of deposition to reduced deposition or even to erosional retreat in the end. An analysis method of multiple regressions was used to establish the relation curves between the area erosion/deposition rates at typical isobaths of the subaqueous delta and the annual water and sediment discharges. The formulas are shown below:

    where V1and V2are the area deposition/erosion rates at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths (km2/year), respectively; Q is the annual water discharge (108m3/year); S is the annual sediment discharge (108t/year); R2is the coefficient of determination; and the coefficient 1 000 converts the units of water and sediment discharges to the same order of magnitude. Fitting curves are obtained under the confidence coefficient α=0.1.

    Fig. 6 Relation between subaqueous delta evolution and annual water and sediment discharges in Yangtze River Basin

    According to Eqs. (2) and (3), the deltaic evolution was jointly affected by the annual water and sediment discharges. Based on the coefficients of Q and S in Eqs. (2) and (3), the contributions of annual sediment discharge and annual water discharge to the areal erosion/deposition rate at the ?10 m isobath were 61.88% and 38.12%, respectively, while 61.01% of the sediment contribution and 38.99% of the water contribution were observed for the areal erosion/deposition rate at the ?20 m isobath. Hence, annual sediment discharge variations have a more significant effect than annual water discharge variations on the evolution of the subaqueous delta. However, the effect of annual water discharge variations on the deltaic evolution should not be ignored.

    4.3 Relationship between water or sediment variation process and evolution of typical deltaic regions

    The water and sediment discharges showed better correlation with the arealerosion/deposition rate at the deltaic isobaths in flood seasons than in dry seasons (Fig. 7). Whether or not the sediment discharge increased in flood seasons or in dry seasons, the delta always shift from a state of erosion to deposition. Based on the erosion/deposition rates at different subaqueous deltaic isobaths, and water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons, curves demonstrating the relationship between the water/sediment variation process and the evolution of the subaqueous delta were built, and the specific fitting formulas are shown in Table 2. Compared with the curves shown in Fig. 6, these curves are more accurate because the water and sediment discharges were examined in both flood seasons and dry seasons. The coefficients of QFand SFin the formulas in Table 2 were positive and the coefficients of QDand SDwere negative, suggesting that the water and sediment discharges promoted deposition of the subaqueous delta in flood seasons, and erosion in dry seasons. Accordingly, the delta showed a deposition trend in flood seasons and an erosion trend in dry seasons, which is consistent with the basic pattern for the evolution of the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River: silting in flood seasons and scouring in dry seasons.

    Fig. 7 Relation between subaqueous delta evolution and variation processes of water and sediment discharges in different seasons

    Table 2 Relation curves of areal erosion/deposition rates at typical isobaths and water/sediment discharge in different seasons

    The Three Gorges Dam has been used for water storage since 2003, maintaining the water and sediment discharges in the Yangtze River Basin at a certain level. The dam showed a lesser effect on the annual water discharge, while the water distributions in flood and dry seasons were changed somewhat. Meanwhile, the annual sediment discharge showed adownward trend, and the distributions of sediment discharge in flood and dry seasons were also changed. According to the coefficients of QF, QD, SF, and SDin the formulas in Table 2, the absolute values of the coefficients of QDand SDwere larger than those of QFand SF, respectively, which suggests that if the reduced amount of water and sediment in flood seasons was emptied in dry seasons, the deltaic deposition area in a dry season would be larger than the erosion area caused by the water and sediment discharge reduction in a flood season. Because of the different distributions of the water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons throughout a year, the delta tended to show deposition development. Assuming that the water and sediment discharges reduced by the Three Gorges Dam in a flood season was all emptied in the dry season, the reduced deposition value of the subaqueous delta in the flood season should be smaller than the increased value in the dry season, indicating a deposition trend of the deltaic evolution. Therefore, the Three Gorges project has changed the distribution processes of water and sediment discharges, and its regulation function can benefit the subaqueous delta deposition, while the annual water and sediment discharges in the basin are not affected.

    4.4 Relationship between water and sediment variation processes and evolution of typical deltaic regions

    Comprehensively considering the effects of the water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons, we established curves to describe the relationships between the areal erosion/deposition rates at different isobaths and the water and sediment discharges. Fitting curves were obtained under the confidence coefficient α = 0.1. The formulas for the curves of?10 m and ?20 m isobaths are as follows:

    According to these formulas, it can be found that comprehensive consideration of the effects of the water and sediment variation processes on the deltaic evolution can reflect the variations of areal erosion/deposition rates at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths in the subaqueous delta much more accurately. Lou (2005) analyzed the subaqueous delta variations from 1997 to 2000, and the reported data wereused to test our fitting formulas. From 1997 to 2000, the water discharges in flood and dry seasons were 8 427 × 108m3/year and 2 989 × 108m3/year, respectively, and the sediment discharges were 3.20 × 108t/year and 0.39 × 108t/year, respectively. According to our calculation, the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths should have an areal erosion/deposition rate of 34.29 km2/year and 63.09 km2/year, respectively, consistent with the values obtained by Lou (2005) of 36.43 km2/year and 69.63 km2/year, respectively.

    5 Conclusions

    (1) The annual water discharge showed no obvious trend from 1950 to 2010, while the annual sediment discharge showed a stepwise decrease. The multi-annual mean water discharge decreased in flood seasons and increased in dry seasons. The multi-annual mean sediment discharge decreased in dry seasons and flood seasons. The percentages of multi-annual mean water and sediment discharges decreased in flood seasons, and increased in dry seasons.

    (2) An evolution process from deposition to erosion occurred at the ?10 m and ?20 m isobaths of the subaqueous delta, and empirical curves were established to present the relationships between the annual water and sediment discharges and the areal erosion/deposition rates in typical regions of the subaqueous delta. The annual sediment discharge variation had a greater effect on the evolution of the subaqueous delta than the annual water discharge variation.

    (3) Empirical curves were established to describe the relationships between the deltaic areal erosion/deposition rates in typical regions of the subaqueous delta and the water and sediment discharges in flood and dry seasons, and the evolution of the subaqueous delta was found to follow the pattern of silting in flood seasons and scouring in dry seasons. Although the Three Gorges Dam has changed the distribution processes of water and sediment discharges throughout a year, the regulation and reservation functions of the dam can benefit the deltaic deposition when the annual water and sediment discharges are not affected.

    The evolution of the estuary delta is controlled by the water and sediment factors in the basin. However, the ocean dynamics vary continuously, and their effects on the deltaic evolution are still unclear. In the future, we will pay more attention to the effect of ocean factors on the deltaic evolution and the corresponding empirical relationship.

    Carriquiry, J. D., Sanchez, A., and Camacho-lbar, V. F. 2001. Sedimentation in the northern Gulf of California after cessation of the Colorado River discharge. Sedimentary Geology, 144(1-2), 37-62. [doi: 10.1016/S0037-0738(01)00134-8]

    Chen, X. Q., Zhang, E. F., Mu, H. Q., and Zong, Y. 2005. A preliminary analysis of human impacts on sediment discharges from the Yangtze, China, into the Sea. Journal of Coastal Research, 21(3), 515-521. [doi:10.2112/03-0034.1]

    Dai, S. B., Lu, X. X., Yang, S. L., and Cai, A. M. 2008. A preliminary estimate of human and natural contributions to the decline in sediment flux from the Yangtze River to the China Sea. Quaternary International, 186, 43-54. [doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2007.11.018]

    Dai, S. B., Yang, S. L., and Li, M. 2009. The sharp decrease in suspended sediment supply from China’s rivers to the sea: Anthropogenic and natural causes. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54(1), 135-146. [doi:10.1623/hysj.54.1.135]

    Fanos, A. M. 1995. The impact of human activities on the erosion and accretion of the Nile delta coast. Journal of Coastal Research, 11(3), 821-833.

    Frihy, O. E., Debes, E. A., and El Sayed, W. R. 2003. Processes reshaping the Nile delta promontories of Egypt: Pre- and post-protection. Geomorphology, 53(3-4), 263-279. [doi:10.1016/S0169-555X(02)00318-5]

    Gao, S. 2010. Changjiang delta sedimentation in response to catchment discharge changes: Progress and problems. Advances in Earth Science, 25(3), 233-241. (in Chinese)

    Gong, C. L., and Yun, C. X. 2002. Floods rebuilding the riverbed of the Changjiang estuary. Ocean Engineering, 20(3), 94-97. [doi:10.3969/j.issn.1005-9865.2002.03.016]

    Li, C. X., Yang, S. Y., Fan, D. D., and Zhao, J. 2004. The change in Changjiang suspended load and its impact on the delta after completion of three gorges dam. Quaternary Sciences, 24(5), 495-500. (in Chinese)

    Li, P., Yang, S. L., Dai, S. B., and Zhang, W. X. 2007. Accretion/erosion of the subaqueous delta at the Yangtze Estuary in recent 10 years. Acta Geographica Sinica, 62(7), 707-716. (in Chinese)

    Li, Q. F., Yu, M. X., Lu, G. B., Cai, T., Bai, X., and Xia, Z. Q. 2011. Impacts of the Gezhouba and Three Gorges reservoirs on the sediment regime in the Yangtze River, China. Journal of Hydrology, 403(3-4), 224-233. [doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.043]

    Lou, F. 2005. The Sedimentary and Accretion-erosion Environment of the Outer Navigation Channel in Changjiang Estuary. Ph. D. Dissertation. Shanghai: East China Normal University. (in Chinese)

    Qian, N., Zhang, R., and Zhou, Z. D. 1989. Riverbed Evolution. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Ren, M. E. 1989. Man’s impact on the coastal zone of the Mississippi River Delta. Acta Geographica Sinica, 44(2), 221-229. (in Chinese)

    Syvitski, J. P. M., Vorosmarty, C. J., Kettner, A. J., and Green, P. 2005. Impact of humans on the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science, 308(5720), 376-380. [doi: 10.1126/science.1109454]

    Trenhaile, A. S. 1997. Coastal Dynamics and Landforms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Wang, A. D., Pan, S. M., Zhang, Y. Z., and Liu, Z. Y. 2010. Modern sedimentation rate of the submarine delta of the Changjiang River. Marine Geology and Quaternary Geology, 30(3), 1-6. [doi:10.3724/SP.J. 1140.2010.03001]. (in Chinese)

    Xu, J. X. 2002. A study of thresholds of runoff and sediment for the land accretion of the Yellow River Delta. Geographical Research, 21(2), 163-170. (in Chinese) [doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0585.2002.02.004]

    Xu, J. X. 2008. Response of land accretion of the Yellow River delta to global climate change and human activity. Quaternary International, 186(1), 4-11. [doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2007.08.032]

    Yang, S. L., Zhu, J., and Zhao, Q. Y. 2003a. A preliminary study on the influence of Changjiang River sediment supply on subaqueous delta-Evidences in late 20th century and an expectation for the coming decades. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 25(5), 83-91. (in Chinese)

    Yang, S. L., Belkin, I. M., Belkin, A. I., Zhao, Q. Y., Zhu, J., and Ding, P. 2003b. Delta response to decline in sediment supply from the Yangtze River: Evidence of the recent four decades and expectations for the next half-century. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 57(4), 689-699. [doi:10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00409-2]

    Yang, S. L., Shi, Z., Zhou, H. Y., Li, P., Dai, S. B., and Gao, A. 2004. Effects of human activities on the Yangtze River suspended sediment flux into the estuary in the last century. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 8(6), 1210-1216.

    Yang, S. L., Milliman, J. D., Li, P., and Xu, K. 2011. 50000 dams later: Erosion of the Yangtze River and its delta. Global and Planetary Change, 75(1-2), 14-20. [doi:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.09.006]

    Yun, C. X. 2004. The Recent Development Rules of the Changjiang Estuary. Beijing: Ocean Press. (in Chinese)

    (Edited by Yan LEI)

    This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (the 973 Program, Grant No. 2010CB429002).

    *Corresponding author (e-mail: yangsan520_521@163.com)

    Received Mar. 6, 2013; accepted Nov. 7, 2013

    日本欧美国产在线视频| 成人二区视频| 在线免费十八禁| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲国产色片| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 一本一本综合久久| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 欧美3d第一页| 性色av一级| 青春草国产在线视频| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 国内精品宾馆在线| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 毛片女人毛片| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 久久久色成人| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| a 毛片基地| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 精品久久久久久久末码| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 各种免费的搞黄视频| www.色视频.com| 高清av免费在线| 国产亚洲最大av| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久6这里有精品| 18禁在线无遮挡免费观看视频| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 亚洲欧美日韩卡通动漫| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 欧美zozozo另类| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 国产免费视频播放在线视频| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 岛国毛片在线播放| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 亚洲成色77777| 日本免费在线观看一区| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 久久精品人妻少妇| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 免费人妻精品一区二区三区视频| 日本wwww免费看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 夫妻午夜视频| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx在线观看| 午夜免费鲁丝| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 免费少妇av软件| 联通29元200g的流量卡| 久久久精品免费免费高清| 久久av网站| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 欧美三级亚洲精品| av在线观看视频网站免费| 精品国产乱码久久久久久小说| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 日韩大片免费观看网站| xxx大片免费视频| 亚洲精品国产成人久久av| 久久青草综合色| 少妇猛男粗大的猛烈进出视频| 嫩草影院入口| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| a 毛片基地| 蜜桃亚洲精品一区二区三区| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 伦精品一区二区三区| 黄色日韩在线| 91久久精品电影网| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 精品午夜福利在线看| 欧美性感艳星| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 国产成人aa在线观看| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲国产精品999| 国产精品一区二区在线观看99| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 午夜福利在线在线| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 中国美白少妇内射xxxbb| 国产成人freesex在线| 国产精品一区二区性色av| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 在线观看国产h片| 美女内射精品一级片tv| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 韩国高清视频一区二区三区| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| a级毛色黄片| 大香蕉久久网| 国产av精品麻豆| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 少妇精品久久久久久久| 91狼人影院| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国产午夜精品久久久久久一区二区三区| 七月丁香在线播放| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 最近的中文字幕免费完整| 久久精品国产鲁丝片午夜精品| 欧美高清成人免费视频www| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 美女中出高潮动态图| 女人久久www免费人成看片| 日本vs欧美在线观看视频 | 国产高清三级在线| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 久久6这里有精品| 老师上课跳d突然被开到最大视频| 免费观看在线日韩| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 一个人免费看片子| 中文天堂在线官网| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| videos熟女内射| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 午夜免费鲁丝| 男人添女人高潮全过程视频| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添av毛片| 九九久久精品国产亚洲av麻豆| 日本一二三区视频观看| 麻豆成人av视频| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 人妻少妇偷人精品九色| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 人人妻人人看人人澡| 日本午夜av视频| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 日韩成人伦理影院| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 国产视频首页在线观看| 97在线人人人人妻| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 观看av在线不卡| 日本一二三区视频观看| 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www | 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 久久精品国产自在天天线| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 三级国产精品片| h日本视频在线播放| xxx大片免费视频| 久久99热6这里只有精品| 国产精品.久久久| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 免费看日本二区| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲精品国产色婷婷电影| 99热这里只有精品一区| freevideosex欧美| 一级毛片我不卡| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 久久久成人免费电影| 国产 精品1| 黄色一级大片看看| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 极品教师在线视频| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 黄片无遮挡物在线观看| 一本一本综合久久| .国产精品久久| 一级毛片电影观看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 日本与韩国留学比较| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 欧美日本视频| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产 精品1| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 美女xxoo啪啪120秒动态图| av黄色大香蕉| 久久99蜜桃精品久久| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 久久精品国产a三级三级三级| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 国产精品不卡视频一区二区| 在线观看三级黄色| 日日啪夜夜爽| 日韩伦理黄色片| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 永久网站在线| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看| 中文资源天堂在线| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 国产极品天堂在线| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 亚洲,欧美,日韩| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 欧美3d第一页| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| av国产免费在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 91狼人影院| 国产一区亚洲一区在线观看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 老司机影院成人| 黄色一级大片看看| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 中文字幕久久专区| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 干丝袜人妻中文字幕| 精品熟女少妇av免费看| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 国产色婷婷99| 99热网站在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av天美| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 简卡轻食公司| 在线看a的网站| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| av视频免费观看在线观看| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 在线观看免费高清a一片| 18+在线观看网站| 黑人高潮一二区| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 日日啪夜夜撸| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 美女福利国产在线 | 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 日韩伦理黄色片| 人妻系列 视频| 永久网站在线| www.av在线官网国产| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 在线观看一区二区三区| 超碰97精品在线观看| 边亲边吃奶的免费视频| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 亚洲高清免费不卡视频| 国产黄片美女视频| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 亚洲性久久影院| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 一级爰片在线观看| 久久久久视频综合| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看 | 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 一级毛片 在线播放| 久久久久久久国产电影| 国产精品无大码| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 日韩强制内射视频| 赤兔流量卡办理| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 亚洲图色成人| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 深夜a级毛片| 韩国av在线不卡| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 99久久精品国产国产毛片| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产成人免费无遮挡视频| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 搡老乐熟女国产| 亚洲国产精品国产精品| 蜜臀久久99精品久久宅男| 国产人妻一区二区三区在| 欧美+日韩+精品| 九色成人免费人妻av| 国产精品麻豆人妻色哟哟久久| 久久久成人免费电影| 中文字幕免费在线视频6| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 少妇裸体淫交视频免费看高清| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日日啪夜夜爽| 久久99热这里只有精品18| 国产一级毛片在线| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 免费观看av网站的网址| 在现免费观看毛片| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 久久97久久精品| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| av在线观看视频网站免费| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 国产高潮美女av| 久久久久网色| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 亚洲国产色片| 日韩av在线免费看完整版不卡| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 国产永久视频网站| 一级黄片播放器| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 在线 av 中文字幕| 中文天堂在线官网| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 男女边摸边吃奶| 最近2019中文字幕mv第一页| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站 | 一级毛片我不卡| 大陆偷拍与自拍| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 午夜老司机福利剧场| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花 | 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 人妻夜夜爽99麻豆av| 精品一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 欧美日韩精品成人综合77777| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 新久久久久国产一级毛片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 久久久a久久爽久久v久久| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 国产成人精品一,二区| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 嫩草影院新地址| 欧美激情极品国产一区二区三区 | 寂寞人妻少妇视频99o| 久久国内精品自在自线图片| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 国产美女午夜福利| 国产精品国产三级专区第一集| 一级黄片播放器| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| av免费观看日本| 极品教师在线视频| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲av成人精品一区久久| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产欧美日韩精品一区二区| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 亚洲精华国产精华液的使用体验| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产成人freesex在线| 女人十人毛片免费观看3o分钟| 成人亚洲精品一区在线观看 | 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 黑丝袜美女国产一区| 国产精品久久久久成人av| 永久免费av网站大全| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 亚洲真实伦在线观看| 亚洲精品456在线播放app| 最新中文字幕久久久久| 一个人免费看片子| 夫妻午夜视频| 精品少妇黑人巨大在线播放| 午夜福利视频精品| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 久久人人爽人人片av| 精品人妻视频免费看| 成年av动漫网址| 美女国产视频在线观看| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 一级二级三级毛片免费看| 在线精品无人区一区二区三 | 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 一级黄片播放器| 久久国产乱子免费精品| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 国产亚洲欧美精品永久| 久久av网站| 久久 成人 亚洲| 久久国产精品大桥未久av | 免费少妇av软件| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 麻豆成人av视频| 午夜福利视频精品| 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 亚洲天堂av无毛| 伊人久久国产一区二区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 免费看光身美女| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 男女免费视频国产| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 日韩精品有码人妻一区| 99热这里只有是精品50| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 中文字幕av成人在线电影| 一级av片app| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 亚洲最大成人中文| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 久久精品人妻少妇| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看| 麻豆精品久久久久久蜜桃| 中文欧美无线码| 99热这里只有精品一区| 一级片'在线观看视频| 中文资源天堂在线| 好男人视频免费观看在线| 国产精品一区二区性色av| a级毛色黄片| 国产真实伦视频高清在线观看| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 午夜激情久久久久久久| 亚洲性久久影院| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 成人毛片a级毛片在线播放| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国产淫片久久久久久久久| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 各种免费的搞黄视频| 日韩在线高清观看一区二区三区| av卡一久久| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版| 免费看日本二区| 色吧在线观看| 熟女av电影| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 国产69精品久久久久777片| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频9| 联通29元200g的流量卡| av国产精品久久久久影院| 日本-黄色视频高清免费观看| 在线免费观看不下载黄p国产| 男女下面进入的视频免费午夜| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 嫩草影院新地址| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 国产高潮美女av| 极品教师在线视频| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91 | 午夜福利在线在线| 久久久久久久久久久丰满| 97在线视频观看| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 中文乱码字字幕精品一区二区三区| 91aial.com中文字幕在线观看| 中文在线观看免费www的网站| 国产亚洲最大av| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 黄色视频在线播放观看不卡| 美女主播在线视频| 免费人成在线观看视频色| av在线播放精品| 免费观看av网站的网址| 亚洲av综合色区一区| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 在线播放无遮挡| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 丰满迷人的少妇在线观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 高清日韩中文字幕在线| 人妻一区二区av| 我要看黄色一级片免费的| 亚洲美女黄色视频免费看| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 天堂8中文在线网| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 色视频在线一区二区三区| 永久网站在线| 18禁动态无遮挡网站| 九色成人免费人妻av| 精品酒店卫生间| 丝袜脚勾引网站| 国产 一区精品| 精品一区二区三卡| 亚洲色图综合在线观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 欧美性感艳星| 男女免费视频国产| 亚洲人成网站在线播| 国产精品欧美亚洲77777| 国产精品.久久久| 免费黄色在线免费观看| 精品一区二区免费观看| kizo精华| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频 | 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 国产视频首页在线观看| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 少妇的逼好多水| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人夜夜| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 一级毛片 在线播放| 亚洲久久久国产精品| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 免费播放大片免费观看视频在线观看| 国产精品国产av在线观看| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 免费少妇av软件| 91久久精品国产一区二区成人| 午夜福利高清视频| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜 | 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 成人综合一区亚洲| 啦啦啦视频在线资源免费观看| 亚洲精品亚洲一区二区| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲,一卡二卡三卡| 亚洲精品视频女| av在线老鸭窝| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看 | 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 国产亚洲午夜精品一区二区久久| 国产av精品麻豆| 国产v大片淫在线免费观看| 国国产精品蜜臀av免费| 一级毛片黄色毛片免费观看视频| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 国产亚洲最大av| 制服丝袜香蕉在线| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 激情 狠狠 欧美| 我的老师免费观看完整版| 亚洲av在线观看美女高潮| 视频中文字幕在线观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 在线观看人妻少妇| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 久久久午夜欧美精品| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 午夜福利视频精品| av播播在线观看一区|