Murine model of acute myocarditis and cerebral cortical neuron edema induced by coxsackievirus B4

Zhao-Peng Dong, Qian Wang, Zhen-Jie Zhang, Michael J. Carr, Dong Li, Wei-Feng Shi,＊

1 Key Laboratory of Etiology and Epidemiology of Emerging Infectious Diseases in Universities of Shandong, Taishan Medical University,Taian Shandong 271000, China

2 Shanghai Jinshan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Shanghai 201599, China

3 School of Public Health, Taishan Medical University, Taian Shandong 271016, China

4 Global Station for Zoonosis Control, Global Institution for Collaborative Research and Education (GI-CoRE), Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-8589, Japan

5 National Virus Reference Laboratory, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland

INTRODUCTION

Coxsackievirus B (CV-B) comprises a number of established cardiomyopathy-associated viral serotypes, taxonomically classified within the genus Enterovirus species B, family Picornaviridae. There are currently 63 recognized enterovirus serotypes (www.picornaviridae.com) with diverse tissue tropisms and correspondingly broad spectrum of disease presentation,including myocarditis, encephalitis, paralysis, meningitis, upper and lower respiratory disease, pleurodynia, herpangina,myopericarditis, pancreatitis, and type I diabetes (Knowles et al., 2011; Tapparel et al., 2013). In the prior two decades,1the relationship between CV-B and myocarditis/dilated cardiomyopathy has been substantiated. For example, CV-B infections have been identified in approximately 25%–40% cases of acute myocarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy in young adolescents and adults (Gaaloul et al., 2014; Leonard, 2004). Furthermore,an epidemiological survey has revealed the co-circulation of six serotypes of CV-B in a single location in Changchun, Jilin Province, China, with the predominant agents of viral myocarditis in infants from 2002–2011 being CV-B3 (30.1%–36.5%), CV-B4 (18.0%–24.8%), and CV-B5 (3.3%–8.1%)(Zhang et al., 2014). Significantly, CV-B4 is also associated with severe central nervous system (CNS) complications and neurological sequelae (Zhu et al., 2015).

Previous research has employed mouse models to study CVB4 infection. These studies have mainly focused on the inflammatory insults in exocrine tissue damage (De Palma et al., 2009) and the association with type 1 diabetes (McCall et al., 2015) during CV-B4 infection. Due to the lack of a stable mouse model of CV-B4 infection, the exact mechanism(s) of how CV-B4 results in myocarditis and CNS invasion remain unclear. Furthermore, pathogenesis studies are impeded by the absence of appropriate animal models of disease that would facilitate the development of prophylactic vaccines and antivirals for the prevention and treatment of acute disease.

We investigated whether CV-B4 infection results in a predisposition to myocarditis and CNS infection in Institute for Cancer Research (ICR) neonatal mice. Dynamic detection of viral loads, hematoxylin and eosin staining, and immunohistochemical examination were performed to determine tissue tropisms,pathological lesions, and distribution of CV-B4 in vivo, respectively.Finally, the expression levels of virus-induced inflammatory cytokines were examined and correlated with viral titers and clinical scores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Virus and cells

Human laryngeal carcinoma epithelium (Hep-2) cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM;Gibco, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum(Gibco) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at 37 °C under a 5%CO2atmosphere. The CV-B4 LY114F strain employed in the present study was isolated from the stool of a three-year-old patient who presented with classical symptoms of hand, foot,and mouth disease (HFMD) in Linyi city, Shandong Province,China, in 2015. Virus propagation in Hep-2 cells and 50% tissue culture infective doses (TCID50) were determined in accordance with the methods of Reed & Muench (1938).

Ethics statement and animal infection model

Institute for Cancer Research (ICR) mice were purchased from Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd. The animal experiments were approved by the Taishan Medical College Administrative Committee for Laboratory Animals, and all procedures involving animals were performed in accordance with the Shandong Laboratory Animal Welfare and Ethics Administrative Committee.

Three-day-old ICR mice were challenged with the CV-B4 LY114F strain (107TCID50/animal) by intramuscular (i.m.) injection,with control groups injected with DMEM. Body weights, clinical manifestations, and survival rates of mice infected with LY114F were monitored daily until 10 days post infection (dpi). Multivariate analysis was used to analyze the differences in body weights between infected mice and negative controls at each observation time point. Clinical criteria were scored as follows: 0, healthy; 1,lethargy and inactivity; 2, hind limb weakness; 3, single limb paralysis; 4, double hind limb paralysis; and 5, death or dying.

Dynamics of CV-B4 viral RNA titers in infected mice

Brain, heart, contralateral hind limb skeletal muscle, lung,intestine, spleen, and blood samples from each mouse (n=3 per time point) infected with LY114F were collected at 1–5 dpi,respectively. Viral RNA was extracted from equivalent weights of tissue samples and volumes of blood samples from infected and control mice with TRIzol reagent (Takara, China), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was generated using a reverse transcription kit (Takara, China) for 45 min at 42 °C and a GoldStar TaqMan Mixture kit (CWBIO) was employed for realtime PCR. Oligonucleotide primers and hydrolysis probe sequences are as follows: sense, 5'-CCTGAATGCGGCTAAT CC-3'; antisense, 5'-TTGTCACCATWAGCAGYCA-3'; and hydrolysis probe, 5'-FAM-CCGACTACTTTGGGWGTCCGTGT-BHQ1-3'.Real-time PCR thermocycling was performed on a LightCycler 96 platform with the following conditions: 95 °C for 10 min; 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 1 min. Standard curves for absolute quantification of CV-B4 copy numbers in different tissue and blood samples were established, as described previously (Zhang et al., 2017a, b).

ELISA measurement of cytokine levels in sera

Peripheral blood was collected from 3-day-old mock-infected controls or mice infected with a 107TCID50/animal dose of LY114F from 1–5 dpi (n=3 per time point). Peripheral blood was centrifuged immediately at 10 000 r/min for 10 min at room temperature and sera were stored at –80 °C prior to use. The levels of IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-4, IL-1β, IL-10, IL-13, IL-18, and TNF-α in sera were determined by commercial ELISA kits (Multisciences Biotechnology, China), according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

Histopathological and immunohistochemical staining

Three-day-old mice were infected with LY114F (107TCID50/animal). Brains, hearts, muscles, and lungs from experimental mice and controls were subjected to histopathological and immunohistochemical examination. Tissues were fixed in 10%neutral buffered formalin for 72 h and then embedded in paraffin, as per previously described procedures (Yu et al.,2014). For pathological examinations, formalin-fixed, paraffinembedded sections (4 μm thick) stained with hematoxylin and eosin were employed. For immunohistochemical examination,paraffin-embedded sections were dewaxed, dehydrated, and microwaved for 15 min at 95 °C to 99 °C in EDTA buffer (1 mmol/L). Polyclonal mouse anti-CV-B4 antibody (1:300 dilution;Abcam, UK) was applied for 15 h at 4 °C. A secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (1:400 dilution; ZSGB-BIO, China) was then applied for 30 min at room temperature, followed by avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex and 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride chromogen (1:1000 dilution; ZSGB-BIO, China). Subsequently, tissue sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and negative controls were incubated with PBS instead of primary antibody.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Analysis System 9.2 (SAS, USA). Differences in mean tissue viral load and serum cytokine concentrations were determined with twotailed analysis of variance (ANOVA). A difference was considered significant at P＜0.05.

RESULTS

Establishment of the CV-B4 infection mouse model

Multivariate analysis showed that the body weights of the infected mice were significantly higher than those of the negative controls at 6 dpi (F=5.439, P=0.031), 8 dpi (F=9.521,P=0.008), 9 dpi (F=8.526, P=0.009), and 10 dpi (F=10.601,P=0.004) (Figure 1). There were no significant differences between the CV-B4 LY114F-treated mice and the control group with respect to mean clinical score, and survival rate.

Figure 1 Body weights of ICR mice infected with the CV-B4 LY114F strain

Histopathological and immunohistochemical examination

To examine the histopathological lesions and distribution of viral antigens in mice post infection, histopathological analysis and immunohistochemical examination of the brains, hearts,skeletal muscles, and lungs were performed. Results showed evident pathological lesions in the brain (Figure 2A–D) and heart (Figure 2E–H) tissues in mice infected with CV-B4 LY114F, including cerebral cortical neuron edema (Figure 2B)and myocardial lymphocytic infiltration (Figure 2F).Furthermore, immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated the presence of CV-B4 antigens in brain neurons (Figure 2D) and myocardial fibers (Figure 2H); however, there were no distinct histopathological lesions or antigen detectable in the lung(Figure 2I–L) or skeletal muscle tissues (Figure 2M–P).

Dynamics of CV-B4 viral RNA titers in the CV-B4 murine model

Viral loads in 3-day-old mice inoculated with 107TCID50of CVB4 LY114F were measured at 1–5 dpi. The kinetics of viral loads in the brain, heart, contralateral hind limb skeletal muscle,lung, intestine, spleen, and blood samples are illustrated in Figure 3. In the infected group, CV-B4 RNA was detectable in the brain at 3 dpi and peaked at 5 dpi with a viral load of ＞108copies/mg tissue. Notably, viral loads in the heart were the earliest evident of all organs tested (2 dpi) and gradually decreased from 2.4×107copies/mg (2 dpi) to 1.1×107copies/mg (5 dpi). Additionally, there was a slow increase in the viral titer following infection from days 1 to 5 in lung tissues and skeletal muscle, in which viral loads each peaked at approximately 3.0×107copies/mg at 5 dpi. In contrast, from 1 to 5 dpi, viral titers in the blood (0.0–1.0×106copies/mL), intestine(0.0–3.1×106copies/mg), and spleen (0.0–3.3×106copies/mg)were much lower.

Expression of inflammatory cytokines in sera

The expressions of inflammatory cytokines, including IFN-γ, IL-6, IL-10, IL-13, TNF-α, IL-18, IL-1β, and IL-4, in sera were measured by ELISA at 1 to 5 dpi in 3-day-old ICR mice infected with CV-B4 LY114F (107TCID50/animal dose). The expressions of IFN-γ and IL-6 in sera were significantly higher in CV-B4-infected mice compared to uninfected negative controls. In CVB4-infected animals, the expression level of IFN-γ (Figure 4A)in serum peaked very early (～7 100 pg/mL at 1 dpi), and then decreased rapidly to ＜4 000 pg/mL by 2 dpi; however, high expression levels (＞2 000 pg/mL) were maintained up to 5 dpi.In contrast, the expression level of IL-6 (Figure 4B) in serum was low at 1 dpi, but increased steadily during infection and peaked at 5 dpi with a concentration of ＞500 pg/mL. The titers of IL-10 (Figure 4C) were detectable early in infection (10 pg/mL at 1 and 2 dpi) compared to uninfected controls and peaked at 16.44 pg/mL by 3 dpi, with low expression levels maintained throughout the infection. The titers of IL-13 (Figure 4D) were also detectable early in infection and peaked at 20.11 pg/mL at 2 dpi, before gradually decreasing. The expression of TNF-α(Figure 4E) was lower at earlier time points, and peaked at 17.37 pg/mL by 4 dpi. The titers of IL-18 (Figure 4F) in both experimental and control groups showed high levels of expression (＞100 pg/mL) across all time points, and there were no significant differences between the groups. Finally, the expressions of IL-1β and IL-4 were not detectable in either group.

DISCUSSION

Previous studies on the CV-B4 viral serotype have primarily focused on cardiotropism, with little emphasis on the pathogenicity of CV-B4 in the CNS (El Hiar et al., 2012; Hu et al., 2012). Earlier reports demonstrated that ＞90% of reported CV-B infections occur in infants, children, and adolescents(Romero, 2008). Therefore, establishing a sensitive neonatal animal model of CV-B4 infection is important for pathogenesis studies of CV-B4-induced CNS disease in infants. Such models could clarify the pathological processes and enable development of vaccines and antivirals for the prevention and treatment of acute neurological cases.

After 3-day-old neonatal mice were inoculated with 107TCID50CV-B4 in the present study, viral RNA was detectable in several organs, including brain, heart, lung, and skeletal muscle. Of note, viral titers in the brain were three-fold greater than that in the other organs at the latter stage of infection (5 dpi). In addition, readily discernible pathological changes were detected in both brain and myocardial tissue. Compared with enterovirus species A virus infection models, including EV-A71(Dong et al., 2016; Yue et al., 2016), CV-A16 (Huang et al.,2015; Mao et al., 2012), CV-A6 (Zhang et al., 2017b), and CVA10 (Zhang et al., 2017a), which are associated with hind limb paralysis and/or severe respiratory involvement, the enterovirus species B CV-B4 had comparably minor pathology in skeletal muscle and lung tissue.

Figure 2 HE and IHC analyses of infected 3-day-old mice after i.m. challenge with the CV-B4 LY114F strain

Figure 3 Mean viral loads in tissue and peripheral blood of CV-B4-infected mice

Figure 4 Peripheral blood cytokine expression levels in neonatal mice infected with the CV-B4 LY114F strain

The interaction between pathogen and the host immune system is critical to develop an understanding of the mechanisms of viral pathogenesis. Clinical studies have shown that the high expressions of several cytokines, such as IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10, are closely correlated with clinical manifestations and complications associated with CV-B4 infection (Alidjinou et al.,2013; Gu et al., 2009). Our data showed that after neonatal mice were inoculated with CV-B4, there was a gradual increase in the level of IL-6 in serum, different from that observed in enterovirus species A virus infection (CV-A6 and CV-A10) in ICR neonatal mice (Zhang et al., 2017a, b). Our previous studies on CV-A6 and CV-A10 mouse models of infection also showed high expression levels of IL-6 throughout all stages of infection (Zhang et al., 2017a, b). Therefore, we speculate that the differences in pathogenicity between CV-A and CV-B enteroviral species in the same neonatal ICR murine model may be attributable to differences in skeletal muscle tropisms and proinflammatory cytokine expression levels, such as that of IL-6, in peripheral blood. Previous in vivo experiments studying EV-A71 infection have shown that treatment with anti-IL-6 neutralizing antibodies increases survival rates, whereas treatment with IL-6 can exacerbate pulmonary dysfunction in EV-A71-infected mice (Khong et al., 2011). We also observed this latter phenomenon of disease exacerbation in CV-A6 and CV-A10 murine models of infection (Zhang et al., 2017a, b).

The coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) is responsible for coxsackie B virus infection in human cells(Bergelson et al., 1997), with non-permissive cells transfected with mCAR cDNA rendered susceptible to CV-B viral infections(Bergelson et al., 1997; Bergelson et al., 1998). CAR is reported to be employed by laboratory reference strains and clinical isolates of all six serotypes of EV-B (Martino et al., 2000);however, different clinical CV-B isolates have been found to possess distinct interactions with CAR (Riabi et al., 2014). In addition, enhanced CAR expression is associated with experimental autoimmune myocarditis in adult mice (Ito et al.,2000) and treatment of CV-B3-infected BALB/c mice with CAR4/7 can aggravate cardiac injury (D?rner et al., 2006).Although CAR expression is significantly higher in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) cases than in negative controls, no significant differences in EV viral loads between DCM and non-DCM cases have been observed (Sharma et al., 2016).Consequently, the relationship between increased CAR expression and viral load of enteroviruses, including CV-A and CV-B species, remains unclear and warrants further investigation.In conclusion, ICR neonatal mice i.m. infected with CV-B4 exhibited significant pathology in the brain and myocardium.This represents a suitable model for the establishment of CV-B4 infection to study the pathogenesis of CNS and cardiac complications and is a resource for the development of both prophylactic vaccines and antivirals to reduce morbidity and mortality in children.

COMPETING INTERESTS

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

W.F.S. and D.L. designed the study. Z.J.Z. and W.F.S.supervised the analyses. Z.P.D. and Q.W. performed the experiments. Z.P.D., Z.J.Z., M.J.C., D.L., and W.F.S. revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Alidjinou EK, Sané F, Engelmann I, Hober D. 2013. Serum-dependent enhancement of Coxsackievirus B4-induced production of IFNα, IL-6 and TNFα by peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Journal of Molecular Biology,425(24): 5020–5031.

Bergelson JM, Cunningham JA, Droguett G, Kurt-Jones EA, Krithivas A,Hong JS, Horwitz MS, Crowell RL, Finberg RW. 1997. Isolation of a common receptor for Coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses 2 and 5.Science, 275(5304): 1320–1323.

Bergelson JM, Krithivas A, Celi L, Droguett G, Horwitz MS, Wickham T,Crowell RL, Finberg RW. 1998. The murine CAR homolog is a receptor for coxsackie B viruses and adenoviruses. Journal of Virology, 72(1): 415–419.De Palma AM, Thibaut HJ, Li SA, Van Aelst I, Dillen C, Swinnen M,Verbeken E, Neyts J, Opdenakker G. 2009. Inflammatory rather than infectious insults play a role in exocrine tissue damage in a mouse model for coxsackievirus B4-induced pancreatitis. The Journal of Pathology,217(5): 633–641.

Dong ZP, Zhang ZJ, Yang LY, Li D, Shi WF. 2016. Establishment of a Model of Infection by Enterovirus 71 in ICR Mice. Chinese Journal of Virology,32(6): 671–682. (in Chinese)

D?rner A, Grunert HP, Lindig V, Chandrasekharan K, Fechner H, Knowlton KU, Isik A, Pauschinger M, Zeichhardt H, Schultheiss HP. 2006. Treatment of coxsackievirus-B3-infected BALB/c mice with the soluble coxsackie adenovirus receptor CAR4/7 aggravates cardiac injury. Journal of Molecular Medicine, 84(10): 842–851.

EI Hiar R, Hober D, Jaidane H, Sané F, M'hadheb-Gharbi MB, Caloone D,Gharbi J, Aouni M. 2012. Prolonged viral RNA detection in the central nervous system of one-week-old Swiss albino mice following coxsackievirus B4 and echovirus 9 infection. Intervirology, 55(6): 435–441.Gaaloul I, Riabi S, Harrath R, Hunter T, Hamda KB, Ghzala AB, Huber S,Aouni M. 2014. Coxsackievirus B detection in cases of myocarditis,myopericarditis, pericarditis and dilated cardiomyopathy in hospitalized patients. Molecular Medicine Reports, 10(6): 2811–2818.

Gu R, Shampang A, Reilly A, Fisher D, Glass W, Ramsingh AI. 2009. IL-10 is pathogenic during the development of coxsackievirus B4-induced chronic pancreatitis. Virology, 395(1): 77–86.

Hu YF, Du J, Zhao R, Xue Y, Yang F, Jin Q. 2012. Complete genome sequence of a recombinant coxsackievirus B4 from a patient with a fatal case of hand, foot, and mouth disease in Guangxi, China. Journal of Virology, 86(19): 10901–10902.

Huang L, Liu X, Li JL, Chang JL, Liu GC, Yu XF, Zhang WY. 2015.Comparative pathogenicity of Coxsackievirus A16 circulating and noncirculating strains in vitro and in a neonatal mouse model. Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 48(5): 420–426.

Ito M, Kodama M, Masuko M, Yamaura M, Fuse K, Uesugi Y, Hirono S,Okura Y, Kato K, Hotta Y, Honda T, Kuwano R, Aizawa Y. 2000. Expression of coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor in hearts of rats with experimental autoimmune myocarditis. Circulation Research, 86(3): 275–280.

Khong WX, Foo DG, Trasti SL, Tan EL, Alonso S. 2011. Sustained high levels of interleukin-6 contribute to the pathogenesis of enterovirus 71 in a neonate mouse model. Journal of Virology, 85(7): 3067–3076.

Knowles NJ, Hovi T, Hyypi? T, King AMQ, Lindberg AM, Pallansch MA,Palmenberg AC, Simmonds P, Skern T, Stanway G, Yamashita T, Zell R.2011. Picornaviridae. In: King AMQ, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Lefkowitz EJ.Virus Taxonomy: Ninth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier/Academic Press, 855–880.

Leonard EG. 2004. Viral myocarditis. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 23(7): 665–666.

Mao QY, Wang YP, Gao R, Shao J, Yao X, Lang SH, Wang C, Mao PY,Liang ZL, Wang JZ. 2012. A neonatal mouse model of coxsackievirus A16 for vaccine evaluation. Journal of Virology, 86(22): 11967–11976.

Martino TA, Petric M, Weingartl H, Bergelson JM, Opavsky MA, Richardson CD, Modlin JF, Finberg RW, Kain KC, Willis N, Gauntt CJ, Liu PP. 2000.The coxsackie-adenovirus receptor (CAR) is used by reference strains and clinical isolates representing all six serotypes of coxsackievirus group B and by swine vesicular disease virus. Virology, 271(1): 99–108.

McCall KD, Thuma JR, Courreges MC, Benencia F, James CBL, Malgor R,Kantake N, Mudd W, Denlinger N, Nolan B, Wen L, Schwartz FL. 2015.Toll-like receptor 3 is critical for coxsackievirus B4-induced type 1 diabetes in female NOD mice. Endocrinology, 156(2): 453–461.

Reed LJ, Muench H. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. American Journal of Epidemiology, 27(3): 493–497.

Riabi S, Harrath R, Gaaloul I, Bouslama L, Nasri D, Aouni M, Pillet S,Pozzetto B. 2014. Study of Coxsackie B viruses interactions with Coxsackie Adenovirus receptor and Decay-Accelerating Factor using Human CaCo-2 cell line. Journal of Biomedical Science, 21(1): 50.

Romero JR. 2008. Pediatric group B coxsackievirus infections. In: Tracy S,Oberste MS, Drescher KM. Group B Coxsackieviruses. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 223–239.

Sharma M, Mishra B, Saikia UN, Bahl A, Ratho RK, Talwar KK. 2016. Role of coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) expression and viral load of adenovirus and enterovirus in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.Archives of Virology, 161(1): 87–94.

Tapparel C, Siegrist F, Petty TJ, Kaiser L. 2013. Picornavirus and enterovirus diversity with associated human diseases. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 14: 282–293.

Yu P, Gao ZF, Zong YY, Bao LL, Xu LL, Deng W, Li FD, Lv Q, Gao ZC, Xu YF, Yao YF, Qin C. 2014. Histopathological features and distribution of EV71 antigens and SCARB2 in human fatal cases and a mouse model of enterovirus 71 infection. Virus Research, 189: 121–132.

Yue YY, Li P, Song NN, Li BQ, Li ZH, Guo YQ, Zhang WD, Wei MQ, Gai ZT,Meng H, Wang JW, Qin LZ. 2016. Genomic and immunologic factors associated with viral pathogenesis in a lethal EV71 infected neonatal mouse model. Molecular Medicine Reports, 13(5): 4183–4190.

Zhang SQ, Liu ZY, Dai L, Zhang FM. 2014. Epidemiology analysis of Coxsackievirus B virus infection in children with viral myocarditis in Changchun. Maternal and Child Health Care of China, 29(1): 75–77. (in Chinese)

Zhang ZJ, Dong ZP, Li J, Carr MJ, Zhuang DM, Wang JX, Zhang YW, Ding SJ, Tong YG, Li D, Shi WF. 2017a. Protective efficacies of formaldehydeinactivated whole-virus vaccine and antivirals in a murine model of coxsackievirus A10 infection. Journal of Virology, 91(13): e00333–17, doi:10.1128/JVI.00333-17.

Zhang ZJ, Dong ZP, Wei QJ, Carr MJ, Li J, Ding SJ, Tong YG, Li D, Shi WF.2017b. A Neonatal Murine Model of Coxsackievirus A6 Infection for Evaluation of Antiviral and Vaccine Efficacy. Journal of Virology, 91(9):e02450–16, doi: 10.1128/JVI.02450-16.

Zhu YJ, Pan Y, Chen JY, Liu JS, Chen W, Ma SH. 2015. A Coxsackie B4 virus isolated in Yunnan in 2009 is a recombinant. Virus Genes, 50(3): 375–380.