• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    An improved method for quantitatively measuring the sequences of total organic carbon and black carbon in marine sediment cores*

    2018-04-02 03:04:02XUXiaoming徐小明ZHUQing祝青ZHOUQianzhi周芊至
    Journal of Oceanology and Limnology 2018年1期
    關(guān)鍵詞:金鐘江海建平

    XU Xiaoming (徐小明) , ZHU Qing (祝青) , ZHOU Qianzhi (周芊至) ,

    LIU Jinzhong (劉金鐘) 2, YUAN Jianping (袁建平) 1,**, WANG Jianghai (王江海) 1,**

    1 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Resources and Coastal Engineering / South China Sea Bioresource Exploitation and Utilization Collaborative Innovation Center, School of Marine Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China

    2 Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China

    1 INTRODUCTION

    Global climate change is closely associated with global carbon cycling, which involves not only in the carbon allocation among diverse carbon reservoirs but also in the circulation within individual carbon reservoir (Schuur et al., 2015; Talley et al., 2016). It is widely accepted that ocean has been considered as a huge carbon reservoir (Mantoura et al., 1991; Blair and Aller, 2012; Canuel and Hardison, 2016). The organic carbon in marine sediments, especially in shelf seas, is an important part of the global carbon reservoir, and previous researches have shown that a great amount of carbon was sequestrated at high burial rates in continental shelf seas (Hedges et al.,1995). Due to the complexity of carbon sources in shelf seas with high sedimentation rates (Gao et al.,2012), to expound the mechanisms of carbon burial(Lin et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2018),and further calculate the carbon storage amounts and their variations (Wang et al., 2018), we should obtain the high-resolution temporal sequences of diff erent carbon forms [including inorganic and organic carbon, as well as black carbon (BC)] in advance on the basis of the studies of marine sediment cores. The total organic carbon (TOC) in marine sediments in the continental shelf seas usually comes from two sources, i.e., terrestrial and marine autogenous sources. The latter is closely related to marine primary productivity, and the former includes inert BC and other labile solid-form organic matters mainly delivered by river to ocean. BC is principally composed of burning remains of fossil fuels and biomass as well as graphite from high-grade metamorphic rocks. It is crucial to identify and measure these diff erent forms of organic carbon in order to understand global carbon cycling and its relationship with global warming.

    Previous investigators have already developed diverse methods for quantitatively detecting the contents of TOC or BC in soils/sediments. Recently,there are two commonly adopted methods to pretreat the soil/sediment samples for detecting the TOC contents, i.e., wet oxidation (Snyder and Trofymow,1984; Leong and Tanner, 1999; Wang et al., 2012;Avramidis et al., 2015) and dry combustion (Dean,1974; Luzak et al., 1997; Rabenhorst, 1988; Vitti,2016). Wet oxidation is followed by titration with ferrous ammonium sulfate or photometric determination of Cr3+, or the collection and measurement of evolved CO2(Avramidis et al., 2015);while dry combustion burns a sample at high temperatures in a furnace with the collection and detection of evolved CO2.

    The methods for quantifying BC in soils/sediments are commonly classified into two types, i.e., chemical oxidation (Meredith et al., 2013) and chemothermal oxidation (Gustafsson et al., 2001; Agarwal and Bucheli, 2011; Yang et al., 2012). Chemical oxidation oxidizes labile organic carbon with acidified potassium dichromate for obtaining and quantifying BC in soils/sediments (Meredith et al., 2013); while chemothermal oxidation burns labile organic carbon at 375° C (CTO-375) for gaining and quantitatively detecting BC (Pohl et al., 2014; Huang et al., 2016).There is a consensus that no single approach may completely measure all forms of BC because BC is a combustion continuum but not any individual compound.

    However, if the traditional methods are adopted to quantitatively determine the contents of various carbon forms for establishing the high-resolution sequence of one marine sediment core, then three immediate questions will follow: How to deal with the contradiction between the limited amount of each subsample in one sediment core and diverse analytical items? How to enhance the data reproducibility of carbon contents for sediment cores? How to achieve the rapid TOC or BC measurements of a great number of subsamples for one core?

    Therefore, the method for determining the sequences of TOC and BC contents in marine sediment cores should be further improved. In this paper, we will address the above-mentioned issues,and subsequently develop a novel method named as“WXY method” (meaning a method mainly established by Wang J H, Xu X M and Yuan J P) to detect the TOC and BC contents for establishing the high-resolution temporal sequences of marine sediment cores. Simultaneously, the newlyestablished method should also meet the requirements of the high and stable recovery rates of TOC and BC or no involvement of recovery procedures, minimum amount of each subsample, high-effi ciency sample pretreatment, and rapid and precise instrumental analysis. Establishment of this novel method will provide a significant technical support for determining the high-resolution temporal sequences of marine sediment cores, and consequently for expounding the mechanism of marine carbon burial.

    2 MATERIAL AND METHOD

    2.1 Materials

    In this study, one big fine-grained surface sediment sample (more than 1 000 g) was collected from the South Yellow Sea, and used to develop the novel method for detecting TOC and BC contents.Hydrochloric acid was of analytical grade, and purchased from the Kermel Chemical Co., Ltd.(Tianjin, China). The ultrapure water preparation device (Milli-Q) from the Wenrui Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China) was used to prepare ultrapure water (resistance at 25° C higher than 18 MΩ· cm; conductivity at 25° C ≤ 1 μ s/cm). The highpurity gases of N2and O2(purity 99.995%) were purchased from the Keming Gas Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou,China). The disposable ceramic crucible with the micropore-controlled ability was customized from the Chashan Crucible Factory (Liling, Hunan, China),and its carbon content was less than 3 μ g/g.

    Fig.1 Comparison of the analytical procedures for detecting total organic carbon (TOC) and black carbon (BC) in marine sediment cores between the newly-developed and conventional methods

    2.2 Instruments

    The teflon holder was made with the size of 220 mm× 145 mm× 18 mm by our group. Other instruments used in this work included the LGJ-50F freeze dryer (Songyuanhuaxing Technology Development Co. Ltd., Beijing, China), CS-230 carbon-sulfur analyzer (Leco Corporation, LECO,Michigan, USA), SG-GL1100 tube furnace with the temperature precision of ± 1°C (customized from the Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics,Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China),Sartorius BT 125D high-precision electronic balance(Beijing Sartorius Instrument System Co. Ltd.,Beijing, China) and Mettler XP6U Microbalance(Mettler-Toledo Ltd., Zurich, Switzerland).

    2.3 Methods

    2.3.1 Analytical procedures

    Generally, the analytical procedures of TOC and BC contents includes the following steps, i.e.,pretreatment, weighing, acidification, chemothermal oxidation and quantification (Fig.1).

    Pretreatment: The big marine sediment sample was dried by the LGJ-50F freeze dryer, and then homogenized by ultrasonic vibration. Finally, it was grounded into the powder with the size of about 200 meshes for the following procedures.

    Weighing: About 100 mg or 150 mg of each subsapmle was weighed for the TOC or BC measurement, respectively. Then, they were successively transferred into the disposable ceramic crucibles with the micropore-controlled ability(Fig.2). Before loading the subsample into each crucible, we burnt the empty crucibles at 1 100°C for 4 hours in order to remove the absorbed water and impurities.

    Acidification: The subsample-filled crucibles were labeled and placed accordingly into the holes of a self-made teflon holder, till fully loaded (depend on need). Then, the teflon holder was placed in a whiteenamel salver. Before acidification, the optimization was performed for the concentrations of HCl, duration of HCl soaking, temperatures of HCl soaking, and heating duration before washing. In acidification, the enough amount of 3 mol/L HCl was added into each crucible and the white-enameled salver, and the HCl level inside the crucibles was kept to be consistent with that outside of them. After maintaining 12 hours,the crucibles together with the holder and salver were heated in a thermostatic water bath at 80° C for 1 hour.After HCl was completely excluded from the crucibles, ultrapure water was added into the crucibles for removing the resultants of inorganic carbon and residual HCl, and the washing procedure needed to repeat at least 6 times until the acidity of the water excluded from the crucibles was neutral. After acidification, the subsample-containing crucibles were dried by a freeze dryer for 24 hours. The dried subsamples were ready to measure the TOC contents according to the following procedure of qualification of TOC. If further analyzing the BC contents, we need to continue the chemothermal oxidation as described below.

    Chemothermal oxidation: Closely following the above-mentioned acidification, the crucibles were blow-dried at 60°C. Then, the subsample-filled crucibles were held on the stainless steel plate in a quartz-tube furnace for the chemothermal oxidation at 375°C for 24 hours under an active airflow. After this step, the labile organic carbon was removed, and BC remained in the crucibles. The subsamples processed by the above-described CTO-375 method were ready to measure the BC contents.

    Quantification of TOC or BC: A CS230 carbonsulfur analyzer was employed to measure the TOC or BC contents in the treated subsamples together with the crucibles. The limit of quantification (LOQ)(defined as the mean blank value plus 10 times its standard deviation) in this study was (2.3± 0.3) μg/g.The comparison of the analytical procedures for quantifying TOC or BC in marine sediment cores between the newly-developed and conventional methods was illustrated in details in Fig.1.

    2.3.2 Facility for the acidification procedures

    The self-made device for the acidification procedures is illustrated in Fig.2, which contains three parts, i.e., teflon holder with 24 holes, white-enameled salver with the size of 25 cm× 19 cm× 3 cm, and disposable ceramic crucible with the microporecontrolled ability. This device may simultaneously process 24 subsamples each batch.

    2.3.3 Facility for the CTO-375 method

    The facility for the CTO-375 method is shown in Fig.3, which contains an SG-GL1100 quartz-tube furnace, a self-made stainless steel plate, disposable ceramic crucibles, and an external air blower. The working temperature of the furnace is at the interval of 0- 1 100°C; and its constant temperature zone is 40 cm long. The stainless steel plate is placed in the constant temperature zone; and can hold 96 crucibles each batch.

    2.3.4 Facility for quantifying TOC or BC

    TOC or BC was measured by a LECO CS 230 carbon-sulfur analyzer, which is designed on the basis of the principle of infrared absorption detection.Carbon and sulfur in the samples were burned at high temperatures under the oxygen-rich condition for producing CO2and SO2gases, which were then transformed into the measurable signals in their respective infrared absorption cell.

    Fig.2 Device for the acidification procedures

    Fig.3 Cross section diagram of SG-GL1100 tube furnace

    3 RESULT AND DISCUSSION

    3.1 Impurities in crucibles and carbon blanks

    To enhance the accuracy of TOC or BC data, five new customized crucibles were heated to 1 100° C for 4 hours for removing the absorbed impurities and water. Their impurities and carbon blanks were accordingly measured, and presented in Table 1,where it can be seen that the diff erences in the masses between original and treated crucibles are at the interval of 3.30- 4.35 mg per crucible, implying the existence of absorbed impurities and water. The carbon blanks of the new empty crucibles were measured by a CS-230 carbon-sulfur analyzer, and listed in Table 1, where it is shown that all detected carbon values are negative, indicating that their carbon blanks are lower than the level of LOQ, and there is no carbon in the new crucibles.

    Table 1 Comparison of the masses between five original and treated crucibles

    Fig.4 Variations of the TOC contents in marine sediment samples with HCl concentrations (a), duration of HCl soaking duration (b), temperatures of HCl cooking (c), and heating duration before washing (d)

    3.2 Optimization of experimental parameters

    To improve accuracy and reliability of TOC and BC data, the following experimental parameters were systematically optimized for acidification: HCl concentration, duration of HCl soaking, HCl cooking temperature, and heating duration before washing.

    3.2.1 HCl concentration

    Ten acidification experiments at room temperature were performed for optimizing the concentrations of HCl, and the results are presented in Fig.4a. It is shown that the TOC contents gradually decrease with increasing HCl concentration at the range of 0.5- 4.0 mol/L, and there is no obvious change at the interval of 2.5- 3.5 mol/L (Fig.4a). Clearly, over high(>4.0 mol/L) or low concentrations (<2.0 mol/L) of HCl will evidently aff ect the measured TOC contents,probably due to the formation of volatile halides or remaining carbonates. Thus, we consider that the optimal concentration is 3 mol/L HCl.

    Table 2 Recovery rate of TOC and BC in soils/sediments

    3.2.2 Duration of HCl soaking

    Eleven acidification experiments at room temperature were carried out for gaining the optimal duration of HCl soaking, and the results are illustrated in Fig.4b. It demonstrates that the TOC contents gradually decline with HCl soaking time in the period of 4- 11 hours, and maintain a level of 0.92%- 0.93%after 11 hours (Fig.4b). Therefore, we considered the optimal HCl soaking duration to be 12 hours.

    3.2.3 HCl cooking temperature

    Ten acidification experiments revealed TOC decreased gradually as temperature increased from 40° C to 75° C, but remained steady at 0.91%- 0.93%between 75° C and 95° C (Fig.4c). Therefore, we considered the optimal HCl cooking temperature to be 80° C.

    3.2.4 Heating duration before washing

    Ten acidification experiments at 80° C revealed TOC decreased gradually with increased heating time between 30 min and 50 min, but stayed a level of 0.91%- 0.93% from 50 min to 120 min (Fig.4d).Therefore, we considered the optimal heating duration before washing to be 60 min.

    3.3 Limited sample size versus diverse analytical items

    Typically many analyses (e.g., isotope dating, TOC and BC measurement, grain size, and stable carbon/nitrogen isotope ratios) compete for a subsample from a complete sample of 2- 3 g total weight. Therefore,economical analytical procedures for measuring various attributes of a sample are preferred. Our optimization experiments suggest 100 mg or 150 mg of subsample usually suffi ces for measurement of TOC or BC (Lin et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2018; Zhu et al., 2018). One gram of sample suffi ces for measurement of detecting the contents of diverse carbon forms and δ13C and δ15N values, in addition to grain-size analysis for marine sediment cores.

    3.4 Low TOC/BC recovery rate versus data reproducibility

    Before measuring TOC or BC using the instruments,samples must be pretreated to remove carbonates,which conventionally involves in the recovery procedure. It is well known that low recovery rates of TOC or BC remarkably influence data reproducibility for sediment cores. In general, TOC or BC recovery from analytical procedures is variable, ranging from 46% to 92% (Table 2). Our own experiments confirmed that the recovery rates of wet oxidation for TOC and dichromate oxidation for BC were 60%- 80% and 50%- 70%, respectively (Table 2).Century-scale BC sequences recently reported from fine-grained sediment cores from the central South Yellow Sea suggest the relatively low BC recovery rate evidently aff ected the pattern of BC sequences,because some BC particles might partially be lost during pretreatment (Xu et al., 2018). Low and/or unstable recovery rates may decrease data reliability and increase fluctuation within temporal TOC or BC sequences, making it more diffi cult to interpret real variations in temporal sequences of sediment cores.Our use of disposable ceramic crucibles with micropore-controlled ability to remove carbonates,without involvement of the procedures of recovering TOC or BC, eliminated the negative eff ects of the low recovery rate, and enhanced the reproducibility of carbon data.

    Table 3 Comparison of the performance between carbon-sulfur analyzer and elemental analyzer

    3.5 A large number of subsamples versus rapid batch measurements

    When measuring TOC or BC contents in marine sediment cores, many (usually several hundred)subsamples need to be analyzed. To economize on time and labor, two key strategies are to develop effi cient pretreatment facilities using optimal analytical procedures, and analytical instruments capable of rapid detection of TOC or BC contents with the high precision and accuracy. According to our optimal experiments and comprehensive assessment, our pretreatment protocols (Figs.2 and 3)enable simultaneous treatment of up to 240 TOC subsamples (equivalent to 10 Teflon holders, Fig.2)and 96 BC subsamples (Fig.3).

    Based on instrument performance, we considered that both carbon/sulfur and elemental analyzers can meet the requirements of quantifying TOC and BC in aspects of accuracy, stability, and effi ciency (running cost) (Table 3). However, as the carbon/sulfur analyzer was more effi cient (Table 3), and compatible with our disposable ceramic crucibles, it was selected for subsequent TOC/BC measurement.

    3.6 Advantages of the new WXY method

    The WXY method uses customized disposable ceramic crucibles with micropore-controlled ability,whose carbon blank is so low that a very low LOQ was reached during analysis. In addition, using disposable ceramic crucibles simplified the experimental procedure, leading to near complete BC recovery compared with conventional methods with complicated operational processes and relatively low BC recovery (Table 4).

    The Teflon holder improves the experimental effi ciency in that it allows simultaneous processing of 24 subsamples, with the tube furnace capable of accommodating up to four Teflon holders for processing 96 subsamples per batch. The Teflon holders also ensure all subsamples are subject to comparable experimental conditions, and therefore keep the high stability and experimental repeatability of the sample data, which is urgent and important when revealing a high-resolution temporal sequence for one marine sediment core.

    The carbon-sulfur analyzer is used in the final measurement, which can easily determine the carbon contents of a relatively large amount of subsample(about 100 mg for TOC, and about 150 mg for BC),more than five times that of the elemental analyzer in conventional methods. Therefore, the homogeneity of large subsamples used for carbon-sulfur analysis is better than that for the elemental analyzer (Table 4).

    The WXY method provides a relatively fast tool for obtaining the accurate and reliable data of TOC or BC contents. The novel approach has already contributed to an improved understanding of the mechanisms of carbon burial, accumulation and sequestration in the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea (Lin et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2018; Xu et al.,2018; Zhu et al., 2018).

    Table 4 Comparison of WXY and conventional CTO-375 methods

    4 CONCLUSION

    The WXY method for detecting the contents of TOC and BC in marine sediment cores has been successfully developed, which can fully meet the requirements of establishing the high-resolution temporal sequences of TOC or BC. The key techniques of this method use customized disposable ceramic crucible with micropores, several readily made Teflon holding devices for batch processing of subsamples,and optimized analytical procedures. The WXY method will provide a strong technical support for studying on sedimentary organic carbon and its related significant issues such as global climate change, anthropogenic influence on seas, and carbon sequestration into coastal shelf sediments, and further understanding of carbon cycles.

    Agarwal T, Bucheli T D. 2011. Adaptation, validation and application of the chemo-thermal oxidation method to quantify black carbon in soils. Environmental Pollution,159(2): 532-538.

    Allison L E. 1935. Organic soil carbon by reduction of chromic acid. Soil Science, 40(4): 311-320.

    Avramidis P, Nikolaou K, Bekiari V. 2015. Total organic carbon and total nitrogen in sediments and soils: a comparison of the wet oxidation-titration method with the combustion-infrared method. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 4: 425-430.

    Blair N E, Aller R C. 2012. The fate of terrestrial organic carbon in the marine environment. Annual Review of Marine Science, 4: 401-423.

    Canuel E A, Hardison A K. 2016. Sources, ages, and alteration of organic matter in estuaries. Annual Review of Marine Science, 8: 409-434.

    Dean Jr W E. 1974. Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 44(1): 242-248.

    Díaz-Zorita M. 1999. Soil organic carbon recovery by the Walkley-Black method in a typic hapludoll. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 30(5-6): 739-745.

    Dickens A F, Gelinas Y, Masiello C A, Wakeham S, Hedges J I.2004. Reburial of fossil organic carbon in marine sediments. Nature, 427(6972): 336-339.

    Gao X L, Yang Y W, Wang C Y. 2012. Geochemistry of organic carbon and nitrogen in surface sediments of coastal Bohai Bay inferred from their ratios and stable isotopic signatures. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 64(6): 1 148-1 155.

    Gillman G P, Sinclair D F, Beech T A. 1986. Recovery of organic carbon by the Walkley and Black procedure in highly weathered soils. Communications in Soil Science& Plant Analysis, 17(8): 885-892.

    Gustafsson O, Bucheli T D, Kukulska Z, Andersson M,Largeau C, Rouzaud J N, Reddy C M, Eglinton T I. 2001.Evaluation of a protocol for the quantification of black carbon in sediments. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,15(4): 881-890.

    Hedges J I, Keil R G. 1995. Sedimentary organic matter preservation: an assessment and speculative synthesis.Marine Chemistry, 49(2-3): 81-115.

    Huang L, Zhang J, Wu Y, Wang J. 2016. Distribution and preservation of black carbon in the East China Sea sediments: Perspectives on carbon cycling at continental margins. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 124: 43-52.

    Leong L S, Tanner P A. 1999. Comparison of methods for determination of organic carbon in marine sediment.Marine Pollution Bulletin, 38(10): 875-879.

    Lettens S, De Vos B, Quataert P, Van Wesemael B, Muys B,Van Orshoven J. 2007. Variable carbon recovery of Walkley-Black analysis and implications for national soil organic carbon accounting. European Journal of Soil Science, 58(6): 1 244-1 253.

    Lin J, Zhu Q, Hong Y H, Yuan L R, Liu J Z, Xu X M, Wang J H. 2017. Synchronous responses of sedimentary organic carbon accumulation in the inner shelf of the East China Sea to the water impoundment of Three Gorges and Gezhouba Dams. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-017-6216-0.

    Luczak C, Janquin M A, Kupka A. 1997. Simple standard procedure for the routine determination of organic matter in marine sediments. Hydrobiologia, 345(1): 87-94.

    Mantoura R F C, Martin J M, Wollast R. 1991. Ocean margin processes in global change. John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    Meredith W, Ascough P L, Bird M I, Large D J, Snape C E,Song J, Sun Y, Tilston E L. 2013. Direct evidence from hydropyrolysis for the retention of long alkyl moieties in black carbon fractions isolated by acidified dichromate oxidation. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis,103: 232-239.

    Mingorance M D, Barahona E, Fernández-Gálvez J. 2007.Guidelines for improving organic carbon recovery by the wet oxidation method. Chemosphere, 68(3): 409-413.

    Pohl K, Cantwell M, Herckes P, Lohmann R. 2014. Black carbon concentrations and sources in the marine boundary layer of the tropical Atlantic Ocean using four methodologies. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,14(14): 7 431-7 443.

    Rabenhorst M C. 1988. Determination of organic and carbonate carbon in calcareous soils using dry combustion. Soils Science Society of America Journal, 52: 965-969.

    Schuur E A G, McGuire A D, Sch?del C, Grosse G, Harden J W, Hayes D J, Hugelius G, Koven C D, Kuhry P, Lawrence D M, Natali S M, Olefeldt D, Romanovsky V E, Schaefer K, Turetsky M R, Treat C C, Vonk J E. 2015. Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback. Nature,520(7546): 171-179.

    Snyder J D, Trofymow J A. 1984. A rapid accurate wet oxidation diff usion procedure for determining organic and inorganic carbon in plant and soil samples. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 15(5): 587-597.

    Talley L D, Feely R A, Sloyan B M, Wanninkhof R, Baringer M O, Bullister J L, Carlson C A, Doney S C, Fine R A,Firing E, Gruber N, Hansell D A, Ishii M, Johnson G C,Katsumata K, Key R M, Kramp M, Langdon C, Macdonald A M, Mathis J T, McDonagh E L, Mecking S, Millero F J,Mordy C W, Nakano T, Sabine C L, Smethie W M, Swift J H, Tanhua T, Thurnherr A M, Warner M J, Zhang J Z.2016. Changes in ocean heat, carbon content, and ventilation: A review of the first decade of GO-SHIP global repeat hydrography. Annual Review of Marine Science, 8: 185-215.

    Vitti C, Stellacci A M, Leogrande R, Mastrangelo M, Cazzato E, Ventrella D. 2016. Assessment of organic carbon in soils: a comparison between the Springer-Klee wet digestion and the dry combustion methods in Mediterranean soils (Southern Italy). Catena, 137: 113-119.

    Walkley A, Black I A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareffmethod for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science, 37(1): 29-38.

    Wang J H, Xiao X, Zhou Q Z, Xu X M, Liu J Z, Yuan D. 2018.Rates and fluxes of century-scale carbon storage in the fine-grained sediments from the central South Yellow Sea and Min-Zhe belt, East China Sea. Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 36(1): 139-152, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-017-6242-y.

    Wang J, Zhu L, Wang Y, Gao S, Daut G. 2012. A comparison of diff erent methods for determining the organic and inorganic carbon content of lake sediment from two lakes on the Tibetan Plateau. Quaternary International, 250:49-54.

    Xu X M, Hong Y H, Zhou Q Z, Liu J Z, Yuan L R, Wang J H.2017. Century-scale high-resolution black carbon records in the sediment cores from the South Yellow Sea, China.Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 36(1): 115-127,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-017-6214-2.

    Yang W, Lampert D, Zhao N, Reible D, Chen W. 2012. Link between black carbon and resistant desorption of PAHs on soil and sediment. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 12(5):713-723.

    Zhu Q, Lin J, Hong Y H, Yuan L R, Liu J Z, Xu X M, Wang J H. 2017. Century-scale records of total organic carbon in the sediment cores from the South Yellow Sea, China.Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 36(1): 128-138,https://doi.org/10.1007/s00343-017-6215-1.

    猜你喜歡
    金鐘江海建平
    在露水與江海面前,你會(huì)如何選擇?
    “金鐘之星”藝術(shù)團(tuán)走進(jìn)精準(zhǔn)扶貧首倡地花垣縣
    中國音協(xié)金鐘之星藝術(shù)團(tuán)慰問演出走進(jìn)十八洞
    Preparation and photoelectric properties of cadmium sulfide quantum dots?
    木朵朵的“金鐘花”
    江海
    黃河之聲(2018年4期)2018-04-24 02:43:58
    The Effect of Grammar Teaching on Writing in China
    卷宗(2016年3期)2016-05-10 07:41:06
    6000m~3江海直達(dá)LNG運(yùn)輸船推進(jìn)系統(tǒng)分析
    船海工程(2015年4期)2016-01-05 15:53:32
    影像站等
    文史天地(2009年11期)2009-12-09 05:55:10
    亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 精品久久久久久久久久免费视频| 操出白浆在线播放| 国产精品av久久久久免费| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 精品久久久久久久人妻蜜臀av | 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲第一电影网av| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 桃红色精品国产亚洲av| 91av网站免费观看| 成人免费观看视频高清| 岛国视频午夜一区免费看| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 午夜两性在线视频| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 9色porny在线观看| 午夜成年电影在线免费观看| 性欧美人与动物交配| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| x7x7x7水蜜桃| 欧美乱妇无乱码| 国产av又大| 成人手机av| 国产午夜精品久久久久久| 在线观看一区二区三区| 成人三级黄色视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看| 在线永久观看黄色视频| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 一级a爱片免费观看的视频| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久久久亚洲av毛片大全| 亚洲全国av大片| 丝袜在线中文字幕| 一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 一级黄色大片毛片| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 曰老女人黄片| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产aⅴ精品一区二区三区波| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 成人国语在线视频| 热99re8久久精品国产| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 丝袜人妻中文字幕| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 久久久久九九精品影院| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 亚洲黑人精品在线| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 国产av又大| 日韩有码中文字幕| 精品无人区乱码1区二区| 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 多毛熟女@视频| 久久久久久久久免费视频了| 人妻丰满熟妇av一区二区三区| 久久青草综合色| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 一二三四在线观看免费中文在| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲欧美精品综合久久99| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 久久国产亚洲av麻豆专区| 国产亚洲精品综合一区在线观看 | 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 成在线人永久免费视频| 亚洲一码二码三码区别大吗| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 久久精品成人免费网站| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 亚洲欧美激情综合另类| 国产精品久久电影中文字幕| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 免费在线观看日本一区| 黑人操中国人逼视频| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 亚洲精华国产精华精| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 久久久国产成人精品二区| 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频| 九色国产91popny在线| 一进一出抽搐动态| 视频区欧美日本亚洲| 狠狠狠狠99中文字幕| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 免费在线观看完整版高清| 亚洲熟妇熟女久久| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 免费看十八禁软件| 女警被强在线播放| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 亚洲免费av在线视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 看免费av毛片| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 国产免费男女视频| 久久精品91蜜桃| 婷婷精品国产亚洲av在线| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 长腿黑丝高跟| 亚洲九九香蕉| 青草久久国产| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 国产激情欧美一区二区| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲 欧美 日韩 在线 免费| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 搡老岳熟女国产| 人人妻人人爽人人添夜夜欢视频| 久久中文字幕一级| 99riav亚洲国产免费| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 久久精品国产99精品国产亚洲性色 | 亚洲人成伊人成综合网2020| 一卡2卡三卡四卡精品乱码亚洲| 制服人妻中文乱码| 亚洲一区二区三区不卡视频| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁狠狠躁| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 免费观看人在逋| 国产欧美日韩一区二区精品| 国产单亲对白刺激| 日日夜夜操网爽| 欧美乱色亚洲激情| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 国产又爽黄色视频| av有码第一页| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 久久久久久久久中文| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 国产av在哪里看| 88av欧美| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国内精品久久久久久久电影| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 国产精品乱码一区二三区的特点 | 一级片免费观看大全| 国产国语露脸激情在线看| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| www日本在线高清视频| 99久久久亚洲精品蜜臀av| 国产成人系列免费观看| 久久香蕉国产精品| 色播亚洲综合网| 亚洲一卡2卡3卡4卡5卡精品中文| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 一区二区三区国产精品乱码| 欧美日韩黄片免| 在线观看免费视频网站a站| 国产精品九九99| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 精品国产亚洲在线| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 露出奶头的视频| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 欧美日韩瑟瑟在线播放| 国产精品99久久99久久久不卡| 国产野战对白在线观看| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 夜夜爽天天搞| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 两个人看的免费小视频| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 又大又爽又粗| 久久久久久亚洲精品国产蜜桃av| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 一区二区三区激情视频| 男女午夜视频在线观看| 免费高清视频大片| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 999久久久精品免费观看国产| 午夜福利欧美成人| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产精品秋霞免费鲁丝片| 国产片内射在线| 精品国产国语对白av| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 午夜影院日韩av| 天堂√8在线中文| 一边摸一边抽搐一进一小说| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲精品av麻豆狂野| 国产精品亚洲一级av第二区| 国产三级在线视频| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 久久久久九九精品影院| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 亚洲精品久久成人aⅴ小说| 亚洲aⅴ乱码一区二区在线播放 | 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 久久中文看片网| 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 国产麻豆成人av免费视频| 黄色a级毛片大全视频| 九色亚洲精品在线播放| 美女大奶头视频| 亚洲精品美女久久av网站| 欧美成狂野欧美在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久男人天堂| 中文字幕精品免费在线观看视频| 日韩免费av在线播放| 天堂动漫精品| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 日韩欧美在线二视频| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| av天堂在线播放| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 高清毛片免费观看视频网站| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 国产精品野战在线观看| 老司机靠b影院| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀| 欧美成人一区二区免费高清观看 | 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 免费av毛片视频| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 久久人人97超碰香蕉20202| 女生性感内裤真人,穿戴方法视频| 99香蕉大伊视频| 欧美大码av| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看 | 99久久国产精品久久久| 久久午夜综合久久蜜桃| 一级a爱视频在线免费观看| 国产精品香港三级国产av潘金莲| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 超碰成人久久| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 成人免费观看视频高清| 很黄的视频免费| 精品高清国产在线一区| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 美女高潮喷水抽搐中文字幕| 大香蕉久久成人网| 日本三级黄在线观看| av免费在线观看网站| 国产三级在线视频| 国产一区二区三区在线臀色熟女| 无人区码免费观看不卡| 在线观看舔阴道视频| 黑人巨大精品欧美一区二区蜜桃| 国产精品九九99| 亚洲成av人片免费观看| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久人人做人人爽| 一区二区三区精品91| 九色国产91popny在线| 国产一区二区三区视频了| 日日夜夜操网爽| 午夜两性在线视频| 免费在线观看完整版高清| 91国产中文字幕| 精品国产乱子伦一区二区三区| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 色婷婷久久久亚洲欧美| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 麻豆av在线久日| 国产三级在线视频| 成人18禁在线播放| 亚洲五月婷婷丁香| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区| av欧美777| 免费搜索国产男女视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 丝袜美腿诱惑在线| 色播亚洲综合网| 91麻豆av在线| 久久久久国产精品人妻aⅴ院| 国产又爽黄色视频| 满18在线观看网站| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 日韩精品中文字幕看吧| 国产蜜桃级精品一区二区三区| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久影院123| 亚洲中文字幕一区二区三区有码在线看 | 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 国产免费av片在线观看野外av| 午夜免费激情av| 黄片播放在线免费| 黄色 视频免费看| 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产麻豆69| 国产伦一二天堂av在线观看| 免费少妇av软件| 18禁美女被吸乳视频| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 欧美绝顶高潮抽搐喷水| 丁香欧美五月| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区综合| 我的亚洲天堂| 91字幕亚洲| 欧美日韩乱码在线| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 国产精品免费视频内射| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 欧美成人免费av一区二区三区| 亚洲色图av天堂| 他把我摸到了高潮在线观看| 国产亚洲av嫩草精品影院| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 亚洲性夜色夜夜综合| 老司机午夜福利在线观看视频| 亚洲午夜精品一区,二区,三区| 午夜免费成人在线视频| 制服丝袜大香蕉在线| 成人三级做爰电影| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久毛片| 久久精品影院6| 可以在线观看的亚洲视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 男女床上黄色一级片免费看| 欧美色视频一区免费| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 亚洲av熟女| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 色播在线永久视频| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 中亚洲国语对白在线视频| 午夜免费鲁丝| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯| 精品第一国产精品| 自线自在国产av| 久久中文字幕人妻熟女| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清牌| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 精品乱码久久久久久99久播| 国产成人影院久久av| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 91成年电影在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 一区在线观看完整版| 成人精品一区二区免费| 91成人精品电影| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久亚洲av鲁大| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 亚洲第一电影网av| ponron亚洲| 欧美成人性av电影在线观看| 91老司机精品| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 欧美另类亚洲清纯唯美| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看| 色综合站精品国产| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 91成年电影在线观看| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| 最近最新中文字幕大全免费视频| 亚洲天堂国产精品一区在线| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 18禁裸乳无遮挡免费网站照片 | 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 精品久久蜜臀av无| 色哟哟哟哟哟哟| 两个人视频免费观看高清| 看免费av毛片| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 在线免费观看的www视频| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 老司机在亚洲福利影院| 亚洲av电影在线进入| 日韩欧美国产一区二区入口| 村上凉子中文字幕在线| 国产精华一区二区三区| 香蕉久久夜色| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久 | 免费人成视频x8x8入口观看| 啦啦啦韩国在线观看视频| 午夜a级毛片| 国产97色在线日韩免费| 亚洲国产欧美日韩在线播放| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产成人av激情在线播放| 精品电影一区二区在线| АⅤ资源中文在线天堂| 精品久久久久久成人av| 麻豆成人av在线观看| 亚洲男人天堂网一区| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频| 久久精品国产亚洲av高清一级| 99国产精品99久久久久| 在线免费观看的www视频| 亚洲av电影不卡..在线观看| 老司机靠b影院| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 又黄又粗又硬又大视频| 99在线人妻在线中文字幕| 久久久久精品国产欧美久久久| 精品久久久久久,| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 亚洲欧美激情在线| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 我的亚洲天堂| 国产高清激情床上av| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 亚洲专区中文字幕在线| 大香蕉久久成人网| 亚洲精品一卡2卡三卡4卡5卡| 香蕉丝袜av| 窝窝影院91人妻| 午夜福利,免费看| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又伦精品不卡| 日韩成人在线观看一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区四区五区乱码| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久人妻精品电影| 精品久久久精品久久久| 久久久久久久午夜电影| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免费看| 老司机午夜十八禁免费视频| 亚洲一区二区三区色噜噜| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 午夜福利影视在线免费观看| 亚洲av日韩精品久久久久久密| xxx96com| 国产精品免费一区二区三区在线| 多毛熟女@视频| 美女午夜性视频免费| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 神马国产精品三级电影在线观看 | 国产三级在线视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 妹子高潮喷水视频| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 成人国产综合亚洲| 香蕉丝袜av| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 在线观看免费视频日本深夜| 欧美在线一区亚洲| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三四区| 99国产精品一区二区三区| av在线天堂中文字幕| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 亚洲精品国产精品久久久不卡| 啦啦啦观看免费观看视频高清 | 国内久久婷婷六月综合欲色啪| 午夜福利欧美成人| 中文字幕色久视频| 国产在线观看jvid| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费另类| 夜夜夜夜夜久久久久| 波多野结衣高清无吗| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 亚洲成人久久性| 男人操女人黄网站| 欧美日韩黄片免| 亚洲色图 男人天堂 中文字幕| 身体一侧抽搐| 好男人在线观看高清免费视频 | 免费在线观看影片大全网站| 一区二区三区精品91| 动漫黄色视频在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 亚洲欧美日韩另类电影网站| 国产精品久久视频播放| 色老头精品视频在线观看| 国产高清有码在线观看视频 | 国产成年人精品一区二区| 国产在线精品亚洲第一网站| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 成人欧美大片| 久久久国产精品麻豆| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 久久香蕉国产精品| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 国产精品九九99| 真人做人爱边吃奶动态| 成人免费观看视频高清| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 国产av精品麻豆| 亚洲最大成人中文| 亚洲国产精品成人综合色| 精品福利观看| 在线观看午夜福利视频| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 一区在线观看完整版| 亚洲全国av大片| 亚洲成a人片在线一区二区| 亚洲国产精品999在线| 国产亚洲精品一区二区www| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 在线国产一区二区在线| 露出奶头的视频| 色播在线永久视频| 黄色视频,在线免费观看| 亚洲国产日韩欧美精品在线观看 | 麻豆成人av在线观看| 啪啪无遮挡十八禁网站| 国产精品98久久久久久宅男小说| 亚洲精品久久国产高清桃花| 亚洲电影在线观看av| 男人操女人黄网站| 老熟妇仑乱视频hdxx| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 精品电影一区二区在线| 精品国产一区二区久久| 999精品在线视频| 在线观看免费午夜福利视频| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 欧美日韩一级在线毛片| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 两人在一起打扑克的视频| 99re在线观看精品视频| 午夜福利成人在线免费观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 正在播放国产对白刺激| 久热这里只有精品99| 九色国产91popny在线| 欧美日本中文国产一区发布| 麻豆一二三区av精品| 国产精品自产拍在线观看55亚洲| 亚洲最大成人中文| 久久精品91无色码中文字幕| 久久久久久免费高清国产稀缺| 最近最新免费中文字幕在线| 激情视频va一区二区三区| 后天国语完整版免费观看| 身体一侧抽搐| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 亚洲精品一区av在线观看| 中出人妻视频一区二区| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 人人澡人人妻人| 国产精品二区激情视频| 一级毛片高清免费大全| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 曰老女人黄片| 18美女黄网站色大片免费观看| 麻豆久久精品国产亚洲av| 如日韩欧美国产精品一区二区三区|