• <tr id="yyy80"></tr>
  • <sup id="yyy80"></sup>
  • <tfoot id="yyy80"><noscript id="yyy80"></noscript></tfoot>
  • 99热精品在线国产_美女午夜性视频免费_国产精品国产高清国产av_av欧美777_自拍偷自拍亚洲精品老妇_亚洲熟女精品中文字幕_www日本黄色视频网_国产精品野战在线观看 ?

    日常建筑,一個(gè)反思的實(shí)踐:閱讀張永和

    2017-10-20 08:27:23朱劍飛黃華青
    世界建筑 2017年10期
    關(guān)鍵詞:詩意文章建筑

    朱劍飛 黃華青 譯

    日常建筑,一個(gè)反思的實(shí)踐:閱讀張永和

    朱劍飛 黃華青 譯

    本文閱讀張永和自1980年代初至2016年的有關(guān)寫作,提出一個(gè)論點(diǎn),認(rèn)為張氏在1990年代末期,在關(guān)于設(shè)計(jì)的基本態(tài)度上,有一個(gè)突破和一個(gè)構(gòu)架的建立。本文進(jìn)一步認(rèn)為,張氏思想構(gòu)架的基本內(nèi)涵是人文的、反思的、批判的,也是中國(guó)急需的,無論在建筑學(xué)還是其他領(lǐng)域。

    張永和,基本建筑,材料,建造,1990年代末期,新鄉(xiāng)土

    盡管我曾在多種場(chǎng)合為張永和寫過文章1),包括2004年和2012年非常建筑事務(wù)所成立10周年及20周年時(shí),但最近閱讀他的新論著及項(xiàng)目,并重讀他較早的作品,放在當(dāng)下所處的新歷史時(shí)代之下,依然是耳目一新、發(fā)人深思的。我想,如今我針對(duì)張永和的思想及實(shí)踐發(fā)展,可以提出一個(gè)假說。

    1 6篇文字:一個(gè)突破

    這個(gè)假說就是,盡管張永和發(fā)表了大量文章,參與了眼花繚亂的建筑或其他領(lǐng)域的活動(dòng)及項(xiàng)目,我們依然可遴選出一組核心文字——集中發(fā)表于1996-2000年,它們對(duì)于張永和的建筑設(shè)計(jì)進(jìn)路的建立過程,是關(guān)鍵且 “完成”的——這條進(jìn)路對(duì)于當(dāng)時(shí)的他來說是嶄新的,自此從未遠(yuǎn)離。那幾年,張永和的職業(yè)生涯似乎攀上了一座高原或山頂,自此他獲得了一種完整的視野,持續(xù)至今。例如,對(duì)海恩斯·賓尼菲特的援引,就從1998年一直延續(xù)到2016年。我認(rèn)為,這組文字是張永和極其重要的分水嶺,亦可幫助我們理解他的思想及喜好。以這幾篇文章為基礎(chǔ),我們不難閱讀他的其他文章,并定位其各自的位置。不僅如此,他的建成、未建成或在建項(xiàng)目和設(shè)計(jì),皆可借由這幾篇文章來閱讀和分析。

    這幾篇文章的寫作時(shí)段,是他剛在中國(guó)渡過的最初的創(chuàng)作摸索期(1993-1996)、即將進(jìn)入實(shí)踐活躍期之時(shí)。它們作于他的兩本著作之間:1997年的《非常建筑》(圖1)和2002年的《平常建筑:一種基本建筑學(xué)》 (圖2)。前3篇論文題為《十二月令》《園》與《宅》,收錄于第一部著作(是他過去15年中關(guān)于敘述性裝置和概念設(shè)計(jì)的文集)的前兩部分,分別作為前言和緒論,可視為他的一次思想綜述和反思性觀察。如果說《園》與《宅》建立了兩種基本建筑類型(即不再是裝置),那么《十二月令》則建立了一個(gè)他將進(jìn)一步探索的概念框架——其中論述了多個(gè)話題,包括:將建筑客體外部化的西方透視法的使用;讓觀者與世界相互內(nèi)化的中國(guó)繪畫;中國(guó)繪畫及造園文化中“內(nèi)向的”世界觀;將中西方觀察方式結(jié)合的必要性;設(shè)計(jì)過程的重要性;設(shè)計(jì)圖紙本身的必要性——“不草的草圖”。[1]2)

    這組核心論述還包括在第一本書出版后的另外3篇:《文學(xué)與建筑》(圖3)、《平常建筑》和《向工業(yè)建筑學(xué)習(xí)》(圖4),分別發(fā)表于1997年、1998年和2000年;后兩篇文章亦收錄于《平常建筑:一種基本建筑學(xué)》(2002)一書中。第一篇文章,張永和探索了文學(xué)與建筑的關(guān)聯(lián)(三島由紀(jì)夫、維克多·雨果、翁貝托·艾柯、阿蘭·羅伯-格里耶以及評(píng)論家羅蘭·巴特)。在以羅布-格里耶的實(shí)踐和巴特的理論分析了“客觀文學(xué)”之后,他亦探討了它在建筑學(xué)中可能的對(duì)應(yīng)物。張永和探索的是一種“零度建筑”,就像巴特所定義的“零度寫作”一樣。在這篇論中,張永和第一次明確定義了“基本建筑”的概念:

    “如果建筑也拒絕意義……如果建筑的能指所指產(chǎn)生重合,建筑只表達(dá)自己。如果建筑也回到基本的時(shí)空經(jīng)驗(yàn),而不是特定的風(fēng)格化的審美經(jīng)驗(yàn)……那么建筑可能成為活人的建筑;如果建筑的每一個(gè)細(xì)部都被(概念性地)顯微,從而超越現(xiàn)實(shí),建筑反而可能成為現(xiàn)實(shí)的也是尋常的建筑;如果建筑回到建造,就可能成為建筑的建筑。”[2]3)

    在之后一年撰寫的《平常建筑》中,張永和針對(duì)這一問題做了更清楚的陳述。在我看來,這篇1998年發(fā)表的文章可視為一篇宣言。該文提到了幾位著名或不那么知名的建筑師,尤其是密斯·凡·德·羅、朱塞佩·特拉尼和海恩斯·賓尼菲特,以及他們各自的代表作:鄉(xiāng)村磚宅、但丁紀(jì)念堂和巴巴尼克住宅。張永和自己的作品也作為一種衍生嘗試而被納入探討。這篇文字中,張永和建立了“基本建筑”的核心陳述,以下兩段話尤為重要——第一段出現(xiàn)在文章第一部分,論述了密斯的鄉(xiāng)村磚宅之后:

    “我最終的興趣并不在于密斯,而是想通過密斯分析一個(gè)更廣泛的現(xiàn)象:一個(gè)將建造而不是理論(如哲學(xué))作為起點(diǎn)的設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)踐。也是一種建筑定義:即建筑等于建造的材料、方法、過程和結(jié)果的總合。就這個(gè)定義而言,建造形成一種思想方法,本身就構(gòu)成一種理論,它討論建造如何構(gòu)成建筑的意義,而不是建造在建筑中的意義?!盵3]

    1

    2

    3

    Although I have written for the tenth and twentieth anniversary of Yung Ho Chang's office Feichang Jianzhu (FCJZ) in 2004 and 2012, and in other occasions1), a recent review of his new writings and projects, with a re-reading of his older pieces, in a new historical time we find ourselves in today, is refreshing and enlightening. I think I now have a hypothesis on Yung Ho Chang in terms of his development in thinking and practice.

    1 Six Essays of the Late 1990s: a Breakthrough

    The hypothesis is that, despite the prolific publication of many essays and a dazzling parade of activities and projects architectural and otherwise, there is a single cluster of key essays -published quickly between 1996 and 2000 - that are essential and "completed" in setting up his approach to architecture, something new to him then and something he has not departed from since. Somehow, in his career, Chang had arrived on a plateau or a hilltop, in these few years, and a whole vision was found, which remains today. The reference to Heinz Bienefeld, for example, remains in 1998 as in 2016. I am suggesting that this cluster of essays was a crucial threshold for Chang and is essential for us in understanding his ideas and obsessions. With this few pieces identified, other pieces can be read and their positions understood.Further, his projects and designs, built, unbuilt and yet to-be-built, can also be read and analysed in the light of these few pieces.

    These few essays were written after a period of initial practice in China (1993-1996) and before launching into an active practice. They were written between two books of him, one in 1997 and the other 2002, titled respectively as Feichang Jianzhu (Un/conventional Architecture, Fig.1) and Pingchang Jianzhu: for a Basic Architecture (Fig.2). The pieces titled "Shier yueling" (calendar paintings), and "Yuan"(the garden) and "Zhai" (the residence), as a preface and an introduction of part one and two of the first book (a collection of essays over the previous 15 years on narrative installations and conceptual designs),acted as an overview and a reflective observation.If "Yuan" and "Zhai" had established two basic typologies of architecture (i.e. not installations any more), "Shier yueling" had arrived at a conceptual framework that he would explore further - and here he covered on the use of western perspectives that externalizes the architectural object, Chinese paintings that internalize the viewer and the world into each other, an "internal" worldview in Chinese culture in painting and garden design, a need to combine western and Chinese ways of seeing, the importance of design process, and the need for design drawings on their own - "sketches that are not sketchy" (bu cao de caotu).[1]2)

    The cluster of key essays also includes three pieces written after the first book. They are Wenxue yu jianzhu (Literature and Architecture, Fig.3),Pingchang jianzhu (Basic Architecture), and Xiang gongye jianzhu xuexi (Learning from Industrial Architecture, Fig.4), published in 1997, 1998 and 2000 respectively; the latter two were reprinted in Pingchang Jianzhu: for a Basic Architecture (2002).In the first piece, Chang explored relations between literature and architecture (as in Yukio Mishima,Victor Hugo, Umberto Eco, Alain Robbe-Grillet, as well as critic Roland Barthes) and, after identifying an "Objective Literature" practiced in Robbe-Grillet and studied in Barthes, asked what an equivalent in architecture would look like. Chang was exploring architecture at degree zero, like Barthes' "writing degree zero". Here, for the first time, Chang was putting forward in clear terms his definition of a"basic architecture":

    "If architecture also rejects meaning … and if its signifier and signified become one, architecture then expresses itself only. If architecture also returns to the basic spatial-temporal experience,rather than a particular style …, then architecture can serve people alive; if details of architecture are(conceptually) magnified, to surpass reality, then it becomes reality and normality; if architecture returns to architecture, then it can be an architecture of architecture" (my translation from Chang's original in Chinese).[2]3)

    In Pingchang Jianzhu (Basic Architecture) in the following year, Chang made another statement on this, clearer this time. This piece of 1998, in my judgment, should be read as a manifesto. The writing here made reference to a few architects known or not so known, including, importantly,Mies van der Rohe, Giuseppe Terragni and Heinz Bienefeld, as well as their key works, such as Brick Country House, the Danteum, and Babanek House of the three architects respectively. Chang's own works were also discussed as an inspired attempt.In this essay where Chang developed his central statement on his "Basic Architecture", the following two are especially important - the first was after a description of Mies' Brick Country House in the first part of the essay:

    "My final interest is not on Mies, but rather a general condition that can be arrived at by studying Mies: a practice that departs not from theory or philosophy but from building and construction. This leads to a definition: architecture is a total sum of the construction of material, method, process and outcome. From this perspective, the logic and the use of construction itself become a method, and a kind of theory on its own, which concerns how meaning in architecture is made through material construction, and not how meaning is constructed in architecture" (my translation).[3]

    In the section on Terragni's Danteum that concludes the essay, Chang had written arguably the most beautiful and accurate statement about his"basic architecture":

    "... though it was not built, the drawings revealed Terragni's deep and refined thinking in the use of material, construction, form and space. What he had constructed with these is not a building but a poem. … But I don't think the poetics of Danteum comes from a relationship between architecture and poetry. The poetry of Danteum, instead, originates from the poetics of loadbearing stone walls, the poetics of a courtyard, the poetics of stone columns,the poetics of a relationship between columns,the poetics of a change of floor levels, the poetics of the steps, the poetics of a doorway, the poetics of a skylight, the poetics of a rectangular shape,the poetics of a square in shape, the poetics of the right angle for an intersection of two parts, the poetics of a narrow spatial passage, the poetics of glazing, the poetics of glass columns, the poetics of a relationship between columns and the ceiling,the poetics of an interstitial space, the poetics of a stone-paved floor, the poetics of an enclosure, the poetics of a basic architecture" (my translation).[3]34

    It is obvious that this "basic architecture"is an austere and tectonic construction in a modernist persuasion. In the following piece Xiang gongye jianzhu xuexi (Learning from Industrial Architecture) of 2000, Chang promoted a pure,autonomous and independent architecture or better "building" - one which "needs no ornament"and is devoid of layers of meaning artificially added. And here, Chang is clear about his support for modernism and is putting forward a succinct description of his "basic architecture":

    "In terms of value orientation, modernist architects privileged buildings over architecture, to resist a traditional idea that architecture was more than a mere building. This subversion is both a failure and a success. Firstly, it is a failure, because these architects could not finally escape from architecture. Yet the success is more profound: when the layers of meaning are stripped away, a building is a building on its own, it is an autonomous existence,and is not a tool of signification nor a secondary existence for something else" (my translation).[4]

    These six pieces - three published in Feichang Jianzhu (1997) and three after - as written between 1996 and 2000, marked a core of Chang's prolific writings and above all a core of his thinking for design practice. We may add another exceptional piece, written much earlier, to this core - a central essay in forming his approach at a conceptual or methodological level. This is Guocheng sixiang,(Thinking as a Process) written in 1987-1988 when Chang was teaching in the United States.Quoting Michel Foucault's essay on René Magritte's juxtaposition of a painting of a smoking pipe and a text This is not a Pipe, and finding a rewarding understanding of complex relations between a statement and a visual representation, Chang argues that a subversion of a truth statement, a reverse in thinking against an accepted idea, notion or understanding, can be illuminating in a true,positive and creative sense - such a process 'provides a condition for a new work to be initiated'. Reversing or changing in thinking, according to Chang, "is helpful in exposing a problem, … in overcoming a conventional assumption, … in recovering a sense of strangeness".[1]194-197Chang had worked surely in this manner, where a bicycle wheel, a door, a floor, a window, etc, is suspended in their normal or "true"condition, and was subverted and creatively remixed or renewed or reshaped, challenging not only a conventional truth statement, but also artificial ideologies applied onto a building to become architecture. The posture here is critical, in design,in thinking, and in a whole outlook concerning more than a mere business of design.

    在文章末尾關(guān)于特拉尼的但丁紀(jì)念堂的論述之后,或許是張永和關(guān)于其“基本建筑”理念最優(yōu)美、準(zhǔn)確的一段陳述:

    “……羅馬的但丁紀(jì)念堂沒能建起來,但不難從保存下來的圖紙中看到建筑師特拉尼對(duì)材料、建造、形態(tài)與空間精深的造詣。他用這些質(zhì)量構(gòu)成的不僅是建筑而是詩……但我不認(rèn)為但丁紀(jì)念堂的詩意出自于建筑與詩歌的關(guān)系。但丁紀(jì)念堂的詩意更是石承重墻的詩意,庭院的詩意,石柱的詩意,柱與柱之間關(guān)系的詩意,高差的詩意,踏步的詩意,門洞的詩意,天光的詩意,矩形的詩意,方形的詩意,正交的詩意,窄的詩意,玻璃的詩意,玻璃柱的詩意,頂棚與柱之間關(guān)系的詩意,縫隙的詩意,石鋪地的詩意,圍合的詩意,基本建筑的詩意?!盵3]34

    顯然,“基本建筑”是在現(xiàn)代主義信念指引下、一種樸素而建構(gòu)的建造。在后一篇寫于2000年的文章《向工業(yè)建筑學(xué)習(xí)》中,張永和推出了一種純粹、自治、獨(dú)立的建筑,或更準(zhǔn)確地說是“房屋”——“不需任何裝飾”,亦擺脫了人為添加的層層意涵。在此,張永和明確表達(dá)對(duì)現(xiàn)代主義的支持,也提出了“基本建筑”理念的簡(jiǎn)明論述:

    “就價(jià)值判斷而言,現(xiàn)代主義建筑師將房屋置于建筑之上,對(duì)立于建筑高于房屋的傳統(tǒng)觀念。這次顛覆既是失敗的又是成功的。首先是失敗的,因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)代主義建筑師們終究未能擺脫建筑。然而成功更深刻——清除了意義的干擾,建筑就是建筑本身,是自主的存在,不是表意的工具或說明它者的第二性存在?!盵4]

    以上6篇論文——前3篇刊載于《非常建筑》(1997),后3篇刊載于《平常建筑》,都是于1996-2000年寫作的,構(gòu)成了張永和豐富論著的內(nèi)核——尤其是他建筑設(shè)計(jì)思想的內(nèi)核。我們或可在其中再添加一篇出色的文章,寫于更早,這篇文章對(duì)于他的理念或方法論進(jìn)路的形成十分重要。那就是《過程思想》,寫于1987-1988年,當(dāng)時(shí)張永和在美國(guó)教書。他援引米歇爾·??玛P(guān)于雷尼·馬格利特將一幅煙斗的油畫與“這不是一只煙斗”的文字并置的文章,深刻辨析了真理陳述和視覺表征之間的復(fù)雜關(guān)系。張永和提出,對(duì)真理陳述的顛覆,對(duì)公認(rèn)概念、觀點(diǎn)或理解的逆向思考,能夠在一種真實(shí)、積極、創(chuàng)造性的意義上給人啟發(fā)——這樣的過程“提供了開啟新工作的條件”。在張永和看來,逆向或轉(zhuǎn)變性的思考,“能幫助我們暴露問題……克服慣常的預(yù)設(shè)……重塑一種陌生感?!盵1]194-197張永和自己顯然也在以這種方式工作,無論是一只自行車輪、一扇門、一層樓板或一扇窗等等,都從常見的、“真實(shí)的”狀態(tài)中剝離,經(jīng)過推翻和創(chuàng)造性的混合、更新或重塑,不僅挑戰(zhàn)了慣用的真理陳述,也顛覆了那些附加在房屋之上、使其成為建筑的人工意識(shí)形態(tài)。這樣一種姿態(tài)在設(shè)計(jì)、思考和他的全部工作中都至關(guān)重要——他關(guān)注的遠(yuǎn)不只是一種作為生意的設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)踐而已。

    4

    2 整體脈絡(luò)

    我之所以說1996-2000年的這組文字非常重要,是因?yàn)樗鼈兂霈F(xiàn)于張永和個(gè)人及職業(yè)發(fā)展軌跡的特殊時(shí)刻。那是張永和15年“學(xué)術(shù)”研究生涯的末端(從1981年至1996年,他在美國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)、教書,直至1990年代中葉;自1993年開始回到中國(guó)試驗(yàn)他的理念);它們也標(biāo)志著張永和在中國(guó)活躍實(shí)踐期的開啟,至今已延續(xù)了20余年。盡管1990年代末的這幾篇論述總結(jié)了他過去15年的諸多思想,但它們更是一次突破、一個(gè)轉(zhuǎn)折點(diǎn),開始探討一些從未真正探討過的論題(至少從未明確談過)——尤其是“基本建筑”的相關(guān)概念,讓“建筑回到建造,成為建筑的建筑”,“建筑就是建筑本身,是自主的存在”。他的生涯早期研究,主要是藉由裝置和概念設(shè)計(jì)所表達(dá)的生活經(jīng)驗(yàn)敘事;而至1990年代末的這些文章,則完全回到建筑的主題,探討建造與建筑空間、形式之間的關(guān)系——這個(gè)問題,是張永和在1990年代末期真正踏入實(shí)踐生涯之后所必須面對(duì)的。那一刻,張永和必須做出一個(gè)劇烈、也可能很困難的轉(zhuǎn)折,從羅德尼式、源于AA的對(duì)生活的敘事性研究及概念裝置研究,轉(zhuǎn)向真正設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)踐的完整模式,并適應(yīng)于其所在的高速發(fā)展的經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境。因此,關(guān)于“建筑”應(yīng)為何物的提法——過去張永和不需回答,如今卻必須創(chuàng)造并發(fā)展。

    1990年代末這次從學(xué)術(shù)研究到商業(yè)實(shí)踐的轉(zhuǎn)變,也伴隨著地緣政治和地緣文化意義上的轉(zhuǎn)型。張永和在1993年回到中國(guó),在太平洋兩岸往返一段時(shí)間后,于1996年定居北京,開始建筑實(shí)踐。矛盾的是,當(dāng)他回到故鄉(xiāng)的這一刻,他反而進(jìn)入、或是被帶到了世界面前,并且在一個(gè)更高的平臺(tái)上。自1996年以來在中國(guó)的20年實(shí)踐生涯,對(duì)張永和來說也是一趟全球交互之旅:他不僅先后在密歇根大學(xué)、哈佛大學(xué)、麻省理工學(xué)院任教,也獲得了AA(倫敦)、the Aedes(柏林)、Gallery MA(東京)及威尼斯雙年展的設(shè)計(jì)委托和展覽邀約。在90年代乃至后來,張永和一度是唯一的、或是極少幾個(gè)來自中國(guó)的、能夠?yàn)槲鞣浇ㄖ熂霸u(píng)論家所理解的聲音,原因是他曾在美國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)和執(zhí)教。更關(guān)鍵的是,張永和在過去20年中不僅向西方傳遞著中國(guó)的聲音,同時(shí)也在中國(guó)傳播西方的思想。他和其他若干建筑師帶到中國(guó)的西方當(dāng)代價(jià)值,對(duì)于中國(guó)這樣一個(gè)奮力進(jìn)入國(guó)際現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的國(guó)家來說,有著不可低估的作用。這一點(diǎn)我會(huì)在后文再次論述。

    5

    6

    因此,1990年代末期的這幾篇論文夾在過去15年和未來20年之間,不僅是分水嶺,也是連接點(diǎn)。作為一道分水嶺,前后兩個(gè)時(shí)期之間存在著巨大的張力與不同。之前,他的焦點(diǎn)是建立在繪畫、文字或空間手段上的日常經(jīng)驗(yàn)敘事,而從1993年、尤其是1996年開始,則轉(zhuǎn)移至實(shí)際項(xiàng)目設(shè)計(jì)之中。盡管過去的某些關(guān)切依然延續(xù)或表達(dá)于新的設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)踐中,但實(shí)際上這并不容易,因?yàn)橐蛔ㄖ虺鞘性O(shè)計(jì),不可能當(dāng)作一件純粹的藝術(shù)作品或抽象裝置——這樣的張力和區(qū)別,是應(yīng)該認(rèn)識(shí)到的。

    當(dāng)然,這一組論文也是一道連接之橋,讓過去的理念——尤其是視野和再現(xiàn)的問題、關(guān)于基本建筑的客觀文學(xué)、對(duì)于日常生活及其物件的關(guān)切——得以在設(shè)計(jì)實(shí)踐中繼續(xù)發(fā)揮重要作用。為此,我們需要簡(jiǎn)要列舉張永和在第一階段的主要關(guān)切和主題——盡管它們并未全部進(jìn)入實(shí)際設(shè)計(jì)之中。從物件到話題來看,這些主題包括:自行車、煙斗、門、樓板、家具、窗戶和開洞、框景裝置、觀看方式、不同文化中的視覺表征、東西文化比較、中國(guó)空間的內(nèi)向性、作為內(nèi)化空間的園林與庭院、性別關(guān)系、謀殺案、偵探小說、建筑的觀念藝術(shù)、創(chuàng)造過程中的逆向批判思維,以及電影、文學(xué)和建筑的關(guān)系。盡管這份名單看似冗長(zhǎng)而無盡,但關(guān)注焦點(diǎn)卻是清晰的。它們?nèi)家詡€(gè)體切身經(jīng)歷的日常生活為核心,而對(duì)它的敘述則建立在文字、視覺、空間或影像構(gòu)筑之上。

    讓我們回到主題。1996-2000年的6篇論文,不僅是對(duì)他之前所關(guān)切問題的總結(jié),也是對(duì)即將開始的設(shè)計(jì)階段的基本準(zhǔn)則的概述。如果說《十二月令》集合了過去偏向于視覺和文化的主題,《園》與《宅》兩篇短文則為下一階段建立了兩種基本建筑類型——真正的建筑必須表達(dá)直接、首要的關(guān)切。而接下來的3篇論文《文學(xué)與建筑》 《平常建筑》和《向工業(yè)建筑學(xué)習(xí)》,則明確了這條思想線索——從客觀文學(xué)到基本建筑,最終走向自治的現(xiàn)代主義。其中的核心概念是一種讓“房屋”理性高于“建筑”文化(經(jīng)典的、風(fēng)格驅(qū)動(dòng)的、裝飾性的)的基本建筑——這樣一種建筑,不表達(dá)其他任何概念,只作為一棟實(shí)體房屋而存在?;窘ㄖ乃囊厥牵翰牧?、建造、形式和空間。在張永和看來,以此為準(zhǔn)則進(jìn)行實(shí)踐的英雄,就是密斯、特拉尼和賓尼菲特。

    如今,盡管張永和在過去20年中積累了大量閱歷和經(jīng)驗(yàn),但他在2016年發(fā)表的文章,依然保持著延續(xù)性。他最近發(fā)表的若干寫作中,有兩篇尤其重要,其中的兩個(gè)問題仍是他關(guān)切的核心:那就是“看”和“造”——一邊是視野和表征,另一邊是工藝、材料和建造?!丁翱础钡慕ㄔ臁罚▓D5)是一次巡禮式反思,總結(jié)了觀看和繪圖的工具,以及看、見、知、表達(dá)的關(guān)系[6]。而更重要的是《對(duì)待工藝的四種態(tài)度》(圖6)這篇文章,展現(xiàn)了張永和對(duì)“基本建筑”理念的持續(xù)研究:文中,他依次剖析了海恩斯·賓尼菲特、筱原一男、杰弗瑞·巴瓦與西格德·萊弗倫茨的約27座建筑,具有一種全新的開放性和包容性,但依然保持了他的長(zhǎng)期興趣——尤其是賓尼菲特的巴巴尼克住宅(1990)、筱原一男的谷川之家(1974)、萊弗倫茨的瑞典克里潘圣彼得教堂(1966)。張永和對(duì)這些項(xiàng)目的贊賞是顯而易見的:“假如我自己住在這個(gè)房子里,我會(huì)祈禱每天都下雨”(稱贊巴巴尼克住宅的排水管及混凝土排水槽);“這里有一個(gè)瘋狂的不對(duì)稱的壁爐煙囪”;“萊弗倫茨完成各種令人難以置信的建筑細(xì)部”;“這座教堂是一個(gè)極為美麗的建筑作品”。[7]總體來說,在2016年的這些論文中,張永和對(duì)“工藝”和“造”這些詞匯的使用看似是新的,因?yàn)檫@是他近年來在同濟(jì)大學(xué)任教所專注的主題;但其中亦反映了他過去20年的不懈探索——“基本建筑”,以及材料和空間的建造詩意。

    2 Overall Trajectories

    The reason I say this cluster of essays from 1996 to 2000 is important is that they emerged at a particular moment in Chang's personal and professional trajectory. They emerged at the end of a 15-year "academic" research (from 1981 to 1996,when Chang studied in the United States, then taught there, up to the mid-1990s, then began to test ideas in China since 1993); they also marked the beginning of a phase of active practice in China that has lasted by now for two decades. Although the essays of the late 1990s summarized many ideas from the past 15 years, they were a breakthrough or a turning point in that they began to address issues never really addressed before (never so clearly at least) - ideas of a "basic architecture",where "architecture returns to itself and becomes an architecture of architecture", and where "a building is a building on its own, and is an autonomous existence". While the early studies before were about narratives of life experience constituted in installations and conceptual designs, the writings now, in the late 1990s, were about architecture, and about relations between building construction and the space and form of architecture - an issue one has to confront when one steps into real practice as Chang did since the late 1990s. At this moment,Chang had to make a dramatic and probably difficult transition, from a Rodney-inspired, AA-derived narrative study of life and of conceptual devices,into a full mode of real design practice, in a fast developing economy. So, such a formulation, about what "architecture" should be - something Chang didn't need to answer - had to be invented or developed now.

    This turning from academic study to commercial practice in the 1990s also coincided with a geopolitical and geo-cultural transition. Chang returned to China in 1993 and, after shuttling across the Pacific for a while, settled down in Beijing to practice in 1996. Paradoxically, from this moment on, when he returned home, he entered or was brought back to the world, this time at a higher platform. Since 1996, the two decades of practice in China for Chang was also a journey of global interactions for him,which witnessed not only professorships at Michigan,Harvard and MIT, but also design commissions and invited exhibitions at venues including the AA, the Aedes, Gallery MA, and Venice Biennale. Chang was for a while the only voice or one of the very few in China that western architects and critics can understand, in the 1990s and after, as he studied and taught in the United States before. The key point to note is that Chang now has acted, for the past two decades, not only a Chinese voice to the west,but also a western voice in China. The western and contemporary values he - and many others - has been bringing into China, a country struggling to move forward to a certain international modernity,cannot be underestimated. On this I will come back soon.

    So, sandwiched between the previous 15 years and the following two decades, the key essays of the late 1990s can be read as serving both as a dividing and connecting point. They served as a dividing point in that there were tensions and differences between these two periods. While the focus was on narratives of life experience as constructed in or with painterly, textural and spatial means before,the focus from 1993 and especially 1996 onwards has been design for real commissions. Although the concerns of the past can be brought in or expressed through new designs, it has been in fact not that easy, because a building or an urban design cannot be a pure art work or abstract installation - this tension and this difference must be acknowledged.

    For sure, this cluster of essays also served as a connecting bridge where ideas of the past, especially the issues of vision and representation, objective literature in relation to basic architecture, and a care of daily life and its objects, remain important in design practice. For this, we need to brief l y enlist the key concerns and themes Chang had explored in the first stage, even though not all of them can be or have been brought into real designs. Ranging from objects to topics, they include: bicycles,smoking pipes, doors, floors, furniture, windows and openings, devices of framing, ways of seeing,visual representation in different cultures, eastwest cultural comparisons, inwardness in Chinese spatiality, gardens and courtyards as internalizing space, gender relations, murders, detective stories, conceptual art for architecture, subverting or reversing for critical thinking in a creative process, and relations between cinema, literature and architecture. Though the list seems long and endless, the focus is clear. All of them center on the everyday, as experienced by concrete individuals,and a narrative about it as found in textual, visual,spatial or cinematic constructions.

    Let us recapture the main point. The six essays of 1996-2000 served both as a summary of the concerns of the past and a framing of basic principles of design for the phase to come. While "calendar paintings" collected the main themes from the past that privileged more for the visual and the cultural,the two short texts on "the garden" and "the residence"established two fundamental architectural typologies for the next stage where real architecture has to be the immediate and primary concern. But the next three essays, Literature and Architecture, for a basic Architecture, and Learning from Industrial Architecture, had clearly established a line of thought,from objective literature to basic architecture, and onto an autonomous modernism. The central idea was for a basic architecture that privileges the rationale of"building" over the culture of "architecture" (classical,style-driven, ornamental) - one which does not speak for something else except itself as a material building.The four elements identified for this basic architecture were: material, construction, form and space. And the heroes who have practiced this way, according to Chang, were Mies, Terragni and Bienefeld.

    Today, the essays written by Chang, as published in 2016, remain consistent despite the enrichment and the experience accumulated over the two decades. Of the several pieces recently published, two appear especially important, and two issues remain as core concerns of Chang.They are viewing and making, that is, vision and representation on the one hand, and craft, material and construction on the other. "Kan" de jianzao(Construction Looking, Fig.5) provides a parade of reflections on the devices of viewing and drawing,and the relations between looking, seeing, knowing and representation.[6]But Duidai gongyi de sizhong taidu (Four Positions on Craft, Fig.6) reveals, more importantly, Chang's ongoing study for the "basic architecture": some 27 buildings by Heinz Bienefeld,Kazuo Shinohara, Geoffrey Bawa and Sigurd Lewerentz, were studied one by one, closely, with a new openness and tolerance, but also a persistent interest, especially on Bienefeld's Babanek House(1990), Shinohara's Tanikawa House (1974), and Lewerentz's St. Peter's Church at Klippan of Sweden(1966). Chang's appreciation of these projects is obvious: "If I lived here, I would pray for it to rain everyday" (commending a drain pipe and concrete sinks collecting rain water); "there is a crazy and asymmetrical chimney"; "Lewerentz has completed incredible architectural details"; "this church is extremely beautiful".[7]On the whole, in these writings of 2016, the use of the term "craft" (gongyi)and "making" (zao) seem relatively new as Chang have been teaching at Tongji University of Shanghai in recent years focusing on these themes, yet a long consistency in exploring a "basic architecture" and a poetics of building with materials and spaces remain over the two decades.

    若回顧張永和的設(shè)計(jì)作品,尤其是近年來的項(xiàng)目,會(huì)看到一種“新鄉(xiāng)土”趨勢(shì)的出現(xiàn)?!皥@”(庭院、組群、場(chǎng)地)和“宅”(室內(nèi)、住房、會(huì)所、辦公室、公寓和宿舍)這兩個(gè)基本類型可以從很多項(xiàng)目中找到。而框景、觀看、視角的主題,也體現(xiàn)于多座建筑中,尤其是柿子林住宅(2004)、蘋果社區(qū)售樓中心(2003)、長(zhǎng)安運(yùn)河會(huì)所(2015)、上海當(dāng)代藝術(shù)館設(shè)計(jì)中心(2016)。對(duì)于日常物件慣常使用方式的懸置,可見于車輪、相機(jī)盒、窗框、透明樓板、折疊門等,涉及的項(xiàng)目從1996年的“席殊書屋,到2013年的垂直玻璃宅和2016年的上海當(dāng)代藝術(shù)館設(shè)計(jì)中心。盡管他持續(xù)關(guān)注宅、園、景框、日常物件的“誤用”、作為中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)的內(nèi)化過程,但或許有一個(gè)問題是最為重要的——那就是房屋建造中使用和表現(xiàn)出的材料,以及其中涉及的工藝。在這個(gè)問題上,可以在項(xiàng)目中看到越來越強(qiáng)的自信和強(qiáng)調(diào):在多處使用的黑色石材,如長(zhǎng)安運(yùn)河會(huì)所(2015);以及若干近期項(xiàng)目在墻體和格柵上使用的灰瓷和灰磚,例如在幾座文化中心及博物館-大學(xué)項(xiàng)目中,尤其是2017年初中標(biāo)的巴黎國(guó)際大學(xué)城的中國(guó)基金會(huì)大樓[8]。我認(rèn)為,一種“新鄉(xiāng)土”正在崛起;它是一種“基本建筑”,關(guān)注實(shí)踐過程中的材料和建構(gòu)邏輯,在整體思路上是反思性和批判性的;它同時(shí)關(guān)注著視覺景框和理性的物質(zhì)性;它受惠于中國(guó)、歐洲文藝復(fù)興及當(dāng)代世界的智識(shí)傳統(tǒng),尤其是空間的內(nèi)化——作為一條中國(guó)的進(jìn)路。

    3 地緣政治關(guān)系中的進(jìn)步力量

    如果我的解讀是正確的,那么1990年代末期的這幾篇文章,或許在張永和整個(gè)建筑世界的思考和實(shí)踐中都起到核心作用。接下來,我們不僅要從內(nèi)部和語義學(xué)意義上,也需借助外部的、地緣政治及全球性的觀察視角理解這些文章。內(nèi)部看來,它們特殊的內(nèi)容和實(shí)體已如前述:個(gè)人生活、表征、表達(dá)方式、作為建筑語言的建構(gòu)材料性、作為文學(xué)和建筑中的批判性起點(diǎn)的基本或“零度”。這些文章的目的是重新發(fā)現(xiàn)日常;它的關(guān)切是微觀的、私密的、個(gè)體的、以人為中心的,而它的批判性則是致力于挑戰(zhàn)或顛覆一種真理陳述(例如一個(gè)宏大敘事、或一種系統(tǒng)化的意識(shí)形態(tài))。

    從外部看,論及全球和地緣政治軌跡,從張永和的自傳性散文《AA與我》(2016,圖7)可見一斑[9]。隨著鄧小平改革開放,中國(guó)人開始到世界各地游學(xué)。張永和在美國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)及任教的1981-1996年,學(xué)到的應(yīng)是1970年代歐美的解放性智識(shí)文化——至少在建筑學(xué)及相關(guān)人文學(xué)科是如此。除了1960-1970年代克里斯托弗·亞歷山大和羅伯特·文丘里的批判和解放思想外,張永和也吸收了一支特別的思想潮流——“敘事建筑”,主要是1970年代在倫敦建筑聯(lián)盟學(xué)院(AA)由伯納德·屈米、羅賓·埃文斯、羅德尼·普萊斯等人所發(fā)展。羅德尼·普萊斯對(duì)于張永和是個(gè)關(guān)鍵人物,他在1982年來到波爾州立大學(xué)任教,并直接教授張永和一門設(shè)計(jì)課,名為“不確定性實(shí)驗(yàn)室:使用、誤用和濫用”。這門課上,張永和探討了自行車的“不確定性”,自此他始終對(duì)這些概念和裝置很感興趣,并體現(xiàn)在他的論文和設(shè)計(jì)中。整體上說,如欲進(jìn)一步探討,他的思想中存在一條視覺及文化線索,和一條智識(shí)或反思線索。其中一條線索是來自視覺藝術(shù)和文化的線索,其主要人物可追溯至羅賓·埃文斯、約翰·貝格和大衛(wèi)·霍克尼,以及學(xué)術(shù)意義上的埃爾文·潘諾夫斯基,還有包括馬塞爾·杜尚和阿爾弗雷德·希區(qū)柯克在內(nèi)的導(dǎo)演和藝術(shù)家。另一條反思和批判的思維線索,從羅德尼·普萊斯和伯納德·屈米,直接或通過他人間接地延伸至米歇爾·??潞土_蘭·巴特等人。

    至于20世紀(jì)美國(guó)和歐洲的批判及智識(shí)傳統(tǒng)——聚焦于微觀、個(gè)體及日常,并以此為基礎(chǔ)進(jìn)行人文主義批評(píng),其中一個(gè)重要的源頭人物不可避免:瓦爾特·本雅明(1892-1940),尤其是他關(guān)于街道、拱廊街、人群、面孔、姿態(tài)、攝影、電影、戲劇、悲苦劇和各類視覺藝術(shù)的評(píng)論(寫于1920-1930年代)。我認(rèn)為,張永和思想的終極源泉是本雅明。從這個(gè)意義上說,張永和傳達(dá)出的信息是人文主義的、反思性的,由此必然會(huì)關(guān)注1970年代的敘事作品和20世紀(jì)早期的建構(gòu)現(xiàn)代主義;而這種信息的核心,則是對(duì)日常生活的微觀批評(píng)。在中國(guó),鄧小平在1970年代末至1980年代大刀闊斧的改革開放帶來了全球文化及西方思想浪潮——同時(shí)也將張永和等多人的反思性文化實(shí)踐帶入逐步走向開放及現(xiàn)代化的中國(guó)。張永和是最早的人物之一,至今仍是建筑領(lǐng)域的核心人物。他不僅是中國(guó)面向西方的聲音,也是世界走進(jìn)中國(guó)的聲音,把在我看來十分必要的進(jìn)步性思想和價(jià)值觀,帶到這個(gè)掙扎著轉(zhuǎn)變、走向某種程度的普世現(xiàn)代性的中國(guó)。

    綜上,張永和的“基本建筑”導(dǎo)向是人文的、反思的、批判的,應(yīng)視為一種對(duì)真誠(chéng)、勇敢、正直的靈魂的呼喚——在建筑和社會(huì)生活領(lǐng)域皆是如此?!?/p>

    7

    /References:

    [1] Zhang Yonghe (Yung Ho Chang), Feichang Jianzhu(Un/conventional Architecture), Harbin: Heilongjiang Chubanshe, 1997.

    [2] Zhang Yonghe, Wenxue yu jianzhu (Literature and Architecture), Dushu, No. 9, 1997, pp. 68-71, reprinted in Zhang Yonghe, Zuo Wen Ben: Yung Ho Chang Writes, Beijing: SDX publishing house, 2005, pp. 95-104.

    [3] Zhang Yonghe, Pingchang jianzhu (basic architecture), Jianzhushi: The Architect, No. 84, Oct 1998, pp. 27-37.

    [4] Zhang Yonghe and Zhang Lufeng, Xiang gongye jianzhu xuexi (Learning from Industrial Architecture),Shijie Jianzhu: World Architecture, No. 7, 2000, pp.22-23.

    [5] Zhang Yonghe, Zuo Wen Ben: Yung Ho Chang Writes, Beijing: SDX publishing house, 2005, pp. 95-104.

    [6] Zhang Yonghe and Zhou Jianjia, "Kan" de jianzao:construct looking, Shidai Jianzhu: Time + Architecture,No. 3, 2016, pp. 28-33.

    [7] Zhang Yonghe, Duidai gongyi de sizhong taidu:Bienefeld, Shinohara, Bawa and Lewerentz - four positions on craft, trans. Jiang Jiawei, Chen Dijia,Shidai Jianzhu: Time + Architecture, No. 3, 2016, pp.154-161.

    [8] (accessed 2 Sept 2017).

    [9] Chang, Yung Ho, The AA and I, The Plan, No. 6-7,2016, pp. 1-4.

    [10] Zhu, Jianfei and Hing-wah Chau, Yung Ho Chang:Thirty Years of Exploring a "Design Discourse", Abitare:Zhu (Asian & Chinese edition), No. 32, Oct-Dec 2012,pp. 30-39.

    [11] Zhu, Jianfei, Criticality in between China and the West, The Journal of Architecture, Vol. 10, No. 5, Nov 2005, pp. 479-498.

    If we review Chang's designs, and especially the recent projects, we witness a "new vernacular"emerging. The two basic typologies, the garden(courts, clusters, fields) and the residence (interiors,houses, clubs, offices, housing and dormitories)are found in many projects. The issues of framing,viewing, and perspectives are addressed in many cases, especially Villa Shizilin, Pingod Sales Center,Chang-An Canal Club, and the psD (power station Design) center, in 2004, 2003, 2015 and 2016 respectively. The suspension of a conventional use of daily objects can be found in the use of wheels, camera boxes, window frames, transparent floors, foldingsliding-doors, in projects ranging from the book-bikestore of 1996 to the vertical glass house and the psD center of 2013 and 2016. While residence, gardening,framing of visions, the "misuse" of daily objects,and internalizing as a Chinese tradition remain as a constant focus, one key concern is arguably the most important - the material employed and expressed in building construction, and the craft of doing so in architecture. In this, we are witnessing an increasing confidence and emphasis: the black stone used in many cases as for example in Chang-An Canal Club of Beijing (2015), and the gray tiles and bricks in the recent projects, for walls and grilles, as in many cultural centers and museum-colleges, and especially in the Maison de la Chine in Paris for CIUP (Cité Internationale Universitaire de Paris), a wining scheme in early 2017[8]. I am suggesting that a "new vernacular" is on the rise; it is a "basic architecture"that cares about materials and the tectonic logic in practice and is Reflexive and critical in outlook; it has a twin focus on visual framing and rational materiality;and it is enriched with intellectual traditions from China, Renaissance Europe and the contemporary world, with a particular interest in internalization in space as a Chinese approach.

    3 Critical and Geo-Political

    If my reading is correct, then the writings of the late 1990s remain central in the whole architectural universe of Yung Ho Chang in thinking and for practice. Here we need to understand this core writings of 1996-2000 from an internal and semantic as well as an external, geo-political and global point of view. Internally, the specif i c contents and entities are already described above: personal life, representations, means of representation,tectonic materiality as an architectural language,the basic or "degree zero" as a critical point of departure in literature as in architecture. The aim is to rediscover the everyday; and the concern is micro,personal, individual and human-centric, while its criticality here aims at challenging or reversing a truth statement (a grand narrative or a systematic ideology for example).

    Externally, in terms of a global and geo-political trajectory, Chang's personal biography and his essay"The AA and I" (2016, Fig.7) reveal a lot[9]. With Deng Xiaoping's opening-up, the Chinese began to travel and study abroad. When Chang studied and taught in the United States from 1981 to 1996, what he learned, I think, was a liberating intellectual culture of the 1970s of American and Europe, at least in the discipline of architecture and the associated humanities. Besides the critical and liberating ideas of Christopher Alexander and Robert Venturi of the 1960s and 1970s, a specific stream absorbed in Chang was the ideas of "narrative architecture"explored mainly at the Architectural Association (AA)of London by figures such as Bernard Tschumi, Robin Evans, and Rodney Place in the 1970s. Rodney Place was a central figure for Chang; he came to Ball State University in 1982 to teach and taught Chang directly,in a studio titled "Lab of Uncertainty: Use, Misuse and Abuse" where Chang explored the "uncertainty"of the bicycle; Chang remained interested in the ideas and the devices ever since, as evidenced in the essays and designs. On the whole, there is a visual and cultural line and an intellectual or ref l ective line, if we like to discover further. One line of inf l uence in visual art and culture can be extended to figures such as Robin Evans, John Berger, and David Hockney and, in terms of intellectual lineage, Erwin Panofsky, as well as directors and artists including Marcel Duchamp and Alfred Hitchcock. Another line of influence in reflective and critical thinking can be extended from Rodney Place and Bernard Tschumi, directly or through others, to Michel Foucault and Roland Barthes.

    Of the critical and intellectual tradition in America and Europe of the twentieth century that have focused on the micro, the individual and the everyday, as a base from which to launch a humanistic critique, one absolute source figure stands out: Walter Benjamin (1892-1940), in his writings on streets, arcades, crowds, the face, the gesture, photography, cinema, theater, tragic drama,and the various visual works of art (in the 1920s-30s). I would argue that, intellectually, Chang's ultimate source is Benjamin. In this sense, Chang's message is humanistic and Reflexive, with a certain focus on the narrative of the 1970s and a tectonic modernism from the early twentieth century; while his core message is a micro critique of the everyday.In China, it is Deng Xiaoping's daring project of opening-up in the late 1970s and the 1980s that had brought a global culture and a wave of western ideas, including the reflexive cultural practice of Chang (and many others) into a China gradually opening up and modernizing. Chang was one of the first such figures and remains a key player in the field of architecture. Acting as a Chinese voice in the west, he also acted and still acts as an international voice in China, bringing ideas and values - progressive and much needed in my view -into a China struggling and transforming, towards a certain universal modernity.

    In summary, Yung Ho Chang's "basic architecture" is humanistic, Reflexive and critical in orientation, and should be viewed as a call for an honest, brave and upright spirit to come, for both architecture and social life.□

    注釋/Notes:

    1)對(duì)張永和整體方法的20周年研究,見參考文獻(xiàn)[10]/For a study of Chang's overall approach for a twentieth anniversary review, see Reference [10]; 對(duì)在全球背景下受到張永和影響的中國(guó)當(dāng)代建筑的研究,見參考文獻(xiàn)[11]/for a study on contemporary Chinese architecture in a global context where Chang played a role, see Reference [11].

    2)《院》和《宅》見參考文獻(xiàn)[1],《十二月令》(月歷繪畫)作為扉頁出版無頁碼。/See Reference[1], for "Yuan" (the garden) and "Zhai" (the residence);"Shier yueling" (calendar paintings) was published as preface with no page number.

    3)見參考文獻(xiàn)[2],再版后為參考文獻(xiàn)[5]/See Reference [2], it is reprinted in Reference [5].

    Building for the Everyday, a Reflexive Project: Reading Yung Ho Chang

    ZHU Jianfei Translated by HUANG Huaqing

    Reviewing essays written by Chang from the early 1980s to 2016, this paper argues that there was a breakthrough and a formulation of key ideas on design practice in Chang in the late 1990s. This paper further argues that the intellectual framework Chang adopts is humanistic,Reflexive and critical, something much needed in China, for architecture and beyond.

    Yung Ho Chang, basic architecture, material,building and construction, the late 1990s, a new vernacular

    墨爾本大學(xué)/University of Melbourne

    2017-09-12

    猜你喜歡
    詩意文章建筑
    詩意地棲居
    金橋(2022年7期)2022-07-22 08:33:14
    《北方建筑》征稿簡(jiǎn)則
    北方建筑(2021年6期)2021-12-31 03:03:54
    冬日浪漫
    關(guān)于建筑的非專業(yè)遐思
    文苑(2020年10期)2020-11-07 03:15:36
    建筑的“芯”
    細(xì)致入微的描寫讓文章熠熠生輝
    放屁文章
    小處著眼,寫大文章
    被耽擱的詩意
    獨(dú)特而偉大的建筑
    青青草视频在线视频观看| 国产成人精品久久二区二区91| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 色94色欧美一区二区| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 91老司机精品| 国产熟女午夜一区二区三区| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 免费看av在线观看网站| 人妻人人澡人人爽人人| 搡老乐熟女国产| 中文字幕色久视频| 亚洲av欧美aⅴ国产| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 999久久久国产精品视频| 欧美少妇被猛烈插入视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 午夜影院在线不卡| 成年人午夜在线观看视频| 校园人妻丝袜中文字幕| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 免费看av在线观看网站| 久久青草综合色| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 男女下面插进去视频免费观看| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 国产精品人妻久久久影院| 免费看十八禁软件| 精品免费久久久久久久清纯 | 午夜福利视频精品| xxx大片免费视频| 久久性视频一级片| 精品国产乱码久久久久久男人| av线在线观看网站| 精品高清国产在线一区| 少妇人妻 视频| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 美国免费a级毛片| 亚洲欧美日韩高清在线视频 | 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 十八禁网站网址无遮挡| 欧美亚洲日本最大视频资源| 丰满少妇做爰视频| 精品少妇久久久久久888优播| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 欧美日韩精品网址| 国产免费一区二区三区四区乱码| 日韩av免费高清视频| 性少妇av在线| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 亚洲 欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 日韩大码丰满熟妇| 99re6热这里在线精品视频| 悠悠久久av| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 亚洲成国产人片在线观看| 99香蕉大伊视频| 天天添夜夜摸| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 免费黄频网站在线观看国产| 欧美日韩黄片免| 一本久久精品| 999精品在线视频| av福利片在线| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 人妻 亚洲 视频| 午夜福利视频在线观看免费| 欧美 日韩 精品 国产| 下体分泌物呈黄色| 欧美 亚洲 国产 日韩一| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 黄片播放在线免费| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 久久九九热精品免费| 日本a在线网址| 午夜免费成人在线视频| a 毛片基地| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 99香蕉大伊视频| 大香蕉久久成人网| 国产成人精品久久久久久| 看十八女毛片水多多多| 尾随美女入室| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| av天堂在线播放| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 宅男免费午夜| 999久久久国产精品视频| 2021少妇久久久久久久久久久| 国产99久久九九免费精品| 黑人欧美特级aaaaaa片| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 日韩制服丝袜自拍偷拍| 亚洲精品在线美女| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 美女扒开内裤让男人捅视频| 十八禁人妻一区二区| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 亚洲精品一区蜜桃| 999久久久国产精品视频| 夫妻午夜视频| 可以免费在线观看a视频的电影网站| 精品熟女少妇八av免费久了| 18在线观看网站| 黄频高清免费视频| 久久国产精品大桥未久av| av有码第一页| 丁香六月天网| 亚洲中文字幕日韩| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| av一本久久久久| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 大片电影免费在线观看免费| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 免费高清在线观看视频在线观看| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 国产亚洲av片在线观看秒播厂| 亚洲欧美中文字幕日韩二区| 大码成人一级视频| 欧美精品人与动牲交sv欧美| 国产在线一区二区三区精| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 国产成人精品久久二区二区免费| 夫妻午夜视频| 亚洲综合色网址| 性少妇av在线| 七月丁香在线播放| 菩萨蛮人人尽说江南好唐韦庄| 一级片免费观看大全| 色94色欧美一区二区| 女性生殖器流出的白浆| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 欧美在线黄色| av天堂在线播放| 国产精品国产三级国产专区5o| 曰老女人黄片| 夜夜骑夜夜射夜夜干| 精品少妇内射三级| 国语对白做爰xxxⅹ性视频网站| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| e午夜精品久久久久久久| e午夜精品久久久久久久| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 在线观看免费高清a一片| 多毛熟女@视频| 国产成人91sexporn| 亚洲人成电影免费在线| 久久性视频一级片| 久久精品亚洲av国产电影网| 日本av免费视频播放| 两性夫妻黄色片| 满18在线观看网站| av网站免费在线观看视频| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 久久久亚洲精品成人影院| 超色免费av| 久久99精品国语久久久| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 久久精品人人爽人人爽视色| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| av在线老鸭窝| 好男人电影高清在线观看| 亚洲精品国产区一区二| 飞空精品影院首页| 老熟女久久久| 亚洲国产毛片av蜜桃av| 国产真人三级小视频在线观看| 日韩电影二区| 欧美激情 高清一区二区三区| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 国产又色又爽无遮挡免| 国产日韩欧美亚洲二区| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 免费一级毛片在线播放高清视频 | 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产精品一区二区在线不卡| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| netflix在线观看网站| 久久精品亚洲熟妇少妇任你| 亚洲欧美清纯卡通| 免费在线观看视频国产中文字幕亚洲 | 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 少妇粗大呻吟视频| 国产视频一区二区在线看| 日本欧美国产在线视频| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜爱| 人人妻人人添人人爽欧美一区卜| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 国产成人欧美在线观看 | 不卡av一区二区三区| 欧美大码av| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 免费不卡黄色视频| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 两性夫妻黄色片| 国产精品一国产av| 成人手机av| 这个男人来自地球电影免费观看| 性色av乱码一区二区三区2| 欧美激情高清一区二区三区| 夫妻性生交免费视频一级片| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 性高湖久久久久久久久免费观看| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁躁| 一边摸一边做爽爽视频免费| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 侵犯人妻中文字幕一二三四区| av不卡在线播放| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区久久| 一区二区三区乱码不卡18| 美女福利国产在线| 中文字幕高清在线视频| 一区二区三区四区激情视频| 国产日韩一区二区三区精品不卡| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 亚洲情色 制服丝袜| 女人爽到高潮嗷嗷叫在线视频| 老司机影院成人| 美女视频免费永久观看网站| 成人午夜精彩视频在线观看| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | av线在线观看网站| 国产一区有黄有色的免费视频| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 高清av免费在线| 国产男女内射视频| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 国产精品熟女久久久久浪| 日日夜夜操网爽| 一本色道久久久久久精品综合| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 日本午夜av视频| av福利片在线| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 欧美日韩福利视频一区二区| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 国产黄频视频在线观看| 久久九九热精品免费| 一区在线观看完整版| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 桃花免费在线播放| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 熟女少妇亚洲综合色aaa.| 久久久国产一区二区| 亚洲欧美成人综合另类久久久| 亚洲国产av影院在线观看| 视频在线观看一区二区三区| 汤姆久久久久久久影院中文字幕| 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲激情五月婷婷啪啪| 国产成人影院久久av| 男人操女人黄网站| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 99精品久久久久人妻精品| 亚洲国产av新网站| av又黄又爽大尺度在线免费看| 自拍欧美九色日韩亚洲蝌蚪91| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 色精品久久人妻99蜜桃| 久久久久久久久久久久大奶| 亚洲av国产av综合av卡| 国产欧美日韩综合在线一区二区| 午夜老司机福利片| 操美女的视频在线观看| 亚洲精品乱久久久久久| 大码成人一级视频| √禁漫天堂资源中文www| 在线观看国产h片| 母亲3免费完整高清在线观看| 欧美+亚洲+日韩+国产| 人妻一区二区av| 国产福利在线免费观看视频| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 热99国产精品久久久久久7| 亚洲成人免费av在线播放| 国产精品.久久久| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 天天躁日日躁夜夜躁夜夜| 欧美成人午夜精品| 波多野结衣av一区二区av| 欧美黑人欧美精品刺激| 天堂中文最新版在线下载| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 久久久国产一区二区| 男男h啪啪无遮挡| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 只有这里有精品99| 国产精品亚洲av一区麻豆| 高潮久久久久久久久久久不卡| 欧美精品啪啪一区二区三区 | 久久青草综合色| 久久久久国产精品人妻一区二区| 嫩草影视91久久| 国产欧美日韩一区二区三 | 黄色 视频免费看| h视频一区二区三区| 精品国产一区二区三区久久久樱花| 超色免费av| 亚洲国产中文字幕在线视频| 久久精品国产综合久久久| 另类精品久久| 国产91精品成人一区二区三区 | 精品人妻1区二区| 男女之事视频高清在线观看 | 午夜两性在线视频| 成人免费观看视频高清| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 成人黄色视频免费在线看| 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 日韩精品免费视频一区二区三区| 国产精品偷伦视频观看了| 国产男女内射视频| 日韩免费高清中文字幕av| 久久精品久久久久久久性| 久久精品aⅴ一区二区三区四区| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 麻豆国产av国片精品| 伦理电影免费视频| 国产精品久久久久久精品电影小说| 韩国精品一区二区三区| 深夜精品福利| 我的亚洲天堂| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区| 日韩视频在线欧美| 国产亚洲精品久久久久5区| 久久精品久久久久久噜噜老黄| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 交换朋友夫妻互换小说| 18禁裸乳无遮挡动漫免费视频| 亚洲成人手机| 每晚都被弄得嗷嗷叫到高潮| 深夜精品福利| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 人人妻,人人澡人人爽秒播 | 亚洲精品久久久久久婷婷小说| 亚洲国产欧美在线一区| 91精品伊人久久大香线蕉| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 婷婷色麻豆天堂久久| 亚洲av电影在线观看一区二区三区| 精品国产超薄肉色丝袜足j| 久久天堂一区二区三区四区| 久久精品成人免费网站| 欧美中文综合在线视频| 97人妻天天添夜夜摸| 18禁国产床啪视频网站| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 国产黄色视频一区二区在线观看| 亚洲伊人色综图| 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 看免费av毛片| 国产老妇伦熟女老妇高清| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 黄频高清免费视频| 精品一区在线观看国产| 老汉色∧v一级毛片| 午夜福利免费观看在线| 婷婷丁香在线五月| 国产亚洲av高清不卡| 成人免费观看视频高清| xxx大片免费视频| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 看免费av毛片| av在线app专区| 国产成人精品无人区| 又粗又硬又长又爽又黄的视频| 在线 av 中文字幕| 日韩视频在线欧美| 99国产精品一区二区蜜桃av | 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 亚洲人成77777在线视频| 美女大奶头黄色视频| 成年女人毛片免费观看观看9 | 人人澡人人妻人| 97在线人人人人妻| 一级,二级,三级黄色视频| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| av天堂在线播放| 久久天躁狠狠躁夜夜2o2o | 亚洲精品美女久久久久99蜜臀 | 老司机深夜福利视频在线观看 | 18禁观看日本| 国产一区二区激情短视频 | 深夜精品福利| 久久人妻熟女aⅴ| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产男人的电影天堂91| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 精品国产一区二区三区四区第35| 嫁个100分男人电影在线观看 | 国产伦理片在线播放av一区| 久9热在线精品视频| av不卡在线播放| 国产精品二区激情视频| 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 老司机亚洲免费影院| 美女中出高潮动态图| 欧美日韩视频精品一区| 制服诱惑二区| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 伦理电影免费视频| 美国免费a级毛片| 国产精品久久久久久精品古装| 天天影视国产精品| 国产又爽黄色视频| 丝瓜视频免费看黄片| 在线 av 中文字幕| 免费看av在线观看网站| 亚洲国产日韩一区二区| 最黄视频免费看| 精品卡一卡二卡四卡免费| 午夜精品国产一区二区电影| 黄色一级大片看看| 日本一区二区免费在线视频| 久久人人爽av亚洲精品天堂| 狠狠精品人妻久久久久久综合| 亚洲少妇的诱惑av| 国产成人系列免费观看| 国产在线免费精品| 婷婷色综合大香蕉| 人人澡人人妻人| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区国产| 精品一区二区三卡| 看免费成人av毛片| 99香蕉大伊视频| 国产人伦9x9x在线观看| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 无遮挡黄片免费观看| 两个人看的免费小视频| 亚洲精品自拍成人| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站| 欧美黑人精品巨大| 操出白浆在线播放| 秋霞在线观看毛片| 国产熟女欧美一区二区| 黄色怎么调成土黄色| 精品视频人人做人人爽| 精品国产一区二区久久| 天堂俺去俺来也www色官网| 久久中文字幕一级| 国产视频首页在线观看| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 亚洲七黄色美女视频| 国产一区二区 视频在线| 老熟女久久久| a级毛片在线看网站| 欧美久久黑人一区二区| 久热爱精品视频在线9| 国产精品国产av在线观看| 人成视频在线观看免费观看| 少妇的丰满在线观看| 美女国产高潮福利片在线看| 久久久久精品人妻al黑| 一级片'在线观看视频| 99热全是精品| 国产伦人伦偷精品视频| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 80岁老熟妇乱子伦牲交| 极品人妻少妇av视频| 性色av一级| 你懂的网址亚洲精品在线观看| 日日爽夜夜爽网站| 国产一卡二卡三卡精品| 大码成人一级视频| 成年av动漫网址| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲av片天天在线观看| 少妇被粗大的猛进出69影院| 黄色片一级片一级黄色片| 91九色精品人成在线观看| 精品一品国产午夜福利视频| 国产精品一国产av| 咕卡用的链子| 国产日韩欧美在线精品| 老鸭窝网址在线观看| 成人18禁高潮啪啪吃奶动态图| 啦啦啦啦在线视频资源| 美女高潮到喷水免费观看| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| av在线老鸭窝| 日韩一卡2卡3卡4卡2021年| 免费在线观看影片大全网站 | 少妇人妻久久综合中文| 亚洲av成人不卡在线观看播放网 | 51午夜福利影视在线观看| 啦啦啦在线免费观看视频4| 午夜福利乱码中文字幕| 十分钟在线观看高清视频www| 国产爽快片一区二区三区| 91国产中文字幕| 在线 av 中文字幕| 久久人妻福利社区极品人妻图片 | 尾随美女入室| 男女高潮啪啪啪动态图| 在线观看人妻少妇| 久久性视频一级片| 老司机影院成人| av有码第一页| 黑人猛操日本美女一级片| av在线老鸭窝| 18禁黄网站禁片午夜丰满| 国产精品一二三区在线看| 国产免费现黄频在线看| 大码成人一级视频| 亚洲三区欧美一区| 波野结衣二区三区在线| 欧美日韩亚洲国产一区二区在线观看 | 国产有黄有色有爽视频| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 亚洲国产看品久久| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 纯流量卡能插随身wifi吗| 国产女主播在线喷水免费视频网站| 99国产精品一区二区三区| 国产精品二区激情视频| 午夜久久久在线观看| av在线app专区| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品济南到| 在现免费观看毛片| 一本一本久久a久久精品综合妖精| 中文字幕人妻熟女乱码| 不卡av一区二区三区| 午夜福利,免费看| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 亚洲熟女毛片儿| 国产av精品麻豆| 久久 成人 亚洲| 国产在线免费精品| 色视频在线一区二区三区| 热99久久久久精品小说推荐| 精品欧美一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品国产av蜜桃| 在线观看免费日韩欧美大片| 亚洲成人免费电影在线观看 | 亚洲中文日韩欧美视频| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区av| 亚洲精品国产av成人精品| 午夜福利在线免费观看网站| 亚洲精品久久午夜乱码| 捣出白浆h1v1| 免费在线观看日本一区| 深夜精品福利| 一级毛片电影观看| 久热这里只有精品99| 99久久精品国产亚洲精品| 又紧又爽又黄一区二区| 叶爱在线成人免费视频播放| 青春草亚洲视频在线观看| 女人高潮潮喷娇喘18禁视频| 久久性视频一级片| av国产久精品久网站免费入址| 啦啦啦 在线观看视频| 久久久久久久精品精品| 国产免费又黄又爽又色| 国产精品一国产av| 一级黄片播放器| 又大又爽又粗| 99久久99久久久精品蜜桃| a级片在线免费高清观看视频| 日韩大片免费观看网站| 悠悠久久av| 又大又爽又粗| 亚洲精品日本国产第一区| 18在线观看网站| 王馨瑶露胸无遮挡在线观看| 色网站视频免费| 最近手机中文字幕大全| 免费观看人在逋| 少妇 在线观看| 男女边摸边吃奶| 国产精品一区二区精品视频观看| 只有这里有精品99| 18禁观看日本| 欧美黄色淫秽网站| 久久精品熟女亚洲av麻豆精品| 多毛熟女@视频| 在线精品无人区一区二区三| 国产成人a∨麻豆精品| 黄频高清免费视频| 一级黄色大片毛片| 国产精品.久久久| 日日夜夜操网爽| 精品久久久久久久毛片微露脸 | 免费久久久久久久精品成人欧美视频| 一区二区日韩欧美中文字幕| 日本av手机在线免费观看| 中文字幕另类日韩欧美亚洲嫩草| 欧美日韩av久久| 免费看十八禁软件| 国产亚洲一区二区精品| 99热国产这里只有精品6| 国产亚洲精品第一综合不卡| 国产男女内射视频| 精品人妻在线不人妻| 黄色毛片三级朝国网站|