• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    influence of Chinese entrepreneurial companies’internationalization on independent innovation:Input incentive effect and efficiency improvement effect

    2017-11-01 14:21:22XinXuYunXiaChuntaoLi
    China Journal of Accounting Research 2017年3期

    Xin Xu,Yun Xia,Chuntao Li

    aSchool of Accounting and Finance,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,China

    bSchool of International Business,Jinan University,China

    cSchool of Finance,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,China

    influence of Chinese entrepreneurial companies’internationalization on independent innovation:Input incentive effect and efficiency improvement effect

    Xin Xua,*,Yun Xiab,Chuntao Lic

    aSchool of Accounting and Finance,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,China

    bSchool of International Business,Jinan University,China

    cSchool of Finance,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,China

    A R T I C L E I N F O

    Internationalization R&D Patent output Strategic emerging industries

    Within the special environment of the ChiNext market,we study how an internationalization strategy affects the independent innovation of Chinese entrepreneurial companies from two dimensions:R&D input and patent output.An internationalization strategy has a significant incentive effect on R&D input and a significant efficiency improvement effect on patent output.Entrepreneurial companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher R&D inputs and patent outputs.After endogeneity is controlled,these effects still exist.Internationalization strategy has more pronounced effects on independent innovation in strategic emerging industries.The results elucidate the internationalization strategy and independent innovation of Chinese entrepreneurial companies,and have valuable implications for Chinese regulators in making international development policies for strategic emerging industries and independent innovation.

    ?2017 Sun Yat-sen University.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    1.Introduction

    In the context of a rapidly growing knowledge economy and increasing economic globalization,independent innovation and internationalization have become inevitable means for many companies to achieve lasting survival and development and a lasting competitive edge.In view of the significance and urgency of indepen-dent innovation and internationalization,China has established a development strategy focused on building an innovative nation and ‘‘going global.” Innovation and internationalization are the ‘‘new normal” for Chinese companies’strategic behaviors.However,the mutual influence of the two major strategies,the independent innovation strategy and the internationalization strategy,has not been fully recognized,which is not helpful for implementing them or forming synergies.The core issue is whether internationalization can promote Chinese companies’independent innovation and improve their capacity for innovation.In the long run,investigating this question may reveal the mechanisms underlying how internationalization affects corporate behavior and firm performance.To become strong in innovation,China must better integrate global resources to deepen and promote Chinese companies’independent innovation and further accelerate its sustainable development.Therefore,exploring the effects of companies’internationalized operations on independent innovation not only improves Chinese companies’capacity for independent innovation using foreign resources,but also facilitates an understanding of the economic consequences of internationalization and evaluates its outcomes.This way,it can guide the implementation of the Chinese going global strategy.

    Research on the relations between companies’internationalized operations and innovation is important in both economics and management sciences.However,no universal conclusion about their relations has been reached.Scholars have various views regarding whether companies’internationalization can promote independent innovation(Hitt et al.,1997;Von Zedtwitz and Gassmann,2002;Sanna-Randaccio and Veugelers,2007;Lileeva and Trefler,2010;Bustos,2011;Bratti and Felice,2012).The empirical evidence has not been converged.In addition,according to recent research,a self-selection effect exists between internationalization and independent innovation(Clerides et al.,1998;Bernard and Jensen,1999;Melitz,2003).Independent innovation and internationalization have reverse causality.Innovation-driven competitive edge can promote internationalization and expand overseas markets(Roper and Love,2002;Lo′pez and Garc?′a,2005;Cassiman and Golovko,2011;Altomonte et al.,2013).Therefore,the endogeneity problem exists between companies’internationalization and independent innovation,which causes inconsistent and even opposite conclusions regarding their relations.Controlling endogeneity is a key strategy for identifying the relations between companies’internationalization and independent innovation.

    In China,some scholars have studied the influence of internationalization on productivity from the perspective of exports(Zhang et al.,2008,2009;Qian et al.,2011)and have provided a preliminary understanding of whether local companies’internationalization can promote productivity.However,few scholars have focused on the evidence showing that internationalization influences independent innovation.Thus,indepth research using the actual conditions in China is necessary.

    Figure 1.Trend in the overseas income and R&D investments of Chinese ChiNext companies.

    Since its establishment in 2009,the ChiNext market has provided a large amount of capital support for cultivating and developing strategic and emerging industries and optimizing and upgrading industrial structures.Various high-tech companies,such as LENS Technology Co.,Ltd.,LEPU Medical Co.,Ltd.and JINFU Technology Co.,Ltd.,have emerged and driven China’s innovative economy.According to statistics from Wind Database,the total R&D input of ChiNext market companies jumped from 4.58 billion yuan in 2009 to 20.727 billion yuan in 2014,with an annual average growth rate of 70.5%.ChiNext companies have actively implemented internationalization strategies to expand overseas markets.Correspondingly,the total revenue of overseas businesses also jumped from 13.967 billion yuan in 2009 to 60.099 billion yuan in 2014,with an annual average growth rate of 92.3%(see Fig.1).In particular,the proportion of the overseas revenue of LENS Technology has topped 95%.Thus,ChiNext companies have become typical examples of combining internationalization and independent innovation.In this context,studying whether Chinese companies’internationalization positively affects independent innovation is of policy significance and urgency.

    We use Chinese ChiNext companies as research objects and study the influence of Chinese entrepreneurial companies’internationalization strategies on independent innovation1There exist different dimensions and perspectives of innovation.The innovation discussed herein refers to technology innovation.The authors appreciate the referee’s advice very much.from the dimensions of R&D input and patent output.We consider the special environment of the Chinese ChiNext market as a natural setting in which to examine the influence of entrepreneurial companies’internationalization on independent innovation and to test relevant theories.First,Chinese ChiNext companies are positioned to promote emerging industries and innovative companies.Thus,independent innovation is an important standard for Chinese ChiNext companies.By the end of 2012,the proportion of companies in strategic emerging industries to all ChiNext companies was as high as 64%.Compared with companies on the main board and the small and medium enterprise board,ChiNext companies better ref l ect the influence of internationalization on independent innovation.Second,innovation and internationalization levels are influenced by organizational scale.However,choosing Chinese ChiNext companies as research objects eliminate the scale effect on internationalization and innovation.In innovation economics,company scale is a key factor inf l uencing innovation(Schumpeter,1942).However,the relation between scale and innovation is still controversial.Schumpeter(1942)argues that only large companies can afford R&D expenditures,take failures through large-scale innovation and enjoy the advantages of innovation,namely the ‘‘Schumpeter Hypothesis.” However,Porter(1985)and Barney(1991)argue that although small companies have no scale advantages,they can flexibly focus on their competitive technological fields.Different from small companies,large companies can bear the high sunk costs and exploration costs of overseas markets and the high risks of international trade.Therefore,large companies can expand into overseas markets more easily(Teece,1986;Clerides et al.,1998;Melitz,2003).Studies have also proved that export-oriented manufacturers are large in scale(Bernard and Jensen,1999;Greenaway et al.,2005).Thus,it is necessary to control the scale effect on internationalization and innovation.As most ChiNext companies are small companies in the start-up and growth phases,the scale effects of large companies can be eliminated,improving the study of the influence of small companies’internationalization on independent innovation.Third,in economics,product diversification exerts extensive influences on innovation(Schumpeter,1942;Hoskisson and Johnson,1992;Hitt et al.,1997;Miller,2004).Thus,the in fluence of industrial diversification on innovation should be controlled in studying internationalization.Interim Measures on Administration of Initial Public Offering and Listing on ChiNext promulgated by the China Securities Regulatory Commission on March 31,2009 and Measures on Administration of Initial Public Offering and Listing on ChiNext on February 11,2014 explicitly state that ‘‘issuers in the ChiNext market shall mainly engage in one main business.”Accordingly,emphasis on business simplification excludes the possibility of diversification,providing a natural setting in which to study the influence of internationalization on independent innovation.

    We make a number of theoretical contributions to the literature.First,we depict internationalization from several dimensions,such as export sales intensity,export sales proportion and overseas institutions.We also study the influence of Chinese entrepreneurial companies’internationalization on independent innovation from the dimensions of R&D input and patent output.This facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the influence of internationalization on independent innovation.We supplement empirical evidence of the influence of internationalization on innovation output and partly reveal the mechanisms underlying the influence of internationalization on companies’behaviors and firm performance.After controlling endogenous factors,internationalization strategies exert input incentive effects on R&D and companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher R&D inputs;furthermore,internationalization strategies exert efficiency improvement effects on patent production and companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher patent output efficiencies.Second,different from studies in which mature companies are the objects,we mainly study Chinese entrepreneurial companies.Third,we study in-depth how an internationalization strategy affects the independent innovation of strategic emerging industries in the Chinese ChiNext market.In strategic emerging industries,internationalization has a more pronounced input incentive effect and efficiency improvement effect on independent innovation.This provides evidence of and policy references for the implementation of the going global strategy of Chinese companies and industries.

    The remainder of this paper is organized as follows.Section 2 reports the theoretical analysis and research hypotheses.Section 3 describes the research design.Section 4 documents the empirical results and analysis.Section 5 discusses the influence of internationalization on strategic emerging industries.Section 6 concludes the paper.

    2.Theoretical analysis and research hypothesis

    The relationship between international operation and innovation has always been an important topic in economics and management,but no unified conclusion has been reached on this issue.Recent empirical evidence has given rise to three hypotheses.

    2.1.Internationalization promotes innovation

    In this hypothesis,internationalization,as the process of studying and knowledge accumulation,can help companies obtain more resources,information,ideas,technologies and opportunities(Kotabe,1990;Kobrin,1991;Hitt et al.,1997);use the international market to dilute and reduce R&D costs(Cheng and Bolon,1993;Granstrand et al.,1993;Kotabe et al.,2002);and form innovative strategic alliances(Santos et al.,2004).The learning effect(Grossman and Helpman,1991;Bratti and Felice,2012;Love and Ganotakis,2013)and the competitive incentive effect(Hitt et al.,1997;Bratti and Felice,2012)of internationalization can increase companies’attention to innovation,improve their capacity for innovation and earn more exclusive income of innovation(Teece,1986;Kafouros et al.,2008).The learning effect of internationalization is the significant theoretical basis of the hypothesis that internationalization promotes innovation,and is the focus of empirical research.Thus,a company’s internationalization has a positive effect on innovation.

    2.2.Internationalization hinders innovation

    In this hypothesis,internationalization increases companies’risk of leaking knowledge and technology(Sanna-Randaccio and Veugelers,2007);increases costs in management,coordination and information exchange;and increases misunderstandings between different R&D teams and opportunistic behavior(Fisch,2003),impeding R&D team cohesion(Von Zedtwitz and Gassmann,2002).Therefore,internationalization increases the risks and costs of company innovation,thereby hindering it.

    2.3.Internationalization is irrelevant to innovation:Self-selection

    In this hypothesis,companies enter the international market and possess higher innovative capability as a result of the self-selection effect.In the global market,companies undertake extremely high sunk costs,high risk and more fierce competition,so they must demonstrate heterogeneity in scale,technical innovation and performance,which generates the self-selection effect of internationalization(Clerides et al.,1998;Melitz,2003;Helpman et al.,2004).Unlike non-international companies,international companies possess higher innovative capabilities and higher productivities before they enter overseas markets.In addition,they can bear high sunk costs,developing costs and high-risk international transactions,making them more likely to expand into overseas markets(Bernard and Jensen,1999;Melitz,2003).Recently,the self-selection effect has been supported by more empirical evidence(Baldwin and Gu,2004;Greenaway et al.,2005),which challenges the causal relationship of the hypothesis that internationalization promotes innovation.

    Moreover,recent research has found that corporate innovation has the reverse effect on the internationalization of companies(Altomonte et al.,2013)and that innovation can strengthen companies’market power and thus facilitates international expansion(Roper and Love,2002;Lo′pez and Garc?′a,2005;Cassiman and Golovko,2011).Internationalization itself can also be seen as an innovative firm process(Bilkey and Tesar,1977;Prashantham,2005).Therefore,strong endogeneity exists between the internationalization and innovation of an enterprise,which has led to inconsistencies in the research.

    Some of the typical microeconometric studies summarized in Table 1 show that no consistent understanding has been achieved regarding whether internationalization promotes independent innovation.There are various contradictions and controversies surrounding the empirical evidence,especially that from different regions and countries.Empirical research has focused more on total factor productivity(TFP)to measure companies’innovation and performance.However,productivity is not the most appropriate and direct innovation measure.First,sales revenue is used to calculate productivity.As price and quantity data cannot be separated,they cannot distinguish between the influence of price(market force)and quantity(productivity).Second,productivity indirectly measures innovation,but it cannot embody companies’learning effects.However,Grossman and Helpman(1991)argue that companies’innovation demonstrates the learning effect.Thus,the proxy variable that directly measures innovation is used to further study the learning effect of internationalization.

    Griliches(1990)points out that innovation is an activity that at least includes R&D input and patent output.A patent is the direct output of R&D,and R&D input and patent output reflect innovation to some degree.We use R&D input and patent output to measure companies’innovation,which can demonstrate the influence of internationalization on independent innovation from the input-output perspective.

    Internationalization and innovation are two engines of economic growth.However,compared with the priority and establishment of the internationalization strategy,Chinese attention to innovation is far behind.In view of China’s resource endowment,the Chinese government established the export-oriented strategy in the 1980s.Currently,exports contribute much more to China’s GDP than innovation.At the micro level,this macroeconomic outcome ref l ects that companies engage in export and other international behavior earlier than they do independent innovation.In the context of economic development transformation,internationalization can promote independent innovation,which can improve companies’sustainable development and China’s sustainable economic growth.In China,some scholars have studied the impact of internationalization on productivity from the export perspective(Zhang et al.,2008,2009;Qian et al.,2011),which provides an initial understanding of the influence of local companies’internationalization on productivity.However,the domestic literature still lacks direct evidence of how internationalization affects independent innovation.Bernard et al.(2006)indicate that it is of little significance to argue the learning effect or the self-selection effect on companies’productivity in developing countries.Instead,the focus should be shifted from technology introduction and learning to independent innovation according to the different developmental stages of developing countries,and to the relevant realization conditions and feasible paths.Thus,the key is to promote independent innovation through internationalization and boost the sustainable improvement of productivity.Given the insufficient evidence of the influence of internationalization on R&D input and patent output,indepth research on the basis of China’s special situation is necessary.Therefore,we propose the following hypotheses.

    Hypothesis 1.If the other conditions remain unchanged,internationalization has an incentive effect on corporate R&D,and higher internationalization entails higher R&D input.

    Hypothesis 2.If the other conditions remain unchanged,internationalization can improve the efficiency of companies’patent outputs,and higher internationalization entails higher patent output.

    3.Research design

    3.1.Sample selection and data sources

    We use Chinese ChiNext companies from 2009 to 2012 as research samples and financial data from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research(CSMAR)Database.Using the annual reports of listed companies,we hand collect the R&D data,overseas income structures and overseas institutions.The patent data of listed companies are from the China Patent Database published by China Intellectual Property Office Intellectual Property Press.We classify and arrange the patents owned by listed companies according to year.After excluding the missing data,we obtain a final sample of 825 firm-year observations.Of these observations,36,153,281 and 355 correspond to 2009,2010,2011 and 2012,respectively.

    3.2.Model specifications and variable definitions

    To test Hypothesis 1,we build the following regression models,Models(1)–(4),according to the relevant literature(Himmelberg and Petersen,1994;Hubbard,1998).The model variables are defined in Table 2.All of the behaviors related to cross-border expansion can be regarded as companies’internationalization;the sales,manufacturing or R&D in different areas or overseas markets embody internationalization(Hitt et al.,1994,1997).Therefore,according to the relevant literature(Hitt et al.,1997;Lu and Beamish,2004;Altomonte et al.,2013),we adopt overseas sales intensity(Overseas_Sales),the proportion of overseas revenue(Export_Rate)and overseas institutions(Overseas_Agency)to measure the degree of internationalization.Due to the different institutions in Hong Kong,Macao,Taiwan and mainland China,the sales revenues in these three areas are included in the overseas sales revenue.

    To alleviate the impact of endogeneity,we build Models(5),(6)and(7)to further investigate the influence of companies’internationalization on R&D input according to Models(1),(2)and(3).The definitions of the main variables are presented in Table 2.

    To better alleviate the impact of endogeneity,we also use the two-stage least squares(TSLS)method to test the influence of companies’internationalization on R&D.We follow the literature(Lileeva and Tref l er,2010;Bustos,2011;Bratti and Felice,2012)and choose the proportion of assets of foreign-funded firms in ChiNext companies with output values of over 5 million yuan(Foreign_ratio)as an instrumental variable for internationalization.The data are from the Industrial Statistics Data of the National Bureau of Statistics.The proportion of foreign assets in ChiNext companies with output values over 5 million yuan is a good indicator of the degree of internationalization.It also has no direct interaction with corporate independent innovation and is irrelevant to the regression residuals of Models(2),(3)and(4).That is,it meets the instrumental variables’exogeneity requirements.The TSLS regression process is as follows.During the first stage,Overseas_Sales,Export_Rate and Overseas_Agency are adopted to conduct the regression of Foreign_ratio and all control variables except for Overseas_Sales,Export_Rate and Overseas_Agency from Models(2),(3)and(4),including Domes_Sales(only in Overseas_Sales),Tobin’s Q,Lev,Ceo_Gender,Ceo_Age,Ceo_Education,Ceo_Experience,Dual,First_Stake,Property,VC,Size,Year and Industry.The following induction model is used:

    where other exogenous variables include Domes_Sales(only in Overseas_Sales),Tobin’s Q,Lev,Ceo_Gender,Ceo_Age,Ceo_Education,Ceo_Experience,Dual,First_Stake,Property,VC,Size,Year and Industry.The fi tted values of Overseas_Sales,Export_Rate and Overseas_Agency are extracted using the preceding equation.During the second stage,the fi tted values of Overseas_Sales,Export_Rate and Overseas_Agency replace Overseas_Sales,Export_Rate and Overseas_Agency in Models(2),(3)and(4)to conduct the regression analysis.To test Hypothesis 2,we construct the Poisson regression in Models(9),(10)and(11)according to related studies(Pakes and Griliches,1980;Bound et al.,1984;Hausman et al.,1984).The variables are defined in Table 2.Patent output has strong lagged e ff ects and results from current and lagged R&D expenditures.We control the lagged one period and lagged two period of companies’R&D inputs(RD_intensityt-1and RD_intensityt-2The authors are grateful for the referees’suggestions.).

    Table 4 Overseas income of ChiNext companies.

    The empirical literature indicates that dependent variables(RD_intensity and△Patents)and independent variables(Overseas_Sales,Export_Rate and Overseas_Agency)may be influenced by company characteristics(Bernard and Jensen,1999;Melitz,2003;Greenaway et al.,2005)and manager characteristics2The authors are grateful for the referees’suggestions.(Faleye,2011;Debrulle and Maes,2015;Naldi et al.,2015;Sala and Yalcin,2015).For example,venture companies or adventurous managers tend to choose the internationalization strategy.These kinds of companies or managers are more inclined to invest in innovative high-risk projects.Therefore,we select firm size(Size),firm investment opportunities(Tobin’s Q),financial risk(Lev),CEO duality(Dual),proportion of the largest shareholder(First_Stake),nature of the controlling owner(Property),venture capital(VC),firm life cycle(Age),CEO gender(Ceo_Gender),CEO age(Ceo_Age),educational background of CEO(Ceo_Education)and overseas experience of CEO(Ceo_Experience)as our control variables.

    4.Empirical results

    4.1.Descriptive statistics

    Table 3 shows the industry affiliations of ChiNext companies.Panel A shows 229 and 77 companies in the manufacturing and information technology industries,respectively.Panel B presents the sample by strategic emerging industries,with 73 companies in new generation of information technology and 56 companies in high-end equipment manufacturing.The number of companies in energy saving and environmental protection and new energy automotive is relatively small.

    Table 4 presents the descriptive statistics of overseas income for ChiNext companies.Of the 355 ChiNext companies,81(22.82%)are non-exporters that never export,190(53.52%)are exporters that always export,80 are entrants(22.82%)that begin exporting and 1 is a quitter that no longer exports.This shows that the degree of internationalization of ChiNext companies is higher and that most companies actively explore the international market to earn overseas income.

    Table 5 presents the descriptive statistics of export region distribution for ChiNext companies.It shows that ChiNext companies have expanded their businesses in five continents,with a considerable number of companies selling their products and services to Europe,North America and South America.From the dynamic trend,the export region of ChiNext companies is mainly in Asia(excluding Hong Kong,Macao and Taiwan)and Hong Kong,and Macao and Taiwan.Asia is the area with the largest overseas export of ChiNext companies in China.In 2012,182 companies exported their products to Asia(excluding Hong Kong,Macao and Taiwan)and 62 companies exported their products to Hong Kong,and Macao and Taiwan.Moreover,under the guidance of the ‘‘going out” strategy,ChiNext companies have actively explored markets in Europe and North America.The companies that export to Europe and North America have maintained increasing trends.

    Table 6 presents the descriptive statistics for the sample of ChiNext companies.The mean value of RD_intensityt,RD_intensityt-1and RD_intensityt-2of the sample companies are 2.32%,2.23%and 2.36%,respectively,which are higher than 2%,the basic survival line recognized by the OECD.This indicates that under the guidance of the national strategy for building an innovative nation,great value has been attached to independent innovation by Chinese enterprises.Investment in technological innovation has also greatly increased.

    Table 5 Export region distribution of ChiNext companies.

    Table 6 Descriptive statistics.

    This phenomenon reflects the clear positioning of the ChiNext market,which is committed to supporting the growth and strength of high-tech and high-growth enterprises.The mean value of△RD_intensity is 0.43%,representing the increase in momentum of R&D in ChiNext companies.The mean value of△Patent is 10.7624,which shows that ChiNext companies have strong capabilities for innovation.However,new patents are distributed unevenly with a great standard deviation of 21.0348,which reflects significant differences in the innovation capabilities of the sample companies.

    In terms of internationalization,the mean value of Export_Rate is 12.72%,indicating that on average 12.72%of ChiNext companies’incomes come from overseas markets.The means of△Export_Rate and△Overseas_Sales are 0.14%and 0.02%,respectively,showing the increase in momentum of the proportion of overseas incomes of ChiNext companies.In addition,the mean value of Overseas_Agency is 0.6424,which suggests that 64.24%of the companies have set up branches abroad.

    As for the control variables,the mean value of Ceo_Gender is 0.9358,indicating that 93.58%of the sample companies have male CEOs.The mean value of Ceo_Education is 0.7648,implying that the vast majority of ChiNext companies’CEOs are highly educated.The mean and median of Ceo_Experience are 0.1018 and 0.0000,respectively,showing that CEOs with overseas experience are rarely seen in ChiNext companies.Only 10.18%of the sample companies have CEOs with overseas experience.Moreover,the mean and median of Lev are 0.1741 and 0.1417,respectively,meaning that the financial risks of ChiNext companies are generally low.The mean,median and standard deviation of First_Stake are 0.3380,0.3125 and 12.7597,respectively.Thus,large shareholders are commonly seen in ChiNext companies and the proportions of the largest shareholders vary drastically.The mean and median of Property are 0.0400 and 0.0000,respectively,denoting that the vast majority of ChiNext companies are non-state-owned companies.The mean of VC is 0.6206,which suggests that the vast majority of ChiNext companies are associated with the equity support of venture capital.

    4.2.Multivariate regression analysis

    Table 7 examines the impacts of the internationalization of ChiNext companies on R&D investments.According to the regression results,the F-statistics of all of the models are significant at the 1%level,indicating high-fitting precision.All of the values of adjusted R2are greater than 27%,signifying that the explanation is reliable.With all other related factors controlled,there is a significant positive relationship betweenTotal_Sales and RD_intensity in Model(1).The regression coefficient is 0.046,which is significant at the 1%level.This indicates that R&D intensity is stronger when the sales income of a company is higher.We conduct further tests in Model(2),dividing the sales revenues of companies into Overseas_Sales and Domes_Sales according to the source of sales revenue.A significant positive relationship is discovered between Overseas_-Sales,Domes_Sales and RD_intensity.The regression coefficients are 0.017 and 0.015,respectively,which are significant at the 1%level.This shows that more overseas and domestic incomes lead to stronger R&D intensity.Furthermore,overseas income,which measures a company’s degree of internationalization,contributes more to R&D investments than domestic income(0.017>0.015).The results demonstrate that an internationalization strategy has a significant incentive effect on R&D inputs.The entrepreneurial companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher R&D inputs.

    Table 9 Two-stage regression results for the internationalization and R&D input of ChiNext companies(Foreign_ratio).

    Table 12 Univariate analysis of the influence of internationalization on R&D input and patent output(exporters vs.non-exporters).

    To obtain robust results,we conduct further tests grouped by the existence of overseas income.One group consists of ChiNext companies without internationalization,which means that all of their revenues are domestic.The other group is made up of ChiNext companies that have overseas revenues.The results are displayed in Models(3)and(4).Overseas_Sales is significantly positively related to RD_intensity in Model(4).The regression coefficient is 0.017,which is significant at the 1%level.Thus,an internationalization strategy has a significant incentive effect on R&D input.The entrepreneurial companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher R&D inputs.

    Using Export_Rate and Overseas_Agency as proxy variables of internationalization,further tests are conducted in Models(5)and(6).Export_Rate is significantly positively related to RD_intensity in Model(5).The regression coefficient is 0.001,which is significant at the 10%level.This illustrates that companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher R&D inputs.Additionally,Overseas_Agency is significantly positively related to RD_intensity in Model(6).The regression coefficient is 0.006,which is significant at the 1%level.This implies that setting up branches overseas has a significant positive effect on domestic R&D.Overall,these results provide support for Hypothesis 1.An internationalization strategy has a significant incentive effect on R&D input.The entrepreneurial companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher R&D inputs.

    In terms of the control variables,Tobin’s Q is significantly positively related to RD_intensity.This shows that better investment opportunities increase R&D intensity investments.

    To obtain more robust results,the Change model is used to further investigate the impacts of ChiNext companies’internationalization on R&D.The results are shown in Table 8.A significant positive relationship between△Total_Sales and△RD_intensity is shown in Model(1).The regression coefficient is 0.014,which is significant at the 1%level.This shows that changes in sales revenues cause changes in R&D investments in the same direction.△Overseas_Sales and△Domes_Sales are significantly positively related to△RD_intensity in Model(2).The regression coefficients are 0.022 and 0.013,respectively,which are significant at the 5%and 1%levels,respectively.This shows that greater changes in overseas and domestic income lead to greater changes in R&D intensity.Furthermore,overseas income,which measures a company’s degree of internationalization,contributes more to changes in R&D investments than domestic income(0.022>0.013).This supports the conclusion that an internationalization strategy has an incentive effect on R&D.Changes in the degree of internationalization beget changes in RD_intensity in the same direction.

    To make our test results more robust,we conduct further tests grouped by the existence of overseas income.One group consists of ChiNext companies without internationalization,which means that all of their revenues are domestic.The other group consists of ChiNext companies that have overseas revenues.The results are displayed in Models(3)and(4).△Overseas_Sales and△Domes_Sales are significantly positively related to△RD_intensity in Model(4).The regression coefficients are 0.023 and 0.013,respectively,which are significant at the 1%and 5%levels,respectively.Thus,an internationalization strategy has a significant incentive effect on R&D input for internationalized ChiNext companies.Overseas income,which measures a company’s degree of internationalization,contributes more to changes in R&D investments than domestic income(0.023>0.013).

    △Export_Rate is significantly positively related to△RD_intensity in Model(5).The regression coefficient is 0.001,which is significant at the 10%level.This indicates that a higher△Export_Rate,which measures the degree of internationalization,strengthens RD_intensity.The empirical evidence reported in Table 8 thus supports Hypothesis 1.An internationalization strategy has an incentive effect on R&D.In addition,the control variables in the model are consistent with the previous regression results.

    Based on previous studies(Lileeva and Trefler,2010;Bustos,2011;Bratti and Felice,2012),we use TSLS to test the effects of internationalization on independent innovation while considering the endogeneity of internationalization.The corresponding results are shown in Table 9.

    As shown in Table 9,an internationalization strategy still has an incentive effect on R&D input after controlling for endogeneity.Companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher R&D inputs.The empirical evidence reported in Table 9 provides additional support for Hypothesis 1.

    To completely investigate the influence of an internationalization strategy on entrepreneurial companies’independent innovation,an empirical analysis of the influences of internationalization on the efficiency of patent output is displayed in the remaining part.In light of the related literature(Pakes and Griliches,1980;Hausman et al.,1984),we adopt the Poisson model to explore the relationship between internationalization,R&D input and patent output.The results are shown in Table 10.

    According to Models(1)to(5)in Table 10,when other variables such as RD_intensityt-1and RD_intensityt-2are controlled,RD_intensity,Patents_past_total and△Patents are significantly positively related.The corresponding regression coefficients are significant at the 1%level.This shows that companies with higher R&D inputs and more knowledge stock have more patent outputs.

    In Models(1),(3),(4)and(5),the proxy variables of internationalization strategy,such as Overseas_Sales,Export_Rate and Overseas_Agency,are significantly positively related to△Patents.The corresponding regression coefficients are 0.280,3.561,0.288 and 0.722,respectively,which are all significant at the 1%level.Thus,internationalization can significantly increase entrepreneurial companies’patent outputs.Moreover,Overseas_Sales has greater effects on patent output than Domes_Sales in Model(3)(3.561>0.331).Therefore,an internationalization strategy can improve the efficiency of patent output.The empirical evidence reported in Table 10 thus supports Hypothesis 2.

    In Table 11,the ordinary least squares(OLS)model is adopted to replace the Poisson model for further robustness testing.Models(1),(3),(4)and(5)show that when other variables such as RD_intensityt-1and RD_intensityt-2are controlled,proxy variables of internationalization strategy such as Overseas_Sales,Export_Rate and Overseas_Agency are significantly positively related to△Patents.The corresponding regression coefficients are 0.234,0.702,0.437 and 0.679,respectively,which are significant.This shows that internationalization can significantly increase the number of entrepreneurial companies’patent outputs.In Model(3),Overseas_Sales has a greater effect on patent output(0.702>0.029)than Domes_Sales.This result is essentially the same as that in Table 10,further demonstrating that our results are robust.The internationalization strategies of companies have obvious efficiency improvement effects on patent output.The higher the degree of internationalization,the higher companies’patent outputs.This further supports Hypothesis 2.

    (二)藥物選用 目前,常用抗寄生蟲藥物有:氯硝柳胺、硝氯酚、左旋咪唑、敵百蟲、丙硫咪唑、芬苯達(dá)唑、阿維菌素、伊維菌素、新型復(fù)合驅(qū)蟲藥(含伊維菌素、芬苯達(dá)唑、增效劑、穩(wěn)定劑)等。

    To make the results more robust,the differences between export and non-export companies in R&D inputs and patent outputs are compared.The results are shown in Table 12.

    Table 12 shows that export companies have higher R&D intensities and more patent outputs than nonexport companies regardless of the mean and median.An internationalization strategy has an incentive effect on R&D and R&D output.Thus,Hypotheses 1 and 2 are supported.

    5.influence of internationalization on strategic emerging industries:An expanding analysis

    Decision of the State Council on Accelerating the Fostering and Development of Strategic Emerging Industries(2010,No.32),promulgated by the State Council in October 2010,determines the focus on the development of energy saving,new generation of IT and seven other strategic emerging industries,requiring the relevant departments to promptly formulate plans and implement specific supporting measures.Moreover,Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Internationalization of Strategic Emerging Industries(2011,No.310),jointly promulgated by the Ministry of Commerce,the National Development and Reform Committee and nine other ministries and commissions in September 2011,explicitly state that global innovation resources are to be used to enhance the ability of industrial innovation.To this end,the ChiNext market attaches more importance to the development of strategic emerging industries.We believe that the ChiNext market is perfect for researching the impacts of internationalization strategy on R&D in strategic emerging industries,as a large sum of high-quality companies in strategic emerging industries are listed in the ChiNext market.

    Conforming with the Strategic Emerging Industry Classification(2012)(Trial)compiled by the National Statistics Bureau in December 2012,the samples are subdivided into strategic emerging industries to further explore the effects of internationalization strategy on R&D in strategic emerging industries.

    More specifically,in correspondence with the main business and prime products disclosed in the prospectuses,540 observations defined in strategic emerging industries include 27 observations in the energy saving and environmental protection industry,158 observations in the new generation of IT industry,89 observations in the pharmaceutical industry,136 observations in the high-end equipment manufacturing industry,48 observations in the new energy industry,68 observations in the new materials industry and 14 observations in the new energy vehicles industry.Table 13 reports the results.

    In Table 13,a comparison of Models(1)and(2)shows a significant positive relationship between Overseas_Sales and RD_intensity in strategic emerging industries.The regression coefficient is 0.023,which is significant at the 1%level.However,in non-strategic industries,there is no significant relationship between overseas sales and R&D input.This shows that the internationalization strategies in strategic emerging industries positively promote R&D.Companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher R&D inputs.

    A comparison of Models(3)and(4)shows that Export_Rate,which measures internationalization,is significantly positively related to RD_intensity.The regression coefficient is 0.004,which is significant at the 5%level.However,no significant relation is found between overseas sales and R&D input in non-strategic industries.This shows that the internationalization strategies in strategic emerging industries have incentive effects on R&D.Companies with higher proportions of overseas sales have higher R&D inputs.

    In Models(5)and(6),Overseas_Agency has significant positive impacts on RD_intensity in either strategic or non-strategic industries.The regression coefficients are 0.005 and 0.013,respectively,which are significant at the 1%level.Thus,the establishment of overseas institutions positively promotes R&D for companies in both strategic and non-strategic industries.In addition,a comparison of Models(7)and(8)shows that the different natures of strategic emerging industries cause overseas sales to have different influences on RD_intensity from those of other internationalization companies.In strategic emerging industries,both the regression coefficients and significance levels are higher than those of non-strategic companies(coefficient 0.017>0.011,T value 2.57>1.3).This further shows that an internationalization strategy has more pronounced incentive effects on R&D inputs in strategic emerging industries.An internationalization strategy has a more positive role in promoting the R&D of companies in strategic emerging industries.

    A comparison of Models(1)and(2)in Table 14 shows that△Overseas_Sales and△Domes_Sales are significantly positively related to△RD_intensity.The regression coefficients are 0.030 and 0.022,respectively,which are significant at the 1%level.In non-strategic industries,changes in overseas and domestic sales have no significant impacts on changes in R&D inputs.This shows that the internationalization strategy mainly exerts positive impacts on R&D in companies in strategic emerging industries.More changes in overseas and domestic sales cause greater changes in R&D input.In addition,compared with domestic revenues,changes in overseas revenues,which measure companies’internationalization,cause greater changes in R&D inputs(0.030>0.022).This further proves that in strategic emerging industries an internationalization strategy has an incentive effect on R&D input,and that changes in the degree of internationalization lead to changes in R&D input in the same direction.

    In Models(3)and(4),the△Export_Rate of strategic industrial companies is positively related to the change in R&D input.The regression coefficient is 0.005,which is significant at the 5%level.In nonstrategic industrial companies,changes in the proportion of overseas sales have no significant impacts on R&D input.This shows that in strategic industrial companies,greater changes in the proportion of overseas sales,which measure the degree of internationalization,cause greater changes in R&D input.Therefore,implementing internationalization strategies in strategic industrial companies have an incentive effect on R&D.

    Compared with Models(5)and(6),changes in overseas sales have significant effects on strategic industrial companies’R&D.The regression coefficient of△Overseas_Sales is 0.022,which is significant at the 5%level.No significant impact is found in non-strategic industries.In addition,comparing Models(5)and(7)shows that an internationalization strategy has a more significant influence on R&D input in strategic emerging industries than in non-strategic emerging industries.

    To comprehensively study the impact of an internationalization strategy on the independent innovation of strategic emerging industries,we further examine the impact of internationalization on patent output in strategic emerging industries.The results are shown in Tables 15 and 16.

    Models(1)to(6)in Table 15 show that after controlling other variables such as RD_intensityt-1and RD_intensityt-2,proxy variables of internationalization strategy such as Overseas_Sales,Export_rate and Overseas_Agency are significantly positively related to△Patents in both strategic emerging and nonstrategic industries.The regression coefficients are 0.756,0.182,0.506 and 0.212,0.521 and 1.062,respectively.This proves that internationalization can significantly improve entrepreneurial companies’patent outputs in both strategic and non-strategic emerging industries.

    Comparing Models(1)and(4)shows that in strategic emerging industries,Overseas_Sales has a greater impact on patent output than domestic sales(0.756>0.260).In non-strategic industrial companies,Dome_S-ales has a greater impact than Overseas_Sales on patent output(0.571>0.212).The results of Model(7)show that in strategic industrial companies,Overseas_Sales has a greater impact than Domes_Sales on patent output(1.037>0.101).The results illustrate that in strategic emerging industries,companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher patent outputs.Thus,an internationalization strategy can enhance companies’patent outputs in strategic emerging industries.

    In Table 16,the OLS model substitutes the Poisson model for further robustness testing.The regression results are substantially the same as those in Table 15,which further demonstrates that our results are robust.In summary,an internationalization strategy has more pronounced effects on the independent innovation input and efficiency of strategic emerging industries.

    6.Conclusions and implications

    Guided by the ‘‘going-out” strategy,Chinese enterprises have accelerated their pace of internationalization in recent years.We study how an internationalization strategy affects the independent innovation of Chinese entrepreneurial companies from two dimensions:R&D input and patent output.The main findings are outlined as follows.

    First,a large number of ChiNext companies have implemented internationalization strategies and have actively expanded into overseas markets to earn foreign revenues.

    Second,an internationalization strategy has a significant incentive effect on R&D input.Companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher R&D inputs.After controlling for endogeneity,the incentive effect still exists.

    Third,an internationalization strategy has significantly improved the efficiency of patent outputs.Companies with higher degrees of internationalization have higher patent output efficiencies.

    Fourth,an internationalization strategy has more pronounced effects on independent innovation in strategic emerging industries.

    Improving independent innovation capability and building a long-term competitive advantage are not only vital to the survival and development of China’s companies,but also important to China’s long-term economic development.An internationalization strategy is conducive to enhancing Chinese companies’independent innovation,regardless of R&D input or patent output.Therefore,Chinese entrepreneurial companies should clearly understand that an internationalization strategy is an important way to enhance independent innovation capacity.They must adhere to the going-out strategy,actively expand overseas markets,integrate global resources through various approaches such as exports and overseas investment and establish foreign institutions to enhance their independent innovation capacities.However,aside from encouraging and guiding companies to open up to the world,the government should vigorously promote the internationalization of strategic emerging industries to achieve industrial transformation and improvement.

    From the two dimensions of R&D input and patent output,we provide empirical evidence that Chinese entrepreneurial companies’internationalization strategies influence their independent innovation.This study has two limitations.First,the ChiNext companies’sales data are not reported clearly or completely with respect to detail or regional division,making it difficult to confirm overseas sales in certain regions.Thus,we fail to study the influences of internationalization on innovation under the distribution of export regions.Second,the sample period used covers 2009 to 2012.Future studies should choose longer sample periods.

    Acknowledgments

    The authors thank Charles Chen,Oliver Rui,the anonymous referees and the editor for their constructive suggestions,and the CJAR symposium participants at Hunan University for their helpful comments.Any errors are the sole responsibility of the authors.This study is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Project No.71402189)and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of the Chinese Ministry of Education(Project No.2014116).

    Altomonte,C.,Aquilante,T.,Be′ke′s,G.,Ottaviano,G.I.P.,2013.Internationalization and innovation of firms:evidence and policy.Econ.Policy 28(76),663–700.

    Baldwin,J.,Gu,W.,2004.Trade liberalization:export market participation,productivity growth and innovation.Oxford Rev.Econ.Policy 20(3),372–392.

    Barney,J.B.,1991.Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage.J.Manage.17,99–120.

    Bernard,A.B.,Jensen,J.B.,1999.Exceptional exporter performance:cause,effect,or both?J.Int.Econ.47(1),1–26.

    Bernard,A.B.,Jensen,J.B.,Schott,P.K.,2006.Trade costs,firms and productivity.J.Monet.Econ.53,917–937.

    Bilkey,W.J.,Tesar,G.,1977.The export behavior of smaller sized Wisconsin manufacturing firms.J.Int.Bus.Stud.8,93–98.

    Bound,J.,Cummins,C.,Griliches,Z.,1984.Who Does R&D and Who Patents,in R&D,Patents and Productivity.University of Chicago Press,Chicago,IL.

    Bratti,M.,Felice,G.,2012.Are exporters more likely to introduce product innovations?The World Economy 35(11),1559–1598.

    Bustos,P.,2011.Trade liberalization,exports and technology upgrading:evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinean firms.Am.Econ.Rev.101(1),304340.

    Cassiman,B.,Golovko,E.,2011.Innovation and internationalization through exports.J.Int.Bus.Stud.42(1),56–75.

    Cheng,J.L.C.,Bolon,D.S.,1993.The management of multinational R&D,a neglected topic in international business research.J.Int.Bus.Stud.24,1–18.

    Clerides,S.,Lach,S.,Tybout,J.,1998.Is learning by exporting important?Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia,Mexico and Morocco.Quart.J.Econ.113(1),903–948.

    Debrulle,J.,Maes,J.,2015.Start-ups’internationalization:the impact of business owners’management experience,start-up experience and professional network on export intensity.Euro.Manage.Rev.12,171–187.

    Faleye,O.,2011.CEO directors,executive incentives,and corporate strategic initiatives.J.Financ.Res.34(2),241–277.

    Fisch,J.H.,2003.Optimal dispersion of R&D activities in multinational corporations with a genetic algorithm.Res.Policy 32,1381–1396.

    Granstrand,O.,Hikanson,L.,Sjiilander,S.,1993.Internationalization of R&D:a survey of some recent research.Res.Policy 22,413–430.

    Greenaway,D.,Gullstrand,J.,Kneller,R.,2005.Exporting may not always boost firm productivity.Rev.World Econ.141(4),561–582.

    Griliches,Z.,1990.Patents statistics as economic indicators:a survey.J.Econ.Lit.28(4),1661–1707.

    Grossman,G.M.,Helpman,E.,1991.Trade,knowledge spillover,and growth.Euro.Econ.Rev.35,517–526.

    Hausman,J.,Hall,B.,Griliches,Z.,1984.Econometric models for count data with an application to patent R&D relationship.Econometrica 7,909–938.

    Helpman,E.,Melitz,M.,Yeaple,S.,2004.Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms.Am.Econ.Rev.94(1),300–316.

    Himmelberg,C.P.,Petersen,B.C.,1994.R&D and internal finance:a panel study of small firms in high-tech industries.Rev.Econ.Stat.76,38–51.

    Hitt,M.A.,Hoskisson,R.E.,Ireland,H.,1994.A midrange theory of the interactive effects of international and product diversification on innovation and performance.J.Manage.20,297–326.

    Hitt,M.A.,Hoskisson,R.E.,Kim,H.,1997.International diversification:effects on innovation and firm performance in productdiversified firms.Acad.Manag.J.40(4),767–798.

    Hoskisson,R.O.,Johnson,R.A.,1992.Corporate restructuring and strategic change:the effect on diversification strategy and R&D intensity.Strateg.Manag.J.13,625–634.

    Hubbard,R.G.,1998.Capital market imperfections and investment.J.Econ.Lit.36(1),193–225.

    Kafouros,M.I.,Buckley,P.J.,Sharp,J.A.,Wang,C.Q.,2008.The role of internationalization in explaining innovation performance.Technovation 28(1–2),63–74.

    Kobrin,S.,1991.An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration.Strateg.Manag.J.12,17–31.

    Kotabe,M.,Srinivasan,S.S.,Aulakh,P.S.,2002.Multinationality and firm performance:the moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities.J.Int.Bus.Stud.33,79–97.

    Kotabe,M.,1990.The relationship between of f shore sourcing and innovativeness of U.S.multinational firms:an empirical investigation.J.Int.Bus.Stud.21(4),623–638.

    Lileeva,A.,Tref l er,D.,2010.Improved access to foreign markets raises plant-level productivityEllipsisfor some plants.Quart.J.Econ.125(3),1051–1099.

    Lo′pez,J.,Garc?′a,R.M.,2005.Technology and export behavior:a resource-based view approach.Int.Bus.Rev.14,539–557.

    Love,J.H.,Ganotakis,P.,2013.Learning by exporting:lessons from high-technology SMEs.Int.Bus.Rev.22,1–17.

    Lu,J.W.,Beamish,P.W.,2004.International diversification and firm performance:the S-curve hypothesis.Acad.Manag.J.47(4),598–609.

    Melitz,M.,2003.The impact of trade in intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity.Econometrica 71(6),1695–1725.

    Miller,D.J.,2004.Firm’s technological resources and the performance effects of diversification:a longitudinal study.Strateg.Manag.J.25,1097–1119.

    Naldi,L.,Acbtenbagen,L.,Davidsson,P.,2015.International corporate entrepreneurship among SMEs:a test of Stevenson’s notion of entrepreneurial management.J.Small Bus.Manage.53(3),780–800.

    Pakes,A.,Griliches,Z.,1980.Patents and R&D at the firm level:a first look.Econ.Lett.5,377–381.

    Porter,M.E.,1985.Competitive Advantage.Free Press,New York.

    Prashantham,S.,2005.Toward a knowledge-based conceptualization of internationalization.J.Int.Entrepren.3,37–52.

    Qian,X.F.,Wang,J.R.,Huang,Y.H.,Wang,S.,2011.Exports and the productivity of Chinese industrial enterprises:self-selection effect or learning by exporting effect?J.Quant.Techn.Econ.2,37–51(in Chinese).

    Roper,S.,Love,J.H.,2002.Innovation and export performance:evidence from U.K.and German manufacturing plants.Res.Policy 31,1087–1102.

    Sala,D.,Yalcin,E.,2015.Export experience of managers and the internationalization of firms.World Econ.38(7),1064–1089.

    Salomon,R.,Jin,B.,2010.Do leading or lagging firms learn more from exporting?Strateg.Manag.J.31,1088–1113.

    Sanna-Randaccio,F.,Veugelers,R.,2007.Multinational knowledge spillovers with decentralised R&D:a game-theoretic approach.J.Int.Bus.Stud.38,47–63.

    Santos,J.,Doz,Y.,Williamson,P.,2004.Is your innovation process global?Sloan Manage.Rev.45(4),31–37.

    Schumpeter,J.A.,1942.Capitalism,Socialism and Democracy.Unwin,London.

    Teece,D.J.,1986.Profiting from technological innovation:implications for integration,collaboration,licensing and public policy.Res.Policy 15(6),285–305.

    Van Biesebroeck,J.,2005.Exporting raises productivity in Sub-Saharan African manufacturing plants.J.Int.Econ.67,373–391.

    Von Zedtwitz,M.,Gassmann,O.,2002.Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization:four different patterns of managing research and development.Res.Policy 31,569–588.

    Zhang,J.,Li,Y.,Liu,Z.B.,2008.Exporting and productivity of Chinese firms:empirical study based on manufacturing firms of Jiangsu Province.Manage.World 12,11–26(in Chinese).

    Zhang,J.,Li,Y.,Liu,Z.B.,2009.Does exporting boost productivity of Chinese firms.Manage.World 12,11–26(in Chinese).

    7 September 2015 Accepted 22 May 2017 Available online 17 July 2017

    *Corresponding author.

    E-mail addresses:xuxinfeiji@126.com(X.Xu),xiayungigicolagi@163.com(Y.Xia),Chtl@znufe.edu.cn(C.Li).

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2017.05.001

    1755-3091/?2017 Sun Yat-sen University.Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

    This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

    JEL Classifications:O32 F23

    亚洲精品自拍成人| av天堂中文字幕网| 国产老妇女一区| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 久久鲁丝午夜福利片| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 最近中文字幕高清免费大全6| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 婷婷色综合www| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 国产中年淑女户外野战色| 久久精品国产亚洲网站| 嘟嘟电影网在线观看| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 黄色欧美视频在线观看| 看黄色毛片网站| 日本熟妇午夜| 精品一区二区三卡| 午夜久久久久精精品| 青春草视频在线免费观看| av专区在线播放| 色5月婷婷丁香| 久久久久久久久久久免费av| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 久久精品人妻少妇| av免费观看日本| 99久久中文字幕三级久久日本| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 国产亚洲最大av| 乱人视频在线观看| 色播亚洲综合网| 大香蕉97超碰在线| 少妇熟女欧美另类| 99热这里只有精品一区| 国产成人a区在线观看| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 一个人看视频在线观看www免费| av天堂中文字幕网| 久久精品人妻少妇| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 国产 亚洲一区二区三区 | 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 噜噜噜噜噜久久久久久91| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 精品久久久精品久久久| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 精品久久久久久久久久久久久| 可以在线观看毛片的网站| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 国产在视频线精品| 午夜激情福利司机影院| 国产91av在线免费观看| 国产淫语在线视频| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 草草在线视频免费看| 一边亲一边摸免费视频| 天美传媒精品一区二区| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 成年免费大片在线观看| 午夜久久久久精精品| 欧美日本视频| 老司机影院毛片| 男女边摸边吃奶| 热99在线观看视频| 欧美另类一区| 亚洲精品影视一区二区三区av| 在线免费十八禁| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 成人综合一区亚洲| 欧美人与善性xxx| 三级国产精品欧美在线观看| 日韩欧美精品v在线| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 国产高清有码在线观看视频| 性色avwww在线观看| 免费看av在线观看网站| 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| 久久久久免费精品人妻一区二区| av福利片在线观看| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 91av网一区二区| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| videossex国产| 高清在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 精品人妻偷拍中文字幕| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 免费看日本二区| 白带黄色成豆腐渣| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 久久久色成人| 美女被艹到高潮喷水动态| 亚洲精品一二三| 69人妻影院| eeuss影院久久| 国产爱豆传媒在线观看| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 人妻一区二区av| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 中文欧美无线码| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 亚洲av一区综合| 韩国av在线不卡| 亚洲人成网站高清观看| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 亚洲不卡免费看| 少妇的逼好多水| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 国产精品一区www在线观看| 深夜a级毛片| 久久久久久久久久人人人人人人| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 亚洲国产欧美人成| 国产三级在线视频| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 一个人观看的视频www高清免费观看| 22中文网久久字幕| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影| 观看美女的网站| 免费不卡的大黄色大毛片视频在线观看 | av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 国产免费福利视频在线观看| 国内精品一区二区在线观看| 国产成人a区在线观看| 97超碰精品成人国产| 国产高潮美女av| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 国产色爽女视频免费观看| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 欧美激情在线99| 一本—道久久a久久精品蜜桃钙片 精品乱码久久久久久99久播 | 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 黄片wwwwww| 22中文网久久字幕| 尾随美女入室| 高清毛片免费看| 成人二区视频| 美女高潮的动态| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 日韩,欧美,国产一区二区三区| 天堂网av新在线| 男女那种视频在线观看| 18+在线观看网站| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 日韩欧美国产在线观看| 国产在线男女| 自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 欧美成人精品欧美一级黄| 99热这里只有是精品50| 亚洲欧美成人精品一区二区| 97超碰精品成人国产| 亚洲精品一二三| 搞女人的毛片| 黄色配什么色好看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产精品久久久久久久电影| 2021天堂中文幕一二区在线观| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 日本三级黄在线观看| 国产伦在线观看视频一区| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| av天堂中文字幕网| av专区在线播放| 国产精品.久久久| 午夜日本视频在线| 一级毛片 在线播放| 日本猛色少妇xxxxx猛交久久| 乱人视频在线观看| 在线 av 中文字幕| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 七月丁香在线播放| 一区二区三区免费毛片| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 免费看不卡的av| 直男gayav资源| av黄色大香蕉| 丝袜喷水一区| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 亚洲第一区二区三区不卡| 在线观看av片永久免费下载| 2022亚洲国产成人精品| 在线免费观看的www视频| 午夜精品在线福利| 国产午夜精品一二区理论片| 午夜福利网站1000一区二区三区| 亚洲av中文av极速乱| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 国产精品精品国产色婷婷| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 成人无遮挡网站| 午夜激情欧美在线| 直男gayav资源| 搞女人的毛片| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久这里只有精品中国| 成人漫画全彩无遮挡| 51国产日韩欧美| 成人欧美大片| 亚洲欧美精品自产自拍| 国产不卡一卡二| 有码 亚洲区| 深爱激情五月婷婷| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 91精品国产九色| 人人妻人人看人人澡| 美女脱内裤让男人舔精品视频| 人人妻人人澡欧美一区二区| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 国产伦精品一区二区三区四那| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 国产精品一区二区性色av| freevideosex欧美| 色综合亚洲欧美另类图片| 久久精品综合一区二区三区| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 色视频www国产| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 91精品一卡2卡3卡4卡| 免费观看a级毛片全部| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 国产视频内射| 久久久久久久久中文| 天天一区二区日本电影三级| 99视频精品全部免费 在线| 日韩不卡一区二区三区视频在线| 中国国产av一级| 午夜福利在线观看吧| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影 | 日本av手机在线免费观看| 内地一区二区视频在线| 人妻制服诱惑在线中文字幕| 亚洲欧美日韩无卡精品| 热99在线观看视频| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 街头女战士在线观看网站| 91久久精品电影网| 国产永久视频网站| 亚洲自偷自拍三级| 毛片一级片免费看久久久久| 国产精品一二三区在线看| h日本视频在线播放| 看非洲黑人一级黄片| 激情五月婷婷亚洲| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 99热这里只有是精品在线观看| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 免费看光身美女| 日产精品乱码卡一卡2卡三| 成人国产麻豆网| 观看美女的网站| 成人一区二区视频在线观看| 91久久精品电影网| 亚洲内射少妇av| 99热6这里只有精品| 天堂影院成人在线观看| kizo精华| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 爱豆传媒免费全集在线观看| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 成人二区视频| 麻豆成人av视频| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 久久久精品欧美日韩精品| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 久久久久国产网址| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久蜜豆| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 欧美日韩视频高清一区二区三区二| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 久久久久久久国产电影| 欧美激情久久久久久爽电影| 淫秽高清视频在线观看| 精品亚洲乱码少妇综合久久| av天堂中文字幕网| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲内射少妇av| 欧美zozozo另类| 99久国产av精品国产电影| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 欧美不卡视频在线免费观看| 国产黄色免费在线视频| 午夜亚洲福利在线播放| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 真实男女啪啪啪动态图| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 老女人水多毛片| 身体一侧抽搐| 五月玫瑰六月丁香| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 又爽又黄无遮挡网站| 老女人水多毛片| 色网站视频免费| 床上黄色一级片| 水蜜桃什么品种好| 91狼人影院| 亚洲精品,欧美精品| 国产免费视频播放在线视频 | 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲不卡免费看| 五月伊人婷婷丁香| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 免费观看av网站的网址| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| 亚洲一区高清亚洲精品| 免费看光身美女| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 精品久久久久久久久av| 午夜免费激情av| 国产成人午夜福利电影在线观看| 日韩av不卡免费在线播放| 国产精品av视频在线免费观看| or卡值多少钱| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网 | 午夜日本视频在线| 亚洲四区av| 国产一区二区三区综合在线观看 | 大话2 男鬼变身卡| 亚洲av免费在线观看| 亚洲va在线va天堂va国产| 成年av动漫网址| 看免费成人av毛片| av免费观看日本| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 日韩电影二区| 黄片wwwwww| 成人无遮挡网站| 免费少妇av软件| 国产精品综合久久久久久久免费| 日韩伦理黄色片| or卡值多少钱| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 国产成人免费观看mmmm| 欧美xxxx黑人xx丫x性爽| 精品国内亚洲2022精品成人| 高清午夜精品一区二区三区| 精品久久国产蜜桃| 大又大粗又爽又黄少妇毛片口| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲人与动物交配视频| 久久久久久久久久成人| 哪个播放器可以免费观看大片| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 精品国产露脸久久av麻豆 | 国产精品女同一区二区软件| 乱系列少妇在线播放| 久久久久国产网址| 欧美一区二区亚洲| 国产精品99久久久久久久久| 啦啦啦中文免费视频观看日本| 欧美人与善性xxx| 有码 亚洲区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久v下载方式| 免费大片黄手机在线观看| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 大片免费播放器 马上看| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| 欧美日韩综合久久久久久| 91久久精品国产一区二区三区| 亚洲精品中文字幕在线视频 | 国产久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲成人中文字幕在线播放| 亚洲美女搞黄在线观看| 久久久久久伊人网av| 欧美极品一区二区三区四区| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 亚洲丝袜综合中文字幕| 91久久精品电影网| 91在线精品国自产拍蜜月| 欧美丝袜亚洲另类| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 在线播放无遮挡| 成人国产麻豆网| 非洲黑人性xxxx精品又粗又长| 在线a可以看的网站| 成人午夜高清在线视频| 精品不卡国产一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品久久久com| 欧美三级亚洲精品| 日韩成人av中文字幕在线观看| 日日啪夜夜爽| 亚洲自拍偷在线| 日韩欧美精品免费久久| 99热这里只有是精品50| av在线观看视频网站免费| 精品欧美国产一区二区三| 日韩一区二区视频免费看| 在线观看一区二区三区| 禁无遮挡网站| 国产成人freesex在线| 黄片wwwwww| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 在线a可以看的网站| 欧美日韩国产mv在线观看视频 | 乱码一卡2卡4卡精品| av国产免费在线观看| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 黄色日韩在线| 日韩三级伦理在线观看| av女优亚洲男人天堂| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕五十中出| 九九爱精品视频在线观看| av在线蜜桃| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| eeuss影院久久| 免费在线观看成人毛片| 男女边摸边吃奶| 欧美3d第一页| 亚洲国产精品专区欧美| 一级毛片aaaaaa免费看小| 2018国产大陆天天弄谢| 久久久久久久亚洲中文字幕| 搡女人真爽免费视频火全软件| 51国产日韩欧美| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区黑人 | 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产成年人精品一区二区| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 只有这里有精品99| 三级毛片av免费| 纵有疾风起免费观看全集完整版 | 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 永久免费av网站大全| 午夜福利视频1000在线观看| 看免费成人av毛片| 最近视频中文字幕2019在线8| av线在线观看网站| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说 | 只有这里有精品99| 成年人午夜在线观看视频 | 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 亚洲最大成人手机在线| www.av在线官网国产| 国产亚洲最大av| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 成人av在线播放网站| 日日啪夜夜撸| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 22中文网久久字幕| 久久久久精品性色| 黄色日韩在线| 日日干狠狠操夜夜爽| 99久久精品一区二区三区| 我的女老师完整版在线观看| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久按摩| 日韩av在线大香蕉| 国产激情偷乱视频一区二区| 免费电影在线观看免费观看| 欧美成人午夜免费资源| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 国产在视频线精品| 欧美xxⅹ黑人| 欧美3d第一页| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 欧美日韩亚洲高清精品| 亚洲成人精品中文字幕电影| 一级黄片播放器| 夜夜看夜夜爽夜夜摸| 一二三四中文在线观看免费高清| 免费人成在线观看视频色| 天堂√8在线中文| 婷婷色av中文字幕| 男人舔奶头视频| 成人无遮挡网站| 亚洲成人av在线免费| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 搞女人的毛片| 国产高清国产精品国产三级 | 午夜免费激情av| 色综合色国产| 偷拍熟女少妇极品色| 亚洲三级黄色毛片| 国内揄拍国产精品人妻在线| 国产精品伦人一区二区| 亚洲国产精品sss在线观看| 国产在视频线精品| 欧美人与善性xxx| 黑人高潮一二区| 欧美一级a爱片免费观看看| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕 | 欧美激情国产日韩精品一区| 男插女下体视频免费在线播放| 欧美日韩一区二区视频在线观看视频在线 | 久久久欧美国产精品| 国产精品国产三级国产av玫瑰| 中文字幕亚洲精品专区| 国产不卡一卡二| 免费看av在线观看网站| 免费看a级黄色片| 日韩 亚洲 欧美在线| 成年女人看的毛片在线观看| 能在线免费看毛片的网站| 亚洲av二区三区四区| 六月丁香七月| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 女的被弄到高潮叫床怎么办| 美女国产视频在线观看| 天堂影院成人在线观看| 色吧在线观看| videos熟女内射| 美女国产视频在线观看| 极品少妇高潮喷水抽搐| 久久久成人免费电影| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 精品久久久久久电影网| 国产精品久久久久久久久免| 日本与韩国留学比较| 51国产日韩欧美| 免费观看在线日韩| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 国产 一区精品| 夜夜爽夜夜爽视频| 免费观看无遮挡的男女| 国产午夜福利久久久久久| 男人爽女人下面视频在线观看| 日韩一本色道免费dvd| 亚洲国产精品成人久久小说| 肉色欧美久久久久久久蜜桃 | 69人妻影院| 免费无遮挡裸体视频| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 秋霞伦理黄片| 男女边吃奶边做爰视频| 小蜜桃在线观看免费完整版高清| 综合色av麻豆| 午夜视频国产福利| 国产综合精华液| 不卡视频在线观看欧美| 在线免费十八禁| 日本wwww免费看| 久久久久久久久中文| 一级毛片久久久久久久久女| 国产成人freesex在线| 69人妻影院| 国产白丝娇喘喷水9色精品| 日本爱情动作片www.在线观看| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 国精品久久久久久国模美| 成人高潮视频无遮挡免费网站| 久久午夜福利片| 国产精品一区二区三区四区免费观看| 国产综合精华液| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 国产亚洲最大av| 久久精品国产亚洲av涩爱| 亚洲一级一片aⅴ在线观看| 尤物成人国产欧美一区二区三区| 国产精品一区二区三区四区久久| 亚洲av中文字字幕乱码综合| 观看美女的网站| 国产一级毛片七仙女欲春2| 建设人人有责人人尽责人人享有的 | 国产永久视频网站| 熟女人妻精品中文字幕| 久久久久久九九精品二区国产| 麻豆乱淫一区二区| 美女主播在线视频| 男人狂女人下面高潮的视频| 精华霜和精华液先用哪个| 精品99又大又爽又粗少妇毛片| 又大又黄又爽视频免费| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频 | 欧美zozozo另类| 国产成人精品福利久久| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产 一区 欧美 日韩| 国产黄色小视频在线观看| 日韩人妻高清精品专区| 精品人妻一区二区三区麻豆| 国产精品爽爽va在线观看网站| 内射极品少妇av片p| 六月丁香七月| 亚洲精品aⅴ在线观看| 麻豆成人午夜福利视频| 男女啪啪激烈高潮av片| 女人被狂操c到高潮| 国产亚洲5aaaaa淫片| 国产单亲对白刺激|